#industrial eqipment

[industrialfansmanufacturer]

Premier Industrial Fan Manufacturer in India for Superior Air Movement Solutions

Blowerfab is an Indian industrial fan manufacturing company that designs value engineered robust fans with high quality performance, suitable for industrial usage and dependable about efficiency. A very wide range of centrifugal and axial flow fans supplied to the respective manufacturing, chemical processing, and power generation industries among others. Product design aimed to ensure energy-efficient, long-term service life facilitates optimized airflow and minimizes production costs with improved workplace safety through Blowerfab solutions. Blowerfab offers the innovative, customized ventilation solutions for attacking the toughest industrial environments. Contact Blowerfab today for the perfect industrial fan solution!

[saumitgroup]

Advanced FRP Equipment Supplier

We’re proud to share that Saumit InterGlobe Pvt. Ltd. is the leading FRP equipment supplier in India. Our state-of-the-art equipment is designed to meet the diverse needs of industries including chemical, water treatment, and construction.

Discover how our advanced FRP equipment can transform your operations.

For more info, visit https://www.saumitgroup.com/frp-eqipment/

[highplanes456]

Beginning Farmer Loans American Agcredit

The Beginning Farmer Chattel Loan program assists beginning ranchers with the acquisition of kit and livestock. Retiring farmers may use this program to transfer their land to future generations. FSA provides up to $500,000 for storage services and $100,000 for storage and handling vans for eligible debtors through Farm Storage Facility Loans. For Sugar Storage Facility Loans, the maximum principal amount of any loan is calculated as 85 % of the net value of the applicant’s wanted storage.

These applications allow for versatile financing options to get your operation off the bottom rapidly. This investment is nicely managed by new and beginning farmers; the delinquency fee for beginning farmers within this program is 1.5%. To go more into element, the FSA is a “lender of final resort.” As opposed to looking at your credit score, they look into your credit score historical past and the reasons why your score could also be low. In fact, to get an FSA microloan, you must have been denied a industrial loan elsewhere. Since we’re talking about acquiring land with no down fee, we’ll be referring to ownership loans in this weblog post.

Equipment is depreciable and loses value yearly, and rents can increase or be terminated, making renting a possible riskier proposition over the lengthy term. Personalize your expertise with Penn State Extension and keep informed of the newest in agriculture. A three-year incentive will be supplied to those who use our information program at the facet first time farmer loans of a loan relationship. Sweet 16 Financial Indicator calculations - This handout provides an summary of the Sweet 16 financial indicators promoted by the Farm Financial Standards Council. These indicators give attention to liquidity, solvency, profitability, debt compensation capability, and efficiency. For an outline of all loans provided by the USDA Farm Service Agency.

The FSA assure permits lenders to make agricultural credit obtainable to producers who do not meet the lender’s normal underwriting criteria. EQIP most immediately supports increased opportunity, including via serving to producers handle important pure young farmer loans useful resource issues, and enhance the viability of their operations. As one example of this program at work, this program can assist hoop houses, that are recognized to extend a farmer’s rising season and improve conservation of water and natural resources.

You can form a solid foundation with Plains Land Bank because of our loan program that makes allowances for your distinctive circumstances. Young Farmer Loans – Provided to farmers, ranchers and harvesters of aquatic products who're 35 or younger. Established by the Farm Credit Act of 1971, the Young, Beginning & Small Loan Program was born and Plains Land Bank created programming to assist a new generation of producers. Financing was additionally secured so as to keep small farms alive, a lot of which have been in existence for decades.

Every farmer, when starting a farm business, has needed to take care of how to finance his/her operation. Parental financing, the native financial institution or Farm Service Agency financing and state government financing are all possible funding sources. Beginning-farmer and land-link packages throughout the nation join new farmers with retiring farmers to help within the transition of land and/or a farm business operation. These programs can facilitate transitions within a family or make matches across households primarily based on a synchronicity of targets, values, character sorts, etc. The combination of an older farmer’s wealth and expertise and a younger farmer’s energy can convey about a fruitful farm transition under the proper circumstances.

Finance tools, land, or production bills associated to farming and ranching, with varied repayment phrases. Finally, we have hyperlinks to a number of private lenders, a quantity of of which provide beginning farmer loans loans particularly geared towards beginning farmers. In addition to our farm applications, there are numerous leadership alternatives for beginning farmers to contribute their voices and experience.

TIP is a program administered by FSA to help producers transition land presently enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program to a BFR, or an individual in other underserved teams, who will return the land back to manufacturing uses. CRP is designed to devote environmentally delicate land to conservation for a length of 10 to fifteen years. BFRs in addition to CRP individuals might enroll in the TIP program two years earlier than 1. The $50 million finances authorized within the 2018 Farm Bill for the CRP program is reached. A general conservation agreement is required for most USDA programs, but there are also quite so much of programs all producers can participate in for specific conservation initiatives and practices.

[ecofriendlydogtravelbottle]

Eco-Friendly Dog Travel Bottle - Your Pets Own Personal Equipment

What is the most important thing you never forget to carry along on your hiking trip? A water bottle, right? When hiking, your little pet needs his accessories as well. The industry has been quite progressive for animal accessories. And if you want a perfect one for your little friend, then this Eco-Friendly Dog travel bottle is perfect for you. 

A perfect bottle for your homie

The Jojo Modern Pets Eco-Friendly Silicone Dog Travelling Water Bottle is ideal for hiking, walking, excursions to the dog park, road trips, holidays, and any other time you're away from home.

This water bottle is composed of high-quality silicone that is odorless, long-lasting, dishwasher-safe, and simple to use. This bottle is made of food-grade silicone that is BPA-free. Better goods improve the quality of life for dogs and cats!

Make your walks more pleasurable.

This 16 oz traveling bottle of water is made from soft silicone and can be simply collapsed to fit within your luggage when empty. Silicone is also less harmful to the environment than plastic, making it a good choice for those who care about the environment.

Portable and useful

It is made from soft silicone and is ideal for any journey. With a carabiner buckle, it is lightweight and simple to carry. It can be clipped into belt loops, backpacks, collars, and other places. Moreover, you can easily wash it in the dishwasher.

Large and leak-proof

This bottle has a capacity of 16 ounces. The liquid does not flow through the leak-proof covers. Made up of three components that may be separated for easy cleaning. The cap doubles as a plastic cup.

Learn more about Eco-Friendly Dog Travel Bottle - Your Pets Own Personal Eqipment ! For more information, please visit: https://earthflourish.shop/

[peckira]

Rising in globalization  and massive advancement in technology to adapt content and formats in the language spoken in different countries Even though English is a widely spoken language, many countries prefer the content in the local language.Media translation is the conversion of the language of all the media and entertainment content into a particular language. we PEC translation are eqipped with certified and skilled tranlators that are experts in various languages and konwledgeable about media and entertainment industry. we provide tranlation service that you demand.

[procrastinatingfeminist]

As much as I dislike going to movies alone and would probably be the target audience for the new model, I also am going on the side of AMC. Because accessibility is one big point, but there are also others.

There are not a lot of us who has a home cinema, and since movie blockbusters often tend to have big fighting scenes with several explosions and thousands of characters, I don’t see that watching it on my itty-bitty notebook as doing favors either to myself nor to the movie.

3D-experience? Forget it. I am not buying the eqipment for watchig 3-D movies on my shitty screen, my eyes are bad enough already.

The social aspect of movie watching? Meeting with friends, bying popcorn and soda, and debates before to decide what we watch and afterwards debating whether to go for cocktails. Not the same in someones living room.

And while people in dying industries (*cough*coal mining*cough*oil rigs*cough) can and should have access to learn new skills and change jobs, we all know that employers won’t to that and in the meantime a lot of those jobs will fall to the wayside.

Experimentation with new viewing techniques - like 3D, there are also 360 degrees cinemas, cinemas with moving seats who prize themselves on 4D-exp., and I am certain other things I am not aware of - will halt; it won’t be sustainable for the few nostalgia and indie outlets who will survive to invest into these. Though I am interested in how the direction and cutting will change to accomodate the way of release - I remember how after Avatar suddenly every movie had a scene with things flying towards the camera.

There are ways to divide the cake. Windowing is one way. If I am not going to watch a movie on a big screen anyway, the theater doesn’t lose my money, but a secondary release in streaming might still reach me. If I like movie enough and want to show my support, I might even catch it on both. But this being capitalism, I am very sceptical.

Are they SURE they meant to write the word “ruined” instead of “liberated film from the stranglehold of?” Maybe their hand slipped??????????????????

[jinalsinghvi8]

Why Indoor game play essential role in Kids Growth

A child's playtime should be an indulging and fun experience. But the threat of accidents or other dangers can make this difficult to achieve. Kids indoor play equipment is a great solution for parents who want their kids to play in a safe and exciting environment that lets them enjoy themselves without risking injury or other hardships. With the proper equipment, children can get the most out of their time playing outside, in ways that will help them develop physically, socially, emotionally, and academically. The right combination of equipment and games can give your kids plenty of fun options while teaching them skills that can carry over into their daily lives.

When you first walk into a indoor playground, you would be amazed at the number of activities that it offers. Playing with slides, play houses, jungle gyms, tumbling areas and various kinds of ride on toys is what makes kid indoors playground so much fun and an exciting playtime experience for the kid.

There is nothing like the fun of a play session when you are young. Benefit Kid Indoor Play Equipment has been designed to harness the creativity in a child and bring out the best, ultimately enabling them to achieve more in life. Maheshwari Play is a leading Indoor play equipment manufacturer that has been designed keeping in mind the needs of parents.

Our kid indoor play eqipment is one of the best in the industry. We ensure you that all our toys are made out of quality material and tested for safety. That’s why we are proud to say that none of our toys or games will ever shatter into too small pieces that can cause choking hazards when swallowed. Our in-house designers have spent a lot time creating eco-friendly, attractive games with fun sound effects and graphics, so your kids will never get bored with our toys. We are leading Kids Play toy supplier in Mumbai.

Author Bio

 I am working for Yug Technology. We are the leading Web Designing and Digital marketing company in India. We help you to grow your business.

For More Details

9960700931

maheshwariplay@gmail.com    

[industrialfansmanufacturer]

Industrial Fans Made in India: Superior Quality and Performance Guaranteed

Choose an industrial fan manufacturer in India known for superior quality and unmatched performance. Our wide range of industrial fans is designed to withstand extreme conditions while providing efficient airflow and ventilation. Backed by cutting-edge technology and a commitment to customer satisfaction, our fans are the perfect choice for all your industrial needs.

[sabrinawhill]

Final EQIP Rule Announced with New Enhancements

Final EQIP Rule Announced with New Enhancements

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) recently announced its updated rule for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). The final EQIP rule makes updates to the program that were part of the 2018 Farm Bill. Changes to the program have been made with input from agricultural producers and a variety of industry stakeholders. More than 600 comments were submitted since the…

[easyfoodnetwork]

Where Does Joe Biden Stand on Climate and Agriculture?

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The Democratic presidential candidate supports a zero-emissions goal for ag and wants to incentivize carbon markets, but his platform makes no mention of animal agriculture or organic farming

This story was originally published on Civil Eats.

Last fall — in debates, Town Hall meetings, and interviews — nearly every Democratic presidential candidate pointed to connections between food production and the climate crisis.

And the similarities went further than that: a whopping 10 candidates agreed that the next administration should pay farmers to adopt climate-friendly practices. Nearly as many also pointed to the need for regenerative practices that make soil a carbon sink, rather than a source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Now, as the general election looms, the Biden agenda and the Democratic Party’s 2020 platform both include a “zero emissions” goal for agriculture as well as increased investment in conservation practices.

Meanwhile, the climate crisis is front and center like never before, with unprecedented wildfires raging on the West Coast and devastating storms hitting Iowa, Louisiana, and other states. And while Biden has been out in front on linking the current catastrophes to climate, big questions remain about precisely how a potential Biden administration will approach farming for the climate, and farmer groups, agribusiness, and environmental advocates are all jockeying to exert their influence.

Progressive groups are working to push Biden’s campaign toward endorsing bigger systemic changes to agriculture.

“National Farmers Union members have long raised concerns about the fact that the climate is changing, that it’s affecting their operations and their lands, and that there are common-sense ways the government should work with farmers to help provide them with the tools and resources they need to lead on solutions,” said Jenny Hopkinson, senior government relations representative at the National Farmers Union (NFU).

That’s why when NFU members headed (virtually) to Washington, D.C. on September 14, climate change was on the agenda in meetings with legislators — even during a year when, for many farmers, it’s hard to focus on anything beyond the economic challenges caused by the pandemic. However, while Hopkinson calls the strategies NFU lobbied for “common sense,” other groups lobbying Democrats see some of the same policies — such as NFU’s support for methane digesters — short-sighted.

In fact, when it comes to building a resilient agricultural system that can both withstand the effects of the climate crisis and cut emissions, there is significant disagreement among advocacy groups and elected officials within the party as to just how radical the path forward should be.

While representatives of larger commodity agriculture (think industrial dairy) are advising Biden, progressive groups are working to push his campaign toward endorsing bigger systemic changes to agriculture. And those are changes that won’t likely please agribusiness.

At the end of August, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) delivered a letter to Congress that called for climate action on behalf of rural and agricultural communities, signed by more than 2,100 farmers and ranchers from around the country.

“There is a real desire to see transformative change in our agricultural production system,” said NSAC policy director Eric Deeble. “And many of those folks are frustrated by the fact that it does not appear to be a high priority for either potential administration. Within progressive, sustainable agriculture circles, he added, “folks don’t feel that their voices are being heard.”

Consensus on incentives, disagreement elsewhere

When adjusted for inflation, overall spending on U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation programs has risen only slightly over the past decade. Now, the one realm in which many Democratic lawmakers appear to agree is the need to significantly increase funding and expand programs that incentivize climate-friendly practices including cover cropping and rotational grazing.

In June, the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis released its first report, including a section dedicated to agriculture. It lays out plans to expand existing agricultural conservation programs such as the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) and the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and to support practices including agroforestry and organic farming.

Many of the recommendations in the report are tied to bills introduced by Democrats, such as the Agriculture Resilience Act introduced by Representative Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and the Climate Stewardship Act introduced by Senator Cory Booker (D-New Jersey). And when the Senate Democrats’ Special Committee on the Climate Crisis released its own report in August, the first bullet point on what Congress should do for farmers is to “expand existing USDA agricultural conservation programs and include improved soil health and soil carbon storage incentives.”

Another approach to incentivizing carbon storage that the Senate report endorses is establishing carbon markets — a strategy that many powerful voices in the agriculture industry opposed when it was on the table a decade ago. Biden’s plan for rural America also appears to lean toward helping farmers participate in carbon markets. And some environmental organizations and many big food companies and farm groups including the NFU support the bipartisan carbon markets bill that was introduced in June.

“We think that carbon markets are a tool that should be available to farmers and we’re hoping that this bill will lend some legitimacy to the nascent efforts [to develop them],” Hopkinson said.

Some advocacy groups, however, say carbon markets will only benefit the largest farms. Kari Hamerschlag, the deputy director of food and agriculture at Friends of the Earth (FOE) and its related PAC group, Friends of the Earth Action, doesn’t see voluntary markets as a strong enough step considering the urgency of the climate crisis. Instead, she wants to see subsidized crop insurance tied to practices that improve soil health — a tactic that many groups advocated for during the run-up to the 2018 Farm Bill but that didn’t make it into the final draft.

“If we are going to continue to provide subsidies, we need to ask farmers, in return, to implement healthy soil practices,” she says, adding that she sees carbon markets as “another false solution.”

Ethanol and other biofuels are also controversial. At a recent “Farmers and Ranchers Roundtable” hosted by the Biden campaign and moderated by NFU president Rob Larew, farmers brought up support for biofuels repeatedly, and NFU has long advocated for government support for ethanol as a financial boon for farmers and a climate-positive swap for fossil fuels.

But many progressive groups believe government support for ethanol props up the corn-dominated monoculture systems that dominate American farming in the Midwest, leading to depleted soil, polluted waterways, and dead zones in the Gulf. And they point to industry influence as a reason Biden still supports ethanol: The Democratic convention included a “Leaders of American Agriculture” symposium sponsored by a long list of seed and chemical companies that profit off of that system, including Bayer/Monsanto and Corteva, as well as the leading trade association for the ethanol industry. And last week, the Washington Post reported on the Biden campaign’s efforts to woo Iowa farmers by touting Biden’s support for ethanol and other biofuels.

Animal agriculture’s climate impacts

“The biggest thing that is missing from both the Biden plan and the DNC platform is a focus on the role of animal agriculture in generating greenhouse gas emissions and the need to curb those emissions through reducing the overall amount of animals that are produced in this country,” said Hamerschlag.

In July, eight national and state-level groups including Family Farm Action, the Land Stewardship Action Fund, and HEAL Food Action joined Friends of the Earth Action in asking the DNC platform committee to endorse a transition away from industrial-scale animal agriculture “starting with a moratorium on new Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) and large-scale food and agriculture mergers.” But the final platform did not include any mention of animal agriculture.

The Biden campaign has so far stayed away from mentioning emissions from animal agriculture.

Elected Democrats, however, are increasingly focused on the issue. Last year, Senator Booker introduced a bill to halt mergers and acquisitions in agriculture and the Farm System Reform Act, which would place a moratorium on new large CAFOs and phase out the largest existing CAFOs by 2040. Then, this summer, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) and Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont), signed on to back the bill, and House Democrats introduced companion legislation. In early September, a coalition of 300 advocacy groups sent a letter to Congress urging lawmakers to pass the bill.

Recent polls show increasing public support for a moratorium on large CAFOs, and progressive Democrats are increasingly focusing on not just the negative environmental impacts, but also on the impact on farmers and rural communities. While NSAC has not endorsed Booker’s bill, Deeble said it was clear that NSAC’s “membership is headed in that direction” in terms of supporting a moratorium.

Despite all this, the Biden campaign has so far stayed away from mentioning emissions from animal agriculture, except in the context of methane digesters, an emissions-reduction strategy that some environmentalists say props up and even incentivizes the growth of large CAFOs, allowing them to continue to pollute in other ways.

Advocates say the Biden campaign’s silence isn’t surprising, since Tom Vilsack — the Agriculture Secretary under Obama, and who now represents a dairy group focused on large-scale exports — is advising the campaign. “There’s no way he’s going to be advocating for regulation of his industry,” Hamerschlag said.

There are also reports that Biden is considering former North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp to lead the USDA. In 2018, Heitkamp ranked number one in Senate campaign donations from the crop production industry. She frequently sided with Republicans on resisting environmental regulations and was a frontrunner to head the USDA under President Trump.

And, instead of a panel that included small, diversified vegetable farms, regenerative ranchers, or organic crop farmers, the farmers given the microphone during the Biden campaign’s Farmers and Ranchers Roundtable were primarily large commodity producers.

“Given the fact that local and regional direct market farmers play such an integral role in resilient local farm systems, that was a missed opportunity,” said Deeble. “But I also think that it’s not the fault of the campaign. We’re looking at the end of maybe a 30, 40, 50-year arc of concentration and consolidation and there’s a notion that not rocking any boats is the right play right now.”

And yet, there’s a real opportunity to talk about what a better system would look like. Biden’s plan, for example, does include a bullet point to make sure “small and medium-sized farms have access to fair markets” by strengthening enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act — something small farm advocates have long been fighting for.

For NSAC members and other groups, a better system would involve policies that drive large scale shifts away from monoculture commodity crops and CAFOs and toward more small, diversified farms that minimize inputs, raise animals on pasture, and sell food directly to their communities — all with an eye towards reducing emissions and building soil that can hold carbon while increasing biodiversity.

A growing number of Democrats are on board with those changes. The Farm System Reform Act includes support for independent livestock producers in the form of payments to help contract farmers transition out of industrial animal agriculture and a restoration of country of origin labeling (COOL) on meat. The House Climate report includes a plan to reduce emissions from livestock operations by significantly increasing support for farmers using rotational grazing and silvopasture.

And Democrats have introduced bills in both the House and Senate that would increase funding for small farms that sell into local markets, many of which were left out of the USDA’s Coronavirus Food Assistance Program.

But where Biden and his potential administration will land is still unclear. Progressives like Hamerschlag said that if the campaign were bolder on agriculture and climate, it could present a more hopeful path forward for rural America.

For example, the 2020 DNC platform includes a plan to fund research on “low-carbon crops” and organic farming, but Biden’s plan does not mention organics at all.

“Organic is such a bright spot for rural America . . . there’s just a lot of economic opportunity,” she said. “Big factory farms and big monocultures are not a winning economic development strategy for rural America, and we know that rural communities bear the brunt of the impacts from factory farms.”

This story originally appeared in Civil Eats and is republished here as part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story.

from Eater - All https://ift.tt/33JmT1q https://ift.tt/3kRwXg7

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The Democratic presidential candidate supports a zero-emissions goal for ag and wants to incentivize carbon markets, but his platform makes no mention of animal agriculture or organic farming

This story was originally published on Civil Eats.

Last fall — in debates, Town Hall meetings, and interviews — nearly every Democratic presidential candidate pointed to connections between food production and the climate crisis.

And the similarities went further than that: a whopping 10 candidates agreed that the next administration should pay farmers to adopt climate-friendly practices. Nearly as many also pointed to the need for regenerative practices that make soil a carbon sink, rather than a source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Now, as the general election looms, the Biden agenda and the Democratic Party’s 2020 platform both include a “zero emissions” goal for agriculture as well as increased investment in conservation practices.

Meanwhile, the climate crisis is front and center like never before, with unprecedented wildfires raging on the West Coast and devastating storms hitting Iowa, Louisiana, and other states. And while Biden has been out in front on linking the current catastrophes to climate, big questions remain about precisely how a potential Biden administration will approach farming for the climate, and farmer groups, agribusiness, and environmental advocates are all jockeying to exert their influence.

Progressive groups are working to push Biden’s campaign toward endorsing bigger systemic changes to agriculture.

“National Farmers Union members have long raised concerns about the fact that the climate is changing, that it’s affecting their operations and their lands, and that there are common-sense ways the government should work with farmers to help provide them with the tools and resources they need to lead on solutions,” said Jenny Hopkinson, senior government relations representative at the National Farmers Union (NFU).

That’s why when NFU members headed (virtually) to Washington, D.C. on September 14, climate change was on the agenda in meetings with legislators — even during a year when, for many farmers, it’s hard to focus on anything beyond the economic challenges caused by the pandemic. However, while Hopkinson calls the strategies NFU lobbied for “common sense,” other groups lobbying Democrats see some of the same policies — such as NFU’s support for methane digesters — short-sighted.

In fact, when it comes to building a resilient agricultural system that can both withstand the effects of the climate crisis and cut emissions, there is significant disagreement among advocacy groups and elected officials within the party as to just how radical the path forward should be.

While representatives of larger commodity agriculture (think industrial dairy) are advising Biden, progressive groups are working to push his campaign toward endorsing bigger systemic changes to agriculture. And those are changes that won’t likely please agribusiness.

At the end of August, National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) delivered a letter to Congress that called for climate action on behalf of rural and agricultural communities, signed by more than 2,100 farmers and ranchers from around the country.

“There is a real desire to see transformative change in our agricultural production system,” said NSAC policy director Eric Deeble. “And many of those folks are frustrated by the fact that it does not appear to be a high priority for either potential administration. Within progressive, sustainable agriculture circles, he added, “folks don’t feel that their voices are being heard.”

Consensus on incentives, disagreement elsewhere

When adjusted for inflation, overall spending on U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation programs has risen only slightly over the past decade. Now, the one realm in which many Democratic lawmakers appear to agree is the need to significantly increase funding and expand programs that incentivize climate-friendly practices including cover cropping and rotational grazing.

In June, the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis released its first report, including a section dedicated to agriculture. It lays out plans to expand existing agricultural conservation programs such as the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) and the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and to support practices including agroforestry and organic farming.

Many of the recommendations in the report are tied to bills introduced by Democrats, such as the Agriculture Resilience Act introduced by Representative Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and the Climate Stewardship Act introduced by Senator Cory Booker (D-New Jersey). And when the Senate Democrats’ Special Committee on the Climate Crisis released its own report in August, the first bullet point on what Congress should do for farmers is to “expand existing USDA agricultural conservation programs and include improved soil health and soil carbon storage incentives.”

Another approach to incentivizing carbon storage that the Senate report endorses is establishing carbon markets — a strategy that many powerful voices in the agriculture industry opposed when it was on the table a decade ago. Biden’s plan for rural America also appears to lean toward helping farmers participate in carbon markets. And some environmental organizations and many big food companies and farm groups including the NFU support the bipartisan carbon markets bill that was introduced in June.

“We think that carbon markets are a tool that should be available to farmers and we’re hoping that this bill will lend some legitimacy to the nascent efforts [to develop them],” Hopkinson said.

Some advocacy groups, however, say carbon markets will only benefit the largest farms. Kari Hamerschlag, the deputy director of food and agriculture at Friends of the Earth (FOE) and its related PAC group, Friends of the Earth Action, doesn’t see voluntary markets as a strong enough step considering the urgency of the climate crisis. Instead, she wants to see subsidized crop insurance tied to practices that improve soil health — a tactic that many groups advocated for during the run-up to the 2018 Farm Bill but that didn’t make it into the final draft.

“If we are going to continue to provide subsidies, we need to ask farmers, in return, to implement healthy soil practices,” she says, adding that she sees carbon markets as “another false solution.”

Ethanol and other biofuels are also controversial. At a recent “Farmers and Ranchers Roundtable” hosted by the Biden campaign and moderated by NFU president Rob Larew, farmers brought up support for biofuels repeatedly, and NFU has long advocated for government support for ethanol as a financial boon for farmers and a climate-positive swap for fossil fuels.

But many progressive groups believe government support for ethanol props up the corn-dominated monoculture systems that dominate American farming in the Midwest, leading to depleted soil, polluted waterways, and dead zones in the Gulf. And they point to industry influence as a reason Biden still supports ethanol: The Democratic convention included a “Leaders of American Agriculture” symposium sponsored by a long list of seed and chemical companies that profit off of that system, including Bayer/Monsanto and Corteva, as well as the leading trade association for the ethanol industry. And last week, the Washington Post reported on the Biden campaign’s efforts to woo Iowa farmers by touting Biden’s support for ethanol and other biofuels.

Animal agriculture’s climate impacts

“The biggest thing that is missing from both the Biden plan and the DNC platform is a focus on the role of animal agriculture in generating greenhouse gas emissions and the need to curb those emissions through reducing the overall amount of animals that are produced in this country,” said Hamerschlag.

In July, eight national and state-level groups including Family Farm Action, the Land Stewardship Action Fund, and HEAL Food Action joined Friends of the Earth Action in asking the DNC platform committee to endorse a transition away from industrial-scale animal agriculture “starting with a moratorium on new Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) and large-scale food and agriculture mergers.” But the final platform did not include any mention of animal agriculture.

The Biden campaign has so far stayed away from mentioning emissions from animal agriculture.

Elected Democrats, however, are increasingly focused on the issue. Last year, Senator Booker introduced a bill to halt mergers and acquisitions in agriculture and the Farm System Reform Act, which would place a moratorium on new large CAFOs and phase out the largest existing CAFOs by 2040. Then, this summer, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) and Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont), signed on to back the bill, and House Democrats introduced companion legislation. In early September, a coalition of 300 advocacy groups sent a letter to Congress urging lawmakers to pass the bill.

Recent polls show increasing public support for a moratorium on large CAFOs, and progressive Democrats are increasingly focusing on not just the negative environmental impacts, but also on the impact on farmers and rural communities. While NSAC has not endorsed Booker’s bill, Deeble said it was clear that NSAC’s “membership is headed in that direction” in terms of supporting a moratorium.

Despite all this, the Biden campaign has so far stayed away from mentioning emissions from animal agriculture, except in the context of methane digesters, an emissions-reduction strategy that some environmentalists say props up and even incentivizes the growth of large CAFOs, allowing them to continue to pollute in other ways.

Advocates say the Biden campaign’s silence isn’t surprising, since Tom Vilsack — the Agriculture Secretary under Obama, and who now represents a dairy group focused on large-scale exports — is advising the campaign. “There’s no way he’s going to be advocating for regulation of his industry,” Hamerschlag said.

There are also reports that Biden is considering former North Dakota Senator Heidi Heitkamp to lead the USDA. In 2018, Heitkamp ranked number one in Senate campaign donations from the crop production industry. She frequently sided with Republicans on resisting environmental regulations and was a frontrunner to head the USDA under President Trump.

And, instead of a panel that included small, diversified vegetable farms, regenerative ranchers, or organic crop farmers, the farmers given the microphone during the Biden campaign’s Farmers and Ranchers Roundtable were primarily large commodity producers.

“Given the fact that local and regional direct market farmers play such an integral role in resilient local farm systems, that was a missed opportunity,” said Deeble. “But I also think that it’s not the fault of the campaign. We’re looking at the end of maybe a 30, 40, 50-year arc of concentration and consolidation and there’s a notion that not rocking any boats is the right play right now.”

And yet, there’s a real opportunity to talk about what a better system would look like. Biden’s plan, for example, does include a bullet point to make sure “small and medium-sized farms have access to fair markets” by strengthening enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act — something small farm advocates have long been fighting for.

For NSAC members and other groups, a better system would involve policies that drive large scale shifts away from monoculture commodity crops and CAFOs and toward more small, diversified farms that minimize inputs, raise animals on pasture, and sell food directly to their communities — all with an eye towards reducing emissions and building soil that can hold carbon while increasing biodiversity.

A growing number of Democrats are on board with those changes. The Farm System Reform Act includes support for independent livestock producers in the form of payments to help contract farmers transition out of industrial animal agriculture and a restoration of country of origin labeling (COOL) on meat. The House Climate report includes a plan to reduce emissions from livestock operations by significantly increasing support for farmers using rotational grazing and silvopasture.

And Democrats have introduced bills in both the House and Senate that would increase funding for small farms that sell into local markets, many of which were left out of the USDA’s Coronavirus Food Assistance Program.

But where Biden and his potential administration will land is still unclear. Progressives like Hamerschlag said that if the campaign were bolder on agriculture and climate, it could present a more hopeful path forward for rural America.

For example, the 2020 DNC platform includes a plan to fund research on “low-carbon crops” and organic farming, but Biden’s plan does not mention organics at all.

“Organic is such a bright spot for rural America . . . there’s just a lot of economic opportunity,” she said. “Big factory farms and big monocultures are not a winning economic development strategy for rural America, and we know that rural communities bear the brunt of the impacts from factory farms.”

This story originally appeared in Civil Eats and is republished here as part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story.

from Eater - All https://ift.tt/33JmT1q via Blogger https://ift.tt/3ckee9R

[industrialfansmanufacturer]

Customized Industrial Fan Manufacturer in India for Challenging Environments

Blowerfab is a renowned industrial fan manufacturer in India, providing tailored solutions like corrosion-resistant and high-temperature fans suitable for harsh industrial environments. Our advanced engineering and precision manufacturing ensure reliable airflow management for sectors such as food processing, cement, and mining.

[letsbreakhearts]

@sunkiisscd​​ allowed me to spam them. Stark industry times and a young spidey of our choosing

“Hand that over to me! Kids your age shouldn’t be trusted with such valuable eqipment!” 

[ellingtonboots]

COMMENT: Progress Toward Building More Sustainable Food System Threatened by Cut

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Reana Kovalcik National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition 202-547-5754, rkovalcik@sustainableagriculture.net

Progress Toward Building a More Sustainable Food System Threatened by Cuts Attacks on key programs would undermine Congress’ recent progress

Washington, DC, May 9, 2018 – The budget and appropriations news released this week, which includes the House’s passage of their FY 2019 Agriculture Appropriations bill and the Administration’s release of a $15 billion rescission package, has serious implications for American farmers and ranchers. In response to the release of the aforementioned appropriations and budget proposals, the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) released the following statement:

“In the last two appropriations bills, NSAC has applauded Congress for funding the programs that help to ensure a profitable and sustainable future for American producers” said Greg Fogel, NSAC Policy Director.

“In the recently passed FY 2018 appropriations package, Congress chose to reject the Administration’s proposal to cut funds from the popular Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) and Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP),” said Fogel. “In the bill marked up by the House Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee today, we were once again heartened to see these critical conservation programs, which already struggle to meet producer demand, emerge with their funding intact. The Subcommittee’s bill also provided crucial funds for programs that support rural entrepreneurship (Value-Added Producer Grants), provide technical assistance for sustainable agriculture (ATTRA), and serve our socially disadvantaged, veteran, and beginning farmers (FSA loan programs, and the Outreach and Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged and Veteran Farmers and Ranchers program).”

“However, by choosing to cut funding for sustainable agriculture research (cut by 14 percent), organic transition research (cut by 20 percent), and food safety training for small and mid-sized farmers (cut by 29 percent), the House threatens to undermine the very progress that it has so recently helped to achieve. We hope that as the bill moves forward through the legislative process, the House will protect these programs that support the integral diversity of our agricultural industry.”

“Finally,” said Fogel, “we must address the Administration’s proposed rescission package. We are alarmed by the proposed cuts to EQIP and Value-Added Producer Grants (VAPG), both of which have a proven track record of success and are widely lauded throughout the agricultural community. These programs provide a crucial service to food producing families and rural entrepreneurs, helping them to take their businesses to the next level through technical support, training, and funding support. It would be not only deeply ironic, but also incredibly harmful, for Congress to pass a FY 2019 funding bill with VAPG and EQIP funded only to reduce funding for the very same programs in the rescissions package. We strongly urge Congress to remove these programs from consideration for rescissions prior to voting on the Administration’s proposal.”

###

About the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition is a grassroots alliance that advocates for federal policy reform supporting the long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability of agriculture, natural resources, and rural communities. Learn more and get involved at: http://sustainableagriculture.net

The post COMMENT: Progress Toward Building More Sustainable Food System Threatened by Cut appeared first on National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.

from National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition https://ift.tt/2K8UwhU

from Grow your own https://ift.tt/2wtRkLJ from Get Your Oganic Groove On https://ift.tt/2I2Qdbn