#and I hate the discourse that what you’ve said in the past shouldn’t affect you

[galpal95]

vvvv mini rant to delete later vvvv

Some people have really never gotten the ‘watch what you say on the internet cause that shit is forever’ or the ‘nothing on the internet is private even if it’s sold to you that way’ lectures that were drilled into me in the early 2000s.

I’m begging everyone to take a few seconds to reflect on what they type before hitting post. Maybe do some self-reflection too, especially if you’re about to post about a topic you know is controversial or sensitive.

Not to be victim blame-y, but it’s way easier to protect yourself then to prevent someone from being cruel and malicious. Especially, on the internet.

[unitchiefs-blackbirdphoenix]

You may have seen this going around but people are hating JJ for snapping at Reid in 10x11. Like maybe she shouldn’t of done that but she was having a literal breakdown and her ptsd affecting her a lot. Not to mention that Reid did the same when Emily asked if he was okay when he was going through his drug addiction and ptsd after Hankel but yet no one gives him hate for it. Emily also snapped at Garcia in 6x17 when Garcia checked up on her. They two were also going through a lot but people still defend them while JJ who also did the same as them gets the most hate (which doesn’t surprise me with this fandom). And at the end of 10x11 JJ thanked Reid for helping her and in a way apologised. Also Reid, Emily and Garcia didn’t take it personally when they were snapped at as they could tell something was going on. When you’re going through something especially trauma it’s possible you may end up snapping at someone and we shouldn’t give them hate for it.

Sorry for this rant, I’m just annoyed that people are hating on JJ for going through something traumatic

Hi thank you so much anon!

I don't know exactly what happened recently regarding this situation, but after reading this ask, I 100% agree with you! You are more than welcome to rant about this because I feel the same way. I think I have seen something like this in the past, and I still don't understand the JJ hate, which I will get at the end of the post under the cut. (I also apologize in advance if this is all over the place haha)

I think JJ has the right to feel the way she feels in 10x11. JJ probably thought Reid means well when he was asking if she was ok, but it also seemed very clear that she didn't want to talk about it. She also didn't want them to cause a scene in a place where it's public. Like you said, it seemed pretty similar to the scene about Reid getting mad at JJ for hiding the fact that Emily was still alive. He didn't get much hate as JJ did in that moment, too. Even people were blaming JJ for "hurting Reid's feelings" because she had to protect someone very close to her and the team. JJ already felt guilty having to lie to the team and while Hotch wasn't the target of Reid's anger, he still felt responsible for his actions and Reid's feelings. In fact, Hotch has made that clear for everyone to tell him how they felt about Emily's return. Even in 7x02, Hotch tells Reid if he is angry, Hotch is willing to take the blame for it and that he shouldn't be angry at JJ, in which Reid bitterly responds: "I can't. I didn't come crying to your house for 10 weeks." Hotch was guilty for hiding it from the team as well, and people have aimed their anger towards JJ because she "hurt Reid's feelings". It also didn't sit right with me when Reid implied that he was going to blame JJ for his hypothetical relapsing (that may be poor writing but it still doesn't sound right).

JJ was dealing with something traumatic to her, and so she deserved to feel frustrated, angry, etc. because it is difficult to keep all those emotions, especially negative ones, shoved into a box. Even though one pushes their emotions down, there is going to be a breaking point and all of whatever they have been feeling is going to burst out of the bottle sooner or later. That's the case with JJ. She wasn't mad that Reid was checking on her, she was only mad that it was at the wrong time. If it was at a time that was decent for them (aka when it's in a quiet place like at the end of 10x11), then JJ wouldn't mind as much. Over time, JJ has worked to push her emotions away because of everything that's happened to her. It becomes both better and worse for her coping. Better because she is able to get a task done fast. Worse because she isn't confronting her feelings, which is unhealthy. At the end of 10x11, JJ has thanked Reid for helping her and didn't seem too angry at him anymore, and in a way, has apologized. She felt somewhat relieved that she finally told someone about what she was going through (even though her trauma was still not entirely resolved, in my opinion).

I think you've made some interesting points using examples of other scenes that have characters snapping at someone else for getting them to open up about something troubling them. Derek and Emily have snapped at Garcia, who was checking up on them during a time of distress. Both of them know she meant no harm as well and they were both frustrated and stressed in those two times. Garcia understood and was only concerned about them. Same with Reid confronting JJ about her trauma. Or even Emily with Reid when he was taking dilaudid. They all were worried about each other and wanted to be there to support their friends.

People have different ways of coping with trauma and shouldn't be judged for it. It is a step forward to help them deal with it, and hopefully, make them feel safe and comfortable to talk about it.

Under the cut is how I feel about the JJ hate, so if you want to read that, feel free to do so.

This is something I needed to get off my chest. I'm already getting tired of seeing the JJ hate on some posts, here and on other social media platforms. Oddly enough back then, there wasn't this much hatred towards her character. Aside from the confession in later seasons, JJ has gotten a lot of hate now that the show's over. I have noticed the common thread of the hate being connected to Reid's character (note: I really don't want to get into some sort of hate discourse thing so please don't come at me for this).

I have seen fans say that JJ's the mean girl of the team because she is "mean to Reid" or because "Reid said so". I disagree with this whole notion because everyone has treated Reid the same way JJ has, and JJ wasn't super mean to him. I've always seen them interact like siblings, so they had that older sis teases little bro vibes to me. They both cared for each other, as seen numerous times on the show (this does not mean I ship them). In the scene where Reid thought JJ was a mean girl, she was defensive because she was hurt that someone close to her would think that lowly of her. Reid didn't even know that JJ was offended by that statement, so he just carried on with it.

People have also said that JJ is "too bland" or "too boring" of a character. I like to dig into little details of the show and/or the characters themselves, and learn why they are the way they are. People don't often see why JJ is the way she is like they do with other characters. To say that JJ's only trait is "being a mom" or "being too sensitive" is stupid. I agree that JJ's character was done dirty by the writers and producers, though. With everything that has happened to her, it explains why she is the person she is on the show. When JJ was younger, she didn't have any role model growing up besides Roslyn. She came from a broken family, who was often emotionally and physically distant from everything and everyone. Because of that, it shaped JJ into the person she is today. This is one of the reasons why she hates talking about her feelings and opening up because as her mom said, "Avoidance is what this family does best, anyhow." Her whole life, JJ pushes herself to work hard that she's never learned how to give herself a break, especially when her mental health is going bad. She needs someone to rely on and that she can trust to vent about anything she's having a hard time with.

Another thing people have to remember is that Reid and JJ are two completely different personalities and their own characters, so comparing them with each other or even pitting them against each other isn't going to make things better for many, and people will continue to fight about this.

Admittedly, this is one of the reasons why I don't join fandoms often because people are there to enjoy and share their interests with one another. I am aware that I have stated my opinions from time to time, but to waste all that energy continuously hating on something others like, is tiring. I like when people post things they like, instead of posting their absolute hatred on something that others enjoy often. I usually don’t interact with posts that have hate on something I like that I've seen and I try to filter that out. (I’m sorry if my wording doesn’t make sense here)

[musette22]

Minnie, I’m sure you’ve gotten asks like this before, and I figure since you’re pretty big in the fandom you might have some thoughts - but you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to. But how do you deal with toxicity within the fandom? Particularly right now with TFATWS - I just can’t enjoy it because it seems like every other post on my dash is a rant about how horrible Bucky is or how he shouldn’t be getting any attention over Sam or that people who are more invested in B’s story than Sam’s are awful racist people, etc etc. And I totally understand that this fandom does have a racism problem, and that there are real-world issues that the show is delving into which need to be addressed and which a lot of people are ignoring. But it’s all just killing my enjoyment of the show, the characters, and the tumble experience in general. Do you have any advice?

Hi my love! Thanks for your message <3 

I’m going to put my reply under the keep reading tag because I’ve already brought a lot of discourse on people’s dashed today lol!

I’m so sorry to hear you’re having a hard time with toxicity in the fandom right now, that’s the last thing you want from a part of your life that’s supposed to be fun and fulfilling for you, and in many people’s cases a kind of escape from (parts of) reality as well! Like I said in my tags to this post this morning, our tumblr presence/use is just an aspect of our lives. It does not equal our entire system of values or beliefs or, for that matter, activism, so in my opinion it’s perfectly valid to want to keep your fandom space as enjoyable as possible for you, and to stay informed and do your bit primarily in your real, day to day life. I know this is much harder for some people to achieve than for others, which is why there are real issues that really do need to be addressed and changed. But I’ll bet that a lot of the things affecting your enjoyment of fandom right now are things like ship wars and big egos and petty arguments, and I’m talking about filtering out those, first and foremost. I won’t address the larger, more serious issues at play here, because that’s a whole different discussion that deserves much more nuance and thought, but I can give you some general advice on keeping fandom mostly enjoyable.

Interestingly, I myself have not seen any Bucky, Steve or Stucky hate at all here on Tumblr, but I know that’s mostly because I’ve unfollowed and blocked a lot of people, and filtered a lot of tags, and I don't go into the general tags. So unless someone tells me about it, I don't hear about it, and that makes my fandom experience so much more enjoyable. I’ve said it too many times to count, and I know some people disagree with me on this which is their right, but I personally strongly believe in curating your own fandom experience. As for the current situation specifically: for the duration of the show, emotions will run high. Some people will start really important discussions that need to be had and might actually fundamentally change fandom for the better, but some people will try to police fandom for personal gain and start fights for the sake of it. But once the show is over, it’ll eventually settle down again and find a new rhythm, as these things always tend to do.

In the meantime, my advice really, truly is to just avoid and ignore people and places where you’re likely to come across hate and toxic content/opinions as much as possible. Protect yourself. If you do still want to watch the show (which is perfectly understandable), then make sure to at least block people you come across whose opinions you really disagree with, filter any tags or blogs (you can do that too, now) that might upset you for now - and make sure not to constantly click ‘view post’ anyway!) - and to stick to a circle of likeminded people. I know it’s tempting to check what everyone else is saying in the tags or on Twitter, but if it’s just going to upset constantly, then it’s just not worth it. Doing all these things has really made a lot of difference for me these past few weeks, and all the difference for my fandom experience in general. I hope it might help you too! Sending you lots of love ❤️

[untilourapathy]

Navigating a white space as a PoC

This comes after a 7 hour conversation with the lovely Anna @pukingpastilles. Bear in mind that this is drawn from our specific experiences and may not be universal. We hope it resonates with some of you.

Scrolling past this is an act of white privilege.

A lot of people either see race as irrelevant or that we talk about it too much in our ‘post-racial’ age. However, for us, it is our daily reality. We cannot choose to switch off our race, and thus cannot remove the burdens that accompany it. We do not have the ‘luxury’ of ignoring race. Until then, we’re going to keep talking about it. You may want to ‘skip the drama’ but it is a privilege for you to be able to scroll past this. It is our very lives that you are scrolling past. We are attempting to argue for our right to exist in this space. The topic of race is extremely underdiscussed in fandom discourse. Some people either see race as not relevant to fandom or something that they think they’ve sussed because they’re ‘open’, ‘liberal’ or have a PoC friend or something. That’s very different from actively educating yourself on issues that affect us beyond what you see in the news or from history. That’s good, but there’s more. Just because you’re socially liberal does not excuse you from perpetuating the cycle of racism. We have to fight to validly exist, and that is exhausting. Existing is exhausting.

Being a PoC in a predominantly white space is an act of protest as our very existence is politicised.

It can never be just a story of two people, not when we are so burdened. You are never just yourself, race comes first, and you are never not conscious of this. A PoC would be constantly hyperaware of their race because it informs how society treats them in every way. You are always self-conscious about things like not associating with too many people of your own race in case it comes off as threatening or exclusive or discriminatory. You subconsciously make adjustments to blend into the space as much as possible in fear of offending somebody, such as changing your accent or clothes. You feel a constant sense of double alienation. You occupy a liminal space. You are the hyphen in the Asian-American. We are marginalised, Othered. We are never granted full rights to exist independently of a Eurocentric standard.

Frank, outright racism does occur. And it sticks with you.

Whether or not you are easily hurt, it does stay with you subconsciously, and just reinforces this concept of your being lesser. It’s even worse when the target is someone you care about. You never forgot those moments. Moreover, microaggressions, ignorant comments, stereotyping and subtle prejudice can be just as bad. You have to work twice as hard to get recognised, and one thing do wrong completely discounts everything you’ve done. We are gaslighted, invalidated, discriminated against because of our genes…

You are seen as a representative of your entire race.

There have been incidents where I see a fellow person of my race on public transport, or in that room, and silently hope that they don’t do anything ‘embarrassing’ or ‘out of the ordinary’ because it would reflect badly on me. Watching the news, every time I see someone of my race do something awful, my heart drops not only due to what they did, because no matter what, their race is highlighted and I feel like this reflects on me. The onus is always on you, to conform, to fit in, to be as least foreign and Other as possible. However, your behaviour will never eradicate the fact that you will be judged. Or, you will be judged as ‘good for a ---‘. We must make a good impression to offset the automatic prejudice before they have met us.

Internalised racism has led us to believe we deserve our treatment.

Family can sometimes be the worst perpetuators of the cycle, as in their bid to give us a better life, they seek for us to fit in to a certain standard (especially with colourism). The effects of colonialism etc have shaped the way people view the white hegemony, and subconsciously we believe that we are lesser, less beautiful, less valid, less human. Furthermore, we’re grateful whenever an ally joins our cause, because we have got used to seeing our treatment as what we have to settle for. Even as adults, Anna and I still feel uncomfortable with our features because they do not fit the European standard of beauty, despite rationally knowing that it is just a subjective, culturally imposed standard. For example, we are keen to wear glasses because we feel so negatively about our eyes due to that ingrained internalised racism. By sole dint of having European features, the irrational part of me with that engrained white supremacy with never think of myself as pretty enough in comparison to white girls. You feel off-brand, broken and like something is wrong with you, even as a very small child. My friends still have to call me out for hating on my features too much. It makes for a very difficult relationship with your family, your sense of identity, home and how you see others of your own race. The onus is on us to accommodate white fragility.

That’s why representation is incredibly important.

Every time I read a fic with representation, no matter how small or how large the issues are explored, the twelve year old me within me tears up a little because for a little girl growing up assuming every character was white until disproven, I remember hunting library shelves for books with any PoC that weren’t stereotyped, reading those few books over and over again just so I could relate to somebody in the media I consumed. For all the little children, and for the children inside us all, please make an effort to reflect the way society is today. Your work makes a huge difference to us, our self-esteem, how we see ourselves. Every instance of representation is something that sticks with us forever. You will have made such a difference in people’s lives. If you’ve made a difference in mine, you must’ve for somebody else. Please. If your art or fic has helped someone deal with the implications of being PoC in a world of white hegemony, I personally think it’s worth the hate that you’ll inevitably get. Every fic or art that involves a PoC has been automatically politically charged, and there is a meaning and purpose behind it.

Often it’s said that a character is not PoC in canon, and thus shouldn’t be in fic.

Well, lots of the things that people do in fic isn’t canon. White fragility is real; a fic that removes every aspect of the character’s personality, or behaviour, or introduces A/B/O or sex pollen or talking hats or removing magic in the HP universe, for example, is seen as more acceptable than making a character PoC. Saying that a character can be turned into a wall or a pancake but not a PoC is to invalidate our experience as less than valid.

How should I write PoC in fic if I am not a PoC?

Perhaps see this comment I made on @gracerene09‘s post here. I am all here for the normalisation of PoC in fic. It doesn’t have to be tackled in depth in every fic. But due to the dearth of authentic representation in fandom, I think it has to be explored. However, please be diligent about how you explore racial issues if you do choose to. Race cannot just be switched out, you must deal with the implications – your heritage, culture, background, experience of the world all shifts. To lend authenticity to the experience you are trying to convey, please research eg please don’t fall into the trap of white saviourism, etc. Also, please don’t use epithets unless is it absolutely integral to the story. If we know the character’s name, there is no need to write: ‘‘Yes, please’, said the Indian man.’ If you are nervous about representing a PoC character without that experience, ask a few friends or try engage in discourse. It is better than remaining in ‘respectful’ silence, because then you are complicit in the greater systemic problem. To pretend race doesn’t matter is to say that we are all treated equally. The experience of being PoC is being hyperaware of your race constantly and that feeding into everything you do, regardless of how mundane, so there is no conceivable way that a PoC's character's every move in a world with white hegemony would not have been influenced by society's perception of their race. To pretend racism doesn’t exist is to dismiss societal racism and our everyday experiences. To be honest, racial issues are an inalienable part of the PoC experience, and thus I think they should be explored. 

HARRY POTTER SPECIFIC DISCOURSE

How would the race be treated in the wizarding world?

There is no canon on this, so this is all my personal conjecture. However, I believe that Petunia’s treatment of Harry could easily be understood as racist as well as prejudiced based on his magic, should you choose to see Harry as a PoC. Harry can be an anglicised name (from Hari, which means Lion in Sanskrit), or Harry could’ve just been named Harry. It’s totally possible for someone to be named Harry and be PoC. Blood purity was intended as an analogy of racism to begin with, and the stigma of being mixed race and that balance between two worlds is not incompatible with canon. Say Harry is desi – the Potters could have gained their wealth from the days of colonised South-East Asia. Also, to say that it is unrealistic for there to be PoC in the Wizarding World is a bit rich, considering as the Wizarding World defies gravity etc. Plus, looking at the census, the nineties had about an 8% ethnic minority population. I think the percentage of PoC characters in HP is less than 1%, although do tell me if I’ve done my maths wrong.

Blaise Zabini: Class, status and race in the upper echelons of the Wizarding World

Blaise Zabini is at a very interesting intersection between various social constructs. He’s chummy with the upper class and the Sacred 28, and grew up in the Wizarding world. He is wealthy, thanks to his mother, and is very posh. However, as a black man, in my eyes he is almost certainly Othered. This is just my personal interpretation, but I think Blaise would have to emphasise his poshness to validate his place in the Pureblood bubble, and yet he would always be subconsciously othered, one’s Otherness can never be erased by looks, class, status, wealth or intelligence. Although race would not be the primary optic that people are discriminated against, I think that it still would be one of those open secrets that blood purity could sometimes be conflated with. I think that is why being both elite and PoC is such an interesting intersection to occupy. In a manner of speaking, I see Blaise to be akin to Othello – accepted because he has his merits but his entire character and experience is so heavily tinged by being black in a white space. This would be especially if the Pureblood set is meant to parallel aristocracy. I doubt the Draco, for example, would say anything intentionally racist to Blaise, but he seems to more the exception to the rule. This social mobility may be because he is a ‘foreigner’ from Italy, and thus his race is ‘excused’ because I very much doubt a PoC family could rise to such extreme heights in medieval England like the Malfoys. Say racism didn’t exist, in an extremely hypothetical scenario, being the minority would still affect you in power dynamics.

Hermione Granger as a Muggleborn PoC

Should you see Hermione as a PoC, she would then be doubly discriminated against. I would believe it to be inconceivable for there to be two parallel societies, of which there is interaction and immigration, existing in the same space where race would not matter in one where it would in the other. Blood purity does not matter in the Muggle World because they do not know of magic. This is not the case with race. Especially given Britain’s empire, it would take lots of worldbuilding for one to believe that the Muggle community at one point owned 25% of the globe but the Wizarding World was a happy little content republic. The twin lenses of blood purity and race is something that cannot be ignored, and that intersection has deep impacts upon a character’s identity. Hermione would be forced to go above and beyond to justify her existence (hence her fear of being expelled) and then would be called out for not fitting in by trying too hard. Being dismissed for the smallest of things is very real because as a PoC, everything is your fault. As a PoC, this behaviour would be normalised for her because she, even at 11, would be so used to accommodating to fit Eurocentric notions.

Cho Chang

This lazy orientalisation naming is another example of JKR being a white feminist. No PoC couple in the 80s would have wanted to draw further attention to their child’s race. To better integrate to make their life easier for their child, they would have not chosen Cho as an extra obstacle for her, I don’t think.

Colourblind casting

Adding onto above, I don’t think we can give JKR credit for being a progressive, intersectional feminist in the books if she retroactively showed love for black Hermione. I love that she did that and could be one now, but a lot of HP does not show due diligence in portraying characters of colour. The thing about a white character being casted as another race is that usually, that is fine because their race is incidental, and was not a defining aspect of their character or experience because white people in white spaces do not face the same institutionalised discrimination. When a PoC character is played by a white person, it complicates matters as their experience as a PoC in a white space is integral to their experience of the world.

by @untilourapathy

[your-lady-star]

Fire Emblem Warriors ”””Controversy”””

You know, I’m starting to think that calling something random and small a “controversy” is slowly losing its value and becoming more and more of a buzzword, pretty much along the same lines as saying “this character that did a cool thing is a mary sue” and “anyone who supports this pairing supports pedophellia, rape, abuse (insert offensive thing that isn’t actually happening here)”. Because, let’s face it, if something as minor as this is what’s making you lose your mind and rage all over the internet, you might want to rethink your life decisions.

To be honest, I’ve pretty much grown immune to people in the Fire Emblem fandom going berserk over the tiniest thing, but it doesn’t make it any easier for me to deal with anytime I have to go on the internet and browse through anything remotely Fire Emblem related. It’s seems like any time we get news regarding anything Fire Emblem related, someone somewhere is trying to make a controversy out of it. Though, to be fair, I don’t really think this could even be called a controversy. It’s just a petty complaint and another case of people being stupid and needy.

Let's cut to the chase. People are getting pissy because the most recent news about Fire Emblem Warriors revealed that the playable cast will be predominately filled with characters from Shadow Dragon, Awakening and Fates. And these people really just need to grow the f*ck up.

Pretty much any person that treats this detail as the biggest trigger seem to be overlooking one major thing. It says that it will predominately feature characters from these three games. It doesn’t say that every playable character in Warriors will come from these three games. Which means that to anyone who can read and think should realize that characters from the other Fire Emblem games will be playable, but they won’t be as abundant.

There. I literally refuted this entire “controversy with just three sentences.

In fact, I can refute the other half of this controversy with just one simple statement.

The other half of this “controversy” is that the article we we’re given also states that not every lord from the games will make it in because a large amount of the lords wield swords and including all of them would be too much. And as you can imagine, this has set off the very easily offended. But I can shoot down this argument with just this.

When making a fighting game that has a large cast of playable characters, what it the most important thing to keep in mind while doing so?

Variety.

You don’t want a roster of characters where most of them are just copy paste with very little changes made to them to make them feel unique. You want each character to stand out in their own way and fit a certain style that different kinds of players can attach to. This is the reason why guide videos are made for fighting game characters, it’s so that people can better learn how to use a character and find what playstyle fits them best. Just take Smash 4 for example. It gave us over 40 characters, each of them had a different and unique play style that catered to different players. Okay, yes, there were some copies here and there, but the overall roster was very diverse and pretty solid. But that’s just a roster of about 40 characters. So imagine having to do the same thing for a series that has over 100 characters!

I think it’s safe to say that no one would be able to accomplish a feat like that. A task like this would probably drive someone mad and to the brink of exhaustion before they even get halfway done. So it doesn’t really surprise me that they won’t be able to get every character into the game, and this especially applies to the lords. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but a lot of the lords in Fire Emblem use swords. And creating multiple play styles for characters that primarily use swords without any of them overlapping is a pretty difficult thing to do. And considering that not only do a lot of the lord's use swords, but a lot of the most popular characters in the franchise use swords, needless to say, it doesn’t surprise me that they can’t include everyone that uses a sword. They need to accommodate for the other weapons in the games and make the roster equal in terms of weapon distribution.

And just because we aren’t going to get every character at launch, it doesn’t mean that we won’t ever get the characters. This is pretty much the same thing that occurred with Heroes. Not every character in the series was available on day one because having that many characters done by release date would be way too much to handle. But as time went on, they’ve slowly worked to include more characters into the game through both the banners and the grand hero battles. They’ve not only worked to bring in characters from certain games that don’t have a lot of representatives, but they’ve also created alternate versions of characters that play differently compared to their original counterpart, despite the outcry from jagoffs who confuse variety for fanservice. And this is very likely to happen the same way for Warriors. New characters, both from the games already represented and newcomers, will be added to the game, most likely as dlc. Of course many people hate dlc, but if there’s anything that Smash Bros, Hyrule Warriors and Mario Kart have shown us is that Nintendo knows how to do dlc properly. So I have no problem believing that they’ll be able to handle the dlc for Warriors.

So to wrap up our little discussion, we have yet another thing to add to the list of stupid overblown controversies that have been started up by whiny ignorant brats who desperately want to be seen as smart and make the Fire Emblem community look back. And we have another reason to show just how many people out there are so willing to believe anything they see posted and not use their brains for even the smallest second and realize that these people are full of sh*t. Because at the end of the day, this whole thing will go down as yet another forgotten controversy that will have no affect on the game's sales and will only proceed to make these people look more like idiots, as they 

so 

often 

tend 

to 

do.

At the end of the day, you might be wondering why someone like me would go so far out of my way to address these idiotic acts and bring to light just how pointless they are. But, the reality is that unless people like me address these idiotic acts and bring to life just how pointless they are, they will just get worse and worse and no one will do anything to stop it. It’s been said many times, and I will repeat it: ignoring the problem doesn’t make it go away. Staying silent and just silently praying that the problem will just resolve itself overnight not only shows just how much you don’t care about the damage it’s causing, it just shows how lazy you are to get off your a** and do something about it. Even if you don’t have the power to affect it on a greater cause, just bringing it to light and encouraging others to do the same will help to make things better. Sunlight is one powerful disinfectant and the more of it you can shine on something, the stronger it gets. The Fire Emblem fandom has already been thoroughly poisoned several times in the past few years and it’s made it one of the most toxic fandoms to be a part of. I can’t begin to tell you how many people I see state how they are afraid to become vocal in the fandom because unless they agree with everything everyone is saying, they are immediately shunned and treated like they aren’t a true fan. And this only goes to show just how horrid, obsessive, closed minded, sadistic and downright disgusting some people can truly be and why they shouldn’t be allowed to be a part of any fandom.

This is the reason why I take so much pride in my opinions and refuse to shirk from the fandom just because I don’t think the same way they do. I’m not doing it for my sake, I’m doing it for the sake of those who aren’t brave enough or vocal enough to do the same. I’ll gladly wear the title of being the discourse of the Fire Emblem community if it means that I’ve been able to help others out there who have been through much worse.

My expectations for Fire Emblem Warriors is the same as the expectations that I have whenever I play any game: let it just be fun. Even if it isn’t this massive juggernaut that is treated like a deity, I’ll gladly enjoy it if it means I can have as much fun and sink as many hours into it as I’ve sunk into Hyrule Warriors (seriously, my playtime on that game is ridiculous). I’ll still lap it up even while the fandom is having a meltdown because their favorite character didn’t make it in, despite that they would likely just be a clone of another character.

Keep this in mind guys, because I’ve learned something crucial. You would probably only love that character because getting a sh*tty version of what you like is better than not getting it at all. And if the only reason why you want them in the game is because they’re your favorite character who you would marry in a millisecond and not because they have potential that makes them unique from the others, maybe you need to take a step back and analyze who is the one really being petty.