#inspired by that mole video on tiktok
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
lesraarsel · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Put'em back in the hole!!
2K notes · View notes
cloudysunflowr · 3 months ago
Text
ÂĄBill Sona!
Thought this was fun! So decided to join!
Funny enough the moles on my cheek are triangular formation! Hehehehe
Saw a couple artists doing this but the video I did on tiktok was inspired by Nirami1 😊
.
.
.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
—sǝuoq ÊŽÉŻ ʞɐǝÉčq ɯᎉɄ ʇǝl ʇuop
163 notes · View notes
bokutosmochi · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
EDITS ♡ MIYA ATSUMU
miya atsumu x gn!reader
ingredients? free publicity for the team plus you, his darling partner being petty? you can bet that atsumu miya's in!
what's it? mostly humor, but also some fluff
allergen warning/s? a suggestive moment, a fluffy moment
sugar level? 3.1k
regulars? N/A but taglist is open! comment, send an ask, or a dm to join
parlor's note? i'd like to start this by saying i have nothing against the type of people i am going to be mentioning in this fic. i am one of those people. i just thought the gist of this fic would be a nice fun time.
inspired by me watching nishida during the vnl, watching edits, and of course, the sweetest anon.
bon appetit
Tumblr media
the window's open, the curtains pulled apart, letting the ohasuhigashi breeze chill in your bedroom.
where the wind touched atsumu's hair, it danced like the most pristine gold silk.
the muscles in his back rippled as he moved, and as it rippled, it sang a siren's song calling out for you to touch it, for you to graze gentle fingertips along the smooth planes of it and kiss the moles you've kissed so many times before.
his bicep, looking as though molded by the gods, flexed as he stretched one arm across his shoulder, repeating the movement for the other arm. the lighting did it favors, highlighting the contours of it, the very same ones atsumu worked so hard on achieving. sufice to say, his time busying himself at the gym paid off.
and his thighs, his muscular thighs, the subject of so many thirst tweets he hilariously had to read out for buzzfeed as a part of msby's promotional stunt for their upcoming bout with ejp raijin.
oh, the way his head grew after that video. for the next few days, gone was the cute, whiny atsumu you called your boyfriend. you wished he gave you the opportunity to say farewell before cocky, borderline cringey boyfriend atsumu made his appearance. you can't really say you minded it that much though. as his loving, supportive partner, you knew how much time and effort he gave in order to gain quads like that, so it was nice to see it pay off, for people to acknowledge his hard work. and besides-
"hey, baby" his raspy morning voice unfortunately interrupted your ogling. as quick as lightning, your eyes moved from travelling down his bare godlike body to meeting his eyes through the mirror. he didn't look away.
-it wasn't like you didn't help with stroking his ego every now and again.
fuck, it was so hard not to do so, though. especially during times like these where he's standing in between the bed you laid in and the vanity. self assured about his looks as ever, he licked his lips, maintaining eye contact with you as he leaned over the desk, his hands carrying his weight on those fucking biceps flexing with effort, and winked.
whether he heard the tiny whimper that left your mouth, you'll never know, but at the very least, you know he didn't see how your thighs, covered by a thick warm blanket, rubbed against each other as a result of his ways.
as stated prior, not singing his praises is easier said than done.
"you enjoying the view, baby?"
"very much so." was your answer, but it was accompanied by you rolling your eyes at his antics.
"always knew you had great taste," he sighed, turning around and plopping into your bed, specifically, plopping right on top of you, kicking the offensive (for him because how dare it be between the two of you) blanket right off of you. he was careful, though, so the action is more reminiscent of a weighted blanket being on top of you rather than an olympic athletic crushing your body under his.
spellbound by the man you called your boyfriend, you couldn't help but run your fingers through his hair, marvelling at how soft they feel. the action made him vibrate out a faint hum. "knew it," he started, "'ya can't resist me." sadly, all you could do is roll your eyes.
it was true and the both of you knew it.
"das why you have yer little tiktok of me," he giggled like a school girl when bringing up the tiktok account you have that's dedicated to the setter who currently has his arms wrapped around your figure and snuggling into your chest like a content cat. or perhaps a content fox would be more appropriate for him.
you've always been a fan of fancams, video edits, whatever they're called. after all, what's not to like? they feature a character or person you admire, showing their best moments, and on top of that, there's neat music accompanying the clips. plus, they're short and sweet.
but it wasn't until you started watching atsumu play when you first thought of making said edits yourself.
he was magnetic on the court, possessing the ability to cast a spell on anyone he wished; his teammates, the opposing team, the audience, you. even an amateur would be able to point out how much of an asset he is to the team. and those abilities translate to him and his gorgeous, picture-perfect plays.
so after his game with the adlers, you concocted a list of your favorite atsumu plays which were the clips you used to make your very first edit: the first clip? a few second video from a game during his high school days. it was one against karasuno high school and he just executed a flawless overhand set that was not under normal circumstances. because of the previous plays, he had to squat down really low to do it, an undersand set would have sufficed, but ever the thoughtful setter, he did what was best for his spikers. then that clip transitioned to a more recent one of him doing a similar set, a set for his newest spiker (at the time) hinata.
what followed were the following clips: him running a hand through his sweaty hair, a confident smile on his lips, one of his famous service aces, him preparing to receive kageyama's serve, a bead of sweat running down the side of his face making him grab his jersey to wipe the perspiration off, a spike that blew through ushijima's block, him celebrating a win with his tongue lolled out of his mouth, and finally, his setter dump that got them a win in the fourth set during their olympic game with argentina.
add all those together, along with the song that went i saw her and she hit me like tadow as a cherry on top, then bam! you have yourself a viral edit.
you never would have expected it, but everyone gushed about your little creation. not only did it explode on tiktok, it exploded out of the app too, all the way to twitter, reddit, and instagram. you couldn't be more proud of yourself for such a magnificent first try, and atsumu couldn't be prouder of... himself. "ah please, 'ya never would have been able 'tah make it if i wasn't such a good player." he reasoned with you. it wasn't a total loss on your part, though. he gave you a kiss on the forehead as thanks for your hard work and free publicity.
you received many comments saying they forgot how hot volleyball players are and claiming they'll start watching again, much to your amusement.
"'ya know, i'm kind of surprised ya don't wanna keep me all to yerself," he mumbled, eyes closed, and at this point, half asleep; the reason why the setter missed you raising an eyebrow at him.
"all of the clips i use are stuff people can easily find, tsumu. it's not like i'm slutting you out for the whole world to see."
"mmmm, yer audience says otherwise..."
"about the clips being easy to find or me slutting you out?"
"bouf'" he yawned. "but if ya insist, i guess ya aren't doing 'tha. maybe i'm just that damn irresistible that yer putting regular stuff in and i already have 'tha girlies goin' crazy. and maybe the clips are easy to find." he referenced all the times you complained to him because of the amount of people asking you where each and every piece of your edit was taken from. "if yer as obssessed with me as you are, 'tha is."
you jokingly pushed him off of you, surprisingly moving him an inch or two. "i can be not obssessed if you, miya, if you prefer that. oikawa toru and tobio-chan are out there, y'know?"
that was a low blow and you knew it. "don't 'ya even dare." he reached to carefully pinch your nose. "'nd what's up with you and tobio??? why's he tobio-chan to you??" the whine in his tone was adorable, so much so it made you laugh. "nothing, 'tsumu. just playing with you." you squeezed his cheeks. "why? you jealous?"
"why 'tha hell would i ever be jealous of him? he ain't the best setter in the world, and he ain't the one with the prettiest, smartest, supportivest, meanest partner in the world."
"supportivest isn't a word."
"i hope 'ya were able to pick up meanest."
there was a little pause in the room, a moment where all that's heard was your sychronized breathing before atsumu opened his mouth to talk again.
"seriously though, angel. i don't thank you enough for everything you've done for me. not all of us have partners as supportive as you are." he gazed up at you with honeyed eyes, fingers tracing over your face, your features, your jawline, your cheeks.
"'tsumu, you know i'd move heaven and earth for you."
"'ya come to all of my games when yer job lets ya, if i ask ya about a play i made, ya always remember in what game i did it. and sometimes when it's a play ya really liked, ya even remember what set it happened."
"you're an amazing player, 'tsumu. i'd do anything to help you play at your full potential."
".... even slutting me out to the world wild web as free advertising," his tone became sarcastically thoughtful. "does 'tha seriously not bother 'ya?"
"no, you've never given me a reason to be worried or insecure about our relationship. they can have all that content as long as i can have you," you weren't done talking yet but you hear atsumu murmur an always at your words. "and besides, your sweetest, sexiest moments are ones only i can see..." atsumu's hand went under your shirt to trail his fingers on your bare skin as your brain trailed elsewhere, an idea sparking itself to life.
"oh my god," you said excitedly, not at all the noise he was expecting you to make. despite the goosebumps raising on your skin and dull ache between your thighs, you continued to squeal at him. "i thought of another edit to make."
amusement painted itself on his lips because of the way you were so giddy, because of the way you pried his hands off of you to shake it with happiness. he found himself being happy too, even though he doesn't have a clue what exactly it is you thought of. he was going to change that though, "so, aren't 'ya gonna let me in this little idea of yers?"
"okay so, you know how people who keep asking me where i found edit clips over and over again annoy me a teeny tiny bit?"
"yeah" yeah, as in, yeah he still has no idea where you're going with this.
"what if i made an edit where one of the clips is just a video i take of you here, like, in our private life, a clip they won't find on youtube or tiktok or volleyball tv or something?" you knew he would be on board with the idea. after all, the two of you wouldn't be together for such a long time if you weren't on similar wavelengths, but it's reassuring to hear atsumu's guffaw all the same.
he took your face in his large hands and kissed you on the lips, complete with an obnoxious smack! when he pulled away. "oh my, yer an evil genius, baby. dunno how this'll help with yer problem 'bout all the comments, but i beg ya ta do it."
and with that, you were formulating your plan.
without a shadow of a doubt, the edits that did the best on your account were thirst edits. the ones that focused more on the physical appeal of your boyfriend rather than his skills, and being petty, you wanted this particular edit of yours to do very well so it was decided it was going to be a thirst edit. gathering the clips available to the public was easy enough. you have several playlists on youtube filled with atsumu videos, curated depending on the type of edit that you were going for.
atsumu sad :(
atsumu cute :3
atsumu's greatest plays vol 1
atsumu's greatest plays vol 2
atsumu's greatest plays vol 3
were the playlists you scrolled through until you found the one you're looking for.
atsumu being hawt đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„”đŸ„” (and yes, he was the one to name that playlist. you thought eleven of those emojis was excessive while he thought it was perfect because "c'mon angelface, eleven's ma jersey number! eleven of those lil thirsty emojis should be a given!")
you landed on the videos considered your favorites as well as videos at the end of the playlist because that's where the ones you haven't used for edits yet was located.
in the end, you ended up with nine clips which you got from youtube, and twenty photos from pinterest (atsumu's public instagram is surprisingly tasteful because of the team's pr team. his private one however is another story) in addition to that, you also already have an audio to use in mind; goodies by ciara, a song you've heard on tiktok that went sexy, independent, down to spend it type that's gettin' his dough, i'm not being too dramatic, that's the way I gotta have it.
now, the only thing that's left is that one clip that has to have the audience wondering where the hell you got it from.
your ever-supportive boyfriend helped you brainstorm since he loved the idea as much as you did, and you guys ended up with a few good ideas;
him wiping sweat off of himself bare chested ("angellll," he whined. "you know damn well i can make it look hot.") with his jersey or a fluffy white towel.
him fixing his hair.
him doing bicep curls while shirtless (while his team does post workout videos of themselves, they're always fully clothed). the next idea being this, but he does push ups instead.
and lastly, a shot of him performing kabedon on the person behind the camera (it'll be a pov shot so the person watching knows what it would look like if the atsumu miya performed kabedon on them).
although some, such as him fresh out of the shower with only a towel wrapped around his waist or him getting on top of you (similar to the kabedon idea. you were to be filming him getting on top of you so people watching would know what it would look like if he got on top of them), or him getting on his knees in front of you (again, similar to prior idea and kabedon idea) had to be scraped because it would cause trouble for him backstage and you didn't quite want it to go that far.
in the end, you chose option number four: him doing push ups while shirtless, and with that, he got to his workout of the day (thankfully it's off season for volleyball so he didn't have much going for today, only exercising, checking emails, and a few hours of practice which were to take place later in the afternoon) while you got to filming.
atsumu gave up the comfiest couch in your living room for you while you edited the video, and ever the sweetheart, cooked you your favorite meal, checking emails at the same time. he knew the result of the sacrifices (he really loves that comfy couch and is thinking of buying another one so you don't have to play rock, paper, scissors for it every time) he was making was going to be worth it.
and it was.
"damn, angel. you made me look hotter than i already am." he praised your work clearly in shock, earning him a kiss to his jaw from you.
"oh baby, yer gonna have them eating off of the palm of yer pretty hands."
after that, you immediately posted it on tiktok with the caption this man cannot actually exist, i'm in love which was a nod to the fact that one of the clips you added in does not actually exist on the internet.
as you expected, it was a hit with your followers. within a minute, your phone was going crazy with notifications. the first few ones were only from people who didn't make edits (and people who you assumed were just casual atsumu fans since they felt no need to ask you about that clip) as they only complimented your work.
Gojo's Left Middle Finger Fingernail: my favorite used to be ushijima, but you're making an atsumu miya believer out of me
KENTOLUVVER: .. i know damn well kageyama's a better setter, but atsumuuuuu
(you didn't agree with this)
kyugisakiiz: this edit served as good as atsumu's serve 😌
minedaikiao: that's my future husband right there
(you don't really agree with this one either)
rickyyy: bro atsumu is soo fine
flower power bowser: girl, imagine an atsumu edit to honeypie. i would lose my mind
but soon after that, the fans you affectionately call certified atsumu girlies (fans who would ask you where a clip is from because they're interested in that video, not in an editor perspective) and the editors came pouring in.
msby filmzzz: ummmm, atsumu's push upsss??? hello?????? where is that from
hearts for tsumu: i can't believe in my two years of editing for atsumu, there's still a vid out there i haven't watched yet
atsumu's #1 girl: girl, i'm gonna need you to do me a favor and tell me where that push up clip is from
4TSUMUM1Y4: can you please send me the link to the fourth clip? can't seem to find it
in which case atsumu, not to be outdone in pettiness, came up with an idea of his own, copy and pasting a link to rick astley's never gonna give you up as a reply to the queries.
Tumblr media
i get: reblog
you get: a copy of this edit
75 notes · View notes
euterpe-of-hesiod · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
linnet beau blue // the muse of music
Name: Carolina Blue Linnet Beau Blue Euterpe of Hesiod Nicknames: Lin, Songbird, Little Miss Magic status: Pixie - Music Talent Muse of Music Unknown Nationality: American Pixie Ethnicity: Colombian/white Pronouns: She/her Accent: Southern Appalachian Height: 5 foot sweet on bare feet! Build: Skinny as a whistle! But she's the first to say that she's stronger than she looks, and she spends a lot of time outside and so she's pretty quick and squirrely. But she's got the tiniest little fairy feet you'll ever see! Complexion: Brown skin. She's got a mole on her chin and one on her temple. Eye colour: Burrow brown, that's what Mother Blue told her. She's got eyes that look like home, you could fall right into them and go to sleep. Hair colour/length/style: Dark brown, thick, long, and naturally very wavy. She keeps it cut pretty simply, straight across the bottom. She does curl it with bottles or something over night when she wants to do something special. Tattoos/piercings/daily jewelry: She has pierced ears. On the daily she doesn't wear that much jewelry
What would you find if you Googled them? A Youtube and TikTok channel with lots of song covers; a few youtube videos of her performing at the Jimmy Awards, which was where she got noticed.
What natives would know about them: Only what they'd Google (see above!) In person, they'd notice pretty quick she's a pixie.
Insta: @linnetsings Twitter: @linnetsings Lives: Pride U Dorm / Enchantra Hollow
Explanation of Magic Under Cut:
Musical Intuition: Can quickly learn and play any instrument, executing on a master’s level with very little practice (the time it takes to master each instrument decreases as the muse’s training period goes on). Can also ‘hear’ the melodies of her charges (those she needs to inspire) which helps her find them. Often times, those melodies first come to her in dreams.
Musical Attraction: When she plays music, people are naturally drawn to her and want to listen. This also applies to animals with connections to music (primarily songbirds). 
Musical Empathic Projection: Can project emotions onto the listener based on the songs she plays or sings. At full power after completed training, she can influence entire crowds to feel certain emotions. 
Musical Healing: Can use music to help heal heartbreak or mental stress (does not apply to physical wounds), calm someone down, or help someone fall asleep. Normally a temporary effect. 
Inspire: Euterpe uses music to inspire people to come to certain realizations, feel certain emotions, recall their dreams (music activates the part of the brain used in dreaming), or take action. Intuitively knows someone’s favorite songs that might be most effective. 
Protective Power: Scream of Cacophony - when unleashed this scream can physically incapacitate an assailant, to the point of rupturing eardrums/breaking glass. 
0 notes
sophie-writings · 5 years ago
Text
Masterlist ☁
A masterlist with all my works!!
Read rules before requesting 
Have a good read 💖
☁ Last updated: 18.06.2020  ☁
Bakugou Katsuki
Headcanons 
How he would be as a boyfriend 
Being told “I love you” for the first time
Girlfriend starts to ignore him 
Having a s/o with crackhead energy
S/o makes him flustered with innuendos 
S/o carries him after he’s hurt during battle
Bakugou reacting to an dancer s/o
Getting jealous of his crush “boyfriend”
Getting jealous of Todoroki
Getting jealous of a teddy bear 
Trying to get his s/o to talk to him 
Bakugou with a s/o who’s self-conscious of her body
Grumpy Bakugou after not sleeping enough
Bakugou with a s/o who has the same quirk and costume as Hela
Defending his s/o from perverts 
Bakugou with a s/o who keeps cute photos of him on their phone
A cuddly Bakugou after a tough day
Disneyland date with his crush
Bakugou meets his favorite shoujo manga writter 
Undercover mission with crush
S/o comes out as bi
Falling in love with his best friend 
Taking care of his lactose intolerant s/o
He hurts his s/o’s feelings 
S/o who has really high pain tolerance
Quarantined with teacher s/o
Innocent looking s/o who’s actually dirty minded
Bakugou dating his polar opposite 
Dating a s/o who had a major surgery when younger
He’s hit by a quirk that turns him into a child
Pro!Hero Bakugou ruins his crush’s date 
Meeting his s/o’s father who has the same personality as him
S/o gets hit by a baby quirk 
Soulmate AU: Timer on your wrist that stops counting when you meet your soulmate
Platonic bff’s with Bakugou
S/o who’s self-conscious of her moles
His kid doesn’t recognize him after he’s been away for a long term mission
Bakugou finds out his s/o’s bi
Prompt: “Do you have a plan?” “Yes” “If we’re burning something it’s not a plan”
Prompt: "How come she loves you?"
Jealous Bakugou headcanons
Comforting s/o who’s self-conscious of her battle scars
S/o calls him ugly
Rejecting his insistent crush
Helping his s/o fall asleep 
Scenarios
Bakugou’s s/o had a bad day so he cheers them up. 
Pro!Hero Bakugou s/o’s is being targeted by the media and attacked online. 
Prompt: “I made her cry. How could I do that?"
Prompts: “I wish I didn’t love you so much.” + “You hurt me so well.”
Prompt: “You don't believe the rumors are true?” “It's just fake pr to sell charms to lovesick fools”
Fics
“I won’t say I’m in love”: Bakugou just might have the biggest tiniest crush on you, but that doesn’t mean he’s going to admit it to anyone — or even himself. Inspired by: “I won’t say (I’m in love)” from Hercules.
SMAU’s
“I’m literally the guy in the picture”
Bakugou with a s/o who keeps cute photos of him on their phone
Drunkly confessing his feelings
“I want a baby” text prank
Wrong text from his s/o ranting about how much she loves him
Midoriya Izuku
Headcanons
How he would be as a boyfriend
Girlfriend starts to ignore him 
Having a s/o with crackhead energy
Midoriya telling his s/o that they are beautiful 
Midoriya with a s/o who has the same quirk and costume as Hela
Helping his s/o study for exams
S/o who sings for him
He’s hit by a quirk that turns him into a child
S/o gets hit by a baby quirk 
His kid doesn’t recognize him after he’s been away for a long term mission
Receiving/giving hickeys 
Comforting s/o who’s self-conscious of her battle scars
Jealous of Bakugou
Scenarios
Findinding his s/o crying
Pro!Hero Midoriya’s crush asks him to be their fake boyfriend for a night
SMAU’s 
“I’m literally the guy in the picture”
Wrong text from his s/o ranting about how much she loves him
Todoroki Shouto 
Headcanons
How he would be as a boyfriend
Girlfriend starts to ignore him
Todoroki with a loud and bubbly s/o
Todoroki with a s/o who’s self-conscious of her body
Todoroki with a s/o who has the same quirk and costume as Hela
Todoroki with a s/o who suffers from amnesia after a blow to the head part 1| part 2
Disneyland date with crush
Todoroki with a s/o with fluffy hair
Todoroki’s first crush 
Todoroki with a s/o who grew up in the countryside
S/o comes out as bi
Falling in love with his best friend 
S/o who has really high pain tolerance
S/o who’s self-conscious of her moles
His kid doesn’t recognize him after he’s been away for a long term mission
He turns into a baby/His s/o turns into a baby
Comforting s/o who’s self-conscious of her surgery scars
Rejecting his insistent crush
Scenarios
Todoroki’s s/o wearing his clothes
Todoroki forgets about a date with his s/o 
SMAU’S
“I’m literally the guy in the picture”
“I want a baby” text prank
Kirishima Eijirou 
Headcanons 
Girlfriend starts to ignore him 
Kirishima and his s/o go camping
Kirishima takes care of sick s/o on their birthday
Meeting his s/o’s father who has the same personality has Bakugou 
SMAU’S
S/o snaps them a TikTok dance 
“I want a baby” text prank
Tenya Iida
Headcanons
Iida with an emotionally drained s/o
Taking care of his lactose intolerant s/o
Prompt: "You own my heart. For all of eternity."
Iida dating his polar opposite
SMAU’S
S/o snaps them a TikTok dance
Kaminari Denki
Headcanons
Undercover mission with crush
Taking care of his lactose intolerant s/o
His s/o breaks up with him 
S/o who needs a lot of medical care
Innocent looking s/o who’s actually dirty minded
Dating a s/o who has a coffee addiction
Dyeing hair with his s/o
Singing “I want it that way” with Denki
SMAU’s 
“I want a baby” text prank
Hanta Sero
Headcanons
Pocky game with s/o
Complimenting Sero’s cute butt
Getting jealous oh his crush “boyfriend”
Sero with an artsy s/o
S/o comes out as bi
Sero and his bestie 
Helping his s/o study for exams
Dating a s/o who has a coffee addiction
Braiding his hair 
Receiving/giving hickeys 
Scenarios
Hurts s/o with his tape
SMAU’s
“I want a baby” text prank
Wrong text from his s/o ranting about how much she loves him
Tamaki Amajiki
Headcanons
Girlfriend starts to ignore him 
Pocky game with s/o
Tamaki takes care of sick s/o on their birthday
Defending his s/o from perverts 
Quarantined with teacher s/o
He’s hit by a quirk that turns him into a child
Dating a s/o who has a coffee addiction
S/o gets hit by a baby quirk 
Prompt: “I wanted to say “I love you” for the first time without stuttering, but that failed.”
Receiving/giving hickeys 
Jealous of his crush best friends
Prompt: "You own my heart. For all of eternity."
SMAU’s
Drunkly confessing his feelings
Wrong text from his s/o ranting about how much she loves him
 Mirio Togata
Headcanons
Mirio takes care of sick s/o on their birthday
Mirio with a touch-starved s/o
Mirio with a s/o who keeps cute photos of him on their phone
S/o who brings him lunch everyday
SMAU’S
Mirio with a s/o who keeps cute photos of him on their phone
Drunkly confessing his feelings
Wrong text from his s/o ranting about how much she loves him
Hitoshi Shinsou 
Headcanons
Shinsou sneaking into UA’s dorms to be with his s/o
Having a s/o with crackhead energy
Pocky game with s/o
Platonic friendship with Shinsou
Playing video-games with his s/o
Getting jealous oh his crush “boyfriend”
Getting jealous of a teddy bear 
Getting jealous of otome games
Bakugou with a s/o who has the same quirk and costume as Hela
Disneyland date with his crush
Defending girlfriends from perverts
Finding his s/o’s body pillows
S/o is his complete opposite 
Undercover mission with crush
Making up after a fight
Taking care of his lactose intolerant s/o
S/o who needs a lot of medical care
S/o who has really high pain tolerance
Quarantined with teacher s/o
Innocent looking s/o who’s actually dirty minded
Dating a s/o who had a major surgery when younger
S/o who sings for him
Dating a s/o who has a coffee addiction
He turns into a baby/His s/o turns into a baby
Receiving/giving hickeys
Soulmate AU: Every time your soulmate lies, their words are written on you.
Scenarios
Finding his s/o crying
“Stop biting your lip, it’s distracting” and “Shut up, do you want us to get caught” Nsfw Prompts
SMAU’S
S/o snaps them a TikTok dance
Drunkly confessing his feelings
Aizawa Shouta
Headcanons
Aizawa and crush take care of Eri
Aizawa with s/o who keeps cute photos of him on their phone
His s/o gets hurt while protecting the students 
S/o who sings for him
First meeting with his future s/o while shopping at 2am
Braiding his hair 
SMAU’S
Aizawa with a s/o who keeps cute photos of him on their phone
Hawks
Headcanons
S/o who sings for him 
Saving his s/o from a deadly attack
Fatgum
Headcanons
Relationship headcanons
SMAU’s
Wrong text from his s/o ranting about how much she loves him
1K notes · View notes
enigmasalad · 6 years ago
Text
Come Out Traitor!
(I was inspired by the cover of Bad Girl Online by Oktavia and by amaris_888 on TikTok. Oh and not to mention the recent sanders sides video) No one knew how the corruption started. What they did know is everyone was being affected terribly. They also knew that the side who was corrupting them must be cut out so Thomas can be back to his normal self. This unfortunately made all the sides very desperate.
 So here they all were, in the living room. Roman looked disheveled and had blood staining his clothes. Logan was messy and his eyes kept shifting around, as if he was going to have an outburst. Poor Patton had black tear marks and was slightly colorless and less bright than usual. Virgil’s eye shadow was out of control and his eyes were completely black.
“Never closer a group of friends, and yet somethings amiss.” Patton said. “Seems within the bounds, someone’s playing foul!” Roman stated with aggression. “Yes, we have what you’d call a traitor in our midst.” Logan agreed, glancing at everyone in the room. Virgil sighed and put his hands in his hoodie pockets. “I don’t know about you but those other vile sides who’ve been hiding seem rather suspicious don’t you think?” Roman proposed. “I honestly doubt they had corrupted everything. After all they’ve kept to themselves.” Logan countered, fiddling with his tie. “Besides wouldn’t it be hard for them to corrupt us?” Patton said. “I honestly agree with Princey. Its one of them. Has to be.” Virgil said, voice distorted. Roman let out a slight hurrah at the fact someone agreed with him, but his celebration was cut short by a smooth voice. “My oh my, could it be that everyone here has equipped a mask to some delusive fear?” Deceit.
Everyone turned to the snake-like side. He was leaning against a cane and looked paler and messier, but besides that he showed no signs of problems. “It was you!” Roman accused, pulling out his sword. “Roman stop!” Patton cried. Deceit laughed humorlessly. “I can assure it was not me. Since I’m being corrupted, I cough up some weird black stuff when I lie. Hurts like a bitch too.” Logan sighed and tried to adjust his tie, but to no avail. “The traitor is among us, but which side could it be?” Logan pondered, eyes shifting from each side repeatedly. Roman slammed his fist on the wall and growled. “Come out, come out whoever you are! Divine judgement awaits, you’ll never get that far!” Patton yelped in fear. “Two, three, four, five catch the mole alive.” Deceit mumbled. “Seven, eight, nine, ten don’t let them go again.” Virgil said, narrowing his eyes. It had been a week since the “meeting” was held. Patton had been worried. Not just about Thomas’s well-being but about who this traitor is. He wanted to believe that none of his family would have betrayed them! They couldn’t have! But as more time went by, he knew that there had to be a traitor. Patton was looking through a book of his family’s photographs when a knock came to his door. “Come in” The door opened, and Virgil stepped in. Patton smiled slightly at him, trying to hide the fact that his insides felt like they were melting. “Just a moment please, I have to tell you something.” Virgil said, voice even more distorted. “Sure kiddo. What’s up?” Patton asked. Virgil sat next to Patton and took a moment before speaking.
“Deceit, all he cares about is bad mouthing.” “I know he’s not the nicest but right now he can’t lie! He said s-“ “Just because he said he’d cough up shit means he’s telling the truth?” Virgil interrupted. Virgil did make sense. It would be easy for Deceit to claim he’s innocent with a lie that he couldn’t physically lie.
“I’m your best friend yes?” Virgil asked while holding Patton’s hands. “Yes?” “So with that I suggest you keep clear of his way.” Later a meeting was called once again. Patton stopped looking at his book and went to leave his room. As he gripped the handle, he gasped. His hands were pitch black. He gulped but exited the room anyways. When he entered the living room, Roman was practically screaming at Deceit. “Wait a sec! You don’t even pass the check! And your treachery isn’t exactly quality!” “You can smile wide and shake everyone’s hands, but it will never cover your obvious plan.” Virgil added with a growl. Deceit sighed and gripped the cane tighter. “My oh my, could it be that everyone here has equipped a mask to some delusive fear?” At that moment Logan stepped in, wheeling a machine of sorts. “Cut it! We’ll know your real ID!” Logan snapped. Deceit smirked for a moment.
“Thomas is dea-“ At that moment he curled in on himself in pain and coughed up black inky fluid. It splattered on the ground at his feet. Around the room eyes went wide. Deceit couldn’t lie. “Is everyone against me?” Now the question that hung thick in the air battered through everyone’s brains. Who caused the corruption? “Don’t blame me, I didn’t have a clue!” Roman desperately declared. “I-It’s not my fault! Im innocent like you!” Patton suddenly found himself saying. “Don’t you know that’s also what he claims?” Deceit wheezed out. Logan rubbed his temples. “This will never work if we all say the same. That is why I brought this lie detector.” Logan explained, running his hands through his hair, messing it up further. He put his hand on the center of the device. “I didn’t start the corruption.” Logan said. The machine blinked green, indicating Logan was telling the truth. Roman hurried over to the machine, obviously desperate to clear his name. “I didn’t start the corruption!” He cried. The machine blinked green. Roman sighed in relief and moved aside so Patton could put his hand on the machine. “I didn’t start the corruption.” Green lights blinked again. Patton sighed in relief, but horror quickly filled his chest. He looked at Virgil and then Deceit. It was one of them. But Deceit just proved that he couldn’t lie! This meant- “I didn’t start the corruption.” Deceit said, his hand on the machine. It blinked green. Roman gasped and all heads turned to Virgil. “W-Wait! It still could have been one of the others! Virgil might not be the traitor!” Patton cried. He looked at Virgil, tears in his eyes. Virgil was visibly trembling, but he sighed and placed his hand on the machine. “I started the corruption.” Patton heard his heart beat in his ears as his body grew freezing. The machine was green. “N-No! Please no! The machine is broken! Has to be!” Patton cried, falling to his knees. “Why did you do this to us?! We trusted you!” Roman roared, tears spilling over.
Logan just stared at Virgil with wide eyes. Even Logic couldn’t believe Virgil couldn’t do such a thing. Virgil was
protecting
Thomas, not harming him!
“What the hell’s this?! I’m going to be sick!” Roman spat, eyes on Virgil as he was pulling out his katana.
“That’s enough now!” Logan ordered.
“Im just saying, I’m so pissed!”
“Guys I know how you feel, but this is going too far, it’s unreal.” Deceit said, moving to hold back Roman.
Roman easily broke out of the weaker side’s grasp and charged at Virgil. Suddenly, Virgil wasn’t there anymore.
“Come out! Come out! Wherever you are!” Roman demanded, looking around him.
Logan’s eyes began to shift all around the room, as if he was looking out from an attack from an assassin.
Patton sobbed and got to his feet. If he found Virgil first, he could save him! He ran.
“GET BACK HERE!”
Patton found himself not even knowing where he was going, he just ran. He couldn’t breathe or think. He had to get to his dark strange son before the others found him! Suddenly he was pulled into a room and thrown onto the floor.
“Ow!” Patton cried out.
“Fuck! Sorry Pat! I thought you were Roman!”
Patton looked up to see Virgil offering a hand. Patton politely refused the hand and stood up. He saw that Virgil had a black mist around him. Patton yelped and stumbled back a bit, but something told him that Virgil wouldn’t hurt him.
“Patton, I’m so sorry. I-I was trying to protect Thomas a-and all of you from the others. It got out of hand. I never meant for it to escape my room.” Virgil shakily explained, fiddling with his hoodie.
“What?” Patton asked.
“The corruption. I was making my room more intense on purpose so I could protect you all better. I didn’t know the anxiety would follow me out of the room!”
“S-So if..if we were around you we were corrupted?”
“Worse.”
They heard footsteps in the distance.
“Divine judgement awaits, you’ll never get that far!” Roman declared.
“If you alert him of your presence he will easily escape! Then we can’t fix this!” Logan snapped.
“Yes, self-preservation is filling the mindscape.” Deceit pointed out.
Virgil looked at Patton for a moment. He smiled reassuringly with a two-finger salute.
With that, he was gone.
Weeks passed and the corruption slowly disappeared. Thomas was back to normal, and so were all the sides. However, despite everything being fixed, Virgil was missing. Patton wondered every day where he was, and if he would come back. Probably not, but he would have dreams about it.
Everyone still couldn’t believe Virgil betrayed them even Thomas. However, they all knew deep down, Virgil never meant to. Did that mean he was forgiven? To Roman and Logan, no. He had hurt them too much to be forgiven. They urged Patton to move past this and try to do his job.
Patton sat in the living room next to the new light side member. Deceit sat next to Patton, watching old Tom and Jerry cartoons with popcorn.
“I won’t admit, I don’t wish Virgil was with us.”
Patton looked at Deceit.
“Even though he tried to frame you?” Patton asked.
Deceit smiled slightly, throwing a piece of popcorn in his mouth.
“No. To me, I don’t think we’re even. I didn’t hurt him, he didn’t hurt me. It isn’t even.”
Patton looked at the TV, eating some popcorn.
“Well, I’m glad to have this moment with you Dee.”
34 notes · View notes
xtruss · 4 years ago
Text
The TikTok Fiasco Reflects the Bankruptcy of Trump’s Foreign Policy
— By Evan Osnos | September 25, 2020 | The New Yorker
Tumblr media
President Trump’s strong-arm effort to force a sale of the Chinese social platform’s U.S. operations has resulted in little discernible improvement in data security.Photograph by Kiyoshi Ota / Bloomberg / Getty
At first glance, the Trump Administration’s decision to ban the popular Chinese apps TikTok and WeChat had the look of hard-nosed diplomacy. China, after all, already blocks more than ten of the largest American tech companies, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter, out of fear that they facilitate unmanageable levels of free speech and organization. In Washington, U.S. officials have been increasingly worried about the rise of TikTok, which is best known for its minute-long videos of people dancing, and WeChat, the vast social-media platform that allows users to text, call, pay bills, buy things, and, of course, swap videos of people dancing. Like similar apps, they collect valuable data on the viewing habits of millions of Americans and could, it is feared, allow the Chinese Communist Party to expose Americans to propaganda and censorship. Under Chinese law, authorities have broad power to intervene in the work of private companies; a spy agency, for instance, could examine the private chats of an American user, or, in theory, direct a stream of TikTok videos and advertisements that could shape the perceptions of viewers in one part of the United States.
Last month, in an unusual intervention in the operations of a business, President Trump ordered ByteDance, the Beijing-based company that owns TikTok, to find an American owner for its U.S. operations. That touched off a chaotic scramble for a sale, culminating last Saturday, when Trump abruptly announced a deal involving Walmart and Oracle, which is headed by one of his major supporters, Larry Ellison. The announcement was vague and grandiose: it heralded the creation of a new U.S.-based company, TikTok Global, which would shift ownership into American hands while creating both twenty-five thousand new jobs in the U.S. and a very ill-defined five-billion-dollar educational fund. As Trump put it, that money would be applied so that “we can educate people as to [the] real history of our country—the real history, not the fake history.” Within days, those promises were unravelling. In Beijing, TikTok’s parent company said that it would retain control over the algorithms and the code that constitute the core of its power. Analysts could discern hardly any improvements in data security or protections against propaganda, and people involved let reporters know that the education fund was a notion added, at the last minute, to assuage Trump.
All sides agreed that Oracle and Walmart would gain a stake worth twenty per cent of the new U.S.-based company, and data from American users would reside in Oracle’s cloud. But the parties agreed on little else, especially who would own what; ByteDance said that it would retain eighty per cent of TikTok, while Oracle countered that the stake would belong to ByteDance’s investors, many of whom are American. Many critics noted that Oracle, led by a Trump supporter, potentially stood to earn a huge windfall in revenue, such that, as one put it, “the very concept of the rule of law is in shambles.” Taking stock of the mess, Bill Bishop, a China analyst and the author of the Sinocism newsletter, commented, “Struggling to find the right Chinese translation for clusterf$$!”
Meanwhile, the effort to bar WeChat also has, for the moment, run into objections. On Sunday, a federal judge in California issued an injunction against regulations issued by the Commerce Department, which seeks to bar U.S. companies from offering downloads or updates for TikTok and WeChat. Free-speech advocates had raised questions about whether the ban would harm First Amendment rights. For the moment, WeChat and TikTok would remain accessible to American users, but their futures were as unclear as Trump’s purported deal. Taken together, what Trump presented as a bold expression of American values and power has turned out to be precisely the opposite: a gesture of wall-building and retreat, suffused with the aroma of potential corruption.
In a new book, “An Open World,” the foreign-policy scholars Rebecca Lissner and Mira Rapp-Hooper begin the process of planning for a “day after Trump”—which they compare to a period of “post–natural disaster recovery”—in which the United States should focus on keeping “the international system open and free.” Lissner, an assistant professor at the U.S. Naval War College, told me that the threat to ban TikTok and WeChat “has put the United States on the wrong side, and set an unfavorable precedent.” There are plausible concerns, she said, that the Chinese Communist Party could use popular apps to collect data on American users, or continue to bar American companies in the name of governing the Internet according to its political anxieties. But the response should not be “replicating a C.C.P.-style approach to assertions of cyber sovereignty, as Trump has done.” Instead, she said, the U.S. should seek to be a leader in establishing rules that protect privacy and the free flow of information “regardless of the nationality of programs they’re using.” Lissner added, “Trump’s whack-a-mole approach doesn’t actually address the underlying risks, which reach far beyond TikTok and WeChat. Even worse, it makes it more likely that China’s preferred approach to Internet governance will triumph.”
The implications of this dispute extend far beyond the question of whether American teen-agers will be able to post to Chinese social-media sites. It represents what the Financial Times’ Tom Mitchell called the latest “proxy wars between the two reigning superpowers.” In contrast to America’s showdowns with the former Soviet Union, these battles are stirring not in Afghanistan and El Salvador but in corporate boardrooms. The Trump Administration opened its first front, in the spring of 2018, by banning American tech companies from selling components to ZTE, a Chinese telecom company that had been caught violating U.S. export controls on shipments to Iran. But Trump, who was eager to make a big trade deal with China, cut the pressure on ZTE, which settled with the U.S. Commerce Department. The battles have continued, though, and, as Mitchell observed, “it is China that has the early lead.”
The effort to wrest TikTok from China’s grip has been a boon for nationalist media sources in Beijing, which cited it as evidence that the U.S. is determined to prevent China from challenging American primacy. On Chinese state television last week, the news anchor Pan Tao derided the “hunt” for TikTok, asking, “Isn’t that behavior akin to a hostage situation? A deadline to sell on their terms, or else?” The opening of this “Pandora’s box,” Pan suggested, would make it impossible to trust American intentions. “If someone does this on Day One, who knows what they’re capable of doing on day fifteen?” Global Times, a nationalist state tabloid newspaper, called it a “thorough exhibit of Washington’s domineering behavior and gangster logic,” and predicted that leaders in Beijing would not ratify the agreement.
To Trump’s admirers in Washington, the move against Chinese tech companies is an act of reciprocity, an acknowledgment that China was the first to splinter the Internet into separate domains divided by a digital iron curtain. That sequence, of course, is true—but it does not follow that the right response to China’s fear is to impose additional barriers, instead of demonstrating that Americans have the capacity and the confidence to win on the strength of our competition. David Wertime, the author of the China Watcher newsletter at Politico, likened Trump’s decision to bar Americans from access to WeChat to the discomfiting new era in which America’s failure in the face of the coronavirus pandemic has left its people unwelcome at foreign borders. A U.S. passport “no longer ranks among the world’s most powerful,” he wrote. “A series of moves away from global institutions like the World Health Organization signal an inward retreat, keeping foreign elements out while also trapping Americans further within their homeland.”
Trump’s approach to TikTok and WeChat, like much of his foreign policy, is a gesture of defeatism camouflaged as strength. From his earliest days in politics, he has stood for the closure of the American mind, and the withdrawal of American power and confidence. He exited the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, and the Iran nuclear agreement; he ordered American troops in Syria to abandon the Kurds and other American allies, a move that James Mattis regarded as so disloyal and imprudent that he resigned as Secretary of Defense. In the present case, Trump would rather wall off Americans digitally and philosophically than establish guidelines on privacy, free speech, and data collection.
The TikTok fiasco is a product of cronyism, empty bombast, and nationalism—a political recipe that, historically, America has tended to criticize in its opponents. But, as a Pew survey reported this month, global confidence in the United States, especially among allies, is as low as it has been since the measurements began, nearly two decades ago. In the most damning indicator, Trump inspires less confidence than Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.
It takes some doing to earn less trust than those leaders, but Trump has achieved that. In a similar spirit, it is not often that one finds a note of prudent prediction in Global Times. But it’s hard to disagree with one of the paper’s observations in an editorial this week, in comments on the TikTok case. “As cybersecurity becomes more of a universal issue,” the paper observed, “there will be imitators around the world who will take action against U.S. companies. The bad precedent set by the United States will eventually come back to bite it.”
— Evan Osnos joined The New Yorker as a staff writer in 2008 and covers politics and foreign affairs. His book on China, “Age of Ambition,” won the National Book Award in 2014.
0 notes
itsfinancethings · 4 years ago
Text
New story in Politics from Time: How Far-Right Personalities And Conspiracy Theorists Are Cashing In On The Pandemic Online
On the evening of Feb. 6, as U.S. news networks reported the death of a doctor in Wuhan, China, who had warned of a deadly new virus, thousands of Americans were tuning in to a different kind of show.
“The good news is I heard actually that you can’t get this if you’re white,” Nick Fuentes, a far-right political commentator, told viewers on his “America First” channel on the streaming platform DLive. “You’re only really susceptible to this virus if you’re Asian,” Fuentes continued. “I think we’ll be O.K.”
Fuentes, 22, a prolific podcaster who on his shows has compared the Holo-caust to a cookie-baking operation, argued that the segregation of Black Americans “was better for them,” and that the First Amendment was “not written for Muslims,” is doing better than O.K. during the COVID-19 pandemic. He’s part of a loose cohort of far-right provocateurs, white nationalists and right-wing extremists who have built large, engaged audiences on lesser-known platforms like DLive after being banned from main-stream sites for spreading hate speech and conspiracy theories.
The model can be lucrative. Viewers pay to watch the livestreams through subscriptions and donations, and the platform allows the content creators to keep most of the revenue. Fuentes appears to have earned more than $140,000 off his DLive streams, cementing himself as the most viewed account on the platform, according to calculations provided to TIME by a livestreaming analyst who was granted anonymity because of their work tracking these accounts. Fuentes is hardly alone. Eight of the 10 top earners on DLive this year as ranked by Social Blade, a social-media analytics website, are far-right commentators, white-nationalist extremists or conspiracy theorists.
The social disruption and economic dislocation caused by the virus–as well as the nationwide protests and civil un-rest that followed the death of George Floyd in late May–has helped fuel this growing, shadowy “alt tech” industry. As public spaces shut down in March, millions of Americans logged online; the livestreaming sector soared 45% from March to April, according to a study by software sites StreamElements and Arsenal.gg. As people became more socially isolated, many increasingly turned to pundits peddling misinformation, conspiracy theories and hate speech. And even as mainstream platforms cracked down on far-right propagandists, online audiences grew. Over the past five months, more than 50 popular accounts reviewed by TIME on sites like DLive have multiplied their viewership and raked in tens of thousands of dollars in online currency by insisting COVID-19 is fake or exaggerated, encouraging followers to resist lockdown orders and broadcasting racist tropes during the nationwide protests over police brutality. Many of these users, including Fuentes, had been banned by major social-media platforms like YouTube for violating policies prohibiting hate speech. But this so-called deplatforming merely pushed them to migrate to less-regulated portals, where some of them have attracted bigger audiences and gamed algorithms to make even more money. In addition, clips of their broadcasts on less-trafficked sites still frequently make it onto YouTube, Twitter and other mainstream platforms, essentially serving as free advertising for their streams elsewhere, experts say.
As social-media giants like YouTube, Twitter and Facebook target hate speech and misinformation, sites like DLive seem to be turning a blind eye, former users and employees say, recognizing that much of their traffic and revenue comes from these accounts. “They care more about having good numbers than weeding these people out,” a former employee of DLive, who was granted anonymity because he still works in the livestreaming sector, tells TIME. (DLive did not respond to multiple requests for comment.)
Which means ordinary users on gaming and streaming platforms, many of them teenagers, are often one click away from white-nationalist content. Many of these far-right personalities allege they are being unfairly censored for conservative political commentary or provocative humor, not hate speech. Most of these viewers won’t respond to streamers’ often cartoonish calls to action, like the “film your hospital” movement in April meant to show that no patients were there, thus “proving” that COVID-19 was fake. But this murky ecosystem of casual viewers, right-wing trolls–and the occasional diehard acolyte–creates a real challenge for technology companies and law-enforcement agencies.
And it doesn’t take much to trigger a tragedy. Over the past two years, terrorists inspired by online right-wing propa-ganda have livestreamed their own deadly attacks in New Zealand and Germany. In March 2019, a Florida man who had been radicalized by far-right media and online conspiracy theorists pleaded guilty to sending more than a dozen pipe bombs to prominent critics of President Donald Trump. A month later, a gunman armed with an AR-15 shot four people, killing one, in a synagogue in Poway, Calif., after allegedly posting a racist and anti-Semitic screed on the site 8chan. About three months later, a man killed 23 people at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, after posting a racist manifesto online, according to authorities.
With COVID-19 continuing to surge in parts of the country, ongoing protests over racial injustice and the upcoming 2020 U.S. presidential election, the next few months promise to offer fertile ground for bad actors in unmoderated virtual spaces. Far-right propagandists “are really capitalizing on this conspiratorial moment,” says Brian Friedberg, a senior researcher at the Harvard University Shorenstein Center’s Technology and Social Change Project. “Everyone’s locked inside while there is what they refer to as a ‘race war’ happening outside their windows that they are ‘reporting on,’ so this is prime content for white-nationalist spaces.”
The migration of far-right personalities to DLive illustrates how, despite mainstream platforms’ recent crack-downs, the incentives that govern this ecosystem are thriving. Anyone with an Internet connection can continue to leverage conspiracy theories, racism and misogyny for attention and money, experts say.
The outbreak of COVID-19 arrived during a period of reinvention for far-right propagandists in the aftermath of the white-nationalist “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017. Over the past three years, social-media giants, which had endured criticism for giving extremists safe harbor, have increasingly attempted to mitigate hate speech on their sites. Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, as well as payment processors like PayPal and GoFundMe, have all shut down accounts run by far-right agitators, neo-Nazis and white supremacists. In late June, YouTube removed the accounts of several well-known figures, including David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a prominent white nationalist. Reddit, Facebook and Amazon-owned streaming site Twitch also suspended dozens of users and forums for violating hate-speech guidelines.
But these purges hardly solved the problem. Many online extremists were on main-stream platforms like YouTube long enough to build a devoted audience willing to follow them to new corners of the Internet. Some had long prepared for a crackdown by setting up copycat accounts across different platforms, like Twitch, DLive or TikTok. “These people build their brand on You-Tube, and when they get demonetized or feel under threat they’ll set up backup channels on DLive or BitChute,” says Megan Squire, a computer scientist at Elon University who tracks online extremism. “They know it’s going to happen and plan ahead.”
While the suspensions by social-media companies have been effective at limiting the reach of some well-known personalities like conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who was banned from YouTube, Facebook and Apple in 2018, others have quickly adapted. “Content creators are incredibly adept at gaming the systems so that they can still find and cultivate audiences,” says Becca Lewis, a researcher at Stanford University who studies far-right subcultures online, describing these efforts as a “game of whack-a-mole.” Many white-nationalist accounts have tied their ban to the right-wing narrative that conservatives are being silenced by technology companies. For platforms like DLive, becoming what their users consider “free speech” and “uncensored” alternatives can be lucrative. “More speech also means more money for the platform, and less content moderation means less of an expense,” says Lewis.
The prospect of being pushed off main-stream social-media, video-streaming and payment platforms has also prompted extremists to become more sophisticated about the financial side of the business. While Twitch takes a 50% cut from livestreamers’ earnings and YouTube takes 45%, platforms like DLive allow content creators to keep 90% of what they make. And as many found themselves cut off from mainstream payment services like PayPal, GoFundMe and Patreon, they began to embrace digital currencies.
DLive was founded in December 2017 by Chinese-born and U.S.-educated entrepreneurs Charles Wayn and Cole Chen, who made no secret of their ambition to build a platform that rivaled Twitch. They described the site as a general-interest streaming platform, focused on everything from “e-sports to lifestyle, crypto and news.” But two things set it apart from its competitors: it did not take a cut of the revenue generated by its streamers, and it issued an implicit promise of a less moderated, more permissive space.
DLive’s first big coup came in April 2019 when it announced an exclusive streaming deal with Felix Kjellberg, known as PewDiePie. In just two months, DLive’s total number of users grew by 67%. At the time, Kjellberg was the most popular individual creator on YouTube, with more than 93 million subscribers and his own controversial history. In 2018, he came under fire for making anti-Semitic jokes and racist remarks, and more than 94,000 people signed a Change.org petition to ban his channel from YouTube for being a “platform for white-supremacist content.” The petition noted that “the New Zealand mosque shooter mentioned PewDiePie by name and asked people to subscribe.”
DLive’s community guidelines theoretically prohibit “hate speech that directly attacks a person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, disease, age, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity.” But it soon became apparent to both employees and users that executives were willing to ignore venomous content. By early 2019, “political” shows were gaining traction on the site. Those programs devolved into “streams dedicated to white pride and a lot of anti-Semitism, entire streams talking about how Jewish people are evil,” says the former DLive employee who spoke to TIME, adding that moderators acted much more quickly when it came to copyright concerns. “Your stream would be taken down faster for streaming sports than saying you hate Jews.”
The employee recalls raising the matter with Wayn, noting how off-putting it was for new users coming to watch or broadcast streams of popular video games. According to the employee, Wayn explained that the company “didn’t want to get rid of these problematic streamers because they brought in numbers.” The founders knew they had to keep viewers because, as Wayn noted in a 2019 interview, if they wanted to “compete with Twitch on the same level and even take them down one day, DLive needs to match its scale.” Wayn did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
By June 2020, DLive seemed to be openly cultivating a right-of-center audience. On Twitter, it briefly changed its bio to read “All Lives Matter,” a right-wing rallying cry in response to Black Lives Matter. The site has increasingly become a haven for fanaticism, says Joan Donovan, the research director of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center. “Before, on YouTube, some of these people would do a dance with the terms of service,” she tells TIME. “But on DLive, the gloves are off, and it’s just full white-supremacist content with very few caveats.”
On the night of June 29, Fuentes had 56% of the site’s total viewership at 10 p.m., according to the review of the site’s analytics provided to TIME. An additional 39% was viewers of 22 other extremist personalities streaming their commentary. At one point on the night of Aug. 10, just 176 of the more than 15,000 viewers on the top 20 channels on the site were not watching accounts linked to far-right figures. Popular programming in recent months has included alarmist footage of racial-justice protests, antivaccine propaganda, conspiracies linking 5G networks to the spread of COVID-19 and calls to “make more white babies while quarantined.”
The company may be even more reliant on those accounts now. Some users have left the site, complaining publicly about the virulent racism and anti-Semitism spilling over into regular channels and game streams. “DLive is a safe-haven for racists and alt-right streamers,” one user wrote on Twitter on June 22. “Seems to me DLive is the new platform for white supremacists,” wrote another, echoing complaints that it’s a “literal Nazi breeding ground” and “the place where racists don’t get deplatformed.”
The migration of hate speech to far-flung corners of the Internet could make it harder to track, increasing the risk that it spills into the offline world. Experts say law-enforcement and national-security agencies are still unprepared to tackle right-wing extremism. They lack expertise not only in the rapidly evolving technology but also in the ideological ecosystem that has spawned a battery of far-right movements. The recently repackaged white-nationalist youth movement, with new names like “America First” or the “Groypers,” looks more like “gussied-up campus conservatives,” as Friedberg of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center puts it, “so they are not triggering the same warning bells.”
Recent incidents show how this online environment that blends political commentary and hate speech can be dangerous. An 18-year-old accused of firebombing a Delaware Planned Parenthood clinic in January was identified through his Instagram profile, which contained far-right memes reflecting popular beliefs in the young white-nationalist movement, according to BuzzFeed News. In June, Facebook deactivated nearly 200 social-media accounts with ties to white-nationalist groups rallying members to attend Black Lives Matter protests, in some cases armed with weapons.
Analysts who track extremist recruitment online also warn that the pandemic may have long-term effects on young people who are now spending far more time on the Internet. Without the structure of school and social activities, many children and teenagers are spending hours a day in spaces where extremist content lurks alongside games and other benign entertainment, says Dana Coester, an associate professor at West Virginia University who researches the impact of online white extremism on youth in Appalachia. It’s common, she notes, to see teenagers sharing Black Lives Matter messages alongside racist cartoons from popular Instagram accounts targeting middle schoolers. “So many parents I’ve spoken with say their kids are on devices until 3 in the morning,” she says. “I can’t begin to imagine how much damage can be done with kids that many hours a day marinating in really toxic content.”
Analysts warn that both U.S. law enforcement and big technology companies need to move quickly to hire experts who understand this new extremist ecosystem. Experts say the mainstream platforms’ recent purges are reactive: they patch yesterday’s problems instead of preventing future abuses, and focus on high-profile provocateurs instead of the underlying networks.
One solution may be to follow the money, as content creators migrate to new platforms in search of new financial opportunities. “[White supremacists] have become particularly as-siduous at exploiting new methods of fundraising, often seeking out platforms that have not yet realized how extremists can exploit them,” said George Selim, senior vice president of programs of the Anti-Defamation League, in testimony before a House subcommittee in January. “When a new fund-raising method or platform emerges, white supremacists can find a window of opportunity. These windows can, however, be shut if platforms promptly take countermeasures.”
On the evening of Aug. 11, Joe Biden’s pick of Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate dominated the news. “She hates white people,” Fuentes told viewers on DLive. “She is going to use the full weight of the federal government 
 to destroy conservatives, to destroy America First, anybody that speaks up for white people.” NBC and ABC News–which have a combined 13 million subscribers on YouTube–had an average of 6,100 concurrent viewers watching their coverage. Fuentes’ show had 9,000.
–With reporting by ALEJANDRO DE LA GARZA/NEW YORK
from Blogger https://ift.tt/31eBuSM via IFTTT
0 notes
ladystylestores · 4 years ago
Text
Edtech is surging, and parents have some notes – TechCrunch
Unlike most sectors, edtech has been booming over the last few months. Flashcards startup Quizlet is now a unicorn, digital textbook company Top Hat is finding unprecedented surges in usage and student success business Edsights raised nearly $2 million from high-profile investors, all from inbound interest. Investors are so confident that homeschooling might become a trend that they just invested $3.7 million in Primer, which creates a “full-stack infrastructure” to help parents get started.
But as tired parents juggle work, family and sanity all day, nearly every day, they say edtech is not a remedy for all education gaps right now.
Parents across all income groups are struggling with homeschooling.
“Our mental health is like whack-a-mole,” said Lisa Walker, the vice president of brand and corporate marketing at Fuze. Walker, who lives in Boston but has relocated to Vermont for the pandemic, has two kids, ages 10 and 13. “One person is having a good day. One person is having a bad day, and we’re just going throughout the family to see who needs help.”
Socioeconomically disadvantaged families have it even worse because resources are strapped and parents often have to work multiple jobs to afford food to put on the table.
One major issue for parents is balancing a decrease in live learning with an uptick in “do it at your own pace” learning.
Walker says she is frustrated by the limited amount of live interaction that her 10-year-old has with teachers and classmates each day. Once the one hour of live learning is done, the rest of the school day looks like him sitting in front of a computer. Think pre-recorded videos, followed up by an online quiz, capped with doing homework on a Google doc.
Asynchronous learning is complicated because, while it is not interactive, it is more inclusive of all socioeconomic backgrounds, Walker said. If all learning material is pre-recorded, households that have more kids than computers are less stressed to make the 8 a.m. science class, and can fit in lessons by taking turns.
“Even though I know there’s a lot of video fatigue out there, I would love there to be more live learning,” Walker said. “Tech is both part of the problem and part of the solution.”
TraLiza King, a single mother living in Atlanta who works full time as a senior tax manager for PWC, points out the downside of live video instruction when it comes to working with younger children.
One challenge is overseeing her four-year-old’s Zoom calls. King needs to be available to help her daughter, Zoe, use the platform, which isn’t intuitive for kids at that age. She helps Zoe log on and off and mute when appropriate so instruction can go on interrupted, ironically enough.
Her 18-year-old college freshman could supervise the four-year-old’s learning, but King doesn’t want her older daughter to feel responsible for teaching. It leaves King to play the role of Zoom tech support, and teacher, in addition to mom and full-time employee.
“This has been a double-edged sword; there’s beauty in it that I get to see what my girls are learning and be a part of their everyday,” she said. “But I am not a preschool teacher.”
Some parents are finding success in pretending it is business as normal. The moment that Roger Roman, the founder of Los Angeles-based Rythm Labs, and his wife saw that there was a shutdown, they scrambled to create a schedule for the children. Breakfast at 6 a.m., physical education right after, and then workbook time and homework time. If their five-year-old checks all the boxes, he can “earn” 30 minutes of screen time.
The Roman family’s schedule for their child.
Technology definitely helps. Roman says he relies on a few apps like Khan Academy Kids and Leapfrog to give him some time to take work calls or meetings. But he says those have been more like supplements instead of replacements. In fact, he says one big solution he found is a bit more low-tech.
“Printers have been a godsend,” he said
The kids being at home has also given the Roman family an opportunity to address the racial violence and police brutality in our country. The existing school curriculums around history have been scrutinized for lacking a comprehensive and accurate account of slavery and Black leaders. Now, with parents at home, those disparities are even more clear. Depending on the household, the gaps around education on slavery can either inspire a difficult conversation on inequality in the country, or leave the talk tabled for schools to reopen.
Roman says he doesn’t remember a time where he wasn’t aware of racism and injustice, and assumes the same will be true for his sons.
“The murders of Ahmaud, Breonna, and George have forced my wife and me to be brutally honest with my five-year-old about this country’s long, dark history of white supremacy and racial oppression,” he said. “We didn’t expect to have these discussions so soon with him, but he’s had a lot of questions about the images he’s been seeing, and we’ve confronted them head-on.”
Roman used books to help illustrate racism to his sons. Edtech platforms have largely been silent on how they’re addressing anti-racism in their platforms, but Quizlet says it is “pulling together programming that can make a real impact.”
What’s next for remote learning?
In light of the struggles parents and educators alike are seeing with the current set of online learning tools and their inability to inspire young learners, new edtech startups are thinking about how the future of remote learning might look.
Zak Ringelstein, the co-founder of Zigazoo, is launching a platform he describes as a “TikTok for kids.” The app is for children from preschool to middle school, and invites users to post short-form videos in response to project-based prompts. Exercises could look like science experiments — like building a baking soda volcano or recreating the solar system from household items — and the app is controlled by parents.
The first users are Ringlestein’s kids. He says they became disengaged with learning when it was just blind staring at screens, leading him to conclude that interaction is key. Down the road, Zigazoo plans to forge partnerships with entertainment companies to have characters act as “brand ambassadors” and feature in the short-form video content. Think “Sesame Street” characters starting a TikTok trend to help kids learn what photosynthesis is all about.
A preview of Zigazoo, a “TikTok for kids” and its video-based prompts“As an educator, I’ve been surprised at how little content exists for parents that is not just entertaining but is actually educational,” he said.
Lingumi is a platform that teaches toddlers critical skills, like learning English. The company began because preschool classes are packed with so many students that teachers can’t give one on one feedback during the “sponge-like years.” Lingumi uses another startup, SoapBox, and its voice tech to listen and understand children, assess how they are pronouncing words and judge fluency.
“Edtech products were designed to work in the classroom and a teacher was supposed to be in the mix somewhere,” said Dr. Patricia Scanlon, the CEO of SoapBox. “Now, the teacher can’t be with the kids individually and this is a technology that gives updates on children’s progress.”
Another app, Make Music Count, was started by Marcus Blackwell to help students use a digital keyboard to solve math equations. It serves 50,000 students in more than 200 schools, and recently landed a partnership with Cartoon Network and Motown records to use content as lessons for followers. If you log onto the app, you are presented with a math problem that, once solved, tells you which key to play. Once you solve all the math problems in the set, the keys you played line up to play popular songs from artists like Ariana Grande and Rihanna.
youtube
The app is using a well-known strategy called gamification to engage its younger users. Gamification of learning has long been effective in engaging and contextualizing studies for students, especially younger ones. Add a sense of accomplishment, like a song or a final product, and kids get the positive feedback they’re looking for. The strategy is found in the underpinnings of some of the most successful education companies we see today, from Quizlet to Duolingo.
But in Make Music Count’s case, it’s forgoing gamification’s usual trappings, like points, badges and other in-app rewards to instead deliver something far more fun than virtual items: music that kids enjoy and often seek out on their own.
Gamification, much like technology more broadly, is not all-encompassing of the deeply personal and hands-on aspects of school. Yet that is what parents need right now. We’re left with a reminder that technology can only help so much in a remote-only world, and that education has always been more than just comprehension and test-taking.
The missing piece to edtech: School isn’t just learning, it’s childcare
At the end of the day, if the future of work is remote, parents will need more support with childcare assistants. Some startups trying to help that include Cleo, a parenting benefits startup that recently partnered with on-demand childcare service UrbanSitter.
“As working moms desperate for a solution to the crisis facing parents today, we were focused on developing a solution that didn’t just work for our members and enterprise clients, but also one that we’d use ourselves. After experimenting and trying everything from virtual care to scheduling shifts to looking for new caregivers ourselves, we realized the only solution that would work for families would require a new model of childcare designed for the unique issues COVID-19 has created,” Cleo CEO Sarahjane Sacchetti told TechCrunch in May.
Sara Mauskopf, the co-founder of childcare marketplace Winnie, said that tech companies trying to help remote learning need to remember that “it’s not just the education aspect that has to be solved for.”
“School is a form of childcare,” she said.
“The thing that irks me is that I see these tweets all the time that ‘more people are going to homeschool than ever before,” Mauskopf said. “But no one is going to feed my toddler mac and cheese or change their diaper.”
Source link
Ù‚Ű§Ù„Űš ÙˆŰ±ŰŻÙŸŰ±Űł
from World Wide News https://ift.tt/2YgZ0fe
0 notes
itsfinancethings · 4 years ago
Link
On the evening of Feb. 6, as U.S. news networks reported the death of a doctor in Wuhan, China, who had warned of a deadly new virus, thousands of Americans were tuning in to a different kind of show.
“The good news is I heard actually that you can’t get this if you’re white,” Nick Fuentes, a far-right political commentator, told viewers on his “America First” channel on the streaming platform DLive. “You’re only really susceptible to this virus if you’re Asian,” Fuentes continued. “I think we’ll be O.K.”
Fuentes, 22, a prolific podcaster who on his shows has compared the Holo-caust to a cookie-baking operation, argued that the segregation of Black Americans “was better for them,” and that the First Amendment was “not written for Muslims,” is doing better than O.K. during the COVID-19 pandemic. He’s part of a loose cohort of far-right provocateurs, white nationalists and right-wing extremists who have built large, engaged audiences on lesser-known platforms like DLive after being banned from main-stream sites for spreading hate speech and conspiracy theories.
The model can be lucrative. Viewers pay to watch the livestreams through subscriptions and donations, and the platform allows the content creators to keep most of the revenue. Fuentes appears to have earned more than $140,000 off his DLive streams, cementing himself as the most viewed account on the platform, according to calculations provided to TIME by a livestreaming analyst who was granted anonymity because of their work tracking these accounts. Fuentes is hardly alone. Eight of the 10 top earners on DLive this year as ranked by Social Blade, a social-media analytics website, are far-right commentators, white-nationalist extremists or conspiracy theorists.
The social disruption and economic dislocation caused by the virus–as well as the nationwide protests and civil un-rest that followed the death of George Floyd in late May–has helped fuel this growing, shadowy “alt tech” industry. As public spaces shut down in March, millions of Americans logged online; the livestreaming sector soared 45% from March to April, according to a study by software sites StreamElements and Arsenal.gg. As people became more socially isolated, many increasingly turned to pundits peddling misinformation, conspiracy theories and hate speech. And even as mainstream platforms cracked down on far-right propagandists, online audiences grew. Over the past five months, more than 50 popular accounts reviewed by TIME on sites like DLive have multiplied their viewership and raked in tens of thousands of dollars in online currency by insisting COVID-19 is fake or exaggerated, encouraging followers to resist lockdown orders and broadcasting racist tropes during the nationwide protests over police brutality. Many of these users, including Fuentes, had been banned by major social-media platforms like YouTube for violating policies prohibiting hate speech. But this so-called deplatforming merely pushed them to migrate to less-regulated portals, where some of them have attracted bigger audiences and gamed algorithms to make even more money. In addition, clips of their broadcasts on less-trafficked sites still frequently make it onto YouTube, Twitter and other mainstream platforms, essentially serving as free advertising for their streams elsewhere, experts say.
As social-media giants like YouTube, Twitter and Facebook target hate speech and misinformation, sites like DLive seem to be turning a blind eye, former users and employees say, recognizing that much of their traffic and revenue comes from these accounts. “They care more about having good numbers than weeding these people out,” a former employee of DLive, who was granted anonymity because he still works in the livestreaming sector, tells TIME. (DLive did not respond to multiple requests for comment.)
Which means ordinary users on gaming and streaming platforms, many of them teenagers, are often one click away from white-nationalist content. Many of these far-right personalities allege they are being unfairly censored for conservative political commentary or provocative humor, not hate speech. Most of these viewers won’t respond to streamers’ often cartoonish calls to action, like the “film your hospital” movement in April meant to show that no patients were there, thus “proving” that COVID-19 was fake. But this murky ecosystem of casual viewers, right-wing trolls–and the occasional diehard acolyte–creates a real challenge for technology companies and law-enforcement agencies.
And it doesn’t take much to trigger a tragedy. Over the past two years, terrorists inspired by online right-wing propa-ganda have livestreamed their own deadly attacks in New Zealand and Germany. In March 2019, a Florida man who had been radicalized by far-right media and online conspiracy theorists pleaded guilty to sending more than a dozen pipe bombs to prominent critics of President Donald Trump. A month later, a gunman armed with an AR-15 shot four people, killing one, in a synagogue in Poway, Calif., after allegedly posting a racist and anti-Semitic screed on the site 8chan. About three months later, a man killed 23 people at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, after posting a racist manifesto online, according to authorities.
With COVID-19 continuing to surge in parts of the country, ongoing protests over racial injustice and the upcoming 2020 U.S. presidential election, the next few months promise to offer fertile ground for bad actors in unmoderated virtual spaces. Far-right propagandists “are really capitalizing on this conspiratorial moment,” says Brian Friedberg, a senior researcher at the Harvard University Shorenstein Center’s Technology and Social Change Project. “Everyone’s locked inside while there is what they refer to as a ‘race war’ happening outside their windows that they are ‘reporting on,’ so this is prime content for white-nationalist spaces.”
The migration of far-right personalities to DLive illustrates how, despite mainstream platforms’ recent crack-downs, the incentives that govern this ecosystem are thriving. Anyone with an Internet connection can continue to leverage conspiracy theories, racism and misogyny for attention and money, experts say.
The outbreak of COVID-19 arrived during a period of reinvention for far-right propagandists in the aftermath of the white-nationalist “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017. Over the past three years, social-media giants, which had endured criticism for giving extremists safe harbor, have increasingly attempted to mitigate hate speech on their sites. Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, as well as payment processors like PayPal and GoFundMe, have all shut down accounts run by far-right agitators, neo-Nazis and white supremacists. In late June, YouTube removed the accounts of several well-known figures, including David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a prominent white nationalist. Reddit, Facebook and Amazon-owned streaming site Twitch also suspended dozens of users and forums for violating hate-speech guidelines.
But these purges hardly solved the problem. Many online extremists were on main-stream platforms like YouTube long enough to build a devoted audience willing to follow them to new corners of the Internet. Some had long prepared for a crackdown by setting up copycat accounts across different platforms, like Twitch, DLive or TikTok. “These people build their brand on You-Tube, and when they get demonetized or feel under threat they’ll set up backup channels on DLive or BitChute,” says Megan Squire, a computer scientist at Elon University who tracks online extremism. “They know it’s going to happen and plan ahead.”
While the suspensions by social-media companies have been effective at limiting the reach of some well-known personalities like conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who was banned from YouTube, Facebook and Apple in 2018, others have quickly adapted. “Content creators are incredibly adept at gaming the systems so that they can still find and cultivate audiences,” says Becca Lewis, a researcher at Stanford University who studies far-right subcultures online, describing these efforts as a “game of whack-a-mole.” Many white-nationalist accounts have tied their ban to the right-wing narrative that conservatives are being silenced by technology companies. For platforms like DLive, becoming what their users consider “free speech” and “uncensored” alternatives can be lucrative. “More speech also means more money for the platform, and less content moderation means less of an expense,” says Lewis.
The prospect of being pushed off main-stream social-media, video-streaming and payment platforms has also prompted extremists to become more sophisticated about the financial side of the business. While Twitch takes a 50% cut from livestreamers’ earnings and YouTube takes 45%, platforms like DLive allow content creators to keep 90% of what they make. And as many found themselves cut off from mainstream payment services like PayPal, GoFundMe and Patreon, they began to embrace digital currencies.
DLive was founded in December 2017 by Chinese-born and U.S.-educated entrepreneurs Charles Wayn and Cole Chen, who made no secret of their ambition to build a platform that rivaled Twitch. They described the site as a general-interest streaming platform, focused on everything from “e-sports to lifestyle, crypto and news.” But two things set it apart from its competitors: it did not take a cut of the revenue generated by its streamers, and it issued an implicit promise of a less moderated, more permissive space.
DLive’s first big coup came in April 2019 when it announced an exclusive streaming deal with Felix Kjellberg, known as PewDiePie. In just two months, DLive’s total number of users grew by 67%. At the time, Kjellberg was the most popular individual creator on YouTube, with more than 93 million subscribers and his own controversial history. In 2018, he came under fire for making anti-Semitic jokes and racist remarks, and more than 94,000 people signed a Change.org petition to ban his channel from YouTube for being a “platform for white-supremacist content.” The petition noted that “the New Zealand mosque shooter mentioned PewDiePie by name and asked people to subscribe.”
DLive’s community guidelines theoretically prohibit “hate speech that directly attacks a person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, disease, age, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity.” But it soon became apparent to both employees and users that executives were willing to ignore venomous content. By early 2019, “political” shows were gaining traction on the site. Those programs devolved into “streams dedicated to white pride and a lot of anti-Semitism, entire streams talking about how Jewish people are evil,” says the former DLive employee who spoke to TIME, adding that moderators acted much more quickly when it came to copyright concerns. “Your stream would be taken down faster for streaming sports than saying you hate Jews.”
The employee recalls raising the matter with Wayn, noting how off-putting it was for new users coming to watch or broadcast streams of popular video games. According to the employee, Wayn explained that the company “didn’t want to get rid of these problematic streamers because they brought in numbers.” The founders knew they had to keep viewers because, as Wayn noted in a 2019 interview, if they wanted to “compete with Twitch on the same level and even take them down one day, DLive needs to match its scale.” Wayn did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
By June 2020, DLive seemed to be openly cultivating a right-of-center audience. On Twitter, it briefly changed its bio to read “All Lives Matter,” a right-wing rallying cry in response to Black Lives Matter. The site has increasingly become a haven for fanaticism, says Joan Donovan, the research director of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center. “Before, on YouTube, some of these people would do a dance with the terms of service,” she tells TIME. “But on DLive, the gloves are off, and it’s just full white-supremacist content with very few caveats.”
On the night of June 29, Fuentes had 56% of the site’s total viewership at 10 p.m., according to the review of the site’s analytics provided to TIME. An additional 39% was viewers of 22 other extremist personalities streaming their commentary. At one point on the night of Aug. 10, just 176 of the more than 15,000 viewers on the top 20 channels on the site were not watching accounts linked to far-right figures. Popular programming in recent months has included alarmist footage of racial-justice protests, antivaccine propaganda, conspiracies linking 5G networks to the spread of COVID-19 and calls to “make more white babies while quarantined.”
The company may be even more reliant on those accounts now. Some users have left the site, complaining publicly about the virulent racism and anti-Semitism spilling over into regular channels and game streams. “DLive is a safe-haven for racists and alt-right streamers,” one user wrote on Twitter on June 22. “Seems to me DLive is the new platform for white supremacists,” wrote another, echoing complaints that it’s a “literal Nazi breeding ground” and “the place where racists don’t get deplatformed.”
The migration of hate speech to far-flung corners of the Internet could make it harder to track, increasing the risk that it spills into the offline world. Experts say law-enforcement and national-security agencies are still unprepared to tackle right-wing extremism. They lack expertise not only in the rapidly evolving technology but also in the ideological ecosystem that has spawned a battery of far-right movements. The recently repackaged white-nationalist youth movement, with new names like “America First” or the “Groypers,” looks more like “gussied-up campus conservatives,” as Friedberg of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center puts it, “so they are not triggering the same warning bells.”
Recent incidents show how this online environment that blends political commentary and hate speech can be dangerous. An 18-year-old accused of firebombing a Delaware Planned Parenthood clinic in January was identified through his Instagram profile, which contained far-right memes reflecting popular beliefs in the young white-nationalist movement, according to BuzzFeed News. In June, Facebook deactivated nearly 200 social-media accounts with ties to white-nationalist groups rallying members to attend Black Lives Matter protests, in some cases armed with weapons.
Analysts who track extremist recruitment online also warn that the pandemic may have long-term effects on young people who are now spending far more time on the Internet. Without the structure of school and social activities, many children and teenagers are spending hours a day in spaces where extremist content lurks alongside games and other benign entertainment, says Dana Coester, an associate professor at West Virginia University who researches the impact of online white extremism on youth in Appalachia. It’s common, she notes, to see teenagers sharing Black Lives Matter messages alongside racist cartoons from popular Instagram accounts targeting middle schoolers. “So many parents I’ve spoken with say their kids are on devices until 3 in the morning,” she says. “I can’t begin to imagine how much damage can be done with kids that many hours a day marinating in really toxic content.”
Analysts warn that both U.S. law enforcement and big technology companies need to move quickly to hire experts who understand this new extremist ecosystem. Experts say the mainstream platforms’ recent purges are reactive: they patch yesterday’s problems instead of preventing future abuses, and focus on high-profile provocateurs instead of the underlying networks.
One solution may be to follow the money, as content creators migrate to new platforms in search of new financial opportunities. “[White supremacists] have become particularly as-siduous at exploiting new methods of fundraising, often seeking out platforms that have not yet realized how extremists can exploit them,” said George Selim, senior vice president of programs of the Anti-Defamation League, in testimony before a House subcommittee in January. “When a new fund-raising method or platform emerges, white supremacists can find a window of opportunity. These windows can, however, be shut if platforms promptly take countermeasures.”
On the evening of Aug. 11, Joe Biden’s pick of Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate dominated the news. “She hates white people,” Fuentes told viewers on DLive. “She is going to use the full weight of the federal government 
 to destroy conservatives, to destroy America First, anybody that speaks up for white people.” NBC and ABC News–which have a combined 13 million subscribers on YouTube–had an average of 6,100 concurrent viewers watching their coverage. Fuentes’ show had 9,000.
–With reporting by ALEJANDRO DE LA GARZA/NEW YORK
0 notes