#apdf

[katty-quartz]

Astrid Parker Doesn’t Fail explores the sexual tension between someone who paints wooden furniture and someone who would rather burn down their house then paint furniture

[normanthedove]

HOW MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL STRIKES OUT OUR MEDICAL CARE AND SENDS YOUR DOCTORS TO PRISON, "MONEY BALLING:" EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL MINDSET OF THE DEA'S ANN MILGRAM, A NEED FOR IMMEDIATE CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT

Some people call it data science, but Anne Milgram calls it “Money Balling Criminal Justice,” disguised and known as “Risk Assessment.”  According to one Physicians’ Advocate group; “ The Government has created false metrics of Criminal medical practices and enforced them as if they were law.” If using smart data and statistics to make player decisions was good enough for the Oakland A’s, Milgram figured it would be good enough for the legal system.  Milgram assembled a team of data scientists and researchers to build a universal risk assessment tool, which gives judges and other decision-makers a data-driven approach to support better decision-making. These risk assessments use data extracted from police and court records, focusing on factors like the suspect’s neighborhood, family criminal history, income, and education. Traditionally, criminal justice and punishment presuppose evidence of a crime being committed. This time-honored principle is violated once the punishment is meted out “for crimes never committed.”

@bobsheerin.apdf @Emmalyn’sJourney #shortages #deahurtingpeople#apdf #sicklecell #Adhesivearachnoiditis #painpatientsfightback https://www.regulations.gov/document/DEA-2023-0150-0001?fbclid=IwAR0JSbrqjTElPHT5A0bvGgQKOyJbZigq1il8TH13-fqHdJ4yJ10Sds8WdP4 ♬ original sound – Bob Sheerin “THERE GOES THE DEA” NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PharmD, BELINDA…

[skippy-reads]

Episode #1:

Iris Kelly Doesn't Date • Ashley Herring Blake

(and by default, its predecessors)

⚠️This book is +18⚠️ Final Rating: 3/10

Disclaimer: Citations will be blurry and crooked, I read a vast majority of this at work with a flimsy paperback library book and sent these to my friends before turning it in and THEN decided i wanted to write a review. Tangents will be in pink

I understand it might be strange to start a book review blog with the finale of a three book series, but rest assured, I read the other two last year and found them to be mostly mid. Boring characters, boring plot, likes to play Queer Utopia dressup games.

One Book: Three Titles

Blake has this...affinity for this specific dynamic of relationship. I'm going to avoid speculating on why, as it's first and foremost not my business and second, not relevant. She is openly bisexual, white and (as far as I know) cisgender.

Each Bright Falls installment features the exact same couple; one lesbian, white, late 20's to early 30's, as gender nonconforming as women's clothing section during pride month or Woxer ad, skinny. She's paired with a bisexual woman, also white, also skinny, also cisgender, high femme and the same age as the lesbian, if not older by a few years, as is the case with IKDD. (I don't remember details like this from DGDC and APDF)

The only slightly notable exception to this would be Jordan Everwood, Astrid's girlfriend from the second book, who the group refers to as "soft butch" at the beginning, as if a short hair style and a buttonup makes someone butch. As if Blake knows anything about the butch experience.

I wouldn't go as far as to say she has no true nonbinary friends, but I highly doubt they've had conversations about what it's like to be trans, what dysphoria feels like, what being trans feels like every single day, and if they have, Blake doesn't care enough about them to make an effort to include them in her stories.

The other exception to this would be Jordan's love interest, and the titular character Astrid Parker. I'm of the opinion that Blake doesn't know her own characters well enough. Astrid Parker is a lesbian, and the book would have been better if this were the case, canonically. I could go on, and I might, but long story short, Astrid experiences comphet at multiple times throughout her life that are textbook lesbian.

She says herself that she never actually liked any of the men she dated and only dated them in the first place for her mother's approval, and has only ever felt romantic love for Jordan, another woman. When she's desperate for advice about her sexuality, she doesn't turn to her best friends of twenty years, two bisexual women, she runs to her estranged step sister, Delilah. They've only recently mended their bond as of a year ago, but what I picked up on is that Delilah is a lesbian, the only lesbian in their group. Astrid is asking for sexuality advice from a lesbian, and doesn't walk away even considering she might be one as well.

Astrid never even calls herself bisexual at any point in any of the books, our only confirmation for this being Blake's twitter with illustration and pride flags. Having a femme lesbian and a double lesbian couple would add a CRUMB of diversity to your main cast of the same cisgender sapphics and would prove that Blake is capable of writing any other kind of sapphic relationship, but alas. This post is not about Astrid.

It's about Iris

I'm gonna be honest; I knew I wasnt going to like this book when I started it. Iris is my least favorite from the Bright Falls friend group, and I dreaded every time her name was mentioned in a chapter. She is loud, vulgar, annoying, and I struggle to think of any reason why her friends keep her around.

That's not to say I kept this opinion by the end of the book. I actually grew to like her more. Surprising, I know! I like that she reads, I like that she draws. I do not believe that her character is a writer, as she is wholly incapable of writing her own novel, just copy and pastes what she and Stevie do and publishes it to a roaring success. Steven King would be proud, Blake. And for her debut novel, of all things! She didn't have a single word written before she met Stevie, and I believe owes Stevie ownership of the IP and a cut of the profits.

So who is Stevie?

Aside from the love interest in a Bright Falls romance, Stevie is no one.

Alright, let's try and be fair. Stevie is an awkward lesbian in her late twenties that struggles to not be defined by her anxiety. However, Blake has done the exact opposite to her character.

Her story begins with her six months after a six YEAR relationship ended after a steady decline of about a year, and is so horny and touch starved that she's "accidentally" nuzzling her ex's neck and sniffing her hair.

We're told she's a "very good" actor by Juilliard graduates and her professors, that her only escape from her debilitating (medicated) anxiety is on stage.

Stevie isn't allowed to be anything other than anxious, blushing, awkward. She has panic attacks in place of character development, fights with her friends who believe she isn't capable of making decisions for herself. Every mistake/decision she makes is excused, explained or justified by her anxiety. When Ren, her best friend, asks why she likes Iris, one of Stevie's first answers is that she "helps work through" her anxiety, who isn't a professional by the way, and anyway Stevie is supposed to be medicated. What are her pills doing if she still has panic attacks this frequently? Why is she not scheduling appointments to get on a different medicine that actually works for her?

This anxiety disappears after her and Iris "work through" her issues, and also disappears after she and Iris have a good fuck.

Telling Instead of Showing

The most emblematic issues I have with IKDD, from a writing stand point, is what Blake chooses to prioritize.

We don't get to see any of these dates. We don't get to see these characters that have spent the entire book falling in love FALL IN LOVE. This is chapter 28, and it begins with a highlight reel of all the amazingly romantic places that Stevie is taking Iris, and we get to see one single sentence of it. There are references to these dates in later parts of the book, but there isn't anymore detail given beyond what you're seeing now.

We're told that this is an argument, that Stevie has never seen these two "bicker" like this, when this exchange reads like a complete regular misunderstanding. Even something as simple as Adri snapped before Van could finish her sentence. or Van asked, genuine confusion coloring her facial features. could have indicated that there is any other emotion other than a hint of misunderstanding. But no, Iris interrupts and the conversation is over.

Again, why don't we see this conversation?? What would you rather be writing in your romance novel other than your leads falling more and more in love?? I understand we can't see every 'walk along the beach' conversation, but why even mention? And then we continue to another dialogue exchange anyway!

Is it because Blake would rather be writing smut scenes??

No, she doesn't seem to really wanna write those either.

So What Else is in the Book?

Our story begins with a chaotic family reunion with the Kelly family, where we're treated to information dump as each and every single one of her siblings, their spouses and their children are named, described and given dialogue within the first two pages. I don't remember a single name of any of them, and they only showed up again near the very, VERY end. Blake does this twice.

At least the theater group comes back two or three times, even if they only get one line a piece between them, IF THAT. This screenshot also leads me to my second biggest issue:

Blake doesn't want to write people of color

Notice how each new character introduced is described with race first, even the white character. This is actually unique to this section, as you typically know a character is white by the lack of mention of race, as opposed to the inclusion. Characters of color are always always described as their race first and foremost, and very rarely receive any other descriptors aside from it. A black man with a septum ring, a black man with glasses, a brown skinned person with--etc. With the lack of diversity in her main cast and this, frankly, infuriating attempt at having a diverse BACKGROUND cast, I've come to the conclusion that Blake is terrified of writing outside her comfort zone and just so happened to find an audience that doesn't give a fuck.

A lot of white people, myself included, are afraid of 'messing up' when writing a non-white character, but this excuse ceases to be valid after you've written three adult romance books, and multiple YA's. At what point are you ready to challenge not only yourself as a writer, but your biases as a white person? As an ally? This isn't at all helped by Blake's usage of words such as "mop" to refer to a POC's hair, or "creamy" when referring to her white character's skin (multiple times!).

I would not recommend this book to any self respecting person of color. You deserve a book that sees you, or is made for you or at least respects you enough to TRY, and learn from mistakes rather than not even bothering in the first place.

Blake doesn't know how to write LGBT+ people either, which is baffling to me. The story is ABOUT Iris Kelly not wanting to form romantic relationships, it's the title of the fucking book. Aromantic people aren't even mentioned until about the halfway point (i wish i would've grabbed a picture) and Iris explicitly tells Stevie that she is NOT aromantic, that she knows she isn't, and that aro people don't need to have their identities shit on, but I have to ask, what is this then?:

Iris has had this spiral, like, six or so times over the course of the book. She gets in regular fights with her friends about how she doesn't need anyone, and her relationship with her mother is strained at the moment because she keeps insisting that Iris hurry up and settle down. Her friends give her the same business, and Iris has the same freak out. The character arc of Iris Kelly is that she loudly, proudly, refuses to form romantic relationships, but says in plain english that it has nothing to do with people on the A-spec.

This book could have been wonderful if it took this premise seriously. Imagine an ending where Iris Kelly DOESNT Date, actually doesn't date. She does the fake dating thing with Stevie, and it re-solidifies her new aro identity. Stevie understands, doesn't catch feelings and they become friends, good friends, hell BEST friends. It might come across that Blake cares about her own community, cares about showing real love and making real strides towards representation, but instead, she looked the aromantic community right in the face and told them "This story is not about or even for you."

It's alright though! Because trans people get the same fuck you! Half of the book's settings and conflict are about a local theater production of Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, where the director has taken liberties with the cast and made every character queer. Blake thinks this makes her God's gift to the community, and sucks herself off every time the play gets mentioned.

Adri, the director, is given heaps of praise from our main characters about how "powerful" this is, how "beautiful" this representation is, and how much we really needed it. Maybe I'm the Scrooge McDuck of queer books, but does this seriously impress people? Is anyone over the age of 22 feeling seen and touched by this? Because all I taste is cardboard and empty promises. If you need to tell us over and over again how good the representation is in your text, maybe you should have taken an extra few months to come up with another draft. Maybe you should roll your sleeves up and get your hands dirty with actual representation.

Ashley Herring Blake is not God's gift to the sapphic romance section. She's an amateur author who writes the same book over and over again and is lavished with blowjobs from the majority for it.

[imaginemyreality03]

🌿🔨It’s never too late in life to discover who you are🔨🌿

🛑 SPOILERS AHEAD 🛑

Astrid Parker Doesn’t Fail- Ashley Herring Blake

Read: March 26 -> April 3, 2024

BRA Score: 73/100

Favorite Quote: “When you’re ready to talk, I’d like to listen.” -Isabel Parker-Green, Pg 356

Abbreviations: AHB- Ashley Herring Blake, DGDC: Delilah Green Doesn’t Care (the first book in this universe), APDF: Astrid Parker Doesn’t Fail.

~~~~~~~~~~

Book Gist: Astrid Parker is trying to hold on to the one part of her life that hasn’t fallen apart in the last year: her interior design business. She gets hired to design the semi-famous Everwood Inn for their feature episode of Innside America, it’s a chance she can’t pass up. But of course, the whole thing has to go awry from the start, when she screams at a woman for spilling coffee on her ivory dress her first morning on the job… and that woman turns out to not only be her lead carpenter (and number one collaborator) but also an Everwood herself. Talk about starting off on the wrong foot. Now this project is a task of survival: get back in the good grace of Jordan Everwood, succeed at this redesign to keep her business afloat, and try not to have any sexuality crises along the way. She is only partially successful here.

Tags: Enemies/Rivals to Lovers, Sapphic, Adult Romance, Smut, Coming Out in Adulthood, Third Act Breakup, Messy Exes, internalized homophobia (ish).

~~~~~~~~~~

Overall Review:

Pre-Read:

I tried to read this when it came out, and I made it like half way through before I put it down and just, forgot to pick it up again. I didn’t mean to DNF but it was not very encouraging to continue. It felt slow, I couldn’t feel the chemistry between Astrid and Jordan, and I still really didn’t like Astrid because of her in DGDC. This time around, I discovered that if I had continued reading literally 4 more pages, I would have finished the book that first time around, because it finally sold Jordan and Astrid to me at that point.

Astrid:

First impressions aside, I don’t think I was ever gonna LOVE this book, because I do have a general dislike for Astrid, both for who she is and how she was around Delilah (they are both at fault for their relationship, but I read a book in Delilah’s POV first, and Astrid was an ass for no reason so many times). That being said, while I would not be friends with her IRL, from a reader/writer perspective, she is a fantastic character. She is deeply flawed and actively acknowledges many of those flaws. She works to do better and her growth through this book is truly admirable. Watching her journey in trying to come out and to unlearn the habits she didn’t even know she had due to her upbringing, and all of her own thoughts she had to challenge in order to find her happiness… I am incredibly proud of her, she is a great main character. Still not gonna choose to spend any free time with her, but she served her purpose well in this book.

Jordan:

Jordan, I am obsessed with. I think the tarot thing wasn’t really made to fit. I think AHB was just really determined to include it, but don’t give Jordan enough connection in her backstory or personality to defend how invested she is in this tarot deck. We just know she bought it after Meredith left her, but we don’t know if Jordan had any prior interest in Tarot or anything similar, like astrology. It felt a bit forced, but other than that, I really did enjoy her. She’s brash and excitable and sarcastic and she’s on this journey of rediscovery too that is really fun to watch.

Meredith should just… move to somewhere international so they never have to see each other again, because while she’s valid to want a change in her life, she completely disregarded everything her wife did for her and everything that she felt for the sake of her “personal reawakening and need to find her destiny”. It was disrespectful of her relationship and of Jordan as a person. So, she can leave. You don’t get an I-had-cancer get-out-of-jail free card for being that much of an asshole.

Cast:

I wanted more of the Bright Falls cast tbh. Especially really defining the way the group works with Delilah in the mix, and Josh back for good. I wanted more Josh being subtly bullied and tested for his promise to stay and be around. I felt like it was way too quiet, when all Astrid had outside of work was her friends, but there was no routinely seeing each other, or weekly get together. There were a handful of group outings and one event. I needed a bigger fix than that. But seeing how Delilah filled in a space they were missing was so beautiful. Claire kinda lost all her personality, but she also had like 6 minutes of screen time in bookish terms, so I’m not necessarily surprised that’s what happened.

Plot:

The plot overall and the main conflict wasn’t super convincing for me. I feel like there wasn’t that much buildup of the risks involved for Astrid and Jordan if this doesn’t go well. But also, I feel like there hasn’t ever really been a risk of this not working out. There weren’t any actual opportunities or reasons to watch for presented to the readers about what could happen that would lead to the Reno failing, or the episode not airing. I knew they were worried, but i was never really worried for them. It just didn’t have the weight it needed to in my opinion. And it was so drawn out, but not in a slow burn kind of way, in a “I don’t know what I’m supposed to feel about this lady, and I’m so involved in my own issues I’m just gonna ignore this weird feeling and move on” kind of way. There wasn’t obvious chemistry to start, just conflict.

Other Comments:

What also probably didn’t help my perception of this book was some of the reviews I read on here before I started it (and I want to be explicitly clear that this is in no way the fault of any other poster or creator and I am in no way criticizing their opinions. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and is allowed to put that on the internet. If I didn’t want to hear it, I wouldn’t read it. This is entirely on me).

A few people posted reviews about why they didn’t like AHB’s writing, and pointed out parts of her writing style and how she develops and includes her queer characters, and especially how she leans into stereotypes and performative allyship.

That’s a rough summary, I can’t remember exactly what was said. But those were the thoughts I had in my head while I was reading, and it did make me very sad, because there was a lot of Delilah and Claire from DGDC that I really related with and I felt very connected to the way that these characters were presented in that story. Reading APDF, I could identify a few points that could be interpreted as this kind of thing, but I didn’t feel that they were as a big a deal, I guess. So that also turned me off from the book at the start, so maybe (ironically) this book was doomed to be a disappointment for me.

All in all, it was a good book. Maybe not worth a reread, but I can’t say I didn’t enjoy some of it. 😐

[skylarkblue]

D, J, K

D: Drink of Choice While Reading

Honestly? Usually an ice-cold coke. If it's late at night, probably a cup of tea, though.

J: Just Finished

Astrid Parker Doesn't Fail by Ashley Herring Blake, which was the kind of delightful no-thoughts-required mental junk food my brain needed, tbh. I don't expect a lot out of romance novels except for entertainment, and APDF delivered on that front, then went out of its way to be actually good, too.

K: Kinds of Books You Won't Read

This is tough, because I'll give most things a chance once, but I don't read a lot of high fantasy anymore. It's not that I don't like it, it's more that I don't find most of it engaging anymore.

[apenas-uma-doida-feliz]

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil: 500,000 people at risk of eviction as Supreme Court moratorium nears end

Half a million people in Brazil are at imminent risk of losing their homes within the next two weeks, as a federal moratorium nears its expiration on June 30. In June 2021, Minister of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) Luís Roberto Barroso issued an injunction against evictions during the pandemic called the Allegation of Non-Compliance or APDF No. 828. This was issued in a case first filed by the Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL). The order, which was set to last until December 2021, was extended until March, 2022 and then again till June 30, following sustained pressure and mobilizations by the Zero Evictions Campaign, which also joined the PSOL case.

Launched in 2020, the Campaign is an “urgent call to address a serious problem in Brazil- that to live, work, and feed yourself is a class privilege.” It includes over 175 organizations, and urban and rural people’s movements against evictions and dispossession, including the Landless Rural Workers’ Movement (MST), the Homeless Workers’ Movement (MTST), the Union of Housing Movements (UMM), and the Movement in Neighborhoods, Towns, and Favelas (MLB).

According to data released by the Zero Evictions Campaign this month, over 142,000 families in Brazil are living under threat of eviction. These include 341,000 women, 97,300 children, and 95,100 elderly people. Children and elderly people represent 33% of those who have either already been evicted, or are at immediate risk of removal, in the country.

Continue reading.

[crippleprophet]

Hey! By any chance would you have apdf of the right way to be crippled and naked by Michael Northen and Sheila Black?

i don’t, but posting here in case anyone does!

[bass01donn]

Welcome!

This is my first post, one of many. This is a mere update of the current development of the Android operating system just as I have an interest in this.

As a somewhat unrelated detail:

I am posting from my android phone, the Huawei CAG-L22 from released 2018. Recently I have been yearning to buy a new phone again, the latest iPhone (iPhone 12 Pro Max)... with a little saving I'll get onto it. I would most likely still have an interest in Android development after I obtain my desire.

>> Here is aPDF link:

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1NKGeAcbhJKxMK6aSWiW7IdBDlu_XcOYM <<

Enjoy the post! See you in the next post!

[shookethbrooketh]

I was legit expecting some really controversial tweet that he liked because people are going insane, but then I saw it and my reaction was just "oh"

apdf;ilakjsfsd;a the constant mood at this point tbh. sometimes you just have to suspend disbelief to exist in any fandom ever 

[normanthedove]

HOW MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL STRIKES OUT OUR MEDICAL CARE AND SENDS YOUR DOCTORS TO PRISON, "MONEY BALLING:" EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL MINDSET OF THE DEA'S ANN MILIGRAM, A NEED FOR IMMEDIATE CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT

@bobsheerin.apdf @Emmalyn’sJourney #shortages #deahurtingpeople#apdf #sicklecell #Adhesivearachnoiditis #painpatientsfightback https://www.regulations.gov/document/DEA-2023-0150-0001?fbclid=IwAR0JSbrqjTElPHT5A0bvGgQKOyJbZigq1il8TH13-fqHdJ4yJ10Sds8WdP4 ♬ original sound – Bob Sheerin “THERE GOES THE DEA” NORMAN J CLEMENT, RPH, DDS, NORMAN L. CLEMENT PHARM-TECH, MALACHI F. MACKANDAL PharmD, BELINDA…

[nyc142]

My flight over the Alps 😍😍😍 pure freedom 🚁🚁🚁🚁🚁 Guimbal #guimbalhelicopters #helicopter #alps #snow #nature #naturephotography #clouds #worldwide #freedom #aircraft #cockpit #photography #photographer #photooftheday #photo #nice #beautiful (hier: Austria) https://www.instagram.com/p/BtHBwQ-APdF/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1ej5of4rr9e04

[arkaonlinecontabilidade]

STF decide que Férias em Dobro é inconstitucional

Agora é oficial, o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) já se pronunciou e decidiu que o Férias em Dobro é inconstitucional. Isso significa que a partir de agora, os trabalhadores terão direito apenas às férias regulares, conforme estabelecido na Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (CLT). O STF derrubou a Súmula 450 do TST, que determinava que quando um empregador pagasse férias a um trabalhador fora dos 2 dias anteriores às férias, ele teria que pagar o dobro do valor. Isso incluiu o terço dia de folga constitucional. O STF declarou a inconstitucionalidade da súmula, invalidando todas as decisões não transitadas em julgado que tenham aplicado o entendimento. Súmula 450 do TST A súmula 450 se fundamentava no artigo 137° da CLT, que prevê o pagamento em dobro das férias não concedidas dentro do prazo de 12 meses a partir da aquisição do direito. O entendimento também foi ampliado pelo TST para atrasos nos pagamentos. A decisão tomada (Férias em Dobro é inconstitucional) afeta diretamente um grande número de processos trabalhistas, tendendo a favorecer os empregadores. Isto ocorre uma vez que há ausência de punições pelo não pagamento do valor integral das férias, com base na decisão final. O Supremo Tribunal de Justiça decidiu que não é da competência do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST) interpretar uma norma de forma a alcançar situações que não estavam previstas no texto legislativo. Isso porque, ao se tratar de uma norma que disciplina uma punição, ela deveria ser interpretada de forma restritiva. O que diz a CLT Para os empregadores, a decisão pode significar uma redução relevante nos casos em que se discutia o pagamento de férias não quitadas no prazo previsto no artigo 145 da CLT. A CLT determina que, se o período de férias não for concedido ao empregado nos 12 meses subsequentes ao término do período aquisitivo, o empregador deverá pagar a remuneração das férias em dobro. No entanto, não há menção à eventual aplicação de sanções caso o empregador não cumpra com o pagamento da contraprestação pelas férias dentro do prazo estabelecido. Entendimento do TST O TST (Tribunal Superior do Trabalho) determinou que, assim como é obrigação do empregador conceder as férias ao funcionário, também é de sua responsabilidade efetuar o pagamento das mesmas dentro do prazo de 2 dias. Isso porque ambos os direitos são indispensáveis para que o funcionário possa usufruir realmente das férias. Conclusão Desde a reforma trabalhista, é possível fracionar as férias em até três períodos, mediante acordo entre o patrão e o funcionário. No entanto, podem existir alguns atrasos por questões burocráticas que não devem levar à punição do empresário. Apesar de a lei de férias em dobro ter sido uma forma de beneficiar os trabalhadores, o STF (Supremo Tribunal Federal) decidiu que ela é inconstitucional. Com isso, os trabalhadores não poderão mais usufruir deste benefício. Julgamento Finalizado no STF da APDF* nº 501. ARKA Online Contabilidade Leia: Cálculo de Rescisão de Trabalho: Saiba Como Fazer de Forma Legal Utilizando as Regras Corretas Read the full article

[shshcsmtk]

planning to expand my holistic health coaching , using TCM diagnostic method, and holistic nutritional perspective to be available both online/ off line, in English and Japanese. I’m keep editing health questionnaires in order to use my health coaching . it is VERY long and detailed questions I have to ask for clients to answer PRIOR to an interview… No doubt it’s quite personal and I have to deeply step into that person’s (past)life. but the core of natural medicine and holistic health is truly focus on that person’s LIFE AS IT IS . What had happened in his/ her life and what he / she felt at that moment, and how those affect to the body and mind . Every single event and thought complicatedly connect to a person’s current health condition. I try to read signals through the questionnaire and interview. Then , make assessment and give an explanation and health advice This is not only about your health and diet, but also about the hint of how to create your FUTURE with healthy body and mind set. If we could meet in person and give a touch, i could see more specifics, though , this option is available for my neighbors only… if anyone wants to try , Please message me . I’ll send you aPDF file of a set of documents to ask you to fill in . Then We’ll set the date of interview . I’m offering this service with no charge so far, because this is 100% for my study purpose, and aim is to improve my understanding through clinical practice. finally Mentioning about legal disclaimer, this is not a medical diagnosis or any medical cure or treatment. This is based on sharing ideas of personal healthcare . https://www.instagram.com/p/CWAWArNLpZ-/?utm_medium=tumblr

[imaginepup]

In you opinion which is better, disposable diapers or reusable/cloth diapers?

Ooooo... that's a tough one. I think there are definitely pros and cons of both. Cloth diapers can get HUGE and bulky, making them absolutely impossible to hide while wearing. Plastic-backed disposables can have a crinkle and temporal feeling of being a modern baby on the go. In my opinion, I like them both at the same time (disposable under cloth) but ultimately, I would argue plastic diapers, and here's why..Although cloth diapers have been around for ages and are just so much better for the environment, they're had a few design flaws I can't overlook. Sharps are typically used to keep them pinned, with, while applying with caution, takes me out of little space. The plastic pants accompanied with cloths can be fun, but can look ugly, and be uncomfortable around the leg cinches. Cloth diapers, although more cost effective, can also be a hassle to clean, but more importantly, they offer no odor protection, making them obnoxious and imposing to wear in public. For today's ABDL/APDF, I would recommend plastic over cloth, but never stop appreciating the cloth. After all, we're all cut from the same one 😉 Peace, love, and padding, however and whatever that looks like to you! 😙❤😄

[jurnaldeoltenia]

Daniel Gheba : Punctele de frontieră sunt prima imagine a României pentru cei care ne vizitează.

Daniel Gheba : Punctele de frontieră sunt prima imagine a României pentru cei care ne vizitează.

Deputatul USRPLUS de Dolj, Daniel Gheba, a mers zilele trecute la Vama Bechet unde a gasit destul de multe probleme . Dupa vizita facuta a pornit demersurile la Compania Națională Administrația Porturilor Dunării Fluviale unde a discutat cu doamna Haschka Luiza Mihaela, director general APDF . Daniel Gheba a prezentat problemele care sunt la Vama Bechet iar azi au fost ridicate deșeurile cu…