Tumgik
#chemical innovation
Text
This guide delves into the diverse uses of specialty chemicals across multiple industries, including electronics, automotive, healthcare, agriculture, construction, and energy. It highlights how these chemicals contribute to advancements in technology and efficiency, addressing global challenges such as sustainability and innovation. Learn about the vital roles these chemicals play and their impact on various sectors.
0 notes
nmsc-market-pulse · 7 months
Text
The Transformative Impact of Innovations in the Flat Glass Market on Sustainable Construction
Tumblr media
The flat glass market, a cornerstone of the global construction and automotive industries, is undergoing a transformative phase marked by groundbreaking innovations aimed at enhancing energy efficiency and sustainability. As architects, builders, and developers increasingly prioritize green building practices, the demand for advanced flat glass products, particularly those offering superior insulation and energy-saving capabilities, has surged.
This article delves into the latest advancements in energy-efficient flat glass, underscoring their significance in reducing energy consumption in buildings and contributing to sustainable construction.
Request FREE Sample: https://www.nextmsc.com/flat-glass-market/request-sample
The Evolution of Energy-Efficient Flat Glass
Flat glass, a material integral to modern architecture and vehicle manufacturing, has evolved significantly from its traditional forms. The latest innovations in this sector are driven by the urgent need to address climate change and the global push for energy conservation. Among these advancements, low-emissivity (low-E) glass stands out for its remarkable ability to minimize energy loss, thereby playing a pivotal role in sustainable construction.
Low-E glass is coated with microscopically thin, transparent layers of metal or metal oxides. This coating reflects infrared radiation, keeping heat inside during the winter and outside during the summer, thus significantly reducing heating and cooling demands. The evolution of low-E technology has led to the development of various types, each tailored to specific climate conditions and building requirements, offering a versatile solution to energy efficiency in buildings.
The Role of Flat Glass in Sustainable Construction
Sustainable construction seeks to minimize the environmental impact of buildings through efficient energy use, reduction of waste, and optimization of lifecycle performance. Flat glass innovations, particularly energy-efficient variants, are at the forefront of this movement. By enhancing thermal insulation and reducing the need for artificial heating and cooling, these glass products significantly lower energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
Inquire Before Buying: https://www.nextmsc.com/flat-glass-market/inquire-before-buying
Moreover, advanced flat glass contributes to sustainable construction by improving natural lighting while minimizing heat gain, thus reducing the reliance on artificial lighting and air conditioning. This not only conserves energy but also enhances the comfort and well-being of building occupants, showcasing the holistic benefits of integrating these innovative glass products into modern architecture.
Innovations in Energy-Efficient Flat Glass
The flat glass industry has witnessed several notable innovations aimed at boosting energy efficiency. Beyond low-E glass, advancements include:
Double and Triple Glazing: Incorporating two or three glass panes separated by an air or gas-filled space to reduce heat transfer. This glazing technique, when combined with low-E coatings, offers superior insulation properties.
Gas Fills: Argon, krypton, and other inert gases are used to fill the spaces between glazed panes, further enhancing thermal performance due to their low thermal conductivity.
Warm Edge Technology: This involves the use of spacers at the edge of glass units that have lower heat transfer rates compared to traditional aluminum spacers, thereby reducing heat loss around the edges of the glass.
Dynamic Glass: Also known as smart glass, this technology allows the glass to change its light transmission properties based on external conditions, thereby optimizing natural light while reducing glare and heat gain.
These innovations exemplify the industry's commitment to enhancing the energy performance of buildings, aligning with global sustainability goals.
The Impact on Green Building Practices
The integration of energy-efficient flat glass products is a key component of green building certifications such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method). These certifications encourage the adoption of sustainable building materials and practices, recognizing the pivotal role of advanced glass technologies in achieving energy efficiency and environmental sustainability.
By significantly reducing energy consumption, these glass innovations not only contribute to the operational efficiency and sustainability of buildings but also offer economic benefits in terms of lower energy costs. Furthermore, they support the health and productivity of occupants by improving indoor environmental quality, illustrating the multifaceted advantages of these advancements in the construction sector.
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite the clear benefits, the adoption of advanced energy-efficient flat glass products faces challenges, including higher initial costs and market accessibility. However, as awareness grows and technology advances, costs are expected to decrease, making these innovative glass products more accessible and appealing to a broader market.
The future of the flat glass market lies in continuous innovation and the development of even more efficient and environmentally friendly products. Research is ongoing into new materials and coatings that offer enhanced thermal insulation and solar control, as well as recyclable and sustainable glass production methods. The integration of photovoltaic cells into flat glass, enabling buildings to generate their own renewable energy, represents another exciting frontier in the evolution of the industry.
Conclusion
The flat glass market is at the cusp of a revolution, driven by the imperative for energy conservation and sustainable construction. Innovations in energy-efficient flat glass, such as low-E coatings, double and triple glazing, gas fills, warm edge technology, and dynamic glass, are making significant strides in reducing energy consumption in buildings.
As these technologies continue to evolve and become more accessible, they will play an increasingly vital role in shaping the future of construction, aligning architectural practices with the urgent need for environmental sustainability. The journey towards greener buildings is complex, but with the advancements in flat glass technology, the construction industry is well-equipped to meet the challenges of the 21st century, paving the way for a more sustainable and energy-efficient world.
Also Browse:
https://www.openpr.com/news/3334039/revolutionizing-healthcare-with-digital-innovation
https://www.openpr.com/news/3334013/double-benzyl-toluene-market-unleashing-the-potential
https://www.openpr.com/news/3334059/revolutionizing-healthcare-blood-preparation-market-poised
0 notes
Text
Thermoplastic Polyester Engineering Resins Market is Led by APAC
The thermoplastic polyester engineering resins market was USD 3,912.2 million in 2022, and it will touch USD 5,896.6 million, advancing at a 5.4% compound annual growth rate, by 2030.
The growth of the industry is attributed to the increasing utilization of these resins for various nonstructural applications as they can be utilized without filters and are usually tougher and more ductile than thermoset resins. Furthermore, they are extensively accessible to meet domestic requirements and are easy to recycle. The rising need from the automobile and electronic sectors is also propelling the advancement of the industry.
Tumblr media
The polybutylene terephthalate category will advance at a steady rate in the years to come. This is because of the growing requirement for PBT in the electrical and automobile sectors. PBT has unique features, including heat resistance, semi-crystalline, and lightweight, because of which conventional materials including bronze, ceramics, and cast iron in the automotive sector are getting replaced.
In 2022, the automotive category, based on application, led the thermoplastic polyester engineering resins market, with 40% share, and it will remain leading in the years to come. The automotive sector has gained momentum, over the past few years, and key manufacturers of automobiles are utilizing thermoplastic polyester to produce parts of vehicles, which benefits them to lessen the overall weight of the automobiles.
North America is likely to observe significant growth in the years to come. This is primarily because of the mounting need for recycled plastics, the existence of major players, and the growing emphasis on fuel-efficient vehicles, because of which manufacturers are extensively utilizing TPER to make their automobiles lightweight.
With the mounting utilization of such resins for numerous industrial applications, the thermoplastic polyester engineering resins industry will continue to advance in the years to come.
0 notes
techtuv · 3 months
Text
Chemiluminescence, or chemical glowing, is the emission of light as a result of a chemical reaction, with minimal thermal radiation. It has numerous applications in chemistry and is commonly observed in everyday life during combustion reactions. Unlike the emission of light from a surface, chemiluminescence occurs due to a chemical reaction. The energy produced by the reaction alters the energy levels of the molecules and radicals involved, causing them to emit photons at specific wavelengths. These emitted photons reveal the character and type of the reacting substances according to the rules of absorption spectroscopy.
4 notes · View notes
morphmagic · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
SPITE DRIVES INNOVATION
2 notes · View notes
totesmag · 2 years
Text
Discover the Latest Innovations in Cleaning Products for Your Home
Certainly! Here’s an example blog post that follows the outline provided: I. Introduction When it comes to living a healthy lifestyle, many people focus on the physical aspects – eating well, exercising regularly, and getting enough sleep. But mental health is just as important, if not more so, for overall well-being. In this blog post, we’ll explore some simple ways to prioritize your mental…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
vamshi11 · 19 days
Text
Exploring MS Plates: Varieties, Applications, and Their Design Impact with Top Brands from SteelonCall
Diverse Varieties of MS Plates
Mild Steel (MS) plates, celebrated for their robustness and adaptability, come in various types to suit different industrial and construction needs:
Standard MS Plates: These versatile plates are the go-to choice for general applications. Their balanced mix of strength and flexibility makes them ideal for structural supports, machinery parts, and general fabrication tasks.
High Strength Low Alloy (HSLA) Plates: Designed to offer enhanced strength without compromising weldability, HSLA plates are perfect for demanding applications. They are commonly used in heavy machinery, bridges, and other high-stress environments.
Corrosion-Resistant Plates: Coated or treated to withstand environmental wear, these plates are used in areas prone to moisture and chemicals. They are ideal for outdoor installations and marine applications where durability against corrosion is crucial.
Quenched and Tempered Plates: Through specific heat treatments, these plates gain exceptional hardness and impact resistance. They are utilized in heavy-duty machinery and equipment that require superior strength and durability.
Tumblr media
Wide-Ranging Applications of MS Plates
The applications of MS plates span a diverse array of sectors, reflecting their integral role in modern industry and construction:
Construction: In construction, MS plates are essential for structural components like beams, columns, and reinforcements. They provide the necessary stability and strength for buildings, bridges, and infrastructure projects.
Manufacturing: The industrial sector relies on MS plates for machinery and equipment fabrication.
Automotive Industry: MS plates are used extensively in automotive production for vehicle bodies and chassis. Their strength and formability are key to producing safe and reliable automotive parts.
Shipbuilding: In the maritime industry, MS plates are fundamental in constructing ship hulls and decks. 
Agricultural Equipment: MS plates are utilized in the production of agricultural machinery. Their toughness and ability to withstand heavy loads make them ideal for farming equipment.
Impact of MS Plates on Design Innovation
MS plates are not only functional but also inspire creative design solutions:
Architectural Innovation: In contemporary architecture, MS plates are often used for their sleek, industrial aesthetic. They feature prominently in building facades, decorative elements, and structural highlights, contributing to modern architectural styles.
Custom Fabrication: The flexibility of MS plates allows for custom designs and fabrications. From bespoke furniture to artistic installations, their ability to be cut, welded, and shaped supports unique and tailored design solutions.
Facade Solutions: For building facades, MS plates can create striking visual effects while providing durability. Various treatments and finishes offer designers flexibility in achieving distinctive and functional exterior designs.
Versatile Design Options: The range of finishes and treatments available for MS plates enables their use in diverse design contexts. This adaptability allows for integration into both interior and exterior designs, meeting varied aesthetic and functional requirements.
Premium MS Plates Available at SteelonCall
At SteelonCall, we offer a selection of high-quality MS plates from renowned brands, ensuring that you receive the best materials for your projects:
Vizag Steel: Renowned for its superior quality and reliable performance, Vizag Steel’s MS plates are ideal for a range of applications, providing both strength and durability.
SAIL: SAIL offers a wide array of MS plates known for their consistent quality and performance, suitable for various industrial and construction needs.
Jindal: Jindal’s MS plates are celebrated for their exceptional strength and resilience, making them a preferred choice for demanding applications in construction and manufacturing.
Conclusion
MS plates are a fundamental component in numerous industrial and construction applications, valued for their strength, versatility, and adaptability. At SteelonCall, we provide top-quality MS plates from leading brands like Vizag Steel, SAIL, and Jindal, complete with test certificates to ensure authenticity and performance. Whether you need MS plates for construction, manufacturing, or innovative design projects, our range of products meets your highest standards.
For the best prices and exceptional service, contact us at 08062212000 or visit our website at steeloncall.com. Discover how our premium MS plates can elevate your projects and meet your needs with excellence.
#MSPlates #SteelPlates #DesignInnovation #ConstructionMaterials #TopSteelBrands #SteelonCall #QualitySteel
#Diverse Varieties of MS Plates#Mild Steel (MS) plates#celebrated for their robustness and adaptability#come in various types to suit different industrial and construction needs:#Standard MS Plates: These versatile plates are the go-to choice for general applications. Their balanced mix of strength and flexibility ma#machinery parts#and general fabrication tasks.#High Strength Low Alloy (HSLA) Plates: Designed to offer enhanced strength without compromising weldability#HSLA plates are perfect for demanding applications. They are commonly used in heavy machinery#bridges#and other high-stress environments.#Corrosion-Resistant Plates: Coated or treated to withstand environmental wear#these plates are used in areas prone to moisture and chemicals. They are ideal for outdoor installations and marine applications where dura#Quenched and Tempered Plates: Through specific heat treatments#these plates gain exceptional hardness and impact resistance. They are utilized in heavy-duty machinery and equipment that require superior#Wide-Ranging Applications of MS Plates#The applications of MS plates span a diverse array of sectors#reflecting their integral role in modern industry and construction:#Construction: In construction#MS plates are essential for structural components like beams#columns#and reinforcements. They provide the necessary stability and strength for buildings#and infrastructure projects.#Manufacturing: The industrial sector relies on MS plates for machinery and equipment fabrication.#Automotive Industry: MS plates are used extensively in automotive production for vehicle bodies and chassis. Their strength and formability#Shipbuilding: In the maritime industry#MS plates are fundamental in constructing ship hulls and decks.#Agricultural Equipment: MS plates are utilized in the production of agricultural machinery. Their toughness and ability to withstand heavy#Impact of MS Plates on Design Innovation#MS plates are not only functional but also inspire creative design solutions:
0 notes
jcmarchi · 2 months
Text
Alex Shalek named director of the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science
New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/alex-shalek-named-director-of-the-institute-for-medical-engineering-and-science/
Alex Shalek named director of the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Alex K. Shalek, the J. W. Kieckhefer Professor in the MIT Institute for Medical Engineering and Sciences (IMES) and Department of Chemistry, has been named the new director of IMES, effective Aug. 1.
“Professor Shalek’s substantial contributions to the scientific community as a researcher and educator have been exemplary. His extensive network across MIT, Harvard, and Mass General Brigham will be a tremendous asset as director of IMES,” says Anantha Chandrakasan, chief innovation and strategy officer, dean of the School of Engineering, and the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. “He will undoubtedly be an excellent leader, bringing his innovative approach and collaborative spirit to this new role.”
Shalek is a core member of IMES, a professor of chemistry, and holds several leadership positions, including director of the Health Innovation Hub. He is also an extramural member of MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research; a member of the Ragon Institute of Mass General, MIT, and Harvard; an institute member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; an assistant in immunology at Mass General Brigham; and an instructor in health sciences and technology at Harvard Medical School.
The Shalek Lab’s research seeks to uncover how communities of cells work together within human tissues to support health, and how they become dysregulated in disease. By developing and applying innovative experimental and computational technologies, they are shedding light on a wide range of human health conditions.
Shalek and his team use a cross-disciplinary approach that combines genomics, chemical biology, and nanotechnology to develop platforms to profile and control cells and their interactions. Collaborating with researchers across the globe, they apply these tools to study human diseases in great detail. Their goal is to connect what occurs at a cellular level with what medical professionals observe in patients, paving the way for more precise ways to prevent and treat diseases. 
Over the course of his career, Shalek’s groundbreaking research has earned him widespread recognition and numerous awards and honors. These include an NIH New Innovator Award, a Beckman Young Investigator Award, a Searle Scholar Award, a Pew-Stewart Scholar Award, an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship in Chemistry, and an Avant-Garde (DP1 Pioneer) Award. Shalek has also been celebrated for his dedication as a faculty member, educator, and mentor. He was awarded the 2019-20 Harold E. Edgerton Faculty Achievement Award at MIT and the 2020 HMS Young Mentor Award.
Shalek received his bachelor’s degree in chemical physics from Columbia University and his master’s and PhD in chemical physics from Harvard University. Prior to joining MIT’s faculty in 2014, he was a postdoc at the Broad Institute.
Shalek succeeds Elazer Edelman, the Edward J. Poitras Professor in Medical Engineering and Science, who has led IMES since April 2018.
“I am grateful to Professor Edelman for his incredible leadership and service to IMES over the past six years,” says Chandrakasan. “His contributions to IMES have been invaluable, and we are thankful for his dedication and vision during his tenure as director.”
0 notes
techninja · 5 months
Text
Agricultural Activator Adjuvants: Enhancing Efficiency and Sustainability
Outline of the Article
Introduction to Agricultural Activator Adjuvants
What are agricultural activator adjuvants?
Importance in modern agriculture.
Types of Agricultural Activator Adjuvants
Surfactants
Oils
Drift Control Agents
Compatibility Agents
Role and Benefits of Agricultural Activator Adjuvants
Enhancing pesticide efficacy
Improving plant uptake
Reducing pesticide drift
Ensuring compatibility with tank mixtures
Market Trends and Growth Drivers
Increasing adoption of precision farming techniques
Growing demand for sustainable agricultural practices
Rise in research and development activities
Key Players in the Agricultural Activator Adjuvants Market
Analysis of major companies and their market share
Overview of their product offerings and strategies
Regional Analysis
Market landscape in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and other regions
Factors influencing market growth in each region
Challenges and Restraints
Regulatory hurdles and compliance issues
Concerns regarding environmental impact
Future Outlook and Opportunities
Emerging trends and innovations
Potential for market expansion
Case Studies and Success Stories
Real-world applications of agricultural activator adjuvants
Impact on crop yield and farm profitability
Environmental Sustainability and Safety Considerations
Eco-friendly formulations
Risk mitigation strategies
Consumer Awareness and Education
Importance of educating farmers about adjuvant selection and usage
Promoting responsible stewardship practices
Industry Collaboration and Partnerships
Collaborative efforts between manufacturers, farmers, and regulatory bodies
Sharing best practices and knowledge exchange
Market Forecast and Analysis
Predictions for market growth and revenue projections
Factors influencing market dynamics in the forecast period
Investment Opportunities and Market Entry Strategies
Potential for new entrants
Investment avenues for existing players
Conclusion
Recap of key points
Summary of market outlook and recommendations for stakeholders
Agriculture, the backbone of our civilization, continually evolves with technology and innovation. One such innovation revolutionizing modern farming practices is the use of agricultural activator adjuvants. These versatile compounds play a crucial role in optimizing the performance of pesticides and other agrochemicals, thereby enhancing crop yield and sustainability.
What are Agricultural Activator Adjuvants?
Agricultural activator adjuvants are additives formulated to improve the efficacy and performance of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. They are designed to enhance the biological activity of these agrochemicals by modifying their physical and chemical properties. By facilitating better absorption, spreading, and retention on plant surfaces, adjuvants ensure maximum utilization of active ingredients, leading to improved pest control and crop protection.
Importance in Modern Agriculture
In today's agricultural landscape, where farmers face escalating challenges such as pest resistance, environmental concerns, and stringent regulations, the role of adjuvants becomes increasingly critical. By harnessing the power of adjuvants, farmers can achieve better results with lower pesticide doses, minimize environmental impact, and maximize profitability.
Types of Agricultural Activator Adjuvants
Surfactants
Surfactants are one of the most commonly used adjuvants in agriculture. They reduce the surface tension of spray solutions, allowing for more uniform coverage and penetration of plant surfaces. By breaking down waxy cuticles and enhancing wetting and spreading, surfactants ensure optimal absorption of active ingredients into plant tissues.
Oils
Oil-based adjuvants, such as crop oils and mineral oils, act as carriers for pesticides and improve their adherence to plant surfaces. They help overcome the hydrophobic nature of certain pesticides and enhance their efficacy under adverse environmental conditions. Additionally, oils can reduce evaporation and volatility of volatile herbicides, minimizing off-target drift.
Drift Control Agents
Drift control agents are formulated to reduce the risk of pesticide drift during application. They increase droplet size and density, improving deposition on target surfaces while minimizing airborne drift. By enhancing spray retention and minimizing off-target movement, drift control agents enhance the safety and efficacy of pesticide applications.
Compatibility Agents
Compatibility agents are used to prevent chemical interactions and precipitation when mixing multiple agrochemicals in a tank mixture. They ensure the stability of the spray solution, preventing clogging of nozzles and maintaining the efficacy of individual components. By promoting uniform dispersion and compatibility, these agents optimize the performance of pesticide mixtures.
Role and Benefits of Agricultural Activator Adjuvants
Agricultural activator adjuvants offer a multitude of benefits, making them indispensable tools for modern farmers:
Enhancing Pesticide Efficacy
By improving the solubility, spreading, and absorption of active ingredients, adjuvants enhance the biological activity and efficacy of pesticides. They help overcome barriers such as cuticular waxes and plant surfaces, ensuring optimal uptake and systemic movement within the plant.
Improving Plant Uptake
Adjuvants enhance the penetration and translocation of pesticides within plant tissues, ensuring effective control of pests and diseases. By facilitating rapid absorption and systemic movement, they maximize the bioavailability of active ingredients, leading to superior pest management and crop protection.
Reducing Pesticide Drift
Drift control agents mitigate the risk of pesticide drift during application, minimizing off-target deposition and environmental contamination. By optimizing droplet size and distribution, these adjuvants ensure precise delivery of pesticides to target areas while reducing the potential for environmental impact.
Ensuring Compatibility with Tank Mixtures
Compatibility agents prevent chemical interactions and compatibility issues when mixing multiple pesticides in a tank mixture. They maintain the stability and integrity of the spray solution, preventing precipitation and clogging of spray equipment. By promoting uniform dispersion and compatibility, these adjuvants maximize the efficacy of tank mixtures and minimize the risk of equipment malfunction.
Market Trends and Growth Drivers
The agricultural activator adjuvants market is witnessing steady growth, driven by several key factors:
Increasing Adoption of Precision Farming Techniques
The rise of precision farming technologies, such as GPS-guided equipment and variable rate application systems, is driving the demand for adjuvants. These technologies enable farmers to optimize pesticide applications and maximize crop yield while minimizing input costs and environmental impact.
Growing Demand for Sustainable Agricultural Practices
With increasing consumer awareness and regulatory pressure, there is a growing demand for sustainable agricultural practices. Adjuvants play a crucial role in supporting sustainable farming by improving the efficiency and efficacy of pesticide applications, reducing chemical usage, and minimizing environmental footprint.
Rise in Research and Development Activities
The agricultural adjuvants industry is characterized by ongoing research and development efforts aimed at introducing innovative formulations and technologies. Manufacturers are investing in developing eco-friendly and biodegradable adjuvants with improved performance and safety profiles, driving market growth and differentiation.
Key Players in the Agricultural Activator Adjuvants Market
The agricultural activator adjuvants market is highly competitive, with several key players vying for market share. Some of the leading companies in the industry include:
Company A: A global leader in agricultural adjuvants, offering a comprehensive portfolio of surfactants, oils, and drift control agents.
Company B: A pioneer in eco-friendly adjuvant formulations, focusing on sustainability and innovation in agricultural solutions.
Company C: A renowned supplier of specialty chemicals and adjuvants, catering to the diverse needs of farmers worldwide.
Company D: A leading provider of compatibility agents and tank mix adjuvants, ensuring optimal performance and efficacy in pesticide applications.
These companies leverage their technological expertise, extensive R&D capabilities, and strategic partnerships to maintain their competitive edge and drive market growth.
Regional Analysis
The agricultural activator adjuvants market exhibits regional variations in terms of market dynamics, regulatory frameworks, and adoption rates.
North America
North America dominates the global adjuvants market, fueled by the presence of large-scale commercial farms and advanced agricultural practices. The region benefits from a favorable regulatory environment and widespread adoption of precision farming technologies, driving market growth and innovation.
Europe
Europe is a key market for agricultural adjuvants, driven by stringent regulations and growing demand for sustainable farming practices. The region prioritizes environmental stewardship and consumer safety, leading to increased adoption of eco-friendly adjuvants and bio-based formulations.
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific represents a lucrative market for agricultural adjuvants, driven by the expanding agricultural sector and rising demand for high-quality crops. The region is witnessing rapid urbanization and industrialization, leading to increased pressure on agricultural productivity and sustainability.
Other Regions
Other regions, such as Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East, offer significant growth opportunities for agricultural adjuvants. These regions are characterized by diverse agricultural landscapes, varying climatic conditions, and evolving regulatory frameworks, presenting unique challenges and opportunities for market players.
Challenges and Restraints
Despite the promising growth prospects, the agricultural activator adjuvants market faces several challenges and restraints:
Regulatory Hurdles and Compliance Issues
The adjuvants industry is subject to stringent regulatory requirements and compliance standards, which vary across different regions and jurisdictions. Manufacturers must navigate complex registration processes, safety assessments, and labeling requirements to ensure regulatory compliance and market access.
Concerns Regarding Environmental Impact
There is growing scrutiny and public concern regarding the environmental impact of agricultural adjuvants. Chemical residues, pesticide drift, and water contamination pose significant risks to environmental health and biodiversity. Manufacturers must prioritize sustainability and develop eco-friendly formulations to address these concerns and meet consumer expectations.
Future Outlook and Opportunities
Despite the challenges, the agricultural activator adjuvants market holds immense potential for growth and innovation:
Emerging Trends and Innovations
The industry is witnessing the emergence of innovative technologies and formulations, such as bio-based adjuvants, nanoemulsions, and smart delivery systems. These advancements aim to improve efficacy, reduce environmental impact, and enhance user safety, driving market growth and differentiation.
Potential for Market Expansion
With increasing global population and food demand, there is a growing need for efficient and sustainable agricultural solutions. Adjuvants play a vital role in supporting modern farming practices, optimizing crop production, and mitigating environmental risks. As farmers seek to maximize yield and profitability, the demand for adjuvants is expected to rise, creating lucrative opportunities for market players.
Conclusion
In conclusion, agricultural activator adjuvants are indispensable tools for modern farming, offering numerous benefits in terms of pesticide efficacy, plant uptake, and environmental sustainability. As the agricultural industry continues to evolve, adjuvants will play a crucial role in optimizing crop protection, enhancing productivity, and ensuring food security for future generations.
FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
What are agricultural activator adjuvants? Agricultural activator adjuvants are additives formulated to enhance the performance and efficacy of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers by modifying their physical and chemical properties.
How do adjuvants improve pesticide efficacy? Adjuvants improve pesticide efficacy by enhancing wetting, spreading, and absorption on plant surfaces, ensuring better penetration and systemic movement within the plant.
What types of adjuvants are commonly used in agriculture? Common types of adjuvants include surfactants, oils, drift control agents, and compatibility agents, each designed to address specific challenges in pesticide applications.
Why are adjuvants important in modern agriculture? Adjuvants are essential in modern agriculture to optimize pesticide performance, minimize environmental impact, and maximize crop yield and profitability.
Are there any environmental concerns associated with adjuvant usage? While adjuvants play a crucial role in crop protection, there are concerns regarding their environmental impact, including chemical residues, pesticide drift, and water contamination. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on developing eco-friendly formulations to address these concerns and promote sustainable farming practices.
0 notes
Text
Explore how recent technological advances have transformed the field of chemical processing and production. This article delves into the integration of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and green chemistry, highlighting their impacts on efficiency, safety, and environmental sustainability. Gain insights into the future trends that are set to redefine industry standards and drive further innovation.
0 notes
nmsc-market-pulse · 7 months
Text
The Evolving Landscape of the Wood Coating Market: Steering Towards Sustainability
Tumblr media
In recent years, the wood coating market has experienced a transformative shift towards sustainability and environmental responsibility. This change is largely driven by increasing consumer awareness and stringent regulatory standards that demand more eco-friendly solutions. As the global community becomes more conscious of the environmental impact of various industries, the wood coatings sector is no exception, adapting rapidly to meet these new expectations with innovative technologies and formulations.
This article delves into the current state of the wood coating market, with a particular focus on eco-friendly and sustainable wood coatings, exploring how these products are revolutionizing the industry without compromising on performance.
Request FREE Sample: https://www.nextmsc.com/wood-coating-market/request-sample
The Rise of Eco-Friendly Wood Coatings
Eco-friendly wood coatings have emerged as a pivotal market trend, addressing the dual need for environmental sustainability and consumer safety. These coatings are designed to minimize the ecological footprint of wood finishing processes, focusing on reducing emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), utilizing renewable resources, and ensuring the safety of both the environment and the end-users. The shift towards water-based, low-VOC, and non-toxic formulations represents a significant departure from traditional solvent-based coatings, which are known for their high VOC content and potential health risks.
Water-Based Coatings: A Sustainable Alternative
Water-based wood coatings have gained substantial traction as a sustainable alternative to solvent-based variants. These coatings use water as the primary solvent, which significantly reduces VOC emissions during application and drying. Besides their environmental benefits, water-based coatings have evolved to offer competitive advantages in terms of durability, ease of application, and aesthetic appeal. Innovations in polymer chemistry and formulation technology have enabled these coatings to achieve performance characteristics that rival or even surpass those of traditional solvent-based coatings.
Low-VOC Formulations: Prioritizing Health and Environment
Low-VOC wood coatings are designed to minimize the release of volatile organic compounds, which are harmful to both human health and the environment. These formulations are a testament to the industry's commitment to reducing air pollution and improving indoor air quality. Advances in resin technologies and additives have been instrumental in developing low-VOC coatings that do not compromise on performance, offering excellent adhesion, resistance, and long-lasting finishes.
Non-Toxic Formulations: Ensuring Consumer Safety
The demand for non-toxic wood coatings reflects a growing consumer preference for products that are safe for both the user and the environment. These coatings are formulated without hazardous chemicals, such as formaldehyde, heavy metals, and toxic solvents, making them ideal for applications in sensitive environments like homes, schools, and healthcare facilities. The development of non-toxic coatings relies heavily on green chemistry principles, aiming to create products that are effective while being benign to human health and the planet.
Inquire Before Purchase: https://www.nextmsc.com/wood-coating-market/inquire-before-buying
Meeting Consumer Demands Without Compromising Performance
The challenge for the wood coating industry has been to develop eco-friendly products that meet consumer demands for sustainability without sacrificing quality or performance. Innovations in this space have focused on creating coatings that offer the same, if not better, functionality as their traditional counterparts. This includes improvements in scratch resistance, UV protection, and ease of maintenance, ensuring that eco-friendly wood coatings can stand the test of time and continue to look great.
Manufacturers are increasingly leveraging advanced research and development to formulate coatings that offer quick drying times, enhanced durability, and superior finish qualities. The use of renewable materials and bio-based solvents is also on the rise, contributing to the circular economy and reducing the carbon footprint of wood coating products.
The Future of Wood Coatings: Towards a Greener Horizon
As we look to the future, the wood coating market is set to continue its trajectory towards more sustainable and environmentally friendly practices. Regulatory pressures and consumer preferences will further drive innovation in this space, leading to the development of new materials and technologies that push the boundaries of what's possible with eco-friendly wood coatings. The industry's commitment to sustainability is not only a response to external demands but also a proactive approach to preserving our planet for future generations.
In conclusion, the wood coating market is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by the imperative for sustainability and eco-friendliness. The innovations in water-based, low-VOC, and non-toxic formulations are a testament to the industry's ability to adapt and innovate in the face of changing consumer demands and environmental challenges. As these eco-friendly wood coatings continue to evolve, they are set to redefine the standards of performance and sustainability in the industry, marking a new era of environmentally responsible wood finishing.
0 notes
trendtrackershq · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
𝑼𝒏𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑰𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒔: 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑳𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒑𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑨𝒏𝒕𝒊-𝑭𝒐𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑨𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒕
𝑬𝒙𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑨𝒏𝒕𝒊-𝑭𝒐𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑨𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒕!
𝑺𝒆𝒄𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒂 𝑭𝑹𝑬𝑬 𝑺𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆: https://www.nextmsc.com/anti--foaming-agents/request-sample?utm_source=sanyukta-16-April-24&utm_medium=sanyukta-tumblr&utm_campaign=sanyukta-anti-foaming-agents
Based on extensive market research, it's evident that the demand for anti-foaming agents is soaring across various industries.
From pharmaceuticals to food processing, these agents play a crucial role in enhancing production efficiency and product quality.
Our research reveals a steady growth trajectory driven by several factors:
 1️. Increased adoption in the food and beverage industry to improve processing efficiency and maintain product consistency.
 2️. Growing demand from the pharmaceutical sector for the manufacturing of drugs and vaccines.
 3️. Expansion of the chemical industry, particularly in emerging economies, contributing to the demand for anti-foaming agents in various applications.
What's intriguing is the innovation landscape within the market, with manufacturers focusing on developing eco-friendly and sustainable solutions to meet evolving consumer preferences and regulatory requirements.
Projections indicate sustained growth in the coming years, fueled by advancements in technology, rising industrialization, and stringent regulations regarding foam control.
𝑲𝒆𝒚 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒕 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒚𝒆𝒓𝒔: Several market players operating in the anti-foaming agents market include Munzing, Dow Corning, Wacker Chemie, BASF SE, Evonik Industries AG, Procurement Building Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Ashland Inc., Ecolab Inc., Shin-Etsu Chemical Company Ltd., and Kemira Oyj.  
Excited to be part of this dynamic market and looking forward to collaborating with industry stakeholders to drive innovation and address evolving challenges!
0 notes
arvindanticor · 5 months
Text
Arvind Anticor at Wire & Tube Düsseldorf 2024
youtube
✨ Arvind Anticor at Wire & Tube Düsseldorf 2024! ✨ We're thrilled to share our journey in pushing the boundaries of wire and tube manufacturing with our advanced Polypropylene Tanks and more. Check out our blog for all the behind-the-scenes and innovative insights!
0 notes
itsgerges · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Kind Regards
Can A Light Beam Its Speed 1.16 million km per second Be Found? (Revised)
or
or
or
Abstract
The paper provides 4 hypotheses with their explanations and proves – let's provide them in following
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis No. (1)
The space is created from one energy and this energy is provided by a light beam moves by a speed 1.16 million km per second – the speed is registered in the created space proves the speed is a fact.
Hypothesis No. (2)
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field– Moreover- The Sun Does NOT Produce A Gravitational Field And It Has No Massive Gravity- 
Hypothesis No. (3)
Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Pluto was The Mercury Moon (Pluto size was equal Mercury size) But these two planets had migrated from their original orbits as a result for a collision- the planets migration caused a risk for the solar system geometrical design- Uranus and Jupiter the Two planets worked to repair the solar system design– that caused Jupiter orbit to be the main orbit in the solar system design- Jupiter orbit proves the speed 1.16 million km per second is a fact.   
Hypothesis No. (4)
The Sun Is a phenomenon created by the planets motions
The sun rays is created from the gravitational waves motions energies and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies-
Based on that 
The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions
And
The Sun Is NOT Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- instead- The Planets Motions Energies Total Is Used To Produce The Sun Rays
The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion – means
The Planets Are Created And Moving In Their Orbits Around A Point Of Space Before The Sun Creation- And The Sun Is Created On This Point Of Space around which the planets revolve - And
No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity (Newton is Wrong) - And
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field (Einstein Is Wrong)
And
The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions– means-The Sun creation and death depends on a cycle – means – after this current sun death another sun will be created for the solar system.
The Hypotheses Explanation
The abstract provides the hypotheses explanation and the paper provides their proves and discussions- In following the hypotheses will be explained in details 
NOTICE - The creatures and all matters on the Earth are created from the sun light energy and the sun light speed is 300000 km/s, because of that, the creature realization is limited to the speed 300000 km/s and can't realize the original speed (1.16 million km per second) that means the speed 300000 km/s is a limit for the creatures realization and not for the universe design.   
Notice- this revised version adds only more proves for the paper first hypothesis-
Hypothesis No. (1)
The space is created from an energy and this energy is provided by a light beam moves by a speed 1.16 million km per second – the speed is registered in the created space which proves the speed is a fact
The Hypothesis Explanation
I- The Space Is Created By One Light Beam Energy- And This Light Beam Speed Is 1.16 million km per second
I-1 Preface (the main idea)
I-2 The Space Creation Method (the distances are one network)
I-3 Light Coherence between light (1.16 million km /s) and light (300000 km/s)
I-4 The Matter definition (based on my planet diameter equation)
I-5 The Planets Creation
I-6 Can The Time Machine Be A Fact?
The Hypothesis Proves
I-7 The Proves Logic Analysis
I-8 Planet Velocity Is A Function In A Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-9 Planets Orbits Are Defined By A Motion Its Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-10 Jupiter distances are defined by a motion by a speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-11 The Solar System Geometrical Design Proves The Hypothesis
I-12 The Solar System Distances Analysis Prove The Hypothesis
I-13 Deep Analysis For The Planets Orbits
1-14 Light defines each planet orbital period
I-15 Can Planet Diameter Be Used As A Period Of Time
I-16 Mercury Orbit Analysis
I-1 Preface (The Main Idea)
The solar system (planets and distances) is created from one energy and this energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed (1.16 million km/s)
The space is created before the planets creation-
Let's write the whole story in following
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) started its motion from Mercury orbit moves toward Pluto orbit– by that– we consider Mercury orbit is the origin point-
Now- we should notice- No planet is created yet- the motion from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit defines the motion direction- and No planet is created before this motion end nor during this motion- the planets will be created after this motion is finished means when the light 1.16 million km per second reaches to Pluto (orbit)- after this event – the planets will be created –as I will explain later  
Notice
The light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances by its motion- means- the light moves from Mercury point to Venus point– the distance from Mercury to Venus was not found and is created only by the light motion through it for first time- means – before the light motion this distance was NOT found- It's found after the light moves through this distance for first time-    
This is similar to the blood motion through the arteries, the blood creates these arteries and the blood moves through these arteries, but the blood created these arteries with its first motion and that needed energy- but – after the arteries creation the blood move through them without any energy is required- means- the first motion is the most important one because by it the arteries are created
Shortly- The space is created from the energy of this light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second – NOW- after the Space creation- the light beam energy is decreased because of the energy consumption in the space creation process- and the rest energy is one light beam its speed is (C=300000 km/s =the light known speed) – But - We understand that- it's the same one light beam- its speed was 1.16 million km /s before the space creation- and the light created the space and that caused to consume the light energy and that caused to decrease the light speed to be 300000 km/s
Shortly- the light beam started its motion from Mercury (orbit) with speed 1.16 million km /s and reaches to Pluto (orbit) with a speed 300000 km/s because of the energy consumption in the space creation process  
Let's give example to explain this idea
Imagine we create A Sea Of Water- we use energy to create this sea of water- now we have some energy and we use this energy to create this sea of water- BUT- our energy is NOT spent completely But there's a small part still rest with us – this small part of energy is used to create one wave moves through this sea and this wave speed is 300000 km/s (I suppose the space is similar to the sea of water)
Now – the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed 300000 km/s and this light beam is found NOW in Pluto Orbit – and this light beam will be reflected from Pluto orbit toward the inner planets– means- the rest energy will move in the reflected direction to the original light motion direction.
This idea will be explained in details in the next point- shortly
The light beam (300000 km/s) will be reflected from Pluto toward the inner planets
AND  the light 300000 km/s will meet the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) in the origin point (in fact – beside the origin point) and there's a coherence of light is done between the light beam (300000 km/s) and the light beam (1.16 million km per second) – this coherence of light is proved strongly- we have to ask (how can that be possible while the light beam 1.16 million km /s is consumed and the new light beam 300000 km/s is the rest energy? how this light beam (300000 km/s) can meet the original one (1.16 million km per second)? in points no. (I-3) and no.(I-6) I answer this question.
Notice (1) I suppose the rest energy is a light beam its speed is (C=300000 km/s) but this idea is for simplicity- the rest energy can be in any wave form its speed (C=300000 km/s) – no necessity to be in visible light beam form
It's simply energy moves by the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
Notice (2)
All Planets Orbits Are Defined Before Any Planet Creation-
The light used the distance from the sun to Pluto as one area and create one geometrical design for this area before any planet creation 
Notice (3)
The planets are created from the rest energy its speed (300000 km/s) – means- the space is created by the light 1.16 million km per second and the energy is consumed in the space creation and the rest energy is one light beam its speed 300000 km/s (or one wave moves by the known speed of light C=300000 km/s) – the solar planets are created from this one wave its speed 300000 km/s and that means all planets orbit are created and defined before any planet creation
Notice (4)
The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creations And Motions
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions energies total
The sun doesn't produce a gravitational field and doesn't have massive gravity
Logically – No planet moves by the sun gravity
(The Planet Moves With The Energy From Which The Planet Is Created – Newton is wrong- later we discuss the proves)
Notice (5)
The child (fetus) inside his mother is created by the blood motion- the blood motion creates arteries for this child and through these arteries the blood moves also but the arteries themselves are created by this same blood motion- Similar to that- the distances are created by the light motion energy and the light moves through these distances also but originally these distances themselves are created by the light motion energy-  means the distances creation is done with the first time of the light motion through them - that required energy- but after the distances are created no more energy is required- the light (or planet) can pass simply through these distances
I-2 The Space Creation Method (the distances are one network)
Data
778.6 = 1.16 x 671
721    = 1.16 x 621
629    = 1.16 x 543
543    = 1.16 x 468
5906  = 1.16 x 5127
These numbers are distances in (million km)
778.6, 721, 671, 629, 551 are Jupiter distances to the sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars respectively- 5906 and 5127 Pluto distances to the sun and Jupiter respectively     
468 = 936 /2 where (940 million km = the Earth orbital circumference)
Discussion
(1)
The previous data tells us how the light beam motion creates the distances-
Simply the light uses a distance as (a period of time) and travels through this period another distance- that can be understood clearly from Jupiter distances- let's look deeply as possible
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) uses the period 629 seconds to pass a new distance = 729 million km (Mercury Jupiter distance is 721 million km error 1%) – where 629 million km = Jupiter Earth distance
Also  
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) uses the period 671 seconds to pas a new distance =778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) 
where 671 million km = Jupiter Venus distance
by this method the light creates the distances based on each other- and that makes all distances to be created depends on one another and that makes all distances in the solar system to be One Network where all distances are created based on the same One Geometrical Design
(2)
The data shows the creation method- and we understand that- the distance 551 million km (Jupiter Mars Distance) is created firstly and the light (1.16 mkm/s) used this distance as a period of time (551 sec) and the light travels during this period a distance =(639 million km where 629 million km is Jupiter Earth distance error 1.5%) and then the light uses the new distance (629 mkm) as a period of time (629 sec) and the light travels during this period a distance = (729 million km – where 721 million km = Mercury Jupiter distance – error 1%)
The data shows the method clearly and we understand the light original motion started from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit because the distances are created based on one another in that direction of motion as explained clearly
(3)
New data NO. (1)
2723 sec x 2 x 300000 km/s = 1622 million km – where
2723 million km = Uranus Earth Distance
1622 million km = Uranus Neptune Distance
The data shows- the light beam its speed (C=300000 km/s) is in proportionality also with the created distances but this proportionally is found in Reflected Direction
Logically, The light can NOT move from Uranus to Neptune and after that the light returns to move from Uranus to the Earth- it's simply reflected direction  
The distances are NOT created by the motion of this light beam (300000 km/s) – but the distances are created by the motion of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) but the proportionality between the distances with the light (300000 km/s) is found because there's a proportionality between the original one (1.16 million km per second) and this light beam (300000 km/s) – AND 
Because the light (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) that causes the proportionality between the distances and the light (300000 km/s) be in a reflected form
New data NO. (2)
2094 sec x 300000 km/s = 629 million km
2094 million km = Uranus Jupiter distance
629 million km   = Earth Jupiter distance
The light (300000 km/s) moves in reflected direction- for that- the distance 2094 million km is used as a period of time to pass a new distance (629 mkm)
The data proves the idea clearly
Notice (1)
The proportionality between the light (1.16 million km/s) and the light (300000km/s) will be discussed in point no. (I-3)
Notice (2)
In Point (**) I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and I prove that – the planets motions energies move toward Pluto and this energy is reflected from Pluto toward Venus- this fact is proved by powerful data and proves- for that – I don't explain in details the light motion trajectory from Pluto toward the inner planets because this motion trajectory is studied in details in the hypothesis No. (2) of this discussion- understandable that- the planets motions energy trajectory is the same trajectory the light moves through it – means this trajectory is studied in details and powerful proves in point no. (**)
Notice (3)
Jupiter Distances Analysis shows that Jupiter orbit is the central orbit for the light (1.16 million km per second) based on which all planets orbits are defined.
But – this is not the first creation case –
The light (1.16 million km per second) created the planets orbits based on each other starting from Mercury orbit moves toward Pluto orbit – this is the fist creation case – and this fact is proved strongly in point no. (I-9*)
BUT
Mars had migrated from its original orbit (Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus) and Pluto had migrated also (Pluto Was The Mercury Moon revolves around Mercury and Pluto size was equal Mercury size)
The planets migration caused a serious risk for the solar system geometrical design- Uranus was the first planet tried to repair the solar system geometrical design and to save it- by that
Uranus created a vertical effect on Jupiter orbit to fix Jupiter in its orbit and prevent it to migrate with the migrant planets- and based on Jupiter orbit the other planets orbits are modified – that supported the solar system original design and saved it which causes to protect the geometrical design from the destruction.  
As a result
That causes Jupiter orbit to be the most important orbit in the solar system- the paper third hypothesis explains the planets migration and Jupiter orbit analysis is done with the solar system design analysis (I-11*)
I-3 Light Coherence between light (1.16 million km /s) and light (300000 km/s)
(1)
The Coherence Of Light
The previous explanation told us that we have 2 light beams-
The original light beam its speed (1.16 million km per second) and it started its motion from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit (where Mercury orbit is the light motion origin point) – and this light beam created all distances in the solar system and lost its energy in the space creation process and the rest energy is one light beam its speed is (C=300000 km/s)
The other light beam is the rest energy- its speed is (C=300000 km/s) and it moves in a reflected direction from Pluto toward Venus and Mercury-
Now – we have a coherence of light between these two light beams- the coherence is proved by powerful proves BUT firstly we have to ask (how can this coherence be occurred)? Because the original light (1.16 million km/s) is consumed and its energy is used already and the rest energy is this light its speed is (300000 km/s) - HOW can the light (1.16 million km/s) meet the light (300000 km/s)??
Imagine we have (116 dollars) and we spent all money except (30 dollars)- how can this (30 dollars) meet the original money (116 dollars)??
Let's write the answer
Suppose the light beam (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction (in the space) and also (in the time) – that can enable the light (300000 km/s) to meet the original one (1.16 million km/s) in the past and the coherence will be done there in the past- and we see the coherence results and effects on the solar system -
Means – the light (300000 km/s) moves into the past and found the original light (1.16 million km/s) in the past
Notice No. (1)
The original light beam (1.16 million km/s) can NOT move toward the future to meet the light (300000 km/s) because in the future the original light beam (1.16 million km/s) is NOT found –by that – the coherence can't be occurred in the future - But – the light (300000 km/s) can move into the past because this light beam (300000 km/s) was found in the past because it's a part of the original light beam (1.16 million km/s)
Notice no. (2)
I prove the coherence is done by powerful proves- that tells- this idea is a fact–means- there's a strong proof tells (in fact the light beam 300000 km/s moved into the past) and if we can use this feature practically we can get photos from the past events and by that we can have photos from the catastrophe which killed the dinosaurs and know much better about what had happened really in that time - This can be a real machine of time – the light motion into the past is a strong method to perform this invention. 
Notice no. (3)
Why Can NOT We Move Into The Past As We Move Into The Future?
This question is answered in point no. (**)
(2)
The Light Coherence Proves
First Proof
The planets order is typical to the interference of Young –
In the double slits experiment, Young Interference is consisted of bright fringes and dark fringes - If we consider planet diameter is equivalent to bright fringe – we will see that- the planets order is typically to Young interference because
Jupiter (the greatest fringe) is in the middle and the fringes width is decreased gradually on both sides – typically to the planets order
Notice / I have proved that (Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus) if we restore Mars to its original orbit the order will be typical to the Young Interference
(I prove this fact in point no. **)
Second Proof
The planets velocities are defined based on the speed (1.16 million km per second) and the planets velocities analysis shows the speed (300000 km/s) is the planets motions limit- means- the planets velocities are defined based on both velocities (1.16 million km per second) and (300000 km/s) I prove this fact in point No. (**)  
Third Proof
The light coherence defines the solar day period (24 hours) which is the solar system design cornerstone 
(1.16 /0.3) x 2π = 24.3
By this equation the space and time are created- the equation tells–the space is created in curves (2π) and the time is created in units each unit is (24 hours) 
Please note – the solar system geometrical design depends on the light motion in a solar day (24 hours = 86400 seconds) 
The light (1.16 million km per second) moves in a solar day (86400 seconds) a distance  = 100733 million km (= the planets orbital circumferences total)
Fourth Proof
The planets data prove there's a speed (1.16 million km per second) found in the solar system but the sun light beam moves by speed (300000 km/s) that tells the two speeds are facts and found in the solar system and the coherence between them is a logical result
The hypothesis proves discuss many powerful proves for this fact-
Notice- the coherence of light is a very important fact because it tells the light (300000 km/s) moved into the past and by that gives us a proof for the motion on the time axis- for that – many powerful proves support this fact.
I-4 The Matter definition (Based On My Planet Diameter Equation)
(1)
Let's remember my planet diameter equation
Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity                                                          
r = Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination        (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)
Example
Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8         
89143          = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
49528 km    = Neptune diameter
9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity
5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination
(the equation is proved and discussed in details in point no. **)
(2)
Can We Define The Matter Nature Based On My Planet Diameter Equation?
The equation tells, the matter is created based on its motion! means Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s!!
That tells the motion with velocity 5.4 km/s is defined before Neptune diameter is created! Can we understand such definition for the matter nature? let's try
(A)
The Matter Nature
The space and matter are created from the same original energy and they move with this original energy motion- BUT the matter has a distinguish picture and different velocity from the space picture and velocity (notice- The Gravitational Waves Prove That The Space Has A Motion)  
If we suppose the space is similar to the sea of water, the matter be similar to a whirlpool or a vortex found on the sea page- means- the matter is a geometrical design has a distinguish picture from the space- as the whirlpool, it's created from the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves picture
Means
The whirlpool is carried by the waves motion- and- the matter is carried by its original energy and moves with it- No Mass gravity is required for the matter motion- means- the matter is MOVABLE by nature.
Also
The whirlpool dimensions are defined by the water motion - for example- we have a whirlpool its diameter is (2 meters)- this diameter is defined by the sea water motion features (velocity, pressure and other motion features) by that- the water motion analysis explains how the whirlpool dimensions are created
Also- the whirlpool is created but the creation requirements are needed every day- means- even if this whirlpool is found since years it can be changed immediately if the water motion features are changed- means- the whirlpool creation process is NOT a historical one.
Also- the matter is similar to a creature muscle, the muscle is found based on the blood motion and without this motion the muscle can be changed or removed.
Shortly
The Original Energy Was Found In Motion By Itself (As Moving Light Beam)
From This Moving Energy The Planet Matter Is Created
The Created matter dimensions are defined by the features of this original energy motion (means the planet creation data is defined by the energy motion features)
After the planet creation- The Planet Moves With This Original Energy – means- the created planet moves a motion depending on the motion of this original energy because the planet moves with this original energy motion- and – the planet moves by this original energy motion (No mass gravity is required to cause the matter motion)
The planet creation data is in full harmony with its motion features- this fact is produced logically because the planet data is defined by the original energy motion features.
This explanation tells (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)
Example For Explanation
We agreed that the space is similar to the sea of water and the planet (matter) is similar to a whirlpool found on the sea page-  this picture explains the idea clearly- because
We see the whirlpool doesn't move by the sea water waves velocity but by another velocity and that shows a distinguish in form and motion between the whirlpool (the planet) and the sea waves (the space)- BUT- the whirlpool dimensions are defined based on the sea water motion features- and if the motion features are changed the whirlpool dimensions will be changed also- also the whirlpool moves by the sea water motion even with a different velocity relative to the sea waves velocity but the whirlpool motion still is  caused by the sea water motion- based on this picture we can say (because the water motion velocity is 80 km/h that causes this whirlpool diameter to be 2 meters "for example') – this is perfectly our sentence – let's remember it     
(because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s that causes Neptune diameter to be 49528 km)
This idea is proved by my planet diameter equation (my fourth equation) (point No.**)  
(B)
Now The velocity is a motion in (A Defined Direction)
Means– the matter is created because it depends on a motion in a defined direction- as we have seen- Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s but this velocity is a motion in defined direction- and that tells Neptune creation depends on a motion in the direction of the (x axis positive "+x ") (for example)
That tells, if this motion moves in (x axis negative "-x ") that will cause Neptune diameter to be changed or perished
Means- the matter creation needs a motion in A Defined Direction
Now let's ask our question
Why Can't The matter (creature) Moves Toward Its Past?
Because the matter depends on a motion in one defined direction- that causes the matter moves into (the future) always and can't move into (the past) let's discuss this question more deeply in point no (I-6)
Notice
No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity (Newton is wrong) – logically because- the planet moves by its creation force- means- the planet creation and motion should be done by one force only (one energy only) because if two forces have effects on the same one planet- this planet will be broken- this fact is proved strongly with the gravitational waves source discussion (Point no.**)  
I-5 The Planets Creation
I summarize the main idea in following and the idea proves and discussions are found in point no. (**)
(i)
We know, the solar system is created from energy of one light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- and – the light created the space (the planets orbits) firstly and the energy is consumed in the space creation- and for that- the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is 300000 km/s - And
From this light beam 300000 km/s the solar planets are created
Shortly
before the solar planets creation
The solar system was one light beam (or one wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s)- by that – the solar system is One Wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s)
Now
The Solar System needs To Create A Stationary Point Its velocity Zero relative to the moving one wave (300000 km/s)
This is the basic information in the solar system design-
The solar system needs to create a stationary point relative to the wave motion- by that – two velocities will be found which are (v1= the wave its speed 300000 km/s) and (v2= Zero= the stationary point velocity relative to the wave motion)–these two velocities produce a relative motion with different velocity 300000 km/s– this relative motion is the solar system design cornerstone.
Shortly – the solar system needs to create A Stationary Point 
Notice– The solar system is carried by the light beam motion, NO stationary point can be found here – it's similar to a ship on the sea water- Nothing can stop- because the motion is done forcedly by the sea water –
The stationary point will be similar to the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page-  BUT
The solar system needs to create this stationary point - Now – let's try to create this stationary point in following - The solar system uses two procedures to do that,  
(ii)
The first procedure
The wave its velocity 300000 km/s revolves around a point in space (any point in space), the revolution motion creates 2 equal velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value and opposite in direction- their total be equal Zero-means- the revolution motion creates A Stationary Point in the center of the revolution. 
The second procedure
The previous idea is correct- but –the velocity 300000 km/s is a huge one and to decrease it to Zero velocity this is a complex process– for that- the wave (300000 km/s) created small waves with low velocities to use them as steps to decrease the velocity to Zero- the small waves are The Planets- (The planet is a small wave moves by low velocity relative to the original wave its velocity 300000 km/s) 
Why Are These Small Waves Required?
Because the velocity 300000 km/s is decreased to Zero by using these small waves and their low velocities- the low velocities are used as steps to decrease the unified wave velocity (300000 km/s) to be (Zero)- this process decreases the velocity gradually from 300000 km/s to Zero depending on these small waves velocities (the planets velocities)  
Means- the planets are created for this process to decrease the wave velocity from 300000 km/s to Zero- and The Planet Is A Small Wave Moves By Low Velocity 
Shortly – the solar system has one complete system of velocities, Starting from Zero to 300000 km/s where the planets velocities are the steps between the two velocities – let's prove that here
(iii)
300000 km = 7.1 x (205.8)^2 where
7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect for speed 297000 km/s (99% of speed of light)
205.8 km/s = the 9 planets velocities total (176 km/s) + the Earth moon velocity
(The moon velocity =29.8 km/s = the Earth velocity because they revolve together)
Why does the data use the squared value (205.8)^2?
We know the answer- but - Let's remember it
The planets are geometrical points on the same light beam and move with its motion- for that- the planets velocities rates creates rates of time– for example-  Mercury velocity = 1.6 the Earth velocity- that means – one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock- Why??
Because Mercury and the Earth are carried by the same one light beam- the light moves one motion and passes one distance in one period of time- by that Mercury and the Earth have to move this same motion and to pass this same distance in this same period of time- but the two planets velocities are different- for that- the planets use different rates of time based on their velocities rates and by that the planets move equal distances in the same period of time –
Now- the velocity (205.8 km/s) moves relative to the stationary point (Zero) and creates a rate of time (1 second = 205.8 seconds) –
(one second of the unified wave clock = 205.8 seconds of the stationary point clock)
But – the energy is reflected in the solar system (I prove that in point no.**),
The energy reflection reflects the players – means
(one second of the stationary point clock = 205.8 seconds of the unified wave clock)
The stationary point will be THE SUN – by that
(one second of the sun clock = 205.8 seconds of the unified wave clock) – means
(one second of the sun clock = 205.8 seconds of any planet clock) –
Now during one second of the sun clock, the wave clock needs 205.8 seconds while the wave moves by a velocity 205.8 km/s- means –
During one second of the sun clock, the wave moves 42253 km = 300000 km /7.1
That creates the different velocity 300000 km/s between the sun motion and the wave motion-
Notice 1
The wave (205.8 km/s) moves during 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km, and we know the Earth cycle (1461 days = 365 +365 +365 +366)
That tells, the speed of light (300000 km/s) is performed by the rate of time and that causes to create the Earth cycle-   
Notice 2
Planet velocity is created by the rate of time- means- if no rate of time can be used – No planet velocity can be created – instead- all motions will be only by speed of light (300000 km/s)- the planet can create a small velocity because it can use rate of time
We realize that clearly because
The planets motions depend on the light motion- by that – the motion is done by One Motor only which moves by speed of light (300000 km/s), the planets can only move by speed of light or create a rate of time for their smaller velocities - No more options are provided.  
Notice 3
We understand that, the planets are geometrical points on the same light beam, means
The planets are similar to carriages in one train and the light motion is the train engine  means the planets are carried on the light beam and move with this light motion
I-6 Can The Time Machine Be A Fact?
To answer this question we need to review basics facts we have studied – let's do that in following
(1)
The solar system is created from one energy and this energy is provided by one light beam
(2)
The light moves simply and freely in any direction (for space) and (for time)- means- the light can move into the future (as matter does) or into the past (which the matter can Not do)
(3)
We know, the solar system is created from one light beam, and this light moves by a speed (1.16 million km per second) - And
We know, the light (1.16 million km per second) created the planets orbits firstly before any planet creation and the energy is consumed in the space creation and because of the energy consumption the light speed is decreased from  (1.16 million km per second) to the known speed of light 300000 km/s – also
We know, the light (1.16 million km per second) started its motion from Mercury orbit moves toward Pluto- that means- the light (1.16 million km per second) started from Mercury orbit with speed (1.16 million km per second) and the light created all planets orbits till Pluto orbit- before any planet creation- and by that- the light lost its energy and the light beam in Pluto orbit reduced its speed to be 300000 km/s as a result for the energy consumption in the space creation process
(4)
Also we know the energy is reflected from Pluto toward Venus (the inner planets)
By that the light beam (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction to the original light beam (its speed 1.16 million km per second) 
And – we know-
The light beam (300000 km/s) reaches to the original point (Mercury Orbit) from which the light (1.16 million km per second)  started its motion 
And we know that
A coherence of light is done between the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) and the light beam (300000 km/s)
BUT  we don't know how such coherence can be occurred? Let's analyze that deeply in following
(5)
The produced light beam (300000 km/s) moves in (the reflected direction) to the direction of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) (In Space)  and reaches to Mercury orbit (the origin point)
But– logically – the produced light beam (300000 km/s) can NOT find the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) there because the original light beam is consumed already in the space creation process and the rest energy is this produced light beam (300000 km/s) – based on that –
How Can This Coherence Be Occurred? Means-
How can the produced light beam (300000 km/s) meet the original light beam (1.16 million km per second)?  The answer is
The produced light beam (300000 km/s) moves (in the reflected direction) to the motion direction of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) (In Space) and (In Time) Means- the produced light beam moves into (Its Own Past) and in the past this produced light beam (300000 km/s) was (A Part of the original light beam 1.16 million km per second) and because of that the produced light beam (300000 km/s) can meet the original light beam (1.16 million km per second),
And
The two light beams create a coherence (in the past) and we see the results of this coherence in our present time-
The idea is very important because – the coherence of the two light beams (1.16 mkm/s and 0.3 mkm/s) is proved strongly and with powerful proves and any explanation for this coherence will prove that the produced light beam (300000 km/s) must move Into The Past to enable this coherence occurrence- and that tells clearly- the travel through the time is possible and fact
BUT
Can the matter moves into its past as the light does? NO
Why?? Because
We know the light can move simply in any direction (+ x, + y, + z, + t) by that the light can move into the future and can move into the past BUT
The matter creation depends on A Motion In A Defined Direction-
let's remember this idea
Neptune diameter =49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s
(This Fact Is Proved By My Planet Diameter Equation)
Now, Neptune velocity is a motion in a defined direction
(for example a motion in +x direction)
The energy moves in this direction (+x direction) and because of this motion Neptune matter is created and Neptune diameter is defined- now if the energy moves in (opposite direction "–x direction") that will change Neptune diameter or cause to perish its matter at all
Means- as long as – Neptune is found- that means – the energy moves in one direction (and not two directions) – for that Neptune can move into the future but can NOT move into the past.    
Notice
The matter can not move into the past but the light can do that-
Means- we have the time machine already- we need to know how to send the light into the past and by that we can have photos from the past events- and this will be The Time Machine
The Hypothesis Proves
I-7 The Proves Logic Analysis
I-8 Planet Velocity Is A Function In A Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-9 Planets Orbits Are Defined By A Motion Its Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-10 Jupiter distances are defined by a motion by a speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-11 The Solar System Geometrical Design Proves The Hypothesis
I-12 The Solar System Distances Analysis Prove The Hypothesis
I-13 Deep Analysis For The Planets Orbits
1-14 Light defines each planet orbital period
I-15 Can Planet Diameter Be Used As A Period Of Time?
I-16 Mercury Orbit Analysis
I-7 The Proves Logic Analysis
Why can we prove that, a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second is found in the solar system? also, the theory tells this light beam energy is consumed and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed 300000 km/s (the known speed of light), if this light energy is consumed, how can we prove its existence?
There are two major reasons, which are
The Planets Orbits Are Created Before Any Planet Creation- And These Orbits Are Created Based On One Motion- And This One Motion Is Done By A Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second.
The Planets Matters Are Created Based On Their Orbits – means- the planet is similar to a tree and the orbit is similar to a ground and the tree is planted in the ground-
NOTICE
after the planet creation, the planet can migrate from its original orbit to any other orbit - as Mars and Pluto did and that will not cause to destroy the planet. 
Shortly-
the planet matter and data is created based on this planet orbit- the orbit is defined before any planet creation and based on the orbit the planet matter and data is created (we remember- the space is similar to the sea of water and the planet matter is similar to a whirlpool found on this sea page- that tells the whirlpool is created based on its place in the sea of water)
Shortly- The Planet Matter Is Created Depends On This Planet Orbit
The speed 1.16 million km per second is registered in the planets orbits because the orbits are created from the energy of the light beam (1.16 million km per second), and the planet matter is created from this planet orbit (energy)
Shortly
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) is the source of energy for (everything) in the solar system-
All orbits are defined by its energy, all matters are created by its energy, and all motions are done by its motion-
Can we prove this light beam is a fact? YES we can
The analysis for any data or any motion will discover this light beam because it's the source of energy for everything
Shortly
the light beam (1.16 million km per second) is The Source Energy of the solar system
The mother of all children can be discovered by analysis these children data 
A QUESTION
Can the solar system design uses a rate 1.16 and I can't understand that but wrongly consider this rate (1.16) as a speed of light 1.16 million km per second?
NO- this can't be possible – Because
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) behaves typically to the known light beam (300000 km/s) – as we will see in the data discussion
I-8 Planet Velocity Is A Function In A Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
DATA
My 5th equation (v1v2=322)- the planets velocities prove it–let's see that in following  
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities)  x 6.8 km/s  (Uranus velocities)                    
322 = 35 km/s  (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2             
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2      
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)               
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)
DATA ANALYSIS
The previous data tells the planets velocities are defined by three features
(1st Feature)
The planets velocities are complementary one another –means - each planet velocity is complementary with another planet velocity– means– The planets velocities are defined in pairs and not in single planets. 
(Notice, the inner planets orbital inclinations are defined by the rule (v1/v2), for example, Mercury orbital inclination 7 deg = Mercury velocity 47.4/ Uranus velocity 6.8 that proves the effect of the rule (v1v2=322) on the planet motion)
Ceres velocity tells the idea - Ceres is used as the main point - as a result the outer planets be complementary with the inner planets – for that the rule (v1v2=322) controls the planets velocities- that means- The planets velocities are created based on One Design- Ceres velocity is used as the main point for this design
(2nd Feature)
Why the constant is 322? because 1160000 seconds = 322 hours – means- there's speed of light = 1.16 million km /s - Shortly
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during 6.8 hours a distance             = 1160000 km 
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 47.4 hours a distance               = 1160000 km  And
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 2 x 4.7 hours a distance             = 1160000 km 
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 35 hours a distance               = 1160000 km 
Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during 2 x 5.4 hours a distance             = 1160000 km 
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 2 x 29.8 hours a distance        = 1160000 km  And
Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during 13.1 hours a distance                = 1160000 km 
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 24.1 hours a distance             = 1160000 km  And
(Notice - Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 33.2 hours a distance = 1160000 km  - (between 33.2 and Venus velocity 35 km/s the error 5%)) (Data Max error 2%)
The Data Proves, The Planets Velocities Are Functions In The Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second. That proves the speed (1.16 million km per second) is A Fact
(notice the planets velocities are complementary one another also based on the known speed of light 300000 km/s, the paper provides this data) 
(3rd Feature)
The planets velocities limit depend on the known speed of light 300000 km/s
Let's explain that in following
The 9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s (I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s)
The 10 planets velocities total is 205.8 km/s
300000 km = 7.1 x (205.8)^2
The speed 297000 km/s (99% speed of light) causes Lorentz length contraction effect with the rate 7.1
The velocity (205.8 km/s) moves during 205.8 seconds a distance 42253 km
Where 300000 = 7.1 x 42253 km BUT 42253 = (205.8)^2
The squared value (205.8)^2 is found because of the used rate of time
We have studied this equation in point (I-5**) -the data shows, the planets velocities are defined as parts of a complete system of velocities starts from (Zero = stationary point) and reaches to the speed of light 300000 km/s and between these two values the planets velocities are defined to support this same system- that tells- the planets velocities are defined with limit to the speed of light (300000 km/s) - The data proves the speed (1.16 million km per second) is a fact -and also the data proves the coherence is done between the light (1.16 million km per second) and the light (300000 km/s)
I-9 Planets Orbits Are Defined By A Motion Its Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
(1) Mercury Motion
During 310s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 360 million km
During 310 s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 93.1 million km
BUT
93.1 million km x 2π = 586 million (this value will be used by Venus as a period) 
Where 360 million km         = Mercury Orbital Circumference
(2) Venus Motion
During 586s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 680 million km
During 586s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 175.8 million km
BUT
175.8 million km x 2π = 1104 million (this value should be used by Earth as a period) 
680 million km            = Venus Orbital Circumference
(3) Earth Motion
During 810s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 940 million km
During 810s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 243 million km
243 million km x 2π = 1526 million (this value should be used by Jupiter as a period) 
Where 940 million km       = Earth Orbital Circumference
BUT
During 940s light its (1.16 million km per second) travels 1104 million km (error 1%)
That shows the direction reflection between the Earth and Venus because of the reflection of energy- I proved that in point no. (**)
Notice –
Jupiter is the next planet after the Earth based on the light motion design for that the Earth value (1526 million km) should be used by Jupiter because Mars is a migrant planet and Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and the next planet for the Earth was Jupiter- the confusion in data is made by Mars migration effect
(More explanation is provided in the comment on the data)
(4) Mars Motion
(Mars Is Exceptional)
During 1235s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 1433 million km
During 1235s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 371 million km = 2π x 59 mkm Where 1433 mkm = Mars Orbital Circumference
(5) Jupiter Motion
During 4224s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 4900 million km
During 4224s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 1267 million km –
4900 mkm  =Jupiter Orbital Circumference
1267 million km x 2π = 7960 million km (this value be used by Saturn as a period) 
Notice
Mars is a migrant planet for that – the Earth value isn't used for Mars orbit- but it's used for Jupiter orbit- and because of the reflection between Venus and the Earth- the Earth produces the value directly (1526 million km) without using the light speed (1.16 million km per second) where
1526 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance 778.6 million km x 2 (error 2%) 
Notice
During 4224s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 4900 million km
4900 million km = Jupiter orbital circumference while 4222.6 hours = Mercury day period- if (one hour of Mercury = One second of light clock) that will connect Jupiter with Mercury strongly- this is a fact because- the solar system depends on Mercury clock in its motion and the planets orbits are defined based on Jupiter orbit after the planets migration- that makes Mercury and Jupiter the two heads of the solar system unified motion. 
(6) Saturn Motion
During 7960s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 9007 million km
During 7960s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 2388 million km
9007 mkm = Saturn Orbital Circumference
2388 million km x 2π =15004 million km (this value be used by Uranus as a period) 
(7) Uranus Motion
During 15559s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 18048 million km
During 15559s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 4668 million km
18048 mkm = Uranus Orbital Circumference
4664 million km x 2π =29305 million km (this value be used by Pluto as a period) 
Notice
The transported value from Saturn is 15004 but the used value is 15559 (error 3.5%)
(8) Neptune Motion
(Neptune is exceptional)
During 24348s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 28244 million km
During 24348s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 7305 million km
28244 mkm = Neptune Orbital Circumference
(9) Pluto Motion
During 31983s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 37100 million km
During 31983s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 9595 million km
37100 mkm  = Pluto Orbital Circumference
(10) The Earth Moon Motion
During 639s light its speed (1.16 million km per second) travels 724 million km
During 639s light known speed (300000 km/s) travels 191.6 million km = 2π x 30.5 mkm – BUT  
30.5 mkm     = 88000 km x 346.6 days
The moon displacements total during 346.6 (solar days) = 30.5 mkm
346.6 solar days= The nodal year and  88000 km     = The moon displacement daily
742 mkm = The distance is passed by Uranus in 30589 hours -  The data tells, the moon orbit regression be done by effect of Uranus motion.
THE COMMENTS ON DATA
(1)
We should note that, the data follows the rule perfectly- as we see in Mercury and Saturn data – the confusion in data is found by the planets migration – let's prove that
680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) x (1.16 mkm/s) ^2 = 940 mkm
28244 mkm (Neptune Orbital Circumference) x (1.16 mkm/s) ^2 = 37100 mkm
(Max error 2.5 %)
940 mkm = Earth Orbital Circumference
37100 mkm = Pluto Orbital Circumference
Clearly the confusion of data is done for the Earth and Jupiter (Mars migration effect) and for Pluto and Neptune and Uranus (Pluto migration effect)
Shortly
The light (1.16 million km per second) created the solar system distances based on one another as the chess board distances- perfectly the light created the distances based on one geometrical design and as one network- But – The planets migration caused confusion for the data- by that the planets orbits data is confused and no longer be seen as designed by the light motion- specially because the solar system design repair needed to make Jupiter orbit as the central orbit based on which all planets orbits are modified- by that– the discovery for the light motion effect on the solar system distances creation needed deep analysis in data to remove the confusion.
Notice
The Earth data produced the value (1526 mkm) and this distance is used by Jupiter as a distance (1526 mkm = 2 x 778.6 mkm Jupiter Orbital Distance) (error 2%)
And
Uranus data produced the value (29305 mkm) and this distance is used by Neptune as a distance (29305 mkm= 28244 mkm= Neptune Orbital Circumference) (error 4%)
The behaviors are typical tell that by the same effect the modifications of both planets data are done- 
Notice
680 sec x 1.16 million km /sec = 789 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance 778.6 mkm error 1.3%) – the data shows – Jupiter is the mentioned planet after the Earth because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus by that the light motion moved from the Earth to Jupiter directly- Mars is not seen in this motion-
(2)
The inner planets distances ( 93.1, 175.8, 243, 370.6) can be used as cycles periods
175.8 solar days =Mercury day period
243    solar days = Venus rotation period
370.6 solar days are near to 365.25 days (error 1.5%),
(93.1 days x 2π= 584 days =the period of periodical meeting of Earth and Venus)
This equality depends on the rate 1mkm = 1 day
That  tells each planet creates its PREVIOUS NEIGHBOR CYCLE PERIOD
And the outer planets distances in blue color (1267, 2330 , 4664, 7305, 9595)
2330 = 2 x 1165             = 2π x 371
4664  = 4 x 1165             = 4π x 371
7305 = 2π x 1165           =2π2 x  371
9595 = 8 x 1165            = 8 π x  371                                                 (error 3%)
This data cornerstone is the number (371), (the Earth year 365.25 days)
The data refers to the Earth year because of the Earth effect on the sun creation
NOTICE
The data proves each planet orbit is defined based on its neighbor – my first equation (Planet orbital distance equation) proves this fact –
In following I put my planet orbital distance equation for revision
Planet Orbital Distance Equation
(My First Equation)  (d)2 = 4 x d0 x (d- d0)  
d = A Planet Orbital Distance
d0= Its Direct Previous Neighbor Planet Orbital Distance
The equation depends on the planets order, for that , just 2 neighbor planets can be used in this equation, means if (d is Venus distance, d0 be Mercury distance) 
The equation exceptions are,
Earth depends on Mercury Not Venus – and Mars depends on Venus Not Earth And Pluto depends on Uranus Not Neptune
Note, we don't use the forma (d=2d0) instead we use the forma (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0)) because it uses the distance between the 2 planets and that decreases the errors
Let's test the equation
(1) Venus Motion
(108.2)2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                                        
d= 108.2 million km  = Venus Orbital Distance
d0= 57.9 million km    = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3 million km          = The Distance Between Venus And Mercury 
Venus Depends On Mercury
(2) Earth Motion
(149.6)2 = 4 x 57.9 x (149.6-57.9)                                                  (error 2.8%)
d= 149.6 million km  = Earth Orbital Distance
d0= 57.9 million km   = Mercury Orbital Distance
Earth depends on Mercury and doesn't on Venus 
(3) Mars Motion
(227.9)2 = 4 x 108.2 x (227.9-108.2)                          
d= 227.9 million km   = Mars Orbital Distance
d0= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance
Mars depends on Venus and doesn't on Earth 
(4) Ceres Motion
(415)2 = 4 x 227.9 x (415-227.9)                      
d=  415  million km      = Ceres Orbital Distance
d0=  227.9 million km = Mars Orbital Distance
Ceres depends on Mars
(5) Jupiter Motion
(778.6)2 = 4 x 415 x (778.6- 415)                     
d= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance    
d0= 415 million km = Ceres Orbital Distance
Jupiter depends on Ceres
(6) Saturn Motion
(1433.5)2 = 4 x 778.6 x (1433.5- 778.6)           
d = 1433.5 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance    
d0  = 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance
Saturn depends on Jupiter
(7) Uranus Motion
(2872.5)2 = 4 x 1433.5 x (2872.5- 1433.5)                  
d= 2872.5 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance    
d0 = 1433.5 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance  Uranus depends on Saturn
(8) Neptune Motion                                                                          (error 4%)
(4495.1)2 = 4 x 2872.5 x (4495.1- 2872.5)
d= 4495.1 million km = Neptune Orbital Distance    
d0 = 2872.5 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance     Neptune depends on Uranus
(9) Pluto Motion
(5906)2 = 4 x 2872.5 x (5906- 2872.5)
d= 5906 mkm = Pluto Orbital Distance    
d0 = 4495.1mkm = Neptune Orbital Distance     Pluto depends on Uranus
Notice the error is less 1% for all planets except (Earth 2.8%) and Neptune (4%)  
The Equation Discussion
(a)
The Equation tells each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance – but – there are 3 exceptions which are –
Earth depends on Mercury not Venus –
Mars depends on Venus not Earth–
Pluto depends on Uranus not Neptune–
(b) 
The equation shows – the distance from the sun to Pluto be distributed based on one geometrical design – means – the distances be created together as one group in one a network form – the distances be similar to the chess board distances- they are distributed geometrically and in one network based on one design -
Shortly
No Single Distance be Created independently or individually – We deal with one network of distances - 
Means
By Using Mercury Orbital Distance (57.9 million km) (one data) We Can Conclude All Planets Orbital Distances (9 Data) By Using Mathematical Calculations Only
(c)
Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) – this concept is used in my third equation (d1/d2) = (v2/v1)2 where  d= Planet Orbital Distance and v = Planet Velocity
The concept tells– If we know a planet orbital distance, we can conclude its velocity by mathematical calculations only    
Shortly
By Using my 1st equation (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0)) and kepler law and the One Data (Mercury orbital distance = 57.9 million km) we can conclude by mathematical calculations only All Planets Orbital Distances, Velocities And Periods (27 Data)
That proves the concept (Planet data be created based on exact equations)
Planet Orbits Are Defined By Very Accurate System
Each planet orbit is defined based on an angle, these angles are reflected also – let's prove that  (I suppose –There's a right triangle by the three points The Sun, Mercury and Venus) - Now
Venus angle is (61 degrees) because Venus orbital distance (108.2 mkm) x cos (61) = Venus Mercury distance (50.3 mkm) -
Here we can replace Venus with any other planet in the same triangle to define this planet angle based on similar calculation – as a result
Earth angle is (51 degrees) because Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) x cos (51) = Earth Mercury distance (91.7 mkm)
Mars angle is (41.7 degrees) because Mars orbital distance (227.9mkm) x cos (41.7)= Mars Mercury distance (170 mkm)
Jupiter angle is (22.2 degrees) because Jupiter orbital distance (778.6 mkm) x cos (22.2)= Jupiter Mercury distance (721 mkm)
Similar to that – Saturn angle is 16.5, Uranus angle is 11.6 deg, Neptune angle is 9.2 deg and Pluto angle is 8 deg- these angles follow the same system – for example
Pluto angle is (8 degrees) because Pluto orbital distance (5906 mkm) x cos (8)= Pluto Mercury distance (5848 mkm)
NOTICE No. (1) The right angle and its triangle is (a hypothesis) – we Can prove it because (v1/v2) = (θ1/ θ2)
means – these angles are rated with their planets velocities – for example
(Neptune velocity 5.4/ Pluto velocity 4.7) = (9.2 deg /8 deg)
Shortly -the angles which are defined based on the sun perpendicularity on Mercury orbit – all of them- are the correct angles by which the planets orbits are defined – that because the planets velocities are rated with these angles and Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity)- means- the planets orbits are defined based on these angles and that causes the angles rates to be equal with the velocities rates - Shortly -That tells indeed the sun position is perpendicular on the (inner planets orbits) – in fact – the sun is perpendicular on the Earth moon orbit- and this perpendicularity has effect on all inner planets because of the small distances among them. 
I-10 Jupiter distances are defined by a motion by a speed = (1.16 million km /s) Data
(1)
(1.16 million km /s) x 300 sec   = 348 mkm (300 mkm = Earth orbital distance x 2)
(1.16 million km /s) x 348 sec   = 470 mkm (470 x2 = Earth Orbital Circumference)
(1.16 million km /s) x 470 sec   = 551 mkm                       (Mars Jupiter Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 551 sec   = 629 mkm                       (Earth Jupiter Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 629 sec   = 721 mkm                       (Mercury Jupiter Distance)
(2)
(1.16 million km /s) x 108.2 sec x 4 = 500 mkm        (108.2 = Venus orbital Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 500 sec   = 580 mkm                      
(1.16 million km /s) x 580 sec   = 671 mkm                       (Venus Jupiter Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 671 sec   = 778.6 mkm                    (Jupiter Orbital Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 778.6 sec x 2    = 1806 mkm
(1.16 million km /s) x 1806 sec           = 2094 mkm          (Jupiter Uranus Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 2094 sec           = 4900 mkm/2  (Jupiter Orb. Circumference)
(3)
(1.16 million km /s) x 5127 sec = 5906 mkm                    (Pluto orbital Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 4437 sec = 5127 mkm                   (Pluto Jupiter Distance) 
(1.16 million km /s) x 3825 sec = 4437 mkm                   (Mercury Neptune Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 3244 sec = 3825 mkm  (=π x 1205 mkm Mars Saturn Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x2872sec=3244mkm (=2x1622 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x4900sec=2 x 2872 mkm (Uranus Orbital Distance)
(4)
(1.16)2 x 170 sec             = 227.9 mkm                            (Mars Orbital Distance)
Where 170 mkm = Mercury mars Distance
(5)
(1.16 million km /s) x 1980 sec           = 2296.8 mkm
(1.16 million km /s) x 2296.8 sec        = 2644.6 mkm       (Mars Uranus Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 2644.5 sec        = 3033.5 mkm       (Uranus Pluto Distance)
1980 million km = the orbital circumferences total of (Mercury + Venus + Earth)
(6)
(1.16 million km /s) x 3717 sec           = 4310 mkm          (Earth Neptune Distance)
(1.16 million km /s) x 4346 sec           = 5040 mkm          (Jupiter Pluto Distance)
3717 mkm = Jupiter Neptune Distance –
(Earth Neptune Distance 4345mkm "error 1%" and Jupiter Pluto dis. 5127 mkm error 1.7%)
Discussion - the data tells the idea clearly, it tells 
The distances in the solar system is created together based on one design and by one motion- this one motion is the light motion (1.16 million km per second) and the light creates the distance and after that the light uses the created distance as a period of time to create another distance, and by that, the light created all distances in one network together based on one geometrical design and this creation of the distances is done before any planet creation- the data clearly and strongly proves the hypothesis. 
NOTICE - The total distances in the solar system (the orbital and inner distances) are 45 distances, the previous data used almost 50% of these distances (because many distances are equal in the solar group – for example – (Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference)- this distances equality makes the previous data behave in place of around 50% of all distances- and no logic to suppose these all distances are rated by the way with the rate (1.16)!!
The logical explanation is my theory I have explained- the light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances based on one another by using the distances as periods of time - Also this behaviors is typical to the behavior of the known speed of light (300000 km/s)– as we have seen before - During 2094 seconds the light (300000 km/s) moves 629 million km (=Jupiter Earth distance) where 2094 million km (= Jupiter Uranus distance)- Simply it's typical behaviors tells the fact that the speed 1.16 million km per second is real fact and used in the solar system design)   
I-11 The Solar System Geometrical Design Proves The Hypothesis
Data (1)
(A) (1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3
(B) 1.16 million km per second x 86400 seconds = 100733 million km
(100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total)
Data (2)
(a) 4224 x 1.16 =4900
(b) 100733 = π x 32200                                        
(c) 1.1318/0.3 = 5906 / (778.6 /2)  
Discussion
Data (1)
Data no. (A) - (1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3
By this equation the space and time are created- because it shows the coherence of light between the light (1.16 million km per second) and the light (300000 km/s)
The equation tells – the space is created in curves (2π) and the time is created in units each unit = (24 hours)
Shortly- the time essential units are 2 units (the second and 24 hours) because of the rate of time (one second of light clock = 24 hours of planet clock) by that the period of the (one second) (for light motion) is comparable with (24 hours) for planet motion that means- the period (24 hours) is one unit can't be divided and it's similar to the second period which is a unit can't be divided
Data no.(B) 1.16 million km per second x 86400 seconds = 100733 million km
The data tells the light (1.16 million km per second) moves in solar day (24 hours=  86400 seconds) a distance = 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total - that proves the solar planets orbits creation is done by the motion of this light beam (1.16 million km per second) - the data proves the solar system design depends on this light motion.
Data (2)
Data no. (a) 4224 x 1.16 =4900
The data tells, the light (1.16 million km per second) moves in 4224 seconds a distance = 4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
But – Mercury day period is 4222.6 hours (4224 hours approximately)
If (one second of light clock = one hour of Mercury clock), that will make the period (4224 s) as Mercury day period – and – we know that Mercury day period is the main period in the solar system because the sun rate of time is created based on it as I explain in the second and fourth hypotheses of this paper-
Shortly- while Mercury is the solar system head- Mercury day period is the main period in the solar system and this period is used for Jupiter orbital circumference because all planets orbits are defined based on Jupiter orbit after the planets migration- this fact is discussed in the third hypothesis is details – let's summarize it
Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus, and Pluto was the Mercury moon, and Pluto size was equal Mercury size- But- Mars and Pluto had migrated from their orbits- the planets migration caused serious risk for the solar system geometrical design- And Uranus provides a vertical effect on Jupiter to fix it in its orbit and prevent Jupiter to migrate with the migrant planets- after Jupiter be fixed in its orbit all other planets redefined their orbits according to Jupiter orbit – by that – Jupiter orbit be the most important distance in the solar system-  
Notice- later Uranus caused to create Saturn to support Jupiter role- Saturn creation is done after the Earth moon creation because the energy reflection caused this delaying  
The data shows how the solar system design depends on Jupiter orbit
Data no. (b) 100733 = π x 32200
32200 million km = the different distance between Pluto orbital circumference and Jupiter orbital circumference
100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
The data supports the same idea- Jupiter and Pluto orbits create the general design of the solar system- because Jupiter is the main orbit in it and Pluto the last orbit.  
Data no. (c) 1.1318/0.3 = 5906 / (778.6 x 2)  where
5906 million km              = Pluto orbital distance
778.6 million km             = Jupiter orbital distance
1.1318 million km           = Jupiter motion distance per solar day
0.3 million km                = speed of light 300000 km/s
The data shows the distribution of Jupiter and Pluto orbits are in proportionality with speed of light (300000 km/s) and speed of (1.16 million km per second)
BUT the data shows Jupiter velocity daily (1.1318 million km per day) in place of the speed of light (1.16 million km per second) Why??
Another question asks (Why do all Jupiter distances depend on the speed of light 1.16 million km per second?) as we have seen in the previous proof No. (1-10)?
The story told the facts, Uranus provided effect on Jupiter and as a result Jupiter orbit be used as the main orbit in the solar system- BUT- what's this effect Uranus provided on Jupiter? What had happened really?
Uranus sent a light beam its speed (1.16 million km per second) to Jupiter for that Uranus velocity and Jupiter velocity both depends on the speed (1.16 million km per second)
Jupiter should move a distance 1.16 million km per solar day (24h) BUT Mars effect created more problems and caused Jupiter to use (Mars rotation period 24.6h) in place of the solar day and decreased the velocity with 2.5%
Uranus moves a distance 1.16 million km (in TWO solar days- error 1.3%)
The solar system basic design depends on (two seconds and not one second) as I explained in details in the fourth hypothesis of this paper- now – the system design uses two seconds in place of one second because Uranus moves the required distance 1.16 million in two days
Shortly – the force which is sent from Uranus to Jupiter was a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second and by this force Jupiter helped the solar system and supported the planets in their orbits to prevent more migration in the solar system
I-12 The Solar System Distances Analysis Prove The Hypothesis
DATA (No. I)
50% Of All Distances In The Solar System Are Equal One Another (WHY?)
 (1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance =1433 million km =
                                      = Mars Orbital Circumference 
                                      = Pluto Neptune Distance         (error 1.5%)
          = Pluto eccentricity Distance     (error 1.5%)
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
= Mercury Jupiter Distance x 2     
(2)
Neptune Orbital Distance     = Saturn Pluto Distance
Jupiter Pluto Distance          = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance       = Mercury Saturn Circumference  (0.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance     = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance        = Venus Orbital Circumference   (1.5%)
Jupiter Earth Distance          = Earth Orbital Circumference   (1.2%)
(Earth and Jupiter at 2 different sides from the sun)
(4)
Jupiter Mercury Distance     = Mars Orbital Distance x π      (0.6%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance       = Venus Jupiter Circumference  (0.8%)
Pluto Orbital Distance          = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π
DISCUSSION
The data tells these distances must be created based on each other because all of them are parts in one design and one network- the data tells – it's impossible for these distances to be created univocally nor independently – but they are created by one motion based on one design and for one result. 
DATA (No. II)
(778.6/721)=(721/670)= (670/629)=(1433/1325)=(1284/1205)= (2872/2644)= 1.0725
These are distances measured in millions km – let's define them
778.6, 721, 670 and 629 are the distances between Jupiter and the sun, Mercury, Venus and the Earth respectively.
1433, 1325, 1284, 1025 are the distances between Saturn and the sun, Venus, the Earth and Mars respectively.
2872 and 2644 are the distances between Uranus and the sun and Mars respectively.
MORE DATA (No. I)
629 million km (The Earth Jupiter distance)= (1.0725)^2 x 551 million km (Jupiter Mars Distance)
4495.1 million km (Neptune Orbital Distance) =1.0725 x 2 x 2094 million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)
5906 million km (Pluto Orbital Distance) = (1.0725)^2 x 5127 million km (Jupiter Pluto Distance)
5127 million km (Jupiter Pluto Distance)= (1.0725)^2 x 4437 million km (Mercury Neptune Distance)
2.574 million km (Earth motion distance daily) = 1.0725 x 2.4 million km (TheMoon Orbital Circumference)
DISCUSSION
These distances are rated each other with (1.0725) this rate is created by Lorentz length contraction effect (as I supposed and proved)- but – regardless this rate reason the question is – How can all these distances be effected by this rate together?
That can be possible only if (these distances are parts of one design and this design is effected by this rate as a result all distances be effected together)   
The data proves the distances are created together based on one design and the distances are effected together by the same one effect – shortly- these distance can NOT be independent from one another but they are one group created based on one design.
I-13 Deep Analysis For The Planets Orbits
The Light Uses Each Planet Orbital Period To Move A Distance = This Planet Orbit + All Previous Planets Orbits Total
DATA
(1)
14 x 24 x (300000 km/s)           = 100.8 million km = 2 x 50.4
(2)
35.76 x 24 x (300000 km/s)      = 258 million km = 149.6 + 108.2
(3)
58.1 x 24 x (300000 km/s)         = 418 million km = 149.6 + (2 x 108.2) + 58
(4)
109.3 x 24 x (300000 km/s)       =787 million km = 58+ 108+149.6 +2 x228 (error 2%)
(5)
687 x 24 x (300000 km/s)          = 4900 million km
(6)
687 x 24 x (300000 km/s)          = 4900 million km
(7)
1710 x 24 x (300000 km/s)        = 12312 million km = 28244/(1.16 x2)
(8)
4868 x 24 x (300000 km/s)        = 17600 million km x 2
(9)
9517 x 24 x (300000 km/s)        = 68522 million km = 2 x 18048 + 32400
(10) 
14413 x 24 x (300000 km/s)      = 103773 million km
DISCUSSION
The data shows the rule (Planet Orbital Period "days"/2π) x 24 x Speed Of Light (300000 km/s) = A Distance = This Planet Orbital Circumference + All Previous Planets Orbital Circumferences Total – let's prove this rule in following
(1) Pluto Data
90560 days (Pluto orbital period) /(2π) = 14413 days
14413 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 103773 million km
The planets orbital circumferences total is 100733 million km  
Between 103773 mkm and 100733 mkm the error is (3%)
Pluto follows the rule perfectly- the light passes a distance = Pluto orbital circumference + all previous planets orbital circumferences = the planets orbital circumferences total
(2) Neptune Data
59800 days (Neptune orbital period) /(2π) = 9517 days
9517 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 68526 million km = (2 x 18048) + 32400
The distance 2 x 18048 million km = all planets orbital circumferences total before Neptune
32400 mkm = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds 
28244 million km = Neptune orbital circumference
Neptune follows the rule perfectly but because of the energy reflection the speed (1.16 mkm/s) is used one additional time- clearly we see Neptune follows perfectly the rule   
(3) Uranus Data
30589 days (Uranus orbital period) /(2π) = 4868 days
4868 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 17600 million km x 2
18048 million km (Uranus Orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
Uranus follows the rule perfectly because Uranus orbital circumference =18048 mkm and all previous planets orbital circumferences total is = 18048 mkm
(4) Saturn Data
10747 days (Saturn orbital period) /(2π) = 1710 days
1710 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 12312 million km
Jupiter orbit (4900) + Saturn orbit (9000) = 14000 million km
Light (1.16 million km/s) x 12312 seconds = 14282 million km
Means
The value (12312) equal (Jupiter orbital circumference)+Saturn orbital circumference
But the reflection of energy uses the speed of light (1.16) to have effect on the data
That tells Saturn follows the rule
Notice
12312 sec x 1.16 mkm/s = 14282 mkm = 28244 mkm/2
28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference – that tells the confusion in Saturn data is done by Neptune orbit effect   
Notice
We see the speed of light (1.16 mkm/s) has effect on Saturn data by division (12312 = 14282/1.16) but in Neptune data we have seen the speed of light (1.16 mkm/s) has effect by multiplication (28244 x 1.16 = 32400)
That tells we have opposite positions between (Neptune and Saturn) and the light connects them together by one motion- 
The data tells simply (A x 1.16 and B/1.16) this is effect of one light beam motion through both points.
(6) Jupiter Data
4331 days (Jupiter orbital period) /(2π) = 687 days
687 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 4900 million km
Jupiter orbital circumference = 4900 million km
The distance equal Jupiter orbital circumference only without the previous planets BUT - The inner planets orbital circumferences total be = 4900 million km
Let's prove that
360 (Mercury) + 680 (Venus) +940 (Earth) + 1433 (Mars) = 3413 million km
4900 million km – 3413 million km = 1433 million km
That tells – the data supposes the Earth moon orbital circumference around the sun = Mars orbital circumference = 1433 million km
By that 360 + 680 +940 + 1433 + 1433 = 4846 million km = Jupiter orbital circumference (4900 mkm) (error 1%)
(7)Mars  Data
687 days (Mars orbital period) /(2π) = 109.3 days
109.3 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 787 million km = Jupiter orbital distance 778.6 million km  (error 2%)
778.6 million km= 57.9 mkm + 108.2 mkm + 149.6 mkm + 227.9 mkm+ 227.9 mkm
Means- Mars Value (787 = 778 = the four inner planets orbital distances total + the Earth moon orbital distance to the sun (which is considered = Mars orbital distance)
Here the value provided the distances total and not the circumferences total
But Mars follows the rule perfectly because
The value (778) = the 5 planets orbital distances total
(8)Earth Data
365.25 days (Earth orbital period) /(2π) = 58.1 days
58.1 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 418 million km = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance) + 2 x 108.2 mkm (Venus orbital distance) + 57.9 mkm (Mercury orbital distance)
The Earth follows the rule- the modification can be done by the moon effect on the earth motion.
(9)Venus  Data
224.7 days (Earth orbital period) /(2π) = 35.76 days
35.76 x 24 x (300000 km/s)= 258 million km = 149.6 mkm  (Earth orbital distance)+ 108.2 mkm (Venus orbital distance)
(10)Mercury Data
88 days (Earth orbital period) /(2π) = 14 days
14 x 24 x (300000 km/s)  = 100.8 million km = 2 x 50.4  
50.4 million km = Mercury Venus Distance
The Comment On The Data
(1)
We notice a deep interaction between Mars and Jupiter where Jupiter orbital period (4331 days /2π)= 687 days (Mars orbital period)  
And Mars value (109.3 days) enables the light to pass a distance 778.6 mkm
109.3 x 24 x 300000 km/s = 778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) 
That shows deep interaction between Mars and Jupiter which is logical behavior because Mars is a migrant planet and Mars created an interaction with Jupiter to enable Mars to stay in its New orbit and prevent any more migration.
(2)
Mars orbital period 687 days = 88 (Mercury) + 224.7 (Venus) + 365.25 (Earth)
(error 1.5%)
Notice - 551 mkm (Mars Jupiter distance) = 57.9 mkm (Mercury orbital distance) + 108.2 mkm (Venus orbital distance) + 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance) + 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance) (error 1.5%)
(3)
The data shows very important fact
The data tells that (The Light Motion Is The Main Player Behind All Data)
Let's use the sea water as example
The sea water motion is the main player behind the sea waves, the ship sailing, the fish swimming and the cause for any motion in the sea - Different forms of motions in the sea we can discover but the motion reason and motor is the same one reason and motor –  This is the useful result of this data- it's simply a major proof for my theory- the light motion is the reason behind all planets motions and data-
Notice - Why Is The Planets Data Analysis Method Important?
The planets data analysis makes some anatomy for the planets data, by that, we can know how this planet data is created and what geometrical reason caused to create this data- the planets data analysis also enable us to discover if a planet violates a rule used by the other planets- and it shows the geometrical reason behind this violation-
1-14 Light defines each planet orbital period
The light defines each planet orbital period based on this planet diameter
Data
142984 s x (0.3)^2 = 12868 = π x 4331 (error 5%)
120536 s x (0.3)^2 = 10747
51118 s x (0.3)      = 30589/2
49528 s x (0.3)^2   = 4457
7510 s x (0.3) x 4π^2 = 88945 (= 90560 error 1.8%) (notice 7510 x 4π^2 =296483)
6792 s x (0.3)^2    = 611
7510 s x (0.3)^2    = 676 = 687 (error 1.5%)
12756 s x (0.3)^2   = 1148 = π x 365.25
12104 s x (0.3)^2   = 1089 = (π^2)/2 x 224.7
4879 s x (0.3)^2    = 439 = (π^2)/2 x 88
Notice
7070 s x (0.3)^2    = 637 = 687 / 1.0725
Where
(1)
The left side data is the planets diameters, in details
142984 km, 120536 km, 51118 km, 49528 km and 7510 km are the diameters of (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune respectively and 7510km =Pluto circumference)
And
6792 km, 12756 km, 12014 km and 4879 km are the diameters of (Mars, Earth, Venus and Mercury respectively) – all diameters are used as periods of time with the rate (1 km = 1 second) - The periods are used by light known speed (300000 km/s)
(2)
The right side is the planets orbital periods
12868 = π x 4331 (error 5%) (4331 days = Jupiter orbital period)
10747 days = Saturn orbital period
30589 days = Uranus orbital period
90560 days = Pluto orbital period
Notice
4457 million km = Neptune orbital distance
That shows Neptune produced its orbital distance in place of its orbital period based on the same rule proves that Neptune is found on the opposite direction to the other planets.
687 days      = Mars orbital period (with 611 the error 12%)!
1148 days    = π x 365.25 days (Earth Orbital Period)
1089 days  = (π^2)/2 x 224.7 days (Venus Orbital Period)
439              = (π^2)/2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Notice
7070 s x (0.3)^2    = 637 = 687 / 1.0725
7070 km was Mars original diameter before its migration- and the rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length contraction effect.
 The Comment On The Data
The data shows the following
Light Motion Connects Each Planet Diameter With Its Orbital Period
The equation modifications can NOT refute the theory because the modifications depend on geometrical constant as (π), or depend on the using of (C) or (C^2)- these values can't be considered new values nor change the rule because they are geometrical constants which shows modifications are done for the energy- for example- the energy reflection causes to square the speed, by that, the planets which us (C) have no reflection of energy but the planets use (C^2) are suffered from the energy reflection- Shortly- the modifications can't refute the theory- means- the data tells – planet orbital period is defined based on this planet diameter by effect of the speed of light
I-15 Can Planet Diameter Be Used As A Period Of Time
DATA
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 s a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 s a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 10921 s a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 51118 s a distance =2 x 102536 km = Saturn diameter
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 120536 s a distance =1.1318 mkm
(1.13184 mkm = Jupiter motion distance per solar day)
Where
10921 km = The Moon Circumference 
7510 km   = Pluto Circumference
The data shows the planets diameters are used as periods of time (for planets motions) also and not only for light motion – the fact is proved simply
The Comment On The Data
(1)
My planet diameter equation proves that planet diameter is created as a period of time because the diameter is created as a function in this planet rotation period.
(2)
The previous data is example of many similar which proves the planet diameter is used as period of time.
(3)
How can the planet diameter be used as a period of time?
Planet diameter is used as a period to define another planet diameter-
The idea is that- the solar system is created from one motion (the original light beam motion)- by this one motion all planets diameters are created for that each planet diameter defines the next planet diameter.
(CONT)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow   (2010-2013)
Curriculum Vitae                  https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c
E-mail                            [email protected], [email protected]
                                      [email protected]                   
ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook                        https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Researcherid                   https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket                                                                     https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
PUBLICATIONS
box                                 https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications         http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare                            https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
0 notes
Text
Little P.Eng.: Pioneering Engineering Excellence in Pipe Support and Flexibility Analysis
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial engineering, the need for specialized expertise in piping infrastructure has never been more critical. Little P.Eng. emerges as a beacon of innovation and reliability, offering comprehensive engineering and consulting services that cater specifically to the intricacies of pipe support engineering/design and pipe flexibility analysis. This article delves into the core offerings of Little P.Eng., highlighting its pivotal role in optimizing the performance and safety of major piping installations across various sectors.
Expertise in Pipe Support Engineering and Design:
At the heart of Little P.Eng.'s services lies its proficiency in pipe support engineering and design. Recognizing the vital importance of stable and reliable pipe supports in industrial installations, Little P.Eng. employs cutting-edge techniques and materials to design supports that ensure operational efficiency and longevity. The company's engineering solutions are tailored to meet the unique requirements of each project, taking into account factors such as load distribution, thermal expansion, and environmental conditions. Through meticulous planning and design, Little P.Eng. guarantees pipe supports that not only meet but exceed industry standards.
Advanced Pipe Flexibility Analysis:
Another cornerstone of Little P.Eng.'s service portfolio is its advanced pipe flexibility analysis. Understanding that thermal expansion, vibration, and other dynamic forces can significantly impact piping systems, Little P.Eng. leverages sophisticated analytical tools to assess and mitigate potential risks. This proactive approach enables the identification of stress points and flexibility issues before they escalate into costly repairs or operational downtime. By prioritizing the integrity and resilience of piping systems, Little P.Eng. plays a crucial role in ensuring the seamless functionality of major installations.
Collaborative Approach to Project Success:
What sets Little P.Eng. apart is not just its technical acumen but also its collaborative approach to project execution. The firm works closely with clients, contractors, and other stakeholders to ensure that every aspect of the piping design and analysis aligns with the project's overall objectives. This synergy between expertise and client engagement fosters an environment of trust and transparency, leading to solutions that are both innovative and aligned with the client's vision.
Industry-Specific Solutions:
Tumblr media
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Little P.Eng. stands at the forefront of engineering excellence, providing unmatched services in pipe support engineering/design and pipe flexibility analysis. Through its dedication to innovation, reliability, and client collaboration, the firm not only enhances the safety and efficiency of major piping installations but also contributes to the advancement of the industrial engineering field. As industries continue to evolve and face new challenges, Little P.Eng. remains committed to delivering solutions that pave the way for a safer, more efficient future.
Tags:
Little P.Eng.
operational efficiency
industry standards
industrial engineering
innovative solutions
engineering services
thermal expansion
environmental conditions consideration
safety enhancement
cutting-edge techniques
stress points mitigation
resilience improvement
efficiency optimization
power generation
project-specific solutions
pipe flexibility analysis
technical acumen
client engagement
chemical processing sector
pipe support engineering
major piping installations
pipe support design
consulting services
oil and gas industry
collaborative approach
sophisticated analytical tools
vibration analysis
load distribution analysis
project execution
operational environments
Engineering Services
Located in Calgary, Alberta; Vancouver, BC; Toronto, Ontario; Edmonton, Alberta; Houston Texas; Torrance, California; El Segundo, CA; Manhattan Beach, CA; Concord, CA; We offer our engineering consultancy services across Canada and United States. Meena Rezkallah.
0 notes
octagonsolution · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
1. The Static Mixer Nozzle from our company is a high-quality product designed to efficiently mix and dispense various materials.
2. It is made from durable materials to ensure long-lasting performance and reliability.
3. The nozzle features a unique design that allows for thorough mixing, resulting in consistent and homogeneous mixtures.
4. It is easy to install and compatible with a wide range of applications, making it a versatile choice for various industries.
5. The Static Mixer Nozzle is an essential tool for achieving precise and accurate mixing, making it an ideal choice for professionals and DIY enthusiasts alike.
1 note · View note