#and while i did shortly thereafter write the bridge and make it through that fairly quickly
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
the last chapter of carla is now up! i talked a little bit about this in the end note there, but i want to thank all of you who have read and spent time with and commented and etc. this fic. it really, really means a lot to me. carla was, i think, my first foray into jtv fanfic, into roisa fanfic (even if it was originally meant to just be a series of luisa focused drabbles on my rp account) - like, my writing roisa fanfic can be traced back to this exploration of luisa and to hollows and if you lived here, you’d be home now, the latter of which i don’t think i would have started without the overwhelming support i got on the first chapter of this fic. so, again, thank y’all so so much for reading this and for the encouragement y’all gave me because honestly i don’t know how much i would have written if not for how well y’all received this. bandit’s a sap, obviously.
#musings#carla stuff#iylhybhn stuff#bandit writes fic#and this is another goal met#at the beginning of the year i had a goal to finish a multi-chap fic#and while i did shortly thereafter write the bridge and make it through that fairly quickly#(and while i think i finished the rough of luisa and the fox before finishing the rough of carla)#i was specifically thinking of carla or iylhybhn#and i'm just#so honored and so happy to be sharing this with y'all#thank you for staying with me through it#like honestly this blog was made because i decided to do roisa writing for nano#and i don't think that would have happened without the support y'all gave me for this fic#so honestly#thank y'all so so much#because i can't imagine#i'm just so grateful#thank y'all so much#BANDIT IS A SAP
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Ongoing Tragedy Of Michael Swaim
(originally written 21 July 2019)
If you’re a writer, or even have that one idea you reckon would be a shit-hot novel and keep meaning to write down one day, you probably know that unique sting of seeing someone else do your idea back to you. The only way this can be worse is if it’s someone you sent a script to, now announcing a near-identical script with another name on it will be going into production, as Michael Swaim (who wrote for Cracked.com and its series After Hours back when it was good) alleges MoviePass Films has done.
The facts are these: Swaim claims that he and Abe Epperson were asked by Emmett/Furla/Oasis Films (now MoviePass Films) to write a ‘revenge-based’ screenplay featuring an ‘ex-Marine or ex-police officer’. They turned out a screenplay titled ‘Force of Nature’, a Die Hard-esque piece taking place in the aftermath of a hurricane. Shortly thereafter, Emmett/Furla/Oasis Films announced they had greenlit a film called ‘Force of Nature’, a Die Hard-esque piece taking place in the aftermath of a hurricane, with Cory Miller’s name attached as screenwriter.
Swaim responded with a Youtube video (since taken down due to legal threats, but mirrored elsewhere), in which he claimed that it’s Emmett/Furla/Oasis’s “MO to rip ideas off of young writers, and hand them to cheaper writers”, and went on to rag on them for casting Mel Gibson in the lead role instead of Nicholas Cage, which he considers “the greatest insult”.
As Swaim noted in his video, punch Emmett/Furla into Google, and one of the autocomplete options is ‘lawsuit’ - the company has a fairly colourful history, including a $6 million lawsuit in 2016 where they were accused of, of all things, racketeering and violation of the RICO act (a statute introduced for the prosecution of high-ranking Mafiosi). While that case was ultimately settled, at the time the opposing attorney stated that their “unlawful and intentionally unethical conduct follows a pattern that they have established over the past few years with numerous independent producers, whom they have swindled into doing business with them” - a summation which appears to tally with Swaim’s impression of the outfit.
Their phoenix-like transformation into MoviePass Films hardly covers them with glory either, considering they’re nailing their colours to the profoundly ill-regarded MoviePass film ticketing service. A swift browse of their social media reveals that even the lightest of puff pieces (‘looking forward to the weekend?’) receives a response almost entirely composed of customer service complaints. Like their new child company, they too have been targeted for legal action, the complaint being that, having been promised they could watch a film a day, customers were only able to view three films over ten months. In other words, MoviePass was unable to provide equivalent service to living opposite a drive-in theatre.
Plagiarism is a tough nut to prove, particularly in the media. Not too long ago there was a story going round that Netflix darling Stranger Things was plagiarised from Charlie Kessler’s 2012 film Montauk. Uniquely, this accusation was set to actually go to court, whereas the vast majority don’t even make it that far – so a judge felt there were enough similarities between Montauk and Stranger Things to hear it out. Nonetheless, Kessler ended up dropping the case and subsequently rescinding his accusation, insisting it was all the brothers’ own work, like the defendant at a Soviet show-trial praising the premier before they are shot and bulldozed into a mass grave.
An even more egregious example came with Joe Quirk’s novel The Ultimate Rush, about a rollerblade courier being chased by a corrupt policeman, which Quirk alleged was ripped off to create the forgettable Joseph Gordon-Levitt vehicle Premium Rush, a film about a bike courier being chased by a corrupt policeman. Quirk’s novel had been optioned for a film adaptation by Warner Bros., only for Columbia pictures to go ahead with Premium Rush shortly after that option expired. This, too, ultimately never made it anywhere in court, with the presiding judge noting that by having publicly published a novel, Quirk couldn’t claim that anyone was “impliedly bound to pay for using the ideas” found therein.
But Swaim did not publicly publish his screenplay. By his own account, he and Epperson wrote it at the request of Emmett/Furla, and sent it directly to them, so if one were to wonder just where the studio got the idea for their film ‘Force of Nature’ there is one very obvious option. This is not necessarily conclusive, there is the occasional strange coincidence where two similar projects come to be completely independently. There are unrelated comic strips in Britain and America called ‘Dennis the Menace’, both of which first appeared on the 12th of March in 1951. However, nobody’s ever accused either strip of plagiarising the other, possibly because America’s white-picket-fence Dennis couldn’t be more different from Britain’s surly, proto-punk Dennis. MoviePass Films’s iteration of ‘Force of Nature’ doesn’t come close to passing that sniff test.
Quirk’s case could at least be put down to it being a similar project with a similar name – rather than, in Swaim’s case, an identical project with an identical name. To stave off MoviePass Films’s presumably bloodthirsty lawyers, I will note that their treatment of ‘Force of Nature’ has significant differences from Swaim’s ‘Force of Nature’ - for instance, the lovable animal companion is a large dog instead of a horse. I leave it to the studio to point out any significant differences in narrative and tone, if indeed they can.
Unlike Kessler or Quirk, Swaim has no plans to take the issue to court due to a lack of funds. I need scarcely go into this perennial flaw of the legal system here – truly, it treats all men equally, just as the rich and poor alike are forbidden from sleeping rough under bridges. Swaim has, however, released a reading of his script ‘Force of Nature’ on Youtube, and I for one am, for legal reasons, confident that we definitely won’t see Mel Gibson stumbling through the exact same storyline while resisting the urge to say something anti-Semitic in about a year’s time.
6 notes
·
View notes