#aaron korsh

[rvspecter]

[snjeguljica33]

season 4… what? what? what the hell.... I give up… Aaron Korsh you short sighted man😒

[vintagewarhol]

[blush-and-books]

ik i say this like. all the time. but harvey just needed someone to love him gently and wholly because he's so jagged and emotional and he doesn't know what to do with himself half the time, he's so full throttle, he just needed someone to hold unwavering and steadfast love for him that wasn't fiery and consuming, but was just. calm. reliable. precious.

and in a similar vein, donna needed someone to love her confidently and fully, strong and assured. she asks harvey how he loves her and she sometimes pushes him a little just to see if he crumbles or backs off. she needs a sure thing, she's used to broken promises and insecurity in her partners and her family, she needs reliability. she needs to know that someone will catch her even if she never falls. she needs stable. affectionate. without a doubt.

[taylormenguista]

it’s so sad to remember how harvey’s therapy arc in s5 was ruined in s7 when they decided to make him date his ex therapist… i know we all agree paula was a terrible psychiatrist, but he had such an interesting development in s5 that was thrown out the window when they started going out together…

did they want to create tension between darvey? okay. then why didn’t they introduce a new character, like they did with thomas? why did they go with harvey’s FORMER THERAPIST?

what a terrible choice…

[lesbiandarvey]

okay suits time :)

[halfthebrain]

Shaking in my boots, looking up who wrote High Noon, s2e10 of SUITS to write them a long, long love letter.

[kinardsevan]

I figured it out. Why hearing that Tommy is a plot device/temporary is so infuriating. It’s the equivalent of being told “it’s just a phase”. As in, Buck just needs a phase to “figure out” being bisexual so then he can guide Eddie through it??? That logic is fucked on so many levels.

Evan Buckley is a grown ass man. He may be figuring out what he likes coming from another man vs a female in a committed relationship, but it’s not like he’s NEVER kissed or had sex with someone before.

Also, I’ve put off saying this, but I think (one of) the things that bothers me most about the possibility of Buddie on any level is that you have to trust in the whole “I fall for my best friend and they fall back at the same time” trope. That shit is not only rare, it’s painful. And given that 911 tends to go for realism (on some level) versus the fantasy when it comes to building relationships, you can’t tell me that Buddie would get it easy. But there’s an entire class of people who think this is the hard part, and one day Eddie is just gonna wake up and realize now that Buck is canonically bisexual. But like… that’s not very realistic? Also, the point Ryan keeps making about Eddie being heterosexual. And also, I genuinely believe that given the original plans for Tommy’s arc, that when Ryan said no, that was their chance.

Hear me out:

Buck would’ve been far easier to flip on a whim of “I’m into my best friend” after Eddie having a moment with Tommy. The ground work is already there, with previous situations (TK, etc). Eddie on the other hand, has so many other issues to contend with (Shannon, Christopher, his faith) that without someone basically shoving him in that direction, it really doesn’t fit.

To which brings my point: I feel like there was probably a conversation (at the very least, if not more than one) had at some point before the season started, and knowing the ideas Tim had on the table, there was an engagement of “this is the direction we want to move in, how do you feel about it?” Because truth be told, you can’t force someone six years into their contract to suddenly make changes they’re not cool with. and again, I feel like when that possibility was broached, and Ryan said no but Oliver said yes, this was the result.

Ryan does not want to play a queer character. Oliver doesn’t have a problem with doing so, nor does Lou. (And all of that is OKAY). But to that end, Ryan literally cannot be forced to do so if he does not want to. (I imagine there are probably bylaws via SAG/AFTRA that ensure this under some level of sexual harrassment, etc). And again, it’s one thing for an actor to read fanfiction about their character, even send it to their scene partner and be like “hey look at this”. But that doesn’t equate to them being like “okay yeah, the fans want it so we should do it”. Case in point? Go look at the entire Marvey fandom in Suits. I personally have a retweeted twt from Aaron Korsh like 6/7/8 years ago which I commented on the two of them kissing. Guess what? It never happened. And AK and Co were well aware of the side of the fandom that wanted those two together.

I don’t know what happens with Lou and Tommy from here on out obvs. They’re certainly teeing up some options, though we don’t have any clear answers due to just entering hiatus last week. But even if he’s gone in s8, that will never ensure that Buddie happens, and I’m not even trying to be mean about that. It’s just fact.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

This is not a rumour, it's a theory from.my own head but ... Do you think that the new Suits spin-off is Aaron Korsch (that's the suits creator, right?) riding on Meghan's coat-tails and getting his dues back because he sort of put Meghan on the map (and on the road to stardom) by casting her in his show?

Going by Meghans track record, she does not like any one making a profit off of her or by their association with her. She famously bitched about Jess and later cut her off for this reason. So I find it very curious that there was all that PR starting 2022 that "Meghan's show suits is seeing a revival on Netflix". It almost seemed like she was taking the credit for making the show the most watched.

And then it got a spin-off.

The PR around that spin-off has been relentless. So I am wondering if this was Meghan paying it back to the suits guy because she owes him something. Or because he did her special favours during her suits days. We know she did love bomb him during season 1&2 and got more screentime.

What would you say? Obviously I have nothing to base this theory on, it's just my brain rambling. But I just don't get the hype or interest in this new spin-off.

Sorry, I don't think Korsh is spinning off Suits to ride Meghan's coattails. He's spinning off Suits because it was one of the most popular shows on streaming last summer so he can make more money for himself.

Riding Meghan's coattails would be if the Suits spinoff was centered around Meghan's character.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

Suits Team Confirm they NEVER Considered TW for Reboot by u/Cocokay1234567

Suits Team Confirm they NEVER Considered TW for Reboot As we all knew, Suits was NEVER considering TW for reboot. In fact, it's been the plan all along to not use any of the original stars in reboot. From the Mirror story yesterday:'Meghan Markle has not been asked back for the upcoming Suits revival, it has been confirmed.Show creator Aaron Korsh does not plan to include Markle’s character in the new spin0off set in Los Angeles, The Mirror has learned exclusively. Korsh is working on a pilot and series treatment for NBC of Suits: L.A - a spinoff that will follow a new cast of characters at a firm on the West Coast. However, The Duchess Of Sussex is not in the frame at all at this stage for any kind of offers, despite reports suggesting an acting comeback is on the cards.'So it was a big fat lie (no surprise) and PR stunt that TW/WME *allegedly* have been churning out PR for weeks now that she was being considered or that a role was written 'just for her', which was not plausible since the showrunner from the beginning was NEVER considering ANY of the original stars;'The showrunner reportedly wants his new version to succeed on its own without bringing in the former stars of the first run, which has broken Netflix streaming records. Korsh’s close friend and ex Suits actress Rachael Harris broke the news at the 11th Make-up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild (MUAHS) Awards in Beverly Hills on camera.'Archive: https://archive.is/R0SLs​​ post link: https://ift.tt/udiPLV0 author: Cocokay1234567 submitted: February 20, 2024 at 06:32PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit

[rvspecter]

[snjeguljica33]

well… i rewatched the first season of suits and i have to point out again… no donna, scottie, rachel, jenny, whoever… have the chemistry marvey has… every day… every moment… every… you know....Aaron Korsh… what a lack of guts….

[ingek73]

Suits creator confirms palace changed line of Meghan’s dialogue

Creator of series, which has set viewership records on Netflix this summer, says palace objected to the word poppycock

Adrian Horton

Tue 29 Aug 2023 17.23 BST

The creator of Suits, the legal drama which launched the acting career of the Duchess of Sussex, is opening up about input from the royal family on scripts.

Speaking to the Hollywood Reporter about the show’s resurgence on Netflix, where it has broken multiple viewership records for an acquired series, the creator, Aaron Korsh, said the royal family “weighed in” on scripts involving Meghan, who played the paralegal Rachel Zane for seven seasons, once she started dating Prince Harry in 2016. “Not many things, by the way, but a few things that we wanted to do and couldn’t do, and it was a little irritating,” he said.

Korsh recalled a particular incident in which the royal family objected to Meghan’s character saying the word poppycock on screen to refer to a topic that would be sensitive, a nod to Korsh’s in-laws. “The royal family did not want her saying the word,” said Korsh. “They didn’t want to put the word poppycock in her mouth. I presume because they didn’t want people cutting things together of her saying cock.” The line was changed to “bullshit”.

Korsh added that he was not sure how the royal family obtained unfilmed scripts of Suits, and that Meghan herself was never responsible for delivering the edits. “It might have been the directing producer at the time, or her agent” who relayed the message, said Korsh. “Whoever it was, they didn’t like having to tell me any more than I liked having to hear it.”

Suits, a glossy legal procedural that ran from 2011 until 2019 on the USA network in the US, has become the breakout show of the summer, setting several Nielsen viewing records. It became Netflix’s most-watched acquired series in a single week, and accounted for a whopping 18bn minutes of viewing for the month of July. Meghan left the series after season seven in 2017, a year before she married Prince Harry.

Harry had previously revealed the palace’s intervention on the show in his memoir Spare, published this January, which detailed the effect of their relationship and palace scrutiny on Meghan’s career. “Meg packed up her house, gave up her role in Suits. After seven seasons. A difficult moment for her, because she loved that show, loved the character she was playing, loved her cast and crew – loved Canada,” wrote Harry. “On the other hand life there had become untenable.

“The show writers were frustrated, because they were often advised by the palace comms team to change lines of dialogue, what her character would do, how she would act,” he added.

-

Remember how the BRF wanted her to keep working? Yet they interfered with her work

[blush-and-books]

we never saw donna sitting in harvey's lap

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

Rachel Zane was written out in 2016

According to Suits Creator Aaron Korsh, in 2016 Rachel Zane, Meghan Markle's character was WRITTEN OUT of the show.

>2015/2016- Patrick J. Adams gave notice of his decision to pursue other interests, including directing.

According to Tom Bower's interview with Gina (agent for product promotion):

>February 2016-Meghan told Gina she wanted to return to LA, but first she needed to become a star. Gina who was only Meghan's agent for commercial contracts, (LA's Lori Sale & others served as agents for PR/talent etc) recommended Freuds PR Agency to help her breakthrough in Britain. Perhaps Britain could become a launching pad for LA stardom

>July 2016 Gina informed MM of her unsuccessful attempts at commercial product promotional ideas (swiss watch manufacturer, a book, etc) but MM didn't care bc she nailed Harry

>In 2017 after Meghan publicly announced she was leaving the show: Aaron Korsh said: "I knew from a year ago (2016) that this relationship was burgeoning and I had a decision to make because I didn't want to intrude and ask her, "hey what's going on and what are you going to do? " So collectively with the writers, we decided to take a gamble that these 2 people were in love and it was going to work out. "

[marvelousgeeks]

In fairness, there are countless compelling fictional relationships that leave a mark, but Harvey Specter and Donna Paulsen are something else entirely. Since Suits began in 2011, no couple has managed to encapsulate loyalty quite as they do. And that loyalty is the beating heart of their relationship.

While the series was airing live, viewers didn’t have the certainty of an endgame. In fact, their slow burn is so effective that creator Aaron Korsh made us believe it was all in their heads. Yet, it wasn’t because, from their very first interaction to the last, it is painfully unmistakable that if they aren’t together, neither can have a lasting romantic relationship because their partnership is too strong. Workplace romances need to look at Harvey and Donna as the trope’s pinnacle. (What’s most surprising about their dynamic is that it isn’t written by a woman.) Still, in the end, they prevail, step by step, instructing viewers on what it means to love someone, come hell or high water.

Continue Reading