#also links in to other conspiracy theories dw about those
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Have I been drawing swords and their spirits for so long that I'm contemplating making up spirits for all the other Loz swords?
Maybe??
Am I going insane???
#every day the worms whispers get louder#the great fairy sword???#look the phantom sword and the locomo sword have sick designs and i wanna play with them ok#stunning#also links in to other conspiracy theories dw about those#*kicks box of red string behind wall*#lil mischievous wood sprire for the kokiri sword#a darmani style spirit for the biggoron sword?
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Part 2. Split from part 1 due to length, covering comment below line and their extra post. This should be shorter then part 1
The initial thread
@hungryhydra69-blog
The Comments
Essentially one but seemingly split into two, possibly a tumbr thing?
"If you consider yourself an intellectual,"
I must admit, being able to read "Wu surrendered to Jin" and other such things, being able to interpret it as Jin rather Wu saw Jin's surrender was not something I considered an intellectual achievement before. Some seem to be trying to make it so
"then how I write my paragraphs should be of no concern to you. Basically, you are dodging the point. I saw the thread, both the Twitter thread and the Reddit thread. You and your gang assumed he was talking about the novel and history when he was obviously talking about the game. You chose to be a toxic Twitter bot and instigate a harassment campaign just because someone thought the game's version of Cao Cao was cool."
"Also, to say my paragraphs creates long wall of text is very HYPOCRITICAL of you, considering that you do the exact same thing even with short paragraphs. Your way of writing is equally as annoying as mine in this regard. In other words, you have no right to talk."
So when, in your life, you fall over and someone offers a hand, do you attack them for hypocrisy, SJW and declare they have no right to do so? Or do you say thanks?
My suspicion would be the second becuase most people realize the first would make them look like someone having a hissy fit and being an idiot.
I don't know why you would think that same wouldn't apply to online. Your making yourself look ridiculous
Why is it a concern when someone posts a 484 word post without paragraphs? Because it is unkind to readers, doesn't help you get your point across clearly and it isn't how things are done becuase it is considered inconsiderate to others.
Now I don't know if your new to tumblr (no likes or posts before) but your certainly unused to posting. Which is fine and everybody new to something is likely to need a hand at some point. I offered it. You threw a hissy fit
Now do I post long stuff? Sure. I am not good at being concise. I would not consider myself a skilled writer. Yet even I know the need for paragraphs.
Now as for this bit
You and your gang assumed he was talking about the novel and history when he was obviously talking about the game. You chose to be a toxic Twitter bot and instigate a harassment campaign just because someone thought the game's version of Cao Cao was cool." Apparently the man who says "In fairness, the game Cao Cao is a character I very much enjoy and DW are very good at tapping into possibly existing perceptions and with Cao Cao sell a tale that appeals. The man who does not care about reputation, the man who values talent, the calm, dynamic leader." " is anti-people liking Cao Cao...
Next up, when game says Jin, what they mean is Wei apparently. When they say you can ride a horse, what they mean is you can ride a cow that will jump over the moon
You keep saying a launched a harassment camapign but whereas I provide links to show what I say and so people can judge, you provide no links of me urging people to harass the person. Almost as if your in a conspiracy theory that ignores the more likely reasons things happened the way they did
Post 2
To be found here
His very first line was “Dynasty Warriors, incidentally, has a very relevant message to our modern society“. Meanwhile, your response was just “None of those. Literally none of those factions won”- you assumed he was talking about history/novel when in he was quite clearly talking about the GAME.
It was. Which is why the answer was a game one. As the game series itself says, the Sima's won. Jin won. Wei gets defeated in battle stages. Sima Zhao calls for Cao Wei to fall.
Just becuase the game doesn't tell you what you want to hear, doesn't mean others who take on what the games says (even if they have critiques) are thus talking history when they use what the game does and says
Even with that in mind, even history shows that Wei didn’t become Jin until after the fall of Shu. Meaning: Wei effectively won, game or otherwise.
The game literally tells you Jin won. Even "going into the history", that is a stance I can't say I have ever seen a historian take.
Wei "won"? Despite not have controls of levers of power for decades, being dethroned before the land was united, being regicided, their policies changed from the Cao beliefs to take the Sima stances even before Cao Huan's abdication, the long slow Sima ploy (that Wei loyalists publicly flagged in 249), the deaths, arrests, the divorces?
To say Wei won is to ignore reality and a slap in the device of both Cao and Sima loyalists who took risks, even giving up their lives, careers, freedom and marriages for their causes. Which were not one and the same.
The game, for understandable reasons, doesn't go into that as I have said in the twitter threads. But even the games don't say Wei won
Regardless, history is irrelevant as they are all effectively biased depending on the speaker.
This is a bit of a cowards action. Bring up a (bad) history claim then claim it doesn't count before your called on it.
Show, humans are biased and so history is biased. That bias is quite useful in understanding the past
You clearly have a bias against Cao Cao and in favor of Liu Bei,
That is... an opinion
that’s your opinion
No, it is what you think, or even wish, my opinion to be becuase I dared say game is saying what the game says. Also that a source, that even the writer says is wrong, is problematic.
You don't actually know my opinion.
so I’ll respect yours but instigate harassment just because they think differently is bad no matter what.
Such a thing would indeed be bad. As I have not done so, it is a bit weird to bring it up.
No evidence I have instigated harassment has been provided (and one of them I am accused of harassing: Corrupter, I don't think has talked to anybody else from the community on twitter?). So far the harassment is simply claims from you, with no evidence, and corrupter, whose inaccuracy has been shown a few times, and also provided no evidence.
Be a decent human being, don’t be like your pervert of a namesake and be reasonable for once in your life!
Nice one on the use of the tyrant. My hat off to you on that one
But given you don't even know my actual opinions, your advice has no meaning. Maybe you can persuade someone worthy of respect to rebuke me? Someone who actually knows me?
As for being a decent person, have you seen corrupter's profile (and twitter handle) while complaining about don't be a pervert? Have you seen swordmaster's behaviour as listed at the end of part 1? Yet you say nothing about that.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
For a comprehensive list of most of my print work (not including magazine articles) see this list on Goodreads.
All my works dedicated to the memory of my dearly departed friends: The members of The Formless Ocean Group – Nina Graboi, Elizabeth Gips, Paddy Long, Betsy Herbert, and Robert Anton Wilson. Also to my departed friends: Dave, DW Cooper, Dr. Hyatt (Alan) and humdog.
PAST WORK
Beats In Time: A Literary Generation’s Legacy (Chapter 12 is my interview with Diane DiPrima) also to be included in Conversations with Diane di Prima to be published by the University Press of Mississippi, in 2021/22.
Transmedia: Who Invited the Lobsters Anyway?
Legend-Tripping Online: Supernatural Folklore and the Search for Ong’s Hat by Michael Kinsell – While clearly this is a book about my transmedia project it also includes a lot of things that I wrote as examples, so I include it here. Metamodernism, anyone?
Rebels and Devils: The Psychology of Liberation edited by Christopher S. Hyatt, Ph.D. introduced by S. Jason Black foreword by Nicholas Tharcher contributions by William S. Burroughs Joseph C. Lisiewski, Ph.D. Timothy Leary Ph.D., Robert Anton Wilson, Austin Osman Spare, Genesis P-Orridge, Aleister Crowley, Joseph Matheny, Peter J. Carroll, Israel Regardie, Jack Parsons, Phil Hine, Osho, and many others
Black Book Omega: CIRQUE APOKLYPSIS by Christopher S. Hyatt, Ph.D. Joseph Matheny, Nick Pell, Calvin Iwema, Wes Unruh, Antero Alli (more info here)
Contributor YouTube: An Insider’s Guide to Climbing the Charts (more info here)
Introduction to The Art of Memetics Aside: When I posted about this book on Greylodge, Seth Godin references the post as a good example of “How to write like a blogger“ This made me happy. 😉
Contributor/Editor:This is Not a Game: A Guide to Alternate Reality Gaming with Dave Szulborski (Excerpt here )I edited and contributed to : “This Is Not a Game” which was included in the annual Tween market report that went to marketing executives worldwide in the toy, gaming and youth market industries. Also, I appeared as myself/in character, in person, in the “Catching the Wish” ARG by Dave.
Third Realm (The Yellow King) Written and executed by me, produced in conjunction with Foolish People http://www.argn.com/2009/10/puzzles_for_the_apocalyps
4P2 My first foray into the True Crime arena. Formula: Just put up a single, spooky web page, that purports to be a recruitment drive for an organization whose actual existence is speculative at best and at worst is fiction presented as fact or paranoid, hysterical hand-waving in the interest of selling books and you will get all kinds of reactions. In all fairness, I think the theories mentioned read as good fantasy crime fiction and this was a conceptual attempt at that very thing. Apparently, it succeeded. The unnerving side of this was the equal amount of applications I received asking to join (Really? Join a group of underground serial killers? Really?) or outright death threats by people who really believe in such things. (Someone summed it up pretty well in this article from The Fenris Wolf)
the-fenriswolf-iss-no-4-pp-87-116 PDF Excerpt
El Centro & OMEGA This was a ARG/Transmedia style story with occult/horror/conspiracy elements, started in 2004 and ended in 2006. It utilized Web, print (booklet), radio, phone trees, theater and news wire services. [A version of the doughnut shop scene from this story was used in Amsterdam production of Terra: Extremitas by Foolish People.] This project was done in collaboration my late friend Dave Szulborski. There’s a LOOOOOONG story about this project. So long in fact that it will take up at least three chapters in an future book.
Contributor: What Would Bill Hicks Say with Ben Mack, Amelia the Great and Soft Skull Press (along with Jeff Danziger and Martyn Turner; writers Neal Pollack, Robert Newman, and A.L. Kennedy; and Thom Yorke of Radiohead and others…)
Contributor: 2004-2005 Exquisite Language project for the 2004 ELfest and collected in the Spring 2005 issue of of 2 Gyrlz Quarterly. NOW AVAILABLE AT POWELLS.COM
Introduction, afterward and editing for Poker Without Cards– First Edition. I orchestrated the first release campaign for this book, with the main character becoming “real”on the Internet for a while. After the first few months I turned it over to the author. (statement regarding this work here)
GALT’S ARK: The Black Symphony, First and Second Movements Produced by Cthulhu The Players: Joseph Matheny, Christopher S. Hyatt, Ph.D., Father Daniel Suders & Nicholas Tharcher Illustrated by S. Jason Black, Jonathan Sellers, Weirdpixie & MobiusFrame
THE BLACK BOOK Volume III, Part I
THE BLACK BOOK Volume III, Part II
(The Black Books are considered the workbooks for The Psychopath’s Bible, which I wrote an infamous jacket blurb for.)
The Incunabula: Ong’s Hat Project [ Reviews | Interviews, etc. | Wikipedia | History] This was a ARG/Transmedia style story started in 1988 and ended in 2001. It utilized zines, BBS, early Internet, Web, CD ROM, CD Audio, DVD, print (book, graphic novel and magazine), radio, phone trees, fax, and news wire services. I gained and leveraged exposure in both the mainstream and alternative media to distribute over 2 million copies of CD ROM, ebook and print versions of the story combined. Story elements from Ong’s Hat were also included in the EA Game, Majestic which unfortunately ended prematurely due to 9/11. It was the subject of a full 4 hour show on Coast to Coast AM, been the subject of an article on the Weekly World News and been covered on many radio shows world wide, books, newspapers, magazines, etc. Links to media here.
Description: “…a bizarre Internet phenomenon: an “immersive” online experience—part mystery, part game, part who knows what—known as both the Incunabula Papers and Ong’s Hat. The Incunabula Papers/Ong’s Hat was, or is, a “many-threaded, open-ended interactive narrative” that ”weds an alternate history of chaos science and consciousness studies to conspiracy theories, parallel dimensions, and claims that computer-mediated environments can serve as magical tools…. the documents provoked a widespread “immersive legend-trip” in the late 1990s. Via Web forums, participants investigated the documents—manifestos—which spun up descriptions of brilliant but suppressed discoveries relating to paths that certain scientists had forged into alternate realities. Soon, those haunted dimensions existed in the minds and fantasies of Ong’s Hat’s many participants. That was evident as they responded to the original postings by uploading their own—all manner of reflections and artifacts: personal anecdotes, audio recordings, and videos—to augment what became “a really immersive world, and it was vast”. – The Chronicle of Higher Education—-
“Ong’s Hat was more of an experiment in transmedia storytelling than what we would now consider to be an ARG but its DNA – the concept of telling a story across various platforms and new media- is evident in every alternate reality game that came after.” – Games Magazine 2013
Though Ong’s Hat may not have set out to be an ARG, the methods by which the author interacted with participants and used different platforms to build and spread its legend has been reflected in later games. –Know Your Meme
The Incunabula Papers are arguably the first immersive online legend complex that introduced readers to a host of content, including what religious historian Robert Ellwood has called the “alternative reality tradition. – Legend-Tripping Online: Supernatural Folklore and the Search for Ong’s Hat
As a companion piece to understanding some of the history of the transmedia work that centered around Ong”s Hat you may also want to read Legend-Tripping Online: Supernatural Folklore and the Search for Ong’s Hat, reviewed here.
The Incunabula Papers CDROM was recently included in the BNF (Bibliothèque nationale de France) digital art collection.
Game Over? (currently re-vamping this for re-release)…but if you just HAVE to have it now, someone is selling one for $900 over here. 😛
What Really Happened at Ong’s Hat?
The Incunabula Papers (CD ROM) Free ebook versions here
Incunabula: The Graphic Novel Free ebook version here
Why DVD? (B and N Digital Bestseller)
A booklet published in April-99
Over 100,000 in circulation to date
Available from booksellers nationwide in October reprinted by:
DVD Creation Magazine
Videography Magazine
(printed copy sent out with each issue – July,1999)
Video Systems magazine
and many others
Convergence 2000 (B and N Digital Bestseller) Free ebook version here
Covert Culture Sourcebook
Earth Dance 2000 (Video and DVD)
The Millennium Whole Earth Catalog
Transmedia Litany (with Genesis P’Orridge)
Thee psychick bible
esoterrorist (publisher)
My idea for an Exquisite Corpse jacket blurb using faxes. (WSB missed inclusion by a day). Used on Esoterrist
Banishing Ritual (cover) with Illusion of Safety (audio here)
The Last Book
Also contributed a few articles to Bob and Arlen Wilson’s Trajectories.
A write up I did about my old friend Rob Brezsny for disinfo.com
Interview that I did with with Beat poet and author Diane DiPrima
Nina Graboi Interview, bOING bOING, Number 8 (written under my nom de plume: Michael Kelly)
I’ve contributed articles to AlwaysOn and Adotas. I’ve contributed book, music, and movie reviews to Gnosis and Magical Blend in the past as well as the old Boing-Boing print magazine and Fringeware Review. Note, in the interest of full disclosure, I’d sometimes contribute more than one article or review to a single publication and to avoid the appearance of saturation, I’d use the pen name: Michael Kelly for some of the articles.
Writing For a comprehensive list of most of my print work (not including magazine articles) see this list on Goodreads…
1 note
·
View note
Text
TeeVee Podcast’s Voltron s8 review
I’ve been waiting eagerly for TeeVee’s review of s8. If you recall, their s7 review was what gave us the man getting choked up about Shiro’s relationship.
The link to the podcast is here but if you’d prefer a sort of transcript, here are some of the highlights for me. I didn’t always catch who was speaking but I wrote down initials where I could. S=Shanon, A=Antony, M=Moises, C=Chip D=Dan. The panel is divided on their feelings on the season. 2 of them seem to have hated it, one liked it, one thought it was fine, and one feels mixed about it. Anyway here we go, some great quotes ahead.
Under the readmore cuz it’s long.
S: "After 7 seasons of a show that was going to be one of the animated series of the decade, they not only did not stick the landing, they fell on their butts, rolled off the mat, off the lines, into the judge's table and their leotard popped open"
"A lot of the plot was callbacks to things from seasons ago that we really probably didn't need to see again." "I wasn't entirely sure that they weren't gaslighting me."
Man Shannon is calling out some great points. She's calling out the dropped druid plot thread, and wondering what the point was of showing Lotor's past when he's dead, and nothing can change in his present and his redemption can't really happen.
A: "endings are hard. I was disappointed with this season [...] it was let down by poor plotting and that final battle made me throw my hands up in despair most of the time. But I have enormous sympathy for the EPs. Maintaining a longform episodic story is hard. And to pull off an ending that satisfies even MOST of the audience is harder yet. and let's not forget they were always upfront that vt always had 'editorial interference' from up top. Toys, the fact that it's aimed at children, corp resistance to some of the more modern social issues that they've tried to tackle. THAT SAID, we don't know what happened on this production, who had the final say, what they argued over. and I say this cuz a lot of the fandom drama over it assumes a LOT over how media and entertainment like this is made that simple ARE. NOT. TRUE. Some of the stuff I've read has been ABSURDLY offbase, like that there were different writers rather than just 1 the whole way through which ignores how TV is made. And if you think these writers just go off and write a script without talking to anyone first and then they come back with something that must be filmed without any changes, THAT'S NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS. [..]we don't know who made these decisions. The studio isn't always the bad guy. Sometimes they rescue things that would otherwise have been a horrible mess. And unless you were IN THE ROOM, you don't know, and neither do any of us. So let's all bear that in mind. [...]You can't lay the blame OR credit on any one person. For any of this."
They're laughing & making so much fun of the final 3 episodes and how baffling they were.
"Don't even get me started on Voltron merging with Atlas [and the crew disappearing] that was a bad, bad idea."
"But that was the ONE time Shiro was back with the team!"
a couple dudes are relatively ok with the Allura death because we've never seen a WOC heroically sacrifice herself for the universe and usually it's the Shiro hero character D: They also point out that technically she wasn't fridged so.. yay?
Antony and Shannon vehemently disagree.
A: "My problem with that ending was more just that it was... not. good." he makes a comparison to RotJ where Vader still dies and it's his SON, who lives, who 'redeems' him. "This was none of those things. It felt like a terrible lesson. You can be so evil that you kill literally billions of people for 10k yrs but if you say sorry just before you're about to be executed it's alright, dw about it, we'll put the universe back to rights. NO, that's a terrible lesson!!"
S:"They had the LIONS. That's my problem. Throughout this series we've had stakes going up but there has always been a trading of ideas, what can we do, what can we figure out, up to the point where they wind up sacrificing the castle, but they go through steps before that 'is there anything else we can do’. And here, there's not even... she didn't even get to say goodbye to Coran! This is the one character, WOC, and she has sacrificed throughout this entire series. She lost her planet. She lost the last connection she had to her father in the AI. She kept LOSING things over and over to the point where she sacrifices her crown to help Shiro. and the thanks she gets is that she has to turn around and say nope I've got to away and fix all of this and apparently never see you all again. It really, REALLY REALLY bothered me. All of my friends who have CHILDREN who watch this show, universally the kids were upset and angry and tearful and HATED that outcome. This did not feel like a triumph. Having to lose Allura like that robbed any kind of triumph in the success of saving all the universes. And I think that's one of the reasons that this last part of the season sits so poorly with me. I feel like it should have ended in a triumphant way. even if it meant losing a couple of the team members or the lions. Of course that takes away the toy aspect which is why that's not an option. We already had several tragedy arcs in this series. Zarkon, Honerva, and Lotor had tragedy arcs. Why does Allura have to have one too? We've had enough."
Antony & Shanon KILLIN IT on this podcast y'all.
C: "This series relies so much on 'oh wait, there's a new upgrade', 'oh wait, there's this new thing'" A: "Well that was the entire final battle." C: "So there's this handwavy Allura has to sacrifice herself. The heavy lifting wasn't done to make this an earned moment."
S: "I do think, whether it was at the direction of DW or WEP (Vld IP), without those little epilogue cards, there is the potential opening that Allura might be able to return.[..]It was open to interpretation."
One guy likes the Shiro ending for the surprising progress aspect, even though he's not thrilled about how it was put together. also he isn't convinced the epilogue wasn't planned. He likes a lot of s8 but all the stuff he likes is tied to stuff that he really didn't like.
S:"The shiro card is the other reason that I think those things were shoved in. For me, that turns Shiro's entire character into a token when he wasn't before. When they introduced his sexuality, it was done BEAUTIFULLY. There was this conversation with his significant other a mature relationship that ran into its problems and therefore couldn't happen anymore. Adam could've been Adele, and nothing would have changed about that conversation. It was not the defining characteristic of Shiro. It was just something else about him."
S: "And then s8 happens and Shiro is divided from everybody on the team. There are so few interactions of any kind that aren't just barking orders. or making plans. Keith is the prime example. Their friendship had been a backbone of this series and suddenly they can't even stand more than feet 5ft from each other.
A: “It’s barely evident, yeah.”
M:”And the same with the rest of the main cast. And if they had set that up at the end of s7, that he’s going to go into the background a bit, it wouldn’t have felt as weird.
S: “And they didn’t! S7 was miraculous in the fact that even though he’s no longer in a lion, he’s still got a vital part to play in the series. And s8 erased that. It pretty much neutered him! And the kind of message is once you've revealed this character to be gay, we've gotta keep him out of the way. And if they had not put those end cards in, again the fact that he's a gay man is just the fact that he's a gay man and it's not any bigger or smaller aspect of his character, but they did not EARN him marrying random bridge crew member #3."
A: "and RETIRING! A man who LEFT adam because he felt he had to go and fight."
A: "He left the guy he loved before because of his devotion to"
S:"To fighting to making things right"
A:”To being a soldier and doing the right thing.”
C:”Isn’t the whole point then that he achieves that?”
M:”The fighting’s over and he can leave that behind and he can actually be happy.”
S: “He wouldn’t’ve. I don’t see it.”
M: “I violently disagree.”
C: “I think it was a nice endcap for his character."
Moises also likes this because it’s not a BYG scenario and he gets retired. Shannon is extremely exasperated by these takes.
S:”For me, it’s like Tangled. You go through Rapunzel and Flynn, going through their adventures, getting closer, getting to know each other, they save each other, things like that. And then she’s reunited with her parents and then we get and endcap that says ‘for political reasons her parents decided they needed to marry her off to the prince in the next county, sorry’. That would’ve had people RIOTING. Thats not how you do a story with characters that people care about. And to shove shiro off onto this random character that we--his name is never spoken!”
A:”No he had like 3 lines in the entire season.”
S:”He had 3 line sin the season, you don’t know his name unless you watched the subtitles, and in the audio narration for the visually impaired, they called him Adam in the endcap. They called him Adam! They fixed that now. It feels like a hugely clumsy attempt to grab the woke points for a character that didn’t need them.”
Moises then talks a little about Shiro and Keith and how he and Shannon both thought there was something there, and still do, but they can’t know what happened behind the scenes and to theorize on the intent of that relationship is “conspiracy theory land” and trying to decide what the writers were prevented from doing is like “reading tea leaves and chicken bones”. He references people extracting things from his own writing.
M: “As much as I wanted to see that relationship flower and flourish, the fact that it didn’t, look, it’s one of a million times that’s happened for me, with fiction, where things didnt turn out the way I wanted to see them.”
S:”I’m talking about 2 different things, as far as Shiro’s character, vs shipping issues. I feel Shiro’s character was done a disservice that if they were going to end him in a relationship with another man, they didn’t earn it by throwing that little endcap on.”
M:”Yeah, they could have brought back one less robeast or something.”
S:”The other thing is, I think there is enough out there as far as interviews with JDS and LM to show that at the very least I think they meant to leave it openended. Again if you take out that endcap, the last shot includes a shot of just Shiro and Keith, together, same screen, looking up as the lions go away, without saying anything further. I know I pie in the sky hoped that they were gonna kiss this season when we did our s7 recap and yes that was the shipper in me talking. I truly did not expect that they would be able to go that far. What I did not expect was for them to tear it down. And I feel like that’s what they did. Between the complete absence of interactions in s8, and then throwing that epilogue in there.”
Dan doesn’t understand how that could be because he sees no reason for them to do that. Shannon patiently explains about DW’s history with LGBT characters but Dan insists that the creators told the story the way they wanted to and he’s fine with Shiro getting a marriage even if it’s a character they don’t know.
Overall the panelists love the show still, and in most cases prefer to consider it in the realm of s1-6 with a weak final double season (7&8) or that the show ends after s7. They would all love to know how long the NDAs last, a making of perhaps, to know what the heck happened and what changed along the way. Big mood my dudes. Big mood.
66 notes
·
View notes
Photo
New Post has been published on https://freenews.today/2021/01/12/youtube-suspends-donald-trump-account-joining-twitter-facebook-dw-13-01-2021/
YouTube suspends Donald Trump account, joining Twitter, Facebook | DW | 13.01.2021
Google-owned YouTube said on Tuesday that it has suspended US President Donald Trump’s account after last week’s US Capitol riot.
The popular video-sharing service followsother social media, online services and companiesthat decided to ban or suspend the real estate mogul over fears he might use social media to incite more unrest.
“In light of concerns about the ongoing potential for violence, we removed new content uploaded to Donald J. Trump’s channel for violating our policies,” YouTube said in a statement.
Trump’s channel has been “temporarily prevented from uploading new content for a minimum’ of 7 days,” the statement read.
YouTube also said it will be “indefinitely disabling comments” on Trump’s channel because of safety concerns
Facebook last week suspended Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts.
Other online services, including Snapchat and Amazon-owned Twitch, also suspended Trump from their platforms.
Twitter’s ban divides Republicans, Democrats
Twitter went a step further by deleting the billionaire’s profile, depriving him of his favorite platform.
It had already started flagging his tweets that repeated the untrue claim that the US election was rigged.
The San Francisco-based tech giant also deleted 70,000 accounts that appeared to have links to the QAnon conspiracy theory.
Its followers believe that President Trump is waging a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media.
There is no evidence for any of this.
The move by Internet firms to remove the president from their platforms has split US politicians along party lines.
Republicans argue claimed conservative beliefs and opinions are being censored, while Democrats point out that the First Amendment places no legal obligations on private companies.
Democrats argued that the company was well within its rights to make the decision – which they said was long overdue.
But some world leaders, including those who had criticized Trump’s rally outside the White House, questioned whether it was the right move.
Trump’s social media shutout
Prior to its suspension, the president’s YouTube account had racked up 2.77 million subscribers.
A month-old video of Trump casting doubt on the voting process in November’s presidential election, and had received 5.8 million views.
YouTube operates a ‘three strikes and you’re out” policy when users violate their terms and conditions.
The firm has not singled out which video President Trump earned him this first strike that led to his seven-day timeout.
Under its policies, earning a second strike will result in a two-week suspension and three strikes will result in a permanent ban.
On Tuesday, an activist group called on YouTube to join other platforms in dumping Trump’s accounts, threatening an advertising boycott campaign.
sms-jf/rc (AFP, Reuters)
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function (event) if (DWDE.dsgvo.isStoringCookiesOkay()) facebookTracking(); ); function facebookTracking() !function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function () n.callMethod ? n.callMethod.apply(n, arguments) : n.queue.push(arguments) ; if (!f._fbq) f._fbq = n; n.push = n; n.loaded = !0; n.version = '2.0'; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement(e); t.async = !0; t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s) (window, document, 'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '157204581336210'); fbq('track', 'ViewContent'); Source
0 notes