#for a much worse player who also has a 2 year contract with the khl??????????????

[sethjarvy]

"but he's not gonna play with the flyers until 2026!!"

1. that's 3 more years of full on tank

2. that means stacking up with high draft picks

3. he's gonna join this team when the rebuild is almost done

4. who the fuck cares we got a generational talent who was the only worthy competitor to connor fucking bedard

thinking about michkov and how he fits perfectly into the flyers rebuild timeline

[arizonanighthawks]

Two years into his tenure as Head Coach, three questions Walter Bowen will have to answer this season

Jasmine Downey, staff writer

Question number 1: Will the Nighthawks finally make the playoffs after a six-year drought?

I know, I know, we’re starting off strong, but it’s the question everyone wants answered. Six years ago in 2018, the Nighthawks were ousted from the Stanley Cup playoffs by the Colorado Avalanche, and then-GM Howard Gagnon cleaned house, trading most of his star players across the league, trading down for picks in the draft, and firing beloved head coach Erik Demers, who then went on to win the Stanley Cup with two different teams in the years since. After the disastrous following year, a spate of injuries and awful coaching from replacement coach Alexander Stuart, the Nighthawks landed in a squarely mediocre position in the standings, and only got worse from there.

Recently, with new GM Isaiah Chambers, head coach Walter Bowen, who has not done anything to warrant firing (yet) and the peaceful transference of power to owner Arthur Lindsay, the Nighthawks have been getting slightly better, both on the ice and in the front office. They picked Anatoly Zikov 2nd overall in the 2021 draft, and while waiting for his KHL contract to end, have been slowly piecing together a team that looks vaguely like the beginnings of a playoff-caliber club.

However, now that we know Zikov is on his way over, what do we need Bowen to do this season?

First of all, the Nighthawks deserve to make the playoffs this season. Michael Houck and Lee Bartlett aren’t getting any younger. Bartlett hasn’t had the opportunity to play in many playoff games, after his late-season injury kept him out of the 2017 playoffs, and the 2018 series against LA and then Colorado were pretty short-lived, and Houck has played [checks NHL.com] zero total playoff games. Plus, Zikov is a potential generational talent and a near lock for the Hall of Fame, so why not get him some playoff games right off the bat? Some of the kids on this team — and there are a lot of kids on this team — should also get some experience playing games that actually have consequences. If Bowen wants to keep this job, the Nighthawks need the playoffs.

2. Special teams

The Nighthawks’ penalty kill last year… well, we all saw it. It had holes bigger than the ones in the ozone layer and problems you could see from space, and the only reason it wasn’t dead last was because of Simon Dahlvig. Assistant coach Chelsea Sheppard has taken over the special teams position for now, but if there aren’t any major improvements, Bowen might need to take drastic measures.

It wasn’t as though the power play was much better; at 26th in the league, it was an insufficient group. Things are looking up with the acquisition of Michael Yeung in the offseason, who was a force on the Rangers' power play, and it’s clear that the Nighthawks are hoping for some of that magic to translate to the ice in Arizona. But Bowen has a lot of work to do with the kids; Yeung alone certainly can't fix that.

3. Nic Proulx

There’s no limit to the amount of sympathy we can extend Proulx, but we also want to see the Nighthawks play well. With limp numbers for the past two years and zero chemistry with every line Bowen tried him on, he’s been something of a stick in the mud for the Nighthawks these past two years. An upcoming RFA, if he wants to stay in Arizona with the team that drafted him, he is desperately going to need a huge change in his play. 

Will it be Zikov? Will they put him on Ezra Page’s wing for the millionth time, hoping something will finally work? Will Lee Bartlett’s incessant fathering finally produce a happy, well-rounded hockey player? We’ve seen flashes, brief, brief flashes of brilliance from Proulx, bare moments of the athlete we know we can be and that we saw in his career in the Q, as captain of the Voltigeurs. We want that all the time. If Bowen can do something to bring that out, we might have on our hands the longest-tenured coach in the NHL today.

[burning-up-ao3]

NEWARK, N.J. — While on a five-day trip to Jackson Hole, Wyo. during the Penguins’ bye week late last month, Sidney Crosby began to feel something he had not felt in years, since the most recent NHL lockout in 2004-05.

On the second-to-last day of what was supposed to be an enjoyable vacation, the Penguins captain wound up a couple thousand miles away from either of his two homes, miserable and sick, unable to do much of anything.

“You get used to having to play through colds and stuff like that,” Crosby said. “People go to work with them. It’s a part of life. But sometimes it stops you in your tracks like that. There’s nothing you can do.”

What Crosby went through is common for NHL players, who are constantly shuttling on and off airplanes, checking in and out of hotels and entering and leaving (entirely too) cold buildings, all during the darkest days of winter.

Ron CookRon Cook: Evgeni Malkin may be ready to break out of long slump

No matter how many vitamins they take or calcium they consume, they’re inevitably going to get sick. Sometimes it might get ugly. And they’re well aware that sick days are almost never an option.

Which means that Crosby, given what he contracted, was actually one of the lucky ones, in that he could rest some. More often than probably anyone realizes, NHL players have to play through some ugly stuff, flu bugs and stomach illnesses the public never hears about.

“It happens every winter, where half the team gets sick,” Matt Cullen said. “The training room is busy. Guys are looking for anything to help them get over the hump so they can feel well enough to play.

“It’s why you try so hard to take care of what you can control. You’re getting your sleep and fluids because it [stinks] as a player when you’re sick. You have to play regardless.

“You see it every once in a while, when guys are throwing up in the bathroom during warmup or between periods. I’ve had teammates run off the bench. It’s part of the deal.”

2. And when it happens on the road, Bryan Rust said, there’s nothing worse.

“It’s miserable,” Rust said. “It’s kind of a helpless feeling; it’s not like you’re in your own bed, and you can rely on someone.

Matt VenselPenguins blue line hopes to keep up its contributions on offense

“You also feel bad for the maids who have to come in there afterward and clean up.”

It’s a feeling Rust knows well, too. He said he was knock-down, drag-out sick twice: once in college at Notre Dame and another time during the early days of his Penguins career.

What does the versatile winger do when it happens?

“Lie in bed, turn the lights off, close the shades,” Rust said. “And hope it goes away as fast as possible.”

3. It was a funny topic to take around the Penguins dressing room: Have you ever been sick on the road?

Those who hadn’t, immediately found some wood on which to knock. Those who had, launched into some humorous tales.

In 2013, Olli Maatta was playing for Finland at the World Junior Championship in Ufa, Russia. Maatta thought he ate something funky, food that was potentially undercooked. The next few days were brutal.

“Not the best thing that ever happened,” Maatta said with a smile. “Although being stuck in my room and trying to watch whatever it was on Russian TV might’ve been the worst thing.”

4. Before he was traded, Riley Sheahan told me a good one about when he was with the Detroit Red Wings a couple years ago. He vacationed in Mexico during the All-Star break and brought back a little present.

“I caught a virus or something,” Sheahan said. “I was sick for like five weeks. I actually had to miss a game, on the Moms’ trip, in Florida. It wasn’t fun.”

Garrett Wilson was a proud member of the knock-on-wood club. Despite playing for San Antonio in the AHL — where they’d have to leave for a month every winter because the rodeo came to town — Wilson has never been sick on the road.

“I don’t puke too often, either,” Wilson said. “Even drinking or anything, I don’t puke. Pretty lucky that way.”

Wilson said he did play with a guy — John McFarland, in the Florida Panthers system — who didn’t feel right until he forced himself to vomit before a game, although that wasn’t related to being sick.

“You definitely hear the odd time a guy is hurling in the bathroom before a game, whether they’re sick or nervous,” Wilson said. “It almost makes you sick hearing it.”

5. Whether or not it’s better to get sick in a hotel room versus at home sparked a lively debate. Matt Murray is all for the road option.

“I think a hotel room is a good place to be,” Murray said before taking his knuckles to his dressing room stall. “You’re not bugging your family or anything like that. You get to sleep it off.”

Wilson agreed.

“I don’t think it’s too bad on the road,” Wilson said. “You’re with the trainers all the time. They’re usually at the same hotel. If you do get really sick, they’re just a text or phone call away.”

6. My personal opinion: These guys are nuts. It’s much worse to be sick in a hotel, with none of the comforts of home.

It happened to me recently, too, around the same time as Crosby. In San Jose, Calif. for the NHL All-Star Game, I literally could not stand at Media Day because I was dizzy and nauseous.

Eventually, with neither Crosby nor Letang there, I decided to cut bait take an Uber back to my hotel room — backpack open the entire way, praying there were no issues.

Yada, yada, yada … the next 24 hours were not fun.

“Hotel room, being stuck in a little space there, it’s terrible,” Maatta (correctly) said.

7. Back to the war stories, though, which turned out to be my favorite part of reporting this.

In Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, Rust’s next-door neighbor in the dressing room was former Penguins prospect Jayson Megna.

“One game, between periods, he was hugging a trash can,” Rust said. “On the bench, same thing. It was impressive to see him play through it. I don’t think I would have been able to. It was pretty wild.”

Penguins coach Mike Sullivan experienced the same thing when he played for the Calgary Flames.

“I had the flu,” Sullivan recalled. “Played through it to the point where I was throwing up between periods, and they had to put an IV in me to replace all the fluids I had lost. That was the hardest one from a personal standpoint.”

8. When he was with Minnesota — the first time — Cullen once played with walking pneumonia. To conserve as much energy as possible, Cullen skipped the morning skate and stayed home basically until puck drop.

With the Wild apparently short on players and unable to make a roster move in time, Cullen said there wasn’t another option.

“That was a tough one, running to the bathroom between periods,” Cullen said. “We were in a pinch. Just had to do it.”

Being able to rely on a routine, Cullen said, does help.

“It helps to normalize everything even if you feel terrible,” Cullen said. “You get out and do warmup, get some blood flowing, you’re out in front of the fans, it gives you some adrenaline. But after the game, you feel it.”

9. Tanner Pearson had some good perspective on the matter because he nearly wound up disgustingly sick on the road while with the Kings last February.

Los Angeles had arrived home from a four-game road trip that actually included its annual Dads’ trip — maybe we should blame the parents? — when Pearson started to feel dizzy and nauseous.

“I don’t know if it was something I ate on the plane or what,” Pearson said. “Just hit me like a ton of bricks. We landed, and that was the end of me.”

But there was the benefit, Pearson said, of making it home. He could sleep in his own bed. His wife was there. At least he wasn’t in a hotel room.

“I see guys who are sick on the road,” Pearson said, “and it looks like pure torture.”

10. It can also be downright scary.

Marcus Pettersson had a couple stories, one funny, the other not so much. The first was the 2016 World Junior Championship, in Helsinki, Finland. A couple of Pettersson’s teammates contracted the stomach flu.

“It’s crazy how quickly something like that can spread,” Pettersson said. “You just have to isolate yourself.”

Pettersson also heard a story about Detroit defenseman Jonathan Ericsson’s brother, Jimmie, when he was playing with SKA Saint Petersburg of the KHL in 2014-15. When Jimmie Ericsson told the team’s doctors he didn’t feel well, they treated it like some sort of illness — but never checked anything else.

Turns out Ericsson had a partially ruptured spleen, which they only discovered upon returning home.

“They just thought he was sick,” Pettersson said. “He got medicine shots in his [butt]. They said, ‘You’re good. You can play.’ It was crazy.”

11. The Penguins would never allow something like that to happen.

Sullivan explained the lengths to which the team goes to try and stack the odds in their favor, all while realizing that sickness during a winter sport are pretty much inevitable.

On the road, the Penguins will ensure that sick players get their own rooms, Sullivan said. They also get their own water bottles on the bench, the equipment staff will wash and sanitize things even more than they already do, and Sullivan has no problem sending a guy home if he’s sick.

“It’s difficult when you’re in close quarters like this,” Sullivan said. “But we do everything within our power to see if we can’t contain it when those types of things arise.”

12. Wanted to close with this anecdote from Crosby on not participating in the NHL All-Star Skills Competition when he was probably extremely contagious. Made me laugh, anyway.

“The last thing I wanted to do was get everyone sick. That’s all I need,” Crosby said before cracking a smile. “Of course, I guess it was our division … “

13. Moving on …

The more I think about it, Carl Hagelin would be a perfect fit for the Penguins at the NHL trade deadline, provided they can convince the Los Angeles Kings or or someone else to take Pearson.

Small problem: The deal actually isn’t possible.

I didn’t learn this until recently, and I’m guessing you didn’t know it, either. It’s a CBA quirk that’s actually pretty dumb, in my opinion.

Once a team retains salary in a trade — the Penguins retained $250,000 — they can’t reacquire that player for a minimum of one year after the transaction or until the player's contract expires or is terminated prior to the one-year date.

It’s a shame, too, because I think Hagelin would’ve been worth checking on.

For his penalty killing (Penguins are just 25 for their last 36, 69.4 percent), Hagelin’s fit with Evgeni Malkin and what Hagelin could potentially do for good friend Patric Hornqvist, who doesn’t have a point in 12 games.

14. As for what the Penguins could realistically do, I’m not in favor of anything big. Maybe add a depth forward or defenseman, depending on who’s out there.

But at some point, this group should be allowed to actually play together for a stretch, and we’re running out of time for that to happen.

Many of you have suggested a 1a goalie type as well. There’s a variety of problems with this. One, cost. That guy wouldn’t come cheap, if he was worth anything. Two, what do you do with Casey DeSmith? Three, how does that play with Murray?

I know he’s been hurt a lot, but I can’t imagine that would go over well. Murray is your No. 1. You paid DeSmith to be your backup. Hold onto Tristan Jarry. I’d stick with that.

15. Without Hagelin, I’m curious to see where this goes with Zach Aston-Reese alongside Malkin and Phil Kessel. It’s a tremendous opportunity for him and one for which he’s actually well-suited.

“Any time you can stay on your natural side, it’s a little bit easier,” Aston-Reese said after Sunday’s 6-5 victory over the New York Rangers. “Phil kind of has that signature shot, too, coming down on his strong side. I like to work hard defensively. It’s definitely nice to balance out those two.”

I like Aston-Reese as a lot, as a player and person. He’s extremely smart, quotable and great to deal with from our perspective. If we were ranking most media-friendly players in the Penguins dressing room, he’d surely be up there.

But hockey-wise, he’s going to make a lot of people happy if he’s able to blend some physicality with offense and a willingness to play defense. He’s still rounding out his game in a few different ways, but I think the Penguins definitely got a good one here.

16. It’s obvious — and Post-Gazette columnist Ron Cook wrote this off of Sunday’s game — but the Penguins need to get Hornqvist going. How do they do that?

I see two options. One, I’d consider playing Hornqvist with Sidney Crosby. Nothing against Rust. He’s been great there. But they need more out of Hornqvist.

My second possible solution would be trying Kessel on the third line with Nick Bjugstad — they had some chemistry — and using Hornqvist with Malkin, a situation where the feisty Swede thrived last season.

I hate Hornqvist in the bottom-six, as I’ve never seen his production give the Penguins a competitive advantage in that spot the way Kessel’s has at various times throughout his Penguins tenure.

17. This won’t be a popular opinion, but I’ve actually liked Jack Johnson on his natural left side the past couple of games.

I know what the goals-for numbers are — they’re awful — and I know how Johnson is perceived by the fan base. But if Rutherford or Sullivan are frustrated with Johnson’s play this season, they’re doing one heck of a job hiding it.

Whether you want to admit it or not, Johnson won’t be a healthy scratch. And what I’ve seen the past couple of games — Johnson’s been with Juuso Riikola with one and Justin Schultz for two — has actually been pretty decent.

18. Shut up, Don Cherry. Can we all agree on that?

He scolded the Carolina Hurricanes for, of all things, having fun. I hate giving this any airspace whatsoever, so I’m going to twist it another way: Forget about Dino Don and think of this from a Hurricanes perspective.

Great organization. Great city. A lot of fun to watch. If this gets their fans excited, my goodness, go for it. I think it’s tremendous. And I love seeing the Old (Canadian) Guard get upset over it.

19. Stat of the week: 12

That’s the number of points for Pettersson since the Dec. 3 trade that brought him to Pittsburgh. It’s also one less than Daniel Sprong has during that same stretch.

20. Non-hockey thought of the week: Apparently MLB commissioner Rob Manfred thinks we’re all stupid. Did you see this story from the Post-Gazette’s new baseball writer, Nubyjas Wilborn? Two quotes struck me.

“This narrative that our teams aren’t trying is just not supported by the facts. Our teams are trying. Every single one of them wants to win.”

Yes, they are trying, and they do want to win. I don’t doubt that the Pirates try and prefer winning to losing. But I could race Usain Bolt, and I’d still try. I’d still want to win. The problem is that I would not have taken the requisite steps to do so.

Then this gem: “I reject the notion that payroll is a good measure for how hard a team is trying or how successful that team is going to be.”

There are certainly outliers here: small-market teams that compete and big spenders that don’t. But the two teams in the World Series last year spent the most. Generally if you’re actually paying to play, you have a chance.

The only thing I hate more than baseball’s financial structure is when people in positions of power try to sell us this garbage.

Jason Mackey: jmackey@post-gazette.com and Twitter @JMackeyPG.

[thrashermaxey]

Tournament: Which Veterans Will Be The Most Productive Over The Next Five Years?

  Welcome of the second of what now will be monthly tournaments/polls, with your votes in the first poll anointing Andrei Vasilevskiy, Connor Hellebuyck, Frederik Andersen, Carter Hart, and Carey Price as the five goalies who’ll have the most wins in the next five seasons, starting in 2019-20.  Sticking with the crystal ball theme of five years from now, the question this week is which skaters who are currently 30+ years old will, in five years, still be as good (or at least in the same echelon) as they are now.

  As you’ll see when you arrive at the poll (a link to which is provided at the bottom of the column) I’ve given you the option of choosing as many of the 18 players as you want, so go ahead and cast your vote for any and all you think will be at least as good/productive (or in roughly the same ballpark) as they are now by the time March 2024 rolls around.  There’s also a ���none of the above” option if you truly think not a single one of these skaters will be able to stay productive enough.  One last note – if a player is doing atypically worse or better this season, then you should base your vote on what would be his more normal output in view of recent seasons.

  Before getting to the player choices (which are listed in alphabetical order along with their age, contract status, and scoring pace for 2018-19 through March 17th), I figure it makes sense to share some “food for thought” data to perhaps influence how you might vote.  So here’s a table with scoring for age 35+ skaters since 2000-01.

  Age

Forwards with 75+ points

Defensemen with 45+ points

35

8

8

36

9

6

37

3

5

38

3

2

39

2

3

40+

1

2

    Nicklas Backstrom (age = 31; signed through 2019-20 for a $6.7M/year; scoring pace = 77 points)

After his worst season in 2017-18 since his rookie campaign saw him tally “only” 71 points, Backstrom is seemingly back to his norm of just under a point per game production despite the presence and further development of Evgeni Kuznetsov.  In fact, whereas some are wondering if Backstrom could continue to produce this well if Washington opts not to re-sign him, perhaps that might ultimately be the best thing for Backstrom given Kuznetsov’s looming presence?

  Patrice Bergeron (age = 33; signed through 2021-22 for a $6.875M/year; scoring pace = 98 points)

Although he’ll be 38 in five years and, assuming he stays healthy, a veteran of more than 1500 total NHL games by then, Bergeron seems poised to defy father time and continue producing, especially if he and Brad Marchand (more on him below) are able to continue to play together and maintain their magical chemistry further into their 30s.

  Brent Burns (age = 34; signed through 2024-25 for an $8M/year; scoring pace = 84 points)

Yes, Burns will be 39 in March 2024; and were he not signed through 2025, he might not have made the cut to be included among voting choices.  That’s because elite older d-men are about as rare as they come, as shown by the table above; and although it’s unlikely that Burns can maintain his current pace at age 39, he could defy the odds and be very productive even with more grey in that long beard of his.

  Dustin Byfuglien (age = 33; signed through 2020-21 for a $7.6M/year; scoring pace = 66 points)

Big Buff, who turns 34 in a week, will miss 13+ games this season for the third time in the last five campaigns.  In fact, he’s played barely 925 games in his career to date; so although with his big frame those are tougher games to log, he might have it in him not only to play until he’s 38 but to remain a top defenseman scoring option in fantasy all the while.

  Sidney Crosby (age = 31; signed through 2024-25 for an $8.7M/year; scoring pace = 107 points)

The calendar keeps turning, and Crosby keeps producing.  With this his sixth straight season not missing a chunk of time, and his skill and hockey sense both as sharp as ever, on paper he’s seemingly as good a bet as any to continue to be able to produce at or near his current levels into his mid-30s.

  Evgeni Dadonov (age = 30; signed through 2019-20 for a $4M per year/year; scoring pace = 66 points)

One of two on the list who spent most of their careers in the KHL, Dadonov has acclimated to the NHL game quite well and looks well equipped to produce into his mid-30s.  The big question is whether he’ll stick around or instead pull a Pavel Datsyuk and go back overseas to finish his career.

  Claude Giroux (age = 31; signed through 2021-22 for an $8.275M/year; scoring pace = 86 points)

Although well below his torrid scoring pace from last season, Giroux has shown more than enough for poolies to look past his other seasons of declining production prior to 2017-18.  Giroux likely will aim to continue building a Hall of Fame resume, and what better way to help out that cause than to tack on another five seasons of elite production?

  Patrick Kane (age = 30; signed through 2022-23 for a $10.5M/year; scoring pace = 116 points)

With how amazingly Kane is playing this season, it’s easy to forget he had only 165 points in 164 games over the prior two seasons.  It seems, however, that Kane plays his best when the Hawks count on him to step up.  If only we knew how much the team would need him in five years….

  Phil Kessel (age = 31; signed through 2021-22 for an $8M/year; scoring pace = 82 points)

He might not be the poster boy for fitness, but Kessel is clearly a smart player and quietly has morphed his game over the past two seasons to be less of a sniper and more of a playmaker, especially on the PP, where his skills could easily be maintained for five more seasons.

  Anze Kopitar (age = 31; signed through 2023-24 for a $10M/year; scoring pace = 58 points)

Is the real Kopitar what we witnessed last season, or what we’re seeing now?  Probably something right in the middle.  The big question is whether Kopitar will opt to play beyond 2023-24, as his name is on the Stanley Cup twice and if he plays well enough between now and then he should already have a Hall of Fame resume.

  Kris Letang (age = 31; signed through 2021-22 for a $7.25M/year; scoring pace = 72 points)

While his many injuries might cause his body to break down before age 36, they just as easily could have the effect of giving him fresher legs than most his age, allowing him to keep playing and producing even once he’s that old.

  Evgeni Malkin (age = 32; signed through 2021-22 for a $9.5M/year; scoring pace = 88)

Given his unique combination of size and elite skill, Malkin could very well be productive even one he’s 37.  The issue is whether – like Letang – all the time he’s missed due to injury will give him a boost due to having fresher legs, or instead cause him to be less productive due to wear and tear.  I’m quite curious what your votes will have to say.

  Brad Marchand (age = 30; signed through 2024-25 for a $6.125M/year; scoring pace = 100)

Not only does Marchand seem to be only getting better with age, but he’s actually signed to play for five more seasons; and as crazy as it might seem, he could be trying to build a Hall of Fame resume over that time, so his effort level might still remain at or near where it is now.

  Alex Ovechkin (age = 33; signed through 2020-21 for a $9.538M/year; scoring pace = 93 points)

Already in most peoples’ minds the best pure goal scorer of the 21st century, fast forward to five years from now and Ovi could be putting himself into the conversation to be among the best of all time, which might be more than enough motivation for him not only to keep playing until 38 but also to still possess much of the same greatness he has now, ala what Teemu Selanne did.

  Alexander Radulov (age = 32; signed through 2021-22 for a $6.25M/year; scoring pace = 78 points)

Like Dadonov, it’s not clear if Radulov will stay in the NHL once his current contract runs out or perhaps return to the KHL.  But with his talent and hockey sense, he could easily be a productive player at age 37.

  Ryan Suter (age 34; signed through 2024-25 for a $7.538M/year; scoring pace = 50 points)

Like Burns, Suter might not have made the cut were it not for the fact that he’s signed through six years from now.  Plus, it’s not like he’s a 60 point d-man now, so him being able to substantially maintain his current level of production isn’t farfetched.

  Blake Wheeler (age = 32; signed through 2018-19 for a $5.6M/year; scoring pace = 100 points)

First poolies questioned whether he was for real.  He showed he was.  Now their concern has shifted to whether he can continue to play at this elite of a level as he gets deeper into his 30s.  Those who’ve bet against Wheeler thus far have lost, so does it make sense to do so here?

  Keith Yandle (age = 32; signed through 2022-23 for a $6.35M/year; scoring pace = 63 points)

One of the most unsung producers in fantasy, Yandle has stayed quite productive as he aged and even on some lousy teams, tallying the fifth-most points among all NHL d-men since 2013-14.  His production doesn’t rely heavily on either speed or on power, so seeing him remain quite good even five years from now at age 37 is within reason.

  ********

There you have the 18 voting choices.  And here’s the link for you to cast your votes to have your voices heard.  As you’ll see in the poll and as noted above, there will be a 19th choice for “none of the above” if you think none of these 18 players will be as productive (or at least substantially as productive) in five years as he is now.

  Mailbag Questions Needed

Next week is my monthly mailbag column, and there’s still time to send me a question for inclusion.  You can do so either by emailing the question to admin@dobbersports.com with “Roos Mailbag” as the subject line or instead you can send me a private message on the DobberHockey Forums – my username is “rizzeedizzee”.  Just be sure to include as much information and details about your league as possible, as that way I can not only give you an informed response but also make the answer most relevant to other readers.  See you next week!

from All About Sports https://dobberhockey.com/hockey-home/fantasy-hockey-rick-roos/tournament-which-veterans-will-be-the-most-productive-over-the-next-five-years/

[yahoo-puck-daddy-blog]

Trending Topics: Other GMs to blame for Vegas menace

Dale Tallon has some explaining to do. (Getty Images)

Self-criticism is a good thing.

The ability to look at past mistakes and say not only “Ah, here’s where I went wrong,” but also understand the “why” of it is critical to growing as a person, professionally, whatever. With that in mind, NHL GMs have a Maoist level of self-criticism to undertake these days.

Vegas spent a few days atop the entire league this week and ahead of Thursday’s slate of games, were still playing at the best points-per-game pace in the NHL. As so many people have said in recent weeks while giggling to themselves as they hit the “Send Tweet” button, “Just like we all predicted.”

We of course have to accept that Vegas has been quite lucky to get the shooting percentages they have, and that to have even gotten anything close to league-average goaltending given what their situation looked like for a good chunk of the season to date is a miracle. Anyone who doesn’t accept that is a homer, a person who has learned approximately zero lessons from the past decade of “smart” hockey fans being right about teams like this, or (often) both.

And that’s fine: It’s fine to say Vegas has been better than anyone has expected, because they have. We must fundamentally understand that this team should fall into the category of Columbus last year “good but not this good.” They’re certainly the best (or at least most interesting) story in the league in decades at least, but that seven coaches picked them to go to the Cup Final in June as part of Bob McKenzie’s midseason poll is putting the cart approximately a mile before the horse.

How many teams have we seen run out like this, and either collapse down the stretch or flame out quickly in the playoffs? About one a year, folks. There’s little to suggest that this isn’t that until proven otherwise, especially because their “star power” — which you absolutely need to win in the playoffs — is more than a little lacking.

Point is, though, Vegas seems to be way ahead of schedule. No one would deny that, and that’s despite the fact that they didn’t really do the best job in the world of picking the right players for their long-term future at last summer’s expansion draft.

Where the issues arise for other GMs and should force them to reconsider how they see the game is that while, yes, the NHL’s rules for the expansion draft were more generous than ever before, they weren’t this generous. Again, even accounting for Vegas’s incredible luck, this is a team that should be fighting for the playoffs, at best, rather than the Presidents’ Trophy.

That they’re doing much, much, much better than anyone foresaw should quite frankly lead to some GMs getting fired. In theory, Vegas should have gotten a bunch of No. 3 defensemen, No. 6/7 forwards, and No. 2 goalies. The salary cap certainly complicated things, which is what allowed them to get, say, Marc-Andre Fleury who is very definitively not a backup, but generally speaking the Golden Knights should have been icing a middling roster.

That they haven’t is a failing of other GMs, and one need only look at the wheelings and dealings Vegas made before the expansion draft to understand why.

Obviously the big loser in this is Dale Tallon, who gave Vegas the two component parts for the engine of its second line — Reilly Smith and Jon Marchessault — as a total giveaway. The Smith thing was a salary dump, obviously, but not a particularly smart one (Smith gets a good chunk of change but they gave up on him due to a low-shooting-percentage season), and Florida was probably banking on Marchessault going from 30 goals last year to maybe 12 or 15 again.

No such luck. Marchessault is on pace for another 30ish-goal season and leads the team in points. He and Smith have some of the best possession numbers in the league. Florida stinks because it has no forward depth. This was an avoidable problem, but at least Florida got a fourth-round pick out of it.

Meanwhile, William Karlsson was a perfectly good middle-of-the-lineup guy who’s going off now, and could end up being an MVP candidate. Obviously the fact that he has so many goals is entirely because he’s shooting 27 percent this season (literally, he has taken 100 shots and scored on 27 of them). But Columbus only gave up this player, whom everyone had a lot of reason to like last year in that lesser role, because Jarmo Kekalainen made a really bad decision in February 2015.

At the time, Kekalainen figured he was better off overpaying a bad player on a worse contract (David Clarkson) to play than not-play, which is what Nathan Horton was doing with his career-ending back problem. But then Clarkson, too, suffered what was effectively a career-ending injury, and that necessitated that Columbus ship him to Vegas — along with a first- and second-round pick!!! — so George McPhee would take Karlsson instead of a guy like Josh Anderson.

The Wild gave up Alex Tuch in exchange for a conditional third-round pick and Vegas taking Erik Haula. The two have combined to score 25 goals this season and like the Florida guys, both are playing pretty well in the middle of the lineup.

Anaheim gave up Shea Theodore, who looks like he’ll develop into a good middle-pairing guy, for taking Clayton Stoner, who hasn’t played a game for them this year and conveniently has no timetable for return.

Tampa gave up two picks and Nikita Gusev (currently shredding the KHL) so Vegas would take the Jason Garrison contract off their hands. Even Pittsburgh gave up a second-round pick to offload Fleury.

Basically, the enticements to take good players here are unconscionable. The fact that Dale Tallon gave away two-thirds of the best second line in hockey is mind-boggling if predictable given that it’s Dale Tallon. The fact that Kekalainen gave up Karlsson to get himself out of a jam everyone thought he was crazy to get himself into in the first place is bonkers. The fact that Chuck Fletcher was so scared of losing Eric Staal that he gave up two young middle-six guys for nothing doesn’t make sense.

McPhee didn’t nail every pick in the expansion draft but he came close enough for it to, apparently, not matter much. Plus as of right now, Vegas will pick in the first two rounds at the entry draft at least 10 more times by 2020, on top of their five go-rounds this past summer.

The league made the job a little harder than usual for the GMs of the 30 other teams in the league with the expansion draft’s rules. And because of extant market inefficiencies, past bad decisions, and the like, those GMs made McPhee’s job a lot easier than it should have been.

I don’t know how those GMs explain that to their bosses, but they really ought to have to this summer.

Ryan Lambert is a Puck Daddy columnist. His email is here and his Twitter is here.

[thrashermaxey]

20 Fantasy Hockey Thoughts

Every Sunday, we'll share 20 Fantasy Thoughts from our writers at DobberHockey. These thoughts are curated from the past week's "Daily Ramblings".

Writers: Michael Clifford, Ian Gooding, Cam Robinson, and Dobber

  1. Micheal Ferland has been a wrecking ball in Carolina. For example, last Sunday, he scored, added eight hits, and even had four faceoff wins, to help out those leagues that count that. Boy was I wrong about this guy. I had him trending the opposite way in the Guide. I should have read it better – the Hurricanes wanted sandpaper, they have a hard-working coach. So, of course they would give Ferland top billing. I miffed this one, just a poor read. Seems so obvious now. (oct15)

  2. After years of being a source of many dominant fantasy hockey teams, the Red Wings don’t have much for fantasy owners to get excited about anymore. But one early sleeper from the Wings is rookie blueliner Dennis Cholowski, who leads the team in both power-play minutes and total minutes (21:48/GP). Cholowski scored a goal and added an assist while taking five shots on Saturday to give him five points in six games, including four power-play points. He could easily hit a rookie wall at some point, but he’s owned in just seven percent of Yahoo leagues. That’s surprisingly low ownership for a player earning first-unit power-play minutes, even if it is for a likely lottery-bound team. (oct20)

  3. In case you hadn’t noticed, Anders Nilsson just recently enjoyed a three-game run, all wins, where he posted a 1.67 GAA and .943 SV%. Yes, I was as surprised as you are. Do remember, though, that after last season, he backstopped Sweden to a World Hockey Championship.

A long-term question is whether Nilsson will unseat Jacob Markstrom as the de facto number one in Van City. I’d say that Nilsson would need more consistency than we’re used to with him before I would proclaim that he will be the guy two months from now. He could also easily force a timeshare with Markstrom, which might be the more likely scenario here. The Canucks are playing well right now, but their defense is the envy of no team. So, over an entire season, I still wouldn’t consider either Nilsson or Markstrom to be a must-own. (oct17)

  4. It’s finally happened, folks. Evgeni Kuznetsov is a superstar. We’ve been as patient as any sane human could ever hope for. Four years of KHL action that had Caps fans and fantasy junkies salivating at the prospect of him tearing it up in the Nation’s Capitol. It took nearly 100 games to push near the point-per-game mark, then a quick backslide and now, now it is here!

Sure, it’s only been six weeks, but all the magical ingredients are coming together. He’s 26-years-old and still in his statistical prime. He’s clicking on a heeeealthy 16.7 percent of his shots, all the while eating up the entirety of all-situations deployment next to the best finisher of all-time (Alex Ovechkin).

Speaking of time-on-ice, he’s getting a lot of it. Through seven games, he’s played 20:57. That’s more than three minutes above the mark he set last season – which represented a career-high at the time. His time-on-ice total places him firmly in the top 10 for forwards to begin the season. With over four minutes of that coming on the man-advantage, you can’t ask for better deployment. The scary thing is, he hasn’t even begun filling his apple basket by feeding Ovi for the patented one-timer. Of Kuzya’s six power-play points, four of them have been goals. That rate will dip, but the PPA’s should more than make up for it. He’s also shooting more than ever before, averaging 3.43 per game. His previous career-high was 2.35.

Last year, we had an unseasonable number of high-end scorers. Nine players cusped the 90-point threshold. Will anyone be surprised if Kuznetsov breaks that milestone this season? I don’t know about you, but I snuck a little preseason coin on him grabbing the Hart Trophy. At 82-1 odds I would’ve been stupid not to, right? Right? Right. (oct19)

  5. Jeff Skinner entered Saturday afternoon’s game against LA with just one goal in his first seven games as a Sabre, mainly playing on a line with rookie Casey Mittelstadt and veteran Kyle Okposo. But on Saturday, Skinner found himself on a line with Jack Eichel and Jason Pominville and produced exactly what the Sabres hoped he would when they acquired him from Carolina, scoring three goals in a 5-1 win. In fact, his entire line combined for nine points in this game. Eichel recorded three assists, while Pominville scored a goal and added two assists.

Eichel’s previous linemates, Sam Reinhart and Conor Sheary, found themselves centered by Vladimir Sobotka, which is obviously a significant downgrade from Eichel. Reinhart has yet to score a goal in eight games, while both Reinhart and Sheary have been held without points in their last three games. Obviously, lines are constantly in a state of flux, but as an owner of both Reinhart and Sheary in separate leagues, I’m not thrilled about the deployment at least in the short term. (oct20)

  6. Here's some more good news for Sabres' fans, they're not in the basement! It might not sound like much but for a team with such a storied history in the cellar, their 4-4 start must be considered a step forward. What's even more heartening is the play of their prospects in AHL Rochester. Victor Olofsson and his ridiculous release crossed over from the SHL this fall and has been terrorizing goaltenders in the AHL early and often. The 23-year-old led the SHL in goals last season and is leading the AHL in points (14) and sits tied for third in goals (5).

Fellow Swede and SHL import, Lawrence Pilut is second among AHL blueliners in points with 10 in six games. The most relieving start has to be from former eighth overall pick, Alex Nylander. The Sabres top pick from 2016 has struggled in two teenaged seasons in the American League. But, so far in 2018-19, he has produced eight points in eight games and looks ready to really knock the door down for a NHL gig. He hasn't been a passenger either. Of his eight total points, seven have been primary and five have come at even-strength. It's just him and Olli Juolevi who haven't cracked the NHL from the top 10 in 2016. The race is on to see who gets the call first. (oct19)

  7. Ryan Suter has seven points in eight games. He looks none the worse after that nasty ankle break last spring. He’s playing over 25 minutes a contest, which is likely a better place for the 33-year-old than 27-29 range he’s lived in in the past. He may not be flashy, but Suter is as consistent as they come. He's played at or above a 40-point pace in eight consecutive years and nine of his 13 career seasons. (oct19)

  8. Roope Hintz got a turn on the Jamie Benn and Tyler Seguin line Friday. Hintz always been an interesting talent. He found good success in the Finnish Liiga but none more than his playoff run in 2016-17 with HIFK. He led the league in scoring that spring and that helped catapult him to a 20-goal rookie season in the American League last year. He's a young player to watch. The change-up was the result of an Alexander Radulov lower-body injury. Something to keep an eye on. (oct19)

  9. Elias Lindholm sure looks like he's found his forever home. The talented Swedish forward has toyed with fantasy owners for years. He had the lofty draft slot, the silky skills and the promise of more production to come. However, over the course of his five NHL seasons, he'd never broke the 50-point barrier. That mark is certainly in danger this season.

A goal and an assist in Calgary's 5-3 loss Nashville on Friday brings him up to five goals eight points in seven games. That's all well and good, but what I like to see is the insanely juicy deployment. Lindholm is locked onto to Johnny Gaudreau and Sean Monahan at even-strength and on the top power-play unit. He's skating over 19 minutes a night with 4:41 coming on the man-advantage. You can't ask for much better than that. The shooting percent is ridiculous (35%) and due for a fistful of a market correction, but this a player who has always appeared to have 60-plus point upside and he's trending nicely towards that this season.

Things haven't been as rosy for the other major forward addition in Calgary. James Neal has just two points in seven contests.  With the Flames putting the Mikael Backlund-led  3M line back together, Neal is struggling to find much offense next to Sam Bennett and Mark Jankowski/Derek Ryan. The second unit power-play deployment isn't helping much either. To make matters worse, he has just 11 shots in seven games, five of which came in game two of the season. It's time to cut ties if you haven't already. (oct19)

  10. The Predators have placed Pekka Rinne on injured reserve, which makes Juuse Saros a must-add if he’s still available in your league (47 percent owned in Yahoo leagues at the time of this writing). Saros has played in four games this season, and all have resulted in wins.

If Saros is still unowned in your league, I can’t stress enough how you need to go add him now. Go directly to the waiver wire. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. And even when Rinne returns, you should try to find a way to retain Saros given the Preds’ status as one of the league’s top teams. Remember that Rinne is on the final year of his contract, so a phase-in could be in the works. Even if Saros is pushed to the bench when Rinne returns, owning a strong backup is in many ways better for your fantasy team than owning a weak starter. (oct20)

  11. How quickly things can change. In a recent Ramblings, I mentioned the solid play of Semyon Varlamov. Since then, coach Jared Bednar has decided to turn to Philipp Grubauer not once, but twice. Grubauer made Bednar’s decision look smart on Saturday, making 42 saves in a 3-1 win. This is shaping up to be an all-out competition in the Colorado net, with both goalies playing extremely well. Despite facing an average of 35 shots per game (one of the highest in the league), the Avalanche hold one of the league’s highest team save percentages. (oct20)

  12. Has Keith Kinkaid earned the starting job for good? Even though Cory Schneider has the larger paycheque with the longer term, this job could be Kinkaid’s to lose. Either way, Kinkaid is the perfect third goalie to own right now. (oct17)

  13. I mentioned that you should probably hold Kevin Shattenkirk in spite of his healthy scratch last week because of his 50-plus point upside on the blueline, but I’m not going to tell you to do the same with Brandon Saad. Unless you play in a very deep league, Saad is most likely replaceable given the number of available forward scoring options. Saad could very well become fantasy relevant again at some point, but it’s been a calendar year since he’s been able to produce at a 50-point pace. (oct17)

  14. If you own Pavel Buchnevich and are wondering whether to drop him, it appears that his scratch this past week isn’t due to a lack of scoring. Buchnevich has scored two goals and added an assist in his six games, which isn’t drop-worthy on its own. In fact, Buchnevich could rebound from this and become a more complete player who competes harder, assuming the coach’s message gets through. If you’re in a league where every game played matters and there’s an equal or better option, then make the move. Otherwise, I’d be fine with holding here.

On a side note, if you’re a Shattenkirk and/or Buchnevich owner, you’ll know by now that coach David Quinn doesn’t care about your fantasy team. I say that facetiously, though. Sarcasm doesn’t translate well over the internet sometimes. (oct17)

  15. When the Erik Karlsson trade was announced, the first thing that popped in my head was how this was going to affect the power play. For years, Brent Burns had been the focal point, ripping shots at will. That helped push him over 300 shots per season for three years. My assumption had been that Karlsson would be a facilitator on the PP with Burns retaining his shot-ripping role.

It hasn’t quite worked that way. And there is cause for concern here. Burns’s shot rate on the PP is his lowest in a decade, about 25 percent lower than last year, and he’s lost about three minutes per game at five-on-five (which I did not anticipate). The latter could lead to a loss of six or seven points alone. Unless that production is made up on the power play, this could be a very down year from what we had been expecting from him. (oct16)

  16. In an effort to maximize the odds that Jake Allen will pan out, the Blues put all their eggs into that basket. To give him confidence and remove any competition for his job. But now, we’re seeing the downside to that. Chad Johnson has been decent but is not going to bail this team out the way Carter Hutton did last year. It’s Allen or bust. Mike Yeo could be the first coach fired this year. (oct15)

  17. I have this ‘breakout’ vibe on Jakob Silfverberg, a la Josh Bailey (last year) or Brad Marchand (three years ago). That’s how good he’s been looking. That’s why it’s such a shame that he left last Sunday’s contest with an upper-body injury in the third. Back in August, I mused that Silfverberg was the perfect Bailey/Marchand situation template: Has more offensive talent than he’s shown, has solidified his production window in around that 50-point range, and it’s now at the point where we don’t expect more (just as it was with Marchand and Bailey). And then ‘whoa’, he gets 65 points out of the blue. So far Silf has seven points in six games so let’s hope he returns soon. (oct15)

  18. I talked about Silfverberg and the Bailey breakouts but Kyle Palmieri is also a suitable candidate. He’s 27 and we have very firm expectations for him and what he can do, as it’s been very stable and reliable in that range. He also plays with Taylor Hall, which can’t hurt. The big Devils’ line (Palmieri, Hall, Nico Hischier) is also the first PP unit. (oct15)

  19. It was a real shame seeing Elias Pettersson go down like that last week. As far as players go, and my early impressions at that point in the season, it’s Pettersson and Auston Matthews. Pettersson is an elite player and I had no idea just how elite until watching two of his games in the NHL. I feel like he’s gonna do what Mathew Barzal did last season, production-wise. It would be a shame if this injury has any long-term implications on his health (i.e. susceptibility to concussion). (oct15)

  20. Matthews has been on another planet. You don’t need me to tell you that. But it’s as if adding John Tavares on another line has freed things up for Matthews to the point where he’s just toying with the poor suckers that the opposition trots out there to try to stop him. I had always considered him a Patrick Kane-type of talent, but now I wonder if he’s a Sidney Crosby-type of generational talent. I don’t use that label very easily. (oct15)

Have a good week, folks!!

    from All About Sports https://dobberhockey.com/hockey-home/20-fantasy-hockey-thoughts/20-fantasy-hockey-thoughts-46/

[thrashermaxey]

Ramblings: Draft Analysis, Weekend Trades and Signings

Draft Analysis, Weekend Trades and Signings

First off, I just wanted to give a shoutout to Peter Harling, Cam Robinson, and the rest of the Dobber Prospects team for some amazing work at the draft (and for Cam for actually dropping a Ramblings to boot – these things don’t take five minutes to write, you know). It was awesome seeing the Dobber brand showing up on the Sportsnet ticker as each big name fell off the board.

As significant as the Dobber presence has been in Dallas, next year might be even better, with the 2019 draft coming to Vancouver! Will Quinn Hughes receive the honor of announcing his brother Jack as the first overall pick and his new teammate? Wait just a minute Canucks fans… you seem to have forgotten about the crummy luck that you have in the draft lottery every year.

By the way, I’m ecstatic about the Hughes pick. I can say that a puck-moving defenseman is something that the Canucks have been missing since, well, ever. I think the one takeaway from this draft – at least the first round – is the type of defensemen that were drafted. After years of teams drafting bigger and bigger, the smaller defensemen were all the rage as teams move toward a faster style that stresses the importance of moving the puck out of your zone and keeping up with the play. Here’s the height and weight of the first seven defensemen drafted in the first round:

Rasmus Dahlin (BUF): 6’ 2”, 181 lbs.

Quinn Hughes (VAN): 5’10”, 173 lbs.

Adam Boqvist (CHI): 5’11”, 165 lbs.

Evan Bouchard (EDM): 6’2”, 195 lbs.

Noah Dobson (NYI): 6’3”, 176 lbs.

Ty Smith (NJ): 5’11”, 176 lbs.

Ryan Merkley (SJ): 5’11”, 167 lbs.

Not one of these defensemen is over 200 pounds, and there are more that are under six feet tall than over. Of course, these are still kids who could continue to grow and should also fill out a bit more. But the trend of blueliners scoring more should continue, while fewer enormous-bodied stay-at-home defensemen will be able to survive in the NHL.

What made this draft fun is that after the first two picks, it didn’t seem to proceed according to plan. It’s easy to criticize Montreal and Arizona on their off-the-board picks, but the fact is that we’re putting faith in 18-year-old kids and perceptions will change. Let’s check back in ten years to find out how these picks really turned out. Maybe these Habs fans will become huge Kotkaniemi fans one day.  

Habs fans are not happy about their 3rd overall pick pic.twitter.com/EVIbIcXrg4

— Hockey Central (@HockeyCentraI) June 23, 2018

There’s certainly a lot to unpack from the past two days, so let’s get started.

*

I’ll start with a question that was asked to me this weekend. Some keeper leagues have an entry draft in which draft-eligible players can be drafted by teams. So if you have the third pick (or are simply ranking draft-eligible players), who would you choose? Assume Rasmus Dahlin and Andrei Svechnikov will be picked first and second overall. This person was initially thinking Filip Zadina, but with Jesper Kotkaniemi being picked third overall by the Habs, he wasn’t so sure anymore. Should the third overall pick in fantasy drafts be Zadina, Kotkaniemi, or someone else?

Settings and team needs could determine who you pick, but just because a certain NHL general manager decides to go off the board to pick the player he wants doesn’t mean that you also have to. And there’s a reason that the Kotkaniemi pick was considered off the board. Zadina obviously fell down at least a couple teams’ draft boards, but picking a real-life team is different from picking a fantasy team. Zadina says he will “bring the goals” to Detroit, something that he did in the QMJHL (44 goals in just 57 games). If you like fantasy goals on your team, he’s the guy I’d look to add at number 3.

For you (and for my own benefit, since I participate in one of these leagues), I will produce a draft list during the summer of draft-eligible prospects. But I’ve started with those three. Who would you pick after that? Or would you include someone else in your top 3? Remember that if you don’t want to wait and/or require far more detailed prospects analysis, you’ll want to pick up your copy of the Fantasy Prospects Report.  

*

Dobber himself provided the Fantasy Take on the Ilya Kovalchuk signing, which includes how top-6 forwards in LA might be impacted. I’d expect Kovalchuk to be a decently productive fantasy option next season, but at age 35 he’s already seen most of his peers his age drop off from their prime (or drop out of the league by now). As productive as Kovalchuk was in the KHL (over a point per game over his last two seasons), I can’t help but think that someone like now-34-year-old Rick Nash is a comparable at this point in his career. And Nash isn’t someone you should be reaching for in next season’s drafts. But don’t get me wrong, I’d still rate Kovalchuk over Nash.

Another point I’ll add: After the Kovalchuk signing, the Kings are left with just over $3 million in cap space. They don’t have much work left to do (possibly extend a qualifying offer to Tobias Rieder), but barring any other moves to clear cap space, they probably won’t have enough room to bring back Slava Voynov. And they may not be planning to bring him back.

From The Athletic (this article is free):

Sources indicated that the Kings trading Voynov’s rights is likely the most plausible scenario.

This article, written by Katie Strang, describes both what would need to happen in order for Voynov to be reinstated, as well as the details of the events that led to his contract being terminated by the Kings. Although the 28-year-old Voynov could provide a team with an all-important right-shot defenseman who can deliver some offense, I don’t imagine that his acquisition will go over well with a significant portion of any team’s fanbase.  

With Kovalchuk now off the board, John Carlson getting close to a deal in Washington, and John Tavares still considering re-signing on Long Island, could July 1 be kind of a “meh” day? Diehard hockey fans will no doubt tune in to the programming on TSN or Sportsnet (at least in Canada), but for the most part we’re not talking about franchise-altering players. Lots of over-30s who have had productive careers, though. You can check out the list over at Cap Friendly.

Speaking of Tavares, he is set to meet with five teams ahead of free agency. According to ESPN, those teams are expected to be San Jose, Toronto, Tampa Bay, Vegas, and Dallas. And according to David Pagnotta, the Islanders’ initial offer to Tavares is an eight-year deal worth $88 million.

*

Dobber also gave you the Fantasy Take on the Calgary/Carolina blockbuster. Fantasy-wise, this trade has a major impact on the Flames’ top line, with the forwards swapping places on it.  

Bill Peters says Lindholm is penciled in on the top line w Gaudreau and Monahan already and will take draws on his strong side. Said he spoke to him but kept it short as Lindholm was attending Sweden’s World Cup game when the call came.

— Eric Francis (@EricFrancis) June 23, 2018

As far as the trade goes, I’m going to concentrate on the forwards in the deal.

I really like this move for Elias Lindholm – more so than anyone else involved in the deal. The previous relationship with Peters should result in Lindholm receiving at least a long look with Johnny Gaudreau and Sean Monahan. There was no real continuity when it came to Lindholm’s linemates last season, but both Gaudreau (1.05 Pts/G) and Monahan (0.86 Pts/G) scored at a higher pace than any Carolina forward. This is a significant upgrade for Lindholm. If Micheal Ferland can score 21 goals while (mostly) playing on that line, then the more talented Lindholm should score at least that many. Lindholm has never scored more than 17 goals in a season.

Conversely, the main reason I decided to take a flier on Ferland last season was his place on the Flames’ top line. Of his 41 points last season, 35 were even strength. And of those 35 even-strength points, only three were without either Gaudreau or Monahan. There could be more turnover with the Canes’ forward group, particularly if Jeff Skinner is traded. But for now Ferland is buried among a large pile of wingers, which means that he should probably only be targeted in leagues that count hits.

*

One day after being traded to the Avalanche, Philipp Grubauer has signed a three-year contract worth $10 million total (Fantasy Take from Mike). I know one Semyon Varlamov owner that is livid right now, as he was counting on Varlamov again after bouncing back to fantasy respectability last season. Given that Varlamov has started 50+ games in four of the last five seasons even with an injury-prone reputation, I don’t think this turns out any worse than a 50/50 split for Varlamov. But it might be better to bet the under than he will play 50 games again in 2018-19.

This probably goes without saying, but the Grubauer trade all but assures that Jonathan Bernier will be headed to unrestricted free agency. The UFA goalie market is thin (you can check out that group at Cap Friendly), but Bernier should be considered a top-5 option in that group. That probably should net him a goalie timeshare situation of his own at best, with the more likely scenario of him being signed as a team’s backup.

As for the vacant Washington backup goalie job, recently signed goalie prospect Ilya Samsonov is expected to play a lot in the AHL next season. That would make Pheonix Copley the little-used backup behind Braden Holtby. The native of North Pole, Alaska (maybe he has met Santa Claus!) has played in just two NHL games – both with the Blues.  

*

For more fantasy hockey information, you can follow me on Twitter @Ian_Gooding.

from All About Sports https://dobberhockey.com/hockey-rambling/ramblings-draft-analysis-weekend-trades-and-signings/

[yahoo-puck-daddy-blog]

Puck Daddy Countdown: Russia, Carey Price and contract demands

Olympic Athletes from Russia could really use a player like Ilya Kovalchuk. (Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

(In which Ryan Lambert takes a look at some of the biggest issues and stories in the NHL, and counts them down.)

8 – Whatever team signed that Matt Moulson contract that it just had to stash in the AHL

I don’t know what team did it, but maybe they put him in the AHL because they don’t have room for him with all their NHL success.

7 – Mother Russia

So the IOC, not surprisingly, made the unprecedented move to basically tell Russia it was not allowed to participate in the Olympics, and that if its (non-doping) athletes really want to show up they can compete as “Olympic Athletes From Russia,” which is a nice little burn on Russia’s whole Extreme Nationalism thing. Those athletes, if they show up and aren’t polonium-ed, will compete under the Olympic flag and only hear the Olympic anthem if they medal.

It’s bad for those people, who probably really like their country.

But the impact on men’s hockey, which was already going to be starving for talent with the NHL sitting it out, is likely going to be severe. There have been threats, which one expects will soon change from threats to action, that if the Russians aren’t allowed to compete under the Russian flag, the KHL would “pull an NHL” and likewise refuse to participate in the Pyeongchang Games.

That, in turn, means probably the best players in the Olympics will be some of the NHL rejects who are playing in the Swiss, German, Swedish and Finnish leagues, and guys on AHL-only contracts. Mix in some college players, maybe major junior guys, and that’s about it.

The real reason this sucks for Russia, of course, is that this was for sure their only real chance to win gold given the current power dynamics in international hockey. There are a bunch of good Russian KHLers. There are not a lot of non-Russian KHLers. It would have given them such a distinct advantage that it might have been a walkover tournament for them.

But alas, turns out if you have a major national doping conspiracy ongoing for a number of years, there can occasionally be very minor consequences.

6 – Scott Wilson

So you’re Scott Wilson, right? You just won your second straight Stanley Cup, you’re getting a not insignificant amount of time on Evgeni Malkin’s wing, and things are looking pretty good.

But then the Penguins realize, “Ah, we forgot to get a No. 3 center this season.” Suddenly you get traded from the two-time Cup champs to the drowning Red Wings, and boy things aren’t going well for you there.

But then, relief. “Hey Scott, you’ve been traded again.” Not that anyone wants to live out of a suitcase again, but getting traded out of the Red Wings organization? I guess you take that. But then where are you traded? Buffalo. Maybe the worst team in the league. Good for your ice time. Bad for literally every other reason.

5 – Erik Karlsson, the bad loser who sucks now

So Erik Karlsson, the best defenseman in the world, is on a nine-game pointless streak, and everyone is saying, “Ah isn’t it so bad, how much Erik Karlsson is the reason the Senators stink on ice?”

Truly an incredible turn of events, because man I could have sworn that even without getting literally any points over the last nine games, he still had 17 in 20 from the blue line despite playing on a manufactured-in-a-lab ankle with a bunch of guys who really aren’t very good.

And boy wouldn’t you know it, Karlsson continues to be a huge possession driver on a team that basically doesn’t have anyone else to do that. And also the team is shooting like 2.4 percent when he’s on the ice over the last nine games.

So is it his fault? I’m going to say: Yes.

4 – Edmonton taxpayers

Darryl Katz just bought the most expensive house in the history of Los Angeles, a real estate market that is absolutely, positively known for its modest prices.

Meanwhile, the very nice people of Edmonton who just like their damn hockey team and didn’t want it to leave, let this guy — who by the way is a billionaire — bully them into paying for a pretty good chunk of the arena’s price tag.

Also their team sucks.

Great deal the city negoatiated, for sure.

3 – Carey Price

Must be nice to be a goalie like Carey Price, in a market where mysticism is very much en vogue whenever anything goes even slightly wrong.

The team was bad before, right? Is it because the team was shooting like 3 percent collectively for the first month of the season? No, that couldn’t be it. Price was old and bad, Max Pacioretty needed to be traded, Alex Galchenyuk should have been deported, all that stuff.

But then Price actually takes the time to get healthy again for the first time in a while and oh jeez look at that, this world-class goalie is world-class again. And literally only coincidentally, the guys on the team started scoring again.

So not only were they getting routine 30-of-31 performances from the big-money goalie, but the team started filling the net in a way it hadn’t all year. Montreal’s back in a playoff spot, and you know why? Cuz Price had an effect on his teammates and made them start scoring again.

Truly an incredible ability that Price guy has. Wonder why he doesn’t do it every game, right? The Habs would go 82-0!

2 – Contract demands

I must bless up Karlsson and Drew Doughty for both basically saying someone’s gotta pay them an absolute crapload of money in summer 2019. Very against type for any hockey player to talk about that kind of thing so openly, but it’s how these things should be talked about. Karlsson, I hope and pray, will get a bunch of money from a team with more than three other actual talented players. For Doughty, one wonders whether the Kings will still be good when he needs to be re-signed, or if they’ll even have the cap space to do it.

The rumors right now are that the cap could basically go up by like $5 million this season, which is huge growth we haven’t seen in years. That might help make everything work, but also the idea that NHL players should always re-sign with their current teams is not good. They should test the market, pit teams against each other, and find the destination that works best for them and get a bunch of money.

Both these guys are probably worth $10 million-plus. If they take less than that, it seems like a mistake. And it’s cool that both of them seem to recognize it.

1 – Seattle

Wow, there’s going to be 32 NHL teams just a few years from now! And enough talent for like 26 of them to be half-decent! What a time to be alive.

(Not ranked this week: Anyone who is still dumb enough to watch Olympic hockey in the middle of the night.

You’re basically going to be watching ECHL hockey, which is fine if you’re into that sort of thing, but this is the Olympics in the middle of the damn night.

Here’s a question: Is it worse that people are going to be expected to watch these rotten games at like 3 in the morning, or if it were on a North American time scale and therefore we all had to collectively watch them in prime time? I don’t know if there’s a good answer to that but it just made me want to cry.)

—

Ryan Lambert is a Puck Daddy columnist. His email is here and his Twitter is here. (All statistics via Corsica unless otherwise noted.)

[yahoo-puck-daddy-blog]

Trending Topics: Golden Knights already badly mismanaged

The Golden Knights completely bungled the Vadim Shipachyov situation. (David Becker/Getty Images)

If you were wondering whether George McPhee had gotten any better at handling an NHL roster since he was ousted in Washington, and you still had some lingering doubts even after he mostly punted the expansion draft, the end of the Vadim Shipachyov saga should answer all questions with finality.

Let’s not all look at once, but Vegas has one win in its last six games, and it needed to score five goals against a not-great Senators team to do it. Part of their current problem is that they can’t keep even an AHL-level goalie healthy enough to stay competitive, sure, and the team is still second in its division. But we all know hard times are coming even if Marc-Andre Fleury gets healthy sometime soon, because the team isn’t going to shoot almost 12 percent for the rest of the season.

But it’s lucky for McPhee the team got off to that hot start — such a great, fun story, especially in the wake of the shooting there; all that stuff is 100 percent true — because if they were playing to the level we would have all expected and were, say, 5-9-1 instead of 9-5-1, the Shipachyov saga would have people asking a lot more questions than they currently are.

Everyone signed off on his contract termination Thursday, and it’s expected the center will head back to Russia. The good news for Vegas is that it’s only on the hook for the cost of Shipachyov’s contract while he was rostered with the NHL club, and a smaller portion of that from when he was technically buried in the AHL, plus a very small portion of his signing bonus.

After the whole story came to an end and Shipachyov “retired” from the NHL, McPhee revealed that he had a trade on the table but that the player wanted to head back home (not hard to understand), but also that Shipachyov wasn’t playing well enough to supplant even the No. 4 center on the roster. This is an incredible statement to make, because in their most recent game, Vegas used Pierre-Edouard Bellemare as its No. 4 center, and he only got a whopping 10:34 of ice time, second-lowest total on the team.

The idea we’re supposed to buy, then, is that Shipachyov wasn’t good enough to take 10 and a half minutes of ice time against fourth liners and do better than Bellemare (currently a 45 percent possession player with 2-1-3 in 15 games against bottom-of-the-barrel competition).

This means one of three things, and neither one speaks highly of what McPhee has done to this point.

1) McPhee is just glossing over a chemistry/dressing room issue

Maybe Shipachyov, like plenty of other Enigmatic Russians over the years, is just a jerk and no one likes him. If this were Boston or Edmonton or Philly, we’d already have gotten those stories shivving the player on his way out of town. And let’s say this is the real issue: It explains why the player capital-R Refused to report to Chicago. But it also leads you to ask why McPhee didn’t do his homework before bringing aboard a 30-year-old who’d never played in North America at $4.5 million for two seasons.

McPhee would have, of course, had plenty of experience dealing with malcontent-locker-room-cancer Russians with the whole Alex Semin thing several years ago, and as good as Semin was in those days — really, really good — the player’s presence was something that overshadowed his quality to a significant extent. Do you know how much of a prick you have to be for an NHL general manager to look past 271 points in 277 games over four seasons?

That’s not saying Shipachyov would have been nearly point-a-game for Vegas, as Semin was, but the principle is the same. This is a guy who can score, and if you screwed up the vetting process, that’s on you.

Frankly, though, I don’t think that’s it, because why wouldn’t McPhee himself just shiv the guy in the exit interview if that were the case? “It didn’t work out because he didn’t match our culture,” is an explanation the hockey establishment would mostly buy. As with elephants, sometimes hockey players are just jerks.

2) McPhee overestimated Shipachyov at the time of the signing

Hey, it happens all the time: GMs get all excited about what they think is a great talent, throw a bunch of money at it, and then find out, “Oops, that was a mistake.”

But I find it extremely difficult to believe that McPhee misevaluated Shipachyov’s talent level to the point that the guy goes from potentially being the No. 1 center — remember, this is on a team with Wild Bill freaking Karlsson as its actual No. 1 center, so being the top pivot isn’t that hard — to thinking, “Ah well, y’know, he’s more like our No. 5.”

Real McPhee quote from when the team signed Shipachyov: “He is prepared to play a lot and sees that there could be a lot of ice time. We fully expect him to be one of the top six forwards, as well as a major contributor on play on power plays and the penalty kill.”

Now he’s not even good enough to be in your lineup? We’re supposed to buy that?

When was the last time a GM was that wrong about someone? Maybe when Ken Holland got Stephen Weiss at $4.9 million — by the way, that contract would still be happening if it hadn’t been bought out three summers ago — and he only put up 29 points in 78 games over two seasons. And even then, that disappointment was driven as much by injury as by Holland not being good at his job.

So if this kind of misevaluation were the case, and I partially doubt that it is, that says to me McPhee is a world-class misjudger of talent. But again, there’s misjudging things and misjudging things so badly that you think an AHLer is going to be the best center on your team. No one is this bad at their job.

3) McPhee underestimated Shipachyov once he got to Vegas

This seems to me to be the most plausible. Remember, Vegas held Shipachyov, Shea Theodore and Alex Tuch off the NHL roster for a little while in part because McPhee was forcing the team to carry the 52 bad defensemen he took in the expansion draft.

Shipachyov, however, didn’t report to the AHL even though he was assigned there, because his wife doesn’t speak English and reportedly wasn’t doing well alone in a new city on a new continent. Shipachyov did pretty well in the preseason, driving play but only getting one assist. He also scored in his NHL debut when the team finally called him up, but that was his only point in three appearances and he got pushed around at 5-on-5.

So it’s a mixed bag in terms of how he played, but it’s also fair to say he wasn’t given a chance by either Gerard Gallant or McPhee. His total ice time between the preseason and regular season only comes to about 100 minutes over seven games — 14 a night, give or take — and overall he finished a mere 51 percent at 5-on-5. However, despite the promises of a lot of power-play time, he got none in either the pre- or regular season. That, frankly, just doesn’t make sense if you thought for even a second the guy was a potential elite scorer.

Again, there’s no way you take a talent with that many points in that many KHL seasons and say, after 100 minutes of even semi-competitive ice time, “This guy’s worse than Bellemare and it’s not particularly close.”

How much, then, does this have to do with the fact that Vegas shot 12.5 percent and went 8-3 before they called up Shipachyov and got him into a game (in which he scored)? How much does it have to do with the fact that in his three games, the team shot just 9.9 percent over three games, all of which they lost because they didn’t have an AHL goalie in the lineup, before they stopped using him again?

If Vegas bought its own BS 12 games into the season, before cutting bait on a potential top center after three losses that weren’t even his fault, that seems like McPhee being colossally bad at his job.

But the good news is no one has to care or think about this again. First, because Shipachyov is Russian and instead of forcing the team to stash his hefty salary in the AHL, which he almost certainly would have dominated with little effort, he just went back to another country and another league, and kept just $86,000 of his $2 million signing bonus. Second, because the team banked a lot of wins when it was shooting 12 percent. Third, because ah who cares, it’s an expansion team and they’re not supposed to be good anyway. Fourth, because this team is in Vegas and no one’s really paying attention. And fifth, because no one in the hockey media dares question a Good Hockey Man like George “Forsberg-for-Erat” McPhee.

It’s a perfect storm of non-accountability. So McPhee comes out of the mud here sparkling clean, but he shouldn’t. Because no matter how you care to look at it, this is like the fourth thing he screwed up since June. No other GM for no other franchise would be able to absorb that kind of failure rate.

—

Ryan Lambert is a Puck Daddy columnist. His email is here and his Twitter is here.

All statistics via Corsica unless otherwise noted.

[yahoo-puck-daddy-blog]

Training camp preview: Coaches, rookies and lines, PTOh my

Will Matt Duchene make it to training camp with the Colorado Avalanche? (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

All 31 NHL training camps officially open today, and that means that after a long, bad summer, hockey is officially back.

And despite the overall quality of the summer (which, again, was bad) you can’t say the NHL is wanting for storylines as camp official begins. Even leaving aside what a catastrophe the inaugural season of Vegas Golden Knights hockey will be, there’s a whole hell of a lot to talk about over the next few weeks.

Let’s run down just a few of the bigger storylines around the league:

So many new coaches

Right now, only three NHL head coaches have had their jobs for more than four years. Joel Quenneville (no surprise) is the longest-tenured, having been hired mid-October 2008. But after that, Jon Cooper and Alain Vigneault only barely make the four-year cut-off, having been hired in their teams’ 2013 offseason.

But the number of coaching changes made in the 2017 calendar year is staggering: 10, not including the Vegas Golden Knights making their first hire ever.

So that’s 11 coaches — more than a third of the league — entering their first full seasons with new clubs? A lot of them take over with their teams in unenviable positions. Just the last five hired (Rick Tocchet in Arizona, Phil Housley in Buffalo, Bob Boughner in Florida, Travis Green in Vancouver, and John Stevens in LA) have tough hills to climb if they want to get their teams all that close to the playoffs. I don’t think anyone expects Gallant to work a miracle with what he’s got.

Some others are better off: Ken Hitchcock will almost certainly get Dallas back to the postseason. Claude Julien has a pretty good club in the Canadiens, and frankly they’re lucky to have him. Mike Yeo in St. Louis should likewise have a nice go of things.

That leaves two more unmentioned: Bruce Cassidy in Boston and Doug Weight in Brooklyn. That feels like two teams that could really go either way, irrespective of what their coaches can do. Just weird rosters on both fronts, and if either club wants to make the playoffs, they have the talent but maybe not the depth.

When 1 in every 3 teams league-wide has a new face behind the bench, there’s a lot to keep track of, but it should at least provide some enjoyable chaos.

Top 2 picks could change their teams’ fortunes

What role will Nico Hischier play with the Devils this season? (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Very fun that the top two picks in the league went to two of the longer-standing Metropolitan Division teams that don’t seem to have a particularly large amount of enmity toward each other, but their impacts could both prove significant.

And like a lot of top-two picks, their teams are in a position to give them plenty of opportunity.

Not that either the Flyers or Devils want to be in position to give Nolan Patrick or Nico Hischier second-line minutes, but they might end up doing just that. In Philly, at least, there’s a cushion of Claude Giroux and Sean Couturier in front of Patrick, who looks like he should be good to go at the start of the season. But if something happens to either of them, or if Patrick really proves something, there could be a bigger role for him.

The Devils have no such luxury, as Travis Zajac is out long-term and the only other centers on the roster who have proven they’re top-nine NHL players are Adam Henrique (who, by the way, played a decent amount of last season on the wing) and Brian Boyle (who, by the way, should be nowhere near second-line minutes). If it’s down to Hischier or, oh god, Pavel Zacha, you’d think John Hynes would go with the rookie. You don’t want to put him in that position, of course, but they might not have much of a choice.

Neither is likely to be a Calder Trophy candidate, simply because they’re so young and they’re not likely to be in positions to succeed over 82 games, but if nothing else they’ll provide a glimpse of things to come.

Goaltending battles?

Speaking of the Flyers, they’re one of the handful of teams league-wide with no clear answers for who will be the starting goalies.

They have to choose between Brian Elliott (who was awful last year in Calgary after years of low-key great hockey under Ken Hitchcock; wonder what changed ha ha ha) and Michal Neuvirth, who was an atrocious backup last year after a mostly decent career as a 1b. Neither seems like a great choice! Maybe they’ll platoon it!

Other teams with a potential goaltending controversy on their hands: The Red Wings (Howard vs. Mrazek), Islanders (Halak vs. Greiss), and Florida (Luongo vs. Reimer). There are also a few maybes here, depending on how things work out, including: Winnipeg (Mason vs. Hellebuyck), Dallas (Bishop vs. Lehtonen), Anaheim (Gibson vs. Miller), and perhaps even Calgary (Smith vs. Lack? Yikes.)

But again, that’s a good chunk of the league with iffy-at-best goaltending situations. Pretty fun!

Finding chemistry

In addition to all the coaching changes, some fairly big shakeups came for star players’ situations as well, with trades, new contracts, and other issues cropping up to dramatically impact the way some marquee lines might have to work.

Probably chief among them is Chicago shipping out Artemi Panarin and bringing back their old friend Brandon Saad. It’s clear that Saad will play with Jonathan Toews and, as I’ve talked about before, it’ll be interesting to see what Patrick Kane looks like without the guy who seemingly made his production shoot into the stratosphere. Maybe the added offense for Toews makes up the difference, but it’s tough to say, especially since they also have to replace Marian Hossa’s two-way quality as well.

Meanwhile, the new-look Washington Capitals are likely to look a lot like the old Caps, only a little worse. They kept TJ Oshie and Evgeny Kuznetsov with big extensions, but it cost them crucial depth in the form of Kevin Shattenkirk, Marcus Johansson, Karl Alzner, and Justin Williams. They’ve still got plenty of talent (as you might expect given their status as Presidents’ Trophy winners two years running), but boy, they sure did lose a lot of it as well. How they navigate that will go a long way toward determining how the best division in hockey looks this year.

Then in Edmonton, the thinking is now pretty clear: If they’re paying big, big money to Leon Draisaitl, he’s gotta be the No. 2 center behind Connor McDavid. That creates some interesting questions. Pushing Ryan Nugent-Hopkins down to be your No. 3 (or maybe trading him, who knows?) ain’t bad at all, but it opens up a slot next to McDavid. Who takes that? Could be anyone.

And maybe it’s just morbid curiosity at this point, but I kind of want to see what happens with the Sedins. So far, it seems the plan is to throw Sam Gagner on their line. Not a bad idea. Gagner is a bit of a player and he’s certainly better than some of the stiffs with whom the Sedins have been saddled the past few years. And if that doesn’t work, might I suggest: Brock Boeser? Gone are the days when the twins can make even, say, Jason King, look like a borderline-useful forward, but Gagner can play a bit, especially on the power play. Boeser’s CV as a scorer at the lower levels speaks for itself. It’d be nice for Daniel and Henrik to ride into the sunset with one last 65-plus-point season under their belts.

Interesting PTOs

Cody Franson seems to be a pretty strong candidate to stick with the Chicago Blackhawks. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey)

As discussed before, most PTOs are cynical pieces of business intended to skirt roster rules. However, there are a few NHLers on tryout deals who could crack their teams’ lineups. You can choose for yourself whether that speaks better for the player or worse for the team.

Probably the slam-dunkest of these deals — in terms of, “He should absolutely make that team” — is Cody Franson in Chicago. Decent No. 4 defender, good bottom-pair guy. And man, Chicago needs help on the blue line.

Other intriguing PTO deals: Jimmy Hayes in New Jersey (he doesn’t score a lot of goals, but neither do they, so let’s not throw stones here) and PA Parenteau in Detroit (he might legitimately be the fifth-best forward they have in camp). Maybe maybe Eric Gelinas in Montreal and Alex Chiasson in Washington (tough to get a read on those guys as far as I’m concerned, but I think they might be cheap fringe NHLers).

Unsigned RFAs

And yeah, training camps are opening, but there’s still a handful of unsigned RFAs out there nonetheless.

Let’s start with the happy news: Marcus Foligno doesn’t have a deal from Minnesota yet, but all indications are it’ll happen soon.

The biggest of these is David Pastrnak in Boston, which has been talked about at length on this website. There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding on the team’s part about what the market bears for a player of Pastrnak’s caliber, and one wonders exactly when light will dawn on Marblehead here. Just pay the guy. Good lord, how do you let it get this far?

Same is true of Andreas Athanasiou in Detroit. Last I saw the team was offering him an incredibly low-value bridge deal. Something less than $2 million, if I’m not mistaken. That’s an insult of an offer on a team that pays Justin Abdelkader whatever Justin Abdelkader makes. (What’s that? It’s how much? Come on.) Athanasiou reportedly has a KHL offer on the table, and I bet you it’s for more than $1.9 million pre-tax.

Josh Anderson and Columbus don’t seem lined up on a deal quite yet and the player won’t show up to camp without one. In fact, he’s apparently prepared to go to Switzerland to skate instead. Maybe that’ll get the contract talks moving along more seriously.

Finally, no progress on Nikita Zadorov re-signing with Colorado. Hey, I wonder what country this Zadorov character is from, and if they have a big-money professional hockey league there. Probably not. I bet Joe Sakic is playing this exactly right.

Oh, and now that I mention the Avs…

Duchene Watch

Your guess is as good as mine. I can’t know the mind of Sakic. Perhaps no one can.

Tavares Watch

Your guess is also as good as mine here.

Will someone sign Jagr?

I DON’T KNOW BUT I’M MAD ABOUT IT.

Ryan Lambert is a Puck Daddy columnist. His email is here and his Twitter is here.

More NHL offseason coverage on Yahoo Sports:

[yahoo-puck-daddy-blog]

Blackhawks, Olympics and NHL goalie ranking (Puck Daddy Countdown)

  (In which Ryan Lambert takes a look at some of the biggest issues and stories in the NHL, and counts them down.)

 6 – Ranking stuff

Everyone was very mad this week that the NHL Network put out its list of the top 10 goalies in the league. As you might imagine, the list was Very Bad.

Let’s go: Carey Price No. 1? I guess I get it still but y’know. Braden Holtby second? I get that too.

Sergei Bobrovsky at No. 3 seems an awful lot like recency bias but he’s got two Vezinas in the collection and is .923 in his five years as a starter with Columbus.

After that it gets wacky: Matt Murray has 62 regular-season appearances to go with his two Cups, so this seems awful premature. Devan Dubnyk has two good seasons as a starter under his belt. Jonathan Quick at sixth is idiotic on its face. Cam Talbot is fine at seventh if you’re weighing last season really really heavily. Henrik Lundqvist, after one bad season, is only the eighth-best goalie in the world all of a sudden.

Martin Jones is fine-ish at No. 9. I accept that I guess. Pekka Rinne at 10 is not.

Where’s Tuukka Rask? Where’s Cory Schneider? Man, tough crowd (unless you’re Jonathan Quick).

Anyway the 10 best goalies in the league are the 10 best goaltenders in quality-adjusted 5v5 save percentage over the last three years, after a further adjustment for aging curves.

Not accepting any questions or comments on the matter at this time. Thank you.

5 – Bringing up the Olympics again

I have been trying not to think about it, but the AP re-confirmed the thing everyone already knew: No NHLers, and no players on NHL contracts in any other league, are going to be heading to South Korea in February.

Which, fair enough. It’s a bummer but I have accepted it.

Or at least, I thought I had. Then I saw that Canada/Russia line brawl from the other day and just how bleak the situation is really going to be. I looked at a quick writeup of that game and, like, Gilbert Brule starred for Canada. Kevin Poulin was the goalie. Justin Azevedo was in the big donnybrook.

Like I say: Bleak.

Look at this list of Americans playing in the KHL this season. These are the best American internationals, playing in what is probably the third-best pro league in the world, and it’s a bunch of guys like TJ Galiardi and Matt Gilroy at best. The Swedish league’s Americans are even worse.

I’m starting to worry we won’t really even get AHL-level hockey out of these Olympics. This is bad news.

4 -The Predators plans

I wonder, at the end of the day, how much the Predators were counting on this decision by Mike Fisher to call it a career to not-happen.

I don’t like their center depth much even with Fisher in the fold, but going with Johansen, then Bonino, then Fisher, then probably Colton Sissons isn’t terrible. I don’t rate Bonino or Fisher as anything approaching being a legitimate top-60 center in the league, but they’d both solidly be in the top 75 or so I think. If you have two “tweener” middle-six centers, I think you can get by, especially with that defense.

Now, the Preds don’t even have that. One clear top-line guy. One so-so middle-six option, and then after that it’s Sissons, who seems okay I guess, and, I dunno, Freddie Gaudreau maybe?

Obviously I’m still pretty high on Nashville to succeed in the Central based on the overall strength the team has on the blue line and, frankly, on both wings as well. But they’re going to realize pretty quickly that if they want to get back to a Cup Final they need some center help. Probably why those “trade a defenseman” rumors persist, huh?

Anyway, speaking of where the Preds will finish in the Central…

3 – Prediction time

Gotta say: Pretty shocking to log onto Twitter on Monday, Aug. 7, and find predictions about who will finish where in the Central Division. But here we are: The Hockey News Yearbook came out and predicted the standings for most everything you could hope to predict. Pittsburgh over Edmonton in the Cup Final, etc. (That’d be three Cups in a row for Pittsburgh, which seems very optimistic.)

Anyway, the really interesting part in all of this was that the Hockey News has the top-three finishers in the Central as Dallas, Nashville, and Chicago in that order.

It got me thinking, like, I don’t know who I think is any good in the Central, except to say that a good chunk of the teams in it are clearly good, if flawed.

I don’t trust Dallas at all, and certainly not with that goaltending situation, to win a division that will probably take 105 points to win. Nashville could do it, but that center depth is concerning and Pekka Rinne has to be considered a big question mark. Chicago, well, we know their problems. Minnesota has a solid roster but would need another bonkers season from Devan Dubnyk to come close to winning. St. Louis poses as credible a threat to the rest as well. Winnipeg could take a step forward if the goaltending sorts itself out with Steve Mason (that it probably won’t do that will not be a reflection on Mason, in my opinion). Colorado is tanking, so that’s the one team that won’t do any real damage.

In a division with seven teams, probably five of them are going to finish north of 90 points, if I had to guess. I just don’t see where any of them stand out above the rest. If I had to ballpark it right now today, I’d say Nashville wins — they were phenomenal in the second half, and not just because of PDO — over the full 82. But hockey’s funny and things can go sideways.

2 – The benefit of the doubt

One other thing to note with all that stuff about the Central got me thinking: What will it take for a major hockey publication to predict Chicago will miss the playoffs?

I think they’re still a playoff team right now — don’t get mad at me, fanboys! — but I don’t think they’re the third-best team in that division any more. They’re capable of being that, but right now there are too many question marks. Serious ones at that. What does Kane look like without Panarin? What does the whole defense look like without Hjalmarsson? What does this team look like with a dozen 22-year-olds on it?

So I think it’s legitimate to ask when Hockey People will stop saying, “Ah it’s Chicago! Kane Toews Keith!” about these guys. Probably has to be two straight playoff misses, right? They’ll be presumed “in” until they miss once, for sure. You can call that a hiccup.

But for the entire hockey ecosystem to shift to, “Ah they’re past it” — which by the way is a somewhat reasonable position to take even right this second — it’s gotta be two misses.

That puts at “at least two more years of people saying Chicago is elite.” Probably more like four, if we’re being honest. Which is wild, because Dallas won a playoff game more recently than Chicago did.

1 – Sidney Crosby

Also wild: Sidney Crosby is now officially one of those guys I would say is “on the wrong side of 30.”

Death comes for us all.

(Not ranked this week: Not signing Jagr.

Folks, this is getting silly! I do not like it!)

—

Ryan Lambert is a Puck Daddy columnist. His email is here and his Twitter is here.

(All statistics via Corsica unless otherwise noted.)

MORE FROM YAHOO SPORTS