#amd epyc vs intel xeon

[govindhtech]

Powerful AMD EPYC 9654 Beats 5th Gen Intel Xeon Processors

AMD EPYC Gen 4 vs Intel Xeon 5th Gen: A Battle for Server Supremacy

The recent availability of 5th Gen Intel Xeon processors allows testing of 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs on critical workloads. AMD EPYC 9654 beats competitors in data centre performance, power efficiency, and cost. AMD EPYC CPU hold over 300 performance world records, and Intel���s latest release maintains our lead. Over 250 server designs and 800 cloud instances comprise AMD EPYC.

SPECpower

Modern data centers manage power utilization to meet growing needs, save costs, and satisfy environmental goals. The System Under Test’s power and performance are used to compare volume server class computers’ energy efficiency in the SPECpower ssj 2008 benchmark. SPECpower was the first industry benchmark for single- and multi-node server power and performance.

Consumers can compare server and configuration energy efficiency using the SPECpower ssj 2008 benchmark. This benchmark applies to hardware, IT, OEM, and government companies. The SPECpower ssj 2008 statistic assesses SUT power efficiency as “overall ssj ops/watt”. It is the ratio of the overall throughput ssj ops, which is the sum of all target load scores, to their average watt power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9754

AMD EPYC 4th Gen excels at power efficiency. A dual-socket system with 128-core AMD EPYC 9754 processors outscored Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ by 2.25x.

AMD EPYC 9554

Industry benchmarks for compute-intensive jobs include the SPEC CPU 2017 test, which stresses the processor, memory subsystem, and compiler on various computer systems. This blog discusses SPECrate 2017 Integer and Floating Point, two of SPEC CPU 2017’s four suites’ 43 benchmarks.

On SPECrate 2017, 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine surpasses Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ by ~1.14x (base) and ~1.06x (64 cores). 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 systems outperform Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ in SPECrate 2017 and similar.

Top performer: SPECrate 2017 ranked 2P 64-core Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ behind 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654. SPECjbb2015 was considered simulates a corporate IT infrastructure that handles point-of-sale requests, online transactions, and data-mining to test server-side Java applications. Because Java is so popular, JVM providers, hardware manufacturers, Java application developers, academics, and academia should evaluate this benchmark.

AMD EPYC 9554 64-core processor

64 cores A dual-socket 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 machine performs comparably to an Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ on SPECjbb 2015 MultiJVM-maxJOPS.

Top of stack: A dual-socket 96-core general purpose AMD EPYC 9654 machine outperforms a 64-core Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system 1.48x on SPECjbb 2015 MultiJVM-maxJOPS.

Decision Support System

The decision support benchmark TPC Benchmark H (TPC-H) evaluates systems that handle complex business queries by running sophisticated queries over big datasets. This benchmark’s queries and data manipulations affect several industries.

TPC-H’s Composite Query-per-Hour Performance Metric (QphH Size) evaluates query processing. When handling concurrent user requests, database sizes, query stream processing, and query throughput are considered. A system’s price-performance ratio, or “bang for the buck,” is likewise assessed by TPC-H.

A 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outperforms a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.14x and ~1.22x at SF 10000 in price-performance TPC-H.

Business Uses

Key SAP ERP logistics module is SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD). SAP Application Performance Standard units’ database efficiency is measured using the SAP-SD 2-Tier benchmark to assess hardware performance. SAPS is hardware-independent and uses the Sales and Distribution (SD) benchmark to evaluate SAP systems. Recently, a 2P system with 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 processors outscored a 64-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ by ~1.53x. For further information, refer to my blog post “4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs Empower SAP SD 2-Tier Performance.”

In four generations of general-purpose AMD EPYC processors, “top of stack” CPU SKUs enhanced performance. It also indicates that AMD EPYC 2nd Gen and later outperform Intel Xeon processors.

The Virtualization Infrastructure

VMmark 3 benchmarks virtualized server performance, power efficiency, and scalability on physical hardware under intense loads. Server capabilities and virtualization solutions are compared for strengths and limitations.

AMD EPYC 9654

A 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 machine outperforms a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system 1.29x on VMmark 3. In VMmark 3, a 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 system outperforms a 2P 64-core Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.60x.

Powerful computing

HPC predicts major climate events and enhances transit and infrastructure safety, making it part of almost every modern activity. Optimizing material use, simplifying designs, and lowering development costs lowers prices. Rapid virtual prototyping reduces physical testing and speeds market entry.

Demand for HPC workload performance rises. Performance increases enable faster simulations, shorter product development cycles, more scenario testing, and finer model tweaks, making products more effective and efficient. Explore 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs HPC dominance.

AMD EPYC 9374F

CFD models and studies fluid behavior like water flowing around a boat hull or air around a vehicle or aircraft using numerical analysis. Uses include industrial and consumer goods. Memory bandwidth limits computationally demanding CFD activities.

Altair AcuSolve: Without CFD, Altair AcuSolve allows organizations investigate ideas using flow, heat transfer, turbulence, and non-Newtonian material analysis. In AcuSolve’s acus-in test, a 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine surpasses an Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system by ~1.46x. Ansys CFX: High-performance CFD software provides fast, reliable, and accurate solutions for a variety of CFD and Multiphysics applications. In several CFX tests, a 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine outperformed an Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system by ~1.48x. Ansys Fluent: Advanced physics modelling and industry-leading accuracy characterize this fluid simulation package. A 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine outperformed a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system performance ~1.25x in chosen Fluent tests.

OpenFOAM CFD software is free and open-source. Academic and commercial institutions use it. In OpenFOAM tests, a 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outperformed an Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ and a top-of-stack general purpose system by ~1.14x. A 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 system outscored a 64-core Intel Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.22 in FEA Clear.

An explicit Finite Element Analysis (FEA) numerical simulation evaluates structures and materials under dynamic situations like impacts, explosions, and crashes. The auto industry uses FEA to predict crash behavior and evaluate occupant safety. Cell phone manufacturers use FEA to simulate drop tests for durability. Simulations save manufacturers time and money by testing designs online instead of prototyping.

These simulations involve complex digital replicas of items like cars and phones. To reproduce dynamic events like impacts, models solve differential equations over time. Model part interactions are assessed for deformations or failures. The calculations demand lots of memory and processing power. Due to model interconnectivity, compute nodes must communicate to exchange information about model elements’ effects.

AMD EPYC 9374F Benchmark

A prominent explicit simulation programme is Ansys LS-DYNA. Complex short-duration events in automobile, aircraft, construction, military, manufacturing, and biotechnology are simulated. In some LS-DYNA tests, the 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine outperformed the Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system by ~1.50x.

Altair Radioss measures impact or crash structures. It benchmarks hardware using common usage issues. The 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F system outperformed the Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ workstation by ~1.25x in some Radioss tests.

AMD EPYC 9654 96-core processor

Molecular Dynamics

Newton’s equations are solved using molecular dynamics to analyze atoms and molecules. Molecular systems can be studied by analyzing material behavior, protein folding, and chemical processes. For hundreds to millions of particles, GROMACS simulates Newtonian motion using modular dynamics. A 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system provides ~1.24x the average performance of an Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system, outperforming competing datacenter CPUs. A top-of-the-stack 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 machine outperforms Intel CPU systems by ~1.63x in GROMACS tests.

AMD EPYC 9554 64-core processor

Quantum chemistry

Quantum chemistry illuminates bonding and reactions through molecule structure, energetics, and reactivity. In quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, CP2K duplicates atomic systems. 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outscored Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ by ~1.27x in H2O-dft-ls test, whereas top-of-stack The AMD EPYC 9654 outperformed the Intel processing system by ~1.62 (Weather Forecast).

The conus2.5km test showed a 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outperforming a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.30x, and a top-of-the-line 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 system outperforming the Intel system by ~1.50.

Conclusion

This blog revealed that 4th Gen AMD EPYC processors outperformed 5th Gen Intel Xeons in critical tasks. The comparisons above show that 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs perform well and reliably in industry-critical tasks. 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs excel in virtualized environments, molecular dynamics, and quantum chemistry simulations. Leading operating systems, hypervisors, and cloud services support AMD EPYC CPUs. The AMD Documentation Hub offers BIOS and OS tunings for different workloads to improve performance.

AMD delivers innovative technology beyond processors:

AMD Instinct Accelerators: These accelerators assist scientists tackle complex challenges in various industries through exascale discoveries. They power scientific research, data analytics, machine learning, and other demanding applications with high-performance computing.

AMD Pensando DPUs enable cloud, computing, networking, storage, and security software-defined programming. These technologies improve productivity, performance, and scalability over present infrastructures wherever data is. Programmable infrastructure pieces provide data centre agility.

AMD FPGAs, hardware-adaptive SoCs, and ACAP processing platforms are adaptable and adaptive. These technologies boost endpoint, edge, and cloud infrastructure innovation.

Developers can adapt and optimize solutions for specific applications and use cases, enhancing processing efficiency.

Read more on govindhtech.com

[dedicated-server-blog]

Select Cheap Dedicated Servers Germany Plans

You can prevent sticker shock by signing a long-term contract with one of the cheap European dedicated server hosts and locking in the lowest rates for single-tenant hardware. Clients are assigned a specific server in a data center rack, and they can use a managed or unmanaged platform.

Single-tenant guarantee in a data center with rack-mounted hardware autonomy is the primary need for dedicated server hosting. In shared hosting, multiple users may use a single server. Virtual private server plans allow numerous users to share a single kernel and accompanying resources to support a single piece of hardware. Germany-dedicated server hosting can be purchased from different providers in bare metal, unmanaged, or managed configurations.

Understand the budgeting for Germany's dedicated servers:

Choosing the best cheap dedicated server plan can be overwhelming, but with some research and careful consideration, you can find a great option that fits your needs and budget. For example, a cheap 10gbps Germany server is essential for operating a video streaming website or a seedbox. Its monthly fees might begin at $120.

Cost-effective hosts offer single-tenant hardware at pricing that is competitive with VPS plans. On average, most dedicated server options cost between $450 and $499 per month. More than 10,000 people should be able to access the server at once.

VPS options can offer more significant configurations or faster performance with SSD storage drives and compete with cheaper dedicated server plans that cost less than $50 monthly. Paying for dedicated servers is a significant investment, so ensure you need one before making the plunge.

Tips for choosing the cheap dedicated server hosting plan:

Comparing hosting rates might help you locate the greatest deal on hardware in the business if you emphasize cost performance as determined by benchmark testing.

The best-dedicated server plans offer great value for the price, with plenty of cores, threads, RAM, and storage to meet your needs.

By conducting an IT audit on your resources, you can find exactly what you need before signing up for a dedicated server plan. By utilizing third-party benchmarks, you can quickly obtain performance information on the Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPUs provided by web host companies.

The commodity approach is excellent for bare metal server usage in a data center network. You can compare the CPU, RAM, storage (HDD vs. SSD), and bandwidth options, just like buying copper or sugar by the pound. This means you can find the best deals and save money.

It's great to have options when it comes to dedicated servers! While managed and unmanaged plans differ, bare metal plans offer affordable pricing and the flexibility to install the necessary stack. You can easily find managed plans with excellent customer service that provides live chat and quick response times.

Ask about a bulk of helpful information for choosing the best-dedicated server plans! With this information, you'll be able to make a wise decision and find the perfect plan to meet your needs: 

Growth in monthly page views for hosting resources is significant.

The Cloud software, websites, or mobile apps will require optimal web traffic.

When choosing plans, high-performance hardware and value for money are essential factors.

Apps can support many microservices, databases, and programming languages!

[eu100tb]

Select Cheap Dedicated Servers Germany Plans

You can prevent sticker shock by signing a long-term contract with one of the cheap European dedicated server hosts and locking in the lowest rates for single-tenant hardware. Clients are assigned a specific server in a data center rack, and they can use a managed or unmanaged platform.

Single-tenant guarantee in a data center with rack-mounted hardware autonomy is the primary need for dedicated server hosting. In shared hosting, multiple users may use a single server. Virtual private server plans allow numerous users to share a single kernel and accompanying resources to support a single piece of hardware. Germany-dedicated server hosting can be purchased from different providers in bare metal, unmanaged, or managed configurations.

Understand the budgeting for Germany's dedicated servers:

Choosing the best cheap dedicated server plan can be overwhelming, but with some research and careful consideration, you can find a great option that fits your needs and budget. For example, a cheap 10gbps Germany server is essential for operating a video streaming website or a seedbox. Its monthly fees might begin at $120.

Cost-effective hosts offer single-tenant hardware at pricing that is competitive with VPS plans. On average, most dedicated server options cost between $450 and $499 per month. More than 10,000 people should be able to access the server at once.

VPS options can offer more significant configurations or faster performance with SSD storage drives and compete with cheaper dedicated server plans that cost less than $50 monthly. Paying for dedicated servers is a significant investment, so ensure you need one before making the plunge.

Tips for choosing the cheap dedicated server hosting plan:

Comparing hosting rates might help you locate the greatest deal on hardware in the business if you emphasize cost performance as determined by benchmark testing.

The best-dedicated server plans offer great value for the price, with plenty of cores, threads, RAM, and storage to meet your needs.

By conducting an IT audit on your resources, you can find exactly what you need before signing up for a dedicated server plan. By utilizing third-party benchmarks, you can quickly obtain performance information on the Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPUs provided by web host companies.

The commodity approach is excellent for bare metal server usage in a data center network. You can compare the CPU, RAM, storage (HDD vs. SSD), and bandwidth options, just like buying copper or sugar by the pound. This means you can find the best deals and save money.

It's great to have options when it comes to dedicated servers! While managed and unmanaged plans differ, bare metal plans offer affordable pricing and the flexibility to install the necessary stack. You can easily find managed plans with excellent customer service that provides live chat and quick response times.

Ask about a bulk of helpful information for choosing the best-dedicated server plans! With this information, you'll be able to make a wise decision and find the perfect plan to meet your needs: 

Growth in monthly page views for hosting resources is significant.

The Cloud software, websites, or mobile apps will require optimal web traffic.

When choosing plans, high-performance hardware and value for money are essential factors.

Apps can support many microservices, databases, and programming languages!

[dailytechnologynews]

1-Socket 32-Core Showdown: Intel Xeon Gold 6314U vs AMD EPYC 7543P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e96mboM155g

[wajeracpu]

Mastercam 2018 hardware acceleration 無料ダウンロード.Camtasia 2018 Hardware Acceleration

Mastercam 2018 hardware acceleration 無料ダウンロード.Mastercam HLE Software FAQ

                                                                          Camtasia 2018 Hardware Acceleration.Camtasia Hardware Acceleration - Digital Nomad Rockstar

    Camtasia Hardware acceleration bugs. Howdy! First time really learning Camtasia. I made a couple videos, found the software intuitive and powerful. However, the colors on the videos both in the canvas and in the final export are washed out. The colors are flat and it looks like there's a film of grey over the whole thing, like there's Dec 20,  · To disable MasterCAM hardware acceleration, follow the following steps. Within MasterCAM, select Settings, Configuration. Click Screen on the left-hand side of the window to display the screen and Author: Reich Web Consulting Dec 01,  · PassMark Software has delved into the millions of benchmark results that PerformanceTest users have posted to its web site and produced a comprehensive range of CPU charts to help compare the relative speeds of different processors from Intel, AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and others. Included in these lists are CPUs designed for servers and workstations     

Mastercam 2018 hardware acceleration 無料ダウンロード.HLE FAQ - CamInstructor

Dec 01,  · PassMark Software has delved into the millions of benchmark results that PerformanceTest users have posted to its web site and produced a comprehensive range of CPU charts to help compare the relative speeds of different processors from Intel, AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and others. Included in these lists are CPUs designed for servers and workstations PDF | Hardware/Software CoDesign for Mathematical Function Acceleration | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Camtasia Hardware acceleration bugs. Howdy! First time really learning Camtasia. I made a couple videos, found the software intuitive and powerful. However, the colors on the videos both in the canvas and in the final export are washed out. The colors are flat and it looks like there's a film of grey over the whole thing, like there's         

 PassMark Software has delved into the millions of benchmark results that PerformanceTest users have posted to its web site and produced a comprehensive range of CPU charts to help compare the relative speeds of different processors from Intel, AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and others. Included in these lists are CPUs designed for servers and workstations such as Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC processors , desktop CPUs Intel Core Series and AMD Ryzen , in addition to ARM processors Apple M1 and Qualcomm Snapdragon and mobile CPUs.

PerformanceTest conducts eight different tests and then averages the results together to determine the CPU Mark rating for a system. To ensure that the full CPU power of a PC system is realized, PerformanceTest runs each CPU test on all available CPUs. Specifically, PerformanceTest runs one simultaneous CPU test for every logical CPU Hyper-threaded ; physical CPU core dual core or physical CPU package multiple CPU chips. So hypothetically if you have a PC that has two CPUs, each with dual cores that use hyper-threading, then PerformanceTest will run eight simultaneous tests Rarely is a graph completely accurate in what it is representing.

There are many factors that can skew the results and make a graph misleading. As such it is necessary to have some background understanding of the data being presented. Download and install PerformanceTest.

Your results will not appear in the graphs immediately as the graphs are only updated once per day. Additionally, only CPUs of which there are at least two samples are included in the graphs. CPU Benchmarks. CPU Benchmarks Over 1,, CPUs benchmarked. cpus High End High Mid Range Low Mid Range Low End Best Value On Market Best Value XY Scatter Best Value All time New Desktop New Laptop Single Thread Systems with Multiple CPUs Overclocked Power Performance CPU Mark by Socket Type Cross-Platform CPU Performance CPU Mega List Search Model Compare 0 Common Most Benchmarked AMD vs Intel Market Share Year on Year Performance.

Intel Core iE 2. AMD Ryzen Embedded VB Quad-core 2.

[govindhtech]

Intel vs AMD: EPYC Siena rivals Sapphire Rapids with less power

AMD EPYC Siena Performance

Both of AMD’s new Zen 4c equipped EPYC 8324P and 8324PN (Siena) server CPUs were recently tested in Linux by Phoronix, and the results showed that both chips deliver exceptional performance when used in server applications. Phoronix’s tests revealed that both of AMD’s Zen 4c processors were capable of matching the performance of an Intel Xeon Gold 6421N 32-core CPU in most tasks, although using a far lower amount of power than the Intel processor.

AMD’s EPYC most recent range of EPYC server CPUs, the 8004 series, focuses on power economy rather than sheer CPU performance. This is reflected in the 8324P and 8324PN models of the EPYC server CPUs. The new Zen 4c core, which is included into all of AMD’s 8004 processors, is 35% more compact than its predecessor, Zen 4, and boasts improved power efficiency compared to Zen 4’s bigger version. The raw performance of an AMD Zen 4c core is lower than that of a normal Zen 4 core. This is the single drawback of the Zen 4c core.

The 8324P and PN are located squarely in the centre of the CPU stack for AMD’s 8004 series. They include 32 cores, 128 MB of L3 cache, six DDR5 memory channels, and 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. They are distinct from one another in terms of clock speeds and power ratings; for example, the 8324P has a base clock of 2.65 GHz, a boost clock of 3 GHz, and a TDP of 180W. The 8324PN, on the other hand, has a base speed of 2.05 GHz, a boost frequency of 3 GHz, and a TDP that is significantly lower at 130 watts.

This is due to the fact that the PN series of 8004 CPUs were developed specifically for installations that must comply with the Network Equipment Building System (NEBS), which calls for systems that are able to survive higher operational temperature ranges than ordinary chips.

Low Power Draw AMD EPYC Siena

Phoronix evaluated the performance of the two chips in a variety of different benchmarks, which together equate to seven distinct categories. These categories include artificial intelligence workloads, video encoding, code compiling, file compression/decompression, high-performance computing, and other tasks.

When both processors were set to their highest power settings, the performance of the two AMD CPUs was superior to that of the Intel Xeon Gold 6421N 32 core. The Xeon 6421N was 2.7% faster than the 8324P when it was configured with its default settings, 2.5% slower when it was configured with its lowest adjustable TDP of 155W, and 5% faster when it was configured with the chip’s performance determinism mode.

It should not come as a surprise that the 8324PN ran at a little slower speed due to the lower power rating and base clock parameters. The Intel Xeon was 11.8% faster than the 8324PN in its stock configuration; however, the 8324PN was still able to outperform the chip in its performance determinism mode, achieving a 4.8% advantage over the Intel CPU.

AMD EPYC Siena Optimization

Even with performance determinism mode turned on, the 8324P and 8324PN were able to provide average power consumption ratings that were considerably below the 100W threshold. This was one of the many ways in which AMD prioritized power efficiency. On the other hand, Intel’s counterpart to Sapphire Rapids, which had an average power consumption rating of 137 watts, was unable to come even near to matching AMD’s level of power efficiency.

Phoronix’s testing has shown that AMD’s most recent Zen 4c core is quite powerful and is capable of producing performance that can compete with the absolute best that Intel has to offer right now. Although Intel may have beaten AMD to the E-core game with the release of Alder Lake, the most recent benchmarks demonstrate that AMD is capable of producing a delectable efficiency core that is capable of competing with Intel’s high-performance cores under certain conditions.

[digital-dynasty]

ARM-Prozessoren für Server: "Neoverse"-Rechenkerne vs. Intel Xeon und AMD Epyc

Kommende Serverprozessoren mit CPU-Kernen der Typen Neoverse V1 und Neoverse N2 rechnen laut ARM schneller als x86-Konkurrenten von AMD und Intel. Read more www.heise.de/news/…-... www.digital-dynasty.net/de/teamblogs/…

http://www.digital-dynasty.net/de/teamblogs/arm-prozessoren-fur-server-neoverse-rechenkerne-vs-intel-xeon-und-amd-epyc

[eu100tb]

Select Cheap Dedicated Servers Germany Plans

You can prevent sticker shock by signing a long-term contract with one of the cheap European dedicated server hosts and locking in the lowest rates for single-tenant hardware. Clients are assigned a specific server in a data center rack, and they can use a managed or unmanaged platform.

Single-tenant guarantee in a data center with rack-mounted hardware autonomy is the primary need for dedicated server hosting. In shared hosting, multiple users may use a single server. Virtual private server plans allow numerous users to share a single kernel and accompanying resources to support a single piece of hardware. Germany-dedicated server hosting can be purchased from different providers in bare metal, unmanaged, or managed configurations.

Understand the budgeting for Germany's dedicated servers:

Choosing the best cheap dedicated server plan can be overwhelming, but with some research and careful consideration, you can find a great option that fits your needs and budget. For example, a cheap 10gbps Germany server is essential for operating a video streaming website or a seedbox. Its monthly fees might begin at $120.

Cost-effective hosts offer single-tenant hardware at pricing that is competitive with VPS plans. On average, most dedicated server options cost between $450 and $499 per month. More than 10,000 people should be able to access the server at once.

VPS options can offer more significant configurations or faster performance with SSD storage drives and compete with cheaper dedicated server plans that cost less than $50 monthly. Paying for dedicated servers is a significant investment, so ensure you need one before making the plunge.

Tips for choosing the cheap dedicated server hosting plan:

Comparing hosting rates might help you locate the greatest deal on hardware in the business if you emphasize cost performance as determined by benchmark testing.

The best-dedicated server plans offer great value for the price, with plenty of cores, threads, RAM, and storage to meet your needs.

By conducting an IT audit on your resources, you can find exactly what you need before signing up for a dedicated server plan. By utilizing third-party benchmarks, you can quickly obtain performance information on the Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPUs provided by web host companies.

The commodity approach is excellent for bare metal server usage in a data center network. You can compare the CPU, RAM, storage (HDD vs. SSD), and bandwidth options, just like buying copper or sugar by the pound. This means you can find the best deals and save money.

It's great to have options when it comes to dedicated servers! While managed and unmanaged plans differ, bare metal plans offer affordable pricing and the flexibility to install the necessary stack. You can easily find managed plans with excellent customer service that provides live chat and quick response times.

Ask about a bulk of helpful information for choosing the best-dedicated server plans! With this information, you'll be able to make a wise decision and find the perfect plan to meet your needs: 

Growth in monthly page views for hosting resources is significant.

The Cloud software, websites, or mobile apps will require optimal web traffic.

When choosing plans, high-performance hardware and value for money are essential factors.

Apps can support many microservices, databases, and programming languages!

[dailytechnologynews]

AMD EPYC 7F72 vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6258R - Latest EPYC Rome vs. Xeon Cascade Lake Benchmarks https://ift.tt/3fL46qF

[bulletinwave]

Bit-Rauschen, the processor podcast from c't: AMD vs. Intel, the current status

Bit-Rauschen, the processor podcast from c’t: AMD vs. Intel, the current status

The bi-weekly processor podcast from c’t is available … At the beginning of the year, AMD brought out the “U” and “H” mobile versions of the Ryzen 5000, later followed by the Ryzen Threadripper Pro for workstations and, above all, the third generation of Epyc processors for servers (Epyc 7003 Milan). Intel has presented the Core i-11000 aka Rocket Lake and finally the first Xeons with 10…

[dellarmenia]

Dell+AMD+Intel: Building the Next-Gen PowerEdge Portfolio

Industry-standard server vendors’ product announcements often focus as much on the components that strategic partners provide as they do on new solutions. That is a natural approach since off-the-shelf components play vital roles in new system features and capabilities. So, it is sensible for vendors to spotlight their partners’ latest/greatest technologies.

That was certainly the case last week when Lenovo, HPE and Cisco Systems all launched new solutions highlighting the benefits offered by AMD’s new EPYC 7003 Series Processors. But one vendor – Dell – followed a considerably different path by announcing a portfolio of 17 new PowerEdge servers featuring both AMD EPYC 7003 and upcoming Intel Xeon Scalable processors. Let’s consider why the company broke from the server vendor pack and why that is important for Dell’s partners and customers, including those that work with the company’s OEM organization.

Splitting hairs or comprehensive storytelling? Some might say that I’m splitting hairs here in focusing on rhetorical trivia that will have little, if any, impact on actual events. After all, won’t other system vendors celebrate the launch of the new Xeon Scalable chips (aka Ice Lake) with new and refreshed servers when Intel makes its formal announcement on April 6?

Absolutely. It is arguable that giving AMD and Intel, along with their respective new silicon solutions, full individual attention accords them the respect they deserve and may be less confusing than trying to spread attention across a host of new server products featuring both companies’ chips. After all, complexity is often the enemy of simplicity, especially when it comes to communications.

However, complexity is not always or even necessarily an adversary. In fact, if you handle it with care, complexity can become an ally, especially in the service of telling full and comprehensive stories. That was Dell’s strategy—using new silicon features and functions to highlight server innovations resulting from both its partners’ and Dell’s own development efforts.

Those include eye-opening enhancements in system performance (including boosting workload-specific solutions), energy efficiency and system cooling, edge computing and security that span the entire PowerEdge portfolio. This approach also provided Dell the opportunity to emphasize the value of its recently announced Project Apex cloud-as-a-service solutions and its Flex on Demand offering for acquiring and paying for data center products.

What do customers and partners gain? Why is this approach important to or even preferable for Dell’s customers and partners? Most importantly, it provides valuable context for the improvements that the company is executing across all its server lines. Sure, new CPUs and GPUs have major roles in that effort but, as Dell noted, the new systems are also bolstered by 1,100 patents the company either owns or has filed. Plus, PowerEdge servers offer features exclusive to Dell, including the company’s Secured Component Verification and Root of Trust offerings.

It is also important to remember the relative competitive positions of AMD and Intel. While the former has enjoyed notable success under the leadership of CEO Lisa Su and her executive team, its data center market share remains well below 10% and its EPYC revenues/earnings are a fraction of what Intel derives from Xeon Scalable. The IT industry loves David vs. Goliath stories, but in practical terms, more data center customers care about Intel’s newest Xeon chips than AMD EPYC.

Finally, as companies approach the end of the traditional fiscal year, many are finalizing purchasing and development plans for the year ahead. That has been a fraught process for companies during the Covid-19 pandemic, so it is vital for vendors to provide as much clarity about new and near-term solutions as possible. This is a particularly important point for Dell’s sizable channel partner community and customers in its multi-billion-dollar OEM business whose businesses depend on long-term guidance.

Final analysis Like most portfolio refreshes, Dell’s new and upcoming server portfolio has much to like. In particular, the company’s new PowerEdge R6515 (AMD) and R750 (Intel) deliver notable boosts in performance for business-critical and highly virtualized applications. The same can be said for the new HPC- and AI-focused PowerEdge XE8545 (AMD) and R750xa (Intel), both of which feature NVIDIA GPUs and software solutions. Finally, Dell’s new Intel-based PowerEdge XR11 and XR12 ruggedized systems should significantly increase the options available for customers focused on building or enhancing edge computing environments.

Overall, by telling the story of its new PowerEdge portfolio in full, Dell has done right by its strategic silicon partners. More importantly, the company has also provided valuable information and actionable insights to its data center customers and channel community. By making complexity an ally, Dell has made itself a better ally to those who depend on it.

[productocomponentes2]

Intel afirma que el Core i3

el nuevo Centro de Control AMD PRO que deja a los profesionales de TI gestionar de manera sencilla un conjunto de equipos AMD desde el lugar de trabajo. Como los modelos de consumo aguantan la arquitectura del sistema heterogéneo (HSA) que deja trabajar juntos en ciertas labores los núcleos de CPU y gráficos.

Salvo el 2500X que tiene 4C/8T y que solo están libres en China, todos los otros van a contar con 6 núcleos físicos y doce lógicos, estando libres en versiones normales y “X” en los que varía el TDP entre 65 y 95W, y la frecuencia. Las versiones Ryzen 2000 tienen dieciseis MB de caché y doce nm, al paso que los Ryzen 3000 Zen dos ascienden a nada menos que 32 MB con si arquitectura basada en chiplets. Como anunciamos antes, estas CPU están desbloqueadas y no tienen GPU integrada, además de esto incluye un disipador de serie bastante competente. Considerablemente más sentido sí que tienen los Ryzen 5, de largo son los más vendidos hoy en día por su desempeño gaming y para equipos con alto volumen de labores simultáneas. A partir de acá todos y cada uno de los procesadores Ryzen cuentan con tecnología multihilo SMC.

Estos IGP están basados en la arquitectura GCN con hasta setecientos cuatro unidades de sombreado para producir cuarenta y cuatro TMUs y ocho ROPs a 1400 MHz con capacidad de overclocking. Con ellos conseguiremos rendimiento suficiente para jugar a títulos poco exigentes en Full HD o bien 720p a buenas tasas de FPS, siendo el ejemplo más claro el Fornite.

Por otro lado AMD usa un cable trenzado de gran calidad frente al cable desnuedo que Intel ha usado tradicionalmente en sus disipadores de aire que entregaba de serie. La frecuencia base del nuevo Ryzen X es de tres,4 Ghz y en modo turbo es capaz de llegar hasta los tres,7 Ghz pudiendo hacer empleo de la tecnología XFR de los nuevos procesadores con arquitectura ZEN llegando hasta los tres,9 Ghz. (Recordemos que el XFR de los procesadores Ryzen es un overclock que es capaz de hacer Ryzen automáticamente dependiendo de la carga de trabajo). En el caso del Ryzen la frecuencia base es de tres,1 Ghz y en modo turbo llega hasta los 3,4 Ghz llegando a los tres,45 Ghz merced a XFR.

Intel Celeron

Ahora que la propia gama de procesadores Core i de la empresa de Santa Clara para equipos de sobremesa comienza con 4 núcleos y llega hasta 6, los usuarios mega-tareas podrían verse tentados por Intel. Al tiempo que AMD ha alcanzado la paridad de rendimiento, la batalla está ahora ostensiblemente orientada a la cantidad de tareas que se pueden hacer al unísono, en lugar de la rapidez para hacer dicha labor. Si comparamos cualquiera de los 2 Ryzen tres con los core i3 de Intel se me ocurren varias razones por las que me decantaría por el Ryzen 3. Indudablemente los 4 núcleos que incorpora en frente de los 2 de un i3 y el multiplicador desbloqueado para efectuar OC transforma a estos procesadores en serios aspirantes a reemplazar a los Core i3 de su situación de hegemonía actual.

Mas debido al carácter generalista de este artículo, me centro en los procesadores para el campo consumo y no en otros más concretos de profesionales y empresas como los Xeon y EPYC. Antes de empezar a leer, es conveniente tener claro que la potencia de los procesadores no depende solamente de aspectos como la frecuencia base y turbo que tengan. La arquitectura interna con la que esté creados es lo que más influye, por sobre las frecuencias, con parámetros como la cantidad de memoria caché que incluyan o bien el número de instrucciones máquina que pueden ejecutar simultáneamente como aspectos esenciales.

Acerca de los procesadores AMD Ryzen 3 tenemos actual hoy día la 2ª generación, es decir, la arquitectura Zen+ con proceso a 12 nm.

AMD también dispone de buenos procesadores de esta clase, si bien es verdad que Intel acapara la mayoría del mercado con sus potentes Core i5 e i7 para equipos gaming.

El fabricante ha optado por no incluir ninguna de estas CPU en la arquitectura Zen dos de siete nm estas CPU.

Aun de este modo, podrían ser una gran opción para usuarios con presupuestos más bajos sin abandonar a equipos que hasta 4 núcleos y 8 hilos de procesamiento con gráficos integrados.

Quizá también os sea interesante conocer los procesadores AMD Ryzen destinados a ordenadores portátiles y dispositivos sin cables.

Esta es la sección donde vamos a poder localizar los mejores procesadores de la gama Intel Core i3 y los AMD Ryzen 3.

¿Qué procesador AMD es igual al Core i5?

AMD Ryzen 5: la gama intermedia para la mayor parte de usuarios. Equivale al Intel Core i5. AMD Ryzen 7: también es equivalente al Core i7 de Intel.

Están desbloqueados, no tienen gráficos integrados y necesitan un disipador de alto rendimiento o refrigeración líquida de doscientos cuarenta o 360 mm para que den su máximo. En la familia i5 se va un pasito más allá para lograr en todos y cada uno de los casos un recuento de 6 núcleos desde la 8ª generación, puesto que en Kaby Lake cara atrás solo tenían cuatro. Al igual que ocurre con los Ryzen 5, podemos decir que son la opción sensata para gaming, por presentar unas frecuencias de trabajo de hasta 3,7 GHz, y una memoria caché bastante alta de nueve MB. Coste ajustado y alta capacidad de procesamiento para juegos y gran volumen de tareas simultáneas. El mercado de CPU cada vez se hace más y más complicado, una incesante lucha de poder entre procesadores Intel vs AMD Ryzen para ver quién alcanza la supremacía.

Como el resto de la familia Ryzen, los nuevos mil doscientos y 1300X se basan en la arquitectura ZEN, de catorce nm, con la eficiencia y multihilo como argumentos principales. Se apoyan en la tecnología SenseMI, con sensores que controlan temperatura y consumo para poder ofrecer un TDP bastante bajo y amoldar las labores del procesador de forma más eficiente. lo que ha hecho amd con estos procesadores es muy grande un ejemplo el ryzen x iguala al Intel i7 de gama media en juegos y lo supera en labores pesadas de renderizado y cuesta 80 euros menos que el i7. AMD ha indicado que ambos compiten directamente con los Core i y Core i de Intel, aunque gracias a sus cuatro núcleos reales y al overclock es muy posible que los RYZEN X y 1200 terminen ofertando un rendimiento muy afín al de los Core i5 siete mil cuatrocientos.

Procesadores Intel vs AMD Ryzen – Comparativa de rendimiento

¿Qué procesador AMD es mejor?

Los mejores procesadores AMD: El mejor procesador AMD de nivel de entrada: Ryzen 3 3200G. El mejor procesador AMD de gama alta: Ryzen 7 3700X. El procesador AMD más potente: Ryzen 9 3900X.

La llegada de los Ryzen 3000 está encabezada por el Ryzen que es un procesador de 6 núcleos físicos con multihilo, y su potencia es afín al Core i , tanto en mononúcleo como multinúcleo. Además de esto, debido a las diferencias internas de arquitectura, unos procesadores son mejores que otros en determinadas tarea, también debido a las microinstrucciones que implementan. Por ejemplo, aplicaciones de cómputo sacarán partido de las instrucciones AVX-512 de los procesadores de Intel, al paso que en el resto de usos apenas le van a sacar partido.

Aunque los procesadores Intel han estado tomando decisiones naturales durante años, la llegada de las CPUs AMD Ryzen ha cambiado dramáticamente un mercado que estaba comenzando a estancarse. La competencia que evidentemente beneficia a los jugadores que ahora están en su derecho a una opción considerablemente más extensa y modelos que continúan ganando poder y versatilidad. Como con los otros chips AMD discutidos anteriormente, el Threadripper 2990WX ofrece computación de alto desempeño, renderización y codificación 3D, mas de nuevo se encuentra desprevenido contra Intel en el campo de los juegos.

En nuestras pruebas, hallamos que son mucho opciones mejores de juego para principiantes que los chips de Intel equiparables. Alrededor del límite de los $ 100 dólares, ofrecen una increíble potencia en los juegos. No son tan veloces como las CPUs Zen dos de nueva generación que nos han robado el corazón en las últimas semanas, pero son las mejores CPUs para juegos básicos que ofrece AMD.

En este rango de costos es donde las CPUs Ryzen de AMD verdaderamente brillan, ofreciendo un increíble rendimiento multinúcleo, una fantástica potencia de juego y, habitualmente, una relación calidad precio mucho mayor que la de sus análogas de Intel. La primera generación de CPUs Ryzen introdujo un elevado número de opciones, mas ahora son difíciles de encontrar a precios aceptables. Como conclusión, ambos procesadores son excelentes opciones para montarse un sistema para jugar y trabajar con él. Aunque, para trabajar, el que mejor desempeño nos va a deparar es el modelo de AMD, singularmente si los programas que empleamos son capaces de usar sus 12 hilos. Mas, más esencial aún, AMD ha conseguido eliminar el hueco que exist��a entre el procesado de instrucciones con un solo núcleo entre Intel y mismos, merced a una sustancial mejora de su IPC.

Suben a 6 núcleos y 12 hilos en Coffe Lake y hasta los ocho núcleos y ocho hilos en Coffe Lake refresh. Se identifican por ofrecer un alto rendimiento y están preparados para resistir en una transición general. La versión ‘extreme’ puede contar con de entre 6 y dieciocho núcleos, perfectos para jugar y para trabajar.

El rendimiento de un A12, por ejemplo, es un diez por cien menor que el de un Athlon 220GE, por ello no son una opción demasiado atrayente. Esta sociedad pronto llegó a su final, con la era de los Pentium en Intel y K5 en AMD, en donde AMD prosiguió a solas a veces mojándole la oreja a Intel sacando primero los procesadores de sesenta y cuatro bits de consumo general, y luego las CPU multinúcleo. El panorama actual está muy reñido, mas AMD se está colocando por encima con sus Ryzen, una serie que ya va por su segunda revisión a 7nm al tiempo que Intel no logra despegar con los 10 nm.

¿Qué procesador AMD es igual al Core i7?

AMD vs INTEL CORE i7 En la línea Ryzen de AMD encontramos hasta tres opciones: Ryzen 3, más simple, con cuatro núcleos y económicos; Ryzen 5 con dos modalidades –1500 e inferiores, con cuatro núcleos y 8 hilos- y los modelos 1600 y 2600 que cuentan con seis núcleos y 12 hilos.

[digital-dynasty]

Bit-Rauschen, der Prozessor-Podcast von c’t: AMD vs. Intel, der aktuelle Stand

Ryzen gegen Tiger- und Rocket Lake, Epyc gegen Xeon: Wie steht es zwischen AMD und Intel derzeit? Das ist das Thema im Audio-Podcast Bit-Rauschen 2021/07. Read more www.heise.de/meinung/…-... www.digital-dynasty.net/de/teamblogs/…

http://www.digital-dynasty.net/de/teamblogs/bit-rauschen-der-prozessor-podcast-von-ct-amd-vs-intel-der-aktuelle-stand