#bf80

[chill-wavetable]

[altades]

vampire kiss full - https://boosty.to/altades/posts/e33fa067-e954-4f86-bf80-6cde23a9fab5?share=success_publish_link

[raccoon-pizza]

493：底名無し沼さん (ｽｯﾌﾟ Sd12-M2UO [1.75.224.60])：2024/03/19(火) 13:39:07.82 ID:zb69f1IMd

金峰山の登山ルート整備し新たな修験道として復活へ 甲府市

03月19日　06時52分

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/lnews/kofu/20240319/1040022806.html

501：底名無し沼さん (ﾌﾞｰｲﾓ MM83-0piB [202.214.198.37])：[sage]：2024/03/19(火) 17:26:38.66 ID:X5U9Pj0aM

>>493

新たな修験道として整備？

NHKのバカ記者は修験道って歩道のことだと思ってんのかww

509：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 06a1-JP6p [240b:11:6201:a700:*])：[sage]：2024/03/19(火) 21:07:38.25 ID:5RgVThAJ0

>>493 >>501

> 新たな修験道として復活

て言ってるから、新興宗教を起こしてやるぜ！て意味じゃねーの？w

オームみたいな

516：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 92ed-p32g [221.117.104.49])：[sage]：2024/03/20(水) 06:39:37.83 ID:erhmqX6C0

>>501

知らんけど奥駈道みたいに「しゅげん（の）みち」と読ませるんじゃない？「しゅげんどう」ではなく

517：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 32ce-INMs [240a:6b:d10:fd07:*])：2024/03/20(水) 07:18:21.53 ID:kJejLCe90

>>516

そういう読み方ないし、登山者が修験道やるわけでないんだから、間違いだとおもう

518：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 0b54-CfZv [240b:c020:420:35d9:*])：[sage]：2024/03/20(水) 08:10:50.59 ID:+KKnHzPs0

>>517

SASUKEみたいなアトラクションが有る道かも知れない

519：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 32ce-INMs [240a:6b:d10:fd07:*])：2024/03/20(水) 12:20:19.23 ID:kJejLCe90

>>518

宗教だから

主観的な精神のあり方の問題なのです

でも瑞牆山荘から登るよりは岩場鎖場だらけなのかしら

502：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ bf80-0R4J [2400:4153:e120:e800:*])：2024/03/19(火) 18:12:37.58 ID:BS3hNRKr0

新たな修験道ってなんだ？国民に修行ブームでも起こすつもりかな？整備された登山ルートを通って修行になるのかな？ゆるふわ修験道？

503：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 67b1-IfCu [222.230.108.83])：2024/03/19(火) 18:58:17.44 ID:TUQWxmnb0

金峰山講でも作るってことですかね

510：底名無し沼さん (ﾊﾞｯﾐﾝｸﾞｸ MM02-FDlJ [153.172.88.212])：2024/03/19(火) 21:14:29.82 ID:nFyoaN+FM

クラファンやってたやつか

目標の半分しか集まらなかったが整備するんだな

520：底名無し沼さん (ｽｯｯﾌﾟ Sdf2-JP6p [49.98.157.65])：[sage]：2024/03/20(水) 12:35:39.09 ID:CqNCNxYOd

整備された修行w

草生える

521：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 8f2e-YpOp [2001:268:9abc:6410:*])：[sage]：2024/03/20(水) 12:37:47.21 ID:RG9sQl0/0

奥駆道は整備された修行の道では？

522：底名無し沼さん (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ 8318-CfnZ [240b:11:4ac3:2f00:*])：[sage]：2024/03/20(水) 13:09:17.04 ID:wb1u23Kk0

>>521

全まびき（何故か変換できない）を廻ってみたけど整備されていないところもあるな。散在していた修行場に至る道を後から整備したんジャマイカ。

[weonchileno]

síguenos en ➡️ @weon__chileno ⬅️ https://www.instagram.com/p/ClFgtnVMHun7ToGuSIXoFav4YcwL3SW1Ih-BF80/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[antoine-roquentin]

In 2013, Daniel Hale was at an antiwar conference in D.C. when a man recounted that two family members had been killed in a U.S. drone strike. The Yemeni man, through tears, said his relatives had been trying to encourage young men to leave al-Qaeda.

Hale realized he had watched the fatal attack from a base in Afghanistan. At the time, he and his colleagues in Air Force intelligence viewed it as a success. Now he was horrified.

It was such experiences, Hale told a federal judge in Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday, that led him to leak classified information about drone warfare to a reporter after leaving the military.

“I believe that it is wrong to kill, but it is especially wrong to kill the defenseless,” he said in court. He said he shared what “was necessary to dispel the lie that drone warfare keeps us safe, that our lives are worth more than theirs.”

U.S. District Judge Liam O’Grady sentenced Hale, 33, of Nashville, to 45 months in prison for violating the Espionage Act, saying his disclosure of documents went beyond his “courageous and principled” stance on drones.

“You are not being prosecuted for speaking out about the drone program killing innocent people,” O’Grady said. “You could have been a whistleblower … without taking any of these documents.”...

None of the government agencies involved reported any direct harm resulting from Hale’s disclosures.

petraeus got 2 years probation for doing the same thing, but because he did it for personal gain instead of critiquing war crimes, they were lenient on him. meanwhile, hale exposed these crimes because of his personal beliefs, so the court is portraying him as having done so for personal gain.

[twoflipstwotwists]

“Nassar has paid approximately $8.33 toward his criminal monetary penalties per month, despite receiving deposits into his account over this period totaling $12,825.00,” said the filing by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joel Fauson. It reported Nassar’s current account balance as $2,041.57.

The Washington Post reported last month that the bureau allows inmates to keep unlimited amounts of money in their accounts and effectively shields much of that money from collection by various entities, leaving the Justice Department in the odd position of having to file court cases to force one of its own agencies to turn over money owed to crime victims or for other debts.

–

A December 2017 court document related to Nassar’s federal plea calls for a minimum payment of $25 every three months to cover what he owes in federal judgments. “All monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, judgments, and/or any other anticipated or unexpected financial gains to any outstanding court-ordered financial obligations must be applied,” the document states.

The court filing says Nassar has not paid any of the $57,488.52 he was ordered to give five of his victims in the child pornography case, who are identified only as Child 10, Child 11, Child 28, Child 29 and Child 30.

In addition, state court records show Nassar still owes $834 in the Eaton County, Mich., case in which he pleaded guilty to charges of abusing children.

The prison-spending figures in the court filing indicate that Nassar is paying the bare minimum required by the Bureau of Prisons’s “inmate financial responsibility” program to maintain prison privileges, such as being able to use email and make phone calls. At this rate, he would ultimately pay only about $500 of the $5,300 he owes because under federal rules, special-assessment debt is canceled after five years.

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

August 7, 2021

Heather Cox Richardson

While I try to post a picture on weekends, I don’t want to fail to put in this record that today’s testimony by Jeffrey A. Rosen, acting attorney general during the Trump administration, before the Senate Judiciary Committee, strikes me as being a game-changer.

New York Times reporter Katie Benner broke the news way back in January that a relatively unknown lawyer in the Justice Department, Jeffrey Clark, worked secretly with then-president Donald Trump to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Clark was a political appointee in the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice until he was moved in September 2020 to the civil division.

Rosen replaced Attorney General William Barr when Barr resigned on December 23, 2020. But immediately, when Rosen refused to entertain the idea of overturning the election, Trump considered firing Rosen and replacing him with Clark. Rosen and his acting deputy attorney general, Richard P. Donoghue, along with top leaders in the Department of Justice all threatened to resign if Trump made the change, and the then-president backed down.

The news that Clark and Trump were working together to overturn the election sparked congressional investigations in the House Oversight and Reform Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee. On Wednesday July 28, from the House committee, we learned that Trump had pressured Rosen daily to help him overturn the election. And we learned that Donoghue had taken notes of the calls.

On Friday, July 31, the House Oversight and Reform Committee released some of those notes. They were explosive. On December 27, Rosen said that the Department of Justice had concluded the election was legitimate and that it “can’t + won’t snap its fingers + change the outcome of the election.” Trump replied that he just wanted the department to “say the election was corrupt + leave the rest to me and the R[epublican] Congressmen.”

The next day, Clark tried to get Rosen and Donoghue to sign off on a letter claiming that the election had been fraudulent and saying that the Georgia legislature should appoint a different set of presidential electors on the grounds that the election there was full of irregularities.

The Justice Department had already determined that the election was, in fact, legitimate, and not marred by fraud. Donoghue responded to Clark that “there is no chance that I would sign this letter or anything remotely like this…. [T]his is not even within the realm of possibility.” Rosen wrote: “I confirmed again today that I am not prepared to sign such a letter."

According to an article in the New York Times by Katie Benner today, Rosen has been in talks with the Department of Justice for months to determine what information he could offer without disclosing information covered by executive privilege. On July 27, the Department of Justice said it would not restrict the testimony of former officials to the House Oversight and Reform Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee, and shortly after, former president Donald Trump said he would not sue to stop them from testifying.

Clark did not comment, but in January he said that while he had “a candid discussion of options and pros and cons with the president,” all of his official communications with Trump “were consistent with law.”

According to Benner, as soon as he got the all-clear, Rosen scheduled interviews with the congressional committees and with the inspector general of the Department of Justice to tell as much as he could of what he had seen before anyone tried to stop him. He met with the inspector general yesterday, and today he talked to the Senate Judiciary Committee for more than six hours.

Richard P. Donoghue has also agreed to testify, as have other Department of Justice officials.

What this means is that congressional investigating committees now have witnesses to Trump’s efforts to overturn the election.

With that in mind, it’s worth noting that tonight the Senate voted 67-27 to move the bipartisan infrastructure bill forward, just hours after Trump called it a “disgrace” and warned, “It will be very hard for me to endorse anyone foolish enough to vote in favor of this deal.” And yet, 18 Republicans joined the Democrats, reflecting the reality that 72% percent of Americans support the measure and going on the record against it, as Republicans did in March with the popular American Rescue Plan, is even less attractive now than it was then.

Tonight’s vote suggests that Republicans are not all going to continue to move in lockstep with the former president. Those cracks could well widen as more and more information about his administration comes out.

—-

Notes:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/27/us/politics/trump-officials-jan-6-testify.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/03/us/politics/trump-justice-dept-officials-testimony.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/22/us/politics/jeffrey-clark-trump-justice-department-election.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/07/us/politics/jeffrey-rosen-trump-election.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-rosen-election-calls/2021/07/28/43106ab6-efd6-11eb-bf80-e3877d9c5f06_story.html

https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-officials-rejected-colleagues-request-intervene-georgias-election/story

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-rosen-phone-call-notes/2021/07/30/2e9430d6-f14d-11eb-81d2-ffae0f931b8f_story.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/565958-poll-shows-broad-support-for-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/04/key-witness-emerges-probe-trump-doj-election-scheme/

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

[public-new-yahoopartner-blog]

Maquillage : 4 astuces pour redonner vie et forme à vos pinceaux

1- NETTOYER

On prend soin de choisir un bon nettoyant doux qui ne détruira pas les poils des pinceaux. De nombreuses enseignes vendent désormais des nettoyants spécialement conçus pour les pinceaux mais sachez que vous pouvez utiliser un shampooing doux à la place du nettoyant. Il suffit de verser un peu de produit sur la main, sur une assiette ou sur un tapis de nettoyage puis de faire pivoter légèrement la brosse humide, en la rinçant et en la replongeant jusqu’à ce que les fibres soient complètement propres. On évite absolument de remplir l’évier d’eau, d’y plonger ses pinceaux et de laisser tremper pendant plusieurs minutes. L’eau va s’infiltrer dans les pois et infiltrera aussi le manche en bois… ce qui va détacher la colle et vous risquez de vous retrouver avec des poils sur le visage lors de votre prochaine session make-up. 2- CHOUCHOUTER Tout comme les cheveux, les poils des pinceaux ont besoin d’un peu de chouchoutages et donc...

Retrouvez cet article sur Public

Nouvel An : 7 tenues pour vous faire remarquer à coup sûr

Christophe Beaugrand : ses photos les plus délirantes pour son anniversaire !

Kim Kardashian bientôt maman pour la 4e fois : Retour sur ses looks de grossesse

Photos : Ces actrices ont caché leur grossesse devant la caméra pour un rôle

SOLDES HIVER 2019 : 30 pièces à shopper chez ZARA pour affronter le froid avec style

[ofhopejewelry]

I just added this listing on Poshmark: Bay bay shades.

[iphone6papers]

Get Wallpaper: http://iphone6papers.com/bf80-diamond-body-marvel-green-art/ - Wallpapers for iPhone 6 & Plus via http://iPhone6papers.com

[marcelofh-blog1]