#i have to say that because every one in 50 people will swear on Gawd I have Amer-Indian blood too

[13thpythagoras]

no scientist would deny that black people lived in Europe, and likely all over the entire Eurasian / African super-continent; before caucasians came in. Black Africans have been seafaring and crossing the Atlantic for millennia. Scientists now agree that even before the younger dryas, seafaring peoples also populated the Americas via Pacific island chains. There's no dispute that at least 3 different genetic sources of humans entered the Americas, including as well the Siberian-American landbridge. beyond dispute that white people originated from south Asia / India, and / or Hindi culture (hence, Indo-European meaning, Hindo or Hindu-European); it makes sense that this was a mercy program for people with albinism, born in the tropics of South Asia and India, to migrate north in their lifetime to seek a life away from the sun that would leave them burnt and with lowered life expectancy. No scientist would argue with the statement that India sent their albinos north and that became what we know as "caucasians" today, so calling caucasians "dravidian albinos" seems pretty accurate to me, almost seems beyond scientific debate at this point, but this write up does a nice job of at least conveying the fragility among audiences on this topic. Is it true some white people get offended by this analysis? holy snowflake meltdown batman I'm a human first and foremost, but i won't deny i am typically perceived as a white guy, this does not offend me whatsoever, I'm just genuinely curious where the controversy or confusion is ...