#and that's not fruitful discussion that's just really tiring discourse

[lgbtlunaverse]

The toga not being able to use the league's quirks thing is fun because it's the first time my dash full of pretty damn smart people whose opinions on these characters I all respect genuinely all disagree with each other. I've never seen this many well thought out thinkpieces that all completely contradict each other in subtle or big ways in one day.

[writingonjorvik]

Ok, look, I put up with a lot of shit. I realize that because this is a games analysis blog, not everyone was going to agree with me and there are going to be discussions about that. I’m going to get kickback and criticism on my comments. And that’s ok. I love seeing y’all’s opinions, even when I disagree with them.

That said, there is still a really unhealthy attitude in this community, on all platforms, about criticism towards the game. It’s fine when it’s on something you agree with, but when it’s not, it’s a rant, it’s overly invested, it’s too emotional. And I’m tired of being told that because it’s gaslighting and projection. And it’s even more frustrating when I’m being told it by people who are supposed to be my mutuals, who are supposed to be my friends, only to have people flip on a dime because they don’t like my opinion.

My opinions being resourced and argued don’t make me too emotional. Me calling the cracks in your argument doesn’t make me too invested. You running out of arguments to my list of support doesn’t make mine a rant. Making me the problem in a discussion and making me feeling bad for having opinions on the game that are different is projection of blame, gaslighting, turtling, often just plain ad homenin and name calling and I’m done with putting up with it. It’s worse when it’s about behavior, and the fact that that’s become a regular comment needing to be added is alarming.

I’ve been harassed by players. I’ve been harassed by SSO’s PR and outreach. I’ve been harassed by SSO’s devs. And I’ve been harassed by people who are supposed to be my peers. And I’m sick of it. I write this blog, I make my content, I play this game because I love it. And I’m done with other people telling me that because I have critical opinions they don’t like that I’m being irrational. And they aren’t welcome here. I’m cutting that shit out of WoJ. People who do that are going to be blocked, because there’s no discourse to be had with someone whose only argument is to put someone else down.

If you’re worried that this might be you, guess what, it’s likely not. The fact that you have the ability to show concern and empathy indicates you’re capable of being a rational human being who can recognize the effects of your comments and separate them from judgments on a person’s character. If you’ve ever engaged with me in a debate, even if I don’t agree with you, you likely aren’t part of this group either. Disagreeing with me is one of the beautiful things about conversation. When we talk about our opinions, we find compromise and we find solutions. But the fact that you can, again, respectfully separate your comments from attacks on character indicates that you have the rational and basic empathy to hold a conversation respectfully.

If you’re reading this and thinking I’m being overdramatic, or if you’re looking up the terms I just used to try and tell me I’m using them wrong, then you’re likely part of the problem. People should be entitled to their opinions and the ability to express them, so long as those opinions aren’t doing anyone actual harm. Which I would say none of mine do since they’re about playing a horse game with no real stakes in the world. But telling people to shut up, to stop talking, to leave, to stop playing the game, to get over yourself, to put someone else down for having a different opinion is wrong and we need to call that behavior out when we see it to stop it from spreading. It is destructive. It is disrespectful. It has no place in healthy relationships or discourse.

And you can choose to acknowledge that, aim to be a better person by correcting that behavior, and aiming to be more respectful of others opinions, even if its minute in your own behavior. Something as small as catching your language before you call something a rant. Or you can perpetuate the cycle of tearing others down for having differing opinions from yourself, and not calling out this behavior for what it is.

I left the community in the first place for a lot of reasons. It was imploding, and I know I’ve gone too far in some cases. But I came back because I love discussing this game, having worked on and improved the best I could to be a better person. But the writing on the wall is clear to me and that’s there’s another implosion waiting to happen in this community. The last one was based on assigning labels. This one is going to be on assigning blame and guilt. Now, we can either work to be better, to support each other despite our differences, and aim to be respectful regardless of opinion, or we can let feuding run its course. For myself, I’m cutting out rotten fruit and encouraging the healthy debate. You may not agree with me, but so long as we can be respectful, that doesn’t matter. 

There is nothing productive in being destructive to others, in insulting character over simply discussing the point at hand. It should be our goal in life to do better, to be better. And I live my everyday by that principle. Give respect, but don’t be trod over. If it does no harm, do as you will. I will not be beaten out or shut up because I have opinions people do not like. And if we want this community to be healthy and to stop having rotating collapses, then we need to stop tearing ourselves apart from within, start calling out poor behavior so we can start moving towards helping others be better, and building up our support of others.

[beeyeah]

Jikook: Appeal to Logic

Title: Appeal to Logic

Summary: /Jikook/ Two-shot/ Canon/ Where Jimin tries to convince Yoongi why he was positive Jungkook likes him and Yoongi asks him, “What would you do with that information?”

Indeed, Jimin wonders what the point was to all this.

Notes: I wanted to post on Valentine’s but I guess my calendar is ten days late hhhhh Anyway, I lurk a lot in Jikook tags (like I’m here everyday) and I’ve read long discourses regarding the legitimacy of their relationship. I thought it’d be interesting if one of them begins to share his proofs too and joins the hot pot of convo his own way. TLDR; enter this fic lol I promise it won’t be 20 chapters this time. 

Chapter 1 under cut or you can read at Ao3

Chapter 1: Points Were Made

It was an on and off thing.

Like a passion project that you know you just would figure how to complete someday but needed time because life would get in the way.

Today though marked the moment Park Jimin was ready to lay out his cards and tell someone that definitely… maybe… with a little more sprinkle of confidence that --

“Hyung, I think Jungkook likes me.”

There was silence in Min Yoongi’s room when the statement was pronounced. It made Jimin squirm on his seat as he tried to understand the non-committal stare directed at him, right behind the bond paper that held Jimin’s scribbled notes for lyrics.

Ah, that was right.

His initial purpose was to hear Yoongi’s feedback on a thing he'd been working on. Somewhere along the way, his thoughts drifted to another which inevitably led to his bold declaration of Jungkook’s far from familial, alleged infatuation for him.

Yoongi reached out to his left where his mug of coffee sat.

��I don't know what you want me to say. Of course, Jungkook likes you.”

Jimin frowned, wrapping his head around how he should explain himself. “No, hyung. I mean Jungkook likes me.”

Yoongi’s mouth was slightly gaped and his eyes were blank. His hyung looked lost while he attempted to blink his confusion away.

Well, his observations go way way back, two years worth of evidence. Right in the hallway of their home, an evening in October.

“Jungkook treats me differently,” he told Yoongi, legs crossed and under him as he put up a finger and discussed his first point.

It wasn't as if it was only him who questioned it. Jungkook only gave Jimin a birthday present in the span of the past years, no one else and that got to mean something.

They were all tired from shoot that most of them were tempted not to shower. Hoseok was pushing him around and urging him to a quick bath before lying on his bed because that was what Hoseok was. He liked things clean and perfect and that same rule applied for his roommate. But then Jeon Jungkook, his beloved dongsaeng, appeared out of nowhere and blocked him from his merry way to the bathroom. A little awkwardly might he add because he stood there, hand fiddling with his fringes and eyes searching the floor in trepidation. At that point, both Jimin and Hoseok unlatched themselves from each other's grip to attend to the youngest who seemed to need some attention.

To his surprise, and perhaps his hyung’s too, Jungkook held out his hand and shoved Jimin a paper bag. Hoseok curiously peeked from his shoulder as Jimin tried to open it while muttering, “What's this?”

Jungkook answered with a shrug and he waited. He waited there and watched Jimin opened his present.

It wasn't even anything grand. In this stage of their career, they were just beginning to gain traction from their first win and as Namjoon had put it, at breakeven, to finally enjoy the fruits of their hard labor. Knowing how their earnings were distributed based on performance and royalty fees, Jimin was pretty sure Jungkook received the same profit he did. To be honest, it wasn't exactly much. The only difference was that Jimin was prone to lavish it on people while Jungkook would save it for practical and grander things.

The practical, grander things in Jungkook’s head was Jimin. Bought him a sweatshirt which costed around 44,000 krw. Jimin researched the price because he was curious how much the maknae was willing to spend on him.

No greeting cards. Not a high end brand. Just plain white paper bag from the department store where he bought his first gift for a Bangtan member.

Needless to say, Jimin was ecstatic and made sure to rub it on everyone's face.

“Jimin-ah,” Yoongi tried to interrupt him but he shushed the older with an afterthought.

“It wasn't the gift that's strange. Jungkook's face was really weird when I thanked him.”

Jimin knew Jungkook well enough to know when he was happy. Whatever gratefulness he saw on Jimin’s face translated on how satisfied Jungkook was on what he did. There was a sense of pride and innocent glee in Jungkook’s eyes similar to the way they would twinkle when he was offered cheesecake or lamb skewers. It was odd how he was comparing himself to food but Yoongi would probably understand the reference. He would bring Jungkook to lamb skewers so often that the maknae even vowed to stay with him forever if he would agree to become business partners.

That was beside the point.

Back then, Jimin thought he was onto something but the idea didn't linger because it was indeed a special occasion. Jungkook was a good dongsaeng and treated his hyung well even outside their birthdays so, on a second thought, it wasn't really much of an evidence.

The hand that held Jimin’s lyrics now dangled limply over the office chair’s armrest.

“Jimin-ah, just get to the point.”

Jimin pursed his lips. As far as he was concerned, he was straightforward from the get-go. He thought Jungkook likes him and he stated the fact right on, now presenting his evidence.

“Number two,” he said after lifting another finger. Perhaps Yoongi wanted him to speed things up and he should. He certainly didn't have all day with their comeback looming around the corner. “Jungkook thinks I'm beautiful.”

Yoongi’s confusion had more color to it this time. Beyond his blinking eyes that questioned where this conversation was headed, his brows met when he spoke, “Should this really be coming out of your own mouth?”

“It didn't come from me. Jungkook told me,” he replied, voice defensive.

“Jungkook thinks you're cute. But so do I. Might as well tell me that all members like you.”

“No,” Jimin answered, tucking his arm in and across his chest. His eyes narrowed, teeth worrying his lips, trying to recall the exact moment that prompted him to ask the youngest. “Ah, that's right,” he muttered when the epiphany came. He searched his pockets for his phone and scrolled through countless and countless of albums of selcas and videos of him with Bangtan.

It was somewhere in there.

“Hyung… this,” he finally said after almost five minutes of sifting through his files.

Yoongi’s back was facing him after he stopped talking to look for his proof. He really should've prepared it beforehand. Now his hyung seemed to have completely lost his interest. He was typically patient to listen, but Jimin interrupted him when he was in the midst of editing a melody submission.

Though Yoongi said it was fine. Jimin would be his breath of fresh air because the team would so rarely go out during crucial period right before their comeback. He knew better not to push the limit but it was tempting and he needed someone to listen to him.

He pulled the bean bag next to his hyung’s leg, lifted his phone so that Yoongi would be able to see what he was referencing to.

His hair was pink, the clip a mere six- seconder. He was staring at the camera, trying to appeal to ARMY. He needed it. There was this greedy part of him that wanted to know how they would react to his flirting. Tell people, ‘Hey, Jimin is right here and this is how he looks right now. His hair changed.’ That kind of drill right before their comeback and their response would in a way boost his confidence. A conscious tactic to keep his fans interested in him perhaps?

“What do you think?”

Yoongi made a face and pulled back to a cringe as he'd expected. Highly likely, he would've done the same thing if any other member showed him a video of themselves. So he merely nodded in agreement. Bangtan wasn't the audience for this video. ARMY was.

“Do you know how Jungkookie reacted when I showed this to him?”

Yoongi sighed. “Would I want to know?”

“He replayed it, hyung,” he said as a matter-of-factly. “He told me I should post it because our fans would love it. Which I did, if you remember.”

“I don't,” Yoongi admitted and turned his chair so that he was facing Jimin, a leg over the other while he waited for him to continue.

“I posted it on Twitter and do you know who posted afterwards?”

“Jungkook?”

It wasn't a wild guess.

“Yeah,” Jimin confirmed the obvious. “After 10 minutes, he posted something and you know what it said?”

No response.

“He posted a song.”

The title was right on the hashtag #ILYSB by Lany.

When it came to music that wasn't in their own language, Jimin would seldom take efforts to find translation. So long as he understood bits and pieces of what little English he knew, he could work around it. Namjoon said to be careful of listening to artists that might cause uproar by association, so he would still have to check it out if he'd want to share it with the fans. But for as much as he believed that lyricism was a key ingredient to any good music, Jimin preferred to feel rather than completely understand and analyze. That job was for their leader.

However, he decided that he wanted to fathom the youngest’s thoughts that night.

The noob part of him thought the title was some secret internet code popular in the west so he searched naver only to be greeted by a simple yet telling I love you so bad. His mouth formed an ‘oh’ when he realized that it might've been an intense confession. It invariably piqued his curious mind so that later he would be listening on loop to… and you need to know that I'm hella obsessed with your face.

“You're reading into it too much,” Yoongi told him with a shake of his head as he reached again for his coffee. “I'm not one to judge who you want to date, but think how this appears to other people.” Yoongi paused, seemingly debating what he should and shouldn't say next. “Jimin-ah, a lot could happen in ten minutes. Like you, Jungkook might be sending that message to the fans. Namjoon recommends a lot of songs. It wouldn't be about us.”

“I know, so I asked him directly.”

Yoongi almost spat his drink on him. He tapped his chest as he drowned out his cough to reaffirm. “Ya, you what?”

“I asked him if the lyrics were about me.”

“And?”

“He laughed,” Jimin confessed.

Truth be told, his ego was slightly hurt to see Jungkook’s initial response to his question. He was serious about it because he was just about more than a quarter sure about his theory. It didn't feel good to have this kid finding amusement to something he pored over. He could've just said ‘no’ outrightly and Jimin wouldn't have minded.

Jungkook’s laughter died down when he saw Jimin’s expression transform and he was reaching out for his hand in apology before he knew it.

Jimin let him hold him.

“It was…” he almost sounded uncertain. “Hyung, why are you being like this?” Sounded almost helpless and then relenting, “Yeah, it was about you. I was nervous so I laughed.” Instinctively, his free hand reached for his fringes like the night of Jimin’s birthday.

When he saw the younger fidget, Jimin felt relieved. Ah, he still knew Jungkook better than anyone. Mindful to see every little shift in the air, Jimin wasn't wrong in reading the situation.

He ruffled Jungkook's head and returned the wide staring with his own curled eyes in amusement. “I knew it,” mumbled to himself and turned once he got the confirmation that he wanted.

“You just left?” Yoongi asked him, tone surprised that it nudged some bafflement at the back of Jimin’s head.

He bobbed his head yes because, well, what else was he supposed to do? He already proved he was right. Yoongi hadn't even heard the rest of his evidences yet.

“Three,” he said to share what was left in his folder.

“Stop,” Yoongi said, planting a foot on Jimin's thigh to emphasize the urgency of his demand.

Jimin slapped the foot away and dusted off his pants.

“Do you even like Jungkook?”

He tilted his head sideways. “Of course,” Jimin answered simply, wondering why it was even a question in the first place. He liked Jungkook. Jungkook was and still is his favorite dongsaeng and BTS member. He'd take care of him even if he grew his muscles and grew taller than him.

Yoongi shook his head. “I don't think we're talking about the same thing.”

“For the third one… ” Jimin took in the opportunity of minute lag on Yoongi’s response to divert the conversation back to the task at hand. He really didn't understand what Yoongi meant but better to finish this off before his momentum dried and faltered.

He picked up his phone again and browsed through his apps. It was quite a long memory lane down Vapp’s timeline until he found the correct reference. He slid the video right on the important moment, him in his bathrobe with Taehyung’s voice singing in the background. The camera was on with Jungkook in his white shirt’s glory, sitting for all ARMY to see.

“That's right… Jimin-hyung is bad at playing games,” Jungkook said to echo his claim.

Back then, the staff berated them silently to turn off vapp. Jungkook was too loud. Jimin wasn't kidding when he said he was hearing him across the hallway. They were only given five hours to eat, take a bath, and nap before they reconvene for post-con review and plan out the adjustments in their set list but this kid chose to do an hour of live for the fans.

Jimin was out his room because Sungdeuk wanted to talk to Hoseok. They needed to work on spacing for Not Today. Their hyung thought they didn't maximize the stage well enough and he was also keen to give feedback on blockings for medley so they could properly execute group choreography for Bultaoreune.

Hoseok was too tired to get up his bed so he texted Jimin if he could get the notes in his place. Which Jimin was happy to do. He loved the fact that Hoseok trusted him and it gave him a sense of pride.

He and Sungdeuk were just about done talking when the older guy stopped him from his tracks by grabbing his arm.

“Can you tell Jungkook to tone it down a little? I heard he opened vapp but everyone's tired.”

Jimin honestly didn't want to deal with it. He was wearing his bathrobe without any make-up and only rushed out in the middle of his evening skin care routine because he wanted to be a useful dongsaeng to Hosoek and let him have an early rest. If he so much as spoke, audible for fans to hear, people were going to ask and he'd have to show himself on camera. Jeon Jungkook, really this kid should know when to stop.

“You know Jungkook listens to you well.”

Jimin jutted out his lower lip, “He doesn't.”

He could already imagine the maknae turning the volume up further for the sake of raising his hackles. Sungdeuk knew this but he was asking Jimin to do it because he knew Jimin couldn't say no when it came to Jungkook.

“Alright, alright,” he said, bobbing his head weakly and dragging his feet towards Jungkook’s room.

Across the end of the floor, he saw Taehyung towing right behind their leader who whispered him something. It made his friend glance at his direction and the next thing he knew, Namjoon was off his room and Taehyung was walking the opposite direction.

Taehyung got hold up by Sungdeuk who was midway his own room and right then, Jimin pressed on Jungkook’s room’s bell and twisted the knob open.

“I heard you from the neighboring room. Let me sleep,” he said, trying to keep his tone annoyed and nagging even when Jungkook was beaming at him so widely. “Stop singing in the middle of the night. Go to sleep.”

“You're losing me here, Jimin-ah. This is just you trying to discipline Jungkook. I would've scolded him the same.”

“Hyung,” Jimin replied sternly, eyes determined and a hand squeezing Yoongi’s thigh. “Did you watch it? Jungkook wanted my attention.”

Yoongi leaned back on his chair, challenging.

“Well, it wasn't even about that.”

His proof went beyond Jungkook's childish yet so endearing attempts to make Jimin come back and join his live. He slid the video right back to the moment and handed his phone in Yoongi’s hand.

When he crashed Jungkook's live that evening, Jimin had every intention to make an impression. After how people disregarded his precious, scant hours of work reprieve, he believed he deserved the screen time. It was tempting to test the waters to say the least. Not just with Jungkook. He wasn't dumb, well aware of his effect when he tried to appeal to someone.

“I don't know why you go to those lengths. They like you already,” Yoongi interrupted him mid-explanation, referencing to their fans. “What's more to prove?”

Jimin wondered to himself why but decided against it. “That's not the point, hyung,” he offered, not wanting to divert from the case at hand. They could ramble on about his insecurities later.

After confiscating the speaker that agitated Namjoon down to coordi noona who just finished fixing damaged buttons of their Blood, Sweat and Tears stage costumes, he went back in Jungkook’s room to greet their fans. A hand comb through his blond hair, cute sounds, zoom the bare face closer to the camera when he knew he just applied mask so he'd look good.

More important than that though was to stare at someone far longer than what was necessary that he’d be conscious to repay the attention. So he did what he knew would work, lure Jungkook's eyes to him and whisper. Mumble because that required someone to pay better heed and read his lips.

“That's not right, I was good at playing games a year ago.”

Then Jungkook would nod absentmindedly and whip his head towards his direction as Taehyung sang Chandelier in the background. Jimin wouldn't say it was the perfect song for the moment but it was good to have a song. Cause Jimin was aware they were recorded. He could go back to this, a song would help with epiphany and drama.

“What do you think?” he asked Yoongi who was squinting at his phone. Doubtful but probably a lot more convinced than he was five minutes ago. “I can be convincing if I want to.” He extended an arm to retrieve his phone.

He fell forward when his hyung suddenly pulled back to keep the small device out of reach. “I don't know if you're being serious about this.”

Jimin titled his head. “I am,” he said. “I am serious. Jungkook really likes me.”

He wasn't unreasonable. The kid had a habit of staring when someone would talk. He observed these things, sometimes obsessively, because it helped him understand the maknae better. So he knew why Jungkook would do it. He found it difficult to focus and physically directing his attention to someone would help him catch what they were trying to say better. It wouldn't be a deal then if Jimin was talking.

But when it was Namjoon who was put on spot to answer an English interview, their leader who still strove to speak a foreign language to represent the group, Jimin quite expected for Jungkook to listen… ogle.

“The korean teacher asked me a question, ‘What are the hardships of being a leader?’”

It wasn’t the first time Jungkook was caught. There was one at a fansign, then at the backstage of a music show, also during that one gayo episode and probably instances he wasn’t aware or the others he couldn’t remember. If Jimin wasn’t so busy overthinking things, he would have found it funny how Jungkook would play it cool and avert his gaze elsewhere. 

“There are hardships when we take positions, specifically being a leader...”

Namjoon continued his answer in the background while Jimin thought to himself what actually goes through the maknae’s head when he would look at him. Was the need so compelling that he’d do it or was Jimin really just that. Beautiful?

“Ya, do you hear yourself?”

Jimin giggled, his head falling back to comfortably rest on the loveseat. It was funny to call himself beautiful. Even he wouldn’t be that shameless.

The point still stands though. Jungkook would stare at him, and he would call him beautiful.

“It has to mean something right?”

He wanted to confirm the motivations behind the not-so-subtle attention. However, he didn’t want to do a repeat of the last time when he confronted Jungkook about the song. It made the air between them strained and the youngest would agonize in his presence. Jimin thought he was being shy so he’d hold back.

But then what about his own curiosity?

“You’re curious, that’s it,” Yoongi said plainly. “What would you do with that information?”

Jimin pursed his lips as he thought about it. 

Good point. Where was he leading with all these? He didn’t think that far enough. He wasn’t even done with his final proof.

“What do you think, hyung? What should I do about it?”

...To be continued

[dxmindstechnologies]

Top AI Chatbots Development and Benefits | DxMinds Technologies

Chatbot Development

Get your chatbot created from the reputed chatbot development company in Bangalore. We offer cost-effective and progressed AI-based programming answers for computerize connection with your clients. Now a days, ChatBots are most important in our Business it’s working Automatically. If you want to develop a Chatbot first you know about how much does cost to Develop a ChatBot.

Chatbot Development for Exceptional User Experience

Chatbot App Development gives the most advantageous and simple method of smoothing out client interactions. We utilize advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine learning (ML) innovation to create new generation chatbots. Being a top Mobile App development company in Dubai, we utilize powerful and trend setting innovation that serves to rapidly create and convey savvy, brilliant and AI based chatbots over a wide number of stations like Facebook, Slack, SMS, Whatsapp, Telegram and some more.

How does a Chatbot work?

Chatbots utilize Natural Language Processing (NLP) innovation to understand and dissect human discourse, sort out the suitable reactions, and return in human-understandable language. The essential point of NLP is to make the collaboration among PCs and people as consistent as could really be expected.

NLP includes two cycles

NLU:

Natural Language Understanding (NLU) is the capacity of the chatbot to change over the content composed by the client into organized information for a machine to comprehend.

NLG:

Natural Language Generation (NLG) changes the organized information into human reasonable content.

With ongoing upgrades in NLP innovation, the chatbots can without much of a stretch identify the subtle tones in composed just as spoken discussion. Despite the fact that there is a little battle with regards to disentangling analogies and representations, yet progressed systems are being contrived each day that assistance to beat these obstacles.

Why use chatbots?

Expanded degree of efficiency

Chatbot Apps are automates techniques and empowers you to eliminate inefficient assets. Through these bots, you can remain associated with your clients 24x7, 365 days a year. This expands productivity and assists you with arriving at worldwide clients without any problem.

Benefits Of Chat BotDevelopment For Your Business

Hire once and let them work for your life time.

Works 24/7. Never gets tired.

Seamlessly works with other bots and your human employees.

Can understand human sentiments, remember pas histories and can communicate in multi-language

Can be scaled quickly.

Can be trained with more sample data for better performance initially.

Learns new processes quickly and update by itself.

Voice commands or Alexa / Google home can be easily integrated

Our Chatbot Development Services

We uphold a wide array of precise chatbot development services that go straight into your organizational frameworks.

FAQ Chatbot development

If you are running a small scale business and you want to attract a potential set of customers, a FAQ chatbot comes your way. It is a basic level of chatbot and our profound developers help you come up with one, that too first of its kind. Our developers are backed with all of the latest technologies available in the market and they can seamlessly make a chatbot that helps you engage your customers in the best way possible. Hire top chatbotDevelopment Company from the house of most experience in reality what the best chatbot development services can have on your business and how far it can take it forward.

NLP Chatbot Development

The most accurate NLP chatbot development services rolled out by our resources adds more mileage to your business. Our resources add more value to your business frameworks, enhancing your chances of becoming a global business. By hiring world-class chatbot developers, you are given a chance to explore the unexplored, make the odds even, and bring the best out of your business. Natural Language Processing chatbots developed by our talented resources can enhance your business growth by engaging the customers in the most intrinsic manner.

AI Chatbot Development

Artificial Intelligence Chatbots are gaining huge traction from the global community and have turned out in being everyone’s cup of tea. It adds more value to the business frameworks and businesses are making the most out of it. To put that into perspective, we help you hire the best AI chatbot developers on board from our enriched resource pool.

Enterprise Chatbot Development

Based on your enterprise requirement and to meet and greeting the most precise manner, we help you hire the best chatbot developers in India. Our resources are well experienced associating with potential chatbot development projects, that nothing comes their way as a barrier to the development. The combines world-class technologies in order to make your project a full-fledged one. Their services are well acclaimed by our global set of customers and uphold a high degree of customer satisfaction rate.

Chatbot Consultation

With our well-versed proficiency and hands-on experience in developing futuristic chatbots, we offer end-to-end chatbot consultation services to our prestigious set of customers. Our resources are well trained to deliver their best all the time and are one hundred percent committed to the same.

Maintenance and Support

Proper maintenance is a factor determining the success rate of a chatbot and we offer full-fledged chatbot maintenance and support services. They are available round the clock, 24x7. We love serving our customers to its fullest and we do it very often.

Why you Choose as DxMinds as Your Technology Partner?

DxMinds Technologies Inc is a leading digital transformation and mobile app development companies in Dubai having headquarters at the USA and corporate offices in India, UAE, Peru, and Australia. The company focuses on imparting unmatched app development services to the clients, thus becoming the best app developers in Dubai. The mobile applications developed by DxMinds Technologies are scalable, reliable and highly productive. DxMinds Technologies develops innovative solutions leveraging its homegrown technologies that help clients in generating fruitful sales and revenue.

Contact us now and empower the valid deal!

We hope this blog served its purpose in letting you aware of the Mobile App Development Companyin Dubai. Hire DxMinds Technologies, the economical app development company in Dubai to develop mobile applications of your kind. To know more about reach us at +971 50 152 9161 or Visit our Website Dedicated Mobile App Developers. Reach us at info@dxminds.com

OUR GLOBAL SERVICES LOCATIONS:·

Mobile App Development Companies in Dubai·

Mobile App Development Companies in Saudi Arabia·

Mobile App Development Companies in Kuwait·

Mobile App Development Companies in Oman Muscat·

Mobile App Development Companies in Abu Dhabi

[rai-jin-andro-jin]

In the event the above gif is not loading, note the following: transphοbes, tεrfs, rαdfems do not interact; whιte sυpremacists, alt-rιght, Trυmp fans DNI.

All reblogs, comments, tags, direct messages, asks, etc. in violation of the DNI rules on this post will be deleted and or reported without reply, and the blog to which they correspond will be blocked and reported. I do not entertain discourse on this topic.

tw: transphobia, racism, terfs, violence against trans people

Saw some weird discourse on my feed the other day from rαcist tεrfs / transphθbes trying to nitpick statistics regarding violence against trans ppl, specifically the mυrder rate of white trans women vs. white cis men. Specifically, they were trying to use statistics to claim that both groups were murdered at the same rate.

There was obviously more to the conversation, more subtleties and prejudice I won't delve into here. But what I got out of seeing this interchange was this:

Tεrfs were not bringing up statistical errors in good faith. Hypothetically speaking, even if they happened to be correct (which is a different topic that I will not discuss on this post) — that is, even if the tεrfs were correct in saying that (white) transwomen and (white) cis men are murdered at the same rate — their motivation for stating this is not out of concern for preserving statistical accuracy or social truth.

The main reason these tεrfs were pointing all of this out in the first place was because they believe that focusing on violence against minorities is favoritism, and that this "favoritism" specifically toward transwomen is threatening and detrimental to cis women (or their narrow definition of cis women, who they distinctly like to refer to as solely "women," minus the "cis" modifier, because they do not consider transwomen to be actual women).

Those who responded in support of transwomen, including the blog on which this discourse occurred, had a different motivation. Again, even if hypothetically, transwomen and cis men were mυrdered at the same rate — or, let's be even more generous: even if the same percentage of both groups were mυrdered over the study period, AND we miraculously had some way of accounting for every single transwoman, alive and dead, out and closeted — I would deem it safe to assume that most allies of trans people (including those who made themselves known, along with the positivity blog moderator) would still consider even equal proportions of mυrders to be too many mυrders.

This highlights what I perceive to be a very big difference in values and worldview. Different motivations are commonplace, even among people who largely agree. But, our motivations are shaped and guided by our values. Our values are in turn, motivated by our worldview, our subscribed ideologies.

This might be quite an obvious statement to make. Many allies and members of the LGBTQIA+ community are well aware of the differences in worldview between themselves and bigots. But the intricacies of these differences are important to notice in both consensual discourse, and in day-to-day conversation. Not all bigots have the same values. Not all bigots subscribe to the same ideologies. The same can be said of allies and queer people. But being able to recognize these differences can save you a lot of energy when dealing with people who chronically disagree with you, even or devalue you.

Ideological literacy is not a new concept. It's also just as important to be aware of your own ideologies and values — why it is you're doing something, or why it is you believe something. Ideological literacy is also important in identifying tεrfs, for example, whether you plan to attempt fruitful discourse, or you'd rather steer clear entirely.

I doubt that queer positivity blog moderator will ever see this post, and that's fine. (I can reach out privately anyway.) But for everyone who is trans and tired, and to all exhausted allies:

Look out for yourself, too.

Moderate where you spend your energy. Moderate who you give access to you (and your platform, if applicable). Sometimes you can't really tell with certain people; sometimes you need hindsight before you can determine if someone was worth your time. But realize that, especially in this case, arguing with anonymous tεrfs on tumblr is not, in my trans opinion, a good use of any of our time and energy. Is it educational to the audience to confront bigotry and reveal it's tenets? Yes. Censor them, block them, out them. Figure out who is a tεrf and who is just confused/misinformed. Accumulate community-maintained block-lists. All of that is necessary and good for the protection of trans folk. But please remember to steer clear of tεrfs as well. Remember to give yourself rest. Remember to put your mental and physical wellbeing at just as high of an importance as that of others. Please take care of yourself.

[witchblade]

it ramped up more than ever around the second half of 2016 bc of the heightened political awareness but I’m like. Tired of the current discourse. not #Discourse as in fringe shit like “guro bloggers are oppressed” but like. the fact that people could actually be arguing/debating/discussing/communing? in a way that brings Fruitful information and perspective on but half the shit i’m seeing right now is just filled with the absolute most shallow, disengaged groups of people talking past each other and not even addressing or acknowledging each other and the content of what the other is saying.

this isn’t me saying uwu arguments and mean words are bad we should only hold hands and speak gently. or that every group ~deserves to have their opinion acknowledged and it’s mean to shut them down unu~. it doesn’t really have anything to do with the actual Opinions held by any side. but I See these massive fucking posts and comments where it’s not the Tone or Stance that’s the issue, but the fact that people are literally just sayin shit. for like pages and pages jus sayin random shit. it’s like watching bots argue.

it just seems like a massive waste of time and reading arguments ranges from being just boring to feeling like you’re watching a rom-com miscommunication plot unfold. just 100% misreading and willful misunderstanding with 0% reading comprehension. we should piss on the poor,

[plxyboi-blog]

Confused about what to eat? Science can help

New Post has been published on https://healthy4lives.com/confused-about-what-to-eat-science-can-help/

Confused about what to eat? Science can help

amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "books009a-20"; amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "manual"; amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; amzn_assoc_region = "US"; amzn_assoc_design = "in_content"; amzn_assoc_linkid = "eb6b8d82602b7891da759d9bf5221f00"; amzn_assoc_asins = "162315944X,B00UJIXKL4,B07CZ837VB";

(The Discussion is an impartial and nonprofit supply of information, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

P.K. Newby, Harvard University

(THE Discussion) Do you experience like nutritionists are always shifting their minds? Do you want science-primarily based facts about eating plan but do not know whom or what to imagine?

If you’re nodding in arrangement, you’re not alone: More than eighty% of Individuals are befuddled.

Nonetheless it is a lament which is acquiring rather tiring – if you’re a diet scientist, that is. So a lot so that I refocused my career to glow scientific mild on today’s important foods discussions, which have profound impacts on community health and fitness and the surroundings. My mantra: From farm to fork, what we take in issues.

In simple fact, did you know that eighty% of chronic conditions are preventable by way of modifiable lifestyle alterations, and eating plan is the single premier contributing aspect?

Science states crops are better for you and our world

Thoroughly clean taking in or keto? Paleo or gluten-absolutely free? Total 30 or vegan? Overlook fad weight loss plans, due to the fact science has the responses – there is far extra arrangement about eating plan and health and fitness than you could know. The scientific report from the 2015-2020 Dietary Rules for Individuals, for illustration, concluded that a plant-primarily based eating plan is best for human health and fitness and the surroundings alike. More than seventy five% of your food really should comprise greens, fruits and complete grains, and protein sources really should incorporate beans, peas, nuts, seeds and soy.

Canada’s 2019 Food Manual is equally plant-focused, as is Harvard’s Healthy Ingesting Plate, while Brazil emphasizes meals “mainly of plant origin.” These tips and other individuals also worry the worth of restricting processed and ultra-processed meals.

There is also consensus from the Food and Agriculture Group of the United Nations and other individuals that plant-primarily based weight loss plans are extra sustainable, mainly owing to the high electricity inputs and environmental injury of livestock.

Even though it could audio like a fad, a “plant-based” eating plan has been studied for a long time. Recognition escalated as it addresses two urgent community health and fitness challenges: the chronic ailment epidemic and the weather adjust disaster. It is a get-get for human health and fitness and the surroundings. Plant-primarily based weight loss plans can be adapted to suit your flavor tastes, traditions and cultures, as the Blue Zones, or regions of the planet the place persons generally are living for a longer period than common and with less chronic conditions, show.

If science has the keys to a health and fitness-endorsing, ailment-protecting against, world-saving eating plan, why are persons so baffled? A nearer glimpse will arm you with the capabilities to form simple fact from fiction.

There is funds in confusion

Superstar junk science is an evident participant. It may even be cloaked in scrubs, like Dr. Oz – even though chastised by the Senate for his quackery. (Medical professionals, in normal, have little to no training in diet.)

Celebs garner monumental platforms, generally clouding the reality (or drowning it absolutely) the deal between Netflix and Gwyneth Paltrow, whose corporation Goop was sued about a particular jade egg, suggests that science is dropping the struggle.

1 needn’t be a celebrity to keep sway, even so. A list of the Top a hundred influencers showed that most were being bloggers or athletes with no skills. (None were being scientists.) These voices obtain substantial traction on social media. Health and fitness Comments, a community of scientists who critique the accuracy of on-line information, performed a analyze with the Credibility Coalition and observed a minority of content articles been given a optimistic rating, with most “exaggerating the advantages and harms of a variety of meals.”

Classic media do not always get rid of mild, alas. One-analyze sensationalism is ubiquitous – for illustration, glyphosate in oats, coconut oil and body weight, coffee leading to most cancers – and results absence context.

And science journalism has taken a hit, and is perhaps why CNN interviewed an anti-science zealot. Or why the Los Angeles Moments tweeted that there’s a “growing belief” about the health and fitness advantages of celery juice. (Pro suggestion: It is not a detail.)

Encompassing the din of bogus nutritional guidance and media buzz is a backdrop of science denialism, which legitimizes anti-science when espoused from top stages of government. Science illiteracy also plays a part.

However, there are information gaps: 57% of Individuals have never found the nutritional illustration from the U.S. Deparment of Agriculture named MyPlate or know little about it, and sixty three% noted it was hard to identify sustainable choices. Buyers also claimed that determining healthy foods was tricky (eleven%) or reasonable (61%). Unsurprising, perhaps, considering the fact that 48% looked to crowded foods offers for guidance: Some labels are significant while other individuals are little extra than advertising. (All natural, any person?) In truth, powerful foods and agriculture lobbies still exert influence on nutritional tips and obscure the science.

By way of all of this, I imagine the diet science community has tacitly contributed by failing to participate collectively in the community discourse. Nor have we adequately defended our self-control when attacked, irrespective of whether by journalists, doctors or foods writers.

Altering the dialogue

Powerful societal powers build a tradition of diet confusion that not only obfuscate the reality about eating plan, they undermine science as a complete. A few methods will enable eaters navigate this rocky terrain.

Start out by inquiring important queries when digesting eating plan information. Does the writer have an superior degree in diet, or does she or he have skills in science journalism? Are there references to peer-reviewed research or scientific companies? Is the supply credible? Are miracle cures or quick benefits promised? Are there high priced price tag tags for magic bullets? Does it audio like clickbait? Questioning the who-what-the place-why-how is paramount.

Next, recall that what flits by way of our newsfeeds generally arrives by way of algorithms that empower information to careen by way of our echo chambers and elicit affirmation bias, factual or not. Offline, way too, we are extra likely to share beliefs with buddies and loved ones, our tribe. Getting curious about what you take in and why it issues outside of your ease and comfort zone is important: You could will need to “unlearn what you have realized.”

Eventually, check out this on for size: Diet. Is not. Confusing. We all have cherished traditions and values – what we take in is not just about the science. (At the very least, I hope not.) But it is time to study the elementary foods and diet points that will inspire you to harness the power of foods to boost health and fitness, stop ailment and shield the world. Alter is possible – and the reality is out there.

This posting is republished from The Discussion underneath a Creative Commons license. Browse the initial posting here: http://theconversation.com/baffled-about-what-to-take in-science-can-enable-118745.

amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "books009a-20"; amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "manual"; amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; amzn_assoc_region = "US"; amzn_assoc_design = "in_content"; amzn_assoc_linkid = "eb6b8d82602b7891da759d9bf5221f00"; amzn_assoc_asins = "162315944X,B00UJIXKL4,B07CZ837VB"; Resource link Diet And Most cancers

[autoirishlitdiscourses]

Discourse of Wednesday, 04 October 2017

Nugent I said in some slice of Irish Women's Poetry, 1967-2000 ISBN 978-0-916390-88-4 around, it's easier for me if this or anything else gets covered in the best person to advise you on time. I meant who's done the reading.

If they take off. In each case, one of the class was welcoming and supportive to other students in great detail simply because they're quite impressive. If you are certainly welcome to leave campus before 3 on Monday for the day before Thanksgiving. I recall correctly: once during the first place; something similar could be set against each other, and I'm happy just to say about students and integrated their interests and observations into your own thoughts even more specificity. As promised in the quarter. It is/your/my/the first three paragraph exactly of the class as a whole. I'm not trying to assess what the implications of course welcome to leave it at the last of the landscape, Beckett may also be aggressively dropping non-passing grade in the novel's plot and thematic development.

I think that there was anything else that is bitter and mysterious, nor does it mean, and those people weren't being grade on the final analysis. By the way: my grading sheet, and it may be able to find something that you are thinking about this, here is one good way to fill ten minutes to talk in detail below. Your plans were adequate but came in after 10 p.

Hello, all of Godot is about 60/70.

It's difficult, and I'll post a link to this, let me know if Tuesday will work productively will just not show, take the penalty. Good choice; I feel that your choices of when to give it back to The Butcher Boy: discussion of On Raglan Road. And I think you've got a lot of different ways. So you can deal with the sweatbeads as big as berries moment in your section about the symbolism associated with certain trees, and have a fully developed idea yet, and you've done a lot of mental problems that I have you down for inaccuracies as measured against a different text.

It, Orlando, in part because its boundaries are rather nebulous. Anyway, my policy documented here is a duplicate message. You just need to take so long to get below 118 out of all of the text than to maintain a separate currency. /Two percent/for making a specific set of beliefs about what's important about this, I can't recall immediately and have decided to go through the writing process, and examining a specific analytical claim would distract you from attending is that you score at the time of the speech itself, though I felt like you haven't done a solid job, but there are several difficulties right there. There's no need to do this a great addition to doing it as he makes clear in the end of your own experiential metaphor may be one of your introduction and conclusion bracket the body of analysis. I'll bring them to dig even deeper examination of the work later. Hello, colleagues! But having specific questions general questions by bridging toward them with more concrete questions might have helped to get back to you. For instance, and perhaps point him toward your historical sources would pay off as much as doing an amazing recitation, and you are feeling excellent that day telling you what happened last week. You might look specifically at Bottle and Fishes; Clarinet and Bottle of Rum on a Mantelpiece; Guitar, Fruits et Pichet; Still Life-Le Jour. /Of your analysis will pay off here. What kind of a letter grade is calculated for the reminder email far enough or in the manner of an overview of a letter grade being worth 10%, vocabulary, like the ideal resource, but if you disagree, OK?

Short version: This is a bad thing, you might find helpful, but leaves it as-is if you re-think your discussion notes is because this coming Wednesday 20 November discussion of a text that you have quite a while because everyone is a really good reading of Ulysses, which has been quite a bit before I do not participate, then digging in to the audience so that I didn't show up and either satisfies or frustrates the expectation for them. The Playboy of the normal production process. Think about the poem and Yeats's biography. But you're a bright student and I don't know whether this happens: 1 avoid the specificity of your paper grade are the significant people in, so you need any accommodations, please leave the group. Thought for the quarter.

Hi! You're very welcome. I like it passes differently. Because it also appears at the smaller scales, and it looks like you're currently thinking may be very very very very hastily is generally pretty strong claim to prove, and that this is possible. Even if the exam is worth/five percent/of your argument, but this will make it to me like you in any other questions, OK? I think that phrasing your claims would help with that one way to get back to your large-scale argument, and you've done a pretty wide variance.

I said above, I think that you examine. You also did a good job of reading the texts that you should have been, though never seriously enough to impede an understanding of your chosen text is all yours. All in all, obligate you to do whatever would be to make sure to do so very lucid and enjoyable if you assert it, but also to try for that section; got the lowest score of anyone whose tests I graded it, but because I'm trying to say. There were some gaps for recall. Papers, Seventh Edition; there are many many problems here—and to your larger-scale motive that makes sense, just sending me a right of way. Let's face it: technology breaks. Does that help? Then, when the power company left me reading by looking up unfamiliar words or words or phrases used in a timely fashion in order to be on campus this weekend has just been going through them in my margin notes. 1, because problems like subject/verb agreement, belief, or slide it under my office! Thanks for being such a good set of ideas in even more attention to the larger-scale motive that makes the time period you're shooting for, say, and to your larger-scale points if they haven't read for quite a good way to impose limits on yourself though it would have helped to have practiced a bit more carefully to be just a bit too tired tonight to do The Butcher Boy would give you the final exam; b write an A, but it should be adaptable in terms of which affects your grade is. Anyway, my point is that the rest of the class, and I don't mean to take so long as fifteen minutes, but this is a way that you took. Hi! He missed four sections, so you need 94% on the structural similarity between Yeats's relationship to each section.

I'm up for a large number of things that you understood the issues that you are from the text of a discussion leader is worth either 3% or 4% of your grade: Recitation:, W. I may not be tied to the audience so that they haven't started the reading yet, and gave a very solid aspects of your grade provided that you can possibly write. Or you could be made. Lesson Plan for Week 3:30 does that tell me when large numbers of people haven't done a good student so far. Alas, my policy documented here is something that's much more candid on Reddit than I am not much of it continually in lecture and section times and locations on GOLD. Overall, you have two options.

You were clearly a bit more. Have a good Thanksgiving break. You also went above and beyond the length requirement is certainly an acceptable excuse for late work.

I'll post it to go above and beyond the length requirements. Being specific about your recitation/discussion, and I really will take this opportunity to say and interacted with the class was not acceptable, that Standard English quite effectively, because you'll want to help you to probe at what constitutes love's bitter mystery as being about nationalism as a study guide for his opinion directly in section. That would give your paper by the other members of the anxiety is different from Joyce's, so I'm signaling that if it's necessary to try the waters with discussion a bit more so that we don't really know whether they'll actually wind up living out amongst it. Up to/one percent/for emailing me a rough sketch of what the exact text of Irish nationalism are connected in rather interesting ways by a group of talented readers, and think about this-type grade, you could pick. Section Guidelines handout, which is the perfect and ideal expression of your future work. Neither is really the ideal and perfect expression of your own writing and thinking abstractly about the rebellion, though not the most productive move, which you perform some complex and loaded as a whole, I think you've made matters in the text. Does that help? It's not.

I'm sorry to take a large amount of introductory speaking to set up an analysis of another text that you find your thesis statement, which would be to make your own project in order to achieve goals that are annoying for the specific parts of the section website. The/performance/recitation/discussion 5 p. Despite these things but could get a fresh eye, asking yourself what you're actually claiming about the change you see this email so I'm sympathetic—but if you get to all your material you emphasize again, a fraction between zero and one less final to drop into the A range; if you describe what needs to happen differently for this to everyone who was it only Hynes. Your Grade Is Calculated document I do; added old to what other selection you want to take a radically relativist position and suggest that you can send you the add code for that assignment. Great! You're not alone. I'll send it, I've attached an. More, you also missed the professor's reading is the contemporary understanding of the class email, but is an emotional payoff and a lot of these are very very impressive moves. There were several ways that I think that setting this up, and you have any more I could try to incorporate alongside of it. Even if the group to discuss any of them are rather nebulous. To be fully effective manner. I am in section will definitely result in the future will help you to perform your own very sophisticated level. I think that your basic point of thinking sensitively about the horror experienced by the poem I was trying to say that I would be if each was a genuine contribution in the class, the highest of any of these are required, of Francie's unusually non-trivial citation problem; incorrectly sized margins or font; use of props and costuming was nice, thoughtful performance that was strong in some form, and your writing is very promising … and then revising lightly or heavily with a fresh emotional trauma. On poems by Seamus Heaney, Requiem for the or, perhaps Gertie's thoughts directly? Thanks! I'm normally much more candid on Reddit than I was surprised how many are attending so I haven't yet started writing a strong and, in any reasonable way, and Stephen is also a thinking process that will promote useful and insightful discussion. Other suggestions. Paper Guidelines: Your paper should be double-spaced; allowing your word processor does not affect the reader's ability to appreciate the argument in a bar with an urgent question the night before. One implication of this, and is as high as any twelve lines of your discussion and helped to have a word processor does not provide a more natural rhythm. I don't yet see a message from him. Here's what I initially thought I had hoped, motivating people to switch topics? For one thing, and your recitation has finished. I'll have your paper most needs to be about right but I believe that I define what that person's ancestry also includes more material than you'll actually be factored in until the very end of your discussion could have been declared in writing here, and sometimes present false dichotomies or otherwise incorrect about them at you, with answers to these in more detail below and your readings is quite clear and solid understanding of topics here that's too big to treat it as bad as it can be helpful. You should think about this. Without going back through my email one message at a time on Wednesday! Have a good choice on text, and what you would like to see what they have exactly 60 minutes to complete all assignments in a complex idea across a fairly comprehensive discussion of a necessary biographical connection for the Academic Senate Outstanding TA Award for the course texts needs to be as effective as it could be, in the attendance/participation because of its most precious illusions. Thanks for doing a large-ish A-. Thinking about ways that this is a more streamlined fashion there is section tonight, along with a more impassioned which may have. I'm so sorry to take. Opening up more quickly, and so if you have 86. Thanks for doing such a good weekend, and none of the country, though, because I expect students will do when they want to know what the crashing situation looks like people have prepared as your notes would be more impassioned which may have required a bit better, I myself often don't revise my thesis statement is so general that it's too late to leave your luggage to section and should take my comments. You've presented a good set of arguments about a the specific language of your late penalty, which may have experienced in attaining those results. 1269-1283, p. You must also provide me with a pen in your email, substantial and/or may not have a wonderful and restful holiday break, and the texts that you just exactly fill eight pages, but didn't fault you in any case, since the professor. From the Republic of Conscience, p. I think you've got a sensitive and nuanced as you're capable of this is often a major theme of crime drama: the final metaphorically speaking, but I remember myself how hard that first draft, but apparently I haven't yet fully thought around what your priorities are if you have a mother who is alive, for instance. Again, well done! Based on notes provided by TA Christopher Walker and the other hand, I will take this set of esoteric knowledge regarding this selection. The Wall Street Journal speculates about whether you're technically meeting the discussion overall. This use is perhaps more flexible, and again your comments and questions from other sources. 5 C-range papers, and this is the question of what the fellow is thinking about them. Is that Walter definition of race that is helpful, but there are a number of texts. I will take this into account when grading your presentation. As you may contact UCSB's Title IX Compliance Office, the theoretical maximum number of genuinely miniscule value. Let me know what you need to get your grade they're just suggestions that I will still be calculating your grade, divided as follows: total number of bonus points you receive no section credit. Remember that you get behind. Let me know if you have two options: prepare a fantastic, documented excuse, then why argue in favor of making your evidence into a more nuanced argument that you're perfectly capable of doing even better, I think that there is a list of the Blooms' marriage. 21% not quite a solid job here. I suppose this is of course multiple other ways in which he or she is thought out extensively, and probably later than you're able to get warmed up for the quarter, though, that you follow that up by a text in question by repeating something you like and are certainly capable of doing it for a job well done overall. You also did the best possible way, and I suspect you edited very very difficult to find a copy of this comes down to size by thinking about what to do with the rest of the Poet-Critic in My Way Reminder: Wednesday is the actual amount of time and managed to introduce some major aspect of Irish identity that signals that the section wound up being a coded but direct reference; perhaps his point? If you have chosen. Attending section that you are one of them, avoid them entirely, etc. There are plenty of room for 65 minutes at that time.

Before I forget: Do you have not yet worked out for you. Serious illness requiring urgent medical care. Currently, your attention on what it means and how they relate to the text's/Ireland's/Irish literature's/your/overall course grade. Failure to turn in a lot this weekend and I'll post the revised version instead of by God these are generally solid. Close enough on its own logic. I do not use GauchoSpace to calculate total points for section this week to read your selected bibliography into sections indicating status Works Cited and Works Consulted would be more comfortable with silence, and it shouldn't be too hard to read and thought closely about how you want to recite as soon as you can get a low A on your grade recorded based on your list existentialism, absurdity though it is the question will be helpful if you don't have time to look at there are a lot of ways in which you make meaningful contributions to the top 39 students excluding F grades, I have by the race as a postcolonial novel as a mother: that sexual desire as lust generally involves invoking one or the other students. You were clearly a bit nervous and halting here, although the multiple starts ate up time that way, would be to let that claim guide you in section. I'll put you down for Dec. However, these are just some possibilities, though they'll probably require a fair portrayal of Rosie is perhaps explicable by the other Godot group for some productive research suggestions today. However. Are For Young People via HuffPostBiz Welcome to the course. Promising two days on grading turnaround was perhaps optimistic for weeks when I cold-called on him for a job well done. I assign your final paper? I am perfectly happy to photocopy the chapter for you. Overall, this could have gone to your thesis statement at the beginning of the poem, gave what was overall an excellent delivery, and not the low end of the Telemachus episode 6, would be the full text of some of my margin notes because your writing really is quite engaging. Abstractions are not limited to: absence of a variety of issues that would work out in her discussion in your own original work/. I will cut you off. Again, thank you for pointing me toward this series, the larger structures and concerns and did a number of things here, but in your own, or a car accident causing head trauma on your final exam. If it doesn't. If you choose.