#cpme elections
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Alain Gargani : Une vision de stabilité et de soutien pour les PME
Alain Gargani, entrepreneur chevronné et candidat à la présidence nationale de la CPME, est prêt à guider les petites et moyennes entreprises (PME) à travers le paysage économique turbulent. Fort de plus de 30 ans d'expérience dans l'entrepreneuriat et l'engagement syndical, Gargani apporte une grande expertise tant dans le domaine des affaires que dans la défense des intérêts du secteur.
Scientifique de formation avec un doctorat en physique, Gargani a découvert sa passion pour l’entrepreneuriat dès ses débuts. En 1996, il organise sa première conférence, ce qui marque la création de sa première entreprise. Au fil des ans, il fonde plusieurs sociétés, principalement dans le secteur de la santé et des startups, ainsi que dans l’événementiel. Ses projets ont souvent été innovants, ce qui caractérise sa manière d’aborder le monde des affaires. Gargani est également très impliqué dans la CPME depuis 30 ans, jouant un rôle clé dans la création et le développement de la CPME des Bouches-du-Rhône et de la CPME Sud, cette dernière étant devenue la première fédération nationale en nombre de membres. Il a travaillé sans relâche pour représenter les intérêts des PME et mettre en avant les réussites collectives de sa région, notamment à travers des initiatives comme les rencontres Made in PME Sud.
Pour Gargani, sa candidature à la présidence de la CPME est motivée par la nécessité d’apporter de la stabilité dans un monde de plus en plus instable. "Nous ne pouvons pas toujours être la variable d’ajustement", déclare-t-il, en évoquant les défis auxquels font face les PME : hausse des prix de l’énergie, instabilité politique et conséquences durables de la pandémie de Covid. Son objectif est de garantir que les PME ne soient pas constamment accablées par des régulations changeantes, des taxes élevées et la pression des changements politiques. Il estime que les entrepreneurs doivent pouvoir se concentrer sur ce qu'ils savent faire de mieux : créer de la richesse et dynamiser les économies locales.
La vision de Gargani pour l’avenir de la CPME repose sur une approche plus unifiée et affirmée. Il souhaite construire une CPME plus offensive qui amplifie la voix des PME, afin que leurs préoccupations soient entendues à tous les niveaux du gouvernement. Fort de son expérience en développement régional et en engagement politique, Gargani est bien placé pour mener un mouvement visant à renforcer les liens entre les dirigeants d'entreprises et les décideurs politiques.
L'un des axes prioritaires de Gargani, s'il prend la tête de la CPME, est la question du logement, un problème majeur empêchant les entreprises d’attirer des employés. Il compte également se concentrer sur la stabilisation de la fiscalité et veiller à ce que les PME ne soient pas submergées par des régulations excessives. À travers ces actions, Gargani espère créer un environnement plus prévisible et favorable aux PME, leur permettant de prospérer même en période de crise.
Le leadership d’Alain Gargani promet un avenir de stabilité, de visibilité et de croissance pour les PME de France.
A lire aussi : Towards a combative and united CPME: Alain Gargani’s candidacy for the presidency
1 note
·
View note
Text
Législatives : "Nous sommes inquiets", reconnaît la CPME après la victoire du Nouveau Front populaire
Les entrepreneurs sont particulièrement préoccupés par la hausse du smic défendue par l’alliance de gauche. — À lire sur www.francetvinfo.fr/elections/legislatives/legislatives-nous-sommes-inquiets-reconnait-la-cpme-apres-la-victoire-du-nouveau-front-populaire_6653778.html
0 notes
Text
Federations are treading lightly with their public comments, aware that they could be sitting across the table from National Rally (RN) ministers if the party scores a major breakthrough in the June 30 and July 7 ballots.
Local business group U2P would "respect the people's choice, but the RN has to say more precisely what it proposes on questions with a tax, social and economic effect on small firms," its chief Michel Picon told AFP.
At the last presidential election in 2022, the outfit had warned that RN chief Marine Le Pen's manifesto promises "would have bad consequences for business," he recalled.
At stake are issues such as returning to an official retirement age of 60 – raised to 64 in a wildly unpopular Macron reform last year – and a still harsher crackdown on immigration.
"What does this mean for people working for us today?" Picon asked.
"We're business players who don't get involved in politics," said Thierry Cotillard, head of the Mousquetaires/Intermarche supermarket chain.
But "whoever the politicians are, we will fiercely defend our positions," he warned.
'Stick your neck out'
Centrist Macron's time in office has been marked by reforms aimed at making life easier for businesses and high-profile courting of foreign investment.
By contrast, "we know nothing" about the RN's plans, said the head of one major European industrial firm's French subsidiary on condition of anonymity.
"We've just seen the beginnings of a reindustrialisation for 10 years, with supply-side policies bearing fruit. Will all that be kept up?" he asked.
Macron's Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire on Tuesday urged business to "stick their neck out" against the far right.
Groups including the big companies' federation MEDEF should "clearly say what they think of the different parties' economic programmes" and warn about "the cost of Marine Le Pen's Marxist plans", he added.
Read moreFrance’s Macron calls snap election in huge gamble after EU polls debacle
Without naming any party, MEDEF told AFP in a statement that "a new campaign is starting in which we do not share certain political visions, which are incompatible with business competitiveness and prosperity for our country and fellow citizens".
The CPME small-business group called for supply-side policy, greenhouse emissions reduction and welfare state reforms to continue.
It also warned about France's staggering three-trillion-euro ($3.2 trillion) debt pile, which ratings agency Moody's said Monday risked a downgrade due to the "potential political instability" from the upcoming election.
"Anyone taking on costly reforms without taking this element into account would be exposing France to a major risk," the CPME said.
The head of a firm on France's heavyweight CAC 40 stock market index, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said there was no reason to panic as the RN winning was "not a done deal".
Even if they did, they said, "everyone wants to upend things, but once in power, being responsible for things will make you responsible."
'Low-carbon electricity essential'
One sector with particular fears for a far-right victory is renewable energy, which has already been waiting for months on a government roadmap stretching to 2035 and including items like sites for massive offshore wind parks.
"What's going on is serious," said Jules Nyssen, president of the Renewable Energies Union (SER).
"We're in a state of total instability, just when we need legal guarantees and clarity," he added, saying "it's going to cost us heavily".
"We have a clear roadmap that we need to eliminate carbon emissions," said Nicolas de Warren, president of the UNIDEN association of big industrial energy users.
"What's essential for us is access to low-carbon electricity at competitive prices, whether it's nuclear or renewable".
In 2022, Le Pen promised a fleet of around 20 new nuclear reactors – although her 2031 timetable for delivering half of those was seen as unrealistic.
But she is also a committed opponent of wind energy, vowing a moratorium on new construction and the gradual dismantling of existing parks – plans incompatible with France's climate commitments.
"The laws of economics and energy will catch up" with the RN if it comes to power, one electricity provider said on condition of anonymity.
"We need more cheap energy. Building nuclear takes 10-15 years. What do we do while we wait? And how do we attract battery factories if we don't want any more electric cars?" he added, citing another of Le Pen's bugbears.
1 note
·
View note
Text
A court decision in Ankara on Thursday to dismiss the board members of the Turkish Medical Association, TTB has been widely condemned by international medical bodies, the opposition and Turkish human rights groups.
“Do not touch the TTB. We are doing our duty,” the TTB said after the decision.
“The lawlessness regime, which was intended to be dominated by political power, has yielded another fruit; In the case of targeting the Turkish Medical Association, the series of unlawful acts that has been going on for a year has resulted in the dismissal of the members of the Executive Council,” the TTB added.
The TTB board, or executive council, was dismissed after its president, Sebnem Korur Fincanci, called for an investigation into allegations of chemical weapon use by the Turkish army.
In January 2023, Fincanci was jailed for two years and eight months for terrorist propaganda. She walked free on account of the five months she had already served.
The court has appointed a five-member board of trustees to oversee the election of a new executive council. Until the court’s decision is finalised at an appeals level, it will remain on duty.
The TTB has received support from numerous international medical organisations.
“World Medical Association, WMA, continues to support TTB. Nothing has changed for TTB from yesterday to today. The Central Council will remain in office until the decision is finalised on appeal. If there is no equality, no freedom, no democracy, no justice, no health; struggle is a right!” WMA said on X on Thursday.
“European doctors call on the Turkish authorities to unconditionally safeguard the autonomy and independence of the Turkish Medical Association,” Dr Christiaan Keijzer, president of the Standing Committee of European Doctors, CPME, said in a written statement.
Turkish rights groups and the opposition also backed the TTB.
“The decision made by political institutions was finalized by the judiciary. We know that this decision is a political decision, not a legal one. The TTB is the professional organisation of [Turkey’s] physicians,” the Human Rights Association of Turkey, IHD, wrote on X on Thursday.
Ozgur Ozel, leader of Turkey’s main opposition Republican People’s Party, CHP, called the decision unlawful.
“The decision to dismiss the members of the TTB Executive Council is against the law …We will continue to defend the law and stand by the elected bodies of the TTB,” Ozel said on Thursday.
The court’s decision represents a dangerous precedent, rights group warn.
“This is the first time since the 1980 coup d’etat that a professional union is being dismissed. This is concerning because it might set a precedent for other professional organisations, such as bar associations,” the Media and Law Studies Association, MLSA, said in a statement on Friday.
Since the pandemic, due to its criticism of President Erdogan’s government, there have been calls by the ruling parties for the TTB, the official representative of medical workers in Turkey, to be to closed and its administrators arrested.
Fincanci is a professor of forensic sciences and, besides leading Turkish medical workers, has been a senior human rights activist, campaigning against torture, war crimes and mistreatment in Turkey and abroad.
Balkan Insight named Fincanci as one of its Heroes of 2022 due to her consistent struggle for justice and human rights.
0 notes
Photo
Commentary by Cornelius a Lapide on Matthew - Chapter 20: 1-16 - Latin Vulgate
What Is The Kingdom Of Heaven Like
Verses:
1 The kingdom of heaven is like to a master of a family, who went out early in the morning to hire labourers into his vineyard.
2 And having agreed with the labourers for a penny a day, he sent them into his vineyard.
3 And going out about the third hour, he saw others standing idle in the market-place,
4 And he said to them, Go you also into my vineyard, and I will give you what shall be just.
5 And they went their way. And again he went out about the sixth and the ninth hour, and did in like manner.
6 But about the eleventh hour he went out and found others standing, and he saith to them: Why stand you here all the day idle?
7 They say to him: Because no man hath hired us. He saith to them: Go you also into my vineyard.
8 And when evening was come, the lord of the vineyard saith to his steward: Call the labourers and pay them their hire, beginning from the last even to the first.
9 When therefore they came, who had come about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny.
10 But when the first also came, they thought that they should have received more: and they likewise received every man a penny.
11 And receiving it, they murmured against the master of the house,
12 Saying: These last have worked but one hour, and thou hast made them equal to us, that have borne the burden of the day and the heats.
13 But he answering one of them, said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst thou not agree with me for a penny?
14 Take what is thine, and go thy way: I will also give to this last even as to thee.
15 Or is it not lawful for me to do what I will? is thy eye evil, because I am good?
16 So shall the last be first, and the first last. For many are called but few chosen.
Commentary:
Verse 1- The kingdom of heaven is like. That is, God acts in the kingdom of Heaven like a master hiring labourers into his vineyard; for strictly speaking, the kingdom of Heaven is not like the householder himself, but like his house and family.
Christ’s purpose is by means of this parable to prove the truth of His last saying in the preceding chapter, many that are first shall be last, &c., and to shew that by the grace of God, without any injustice or injury to anyone it will cpme to pass that those who here seemed to have the first place will in the Day of Judgment have the last, and those who seemed to have the last will then have the first; that is, that the Apostles and the despised faithful who followed Christ will in the kingdom of Heaven be preferred to the Scribes and Pharisees; and the believing Gentiles to the Jews, who were called by the Lord that they might obtain the first place in the kingdom of God, that is, in the Church both militant and triumphant; or, that the Sons of the New Testament, and especially the Apostles who are to sit on twelve thrones in the Day of Judgment, will be preferred to the Sons of the Old Testament, who under the shadows of legal sacrifices performed a laborious service, because, trusting in the works of the Law, they falsely claimed the kingdom of God for themselves, and rejected Christ. Whence they deservedly lost the kingdom; while the others submitted with humility to Christ, and zealously co-operated with Him, and therefore were elected in preference to the Jews both to grace and glory. That this is the scope of the parable is evident. 1. From the saying which precedes and follows it, many that are first, &c. 2. From S. Luke, who in chap. xiii,, 29, 30, explains these same words of the admission of the Gentiles and the exclusion of the Jews. 3. Because otherwise we cannot explain the murmurings of those who were first called, for in Heaven among the blessed there is no murmuring, but only in hell among-the damned.
By the vineyard we are to understand the Church; by the market place the world; by those called at the first, third, and sixth hour, the Jews, called in their fathers, Abraham, Jacob, and Moses, to the faith and worship of God; by those called at he eleventh hour, we are to understand the Gentiles; by the evening, the Day of Judgment, in which each will receive his reward, either already given in this life (as it was given to the Jews), or to be then given, as in the case of the Gentiles in Heaven.
By the penny (denarius) is signified a whole day’s pay. The denarius was a common coin, of which there were many different kinds; for there was the copper, the silver, and the gold denarius. And it is clear, that the pay given to the labourers was unequal, because the last were preferred to the others who came at the first, third, and sixth hour, for although the latter had laboured for a longer time, yet the former had laboured with greater grace, diligence and zeal.
You will say then, that to the greater labourer the less reward is given. I answer: True, but not to the greater merit; for to this a greater reward is always due, and is always given. Moreover, it is not the greater labourer that makes the merit greater, but grace, and co-operation with grace. The Apostles had greater grace than the Scribes, Christians than Jews, and co-operated more with grace, and therefore the greater denarius, i.e., the greater reward was promised them. For to the Jews the denarius promised by God was a temporal reward, an abundance of temporal blessings; but to the Gentile Christians was promised by Christ a denarius far more noble, namely eternal life. The Jews therefore received a denarius of copper or silver, the Christians one of gold. For otherwise if the denarius signified exactly the same reward, it would not agree with the words which precede and follow the parable—the first shall be last, and the last first.
In a word, the parable signifies that the Gentiles who believe in Christ will be preferred to the Jews who despise Christ. And this is what S. Paul teaches in many places, and especially in his Epistle to the Romans. And Christ Himself says, The publicans and harlots go into the Kingdom of God before you. (See also S. Matt. viii., 11, 12, and S. Luke xiii., 28, 30.)
According to this sense, the first will be saved, the last will he damned. But in another sense, the first who will be the last are those who were first called but arrive at their reward last; while the last who will be the first are those who though called last become the first in reward. Whence the Fathers, doctors, and schoolmen commonly explain this parable as if Christ intended to say that the first as well as the last, i.e., Jews as well as Christians, who serve God, will receive the same eternal life; nor will it be to the injury of anyone that he has been called at the end of the world or of his own life; yea, rather he will be preferred in heavenly glory before others who were called long before, if with greater labour and zeal he co-operated with the greater grace given him by God. This is the interpretation of S. Jerome, S. Augustine, S. Chrysostom, S. Thomas, Maldonatus, Gregorius de Valentia, Bellarmine (Lib. iii. de Justificatione, cap. 16), and Suarez. And this interpretation is very probable, and it is much in its favour, that it is better explained in this way how the same denarius is given to all the labourers. For the Fathers everywhere by the denarius understand eternal life.
You will say, how is it that in this denarius the first and the last are equal, since the first excel the last in the felicity and glory of eternal life? I answer, that the same denarius denotes the same blessing generically and objectively, i.e., the same Divine essence which constitutes the blessedness of the saints; for this is one and the same, but nevertheless the fruition of it is different according to their different degrees of merit; for those who have served God with greater grace and labour, as those did who were called last, will behold God in a clearer and more perfect vision, and therefore will have a fuller fruition of His love, and will be more blessed than those who served God with less grace and labour. So S. Gregory, S. Augustine, S. Jerome, S. Thomas (Part I., quæst. 15, art. 6), and others explain it. To these may be added Bellarmine in the place already quoted: for that denarius, he says, signifies an equality of eternity, not of glory. Again, this opinion is favoured by the words of Christ (chap. xix. 21, and following), which are closely connected with this payable. And now to explain the several points of the parable according to this sense: By the day is to be understood the course of this world; by the various hours the different ages of the world; so that the first hour is the age from Adam to Noah, the second that from Noah to Abraham, the third from Abraham to Moses, the sixth from Moses to Christ, the eleventh from Christ to the end of the world. Thus S. Hilary, S. Gregory, and Theophylact explain it. Or the day is the life of each man; the first hour being infancy; the third, youth; the sixth, manhood; the ninth, old age; the eleventh, decrepitude. So S. Jerome and S. Basil explain it. By the murmuring, understand with Theophylact, Suarez, and others, the surprise of the saints when those who shall be less in glory, and yet (as the Jews) had laboured more here will wonder that others, who laboured less here, but excelled them in the measure of grace, are preferred to them in glory. To conclude: the sense will be complete and adequate, if this second meaning is taken in conjunction with the first; for as I said at the end of the preceding chapter, the last can be taken in both ways—either as meaning the last, in the sense of the damned, or the last in Heaven itself, and therefore saved. The first sense applies to those who were first called, and clearly explains their murmuring; while the second sense applies to those last called, and in their case clearly explains the denarius, how the same denarius—i.e., eternal life—is given to all. Wherefore, the second sense supplies the first, and the first supplies what is wanting in the second.
Tropologically.
The vineyard is the soul which each man has to cultivate. Morally, therefore, we learn that we are called to labour in the vineyard, i.e., our own souls and the Church of God. The cultivators of this vineyard are not held in honour for the time during which they have laboured, but for the diligence, the zeal, and the spirit with which they have laboured. S. Jerome (Epist. 13, ad Paul): Hence the Spouse in the Canticles says, They have made me keeper of the vineyards, mine own vineyard have I not kept. The essence of the soul is the vineyard, planted in the soil of the body; its faculties are the vines, and works of charity are its wine; the vines are to be fastened to the Cross, at the foot of which we make a grave, against the approach of our death and burial. This vineyard must be kept from the wild boar out of the wood (Ps. lxxx.)—i.e., from lustful pleasure; and from the singular wild beast (Vulg.)—i.e., from the sin of pride, which makes a man singular; from the fox of cunning flattery; from the wolf of greediness; from the dog of detraction. We must pray the Lord to send upon this His vineyard the rain of His doctrine, and the warmth of His charity, and dung—i.e., the memory of the death of His Son and of the holy martyrs. The soul is green like a vineyard with flowers and leaves, that is, with holy desires and edifying speech; it pours forth the tears of compunction; it sheds forth the sweet odour of virtue; it bears the ripe grapes of good works. Again, the faithful man performs in his own soul the same works as the vine-dresser in the vineyard. He prunes, hoes, transplants, disentangles, &c.; the faithful does the same mystically in his own soul.
And now to explain each verse briefly.
Verse 2. When he had agreed with the labourers. Jovian and Calvin have asserted that all the just are equal in reward, i.e., in the denarius of eternal life, and that therefore they are equal in merit, and all good works are equal. But I have already answered that all are equal generally in eternal life; but in this there will be degrees, for some will have a clearer and others a dimmer vision of God, and therefore the one will be more and the others less blessed and glorious.
Verse 3- And he went out about the third hour
. The Romans and the Jews used to divide the night as well as the day into twelve hours reckoned in four periods which in the night were called watches. The first hour began at sunrise, the sixth at midday. Again, in winter the hours were shorter in the day and longer in the night, and the reverse in summer.
Verse 4- And He said unto them, go ye also.
To these He does not promise a denarius, but what is right (just, Vulg.) By this is signified the merit of good works, which according to justice merits a reward, which God promises to each work according to distributive justice.
Verse 5- Again He went out
, This shews the carefulness of God who is desirous that all men should be workers in the vineyard of their own souls, and of the Church, that both may be adorned with fruits of every kind.
Verse 6- About the eleventh hour.
This is the last hour of the day, and those called at this hour are Christians. Origen says that Adam was called at the first hour, Paul at the eleventh.
Verse 7- Because no man hath hired us.
This is the vain excuse, S. Chryostom says, of slothful men; for God calls all to virtue from childhood. But again S. Chrysostom says the hiring is the promise of eternal life: but the Gentiles knew neither God nor the promises of God, so they say that they had not been hired, or called, though they had been called by the law and light of nature.
Verse 8- And when the evening was come.
The evening is the end of the world and the Day of Judgment.
Symbolically,
Origen understands by the steward the holy Angels, as S. Michael; but Remigius understands Christ, Who as man is the steward of God the Father, and in His name will judge the quick and dead. Irenæus (Lib. iv. contr. hær. c. 70) understands the Holy Spirit who dispenses both gifts and graces, and glory and rewards.
The Gentiles had more grace, and co-operated with grace more than the Jews who were first called, and therefore they obtain a higher place in Heaven. We may learn from this that a man may easily gain an increase of merit and glory if he practise frequent acts of charity, and perform all external works from charity and the love of God; for thus he will merit more even than the religious who undergo hard penances, if he practise his works with greater charity than they do, although they be less difficult,
Verse 8- Beginning with the last.
S. Gregory says, Those who are called at the end of life are often times rewarded before others, inasmuch as they depart out of the body into the kingdom before those who were called in childhood.
Verse 9- When they came who were hired about the eleventh hour,
they received every man a penny. This penny (denarius) was, as I have said above, in kind the same, but in appearance different. The meaning is that the Apostles and Christians called in the last age of the world have received a better denarius, and one that corresponds (congruentem) and is due to their labour and merit.
You will say that the first called, murmured and said, Thou hast made them equal to us, and therefore the same denarius was given to both; for if it had been a better one, they would have said, Thou hast made them superior to us, and they would have murmured much more.
I answer, that the day’s hire is given to workmen in the evening, and therefore those who come last could not easily perceive what sort of denarius was given to those who preceded them, but they only heard the steward say to each, receive your denarius: or if they did see it, they could not clearly perceive in the darkness that they had received a copper denarius, while the others had received a gold one. For copper (aurichalcum) resembles gold in glow and brightness, so that they thought the same denarius was given to them as themselves, and were offended. All this parabolically signifies the envy of the Jews against the Gentiles, for they were offended because the Gentiles were made equal to them in the grace and glory of their Messiah: for they thought that these things were due properly and entirely to them alone, but to the Gentiles only by a certain gratuitous dispensation. Whence arose that contention of the Jews against S. Peter for preaching the Gospel to Cornelius; and that more vehement contention against S. Paul, as is clear from the Acts of the Apostles.
If you ask why Christ did not say expressly that those who came at the eleventh hour received a greater denarius, I answer that Christ was not here treating of that point, but He only intended to eradicate from the Jews their prejudice, and arrogant claim to the first place in the kingdom of Heaven. In opposition to this therefore He teaches that the first shall he last and the last first. For He wishes to confirm His promise made to the Apostles (S. Matt. xix. 28). For thus the Apostles will be first in Heaven, inasmuch as they will be the judges of the rest, but the Jews will be the last, as they are to be judged by them.
Morally,
S. Chrysostom says, they are called at the eleventh hour who are called in old age; so that this parable was spoken to quicken the zeal of those who are converted in extreme old age, so that they may not suppose that they shall have any less than others.
Verse 11- They murmured.
By the murmuring, S. Chrysostom says, is signified the greatness of the reward and glory, which in the Apostles is so great that the rest of the elect and blessed from among the Jews would envy them and would murmur, if envy and murmuring were possible among the blessed. In a different way, S. Gregory says, Because the Fathers before Christ were not brought to the kingdom; this is to have murmured. Lastly, S. Chrysostom thinks that this murmuring is only an ornament of (a point introduced into) the parable, and therefore not to be applied to the thing signified by it.
Verse 12- We have borne the burden and heat of the day.
That is, we have toiled under the burden of the Law. The Scribes and Pharisees used to fast twice in the week, give tithes of all things to God, teach the people, compass sea and land to make one proselyte; so that they had a weight of labours, but often an unprofitable one.
Verse 13. But He answered, &c. An evil eye is an envious eye. The sense is, Since I have bestowed a favour of grace on those who came at the eleventh hour by giving them a denarius, I have done thee no wrong. The Master might have made answer to the murmurer, Those who came at the eleventh hour worked with greater grace and zeal, and accomplished more in one hour than thou didst in the whole day, and therefore merited more, as the first have received a better denarius. But it did not become the Master to contend on an equality with His servant, but rather to silence his murmuring by asserting his own right of ownership, liberality, and grace.
You will object, that S. Prosper here seems to take away all merit: for (lib. 2, de Vocat. Gent. c. 5) speaking of this parable, he says. “We read that the same reward was given to all the labourers, in order that those who laboured much without receiving more than the last might understand that they had received a gift of grace, not a reward of work.” Bellarmine answers: “S. Prosper considers eternal life is the reward which is the same and equal in the case of all the blessed: and God bestows this eternal life as a gift of grace, not a reward of works, in that sense of which S. Augustine speaks, ‘God crowns His own gifts, not thy merits;’ and therefore He willed to bestow eternal life on those who had laboured much and on those who had laboured little; that those who labour much may not glory in their own strength.”
Verse 14- Take that thine is.
Take, 0 Pharisee, thy wealth and honours which I have given thee in this life and which thou didst desire more than eternal life; be content with them, and go thy way. But Remigius explains the words thus: “Take thy reward, and enter into glory.”
I will give unto this last
(i.e., the Gentiles), according to his merit, even as unto thee. But Origen says: “Perhaps He says to Adam, Friend, I do thee no wrong, &c.” One may reasonably suppose that this last is the Apostle Paul, who laboured one hour. Others interpret: “Take thy damnation due to thee on account of thy murmuring, and go thy way to hell.”
So the last shall be first.
According to the first sense of the parable, the last who will be the first in Heaven are the elect; but the first who will be the last are the called only, who have not followed their calling or who have abandoned it, and are therefore damned. These are many, if they are compared with the elect, who are few (S. Matthew vii. 14). But according to the second sense, which I have given above, it is not easy to connect the latter clause, “Many are called, &c.,” with the first, “so the last shall he first.” Maldonatus thus connects them. “From the particular sentence in which He said that the first should be last and the last first, He draws a more general conclusion—that not all who are called will receive a reward, because very many when called will not come.” Suarez considers that it is an argument a fortiori—You will not be astonished that the first will be last and the last first, since many are called but few chosen, and therefore all the rest will be damned, which is more to be wondered at and dreaded; for if many are called who are not saved, what wonder is it that many are called who are not first in reward, although they may obtain something?
Again many, i.e., all are called to eternal life, yet He says many, because all are many and because He opposes them to the few who are elect: “live therefore like the few,” says Cassian, “that with the few you may merit election and a place in Heaven.”
Lastly, some explain thus, many, i.e., all are called to grace and to the keeping of the commandments, but few are chosen to extraordinary grace, and to the keeping of the Evangelical counsels.
Of this opinion are those schoolmen who hold that there are two classes of the elect. 1. The ordinary class consisting of those who upon the pre-knowledge of their merits are elected to glory; the other, consisting of those who are elected to glory before their merits are pre-known, whom they call extraordinarily predestinated and suppose to be here intended, when it is said, “few are chosen.” Among these few are the Blessed Virgin, the Apostles, and a few others; but the former are far more numerous, and therefore of them it is, many are called.
The Arabic version renders How many are called, &c., as if the words were an exclamation of Christ moved with wonder and pity at the multitude of the called and the fewness of the elect, and consequently at the multitude of the damned.
Here is brought to conclusion the narration of the events of the third year of Christ’s ministry; for a short time after this He raised Lazarus, which event took place in March, after which in the same month and year He was crucified.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
GettyImages-648494458
Gov-auctions.org – #1 Government & Seized Auto Auctions. Cars 95% Off!
French far-right Front National (FN) party candidate for the presidential election Marine Le Pen gestures as she speaks during a debate at the French Confederation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (CPME) union’s headquarters in Puteaux, near Paris on March 6, 2017. / AFP PHOTO / ERIC PIERMONT (Photo credit should read…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
GettyImages-648494458
Gov-auctions.org - #1 Government & Seized Auto Auctions. Cars 95% Off!
French far-right Front National (FN) party candidate for the presidential election Marine Le Pen gestures as she speaks during a debate at the French Confederation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (CPME) union's headquarters in Puteaux, near Paris on March 6, 2017. / AFP PHOTO / ERIC PIERMONT (Photo credit should read ERIC PIERMONT/AFP/Getty Images)
Legally Concealed Courses - Firearms, Concealed Carry, Survival
from Regina Perez RSS Feed http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/breitbart/~3/vNBqX3VdA1g/ via IFTTT
0 notes