#bisexuality as a whole is often pretty.... put under a microscope so to say
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
(Per my last reblog) obviously I'm jumping in as well on this becauss its Obama but there's a huge part of it is just standard biphobia. Bisexuality is only real when it's a white girl with a golden retriever bf (whatever that means) and bisexual men all went extinct during the AIDs crisis because of the rumor that they'd bring AIDs to their heterosexual wives with their inherent promiscuous deviousy. (Yes this is literally one of the biggest reasons bisexual men don't come out/seem more rare than bisexual women or gay men)
#fun fact: gay boomers themselves often still harbour deep prejudices against bisexual men specifically#bisexuality as a whole is often pretty.... put under a microscope so to say#now add the moral panic of AIDs and how that LITERALLY still shapes societies perspective#of gay people#bisexual women will always appear way more common. because people dont inherently assume theyre diseased#sydney talking
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Chapter Twenty : B IS FOR BI
â⊠But it ainât no lie, Baby Bi Bi Bi (Bi Bi)â NâSync, 2000
Prior to the redaction of this article, I asked a very close friend of mine, who happens to identify as bisexual/pansexual (more on that later) one simple questionâââa way for me to see if I was heading in the right direction and be sure to do justice to this part of our community. What do you think the biggest obstacle for bisexuals is in 2019 ? âInvisibility. The lack of representation of bisexuality as a legitimate identity. The more you are out there, the more everything is normalized, and thereâs so much talk about the G in LGBT, Gay men, and next to nothing when it comes to Bisexuals.â
Communities tend to make the same mistakes as societies, as we are born in the same environments and are influenced by the same principles. When it comes to the Queer Community, patriarchy wins. In the L G B T Q I +, the G is omnipresent (because they represent the MAN, usually white), the L takes a little place on the side, T is the most persecuted, I is invisible. But itâs the B that keeps being so fascinating to me. B is the most under appreciated, denied and dismissed of them all.
WHAT IS AND WHAT IS DEFINITELY NOT
Bisexuality : romantic or sexual attraction to both males and females, or to put more in a 2019 kind-of-term, to more than one sex or gender. Bisexuality is part of the three main classifications of sexual orientation alongside heterosexuality and homosexuality, but weâve already talked about this. This is bullshit and it doesnât matter. These are just principles that the world kept cramming into our faces when they didnât know any better. Not anymore. Just like its three other âmainâ terms, Bisexuality was coined in the 19th century, and its history is as old as the rest of them.
Ancient Greeks (at least 550 BC) incorporated bisexual relationships into their practices, but not exactly in a sexual way. Men with wisdom and experience would often pass along their knowledge or strength (if you were a soldier) to the younger generation through the act of sodomy. Once the young would reach maturity, the relationship became non-sexualâââsupposedly. It did interesting to point out that stigmas were present when the sexual relationship continued after the boyâs adulthood. A preview of things to come, in terms of bigotry.
Another interesting detail into History, it is never mentioned that women could have sex with other women as well. Sure, Sappho wrote about the female beauty, but this was just poetry. History itself only mentions the Men, as only them could dominate and be part of the wisdom. In Ancient Rome, it was acceptable for a man to have sex with other men outside of marriage, as long as they were younger, not another manâs son (so, slaves) and if the man would be the one to penetrate. Patriarchy, La-dee-da, La-dee-da.
In our modern society, what is REALLY interesting to point out though, is that when it comes to bisexuality, it is not easily owned by the person who could represent him/her/themself as bisexual. Terms like queer, polysexual, heterofexible, homoflexible, MSM or FSM are thrown around as alternatives to bisexuality. Hmm.
Bisexual activist Robyn Ochs defines bisexuality as âthe POTENTIAL to be attractedâââromantically and/or sexuallyâââto people of more than one sex and/or gender, not necessarily at the same TIME, not necessarily in the same WAY and not necessarily to the same DEGREEâ which is going into more detail than the human heteronormative brain might comprehend at the moment, but pretty accurate to my knowledge.
What bisexuality is not, though, is what some papers found smart to call a transitional period. A study âfound evidence of both considerable consistency and change in LGB sexual identity over timeâ (there it is again, the confusion between orientation and identity. See my article from June 9th). Apparently, youth under that study who had identified only as bisexual at earlier assessments would then assume the gay/lesbian âidentityâ over time by 30 to 40%. I feel the need to clarify the situation ONE. MORE. TIME. Sexual orientation and identity are two separate things. Yes, scientists substitute those terms as easily as you might replace regular mayo with non-fat mayo, and it would be correct. But it creates way too much confusion. Sexual orientation is who you are attracted to. Identity is who you are, and it includes but not limited to sexual orientation. You canât define yourself by your sexuality only. What the study is trying to explain (I hope) in a very broad and clumsy way is that sometimes, social circumstances prevent you from assuming and owing your real sexual orientation, whether it is straight or gay or whatever your orientation is. So a nice teenage cover up is the use of the term âbisexualâ as a transitional period of time. I get it. Iâve done it. I made myself believe it for a long while. But that doesnât make us bisexuals for a while THEN something else. I was always a homosexual. My non-nurturing environment didnât give me the tools to put my dick on the table and say âIâm gay, bitchesâ. But to keep going back to that stereotype of the half closeted homosexual when it comes to have a general image of bisexuality is just so fucking wrong. A clichĂ©, my dear. And now that Iâve mentioned it.
COMMON UNREAL NOTIONS
A person can be smart. People are dumb. So when it comes to understanding someone that you are not, crowds tend to go to the silliest questions. Like :
âSo⊠Is there a percentage of how gay you were and how straight you can be?â Nop. Maybe someone can put a number on it, but it seems quite unrealistic to say âIâm like 40/60â. Sexuality is not be quantifiable.
âDo you think youâll ever make a choice ?â There is no choice to make. Bisexuality is a definitive (though somehow less finite exploration of the human form) sexuality and thinking it has to evolve is offensive. Like saying that a gay man will get over it and go back to women eventually.
âBut if you had to choose ?â Youâre dumb. Your mother definitely fucked your uncle nine months before your birth.
âSo you are dating someone of the opposite gender. Are you straight now ?â Fuck no. The gender of the person that Iâm dating does not tilt the needle of the fucking outdated Kinsey scale.
âYou are probably confusedâ You are probably ready to go fuck your motherâs pussy with a rake. And that was not a question.
âI could never date a bisexual. I would never be sure if he/sheâs not looking at another guy/girlâ So ? Your straight/gay boyfriend/girlfriend can still look around no matter what. If he/sheâs a horn-dog, you should be worried. Bisexuals do not have more sexual desires because they can be attracted to multiple genders. Still not a question, dumbass.
âYouâre so lucky, you have twice the chances to find someone, right ?â You failed math and it shows. AGAIN, being bisexual does not mean that romantic and sexual feelings are constant towards all genders all the time. They have the same troubles with human connexions as everyone because people are dumb, remember ?
âBut you canât actually know for sure until youâve tried it both, donât you think ?â I donât know, did you try humping your uncle/father before you realized you were incestuous and you liked it ? Sorry, I meant to say sexual orientation does not need a try run to be real. You are what you are no matter what. You may sometimes ignore it for a while but itâs mostly because society never showed you it could exist.
âDo you believe that everyone is bisexual ?â No, Iâm not Freud. Iâm a grown man perfectly capable of understanding that bisexuality is not an umbrella-term for ALL sexuality.
âDonât you think Bisexuality is a myth ?â This whole conversation is a myth. Gurl, Bi.
And thatâs just the tip of the crushingly big iceberg. Bisexuals are constantly under the microscope of the rest of the world for existing outside the binary system of human recognition. You are a woman or a man. You like women or men. Simple. It never was. But the public (whether LGBTQ+ or not) insist on pushing the idea of bisexuality to the side and ignoring its legitimacy.
OSTRACISM
Worst than the usual queer rejection from society, bisexuals have it both ways by being denied true existence by society AND by the Queer community. Just look at their flag. The purple is crushed between the blue and pink, ready to disappear, not taking much space. You queers who are reading this article, donât try to cop out and say âbut I have no problems with bisexual peopleâ. Fuck the fuck off. You fall into the same trap as heterosexuals. You fear someone who isnât exactly like you. And do you actually date a lot a bisexual people ? Because last time I checked, bisexuals werenât really talkative about their sexuality since itâs welcomed with such cold shoulders the white walkers are asking if they put on a nice little sweater. I keep coming back to a conversation I had a few weeks ago with a lesbian woman I know who said she could never date a bisexual woman as she would never be sure if she would stay gay for her and that she liked girls who knew what they wanted. Bisexuals know what they want. It may change from Monday to Tuesday (matter of speech) but I do believe the sexual attraction does not come from a switch inside them with two modes (either gay or straight) but from the individuals, whether closer to masculine or feminine traits, they might encounter that day. Again, thatâs prejudicial and it makes you kind of a bigot but whatever.
Still on the subject of rejection, itâs not just romantic or sexual. If you go on the internet, there are countless examples of bisexual men or women who, after they came out as WHO THEY FUCKING ARE, had to face a change in the way people would treat them and act around them. A straight girl who couldnât sit too close to her bisexual female friend because she could have a crush on her. A straight man who stopped giving hugs to his close bisexual male friend in case he would get the wrong ideas. OR a gay man or woman who would just end a relationship when they found out about their partnerâs sexuality. Yep, I went back to sexual. Sue me.
Letâs put this out there : bisexual people are just as capable to commit to a monogamous relationship. Itâs not because you fell in love with someone with a V that youâre gonna suddenly get hungry for the P. Donât be a child.
Now, being rejected by society is one thing. We are queer, thatâs our song, we twerk to it with vigorous enthusiasm. But the treatment of bisexuals in the Queer community is plainly unacceptable.
In France, when the Mariage pour Tous (fuck, I promised myself I wouldnât use France again. Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Whatever.) succeeded after months of lobbying and manifestations from all sexual orientations, this was considered a victory for the LBGTQ+ community as a whole. But really, it was a success for Gay men and Lesbian women, as Bisexuals are not viewed as a consequential orientation. They are not visually recognizable to gay, lesbian or straight people, they donât have the same historic tragedies that the general public know about and their sexuality has been used and abused as a motor for heterosexual male fantasies in pornographic movies and myths, thus keeping it from becoming a reality in peopleâs minds. It then becomes a vicious circle where the moral is low and the activism is nowhere to be found, so nothing changes. Bisexuals stay in the darkness (until they make a fucking choice, right ?). By the way, the term biphobia is never uttered but itâs real and it happens constantly.
WHAM, BAM, THANK YOU PAN ?
Something I havenât totally mentioned yet is the term Pansexual. Itâs actually the part of the article I was the most apprehensive about as if uninformed, is quite difficult to distinguish with Bisexual. Bisexuality is the romantic or sexual attraction to more than one gender. Well, Pansexuality is the romantic or sexual attraction to all genders, outside of the binary scope of what gender is, I guess ? Thatâs when things get complicated because people are really attach to the label âBiâ would argue that it does not limit them to only boys and girls but other genders. And then those really attach to the label âPanâ could argue that their term is more inclusive to transgender people, who are men and women but also non-binary individuals who do not identify with male and female identitiesâ basic definitions. Then I would say that to me, bisexuality is the more known and comprehensive umbrella term for what this romantic or sexual orientation is and that pansexual is a more recent word and kinda beyond the scope of bisexuality (in a good way). And then someone would tell me I have it all wrong and then I would shut the fuck up. Definite differentiation between bisexuality and pansexuality is a mindfuck for the ages, as is the term âfeminismâ to some these days. By the way, âPanâ means âAllâ in ancient greek and a synonym to Pansexual can be Omnisexual (âomniâ is latin for âAllâ). But I donât want to get too much into that, I donât feel like I have the energy.
DOUBLE JEOPARDY
As I kept my searches broad for this article, I ran into a term that was used by SOS Homophobie to talk about discrimination of bisexual people. Double Jeopardy. We talked a lot about ways that straight folks can discriminate against bisexual people and a little bit about biphobia inside the Queer community but I would like to come back to the latter. I do write these articles for everyone but I seem to keep repeating myself quite a lot at the end of each of them, only because the problem seems to always be the same : as long as we are tearing each other apart, we wonât advance as one. Live together, Die alone, that sort of thing (Damn, I really do repeat myself).
To my queer peeps, do not fear the sexual preferences of your partner as your relationship do not depend on what gay or straight orientation she/he/they is/are gonna have that day. Do not make the mistake to judge them by their supposedly easy-way-out heterosexuality as they are not straight. They donât hold more privileges than you in this world, as they might flip flop at convenience from one side to the other. A bisexual woman who falls in love with a man is still a Queer woman. Itâs not your queer experience, but it is one and you need to embrace it. Do not put them down for it because they are already being put there by straight people on a daily basis.
All of this is based only on your own insecurities which have been fed by your minority status, your heteronormative education, your own ostracism from said heteronormative society and possibly your capabilities as a lover (ndlr : your fear of being dumped).
But most of all, do not ignore them. Those are your people. They hurt just as much as you (but between us, you canât rank genders but in the prejudice scale, Iâd say it comes at a close number 2. Think about it.) and they need your support, as you needed theirs when it was time to get that Mariage Pour Tousâââdamn, last time, I promise. Remember that this MPT was also for them. Every action you take as a community is an action to benefit them as well. As they are the B in LGBTQ+. Say it out loud. See how weird it sounds without the B.
Mic dropped.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUDab9piv_U
0 notes