#i remember writing an academic paper on queer-coding in american media and let me tell u none of it was positive
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
"X is so genderidentity-coded" this "Z is b-sexuality and i will fight people on this" that, "10001 reasons why character C is [insert sexuality, gender identity, disability etc.]" shmat.
can we just go back to saying "I headcanon this character as being X, Y, Z"
If I see one more person use "[insert disability, gender identity, sexuality]-coded" in context of
"I personally view them as [sexuality] and a representation of [sexuality] and it's a positive thing and I will be upset if someone disagrees"
My brain will melt.
No one will fight you over headcanons, but some people will fight you over saying that a canonically pansexual character is 'actually lesbian/asexual/gay etc.'
#i feel like fandom etiquette is lost to time and fandoms and social media only suffers from it#bcs yes!! HC that this character is autistic or aroace or trans#everyone has headcanons!#but YOUR personal interpretation and takeaway of piece of media is NOT automatically canon#i remember writing an academic paper on queer-coding in american media and let me tell u none of it was positive#it started as filmmakers trying to pass the censorship by only coding characters as queer but it turned into just#coding villains and bad characters as queer#which harms the entire queer community#it applies to disabilities too#going 'oh they are so OCD-coded!' when a character just likes organizing and cleaning is not good#seeing a stereotype or crumb of stereotype and taking it as 'oh they are this then' is not great#ramble#qbr rambling
6 notes
·
View notes