#if this is wrong I'm sorry I'm not a quantum physicist

[hawnks]

There's this very famous experiment where particles pass through a screen with two slits in it, and essentially the outcome of it was that the particles behave one way when someone is looking at them, a different way when they're left alone. Which is so crazy because it means that somehow, the particles know when they're being observed.

I had a dream last night that I was one of the scientists observing the particles, their little tiny patterns. And one of them stopped and looked back at me (don't ask me how a photon can look at someone); so I asked it "does any of this really matter?" And the photon shrugged and said "it can," and then it went back to being a wave and then I woke up.

Idk what that means.

[spiritualitygeek]

I Don't Know Who Needs To Read This But-

At this point I'm literally so annoyed about the misconceptions the LOA/LOAss communities and people have in general about "manifestation."

I mean, I'm sorry not sorry if I sound rude or blunt on this one. But it pushes me to the edge to see literally everyone around me, including myself feeling guilty and insecure and what not about wanting/ desiring something.

Like, despite having read so many books about the concept and having understood the fact that "Creation is finished," as Neville Goddard quoted. And that "There's multiple versions of each of us in multiple realities," as explained by Frederick E Dodson in his book Parallel Universes of Self, I still suffer from the feelings of insecurity and guilty, time and time again.

And not just me, I've seen many, even on YouTube, Tumblr, etc, stuck in the same worries and doubts. Whether it's about wanting something or someone in our lives. Specially when it's a "big deal" that seem practically impossible.

I simply don't understand why we humans are so fixated on being practical and staying grounded, fearing that we might lose our sense of reality? That we might go insane.

Influenced by these fears we accept things we don't truly deserve. And it's pathetic because we aren't ready to do even the bare minimum for the things we actually do deserve.

It's sad that just to feel secure and avoid losing our minds, we conform to a life that isn't what we truly want, all the while ignoring the fact that the life we desire exists in another reality. And it's not mere wishful thinking and woodoo stuff.

If it wasn't attainable, it wouldn't have been on your mind to begin with.

So many quantum physicists, Metaphysicians, are they probably dumb? And are we, ignorant humans very smart?

Why? Why it's so hard to accept that there's nothing wrong with wanting what the version of ourselves has in that different reality. It's all about our own damn conciousness. We can literally shift into that reality the moment we gain this clarity and stick to it.

So many coaches and metaphysicians kept repeating. And it still can't be stressed enough that "Manifestation isn't about creating something new or manipulating circumstances to attract things. No! There are countless versions of each of us, existing simultaneously in numerous different realities. Manifestation is about aligning ourselves with the version of us that already possesses what we want. We aren't attracting or creating anything externally. There's literally nothing and no one to change but self."

The key is to manipulate yourself. Command yourself. Control yourself. Keep repeating to yourself. You don't need to change a thing out there, you simply need to convince yourself of the simple truth. Because that's exactly how things work.

Once you start to see it like that, you'll see why there's literally no need to feel guilty or insecure about wanting things for yourself. You're not a bad person to want love or to want happiness. It doesn't harm anyone as long as your intentions aren't meant to hurt others physically or mentally. And rest assured, for people who mean harm for others, Law of Karma exists.

But for others of us, who want love, money, happiness and joy in life, you're not doing anything wrong! Because again, I can't stress this enough!! There's already a reality where you do have it all. You just need to align yourself with that version of you. It's not about manipulation or attraction; it's about embracing a reality, a version of you, that's already there. Just shift your focus away from what you're seeing with your naked eyes and dare to see with your third eye that sees beyond physical realities, aka "imagination."

[sabakos]

OK so like what is the deal with the rationalists every time you post about them there are new and wild details what are their beliefs why do you hate them. Sorry if you've answered this 1 billion times before

Nota Bene: This post is for informational purposes only, anyone who tries to argue or "debate" with me on it is getting blocked with no further warning.

Yeah, sorry, I've been a bit worn down by discourse so I think I'm going to mostly pass on this one and lean on someone else's work. Especially since RationalWiki (which, confusingly, predates and is mostly not aligned with Yudkowsky brand Rationalism) has a fairly thorough exposition.

It's certainly far from unbiased and I don't necessarily endorse everything in this article at the time of my posting, but I don't think it's unfair either. Here's a summary from the article:

The good bits are not original and the original bits are not good. The well-written explanations of cognitive biases are taken idea-for-idea from Kahneman. In contrast, the quantum physics sequence not only makes actual physicists throw things at walls, it builds to an essay arguing that you should use Yudkowsky's version of Bayesianism rather than empirical science.

I feel this is mostly true, except I would lean heavier on even the parts about cognitive biases also being fairly out of date at this point. Still far better than the quantum bayesian nonsense though, it's at least interestingly wrong. I would say that Kahneman's worth reading if you can be properly skeptical about him, but Yudkowsky isn't.

As for why I personally hate the Rationalists, well, it's like if the Jehovah's Witnesses knocked on your door over a hundred times per year: you'd be polite the first few times, but after a dozen or so you'd probably put up a "No Solicitors" sign, and soon you'd start chasing them off with a shotgun. I have an overlapping set of hobbies with many of these people (e.g. philosophy, physics, computer science), which attracts a disproportionate number of them into my life. I then somehow (???) give these people the initial impression that I'm intelligent and thoughtful, but when it turns out that I'm unwilling to extend that courtesy of "thoughtfulness" to their insane pseudophilosophical beliefs, there's a great deal of friction. Especially so since one of the main vulnerabilities that this group plays on is their victims' need to feel intelligent, an opinion I categorically do not share about them!

[thatreallyminecraftsmygender]

If the dimensions are fold into eachother could the portals work wormhole style but instead of jumping through parts space time you jump between dimensions...

So where the 2 dimensions overlap you can create a portal that allows you to travel between the 2?

Idk if that would work because idk if the nether and the overworld are made of the same 'fabric'... so idk if they would overlap and interact in the same way space time could, it's been a while since I've done physics

I also think that quantum entanglement could me more useful than quantum tunneling because quantum tunneling (from what I remember) is mostly useful because we can sorta reverse engineer what they're coming from using the probability of an electron tunneling a certain distance. But quantum entanglement works across space so you can move really large distances and still affect the 2 particles and therefore send information.

I also vaguely remember that both quantum tunneling and entanglement work on particles with mass (like electrons) so that might useful.... But I'm still stumped as to how teleportation would work unless it happened star trek style where you're recreated atom for atom in the new place, using quantum entanglement to send the info in some sort of code...

Disclaimer I'm not a physicist and I'm trying to remember things I did briefly like.. 2 years ago THIS IS ALL WRONG IM NOT AJ EXPERT

@n0vashift sorry for tagging you I wanna know ur thoughts you seem to know a lot more about this than me

Amateur physicist here! i think it was mentioned a while back about how the nether and end are alternate dimensions stacked kinda like a sandwich so those two dimensions could be higher dimensions (up to 10th or 9th depending on what school of thought you subscribe to) that have coiled up on themselves very small into circles - the nether may be a folded space that allows you to travel very far distances when coming in and out of it bc it's non-euclidian (continued in another ask wheeze sorry)

Wow, I think I understood maybe three words in this! That’s a new record low :D But seriously, feel free to come around and shower this blog with science whenever you want.

[sagebodisattva]

The Theory of Everything - Master Equation of the Universe REVEALED!

"A theory of everything (ToE), final theory, ultimate theory, or master theory is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of the universe. Finding a theory of everything is one of the major unsolved problems in physics. Over the past few centuries, two theoretical frameworks have been developed that, as a whole, most closely resemble a theory of everything. These two theories upon which all modern physics rests are general relativity (GR) and quantum field theory (QFT). General relativity is a theoretical framework that only focuses on gravity for understanding the universe in regions of both large-scale and high-mass: stars, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, etc. On the other hand, quantum field theory is a theoretical framework that only focuses on three non-gravitational forces for understanding the universe in regions of both small scale and low mass: sub-atomic particles, atoms, molecules, etc. Quantum field theory successfully implemented the Standard Model and unified the interactions (so-called Grand Unified Theory) between the three non-gravitational forces: weak, strong, and electromagnetic force.

Through years of research, physicists have experimentally confirmed with tremendous accuracy virtually every prediction made by these two theories when in their appropriate domains of applicability. In accordance with their findings, scientists also learned that general relativity and quantum field theory, as they are currently formulated, are mutually incompatible – they cannot both be right. Since the usual domains of applicability of general relativity and quantum field theory are so different, most situations require that only one of the two theories be used. As it turns out, this incompatibility between general relativity and quantum field theory is apparently only an issue in regions of extremely small-scale and high-mass, such as those that exist within a black hole or during the beginning stages of the universe (i.e., the moment immediately following the Big Bang). To resolve this conflict, a theoretical framework revealing a deeper underlying reality, unifying gravity with the other three interactions, must be discovered to harmoniously integrate the realms of general relativity and quantum field theory into a seamless whole: a single theory that, in principle, is capable of describing all phenomena. In pursuit of this goal, quantum gravity has become an area of active research.

Eventually a single explanatory framework, called "string theory", emerged that intends to be the ultimate theory of the universe. String theory posits that at the beginning of the universe (up to 10−43 seconds after the Big Bang), the four fundamental forces were once a single fundamental force. According to string theory, every particle in the universe, at its most microscopic level (Planck length), consists of varying combinations of vibrating strings (or strands) with preferred patterns of vibration. String theory further claims that it is through these specific oscillatory patterns of strings that a particle of unique mass and force charge is created (that is to say, the electron is a type of string that vibrates one way, while the up-quark is a type of string vibrating another way, and so forth)."

Of course, the pursuit to find a single unifying theory that is capable of describing all phenomena will remain elusive to mankind for so long as he keeps on the materialist blinders and continually ignores the deeper implications of quantum mechanics. For so long as he dismisses these implications, relegating them to quantum quackery, and maintains his tunnel vision for objectivity and externalism, he is simply not pursuing the truth of reality. Yes, REALITY. It's not even a question of a universe. It's a question of reality; of which, the universe is just a feature. I mean, really... How ignorant and short sighted do you have to be to focus your scientific inquires solely on visual phenomena and completely ignore that which gives visual phenomena context? Talk about putting the cart before the horse! Or, even worse, to take it for granted as some inconsequential default given that plays no part in the reality equation? It's simply foolish.

And so now, "string theory", is the best they could come up with, in establishing a single explanatory framework... and don't get me wrong, it's a decent theory. Perhaps the best one to date... but it's still WRONG, as it continues to make the same ole mistake. String theory talks about what happened right after the big bang, when the so called "universe", was seconds old... when all four of the so called "forces", were a single fundamental force! Then goes on to posit that every particle in the universe is composed of combinations of vibrating strings at the microscopic level, which vibrate according to preferred patterns! And from this, particles of unique mass and force charge are created! GASP! Wow! That's sure a whole lot of complex materials out there doing lots of inexplicably strange things! It feels like we are getting closer to the truth, doesn't it?? I dunno, does it? Or are these just conceptual models crafted from abstractions, that are based on limited perceptions of experience, that are often filtered through a prosthetic technology, attempting to describe events that mankind has never even seen with his own eyes?

"Yes, but our telescopes and microscopes allow the inductive and deductive logical reasoning required to make inferences and attributions about the universe!"

Yes, of course.. and that's nice. But it has nothing to do with the truth. This is something you're gonna have to face up to sooner or later, and the sooner you face up to it, the better off you'll be: Material science doesn't deal in the truth. Sorry. In fact, material science is dead... they just don't know it yet... at least as it pertains to the discovery of the truth of reality.

"Yeah, but material science deals in facts!"

And, so what? Facts are not the truth. Can you prove the fact of the fact is a fact? I don't think you can. And even if you tried, your conclusion is still going to heavily involve YOU as the main key ingredient in substantiating any such proof, despite your denial of this, and your dismissal of the subject as extraneous. Facts are, at best, temporary provisional circumstances. They are situational stock. Visual arrangements in the limited scope of sense perception illusion. So, if you are interested in describing illusion, then yeah, stick with material science... but don't do so and pretend that you are in pursuit of the truth. If you are actually interested in the truth, you will make the scientific inquiry with the approach of idealism... and if so, THEN you might actually begin to get somewhere with your exploratory investigations. But until then, you are just dicking around with abstractions about illusory objects that have nothing to do with the fundamentals of reality.

So, with this in mind, it's obvious why the theory of everything has been so elusive to mankind. All this time man has pursued it, he has been approaching it with a false premise. No wonder he isn't getting anywhere!

"But we've discovered quarks!"

It goes even deeper then that! If I told you that it goes on forever, and never has an end, would you keep voluntarily tumbling down that rabbit hole? You feel like you don't have a choice, and feel you must do so to uphold the integrity of science and knowledge, but that's only because you don't understand that it's an illusion, hence you are holding a false premise, thus you are taking the completely wrong approach, despite it feeling so right. Like the thirsty guy who keeps on walking down the highway towards the water on the horizon, unable to recognize that what he is pursuing is merely a mirage.

"So what about an underlying mathematical pattern that accounts for all phenomena?"

After everything I've just said, if you are still asking that question, then you have seemingly missed the point... but, if you feel you really need a master equation to sleep better at night, then I will finally tell you the ancient top secret elusive mathematical equation of the universe that physicists have long sought over the course of many years. This is the big reveal folks. This is full disclosure.

The reason the master equation has always evaded the scientist's grasp, is because said scientist's have been applying themselves to the problem with the wrong approach. All this time, they were trying to put a square peg into a round hole. To unravel the master equation involves a higher form of mathematics; a "meta math", if you will, to give full clarity to the enigmatic solution. This is a form of math far beyond linear algebra, vector calculus, differentials, probabilities, number theory or real analysis. This is an area of math that could best be described as mathematical metaphysics. A kind of metaphysical math that can only be applied when approaching mathematics from the meta perspective. This is the math of math.

And so, without further ado, here is the Meta Sage's theory of everything. The master equation of the universe REVEALED!

0 + 1 - 1 = 0.

And I'm dead serious. This is no joke. Zero, plus one, minus one, equals zero...

And I know many of you may be screaming, or groaning, or face palming, but that's because you still don't get it. You still have not broken the externalization mindset conditioning. But you'll see, if this has to stand the test of time, so be it. This is the record of my claim. And you'll see, years from now, long after I'm dead and gone, they'll find out that I was right. But that's because physics has a worm's eye view, while metaphysics flies higher then an eagle.