Tumgik
#i remember writing an academic paper on queer-coding in american media and let me tell u none of it was positive
queerbrainrot · 8 months
Text
"X is so genderidentity-coded" this "Z is b-sexuality and i will fight people on this" that, "10001 reasons why character C is [insert sexuality, gender identity, disability etc.]" shmat.
can we just go back to saying "I headcanon this character as being X, Y, Z"
If I see one more person use "[insert disability, gender identity, sexuality]-coded" in context of
"I personally view them as [sexuality] and a representation of [sexuality] and it's a positive thing and I will be upset if someone disagrees"
My brain will melt.
No one will fight you over headcanons, but some people will fight you over saying that a canonically pansexual character is 'actually lesbian/asexual/gay etc.'
6 notes · View notes