#Volkswagen repair Atlanta mobile service
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
EuroFix Mobile Mechanic Atlanta
Contact us:
600 W Peachtree St NW, Floor 17, ste 45,
Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
470-275-2305
Auto Mechanic
About us: EuroFix Mobile Mechanic Atlanta offers premium on-site European car repair, bringing skilled service straight to your location. We specialize in top brands such as BMW, Audi, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Porsche, Volvo, MINI, Jaguar, and Land Rover, providing expert diagnostics and a full range of services from engine repairs and brake maintenance to oil changes and more. No matter where you are—at home, at work, or on the roadside—our experienced mobile mechanics are ready to offer fast, dependable, and cost-effective solutions. Serving the greater Atlanta area, including Marietta, Sandy Springs, Decatur, Brookhaven, and Buckhead, we use only OEM parts to ensure top-quality repairs every time. Skip the traditional repair shop and enjoy professional car care at your convenience. Book online or give us a call today to experience the EuroFix difference!
Hours:
Mon-Fri: 7AM - 10PM,
Sat: 8AM-5PM,
Sun: closed
Facebook Link:
#mobile mechanic in Atlanta#Atlanta mobile auto repair#mobile car repair#European auto repair Atlanta mobile service#Mobile European car mechanic Atlanta#Mobile mechanic for BMW in Atlanta#mobile break repair Atlanta#Audi mobile repair Atlanta#Mercedes-Benz mobile mechanic Atlanta#Volkswagen repair Atlanta mobile service#Porsche mobile mechanic Atlanta#Import car mobile repair#On-site car diagnostics Atlanta#Check engine light mobile diagnostics Atlanta#mobile electrical repair for European cars Atlanta#Mobile AC repair for Mercedes Atlanta#European mobile car battery replacement Atlanta#BMW alternator mobile repair#car repair at home Atlanta#emergency mobile mechanic
1 note
·
View note
Link
Semi-Truck Towing Services in Edinburg McAllen TX | Towing Services Edinburg McAllen
More information is at: http://www.mobilemechanicmcallentx.com/semi-truck-towing.html
Looking for a semi-truck for your business. Towing Services Edinburg McAllen understands that. Our trucks are our business too. When you need assistance, we have the experience and equipment to help. We are the number one choice to call for semi-truck towing in Edinburg McAllen TX and the surrounding areas.
Not all towing companies are equipped to help with semi-trucks, especially when dealing with things like load-shift and other situations unique to cargo vehicles. Our semi-truck towing team members have the expertise to trouble-shoot just about any type of situation you could be in, even underwater recoveries. We show up quickly and we show up prepared. Whenever possible, we get you back on the road and on your way. If your truck needs repair work, we can move and store your cargo until your vehicle is ready.
Call us or leave a message for Costs? Free estimates.
REQUEST FREE QUOTE!
SEMI TRUCK TOWING SERVICE
724 Towing provides exceptional commercial towing services and specializes in heavy duty towing and semi truck towing. Towing Services Edinburg McAllen are in Edinburg McAllen extensive experience in light, medium, and heavy duty towing services plus an outstanding safety record we pride ourselves in.This includes but is not limited to heavy duty towing, winch outs, pull starts, load shifts, trailer shifts, equipment transport, and multi-vehicle transport. Our fleet of trucks can get your commercial vehicles back on the road or to the shop quickly. Local and long distant services are available 24/7. Our expert 24 hour recovery services ensure the safety and security of your truck, trailer and cargo.
Our operators are able to tow the following:
• tractors
• Trailers
• Motor homes
• Boom trucks
• Buses
• Dump truck
• Garbage trucks
We have a large fleet of towing trucks and equipment that will get you from where you are to where you need to be. Our Towing services include the retrieval and recovery of large semi-tractors, tour/city buses, coaches, tractor-trailers, RV’s, large fleet trucks, cube vans, bread trucks, semi-tractors and storage units. We accommodate weights up to 100,000 pounds .Our extensive and flexible fleet of heavy duty towing tow trucks are able to provide all sorts of truck towing services, both emergency and scheduled. Our reputation is known for providing quick, friendly, efficient and cost effective truck towing services for our clients and has allowed us to become the premier provider of truck towing services in Metro Atlanta area and beyond.
CALL US FOR:-
§ Heavy-duty tow truck service near me
§ Semi truck towing near me
§ heavy duty towing service
§ towing company
§ semi tow truck near me
§ semi towing near me
BEST SEMI TRUCK TOWING SERVICES IN EDINBURG MCALLEN
Towing Services Edinburg McAllen
REQUEST MORE INFORMATION!
CONTACT:
Mobile Mechanic Edinburg McAllen
Best Mobile Mechanic in Edinburg Mission McAllen TX
CALL (956) 278-8258 MOBILE MECHANIC
CALL (956) 587-3436 TOWING AND ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE
Open 24 hours
WEB: www.mobilemechanicmcallentx.com
http://www.mobilemechanicmcallentx.com/
SERVICES:
· Tune Ups
· Oil And Oil Filter
· Brakes
· Air Filter
· A/C Repairs
· Fuel Injection Or Fuel Filter
· Preventative Maintenance
· Cooling Systems And Radiator Repair
· Alternator
· Water Pump
· Starter/ Solenoids
· Electric Window Repair
· Lock Outs
· Flat Tires
· Out Of Gas
· Suspension
· Shocks And Struts
· Gaskets, Belts, Hoses
· Timing Belts
· Towing
· Mobile Mechanic
· Jumpstart
· Mobile Truck Repair
· Rv Repair
· Diesel Mechanic
· Towing Services
· Roadside Assistance
· Tow Truck Service
VEHICLES SERVICED:
Acura | Audi | Bmw | Buick | Cadillac | Chevrolet | Chrysler| Daewoo | Dodge | Eagle | Fiat | Ford| Gmc | Geo| Honda| Hummer | Hyundai | Infiniti | Isuzu | Jaguar | Jeep | Kia | Land Rover | Lexus | Lincoln | Mazda | Mercedes Benz | Mercury| Mini| Mitsubishi | Nissan | Oldsmobile| Plymouth | Pontiac| Porsche | Saab| Saturn | Scion | Smart | Subaru | Suzuki | Toyota | Volkswagen | Volvo
SERVICE AREA:
Alamo TX | Alton TX | Brownsville TX | Donna TX | Edcouch TX | Edinburg TX | Elsa TX | Granjeno TX | Harlingen TX | Hidalgo TX | La Joya TX | La Villa TX | McAllen TX | Mercedes TX | Mission TX | Rio Grande City TX | Raymondville TX | Palmhurst TX | Palmview TX | Penitas TX | Pharr TX | Progreso TX | Progreso Lakes TX | San Juan TX | Sullivan City TX | Weslaco TX | Starr County | Hidalgo County | Willacy County | Cameron County | 78504 | 78539 | 78540 | 78541 | 78542 | 78501 | 78503| 78505 | 78557 | 88540 |78502 | 78504 | 78539 | 78572
0 notes
Video
youtube
Semi-Truck Towing Services in Las Vegas NV | Aone Mobile Mechanics
More Information is at: http://www.lvmobilemechanic.com/semi-truck-towing-services-las-vegas-nv.html
Youtube - https://youtu.be/Ql31PYFOheQ
Looking for a semi-truck for your business. Aone Mobile Mechanics understands that. Our trucks are our business too. When you need assistance, we have the experience and equipment to help. We are the number one choice to call for semi-truck towing in Las Vegas NV and the surrounding areas.
Not all towing companies are equipped to help with semi-trucks, especially when dealing with things like load-shift and other situations unique to cargo vehicles. Our semi-truck towing team members have the expertise to trouble-shoot just about any type of situation you could be in, even underwater recoveries. We show up quickly and we show up prepared. Whenever possible, we get you back on the road and on your way. If your truck needs repair work, we can move and store your cargo until your vehicle is ready.
Call us or leave a message for Costs? Free estimates.
REQUEST FREE QUOTE!
SEMI TRUCK TOWING SERVICE
724 Towing provides exceptional commercial towing services and specializes in heavy duty towing and semi truck towing. Aone Mobile Mechanics are in Las Vegas extensive experience in light, medium, and heavy duty towing services plus an outstanding safety record we pride ourselves in.This includes but is not limited to heavy duty towing, winch outs, pull starts, load shifts, trailer shifts, equipment transport, and multi-vehicle transport. Our fleet of trucks can get your commercial vehicles back on the road or to the shop quickly. Local and long distant services are available 24/7. Our expert 24 hour recovery services ensure the safety and security of your truck, trailer and cargo.
Our operators are able to tow the following:
• tractors
• Trailers
• Motor homes
• Boom trucks
• Buses
• Dump truck
• Garbage trucks
We have a large fleet of towing trucks and equipment that will get you from where you are to where you need to be. Our Towing services include the retrieval and recovery of large semi-tractors, tour/city buses, coaches, tractor-trailers, RV’s, large fleet trucks, cube vans, bread trucks, semi-tractors and storage units. We accommodate weights up to 100,000 pounds .Our extensive and flexible fleet of heavy duty towing tow trucks are able to provide all sorts of truck towing services, both emergency and scheduled. Our reputation is known for providing quick, friendly, efficient and cost effective truck towing services for our clients and has allowed us to become the premier provider of truck towing services in Metro Atlanta area and beyond.
CALL US FOR:-
§ Heavy-duty tow truck service near me
§ Semi truck towing near me
§ heavy duty towing service
§ towing company
§ semi tow truck near me
§ semi towing near me
BEST SEMI TRUCK TOWING SERVICES IN LAS VEGAS
Aone Mobile Mechanics
REQUEST MORE INFORMATION!
CONTACT:
Aone Mobile Mechanics
Best Mobile Mechanic &Towing & Mobile Auto Truck Repair in Las Vegas NV!
CALL (702) 560-2682MOBILE MECHANIC – 1, http://www.lvmobilemechanic.com/
CALL (702) 560-5357 MOBILE MECHANIC – 2, http://www.mobilemechanicinlasvegas.com/
CALL (702) 560-5869 TOWING, http://www.towing-lasvegas.com/
OPEN 7 days 24 Hours
Las Vegas Summerlin Henderson Green Valley Nevada 89108
WEB: www.lvmobilemechanic.com
http://www.lvmobilemechanic.com/
CALL US FOR:
· Mobile Mechanic
· Mobile Auto Repair
· Mobile Truck Repair
· Diesel Service
· Vehicle Inspection
· Lockout services
· Flat Tire Repair
· Roadside Assistance
· RV Repair
VEHICLES SERVICED:
Acura Mechanic | Audi Mechanic | BMW Mechanic | Buick Mechanic | Cadillac Mechanic | Chevrolet | Chrysler Mechanic | Daewoo Mechanic | Dodge Mechanic | Eagle Mechanic | Fiat Mechanic | FordMechanic | GMC Mechanic | Geo Mechanic | Honda Mechanic | Hummer Mechanic | Hyundai Mechanic | Infiniti Mechanic | Isuzu Mechanic | Jaguar Mechanic | Jeep Mechanic | Kia Mechanic | Land Rover Mechanic | Lexus Mechanic | Lincoln Mechanic | Mazda Mechanic | Mercedes Benz Mechanic | MercuryMechanic | Mini Mechanic | Mitsubishi Mechanic | Nissan Mechanic | Oldsmobile Mechanic | Plymouth Mechanic | Pontiac Mechanic | Porsche Mechanic | SaabMechanic | Saturn Mechanic | Scion Mechanic | Smart | Subaru Mechanic | Suzuki | Toyota Mechanic | Volkswagen Mechanic | VolvoMechanic
SERVICE AREA: Las Vegas NV, Boulder City NV, Enterprise, Henderson, North Las Vegas, Paradise, Spring Valley, Summerlin, Sunrise Manor Nevada.
Las Vegas Neighborhoods:Aliante, Anthem/Anthem Country Club, Chinatown, Downtown Las Vegas, Green Valley, Lake Las Vegas, Las Vegas Country Club, MacDonald Highlands, Mountain's Edge, Paradise Palms, Queensridge& One Queensridge Place, Seven Hills, Southern Highlands, Summerlin, Summerlin South, The Lakes, The Ridges, West Las Vegas Nevada.
Service Area Zip Codes:
88901, 88905, 89101, 89102, 89104, 89106, 89107, 89108, 89109, 89110, 89116, 89117, 89124, 89125, 89126, 89127, 89128, 89129, 89130, 89131, 89133, 89134, 89136, 89137, 89138, 89143, 89144, 89145, 89146, 89147, 89149, 89151, 89152, 89153, 89154, 89155, 89157, 89158, 89161, 89162, 89163, 89164, 89166, 89185
0 notes
Text
PSA’s Free2Move Aims to Offer Total Mobility for One Flat Price
PSA, owner of the Peugeot, Citroen, DS and Opel brands, has just officially unfurled the first consumer-focused step of what it expects to be a 10-year plan with the announcement of its Free2Move program in Washington, D.C. Based around an app, it proposes to offer District residents total mobility at a flat price—from cars and SUVs to electric scooters and bicycles to ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft—with no charges for parking, gas, or insurance. Signing up is $10 and users may use the app to book with Bird, Capital Bikeshare, car2go, Jump, Lime, Skip, and Uber. Notably, none of Free2Move’s 600 cars in service are PSA products; rather it offers Chevy Cruze compacts and Equinox crossovers. On the eve of the program’s announcement, Larry Dominque, PSA’s senior U.S. executive, formerly of Nissan, and now stationed at PSA’s newly opened offices in Atlanta, spoke with New York bureau chief Jamie Kitman.
AM: So you’re just about to formally announce your new car sharing business. But it’s been soft-launched already?
LD: [Four] weeks ago. We put about a hundred of the cars out on the streets of Washington, D.C. Actually it was around 137. We had put some marketing stuff out there and allowed some hand raisers to register for the system and we gave them promotional access. Because we wanted to make sure that everything is working very, very well from the applications standpoint, how you book it, how you find the cars, to the registration process, to the back end, which is our operational side of our business. To make sure that the company we hire that’s cleaning and staging the vehicles, that that is working well.
So we wanted to do a little bit of a beta, in software terms, to try out the system and by giving people free minutes to try this out. Fortunately we haven’t had any glitches, but had you had any, put it this way, you’re a little more forgiving if someone gave you a free dinner [and there was a problem] then if somebody made you pay for the dinner.
We wanted to test everything out because everything we’re trying to do in North America is related to high customer satisfaction. Everything we want to do must be done with quality. I didn’t want to launch anything in scale until I had confidence that everything was going to be working perfectly.
AM: How soon do you see yourself expanding into other cities?
LD: Great question. One of the things that my CEO (Carlos Tavares) believes in is profitability. He likes margin, and he likes managing frugally and with high agility. He loves using words like “robust execution,” “focus,” things like that. So we’ve looked at what other car-sharing businesses have done. Enterprise has bought into cities, and gone out of cities; car2go has bought into a lot of cities, and they lost 60 million dollars in the U.S. last year.
Washington D.C. is a fairly high cost city to do this, everything from the parking permits to insurance to parking; it costs a lot operating in this city. So what our team has done is set up a very lean operation. I’m very confident it will turn around to profitability pretty quickly. We made the choice of D.C. for a reason. We looked at many different cities, we looked at population density, income, openness to mobility and alternative transportation, and we chose D.C. as one of the top cities that we felt was right for mobility services, in particular car-sharing.
So as we operate the business and my team gets a good understanding of the financials and how to operate car-sharing efficiently, we’ll be ready to jump to the next city. We’re already identifying other potential candidate cities [for when] I believe we are mature enough.
AM: What’s structurally different about what you’re attempting?
LD: I think there are several differences. On the experiential side, we believe the front end of our app is better than most, and we’re going to continue to roll out new features. Things that attract loyalty, things that we believe will make the access to the vehicles easier, faster, more reliable, more consistent.
In concert with our Free2Move car-sharing, we’re launching our Free2Move aggregation app as well, which incorporates our car-sharing in it.
AM: What else does Free2Move Aggregation include?
LD: Free2Move Aggregation is an aggregation platform we launched a year ago. It’s more mature in Europe, just because it’s been there three years longer. But it’s an aggregation service where through our multi-provider registration, you can come into our app, you can put in your driver’s license information once and your credit card information once, and you’re registered for any of our partners that are on our system.
So in the city of D.C., as of this week, we have nine discreet programs. Carsharing, bike sharing, scooter sharing, and so on. We’re going to be incorporating ride-hailing soon.
Aggregation is nice in the sense that is gives you access to what we call First-Mile/Last-Mile, so if you want car-sharing, or ride-hailing, you can get it. If you just want an electric scooter to go six or eight blocks, you don’t feel like walking today, we have that available for you as well. And you don’t have to worry about going to half a dozen or a dozen native apps. You can do it all through our app, and all the billing and everything else is taken care of.
Even though they’re a competitor for Free2Move car-sharing, car2go are on our aggregation platform. Primarily because we believe there’s a big enough marketplace out there for everybody to participate.
Also, they run about 75 percent Smart cars and 25 percent Mercedes, so that’s different types of vehicles for different needs. For now, we’re running Chevy Equinoxes and Chevy Cruises in D.C., so we believe we have the right cars, and the right SUV. Nobody else right now offers an [car-sharing] SUV, but we do.
AM: I guess on some simplistic level that’s one of the surprises—that you would be opening with somebody else’s cars, although we can see what the advantages to that might be.
LD: The way I’ve approached this and Carlos approached it with me initially—cause I started out doing some consulting for the group before taking this position—is [based on the fact that he] understands really well there are 42 brands and 430 something models for sale in the United States. Incentives hover around 11 percent [of transaction prices.] Intra-brand competition in some places is worse than inter-brand.
So how do you come into this amazingly large market, and focus on C and D segments, which mean high transaction prices in theory, high profitability, and do it successfully? We discussed this for a long time. And the focus needs to be on being different in everything we do. And that means not just in customer experience, but also how you structure the business and how you invest.
The biggest mistake most companies make is over-investment, and then the moment there’s an initial downturn, their fixed costs are way beyond their revenue, and they’re in deep, deep trouble. We want to avoid that. And how do you avoid that? By planning well and making sure you understand very, very well the trends, the consumers, the behaviors, their wants and desires. How is mobility as a service saving car ownership patterns? What are we seeing geographically? How are alternative power trains manifesting themselves in North America versus other parts of the world?
So while we are in the process of homologating our own vehicles —which we’re already doing, but it takes a few years to do—we’ve made it very clear: we’re going to launch with mobility services, without our cars.
We’ve been very clear saying we’re going to launch without our cars, to learn how to operate the business. Ironically, under [another PSA Free2Move globally, we run a company called Euro Repar [Car Service,] where [our stores are] embedded in PSA dealerships—Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel—but we actually have separate companies, we own them, and it’s a separate service facility that repairs Fords and Volkswagen and Toyotas as well. We have Free2Move Lease in Europe which uses, not only our own vehicles, but other brands.
If I have a business, and there’s an opportunity to make a good business case and learn from it, if I need to put GM vehicles in, I’ll put GM vehicles in. I’ll use anybody’s brands. I don’t care as long as they’re the right car for what I’m trying to accomplish. I don’t think we’re ready to actually launch our retail sales. But through everything we’ve learned and the planning we’ve put in place, I think we’re going to be very well positioned.
And I think, just to be very clear, we have no legacy in North America. I have no dealer networks, I have no dealer contracts, I have no service contracts, I have no IT contracts, I literally have a green field opportunity in North America.
AM: Must be exciting. It’s really almost impossible to imagine anyone else having such an open field to run on.
LD: Exactly, and trust me I’ve had lot of calls from my friends and other OEMs saying “Larry, you have an opportunity that we can only dream of.” They can’t tear down what they’ve already got.
AM: PSA actually has in its quiver a lot of brands that we would imagine have quite a bit of good will—Citroen, Peugeot and Opel—in the United States. It raises the question of which brands do you think make the most sense for North America, what does your research tell you?
LD: Some of the most fun I’m having is listening to all the different guessing that’s going on out there in the marketplace. Every time there’s an article in Automotive News and it talks about the brand, people are saying, “Oh it’s gotta be DS, oh no no, it’s gotta be Opel. Oh it’s probably gonna be Peugeot.” Right? So we’re hearing a lot of these different things.
We’ve identified the brand. I know [PSA CEO] Carlos [Tavares] is cryptic, and we’ve been cryptic for a reason. But we’ve done the research; we wanted to understand. We started the research before Opel was part of the family. One of the things we wanted to understand is what is the awareness level? What is the perception of the brands and the company or being French? What does it mean to American consumers and Canadian consumers?
And the great news, to your point, is a lot of people had very positive reactions to a French automaker. They thought it was different. We did static clinics with the vehicles. We did dynamic clinics with the vehicles, including competitors and so forth, and I’m very, very pleased with the response we got from American and Canadian consumers related to all of our brands.
So we don’t start out in negative position in anyway. It’s interesting because if you resurrect another French brand from the past, the response was much more negative.
AM: That would be Renault?
LD: Yeah. And they injured the brand with the Alliance, they had some major market issues with some of those cars, and that still resonates with people in their minds
AM: What do you mean major market issues?
LD: So from our point of view, what I wanted to make sure is, I wanted to understand where our brands resonated, where we had challenges, what opportunities existed, what kind of product challenges existed, or what American sore spots of already existing products. So the great news for me is people are open to us. When you look back 60 years ago when the Japanese came in for the first time in the late ’50s, the cars were basically crap. They were small compared to the U.S. cars, they were underpowered, they rusted easy, and they fixed it. But it took decades for them to fix the issue. The Koreans came in 30 years ago, and also their products were not very good. Today they are.
The great news for me is our products are already globally competitive, and having a great car, we could discuss the styling right, cause everyone’s style is a little bit unique, but having a great car, quality, reliability, safety, is just a cost of entry now. We make good cars. So that’s just the starting point to even have a discussion about coming into the marketplace. And I’m very confident the cars we’re designing with full homologation for North America, with the right specs and features, the right size cup-holders—everyone jokes about cup-holders—the right size cup-holders is going to be there. I’m not worried about that.
But I’m still quiet on the brand because we’re not announcing it yet. Carlos says we’re finalizing a lot of decisions between the end of this year and the beginning of the first quarter of next year, and then we’re going be much more vocal externally after that.
When we’ve identified all the things related to the brand positioning, we know that we have one opportunity to re-enter the North America market successfully. Carlos is very quick to remind me that he and I are old car guys. And he’s only a couple years older than me so we’re in the same generational bucket, right? So we’ve been around this industry for 35, 37 years. We’ve lived through what has grown into the four square reality globally for car dealerships and the relationships between OEMs, consumers, and the dealer marketplace.
So he said let’s think about this as a sustainable business. Let’s step in and never have to step out again. How do we do that? We make sure we don’t over-leverage until we have the brand strength. Let’s focus on customer satisfaction, let’s focus on high margins, let’s not focus on market share. If I’m bringing vehicles over for the time being from Europe, and plants in Europe, they’ll make a marginal contribution to an existing marketplace. Yes we have to invest uniquely to build some products in North America, but for the most part, it’s using existing plants we have, which means I don’t have to pay for a billion dollar plant, divided by every car I sell. You can focus on margin per vehicle sold.
What I sense is very clear externally and internally—you cannot ignore the four key segments, you can’t ignore C-sedan or whatever you want to define as a future sedan.
AM: You mean the way Ford Motor Company is.
LD: I hear you, and look where their stock is.
You need an unique value proposition, and understand, we’re not thinking of the value proposition as merely the vehicle, we’re thinking of our value proposition as the buying process, the sales process, the ownership process, the high end mobility. So we want to develop a new kind of interaction with consumers that a lot of other OEMs just can’t do. We believe that part of our value proposition is not only having great differentiated vehicles, beautiful design, great features, with the right performance, with the right DNA to be French, and to be the brand we’re bringing to the market, but it’s also that whole attached experience to the whole process, and what differentiates us from other brands. …
From a French brand point of view, just being French, I was very pleased to learn [from research, that] a lot of people have some very positive references to make and not just related to Louis Vuitton. People understand fashion and design and innovation come out of France in addition to luxury brands like Louis Vuitton and Hermes and great wine.
So when you associate French autos to American consumers, many of them say based on their other types of associations they think that’s really cool. They’re assuming the vehicles would have a certain kind of flair and uniqueness and design and so forth, but there’s not a negative association.
I would say where there’s a gap, as you can imagine, is in the foundational trust of “okay, I love the way this vehicle looks, I love the way this vehicle drives, I think it would be positioned here or there. But are they safe? Are they reliable? Are they dependable?” Those kinds of questions come up. As with any brand coming into the U.S. market, we have to prove those things to people, otherwise you may not be in their consideration. Because sometimes they’ll say “wow, that’s beautiful,” or “that’s gorgeous,” or “that’s innovative,” and then they’ll say “but I’ve never heard of that brand before.”
If Apple comes out with innovative design, people will flock to it because they trust Apple. If a new brand came out, and even though the design was as beautiful or more beautiful and more simple than Apple, people might still question whether they trust that brand, so we have to build that trust. That exists with any new brand that comes to the United States in any vertical, not just automotive.
Relative to our French brands, as you can imagine, Peugeot and Citroen have a history here in the United States, and people know of them. Older people know them directly through friends, family, themselves. Younger people know some of the brands, or they have an uncle that had a 504 or something like that. But you show them the logos, and many people are aware of the logos. And you can just show them the Peugeot logo, show them the Citroen logo, and a lot of people know what those are. DS is less known, but understand, DS has only been a brand for about five years. And it was never sold here.
AM: What about a portal where you could buy or get all three brands or even four brands, and each of the brands could be represented by a model?
LD: It’s interesting you say that. I used run product buying information on this, and one of the things that’s extremely critical for me, is I know the energy that all the OEMs use and trying to spend time differentiating their own individual brands. How Buicks are different than Cadillacs, how Chevy is different than Buick, how’s Infiniti different than Nissan. And if you’re going to successfully and organically build the brand, you have to focus on that brand, just the single brand. It’s not to say in the future once you’re well established and positioned, you could potentially bring another bra from Performance Junk WP Feed 4 https://ift.tt/2Pp3IVA via IFTTT
0 notes
Text
PSA’s Free2Move Aims to Offer Total Mobility for One Flat Price
PSA, owner of the Peugeot, Citroen, DS and Opel brands, has just officially unfurled the first consumer-focused step of what it expects to be a 10-year plan with the announcement of its Free2Move program in Washington, D.C. Based around an app, it proposes to offer District residents total mobility at a flat price—from cars and SUVs to electric scooters and bicycles to ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft—with no charges for parking, gas, or insurance. Signing up is $10 and users may use the app to book with Bird, Capital Bikeshare, car2go, Jump, Lime, Skip, and Uber. Notably, none of Free2Move’s 600 cars in service are PSA products; rather it offers Chevy Cruze compacts and Equinox crossovers. On the eve of the program’s announcement, Larry Dominque, PSA’s senior U.S. executive, formerly of Nissan, and now stationed at PSA’s newly opened offices in Atlanta, spoke with New York bureau chief Jamie Kitman.
AM: So you’re just about to formally announce your new car sharing business. But it’s been soft-launched already?
LD: [Four] weeks ago. We put about a hundred of the cars out on the streets of Washington, D.C. Actually it was around 137. We had put some marketing stuff out there and allowed some hand raisers to register for the system and we gave them promotional access. Because we wanted to make sure that everything is working very, very well from the applications standpoint, how you book it, how you find the cars, to the registration process, to the back end, which is our operational side of our business. To make sure that the company we hire that’s cleaning and staging the vehicles, that that is working well.
So we wanted to do a little bit of a beta, in software terms, to try out the system and by giving people free minutes to try this out. Fortunately we haven’t had any glitches, but had you had any, put it this way, you’re a little more forgiving if someone gave you a free dinner [and there was a problem] then if somebody made you pay for the dinner.
We wanted to test everything out because everything we’re trying to do in North America is related to high customer satisfaction. Everything we want to do must be done with quality. I didn’t want to launch anything in scale until I had confidence that everything was going to be working perfectly.
AM: How soon do you see yourself expanding into other cities?
LD: Great question. One of the things that my CEO (Carlos Tavares) believes in is profitability. He likes margin, and he likes managing frugally and with high agility. He loves using words like “robust execution,” “focus,” things like that. So we’ve looked at what other car-sharing businesses have done. Enterprise has bought into cities, and gone out of cities; car2go has bought into a lot of cities, and they lost 60 million dollars in the U.S. last year.
Washington D.C. is a fairly high cost city to do this, everything from the parking permits to insurance to parking; it costs a lot operating in this city. So what our team has done is set up a very lean operation. I’m very confident it will turn around to profitability pretty quickly. We made the choice of D.C. for a reason. We looked at many different cities, we looked at population density, income, openness to mobility and alternative transportation, and we chose D.C. as one of the top cities that we felt was right for mobility services, in particular car-sharing.
So as we operate the business and my team gets a good understanding of the financials and how to operate car-sharing efficiently, we’ll be ready to jump to the next city. We’re already identifying other potential candidate cities [for when] I believe we are mature enough.
AM: What’s structurally different about what you’re attempting?
LD: I think there are several differences. On the experiential side, we believe the front end of our app is better than most, and we’re going to continue to roll out new features. Things that attract loyalty, things that we believe will make the access to the vehicles easier, faster, more reliable, more consistent.
In concert with our Free2Move car-sharing, we’re launching our Free2Move aggregation app as well, which incorporates our car-sharing in it.
AM: What else does Free2Move Aggregation include?
LD: Free2Move Aggregation is an aggregation platform we launched a year ago. It’s more mature in Europe, just because it’s been there three years longer. But it’s an aggregation service where through our multi-provider registration, you can come into our app, you can put in your driver’s license information once and your credit card information once, and you’re registered for any of our partners that are on our system.
So in the city of D.C., as of this week, we have nine discreet programs. Carsharing, bike sharing, scooter sharing, and so on. We’re going to be incorporating ride-hailing soon.
Aggregation is nice in the sense that is gives you access to what we call First-Mile/Last-Mile, so if you want car-sharing, or ride-hailing, you can get it. If you just want an electric scooter to go six or eight blocks, you don’t feel like walking today, we have that available for you as well. And you don’t have to worry about going to half a dozen or a dozen native apps. You can do it all through our app, and all the billing and everything else is taken care of.
Even though they’re a competitor for Free2Move car-sharing, car2go are on our aggregation platform. Primarily because we believe there’s a big enough marketplace out there for everybody to participate.
Also, they run about 75 percent Smart cars and 25 percent Mercedes, so that’s different types of vehicles for different needs. For now, we’re running Chevy Equinoxes and Chevy Cruises in D.C., so we believe we have the right cars, and the right SUV. Nobody else right now offers an [car-sharing] SUV, but we do.
AM: I guess on some simplistic level that’s one of the surprises—that you would be opening with somebody else’s cars, although we can see what the advantages to that might be.
LD: The way I’ve approached this and Carlos approached it with me initially—cause I started out doing some consulting for the group before taking this position—is [based on the fact that he] understands really well there are 42 brands and 430 something models for sale in the United States. Incentives hover around 11 percent [of transaction prices.] Intra-brand competition in some places is worse than inter-brand.
So how do you come into this amazingly large market, and focus on C and D segments, which mean high transaction prices in theory, high profitability, and do it successfully? We discussed this for a long time. And the focus needs to be on being different in everything we do. And that means not just in customer experience, but also how you structure the business and how you invest.
The biggest mistake most companies make is over-investment, and then the moment there’s an initial downturn, their fixed costs are way beyond their revenue, and they’re in deep, deep trouble. We want to avoid that. And how do you avoid that? By planning well and making sure you understand very, very well the trends, the consumers, the behaviors, their wants and desires. How is mobility as a service saving car ownership patterns? What are we seeing geographically? How are alternative power trains manifesting themselves in North America versus other parts of the world?
So while we are in the process of homologating our own vehicles —which we’re already doing, but it takes a few years to do—we’ve made it very clear: we’re going to launch with mobility services, without our cars.
We’ve been very clear saying we’re going to launch without our cars, to learn how to operate the business. Ironically, under [another PSA Free2Move globally, we run a company called Euro Repar [Car Service,] where [our stores are] embedded in PSA dealerships—Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel—but we actually have separate companies, we own them, and it’s a separate service facility that repairs Fords and Volkswagen and Toyotas as well. We have Free2Move Lease in Europe which uses, not only our own vehicles, but other brands.
If I have a business, and there’s an opportunity to make a good business case and learn from it, if I need to put GM vehicles in, I’ll put GM vehicles in. I’ll use anybody’s brands. I don’t care as long as they’re the right car for what I’m trying to accomplish. I don’t think we’re ready to actually launch our retail sales. But through everything we’ve learned and the planning we’ve put in place, I think we’re going to be very well positioned.
And I think, just to be very clear, we have no legacy in North America. I have no dealer networks, I have no dealer contracts, I have no service contracts, I have no IT contracts, I literally have a green field opportunity in North America.
AM: Must be exciting. It’s really almost impossible to imagine anyone else having such an open field to run on.
LD: Exactly, and trust me I’ve had lot of calls from my friends and other OEMs saying “Larry, you have an opportunity that we can only dream of.” They can’t tear down what they’ve already got.
AM: PSA actually has in its quiver a lot of brands that we would imagine have quite a bit of good will—Citroen, Peugeot and Opel—in the United States. It raises the question of which brands do you think make the most sense for North America, what does your research tell you?
LD: Some of the most fun I’m having is listening to all the different guessing that’s going on out there in the marketplace. Every time there’s an article in Automotive News and it talks about the brand, people are saying, “Oh it’s gotta be DS, oh no no, it’s gotta be Opel. Oh it’s probably gonna be Peugeot.” Right? So we’re hearing a lot of these different things.
We’ve identified the brand. I know [PSA CEO] Carlos [Tavares] is cryptic, and we’ve been cryptic for a reason. But we’ve done the research; we wanted to understand. We started the research before Opel was part of the family. One of the things we wanted to understand is what is the awareness level? What is the perception of the brands and the company or being French? What does it mean to American consumers and Canadian consumers?
And the great news, to your point, is a lot of people had very positive reactions to a French automaker. They thought it was different. We did static clinics with the vehicles. We did dynamic clinics with the vehicles, including competitors and so forth, and I’m very, very pleased with the response we got from American and Canadian consumers related to all of our brands.
So we don’t start out in negative position in anyway. It’s interesting because if you resurrect another French brand from the past, the response was much more negative.
AM: That would be Renault?
LD: Yeah. And they injured the brand with the Alliance, they had some major market issues with some of those cars, and that still resonates with people in their minds
AM: What do you mean major market issues?
LD: So from our point of view, what I wanted to make sure is, I wanted to understand where our brands resonated, where we had challenges, what opportunities existed, what kind of product challenges existed, or what American sore spots of already existing products. So the great news for me is people are open to us. When you look back 60 years ago when the Japanese came in for the first time in the late ’50s, the cars were basically crap. They were small compared to the U.S. cars, they were underpowered, they rusted easy, and they fixed it. But it took decades for them to fix the issue. The Koreans came in 30 years ago, and also their products were not very good. Today they are.
The great news for me is our products are already globally competitive, and having a great car, we could discuss the styling right, cause everyone’s style is a little bit unique, but having a great car, quality, reliability, safety, is just a cost of entry now. We make good cars. So that’s just the starting point to even have a discussion about coming into the marketplace. And I’m very confident the cars we’re designing with full homologation for North America, with the right specs and features, the right size cup-holders—everyone jokes about cup-holders—the right size cup-holders is going to be there. I’m not worried about that.
But I’m still quiet on the brand because we’re not announcing it yet. Carlos says we’re finalizing a lot of decisions between the end of this year and the beginning of the first quarter of next year, and then we’re going be much more vocal externally after that.
When we’ve identified all the things related to the brand positioning, we know that we have one opportunity to re-enter the North America market successfully. Carlos is very quick to remind me that he and I are old car guys. And he’s only a couple years older than me so we’re in the same generational bucket, right? So we’ve been around this industry for 35, 37 years. We’ve lived through what has grown into the four square reality globally for car dealerships and the relationships between OEMs, consumers, and the dealer marketplace.
So he said let’s think about this as a sustainable business. Let’s step in and never have to step out again. How do we do that? We make sure we don’t over-leverage until we have the brand strength. Let’s focus on customer satisfaction, let’s focus on high margins, let’s not focus on market share. If I’m bringing vehicles over for the time being from Europe, and plants in Europe, they’ll make a marginal contribution to an existing marketplace. Yes we have to invest uniquely to build some products in North America, but for the most part, it’s using existing plants we have, which means I don’t have to pay for a billion dollar plant, divided by every car I sell. You can focus on margin per vehicle sold.
What I sense is very clear externally and internally—you cannot ignore the four key segments, you can’t ignore C-sedan or whatever you want to define as a future sedan.
AM: You mean the way Ford Motor Company is.
LD: I hear you, and look where their stock is.
You need an unique value proposition, and understand, we’re not thinking of the value proposition as merely the vehicle, we’re thinking of our value proposition as the buying process, the sales process, the ownership process, the high end mobility. So we want to develop a new kind of interaction with consumers that a lot of other OEMs just can’t do. We believe that part of our value proposition is not only having great differentiated vehicles, beautiful design, great features, with the right performance, with the right DNA to be French, and to be the brand we’re bringing to the market, but it’s also that whole attached experience to the whole process, and what differentiates us from other brands. …
From a French brand point of view, just being French, I was very pleased to learn [from research, that] a lot of people have some very positive references to make and not just related to Louis Vuitton. People understand fashion and design and innovation come out of France in addition to luxury brands like Louis Vuitton and Hermes and great wine.
So when you associate French autos to American consumers, many of them say based on their other types of associations they think that’s really cool. They’re assuming the vehicles would have a certain kind of flair and uniqueness and design and so forth, but there’s not a negative association.
I would say where there’s a gap, as you can imagine, is in the foundational trust of “okay, I love the way this vehicle looks, I love the way this vehicle drives, I think it would be positioned here or there. But are they safe? Are they reliable? Are they dependable?” Those kinds of questions come up. As with any brand coming into the U.S. market, we have to prove those things to people, otherwise you may not be in their consideration. Because sometimes they’ll say “wow, that’s beautiful,” or “that’s gorgeous,” or “that’s innovative,” and then they’ll say “but I’ve never heard of that brand before.”
If Apple comes out with innovative design, people will flock to it because they trust Apple. If a new brand came out, and even though the design was as beautiful or more beautiful and more simple than Apple, people might still question whether they trust that brand, so we have to build that trust. That exists with any new brand that comes to the United States in any vertical, not just automotive.
Relative to our French brands, as you can imagine, Peugeot and Citroen have a history here in the United States, and people know of them. Older people know them directly through friends, family, themselves. Younger people know some of the brands, or they have an uncle that had a 504 or something like that. But you show them the logos, and many people are aware of the logos. And you can just show them the Peugeot logo, show them the Citroen logo, and a lot of people know what those are. DS is less known, but understand, DS has only been a brand for about five years. And it was never sold here.
AM: What about a portal where you could buy or get all three brands or even four brands, and each of the brands could be represented by a model?
LD: It’s interesting you say that. I used run product buying information on this, and one of the things that’s extremely critical for me, is I know the energy that all the OEMs use and trying to spend time differentiating their own individual brands. How Buicks are different than Cadillacs, how Chevy is different than Buick, how’s Infiniti different than Nissan. And if you’re going to successfully and organically build the brand, you have to focus on that brand, just the single brand. It’s not to say in the future once you’re well established and positioned, you could potentially bring another bra from Performance Junk Blogger Feed 4 https://ift.tt/2Pp3IVA via IFTTT
0 notes
Text
PSA’s Free2Move Aims to Offer Total Mobility for One Flat Price
PSA, owner of the Peugeot, Citroen, DS and Opel brands, has just officially unfurled the first consumer-focused step of what it expects to be a 10-year plan with the announcement of its Free2Move program in Washington, D.C. Based around an app, it proposes to offer District residents total mobility at a flat price—from cars and SUVs to electric scooters and bicycles to ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft—with no charges for parking, gas, or insurance. Signing up is $10 and users may use the app to book with Bird, Capital Bikeshare, car2go, Jump, Lime, Skip, and Uber. Notably, none of Free2Move’s 600 cars in service are PSA products; rather it offers Chevy Cruze compacts and Equinox crossovers. On the eve of the program’s announcement, Larry Dominque, PSA’s senior U.S. executive, formerly of Nissan, and now stationed at PSA’s newly opened offices in Atlanta, spoke with New York bureau chief Jamie Kitman.
AM: So you’re just about to formally announce your new car sharing business. But it’s been soft-launched already?
LD: [Four] weeks ago. We put about a hundred of the cars out on the streets of Washington, D.C. Actually it was around 137. We had put some marketing stuff out there and allowed some hand raisers to register for the system and we gave them promotional access. Because we wanted to make sure that everything is working very, very well from the applications standpoint, how you book it, how you find the cars, to the registration process, to the back end, which is our operational side of our business. To make sure that the company we hire that’s cleaning and staging the vehicles, that that is working well.
So we wanted to do a little bit of a beta, in software terms, to try out the system and by giving people free minutes to try this out. Fortunately we haven’t had any glitches, but had you had any, put it this way, you’re a little more forgiving if someone gave you a free dinner [and there was a problem] then if somebody made you pay for the dinner.
We wanted to test everything out because everything we’re trying to do in North America is related to high customer satisfaction. Everything we want to do must be done with quality. I didn’t want to launch anything in scale until I had confidence that everything was going to be working perfectly.
AM: How soon do you see yourself expanding into other cities?
LD: Great question. One of the things that my CEO (Carlos Tavares) believes in is profitability. He likes margin, and he likes managing frugally and with high agility. He loves using words like “robust execution,” “focus,” things like that. So we’ve looked at what other car-sharing businesses have done. Enterprise has bought into cities, and gone out of cities; car2go has bought into a lot of cities, and they lost 60 million dollars in the U.S. last year.
Washington D.C. is a fairly high cost city to do this, everything from the parking permits to insurance to parking; it costs a lot operating in this city. So what our team has done is set up a very lean operation. I’m very confident it will turn around to profitability pretty quickly. We made the choice of D.C. for a reason. We looked at many different cities, we looked at population density, income, openness to mobility and alternative transportation, and we chose D.C. as one of the top cities that we felt was right for mobility services, in particular car-sharing.
So as we operate the business and my team gets a good understanding of the financials and how to operate car-sharing efficiently, we’ll be ready to jump to the next city. We’re already identifying other potential candidate cities [for when] I believe we are mature enough.
AM: What’s structurally different about what you’re attempting?
LD: I think there are several differences. On the experiential side, we believe the front end of our app is better than most, and we’re going to continue to roll out new features. Things that attract loyalty, things that we believe will make the access to the vehicles easier, faster, more reliable, more consistent.
In concert with our Free2Move car-sharing, we’re launching our Free2Move aggregation app as well, which incorporates our car-sharing in it.
AM: What else does Free2Move Aggregation include?
LD: Free2Move Aggregation is an aggregation platform we launched a year ago. It’s more mature in Europe, just because it’s been there three years longer. But it’s an aggregation service where through our multi-provider registration, you can come into our app, you can put in your driver’s license information once and your credit card information once, and you’re registered for any of our partners that are on our system.
So in the city of D.C., as of this week, we have nine discreet programs. Carsharing, bike sharing, scooter sharing, and so on. We’re going to be incorporating ride-hailing soon.
Aggregation is nice in the sense that is gives you access to what we call First-Mile/Last-Mile, so if you want car-sharing, or ride-hailing, you can get it. If you just want an electric scooter to go six or eight blocks, you don’t feel like walking today, we have that available for you as well. And you don’t have to worry about going to half a dozen or a dozen native apps. You can do it all through our app, and all the billing and everything else is taken care of.
Even though they’re a competitor for Free2Move car-sharing, car2go are on our aggregation platform. Primarily because we believe there’s a big enough marketplace out there for everybody to participate.
Also, they run about 75 percent Smart cars and 25 percent Mercedes, so that’s different types of vehicles for different needs. For now, we’re running Chevy Equinoxes and Chevy Cruises in D.C., so we believe we have the right cars, and the right SUV. Nobody else right now offers an [car-sharing] SUV, but we do.
AM: I guess on some simplistic level that’s one of the surprises—that you would be opening with somebody else’s cars, although we can see what the advantages to that might be.
LD: The way I’ve approached this and Carlos approached it with me initially—cause I started out doing some consulting for the group before taking this position—is [based on the fact that he] understands really well there are 42 brands and 430 something models for sale in the United States. Incentives hover around 11 percent [of transaction prices.] Intra-brand competition in some places is worse than inter-brand.
So how do you come into this amazingly large market, and focus on C and D segments, which mean high transaction prices in theory, high profitability, and do it successfully? We discussed this for a long time. And the focus needs to be on being different in everything we do. And that means not just in customer experience, but also how you structure the business and how you invest.
The biggest mistake most companies make is over-investment, and then the moment there’s an initial downturn, their fixed costs are way beyond their revenue, and they’re in deep, deep trouble. We want to avoid that. And how do you avoid that? By planning well and making sure you understand very, very well the trends, the consumers, the behaviors, their wants and desires. How is mobility as a service saving car ownership patterns? What are we seeing geographically? How are alternative power trains manifesting themselves in North America versus other parts of the world?
So while we are in the process of homologating our own vehicles —which we’re already doing, but it takes a few years to do—we’ve made it very clear: we’re going to launch with mobility services, without our cars.
We’ve been very clear saying we’re going to launch without our cars, to learn how to operate the business. Ironically, under [another PSA Free2Move globally, we run a company called Euro Repar [Car Service,] where [our stores are] embedded in PSA dealerships—Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel—but we actually have separate companies, we own them, and it’s a separate service facility that repairs Fords and Volkswagen and Toyotas as well. We have Free2Move Lease in Europe which uses, not only our own vehicles, but other brands.
If I have a business, and there’s an opportunity to make a good business case and learn from it, if I need to put GM vehicles in, I’ll put GM vehicles in. I’ll use anybody’s brands. I don’t care as long as they’re the right car for what I’m trying to accomplish. I don’t think we’re ready to actually launch our retail sales. But through everything we’ve learned and the planning we’ve put in place, I think we’re going to be very well positioned.
And I think, just to be very clear, we have no legacy in North America. I have no dealer networks, I have no dealer contracts, I have no service contracts, I have no IT contracts, I literally have a green field opportunity in North America.
AM: Must be exciting. It’s really almost impossible to imagine anyone else having such an open field to run on.
LD: Exactly, and trust me I’ve had lot of calls from my friends and other OEMs saying “Larry, you have an opportunity that we can only dream of.” They can’t tear down what they’ve already got.
AM: PSA actually has in its quiver a lot of brands that we would imagine have quite a bit of good will—Citroen, Peugeot and Opel—in the United States. It raises the question of which brands do you think make the most sense for North America, what does your research tell you?
LD: Some of the most fun I’m having is listening to all the different guessing that’s going on out there in the marketplace. Every time there’s an article in Automotive News and it talks about the brand, people are saying, “Oh it’s gotta be DS, oh no no, it’s gotta be Opel. Oh it’s probably gonna be Peugeot.” Right? So we’re hearing a lot of these different things.
We’ve identified the brand. I know [PSA CEO] Carlos [Tavares] is cryptic, and we’ve been cryptic for a reason. But we’ve done the research; we wanted to understand. We started the research before Opel was part of the family. One of the things we wanted to understand is what is the awareness level? What is the perception of the brands and the company or being French? What does it mean to American consumers and Canadian consumers?
And the great news, to your point, is a lot of people had very positive reactions to a French automaker. They thought it was different. We did static clinics with the vehicles. We did dynamic clinics with the vehicles, including competitors and so forth, and I’m very, very pleased with the response we got from American and Canadian consumers related to all of our brands.
So we don’t start out in negative position in anyway. It’s interesting because if you resurrect another French brand from the past, the response was much more negative.
AM: That would be Renault?
LD: Yeah. And they injured the brand with the Alliance, they had some major market issues with some of those cars, and that still resonates with people in their minds
AM: What do you mean major market issues?
LD: So from our point of view, what I wanted to make sure is, I wanted to understand where our brands resonated, where we had challenges, what opportunities existed, what kind of product challenges existed, or what American sore spots of already existing products. So the great news for me is people are open to us. When you look back 60 years ago when the Japanese came in for the first time in the late ’50s, the cars were basically crap. They were small compared to the U.S. cars, they were underpowered, they rusted easy, and they fixed it. But it took decades for them to fix the issue. The Koreans came in 30 years ago, and also their products were not very good. Today they are.
The great news for me is our products are already globally competitive, and having a great car, we could discuss the styling right, cause everyone’s style is a little bit unique, but having a great car, quality, reliability, safety, is just a cost of entry now. We make good cars. So that’s just the starting point to even have a discussion about coming into the marketplace. And I’m very confident the cars we’re designing with full homologation for North America, with the right specs and features, the right size cup-holders—everyone jokes about cup-holders—the right size cup-holders is going to be there. I’m not worried about that.
But I’m still quiet on the brand because we’re not announcing it yet. Carlos says we’re finalizing a lot of decisions between the end of this year and the beginning of the first quarter of next year, and then we’re going be much more vocal externally after that.
When we’ve identified all the things related to the brand positioning, we know that we have one opportunity to re-enter the North America market successfully. Carlos is very quick to remind me that he and I are old car guys. And he’s only a couple years older than me so we’re in the same generational bucket, right? So we’ve been around this industry for 35, 37 years. We’ve lived through what has grown into the four square reality globally for car dealerships and the relationships between OEMs, consumers, and the dealer marketplace.
So he said let’s think about this as a sustainable business. Let’s step in and never have to step out again. How do we do that? We make sure we don’t over-leverage until we have the brand strength. Let’s focus on customer satisfaction, let’s focus on high margins, let’s not focus on market share. If I’m bringing vehicles over for the time being from Europe, and plants in Europe, they’ll make a marginal contribution to an existing marketplace. Yes we have to invest uniquely to build some products in North America, but for the most part, it’s using existing plants we have, which means I don’t have to pay for a billion dollar plant, divided by every car I sell. You can focus on margin per vehicle sold.
What I sense is very clear externally and internally—you cannot ignore the four key segments, you can’t ignore C-sedan or whatever you want to define as a future sedan.
AM: You mean the way Ford Motor Company is.
LD: I hear you, and look where their stock is.
You need an unique value proposition, and understand, we’re not thinking of the value proposition as merely the vehicle, we’re thinking of our value proposition as the buying process, the sales process, the ownership process, the high end mobility. So we want to develop a new kind of interaction with consumers that a lot of other OEMs just can’t do. We believe that part of our value proposition is not only having great differentiated vehicles, beautiful design, great features, with the right performance, with the right DNA to be French, and to be the brand we’re bringing to the market, but it’s also that whole attached experience to the whole process, and what differentiates us from other brands. …
From a French brand point of view, just being French, I was very pleased to learn [from research, that] a lot of people have some very positive references to make and not just related to Louis Vuitton. People understand fashion and design and innovation come out of France in addition to luxury brands like Louis Vuitton and Hermes and great wine.
So when you associate French autos to American consumers, many of them say based on their other types of associations they think that’s really cool. They’re assuming the vehicles would have a certain kind of flair and uniqueness and design and so forth, but there’s not a negative association.
I would say where there’s a gap, as you can imagine, is in the foundational trust of “okay, I love the way this vehicle looks, I love the way this vehicle drives, I think it would be positioned here or there. But are they safe? Are they reliable? Are they dependable?” Those kinds of questions come up. As with any brand coming into the U.S. market, we have to prove those things to people, otherwise you may not be in their consideration. Because sometimes they’ll say “wow, that’s beautiful,” or “that’s gorgeous,” or “that’s innovative,” and then they’ll say “but I’ve never heard of that brand before.”
If Apple comes out with innovative design, people will flock to it because they trust Apple. If a new brand came out, and even though the design was as beautiful or more beautiful and more simple than Apple, people might still question whether they trust that brand, so we have to build that trust. That exists with any new brand that comes to the United States in any vertical, not just automotive.
Relative to our French brands, as you can imagine, Peugeot and Citroen have a history here in the United States, and people know of them. Older people know them directly through friends, family, themselves. Younger people know some of the brands, or they have an uncle that had a 504 or something like that. But you show them the logos, and many people are aware of the logos. And you can just show them the Peugeot logo, show them the Citroen logo, and a lot of people know what those are. DS is less known, but understand, DS has only been a brand for about five years. And it was never sold here.
AM: What about a portal where you could buy or get all three brands or even four brands, and each of the brands could be represented by a model?
LD: It’s interesting you say that. I used run product buying information on this, and one of the things that’s extremely critical for me, is I know the energy that all the OEMs use and trying to spend time differentiating their own individual brands. How Buicks are different than Cadillacs, how Chevy is different than Buick, how’s Infiniti different than Nissan. And if you’re going to successfully and organically build the brand, you have to focus on that brand, just the single brand. It’s not to say in the future once you’re well established and positioned, you could potentially bring another bra from Performance Junk Blogger 6 https://ift.tt/2Pp3IVA via IFTTT
0 notes