#alaskey
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
ducktracy · 2 months ago
Text
it's absolutely beyond me how i never posted this extremely cute bit from the end of the last episode of Duck Dodgers
461 notes · View notes
skullislandproductions · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
A bemused Bugs Bunny reacts to Daffy Duck’s unlikely run for office, in “Daffy Duck for President,” 2004.
79 notes · View notes
haveyouseenthisseries-poll · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
57 notes · View notes
mendfri · 3 months ago
Text
Having a garbage day today, so here's the full scene of Marvin where he sings with Michigan J. Frog.
35 notes · View notes
animatejournal · 2 years ago
Video
tumblr
Bugs Bunny: Carrotblanca Director: Douglas McCarthy | Studio: Warner Bros. | USA, 1995
510 notes · View notes
acmeoop · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Marvin the Martian in the 3rd Dimension Limited Edition Print (1996)
210 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Hey guys. Remember that time Porky ghot roided out and beat the shit out of a bunch of copyright friendly Klingons using Daffy as a weapon?
4 notes · View notes
selenadrawsstuff · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Dr. James Harvey and the ghostly trio!!!
52 notes · View notes
ducktracy · 3 months ago
Text
the voice acting in this show is so good
221 notes · View notes
skullislandproductions · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
If at first you don’t succeed….Duck Dodgers pitch cover - This second attempt to sell Duck Dodgers as a television show in Oct. 1998, had Lola Bunny joining the crew, Sparky being reduced to a smaller role with Dodgers’ rival Star Johnson. John P. McCann was in charge of revamping this version of the show. He asked me and Tony Cervone to adapt the artwork to reflect this new direction.
264 notes · View notes
haveyouseenthisseries-poll · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
12 notes · View notes
inked-and-painted · 1 year ago
Text
Currently thinking about that time I was watching a review for Space Jam: A New Legacy (2021) on YouTube and the reviewer complained about the scene where “they went into an old TV show.” And that “TV show” was actually Casablanca (1942).
Here’s the scene in question:
youtube
What’s most interesting to me about it is it’s not even the first time the Looney Tunes franchise has been involved with Casablanca.
In 1995 an adaptation of the film called “Carrotblanca” played before The Amazing Panda Adventure in US theaters and The Pebble and the Penguin internationally. It has (in my opinion) one of the best post Mel Blanc voice casts including Joe Alaskey, Bob Bergen, Maurice LaMarche, Greg Bryson, and Tress MacNeille. I believe MacNeille’s performance remains the only time Penelope Pussycat has been given a voice; something I really wish Warner Brothers would bring back to the character. The short’s music was composed by Richard Stone, who was often described as the stylistic successor to Carl Stalling and Milt Franklyn, the two most prolific Looney Tunes composers in The Golden Age.
Video starts around the two minute mark:
youtube
Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
animatejournal · 1 year ago
Text
Hey Arnold! | Creator: Craig Bartlett Studio: Nickelodeon | USA, 1999
32 notes · View notes
camyfilms · 1 year ago
Photo
Tumblr media
WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT 1988
I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way.
8 notes · View notes
adamwatchesmovies · 2 years ago
Text
Tom and Jerry & the Wizard of Oz (2011)
Tumblr media
While I didn't enjoy this film, that doesn't mean you won't. No matter what I say, the people involved in this project did it: they actually made a movie. That's something to be applauded. With that established...
I don't often give movies "So Bad It's Good" ratings. Even rarer are low “So Bad It’s Good” ratings. If a movie isn't good and isn't enjoyably awful, it probably isn't pleasant under any definition. I'm making an exception for Tom and Jerry & The Wizard of Oz. Why? Well, it all began with Tom and Jerry and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory; a film so bad you had to see it to believe it. No one in their right mind would rent or buy that cinematic mistake. All of its profits must have come from grandparents with poor eyesight desperate to find their grandkids a last-minute Christmas gift. After seeing it, no one would give any Tom and Jerry films - past or future - a chance but it's still available for purchase today. As long as Tom and Jerry and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is out there, the only audience for this… adaptation? Spoof? Follow-up? to the 1939 Judy Garland classic are demented cinephiles who purposely seek bad movies. Why aren’t they going to be pleased? Read on.
While reuniting Dorothy Gale (voiced by Grey Griffin) with her dog Toto, Tom and Jerry get sucked into a twister and transported to the magical land of Oz. Following Dorothy’s tracks on the yellow brick road, they meet munchkin Tuffy (voiced by Kath Soucie) who tells them of the great and powerful Oz (Joe Alaskey) - the only being who can help them return home.
Unlike Tom and Jerry and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, this isn’t a straight retelling of the original film with the two violence-prone cat and mouse clumsily jammed in. This is an “original movie” with an original plot. It's sort of a Lion King 1 ½ type of story. We see familiar events from a new angle. For instance, did you ever wonder how that bucket of water ended up in the Wicked Witch of the West’s castle? You'll know its back story after this film. What’s that? You never cared? You shouldn't, and that's why this movie fails. This side story is razor thin. In fact, the whole thing clocks in at a slim 56 minutes - far less than the film it’s spinning off of. Unfortunately, since you don’t care about anything, it feels much longer.
This is a perfect example of a film that would be better if it were worse. The new songs are bad, but they’re lame, not cringe-inducing and not memorable. The animation is cheap. I only counted one scene in which a character had a shadow. However, the budget isn’t so low that characters are constantly off-model or animated in a way that makes for great stills. Similarly, since the plot is new, there are no plot holes or nonsensical developments like we had in the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory ripoff. This means there is less to make fun of and many more reasons to become bored.
This is a picture for a non-existent audience. No adult watching will go “I’d much rather watch this than the classic!” If you haven’t seen Dorothy Gale’s original adventure, you won’t understand this plot because it assumes you already know the story and blazes through important information. It isn’t good, and isn’t bad enough to be fun. There’s no reason to see this film and everyone who made it knew this perfectly well. I can’t think of any reason why anyone should ever see it but I also don’t hate it enough to care if you disagree. (On DVD, November 23, 2018)
Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes
anissapierce · 2 days ago
Text
its kinda irksman to think abt how even in my choice of daffy voice of the 90s-2000s that like is The Daffy for me I'm hipster about it because ... Bergman is the obvious answer here for a lot of ppl bc his story is so much more impressive too like how he got hired the first time and everything. Unfortunately I grew up on Alaskey so instead I'm a hipster abt this like I am abt everything else
0 notes