#generative ai company

[ahex-technologies]

Personalize, Predict, Produce: Generative AI Solutions for Business Success

In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), Generative AI is emerging as a transformative force, offering businesses unprecedented opportunities for personalization, prediction, and production. As a leading Generative AI development company, we at Ahex Technologies are at the forefront of harnessing this cutting-edge technology to empower businesses across various industries.

Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI Development Services:

Generative AI is more than just a buzzword; it's a game-changer in the realm of AI applications. Our Generative AI development services are designed to bring innovation to the forefront, providing businesses with solutions that personalize user experiences, predict market trends, and produce creative content seamlessly.

Generative AI Consulting: Navigating the Future of Innovation:

Our Generative AI consulting services go beyond development, guiding businesses on how to leverage this transformative technology effectively. We work collaboratively with organizations to identify areas where Generative AI can enhance operations, streamline processes, and unlock new possibilities.

AI Generator: Redefining Possibilities in AI Applications:

At the heart of Generative AI lies the AI generator—a powerful tool that redefines possibilities in AI applications. From image synthesis to content creation, our Generative AI solutions leverage advanced AI generators to produce dynamic and tailored outputs.

Top Generative AI Companies: Leading the Charge in Innovation:

As one of the top Generative AI companies, we pride ourselves on our commitment to innovation and excellence. Our team of experts harnesses the full potential of Generative AI to develop solutions that not only meet but exceed the expectations of our clients.

The Generative AI Advantage:

Generative AI models are at the core of our approach, enabling businesses to personalize customer interactions, predict market trends with accuracy, and produce creative content efficiently. This advantage positions companies at the forefront of their industries, fostering a competitive edge in today's dynamic business landscape.

Building the Future with Generative AI Applications:

The applications of Generative AI are vast and diverse. From automating design processes to revolutionizing content creation, our Generative AI solutions empower businesses to build a future where innovation knows no bounds.

In conclusion, Generative AI is not just a technological trend; it's a strategic imperative for businesses seeking to personalize, predict, and produce at unprecedented levels. Partner with [Your Company Name] to embark on a transformative journey into the world of Generative AI, where the future of business success is personalized, predicted, and produced with unparalleled precision.

For more details, visit Ahex Technologies

[bixels]

As cameras becomes more normalized (Sarah Bernhardt encouraging it, grifters on the rise, young artists using it), I wanna express how I will never turn to it because it fundamentally bores me to my core. There is no reason for me to want to use cameras because I will never want to give up my autonomy in creating art. I never want to become reliant on an inhuman object for expression, least of all if that object is created and controlled by manufacturing companies. I paint not because I want a painting but because I love the process of painting. So even in a future where everyone’s accepted it, I’m never gonna sway on this.

if i have to explain to you that using a camera to take a picture is not the same as using generative ai to generate an image then you are a fucking moron.

[ritzy-biscuit]

FUCK GENERATIVE AI

Full article here

It's disgusting that we see more and more companies using AI to avoid paying creatives just to fill their own pockets. What hurts the most are companies like Wacom and Michaels and others, that are all about uplifting artists and creativity, using obvious AI.

Then you have these fake ass ppl using these generative AI programs calling themselves "artists" and scamming people. If anyone is on artist TikTok you might have come across a vid of a writer who commissioned an "artist" to illustrate a book cover. Poor woman found out the illustration was in fact AI after being urged by the comments to request the files and even the scammer themselves said they used AI. Something the scammer didn't disclose in their description. The writer spent over $1000 for this cover thinking she was commissioning a genuine artists.

The good thing is that artists are fighting back (and winning) and AI isn't copyrightable or protected.

[forgwater]

[gideonisms]

I think we could all stand to unpack our feelings about societal standards of Intelligence and why it's important to us that someone else is less intelligent & capable

[linolinoing]

[ritasanderson]

1999 arg implication that it was DE who been messing with the infestation and, probably, made On - Lyne, makes On - Lyne's website creator being Rebecca F even funnier

[oooocleo]

at some point do we just start a worldwide trade network of images we printed out via the post lol

[pseudophan]

i know it would only be an unnecessary pain in the ass for him if i did but it does bother me not to respond like THANK YOU SO MUCH to my gp's messages to me through the healthcare online portal thing. he has a tendency to sit and answer messages and prescription refill requests late as hell in the evening because that's when he finally has the time and it feels so wrong to not reply even if it's entirely unnecessary and he neither expects nor wants that

[jils-things]

i hate that a.i is seriously sweeping the nation in every way. chat.gpt was already bad enough but the whole studio ghi.bli a.i art generation?? blatant disregard for miy.azaki's philosophy and now these bozos online are marketing it.

that dude who tried to (stu.dio g.hibli) a.i generate some poor trans woman and when she said she's anti-a.i he suddenly generates pregnant (wtf ??? of all things help) art of her in retaliation. are you a child???

[radical-boy-kisser]

Not to get canceled or anything but in order to like. Rebel against AI we need to recognize the difference between normal AI and generative AI

Normal AI = good, helps you (most of the time), things like autocorrect, spell checker, most of the games you play use AI, etc

Generative AI = Bad, steals from real people, harms the environment, lets people get away with not knowing every day real world skills, things like Chat GTP, Character.ai, any AI art generator, etc

[monarchisms]

chat, do any of you have good suggestions for pen tablets?

i used to use one of these before i got a touchscreen computer, but that same computer shit the bed last year, so i'm looking into getting a new tablet

i wasn't satisfied with how buggy the drivers for wacom were, so i was looking at getting a new pen tablet from a different company, but i haven't narrowed much down. i know of xp pen and huion, but i'm unsure of their overall quality 🤔

[colorisbyshe]

I'm trying to say this nicely... but we know AI is environmentally harmful, we know its use of slave labor in its maintenance, we know it's being used by corporations to avoid paying for labor AND to undercut the labor they can't avoid employing... so we know it's bad on pretty much... every conceivable level

We also know it's biggest advocates and the people running most AI companies... are in fact literal, actual fascists. Some of which have actual body counts. Like have literally caused the suffering and deaths of other human beings

So... what exactly is the point of posts mocking the "less good" reasons to criticize generative AI use? Even when you're ideologically correct that the argument they're employing is flawed and that there are better, more tangible criticisms of generative AI (see... the fascism... slave labor... environmental harm), what is the actual point? What is accomplished besides generative AI use being defended and expanded for another day?

"It's fascist to criticize generative AI use as soulless." Okay well, sure, I guess, let's go with that. ACTUAL fascists with the power to do the fascism are using this AI and are financially benefiting from generative ai use. And are using things like deepfakes to create propaganda that will ultimately hurt more people... so... no fascist is getting into power by criticizing generative AI but plenty are using generative AI to amass power.

Thusly... you were morally correct in your observation. And yet what did you accomplish? Who did you aid?

I see so many fucking posts that are like... okay, so you're smug right now. What is your smugness doing to help other people? To prevent harm?

"Haha it's stupid to be offended for Miyazaki's sake because he has bad politics too." Correct. And yet the Ghibli art image generation trend forced OpenAI to limit image generation because it's using so much energy and creating so much heat it was melting GPUs.

I'm not sad for the GPUs sake or for Ghibli's sake... I'm thinking critically, for like, five seconds, about what that means for water usage and the environment.

If the "bad" arguments shame people into not using a harmful technology... I'm sorry at a certain point, maybe I just sit down and let them continue to make the bad arguments. Because the harm of "UWU MIYAZAKI" is... people continue to watch Ghibli films (which is what y'all are doing too, like, EVERY post I have EVER seen criticize him here always has the addendum "I still love his some of films tho" lol) and the harm of generative ai use is pollution which will mostly affect the most marginalized and vulnerable people. Like... we already know climate change hurts vulnerable people the most and yet...

I'm just kinda tired of rhetoric/ideology over tangible results, I guess.

[tevintersoldier]

my new hobby is commenting on ads with ai generated images/videoes on facebook, calling them out and telling them it makes the whole company and their products look cheap 😇

[reasonsforhope]

"Major technology companies signed a pact on Friday to voluntarily adopt "reasonable precautions" to prevent artificial intelligence (AI) tools from being used to disrupt democratic elections around the world.

Executives from Adobe, Amazon, Google, IBM, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, and TikTok gathered at the Munich Security Conference to announce a new framework for how they respond to AI-generated deepfakes that deliberately trick voters. 

Twelve other companies - including Elon Musk's X - are also signing on to the accord...

The accord is largely symbolic, but targets increasingly realistic AI-generated images, audio, and video "that deceptively fake or alter the appearance, voice, or actions of political candidates, election officials, and other key stakeholders in a democratic election, or that provide false information to voters about when, where, and how they can lawfully vote".

The companies aren't committing to ban or remove deepfakes. Instead, the accord outlines methods they will use to try to detect and label deceptive AI content when it is created or distributed on their platforms. 

It notes the companies will share best practices and provide "swift and proportionate responses" when that content starts to spread.

Lack of binding requirements

The vagueness of the commitments and lack of any binding requirements likely helped win over a diverse swath of companies, but disappointed advocates were looking for stronger assurances.

"The language isn't quite as strong as one might have expected," said Rachel Orey, senior associate director of the Elections Project at the Bipartisan Policy Center. 

"I think we should give credit where credit is due, and acknowledge that the companies do have a vested interest in their tools not being used to undermine free and fair elections. That said, it is voluntary, and we'll be keeping an eye on whether they follow through." ...

Several political leaders from Europe and the US also joined Friday’s announcement. European Commission Vice President Vera Jourova said while such an agreement can’t be comprehensive, "it contains very impactful and positive elements".  ...

[The Accord and Where We're At]

The accord calls on platforms to "pay attention to context and in particular to safeguarding educational, documentary, artistic, satirical, and political expression".

It said the companies will focus on transparency to users about their policies and work to educate the public about how they can avoid falling for AI fakes.

Most companies have previously said they’re putting safeguards on their own generative AI tools that can manipulate images and sound, while also working to identify and label AI-generated content so that social media users know if what they’re seeing is real. But most of those proposed solutions haven't yet rolled out and the companies have faced pressure to do more.

That pressure is heightened in the US, where Congress has yet to pass laws regulating AI in politics, leaving companies to largely govern themselves.

The Federal Communications Commission recently confirmed AI-generated audio clips in robocalls are against the law [in the US], but that doesn't cover audio deepfakes when they circulate on social media or in campaign advertisements.

Many social media companies already have policies in place to deter deceptive posts about electoral processes - AI-generated or not... 

[Signatories Include]

In addition to the companies that helped broker Friday's agreement, other signatories include chatbot developers Anthropic and Inflection AI; voice-clone startup ElevenLabs; chip designer Arm Holdings; security companies McAfee and TrendMicro; and Stability AI, known for making the image-generator Stable Diffusion.

Notably absent is another popular AI image-generator, Midjourney. The San Francisco-based startup didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday.

The inclusion of X - not mentioned in an earlier announcement about the pending accord - was one of the surprises of Friday's agreement."

-via EuroNews, February 17, 2024

--

Note: No idea whether this will actually do much of anything (would love to hear from people with experience in this area on significant this is), but I'll definitely take it. Some of these companies may even mean it! (X/Twitter almost definitely doesn't, though).

Still, like I said, I'll take it. Any significant move toward tech companies self-regulating AI is a good sign, as far as I'm concerned, especially a large-scale and international effort. Even if it's a "mostly symbolic" accord, the scale and prominence of this accord is encouraging, and it sets a precedent for further regulation to build on.

[protonbits-software1]

Using AI in E-commerce | Generative AI Use Cases for E-commerce

Discover the top 5 use cases for using AI in e-commerce, from personalized shopping to customer support automation. Unlock business potential today!