#biologicallyfemale

[monriatitans]

Why Trans Women are Not "Biological Males"

Jessie Gender You often hear the phrase “trans women are biological males” thrown around, mainly by those trying to discriminate against trans people. But aren’t trans people really just biologically male? Isn’t that “the whole point of being trans,” as some people say? Even trans-supportive people seem to agree on this point. Or, is it, as anti-trans people argue, that trans people do not…

[mustardmeme]

He said it was okay tho... by biologicallyfemale

Follow the Mustard Gang!

[anastacia-of-astora]

URL change

Biologicallyfemale->su-critical-phobe

[jethroq]

biologicallyfemale replied to your post: Like yes, the Finnish system has some ...

Did some liberal call finland a socialist country again

nah, there's a thing about Finland and child poverty, I just reblogged it with some commentary.

But like, I can say I'm at least a bit proud of our system (partly because my party is the one who stood up for every part of it), but there's constant attempts to undermine it with restrictions, political  innuendo about misuse of funds, most recently the whole debacle about baby carriages for immigrants, and the constant attempts to privatize parts of it.

[nineisamagicnumber]

In response to http://biologicallyfemale.tumblr.com/

"you should add a disclaimer that you are a blabbing moron that doesn’t understand the Frankfurt school’s historical unimportance in marxist thinking, thinks people not wanting to be murdered and dehumanized is playing victim, doesn’t know that marxism is actually all about linking things together and not seeing them as individual moments of time, thinks “classism” exists, and uses marxism as a boogeyman to scare people from social liberation"

Nice ad hominem, m8 :^) Let's break this down.

1) I am a blabbing moron that doesn't understand the Frankfurt school's historical unimportance.

Actually I'd suggest that they've been very important, perhaps not to Marxism itself, but in spreading their ideology through mainstream culture extremely efficiently, hence the very rise of critical theory and the other theories resulting from it.

2) I think that people not wanting to be murdered and dehumanized is playing victim.

Not at all, I think the motives of those who fall for these ideologies, such as yourself, do so for the very simple reason that they make you feel safe, you think that they offer a feasible future and that you think you're genuinely in the right in thinking the things you do. What you don't realize is that by buying into all of this (specifically this brand of radical egalitarianism), you blind yourself of all of human history, the natural world and it's laws, and the fundamental rules of this reality in general. By abandoning strength you open yourself to threats, and thus your society to threats, and this is only defended by your ideologies - trapping you in perpetual victimhood whether you like it or not.

3) I don't know that Marxism is actually all about 'linking things together', and not 'seeing them as individual moments of time'.

It seems to me that every Marxist has their own private definition, you all buy into moral relativism, so it's not surprising you buy into logical relativism. I will admit, my knowledge of Marxism is very shallow compared to the likes of some people I know, but I do understand the general direction of it, it's precepts and it's fundamental ignorance of human nature, and like I've said, biology in general. See, you assume that man is above the natural world as you follow egalitarianism, 'genderfluidity', and other such abstractions. People such as myself, however know that humanity is just as much a product of nature as we wish not to believe so. We adhere to natural laws such as r/K selection theory, behavioral sink and natural selection. Human empires rise and fall roughly the same ways time and time again, and no amount of utopianism can overcome this - heck, everywhere Marxism has been implemented, the societies fail tremendously every time, and always will, thus my (and others') disregard of your thinking.

4) I think classism exists.

Perhaps not tangibly, but it's beginning to take shape. Hence Marxist perceptions of prejudice - that only those with institutionalized power can posses it (my brother was taught this). Obviously, those with the most power in society tend be of the upper classes. And what do we see on Occupy Wall Street, for example? A general disdain for the elite, the wealthy and prosperous. How interesting. :^)

5) I'm using Marxism as a boogeyman.

Perhaps that's because it is? Our civilization is currently in a quagmire, after the fall of the British empire, society did not suffer physical conquering, but cultural conquering around the 60s. Since then, your ideologies have been taking a strangle-hold on the politics, media and education of western nations. Subtly at first - but it's very rampant and obvious now. Every day the western peoples are force-fed 'multiculturalism', 'tolerance', 'diversity' and in the past few years 'you as a majority are privileged - you are an oppressor - you are evil' or 'traditional values are evil and primitive - if you hold any traditional values you are evil and primitive'.

I'm telling everyone this, but you really ought to read The Fate of Empires: http://nineisamagicnumber.tumblr.com/post/96486472672

Peace.

[minipops1917-blog]

"Get this clear: Stalinism isn't socialism, it's just a way of getting power using socialist rhetoric, while not practicing it. The planned economy was an invention by Stalin, not by Marx or even Lenin. It does nothing to drag society towards equality in any way. The money goes to the elite, just as before any twisted revolution."

i love it when people make empirically false statements tbh

[mustardmeme]

#relatable by biologicallyfemale

Follow the Mustard Gang!

[jethroq]

My Hungarian friend says he can understand Finnish a bit, do you feel the same about Hungarian?

can't  say I've ever heard enough to know, but seeing I can't really make out much of Estonian, I doubt it.

[minipops1917-blog]

why does Cuba have an unemployment rate? I mean I know it's not exactly the best model of socialism, but like how does a system as you said "can't fire someone and has no labor market" have an unemployment rate

cuba has some unemployment as a result of privatization/co-operatization of small enterprises in the last few years, combined with transitional unemployment from one job to another (which means you'll never achieve a perfect 0% unemployment rate in a socialist economy as such, but that there's no structural unemployment based on the existence of labour markets). the cuban social formation as a whole, while it has some small private enterprise (much of which is actually small commodity production rather than capitalist production of any kind), is overwhelmingly dominated by the socialist mode of production still

[jethroq]

biologicallyfemale replied to your post:

what new wiki is this

it's part of the "see also" section for the wikipedia article for Gaydar.