#batptist

[ramrodd]

Savage Takedown of Markan Priority!

COMMENTARY:

The original euangelion was Pilate's intelligence report to Tiberius cited by Tertullian in Book V. Apology, which included the designation"Christian" the Roman soldiers gave to the Jesus Followers generally described enmasse in Mark 3:7 -8, who called themselves followers of Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah (Christ).  

Euangelion is a Roman signals priority for "Special Delivery" to the Emperor regarding Tidings of Joy, in thsi case the vision of the Talking Cross in the Gospel of Peter.

Pilate's lost euangelion is a fusion of the Roman testimonhy of Mark 15:1 - 16:8 and the Gospel of Peter.  Cornelius assissted Pilate in the composition of this original euangelion to Tiberious and he, Cornelius, conveyed it to Peter when they exchanege notes about Jesus in Acts 10.

At this meeting in Acts 10, Peter conveyed his confession in Acts 10:34 - 43, which becomes the narrative arc of the Gospel of Mark.

Thereafter, both the oral tradition of the euangelion and the written tradition were composed of both the Roman testimony of the Resurrection vision of the 16 sodkers and centurion at the Tomb and Peter's confesson in Acts 10. This is the euangelion Peter employs to vet Paul in Acts 15:7. Thereafter, Paul uses the term, euangelion, 19 times  throughout his epistles to anchor his own testimony.  

A more compelling interpolation of Mark 1:1 :"The Beginning ot the euangelion of Jesus the Christ..." is "Everything we now know about Jesus before He was remanded to Pilate and crucified..."  Cornelius was the curator of Quelle, which was the intelligence portfolion of the 10th Legion that was collected regarding the populist movement of John the Batptist before Jesus took command at His baptism. Josephus drawa upon this archive for his portrait of John the Baptist for the Jewish Wars.

Bart Ehrma, James Tabor and John Dominick Crossan employ dialectical Marxism of the Post Modern Historical Deconstruction to render their polemic that posits Mark as being derivative of Pauline Theology,

The Jesus Seminar presents an existentially unanchored analysis of all scripture and is an example of why the Gospels can be depended upon to shed a great deal of light on the commentaries.

[connoisseur-art]

Jean Batptiste Deshays, Hector Exposed on the Baks of Xanthus River

[ennoa]

" - Michel est agité, ces temps-ci.

- C'est à dire ?

- Toujours pareil. Il dit qu'il vient du futur."

Les Yeux - Slimane-Batptiste Berhoun aka docteur Castafolte <3

[ramrodd]

60-Second Scripture: Doubt (John 20:29) #religion #logic #jesuschrist #s...

COMMENTARY:

The original euangelion was Pilate's intelligence report to Tiberius cited by Tertullian in Book V. Apology, which included the designation"Christian" the Roman soldiers gave to the Jesus Followers generally described enmasse in Mark 3:7 -8, who called themselves followers of Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah (Christ).  

Euangelion is a Roman signals priority for "Special Delivery" to the Emperor regarding Tidings of Joy, in thsi case the vision of the Talking Cross in the Gospel of Peter.

Pilate's lost euangelion is a fusion of the Roman testimonhy of Mark 15:1 - 16:8 and the Gospel of Peter.  Cornelius assissted Pilate in the composition of this original euangelion to Tiberious and he, Cornelius, conveyed it to Peter when they exchanege notes about Jesus in Acts 10.

At this meeting in Acts 10, Peter conveyed his confession in Acts 10:34 - 43, which becomes the narrative arc of the Gospel of Mark.

Thereafter, both the oral tradition of the euangelion and the written tradition were composed of both the Roman testimony of the Resurrection vision of the 16 sodkers and centurion at the Tomb and Peter's confesson in Acts 10. This is the euangelion Peter employs to vet Paul in Acts 15:7. Thereafter, Paul uses the term, euangelion, 19 times  throughout his epistles to anchor his own testimony.  

A more compelling interpolation of Mark 1:1 :"The Beginning ot the euangelion of Jesus the Christ..." is "Everything we now know about Jesus before He was remanded to Pilate and crucified..."  Cornelius was the curator of Quelle, which was the intelligence portfolion of the 10th Legion that was collected regarding the populist movement of John the Batptist before Jesus took command at His baptism. Josephus drawa upon this archive for his portrait of John the Baptist for the Jewish Wars.

Bart Ehrma, James Tabor and John Dominick Crossan employ dialectical Marxism of the Post Modern Historical Deconstruction to render their polemic that posits Mark as being derivative of Pauline Theology,

The Jesus Seminar presents an existentially unanchored analysis of all scripture and is an example of why the Gospels can be depended upon to shed a great deal of light on the commentaries.

[ramrodd]

The Historical Jesus with Dr Dale Martin

COMMENTARY:

Dale, the reason why there were no Jewish witnesses inside the Praetorium is because all of Jesus's friends had gone to ground out of danger from the Jews who wanted Jesus dead and the Jews that did show up didn't want to become unclean on the verge of Passover. The Gospel of John brings this up.

If you  abandoned the critical historic method of the dialectical Marxism of the JEsus Seminar, the contradiction would tend to anchor the history you prefer to ignore.

The thing that Marx didn't understand about Hegel was that the contradictions he could identify with his forensic methods were a point of paradox between the bacon with the oink removed and the bacon with the "oink" as part of a dynamical system. We can pretty well narrow the day and hour that Jesus actually died in 33 CE from the astronomy and oral history. This compresses everything that happens in Acts before Cornelius, when the cult of the Jewish Jesus Followers went on the timeline of Roman Standard Time.

The tenth Legion had eyewitness spy reports of the moment Jesus comes up out of the Jordan in the arms of His cousin, John the Baptist. The first εὐθὺς appears inerrantly in the Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Mark. We know that it was between Passover either in 28 CE or 30 CE  and Pentecost, and the Reading of the Law, which was virtually mandatory for Jewish males. John Mark's first impression of Jesus was in the week before Passover in either 28 CE or 30 CE and after John the Baptist and Jesus have returned from Jericho for Laws. What should have been made Metaphysically Transparent from the emergence of Josephus since the 1960s is that the Romans were fully aware of the sphere of influence of John the Baptists as a potential insurgency before Jesus pops out of no where and takes over this irregular militia. From the Roman point of view. Before Jesus, shows up, the Romans know whether John the Batptist wipes his ass from front to back or back to front..

At what point does any of this become "History" in your little academic bag of tricks?  I ran an Recon platoon on the Ho Chi Minh Trail at the moment the US Army began to bug out of the AO. My understanding of the perspective of Cornelius in the universe of Christian scholarship as near as I can tell. For one thing, I am the only American writing about The Gospel of Mark as a Roman intelligence report right out of the Ranger Handbook.

Here's what happened. Jesus happened. Resurrection happened and the whole idea of actual physical Jesus H. Christ Resurrection didn't exist in the Greco-Roman mind. The recurrection events in the sort of general cultural inquiry into the nature of existence, resurrection served a certain need to explain recurring events, like the sun coming up in the morning. But actual, rise from the gore of the battlefield Resurrection was a technology way beyond sowing dragons teeth.

Richard Bauckman's only error is that the mind-map he posits isn't the mind-map of a Jewish fishman but of a senior Roman centurion, Cornelius. Everything Bauckman presents as evident is validated by Mark 3:8. This verse is straight off the Roman map sheets of  the AO (Area of Operations) of the X Legion. We had maps like this in Vietnam hung in the TOC (Tactical Operations Center) the Operations Officer used with plastic lamination and grease pencils in a practical application of Topology as a tool of command.

At what point does "history" kick in for you. Dale?  Quelle was a primary source for Josephus's The Jewish Wars and Mark 1:4 - 8 is the leading edge of the intelligence archives of the 10 Legion the instant Jesus emerges from the Jordan and steals the spotlight from John the Baptist for the Roman spy network, which is what Mark 1:14 is all about. All the assets dedicated to keeping track of John the Baptist was shifted to watching Jesus and what the Romans cane to know about the fate of John the Baptist came from the intelligence archives of Harrod Antipas  by way of Pilate and their mutual interest in all things Jesus.

When does your trigger for "History" get pulled, Dale? James Tabor's intuition that Mark and John are an entwined narrative is exactly correct. The moral confusion being generated by your critical historical model will evaporate like the morning mist that covered the Roman soldiers at the tomb when the women at the ending of the Gospel of Mark arrive at the Tomb when you abandon Marx for