#deuxlectrices
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Photo
Heather Reviews: Heartless by Marissa Meyer http://bit.ly/2H3U82P
Title: Heartless Author: Marissa Meyer Released: 2016 Publisher: Feiwel & Friends
Long before she was the terror of Wonderland—the infamous Queen of Hearts—she was just a girl who wanted to fall in love.
Catherine may be one of the most desired girls in Wonderland, and a favorite of the unmarried King of Hearts, but her interests lie elsewhere. A talented baker, all she wants is to open a shop with her best friend. But according to her mother, such a goal is unthinkable for the young woman who could be the next queen.
Then Cath meets Jest, the handsome and mysterious court joker. For the first time, she feels the pull of true attraction. At the risk of offending the king and infuriating her parents, she and Jest enter into an intense, secret courtship. Cath is determined to define her own destiny and fall in love on her terms. But in a land thriving with magic, madness, and monsters, fate has other plans.
In her first stand-alone teen novel, the New York Times-bestselling author dazzles us with a prequel to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.
"Someone has to do something," [Cath] repeated, though most of her fire had turned to smoke.
"Yes, and that something shall be to ignore such a horrible incident and go on pretending nothing has happened at all."
I feel like that exchange sums up this book in a nutshell. I'm joining the chorus of people who didn't like this book and thought it would've worked better as a novella. There's not enough material or world building here to justify a 440+ page novel because most of said novel is Cath sitting around and either whining about how she doesn't want to marry the King, thinking about the bakery she wants to open, thinking about baking, or thinking about Jest and wondering if he's thinking about her. Also, Cath's mother would've made a much better Queen of Heart-to be. She was relentless in getting her daughter into that position and Cath wasn't actually much of a character at all. Plus, Cath's mother was actually quite mean and ruthless; she was much more believable as the Queen of Hearts. I'm just saying, I would read the fanfic! Anyway, this book is pretty much the Lunar Chronicles but in a Victorian England setting, but instead of any technology there are occasional references to Wonderland characters. And by occasional reference, I mean very sparse, and that is about as Wonderland as a book promising the rise of the Queen of Hearts gets. For some reason, joining the Wonderland characters are nursery rhyme characters: Jack Sprat and Peter Peter appear for ... reasons? And Edgar Allan Poe's raven from the titular poem is Jest's partner in crime. Again for whatever reason. This is Wonderland and any characters can exist that you want; why drag in others? I'm not a Wonderland fanatic, but I've seen the first Tim Burton movie (it was on ABC Family one night), the Disney movie (I couldn't sleep and borrowed my sister's DVD one night), I've played the American McGee's Alice games (that's just coincidence and I'm more fond of the soundtracks) and read the Lewis Carroll books (I'm interested in classic literature). I don't feel like this book captures the spirit of Carroll's Wonderland, and instead rams it into a 19th century setting for forced drama and -I shudder- insta-love. Nothing is as random and weird and, pardon the pun, wonderful as it was, it's just Catherine sitting around thinking about how she has to conform to the laws of this society. Add into the fact that I don't entirely understand Cath's quibbles about marrying the King of Hearts. She mentions early "[...] queens did not open bakeries with their best friends. Queens did not gossip with half invisible cats. Queens did not have dreams of yellow-eyed boys and wake up with lemon trees over their beds." Queens don't stop being people, first of all. Secondly, the book makes a show of mentioning that the King loves Cath's baking; I can't see why he wouldn't allow her to open a bakery (Again, I quote: "What a queen you will make, Lady Pinkerton, cake baker and happiness maker!"). And, yeah, maybe Cath didn't like the King, and, yeah again, he's a few years older than her, but she also mentions he was a decent man, if just a little odd, so the audience could assume she would be treated well. When she meets him for a croquet game and mentions that she would like to be courted slowly, he respects her wishes; why does she think she would have to give up her existence if she became Queen of Hearts? But Cath thinks "Her husband? Her one and only? Her life's partner through trials and joys?" and I just roll my eyes; most women in that time did not marry for love. All I could think was, "please stop trying to emulate Romeo & Juliet, I think we can all agree that wasn't a good look." Cheshire at one point tells her what the entire audience thinks, "I'm only saying you may be the King's wife, but who is to say you couldn't also have more clandestine relations with the Joker?" to which Cath's "jaw falls open" and she huffs around the kitchen and declares she wants to be an honest wife. Oh, it's cute and noble and all that, but we all know that real life royal families get down like that, so Cheshire's suggestion was completely legit. In my eyes, Cath was just further complicating things and refusing to move the book along. I'm not complaining about her not being able to love the King, that's fine and nobody's asking her to, but, as Mary Ann points out, so many women in the Kingdom would love to be in her position and she acts like she's been asked to die on a cross. Unfortunately, for all the mental fuss that Cath makes about marrying the King, she never puts up a physical or verbal fight. She'll fluster and redden when he asks to marry or court her and think about how she will say yes or how she can't say no because of expectations and her family, instead of thinking about all her thoughts from the past, oh, 100 or so pages about her bakery and her dreams and how ~she wants to marry for love~ and how she could never actually be in love with the King. It's tiring, dear reader. Cath's inability to see the long term good in marrying the King of Hearts wasn't the only thing about her that annoyed me. The first chapter of the ball we're introduced to her childhood friend, Margaret Mearle, who "had the great hardship of being unbearably unattractive." The book then spends a paragraph describing exactly how unbearably unattractive Margaret is and ends said paragraph with, "If it weren't for the gowns she wore, Margaret would have been frequently mistaken for a boy. An unattractive one." Way to go, book. I guess it tries to have Cath be redeemed by descending into Mean Girls territory by having the Knave of Hearts come up to her to tell her how much he never liked her and how her dress is so red while Cath just ~smiles and bears it~ and Goody Pinkerton remains pious, but it's just so cheap and trope-y, and besides, I just saw her dancing with the devil mentally insulting her friend. The other side of the love triangle is Jest and the further into this book I read the more I just thought, "why was this written?" All apologies; I liked the Lunar Chronicles, but this is just such a black hole of a book with characters that have no chemistry... That was my only thought. Jest's intro scene shows him doing apparent, actual magic, but this is spoiled, at least in my opinion, by having the book cut back to Cath for her reaction on everything. Especially because it was for mundane things like Cath marveling at Jest summoning a snow storm of paper and noticing the bit that fell into her hair had a heart on it (~foreshadowing~). All I could think was, who cares; the rest of the ballroom is probably having the same reaction. It was so un-memorable all I actually remember from the scene was the lights in the candelabras going out, him appearing in a hoop, and the reader gets Cath's reactions on everything he was doing like she was the announcer at a sports game. That was my memory of another character's introduction. Their ~courtship is just as boring as the rest of the book was to me (though, since the book is romance, I guess their courtship IS the rest of the book?): They meet outside the ball because Cath ran away after hearing the King would propose to her and she faints in front of Jest (side note: why?), then they meet again at the castle for a game of croquet and they both manage to be the best players while making a show of how inept the King is at everything, and then they go to the Mad Hatter's tea party. And it's just so vanilla and boring. I remember reading their parting after Cath faints and thinking, "shouldn't I feel... giddy? Like they have some chemistry? Like their interactions were cute?" Instead I just felt nothing; I was so aware that they were two characters on a paper for the sole purpose of taking one character from point A to B that it was painful. At a certain point, after the Rock Turtle Cove thing, everything starts going wrong for Cath, which, if you're a reader of Victorian literature and, you know, you read the blurb, you know Cath isn't going to get what she wants. Skip this: I liked the Lunar Chronicles, really I did, but this feels like a sophomore effort and doesn't offer anything new to the Wonderland mythos. If you haven't, pick up Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass, watch the Disney classic, maybe play (or watch) the American McGee's take on them, but this is just boring. Nothing new to see here.
------
Grab A Copy*: Amazon / abebooks / Book Depository / Barnes & Noble
* friendly reminder that we do not have any type affiliate status with the above sites and gain nothing from you clicking through them, we would just like to provide you with links to obtain the books.
1 note
·
View note
Photo
Heather Reviews: Bookishly Ever After by Isabel Bandeira http://bit.ly/2EVmQFJ
Title: Bookishly Ever After (Ever After #1) Author: Isabel Bandeira Released: 2016 Publisher: Spencer Hill Contemporary
In a perfect world, sixteen-year-old Phoebe Martins’ life would be a book. Preferably one filled with magic and a hot paranormal love interest. Unfortunately, her life probably wouldn’t even qualify for a quiet contemporary.
Everything changes when Phoebe learns that Dev, the hottest guy in the clarinet section, might actually have a crush on her. So, Phoebe turns to the heroines in her favorite books for advice on a personality overhaul. Becoming as awesome as her book characters isn’t as easy as it sounds and when another girl nets Dev for herself right from under Phoebe’s nose, she’s crushed.
Then, to up the suckage, she gets assigned as his co-counselor at a sixth grade camp and has to spend an entire week tied to the hip with the one guy on the planet she wanted to avoid. Can she make it through the potential danger of romantic bonfires and nature walks without Dev figuring out she’s still not over him, or will her counseling career end in emotional disaster? Can she ever go back to her happy world of fictional boys after falling for the real thing?
First of all: Trigger warning for sexual assault This is the story of Phoebe, a girl who's very into books. And knitting. And archery. And band. And k-dramas. And anime. And cosplay. Does that feel like a checklist to you because it did to me. I waited for baking to show up so I could call bingo but the book ended and it never did. I was kinda shocked. Every time a new ~hot interest showed up in the book I just thought "of course" and "why weren't we told she liked anime before this point?" But Phoebe is so into books that she has a hard time functioning in the real world. She takes her cues about relationships from her fictional heroines, she has a whole notebook full of copy-pasted ~ideas that she thinks might work out. Somehow they do, possibly because this too is a book, but instead of teaching the audience that it's just better to be yourself with your crush, it sorta says "put on a fake front and act like these characters until you win him over!" Never mind that the guy in question had been crushing on "nerdy" bookish Phoebe BEFORE she got a makeover and started acting like her book heroines. The writing/plot is kinda all over the place. In the first few chapters alone there's band drama, then a dance that's also a Halloween party. Later there's a Very Special Camp Episode, that camping trip was brought up earlier in the book but it takes more than half the book to finally bring it around. The book sorta moves at a snail's pace too: We know that Em wants to get Dev and Phoebe together, we know that Phoebe keeps waffling on her feelings for Dev and can't decide whether or not she even likes him, at about 50% it seems like finally she's decided she does like him, the heavens are about to open and they'll get together. No such luck. I'm a little uncomfortable with how the text describe Dev sometimes. IDK about it but I'm a white woman. Dev is constantly described as smelling "spicy-soapy." He's an Indian character. I'm also a bit uncomfortable with the hate Lexie gets for being ambitious. I get she's a theater kid and, having known one in high school, I get that they can be a bit much, but every time Lexie's on a page, the other characters treat it as such a chore. Em is also a theater kid, but it's not treated as bad, though possibly because she's not gunning for the same guy Phoebe sorta-kinda is. However, for all my complaints, it's not all that bad? It might be me getting older and mellowing out but I found it a little campy -and thus cute- in places. I just wouldn't recommend it if you're easily frustrated by tropes.
------
Grab A Copy*: Amazon / abebooks / Book Depository / Barnes & Noble
* friendly reminder that we do not have any type affiliate status with the above sites and gain nothing from you clicking through them, we would just like to provide you with links to obtain the books.
1 note
·
View note
Photo
Heather Reviews: Every Exquisite Thing by Matthew Quick (Spoilers) http://bit.ly/2HlSCJx
Title: Every Exquisite Thing Author: Matthew Quick Released: 2016 Publisher: Little, Brown Books for Young Readers
From the bestselling author of The Silver Linings Playbook comes a heartfelt and unexpected novel in the vein of The Perks of Being a Wallflower.
Nanette O’Hare is an unassuming teen who has played the role of dutiful daughter, hard-working student, and star athlete for as long as she can remember. But when a beloved teacher gives her his worn copy of The Bubblegum Reaper—the mysterious, out-of-print cult-classic—the rebel within Nanette awakens.
As she befriends the reclusive author, falls in love with a young but troubled poet, and attempts to insert her true self into the world with wild abandon, Nanette learns the hard way that sometimes rebellion comes at a high price.
A celebration of the self and the formidable power of story, Every Exquisite Thing is Matthew Quick at his finest..
I'm torn on my feelings about this book; on the one hand, when the book is about Nannette and her friends talking about what The Bubblegum Reaper means to them and trying to solve the mysteries of it, I feel like it's genuinely a good book. On the other hand, when the book is about how Nannette is a real-er person than her classmates because she read TBR and how everyone else is ridiculous because they drink and have sex with people they may or may not care about, it's a flaming hot mess and extremely forgettable. I do mean it when I say I enjoyed the book when it was about trying to "figure out" TBR (even though I believe in the death of the artist; art is how you interpret it; you can never really know everything about the universe of a work because that's for the author to know and I think that sometimes; yeah, authors tell a story to get it out of themselves and into the world and then are done with it, etc) because then the book was about something. The characters thought things and did things and tried to do things. When the novel hits the midway point and Nannette goes into therapy, I hate to say it, it gets boring. Possibly because there's such a huge disconnect at that point as well: Nannette's therapist, June, who Nannette is a jerk to for no real reason, encourages her to speak in the third person because... "first person Nannette is too accommodating." Or something. So Nannette "floats through" (her own words) the second half of this novel sounding bored and disconnected, not caring about anything but claiming she cares so much about all the things her classmates don't care about, thus making me not care about anything. But the thing is her classmates, or at least what we do see of them, do care. We only really see much of Nannette's old friend from soccer, Shannon, who began blowing high school guys in middle school and drinks a ton and has more sex than Nannette. I have a lot of problems with casting Shannon as a sort of villain for how she lives her life because I had so many friends from so many walks of life in high school and some of them came from groups that were into drugs and had sex. It's not a big deal! I won't name names because they were lovely people and don't deserve that, but I cared about them and they really cared about me, even if we didn't have similar lifestyles, so God help you if you try to tell me that they were terrible people because they drank and had sex. (And breathe...) Nannette, attempting to assimilate into high school life, rejoins soccer and decides to attend a party with Shannon and other friends she used to play soccer with (and she takes a swipe at them by calling them fickle because they hated her and they're acting ~drunker than they really were). She puts on a bunch of makeup she doesn't want to wear, she wears some outfit she wouldn't actually wear, and goes with them, deciding not to drink. She meets a guy there named Ned and then, mentally, decides to begin an "experiment," wherein she loses her virginity to him, she goes on the Senior Trip with their group and he declares he loves her, and she agrees to go to prom with him. Prom night, Nannette sees herself in the limo window and is uncomfortable with the way she looks in the prom night finery (she's been uncomfortable the whole time, but now she's just noticed a new quote in TBR and so she's got to apply it to her life somehow), and she flips out and screams to be let out. I think, given the circumstances, the kids in the limo were extremely accommodating: They tried talking to her calmly, they tried asking her to tell them what was going on and why she was panicking, and after she got out of the limo Shannon tried to get her to get back in as Nannette had taken her shoes off and her feet were getting cut up. They were all very good to her, IMO. But Nannette wouldn't hear it and she runs all the way from that limo, dumping her experimental boyfriend on prom night, to Booker's house, where she basically cries and begs him to tell her what happens to Wrigley after TBR ends. Booker gives Nannette his life story up to that point, says, "satisfied?" and invites her in to play Scrabble. Nannette ignores him and goes home, and when he tries to contact her later, she throws her phone in a lake and then requits soccer. Later, Shannon rightfully calls Nannette out after she loses it on prom night and ditches her date. She even tells Nannette, "hey, I also have massive debilitating doubts about my future, but I'm trying to have fun while I'm still young!" And... look, I can see everyone's sides; I think if everyone sat down in this novel and realized that Nannette was having difficulty figuring out what she wanted to do and MIGHT have been having a breakdown in the novel and if Nannette could pull herself out of her ass long enough to realize that her lifestyle wasn't the only correct one, everyone could've gotten along quite well. As it is, both girls are right, but Nannette goes about it wrong by hating people. No, of course, Nannette, shouldn't have to force herself into a role and do things she's not comfortable with. But I also think it was a bad idea to perform some Sprouse-sibling social experiment senior year while her mental health is still quite fragile and a person she loved has very recently died. Speaking of Alex. I liked him initially but somebody really should've stopped him from fighting those bullies. I know schools don't do anything for the bullied, but this dude was apparently twice the size of those kids and beating them up. And since they weren't stopping, it was only a matter of time before he escalated it to their fathers. Alex's poetry, as Nannette's inner thoughts reflected before she (or the author) decided to stop caring about the story, reflected someone who strongly believed in vigilante justice. Alex himself even straight up admits to Nannette in his Jeep once that, yes, vigilante justice is the way to go. So, possibly knowing this, I don't know myself because he never shares anything with Nannette, Booker, the author of TBR, corresponds with Alex and believes he's a ~gentle soul~ and cultivates a relationship with him. Booker however tells Nannette in the novel that part of the reason he pulled TBR from print is that some people who read it tended to act out violently, and at Alex and Nannette's first meeting, Alex tells Nannette he's been sending Booker his poetry. I know that paragraph might be confusing but I hope I'm coming across: Booker has read Alex's poetry, all of it, even the vigilante justice stuff, and still decided he was a kind enough soul to form a relationship with. Booker apparently didn't do anything to quell this rage in Alex, he encouraged Alex to try and get published. And I know that writing about certain things are therapeutic and can help people get over them or get them out of their system, but sometimes they can also make people act on those things. It's a tricky thing knowing where that line lies though, I admit. Booker's a bit of an asshole, honestly. He will form bonds with people who write to him about TBR, but only if he senses they are sincere (what qualifies as sincere? We're never told), and after befriending people who fall in love with his magnum opus, he tells them that they will never be allowed to speak to him about the novel after the first conversation about it. Usually the people he befriends are teenagers, and let's be honest, that's already a rough time in life, so if you can find a piece of media to guide you through it and, hey, your favorite author writes you back to say, "you seem to be a sincere and nonviolent person, let's us become friends!" WHY NOT JUST TALK TO THE TEENAGERS ABOUT THE NOVELS? Or, better yet, just write the kids back thanking them for reading the novel, answering some questions, and then LEAVE THE CORRESPONDENCE AT THAT? And if the kids were gonna try to solve the mystery without your help, they were still gonna do that. Booker tells Nannette that sometimes his work causes kids to act out in violent ways, but never considers talking to Alex about his violent urges and how wrong they are, especially knowing that Alex's father isn't that present in his life. It's actually a little maddening considering that neither Nannette nor Alex actually bring up the book that much, but when they do Booker immediately shuts them down. And no, I don't believe that Booker should be on hand to answer any questions because, again, death of the author, but I have to stress Alex's situation and how much he looks up to Booker. I can't emphasize enough how different the first and second half of the book are. I mean, Alex bringing in Oliver to his and Nannette's little group and giving Oliver a copy of TBR, buying a copy of Booker's high school yearbook to see if there are clues (creepy, I'll admit), visiting one of Booker's old classmates to see if she could help. And then, "Nannette doesn't know how that makes her feel, Nannette speaks in the third person, Nannette doesn't like this, Nannette doesn't care for that," Booker shutting Nannette out of his life because of Alex's actions (excellent decision there! She lost a guy she thought she was in love with and she was having a breakdown), nobody just sitting down and thinking about how anyone else in novel feels about anything, except possibly Shannon. I will admit the only things I like in the second part are Nannette's parents stepping up after realizing she's suffering (I went through a breakdown my senior year and my family basically told me "tell no one" and "you need to stop this nonsense"), people treating Nannette being in therapy like it's no big deal (therapy shouldn't be), and seeing more of Nannette's classmates. But I'm so angry at the way most characters begin acting out of character in the second half. Booker just slashing people out of his life and then randomly reconnecting and sleeping with his old schoolmate. Nannette claiming to be so passionate about everything, but not feeling passionate about anything at all. Oliver who doesn't like people or make friends easily suddenly finding a girlfriend and ditching Nannette (although that second part's a bit realistic in my experience). Alex is the only one who is consistent (exacting his own brand of justice, doing whatever the hell he wants), but he dies about 70% in. This was my first read by Quick and while I didn't enjoy it, I will be trying something else. I typically don't write off authors after one bad book experience unless they're awful people. The problem is I just don't know what to make of this book. Is it a deconstruction of works like The Fault in Our Stars? (Which I've never read so I can't really compare it to.) Is it actually mimicking yet mocking The Bubblegum Reaper? Is it ironic that Nannette keeps calling everyone selfish when she herself is the most selfish character in the entire novel? (I mean, Jesus Christ, she's so selfish.) I really don't know what to think. It's a two-star for some actually very nice quotes about how hard feelings are to figure out sometimes and how much I enjoyed the first half, but I really wouldn't want to suffer through it again or recommend it to anyone.
------
Grab A Copy*: Amazon / abebooks / Book Depository / Barnes & Noble
* friendly reminder that we do not have any type affiliate status with the above sites and gain nothing from you clicking through them, we would just like to provide you with links to obtain the books.
1 note
·
View note
Photo
Heather Reviews: Made You Up by Francesca Zappia http://bit.ly/2G7F9ED
0 notes
Photo
Monthly Releases: August 2016 http://bit.ly/2b2iGym
0 notes
Photo
Heather Post: #BloggerSRP Results! http://bit.ly/2aAXeNH
0 notes
Photo
Heather Does: the Blogger Summer Reading Program! http://bit.ly/29Jq4dk
0 notes
Photo
Kaniesha's Post: Half Year Mark! http://bit.ly/29av9hQ
0 notes
Photo
Monthly Releases: May 2016 http://bit.ly/1TdR7et
0 notes
Photo
Monthly Releases: August 2015 http://bit.ly/1N0PgID
0 notes
Photo
Kaniesha's July 2015 Roundup http://bit.ly/1DeZOUH
0 notes
Photo
Kaniesha's June 2015 Roundup http://bit.ly/1Kyrgid
0 notes
Photo
Monthly Releases: July 2015 http://bit.ly/1gcW2AE
0 notes
Photo
Kaniesha's TTT: Top Ten Books I've Read So Far In 2015 http://bit.ly/1ehCU39
0 notes
Photo
Read Play Blog: June 2015 http://bit.ly/1RnSC9u
0 notes
Photo
Kaniesha's TTT: Top Ten Most Anticipated Releases For the Rest of 2015 http://bit.ly/1HYaFhx
1 note
·
View note