#bharti singh news

[townpostin]

LJP Organizes Workers' Meet, Welcomes New Members in Jamshedpur

LJP leaders highlight growing dissatisfaction with Jharkhand government, predict NDA victory. Key Points: – LJP holds workers’ meet in Jamshedpur with key leaders attending. – Several youths join LJP, leaving other political parties. – Party confident of NDA’s success in upcoming Jharkhand elections. JAMSHEDPUR – The Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) held a major workers’ meeting in Jamshedpur. The…

[filmystream]

Laughter Chefs Show Ending: Bharti Singh Confirms, Fans Devastated

A Memorable Comedy JourneyThe Show’s ImpactThe Road Ahead Laughter Chefs, a popular comedy programme hosted by Bharti Singh, was leaving the air. This announcement has caught many fans unawares; they have been, you could say, living their lives around it every week forquite some time now and tuning in time after to see what curious mix of amusement or information this unpredictable little show…

[cybercrime-blogs]

Mahadev Online Betting Scam: Bollywood Celebrities and Pakistani Connections Under Scrutiny

MUMBAI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has initiated an extensive investigation into the Mahadev Online Betting scandal, revealing a complex network of money laundering activities that extend far beyond the realm of online betting. This case has taken an intriguing turn, with the involvement of UPI IDs, implicating well-known personalities, celebrities, and even political contributions.

The Mahadev Online Betting Scandal: A Brief Overview The spotlight has turned to Mahadev, an online betting application, founded by Saurabh Chandrakar and Ravi Uppal hailing from Bhilai, Chattisgarh. The ED has cast a sharp eye on this platform, alleging that it served as a hub for illicit betting websites. It facilitated new user registrations, generated User IDs, and funneled funds through a convoluted network of anonymous bank accounts.

Also Read: Kashmiri Brother-in-Law could not show Kamal, and pressure on Nagpur police failed

Extensive Raids and Compelling Evidence In a recent series of coordinated raids conducted in cities like Kolkata, Bhopal, and Mumbai, the ED has unearthed substantial evidence and frozen/seized assets totaling an astounding Rs 417 Crore. According to the ED, Chandrakar and Uppal orchestrated the operations of Mahadev Online Betting from a central headquarters located in the UAE. They employed a franchising model, establishing "Panel/Branches" for their associates, with profit-sharing arrangements set at a 70:30 ratio.

A deeply troubling aspect of this scandal revolves around the exploitation of vulnerable communities, specifically slum residents and those with limited incomes. It appears that individuals implicated in this alleged scam acquired UPI (Unified Payments Interface) details from these unsuspecting individuals, effectively using them as pawns in money laundering schemes. In return for the use of their UPI IDs, these victims were given meager sums, while the ill-gotten funds were channeled to foreign entities. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is currently conducting a thorough investigation to determine the full scope of this fraudulent activity and quantify the amount of money that has been laundered through this deceptive modus operandi.

Lavish Wedding Expenditure Raises Concerns

Recent ED raids conducted in Bhopal, Mumbai, and Kolkata have brought to light the extravagant lifestyle of the primary accused, Saurabh Chandrakar. Astonishingly, it was revealed that he lavishly spent over Rs 200 crore on his wedding ceremony in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Shockingly, reports suggest that the funds for this opulent celebration were sourced from the proceeds of criminal activities.

Private jets were chartered to transport family members from Nagpur to the UAE for the wedding festivities, and renowned celebrities were hired for special performances. An array of wedding planners, dancers, and decorators were flown in from Mumbai, with cash payments facilitated through clandestine hawala channels.

Also Read: Cybercrime in Nagpur - Cyber Blackmailer Couple Arrested in Pune for Extorting Money

Celebrity Involvement and Suspicions of Proceeds from Illegal Activities

The ED's ongoing investigation has also implicated several prominent celebrities who endorsed these betting entities. These celebrities not only lent their names to these platforms but also participated in various events organized by the app promoters and other individuals accused in this case. Payments to these celebrities were routed through intricate transactions, ultimately sourced from the proceeds of online betting activities.

The list of celebrities under scrutiny includes well-known figures such as singers Atif Aslam, Rahat Fateh Ali Khan, Neha Kakkar, Vishal Dadlani, actor Tiger Shroff, Elli Evram, Bhagyashree, Pulkit Samrat, Sunny Leone, Kirti Kharbanda, Nushrat Bharucha, and comedians Bharti Singh, Krishna Abhishek, and Ali Azgar.

In conclusion, this disturbing scandal not only highlights the exploitation of vulnerable populations but also shines a light on the extravagant spending habits of key individuals involved. The web of celebrity endorsements and the suspected use of proceeds from illegal activities underscore the need for a thorough investigation into the matter, ensuring that justice is served and accountability upheld.

Source: https://www.the420.in/bollywood-celebrities-pakistani-connections-mahadev-online-betting-scam-ed/

[seemabhatnagar]

Physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of the work being performed

Sarnam Singh v. Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. & Others

Civil Appeal 3900/2023

Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay S Oka J & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal J

Appeal allowed on 04.07.2023

Fact:

Appellant Sarnam Singh, a gunman at Bharti Hotel Ltd. met with an accident with a tempo on 24.11.2013. He underwent treatment but injury being severe his lower limb was amputated leaving him permanently disabled for the job for which he was employed. At the time of accident, he was aged about 50 years and 05 months drawing salary of Rs. 20,774/- pm and Rs. 800/- towards conveyance allowance.

On account of his inability to discharge his duties for which he was employed his services were terminated w.e.f. 31.5.2015.

Motor Accident Claim Tribunal:

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, South District, Saket New Delhi, vide its award dated 18.4.2016, awarded a compensation of ₹ 34,29,800/- as the vehicle was insured, the liability was put on the insurance company. The Tribunal awarded a sum of ₹ 1,50,000/- on account of pain and suffering, ₹ 95,000/- on account of diet, conveyance and attendant charges. In addition, a sum of ₹ 1,00,000/- was awarded on account of loss of amenities.

Appeal before Delhi High Court against award of MACT by Insurance Co.

Shriram General Insurance Company filed appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Tribunal. The High Court vide impugned order dated 25.8.2017, while not finding any fault with reference to any of the findings recorded by the Tribunal, reduced the compensation taking loss of earning capacity of the appellant Sarnam Singh at 80%. The amount of compensation was reduced by ₹ 4,92,205/- and finally the amount determined was ₹ 28,43,000/-. The compensation awarded under other heads was not disturbed.

Aggrieved by the order of the Delhi High Court reducing the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal instant Civil Appeal was filed.

Civil Appeal Before Supreme Court (SC) by Appellant Sarnam Singh

Argument of the Appellant Counsel before SC

The order of the High Court reducing the loss of earning capacity to 80% is erroneous as the appellant had suffered amputation of his right lower limb. the functional disability could not be taken as 80%. It should be taken as 100%.

Argument of the Respondent Counsel before SC:

There was error in calculation of the compensation by the Tribunal The same has been corrected by the High Court. There is no error in the order passed by the High Court.

Observation of the Apex Court:

The kind of injury the appellant suffered resulted into permanent disability.

Medical Certificate issued by Board of Doctors is showing disability as 85% with no further possibility of improvement.

Any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of the work being performed by the person who suffered disability.

The same injury suffered by two different persons may affect them in different ways.

Loss of leg by a farmer or a rickshaw puller may be end of the road as far as his earning capacity is concerned.

Whereas, in case of the persons engaged in some kind of desk work in office, loss of leg may have lesser effect.

Appellant suffered functional disability.

The Tribunal was right in assessing the loss of earning capacity of the appellant at 100% and assessing the compensation accordingly.

The High Court was in error in reducing the loss of earning capacity to 80%,

There is another error in order passed by the High Court in calculating the compensation. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal was taken on ₹ 33,34,800/-.  Whereas, total compensation awarded by the Tribunal was ₹ 34,29,800/- and not ₹ 33,34,800/-

Decision:

The appeal filed by the appellant is allowed. The impugned order passed by the High Court is set aside and the award passed by the Tribunal is restored.

Seema Bhatnagar

[starbiopic]

Exciting Return of ‘Laughter Chefs’ in 2025 with New Surprises!

The much-loved cooking-comedy show Laughter Chefs is all set to return with its second season in January 2025. After the success of its first season, which premiered in June 2024, fans have been eagerly waiting for the next installment. Hosted by Bharti Singh and judged by celebrity chef Harpal Singh Sokhi, the show combined cooking with comedy, making it an instant favorite among viewers. The…

[venkateshwara-group1998]

Shri Venkateshwara University marked World Pharmacists Day with a seminar, an organ donation awareness rally, and a blood donation camp. 

Shri Venkateshwara University and VGI Meerut celebrated World Pharmacists Day by hosting a seminar on Pharmacists Meeting Global Health Needs.

In addition, they organized an organ donation awareness rally and a blood donation camp.

We organized an organ donation awareness rally to inform the masses about organ donation.

Besides this, we held a blood donation camp at VGI Campus. Students and faculty members willingly donated blood, resulting in a collection of 124 units.

The Venkateshwara Group Founder President Dr Sudhir Giri, Pro Chancellor Dr Rajeev Tyagi, VC Dr Krishan Kant Dave & the District Hospital Chief Pharmacist Dr Pradeep Kumar inaugurated the event by lighting a lamp to Goddess Saraswati.

Dr Nitin Singh, the Pharmacy Deans Dr Om Prakash Gosai & Dr Ashwini Saxena joined them to unveil the Pharmacists Meeting Global Health Needs seminar, organ donation rally & a blood donation camp.

The Venkateshwara Group Founder President Dr Sudhir Giri reiterated, Pharmacists play a crucial role in fulfilling the changing global health & medical requirements of the world.

He said organ or body donation is the biggest donation because you not only give a new lease of life to the needy but by doing so one becomes immortal in life.

He praised all those who have donated their organ/body & appealed that all should come forward for organ/body donation.

The Pro Chancellor Dr Rajeev Tyagi emphasized that rather than turning a dead body to ashes, we should do the noble cause of donating our organs to bring smiles on the faces of the needy & sick.

The VC Dr Krishna Kant Dave asserted the Pharmacists play a vital role in fulfilling global health needs.

The CEO Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, VC Dr Krishna Kant Dave, Dean Dr Om Prakash Gosai & the Meerut Campus Director Dr Pratap Singh also addressed the seminar.

Those present included the Academic Director Dr Rajesh Singh, Dr SN Sahu, Dr LS Rawat, Dr Divya Girdhar, Dr Ashwini Kumar Saxena, Dr Om Prakash, Dr Ramesh, Ashwini Gupta & Dr Shilpi Sharma.

Dr Mohit Shrivastava, Dr Dheeraj Dubey, Pankaj Gill, Ravi Saini, Vicky Kumar, Shrestha Singh, Renu Saini Manu Bharti, Pranshul, Farhan Usmani, Shivangi Raj, Tejaswi Chaudhary, Manju Rani were all present.

Also present were Ankush Gautam, Nitin Kumar, Dr Nidhi Singh, Ritu, Shivakant, Gaurav, Ravi, Arun Goswami, SS Baghel along with the Media Incharge Mr. Vishwas Rana among others.  

[lyricsolution-com]

'Laughter Chefs' Extension Cancelled: Final Episode To Air This October | Television News

Mumbai: The cooking-based television show ‘Laughter Chefs-Unlimited Entertainment’ which features celebrities like –Ankita Lokhande, Aly Goni, Rahul Vaidya among others, is all set to air its last episode in October. The show which first premiered in June 2024 is hosted by Bharti Singh and judged by celebrity chef Harpal Singh Sokhi. Recently, there was a buzz that the show will continue airing…

[djfloops]

#Video | पटना वाला मकनिया | #Gunjan Singh | #Anjali_Bharti | Patna Wala Makaniya | New #Magahi Song

Subscribe करने के लिए क्लिक करें 👉 – http://goo.gl/ip2lbk आप सब इस गाने का Reels बनाए – Make Your Reels :- https://www.instagram.com/reels/audio/1226063525259606/ ♪ Audio Credits ♪ ►Song – Patna Wala Makaniya ►Singer – Gunjan Singh, Anjali Bharti ►Feat – Ritu Chauhan ►Lyrics – Gore Lal Yadav ►Music Director – Pappu Bhai ►Company/ Label – Wave Music 📽️ Video Credits 📽️ ►Video Director – Pankaj…

[chutneymusic]

#Video | पटना वाला मकनिया | #Gunjan Singh | #Anjali_Bharti | Patna Wala Makaniya | New #Magahi Song

Subscribe करने के लिए क्लिक करें 👉 – http://goo.gl/ip2lbk आप सब इस गाने का Reels बनाए – Make Your Reels :- https://www.instagram.com/reels/audio/1226063525259606/ ♪ Audio Credits ♪ ►Song – Patna Wala Makaniya ►Singer – Gunjan Singh, Anjali Bharti ►Feat – Ritu Chauhan ►Lyrics – Gore Lal Yadav ►Music Director – Pappu Bhai ►Company/ Label – Wave Music 📽️ Video Credits 📽️ ►Video Director – Pankaj…

[marwahstudios]

8th Global Fashion and Design Week Noida 2024: A Spectacular Showcase of International Talent

Noida, India – The 8th Global Fashion and Design Week Noida 2024, under the visionary leadership of Sandeep Marwah, President of Marwah Studios, has been hailed as one of the most impressive fashion events in India and the largest ever conducted at any fashion institution worldwide. The event was a grand celebration of creativity, culture, and couture, bringing together talent from across the globe in an unparalleled display of fashion and design excellence.

Over the course of three days, the event featured: 600 Dresses, 100 Designers, 72 Countries Participations, 90 Rounds, 9 Major Shows, 4 Exhibitions, 700 Participants including models, makeup artists, and backstage crews, 7 Coffee Table Books launched

Sandeep Marwah expressed his pride and excitement to a full house of attendees eagerly awaiting the commencement of the 7th show on the third day, stating, “Achieving such a monumental event with three months of preparation is no small feat, but the creativity and dedication displayed here make it all worthwhile.”

The inauguration ceremony was graced by prominent personalities including filmmaker and broadcaster Anoop Bose, Col. J.S Bindra, Hema Paul (Founder of Ehmiyat Foundation), Gaurav Arora (Co-Founder & Director of Market Craft), and Rekha Jha (Social Worker and Poet), who collectively lighted the ceremonial lamp, marking the official start of the event.

The talented designers of AAFT presented a wide array of garments that beautifully encapsulated the cultural essence of various countries:

Lesotho: Garments by Vaishnavi Bharadwaj

Georgia: Cultural projections by Priyanka Bharti

Cyprus: Designs by Ishika Garg

Ukraine: Influences in the range by Pallavi Singh

Mauritius: Creations by Nishant and Sakshi Singh

Philippines: Designs by Anuradha

Afghanistan: Dresses by Bibi Saira Khan

Israel: Colorful attire by Kanan and Pranja

In addition to the stunning fashion displays, the event also saw the launch of two significant coffee table books designed by students of fashion communication at AAFT: “Jatin Malik Couture” by Muskan Jain, “Workers Fashion” by Neha Singh These books capture the essence of contemporary fashion and the dynamic creativity of young designers.

The 8th Global Fashion and Design Week Noida 2024 was indeed an international show, setting new benchmarks in the world of fashion and design education. The event not only highlighted the rich tapestry of global cultures but also demonstrated the immense potential and innovation of budding designers from AAFT. This spectacular convergence of art, culture, and fashion will undoubtedly leave an indelible mark on the fashion industry. The event was supported by International Chamber of Media and Entertainment Industry.

[akhabarfactory]

Police Case on Ajaz Khan and Rajveer Sisodia? Reason Why Rajveer Didn’t Meet Ajaz, 2 YouTubers Lafda

The Current Argument: Ajaz Khan vs. Rajveer SisodiaThe First BattleA String of Unfulfilled MeetingsPublic Views and ResponsesRajveer's ExplanationThe Trending Topic: Nitin ChandilaThe Poorva Jha ApologyTwitter Conflicts and Court CasesMistaken Stunts: Farhad Azam ShaikhPartings and Fresh StartsThe Dilemma Around SelfiesIn summary

The Current Argument: Ajaz Khan vs. Rajveer Sisodia

Drama frequently develops on Indian social media platforms with the ferocity of a big-budget film. The ongoing romance between Ajaz Khan and Rajveer Sisodia has captured the attention of viewers recently and generated unavoidable buzz. Let's examine the specifics of this intense dispute and find out why it's generating so much buzz.

The First Battle

The conflict between Ajaz Khan and Rajveer Sisodia is not a new development. Ajaz Khan has been threatening people on YouTube for a while now, and Rajveer Sisodia has said he will face him in Mumbai. The excitement intensified till Rajveer—who was lodging at the Hilton Mumbai International Airport hotel—arrived in Mumbai. After that, he released a video in which he challenged Ajaz Khan to meet him.

A String of Unfulfilled Meetings

When Ajaz Khan replied on Instagram and said he was at one place and would shortly be moving to another, the situation intensified. Eager to see him, Rajveer Sisodia hurried to the designated spot and bided his time. In spite of his assertions, Ajaz Khan was not appearing, as he explained in a reel he shared. Both sides continued to accuse one another of dodging the confrontation during this back and forth.

Public Views and Responses

As the situation developed, public opinion started to change. There were a lot of people who started thinking that Rajveer Sisodia was avoiding Ajaz Khan because he was afraid of him, which made people laugh at him. In response, Rajveer sent out a reel outlining his reasons for avoiding conflict. He emphasized his obligations to his friends and the legal ramifications of a fight of this nature in a different state. Rajveer underlined the need to avoid enforcing one's own laws and the fine line that separates bravery from stupidity. Also Read: Dhruv Rathee 9th FAIL? REPLY!,Purav Jha Roasts Elvish Yadav, UK07 Rider Exposed? Bharti Singh

Rajveer's Explanation

Many others found resonance in Rajveer Sisodia's answer, which clarified the intricacies of the circumstance. He made the point that any disagreement may be deadly because his buddy, Okendra Rana from Haryana, had multiple open cases. His wary demeanor was heightened by his concern about falling victim to harsh legal measures such as the MCOCA Act. Finally, Rajveer promised accountability and openness, saying he would go back to Mumbai and let his supporters know ahead of time.

The Trending Topic: Nitin Chandila

Amidst the Rajveer-Ajaz drama, prominent YouTuber Nitin Chandila's video also gained notice. Even though it was too gruesome to share in its entirety, his video went viral. Nitin's heated and contentious content fueled the already burning social media scene, despite his wife's attempts to stop him.

The Poorva Jha Apology

Another well-known social media personality, Poorva Jha, also encountered criticism over a spelling error in a recent video regarding the NEET exam. He spelled it incorrectly, writing "N-E-A-T" instead of "N-E-E-T." He issued a public apology, owning up to the mistake and adding a note to his video to clarify the oversight. The scrutiny and pressure that social media influencers must endure to retain their credibility were brought to light by this episode.

Twitter Conflicts and Court Cases

Social media is a battleground in addition to a platform for entertainment. Flying Beast and The Deshbhakt got into a heated Twitter spat on power outages in Gurgaon, and BJP leader Suresh Nakhwa launched a defamation suit against Dhruv Rathee. The issue got worse when Dhruv Rathee replied by forwarding an older tweet from Suresh Nakhwa. These examples highlight how unstable internet relationships may be and the implications they have offline.

Mistaken Stunts: Farhad Azam Shaikh

Farhad Azam Shaikh's tale, which gained notoriety for his daring feats on Mumbai local trains, tragically changed course. He suffered the loss of both an arm and a leg following another risky act. This episode is a clear warning of the risks involved with pursuing internet celebrity by risky behavior.

Partings and Fresh Starts

TV actor Kush Shah, most known for his part in "Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah," departed the show to continue his education in the United States. The cast of the show bid him a fond farewell upon his departure. Raj Grover, meanwhile, came under fire for a video that some saw as demeaning to domestic workers, even though he later emphasized that it was meant to be a humorous parody.

The Dilemma Around Selfies

Finally, a controversy was triggered by the widely shared video of actress Taapsee Pannu graciously declining to take a selfie with influencer Ananya at an event. On social media, Ananya voiced her bewilderment and dismay, wondering why Taapsee would decline a photo in front of cameras.

In summary

With social media platforms serving as both a stage and a battlefield, the boundaries between entertainment and real life are becoming increasingly hazy in the digital era. These tales serve as a warning about the dangers and influence of social media. What do you think of these current dramas? Post your opinions in the space provided below. Read the full article

[the-hacker-news]

Hackers Exploiting Jenkins Script Console for Cryptocurrency Mining Attacks

The Hacker News : Cybersecurity researchers have found that it's possible for attackers to weaponize improperly configured Jenkins Script Console instances to further criminal activities such as cryptocurrency mining. "Misconfigurations such as improperly set up authentication mechanisms expose the '/script' endpoint to attackers," Trend Micro's Shubham Singh and Sunil Bharti said in a technical write-up http://dlvr.it/T9Rx3J Posted by : Mohit Kumar ( Hacker )

[filmystream]

Laughter Chefs Show Ending: Bigg Boss Season 18 Takes Over

The fans are eagerly awaiting the return of Bigg BossLaughter Chefs: Cast Updates The first season of the popular reality show Laughter Chefs, being hosted by Bharti Singh and judged by Chef Harpal Singh Sokhi, is all set to draw its curtains in October. It was meant to be continued till January 2025. Well, the decision to draw it up before time aligns with the good news that Bigg Boss Season 18…

[legalhub16]

LANDMARK JUDGEMENT

KESAVANANDA BHARTI VS STATE OF KERELA AIR 1973 SC 1461

I. Background

Several incidents formed the "backdrop" of the Kesavananda Bharti decision. The ‘backdrop’ or course before Kesavananda is needed to understand the decision. As finely built as the Indian Constitution is, it is ageing like everything else in the world after 70 years. In early 1951, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru wrote to his chief ministers, “It is impossible to hand up urgent social changes because the Constitution comes in the way,We shall have to find a remedy, even though this might involve a Constitutional change This started India's amendments path. Within 1.5 years of its passage, the first constitutional amendment was passed. After intense parliamentary debate, the First Amendment restricted freedom of speech, introduced caste-based reservation, circumscribed the right to property, formalised and legalised the abolition of the zamindari system, and inscribed a new schedule of "contradicting" constitutional laws immune to judicial reviews. Citizens challenged the First Amendment, arguing that it altered fundamental rights. In the cases of Shankar Prasad Deo vs Union of India and Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan, the power of parliament to amend the constitution, including fundamental rights, was upheld without limitations. Justice J.R. Mudholkar dissented in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan. He raised the intriguing question of whether Article 368 might change a fundamental principle or modify the Constitution. He said, “It is additionally a matter for consideration whether making a change in an extremely basic feature of the Constitution are often regarded merely as an amendment or would it be, in effect, rewriting a section of the Constitution; and if the latter, wouldn’t it be within the purview of Article 368

Parliament was close to supremacy until the I C Golaknath Vs State of Punjab case. Finally, the historic Golaknath v. State of Punjab ruling made fundamental rights ‘transcendental and sacrosanct’. Constitutional lawyer M.K. Nambiar introduced Professor Conrad's "doctrine of implied limitations" in this case. Thus, the Supreme Court reversed its earlier rulings and ruled that no amendment could advance the nation at the expense of citizens' fundamental rights. Kesavananda Bharti Vs. State of Kerala, the country's most referenced constitutional case, was paved here.

II. Facts

The petitioner, His Holiness Sripadavalguru Kesavanand Bharti was chief of a religious sect ‘ Edneer Mutt’ in Kerala. This sect was disappointed by the fact that certain lands ‘property’ was acquired by the state for socio-economic progress. So, a petition was filed by His Holiness on 21 March 1970 under Article 32 for enforcement of his fundamental rights (Art. 25, 14, 19(1) (f), and 31). And while the petition was still in progress, Govt. of Kerala passed Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1971. Simultaneously, 24th, 25th, and 29th Amendments were also passed.

III. Issues

The court had to decide the constitutional validity of

With the passage of the 24th Amendment Act, Parliament was granted the authority to alter any provision of the Constitution, even if doing so would result in the restriction of basic rights. A significant portion of residents' rights to their own property were eliminated by the 25th Amendment Act. It allowed the government to acquire private property for the purpose of putting it to public use in exchange for compensation that was payable. Specifically, the Kerala Land Reforms Amendment Act, 1969 and 1971, which was included in the Constitution's IX schedule, was outlined in the 29th amendment act. Most of these were passed in order to overturn the ruling that the court made in the Golaknath case. An eleven-judge bench made the decision regarding Golaknath.As a result, the case of Kesavanand Bharti was going to be considered by the largest ever bench consisting of thirteen judges.

IV. Contentions of Petitioner and Respondent

The petitioner used the case of Eason vs. State, Supra as an example. This foreign decision made it clear that the Legislature could not change any part of the Bill of Rights, which lists the basic rights protected by the Constitution. At this point, the respondents said that the Sate could change any part of the Constitution and limit basic rights in order to meet the guidelines for state policy and the obligations for socioeconomic progress set out in the preamble.

The people who signed the letter said that Parliament shouldn't have too much power in a democracy. Indian citizens were promised a feeling of freedom. If the Court rules that Article 31 C, which was added by the 25th Constitutional Amendment Act, is valid, then only Parliament and the Legislature will be able to decide how much freedom citizens need. Respondents said that Articles 31 (A), (B), and (C) are very similar and that the point of adding them was to protect them from parliamentary review under the Fundamental Rights. They also said that if this Court agrees that Article 31 (A) is valid, then Article 31 (C) is also valid.

The petitioners said that Art. 368's power to change things is limited. In Indian democracy, the Constitution gave people certain rights and freedoms that will last as long as the Constitution does. As a result, modifying power cannot take away such basic freedoms. The Respondents said that the body making the changes should have unlimited power. They even said that the State has such broad amending power that it can change all the rights in Part III and have unrestricted access to change the Directive Principles of State Policy. This means that the federal system can be drastically altered and the right to judicial review can be taken away. The people who answered said that Art. 368 gives Parliament "omnipotent powers."

The respondents said that the Constitution sets up Parliament. The Constitution gives us the power to change things. The Constitution calls the "State" a Sovereign Democratic Republic. It is the Parliament of the Sovereign Democratic Republic, so the exercise of power should also be done with that in mind. Also, the general points that Alexander Hamilton made about the "Doctrine of Implied Limitations" should be kept safe and can't be changed. Respondents said that Art. 368 gives the government "constituent power," which means it has full power. The steps Parliament took to use Article 368 are exactly the same as the steps the Constituent Assembly took to make the Constitution. To put it another way, Parliament is the same thing as the Constituent Assembly, and it can totally destroy, change, or shorten the Constitution.

V. Judgement

In his perspective, Chief Justice Sikri highlighted that the respondents argue that Parliament has the power to abolish fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech and expression, freedom to organise groups or unions, and freedom of religion. They assert that democracy may be substituted and a one-party regime can be established. Without repealing the Constitution, Parliament can establish any type of government that denies freedom to citizens by utilising its authority under Article 368. Nani Palkhivala presented an intriguing position during the ongoing hearings of the case, stating that even if Article 368 were analysed extensively, the preamble could not be amended. Furthermore, Article 368 should not be interpreted as "expressing the desire for the Constitution's demise or as a provision for its legal self-destruction." While the judges discussed their opinions on the 'Doctrine of Basic Structure', they all interpreted it similarly but with different literary styles. However, Justice Khanna's majority view stands out and is remembered in legal literature for being the one who established the concept of 'basic structure'.

The Court determined that any constitutional principle that is violated could potentially undermine the unity and integrity of the nation, which formed the basis of our freedom struggle. The Court also recognised that the dignity of the individual is an essential aspect of the Basic Structure. Furthermore, it was established that the ability of the legislature to make amendments is limited by a principle known as the "doctrine of basic structure". This means that the parliament cannot utilise its power to amend the constitution, as stated in Article 368, in a way that would harm, weaken, dismantle, abolish, modify, or change the fundamental framework or structure of the Constitution. Justice Sikri noted that the word 'amending the Constitution' does not grant Parliament the power to completely alter its essence, revoke basic rights, or modify its recognised existence. Justices Reddy, Mukherjee, and Hedge elucidated the fundamental attributes that constitute a comprehensive classification term encompassing sovereignty, democratic nature, unity, and essential liberties, all of which are safeguarded for citizens. Justices Grover and Shelat likewise held the belief that the ability of Parliament to change the Constitution had implied limitations and that there were specific fundamental aspects to the Constitution.

However, Justice Ray noted that the ability to amend is extensive and unrestricted. Justice Palekar remarked that, in his opinion, the deprivation of fundamental rights cannot be deemed unjustified. Justice Khanna coined the term 'fundamental framework', which was later embraced by Chief Justice Sikri and incorporated into his majority opinion. In his work, T. R. Andhyarujina stated that the "view of the majority" cannot serve as the legal reasoning behind the decision in the Keshavananda Case. The court fully affirmed the 24th and 25th Constitutional Amendments, however it deemed the first part of the latter to be within the scope of the law and the second part to be beyond the scope of the law. The ruling validated the notion of the 'Basic Structure'.

[newsplus21]

Top Picks: Latest Stories by Newsplus21

Discover the cream of the crop with Newsplus21's "Top Picks," a curated selection of the most compelling and insightful stories of the moment. In a sea of information, "Top Picks" rises above the rest, offering a handpicked assortment of news articles, features, and analyses that demand your attention.

From breaking news to in-depth investigations, "Top Picks" showcases the breadth and depth of coverage you can expect from Newsplus21. Each story is carefully selected to inform, engage, and inspire, ensuring you're always in the know about the issues that matter most.

Join us as we navigate the vast landscape of news with "Top Picks" on Newsplus21. Whether you're a casual reader or a news enthusiast, our curated selection guarantees you'll find something worth exploring. Welcome to a space where the latest stories are always at your fingertips, waiting to be discovered.

Here are some latest news please go through the links given below:

Amid perception of rising attacks on Indians in US, a clarification from administration

Amid the concerns and perception that there has been a sharp rise in attacks on Indian students in America, the National Security Council Strategic Communications Coordinator John Kirby has clarified that there is no excuse for violence, certainly based on race or gender or religion or any other factor.

To mark Surya Saptami, 108 Surya Namaskar event organized in Jaipur

In Jaipur of Rajasthan, the Kreeda Bharti organised a 108 Surya Namaskar program in front of Alber Hall, Ramniwas Bagh. RSS regional ‘Pracharak’ Nimbaram remained present as the Chief Guest. State minister Colonel Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore also present.

Horoscope: माता लक्ष्मी की इन पर रहेगी ��ास कृपा, पढ़ें आज का राशिफल

Horoscope: वैदिक ज्योतिष शास्त्र में कुल 12 राशियों का वर्णन किया गया है। हर राशि का स्वामी ग्रह होता है। ग्रह-नक्षत्रों की चाल से राशिफल का आकंलन किया जाता है। आज शुक्रवार है और आज का दिन माता लक्ष्मी को समर्पित होता है। इस दिन विधि- विधान से माता लक्ष्मी की पूजा- अर्चना की जाती है।

CG News: ग्रामीण औद्योगिक पार्क (रीपा) को स्थापित करने में हुए व्यय की होगी जांच- उपमुख्यमंत्री विजय शर्मा

CG News: रायपुर: उपमुख्यमंत्री विजय शर्मा ने कहा कि पूरे प्रदेश में नवम्बर, 2023 तक कुल 300 रीपा स्थापित करने का लक्ष्य रखा गया था और 300 रीपा स्थापित किये गए हैं। वर्ष 2022-23 एवं 2023-24 में 441 करोड़ 75 लाख रुपये बजट में स्वीकृत किया गया। जिसमें राशि 260 करोड़ 1 लाख रूपये का भुगतान किया गया है।

Jharkhand land scam: हेमंत सोरेन की न्यायिक हिरासत 22 फरवरी तक बढ़ी

रांची। Jharkhand land scam: झारखंड भूमि घोटाला मामले में जेल में बंद झारखंड के पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री हेमंत सोरेन को रांची में एक विशेष धनशोधन निवारण अधिनियम (पीएमएलए) अदालत ने 22 फरवरी तक न्यायिक हिरासत में भेज दिया। बता दें कि सोरेन को मुख्यमंत्री पद से इस्तीफा देने के तुरंत बाद 31 जनवरी को ईडी ने गिरफ्तार कर लिया था।

80-year-old collapses in absence of wheelchair, now Air India clarifies

Multiple reports claim that a senior citizen passenger who had requested for a wheelchair as he was bound from New York to Mumbai, walked to a distance and collapsed due to heart attack but he could not be provided with a wheelchair.

Read more related news: https://newsplus21.com/

[starbiopic]

Popular Comedy Show 'Laughter Chefs' to End in October, Ahead of Bigg Boss 18

The hit TV show Laughter Chefs: Unlimited Entertainment is all set to wrap up its first season earlier than expected. Known for its unique blend of cooking and comedy, the show, hosted by Bharti Singh, has won the hearts of viewers. However, due to the upcoming new season of Bigg Boss, the final episode will air in October 2024, instead of running until January 2025 as initially planned. A Show…