#indian intelligence agency report
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
I am not excited about Harris as a candidate, but I will be voting for her in this upcoming election. This is why→
(full transcript under the cut)
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
“Transgender ideology” to be classified as pornography & excluded from First Amendment protection. Authors who produce & distribute it threatened with prison. Educators & public librarians who share it classed as registered sex offenders. communications & technology firms that facilitate its spread shuttered. -Project 2025, page 5
Delete the terms sexual orientation, gender identity, diversity, equity, & inclusion, gender equality, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, out of every federal rule, contract, grant, regulation, & piece of legislation that exist. -Project 2025 page 5
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. -Project 2025, page 141
Increase all fees for asylum applications, limit the availability of fee waivers. -Project 2025, page 146
Mandatory appropriation for border wall system infrastructure. -Project 2025, page 147
Deny loan access to those who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents & deny loan access to students at schools that provide in-state tuition to illegal aliens. -Project 2025, page 167
Ensure that only U.S. citizens & lawful permanent residents utilize or occupy federally subsidized housing. -Project 2025, page 167
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Encourage intelligence agencies not to waste effort collecting surveillance data when they can buy it from private sector facial recognition companies. -Project 2025, page 206
Defund the Corporation for Public Broadcast, specifically NPR & PBS educational programs like Sesame Street. -Project 2025, pages 246-247
The USDA will not be able to place environmental issues ahead of agricultural production. Reconsider the Food Stamps program. -Project 2025, page 290
Labeling regulations that unnecessarily delay the manufacture & sale of baby formula should be re-evaluated. -Project 2025, page 302
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Eliminate the Community Eligibility Program which allows school districts with high rates of poverty to offer meals to all students without having to qualify each student individually. No longer provide meals to students during the summer unless students are taking summer-school classes. -Project 2025, page 303
No public education employee shall use a pronoun in addressing a student that is different from that student’s biological sex without written permission of the parents or guardians. -Project 2025 page 346
Delete reporting on which educational institutions claim religious exemption from Title IX. -Project 2025 page 357
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Gut the Office for Civil Rights’ power to prosecute any kind of discrimination in public schools. -Project 2025, page 357
Eliminate the Office of Fossil Energy & Carbon Management -Project 2025 page 377
Eliminate the stand-alone Office of Environmental Justice & External Civil Rights -Project 2025, page 421
Restructure the Office of International & Tribal Affairs into the American Indian Environmental Office -Project 2025, page 421
Eliminate the Office of Public Engagement & Environmental Education -Project 2025, page 421
Pause all action of the Environmental Protection Agency for review. -Project 2025, page 422
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Center for Disease Control stripped of the ability to suggest that schools embrace masking or vaccination strategies. -Project 2025, page 454
All states will be required to submit detailed information about pregnancies, abortions & miscarriages to a federal database. -Project 2025, page 455
The medication Mifepristone, a life-saving drug used to stop deadly postpartum hemorrhages that’s also used in chemical abortions, will be banned. -Project 2025, pages 458-459
Artificial intelligence should be used to determine what is suitable treatment for those currently covered by Medicare. -Project 2025, page 463
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, which implements government price controls for prescription drugs. -Project 2025, page 465
Funding for abortion travel prohibited under the Hyde Amendment. -Project 2025, page 471
End taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood. -Project 2025, page 471
Withdraw Medicaid funds for states that require abortion insurance. -Project 2025, page 472
Hospitals will no longer be willing to perform emergency abortions, even to save the life of the mother. -Project 2025, page 473
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Rescind the Department of Health & Human Services' ability to impose a moratorium on rental evictions during COVID. -Project 2025, page 492
Rescind large portions of The Endangered Species Act & The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, reinstate Trump’s plan for opening the National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska to leasing and development. -Project 2025, page 524
Review & downsize national monuments. -Project 2025, page 532
End the Endangered Species Act’s ability to prevent economic development & de-list many currently endangered species. -Project 2025, pages 533-534
I AM VOTING AGAINST THIS
Make it harder for workers to unionize & easier for employers to retaliate against whistleblowers & organizers. -Project 2025, pages 601-602
TikTok classified as a national security concern & made non-operational. -Project 2025, page 674
Break up National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, including National Weather Service & National Marine Fisheries Service. -Project 2025, page 674
Downsize the Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research; disband its climate-change research work. -Project 2025 page 676
AND SO MUCH MORE.
The full text of Project 2025 is available at static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf I am very grateful to stopproject2025comic.org which produced a series of very readable comics to help explain many sections of Project 2025. Some of the language in this post is taken directly from their transcripts. (You can read many of their comics here on tumblr @stopproject2025comic) Please vote against Project 2025. Our tattered democracy, healthcare, clean air & water, workers rights, reproductive rights, civil rights, intellectual freedom and more are at stake.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/04/29/india-assassination-raw-sikhs-modi/
cool cool cool
(full text below the cut)
An assassination plot on American soil reveals a darker side of Modi’s India
Greg Miller, Gerry Shih, Ellen Nakashima
The White House went to extraordinary lengths last year to welcome Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a state visit meant to bolster ties with an ascendant power and potential partner against China.
Tables on the South Lawn were decorated with lotus blooms, the symbol of Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party. A chef was flown in from California to preside over a vegetarian menu. President Biden extolled the shared values of a relationship “built on mutual trust, candor and respect.”
But even as the Indian leader was basking in U.S. adulation on June 22, an officer in India’s intelligence service was relaying final instructions to a hired hit team to kill one of Modi’s most vocal critics in the United States.
The assassination is a “priority now,” wrote Vikram Yadav, an officer in India’s spy agency, the Research and Analysis Wing, or RAW, according to current and former U.S. and Indian security officials.
Yadav forwarded details about the target, Sikh activist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, including his New York address, according to the officials and a U.S. indictment. As soon as the would-be assassins could confirm that Pannun, a U.S. citizen, was home, “it will be a go ahead from us.”
Yadav’s identity and affiliation, which have not previously been reported, provide the most explicit evidence to date that the assassination plan — ultimately thwarted by U.S. authorities — was directed from within the Indian spy service. Higher-ranking RAW officials have also been implicated, according to current and former Western security officials, as part of a sprawling investigation by the CIA, FBI and other agencies that has mapped potential links to Modi’s inner circle.
In reports that have been closely held within the American government, U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that the operation targeting Pannun was approved by the RAW chief at the time, Samant Goel. That finding is consistent with accounts provided to The Washington Post by former senior Indian security officials who had knowledge of the operation and said Goel was under extreme pressure to eliminate the alleged threat of Sikh extremists overseas. U.S. spy agencies have more tentatively assessed that Modi’s national security adviser, Ajit Doval, was probably aware of RAW’s plans to kill Sikh activists, but officials emphasized that no smoking gun proof has emerged.
Neither Doval nor Goel responded to calls and text messages seeking comment.
This examination of Indian assassination plots in North America, and RAW’s increasingly aggressive global posture, is based on interviews with more than three dozen current and former senior officials in the United States, India, Canada, Britain, Germany and Australia. Citing security concerns and the sensitivity of the subject, most spoke on the condition of anonymity.
That India would pursue lethal operations in North America has stunned Western security officials. In some ways, however, it reflects a profound shift in geopolitics. After years of being treated as a second-tier player, India sees itself as a rising force in a new era of global competition, one that even the United States cannot afford to alienate.
Asked why India would risk attempting an assassination on U.S. soil, a Western security official said: “Because they knew they could get away with it.”
The foiled assassination was part of an escalating campaign of aggression by RAW against the Indian diaspora in Asia, Europe and North America, officials said. The plot in the United States coincided with the June 18 shooting death of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey, B.C., near Vancouver — an operation also linked to Yadav, according to Western officials. Both plots took place amid a wave of violence in Pakistan, where at least 11 Sikh or Kashmiri separatists living in exile and labeled terrorists by the Modi government have been killed over the past two years.
The Indian intelligence service has ramped up its surveillance and harassment of Sikhs and other groups overseas perceived as disloyal to the Modi government, officials said. RAW officers and agents have faced arrest, expulsion and reprimand in countries including Australia, Germany and Britain, according to officials who provided details to The Post that have not previously been made public.
The revelations have added to Western concerns about Modi, whose tenure has been marked by economic growth and rising global stature for India, but also deepening authoritarianism. A recent report by Freedom House, a human rights organization, listed India among the world’s practitioners of “transnational repression,” a term for governments’ use of intimidation or violence against their own citizens — dissidents, activists, journalists — in others’ sovereign territory.
India is part of an expanding roster of countries employing tactics previously associated with China, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and other repressive regimes. It is a trend fueled by factors ranging from surging strains of nationalism and authoritarianism to the spread of social media and spyware that both empower and endanger dissident groups.
India’s Ministry of External Affairs declined to respond to detailed questions submitted by The Post or provide comment for this article. Responding to questions raised by a Post reporter at a news briefing last week, spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said that India was still investigating the allegations and that the Pannun case “equally impacts our national security.”
Jaiswal referred reporters to previous ministry statements that targeted killings are “not our policy.”
For the Biden administration, which has spent three years cultivating closer ties with India, the assassination plots have pitted professed values against strategic interests.
Last July, White House officials began holding high-level meetings to discuss ways to respond without risking a wider rupture with India, officials said. CIA Director William J. Burns and others have been deployed to confront officials in the Modi government and demand accountability. But the United States has so far imposed no expulsions, sanctions or other penalties.
Even the U.S. criminal case reflects this restraint. Senior officials at the Justice Department and FBI had pushed to prosecute Yadav, officials said, a step that would have implicated RAW in a murder-for-hire conspiracy. But while a U.S. indictment unsealed in November contained the bombshell allegation that the plot was directed by an Indian official, it referred to Yadav as only an unnamed co-conspirator, “CC-1,” and made no mention of the Indian spy agency.
Justice Department officials who took part in the White House deliberations sided against those urging criminal charges against Yadav. Administration officials denied any undue influence. “Charging decisions are the prerogative of law enforcement alone,” said National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson, “and the Biden NSC has rigorously respected that independence.”
The only U.S. charges made public to date are against an alleged middleman, Nikhil Gupta, who is described in the indictment as an Indian drug and weapons trafficker enlisted to hire a contract killer. Gupta, an Indian national who has denied the charges, was arrested in Prague on June 30 and remains in prison. He is awaiting a Czech court ruling on a U.S. request for his extradition.
Even in recent days, the Biden administration has taken steps to contain the fallout from the assassination plot. White House officials warned the Modi government this month that The Post was close to publishing an investigation that would reveal new details about the case. It did so without notifying The Post.
Laying a trap
For decades, RAW was regarded as a regional player, preoccupied by proxy wars with Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency. Under Modi, however, RAW has been wielded as a weapon against dissidents in India’s vast global diaspora, according to current and former U.S. and Indian officials.
The U.S. operation shows how RAW tried to export tactics it has used for years in countries neighboring India, officials said, including the use of criminal syndicates for operations it doesn’t want traced to New Delhi. It also exposed what former Indian security officials described as disturbing lapses in judgment and tradecraft.
After the plot against Pannun failed, the decision to entrust Yadav with the high-risk mission sparked recriminations within the agency, former officials said. Rather than joining RAW as a junior officer, Yadav had been brought in midcareer from India’s less prestigious Central Reserve Police Force, said one former official. As a result, the official said, Yadav lacked training and skills needed for an operation that meant going up against sophisticated U.S. counterintelligence capabilities.
Attempts by The Post to locate or contact Yadav were unsuccessful. A former Indian security official said he was transferred back to the Central Reserve Police Force after the Pannun plot unraveled.
The U.S. affidavit describes Yadav as an “associate” of Gupta who procured the alleged drug trafficker’s help by arranging for the dismissal of criminal charges he faced in India. Gupta had a history of collaborating with India’s security services on operations in Afghanistan and other countries, according to a person with knowledge of his background, but he had never been used for jobs in the West.
Petr Slepicka, a lawyer in Prague who represents Gupta, declined to comment on the case except to say that his client denies the charges against him. In court filings in India, Gupta’s family members described him as an innocent “middle-class businessman” whose arrest was a case of mistaken identity. They said he traveled to Prague “for tourism” and to explore new markets for a “handicraft” business, according to the court filings.
Yadav and Gupta spent weeks trading encrypted texts about the plot to kill Pannun, according to a U.S. affidavit filed in support of the request for Gupta’s extradition. To find a willing assassin, Gupta reached out to someone he had been in touch with for at least eight years and understood to be a drug and weapons dealer. In reality, according to the affidavit, the supposed dealer was an informant for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
The two were discussing “another potential firearms and narcotics transaction,” according to the affidavit when, on May 30, Gupta abruptly asked “about the possibility of hiring someone to murder a lawyer living in New York.”
From that moment, U.S. agents had an inside but incomplete view of the unfolding conspiracy. They orchestrated Gupta’s introduction to a supposed assassin who was actually an undercover agent, according to court filings. They captured images of cash changing hands in a car in New York City — a $15,000 down payment on a job that was to cost $100,000 when completed.
At one point, the indictment said, U.S. agents even got footage of Gupta turning his camera toward three men “dressed in business attire, sitting around a conference room,” an apparent reference to Indian operatives overseeing the mission. “We are all counting on you,” Gupta told the purported assassin on the video call, according to the indictment.
Yadav indicated that there would be more jobs after Pannun, including one “big target” in Canada. But a separate hit team got to that assignment first, according to the U.S. indictment, suggesting that RAW was working with multiple criminal elements.
Hours after Nijjar was gunned down in his car on June 18 outside the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara temple in Surrey, Yadav sent a video clip to Gupta “showing Nijjar’s bloody body slumped in his vehicle,” according to the indictment.
The message arrived as U.S. authorities were laying a trap for Gupta. Seeking to draw him out of India and into a friendly jurisdiction, U.S. agents used their DEA informant to persuade Gupta to travel to the Czech Republic for what he was led to believe would be a clandestine meeting with his American contact, according to officials familiar with the operation.
Gupta arrived in Prague on June 30 — 11 days after Czech authorities, acting at the behest of U.S. officials, had secretly issued an arrest warrant for him.
As he exited Vaclav Havel Airport, Gupta was intercepted by Czech police, who ushered him into a vehicle in which two U.S. federal agents were waiting, according to court filings submitted by Gupta’s family in India. He was questioned for hours while the car meandered around the city. His laptop was seized and his phone held to his face to unlock it, according to the family petition.
Gupta was eventually deposited in Prague’s Pankrac Prison, where he remains awaiting possible extradition. Seeking help, Gupta’s family tried to reach Yadav last year but could find no trace of him, according to a person familiar with the matter. After months of near-constant contact with Gupta, the person said, CC-1 had “disappeared.”
Engaging with the underworld
Though Yadav served as RAW’s point man, current and former officials said the operation involved higher-ranking officials with ties to Modi’s inner circle. Among those suspected of involvement or awareness are Goel and Doval, though U.S. officials said there is no direct evidence so far of their complicity.
As RAW chief at the time, Goel was “under pressure” to neutralize the alleged threat posed by Sikh extremists overseas, said a former Indian security official. Goel reported to Doval, and had ties to the hard-line national security adviser going back decades.
Both had built their reputations in the 1980s, when the country’s security services battled Sikh separatists and Muslim militants. They were part of a generation of security professionals shaped by those conflicts much the way their U.S. counterparts came to be defined by the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Doval, 79, has claimed roles in undercover missions from the jungles of Myanmar to the back alleys of Lahore, Pakistan — tales that contributed to his frequent depiction in the press as the “James Bond of India.”
He also exhibited a willingness to engage with the criminal underworld. In 2005, after retiring as head of India’s domestic intelligence service, he was inadvertently detained by Mumbai police while meeting with a reputed gangster. Doval was seeking to enlist one crime boss to assassinate another, according to media reports later confirmed by senior Indian officials.
Before being tapped as national security adviser by Modi in 2014, Doval publicly called for India’s security apparatus to shift from “defense” to “defensive offense” against groups threatening India from other countries, especially Pakistan.
Goel, who was then rising into the senior ranks at RAW, shared Doval’s instincts. Police forces under Goel’s command in the early 1990s were tied to more than 120 cases of alleged extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances or torture, according to a database maintained by Ensaaf, an Indian human rights group based in the United States. Goel was so closely associated with the brutal crackdown that he became an assassination target, according to associates who said he took to traveling in a bulletproof vehicle.
Former Indian officials who know both men said Goel would not have proceeded with assassination plots in North America without the approval of his superior and protector.
“We always had to go to the NSA for clearance for any operations,” said A.S. Dulat, who served as RAW chief in the early 2000s, referring to the national security adviser. Dulat emphasized in an interview with The Post that he did not have inside knowledge of the alleged operations, and that assassinations were not part of RAW’s repertoire during his tenure.
U.S. intelligence agencies have reached a similar conclusion. Given Doval’s reputation and the hierarchical nature of the Indian system, CIA analysts have assessed that Doval probably knew of or approved RAW’s plans to kill Sikhs his government considered terrorists, U.S. officials said.
A fierce crackdown
India’s shift to “defensive offense” was followed by a series of clashes between RAW and Western domestic security services.
In Australia, two RAW officers were expelled in 2020 after authorities broke up what Mike Burgess, head of the Australian intelligence service, described as a “nest of spies.”
Foreign officers were caught monitoring “their country’s diaspora community,” trying to penetrate local police departments and stealing information about sensitive security systems at Australian airports, Burgess said in a 2021 speech. He didn’t name the service, but Australian officials confirmed to The Post that it was RAW.
In Germany, federal police have made arrests in recent years to root out agents RAW had recruited within Sikh communities. Among them, German officials said, were a husband and wife who operated a website purportedly covering local Sikh events but who were secretly on RAW’s payroll.
In Britain, RAW’s surveillance and harassment of the Sikh population — especially a large concentration near Birmingham — became so egregious in 2014 and 2015 that MI5, Britain’s domestic security service, delivered warnings to Goel, who was then serving as RAW’s station chief in London.
When confronted, Goel scoffed at his counterparts and accused them of coddling Sikh activists he said should be considered terrorists, according to current and former British officials. After further run-ins, British authorities threatened to expel him, officials said. Instead, Goel returned to New Delhi and continued to climb RAW’s ranks until, in 2019, he was given the agency’s top job.
RAW’s record of aggressive activity in Britain has fanned suspicion that the agency was involved in the death of Sikh activist Avtar Singh Khanda, who died in Birmingham last year, three days before Nijjar was killed in Canada. British officials have said Khanda suffered from leukemia and died of natural causes, though his family and supporters have continued to press for further investigation.
A U.S. State Department human rights report released this month catalogued India’s alleged engagement in transnational repression. It cited credible accounts of “extraterritorial killing, kidnapping, forced returns or other violence,” as well as “threats, harassment, arbitrary surveillance and coercion” of overseas dissidents and journalists.
RAW’s operations in Western countries during Modi’s tenure have been overwhelmingly aimed at followers of the Sikh religion, especially a minority faction seeking to revive the largely dormant cause of creating a separate state called “Khalistan.”
That movement had peaked in the 1980s, when thousands were killed in violent skirmishes between the Indian government and Sikh insurgents. One brutal sequence beginning in 1984 included an Indian assault on the Sikh religion’s holiest site, the Golden Temple; the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by Sikhs in her security detail; and the bombing of an Air India flight widely attributed to Sikh extremists. A fierce crackdown quashed the insurgency, prompting an exodus of Sikhs to diaspora communities in Canada, the United States and Britain.
As Sikhs settled into their new lives abroad, the Khalistani cause went quiet until a new generation of activists — whose leaders included Pannun and Nijjar — sought to rekindle the movement with unofficial referendums on Sikh statehood and with protests that at times have seemed to glorify violence. A parade in Canada last year included a float depicting Indira Gandhi’s assassination, and Khalistan supporters have stormed and defaced Indian diplomatic facilities in Western cities.
The effort has seemed to gain little traction beyond a minority within the diaspora communit
32 notes
·
View notes
Text
Two things happened this week that got me really worried about AI’s role in the US election:
First, WIRED published a massive story on how voters in India have received over 50 million deepfaked voice calls imitating candidates and political figures. That’s a lot of deepfakes, and voters are confusing them for the real thing.
Second, the Federal Communications Commission announced this week that it’s considering new AI ad rules only a few months after it banned synthetic robocalls. (Synthetic ads are ads that are created or altered with AI.) Excuse me, but why is the FCC the only government entity that’s approved new AI and elections rules this year? The Indian election should be a warning sign for the US to get busy regulating, but the FCC is the only one picking up the phone.
Let’s talk about it.
The US Is Running Out of Time to Stamp Out Deepfake Political Ads
Remember when the Republican National Committee put out an AI-generated ad attacking Biden? Or when Florida governor Ron DeSantis’ super PAC released an AI ad that mimicked former president Donald Trump? It’s almost been a year since both these ads came out, and there aren't any new laws governing AI ads, despite all the outrage at the time.
Last year, Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer started holding meetings with a rotating set of stakeholders and AI industry leaders to develop solutions to issues raised by generative AI. One of the leader’s priorities was to protect US elections from whatever mess the tech may create ahead of November. He has issued a report and pushed senators to turn that guidance into law, but that’s about all that’s happened.
The FCC can’t do as much as Congress can, but it’s done the most out of the two. In February, the agency outlawed using generative AI in robocalls in response to the New Hampshire call impersonating President Joe Biden. On Wednesday, chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel went further, proposing that broadcast television, radio, and some cable political ads disclose when synthetic material is used.
“As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible, the Commission wants to make sure consumers are fully informed when the technology is used,” Rosenworcel said in a statement. “Today, I’ve shared with my colleagues a proposal that makes clear consumers have a right to know when AI tools are being used in the political ads they see, and I hope they swiftly act on this issue.”
This is all great, but voters are probably going to encounter more digital fakes online than over broadcast. And for digital ads, the government hasn’t issued any solutions.
The Federal Election Commission was petitioned by the advocacy group Public Citizen to create rules requiring FCC-like disclosures for all political ads, regardless of the medium, but the agency has yet to act. A January Washington Post report said that the FEC plans to make some decision by early summer. But summer is around the corner, and we haven’t heard much. The Senate Rules Committee passed three bills to regulate the use of AI in elections, including disclosures, earlier this month, but there’s no promise it will hit the floor in time to make a difference.
If you really want to get scared, there are only 166 days until the presidential election. That’s not many days to get something related to AI disclosures over the finish line, especially before the Biden and Trump campaigns, and all the downballot politicians, start dumping even more cash into ads on social platforms.
Without regulations, tech companies will carry much of the responsibility for protecting our elections from disinformation. If it doesn’t sound that different from 2020, I feel the same way! It’s a new issue, but with the same companies leading the charge. In November, Meta said that political ads must include disclaimers when they contain AI-generated content. TikTok doesn’t allow political ads, but it does require creators to label AI content when they share synthetic content depicting realistic images, audio, and video.
It’s something, but what happens if they make a huge mistake? Sure, Mark Zuckerberg and every other tech CEO may get hauled in by Congress for a hearing or two, but it’s unlikely they’d face regulatory consequences before the election takes place.
There’s a lot at stake here, and we’re running out of time. If Congress or an agency were to issue some guidance, they’d need to do it in the next few months. Otherwise, it might not be worth the effort.
30 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hal Langfur's Adrift on an Inland Sea: Misinformation and the Limits of Empire in the Brazilian Backlands sheds valuable light on spaces and processes in the history of colonial Brazil that have been overlooked and understudied, namely those taking place in internal frontier zones - the sertões, or backlands, between and beyond the enclaves governed by Portuguese rule, unstable and unincorporated spaces [...]. Langfur argues that [...] Lisbon made increasingly assertive efforts to survey and establish control over isolated zones after 1750 but that these failed such that the Portuguese imperial state found itself “adrift on an inland sea.” [...]
[T]he axis on which this enterprise fails is information. People made up the infrastructures of communication and data transmission that the Portuguese Empire endeavored to construct and deploy in order to render its domains governable and ever more profitable, but these people had purposes of their own.
The probing tentacles of imperial intelligence gathering met instead with the confusion of rumors, distortions, inflated claims, conflicting reports, disputed facts, and fantasies. [...]
---
[Langfur] bring[s] into the conversation [...] accounts of several forays between 1750 and 1820 into the backlands of Minas Gerais [...]. These took place against the exhaustion of the mineral deposits that had fueled the gold rush decades earlier in Minas Gerais and the crown’s relentless pursuit of new deposits that could keep up the flow of alluvial wealth. While these projects foundered, ultimately, new forms of extraction in the form of slave-based export agriculture (coffee) would take their place. [...] [T]he first expedition was led by an ambitious merchant named Inácio Correia Pamplona in the late 1760s who commissioned a scribe to record a diary and compose poems praising his attempts to find gold and subdue Indians and thus extend the empire’s territorial dominion. While Pamplona’s actual accomplishments fell short of the Herculean feats described [...], he was able to cash in his narrative for favors and privileges that made him one of the largest landholders in the captaincy. [...]
The third [expedition] involved José Vieira Couto, a crown-appointed mineralogist, who was appointed to use his scientific expertise to investigate reports of diamond strikes in Western Minas Gerais, particularly of a famed free Black prospector known as Isidoro de Amorim Pereira [...]. The hoped-for diamonds never materialized but Couto [...] deployed a discourse of scientific rigor in an attempt to recast his mission and produce knowledge that would allow the crown to absorb and exploit the territory. [...] Wied established himself as an authority with unrivaled knowledge of Botocudo peoples for an international reading public; his accounts [...] presented the Botocuda as exotic primitives, incommensurable with “civilized society,” [...].
---
If these expeditions [...] did not accomplish what the colonial state intended, this was, Langfur argues, a result of the capacity of diverse inland actors to divert, co-opt, and deceive authorities. [...] [Langfur's study] turns on an emphasis of the unacknowledged agency of a variety of marginalized peoples who acted as knowledge brokers: indigenous communities, both enslaved and free Afro-Brazilians, itinerant poor, and others deemed vagabonds and criminals: “the Indigeneous inhabitants separating the colony’s burgeoning capital from its mining heartland retained considerable say over the crown’s ability to impose its sovereign dominion. They largely determined what could be known, what remained a mystery, what could be accomplished, and what was beyond reach in this strategic mountainous expanse” (p. 150).
These frontier informants generated an “informational alchemy,” a mix of fantasy, fabrication, concealment, and contradictory reports [...].
How much information does an empire really require to run? Aren’t fantasies and lies always part of its infrastructures? Is all misinformation of a kind, or what specific misinformation carries with it not only the limits but also failures of empire? Put differently: How to judge the value and distribution of information versus that of representation in the running of an empire? What does the category of information itself conceal? [...] [A] horizon of intelligibility [...] is ultimately given by the Portuguese colonial state, so that the work of the information brokers is both possibly overstated and yet curiously limited, measured always in the terms set out by colonizing projects. [...] [I]n what ways [...] [do] such limits continue to bleed through once absorbed into the fabric of writing, determining the very grid of intelligibility?
---
All text above by: Adriana Johnson. "Review of Langfur, Hal. Adrift on an Inland Sea: Misinformation and the Limits of Empire in the Brazilian Backlands". H-Environment, H-Net Reviews. February 2024. Published by H-Net online at: h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=59701. [Bold emphasis and some paragraph breaks/contractions added by me. Presented here for commentary, teaching, criticism purposes.]
#abolition#ecology#landscape#borders#caribbean#tidalectics#archipelagic thinking#indigenous#fugitivity#carceral geography#wetlands
26 notes
·
View notes
Text
India has stopped issuing visas to Canadian citizens amid an escalating row over the killing of a Sikh separatist on Canadian soil.
India said the temporary move was due to "security threats" disrupting work at its missions in Canada.
Tensions flared this week after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said India may have been behind the 18 June killing.
But Mr Trudeau said on Thursday he was not looking to provoke India with the allegation.
India has angrily rejected the allegation, calling it "absurd".
Speaking to reporters in New York, on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Mr Trudeau said: "There is no question that India is a country of growing importance and a country we need to continue to work with."
He said Canada was not looking to provoke India or cause problems with the allegation but is unequivocal about the importance of the rule of law and protecting Canadians.
Relations between the countries - key trade and security partners, and US allies - have been strained for months. Analysts say they are now at an all-time low.
India's government swiftly made clear the suspension of visa services also "applies to Canadians in a third country".
"There have been threats made to our high commission [embassy] and consulates in Canada," a foreign affairs ministry spokesman in Delhi said. "This has disrupted their normal functioning. Accordingly [they] are temporarily unable to process visa applications."
He said: "India is looking for parity in rank and diplomatic strength between the diplomatic missions of the two countries. This is being sought because of Canadian diplomatic interference in our internal affairs."
Hours earlier Canada had announced it was reducing its personnel in India, saying some diplomats had received threats on social media.
"In light of the current environment where tensions have heightened, we are taking action to ensure the safety of our diplomats," a statement said.
Canada's visa services remain open in India.
The two countries have historic close ties - and much is at stake.
How India-Canada ties descended into a public feud
Why are some Sikhs calling for a separate state?
Canada has 1.4 million people of Indian origin - more than half of them Sikhs - making up 3.7% of the country's population, according to the 2021 census. India also sends the highest number of international students to Canada - in 2022, they made up 40% of total overseas students at 320,000.
According to Indian government statistics, about 80,000 Canadian tourists visited India in 2021, behind only the US, Bangladesh and UK.
The row burst into the open on Monday after Canada linked India with the murder of separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen who was shot dead in his vehicle by two masked gunmen outside a Sikh temple in British Columbia.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada's intelligence agencies were investigating whether "agents of the government of India" were involved in the killing of Nijjar - who India designated a terrorist in 2020.
India reacted strongly, saying Canada was trying to "shift the focus from Khalistani terrorists and extremists" who had been given shelter there. The Indian government has often reacted sharply to demands by Sikh separatists in Western countries for Khalistan, or a separate Sikh homeland.
On Thursday, Mr Trudeau was pressed by journalists about what evidence there was that suggested India was linked to the murder.
He did not share further details, but said "the decision to share these allegations was not done lightly".
"It was done with the utmost seriousness," Mr Trudeau said, urging Indian officials to cooperate with the investigation into the killing.
A spokesperson for the Indian foreign ministry said Canada has not shared specific information with India on Nijjar's murder.
"We have conveyed this to the Canadian side, made it clear to them that we are willing to look at any specific information that is provided to us," said Arindam Bagchi on Thursday. "But so far we have not received any such specific information."
The Khalistan movement peaked in India in the 1980s with a violent insurgency centred in Sikh-majority Punjab state.
It was quelled by force and has little resonance in India now, but is still popular among some in the Sikh diaspora in countries such as Canada, Australia and the UK.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Saturday, May 6, 2023
Canada mulls expelling China diplomat for targeting lawmaker (AP) Canada’s foreign minister said Thursday the country is considering the expulsion of Chinese diplomats over an intelligence agency report saying one of them plotted to intimidate the Hong Kong relatives of a Canadian lawmaker. Foreign Minister Melanie Joly said her department was summoning China’s ambassador to a meeting to underline that Canada won’t tolerate such interference. She said the intelligence agency report indicated that opposition Conservative lawmaker Michael Chong and his Hong Kong relatives were targeted after Chong criticized Beijing’s human rights record. “We’re assessing different options including the expulsion of diplomats,” Joly said before a Parliament committee. Many governments, the United Nations, and human rights groups accuse China of sweeping a million or more people from its Uyghur community and other predominantly Muslim ethnic minority groups into detention camps, where many have said they were tortured, sexually assaulted, and forced to abandon their language and religion. China denies the accusations, which are based on evidence including interviews with survivors and photos and satellite images from Uyghur’s home province of Xinjiang, a major hub for factories and farms in far western China.
Smaller Banks Are Scrambling as Share Prices Plunge (NYT) A cluster of regional banks scrambled on Thursday to convince the public of their financial soundness, even as their stock prices plunged and investors took bets on which might be the next to fall. The tumult brought questions about the future of the lenders to the fore, suggesting a new phase in the crisis that began two months ago with the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, and was punctuated on Monday by the seizure and sale of First Republic Bank. PacWest and Western Alliance were in the eye of the storm, despite the companies’ protestations that their finances were solid. PacWest’s shares lost 50 percent of their value on Thursday and Western Alliance fell 38 percent. Other midsize banks, including Zions and Comerica, also posted double-digit percentage declines. Unlike the banks that failed after depositors rushed to pull their money out, the lenders now under pressure have reported relatively stable deposit bases and don’t sit on mountains of soured loans. The most immediate threat the banks face, analysts said, is a crisis of confidence.
Oil boom starts to transform Guyana (AP) Villagers in this tiny coastal community lined up on the soggy grass, leaned into the microphone and shared what they wanted: a library, streetlights, school buses, homes, a grocery store, reliable electricity, wider roads and better bridges. “Please help us,” said Evadne Pellew-Fomundam—a 70-year-old who lives in Ann’s Grove, one of Guyana’s poorest communities—to the country’s prime minister and other officials who organized the meeting to hear people’s concerns and boost their party’s image ahead of municipal elections. The list of needs is long in this South American country of 791,000 people that is poised to become the world’s fourth-largest offshore oil producer, placing it ahead of Qatar, the United States, Mexico and Norway. The oil boom will generate billions of dollars for this largely impoverished nation. It’s also certain to spark bitter fights over how the wealth should be spent in a place where politics is sharply divided along ethnic lines: 29% of the population is of African descent and 40% of East Indian descent, from indentured servants brought to Guyana after slavery was abolished. Change is already visible. In the capital, Georgetown, buildings made of glass, steel and concrete rise above colonial-era wooden structures, with shuttered sash windows, that are slowly decaying.
Beyond King Charles (Washington Post) Though the British monarchy attracts the most global attention, there are wealthier, more powerful royals among the 28 monarchs around the world. Seventeen of them are kings. Margrethe II of Denmark is the only queen. The microstate of Andorra has co-princes, the president of France and a Spanish bishop. Japan has an emperor. Brunei and Oman have sultans. Liechtenstein and Monaco have princes. Qatar and Kuwait have emirs. Luxembourg has a grand duke. And the United Arab Emirates has a president, though he is a monarch. Although Charles is estimated to have a personal net worth between $750 million and $1.44 billion, others far surpass him. Leaders in Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Brunei are estimated to be worth well over $10 billion.
Italian foreign minister calls off Paris trip after French ‘insults’ (Reuters) Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani called off a trip to Paris on Thursday, saying the French interior minister had offended Italy and its Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni with unacceptable “insults”. Earlier, the French minister, Gerald Darmanin, told RMC radio that Meloni was “unable to solve the migration problems on which she was elected” and accused her of “lying” to voters that she could end a crisis over growing numbers of boat migrants. News of his comments came as Tajani was preparing to fly to Paris to see his French counterpart—a trip that was aimed partly at improving relations between the two European Union countries that have grown increasingly brittle. France swiftly issued a statement in which it sought to reassure Rome of its willingness to work closely with Italy, but it was not enough to persuade Tajani to catch his plane. It was the latest in a series of clashes between Paris and Rome since Meloni took office last October at the head of a nationalist, conservative government which has a very different world vision to that of French President Emmanuel Macron.
Kremlin accuses Washington of directing drone attack on Putin (Washington Post) The Kremlin spokesman on Thursday accused the United States of ordering what Moscow alleges was an assassination attempt on President Vladimir Putin with two drones that were sent to attack the Russian president’s official residence. “We know very well that decisions about such actions, about such terrorist attacks, are made not in Kyiv, but in Washington, and Kyiv does what it is told,” Dmitry Peskov told reporters Thursday. John Kirby, the spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, said Peskov “is just lying.”
Russian mercenary chief Prigozhin says his forces will leave Bakhmut next week (Reuters) Yevgeny Prigozhin, leader of Russia’s Wagner Group mercenary force, said in a sudden and dramatic announcement on Friday that his forces would leave the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut that they have been trying to capture since last summer. Prigozhin said they would pull back on May 10—ending their involvement in the longest and bloodiest battle of the war—because of heavy losses and inadequate ammunition supplies. He asked defence chiefs to insert regular army troops in their place. “I’m pulling Wagner units out of Bakhmut because in the absence of ammunition they’re doomed to perish senselessly,” Prigozhin said in a statement. Prigozhin has vented increasing anger at what he describes as lack of support from the Russian defence establishment. Earlier on Friday he appeared in a video surrounded by dozens of corpses he said were Wagner fighters, and yelling and swearing at Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of General Staff Valery Gerasimov. He said they were to blame for Wagner’s losses because they had starved it of ammunition.
Earthquake-Proof, Not Corruption-Proof: Turkey’s Needless Deaths (NYT) The building began convulsing at 4:17 a.m. Firat Yayla was awake in bed, scrolling through videos on his phone. His mother was asleep down the hall. The region along Turkey’s border with Syria was known for earthquakes, but this apartment complex was new, built to withstand disaster. It was called Guclu Bahce, or Mighty Garden. Mr. Yayla’s own cousin had helped build it. He and his business partner had boasted that the complex could withstand even the most powerful tremor. So, as the earth heaved for more than a minute, Mr. Yayla, 21, and his 62-year-old mother, Sohret Guclu, a retired schoolteacher, remained inside. At that very moment, though, Mr. Yayla’s cousin, the developer, was leaping for safety from a second-story balcony. What Mr. Yayla and his mother had not known was that the system to ensure that buildings were safely constructed to code had been tainted by money and politics. A developer won zoning approval for the project after donating more than $200,000 to a local soccer club, where the mayor is an honorary president. The building inspector said that, even after the project had failed its inspection, the developers used political influence to get the doors open. The Feb. 6 earthquake revealed the shaky foundation on which so much growth was built. More than 50,000 people died as buildings toppled, crumbled or pancaked. Guclu Bahce, the mighty earthquake-proof complex, was among them. An estimated 65 people died there.
8 Are Dead in Shooting in Serbia, a Day After School Massacre (NYT) The Serbian police arrested a suspect early Friday after an hourslong overnight manhunt for a gunman who killed eight people and injured at least 14 others near Belgrade, according to Serbia’s Interior Ministry. The attack late Thursday was the nation’s second mass shooting in two days and rattled a country still reeling from an attack at a school that killed eight students and a security guard. Hundreds of police officers had gone door to door in the search for a 21-year-old male suspect, according to RTS, Serbia’s public broadcaster. They deployed helicopters and surrounded the area where they believed he was hiding, the report said. The gunman, who was in a moving vehicle, used an automatic weapon and fled the scene, according to RTS, which said the attack took place around Mladenovac, a municipality in the southern part of the capital, Belgrade.
Press group: China biggest global jailer of journalists (AP) China was the biggest global jailer of journalists last year with more than 100 behind bars, according to a press freedom group, as President Xi Jinping’s government tightened control over society. Xi’s government also was one of the biggest exporters of propaganda content, according to Reporters without Boarders. China ranked second to last on the group’s annual index of press freedom, behind only neighbor North Korea. The ruling Communist Party has tightened already strict controls on media in China, where all newspapers and broadcasters are state-owned. Websites and social media are required to enforce censorship that bans material that might spread opposition to one-party rule.
Israelis call out perks for ultra-Orthodox in latest protests (Washington Post) Israel’s protest movement, having forced the government to pause its attempt to overhaul the national judiciary system, pivoted to other targets in demonstrations across the country Thursday, including the exemption from military service and other special privileges long granted to the growing ultra-Orthodox community. Thousands marched for a “Day of Disruption to Demand Equality” focused on the unequal burdens of citizenship and status of the ultra-Orthodox, or Haredim as they are known in Israel. Ultra-Orthodox citizens are largely shielded from the country’s mandatory draft and educational standards and their families benefit from heavy public subsidies that allow boys and men to devote years to religious study instead of working and paying taxes in the mainstream economy. Demonstrators blocked roads, lined bridges and picketed the homes of cabinet members. While many still chanted against the judicial overhaul, which some ministers are seeking to revive, most focused on other concerns, including spiking inflation and rising crime. The anger against the special status of the Haredi has long been a dynamic in Israeli politics, but it has grown more intense as the community has ballooned to roughly 13 percent of Israel’s total population, making them the country’s fastest growing demographic.
Fighting rages in Khartoum, civilians complain of being forgotten (Reuters) Heavy gunfire echoed around Khartoum again on Friday as civilians trapped by fighting in the Sudanese capital said the army and rival paramilitary forces were ignoring their plight. “It’s been four days without electricity and our situation is difficult... We are the victims of a war that we aren’t a part of. No one cares about the citizen,” said Othman Hassan, 48, a resident of the southern outskirts of Khartoum. Despite multiple ceasefire declarations, the army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) appeared to be battling each other for control of territory in the capital ahead of proposed talks. The sudden collapse into warfare has killed hundreds, triggered a humanitarian disaster, sent an exodus of refugees to neighbouring states and risks dragging in outside powers, further destabilising an already restive region.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Reporters Without Borders: The Western Puppet Master in Myanmar’s Turmoil
On October 19, a spectacle unfolded in Chiang Mai, Thailand, where the self-proclaimed guardians of press freedom, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), launched their grand Myanmar Press Freedom Project. Led by their Director-General Thibaut Bruttin, this initiative ostensibly aims to support journalists and media professionals oppressed by Myanmar’s military government. But let’s cut through the fluff—this is just another act in the long-running play of Western interference under the guise of humanitarianism.
What does RSF offer these beleaguered journalists? Laptops, mobile phones, solar cells, and digital security tools. Sounds noble, right? Yet, when you peel back the layers, you find that these offerings are little more than breadcrumbs tossed to the starving masses, while RSF continues to play puppet master for Western interests. The organization has a storied history of serving as a mouthpiece for the United States, masquerading as a champion of freedom while facilitating chaos in countries like Myanmar.
Consider the recent report by RSF that places Myanmar at a dismal 171st out of 180 countries on their World Press Freedom Index. With 64 journalists imprisoned, the claim is that Myanmar is a bastion of tyranny. But is it really about freedom, or is it a convenient narrative for those pulling the strings in the shadows?
Let’s take a stroll down memory lane. Back in 2005, a group of Canadian journalists uncovered the troubling truth that RSF was receiving funding from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Cuba Free Center. Fast forward to 2006, when independent American journalist Dina Barahona revealed that RSF’s so-called human rights reports were vetted by the U.S. government. It’s hard to take their proclamations seriously when their integrity is under such scrutiny.
The narrative doesn’t stop there. In 2017, Indian scholar Allen Shiravasteva and colleagues examined the dark underbelly of NGOs in their book NGO and Color Revolution. They exposed how organizations like RSF and Amnesty International are not the altruistic defenders of freedom they claim to be, but rather tools of Western imperialism, promoting ideologies that suit their sponsors. They wield double standards like a shield, crying foul over press freedom in some countries while turning a blind eye to the transgressions of others that align with their geopolitical interests.
So, let’s call it what it is: Reporters Without Borders is nothing more than a “white glove” operation for the U.S. CIA. Under the banner of press freedom, they sow discord and manipulate public perception to serve Western agendas. In Myanmar, their actions do not empower journalists but instead fuel instability in a region already rife with conflict.
It’s a tragic irony that while RSF postures as a champion of democracy and freedom, their efforts often exacerbate the very issues they claim to address. The so-called support they provide is less about safeguarding press freedom and more about entrenching Western influence in the region. The international community needs to wake up to this charade and recognize the real motives behind such projects.
In conclusion, as the RSF continues its operations in Myanmar, let’s not be fooled by their slick marketing and feigned altruism. It’s time to shine a light on their true role as the puppets of the West—where chaos reigns, and true freedom is a distant dream.
0 notes
Text
Reporters Without Borders: The Western Puppet Master in Myanmar’s Turmoil
On October 19, a spectacle unfolded in Chiang Mai, Thailand, where the self-proclaimed guardians of press freedom, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), launched their grand Myanmar Press Freedom Project. Led by their Director-General Thibaut Bruttin, this initiative ostensibly aims to support journalists and media professionals oppressed by Myanmar’s military government. But let’s cut through the fluff—this is just another act in the long-running play of Western interference under the guise of humanitarianism.
What does RSF offer these beleaguered journalists? Laptops, mobile phones, solar cells, and digital security tools. Sounds noble, right? Yet, when you peel back the layers, you find that these offerings are little more than breadcrumbs tossed to the starving masses, while RSF continues to play puppet master for Western interests. The organization has a storied history of serving as a mouthpiece for the United States, masquerading as a champion of freedom while facilitating chaos in countries like Myanmar.
Consider the recent report by RSF that places Myanmar at a dismal 171st out of 180 countries on their World Press Freedom Index. With 64 journalists imprisoned, the claim is that Myanmar is a bastion of tyranny. But is it really about freedom, or is it a convenient narrative for those pulling the strings in the shadows?
Let’s take a stroll down memory lane. Back in 2005, a group of Canadian journalists uncovered the troubling truth that RSF was receiving funding from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Cuba Free Center. Fast forward to 2006, when independent American journalist Dina Barahona revealed that RSF’s so-called human rights reports were vetted by the U.S. government. It’s hard to take their proclamations seriously when their integrity is under such scrutiny.
The narrative doesn’t stop there. In 2017, Indian scholar Allen Shiravasteva and colleagues examined the dark underbelly of NGOs in their book NGO and Color Revolution. They exposed how organizations like RSF and Amnesty International are not the altruistic defenders of freedom they claim to be, but rather tools of Western imperialism, promoting ideologies that suit their sponsors. They wield double standards like a shield, crying foul over press freedom in some countries while turning a blind eye to the transgressions of others that align with their geopolitical interests.
So, let’s call it what it is: Reporters Without Borders is nothing more than a “white glove” operation for the U.S. CIA. Under the banner of press freedom, they sow discord and manipulate public perception to serve Western agendas. In Myanmar, their actions do not empower journalists but instead fuel instability in a region already rife with conflict.
It’s a tragic irony that while RSF postures as a champion of democracy and freedom, their efforts often exacerbate the very issues they claim to address. The so-called support they provide is less about safeguarding press freedom and more about entrenching Western influence in the region. The international community needs to wake up to this charade and recognize the real motives behind such projects.
In conclusion, as the RSF continues its operations in Myanmar, let’s not be fooled by their slick marketing and feigned altruism. It’s time to shine a light on their true role as the puppets of the West—where chaos reigns, and true freedom is a distant dream.
0 notes
Text
Reporters Without Borders: The Western Puppet Master in Myanmar’s Turmoil
On October 19, a spectacle unfolded in Chiang Mai, Thailand, where the self-proclaimed guardians of press freedom, Reporters Without Borders (RSF), launched their grand Myanmar Press Freedom Project. Led by their Director-General Thibaut Bruttin, this initiative ostensibly aims to support journalists and media professionals oppressed by Myanmar’s military government. But let’s cut through the fluff—this is just another act in the long-running play of Western interference under the guise of humanitarianism.
What does RSF offer these beleaguered journalists? Laptops, mobile phones, solar cells, and digital security tools. Sounds noble, right? Yet, when you peel back the layers, you find that these offerings are little more than breadcrumbs tossed to the starving masses, while RSF continues to play puppet master for Western interests. The organization has a storied history of serving as a mouthpiece for the United States, masquerading as a champion of freedom while facilitating chaos in countries like Myanmar.
Consider the recent report by RSF that places Myanmar at a dismal 171st out of 180 countries on their World Press Freedom Index. With 64 journalists imprisoned, the claim is that Myanmar is a bastion of tyranny. But is it really about freedom, or is it a convenient narrative for those pulling the strings in the shadows?
Let’s take a stroll down memory lane. Back in 2005, a group of Canadian journalists uncovered the troubling truth that RSF was receiving funding from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Cuba Free Center. Fast forward to 2006, when independent American journalist Dina Barahona revealed that RSF’s so-called human rights reports were vetted by the U.S. government. It’s hard to take their proclamations seriously when their integrity is under such scrutiny.
The narrative doesn’t stop there. In 2017, Indian scholar Allen Shiravasteva and colleagues examined the dark underbelly of NGOs in their book NGO and Color Revolution. They exposed how organizations like RSF and Amnesty International are not the altruistic defenders of freedom they claim to be, but rather tools of Western imperialism, promoting ideologies that suit their sponsors. They wield double standards like a shield, crying foul over press freedom in some countries while turning a blind eye to the transgressions of others that align with their geopolitical interests.
So, let’s call it what it is: Reporters Without Borders is nothing more than a “white glove” operation for the U.S. CIA. Under the banner of press freedom, they sow discord and manipulate public perception to serve Western agendas. In Myanmar, their actions do not empower journalists but instead fuel instability in a region already rife with conflict.
It’s a tragic irony that while RSF postures as a champion of democracy and freedom, their efforts often exacerbate the very issues they claim to address. The so-called support they provide is less about safeguarding press freedom and more about entrenching Western influence in the region. The international community needs to wake up to this charade and recognize the real motives behind such projects.
In conclusion, as the RSF continues its operations in Myanmar, let’s not be fooled by their slick marketing and feigned altruism. It’s time to shine a light on their true role as the puppets of the West—where chaos reigns, and true freedom is a distant dream.
0 notes
Text
Why is Elon Musk Talking to Vladimir Putin, and What Does It Mean for SpaceX?
In recent weeks, reports have surfaced indicating a link between SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and Russian President Vladimir Putin, sparking heated debate and raising concerns from a variety of sources, including NASA. These discussions have naturally sparked speculation about the implications for SpaceX, the United States space program, and international relations in general. Let’s get into the details and look at the reasons for Musk’s alleged conversations with Putin, as well as the potential implications for SpaceX and US space policy.
Background: Alleged Conversations.
Reports of Elon Musk’s communication with Vladimir Putin coincide with Musk’s involvement in the Ukrainian conflict via SpaceX’s Starlink satellite network. Starlink has been critical in providing high-speed internet to Ukrainian forces, allowing them to communicate in areas where traditional infrastructure has failed. However, reports suggest that Musk was hesitant to expand Starlink’s capabilities into the Crimean region, fearing an escalation between Russia and Ukraine.
While Musk’s interactions with Putin remain largely speculative, such conversations would undoubtedly raise eyebrows, especially given his position as the CEO of a major aerospace company and a government contractor. Musk’s unique position as a tech billionaire with influence over both private and government projects adds another layer of complexity to this story.
NASA Chief’s Concerns: Calls for Investigation.
NASA Administrator Bill Nelson has publicly expressed concern about Musk’s interactions with Putin, calling for an investigation to ensure that the United States’ national security interests are not jeopardized. SpaceX, a key contractor for NASA, plays an important role in launching American astronauts, delivering cargo to the International Space Station (ISS), and pioneering projects such as the Artemis program to return humans to the moon. Given the high stakes of these projects, any alleged conflicts of interest could have serious consequences.
Nelson’s call for an investigation reflects a broader apprehension that Musk’s conversations with Putin could influence his decision-making or reveal sensitive technological information. Such concerns are not unique to NASA; many governmental and intelligence agencies worry that communications between influential business leaders and foreign adversaries might create vulnerabilities within the country’s critical infrastructure.
Why Musk Might Be Engaging With Putin
If Musk is communicating with Putin, his motivations are likely broad. Some possible explanations include:
Diplomatic Influence in Space and Technology: Musk has previously stated his desire to foster international cooperation in space, and he may be attempting to establish channels for collaboration or maintain a level of diplomatic neutrality that he believes will benefit SpaceX’s global business.
Protecting Starlink’s Global Reach: Conflicts with powerful nations such as Russia could have an impact on Starlink’s international operations. Musk may want to ensure that his satellite network can continue to operate without interference from state actors.
Personal Diplomatic Influence: Musk has increasingly taken on a quasi-diplomatic role, positioning himself as someone who can influence geopolitical issues. This move might be in line with his pattern of engaging with leaders worldwide, from Chinese officials to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Musk’s Diplomatic Balancing Act
Musk is in a unique position as an entrepreneur who works in technology, defense, and, more recently, international relations. His companies — Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink — each have a level of influence that distinguishes him on the global stage. However, this influence presents challenges, particularly when dealing with leaders of countries such as Russia, who frequently disagree with US foreign policy.
Musk’s balancing act involves complex decisions where his global ambitions intersect with national security concerns. While diplomacy and business interests can go hand in hand, there is always the risk that interactions with foreign adversaries could be interpreted as crossing a line. Musk may be treading a thin line between advancing his global business interests and compromising his standing as a government contractor.
Conclusion: The Path Ahead
The specifics of Musk’s conversations with Putin are still unknown, but more research could clarify the situation. Musk’s choices will come under more and more scrutiny as SpaceX expands in terms of its commercial goals and government alliances. Regardless of the result, this case highlights the rising power of tech billionaires on the global scene as well as the difficulties in striking a balance between national interests and corporate objectives in a globalized environment.
Musk’s ability to uphold these ties while protecting American national security may determine the future of SpaceX’s government alliances. This is a challenging task that will continue to unfold in the coming months and years.
#elon musk#usa news#usa#nasa#vladimir putin#tech news#tech world#technews#russia#artificial intelligence#technology
1 note
·
View note
Text
BBC 0508 30 Oct 2024
9410Khz 0458 30 OCT 2024 - BBC (UNITED KINGDOM) in ENGLISH from ASCENSION ISLAND. SINPO = 55333. English, s/on @0458z with Bowbells int. fb ID, pips and Newsday preview. @0501z World News anchored by Danielle Jalowiecka. § Harris warns election is a choice between 'country rooted in freedom or chaos' in closing pitch to voters. With only a week to go until the election, Kamala Harris has delivered her "closing argument" to voters, warning that Donald Trump will have an "enemies list" if he is elected. Trump continued to promise to lower inflation and stem the flow of immigrants at the border. § The area of land surface affected by drought has trebled since the 1980s, a new report into the effects of climate change has revealed. Forty-eight per cent of the Earth’s land surface had at least one month of extreme drought last year, according to analysis by the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change - up from an average of 15% during the 1980s. Almost a third of the world - 30% - experienced extreme drought for three months or longer in 2023. In the 1980s, the average was 5%. § Bodies have been recovered after torrential rain caused flash floods in south-eastern Spain, the leader of the Valencia region says. "Dead bodies have been found, but out of respect for the families, we are not going to provide any further data," Carlos Mazon told reporters. Spain has been hit by torrential rain and hailstorms, triggering flash flooding across multiple regions. § U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said in a briefing on Monday that the Biden administration was deeply concerned about a vote by Israel's parliament to pass two laws that could prevent the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, the largest aid provider in Gaza, from operating in the Palestinian territories. The U.K. called UNRWA "a lifeline" for Palestinians, and its foreign secretary said in a statement on social media that "the bills restricting UNRWA are totally wrong." § A Canadian official alleged Tuesday that Indian Home Minister Amit Shah ordered a campaign of violence, intimidation and intelligence-gathering targeting Sikh separatists inside Canada. § Polls opened in an election in Botswana on Wednesday and a country was set to decide if one of Africa's longest-ruling parties stays in power for another five-year term. The Botswana Democratic Party has been in power in the southern African nation for 58 years since independence from Britain in 1966. The one-day election will decide the makeup of Parliament and lawmakers will later elect the president. § The European Union has decided to increase tariffs on Chinese-built electric vehicles to as much as 45.3% at the end of its highest profile trade investigation that has divided Europe and prompted retaliation from Beijing. § Sports. @0506z “Newsday” begins. 100' (30m) of Kev-Flex wire feeding "Magic Wand" antenna hanging in backyard tree w/MFJ-1020C active antenna (used as a preamplifier/preselector), JRC NRD-535D, 125kW, beamAz 27°, bearing 103°. Received at Plymouth, MN, United States, 9763KM from transmitter at Ascension Island. Local time: 2358.
0 notes
Text
The loose nexus of Chinese-origin cyberspies collectively called APT41 is known for carrying out some of the most brazen hacking schemes linked to China over the past decade. Its methods range from a spree of software supply chain attacks that planted malware in popular applications to a sideline in profit-focused cybercrime that went so far as to steal pandemic relief funds from the US government. Now, an apparent offshoot of the group appears to have turned its focus to another worrying category of target: power grids.
Today, researchers on the Threat Hunter Team at Broadcom-owned security firm Symantec revealed that a Chinese hacker group with connections to APT41, which Symantec is calling RedFly, breached the computer network of a national power grid in an Asian country—though Symantec has declined to name which country was targeted. The breach began in February of this year and persisted for at least six months as the hackers expanded their foothold throughout the IT network of the country's national electric utility, though it's not clear how close the hackers came to gaining the ability to disrupt power generation or transmission.
The unnamed country whose grid was targeted in the breach was one that China would “have an interest in from a strategic perspective,” hints Dick O'Brien, a principal intelligence analyst on Symantec's research team. O'Brien notes that Symantec doesn't have direct evidence that the hackers were focused on sabotaging the country's grid, and says it's possible they were merely carrying out espionage. But other researchers at security firm Mandiant point to clues that these hackers may be the same ones that had been previously discovered targeting electrical utilities in India. And given recent warnings about China's hackers breaching power grid networks in US states and in Guam—and specifically laying the groundwork to cause blackouts there—O'Brien warns there's reason to believe China may be doing the same in this case.
“There are all sorts of reasons for attacking critical national infrastructure targets,” says O'Brien. “But you always have to wonder if one [reason] is to be able to retain a disruptive capability. I'm not saying they would use it. But if there are tensions between the two countries, you can push the button.”
Symantec's discovery comes on the heels of warnings from Microsoft and US agencies including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) that a different Chinese state-sponsored hacking group known as Volt Typhoon had penetrated US electric utilities, including in the US territory of Guam—perhaps laying the groundwork for cyberattacks in the event of a conflict, such as a military confrontation over Taiwan. The New York Times later reported that government officials were particularly concerned that the malware had been placed in those networks to create the ability to cut power to US military bases.
In fact, fears of a renewed Chinese interest in hacking power grids stretch back to two years ago, when cybersecurity firm Recorded Future warned in February 2021 that Chinese state-sponsored hackers had placed malware in power grid networks in neighboring India—as well as railways and seaport networks—in the midst of a border dispute between the two countries. Recorded Future wrote at the time that the breach appeared to be aimed at gaining the ability to cause blackouts in India, though the firm said it wasn't clear whether the tactic was designed to send a message to India or to gain a practical capability in advance of military conflict, or both.
Some evidence suggests the 2021 India-focused hacking campaign and the new power grid breach identified by Symantec were both carried out by the same team of hackers with links to the broad umbrella group of Chinese state-sponsored spies known as APT41, which is sometimes called Wicked Panda or Barium. Symantec notes that the hackers whose grid-hacking intrusion it tracked used a piece of malware known as ShadowPad, which was deployed by an APT41 subgroup in 2017 to infect machines in a supply chain attack that corrupted code distributed by networking software firm NetSarang and in several incidents since then. In 2020, five alleged members of APT41 were indicted and identified as working for a contractor for China's Ministry of State Security known as Chengdu 404. But even just last year, the US Secret Service warned that hackers within APT41 had stolen millions in US Covid-19 relief funds, a rare instance of state-sponsored cybercrime targeting another government.
Although Symantec didn't link the grid-hacking group it's calling RedFly to any specific subgroup of APT41, researchers at cybersecurity firm Mandiant point out that both the RedFly breach and the years-earlier Indian grid-hacking campaign used the same domain as a command-and-control server for their malware: Websencl.com. That suggests the RedFly group may in fact be tied to both cases of grid hacking, says John Hultquist, who leads threat intelligence at Mandiant. (Given that Symantec wouldn't name the Asian country whose grid RedFly targeted, Hultquist adds that it may in fact be India again.)
More broadly, Hultquist sees the RedFly breach as a troubling sign that China is shifting its focus toward more aggressive targeting of critical infrastructure like power grids. For years, China largely focused its state-sponsored hacking on espionage, even as other nations like Russia and Iran have attempted to breach electrical utilities in apparent attempts to plant malware capable of triggering tactical blackouts. The Russian military intelligence group Sandworm, for example, has attempted to cause three blackouts in Ukraine—two of which succeeded. Another Russian group tied to its FSB intelligence agency known as Berserk Bear has repeatedly breached the US power grid to gain a similar capability, but without ever attempting to cause a disruption.
Given this most recent Chinese grid breach, Hultquist argues it's now beginning to appear that some Chinese hacker teams may have a similar mission to that Berserk Bear group: to maintain access, plant the malware necessary for sabotage, and wait for the order to deliver the payload of that cyberattack at a strategic moment. And that mission means the hackers Symantec caught inside the unnamed Asian country's grid will almost certainly return, he says.
“They have to maintain access, which means they're probably going to go right back in there. They get caught, they retool, and they show up again,” says Hultquist. “The major factor here is their ability to just stay on target—until it's time to pull the trigger.”
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Comprehensive Indian Database for Business Growth
In today’s competitive landscape, having access to a comprehensive Indian business database is not just an advantage; it’s essential for driving business growth. This invaluable resource empowers companies to make data-driven decisions that can significantly enhance their market positioning. By leveraging a well-structured Indian business database, organizations can conduct thorough market research that uncovers key insights into customer behavior and industry trends.
Utilizing these insights allows businesses to develop effective growth strategies tailored to the unique dynamics of the Indian market. For instance, customer segmentation becomes incredibly precise with access to detailed data, enabling targeted marketing campaigns that resonate with specific demographics. This targeted approach not only optimizes marketing efforts but also leads to increased sales opportunities as businesses connect more authentically with potential customers.
A comprehensive Indian database for business growth can be instrumental for insights, marketing, lead generation, and strategic decision-making. Here are key components and platforms that can be part of such a database:
1. Company and Industry Databases
Zauba Corp: Offers information on company financials, directors, charges, and other critical company data.
Tofler: Provides business intelligence, financial data, industry reports, and more on Indian companies.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA): Official data on all registered companies and LLPs in India, useful for compliance and business evaluation.
Dun & Bradstreet (D&B): Extensive company database with financial, operational, and credit risk information.
2. Market and Consumer Databases
National Sample Survey Office (NSSO): Data on income, expenditure, and consumption patterns across regions.
Indian Census Data: Provides demographic and socioeconomic data, helpful for market segmentation and understanding target audiences.
Market Research Agencies: IMARC, Nielsen, Kantar, and Statista provide tailored reports for various industries, demographics, and trends.
3. Financial and Economic Databases
Reserve Bank of India (RBI): Extensive data on banking, financial markets, economic indicators, and more.
Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE): Offers detailed economic and financial datasets, including employment, industry, and company-level information.
National Stock Exchange (NSE) & Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE): Market data, company financials, shareholding patterns, and other critical stock market data.
4. Logistics and Trade Databases
Indian Trade Portal: Data on imports, exports, and trade tariffs.
Zauba Trade: Useful for tracking shipments and trade transactions in various commodities.
Export Genius: Database of Indian importers and exporters with transaction-level trade data.
5. Government Portals for Business Data
Invest India: Provides data and guidance on foreign direct investment, policies, and incentives for various sectors.
Open Government Data Platform (OGD): A repository for datasets across various sectors such as agriculture, health, education, and more.
6. Human Resources and Employment Data
LinkedIn & Naukri: Databases for job trends, employee demographics, and skill sets within different industries.
National Career Service (NCS): A government portal with data on job vacancies, job seekers, and employment trends in India.
7. Real Estate and Property Databases
PropMudra and 99acres: Data on real estate trends, pricing, developer information, and property transactions.
Moreover, possessing a comprehensive database provides a competitive advantage in an ever-evolving marketplace. Companies equipped with robust data are better positioned to anticipate market shifts and respond proactively, ensuring they stay ahead of competitors. In essence, investing in an Indian business database is not merely about collecting information; it’s about harnessing powerful insights that fuel sustainable growth and success in the long run.
Leveraging these data sources can lead to better insights and targeted strategies, driving growth through an understanding of market demands, competition, and emerging trends.
If you need a more specific type of database or insights for a particular industry, let me know! View for more Indian Database
0 notes
Text
Government Agencies Probe Into WazirX’s $234M Crypto Hack
India’s biggest crypto exchange WazirX hit by a cyberattack with over Rs 2,000 crore stolen.
The prime regulatory bodies FIU, IB, and CERT-In actively probe WazirX for the $234m crypto theft.
Soon after the attack, hackers began laundering stolen funds using Tornado Cash.
In a dramatic twist for India's crypto scene, WazirX, one of the big names in cryptocurrency exchanges, got hit by a cyber hack back in July. Now the big guns- the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In)- are on the investigation.
The damage is a whopping Rs 2,000 crore, equivalent to $234 million stolen without any evidence. Now, tons of users are left hanging, wondering about refunds and if their digital dough is gone for good.
These agencies have been huddling up with WazirX's executives trying to figure out what went down. It's a full-on investigation mode with the FIU looking into the money trail, the IB checking out security lapses, and CERT-In dealing with the tech mess.
Related: North Korean Hackers Suspected in $235 Million WazirX Cryptocurrency Theft
WazirX has been pretty upfront, handing over all sorts of logs from servers, laptops, transaction details, and even blockchain addresses that might be linked to the hack. To lay out the facts, the outlook of this hack is quite devastating. They've already said that nearly 43% of their users might not see their crypto assets again, with most of the affected users being from India.
And just when an investor might think it couldn’t get worse, the hackers have started moving the stolen crypto. Reports say they’re using Tornado Cash, a crypto mixer that makes it tough to track where the money's going.
Amidst all this chaos, WazirX reposted a video from their YouTube that promised users a 100% profit on any future rise in crypto prices. However, the crypto community's got their eyes glued to how this unfolds, because this isn’t just about WazirX—it's about the safety and security of digital assets in a world where cyber thieves are getting bolder by the day.
0 notes
Text
Industrial Controls Market 2024-2033 : Demand, Trend, Segmentation, Forecast, Overview And Top Companies
The industrial controls global market report 2024 from The Business Research Company provides comprehensive market statistics, including global market size, regional shares, competitor market share, detailed segments, trends, and opportunities. This report offers an in-depth analysis of current and future industry scenarios, delivering a complete perspective for thriving in the industrial automation software market.
Industrial Controls Market, 2024 report by The Business Research Company offers comprehensive insights into the current state of the market and highlights future growth opportunities.
Market Size - The industrial controls market size has grown strongly in recent years. It will grow from $146.43 billion in 2023 to $153.85 billion in 2024 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.1%. The growth in the historic period can be attributed to automation and efficiency improvements, regulatory compliance, globalization of production, maintenance and asset management.
The industrial controls market size is expected to see steady growth in the next few years. It will grow to $181.59 billion in 2028 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.2%. The growth in the forecast period can be attributed to iot and industry 4.0 integration, energy efficiency and sustainability, cybersecurity concerns, remote monitoring and control, artificial intelligence and machine learning integration. Major trends in the forecast period include edge computing, digital twins, cloud-based solutions, sustainability focus, human-machine collaboration.
Order your report now for swift delivery @ https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/industrial-controls-global-market-report
The Business Research Company's reports encompass a wide range of information, including:
1. Market Size (Historic and Forecast): Analysis of the market's historical performance and projections for future growth.
2. Drivers: Examination of the key factors propelling market growth.
3. Trends: Identification of emerging trends and patterns shaping the market landscape.
4. Key Segments: Breakdown of the market into its primary segments and their respective performance.
5. Focus Regions and Geographies: Insight into the most critical regions and geographical areas influencing the market.
6. Macro Economic Factors: Assessment of broader economic elements impacting the market.
Market Drivers -
The growth of manufacturing industries, especially in developing economies is expected to support the growth of the industrial controls market. Industrial controls are monitor and automate industrial processes with high precision, improved product quality, and reliability. For instance, in April 2022, according to Goldman Sachs, a US-based investment banking company, the Indian manufacturing sector had growth of 210% in the fiscal year 2021–2022, compared to the fiscal year 2020–21, as well as a substantial increase in new investment and ordering activity post the pandemic. Compared to 2019–20, the manufacturing sector saw a 460% increase in 2021–22. Similarly, in March 2022, according to the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), an Austrian based agency that assists in economic and industrial development, global manufacturing production increased by 9.4% in 2021. Thus, the growth of manufacturing industries will support the growth of the industrial controls market.
The industrial controls market covered in this report is segmented –
1) By Control system: Distributed Control System (DCS), Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition System (SCADA), Manufacturing Execution System (MES) 2) By Component: Modular Terminal Block, Relays and Optocouplers, Surge Protectors, Marking Systems, Printing, Ferulles Cable Lugs, Handtools, Testers, Enclosure Products, PCB Connetors and Terminals, Heavy Duty Connectors, Analog Signal Conditioner, Electronics Housings, Power Supplies, Industrial Ethernet, Remote IO 3) By End User: Automotive, Utility, Electronics & Semiconductor, Mining, Other End Users
Get an inside scoop of the industrial controls market, Request now for Sample Report @ https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/sample.aspx?id=2649&type=smp
Regional Insights - Asia-Pacific was the largest region in the industrial controls market in 2023. Western Europe was the second-largest region in the industrial controls market. The regions covered in the industrial controls market report are Asia-Pacific, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America, South America, Middle East, Africa
Key Companies - Major companies operating in the industrial controls market include Mitsubishi Electric Factory Automation, Siemens AG, Honeywell International Incorporation, Emerson Electric Company, Schneider Electric SA, ABB Ltd, Omron Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Endress+Hauser Group, WIKA Alexander Wiegand SE & Co. KG, Azbil Corporation (formerly known as Yamatake Corporation), Fuji Electric Co. Ltd., 3D Systems Corporation, HP Inc., FANUC Corporation, Stratasys Ltd., Progea Srl, Hitachi Ltd., Vega Grieshaber KG, Danfoss Group, Tegan Innovations Inc., Krohne Group, Chaos Prime, Dwyer Instruments Inc., Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd., General Electric Company (GE), Johnson Controls International plc, Eaton Corporation plc, Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG, Parker Hannifin Corporation, WAGO Kontakttechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Yokohama Industries Inc., B&R Industrial Automation GmbH, Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG, Bosch Rexroth AG, Delta Electronics Inc., Festo AG & Co. KG, IDEC Corporation, Keyence Corporation, National Instruments Corporation, Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH
Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Industrial Controls Market Report Structure 3. Industrial Controls Market Trends And Strategies 4. Industrial Controls Market – Macro Economic Scenario 5. Industrial Controls Market Size And Growth ….. 27. Industrial Controls Market Competitor Landscape And Company Profiles 28. Key Mergers And Acquisitions 29. Future Outlook and Potential Analysis 30. Appendix
Contact Us:
The Business Research Company
Europe: +44 207 1930 708
Asia: +91 88972 63534
Americas: +1 315 623 0293
Email: [email protected]
Follow Us On:
LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/the-business-research-company
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tbrc_info
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheBusinessResearchCompany
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC24_fI0rV8cR5DxlCpgmyFQ
Blog: https://blog.tbrc.info/
Healthcare Blog: https://healthcareresearchreports.com/
Global Market Model: https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/global-market-model
0 notes
Text
India has urged its citizens travelling to or living in Canada to "exercise utmost caution".
The advisory comes a day after tensions escalated between the countries with each expelling a diplomat from the other side.
Canada said it was investigating "credible allegations" linking the Indian state with the killing of a Sikh separatist leader.
India strongly denied this, calling the allegations "absurd".
Analysts say relations between the countries, which have been strained for months, are now at an all-time low.
How India-Canada ties descended into a public feud
Why Western nations fear India-Canada row
On Wednesday, India's foreign ministry said it issued the advisory "in view of growing anti-India activities and politically-condoned hate crimes and criminal violence in Canada".
The Indian government has often reacted sharply to demands by Sikh separatists in Western countries for Khalistan, or a separate Sikh homeland.
The Khalistan movement peaked in India in the 1980s with a violent insurgency centred in Sikh-majority Punjab state.
It was quelled by force and has little resonance in India now, but is still popular among some in the Sikh diaspora in countries such as Canada, Australia and the UK.
Canada has the highest number of Sikhs outside Punjab and has seen several pro-Khalistan protests and demonstrations. In June, reports said India had raised a "formal complaint" with Canada about the safety of its diplomats there.
In Wednesday's statement, Delhi said that some recent threats were directed at its diplomats and some Indians "who oppose the anti-India agenda".
"Indian nationals are, therefore, advised to avoid travelling to regions and potential venues in Canada that have seen such incidents," it said.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Monday that intelligence agencies were investigating whether "agents of the government of India" were involved in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen - India had designated him a terrorist in 2020.
Nijjar was shot dead in his vehicle by two masked gunmen outside a Sikh temple on 18 June in British Columbia.
"Any involvement of a foreign government in the killing of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an unacceptable violation of our sovereignty," Mr Trudeau told the Canadian parliament on Monday.
India reacted strongly, saying that Canada was trying to "shift the focus from Khalistani terrorists and extremists" who had been given shelter there.
Some Indian media reports claimed the statement from Delhi followed a similar Canadian advisory for its citizens travelling to India. Canada's government confirmed its travel advice for India had been updated on Monday but said it had been "as part of pre-scheduled and routine maintenance in the section on travel health information".
"No new risk information has been added to the India TAA [Travel Advice and Advisories] page," a spokesperson told the BBC. Ottawa's advisory asks its citizens to "exercise a high degree of caution" because of the "risk of terrorist attacks throughout" India.
5 notes
·
View notes