#irs audit archewell

[trexalicious]

🤣

[trexalicious]

We knew the truth years ago...

Meghan is Imitating Diana After Years of Study

SANTA BARBARA - USA - Meghan Markle has adopted to full persona and dressing style of the former Princess Diana, for her own gain.

Meghan Markle is acting in the biggest and most lucrative acting role ever — that of imitating Princess Diana.

Psychologist Miriam Levy, has analysed Markle’s actions and dressing tactics to evaluate how the actress has taken on the role of the former Princess Diana.

“Markle is a self-confessed Diana-phile and has even taken on the benevolent role of the former princess by imitating her mannerisms and dressing style to a tee. She knows this is key to keeping the inner child persona of Prince Harry happy, and safe. Psychopaths and narcissists know that they must adhere to a certain image for their mark, and as Markle has no true feelings for Harry, she is using his desire to get his mother back, by imitating his mother.

“Narcissists and schizoid personalities like Meghan Markle do not feel like normal humans, they can only imitate, and this is why Markle meticulously studied Princess Diana as a teenager onwards. She has read every book, analysed every piece of footage to act like and become her vision of Princess Diana. At the end of this, Markle’s Diana-persona is flawed because it does not come from true feelings or emotions, unlike Diana who was a real person with real emotions.

“This is why Meghan Markle, who does not have real human emotions can easily erase people from her life once they have fulfilled their role. When meeting a person for the first time, Markle immediately sees the person’s weaknesses and evaluates what use that person can be for them in social climbing circles. If they have no value for her, she immediately moves on to someone who does. She will use her mark up completely until they have nothing left to give, then move on to her next mark.

“With the unfortunate Harry, who is truly a broken person, Markle fills in the gaps of his broken personality, imitating his mother, and it is this fear of losing his ‘mother’ for a second time that is keeping him imprisoned under this controlling woman’s claws. One thing controlling narcissistic personalities do to their marks is remove them from their own families and environments, because this way they have more control over their prey. This is what Markle has done to Harry, and she is even using her Diana-personality to make the Royal Family the enemy, as was the case later on with Diana before she died tragically in a tunnel in Paris. Cults also utilise the same technique on their followers, to remove them from their families, and long term friends as a better way to control these poor people.

“My evaluation is dire for Harry, because he is completely under the spell of this charlatan woman who has conspired meticulously to use him, and his royal title, and his money to increase her own narcissistic self to higher levels. Markle has also recently tied the prince into a vast property in America, which he has been forced to payroll with his trust fund money, adding to the shackles of this false marriage, where he is not only trapped emotionally, but monetarily, standing to lose everything to Markle once she pulls the trigger. The reason Markle chose California specifically is because the divorce laws are heavily in favour of women, and many men in marriages lose over 90% of their wealth in divorce settlements. There may come a time when Harry realises what is happening, he probably sub-consciously knows what Markle is doing to him, and feels an internal resentment. He will be a lost soul for decades unless he somehow extricates himself from this manipulating unfeeling schizoid actress, who will of course dump him faster than a brick, when he wakes up to her tricks.”

Wait until Harry finds her Diana books with all the calligraphy notes! 🤣🤣🤣

By Semi Ramis - September 2, 2020

[trexalicious]

On command bump...

[trexalicious]

There's not enough money to buy Harry's wife some class...

[trexalicious]

Let's not forget that her husband, the hateful traitor prince, enabled and encouraged her...

[trexalicious]

Like @grannycrowley says, KCIII just bought a NY apartment for almost $6.9 million in June. Why would KCIII buy an über modern 3,596 ft² Soho House looking place on Millionaires Row like this? 🤔

https://streeteasy.com/building/111-west-57-street-new_york/11a

It's starting.

I know, it's CDAN, so take with salt. But Harry's just had a semi-successful week in NYC where the reception was much different than when he's with Meghan and now he's in Africa (his one true love), and there's not been a Meghan papwalk yet.

[trexalicious]

[trexalicious]

He enabled and encouraged her to be hateful...

[trexalicious]

Everything about her is fake she's the Duchess of Faux...

[trexalicious]

#TheRealMeghanMarkle

#DuchessDifficult

Thank you Anon😂😂😂😂😂😂

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

I think, Meghan (allegedly) filed a case against the IRS to contest some charges/tax returns that she felt were unfair. Or because she thought she was charged extra and deserved a hugher refund than she got. And then she lost the case and had to pay the IRS for the filing a case against her. I don't know how true that is, just that she did file a case against the IRS. This was probably around 2010/11 so around the Trevor years. This is off the top of my head though, no factual receipts. Just something I remember reading on the old Tumblrs that are now defunct.

But about the financial fraud, I don't know if it counts but it is interesting to me that Meghan's lifestyle was mostly sustained on gifts and favours. She hardly paid for anything. At first, while she was auditioning, she lived with Trevor. They had a decent enihouse. But her dad says that he sometimes gave her money and it was mostly Trevor who sustained their day-to-day. It's believable and nothing wrong in that if that's the understanding that the couple has.

Then in Toronto, the suits producers got her a rental home. And later, a chauffeured car to get her to and from the set. This was a favour pulled by her friend rick hoffman.

There are some conflicting reports that say that she moved in with Cory mainly to save on rental. As in, it was his place and she moved in with him immediately after they started dating.

The Soho ambassadorship that she did, and later her small scale endorsements and Tig sponcerships got her a lot of goodies. All of her hotel stays, 1st class travels, food etc was almost always sponcon.

The only thing she allegedly spent her own money on was (probably) the air travel when she started dating Harry and they had their 2week arrangment. (Either one of them would travel to the other every 2 weeks). But she later moved in with himwhen suits ended.

So I'd say, Meghan does not understand finances, other than accumulating money in her own name in her own bank account. She has big dreams - foundations, charities, galas, UN missions, commonwealth, holiday homes, private jets etc etc... but has never paid for anything out of pocket so does not know how to sustain those dreams.

I was thinking of a different case of financial fraud - in 2020 or 2021, it was revealed that the SussexRoyal Foundation was being investigated over some allegations made about the way Harry and Meghan handled some transactions. I don’t remember the specific details and I can’t look it up at the moment, but there was a very haughty Sussex “we told you we didn’t do anything wrong” statement made when the investigation closed/cleared the allegations.

Whenever the Sussexes get in the news for their finances or Archewell paperwork, I always remember that incident, and specifically their response. It really rubbed me the wrong way and because they seemed to be gloating about having been cleared of wrongdoing, it makes me think that there actually really is something shady happening behind the scenes. I think they’re lucky it hasn’t been caught yet, chiefly because their MO is to distract us with semantics and petty “it’s the AG’s fault” blame game-type BS, but this week makes it clear they’re living on borrowed time.

[trexalicious]

[trexalicious]

Staff forced to wear the Sussex's TEMU version of a cypher...

[trexalicious]

"She terrifies and belittles people..."

Almost 16,000 people say 'NO'...

[trexalicious]

[trexalicious]

My vote's for criminal acts as he has quite the temper...

Very interesting redaction in Harry’s visa lawsuit now in the public domain. Must be pretty serious for it to be redacted.

*

Hi TeaWithBooks,

It is very interesting. I agree that it must be serious - or very embarrassing - for it to be redacted. I can understand a suppression for health reasons, but I don’t think that applies here. Of course, having this judgement just draws attention to the redacted bit, so everyone will be speculating about them. Drug use as per Spare? Criminal acts? Or just embarrassing things?