#allahabad high court jobs 2020
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
latestsarkarijobs · 3 years ago
Text
Allahabad High Court job - 29 समीक्षा अधिकारी भर्ती 2021
Allahabad High Court job – 29 समीक्षा अधिकारी भर्ती 2021
इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय Allahabad High Court Recruitment 2021 Allahabad High Court job: इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने 29 समीक्षा अधिकारी पदों के लिए रोजगार समाचार (Employment News) प्रकाशित किया है सभी उम्मीदवारों से निवेदन है की Allahabad High Court Recruitment के लिए आवेदन करने से पहले रोजगार संबंधी सभी आवश्यक जानकारियाँ पढ़ लें उसके बाद ही आवेदन करें। Details of 29 Review Officer Post in Allahabad…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
vilaspatelvlogs · 4 years ago
Text
Sarkari Naukri 2021 : यूपी एचजेएस भर्ती आवेदन के लिए आज आखिरी मौका 
अगर आप वकालत करते हैं और सरकारी नौकरी पाना चाहते हैं तो यह खबर आपके लिए बेहद अहम है। यदि आपके पास निर्धारित योग्यता और अनुभव है तो इस खबर को पढ़ने के बाद आप जज बनने का अपना ख्वाब पूरा कर सकते हैं। दरअसल, वकीलों के लिए उत्तर प्रदेश में जज बनने का सुनहरा मौका आया है। इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय, प्रयागराज ने 98 पदों पर भर्ती के लिए आवेदन आमंत्रित किए हैं। इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट द्वारा मांगे गए आवेदन जिला…
View On WordPress
0 notes
dailyresult · 4 years ago
Text
Allahabad High Court HJS Online Form 2020
Allahabad High Court HJS Online Form 2020
View On WordPress
0 notes
newznotify · 4 years ago
Text
UP HJS Recruitment: Allahabad Excessive Courtroom launched UP HJS recruitment notification, apply for 98 emptiness
UP HJS Recruitment: Allahabad Excessive Courtroom launched UP HJS recruitment notification, apply for 98 emptiness
UP HJS Recruitment 2020 Notification: Allahabad Excessive Courtroom, Prayagraj has invited on-line software from Indian residents by issuing notification of Uttar Pradesh Increased Judicial Service {UP HJS Recruitment 2020 – 2021}. Eligible and candidates can apply on-line for the examinations for the posts of judges within the District Courtroom. The method of on-line software for this may begin…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
theburialofstrawberries · 4 years ago
Text
[Sep 1 2020] Some good news from India, all within the last day or two
The supreme court blinked; Prashant Bhushan does not have to apologise, go to jail, or lose his license for tweets critical of the Modi govt and calling out an SC judge for riding a BJP member’s Harley Davidson. He has to pay a token Re. 1 fine
The Allahabad high court ordered the release of Dr. Kafeel Khan, a hero who saved many lives in the 2017 UP tragedy when oxygen supply to the BRD Medical College was cut. UP Police arrested him for a speech he gave to students of Aligarh Muslim University for supposedly inciting violence when he was really talking about the communal nature of the NRC exercise and how Indian muslims should band together and resist attempts that pit them against their Hindu brethren. He has been detained for 9 months, missing more than half of his new baby boy’s life in jail 
Another victim of enthusiastic Home ministry crackdowns during this pandemic (when better to arrest civil rights activists than a time where social distancing prevents protesting!!!), Devangana Kalita, member of the feminist student organisation Pinjra Tod, was finally granted bail. She, along with fellow Pinjra Tod activist and student Natasha Narwhal, have been holed up in Tihar jail for the past 90 days on the flimsiest of charges. When questioned by the court, the police literally couldn’t produce the evidence that was the basis for the arrest. This is a continuation of the attempts to paint aggression on JNU campus as having been masterminded by left wing student outfits instead of the right wing student outfit ABVP, and erase the enormous trauma and literal physical harm suffered by these students, absolutely perverse and sick 
A friend pointed out the other day that Wikipedia is doing a tremendous job in keeping the timelines straight and piecing together eyewitness accounts, so if you haven’t done so already, please do read about the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots (and the 2020 attack on JNU!!). The BJP member who incited the riots with his hate speech against the anti-CAA protestors and called on BJP supporters to take matters into their own hands recently attended the launch of a conspiracy theory book that tries to show how the riots were, in fact, anti-Hindu. Bloomsbury was forced to drop the book, and its now being published by a Tamil-Nadu based publisher owned by, surprise surprise, another BJP member. The propaganda just doesn't quit 
71 notes · View notes
927piyush-blog · 4 years ago
Text
all govt jobs and latest news
LATEST VACANCY  
GOVT OF INDIA TOP SCHEME
Sahakar Mitra Internship Yojana
Delhi University PG Admission Online Form 2020
Allahabad High Court Review Officer / Computer Assistant Result 2020
Bihar Police Constable Exam Date 2020
ITBP Constable (MM) Result 2019
CGPSC Forest Service Recruitment 2020 Online Form
UPSC National Defence Academy & Naval Academy Exam II 2020 Online Form
NTPC Executive Trainee Online Form 2020
65th Combined Mains Exam Online Form 2020
1 note · View note
latestsarkarijobs · 3 years ago
Text
Allahabad High Court Recruitment-कानून क्लर्क (प्रशिक्षु) भर्ती
Allahabad High Court Recruitment-कानून क्लर्क (प्रशिक्षु) भर्ती
इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालयय भर्ती 2021 – 94 कानून क्लर्क (प्रशिक्षु) पद Apply Now Allahabad High Court Recruitment 2021-2022 इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालयय भर्ती Allahabad High Court Notification 2021 » इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालयय (High Court of Allahabad) ने 94 कानून क्लर्क (प्रशिक्षु) पदों के लिए नोटिफिकेशन प्रकाशित किया है l Allahabad High Court Recruitment 2021 इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालयय से जुड़ी विभागीय…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
joinnoukri · 2 years ago
Text
UP Government Should Consider Giving Job To A Family Member Of Hathras Victim: Allahabad High Court - हाथरस पीड़िता के परिवार के एक सदस्य को नौकरी देने पर यूपी सरकार करे विचार : अदालत
UP Government Should Consider Giving Job To A Family Member Of Hathras Victim: Allahabad High Court – हाथरस पीड़िता के परिवार के एक सदस्य को नौकरी देने पर यूपी सरकार करे विचार : अदालत
लखनऊ : इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय की लखनऊ पीठ ने राज्य सरकार को निर्देश दिया है कि वह हाथरस पीड़िता के परिवार के एक सदस्य को तीन महीने के भीतर सरकारी या सरकारी उपक्��म में रोजगार देने पर विचार करे. अदालत ने कहा कि सरकार को अपने 30 सितंबर 2020 के उस लिखित आश्‍वासन पर अमल करना चाहिए, जिसमें उसने पीड़ित के परिवार के किसी एक सदस्य को ग्रुप डी स्तर की सरकारी नौकरी देने का वादा किया था.  यह भी…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
vilaspatelvlogs · 4 years ago
Text
Sarkari Naukri 2021 : उत्तर प्रदेश उच्च न्यायिक सेवा में भर्ती शुरू, वकीलों को मिलेगा मौका
Sarkari Naukri 2021 : उत्तर प्रदेश उच्च न्यायिक सेवा में भर्ती शुरू, वकीलों को मिलेगा मौका
अगर आप भी वकालत पेशे से जुड़े हैं और सरकारी नौकरी पाना चाहते हैं या जज बनने का ख्वाब देख रहे हैं, तो यह खबर आपके लिए बेहद अहम है। वकीलों के लिए उत्तर प्रदेश में जज बनने का सुनहरा मौका आया है। इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय, प्रयागराज ने 98 पदों पर भर्ती के लिए आवेदन आमंत्रित किए हैं। इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट द्वारा मांगे गए आवेदन जिला अदालतों में जज भर्ती के लिए हैं।  Source link
View On WordPress
0 notes
squarwell-breakingnews · 2 years ago
Text
HC to Uttar Pradesh govt: Give job to Hathras case victim's family member within 3 months | Lucknow News - Times of India
HC to Uttar Pradesh govt: Give job to Hathras case victim’s family member within 3 months | Lucknow News – Times of India
LUCKNOW: Lucknow bench of Allahabad high court has directed the Uttar Pradesh government to consider giving employment, within three months in a government department or undertaking, to a family member of Hathras case victim, who was allegedly raped and murdered in September 2020. The bench directed the state authorities to abide by their promise made to the victim’s family in writing on…
View On WordPress
0 notes
beenheresinceforever · 4 years ago
Text
https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/dalit-obc-devotees-in-ayodhya-oppose-attempt-to-displace-them-for-tallest-ram-statue
Residents of Majha Barhata, a gram panchayat in Uttar Pradesh’s Ayodhya district, were elated with the Supreme Court’s judgment to construct a Ram temple at the disputed Babri Masjid–Ram Janmabhoomi site in November 2019. But their joy turned into despair in late January 2020, when the office of Anuj Kumar Jha, the district magistrate of Ayodhya, released a notification stating that 85.977 hectares of land at Majha Barhata was being acquired for constructing a statue of Ram. Further, according to residents of the area, in August that year, seven or eight administration officials visited the gram panchayat and told them that more land from Majha Barhata than what was previously delineated in the notification would be needed for constructing the statue. Residents said that based on what the officials told them, it appeared that the statue would effectively subsume four areas in the panchayat locally referred to as Nyoor ka Purva, Nyoor ka Purva Dalit Basti, Dharmu ka Purva and Chhoti Mujhniya. 
Almost one year before the Ayodhya judgement, Ajay Singh Bisht, the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, had announced the plan to erect a grand statue of Ram. Initially, the state government had selected Meerpur Majha, another village in Ayodhya, for this task but the plan did not materialise—locals reportedly protested against the proposal and a technical audit team of the Ayodhya administration gave the location a negative report. By July 2019, the media reported that the proposed Ram statue would be the tallest in the world, with a height of 251 metres. Bisht, popularly known as Adityanath, envisioned the statue premises to be a tourism hub which should have a “digital museum, interpretation centre, library, parking, food plaza, landscaping based on the theme of Lord Shri Ram.”
The January 2020 notification stated that the selected land, a part of Majha Barhata, was situated between the national highway and an embankment of the irrigation department. It said that this land will be “bought” with “mutual consent.” But residents of Majha Barhata said there was no mutual understanding, only confusion about the matter. They told us that even though the administration officials who visited them in August had said that land beyond the notified 86 hectares would be acquired, they had not been given any document in this regard. The residents said they could not identify the officials, but knew that they came from a “survey department.”
According to Arvind Kumar Yadav, a resident who filed a case against the acquisition in the Allahabad High Court, the move will impact a thousand families. Most of them are extremely poor, from backward-caste groups and work in the agriculture sector. “When a grand temple of Ram is being built now, what is the need for this statue? Is it okay to uproot farmers from their work?” he said. “We will do jal samadhi”—submerge ourselves—“like Ram, but not give our land.” 

A farmer works at a field in Majha Barhata. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, another farmer in the village said, erecting the statue at Majha Barhata by displacing poor people was unnecessary. “We are already oppressed,” he said. “There are anyway several issues that people from backward castes and farmers face.”
 SHAHID TANTRAY FOR THE CARAVAN
Majha Barhata is about ten kilometres away from the Babri Masjid–Ram Janmabhoomi site. Everyone we spoke to said that they had been rooting for a Ram temple to be built at the site of the Babri Masjid. Arvind said he was 12 years old when karsevaks, or religious volunteers, had reached Ayodhya in 1991 to dismantle the Babri Masjid. “Our school used to shut down for months at a stretch. We used to go to Ayodhya to shout slogans,” Arvind said. “At that time, thousands of karsevaks lived in our village. They would stop by, and we would arrange refreshments for them. No karsevak would sleep hungry.” Arvind said that when the Supreme Court verdict in the case was announced last November, “Drums and dhols were played. We celebrated with gulaal”—coloured powder—he told us. “But now that the temple is being built, we are being destroyed,” he added. “If we give our house land to this statue, then what will our children do, how will they live?” 
Arvind appears to be leading the fight against the statue now. Shortly after the notification was released, he approached the high court. On 28 January 2020, the Allahabad High Court directed the state government to act in accordance with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act of 2013, relying on a precedent set by an order passed in a similar matter last year. The July 2019 order had said, “In case no consent is arrived, respondents will take recourse as provided in Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.” The 2013 act states that compensation for land is decided on a host of factors, including market value and how the acquisition would affect the original land owner’s earnings. Based on this, Arvind said, “We should be given a house in exchange of house, land in exchange of land. And the residents who are landless, they should get a job.”
Arvind said that a case had been registered against him and fourteen other villagers for holding a sit-in protest about the matter on 14 February. The first-information report in the case mentioned that 200 others were also present at the protest in violation of rules invoked under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows certain administrative officials to pass orders imposing restrictions on the assembly of persons. A second FIR was lodged against Arvind and Avdesh Kumar Singh, another resident, in September. The two were booked under four sections of the Indian Penal Code, pertaining to intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace, punishment for assault or criminal force otherwise than on grave provocation, assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty, voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty. Arvind said the police told him, “We will get the administration to lock you up,” “We will get you killed an encounter.” 
Residents said that they had lived on this land for decades. Arvind told us that his ancestors had taken this land during the British Raj. He said till date, the administration had not resolved other issues that the residents were facing concerning their land. “Our land-record operation has been pending since 1984,” he said. “The Sita Rampur village,” in Basti district, “is next to us—even our border is not demarcated. How will they manage to take the land?” 

Vimala Devi, a member of the Chamar community, a resident of Majha Barhata, shows her “patta”—a land document—of her house. Referring to Adityanath, she said, “He does not have children, which is why he doesn’t understand the value of these patte.” 
 SHAHID TANTRAY FOR THE CARAVAN
Multiple people from the Dalit community told us they got the land as a result of the Bhoodan movement of the 1950s, which urged communities and individuals to give some of their lands to the landless. The land distribution that began then carried on over the coming years. Ramjit Gautam, a member of the Chamar community, was among the people who received this land. “We were given the patta”—a land document—“for this land during Indira Gandhi’s time, in 1976. The Modi-Yogi government wants to dismiss this. The administration is believing that ‘These Dalits will not be able to do anything,’” Ramjit said. He told us he thought that the government intended to dislocate them without adequate compensation—this could be possible as they did not originally purchase the land, it was donated to them in the Bhoodan movement. “They want to occupy it, for free. This is an upper-caste government. They are not thinking of us,” he said. “They want to drive away Chamars and Yadavs.”
Residents told us that erecting the statue at Majha Barhata by displacing poor people was unnecessary. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, a resident and a sugarcane farmer, was one such resident. “Now when the temple is being built, there is no justification to install a statue also. It will not be worshipped either. His face will be placed so high that he will not be visible properly,” Sanjay told us. “We are already oppressed,” he said. “There are anyway several issues that people from backward castes and farmers face. Farmers get paid for sugarcane years later.”
Villagers said that the administration had ignored several other locations which appeared to be viable for erecting the statue. Arvind said, “If the administration wants land, it should first take the thousands of acres of non-agricultural land lying with sants and bhagato”—referring to saints and their followers. “If you want land, many matts have more land than us,” he said, referring to monasteries. According to him, the akhadas—ascetic orders—in Ayodhya are also known to own a lot of land. “If that is not enough, we will give our land,” Arvind added. Anara Devi Yadav, a resident, also said, “There is a river embankment nearby. There is an empty piece of land there, they can install the statue there as well.”
Lack of clear communication by the administration appeared to be fuelling residents’ anxieties. Anara said that the administration is not willing to give any clarity about whether the 86 hectares of land which was mentioned in the notification was being acquired or more. “No one from the administration is even talking to us, or telling us anything properly—if they will take our house or land or what,” Anara said. “They don’t talk to us. Even if old people ask them, they scold them and drive them away.” Sanjay reiterated that there was a lot of confusion about the administration’s plan. “Sometimes they say our farmland will be taken, sometimes they say both our land and house with be taken,” he said. “A new notification should be issued saying neither our house nor our land will be taken.” 

A portrait of BR Ambedkar at the home of a resident of Majha Barahata. Vimala said that the government is ignoring the residents’ concerns. “This is a government for upper castes,” she said. 
SHAHID TANTRAY FOR THE CARAVAN
Anara emphasised that the residents did not have any say in what happened to their land. She told us when the officials came to the village to measure the land, “Hundreds of families were standing here, with folded hands, saying, ‘Do not measure our house.’” Last year, Majha Barhata was made a part of the Ayodhya Nagar Nigam, or municipal corporation. Anara said, “There was no hearing. Our village was made a part of the Nagar Nigam by force.” We emailed a questionnaire about the villagers’ allegations to Jha, the district magistrate of Ayodhya, and Deepak Kumar, the Deputy Inspector General/Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya, but did not receive a response.
Anara said that it was a struggle for her family to live in Majha Barhata. “No drain has been made in our village, no bulb has been installed till date. This government has done nothing for us,” she told us. “Whether foreigners come here for tourism or a temple is built or a mosque is built, what benefit will we get?” she said. “Drowning with our families would be better than this. After that, they can put up this grand statue.” Her despair did not appear to shake her resolve to stay put in Majha Barhata. “I was married into this village, and I will die here,” Anara said. 
Shivnath Yadav, another resident, said that three generations of his family had lived in a thatch hut in Majha Barhata. “If we leave that also, what will we be left with?” he said. “The statue is of no use to us. Had they planned it on some barren land, then maybe our children could have gotten jobs nearby and earned a living.” He added, “We are not getting any support from Modi and Yogi. They want to see us homeless. By removing the entire population of all four areas, how much development will you be able to do?”
Vimala Devi, a member of the Chamar community, said that the government is ignoring the residents’ concerns. “This is a government for upper castes,” she told us. Referring to Adityanath, she said, “He does not have children, which is why he doesn’t understand the value of these patte. Aren’t we Ayodhyawaasi?”—residents of Ayodhya. “Don’t we worship Ram?” Vimala added, “We will all die, but we will not leave our home.”
SUNIL KASHYAP is a reporting fellow at The Caravan.
SHAHID TANTRAY is an assistant photo editor at The Caravan.
Support The Caravan
 The Caravan’s award-winning long-form stories and investigations
0 notes
bbcbreakingnews · 4 years ago
Text
Want to leave our village: Hathras girl kin
Tumblr media
AGRA: They don’t step out of their house, no one comes in without a thorough check and they have barely spoken to anyone else in the village for three months now. The family of the 19-year-old Dalit girl from Hathras who was allegedly gangraped and murdered just wants out. “We had said this before and we say this again. We want to move out of our village,” the victim’s younger brother told TOI on Saturday. The families of the four accused are influential people in the village and the Dalit families, four of them, would “stay out of the way” of the 60 upper caste families. “We fear we could be harmed,” he said. In October, for instance, they had received a text: “My advice to you is that you admit to the truth or all the land in this country will not be enough for you to hide. I will get you and your mother jailed for killing her (the victim).” He saw the message in November and told the police and CBI who, he added, said they’d look into it. But around the time the message was sent, the family had expressed concerns about their safety and provided a security cover. Two weeks after that, the family had approached the Allahabad high court with a plea to secure their relocation to Delhi so they could “move freely.” So far, no one from the administration has reached out to them about this. “CRPF personnel always accompany us but don’t bother us. No one enters without them checking with us first. But the security we have now will not be there forever,” he said. The Hathras district magistrate, Praveen Kumar Laxkar, had told them as much in a purported video that went viral a day after the girl was cremated by the police without her family’s consent. “How can we feel safe?” the victim’s sister-in-law said. The younger brother has quit his job as a lab attendant in Ghaziabad. In all this, there is, unavoidably, the question of basic sustenance. “We have received the Rs 25 lakh compensation but no house or job has been provided, which the CM had promised,” he said. Initially, the district administration had been sending food supplies and cattle fodder to their house.
source https://bbcbreakingnews.com/2020/12/20/want-to-leave-our-village-hathras-girl-kin/
0 notes
sarkarionlineexamind · 4 years ago
Link
Allahabad High Court, Prayagraj Are Invited to Online Form for the Recruitment Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service UP HJS Recruitment 2020-2021. Those Candidates Are Interested to the Following UPHJS Jobs Can Read the Full Notification Before Apply Online.
0 notes
studyiqeducation · 4 years ago
Link
0 notes
freshgovtjobs · 4 years ago
Text
Allahabad High Court Jobs Prayagraj 2020 | Apply 102 Law Clerk (Trainee) Post
Tumblr media
Uttar Pradesh  State ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT  has Announced a Job -Notification for the Fresh job recruitment for (Law Clerk (Trainee) ) Jobs vacancies on contract basis or regular basis . Still Those Job Seeker or Candidates who are waiting or interested in the jobs vacancy than they can read full details & apply this job online with all certifie all documents .   No. of Vacancies : 102 Job Location :  �� Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh Age Limit :    21 to 26  Years Educational Qualification :   Degree(Law) How to Apply :   Online Selection Process   :    Written Exam & Interview Pay Scale :   25000 to 33000/- Application Fee :   General, OBC & EWS: Rs.400/ Other including Departmental: Rs.100/- Starting Date:    21-07-2020 Last Date:      08-08-2020 Official Website :                 Click Here   ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Jobs in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 2020 information is provided in this post. Interested aspirants across the Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, who are searching for the Central Government ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Board Jobs, Now Can apply For ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Jobs for this. There are total 102 + ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT job opening in Law Clerk (Trainee)  Vacancies available in the organization. All the details that are given in the official KOCHI Boat Master, Boat Operator, Serang METRO RAIL LTD Recruitment Board Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh Jobs 2020 Notification are clearly discussed in this post. Read the full article
0 notes
vilaspatelvlogs · 4 years ago
Text
इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट उत्तर प्रदेश में इंटरव्यू के माध्यम से पाएं नौकरी, आवेदन के लिए एक दिन बाकी
इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट उत्तर प्रदेश में इंटरव्यू के माध्यम से पाएं नौकरी, आवेदन के लिए एक दिन बाकी
Tumblr media
[ad_1]
{“_id”:”5f2cf19dfc7b213d722b5b5e”,”slug”:”allahabad-high-court-recruitment-2020-law-clerk-trainee-posts-vacant-know-more-details”,”type”:”photo-gallery”,”status”:”publish”,”title_hn”:”u0907u0932u093eu0939u093eu092cu093eu0926 u0939u093eu0908u0915u094bu0930u094du091f u0909u0924u094du0924u0930 u092au094du0930u0926u0947u0936 u092eu0947u0902 u0907u0902u091fu0930u0935u094du092fu0942 u0915u0947…
View On WordPress
0 notes