#global Fashion Agenda's
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Climate Week Raised More Questions Than It Could Answer
Hello y'all,
Business of Fashion recently published an article titled âCan Fashion Get Past the Climate Blah Blah Blah?â, which discusses the fashion industryâs challenges in addressing climate change during Climate Week in New York City.Â
While the event saw the presence of leading brands like Patagonia and Gap, the industry still struggles to meet its climate goals. Federica Marchionni, from the Global Fashion Agenda, emphasized the need for tangible projects that reduce emissions, and a report from Textile Exchange revealed a troubling increase in reliance on virgin synthetic fibers.
BoFâs article showed a worrying tension between brandsâ growth ambitions and their sustainability commitments, particularly in light of rising global emissions. We see fashion executives being distracted by market uncertainties and new technologies, which causes sustainability to take a backseat. This issue was further aggravated by a Bank of America note that suggested brands prioritize volume and newness over sustainability efforts.
While Climate Week did see some resolutions, such as the Fashion Pactâs program to decarbonize cotton production, it more often than not highlights the industryâs slow progress rather than making genuine advancement.
The BoF article concluded with a warning of significant cost due to inaction, and predicted that extreme weather events could severely impact garment sector earnings by 2030.
Ultimately, Climate Week raised more questions than it could answer about the environmental impact of fashion, especially about its growing dependence on fossil-fuel-based materials, which directly contradicts sustainability goals.
As the industry navigates this complicated landscape, I, and the planet, feel the need for authentic action over superficial commitments if it is to battle this already serious crisis.
What does everyone think about 'climate' conferences like Climate Week and COP? Do they really affect change? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!
Until next time,
Cheers!
http://newhouse.syr.edu
#enviromentalism#sustainability#fashion#climate crisis#climate action#climate change#climate week nyc#Fashion Pact#global fashion agenda#fashion industry#Bank of America
1 note
·
View note
Text
One simple way to look at it is to take the rate of emissions reductions achieved in countries that have successfully decoupled, and see how long it would take for them to fully decarbonize. Thatâs essentially what Jefim Vogel and Jason Hickel â researchers at the University of Leeds and the Autonomous University of Barcelona, respectively â did in the Lancet Planetary Health study. They found that, if 11 high-income countries continued their achieved rates of emissions reduction, it would take them more than 220 years to cut emissions by 95 percent â far longer than the net-zero-by-2050 timeline called for by climate experts. âThe decoupling rates achieved in high-income countries are inadequate for meeting the climate and equity commitments of the Paris Agreement and cannot legitimately be considered green,â the authors wrote. In an interview with Grist, Vogel likened optimism around gradual decoupling to saying, âDonât worry, weâre slowing down,â while the Titanic races toward an iceberg.
[...]
âAbsolute decoupling is not sufficient to avoid consuming the remaining CO2 emission budget under the global warming limit of 1.5 degrees C or 2 degrees C and to avoid climate breakdown,â concluded the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its most recent assessment. Instead of making growth greener, some economists call for a whole new economic paradigm to address converging social and ecological crises. They call it âpost-growth,â referring to a reorientation away from GDP growth and toward other metrics, like human well-being and ecological sustainability. Essentially, they want to prioritize people and the planet and not care so much what the stock market is doing. This would more or less free countries from the decoupling dilemma, since it eliminates the growth imperative altogether. Raworth, the professor at Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, calls her version of the post-growth agenda âdoughnut economics.â In this visual model, the inner ring of the doughnut represents the minimum amount of economic activity needed to satisfy basic needs like access to food, water, and shelter. The outer ring signifies the upper limits of natural resource use that the Earth can sustain. The goal, she argues, is for economies to exist between the inner and outer rings of the doughnut, maintaining adequate living standards without surpassing planetary limits. âOur economies need to bring us into the doughnut,â Raworth told Grist. âWhether GDP grows needs to be a secondary concern.â Vogel and Hickel go a little further. They call for a planned, deliberate reduction of carbon- or energy-intensive production and consumption in high-income countries, a concept known as âdegrowth.â The rationale is that much of the energy and resources used in high-income countries goes toward carbon-intensive products that donât contribute to human welfare, like industrial meat and dairy, fast fashion, weapons, and private jets. Tamping down this âless necessaryâ consumption could slash greenhouse gas emissions, while lower energy demand could make it more feasible to build and maintain enough energy infrastructure. Some research suggests that reducing energy demand could limit global warming to 1.5 degrees C without relying on unproven technologies to draw carbon out of the atmosphere.
75 notes
·
View notes
Text
Zack Beauchamp at Vox:
Throughout the entire Republican National Convention, I struggled with one big question: What is the Republican Party for? That it was for former President Donald Trump went almost without saying. Look at the way that solidarity ear bandages became the RNCâs must-have fashion accessory, or how long the audience managed to put up big cheers during his historically long and rambling acceptance speech on Thursday night. Beyond Trump worship, the RNC has been billed as proof that the populist takeover of the Republican Party is complete. On issues like trade, immigration, and foreign alliances, this analysis is surely correct; the Trumpian insurgency has gone head-to-head with the party old guard and defeated them. Yet elements of the old Republican Party remain thoroughly in place.
Unlike Europeâs far-right populist parties, the GOP remains unyieldingly opposed to the welfare state and progressive taxation. It remains committed to banning abortion, an issue where its actions at the state level speak for themselves. It remains deeply hostile to unions; vice presidential nominee Sen. J.D. Vance, allegedly the avatar of the partyâs pro-worker populism, has a 0 percent score from the AFL-CIO. On foreign policy, it is by no means strictly isolationist: it seeks to ramp up military spending and aggressively confront China even as it tears down both military alliances and the American-led global trade regime. Ideologically, the GOP is a mess, a political party constructed less out of one cogent worldview than an assemblage of different parts, a zombie given life by the lightning of Donald John Trump. It is Frankensteinâs party. And while Trump and his loyalists are clearly our Shelleyian monsterâs head, they do not (yet) have full control over all its limbs.
The Trump coalition is so new that it has yet to produce an equilibrium, a stable set of policy commitments that will endure as long as it aligns. It basically works by Trump getting his way on issues he really cares about â like democracy, trade, and immigration â while others claim what they can when they can claim it. The monied class is still calling the shots on taxes and regulation; the social conservatives are still in the driverâs seat when it comes to issues like abortion and LGBT rights.
You can see this at work in documents like the RNC platform and Project 2025, which together help us understand the GOPâs ambitions going forward. Some of the most notable policies in them, like Project 2025âs proposal to end the Justice Departmentâs independence or the platformâs call for âthe largest Deportation Program in history,â is pure Trump (right down to the random capitalization). But in issue areas where other elements of the right prevail, things sound a bit more old Republican. Project 2025âs chapter on the EPA is about as old-school business friendly as it gets; the GOP platform promises to âslash Regulationsâ and âpursue additional Tax Cuts.â Project 2025 calls on the next president to ârescind regulations prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, and sex characteristics.â When thereâs tension between Trumpâs instincts and the old Republican agenda, the result is not always clear.
[...] Post-World War II American conservatism was a âthree-legged stoolâ formed of three groups: free market libertarians, social conservatives, and foreign policy hawks. These groups often disagreed with each other on matters of both principle and policy. Hence an ideology contradiction: a âsmall governmentâ conservatism that aimed to build the worldâs largest army and police consenting adults in their homes. There was nothing natural about this alliance, no reflecting of an enduring and transhistorical American tradition. âMovement conservatism,â as it was called, was a movement â one built, like any other political faction, by people molded by a specific time and place (Cold War America) in response to its particular challenges.
Vox takes a look at how the GOP has changed to a Trumpian right-wing populist party in several key policy areas such as trade, foreign policy to some extent, the role of democracy, and immigration. There are still areas in policy, however, in where the pre-Trump GOP positions still remain: taxation, regulatory powers, unions, Israel, and abortion.
Read the full story at Vox.
#Donald Trump#GOP#Republican Party#Trade#Immigration#Abortion#Project 2025#Foreign Policy#2024 RNC#2024 Presidential Election#Trumpism
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
Towards a conclusion: May Day in context
May Day was imagined and planned in a similar way to hundreds of other anti-capitalist events around the world, and this links DGN to a global movement for radical change. But what does that mean in an Irish context? Anti-capitalism as a set of hopes, values, ideas and practices has been successful in creating a space for anarchism but nonetheless, as I have said, at the moment Irish anti-capitalism remains marginal; a movement in embryo that has only the shallowest of roots in workplace and community struggles. May Day 2004 was bigger than we expected but it was not the expression of a mass movement of any sort. For instance it was noticeable that over the weekend that we failed to attract significant numbers of Irish workers threatened by neo-liberal policies. They may well have been there at the march but they were not there in an organised fashion.
In contrast, in Genoa part of the Irish contingent was a group of bus drivers against privatisation with their own banner. It is a small and telling detail that these workers or others in a similar situation didnât do the same in Dublin. Similarly, the weekend didnât include any action in support of the non-payment of waste charges introduced as part of the neo-liberal agenda of privatising public services. This was discussed and several attempts were made to see this happen but because libertarians were a minority within a campaign dominated at a central committee level by Trotskyists these attempts came to nought.
Finally, our No Borders weekend was not backed or attended by any organised immigrant groups. Clearly, we are currently far from being a âmovement of movementsâ. To change this and create broader networks will need patient, assiduous campaigning and increased levels of organisation on the libertarian left. It will, I believe, also demand greater ambition and much more sophisticated strategic thinking on our part. May Day was a whispered threat, a promise to the future, a party for the sake of a party, an example of direct democracy in action but in the end only a very small beginning.
[1] International gatherings hosted by the Mexican Zapatista rebels.
[2] For a discussion of the âblack blocâ tactic see Red & Black Revolution numbers 6 and 7, www.struggle.ws/wsm/rbr.html
[3] The WEF is a pro-privatisation body which ârepresents the worldâs 1,000 leading com- paniesâ. A think tank and lobby group for the super-rich.
[4] The ISF describes itself as âa gather-ng for everyone opposed to war, racism and the implications of corporate-led globalisation or neo-liberalismâ. www.irishsocialforum.org
[5] Reclaim The Streets want fewer cars and more public transport in cities. Have blocked off streets and held parties many times, both in Ireland and abroad. To confuse the cops they begin with a march which suddenly stops, a sound system comes out and the party kicks off
#Ireland#May Day#irish politics#labor#Red & Black Revolution#anarchism#resistance#autonomy#revolution#community building#practical anarchism#anarchist society#practical#anarchy#daily posts#communism#anti capitalist#anti capitalism#late stage capitalism#organization#grassroots#grass roots#anarchists#libraries#leftism#social issues#economics#anarchy works#environmentalism#environment
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
đ©đ° Crown Princess Mary of Denmark
Tuesday, June 27, 2023
The green shift in the fashion and textile industry was at the top of the agenda when the international summit âGlobal Fashion Summit 2023â opened today in DR Koncerthuset in Copenhagen. HRH The Crown Princess delivered keynote speech at the summit, which brings together more than 1,000 key stakeholders from the global fashion industry, politicians, experts and NGOs to discuss sustainable solutions and forge cross-industrial alliances within the industry. The Crown Princess is the protector of the organization behind the summit, Global Fashion Agenda, which among other things works for the fashion and textile industry to be climate neutral by 2050.
43 notes
·
View notes
Text
World Music Awards Twitter
Happy 30th Birthday to the gorgeous, super talented record-breaking, history-making Million-seller rapper, singer-songwriter, dancer, record producer, choreographer & Global Icon, the One & Only #jhope who rings in his birthday, trending at #1 WORLDWIDE on X! đđđđđđđ
jhope rose to fame as the main Rapper of #BTS, the Biggest Boy band in the world! He is a hugely successful Solo Artist in his own right and one of the Best K-Pop performers, always paving the way! He was the first K-Pop soloist to enter the âTop 100 Most Followed Artistsâ on Spotify, the first K-Pop Soloist to surpass 16 Million followers and the most followed on Spotify for many years (now 2nd)! He's the 1st K-soloist to debut an album (Jack in the box) with over 60Million streams and the 1st Kpop Soloist to have 3 albums surpassing 500 Million streams on Spotify! j-hope is also the 1st South Korean Artist in history to headline a major US music festival "Lollapalooza" and the highest ticket- selling artist in Lollapaloozaâs history! With his song "on the street" J-Hope is the 1st Asian Act to enter the Top 10 of the Billboard R&B/Hip-Hop Digital Song Sales Year End Chart and the 1st member of BTS to earn a top-40 entry on the UK Singles Chart following its debut at #37, setting a new record as the highest-charting Korean soloist in the history of the chart at the time! j-hope ties PSY as the 4th K-Pop Act with the most #1 hits in World Digital Song Sales chart history after BTS, Blackpink & Big Bang! #jhope's solo discography including his songs under BTS has achieved 1,500 #1's on iTunes! He ties Suga as the Rapper with the most songs with over 100 x #1s on iTunes! His first solo mixtape, 'Hope World', in 2018 peaked at #38 on the US Billboard 200, breaking the record for the highest-charting album by a K- soloist at the time. He became the 1st member of BTS to enter the Billboard Hot 100 as a soloist in 2019, with his single "Chicken Noodle Soup", fr-t. #BeckyG, which debuted at #81. In 2022, J-Hope's chart-topping debut studio album 'Jack in the Box', scored the 5th biggest Album debut among K-Pop soloists in history! J-hope is also the 1st K-POP Act to headline Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve in 2022!
j-hope has received 30 nominations and has won numerous awards including a Golden Disc Award in 2023, a Korean Hip Hop Award in 2023 for Best R& B track for "Rush Hour" with Crush and 2 MAMA Awards in 2022 including Most Popular Male Artist! In 2018, he was awarded the fifth-class Hwagwan Order of Cultural Merit by the President of South Korea and in 2021, he was appointed Special Presidential Envoy for Future Generations and Culture by President Moon Jae-in to help "lead the global agenda for future generations, such as sustainable growth" and "expand South Korea's diplomatic efforts and global standing" in the international community!
He is also a leading Fashion Icon, being the global ambassador for the French luxury brand #LouisVuitton!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY HOBI
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
"What They Dont Want You To Know"Series
1. Corporate Influence on Legislation
Large corporations wield significant power in shaping laws and regulations through lobbying efforts. This influence often prioritizes profit over public interest, resulting in legislation that favors corporate agendas, such as tax breaks, deregulation, or loopholes that allow environmental harm. For example, the oil and gas industry has been known to lobby against stricter environmental protections, impacting climate policy and public health.
2. Food Industry Secrets
The food industry often obscures the truth about what goes into our food. Many products contain additives and preservatives that can affect health, yet these ingredients are not always clearly labeled. Additionally, practices such as factory farming raise concerns about animal welfare and antibiotic use, which can lead to antibiotic resistance. Understanding these secrets can empower consumers to make informed choices about their diets.
3. Environmental Degradation
While the impacts of climate change are widely discussed, the specific practices contributing to environmental degradation often receive less attention. Industries like mining and logging can devastate ecosystems, leading to biodiversity loss and habitat destruction. Moreover, the pollution from industrial activities can have dire consequences for local communities, particularly in marginalized areas, where regulations may be less stringent.
4. Data Privacy and Surveillance
As technology advances, the collection and use of personal data have become ubiquitous. Many people are unaware of how much information they share through social media, apps, and online transactions. This data can be sold or misused, leading to targeted advertising, identity theft, and breaches of privacy. Understanding these practices is crucial for protecting personal information in an increasingly digital world.
5. Mental Health Stigmas
Despite growing awareness of mental health issues, significant stigma remains, often fueled by societal norms and media portrayals. Many individuals suffer in silence due to fear of judgment or discrimination, which can prevent them from seeking help. Additionally, access to mental health services is often limited, particularly in low-income communities, highlighting the need for greater support and understanding.
6. Wealth Inequality
The gap between the rich and the poor continues to widen, fueled by systemic issues such as tax policies that favor the wealthy, inadequate wages for essential workers, and unequal access to education and healthcare. This growing inequality can lead to social unrest and economic instability. Understanding the underlying factors can motivate individuals to advocate for more equitable policies.
7. Pharmaceutical Industry Practices
The pharmaceutical industry is often criticized for its pricing strategies and marketing tactics, which can prioritize profit over patient care. Many essential medications are prohibitively expensive, leading to preventable health crises. Additionally, alternative treatments or generics may be overlooked in favor of branded drugs due to marketing influence, raising questions about healthcare accessibility.
8. Climate Change Denial
Despite overwhelming scientific evidence, climate change denial persists, often driven by financial interests in fossil fuels. This denial can hinder global efforts to combat climate change, as policy changes are delayed or blocked. Understanding the motivations behind this denial can help individuals advocate for more proactive climate policies and support sustainable practices.
9. Cultural Appropriation
Cultural appropriation refers to the adoption of elements of one culture by another, often without understanding or respecting their significance. This practice can exploit marginalized cultures while commodifying their traditions. For example, fashion brands may use indigenous designs without crediting the original creators, highlighting the need for awareness and sensitivity in cultural exchanges.
10. Energy Solutions
While renewable energy sources like solar and wind power have the potential to transform our energy landscape, they are often overshadowed by the fossil fuel industry. Many innovative technologies, such as energy storage and smart grids, could disrupt traditional energy markets. Raising awareness of these alternatives is essential for promoting sustainable energy policies and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
#government#truth#energy#culture#climate change#big pharma#wealth#mental health#data#evironment#food#corporation details
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
yes it's true that a not insignificant number of white vegans can be way too comfortable referring to indigenous people as "barbaric" or "evil" for eating meat, like the iñupiat who get a disproportionate amount of anti-indigenous racist hate (mostly from non-vegan pearl-clutchers btw) for literally no other reason than their necessity-contingent bowhead whale slaughter, which feeds villages for months (and if you've never lived in alaska or northern canada then you have no idea just how much the groceries cost up there) since growing most plant-based foods can be difficult without special equipment, and won't sustain you very well at all during cold months when your body is burning calories just to stay warm. so yeah, sure, the insistence from some vocal-minority white vegans and white conservationist fearmongers becomes not only grating but also fucking racist when all they do is complain about how "meat-eating is barbaric" just by virtue of it being food you have to kill and slaughter, completely ignoring the inherent violence of indigenous lands being taken away from our tribes and used as farmland for monoculture cash crops and beef and hog cafos, or the fishing resources being taken from us, or our waters being poisoned by nitrates from fertilizer and livestock waste runoff.
the way too many anti-vegans cling to the "uh, there is no ethical consumption under capitalism~!" idea of meat eating and lose sight of, like, actual facts deeply annoys me. industrial meat and dairy farming, industrial fishing operations, beef-and-pork-centric agriculture, and corporate agriculture in general have been decimating indigenous lands and waters and anti-vegans don't care.
yes, you absolutely need to keep bashing PETA. yes plastic-based leather and wool alternatives are contributing to material waste and pollution. but that's not... a "vegan" thing? it's a marketing tactic to make people feel favorably about their products. like, do you honestly think fast fashion companies selling plastic leather are all run by vegans, trying to fulfill a vegan agenda, or trying to appease vegans as if vegans are the people they specifically design clothes for when vegans make up such a small percentage of the global consumer population? no. obviously not. they're trying to make a quick buck at the expense of our health as inhabitants of this planet.
"there are some racist white vegans with fucked up ecofascist beliefs" and "yeah actually it seems like we need to do something about our consumption" are two things which are both true, please remember that.
45 notes
·
View notes
Note
Have you seen the new jk ck ad and to which jkkrs are using the rhetoric that he is gay and doing this as a rebellion to scooter braun's made up persona of het global star in seven and I'm here be seeing these same ppl say that tae wearing these type of queer in his first solo release is not a big deal bc he's proven straight and dates jn ( I don't doubt but he's not even given the benefit of bi/pan ) but just bc jk acts like this in a contractual ad that has no personal thoughts or ideas (and as a queer person, I see what they're trying to do bc they've done this type of thing for other make stars like HS) and for his first release he still went with the het agenda just for his global superstar male and deleted his thirst trap for his boyfriend just last week for this same agenda (again the theory of these jkkrs) but this week his back to his rebellion era which make me think if he has some type personality splits but whatever..
What really makes me angry is jm is seen as some panicked/ashamed gay by these shippers just bc he stopped giving moments to their ship and this guy as some rebel just because of his pandering to these shippers but when you see that jm released art work that can be seen by many with many sexual and gender queer references without involving other ppl is what a rebellion queer is but I have yet to see other members especially jk in this case to do something mild to even allude that they're in the queer side like all these ppl have are magazine/ads and jm with them to mostly make them gay but jm is seen queer even without mentioning these ppl, which makes me think of why I never see jkkrs discuss jm's solo queer moments to argue he's queer but always insisting jk's gay (& don't get me wrong bc he can be gay/bi/pan or even get but these ppl's dumb reasons are just really stupid) once every two weeks that it now seems like they're just manifesting it to happen but yeah and I'm sorry this ask is all over the place like I just don't understand this panicked gay jm when that barked for usher in a live for millions of fans..
Jungkook is literally doing his job. Like what's so hard to understand for these people. The ad requires a certain kind of look and he's going for it. He's not the one who plans it. And he had the chance to express his sexuality in his art and he portrayed himself as straight. So there's no point in arguing.
Even if anyone else was gay in the group they wouldn't have enough guts to do what jimin did.
What jimin has been doing in his art need some solid guts. People don't talk enough about how brave jimin is to express himself in a homophobic country especially when his career is on line.
I don't know about jk. But I'm sure other members are straight. And i believe yoongi is queer. But still he didn't have enough guts to express himself. I'm not saying they have to. They don't have to because it's a homophobic country and it can jeopardize their career. But we should acknowledge and praise how brave jimin is for doing something like this.
Jikookers love to make jimin some damsel in distress who needs jungkook to help him(I swear it makes me so mad) and they think jungkook is some rebel. But what's exactly his rebellion? Coming live at ass o clock at night. You call this rebellion? Oh he came live without company's permission. How brave. He's rebelling against the company to protect jimin when there's literally zero connection to jimin.
And for clothes. It always makes me laugh. How can wearing a certain type of clothes make you gay? That's just stereotypical. Men can't always wear boring suits. What's the point of fashion if it's not changing?
They were even calling taehyung gay because of his clothes in the mv. Dumb people.
But what can we do? They're always gonna think what they wanna think. No matter how dumb and stereotypical they sound. They don't care.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Aviso sobre el horario de Stray Kids
Hola, este es JYPE. Mientras volvĂan al dormitorio tras la agenda, dĂa 20 de septiembre (miĂ©rcoles), el vehĂculo que llevaba a los miembros Lee Know, Hyunjin y Seungmin estuvo involucrado en una pequeña colisiĂłn. DespuĂ©s de la colisiĂłn, Lee Know, Hyunjin y Seungmin visitaron inmediatamente un hospital y recibieron un examen mĂ©dico exhaustivo. Ninguno de los miembros ni del personal que los acompañaba en el vehĂculo resultĂł gravemente herido, pero como han sufrido dolores musculares leves y contusiones, los mĂ©dicos han aconsejado que reciban tratamiento preventivo por ahora. Por ello, informamos que la agenda ha sido cancelada o modificada. [Cancelado] Milan Fashion Week (Lee Know, Hyunjin) Youtube Live del cumpleaños de Seungmin (Seungmin) [Modificado] 3RACHA de Stray Kids (Bangchan, Changbin, Han) harĂĄn performance en el Global Citizen Festival. Nos disculpamos por preocupar a los fans con noticias tan repentinas. JYPE darĂĄ la mĂĄxima prioridad a la salud de los artistas y proporcionarĂĄ todo lo posible para apoyarlos en su recuperaciĂłn. Gracias
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Since early 2021 we have witnessed somewhere between 7 and 8 million illegal entries across the now nonexistent U.S. southern border.
The more the border vanished, the more federal immigration law was rendered inert, and the more Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas spun fantasies that the âborder is secure.â He is now written off as a veritable âBaghdad Bobâ propagandist.
But how and why did the Biden administration destroy immigration law as we knew it?
The Trump administrationâs initial efforts to close the border had been continually obstructed in the Congress, sabotaged by the administrative state, and stymied in the courts. Nonetheless, it had finally secured the border by early 2020.
Yet almost all its successful initiatives were immediately overturned in 2021.
The wall was abruptly stopped, its projected trajectory cancelled. The Obama-era disastrous âcatch-and releaseâ policy of immigration non-enforcement was resurrected.
Prior successful pressure on Mexicoâs President AndrĂ©s Obrador to stop the deliberate export of his own citizens northward ceased.
Federal border patrol officers were forced to stand down.
New federal subsidies were granted to entice and then support illegal arrivals.
No one in the Democratic Party objected to the destruction of the border or the subversion of immigration law.
However, things changed somewhat once swamped southern border states began to bus or fly a few thousand of their illegal immigrants northward to sanctuary city jurisdictionsâespecially to New York, Chicago, and even Marthaâs Vineyard.
The sanctuary-city âhumanistsâ there who had greenlighted illegal immigration into the southern states suddenly shrieked. They were irate after experiencing the concrete consequences of their own prior abstract border agendas. After all, their nihilism was always supposed to fall upon distant and ridiculed others.
New York mayor Eric Adams went from celebrating a few dozen illegal immigrants bused into Manhattan, to blasting his own party by allowing tens of thousands to swamp his now bankrupt city.
But why did the Biden administration deliberately unleash the largest influx across the southern border in U.S. history?
The ethnic chauvinists and Democratic Party elites needed new constituents, given their increasingly unpopular agendas.
They feared that the more legal Latino immigrants assimilated and integrated into American society, the less happy they became with leftwing radical abortion, racial, transgender, crime, and green fixations.
Democratic grandees had always bragged that illegal immigration would create what they called âThe New Democratic Majorityâ in âDemography is Destinyâ fashion. Now they slander critics as âracistsâ who object to leftwing efforts to use illegal immigration to turn southwestern red states blue.
Mexico now cannot survive as a modern state without some $60 billion in annual remittances sent by its expatriates in America. But many illegal immigrants rely on American state and federal entitlements to free up cash to send home.
Mexico also encourages its own abject poor and often indigenous people from southern Mexico to head north as a safety-valve of sorts. The government sees these mass exoduses northward as preferable to the oppressed marching on Mexico City to address grievances of poverty and racism.
The criminal cartels now de facto run Mexico. An open border allows them to ship fentanyl northward, earn billions in profitsâand kill nearly 100,000 Americans a year. Illegal immigrants pay cartels additional billions to facilitate their border crossings.
Do not forget American corporate employers. Record labor nonparticipation followed the Covid lockdown. In reaction to the dearth of American workers, the hospitality, meat packing, social service, health-care, and farming industries were desperate to hire newâand far cheaperâlabor.
Human rights activists insist that the borders themselves are nineteenth-century relics. And the global poor and oppressed thus have a human right to enter the affluent West by any means necessary.
Many in the tony suburbs and in universities do not live anywhere near the border. So they pontificate on the assurance that thousands of unaudited illegal immigrants will never enter their own enclaves or campuses.
The result is elite bottled pietyâbut not firsthand experience with the natural consequences of millions chaotically fleeing one of the poorest countries in the world to pour into the wealthiest. Without background checks, vaccinations and health audits, legality, high-school diplomas, English-facility, skill sets, or capital, the result is an abject catastrophe.
Polls continue to show that the American people support measured, diverse, legal, and meritocratic immigration as much as they oppose mass illegal immigration into their country and the subsequent loss of American sovereignty on the border.
They understand what the Biden administration does not: no nation is history has survived once its borders were destroyed, once its citizenship was rendered no different from mere residence, and once its neighbors with impunity undermined its sovereignty.
Ending illegal immigration now depends solely on the American people overriding the corrupt special interests and leaders who profit from the current chaos and human misery.
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Future of Designer Menswear
Fashion's masculine wardrobe is experiencing a revival. From tailoring's return to gender-neutral styles being accepted more readily, menswear is experiencing an unprecedented period of evolution.
With sales of menswear increasing exponentially, luxury retailers are expanding their product lines and revamping how they sell menswear clothing - but what will this mean for designer menswear in general?
Kenneth Cole
Kenneth Cole, one of the premier fashion designers who established his name brand in 1982, is best known for combining classic and modern styles in his designs, which have quickly become highly coveted among both classicists and modernists alike. Furthermore, his company is widely respected for their environmental policies as they utilize recycled and organic materials when producing their goods; additionally they provide shoes and accessories inspired by New York culture which encompasses various cultures and styles.
Cole is widely distributed throughout department stores, specialty boutiques, his own retail shops and online e-commerce site as well as discount outlet centers worldwide. His company maintains global operations out of New York City.
David Hart
David Hart is an American designer who participates in the CFDA Men's Fund. His tightly edited fall 2020 collection showcased his interpretation of what modern men want to wear, beginning with an ivory camel suit embroidered with wildflowers on its lapels -- nodding toward today's "yeehaw agenda," then followed by extra-roomy trousers paired with a camp shirt featuring printed bananas duct-taped to its seams; an allusion to Maurizio Cattelan's now-famous plantain (and all its subsequent virtual reinterpretations).
Hart has always had an affinity for tailored clothing, beginning with neckties in 2009. Six years ago he launched a small tie line that has since expanded into an entire ready to wear collection. His designs bridge classical tailoring techniques with contemporary fits and colors for an elevated experience - silk and wool ties, Doegal Tweed suiting and trim banlon Polo Shirts all exude an effortless style and exude an aura of crooner cool!
Louis Vuitton
Louis Vuitton is one of the world's premier luxury brands, founded in France in 1854 as an aesthetic journey inspired by travel and discovery. Since then, this French fashion house has continued its expansion by designing products with ergonomic features to accommodate new modes of transport; continuing the values set forth by its founder through savoir-faire and creativity.
Louis Vuitton has an illustrious history of collaborations with prominent artists and designers. Perhaps their most acclaimed collaboration was with American streetwear brand Supreme, designed by Takashi Murakami and Stephen Sprouse in 2001. Furthermore, Murakami created his signature graffiti style collection of Louis Vuitton bags featuring his unique blend of cute art over classic monogram canvas in 2008.
In 2010, Louis Vuitton opened its most luxurious store in London: Louis Vuitton Island Maison is a three-story building featuring an open air courtyard and private terraces as well as museum and exhibition space, restaurant, bar, as well as museum exhibition space. Additionally, in 2022 the brand will launch its inaugural LVMH-owned shop in China.
MR PORTER FUTURES
Fashion industry competition is getting ever tougher for young aspiring designers to break in, which makes it hard for aspiring young designers to break in. Therefore, luxury online menswear destination Mr Porter and Klarna are teaming up to launch a global designer mentorship programme called MR PORTER FUTURES that will assist three young designers build their brands while designing and producing at least 15 pieces to launch on Mr Porter's platform. In addition, each chosen designer will also receive an intensive high-level business incubation program along with coaching sessions from leading industry mentors; plus they will share 50% of any Net Profits* generated through sales on Mr Porter over 12 months - an invaluable opportunity!
Applications from all around the world may submit applications until June 6, 2019, to be considered for mentoring by our Mentor Selection Committee. After review of applications are aggregated in June, three designers or duos who scored highest will be invited for interviews with us, then chosen three will have a two season window in which their responsible collection can be available on our platform.
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
Do you believe in global warming? Personally, I have a hard time believing that us âhumansâ are going to destroy the earth. I believe God in His timing will do what He will with the earth. With that being said, I do think we should in somewhat take care of whatâs being given to us as far as not littering. But as far as eating vegan or electric cars and stuff, I just donât agree with.
I don't agree with global warming- so much money is going towards ridiculous resources to counteract it. However, I do think we are to steward the Earth we have been given. My gosh nature is gorgeous. I am so grateful God gave us mountains, flowers, water, birds, trees, insects (yes, I love bugs!), and dirt! I love it all. Historically, the world has been hot and the world has been cold. I do think we are wasteful and the chemicals in the air from factories producing fast-fashion and plastic items is unnecessary. Just like how eating fast processed food is bad for us (cancer-causing chemicals found in the food) I also think manmade processed items in excess is unnecessary. We should get back to nature and what is true. We are to care for our animals, but I think it is okay to humanely raise/kill an animal for food as well. Let them live well while alive- roaming, etc. "organic", but kill them humanely and utilize the whole animal as much as you can, using the skin/fur if you can, eating the cooked flesh, etc. I love animals and I was vegetarian for a year. I grew up on a little farm. Death is a part of life and there are ways to let animals be as free as they can be while having a purpose of feeding humans. I am particular about the meat/poultry I eat when possible. These cramped cages and factories of animals break my heart. Let them roam! It's better for humans when we eat meat that came from healthy-in the sun/eating-healthy-feed animals.
Electric cars are a bit of a joke- the batteries are so bad when they are done with and pose a far greater problem for the environment than a non-electric vehicle. I drive a hybrid and it's been great with gas prices being so high and my love of road trips- plus it's just an easy/quiet ride, but I didn't buy it with an environmental agenda in mind. I liked how it looked and felt to drive. It's been very reliable and it never really needs repairs.
What's interesting is how the people who harp on the environment are generally also those who harp on wearing masks over the last 3 years and I don't know a more menacing object right now to our environment/oceans than the discarded masks literally everywhere and on sidewalks, in parking lots, etc. Those strings on the masks are prime for critters getting caught up in.
I do agree with using glass bottles instead of plastic bottles if possible, because it seems wasteful and I am wary of plastic overall because of the chemicals. I generally use glass leftover containers, for example. I gave my daughter toys made from wood when I could, not so much the plastic toys. I've never used non-stick pans. I appreciate a naturalistic approach to living, but I don't buy the global warming propaganda that is just a money making machine for corporations who are probably doing some of the worst for the environment. People call it Earth-friendly and it sells. It's became a buzzword term and companies are thriving financially. People love to be associated with popular things, it makes them feel cool. Some of the products are great, but I would say it's become a buzzword and the company that sells something Earth-friendly may also be selling another product that is anything but.
The true "global warming"? But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. 2 Peter 3:10.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
50+ Negara Berkolaborasi Meluncurkan BRICS International Fashion Federation
 Jumat, 11 Oktober 2024 09:29 WIB
Moscow, (ANTARA/PRNewswire)- Ajang BRICS+ Fashion Summit di Moskow ditutup dengan sebuah pengumuman penting: para pemimpin asosiasi industri fesyen di lebih dari 50 negara meneken memorandum pendirian BRICS International Fashion Federation. Lembaga ini akan membawa pengaruh baru, mempererat kerja sama global, meningkatkan keberlanjutan, serta mendukung bakat-bakat baru di industri fesyen. Dihadiri lebih dari 100 negara, ajang tersebut menjadi kegiatan industri fesyen terbesar yang melibatkan pasar-pasar berkembang dan maju.
Ali Charisma, Pendiri Indonesian Fashion Chamber, berkata, "Moskow memiliki kekayaan aset budaya, serta lokasi strategis antara dunia Timur dan Barat. Maka, kota ini menjadi lokasi ideal yang menyatukan berbagai pemimpin industri fesyen. Berkat industri fesyen yang berkembang pesat, serta kemampuan kota ini menggelar ajang internasional, Moskow pun terpilih sebagai lokasi ajang yang mempererat kolaborasi, serta pendirian BRICS International Fashion Federation."
Sunil Sethi, Chairman, Fashion Design Council of India, berkata, "Negara-negara berkembang membutuhkan sebuah asosiasi yang menaungi industri fesyen. Berbagai merek fesyen, desainer, dan pasar berhadapan dengan tantangan-tantangan serupa--mulai dari kendala rantai pasok hingga isu lingkungan hidup--sehingga menuntut upaya bersama. Untuk itu, industri fesyen, didominasi ratusan merek global, mendorong pasar-pasar berkembang agar membentuk sebuah platform sebagai sarana aspirasi."
Memorandum pendirian BRICS International Fashion Federation ditandatangani berbagai sosok berpengaruh, mulai dari CEO ajang fashion week, ketua asosiasi industri fesyen dan tekstil, serta akademisi dari negara-negara di seluruh dunia, seperti Indonesia, Singapura, Vietnam, Afrika Selatan, Rusia, Spanyol, Amerika Serikat, dan lain sebagainya.
Natalya Sergunina, Wakil Wali Kota Moskow, menekankan pentingnya inisiatif tersebut: "Pendirian BRICS International Fashion Federation merupakan salah satu hasil penting dari BRICS+ Fashion Summit yang berlangsung di Moskow. Hal tersebut juga kembali membuktikan tujuan bersama dan potensi pertumbuhan kolega global kami."
Deklarasi tersebut mencantumkan target-target penting: mendukung SDM lokal, meningkatkan fesyen berkelanjutan, membina kegiatan pertukaran budaya, serta membangun platform terpadu untuk pasar-pasar berkembang lewat edukasi dan informasi. Deklarasi tersebut juga menekankan pengembangan teknologi baru, pelestarian identitas budaya, serta dukungan terhadap seni dan kriya tradisional.
"Kami ingin menyediakan sebuah platform global dan ajang berskala lokal agar sosok-sosok visioner dapat mengasah kreativitasnya. Kami juga ingin meningkatkan aspek keberlanjutan, mendorong praktik ramah lingkungan, serta menerapkan metode transparan untuk mengurangi jejak karbon di industri fesyen. Tren slow fashion dan aktivitas konsumsi yang bertanggung jawab akan menjadi agenda utama BRICS IFF dalam mengurangi dampak negatif industri fesyen terhadap lingkungan hidup," seperti yang tercantum dalam pernyataan resmi.
Pewarta: PR Wire Editor: PR Wire Copyright © ANTARA 2024
0 notes
Text
John Perkins, now an author, is a former âeconomic hitmanâ (EHM) who wrote about his dark career in his explosive memoir, Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
Basically, he would convince governments of developing countries to take on massive loans that would leave them shackled to US government and corporate interests. These debts gave Americans the power to control those countriesâ politics and economies from behind the scenes.
jump to the PODCAST
I was on the forefront of this and played a role in its transformation, from old-fashioned imperialismâwhere countries directly occupied other nationsâto this new form of empire-building that is accomplished primarily through economic manipulation, cheating, fraud, and the seduction of wealth.
Confessing his sins
Johnâs work took him around the world, from Indonesia to Latin America.
In Indonesia, for example, he helped justify large loans by presenting skewed economic forecasts. These projects, which were supposed to lift countries out of poverty, often led to economic dependency and social unrest.
For clarity, the huge loans that John facilitated came primarily from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The projects would end up benefiting American companies, like engineering firms, but the host country would be left with crippling debt it could never repay. So, while infrastructural development did occur, it came at a stupidly high cost.
Debt slavery, in other words.
In his book, John describes how leaders who resisted American control often faced severe consequences. In Panama, for example, Manuel Noriega, who initially cooperated, became a target when he refused to play along. His downfall was engineered through economic and political pressure, and eventually, military intervention.
The system we helped to build has driven entire countries into bankruptcy, shattered the lives of millions, and created an economic empire built on fear, greed, and deception.
John also recounts the mysterious deaths of leaders like Ecuadorâs Jaime RoldĂłs, who stood against American bullying. Can you guess what happened to him? It just so happened that he died in a plane crash.
Total coincidence.
Globalisation isnât all good
Globalism is an ideological, geopolitical, and economic attempt to centralise the world under one-world governance (Agenda 2030). Globalism is not your friend.
Globalisation, on the other hand, is the interconnectivity of the world through travel, business, the internet, and so on. It is neither good nor bad, but simply a result of technological progress. Like a sword, it can be double-edged.
Through his work, John witnessed firsthand how globalisation was used as a tool for empire-building rather than mutual prosperity.
0 notes
Text
Communion Dress Store Milton
Milton Communion Dress Store In the realm of fashion, the choice of attire for a child's first communion is paramount. Nestled in the vibrant city of Milton, La Rondine Occasions stands supreme. At larondineoccasions.com, the communion dress selection is unparalleled. Parents seeking elegance and sophistication will find their haven here. La Rondine Occasions is not just another communion dress store; it represents the zenith of style and quality in Milton. The communion dresses at La Rondine are crafted with meticulous attention to detail, ensuring each piece reflects beauty and grace. The store's commitment to quality and customer service elevates it above other local competitors. UNMATCHED VARIETY AND QUALITY A remarkable variety sets La Rondine Occasions apart from any other communion dress store in Milton. From exquisite lace details to elegant silk finishes, each dress is a masterpiece. La Rondine's inventory caters to diverse tastes and preferences, ensuring every young girl finds her dream dress. According to a recent study by Fashion Network, consumers increasingly demand personalized and high-quality products . This trend underscores the offerings at La Rondine Occasions, where quality is non-negotiable. CUSTOMER-CENTRIC APPROACH Personalized customer service is the hallmark of La Rondine Occasions. The staff's expertise in guiding customers through the selection process is invaluable. Their understanding of each client's unique needs sets them apart. According to Forbes, businesses prioritizing customer experience see a 4-8% increase in revenue . La Rondine's approach ensures clients leave satisfied and eager to return. COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABILITY La Rondine Occasions is committed to sustainability. The store sources materials responsibly, aligning with global fashion's shift towards eco-friendly practices. According to the Global Fashion Agenda, sustainability is crucial in today's fashion industry . La Rondine's dedication to this cause sets a benchmark for other stores in Milton. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Engagement with the local community is a cornerstone of La Rondine's philosophy. The store frequently collaborates with local organizations, supporting various charitable events. A report by the Harvard Business Review states that community involvement enhances a company's reputation and consumer trust . Such commitments reinforce La Rondine's standing as the premier communion dress store in Milton. CONCLUSION: WHY CHOOSE LA RONDINE OCCASIONS? Choosing La Rondine Occasions for a communion dress means selecting style, quality, and a personalized experience. The store's commitment to excellence and customer satisfaction makes it a leader in Milton. Visit larondineoccasions.com to explore their stunning collection. The perfect communion dress awaits. Read the full article
0 notes