"Jean, if you think I'm a Titan for odd jobs and not cut out for combat, you're dead wrong! With the Cart's endurance, as long as I'm not taken out, I can keep going until I’ve won!”
195 notes
·
View notes
This is the second time in 2 books that a character told Clementine she just isn't capable of love. Y'know. Clementine. The girl who loved so fiercely she killed for it. Who somehow managed to raise both herself and a baby starting at 11 and resisted any and all adults who tried to get her to give up. Tillie who taught you romantic love was the only valid form of affection
44 notes
·
View notes
OK YES YES I STARTED S2 AND UM I LOVE IT THO THO THO I FEEL NORMAL ABT GETO IK IM SUPPOSED TO FEEL SMTH BUT I CANT NOT YET ANYWAY😭 I CANT EVEN SHIP HIM AND GOJO😭 ALSO THE TRIO ARE SO DEAR TO ME MEGUMI, ITADORI AND NABORA MY BELOVEDS<3333 ALSO SUKUNA IS HOT OK. ALSO ALSO ITADORI MY BOYYYY MY BABYYYY MY BFFFF THAT LITTLE SUNSHINE BOY DUMBASS I LOVE HIM SM!!! alsoooo i lowkey ship him and nabora bye but like i also shipped him and megumi in s1 too so like haha nvm me
you'll come around it will take some time but you will, it everything will hit different with manga (if you want to try it) also there are two notes i would like to give 1) after episode 5 of season 2 watch the jjk 0 movie because the timeline is jumbled up and everything that will happen after ep6 will make so much sense if you've seen it 2) prepare yourself that's all <3
i lovee the trio but if we are talking about shipping the most popular ships would itafushi (itadori and megumi) and nobamaki (nobara and maki)
8 notes
·
View notes
i love Superman and Lois SO GODDAMN MUCH it’s makes me incredibly happy to see another person watching and trust me… it’s gets crazier
I'm definitely enjoying it even if I'm still shouting at Clark about what I feel is his misplaced affection for small towns! 😂 It's better than I thought it would be (I was expecting just some standard superhero fare), and at least so far *knocks on wood* I'm enjoying the healthy romantic relationship he has with Lois. I can't wait to see what weirdness pops up going forward, BRING IT ON.
11 notes
·
View notes
The existence of this Rosaline movie makes me so MAD, because SHE WAS NEVER IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH ROMEO. SHE TOOK A VOW OF CHASTITY, AND SAID THAT SHE WAS JUST GONNA NOT BE IN LOVE.
SHE. REJECTED. HIM.
SHE WAS NEVER INTERESTED IN BEING WITH HIM AT ALL.
And then they just...make a whole movie from her supposed perspective (which is loosely based on a book which...hoo boy we’ll get to that in a second), where the premise is that she’s jealous and wants to break him and Juliet up? That she’s so in love that she has to win him over again? (Also, how do they justify her knowing that they’re together? The entire point is that no one knows Romeo and Juliet are in love?? I know this is an adaptation, but Jesus Christ.)
WHY DID YOU PICK THIS CHARACTER. TO HAVE THIS STORY WITH. THE WHOLE POINT OF HER CHARACTER IS THAT SHE CHOOSES NOT TO BE WITH HIM. THAT’S WHAT OPENS THE DOOR TO HIM MEETING JULIET. IF ROSALINE IS DEEPLY INTO ROMEO, THE ENTIRE PLAY DOESN’T WORK.
Are we saying that she was just “““playing hard to get”””? That she was toying with his heart for fun? That when she told him no, she really meant “yes”?? I THOUGHT WE LEFT THAT BEHIND OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST DECADE, I THOUGHT WE DECIDED THAT WAS BAD???!!?
Don’t even get me started on the book this is based on, where that general premise is that Rosaline is just an Innocent Average Girl, and her cousin who is Beautiful™ and vOLaTiLeLY uNsTAbLe and cRaZy comes and “takes” her poor unsuspecting boyfriend who is completely blameless for his own terrible behavior away from her while being called a “slut” the whole time. (I doubt much of this carried over into the actual movie, because that’s being billed as an ironic rom-com, and I highly doubt ANYONE would try to make that genre work while keeping this premise 100% intact.)
WHY WOULD YOU EXPAND THIS CHARACTER LIKE THIS. WHY. WE STUDY THIS PLAY IN SCHOOL AS AN EXAMPLE OF LITERARY STRUCTURE AND POETIC LANGUAGE AND FORESHADOWING AND HOW TO WRITE A TRAGIC NARRATIVE AND FOR WHAT. FOR PEOPLE TO NOT TAKE AWAY ANY OF THE INTENDED MEANING FROM THIS PLAY???!?!?!? I AM SCREAMING SO HARD I WILL BREAK THE EARTH’S CRUST UNTIL I AM SUBSUMED INTO HELL.
If you’re going to adapt something, you’ve gotta make it clear that you have some significant understanding of the original work. Retellings are fine! They can even have different functions or deconstruct tropes or be unexpectedly edgy! But it’s 1000% obvious when you don’t have any knowledge or engagement with the source material, and that is a problem. It’s ignorant, it’s lazy, and everyone involved deserves better.
31 notes
·
View notes