#idt we’re compatible

[myli3s]

i dont like him

[seiwas]

selly belly, i want to ask you !! what tropes would you pair yourself with your faves ??

tallulah bb!! hello 🥹 lovely of you to drop by!!

thank u for asking this bb!! this is such an interesting question for my very uninteresting answer 🥲🥹🫶🏻 truly, my default is always a slowburn friends to lovers, no matter who it is 😭 (i think it comes w how i am 😭 it takes me a while to warm up to someone!!)

but!!! to give you something more creative hehe here are some of my thoughts if we take away bsf/friends to lovers 🫶🏻:

iwaizumi -> fwb to lovers (it is wholly out of character for the both of us & i think that’s why we’d end up together cos we’re both fools n get attached lOL)

bakugo -> exes to lovers (i would not stand his ass with his attitude 😭 i also think he has too many issues i probs won’t be equipped to handle earlier on—it’s a timing thing!)

shouto & megumi -> fake dating (i looooove the idea of fake dating w shouto for publicity 😭 & megumi for convenience 😭 the blurred lines of what’s fake and what’s real!!!)

gojo -> arranged marriage (truly bc idt i’d marry him otherwise 😭 i love him but being so fr idk if we’re compatible 😭 an arranged marriage leaves us with no choice! and maybe i do realise along the way that we can work out somehow!!!)

oikawa -> exes to lovers (very much a case of right person wrong time—so with that point, we try to find the right time 🥹)

atsumu, kiri, & yuuji -> roommates (not sure if this is a trope but they all fit here bc i think they’re all some sub breed of friends to lovers widjejd i think it’s bc they’re bros who try to play it cool but are in denial to the core 😭)

nanami -> neighbours to lovers (i just think i’d be his annoyingly happy neighbour who bakes way too often and ends up giving him some extras every now and then 🥹)

[marley-manson]

Depending on what you mean by trust, I might suggest season 5, since it’s when they team up for more serious shennanigans such as The Korean Surgeon and Souvenirs. He does tell BJ about sensitive things in season 4 though, like his sad monologue in The Late Captain Pierce, Carlye, and his erectile dysfunction lol, but tbf he tells everyone about the latter and imo Hawkeye being open and emotionally forthcoming isn’t necessarily a sign of trust for him, it’s just how he is.

Though tbh I never get the sense early on that Hawkeye doesn’t trust BJ, I feel like it’s just an assumed part of their friendship. Like if we’re talking analytically, I don’t get an impression that Hawkeye lacking in trust in BJ is a thing in seasons 4-6. Though if we’re talking in more headcanony terms of like, eg whether Hawkeye would come out to him lol, since that’s been a discussion going around recently, I don’t think he ever trusts him enough for that over the course of the show. Imo that’s less about trust anyway and more about a rock solid understanding of the other person’s worldview being compatible with having gay friends, and by 50s standards idt BJ demonstrated that worldview.

And that said, I personally also think that after season 6/7 Hawkeye’s trust in BJ goes down, as BJ gets more emotionally unavailable and combatative. Hawkeye turns to other people for support, sometimes directly eschewing BJ in favour of someone else, like seeking out Mulcahy in Letters, or Margaret in Blood and Guts after BJ spends a conversation ignoring him, or Mulcahy again in Depressing News. Which I think is a very interesting friendship trajectory for them, and very fitting as a depiction of friendships made in a war zone.

when dose Hawkeye start to trust BJ? because BJ trusts Hawkeye immediatley but I'm not sure when it really clicks that Hawkeye trusts BJ. I don't mean that he dosen't immediately like BJ, because he dose, they click instantly on a pretty core level, but i'm interested when that sort of intellectual thought out comes into the relationship.

[johnettereidy75-blog]

Free Converter From YouTube To Mp4

In case you've ever tried to seek for software that may convert audio and video information on Home windows, you may know how laborious it can be to find dedicated options that are truly free and performance as marketed. And it stays like this for all future use of the MP3 format, until one goes to Tools""Preferences""Reset preferences" which then returns all to defaults and it really works, however solely on the 128 bit fee. Other formats like OGG Vorbis and so forth should not displaying this behaviour, and I don't bear in mind my previous verson which was 2.zero.5., doing this. WMA, quick for Home windows Media Audio, is an audio file format created by Microsoft for the Windows working system. Though it is a common and extensively appropriate format, there are occasions when converting an wma to an MP3 is good, particularly now with the recognition of iPod, iPad, iPhone, and many others. If you wish to assure complete compatibility between WMA information and transportable music players, one of the best wager is to convert music files to the favored unprotected MP3 format to be able to totally get pleasure from all of the music on any other moveable gadget. WMA can be utilized to confer with its audio file format or its audio codecs. Usually WMA" stands for Home windows Media Audio". wma mp4 конвертер скачать бесплатно" owned by Microsoft as a part of Microsoft's Windows Media expertise. WMA is a quite common and extensively used audio file extension, being solely second to MP3. WMA is a downloadable format, and along side Microsoft's Advanced Streaming Format (ASF). WMA can optionally support digital rights management (DRM) use to guard copy right audio information. Just like the above apps, VidCompact does greater than converting movies. It might probably also minimize, trim, crop, and compress movies if you need. The app helps all major formats like AVI, MKV, FLV, RMVB, 3GP, MPEG, WMV, MOV, and so forth. What's totally different about this app is that you could convert videos from supported codecs to MP4 format only. Since virtually every machine, service, and website supports the MP4 format, it isn't that big of a limitation except you wish to particularly convert the video into different codecs.

is a service for converting information on-line from one kind to another. We care for your privateness and handle your information. As part of this, there isn't any registration required on As we're providing our service in a browser, it does'nt matter whether or not you employ Windows, Apple OS X or Linux. Your conversion outcomes will at all times be at the identical, very high quality and naturally, with out watermarks.

After I tried to convert my audio recordsdata from WMA to MP3, I get an error message that I have to seek for a plugin. See pictures beneath. Some customers have reported that this system stops letting you convert information after 14 days. If that occurs to you, something you may strive is beginning the uninstall process and seeing if Change asks you to revert to the free, non-trial version (as an alternative of eradicating this system). Select the Output folder the place you'll be able to choose the destination folder for saving your transformed MP3 file. Hit ‘Convert' button to complete the conversion of WMA to MP3 file format. A: No. This message means that there's one thing unsuitable along with your input file. Attempting to convert it once more, even deciding on another output format, is mindless. On this step, you simply have to pick the output format as MP4 and select desired vacation spot file for saving the converted MP4 video file. You could see a format tray on the backside of the primary interface, select video class and select MP4 as output format. You can additionally select from pre-outlined presets like iPhone, iPod and so on. to play files conveniently. Finally, click on "Convert" to begin the conversion course of. For all formats, Audacity presently discards any current lyrics or album art when exporting. You may copy the lyrics (or search for them online) then add them back to the exported file in your favourite media player. Extract the album artwork utilizing a tag editor comparable to IDTE (or use Windows Media Player or iTunes to look online for the artwork) then add the artwork back to the exported file using your media participant. Free Video Converter has a small set of output options (MP4, AVI, MPEG and MP3 can be found, plus an option optimized for iOS gadgets), however that might be a lot if you happen to're not used to working with video information, and the likes of Handbrake or MediaCoder look excessively sophisticated. So you need to set up Wondershare Video Converter in your system and wma mp4 конвертер скачать бесплатно that additionally help you edit audio or convert the video information additionally. So simply observe these few points and that may assist you to lots.

[tastydregs]

Energous’ WattUp can charge hearing aids and other devices from 15 feet away

San Jose, California company Energous — the brainchild of George Holmes, an MIT graduate and former sales executive at Lucent — has made considerable progress toward its goal of ubiquitous power-at-a-distance charging in five years. It’s amassed more than 170 patents, partnered with Dialog Semiconductor to manufacture and sell its licensed chip designs, and assembled a crack team of engineers who’ve honed its WattUp transceivers for commercialization.

So naturally, Energous CEO Steve Rizzone had lots to discuss at CES 2019 in Las Vegas, where VentureBeat caught up with him for a brief chat. His main point: FCC-approved Energous devices are just weeks from shipping.

“[What’s] different at CES 2019 is that this is all this … technology is ready [to be] actively … integrated into customer products,” he said. “Products are going to start shipping to the consumer in the coming weeks.”

You’ve likely never heard of Energous’ early adopters — companies like IDT International Limited, Qubercomm, Delight, and The Gokhale Method. But their products are real and useful. Delight and SK Telesys designed sound-amplifying earbuds and a wireless charging case that tap Energous’ near-field ( i.e., within 10 centimeters) charging tech. Austar Hearing Science and Technology has a hearing aid that recharges wire-free. And posture specialist Gokhale is working on a spine tracker that swaps pogo pins for a WattUp chip, allowing up to five sensors to draw power through the air from a single charging pad.

Above: Austar Hearing Science and Technology’s hearing aid.

Image Credit: Kyle Wiggers / VentureBeat

Many of the integrations — particularly those involving smaller devices, like hearing aids — wouldn’t have been possible with existing solutions, Rizzone says. One of the most popular wireless charging standards, Qi, achieves inductive transfer through magnetic coils embedded in both the device and charger. They have to be perfectly aligned and laid flat against each other. Otherwise, it’s no go.

WattUp needs no such coils — its transmitters sense and communicate with receiver devices via Bluetooth Low Energy, and send power when requested by said devices. As long as compatible gadgets are within range of a transmitter, they’ll charge — regardless of their orientation or position. Better still, there’s no limit to the number of devices that can charge simultaneously.

That versatility likely played a role in convincing T-Mobile parent company Deutsche Telekom, Qualcomm, and Vuzix to create concept products embedded with chips from Energous’ portfolio. Vuzix’s prototype Blade smart glasses have a charging case that supplies juice wirelessly. Qualcomm, for its part, showed off low-latency Locatum asset-tracking tags, up to 20 of which can be placed on a single charging pad.

Perhaps the most intriguing of the bunch, though, is Deutsche Telekom’s router. From the outside, there’s nothing to suggest it’s anything other than a stock gateway with a few built-in telephony features. But peel back the plastic housing and you’ll find an Energous mid-field transmitter onboard, which can charge things placed 8 to 12 inches from the router’s topmost point.

Above: Deutsche Telekom’s concept router.

Image Credit: Kyle Wiggers / VentureBeat

“What we’re seeing is that customers [are] adding more and more SKUs because they’re familiar with technology,” Rizzone said. “They’re comfortable [that it] works, and they’re happy.”

It helps, of course that Energous’ chips don’t contribute much to the overall bill of materials — just a few dollars, Rizzone said — and afford greater freedom in product design. For example, smartwatches that charge with pogo pins can’t be hermetically sealed. Relegating charging to a wireless radio solves that problem.

Internet of things devices stand to benefit too, Rizzone said — things like thermostats, security cameras, and wall-mounted alarms. With WattUp, they wouldn’t need to draw power from a battery or an eyesore of a cable — they’d get it from a router placed a few feet away.

Devices won’t charge quickly, though, or from across a room. Rizzone says that far-field charging (that is to say, at distances of 30 feet or more) isn’t in the cards right now. It’s not that it isn’t possible — Energous says it’s achieved such in the lab — but that it’s impractical. Rizzone says that within the FCC’s mandated transmission limit, you’d see tens to hundreds of microwatts at best, a fraction of a fraction of the 7 watts some smartphones are capable of drawing.

That said, Energous isn’t abandoning the idea of high-power transmission. In the next year or two, it plans to roll out a near-field chip that can deliver up to 20 watts.

Above: Gokhale Method’s SpineTracker.

Image Credit: Kyle Wiggers / VentureBeat

Energous’ forthcoming commercial lineup was a year in the making.

In April, it announced that Wireless Charging 2.0 — the latest generation of its platform, which can theoretically charge devices from up to 15 feet away — had received approval from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for short-range, near-field charging under the agency’s Part 18 rules. The news came months after U.S. regulators greenlit Energous’ mid-field charging transmitters, which can recharge compatible gadgets devices within a three-foot radius.

And in November, Energous launched the DA2223 receiver chip — at 1.7 x 1.4 x 0.5 millimeters, its smallest chip yet, a fraction of the size of a coin. It’s designed to couple with discrete components and small antennae, all of which together have a footprint small enough to fit in hearing aids, smartwatches, wireless speakers, and smartphones.

With the technological hurdles out of the way, Energous is turning its attention to the next roadblock: regulatory acceptance. While its WattUp near-field and mid-field chips have passed muster in the U.S., Europe, and over 100 other countries, South Korea’s Korea Communications Commission, China’s Certification and Accreditation Administration, and Japan’s Telecommunications Bureau have yet to give it the green light.

Of course, there’s competition. Ossia, which has raised more than $35 million to date, earlier this year teamed up with Walmart to pilot its wireless charging tech. And Powercast, a startup founded in 2003, has an at-a-distance wireless system that’s available in the form of a development kit.

But Rizzone firmly believes that Energous has them beat — because of its expanding partner ecosystem, the inroads its made with regulators, and the maturity of its technology.

“Let me make it clear that no wireless company is even our frame of reference,” Rizzone said.

[jewel-kr]

Reminiscing the friendship

So hello Tumblr... After a few yrs, i am back w a banger lol jk no . Just a few simple short-composing-alike that i’d fancy to jot down here . On the other hand, it feels so good to be back after maybe 3yrs of being inactive . hahahah sorry for that , got no time w all these growing up issues and responsibilities , ya get me right? was prolly 18y/o the last time i wrote here, On the verge of being 21st this yr hahaha .

Okay, I am not here to shittalk abt myself (prolly some other time) . Legitimately, the caption written above *Reminiscing The Friendship* . Friendship can comes in any way, any time and only the realest one would stick to your dummy freaky ass  hahaha . I got homies myself: from elementary school , middle school , college , social media acquaintances and prolly a ‘hai bye’ kinda friends hahaha . ykno, when yguys only met once and not having the chance to introduce yourself on the first place so on the second meetings yguys just ‘oh hey tsup? all good? aight nice to meet you , again’ . yup, you can relate . But yes i still got my realest blood that doesn’t wants me to die hahaha *Forever Grateful*

In this “so-called-diary” ,I  would only include one and only honorable mention for one of my 3yrs long-servant best-buddy (coming 4yrs this September) . Oh first of all, I won’t gonna include name of her cause she would notice this too . YES A SHE OMG HAHAHAHA . A funsized , adorable , lovely little buckteeth of mine (IF SHE’S TAKEN THEN SHE’S NOT MINE SO THIS CONTEXT WOULD AUTOMATICALLY CHANGED) . where were we? Right , our size is really not an issue *sobbing cause i am a huge beast standing to her*

It all started on 2013 (Actually way earlier cause i’ve been knowing her eversince she dated my friend , But i wasn’t  fond abt knowing her that period) . SO ITS A ONE SUNNY DAY IN 2013 WHERE .. jk it was on break-time period around 10-10.30 in the morning where i (okay i actually really have forgotten either i stole her number from a friend or ask for it) NEVERTHELESS THATS NOT THE CASE (it will be the case Joul if she finds out you forgot abt it) UGHHHH...PLS...ENCOURAGE...ME... OKAY I MIGHT ACTUALLY HAD ASKED FOR IT (don’t lie Joul) ... ITS BETWEEN THE TWO FFS , STOP MESSING W MY FEELINGS YOU SICK HUNCH! *inhale-exhale peacefully* . I AM OKAY NOW :) SO :) HMMM (whats w the smiley face) *this paragraph is a chaos create new one*

*new paragraph* so its between those two , the reason why i *EITHER* asked or stole it, its bcs she seems friendly the way she texted w him (they actually talk abt Neymar that time hahaha i remembered) , and no im not gonna spit down what our convo looked like afterthat , but forreal we got that same thinking w all the pros and cons of everything , abt the past and the future , we coped well cause she’s VERY VERY VERY AND REALISTICALLY FRIENDLY so idts it would be so hard for her to make friends and make a bond w everyone (WAIT... IF YGUYS ARE COMPATIBLE , WHY DON’T YGUYS JUST DATE?) . well Tumblr , if i wouldn’t be thinking of my future w her. I might have dated her long ago , She knows the drill too but it was never an issue for us

Had a thought during our fun-joy texting period that I and her would only be friend for temporary or maybe just a “hai bye” acquainted . BUT ... 29th September , 2013 proved me wrong . Its the day where we actually met , Accidentally i shall said cause we didn’t really planned on meeting . As i walked past by her group of friends she called up by my nickname hahaha , w that “ HAI DITO” all clear and clarity to that sound so i just said HI back and smile . We don’t really talked that day (idk why) . We did texted when we reached home abt meeting eachother and “oh wow you’re cute in real life” kinda expression. i wish i could actually tell detail information abt our conversation and what we’ve been thru but this story wouldn’t get to its end for even in 2hrs hahaha . Since that day , we’re officially-lawfully-ideal best buddy for life.

Time flies so fast , as if i’ve just known and met her yesterday . We went to the same college for a year in 2015-2016 , she’s still there but not me . I still remember the first day we met on college after such a long-drought of not meeting each each other .We had this cute-little hugs on elevator on our way to the basement hahaha . ITS SO CUTE , and ofcourse many more hugs came from her . okay back to basic.. We shared our stories together, We called each other on phone tho very seldomly hahaha but the memory stays fresh in me . We talked abt how stupid , reckless and unworthy our ex-es were (mostly came from her) . i know i can sense if she’s not okay even that she said she’s okay . some ppl might say she’s problematic but that’s not how i view her . yes she got plenty of problems but she intends to keep it , that’s what i called that she’s just the victim of situation . Not truly her fault . Tho she can be so stubborn yet i would still love her . At some point i’ve been thinking that both of us is the contrast of each other character : Our attitude,  social life, style of living ... yet , its the same moment where i felt that I and her have that strong bond towards each other . We had our ups & downs , She was there when i needed her the most : I loved how she never judged me . I am always the pessimist and negative side but i know she got my back and vice versa, Cause that’s what bestfriends would do . Supportive and encouraging towards the journey. She might be a Diploma holder in the nearest time and i would be glad for her achievement , And i hope she would achieve much more in life.

We may not talk nor meet regularly due to focusing on studies but i know at some glance she��ll remember me , Even if i dropped drastically from her ‘important ppls’ charts . As long as i’ll have 1% chance of going top , I’ll put 99% faith on it . But hey, that’s part of growing up : Living w big circles of countless friends , active social life cause that’s what growing up needs to do for living (:

xoxo, J  *stopped writing at 3.56AM*  *currently missing the hugs hahaha*

[guluamnews-blog]

A Wayback Machine travel with BeOS R4, Zeta 1.0, and Haiku Bounce into the Wayback Machine with Ars and return to the radiance that was BeOS.

Introducing BeOS R4 on Intel

Unique proofreader's note: this introduce audit was composed in light of the Win32 client. Not the greater part of the elements said in this audit are exceptional to R4, nor are they just to be found in the BeOS. Be that as it may, this should be a "Windows versus Be" or a "Linux versus Be" correlation.

What we have here is an (ideally) point by point survey of the BeOS R4 establishment on Intel-based machines. While you'll surely get a decent take a gander at this new OS, we're not going to discuss the applications that come packaged with BeOS R4, and we'll spare the yummy center innovation review for some other time. I'm beginning with a survey of the introduce procedure since I believe it's an awesome marker of what BeOS is and can be, and I needed to let everybody know exactly what's in question in case you're occupied with giving it a turn.

In the first place things first

The primary thing I did, obviously, was to check Be's Intel Hardware Compatibility Information (you can check PPC Hardware Compatibility here). For your illumination however, lemme simply say that we have the accompanying backing anticipating our (ab)use:

Most all your Intel-perfect CPU adore needs:

AMD

K-6 and K6-2

Cyrix 686MX, GXm

(not M1)

Intel Pentium

family (classico, MMX, Pro, II)

IDT WinChip C6

Most all the Intel chipsets you're going to discover these CPU's running on are upheld, including the more up to date BX and GX sets (yet check no doubt, please!).

Representation adore:

Matrox

cards out the wazoo. Each card that I am aware of (starting at 12/98) is bolstered.

Riva 128 and TNT

based cards (the TNT driver is as yet being advanced, in any case).

ATI cards are

good to go: 3D Rage (II, Pro, Pro Turbo, LT Pro) based cards are set.

To say the very least

Virge, S3, Cirrus cards, and so on.

Support is in

the works for Number 9 128 and 3D cards.

Once more, you ought to check the BeOS Intel Hardware Guide certainly if your framework is bolstered or not.

I've introduced R4 on 4 machines up until now, and every one of the four have worked great. My two Matrox cards (a Millennium II and a Mystique 220) sparkled in 2D, and my Riva 128 (STB) was nearly as smooth. I kept running into some video related issues on my home machine, however that is on account of I was utilizing the test TNT drivers. More on that later.

Where to Install?

BeOS has it's own (kickin', cutting edge) filesystem, so you can't simply introduce onto some FAT or NTFS parcel. You'll require a vacant parcel (or even better, an unfilled circle) accessible in the event that you need to introduce the BeOS. Be that as it may, don't worry it in the event that you don't as of now have these things. Circle space is shoddy, and even better, the BeOS R4 CD accompanies an extraordinary rendition of Partition Magic (for 9x and NT) that can help you in your journey for affection. In the event that you have a FAT32 parcel of 8GB, and you're just utilizing 3GB, simply start up this uncommon variant of Partition Magic and resize that segment and you're good to go. On the off chance that you don't have to resize any parcels, I suggest utilizing BeOS's boot-time segment administrator. It's out and out smooth. More on that later.

I attempted a couple introduce situation changes to cover however many bases as could be expected under the circumstances: a BeOS-just introduce (on a PII 350), a Linux and BeOS double boot (on a Pentium Pro, and yes, it was the scandalous Pro!), and a Win95/NT/BeOS Triple boot on an Abit BH6-Celeron 300a overclocked to 450MHz (Wanna find out about this frantic machine setup? Look at Dr. Harm's audit).

How about we do it

Introducing the BeOS is a great deal like introducing NT or Linux from CD. The floppy installer/boot circle will in all probability recognize your CD-ROM, mount it, and run the installer. It worked for me: even the extraordinarily crappy CD-ROM drive on one of the Imperial Labs machines was distinguished and worked. Without a doubt, it's an ATAPI consistent CD-ROM drive, so identification is not too astounding, but rather my anomaly of-nature CD-ROM drive has constantly found a method for resisting most CD-ROM location stages.

In the event that you don't as of now have the BeOS on your framework, make sure to put your BeOS R4 CD in your CD-ROM drive while you're booting off the floppy. Not at all like NT and most Linux introduces, the BeOS boot plate won't really instruct you to put the CD in. Or maybe, you'll simply get a mistake expressing that a bootable BeOS segment was not accessible. Be ought to clear up this on-screen (you are advised to do as such in the documentation, in any case).

Booting off the CD-ROM takes you directly into the BeOS R4 Setup GUI. No ASCII, no grotesqueness (however offensiveness is cool when practical). In case you're parceled and prepared to go (i.e., in the event that you've effectively made your BeOS filesystem segment with the included Partition Magic), you can choose where you wish to introduce the BeOS. If not, the installer will check your setup and see what it finds. In the event that you have a blend of SCSI and IDE gadgets, don't stress. It knows they exist. Here's a look at the installer applet that surfaces when you boot from the CD-ROM.Now, it won't not be so lovely for you! The setup GUI will endeavor to stack the fitting base video driver for your card. In everything except one of my trials, my cards were identified and set up consummately. On the TNT framework, the GUI came up to a frightening looking "grayscale" config that was truly more purple than dim. On the off chance that you boot into something like this, it implies that your video card is not yet bolstered. However, you'll be expecting that since you checked the equipment list, isn't that so?

Be that as it may, don't fuss. You can finish the introduce and even utilize the BeOS utilizing the frightful SVGA grayscale driver (be cautioned: it ravenously expends CPU cycles). In the wake of introducing you can introduce the test drivers on the off chance that you have a card that has some accessible (like my TNT), or you can check in with Be to perceive how driver advancements are going (a few drivers, similar to the #9 drivers, might be made accessible online after R4 begins to send). As should be obvious, the exploratory TNT drivers work, generally (these screen shots are from my TNT based framework).

In the event that you have a TNT based video card, be cautioned, nonetheless: the trial drivers truly are trial. In the 8 hours that I utilized R4 with the TNT drivers, the video drivers cut my framework down 3 times. They're practical, yet not exactly steady. On the off chance that any other person is out there utilizing them without an issue, lemme know!

Parceling with the boot time partitioner

For my first introduce I chose to (GASP!) introduce to my IBM SCSI 9GB Lovewonder on my revered Pentium Pro. That drive coincides with and is oppressed to my two EIDE Hard drives which as of now have Linux introduced. I was satisfied to find that the Setup GUI partitioner distinguished my Linux parcels accurately (local and swap), and didn't upset them. I was significantly more satisfied to discover that it was so natural to slap an Intel-style BeOS segment on my SCSI drive and introduce it. Panders (an Ars NT/Linux monster) will be eager to realize that Be gives you the decision of setting your default File System Block Size AT INSTALL (i.e., bunch size of 1024, 2048, and 4096). Tragically, I was seeking after a 512 choice. Here's a (trimmed) look at the Drive Setup apparatus, which you can use to include, introduce and demolish partitions.What you see above is my second introduce test: slappin' BeOS R4 on the impressive passing machine also called the Imperator's BH6-Celeron 300a pumpmeister. This time I was in marginally more perilous waters than when I was introducing to a Linux framework. Effectively donning two Microsoft Operating Systems, Windows 95 and Windows NT 4.0 w/SP4, I was interested to perceive what Be would consider the notorious NT OSLoader and how the NT OSLoader would respond to Be's plate enchantment! So on this framework I chose to put Be on my second of two Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 2500 10GB 7200 RPM drives. The primary parcel on this puppy sizes up at 6GB, and as should be obvious beneath, is designed for NTFS.I included the second segment and estimated it to 3GB. Be merits all the more, however hell, I'm running low on space as it seems to be! Entirely easy, regardless of the possibility that it's somewhat alarming to disturb ye olde parcels. Who controls the boot?

Who controls the Master Boot Record is a significantly scarier question. Gratefully, you have a ton of decisions. Would it be advisable for you to utilize Be's loader, NT's loader, LILO (Linux Loader), System Commander, or something else? I attempted both System Commander and Be's loader on my triple boot framework. Both worked awesome. I have (likely pointless) stresses over what will happen whenever I introduce a Microsoft refresh (NT, at any rate, has a propensity for seizing the MBR and thus devastating your other boot loaders), yet savvy reinforcements will dependably protect you (on the off chance that you run NT, refresh your RDISK!). Which would it be advisable for you to utilize? Be's loader is, obviously, free, so it's difficult to contend against it.

On the off chance that you run NT, notwithstanding, I would utilize a unique little device Be gives in the NT dir of the R4 CD called addbeos.exe. This application will examine your drive parcels, make a record called beos.bs in the base of c:, and change your boot.ini so you can simply choose BeOS from the NT OSLoader screen. Woohoo! Helpful, and a shrewd proceed onward Be's benefit.

In any case, there is another alternative, as well. On the off chance that you are vigilant about introducing some other boot loader than the one you as of now have introduced, or on the off chance that you run NT and would prefer not to adjust the boot.ini, you can boot Be simply utilizing a floppy. Dissimilar to DOS based frameworks, the BeOS (and Linux) enables you to start a totally typical, practical boot grouping from a floppy. Other than backing off the initial 20 seconds of your boot procedure, you'll encounter no different contrasts. Truly. Once the BeOS bootdisk has mounted your segment, the bootdisk is done, so you don't have to stress over keeping it in the drive or the drive get to backing you off or anything like that. Those of us with recollections of booting DOS for Windows recuperations have recollections that are difficult to deal with.