"- I have a lot of problems with Biden. He is clearly the better of the two options, which I recognize is a very low bar. Being better than Trump cannot be the standard, because Donald Trump is the absence of a standard.
"But the truth is, even if Trump looses, that won't be the end of this. The people who cooked up Project 2025 will just move onto Project 2029 instead, because for them, this is so much more than just one election, or indeed, one candidate. Project 2025 is born from impulse as old as America. It's an impulse that says one class of Americans is entitled to lead, and the rest of us are lucky to be allowed to serve- that thinks there should be a limited government when it comes to rules they have to live by, but also a unitary executive to keep the rest of us in line. These are old, old ideas that have been shouted from podiums-... but have now been placed into a new handbook for an only too willing president to use on day one.
"And in a perfect world, I would love if we had an opposing party better able to articulate a strong defense of our country's ideals and that also consistently lived up to them. People are entitled to hope for more from the next four years than someone just not being Trump (and for at least two supreme court justices to die)-...
"And for anyone tempted to think, 'Well, we survived Trump's first term,' first, not everyone did, and it should hopefully be very clear by now a second Trump term really does promise to be far, far worse, because if Trump's first term was defined by chaos, his second could be defined by ruthless efficiency. That should be troubling to absolutely everyone because Project 2025 is a movement who's members joke about wanting a white homeland and insist women have to have more babies to uphold western society.-
"We need to be better than this."
-John Oliver, June 19th of 2024
14K notes
·
View notes
How to Use Social Media to Drive Traffic to Your YouTube Channel
Social media has developed into a potent tool for content producers in the current digital era to market their work and reach a larger audience. Click to here get free access...
1 note
·
View note
YouTube SEO
YouTube SEO
SEO refers to the process of optimizing a video on the platform in order to rank higher and drive more organic traffic. Here some best practices for optimizing your YouTube videos for search:
1. Keyword Research: Start by researching relevant keywords and phrases related to your video topic. Use these keywords in your video title, description, and tags. recommend https://www.tubebuddy.com/Dimaswunjir
2. Video Title: Make sure your video title accurately describes the content of the video and includes relevant keywords. Keep it short and attention-grabbing.
3. Video Description: Write a compelling description that includes a brief overview of the video and relevant keywords. Use your description to entice viewers to watch the video.
4. Video Thumbnail: Choose a thumbnail that is visually appealing and accurately represents the content of the video.on this
5. Video Tags: Add relevant tags to your video to help it show up in relevant search results.
6. Engagement: Encourage viewers to like, comment, and share your videos, as engagement signals like these can impact your video's visibility in search results.
7. Consistency: Upload videos on a consistent schedule to build a loyal audience and establish yourself as a trusted source of content.
By following these best practices, you can increase the visibility of your YouTube videos and drive more organic traffic to your channel.https://www.tubebuddy.com/DimaswunjirBy following these best practices, you can increase the visibility of your YouTube videos and drive more organic traffic to your channel.
1 note
·
View note
Finally my youtube channel is eligible for monetization, which means I get to decide how many ads there are, which means NO midroll ads because I hate them!!
I hate them so much and it's very scummy of youtube to have been putting them on my videos without paying me anything, just because I hadn't met their arbitrary requirements for watchtime.
299 notes
·
View notes
Would you guys be mad at me if i said i dont think touchstarved is gonna be that good when it comes out
48 notes
·
View notes
okay apparently watcher released an apology so here's my thoughts (not asked for):
it was decent, as far as youtube apologies go. I don't understand why people are now saying that people overreacted when we probably wouldn't have gotten an apology if no one said anything? like being critical of things is okay, you know? and in this case it led to the right outcome.
I also don't think it's wrong that people started criticizing the content at watcher. especially after being told they had to pay for it, like you're gonna become more critical of things when you're being asked to pay money for it instead of it being free. and when the product is becoming more expensive to produce but it ends up being less entertaining, that is not a good thing (*cough* ghost files)
watcher 100% needs someone to budget their money, idk who is in charge of it now, but they really don't seem to be doing a good job. production is expensive, but you cannoooot be making projects as if you have a disney/warner brothers type budget when you're an indie studio. even with the streaming service money, this will still be an issue. they're trying to grow their company way too fast, and it will lead to them going under completely if they're not careful. you can't rely on the fans to bail you out when you make bad choices.
also, they need other on-screen talent. like the try guys have been struggling for awhile now, but at least they were smart enough to get people like kwesi and johnny to be new cast members. ryan and shane are 1000% burnt out, they need other talent. I remember they had a show with one of the staff members(?) but it only lasted 3 episodes and then they just stopped it. obv it didn't get as many views, but you need to build an audience and that takes more than 3 episodes to do. if they want to actually produce more content (which would help make more money and make their huge staff actually make sense) they need new people to be on screen. look at dropout/GMM/smosh. bigger casts, way more output. putting steven and andrew as hosts is actually a good choice i think, but sadly they're choosing to have them host one of the most expensive shows to produce. when you're making food content, why are you starting with the pricey international restaurants? start at del taco or something. build a bigger audience to justify the costs. look at eat the menu; the first episode was literally taco bell, and five years later, NOW they're doing fine dining. because they can put more money into it, because they KNOW it's one of their more profitable shows.
idk. acting like there still isn't problems is so strange to me. they apologized, that's a good thing, but it doesn't solve all the issues that have been brought to the forefront as a result of this whole debacle.
68 notes
·
View notes
every time i see a youtuber reviewing rwrb and they make jokes about how “everyone but henry and alex get low and they stare at each other and that’s silly” i wanna rip my hair out bc people clearly don’t understand symbolism and how it was shot like that intentionally to show that alex and henry have been watching each other all night through the crowd. i really love that scene and thought it was beautiful cinematography and unobservant people just kill me lol.
131 notes
·
View notes
my biggest pet peeve with web 2.0 dying is that people really think that the cryptobro web 3.0 is the inevitable next step. like it's written in stone that the internet will take the form of NFTs and cryptocurrency and the "metaverse" in the future.
like. come on. when was the last time you've actually seen anything NFT related in the year of our lord 2023? has ANYONE other than the cryptobros and their bots on twitter been talking about it?? what about the "metaverse"??? im pretty sure Meta itself even dropped their vr "metaverse" crap.
also even if the "mainstream" internet DOES go in that direction, that doesn't mean we need to follow? Despite the total takeover of web 2.0 and social media, personal sites and forums DO still exist. there are still IRC chats and MUCKs and MUDs. We will still have websites and web browsers in a web 3.0-dominated internet. even if those become niche.
plus, i think the whole reason web 2.0 and social media took off in the first place was because it was convenient. rather than building your own website from scratch, you instead had your own profile that you can easily upload photos to and set your mood and make small posts. people saw it as a way to easily keep up with friends, so they flocked to it.
what the fuck does web 3.0 offer to the average person? needing to put on a clunky, expensive set of goggles to virtually attend a work meeting? artificial scarcity assigned to shitty monkey jpegs?? other than techbros and billionares creating artificial hype around this shit to get people flocking there, what actually has people staying?
149 notes
·
View notes
THIS SLIMY, SELLOUT, SON oF A [SpongeBob] IS MAKING [ModeratelyEngagingContent] ON [YourTube] AND IS PARTAKING IN [Shameless. Putrid Even.] SELF ADVERTISEMENT. 💰🦜JUST LIKE YOUR OLD PAL [Spamley From The Internet.] THEY/IT/SHE’S ALSO OBSESSED WITH [I’m Gonna Wreck It!] FOR UNKNOWN REASONS…
AND SO THE WRETCHeD FEATHerED CREATURE REQUESTS YOU [Pity The Fool!]
WATCH [The New! ✅] 478036th SUPER UNIQUE VIDEO ESSAY THAT EXISTS WHILE YOU EAT YOUR [Sneo Soup!] (AND TO THINK. SHE HAD NO SHAME LEFT.)
31 notes
·
View notes
Telling content creators it's wrong to explore artistic freedom and be independently funded by fans, and they should instead continue taking advertisement revenue from google* is
NOT
the anti-capitalism stance actually.
*(Yes, google owns youtube.)
37 notes
·
View notes
i love your blog and brain i also wish you did not have a full time job
i also wish i didn't have a full time job but alas...money :(
21 notes
·
View notes
sometimes looking at like Self Help Strategies lists for the symptoms I'm having is always just like:
thing that I already do
thing I have tried 10 times
thing I already do
thing that I don't have the money to do
thing I already do
thing I've been doing since I was 10yrs old to no avail
thing that is impossible given my situation
thing that doesn't apply to me
thing that I already do
thing I have already tried
hrmm, oh wait, maybe finally- OH, yeah.. okay. thing that I already do but it was just phrased slightly differently
thing I have already done
20 notes
·
View notes
Genuinely my main thing with the Watcher thing (I watch their stuff but I’d never consider myself a die hard fan) is that I really want to see the back end projections and business plans that went into this. Show me how their math mathed to the point that this seemed not just viable, but an improvement upon YouTube at this moment in time.
I’ve been watching it unfold all day and seeing the comparisons to Dropout, the unfortunate optics of reinstating the “let’s go eat stupidly expensive stuff” show as your first big new thing for the platform while also saying you don’t have money to do the “TV-quality” things you want, all that’s fine and dandy and not incorrect. But I just can’t see how this is financially going to win out.
I wish the boys the best, hope it works out for their sakes, and I hope regardless that one day we get an idea of what the decision making process was. Not the vague “ad revenue ain’t what it used to be” type comments they made in their very not-reading-the-room announcement video, but actual numbers. I’m super interested.
27 notes
·
View notes
you know you fucked up when the YouTube comments section is completely unified to tell you how badly you fucked up
22 notes
·
View notes
Draw yellue playing tennis
boom
,,,yea i don’t think these drawing are gonna be hq in anyway,,
68 notes
·
View notes
hey youtube why you playing ads on my own damn videos when you refuse to give me monetisation for them
10 notes
·
View notes