#bal thackeray

[hareefaree]

Journal - 2022 Fall Reflections - Pre-Production and The Dressmaker Project - P1

EDIT: Part 2 | Part 3 | Final Photos

So perhaps my biggest project of the semester was this several-month long set/stop-motion preproduction project. My working title is The Dressmaker Project since thats the main character's vibe. Basically I just spent 4 months building, texturing, and crafting these two sets and a single puppet to just kinda live in it, based off of old photos and memories (round the 70s/80s) of my mother's childhood home in Bombay.

Process under the cut! Animation reflections here and game design here!

So I knew I wanted to work in 70s-80s india (for some reason this period just sings to me, my first 3D-puppet stop motion project was like 70s bollywood) so I spent most of the early semester watching vintage Bollywood films and asking my parents for photos and stories about growing up in Mumbai. I've also not been back to India in a while - since my grandfather died, actually - and usually when we go I call my grandparents' house/my mother's childhood flat home. I was feeling home(ish?)sick and was also super excited about coming out as a lesbian.

(photos from my mom's childhood)

So my goal was to capture like... young womanhood/girlhood in Bombay, the feeling you get of desiring something just out of reach, about wanting closeness with your girl peers that you can't cross over. I also learned a lot about the 1990 Mumbai riots, Bal Thackeray, and how that sorta framed modern Indian politics, sectarianism, etc.

Some films I watched for vibe reasons! Arth (1982), Sancharram/The Journey (2004), Parinda (1989), Fire (1996), Bombay (1995). At some point through this I became like, a massive Shabana Azmi fan lol. None of these are from the 70s. I am realizing that now.

I also listened to a lot of 70s bollywood and just general disco-pop music. You can find my work playlist here!

So yeah! Concept wise I was REALLY strong about my set but less so about my character. You'll see how that worked out for me :P

Some concept work:

(I really want to solidify my puppet making style. I love paper heads and felted bodies and I wanted a very shapey design. I don't think the character design on the left was super attainable or that it reflects the direction I was going with the character... but its a good design that would be fun to animate in a 2D style methinks.) Also the armature drawing looks disgusting bc there was epoxy putty and sculpey all over that thing.)

Some cardboard set experiments (my stop mo professor has been drilling it into our heads to map out the set on paper and test dimensions with cardboard cutouts. She's right):

So yeah! Two sets, one in which you can look to the other one via window. Pretty ambitious of me on its own, on top of that both sets would have to feel lived in...

Part 2 for texturing process!

[newnewz]

PM Modi Claims Previous Congress Regimes Planned 15% Budget Allocation for Minorities

Prime Minister Narendra Modi accused the former Congress-led UPA government of advocating for a significant portion of the budget, around 15%, to be allocated exclusively for minorities. Speaking at a rally in Pimpalgaon, Nashik, Modi criticized this proposal, emphasizing his opposition to budgetary segregation based on religion. He pledged to safeguard against any such division and affirmed his commitment to maintaining reservation policies based on socio-economic criteria rather than religion.

Modi described the concept of dividing the budget along religious lines as perilous and accused the Congress of displaying bias towards minority communities. He recounted his strong dissent against then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s proposal during his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat, underscoring his steadfast stance against budgetary allocations based on religious grounds.

The rally, held in support of Mahayuti candidates ahead of the Phase 5 Lok Sabha polls, saw Modi endorsing Union Minister Bharati Pawar and Hemant Godse among others. He lambasted the Congress for allegedly prioritizing religious-based reservation over the interests of marginalized communities, citing Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s opposition to such practices.

Highlighting the achievements of his government, Modi contrasted the perceived insecurity during previous Congress regimes with the improved security situation under his leadership. He cited instances of terrorism and instability prevalent during Congress rule and credited his administration with implementing measures to enhance national security, including surgical strikes and air strikes against terrorist threats.

In a swipe at the opposition alliance, particularly the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena, Modi predicted a resounding victory for the BJP while questioning the electoral prospects of the Congress and its allies. He criticized the alliance, labeling the Shiv Sena as “fake” and accusing it of deviating from the principles espoused by its founder, late Bal Thackeray.

Modi condemned the alleged reluctance of the opposition parties to support initiatives such as the construction of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya and the revocation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. He accused the Shiv Sena of betraying its ideological legacy and likened its actions to those of the Congress, highlighting what he perceived as a disregard for Hindu sentiments and national interests.

In his address, Modi rallied support for the BJP while portraying the opposition alliance as a threat to the state’s welfare and integrity. He urged voters to reject the alleged opportunism of the opposition parties and reaffirmed his government’s commitment to serving the nation’s interests above all else.

[legalupanishad]

Shreya Singhal Vs Union Of India: Understanding the Landmark Judgment for Free Speech in India

This article on 'Shreya Singhal Vs Union Of India: All You Need To Know' was written by Shriharshini Balachandar, an intern at Legal Upanishad.

Introduction

In 2012, the Indian government introduced a new section to the Information Technology Act, of 2000, known as Section 66A. This section made it an offense to send "offensive" messages through communication devices like the Internet, social media, or instant messaging platforms. The punishment for violating Section 66A was up to three years in jail and a fine. However, this law was widely criticized by activists and legal experts, who argued that it violated the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The law was also used to stifle dissent and criticism of the government, leading to several cases of individuals being arrested for making online comments deemed "offensive." One such case was that of Shreya Singhal, a law student from Delhi, who challenged the constitutionality of Section 66A in the Supreme Court of India. Her case, known as Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, became a landmark judgment in the Indian legal system, setting important precedents for freedom of speech and expression in the digital age.

Background of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India

In 2012, two young women from Maharashtra were arrested for criticizing the shutdown of Mumbai due to the death of Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray on Facebook. The police charged them under Section 66A of the IT Act, claiming that their comments were "offensive" and had caused "hurt" to the sentiments of Shiv Sena supporters. This incident sparked a nationwide debate on the misuse of Section 66A and its potential to curb freedom of speech and expression. Several other cases of misuse of the law were reported, including the arrest of a man who had "liked" a Facebook post critical of a political leader, and a cartoonist who had uploaded a cartoon mocking the government's response to a dam project. Shreya Singhal, who was a law student at the time, decided to take up the cause and challenge the constitutionality of Section 66A. She filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India, arguing that the law was vague, overbroad, and violated the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. The Shreya Singhal Vs Union Of India case was heard by a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton F. Nariman. The central government defended the law, arguing that it was necessary to maintain public order and prevent the spread of hate speech and fake news.

Key arguments in the Shreya Singhal Vs Union Of India

Shreya Singhal's main argument was that Section 66A was vague and overbroad, and therefore, it violated the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. She argued that the law was so broad that it could be used to curtail any form of online communication, including legitimate criticism and dissent. Shreya Singhal's lawyers also argued that the law was unconstitutional because it did not contain any guidelines or standards for determining what constituted "offensive" or "menacing" communication. They argued that this lack of clarity gave too much discretion to law enforcement agencies, leading to arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement of the law. The government's main argument was that Section 66A was necessary to maintain public order and prevent the spread of hate speech and fake news. They maintained that the law had been successfully applied to stop cyberbullying and online abuse, and that multiple high courts in India had upheld it.

The Judgment

In the matter of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, the Supreme Court of India issued its ruling in March 2015. The Information Technology Act, 2000's Section 66A was deemed unlawful and overturned by the court. According to the Indian Constitution's Article 19(1)(a), Section 66A infringes on the basic right to freedom of speech and expression. In its judgment, the court noted that the law was too vague and overbroad, and had a chilling effect on free speech. The court held that the terms "grossly offensive" and "menacing" were subjective and could be interpreted in a manner that would curtail legitimate criticism and dissent. The court also noted that Section 66A was not narrowly tailored to achieve its stated objective of preventing cyberbullying and online harassment. The court held that the law was not proportional to the harm it sought to prevent and that it had a disproportionate impact on free speech. The court also held that the law had a "chilling effect" on free speech and that it created a "perceptible" danger of arbitrary and discriminatory application. The court noted that the law had been used to target individuals who had engaged in legitimate criticism of public figures and institutions.

Shreya Singhal Vs Union Of India: All You Need To Know

The impact of the judgment

The judgment in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India was a significant victory for free speech and expression in India. The judgment set an important precedent for the protection of online speech and expression, and it provided clarity on the limits of government regulation of online communication. The verdict had a substantial effect on India's legal system as well. Following the ruling, numerous other Information Technology Act of 2000 provisions were contested on similar grounds, and many of them were overturned by the courts. The judgment also led to a renewed debate on the need for a comprehensive data protection law in India. The court noted in its judgment that the lack of a comprehensive data protection law in India had created a situation where sensitive personal information was being collected and used without adequate safeguards.

Suggestions

- Need for a thorough data protection law: The decision emphasized the requirement for a thorough data protection law in India. People should be aware of how crucial it is to prevent the misuse of their sensitive personal information, and they should insist that the government take action to safeguard their information. - Clarity on government regulation of online communication: The judgment provided clarity on the limits of government regulation of online communication. Individuals should be aware of their rights and should take action when their freedom of speech and expression is curtailed by government action. - Importance of challenging unconstitutional laws: The judgment in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India was the result of a legal challenge to an unconstitutional law. It is important for individuals to challenge unconstitutional laws and regulations that infringe upon their rights, and to seek redress through the courts when necessary. - Need for continued vigilance: The judgment in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India was an important victory for free speech and expression, but individuals should remain vigilant to ensure that their rights are not infringed upon in the future. It is important to monitor government action and challenge unconstitutional laws and regulations when necessary.

Conclusion

In the Indian legal system, a significant decision was made in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India. The ruling clarified the boundaries of government regulation of online communication and acknowledged the value of free speech and expression in a democratic society. The judgment also highlighted the need for a comprehensive data protection law in India and the importance of protecting sensitive personal information from misuse. The judgment has had a significant impact on the legal landscape in India and has set an important precedent for the protection of online speech and expression.

References

- Merrin Muhammed Ashraf, Revisiting Shreya Singhal versus Union of India: A not so bright spot in the free speech jurisprudence of India, The Leaflet, 29 July 2022, available at: https://theleaflet.in/revisiting-shreya-singhal-versus-union-of-india-a-not-so-bright-spot-in-the-free-speech-jurisprudence-of-india/ - Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, Columbia University, available at: https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/shreya-singhal-v-union-of-india/ - Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, Fonology Legal, 2 February 2023, available at: https://blog.finology.in/Legal-news/shreya-singhal-vs-union-of-india Read the full article

[wordexpress]

Maha CM Shinde cried and said he will be jailed if he didn't hop over to BJP: Aaditya Thackeray

Shiv Sena MLA Santosh Bangar rejected Aaditya Thackeray's claims and said the fundamental reason behind the "revolt" against Thackerays was the alliance they had with the NCP and the Congress.

MUMBAI: Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray has claimed Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde had come to his residence and cried that he will be arrested by a central agency if he did not switch over to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), before revolting against the Sena leadership.

However, MLA Santosh Bangar from the Shinde-led Shiv Sena denied Thackeray’s claim and said there was no threat by the BJP.

The reason behind the “revolt” was Thackeray’s alliance with the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and the Congress, Bangar said.

Union minister Ramdas Athawale also said the allegations against Shinde were false and the latter was a strong man and he would never cry.

Speaking during an interaction at a university in Visakhapatnam on Wednesday, Aaditya Thackeray, the son of former Maharashtra CM Uddhav Thackeray, alleged that 40 MLAs rebelled against the Sena leadership for their own seats and “money”.

“The current chief minister (Shinde) came to our house and cried because he was going to be arrested by a central agency, and he said ‘I will have to hop over to the BJP otherwise they will arrest me’,” he claimed.

“It was his good luck that they (the BJP) wanted to show this guy is the true Sena and we (BJP) will make him the CM,” the former minister said.

Defending his party’s alliance with the Congress, Aaditya Thackeray said he has learnt a little more about his grandfather than the “BJP’s WhatsApp university” is teaching.

“My grandfather (Bal Thackeray) had tie-ups with the Congress before. He had better relations with the Gandhi family earlier also. He had openly supported Pranab Mukherjee and Pratibha Patil (both former Presidents) openly when the BJP was putting up another candidate (during presidential elections),” he said.

On the other hand, the BJP formed an alliance with the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) which “supported terrorists”, Aaditya Thackeray said.

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut said Aaditya Thackeray’s claims were true.

The Rajya Sabha member said Shinde had even come to his residence in Bhandup area of Mumbai and made similar pleas and that he did not want to go to jail.

Raut said he told Shinde not to get scared and that they should stand up against injustice.

There were many Sena MLAs (among those who revolted) against whom probes were on by central agencies, he said.

“A similar thing is happening against the NCP,” Raut claimed.

However, Shiv Sena MLA Santosh Bangar rejected Aaditya Thackeray’s claims and said the fundamental reason behind the “revolt” against Thackerays was the alliance they had with the NCP and the Congress.

“All MLAs backed Eknath Shinde in this revolt. There was no threat (of central agencies) from the BJP,” Bangar said.

Meanwhile, when reporters asked Union minister and Republican Party of India (A) chief Ramdas Athawale in Pune about Aaditya Thackeray’s claims, he said, “Eknath Shinde is a strong man, he will never cry. The allegations made against Shinde are false.”

[werindialive]

'Mogambo khush hua' Uddhav Thackrey taunts Amit Shah after losing party name and symbol

After the Election Commission stripped Shiv Sena faction chief Uddhav Thackeray of the party name and its election symbol he attacked BJP and its chief strategist Amit Shah using the popular lines from the movie "Mr. India" -- 'Mogambo khush hua". He also attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and said that it was Shiv Sainiks who did themarvelouss job of saving Mumbai from the serial blasts of 1993, "Those talking of Hindutva now, where were they? Address is not known. Now they brag about a 56-inch chest. Where was that 56-inch chest then? He was sweating," he said.  

He further talked about people wearing masks and said that once people wore "Modi masks at rallies, now it is PM Modi, who is after the mask of Balasaheb Thackeray," he added. On Friday, the month-long battle over the legacy of Bal Thackrey, father of Uddhav Thackrey settled in the favour of Eknath Shinde by the Election Commission.

"Yesterday, someone (Amit Shah) came to Pune. He asked how things are going in Maharashtra. Then someone said it was a very good day, because the name and symbol of Shiv Sena were given to the slaves who came with us. So he (Mr. Shah) said very well, 'Mogambo khush hua'," he said while attending a Public meeting in Andheri, Mumbai.

Citing the supervillains of Bollywood, Uddhav said, "These are the Mogambos of today. Like the original Mogambo, they want people to fight among each other, so they can enjoy power."

"They turned me out of my own house and the verdict went in the favour of thieves," he said as he warned other parties about BJP claiming that they are allowed to get away with anything and others must be on alert.

For more political news India in Hindi, subscribe to our newsletter.

[rnewspost]

'Once name is gone...': Raj Thackeray shares Balasaheb’s clip after Shinde camp named real Sena

MNS chief Raj Thackeray took a jibe at Uddhav Thackeray after the EC allowed the Eknath Shinde faction to retain the party’s name “Shiv Sena” and the “Bow and Arrow” symbol. New Delhi ,UPDATED: Feb 17, 2023 22:15 IST Shiv Sena founder late Bal Thackeray. By India Today Web Desk: Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray took a veiled jibe at his cousin, Uddhav Thackeray, after the…

[newssy]

Bal Thackeray Saved Modi when Atalji Spoke About 'Rajdharma', Says Uddhav; Slams BJP Over 'Divisive' Hindutva

Last Updated: February 12, 2023, 23:46 IST Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray. (File Photo: PTI) Thackeray said he walked out of the alliance with BJP to protect his dignity and joined hands with the NCP and Congress to form the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray on Sunday targeted the BJP, saying Prime Minister Narendra Modi wouldn’t have come this…

[newspatron]

Manohar Joshi: 5 Facts About Maharashtra's First Shiv Sena CM

Image Source – Newspatron Creative Team AI-Generated Image for representative purpose [Read About Us to know more] editor@newspatron.comManohar Joshi: A Glimpse into His Personal LifeDid You Know These Facts About Manohar Joshi?Did You Know These Facts About Manohar Joshi?Manohar Joshi: A Look at His Rise in Maharashtra PoliticsJoshi’s Strategic Role in the Shiv SenaManohar Joshi’s Tenure as…

[toptopic4u]

Uddhav to address Sena workers on Bal Thackeray’s 97th birth anniversary

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut on Sunday said party president Uddhav Thackeray will address the party workers on Monday to mark the 97th birth anniversary of the Sena’s founder Bal Thackeray. Talking to reporters, Raut said Uddhav Thackeray will pay homage at the party founder’s statute near the Gateway of India on Monday and address the party workers at Shanmukhanand Hall later in the…

[news24fr]

Il sera "impossible" pour le BJP de reproduire son triomphe électoral de 2019 en 2024, a déclaré vendredi le haut responsable du Congrès, Shashi Tharoor, et a ajouté qu'il est "concevable" que le parti au pouvoir puisse perdre "50 sièges" au Lok Sabha. Le député de Thiruvananthapuram, qui s'exprimait ici au Kerala Literature Festival, a déclaré que s'il admet la domination du BJP, c'est aussi un fait qu'ils ont perdu de nombreux États et qu'ils perdent le gouvernement central n'est pas impossible. « Si vous regardez à quel point ils (le BJP) ont réussi en 2019, ils ont essentiellement eu tous les sièges dans l'Haryana, le Gujarat, le Rajasthan ; ou tous les sièges sauf un dans le Bihar, MP (Madhya Pradesh), Maharashtra ; et 18 sièges au Bengale. . "Maintenant, tous ces résultats sont impossibles à reproduire et le BJP tomber en dessous de la majorité en 2024 est tout à fait possible", a déclaré M. Tharoor lors d'une session intitulée "Inde @ 75 : Une promenade à travers les institutions démocratiques". Qualifiant les attaques de Pulwama et la grève de Balakot, qui, selon lui, ont conduit à une "énorme vague" à la dernière minute - un "phénomène" qui ne se répétera pas en 2024 - l'homme de 66 ans a déclaré une baisse de 50 sièges pour le BJP et gain pour les partis d'opposition est tout à fait "concevable". Cependant, sur la question importante de savoir si les partis d'opposition, qui, selon Tharoor, l'emporteront sur le BJP de sa position majoritaire, resteront ensemble, c'est une chose à laquelle il a dit qu'il était "impossible de répondre". "Si le BJP est à 250 et les autres à 290 … ces 290 seront-ils d'accord ou le BJP pourra-t-il en choisir 20 ici et 10 là parmi les partis qui veulent des faveurs du gouvernement central du jour, puis former le gouvernement . Nous ne savons pas », a-t-il déclaré. Le BJP a remporté 303 sièges sur 543 lors des élections de 2019 à Lok Sabha alors que le Congrès n'en a géré que 52. Parlant des défis auxquels l'Inde est confrontée après 75 ans d'indépendance, Tharoor, qui, bien qu'admettant que le dynasticisme dans une démocratie est un "défi", a déclaré que ceux qui distinguent son parti devraient également regarder autour du pays. Il a fait valoir qu'à la seule exception des «communistes et du BJP», ironiquement à l'extrémité polaire du spectre politique, chaque parti semble avoir une politique dynastique. "Quand nous pointons du doigt et disons la" dynastie du Congrès "... vous regardez autour du pays et ce que vous voyez Mulayam Singh (Yadav) est remplacé par son fils, Lalu Prasad Yadav est remplacé par son fils, Karunanidhi est remplacé par son fils, Bal Thackeray est remplacé par son fils, Sharad Pawar... il est très présent mais son héritier présomptif est sa fille et son neveu", a-t-il ajouté. Considéré comme l'un des plus grands rendez-vous littéraires d'Asie, le Kerala Literature Festival accueille un mélange éclectique d'icônes littéraires et culturelles allant des lauréats du prix Nobel, des écrivains lauréats du prix Booker, des politiciens de haut niveau aux historiens, personnalités du cinéma, diplomates et artistes. La liste des orateurs comprend le lauréat du prix Booker 2022 Shehan Karunatilaka, les lauréats du prix Nobel Ada Yonath et Abhijit Banerjee, l'indologue américaine Wendy Doniger, l'acteur Kamal Haasan, l'auteur pour enfants Sudha Murty et le chanteur vétéran Usha Uthup.(À l'exception du titre, cette histoire n'a pas été éditée par le personnel de NDTV et est publiée à partir d'un flux syndiqué.)

[recentlyheardcom]

Team Thackeray’s Sanjay Raut praises BJP’s Devendra Fadnavis, tone softens

Team Thackeray’s Sanjay Raut praises BJP’s Devendra Fadnavis, tone softens

<!– –> Sanjay Raut at the home of Uddhav Thackeray, paying tribute to Sena founder Bal Thackeray. Mumbai: A day after being released from prison after more than three months, Team Thackeray’s Sanjay Raut today praised Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, the BJP leader seen as a powerhouse behind the Sena mutineer Eknath Shinde replacing Uddhav Thackeray as chief minister in June. “There is…

[znewstech]

"Some Good Decisions": Sanjay Rauts Unlikely Praise For D Fadnavis Day After Jail Exit

“Some Good Decisions”: Sanjay Rauts Unlikely Praise For D Fadnavis Day After Jail Exit

Sanjay Raut at Uddhav Thackeray’s home, paying respects to Sena founder Bal Thackeray. Mumbai: A day after his release from jail after over three months, Team Thackeray’s Sanjay Raut today had praise for Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, the BJP leader seen as a power behind Sena mutineer Eknath Shinde replacing Uddhav Thackeray as Chief Minister in June.  “There is a new government in…

[squarwell-breakingnews]

Shiv Sena Founder Bal Thackeray's Memorial To Be Completed By 2023

Shiv Sena Founder Bal Thackeray’s Memorial To Be Completed By 2023

Mumbai: The construction of the memorial of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray in the city will be completed by the end of 2023, his son and Sena president Uddhav Thackeray said on Saturday. The memorial is coming up at the Mayor’s bungalow at Shivaji Park in central Mumbai. As much as 58 per cent of the work is complete, Uddhav Thackeray told reporters. “The first phase will be completed by May and…