#being employed for just that one month has crippled me so bad financially
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
hiatus lol
#i can’t find the motivation to do anything cause I’m too stressed about money#being employed for just that one month has crippled me so bad financially#im not e-begging again i don’t have it in me to ask any more of you for any more help#but goddamn#i just wanna play sims#but every day i get emails from my bank about overdraft fees and insufficient funds#hopefully it’s just til the end of this week#but my hiatus is ongoing until i can get myself settled again#I’ll be back hopefully soon#nia.txt
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Rising Tide Raises All Ships
I don't understand people who are so ardently against social systems. Like, it's pulling eye-teeth just to have what little we do. I can't tell you how many f*cking time some MAGA cultist attacks food stamps or welfare like it's the worst thing ever but it's like, the ones who abuse it like you say, look like you. They don't look like me. There's always bad actors in any system, but if the majority carries on the way they should, then that system should function regardless. We know it can because it's being executed in real time, all over the world. There's a reason why the happiest places on earth, have the most expansive social welfare systems. Its fine to drive capitalism, no one's telling you not to work hard, but if we expanded those processes, everyone benefits. If everyone contributes a little more to the pool, all of our boats rise with the tide. I mean, seriously, if 2020 has taught us anything, it's that the systems we have in pace right now, don't work. They are easily exploited, easily manipulated, and completely counter intuitive to living life. There is a literal f*cking plague going on and our president is forcing people back to work and kids back to class because the economy. If that don't scream broke and needs fixing, I don't what does.
Free Healthcare means no worries going to the doctor. Paper cut, baby delivery, broken bone, or f*cking cancer, there'd be no stressing over how to pay those ridiculous bills. They wouldn't be ridiculous. I think in Canada an ambulance ride is, like, $230 dollars, average, depending on circumstances. In some places, it's as low as $45 and others, as high as $385. The average here in the States is closer to $1200 f*cking dollars. For just the ambulance. That's not even beginning to address the hospital visit and hope you don't an extended stay. These mother*ckers gave me a bill for close to $50,000 for my two week stay the first time I almost died. Bro, there's no way I am ever going to pay that. The f*ck is you saying? I read an account of someone going to the emergency room in the Philippines and it cost her $15 dollars. To see the doctor. It would have been free but she's not a citizen. More than anything, universal healthcare would force Big Pharma to price their medications appropriately. There would have affordable prescriptions for everyone. When I left my job, I lot my insurance. When I checked prices on my meds, just a single prescription was $400 f*cking dollars for one month's worth. In Canada, that prescription would have been $15. The ill thing? The $400 dollar one was the cheapest I could find stateside. I take five medications for my heart. Uninsured, I'd be dropping close to $3800 a month, on sh*t I need to live. Who the f*ck has a loose $3800 when they have to pay that much in rent every month? Insulin is, like, $300 for 10 days worth here. In Canada, it's f*cking $30. Sh*t's even cheaper in Egypt. Small businesses wouldn't have to worry about employee healthcare or anything like that. If you have more than two employees, the cost you save in insurance coverage is more than enough to offset that tax increase. You'd be able to actually pay a more livable wage, while pocketing more profit at the same time. How is any of this bad? How can you spin this sh*t as a negative?
Free education means a more literate populace. We wouldn't have near as many Anti-Vaxxers and Flat Earthers. Motherf*ckers would understand the science of social distancing and mask wearing during a goddamn pandemic. I wouldn't be so f*cking mad having to dumb myself down just to interact with society. If we follow the Nordic system, you get your four years worth of education, graduate with a proper degree, and get placed into a position immediately out of college to tenure in your focus for the next four years. It's not an internship but a real job. You not only get a degree, but you immediately start earning a living in that field, while accumulating experience. Once you complete your four year employment obligation, you can continue your employment, start the process over with a new major in mind, or you're free to travel abroad with four years experience and a BA in your pocket. Not only would the populace be more literate, more people would be employed thus stimulating the economy. Those that enter into science and engineering, would have to innovate in their fields for four years, minimum, so you'd have hungry minds creating the future, just like back in the day when “America was great” or whatever. More education, means more jobs, means a stronger economy, means less crime. Again, how is this a bad thing? You wouldn't even have to do away with private college or studying whatever you want. If there wasn't a free program to take advantage of, just pay for your classes. I'm sure there'd still be grants and scholarship and financial aid available for aspiring painters or wannabe film makers, or any number of vanity degrees. F*ck it, man, if you want to go to Harvard just for the clout, you can still totally do that. F*ck, dude, you can do it after getting your free degree even. Graduate school, bro. Motherf*cker can be making six figures paying that stupid, clout chasing, tuition out of pocket because you can afford it with the job you got with that free degree. That's the beauty of the Nordic system; Everyone gets what they want.
That's just the surface of these benefits. I'm not even going to go into what universal income, maternity leave, vacation time, strong unions, and subsidized child care. I'm not even going to touch on how prisons over there are built to rehabilitate, not to humiliate and effectively enslave. For Profit prisons are the modern plantations. Look that sh*t up. I'm not even going to go into detail about the benefits collective legalization for all drugs and how crime plummeted because of it, or how they treat addiction like a mental illness and not a criminal offense, or the way they house their homeless and treat them humanely, while transitioning them into society with counseling, job placement, and social work. All of this, for, maybe, an extra hundred or two a year. That's, what? An extra $30 a month out of your check? Less than $10 a f*cking week? That one trip to Starbucks. That's two Quarter-Pounders. That's nothing. How does that math not work? How do these universal benefits, not jive with everyone? How does this sh*t not make sense to people, when you can see it working the world over? The illest thing in this whole situations is the fact that we, as the US, have absolutely more than enough to implement this system, this type of social democracy which benefits everyone, if we just rearranged our budget. Admittedly, we couldn't just implement the healthcare out the box. I mean, we could, but that would entail getting motherf*ckers who make trillions, like Amazon, Facebook, and Tesla as well as Zuckerberg, Musk, and Bezos, to pay their fair share without circumventing said responsibilities Corporate Welfare is crippling the working American and people are too dumb to even pay attention to it, distracted by buzzwords like “communism” and “immigrant.” So we do the free education thing first. That's only $4 billion a year. I checked. That's pittance compared to the defense budget.
Motherf*ckers wouldn't even need to “tax the rich” or “hold them accountable” if we just cut the defense budget. We can keep pretending that trickle down works and that Wall Street works for us and not corporate gluttons and that Reaganomics works, and whatever else the conservatives want us all to believe. Whatever, right? The US spends $650 billion on defense. That is, quite literally, $400 billion more than the next country, China. The rest of the world, minus the US and China, spends a collective $831 billion. That's an average of less than $50 billion a year, worldwide. F*ck, if you add China back into that, it's still less than $65 billion a year. Did i mention that these are yearly budgets? And these are old numbers. My guy, we can afford to drop a few billion of that defense budget. We can probably skim $50 billion and enrich a lot of people's lives but we don't even need that much. Drop $4 billion off of that gratuitous $650 tril, and you can fund free education for everyone. Following the Nordic system, that means more jobs. That means more taxes. That means a better economy and more revenue to implement the universal health care, which would further lessen the burden of employers and employees, putting even more money back into everyone's pockets, which would grow the economy even more. Happy and secure people, spend more money. The only people this system hurts, are those hurting us with the current system. Are they literally too dumb and/or selfish to let go of a little extra and uplift all of us? How do you argue that math? No one loses but the people forcing you to lose right now, in real time. F*ck, man, 2020 has exposed this entire system and there are still people who will die for a country that won't even give you enough money to be safe during a whole ass plague and I don't understand that at all.
1 note
·
View note
Text
The Rising Tide Raises All Ships
I don't understand people who are so ardently against social systems. Like, it's pulling eye-teeth just to have what little we do. I can't tell you how many f*cking time some MAGA cultist attacks food stamps or welfare like it's the worst thing ever but it's like, the ones who abuse it like you say, look like you. They don't look like me. There's always bad actors in any system, but if the majority carries on the way they should, then that system should function regardless. We know it can because it's being executed in real time, all over the world. There's a reason why the happiest places on earth, have the most expansive social welfare systems. Its fine to drive capitalism, no one's telling you not to work hard, but if we expanded those processes, everyone benefits. If everyone contributes a little more to the pool, all of our boats rise with the tide. I mean, seriously, if 2020 has taught us anything, it's that the systems we have in pace right now, don't work. They are easily exploited, easily manipulated, and completely counter intuitive to living life. There is a literal f*cking plague going on and our president is forcing people back to work and kids back to class because the economy. If that don't scream broke and needs fixing, I don't what does.
Free Healthcare means no worries going to the doctor. Paper cut, baby delivery, broken bone, or f*cking cancer, there'd be no stressing over how to pay those ridiculous bills. They wouldn't be ridiculous. I think in Canada an ambulance ride is, like, $230 dollars, average, depending on circumstances. In some places, it's as low as $45 and others, as high as $385. The average here in the States is closer to $1200 f*cking dollars. For just the ambulance. That's not even beginning to address the hospital visit and hope you don't an extended stay. These mother*ckers gave me a bill for close to $50,000 for my two week stay the first time I almost died. Bro, there's no way I am ever going to pay that. The f*ck is you saying? I read an account of someone going to the emergency room in the Philippines and it cost her $15 dollars. To see the doctor. It would have been free but she's not a citizen. More than anything, universal healthcare would force Big Pharma to price their medications appropriately. There would have affordable prescriptions for everyone. When I left my job, I lot my insurance. When I checked prices on my meds, just a single prescription was $400 f*cking dollars for one month's worth. In Canada, that prescription would have been $15. The ill thing? The $400 dollar one was the cheapest I could find stateside. I take five medications for my heart. Uninsured, I'd be dropping close to $3800 a month, on sh*t I need to live. Who the f*ck has a loose $3800 when they have to pay that much in rent every month? Insulin is, like, $300 for 10 days worth here. In Canada, it's f*cking $30. Sh*t's even cheaper in Egypt. Small businesses wouldn't have to worry about employee healthcare or anything like that. If you have more than two employees, the cost you save in insurance coverage is more than enough to offset that tax increase. You'd be able to actually pay a more livable wage, while pocketing more profit at the same time. How is any of this bad? How can you spin this sh*t as a negative?
Free education means a more literate populace. We wouldn't have near as many Anti-Vaxxers and Flat Earthers. Motherf*ckers would understand the science of social distancing and mask wearing during a goddamn pandemic. I wouldn't be so f*cking mad having to dumb myself down just to interact with society. If we follow the Nordic system, you get your four years worth of education, graduate with a proper degree, and get placed into a position immediately out of college to tenure in your focus for the next four years. It's not an internship but a real job. You not only get a degree, but you immediately start earning a living in that field, while accumulating experience. Once you complete your four year employment obligation, you can continue your employment, start the process over with a new major in mind, or you're free to travel abroad with four years experience and a BA in your pocket. Not only would the populace be more literate, more people would be employed thus stimulating the economy. Those that enter into science and engineering, would have to innovate in their fields for four years, minimum, so you'd have hungry minds creating the future, just like back in the day when “America was great” or whatever. More education, means more jobs, means a stronger economy, means less crime. Again, how is this a bad thing? You wouldn't even have to do away with private college or studying whatever you want. If there wasn't a free program to take advantage of, just pay for your classes. I'm sure there'd still be grants and scholarship and financial aid available for aspiring painters or wannabe film makers, or any number of vanity degrees. F*ck it, man, if you want to go to Harvard just for the clout, you can still totally do that. F*ck, dude, you can do it after getting your free degree even. Graduate school, bro. Motherf*cker can be making six figures paying that stupid, clout chasing, tuition out of pocket because you can afford it with the job you got with that free degree. That's the beauty of the Nordic system; Everyone gets what they want.
That's just the surface of these benefits. I'm not even going to go into what universal income, maternity leave, vacation time, strong unions, and subsidized child care. I'm not even going to touch on how prisons over there are built to rehabilitate, not to humiliate and effectively enslave. For Profit prisons are the modern plantations. Look that sh*t up. I'm not even going to go into detail about the benefits collective legalization for all drugs and how crime plummeted because of it, or how they treat addiction like a mental illness and not a criminal offense, or the way they house their homeless and treat them humanely, while transitioning them into society with counseling, job placement, and social work. All of this, for, maybe, an extra hundred or two a year. That's, what? An extra $30 a month out of your check? Less than $10 a f*cking week? That one trip to Starbucks. That's two Quarter-Pounders. That's nothing. How does that math not work? How do these universal benefits, not jive with everyone? How does this sh*t not make sense to people, when you can see it working the world over? The illest thing in this whole situations is the fact that we, as the US, have absolutely more than enough to implement this system, this type of social democracy which benefits everyone, if we just rearranged our budget. Admittedly, we couldn't just implement the healthcare out the box. I mean, we could, but that would entail getting motherf*ckers who make trillions, like Amazon, Facebook, and Tesla as well as Zuckerberg, Musk, and Bezos, to pay their fair share without circumventing said responsibilities Corporate Welfare is crippling the working American and people are too dumb to even pay attention to it, distracted by buzzwords like “communism” and “immigrant.” So we do the free education thing first. That's only $4 billion a year. I checked. That's pittance compared to the defense budget.
Motherf*ckers wouldn't even need to “tax the rich” or “hold them accountable” if we just cut the defense budget. We can keep pretending that trickle down works and that Wall Street works for us and not corporate gluttons and that Reaganomics works, and whatever else the conservatives want us all to believe. Whatever, right? The US spends $650 billion on defense. That is, quite literally, $400 billion more than the next country, China. The rest of the world, minus the US and China, spends a collective $831 billion. That's an average of less than $50 billion a year, worldwide. F*ck, if you add China back into that, it's still less than $65 billion a year. Did i mention that these are yearly budgets? And these are old numbers. My guy, we can afford to drop a few billion of that defense budget. We can probably skim $50 billion and enrich a lot of people's lives but we don't even need that much. Drop $4 billion off of that gratuitous $650 tril, and you can fund free education for everyone. Following the Nordic system, that means more jobs. That means more taxes. That means a better economy and more revenue to implement the universal health care, which would further lessen the burden of employers and employees, putting even more money back into everyone's pockets, which would grow the economy even more. Happy and secure people, spend more money. The only people this system hurts, are those hurting us with the current system. Are they literally too dumb and/or selfish to let go of a little extra and uplift all of us? How do you argue that math? No one loses but the people forcing you to lose right now, in real time. F*ck, man, 2020 has exposed this entire system and there are still people who will die for a country that won't even give you enough money to be safe during a whole ass plague and I don't understand that at all.
0 notes
Text
Reflections on Being Fired as a 60-Year Old Lawyer
One
“I’m sorry, I have to let you go.”
The head of the firm managed to look sad. I had started working for the firm less than a year before. I had been brought in at 60 years old because the firm wanted an older, experienced attorney to mentor the younger employees in the firm.
I flattered myself in believing I had done this, sharing my trial experience, my voir dire questions, my knowledge of search and seizure case law, and my real-world understanding of what made clients tick.
“Can you tell me why?” I asked.
He shook his head.
“My lawyer told me not to say anything,” he said. The old dodge: Blame the lawyers.
“For what it’s worth,” he said, giving me a tiny sheepish smile, “I think you’re a good guy.”
I felt as if the floor underneath me had disappeared. I saw myself falling and falling and falling with no end in sight.
“I don’t like doing this,” the boss said. “You’re the first lawyer in ten years I’ve had to terminate.”
“Why does that not make me feel better?” I asked sickly.
I was 61 now. What the hell was I going to do?
My son would be getting married in two months. Fortunately, I had already purchased my airline tickets to the wedding in Indiana. The firm gave me enough in severance to get me through to then. But what would happen when I returned?
I half-jokingly told myself that maybe I would get lucky and the plane would crash on the way back. Financial problem solved.
I could look for another job, but I couldn’t indulge in the fantasy that I would find one. At my age, no one would seriously consider me, though they would all make a great show of doing so to avoid a discrimination claim.
Falling, falling, falling…
“What do you think I should do?” I said to my boss. He shook his head.
“Could you at least give me a recommendation letter?” I asked, grasping at the last tiny shred of dignity.
“My lawyer recommends we stay out of that,” he said.
When a lawyer loses a job, it’s different from when a real person loses a job. Most lawyers go through their lives with one or two firms, rarely facing the prospect of unemployment. To be fired would be an eternal black mark on my career.
I staggered out the door, boxes of my personal accouterment awkwardly in my hands. I was surprised there was still solid ground beneath my feet.
Two of my colleagues helped me get the boxes into the car and then stood outside with me telling me how much this sucked. I knew what they were thinking: What if this was me?
Finally, I drove off. I tried to pay attention to the road even though I was having an out of body experience.
I was untethered. It felt like my career was in my rear view mirror.
The silence after you are fired is earthquake-like: eerie and foreboding.
I drove home dazed, worrying I may not capably focus on the pavement unfurling in front of my empty eyes. I thought briefly about stopping for a late breakfast but quickly reminded myself that every penny would now be husbanded toward my survival for the next few months. Or years. Or forever.
Before I slid from the firm’s office, I had agreed to sign a liability release in exchange for two weeks’ pay. They seemed surprised I would agree to it so readily. But I was an at-will employee. Unless a firm insider went rogue and revealed some illegal reason for my termination—that I was too old and too expensive, for example—I would have no case. Better to squirrel away a few thousand now and extend my resources, right?
My final check and my severance paycheck sat on the passenger seat like unwilling children. They seemed to brood with every glance I stole at them. They totaled $5,000. About a month’s wages at the firm.
I walked into my apartment and slumped into the couch. At $1,400 per month, the rent would be crippling for an unemployed lawyer. I’d need to plot my exit before Halloween.
I looked around at my books, my television, the pictures on the walls. They were so frivolous, weren’t they? How much would they fetch in a yard sale?
It was strange sitting on that dark green couch I bought when I first arrived in Sacramento for the job. The couch and my Queen-sized bed set me back a cool $2,500 when I’d first moved in. I paid them off in three payments, sure that money was no issue for a gainfully-employed lawyer.
Now it mocked me: ‘”What a fool! Trusting your employer to keep his word!?!”
When hired, I’d explained that this needed to be my last job. I would work for until I hit 70 and would retire in honor. They readily agreed.
Now I was out on my ear, with no real explanation why. That, in my considered and pained and brutalized judgment, meant the explanation was probably an illegal one. My boss had even said, “My lawyers say I can’t tell you why.” It was hard to suppress the anger threatening to overwhelm my heart.
It’s like that old chestnut about the difference between a dead lawyer and a dead skunk in the road: there are skid marks in front of the skunk. Well, I could relate. I couldn’t find a damned skid mark in front of me. No one even tried to stop this demise.
I called my friends. My brother. Some old public defender contacts in San Bernardino.
And I stared at the walls, at my pictures, at my books. I didn’t turn on the television—I knew the rattle of inane comedy would only manifest my tragedy.
I felt like I was still falling, falling. I had a little money in savings, but it wouldn’t last into November. One month. Beyond that, chaos. I had a vision of myself standing on a street corner in a ragged three-piece suit with a tattered “Will Sue for Food” sign. Would passers-by be amused enough to spare a few bucks?
As the numbness retreated, however, my ego slowly began to reassert itself. “You’ve been in tough spots like this before,” it said. “Let yourself grieve for a few days, then decide how you’ll spend the rest of your life,” it said.
It was a good plan. But my anger and my grief would last a long time. I felt conned. I told them who and what I was. I had been radically honest. They had not. It kept coming back to me, on a loop like a bad song the D.J. couldn’t quit.
Slowly, my shock was lifting. My ego was right. I had been in tough spots, both before and after I passed the bar. This was just one more. This was the Universe untethering me from a questionable job with a questionable employer.
Defiance was my best response. I grabbed my car keys and headed out my apartment door. I was going for dinner. And a movie.
Screw those guys. I was still alive.
The day after I’m fired is Saturday. Part of me wants to lounge on the couch and watch bad TV all day, drink diet iced tea and feel sorry for myself. This is something I need to do, I told myself, so that I can feel better, ready to revise and change my life Monday morning.
But I know better.
Oh, I tried it. But after I watched a stupid situation comedy which not only insulted my intelligence but made me worry about the survival of Western Civilization, I got off the couch and pounce on my cell phone.
It was time to call in the troops.
Specifically, friends and family who might be able to help me find another job. Or, at least, who could lend me money until I can start bringing in an income.
You truly find out whether your friends and family love you or think you’re a schlump when you lose your job. In this case, I was in for a pleasant surprise.
The first person I called was my friend Shelby, who has worked for the Public Defender in a Southern California county for 25 years. After I explained to him what had happened, he laughed.
“Knew it was gonna go South for you,” he says cheerfully. “Just had that feeling.”
“You’re a great comfort,” I said. I resisted the urge to climb through the telephone line and strangle him. After all, I couldn’t afford to alienate someone who might get me back to gainful employment, even if he’s being a jerk.
“I’ll ask around the office to see if they might want you back,” he said. Rude comment forgiven.
I called my friend Jerome, who is a little more sympathetic.
“How could they do that to you?” he asked. Jerome is one of those guys whom everyone likes. He’s never been fired, never will be, despite jumping around in his legal career. He now worked for the same PD’s office as Scott.
“I’m not sure how they could, but they did,” I say.
“I’ll talk to the head of the office. Maybe they want you back.”
As I said, everyone likes Jerome.
I’m feeling a little better now. I’m thinking I can return to Southern California and go back to work for the old office, the one I left voluntarily for the job I’ve just lost. Not exactly as a conquering hero, but at least intact.
I called my brother, my older sister, and a 30-years-long friend of mine to let them know the awful news. All three offered to lend me a thousand or so to keep me from being on the street. Since I am still flush with severance pay, I thanked them all and told them I might call on them in the future.
As I hang up the phone, I realized that I am far too good at dealing with disaster. I’ve been through this before, both as a civilian and as an attorney. I always managed to muddle through. I’m not sure how I do it. After I’m out of danger, I always seem to look back and marvel that I am not buried under a smoking pile of rubble along some lonely freeway.
As a lawyer, I should have been embarrassed to call these folks and tell them that I’d been fired. Termination of employment is not normal in the legal profession. Usually, one gets fired from a law firm or a public agency for some heinous crime, such as leaving a comma out of a pleading that leads to the motion being denied. Or sleeping with a client. Were I to choose my sin, I would go for the sin of commission, not the one of omission. It seems more fun. Alas, the reason I was terminated is still a mystery to me. All I knew was that I couldn’t talk my way back into the job.
I go online and begin applying for any Public Defender job I could find. Despite my ugly experience with the firm, I am convinced that I am a good PD. My clients told me so. My colleagues told me so. Even the judges told me so. In fact, in a roundabout way, the prosecutors told me so—they would give me a hard time about filing too many motions, announcing ready for too many trials. In other words, I was making them work. How dare I?
So I am not embarrassed. I am irked. I am scared. I am puzzled. But not embarrassed.
That comes later.
Two
I am invited into an office with a window view. A round table sits near the door. Bookshelves line the outer wall. Pictures of an indeterminate theme dot the walls.
This is my first interview since being “resigned” at the old law firm. I wish I was more nervous than I am. Sad to say, I’ve been through a lot of interviews in my career.
The man who greets me is tall, about six foot two. He has sandy hair and startling blue eyes. He would be perfectly cast as a Southern Lawyer defending some unjustly charged young teenager in a melodrama about racism.
He is, in fact, from the South—Tennessee, he tells me. How he got to California is a labyrinthian story to which I listen respectfully. He’s about forty, twenty-one years my junior. He’s the head of the local Public Defender’s Office.
“I’m trying to build this office,” he says. “It was a mess when I was appointed.” I don’t ask him why it was a mess. You never know where the sore spots are.
“I have a lot of experience in Public Defender Offices,” I say, hoping it’s a strong point and does not advertise the fact that my career has been a checkered one. Checkers? More like Parcheesi.
We talk about what it means to be a Public Defender and how different it is from any other kind of job in the law. The difference between your typical private defense attorney and a Public Defender is that PDs have ethics, they have rules, they have 30 cases a day. A PD makes about a quarter of what a good private defense lawyer pulls in, though there are private lawyers that make ten times what a “line” PD makes—into seven figures.
(So, you are asking, why don’t I go that way? Well, to get to the seven-figure private lawyer world, you must start as a solo practitioner when you are fresh out of law school and carefully build your practice over twenty years. Then you need a bit of luck—landing a case with lots of publicity. It doesn’t matter if you win. So long as you’re on TV and in the newspapers, people will remember your name. At 61, I’m a bit too long in the tooth to try to build such a practice.)
But there’s more to being a PD than just a lot of cases and too little money. To be a Public Defender is a mindset—you fight, you work for your clients, you remember why you’re there. The best Public Defenders know how to work hard for their clients without alienating the prosecutors. You get good deals from them because they know how hard you’re going to make them work at trial, even on a slam-dunk case; and because they get along with you.
We talk about all these ideas. We feel pretty good about ourselves when it’s over. Our interview was scheduled for thirty minutes, but we’ve been going for nearly an hour.
He likes me, he really likes me. We have an easy conversation and agree on pretty much everything. I tell him that I can help him rebuild his office because I have the experience to help the younger lawyers. He nods his head.
“That sounds really good,” he says in his Southern accent. “I could use the help.”
I don’t spread my arms and say, “Here I am,” though I want to.
I walk out of the office feeling good about my chances. I change into more comfortable shoes with my car door open in the parking lot just as my interviewer runs out, rushing to court. I smile sheepishly at him and he says, “I’ve had to do that myself.” Another connection.
On the way out of town, I check out apartment and home rentals. They’re much cheaper than Sacramento—about half so. This is looking better and better.
I drive the hours back to Sacramento thinking I should start boxing everything up. I might get hired before the end of October when I will fly to Indiana for my son’s wedding. I’ve already bought the tickets. I’m pretty sure my new employers won’t have a problem with my disappearing for a week to see my only son get married.
I wait for the call to be hired. It never comes. To this day I haven’t even received a letter from that Public Defender’s office telling me thanks but no thanks. I guess rebuilding a PD’s office is so time-consuming you can’t dredge up the grace to say “no.”
Three
I have agreed to make an appearance for another lawyer in Dept 30 of the Superior Court. This is my first time back in court since the untimely demise of my career.
It is a misdemeanor court, so I will not see any of my former felony teammates. However, there will be others from the firm roaming the courtroom.
I see the woman who supervises misdemeanors for the firm. She is standing outside the doors talking to a tall man with a bad haircut. She is chastising him for some transgression.
I avoid her and sit in the audience. I contemplate my ruin while waiting for the doors to open. You know your career is near rock bottom when you start snapping up $50 to make brief appearances for other lawyers. You’re not even a pinch hitter. More like a stand-in for the movies. You are a non-entity, a nothing, a fool.
At 1 p.m. precisely, the bailiff opens the doors to Dept. 30.
The courtroom is both familiar and unfamiliar to me. It looks like every courtroom in which I’ve spent thirty years: Long row of chairs for the audience, a wooden “bar” at the front, a pair of pine-topped tables pushed together, the clerk off to the side in her little enclave and the bailiff at a small desk near the bar. At the head of the room, elevated so that one will be cowed by the majesty of the law, the judge’s bench. Mounted on the wall behind the bench is the Seal of the Great State of California. The goddess Minerva sits in the seal with her ill-fitting war helmet, a spear, and an impassive expression.
I sit in the audience, too embarrassed to sit in the jury box like I used to do when I was a person with a real job. The supervisor for the misdemeanors begins asking each person about their case.
“Which case are you here on?” she asks me. Then she looks closer.
“Oh, it’s you!” she says. I nod. Then she looks concerned. “Do you have a case in here today?” She’s thinking I committed a crime after I got fired.
“I’m appearing on the Smith matter,” I say, “for another lawyer.”
“Oh, the bail matter,” she says, and moves on.
No other attorney from the firm acknowledges my existence. One, a burly ex-Marine with whom I had engaged in discussions about the military, the law, and being a public defender, slides his gaze over me.
Another lawyer, a middle-aged man with salt and pepper hair whom I had helped with thorny legal issues, searches for his clients in every part of the courtroom except where I sit.
I get up and walk past the bar. I check in with the clerk, handing her one of my new business cards. Then I talk to a young woman from the DA’s office who is wearing matching purple jacket and pants, a daring look for a prosecutor.
I sit in the jury box, thinking that now my former office mates will recognize me and say hello. But they studiously avoid me.
I should be shouting “Unclean! Unclean!” to warn them that I am contagious and if they dare talk to me, they may be infected with the termination virus. How frightened they look. How cowardly.
I am Banquo’s ghost, the unwelcome guest at the feast. To talk to me would be to acknowledge that they, too, might someday find themselves out of a job. Nothing has been officially disseminated in the firm about my termination, though it’s been implied by the higher-ups that some “emergency” required my firing.
Judge Evans, who sometimes was friendly to me, takes the bench. He peers at me.
“What did you say your name was?” he asks.
I say my name and spell it.
I tell him I’m appearing for another lawyer and that we need the bail exonerated. There is a written motion, which he carefully reviews. He grants the motion. Then he’s on to the next matter.
As I turn to leave a young woman, dark-haired and brown-eyed, says to me, “Mark, I didn’t recognize you! How are you?”
She is also from the firm but she seems to be unafraid of my unclean status.
“I’m doing fine,” I said. She puts her arm around my shoulders.
“This is my last appearance in Placer,” I say. “I’m moving to Southern California soon.”
“Good luck to you,” she smiles. We say goodbye and I walk out of the courtroom. I am contemplating why the big burly men were afraid of me but this young woman was not.
As for myself, I shake the dust of the county from my feet. In a week, I am going to my son’s wedding. Then I’m moving back to Southern California, where I have a place to rent and friends in the court system.
After my unfortunate adventure up North, I’m going home.
The post Reflections on Being Fired as a 60-Year Old Lawyer appeared first on Lawyerist.
from Law and Politics https://lawyerist.com/blog/being-fired/ via http://www.rssmix.com/
0 notes
Text
Reflections on Being Fired as a 60-Year Old Lawyer
One
“I’m sorry, I have to let you go.”
The head of the firm managed to look sad. I had started working for the firm less than a year before. I had been brought in at 60 years old because the firm wanted an older, experienced attorney to mentor the younger employees in the firm.
I flattered myself in believing I had done this, sharing my trial experience, my voir dire questions, my knowledge of search and seizure case law, and my real-world understanding of what made clients tick.
“Can you tell me why?” I asked.
He shook his head.
“My lawyer told me not to say anything,” he said. The old dodge: Blame the lawyers.
“For what it’s worth,” he said, giving me a tiny sheepish smile, “I think you’re a good guy.”
I felt as if the floor underneath me had disappeared. I saw myself falling and falling and falling with no end in sight.
“I don’t like doing this,” the boss said. “You’re the first lawyer in ten years I’ve had to terminate.”
“Why does that not make me feel better?” I asked sickly.
I was 61 now. What the hell was I going to do?
My son would be getting married in two months. Fortunately, I had already purchased my airline tickets to the wedding in Indiana. The firm gave me enough in severance to get me through to then. But what would happen when I returned?
I half-jokingly told myself that maybe I would get lucky and the plane would crash on the way back. Financial problem solved.
I could look for another job, but I couldn’t indulge in the fantasy that I would find one. At my age, no one would seriously consider me, though they would all make a great show of doing so to avoid a discrimination claim.
Falling, falling, falling…
“What do you think I should do?” I said to my boss. He shook his head.
“Could you at least give me a recommendation letter?” I asked, grasping at the last tiny shred of dignity.
“My lawyer recommends we stay out of that,” he said.
When a lawyer loses a job, it’s different from when a real person loses a job. Most lawyers go through their lives with one or two firms, rarely facing the prospect of unemployment. To be fired would be an eternal black mark on my career.
I staggered out the door, boxes of my personal accouterment awkwardly in my hands. I was surprised there was still solid ground beneath my feet.
Two of my colleagues helped me get the boxes into the car and then stood outside with me telling me how much this sucked. I knew what they were thinking: What if this was me?
Finally, I drove off. I tried to pay attention to the road even though I was having an out of body experience.
I was untethered. It felt like my career was in my rear view mirror.
The silence after you are fired is earthquake-like: eerie and foreboding.
I drove home dazed, worrying I may not capably focus on the pavement unfurling in front of my empty eyes. I thought briefly about stopping for a late breakfast but quickly reminded myself that every penny would now be husbanded toward my survival for the next few months. Or years. Or forever.
Before I slid from the firm’s office, I had agreed to sign a liability release in exchange for two weeks’ pay. They seemed surprised I would agree to it so readily. But I was an at-will employee. Unless a firm insider went rogue and revealed some illegal reason for my termination—that I was too old and too expensive, for example—I would have no case. Better to squirrel away a few thousand now and extend my resources, right?
My final check and my severance paycheck sat on the passenger seat like unwilling children. They seemed to brood with every glance I stole at them. They totaled $5,000. About a month’s wages at the firm.
I walked into my apartment and slumped into the couch. At $1,400 per month, the rent would be crippling for an unemployed lawyer. I’d need to plot my exit before Halloween.
I looked around at my books, my television, the pictures on the walls. They were so frivolous, weren’t they? How much would they fetch in a yard sale?
It was strange sitting on that dark green couch I bought when I first arrived in Sacramento for the job. The couch and my Queen-sized bed set me back a cool $2,500 when I’d first moved in. I paid them off in three payments, sure that money was no issue for a gainfully-employed lawyer.
Now it mocked me: ‘”What a fool! Trusting your employer to keep his word!?!”
When hired, I’d explained that this needed to be my last job. I would work for until I hit 70 and would retire in honor. They readily agreed.
Now I was out on my ear, with no real explanation why. That, in my considered and pained and brutalized judgment, meant the explanation was probably an illegal one. My boss had even said, “My lawyers say I can’t tell you why.” It was hard to suppress the anger threatening to overwhelm my heart.
It’s like that old chestnut about the difference between a dead lawyer and a dead skunk in the road: there are skid marks in front of the skunk. Well, I could relate. I couldn’t find a damned skid mark in front of me. No one even tried to stop this demise.
I called my friends. My brother. Some old public defender contacts in San Bernardino.
And I stared at the walls, at my pictures, at my books. I didn’t turn on the television—I knew the rattle of inane comedy would only manifest my tragedy.
I felt like I was still falling, falling. I had a little money in savings, but it wouldn’t last into November. One month. Beyond that, chaos. I had a vision of myself standing on a street corner in a ragged three-piece suit with a tattered “Will Sue for Food” sign. Would passers-by be amused enough to spare a few bucks?
As the numbness retreated, however, my ego slowly began to reassert itself. “You’ve been in tough spots like this before,” it said. “Let yourself grieve for a few days, then decide how you’ll spend the rest of your life,” it said.
It was a good plan. But my anger and my grief would last a long time. I felt conned. I told them who and what I was. I had been radically honest. They had not. It kept coming back to me, on a loop like a bad song the D.J. couldn’t quit.
Slowly, my shock was lifting. My ego was right. I had been in tough spots, both before and after I passed the bar. This was just one more. This was the Universe untethering me from a questionable job with a questionable employer.
Defiance was my best response. I grabbed my car keys and headed out my apartment door. I was going for dinner. And a movie.
Screw those guys. I was still alive.
The day after I’m fired is Saturday. Part of me wants to lounge on the couch and watch bad TV all day, drink diet iced tea and feel sorry for myself. This is something I need to do, I told myself, so that I can feel better, ready to revise and change my life Monday morning.
But I know better.
Oh, I tried it. But after I watched a stupid situation comedy which not only insulted my intelligence but made me worry about the survival of Western Civilization, I got off the couch and pounce on my cell phone.
It was time to call in the troops.
Specifically, friends and family who might be able to help me find another job. Or, at least, who could lend me money until I can start bringing in an income.
You truly find out whether your friends and family love you or think you’re a schlump when you lose your job. In this case, I was in for a pleasant surprise.
The first person I called was my friend Shelby, who has worked for the Public Defender in a Southern California county for 25 years. After I explained to him what had happened, he laughed.
“Knew it was gonna go South for you,” he says cheerfully. “Just had that feeling.”
“You’re a great comfort,” I said. I resisted the urge to climb through the telephone line and strangle him. After all, I couldn’t afford to alienate someone who might get me back to gainful employment, even if he’s being a jerk.
“I’ll ask around the office to see if they might want you back,” he said. Rude comment forgiven.
I called my friend Jerome, who is a little more sympathetic.
“How could they do that to you?” he asked. Jerome is one of those guys whom everyone likes. He’s never been fired, never will be, despite jumping around in his legal career. He now worked for the same PD’s office as Scott.
“I’m not sure how they could, but they did,” I say.
“I’ll talk to the head of the office. Maybe they want you back.”
As I said, everyone likes Jerome.
I’m feeling a little better now. I’m thinking I can return to Southern California and go back to work for the old office, the one I left voluntarily for the job I’ve just lost. Not exactly as a conquering hero, but at least intact.
I called my brother, my older sister, and a 30-years-long friend of mine to let them know the awful news. All three offered to lend me a thousand or so to keep me from being on the street. Since I am still flush with severance pay, I thanked them all and told them I might call on them in the future.
As I hang up the phone, I realized that I am far too good at dealing with disaster. I’ve been through this before, both as a civilian and as an attorney. I always managed to muddle through. I’m not sure how I do it. After I’m out of danger, I always seem to look back and marvel that I am not buried under a smoking pile of rubble along some lonely freeway.
As a lawyer, I should have been embarrassed to call these folks and tell them that I’d been fired. Termination of employment is not normal in the legal profession. Usually, one gets fired from a law firm or a public agency for some heinous crime, such as leaving a comma out of a pleading that leads to the motion being denied. Or sleeping with a client. Were I to choose my sin, I would go for the sin of commission, not the one of omission. It seems more fun. Alas, the reason I was terminated is still a mystery to me. All I knew was that I couldn’t talk my way back into the job.
I go online and begin applying for any Public Defender job I could find. Despite my ugly experience with the firm, I am convinced that I am a good PD. My clients told me so. My colleagues told me so. Even the judges told me so. In fact, in a roundabout way, the prosecutors told me so—they would give me a hard time about filing too many motions, announcing ready for too many trials. In other words, I was making them work. How dare I?
So I am not embarrassed. I am irked. I am scared. I am puzzled. But not embarrassed.
That comes later.
Two
I am invited into an office with a window view. A round table sits near the door. Bookshelves line the outer wall. Pictures of an indeterminate theme dot the walls.
This is my first interview since being “resigned” at the old law firm. I wish I was more nervous than I am. Sad to say, I’ve been through a lot of interviews in my career.
The man who greets me is tall, about six foot two. He has sandy hair and startling blue eyes. He would be perfectly cast as a Southern Lawyer defending some unjustly charged young teenager in a melodrama about racism.
He is, in fact, from the South—Tennessee, he tells me. How he got to California is a labyrinthian story to which I listen respectfully. He’s about forty, twenty-one years my junior. He’s the head of the local Public Defender’s Office.
“I’m trying to build this office,” he says. “It was a mess when I was appointed.” I don’t ask him why it was a mess. You never know where the sore spots are.
“I have a lot of experience in Public Defender Offices,” I say, hoping it’s a strong point and does not advertise the fact that my career has been a checkered one. Checkers? More like Parcheesi.
We talk about what it means to be a Public Defender and how different it is from any other kind of job in the law. The difference between your typical private defense attorney and a Public Defender is that PDs have ethics, they have rules, they have 30 cases a day. A PD makes about a quarter of what a good private defense lawyer pulls in, though there are private lawyers that make ten times what a “line” PD makes—into seven figures.
(So, you are asking, why don’t I go that way? Well, to get to the seven-figure private lawyer world, you must start as a solo practitioner when you are fresh out of law school and carefully build your practice over twenty years. Then you need a bit of luck—landing a case with lots of publicity. It doesn’t matter if you win. So long as you’re on TV and in the newspapers, people will remember your name. At 61, I’m a bit too long in the tooth to try to build such a practice.)
But there’s more to being a PD than just a lot of cases and too little money. To be a Public Defender is a mindset—you fight, you work for your clients, you remember why you’re there. The best Public Defenders know how to work hard for their clients without alienating the prosecutors. You get good deals from them because they know how hard you’re going to make them work at trial, even on a slam-dunk case; and because they get along with you.
We talk about all these ideas. We feel pretty good about ourselves when it’s over. Our interview was scheduled for thirty minutes, but we’ve been going for nearly an hour.
He likes me, he really likes me. We have an easy conversation and agree on pretty much everything. I tell him that I can help him rebuild his office because I have the experience to help the younger lawyers. He nods his head.
“That sounds really good,” he says in his Southern accent. “I could use the help.”
I don’t spread my arms and say, “Here I am,” though I want to.
I walk out of the office feeling good about my chances. I change into more comfortable shoes with my car door open in the parking lot just as my interviewer runs out, rushing to court. I smile sheepishly at him and he says, “I’ve had to do that myself.” Another connection.
On the way out of town, I check out apartment and home rentals. They’re much cheaper than Sacramento—about half so. This is looking better and better.
I drive the hours back to Sacramento thinking I should start boxing everything up. I might get hired before the end of October when I will fly to Indiana for my son’s wedding. I’ve already bought the tickets. I’m pretty sure my new employers won’t have a problem with my disappearing for a week to see my only son get married.
I wait for the call to be hired. It never comes. To this day I haven’t even received a letter from that Public Defender’s office telling me thanks but no thanks. I guess rebuilding a PD’s office is so time-consuming you can’t dredge up the grace to say “no.”
Three
I have agreed to make an appearance for another lawyer in Dept 30 of the Superior Court. This is my first time back in court since the untimely demise of my career.
It is a misdemeanor court, so I will not see any of my former felony teammates. However, there will be others from the firm roaming the courtroom.
I see the woman who supervises misdemeanors for the firm. She is standing outside the doors talking to a tall man with a bad haircut. She is chastising him for some transgression.
I avoid her and sit in the audience. I contemplate my ruin while waiting for the doors to open. You know your career is near rock bottom when you start snapping up $50 to make brief appearances for other lawyers. You’re not even a pinch hitter. More like a stand-in for the movies. You are a non-entity, a nothing, a fool.
At 1 p.m. precisely, the bailiff opens the doors to Dept. 30.
The courtroom is both familiar and unfamiliar to me. It looks like every courtroom in which I’ve spent thirty years: Long row of chairs for the audience, a wooden “bar” at the front, a pair of pine-topped tables pushed together, the clerk off to the side in her little enclave and the bailiff at a small desk near the bar. At the head of the room, elevated so that one will be cowed by the majesty of the law, the judge’s bench. Mounted on the wall behind the bench is the Seal of the Great State of California. The goddess Minerva sits in the seal with her ill-fitting war helmet, a spear, and an impassive expression.
I sit in the audience, too embarrassed to sit in the jury box like I used to do when I was a person with a real job. The supervisor for the misdemeanors begins asking each person about their case.
“Which case are you here on?” she asks me. Then she looks closer.
“Oh, it’s you!” she says. I nod. Then she looks concerned. “Do you have a case in here today?” She’s thinking I committed a crime after I got fired.
“I’m appearing on the Smith matter,” I say, “for another lawyer.”
“Oh, the bail matter,” she says, and moves on.
No other attorney from the firm acknowledges my existence. One, a burly ex-Marine with whom I had engaged in discussions about the military, the law, and being a public defender, slides his gaze over me.
Another lawyer, a middle-aged man with salt and pepper hair whom I had helped with thorny legal issues, searches for his clients in every part of the courtroom except where I sit.
I get up and walk past the bar. I check in with the clerk, handing her one of my new business cards. Then I talk to a young woman from the DA’s office who is wearing matching purple jacket and pants, a daring look for a prosecutor.
I sit in the jury box, thinking that now my former office mates will recognize me and say hello. But they studiously avoid me.
I should be shouting “Unclean! Unclean!” to warn them that I am contagious and if they dare talk to me, they may be infected with the termination virus. How frightened they look. How cowardly.
I am Banquo’s ghost, the unwelcome guest at the feast. To talk to me would be to acknowledge that they, too, might someday find themselves out of a job. Nothing has been officially disseminated in the firm about my termination, though it’s been implied by the higher-ups that some “emergency” required my firing.
Judge Evans, who sometimes was friendly to me, takes the bench. He peers at me.
“What did you say your name was?” he asks.
I say my name and spell it.
I tell him I’m appearing for another lawyer and that we need the bail exonerated. There is a written motion, which he carefully reviews. He grants the motion. Then he’s on to the next matter.
As I turn to leave a young woman, dark-haired and brown-eyed, says to me, “Mark, I didn’t recognize you! How are you?”
She is also from the firm but she seems to be unafraid of my unclean status.
“I’m doing fine,” I said. She puts her arm around my shoulders.
“This is my last appearance in Placer,” I say. “I’m moving to Southern California soon.”
“Good luck to you,” she smiles. We say goodbye and I walk out of the courtroom. I am contemplating why the big burly men were afraid of me but this young woman was not.
As for myself, I shake the dust of the county from my feet. In a week, I am going to my son’s wedding. Then I’m moving back to Southern California, where I have a place to rent and friends in the court system.
After my unfortunate adventure up North, I’m going home.
The post Reflections on Being Fired as a 60-Year Old Lawyer appeared first on Lawyerist.
from Law https://lawyerist.com/blog/being-fired/ via http://www.rssmix.com/
0 notes
Text
The Chase Files Daily Newscap
Good MORNING #realdreamchasers! Here is The Chase Files Daily News Cap for Wednesday 12th June 2019. Remember you can read full articles for FREE via Barbados Today (BT), Barbados Government Information Services (BGIS) or by purchasing a Midweek Nation Newspaper (MWN).
BARBADOS CURRENCY PUT AT RISK – Government’s decision to default on external credit for an entire year has once again exposed the Barbados dollar to possible devaluation, a senior Democratic Labour Party (DLP) spokesperson has warned. He has joined a chorus of both local and international dissenting voices, querying Government’s decision-making on the matter. In a scornful condemnation of the administration’s economic management, former Senator, Jepter Ince questioned why an administration with “all the consultants in the world” would have chosen to selectively default on its external arrears. “If you as an individual tell the bank that you are not going to pay your mortgage anymore, you’re not going to pay your credit cards anymore, then you have chosen to default and become a bad customer in the banking industry,” the former Wall Street investment banker explained to party faithful. “You defaulted on your international loans so your credit rating is bad and you can’t get any loans…and you can’t use the IMF’s money to buy garbage trucks and buses.” Estimating the country’s external debt was now north of U.S $140 million, Ince issued a stern warning to Government. “Nobody talks about the arrears, even the Central Bank doesn’t talk about the arrears on the international debt. Every country that defaulted on its international debt and ran arrears had devaluation…and I am sending out a warning to the Barbados Labour Party and to the Prime Minister. I am saying to them to deal with those arrears, because every country in the world that defaulted on its international debt and ran arrears had devaluation and I don’t want that for Barbados. We have nothing to devalue but our people, so Mr. Finance Minister, come and tell the people what is happening with the international debt and the arrears,” he urged. Last month, two separate international media houses, the Financial Times and Bloomberg revealed alarming discontent by creditors over Government’s refusal to pay its debts. They also questioned the controversial US$27 million bill to White Oak consultancy firm, which is assisting Government with its negotiations. Local, independent economist Jeremy Stephen has also warned that the decision could result in tremendous hardships including food shortages in the future, if the country was unable to secure financing and investment from outside. Prime Minister, Mia Mottley and other members of her Cabinet have continued to defend their handling of the situation, noting that the debt burden was unsustainable. The PM has also continuously praised White Oak for saving the country millions. Ince however told a packed auditorium at The St Michael School that the previous DLP administration led by Freundel Stuart intended to reduce Government’s international debt gradually without causing “hurt, pain or dislocation” to Barbadians. Ince accused Government of offering little transparency about the extent of the problem. “This Government has not laid a report from the accountant general in Parliament for a whole year. The accountant general report would tell me the position with the arrears on the foreign debt,” said Ince. Accusing Government of running the country’s affairs on IMF borrowed money, Ince challenged the administration to bring evidence of real economic growth and revenue generation over its first year in office. “They said to the people of Barbados that our foreign reserves were in dire straits and we were in trouble. Do you realise that in all the talk about foreign reserves, none of the car importers complained about not being able to bring in cars? Every Crop Overthe stores were filled with all the goodies for Crop Over. None of the supermarkets complained about a shortage of goods, but now they are borrowing money to prop up the foreign reserves,” charged Ince. (BT)
BAJAN BITCOIN BITES THE DUST – Bitcoin’s brief life as a digital currency here is headed for an abrupt end as financial technology firm Bitt informs customers it is shutting down its Exchange and Wallet in two months. Bitt customers will no longer be able to sell and buy Bitcoin via its Exchange and Wallet service come August 29. Account holders were urged to close their bitcoin accounts. In a statement, the fintech firm advised: “After years of serving you, the Bitt Exchange will cease all operations at 4 p.m. on August 29, 2019. Since you will no longer be able to sell or buy Bitcoin via this Exchange, we ask that you close your account with us before that time and date.” Bitt said it was closing the Exchange service to focus on its blockchain-based central bank digital currencies and Mmoney retail transaction business. Chief Financial Officer Patrick Hidalgo told Barbados TODAY: “We had the Bitt Exchange and Wallet, we have the Mmoney Wallet, Mmoney Merchant, License Financial Institutions Solutions and Central Banks Solutions. “So of those five we are just taking away one. That means that none of those other components of our business have anything to do with cryptocurrencies. “We are closing it so that we can focus on blockchain-based central bank digital currencies and Mmoney. The company said it expected to send further notifications to its customers. (BT)
‘SAVE OUR JOBS’, CRIES GARMENT MAKER – The jobs of 500 Barbadians are currently hanging in the balance as the local garment manufacturing industry continues to be crippled by imports, said one of the island’s largest garment makers. And Dean Straker, the co-managing director of Barbados Industries Ltd, is calling on Government to urgently put a policy in place to either keep the industry alive or allow operators to move in a different direction. Straker told reporters at a Barbados Manufacturers Association (BMA) media conference at the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre on Tuesday, that while the industry used to have thousands of workers, the 300 to 500 workers remaining could be put on the breadline if something was not done urgently. “We have a situation where in my industry, which is garment manufacturing, those manufacturing companies are folding every year. They are getting less and less. You have to think to yourself, ‘why?’ People are going to shut because they are not making money. They are not making money because of all the imports that are happening. “But I think Government needs to decide if they want to have garment manufacturing anymore and let those that are in it make future plans because everybody can import. But the fact of the matter is, I look at my staff every week and they have families. “I go to pay them every Friday and I think to myself ‘what happens when I tell them one week that this is it’. A lot of people are going to be affected.” He told reporters that once there was a clear policy, everyone would know exactly where they stand and what their next step should be, whether to say in the industry or move on. And while he could not say how soon his company or any other could fold if they did not get their concerns addressed, Straker said the policy should be put in place “very soon or else, as I said, different aspects of manufacturing will fall by the wayside and garment manufacturing is traditionally big numbers”. For decades, garment manufacturers in Barbados have been complaining about the impact of imported products on ever-dwindling factories. “You have a situation here where Government needs to set the tone, they need to let Barbadians know ‘this is what we expect’. “And we, for example, are telling our agencies, our ministries and statutory boards that you have to take tenders from Barbadian manufacturers and not from companies that have two or three staff in an office importing uniforms in the island. “I am just saying for us to stay in business we need support. So if we don’t get that support then obviously we have to go the way of others.” Straker said the Mottley administration was aware of the issues. On day three of the Barbados Manufacturers’ Exhibition (BMEX) which concluded yesterday, Minister of International Business and Industry Ronald Toppin promised that a National Industrial Policy would be put in place to help revive manufacturing. A first draft of the policy was to be ready by September and finalized before the end of the current financial year, he said. Pointing to a decline over the years, Toppin acknowledged that the number of people employed in the sector, the number of companies, the level of investment and the contribution of the sector to the economy had all fallen significantly over the past decade. While the Minister made no mention of garment manufacturers or any other groups, he also said there would be a national consultation with manufacturers in coming months so they could air their concerns and help to identify solutions. Straker said he welcomed the idea of a national industrial policy, adding that this gave him some “hope”. BMA executive director Shardae Boyce said she left the BMEX showcase with the feeling that the local manufacturing sector was in good hands, adding that she was most encouraged by the number of young people involved in the sector and the innovative products they were producing. Pointing to plans for a national industry policy to help revive manufacturing, Boyce said: “These are things, from working in the profession, I know manufacturers will need to thrive.” While there were still some furniture manufacturers, which was once a heavy focus on the island, the industry had seen a shift in recent years to more personal care items and food production. (BT)
SLOW BMEX, SAY EXHIBITORS – A combination of competing events, a weak economy and a changed venue are being blamed for small crowds and little to no sales at this year’s Barbados Manufacturer’s Exhibition (BMEX). But organiser the Barbados Manufacturers Association (BMA) countered that the exhibition benefitted from a “reinvigorating” layout and more time for manufacturers to meet potential distributors. Some exhibitors expressed disappointment with sales and foot traffic over the trade fair’s four days in interviews with Barbados TODAY. (BT)
FORCED OUT BY ROSS – A downright shame and disgrace! That was how leader of the Democratic Labour Party, Verla De Peiza, described the situation at the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre (LESC) where the Barbados Manufacturers’ Exhibition (BMEX) was held over the long Whitsuntide weekend. Speaking to the media yesterday during her tour of the annual expo, De Peiza said she was on record as saying the dislocation because of Ross University School of Medicine was not the best situation. Ross moved to Barbados last year, but began operations last January, after 40 years in Dominica. After Hurricane Maria devastated Dominica in 2017, Ross was forced to relocate its operations to St Kitts and Tennessee, United States. “This building was put here for public purposes and I think it is a shame and a disgrace that BMEX exhibitors have to be outside in the elements because they can no longer be accommodated here. Hopefully, by next year there would be some other location where our people can get back to feeling special again and not like second-class citizens in their own home,” she said. (MWN)
‘FAKE NEWS’ – Appalling and untrue! That is how organisers of the annual Barbados Manufacturers’ Exhibition (BMEX) have described the comments made by Leader of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) Verla De Peiza published in another section of the press. According to that story, De Peiza said it was a “shame and disgrace” that the exhibitors were forced to be outside “in the elements” because of the presence of the Ross University School of Medicine. However, in a somewhat hastily-called media conference late this afternoon at the Lloyd Erskine Sandiford Centre, BMA officials explained that the exhibitors outside have always been there except for about two of them because of the products that they were showcasing this year. In fact, officials said far from having any negative impact on the showcase, the presence of the university had its benefits, with students supporting the event and providing some medical services. In a clear-the-air statement, coordinator of BMEX 2019 Wendy Burke said she was not surprised that “fake news” had come the way of BMEX. “BMA and BMEX have always had outdoor booths. The difference between last year and this year is that Ross is present. The Barbados Conference Services Limited has been working with us every step of the way to ensure that our exercise did not wane in terms of its quality or the support they could give to manufacturers,” said Burke. “Our Executive Director Ms [Shardae] Boyce was on tour with Ms De Peiza and she expressed satisfaction with some of what she saw, so we all found it a bit appalling and alarming this morning to see the information out there because she had the prime opportunity to ask any question she wanted during that two-hour tour she was on with us and she did no such thing,” said Burke. Burke also explained that the children were placed in zones to visit the location because of the Barbados Investment and Development Corporation’s (BIDC) buyers’ programme. “Over the last three years that the BIDC has been doing it, there have been some concerns about them being able to see the booths and pay as much attention to them because of the swarm of school children we usually have,” she explained, while pointing out that the volunteers from the University of the West Indies were meticulous in their duties. Children from the north visited the location during the first two hours and schools from the south went after. Burke further pointed out that neither the exhibitors nor patrons expressed any concern about the university being at the location. “So I am not too sure where all of the discomfort came from. I am not too sure how the issue of pushing out came because all of the exhibitors were here, they came, they made their money over the three days, they met with the foreign buyers and did their trade and all of us are happy that we had an incident-free BMEX 2019,” said Burke. Chairman of the Barbados Conference Services Limited, operators of the LESC, Dean Straker said they tried their best to facilitate all the tenants and users of the location. He reported that the university had reduced the space by only about five to seven per cent. “This was not a problem as we adjusted our fees to suit . . . we also made more space available on the outside to compensate,” he said, adding that “far from this Ross was a positive on BMEX this year. So I just would like to think that this was a misunderstanding.” “I think all right-thinking Barbadians understand that Ross University is actually a blessing to Barbados in these [harsh] economic times and I can tell you that from the management perspective at the conference services, we will be doing our utmost best to facilitate BMEX and Ross University in the future because both are important,” said Straker. Executive Director of the BMA Shardae Boyce told journalists the BMA was accustomed to having exhibitors on the outside of the building, adding that the Lions Club, which was involved this year, expressed satisfaction with the overall exhibit. “I will go further to say that our exhibitors on the outside actually benefitted from the presence of Ross University being on site,” said Boyce. There were about 108 exhibitors at this year’s showcase despite the near 200 that expressed an interest, and officials said they were still in the process of tallying the number of patrons who passed though the event over the four days. (BT)
TWO SIDES IN EVICTION ROW – A mother who was evicted from a National Housing Corporation (NHC) property is crying foul, but the state agency is saying she is only crying wolf, as she was no more than a squatter. Latoya Barrow is claiming that after more than two decades, the place where she was living in Rock Close, The Pine, St Michael, is no longer home for her and her three children. Following the eviction last week Monday, Barrow, 41, is staying at her aunt Nicola Alleyne, in Golden Rock, also The Pine, where there are already ten people in that house. “I have a 21-year old son who goes to the Children’s Development Centre, a 15-year-old son and a 14-year-old daughter who go to St George Secondary. My middle son is with his father but the rest of us have to sleep in the front house,” she said. However, an official from the NHC, who requested anonymity, said Barrow had not been there for the 22 years she was claiming. (MWN)
‘HOME-GROWN HERB’ – More Barbadians are cultivating cannabis strictly for domestic sale, an assistant commissioner of the Royal Barbados Police Force (RBPF) reported today. Acting Assistant Commissioner of Police William Yearwood said that as the RBPF gathers more intelligence to intercept drugs at the ports of entry, perpetrators are now seeking to grow the contraband in remote areas. Revealing the latest quarterly crime figures, Yearwood said: “For the last quarter of the year that is up to March, we have had . . . 468 cases brought before the courts involving drugs such as cases which include; possession of cannabis up to March they were 185, cultivation of cannabis because we have been intercepting the drugs persons are now seeking to grow the drugs on the island in the cane fields and in the wooded areas. We had 15 such cases. Importation has been 24. “Exporting – they were no cases of exporting – trafficking 84 cases, intent to supply 84 cases. Possession of apparatus is those persons who want to smoke it and so on using pipes, whether it is bamboo or plastic material they were 14 such cases and what we term as other drug crimes, two which have been placed before the court thus far. He further revealed for the month of April, 165 drug cases were brought before the courts with 11 cases for the cultivation of cannabis, 33 cases of intent to supply, five cases of possession of apparatus, 33 cases related to trafficking, ten cases of importation and 63 cases of the possession of cannabis. Yearwood declared: “Having done the interdiction, persons have sought to increase cultivation in land and we have problems with this but we have been making seizures. “We have not been getting persons convicted in such matters but we have been stemming the flow of drugs on the island. But the assistant commissioner blamed police understaffing for hindering lawmen in the apprehending the growers. Yearwood said: “I want to mention here such operations can go for days and we are currently 280 personnel short because of persons either leaving the force, retiring and so on. So we do not have the manpower to go into lengthy operations.” The acting assistant commissioner of police added that in the month of April there have been three cases of intent to supply cocaine, three cases of possession of cocaine and three cases of trafficking of cocaine. He noted there has only been one case of ecstasy so far since April this year. He told the media that generally crime has been down but commercial burglaries have increased at this time with persons seeking to steal liquor to sell. Yearwood said: “Burglaries have been steady throughout the years yet this year we have had a reduction in burglaries. It is only the commercial burglaries that were on the increase in recent times as persons are seeking to get liquor and those kind of things. “Crop Over is on now so commercial burglaries they are committing to get liquor and so on to sell to make money. The senior police officer revealed the data at a graduation ceremony for students from the St Giles Primary School’s completion of its Drug Abuse Resistance Education programme (D.A.R.E). (BT)
WORRELL’S WAY OUT – High Court Judge Randall Worrell yesterday took steps to reduce the ever-expanding list of prisoners on remand who are languishing in prison waiting to plead guilty. Moments after another prisoner confessed he had been waiting since May 2016 to plead guilty and that there were at least 17 others in his building who also wanted to throw in the towel, the judge declared the ongoing manslaughter trial would be his last before he dedicated the court’s time to having status hearings, where those who wanted to plead guilty would have the opportunity to do so. The move has been given the thumbs up by two attorneys, but they differed on whether it would reduce the backlog of cases. Justice Worrell’s comments came less than a week after Prison Officer Floyd Downes discovered that petty thief Winston Adolphus Agard had been sitting in prison for the last ten years wanting and waiting to plead guilty, and brought him to court. (MWN)
BACK-DATED – A High Court Judge is clearing his court’s calendar to hear the matters of some prisoners presently on remand at Dodds Prison and who may not have had a hearing for a protracted period. Today, all matters set before the No. 2 Supreme Court for next week were suspended and status hearings for persons on remand at Dodds wishing to plead guilty are being scheduled to begin on June 17. Justice Randall Worrell made the announcement this morning moments after 52-year-old Joel Mckenzie McDonald Springer of Hope Road and Northumberland, St Lucy, pleaded guilty to several criminal offences. He had not been before a High Court since 2016. Springer informed the court that there were 17 other inmates in his building who were also desirous of pleading guilty. “All matters that are set for next week in this court are suspended except the [manslaughter] trial that is presently engaging the court. All of them are suspended! We will have status hearings on all those persons who wish to plead guilty . . . on whether they have indictments or whether they do not . . . [and] we will be dealing with those matters from as early as next Monday,” the judge said. He explained that there are some administrative matters that would have to be dealt with but the hearings will go on in a bid to give those inmates their day before the High Court. “Some of them do not know which court they belong to but we will have status hearings, that is what this court is going to embark upon so that these persons can say they came to court. Whether they are then assigned to [Supreme] Court No. 5 or No. 2 that is an administrative matter,” Worrell stated. Veteran Attorney Angella Mitchell-Gittens who is representing Springer as a friend of the court, gave the judge the thumbs up for the move. “I am sure we will see a significant reduction in the backlog,” Mitchell-Gittens said. Last week Winston Adolphus Agard appeared in court for the first time in seven years, after being on remand for close to a decade. He pleaded guilty to the 2009 charge brought against him. The court heard that he had “fallen through the cracks” a matter that alarmed jurists, senior Government officials and members of the public. Today, Mitchell-Gittens also informed the High Court judge that she had already filed ten bail applications for some inmates on remand at the Whitepark Road, St Michael Court Complex this morning with another ten to follow suit. “It seems nobody knows how to get them here [so] I would see if I can get them here all on bail,” she added. However, Worrell said that his court would not wait on that process. “We are not going to wait till the bail applications filter through the system . . . ,” Worrell stated adding that Prison Officer Floyd Downes who brought the situation of inmates languishing on remand to the court’s attention will be notified to have all those persons who have indictments brought to court. The judge added: “We will then proceed to the ones who have been committed but have not received an indictment as yet, that is the best that I can do at this point . . . to assist persons who are similar to Mr Agard and Mr Springer, who wish to plead guilty. . . . So that we can get rid of that particular aspect of the backlog and then concentrate on the other trials.” Justice Worrell is not only getting the support of Mitchell-Gittens. Queen’s Counsel Michael Lashley is fully on board with the initiative. “I support it as it will expedite the process . . .something similar to what we use to have before which is a plea of direction hearing . . . . But I support it. I think that will help alleviate the delays,” Lashley said. Veteran attorney-at-law Arthur Holder who is a current Member of Parliament and Speaker of the House of Assembly, described Worrell’s decision as a step in the right direction and “a workable solution” which would facilitate the process. He was however quick to point out that there were similar systems in place before such as jail delivery and plea and directions hearing. “If [those] were complied with, we would never have a situation as to what currently occurs and it is as simple as that. All we need is a specific system in place so that matters can be expedited. Not only expedited, but the court is aware of persons who have attorneys and who do not have attorneys. “What it means is that we have to get back to basics that is all we need to do. If we get back to basics these issues that have surfaced will never occur. It also calls for . . . a collaborative effort. We need to sit down all the stakeholders and find a workable solution but it can be solved,” Arthur said. Senator Damian Sands, also an attorney, agreed with his colleagues but said there must be the right balance. “I think that it is a good idea, however, you still have to find the balance because while you might suspend the pending matters for persons who want trial, to deal with the persons who want to plead guilty . . . on the same hand there are still a number of persons who want their day in trial who are maintaining their innocence,” Sands said. (BT)
CRAZY DEATH –Sonia Archer is describing the circumstances that led to the murder of her 32-year-old son Dave Archer while he was on the job, as “craziness”. Hours after doctors summoned her to the hospital where she learnt about the tragedy that shattered her world, Archer lamented that her child was a hardworking young man with a big heart, and did not deserve to lose his life as a result of the crazy actions of a gunman. “If he was a person to live in a particular way… then I would have had reasons to expect anything is possible, because I am a realist. But this is craziness. “He was the type of person that would always say ‘mummy these fellas does just like a lot of foolishness, people does just want to be fussing about simple things’. His thought process was good. So I never had a reason to think this may happen to him,” a grieving Archer said, as she reflected on her son’s life this afternoon. It was around 10:35 p.m. on Monday, that Dave, a role model who worked with at risk youth and participated in bodybuilding competitions, was shot on board the MV Dreamchaser during an altercation. According to police, Dave and other security personnel had to intervene in a fight that occurred moments before docking. The assailant exited the boat and returned with two other males. Security was alerted and a struggle ensued resulting in Dave being shot. He was rushed by police to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital where he later died. “Right now I don’t even know about justice. I know somebody did it and they are probably out there breathing. There are just so many layers to this whole event. It’s just crazy. I don’t know that there are words . . . It is the most unreal, yet real experience”. Archer said Dave was a genuinely respectful individual. She suggested that it would be difficult for her to find a memory of the former Alexandra student ever being rude to her. The mother repeated that she and Dave enjoyed a wonderful relationship. In fact, Archer pointed out that yesterday morning she visited Dave at his West Terrace, St James home, located just a short distance from her house. She recalled that as they chatted while he prepared breakfast, Dave informed her that he would be heading to his security work with Gorilla Security Services, on the MV Dreamchaser for 1 p.m. “He is good at what he does and he was built for it. As the guys were saying to me this morning, he was really the negotiator. So when guys want to get into something, he would tell them settle yourself, because he was also a firm person. So rather than be quick to put his hands on them, he would be the one to get your attention and tell you relax yourself,” she said. “I don’t think it was specifically targeting him, but the shooter meant to use his firearm on whoever. He left home with it, or he went and got access to it and came back. So he probably was returning to use it. Everybody just saying to me that Dave was trying to do his job.” The mother of four who lost a daughter to breast cancer in 2010, indicated that until now, she never saw Dave working as a security officer as a risky undertaking. Nevertheless, she admitted that she often warned Dave to drive carefully when returning home, especially after working double shifts. “I never had the fear of what actually happen because he didn’t have the associations that would create a fear in me that I can’t sleep, or I should be monitoring,” she said. Dave was employed with Massy as a forklift driver for many years. For 16 years, Dave worked as a volunteer with the Nature Fun Ranch. His mother said he also worked with the senior citizens in the community in addition to organising activities for the St Michael North West Constituency Council. She said he took his love for body building serious, having participated in several competitions, including the Darcy Beckles Bodybuilding Invitational Classic and the Mr and Ms Bridgetown Bodybuilding contest. “When I remember how many people lives he has touched . . . Young and old, people are not even controlling their emotions, they are just expressing themselves. That is a comforting thing for me,” an emotional Archer said. When Barbados TODAY contacted one of the owners of the MV Dreamchaser, they said there would be no comments on the incident at this time. However, a cruise scheduled for Saturday June 15 on board that same vessel has been cancelled. Posting a tribute to Dave who was also known as Jungle, on his Facebook Page, Founder of Nature Fun Ranch, Corey Lane, said many saw Dave’s big muscles, but those at the ranch saw his big heart. “Thank you Jungle for every rancher you taught to ride, that you checked in with their teachers for us, that you gave foodstuff to, that you provided school clothes for and much more. Thank you for your 16 years of service. “We are happy we were able to say thanks formally last year, but we are sad to say it finally now. Rest in peace and while there will be no one to help in heaven, I am sure we’ll find some horses and barbells,” Layne’s tribute read. (BT)
GUARD’S CRUISE KILLING PROMPTS ID CHECK CALL – Less than 24 hours after a guard was fatally shot while trying to stop a brawl aboard a pleasure cruise, the police have urged owners to insist on identification from patrons. Acting Assistant Commissioner of Police William Yearwood is suggesting the measure as means of building a relationship with the owners. Dave Archer, 32, died after a fight broke out aboard the MV Dream Chaser around 10:35 p.m. on Sunday, said police. Archer was felled by a single shot which was fired by an unknown assailant, police said. He was rushed to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) by private vehicle where he later died. Yearwood said: “We have been asking that every person who is on those types of ships travelling that they be known by name or some form of identification. “The same way that you leave the airport, if you are leaving the island, yes, you are just going off the coast but we think we should know as police officers who are going to travel on these ships that we can act before and we would have a good idea of the persons suspected to be involved in crime, so we can monitor this situation.” Declaring the loss of life unfortunate, the senior police officer expressed the hope of building a relationship with operators of pleasure craft so that police can respond to an incident on the vessel once it docks at port. Yearwood said: “If a ship is going to go off the coast on such a cruise the security personnel indentify persons who are involved in crime or alleged to be involved in crime because of what is going on onboard. We are asking that some communication come back to us ahead of the landing so we would be in place to deal with such matters.” (BT)
POLICE PROBING SHOOTING AT TWEEDSIDE ROAD – Lawmen are investigating a shooting at Tweedside Road, St Michael. One man has been shot. (MWN)
ELDERLY MAN IN ROAD FATALITY IDENTIFIED – Police have identified the man who was killed this morning at the junction of President Kennedy Drive and 1st Avenue Thomas Gap, Westbury Road, St Michael. He is 79-year-old Warwick Sargeant of nearby Yearwood Road, Black Rock. He was riding along President Kennedy Drive in the direction of Kensington Oval when he was involved in a collision with a car driven by Dwayne Tull of Waterford. Sargeant was pronounced dead at the scene. Anyone who may have information about this fatal accident is asked to contact Police emergency at 211 Crime Stoppers at 1-800-8477, Black Rock Police Station at 417-7500 or any Police Station. (MWN)
HAIR CHARGE – Another man has been remanded to HMP Dodds on allegations of stealing thousands of dollars in hair. He is Dario Rico Morris, of 2nd Avenue, Richmond Gap, St Michael who was not required to plead to the indictable offence of burglarising Beautylicious which trades as No. 1 Beauty Supply between May 14 and 15 and stealing 198 packets of hair totalling $54, 350. Station Sergeant Cameron Gibbons objected to bail on the grounds that police remain on the hunt for other persons in relation to the matter and that Morris was currently on bail from the No. 1 and No. 2 District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Courts. The prosecutor also pointed to the seriousness of the offence, the fact that others had been charged with the same offence and the likelihood that the 28-year-old may interfere with investigations if granted bail at this time. In her application for bail however, Angella Mitchell-Gittens argued that the prosecutor’s objection that her client may interfere with the probe was “inflammatory and prejudicial”. “That is a very serious allegation. This is a court of evidence not a court of feelings. It is inflammatory and prejudicial . . . and this court should not be moved by inflammatory statements. If he wants to warn anybody he can do so with a phone call from the prison . . .and seriousness is not enough,” Mitchell-Gittens argued. She went on to state that unlike her client’s co-accused he was before the court on a single charge and had been adhering to bail conditions set by the court. The attorney also discarded as invalid, the prosecutor’s objection that police were still searching for others. “How would he prevent the police from arresting other persons? Others were arrested and that did not stop him from being charged,” the attorney said. Following the submissions Magistrate Kristie Cuffy-Sargeant denied the bail application and remanded Morris to Dodds until July 3. The case against the father of three who is a labourer by trade, has been transferred to the No. 1 District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Court where the other accused are also scheduled to appear. (BT)
MAN SENT FOR EVALUATION AFTER ADMITTING TO DAMAGING VEHICLE – Forty-four-year-old Noel Alexander Austin will spend the next few days at the Psychiatric Hospital. Magistrate Krisite Cuffy-Sargeant remanded Austin, who has no fixed place of abode, to the Black Rock, St Michael institution after he pleaded guilty to damaging a motor van belonging to Davanand Persaud on June 8. Persaud parked his vehicle on the right side of the fence at the Cheapside Public Market where he operators as a vendor. According to officer Kenmore Phillips, sometime later he told Austin with whom he was familiar, to behave himself while at the market which caused Austin to argue. Austin then walked off, continued to argue, pulled a knife from his waist and threatened Persaud. Around 6:10 a.m. other workers at the market informed Persaud that Austin had broken the windshield of his vehicle before leaving the area. The matter was reported to police. On his arrest Austin claimed that Persaud hit him in the back with a piece of iron. He told police that he picked up a rock from outside the market and threw it at the windshield before leaving. The matter will continue in the No. 2 District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Court on June 14 when Persaud is expected to make an appearance. (BT)
FARMER REMANDED ON LOITERING CHARGE – A 38-year-old farmer was remanded to Dodds this afternoon after appearing in court on a criminal charge. Omar McDonald Sealy, who was recorded as having no fixed place of abode, but told Magistrate Kristie Cuffy-Sargeant he is from St Thomas, is accused of loitering at Bush Hall Main Road, St Michael with cause to suspect that he was about to commit theft on June 8. Sealy pleaded guilty to the charge when Magistrate Cuffy-Sargeant first read it and the facts were detailed by Station Sergeant Cameron Gibbons. However, the magistrate was forced to vacate the plea when Sealy explained himself in the No. 2 District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Court. “I was not loitering,” Sealy said causing the magistrate to enter a not guilty plea. The accused will make his next court appearance on July 9. (BT)
MASON SENT TO DODDS – A lack of surety to sign bail on his behalf has landed a 51-year-old mason on remand at Dodds. The prosecutor did not object to bail for Romel McFarland, of Porey Springs, St Thomas when he appeared before Magistrate Kristie Cuffy-Sargeant today. However, the accused had no one to post bail up until the end of the day’s sitting and was sent up to the St Philip institution until July 3. McFarland is accused of attempting to enter Stall No. 8 at Princess Alice Highway, St Michael with intent to steal on June 8. He pleaded not guilty to the offence in the No. 2 District ‘A’ Magistrates’ Court. (BT)
SECOND COURT MARTIAL IN LIMBO – After being adjourned last month on account of procedural concerns, the court martial of Ordinary Seaman, Tyrrel Gibbons is still up in the air, as arguments over procedure again prevented the matter from moving forward. The hearing has now been adjourned sine die (without a date being set). This morning the prosecution, led by Lieutenant Jamar Bourne, made an application for the matter to be handled by a Judge Advocate, due to the technical complexities of the allegations. This was met with strong objection from defence attorney-at-law, Larry Smith, QC, who explained that while the defence did not have a problem with the appointment of a Judge Advocate, the rules do not allow for one to be introduced at this stage of the proceedings. “Our issue is with the process and having already convened the court martial, our submission is that this should have been done at the outset,” Smith said. He contended that according to the rules governing court martials, in cases where a Judge Advocate is assigned, that person would be required to swear in the president of the court martial. Smith further argued that with the court martial already in progress and the president already sworn in, the law makes no provision for this to be done mid-stream. “Rule 21.1.(f) of the Defence Rules and Procedure makes allowances for the person convening the court martial to appoint a Judge Advocate. However, in rules 26 and 27, the Judge Advocate swears in the president and the other members of the tribunal and then the president, having been sworn in, then swears in the Judge Advocate. So how do you get to swear in the Judge Advocate when the president has already been sworn in?” the defence attorney queried. He submitted, “What would be required from my reading of the law is that the court martial would have to be dissolved under Section 1 of the Defence Act, in the interest of justice. I can find nothing either in the actual parent Act or the subsidiary legislation, which speaks to rectifying this procedural error. I appreciate the role of a Judge Advocate and one is most useful in a court martial like this, but we must follow procedure. This is a military organisation and as lawyers we follow rules as well.” Gibbons is charged with a civil offence contrary to section 71 (1) of the Defence Act by wrongful communicating information contrary to section 2 (1) (a) of the Official Secrets Act, 1911, as amended by the Official Secrets Act, 1920. However, with no restart date set, Smith told Barbados TODAY that the uncertainty over the court martial was not fair to his client. “I haven’t had a chance to respond but I have a challenge with the type of adjournment. A person who is charged with a criminal offence in the civilian system, has a right to know when his or her trial is going to be and when the matter is coming up next for hearing. You cannot have a charge hanging over a person’s head without a date. That is a problem,” said Smith, who revealed that he plans to do some further research before requesting that the court martial convenes to settle this outstanding issue. He added, “The soldier that is charged is also a human being and he has a life. It is not reasonable to expect him to walk around for the next six months or whenever the case maybe, without knowing his date before the court. I intend to do some research and then in due course I would communicate with the prosecution that we may need to have the matter brought back on to address this serious issue.” (BT)
ROCK HARD: CCJ TO HEAR FINAL ARGUMENTS – The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) will tomorrow hear oral arguments in a cement tariff case between Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago over Barbadian cement maker Rock Hard Cement. The CCJ, based in Port of Spain, is hearing the case in its original jurisdiction over interpreting the CARICOM Treaty in disputes between member states. The justices are also expected to render judgment on previous rulings made by the Council for Trade and Economic Development (COTED), CARICOM’s decision-making body on trade matters, and the World Customs Organization (WCO) in favour of Rock Hard. The court ended the taking of evidence today by hearing four cases simultaneously regarding the issue of the classification of cement imported by Rock Hard Distribution Limited/Rock Hard Cement Limited into Trinidad and Tobago and Barbados and applicable customs duties. In mid-April, the CCJ ruled in favour of Rock Hard Cement over Arawak Cement Company, a subsidiary of Trinidad Cement Limited (TCL), that the regional tax payable on cement imported by the Barbadian company from Portugal and Turkey should be five per cent and not 60 per cent. The amount is a far cry from the 60 per cent tariff that Rock Hard Cement had once paid on the imports. In 2001, COTED granted Barbados an exemption, from the regional Common External Tariff (CET) of zero to five per cent, so that Barbados could apply taxes of 60 per cent to categories of cement described as ‘other hydraulic cement’ – cement used to stop water and leaks in concrete and masonry structures. The CET is intended to offer goods produced and distributed in CARICOM an advantage over imported ones. In 2015, Barbados decided to return to the CET and apply a five per cent tax on the ‘other hydraulic cement’ imported by Rock Hard Cement Limited. TCL and Arawak Cement Company had contended that Barbados contravened the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas by unilaterally reducing and/or altering the CET on ‘other hydraulic cement’ from the rate approved by COTED. They also claimed that Barbados misclassified extra-regional cement imported by Rock Hard as ‘other hydraulic cement’. The four consolidated cases heard today involved Trinidad Cement Limited versus the State of Trinidad and Tobago, Rock Hard Distribution Limited, Moonilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Limited; Trinidad Cement Limited, Arawak Cement Company Limited versus the State of Barbados and Rock Hard Cement Limited; Rock Hard Distribution Limited versus the State of Trinidad and Tobago, the Caribbean Community; and Rock Hard Cement Limited versus the State of Barbados, the Caribbean Community. Chief Executive Officer of Rock Hard, Mark Maloney, who was present at today’s hearing in Port of Spain and was scheduled to give evidence, was informed by the court he was no longer needed because lawyers did not want to cross-examine him. No reasons were given. Ramhit of Moonilal Ramhit and Sons was also in the same situation. Much of the evidence taken today was of a technical nature. The case concludes tomorrow with the court, meeting in its original jurisdiction, cautioning the attorneys to stick to their timelines in making their submissions. The sitting, which will be streamed live from its website, begins it session at 10 a.m. (BT)
RAIN RUINS WI GOOD START – From 11 a.m. the lights at the ground were turned on in dark and overcast conditions. Some 45 minutes later, a drizzle turned into a heavy downpour of rain that put paid to any more play when South Africa were rattled at 29 for two in 7.3 overs. The one point each left the West Indies on three points from as many matches and it provided South Africa an opportunity to get off the mark in the points standings after four matches when play was called off at 4:20 p.m. Fast bowlers Sheldon Cottrell and Kemar Roach, in his first match of the tournament, clearly had South Africa on the back foot after Jason Holder decided to field first on a seamer’s pitch. Hashim Amla edged a delivery with pace and bounce from Cottrell to Chris Gayle at slip and Aiden Markram gloved a ball down the legside for wicket-keeper Shai Hope to take another memorable catch off Cottrell, who had both wickets for 18 runs in four overs. The rain then came in pacer Oshane Thomas’ first over and ended the contest before a sizeable crowd of mostly West Indians. (MWN)
REIFER: ‘ARCHER IS NO WORRY’ – As if Friday’s fixture in Southampton was not tantalising enough, there will be an extra piquancy in England and West Indies’ World Cup match-up, given the reunion between Jofra Archer and the team for whom he might already have been a mainstay. The Barbados-born Archer, 24, has been one of the stars of the tournament to date, having qualified to play for England in April after the ECB chose late last year to reduce its residency period from seven years to three. And though he is hardly an unknown quantity on account of his exploits in T20 leagues around the world, he’s undoubtedly benefited in some of his early outings from a certain surprise factor – not least his ability to bowl in excess of 90mph from an ambling run-up that scarcely requires him to break sweat. But according to Floyd Reifer, West Indies’ head coach and fellow Bajan, there will be nothing about Archer that can take his players by surprise on Friday – and he should know, having played alongside him in club cricket while he was still a West Indies youth prospect. “To be honest, we knew Jofra for a long time,” said Reifer. “He is from Barbados, where we are from. We knew him from the U15s, U17s, U19s so he is not new to us. Yes, he’s bowling quickly, but there’s nothing that we are not accustomed to. We are looking forward to the challenge. So we will see how it goes on Friday.” In a tournament that has already featured some tantalising match-ups, the expectations around Friday’s game have been heightened by the extraordinary feast of attacking batting and fierce quick bowling that lit up the team’s 2-2 series draw in the Caribbean earlier this year. In a see-saw series, England appeared to have struck a decisive blow in posting a hefty 418 for 6 in the fourth match in Grenada, a match in which Jos Buttler cracked a remarkable 150 from 77 balls. But their thunder was stolen in the series decider in St Kitts, where Chris Gayle set a personal seal on a brilliant campaign with 77 from 27 balls, after Oshane Thomas had bombed England out for 113 with figures of 5 for 21. And with a further trial by pace in prospect on Friday, England will doubtless be grateful to have their own spearhead to return the compliment to their opponents. “We are entertainers,” said Reifer. “We are here to entertain so the players come out and entertain us. But yes, we will have a good game. I’m sure Jofra will be chomping at the bit to come at us and we will be ready for him.” Archer’s decision to abandon his aspirations to play for West Indies came after he was overlooked for the Under-19 World Cup in 2014. Instead, he followed the advice of his friend and fellow Bajan-turned-England international, Chris Jordan, and took advantage of his British passport to forge a new career at Sussex. The rest, as they say, is history. Asked if he was disappointed that Archer would be playing against, rather than for, his team on Friday, Reifer laughed and said: “He made his choice.” “Jofra is a tremendous talent, we all know that. Like I said, we are looking forward to the game on Friday. “He obviously had the pace [to play international cricket]. He had a few injuries as a young guy. But I’m guessing though he’s fully over those injuries and he is bowling very well for England.” West Indies’ own fast-bowling stocks were depleted for the South Africa game with the absence of Andre Russell, who has been managing a knee problem since the start of the tournament. But Reifer said that his non-selection had merely been a precaution, given the length of the tournament and his importance to the cause. “Yes, Andre will be fit enough for the game on Friday,” he said. “The game against England is a big game for us. We are looking forward to that game. Looking at the weather forecast, it was 90 percent rain today and they had rain over the last couple of days here as well. So it is just a precautionary measure where we are kind of wrapping him in cotton wool.” Opener Evin Lewis has also been bothered by injury and has played in just one game of the tournament. He suffered a blow to his hand ahead of the Windies opener against Pakistan and was ruled out of the fixture. Even though he returned for the Australia clash last week, he subsequently missed the South Africa game after the injury resurfaced. “Evin got struck on his hand in one of the practice sessions so he is still getting some pain, some severe pain from it as well,” Reifer explained. “So he played the last game [against Australia], but he is still having some pain in his hand.” (BT)
ONE SONG BLUES – The one-song format for the premier Crop Over competition, Pic-O-De-Crop, is not sitting well with some calypsonians. Veterans Serenader and Colin Spencer said yesterday the genre would suffer in the long-term; while four-time monarchKid Site said while he had no major issue with the new format, he would have preferred a semi-final rather than a straight slot for 16 into the finals against the reigning king. In announcing changes to the festival for 2019, the National Cultural Foundation (NCF) cited cost-cutting measures as part of the reasons. They included combining the Sweet Soca and Party Monarch into a new Soca Monarch final, the removal of the semi-final leg from the Pic-O-De-Crop, and the one song on finals night Chief executive officer Carol Roberts-Reifer, during a sponsors’ reception at Ilaro Court in March, revealed that last year fewer than 900 people attended the semifinals and under 4 000 were at the finals. “We decided when we began to look at the festival that we needed to do two things: tighten the cost . . . [and] bring the sparkle back to the Pic-O-De-Crop, what was the jewel in the crown of Crop Over past . . . . One song means one presentation, one set of backups and one of everything else,” she said then. (MWN)
For daily or breaking news reports follow us on Instagram, Tumblr, Twitter & Facebook. That’s all for today folks. There are 203 days left in the year. Shalom! #thechasefilesdailynewscap #thechasefiles# dailynewscapsbythechasefiles
0 notes
Text
Super long extremely self pitying rant I am so sorry, idk how to make a cut but I need to feel sorry for myself publicly My birthday. Is a couple months away. September. It's so stupid but I have this huge thing with my birthday. Major depressive period of turning a year older combined with years of being ignored and forgotten by friends. On my 18th birthday I threw a huge party for myself and no one came. But I throw parties for my friends all the time. I plan elaborate and expensive birthdays with meaningful gifts. It's a chicken and egg situation - I don't know if I'm sad because I feel like the people I give so much to will hardly give back the time of day, or if I'm sad about my birthday which makes me want so badly to keep my loved ones from feeling that way. I'll be turning 20 with no career, one year of college under my belt, no direction, no money to my name, and none of the accomplishments I promised myself I would get done. I haven't even been able to afford to move out of my parents house, and I'm miserable here. Now granted, I had a really really bad hand of cards starting out. When I was 17 I was caught out in an ice storm and hit the wrong path of ice the wrong way. I was going 20 mph, on the highway. I spun so wildly out of control that I smashed into 2 barriers, took out a highway sign, and totaled the car. It's a miracle I survived. That miracle took every dollar of money I had for college. Every drop of savings I had to try to move out. And then when I finally saved up for my first car, the car my parents didn't give me even though they gave my only sibling her own - the insurance on my 2-years-younger-than-me rust bucket that I love so much, it costs me 400$ a month. Just for insurance. Not including upkeep, repairs, gas. The food I eat. The rent I pay to my parents - who mind you, never charged my sister a day in her life through the years she lived at home. I was selling blood to eat. Cutting every corner. Working two jobs, 50, 60 hours a week. I had an opportunity for a real career, worked so hard at it to find the job was an utter sham. My family and my circumstances forced me out of it. Now I'm not even employed. I've calculated every adult decision I've made carefully. I consulted with older wiser people before making my moves. I've made every good decision. Every single one has been backed by sound logic and reasoning with the information I had and the research I did. The car accident 2 years ago has financially crippled me for at least 5 years. 100$ of the little money I can earn, every single week, goes to insurance. Insurance that gives me absolutely nothing except the knowledge that if something did happen, I wouldn't be charged with driving without insurance. And I haven't been in an accident since that ice storm. No tickets, no nothing. Never once has it paid off for me to give thousands while I could barely eat to just stay in the law. I feel hopeless and helpless. My parents constantly belittle me. Eat the food I buy with my scant earnings, go through my things, throw away things in my room when I'm away, insult me. I have no freedom, no privacy, and I pay rent to be treated this way. But it's low rent. I can't afford real rent. Not yet. And it makes me wonder when I will ever be fucking free. And if I am, if I will ever stop being so deeply unhappy with myself anyways. Happy fucking birthday, you piece of shit who hasn't accomplished anything ever.
0 notes