#Uncertainty principle
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
minmin-vs-physics · 3 months ago
Text
Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
This derivation is lovingly taken from my intermediate quantum mechanics prof's lectures. But, I think it's a standard treatment of the subject. I apologize that it's not as accessible as my previous post, but I hope to make a follow-up post to explain my thoughts on this derivation and other approaches to the theory.
Please yell at me if I got sloppy or was just plain wrong lmao
58 notes · View notes
blackswaneuroparedux · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Only a few know, how much one must know to know how little one knows.
- Werner Heisenberg
By 1924, the 23 year old Werner Heisenberg was already a brilliant physicist and so he went to research with Niels Bohr, the director of the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the University of Copenhagen. His paper, “Quantum Theoretical Reinterpretation of Kinematic and Mechanical Relations” was published a year later. After his return to Gottingen, he developed the matrix mechanics formulation of quantum mechanics. He was around 27 years old when in 1927, Heisenberg developed his famed Uncertainty Principal while in Copenhagen. That same year, he became a professor of theoretical physics and head of the physics department at the University of Leipzig. Werner Heisenberg received the Novel Prize in Physics in 1932 for his Uncertainty Principle, though he had been previously nominated in 1928 by Albert Einstein.
273 notes · View notes
itsgerges · 4 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Best Regards
The Sun Is Created Based On The Planets Motions (Revised 2)
or
or
or
My Research Presentation
I- Research Methodology 
II- Major Problems In The Physics Book
(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System 
(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition
(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis
(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition
III- My 5 Equations 
(1st equation) Planet orbital distance equation- the equation proves planet orbital distance is defined based on its neighbor orbital distance and no planet mass is used for this definition- Newton is wrong-
(4th equation) Planet diameter equation- the equation proves planet diameter is created based on a geometrical rule (NO Random Creation- the big bang theory is wrong) -also the equation proves the matter is created in pairs (as electron and positron are produced by Gamma ray 1.2 Mev)
(5th equation) Planet velocity equation- the equation proves planet mass has no effect on this planet velocity definition
IV- The Research Discovery
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field- Moreover- There's No Gravitational Field
V- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis  
The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies
VI- The Research Hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- Instead- The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies- And The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- Means- The Sun Rays Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total- Shortly- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created After All Planets Creation And Motion Because The Sun Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies. 
That explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body for that the energy out of the sun is so greater than the energy inside the sun (the energy comes from the gravitational waves which are produced by the planets motions energies total)    
The Hypothesis Explanation
The Sun Rays Creation Process
This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83
This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim The Sun Rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- also –No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states.  
Here we have four questions to answer
How can the gravitational waves be produced by the planets motions energies?
How can the gravitational waves move by speed of light?
How can the gravitational waves motions produce a light beam?
Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?
Let's answer in following
1st Question
How Can The Gravitational Waves Be Produced By Planets Motions Energies?
Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this motion energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- and - fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- and these waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)
Shortly- the planets move and their motions create waves in the space and each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity
AND the planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)
AND  in Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity= 205.8 km/s where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-
Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –
NOW the unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s) is the gravitational wave-
The scientists discovered these waves in the space and they called them (gravitational waves) supposing these waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- BUT Planet motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves – as proved by the previous analysis -means- even if There's NO Gravitational field at all there's a strong reason to find waves in the space because these waves are created by the planets motions energies
Note- I refute the sun gravitational field theory- and prove the sun has no massive gravity and also NO planet moves by the sun gravity
The Conclusion
The Unified Wave Its Velocity 205.8 Km/S Is The Gravitational Wave
Notice - the new article still believes that the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field- I refuse this idea and prove the waves are produced by the planets motions energies but I need the article because it tells the waves can move by speed of light and can produce the light beam where I suppose the sun rays is created by this method 
The Answer Of The Questions No. (2) And No. (3) 
2ndQuestion   How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light? AND
3rdQuestion How Can The Gravitational Waves Motions Produce A Light Beam?
What Do We Have?
We have One unified wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s
What Do We Need?
We need to accelerate the unified wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and this wave should produce (A Light Beam)
We know the light beam is produced from (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light)
Technically- How To Solve This Problem?
We Need To Square The Wave Velocity
Let's see my hypothesis (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity) - let's see if this hypothesis can solve the problem
(a)
(205.8)^2 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s = C = (speed of light)
Where
205.8 km/s= the velocity of the unified wave (the gravitational wave)
7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect rate for speed (0.99 C)
Let's discuss the equation
The unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s) – and this wave is reflected- the wave reflection causes to square its velocity – for that the velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared and be (205.8 km/s)^2= 42354 km/s
But Lorentz length contraction effect rate causes to increase the distance 42354 km to be (42354 x 7.1 = 300000 km) – means- the speed 42354 km/s is accelerated to be 300000 km/s = C=speed of light by Lorentz length contraction effect – we understand the rate 7.1 causes to contract the distances but here the rate increases the distances because the wave reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects.
Conclusion No. (1)
The Wave Reflection Causes To accelerate the unified wave from (205.8 km/s) to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
(b)
Now we have a gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
This wave is reflected one more time
The gravitational wave reflection causes to square its speed by that – the wave speed was = speed of light (C=300000 km/s) before the reflection and after the reflection this speed will be (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)
The light beam is produced from this value (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)
Now we know how the unified wave (205.8 km/s) can be accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and how this wave can produce a light beam
Conclusion No. (2)
The Gravitational Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity
This is the main useful result from the wave reflection- because without the squaring of the wave velocity no acceleration can be done for the wave and by that the gravitational wave can't move by speed of light Nor produce any light beam
Notice (1)
The waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the abstract provides strong proves for these reflections and more proves are found in the paper- the waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data and I suppose – the waves reflection causes also to square the waves velocity
Notice (2)
The rate 7.1 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect as a result for motion by speed (.99C= 297000 km/s)- I proved this fact in (Item no. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)
THE SUN POINT CREATION
The sun point of space has geometrical features enable to produce the sun rays and that means – the sun rays can be created only in the sun corona and far from the sun NO light beam can be created – let's see the sun geometrical features in following
(i)
The Sun Point Is A Stationary Point Its Velocity 1 km/s = Zero Approximately
This is important feature – Because
All motions are done relative to the sun point of space – for example- Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s –means- Pluto moves by 4.7 km/s relative to the sun point of space – Shortly- the whole solar system is in motion (space and planets are in motion) but the sun point is stationary (static point moves by velocity 1 km/s = Zero approximately) Means- the solar system is similar to a sea of water and the sun is similar to a vortex or whirlpool found on the sea page – the vortex doesn’t move with the sea waves -Shortly- the sun point of space is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-
Example – Venus moves by 35 km/s that means Venus moves by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space – also we know Venus motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity 35 km/s – means- these waves move by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space-
(ii)
Why Is It Necessary For The Sun Point To Be Stationary Point? Because
1- The Gravitational Wave (Unified Wave) Moves By Speed Of Light Relative To The Sun
2- The Gravitational Wave Can NOT Move By Speed Greater Than Speed Of light
3- The Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Different Speed Between The Gravitational Wave Speed And The Sun Point Motion Speed
4- If The Different Speed Is Less Than Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S) The Speed Squaring Process Will Never Produce The Value (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light) – means- No Light Beam Can Be Created
Now we see the necessity to make the sun point as stationary point moves by  (Zero approximately =1 km/s) – because – if the sun point moves by any higher speed than (1 km/s) the different speed will be less than speed of light and the squared value will be less than (C^2) and No light beam can be created
Now let's ask- while the space is in motion as the sea of water – how can this stationary point be created? let's answer in following
(iii)
The planets were created before the sun creation and the planets revolve around a point in space (any point in space) the revolution creates two velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value opposite in direction- the total be Zero- means- the revolution motion creates a stationary point in the revolution center-
By That -the sun point of space is created as a stationary point- and the sun point is the only stationary point in the solar system- for that all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-
4th Question
Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays? the question is logical because
Planet motion energy (1/2 mv^2) is so small energy and the sun rays energy is massive energy -for that- It's Logical Question To Know How Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?
Let's answer in following
(1)
The secret is the rates of time using-
The planets motions use different rates of time- by that- the planets motions energies can be accumulated during long period of time to produce massive energy sufficient to produce the sun rays – let's give examples
Example No. (1)
(One Solar Day Of The Sun Clock = 365.25 Solar Days Of The Earth Clock)
By this rate of time– The Earth motion energy for one complete year can be used by the sun in one solar day – in fact- the solar planets motions energies total during one complete year (365.25 solar days) is accumulated and stored in one energy and be used by the sun motion on one solar day that causes to accumulate massive energy to be used (notice 1461 days = 365+365+365+366) 
Example No. (2)
(One Second Of The Sun Clock=1461Seconds Of The Gravitational Wave Clock)
We remember the unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s -And – the gravitational wave moves in 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km -BUT the Sun clock doesn't see this period 1461 seconds but sees only the period (ONE SECOND) – means-
The distance 300000 km is passed in (ONE SECOND)only for the sun clock– That causes the gravitational wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) relative to The Sun – (the rate of time using and effect is explained in details in item no VII)
VII- The Solar System Description Refutation
(The Sun Is The Planets Motions Result But The Description Supposes The Sun Is The Planets Motions Reason) and (The Matter Is Created Depending On Its Motion But The Description Supposes The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Motion)
VIII – The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
IX  - The Physicist Wrong Vision Proves
X   - The Refutations Of Many Theories In The Physics Book 
XI - The Proves For My Theory
(There's A Light Beam Moves By Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second)
XII-The Solar System History And Neptune Orbit Creation
First Item - Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the planets creation and motion facts–
In details- I try to discover how the planet get its data- for example – why Jupiter diameter is 142984 km? why Neptune axel tilt is 28.3 deg? why Pluto orbital period is 90560 days? This method helps greatly to discover the solar system facts let's provide two examples to explain how this method works
Example No. (1)
Why Is The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 Km?
The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 days (the moon day period) the displacements total be = 2.598 million km = 2π x 413600 km
The data tells us the moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km and also it tells, because the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is so long, the moon should revolve around the Earth through this apogee orbit its radius (413600 km) only and can't revolve around the Earth through any more near orbit…
Not Facts
The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km only and the moon revolves around the Earth through near orbits and can reach to perigee radius (363000 km). 
How Can The Moon Do That?
 
The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level by that the real displacement (L) through the orbit be less than (88000 km) because it be (L = 88000 km cos θ), as a result the total displacements be less than (2.598 million km) and that makes the moon orbital apogee radius to be decreased from 413600 km to 406000 km.
We should pay attention for the angle (θ), because this angle controls the moon motion features – where- with the angle (θ) increasing the real displacement (L) be shorter and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits – but –with the angle (θ) deceasing the real displacement (L) be longer and that pushes the moon far from the Earth to more far orbits- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this angle (θ) it tells θ1 = θ0 +1.7 deg where (θ1) = today angle and (θ0) =yesterday angle and 1.7 deg is used as the moon motion degrees per solar day for the equation
Example No. (2)
Can Mars Itself Cause The Earth Moon Creation?
Giant-impact hypothesis tells (NO) – but let's see the planets data analysis   
I Suppose - Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus
The order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows correct order in planets diameters (and masses), and orbital distances - BUT – Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) to its current one (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with the Earth in its migration motion – and Mars itself has caused the Earth moon creation- My Mars Migration Theory answers many left questions by Giant-Impact Hypothesis – for example -
Why Does Venus Have No Moon? Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) – and moved to its current orbit (227.9 million km) – BUT- Mars had moved by a force – and then Mars had collided with Venus –and Mars had pushed ALL DEBRIS with it in its Motion Direction because of its strong motion - Venus had found no debris around and for that Venus couldn't create its moon –But – The Earth mass is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum for that the Earth could attracted some debris and created its moon-Mars has 2 moons and this fact supports my theory because Mars with small mass could attract two  moons because the debris were around it while Venus has greater mass but couldn't create its own moon because the debris are moved with Mars motion- the rest debris are attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt 
Shortly
The planet data analysis compares between the theory and the planets data to see if there's harmony between them and if the data logical analysis supports the theory 
Second Item - Major Problems In The Physics Book
(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System 
(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition
(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis
(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition 
1stProblem The Physicist wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System 
The Physicist Vision
The physicist supposes there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the matter (mass) as a wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and the physicist searches for this (unit of building)–
For that the physicist divided the matter and found the particles and then the particle is divided into Molecules and the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc
The physicist searches for the building unit- for that he divides anything to reach to this building unit- 
The Nature System Vision
The Nature designer aims to create INTEGRATION- as the marriage– male and female- For that- the matter is created complementary one another-means- The Matter Is Created In Pairs (as Gamma ray 1.2 Mev produces electron and positron)
No building unit- AND
I want to show how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method while the physicist divides the elements (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which the physicist considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process- Shortly- the physicist sees a universe (never be created by the designer)- while the designer created the integration is a goal and created tools to perform this integration the physicist destroyed the integration tools while he searched for the building unit which is not found at all.
NOTICE
Another point shows the physicist wrong vision is (The Planet Motion)
While the solar planets move as gears in one machine and all planets motions are unified into one unified general motion- means- all planets motions are unified and produce one result only (one unified motion)- the physicist supposes each planet motion is independent-by that- in place of one machine of gears moves and produces one unified motion (one result) the physicist told us each planet motion is independent and No unification is found for the planets motions –here – one more time the physicist sees very different picture from the real one- in place of one hand has five fingers the physicist sees five independent moving fingers
2ndProblem  Planet Motion Energy Definition
Let's remember this question where's Planet Motion Energy?
We agreed planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy must be stored in the space as moving waves because planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body otherwise this planet temperature would be raised- that tells- the space has moving waves produced by planet motion energy
Also –we agreed- planet motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity-
Shortly- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and its motion energy produces waves in the space and these waves move by velocity (47.4 km/s) –this analysis creates 3 difficulties for the physics book let's see them
First Difficulty
This analysis tells the space has moving waves are produced by planets motions energies– But- the scientists discovered these waves and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field- and they called them (gravitational waves)- I prove the sun doesn’t produce a gravitational field and has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity – But- here we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?) because planet motion energy analysis forces us to accept that these waves are produced by the planets motions energies
Here – we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?)
I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field.
I provided two major proves
(1st proof) I proves there's no gravitational field and the sun has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity
(2nd proof) the gravitational waves reflection proves the waves are produced by the planets motions energies because the waves reflection causes effects on the planets data
Second Difficulty
Now we know planet motion energy is stored in the space as moving waves (the gravitational waves)- But- the planets move since long period of time means the planets motions should cause to store massive motion energy in space during this long period- Now -where's this stored massive energy? also the energy can NOT be stored in space forever- so what's happening for this stored massive energy? I prove the sun rays are created from this stored massive energy and not from the sun nuclear fusion process- this is my research hypothesis – in all cases we should know how this stored massive energy be used because this massive energy can cause risk for the solar system stability.
Third Difficulty
Newton Mass gravity definition is disproved by planet motion energy
Because
Suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity and the moon motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) now let's ask- From What Source The Moon Motion Energy Is Provided? What's the moon motion reason? The mass gravity- means- the mass should provide the motion energy- means – if The moon moves by the Earth gravity that necessitates to decrease the masses of the Earth and the moon by the motion energy- here's the problem- Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass-  this decrease is done because of the motion energy
The analysis tells us–the physicist supposes planet motion produces NO energy this is the only one solution for the problems created by the physicist neglect to observe planet motion energy-
3rdProblem Mass Gravity Force Analysis
The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following
(i)
The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- 
(ii)
No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- Planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- planet creation and motion is done by one force only- otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it-
Suppose planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force this planet to move against its internal structure and that will cause this planet to be broken-
Imagine a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs- this human will be dead by this motion-
That's why the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created- and he considered - the creation force is a historical force has no effect on the current motion- Shortly-the sun didn't cause to create any planet and the sun doesn't cause any planet to move
(iii)
We agreed that, mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- because –any motion will produce energy- suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity- the moon motion produces energy- and – from what source this energy is provided? From the masses of the Earth and the moon –here's the problem  
Where Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass
BUT Mass gravity is a fact - the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon are bond by their masses gravity ) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon.
(iv)
The planets order contradicts the gravitation equation- for example- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the planets initial conditions)- all these are wrong- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on this planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it
Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)
d^2= 4do (d-do)
where d=planet orbital distance
do= its neighbor orbital distance
Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                             
d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance       d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury
Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655
d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance     d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance
655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter
All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct and discussed in item no. (III)- Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.
Notice
Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor planets orbits (item No. III has more proves)
(v)
Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is wrong - I define planet velocity (my 5th equation)- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.
The Conclusion
The Sun Doesn't Produce Any Gravitational Field
4th Problem The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition
In following we compare between the physics book theory about the matter creation and my theory about it- the discussion contains Two points
I- The Physics Book Theory About The Creation of the Matter (Mass)
The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Outer Motion – means- even if the matter motion is stopped the matter is still found and never be perished (the motion here means the outer motion and not the atoms motions)
The Matter Is Motionless By Nature
The Matter Needs Mass Gravity Force To Cause Its Motion
The Matter Data And Dimensions Are Not Changed By Its Motion
The big bang theory tells planet is created by random creation- for example- Jupiter diameter is created by unknown value and Jupiter is collided many times in its history and these collisions caused Jupiter diameter (and mass) to be decreased- based on that– Jupiter diameter value (142984 km) is found by random process and without any geometrical reason behind- by that- the big bang theory prevent us to use any planet data to discover the creation and motion rules of this planet.
Note – The physicist doesn't use planet data in forming a theory to explain this planet motion-for example- Jupiter diameter is 142984 km and the physicist has a theory explains Jupiter motion but if Jupiter diameter is changed into 180000 km the theory will have no change because the physicist doesn't consider Jupiter diameter is a player in its motion- that's why the big bang theory is wrong because it supposes the change in diameter and mass doesn't cause a change in motion 
Shortly- the physics book doesn't tell how the matter is created nor what's the matter nature- we remember Einstein problem in physics- he told (All researches in particle electromagnetic properties can't predict this particle behavior in the daily life physics) that shows two different branches of the physics one for the electromagnetism and the other for the mass gravity physics
II- My Theory About The Creation of the matter (mass) –
The Matter Main Features Are: 
The Matter Is Created In Pairs  Means- No Single Matter Is Created -This conclusion depends on Gamma ray experiment -From Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) electron and positron are created- by this experiment- the matter is created in pairs from electromagnetic waves- the produced pair particles motions depend on each other (or related to each other) (notice the creation system is male and female–two complementary matters-that tells the source of energy must be electromagnetic wave)
The matter is created depending on its motion- means- the motion is found before the matter creation- this conclusion depends on my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity (for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)- means–Planet motion is defined before its creation -later explained
Lorentz transformation proves Matter dimensions are effected by high speed motion- also- Lorentz transformation proves the matter and space are created from the same energy for that particle length and distance both are contracted by the same one equation (Lorentz length contraction effect)
The Matter Is Created Depending On Light Motion –
The Discussion Proves These Features Strongly
The Matter Creation Depends On 5 Main Facts  Which Are
Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron
Lorentz Transformation
My Planet Diameter Equation
The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference) 
Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit
(Item No. i) Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron    From Gamma ray (1.2Mev) one electron and one positron are created- I prove the matter is created by this method- means- the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created
(Item No. ii) Lorentz Transformation
Lorentz transformation tells
If a particle moves by high speed motion (near to speed of light), this particle length would be contracted and its mass would be increased and its time would be dilated
I accept this meaning clearly and find this meaning supports my theory strongly BUT Many physics Books tell the following
(NO Real Change Is Done For Any Particle Data Moves By High Speed Motion But All Changes Are Illusions Of Measurements)-
Means- while a particle is moving by high speed motion and the experiments results show contraction in its length and increasing in its mass and dilation in its time – these changes are just illusions in measurements and the particle itself has no change in any data - tenth of books tell this meaning clearly and with confirmation and the physicist killed Lorentz work and made Lorentz transformation measures illusions and not facts- regardless the empirical proves which supports Lorentz transformation  
I refuse these books idea because
The Physics Is The Measurements Science And What's Measured Is The Fact
If no real changes are done how the problem of Michelson and Morelly experiment is solved?- also- Why the synchronous events in one frame can't be synchronous in another (as Einstein stated) where no change is found for any data- the distances are Not contracted nor the time is dilated nor the mass is increased why the events can NOT be synchronous in any frame?  
If the particle own data is measured correctly while it moves by my motion velocity and these measurements are suffered from illusions because the particle moves by high speed motion relative to my motion that means (I'm the universe reference point)
We notice- Lorentz length contraction equation can't distinguish between particle length and a distance, both can be contracted by the same one equation- that supports my theory tells (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same Energy)–
My planet diameter equation proves planet diameter is created depending on this planet motion and also proves the matter and space are created from the same one energy which supports Lorentz transformation 
NOTICE  
The major importance of Lorentz transformation is
The transformation proves there's a connection between particle dimensions and its  motion means the motion has effect on particle dimensions definition and by that the matter (mass) can't be independent because its existence depends on a motion- shortly (The Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion) 
The matter and space are created from the same energy- because- particle length and the distance both are contracted by the same equation (Lorentz length contraction effect) shortly (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same One Energy) (This theory is proved by my planet diameter equation)
(Item No. iii) My Planet Diameter Equation
My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity                          
r = Planet Diameter
I= Planet Orbital Inclination   
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity                        
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity      
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
Example  Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8                  
89143                   = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
49528 km   = Neptune diameter            
9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and
5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity             
1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
Discussion
(1)
The Equation Concept  Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbit (orbital distance) its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result- the designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if  the Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved
(2)
Matter Definition Based On My Planet Diameter Equation
My equation tells, Planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because it velocity is 5.4 km/s where the velocity is used in the diameter definition equation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- how can that be possible? let's answer in following
The original energy was in motion and planet matter is created from this moving original energy and planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after Planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data and dimensions are created that's why Planet data is in full harmony with its motion features- that explains how planet diameter is created based on its velocity
Shortly- the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle dimensions depend on the blood motion- similar to that- the matter dimensions depend on this energy motion from which this matter is created-
Also space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a distinguished picture different from the space picture and the matter moves by a different velocity from the space motion velocity- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- that explains how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters- why does this diameter equal= 2 meters? The diameter is created depends on the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also- (notice- The Gravitational Waves Prove The Space Has Motion And Not Static)
NOTICE   Also (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) Newton is wrong, because planet moves by the energy from which this planet is created- as explained here – means– The Matter Is Not Motionless By Nature- The Matter moves with the energy from which this matter is created-
(3)
Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion
Shortly-if the motion is stopped the matter will be perished- again the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature body- if the blood motion is stopped the muscle will be perished- this is the fact- Based on that- Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s if Neptune stops its motion Neptune diameter and matter will be perished-
The fact I prove is (The Matter Creation Depends On Its Motion) – Lorentz transformation and my planet diameter equation supports this fact strongly 
DEEP DISCUSSION
(4)
The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created
Planet velocity is defined based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) let's prove that
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities)         x 6.8 km/s  (Uranus velocities)                            
322 = 35 km/s  (Venus velocity)                 x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                     
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity)                    x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2  
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)                x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)                        
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity)                   (Max error 2%)
The idea is understandable – let's summarize it in following
(i)
The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) and
(ii)
Planet data is created depending on its velocity- means- planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation and based on the velocity all other data is created- as we see in the planet diameter equation, planet diameter and all creation data is created depending on this planet velocity- means- based on (v1/v2) but planet orbital distance is defined based on  (v1/v2)^2 and planet orbital period is defined based on (v1/v2)^3
Based on this system planet data is created but we know that planet orbital distance is defined before planet creation and based on the orbit, planet velocity is defined and then all data is defined based on the planet velocity-
(iii)
Now the idea is clear- let's summarize it
The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=322) and planet diameter is created depending on its velocity for that reason planet diameter is created complementary to another planet diameter- let's prove that
341.7 million km = Jupiter diameter 142984 km          x Pluto diameter 2390 km
341.7 million km = Jupiter radius 71492 km       x Mercury diameter 4879 km (2%)
341.7 million km  = Saturn diameter 120536 km x 4 Mars diameter 6792 km (4%)
341.7 million km = Uranus diameter 51118 km  x Earth radius 6378 km (5%)
341.7 million km = Neptune diameter 49528 km x 2 The Moon diameter 3475 km
Clearly we see the planets diameters are complementary one another- because the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created
Notice (1)
Suppose the physicist can create a type of single matter which has no complementary can that disprove my theory tells (The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created?) NO NEVER
Because- the matter is created from the original energy and the energy uses a system depends on matters in pairs complementary one another-  means any type of matter can't be used by the original energy will be neglected and useless because the energy uses matters in pairs  
(Item No. v) The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference)
I provide proves tell Gamma Ray and Young experiments are used in the solar planets creation – let's remember these experiments
(1st Experiment) Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) can produce electron and positron
(2nd Experiment) the coherence of light experiment (Young Interference)
Let's provide the proves for the using of these two experiments in the planets creation
Gamma Ray Experiment
There are two facts prove this experiment concept is used in the planets creation
First Fact Planet creation data is defined based on its velocity- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity as explained before (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)-means- Planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation process and based on this velocity all planet creation and motion data is created
Second Fact Planet velocity is complementary one another, which is proved by the rule (v1v2= 322 = constant)- that shows the planets data must be complementary one another as I have proved in the diameters values analysis
Shortly – The planets data are complementary one another (similar to the electron and positron are created from Gamma ray)
The Coherence of light Experiment (Young Interference)
There are two facts prove this experiment concept using in the solar system creation
1st Fact
The planets order is typical for Young interference- if we consider planet diameter is equivalent to the fringe breadth by that the planets order be typical for Young interference where the greatest fringe is in the middle (the greatest planet Jupiter) and the fringes breadth is deceased gradually on both sides
(I Proved Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus- so the original inner planets order was Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) which shows gradual decreasing in diameters- the outer planets diameters also is decreased gradually      
2nd Fact
There's a coherence of light in the solar system- what does that mean?
Means- while planet orbit has energy of a light beam- another light beam enters this orbit by that there are two light beams in the same orbit- these two light beams create coherence of light- the planets orbits creation explain this fact in details- but here I want to prove this fact by simple direct proof before the planets orbits creation discussion –let's write this proof here
We have seen that the planets velocities are complementary one another by the rule (v1v2=constant=322) and planet all data is created depending on its velocity- by that the planets diameters also follow this rule where (R1R2= constant) as I have proved in my planet diameter equation
Now let's ask – can the planets orbits complementary one another? NO
So- how this rule (v1v2=constant= 322) is found?
By the energy reflection- means- the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection of energy causes the velocities to be reflected on one another and that produced the rule (v1v2=constant= 322)
We note the planets can’t be reflected on each other because the planets are connected with their orbits- and the energy reflection needs freedom in motion- means- this reflection of the planets velocities are done by effect of the energy reflection- please note- the energy reflection is a proved fact in the solar system- this fact is proved by hundreds of the planets data because the energy reflection cause effects on the planets data- shortly- the planets data is created by effects of the energy reflection-
Here we see the coherence of light is created because the orbits have energy where the space is energy and (Another energy is reflected and moved through all orbits and caused to create the planets data) by that each orbit has two energies together- I prove both energies are light beams-for that the two light beams create a coherence of light
I want to say- there are two facts prove the solar system has coherence of light which are the reflection of energy and the planets order
The planets orbits creation explain this theory in details I discuss it in item no. (**)
NOTICE
Please Note – I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars is migrated to its current orbit behind the Earth- by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) here we see planets diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury where Jupiter was the planet beside the Earth- means – the planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Mercury- and the outer planets – the planets diameters also are decreased gradually- as I explained – if we compare planet diameter with fringe- the planets order be typical to Young interference – but – the order is reflected each other –let's see that
The inner planets (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates longer orbital distance – but
The outer planets (Jupiter– Saturn– Uranus– Neptune –Pluto)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates shorter distance
Here we see the orders are reflected one another- but in Young interference there's no reflection- I want to say- the planets orders are reflected because of the sun position- if the sun is not found no reflection will be found- that means- the reflection of energy caused to create the sun in the solar system because the sun creation causes the planets order to be reflected one another- my paper proves the sun is created after all planets creation and motion – and the sun is created by the reflected energy 
(Item No. vi) Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit
The solar planets matters and their distances are created from one energy and this one energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed = 1.16 million km per second (The speed is proved strongly and decisively)
The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) built the solar system orbits starting from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation- means- all orbits are created before any planet creation- the orbits are created based on each other (this fact is proved by my planet orbital distance equation) after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second before the space creation (In Mercury Orbit) and its speed becomes 300000 km/s after the space creation (in Pluto orbit) as result for the energy consumption in the space creation- 
In Pluto orbit - the light could Not move any further to build any more orbits because any additional space creation will consume more energy and that will decrease the light speed to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) – and – No known light moves by speed less than 300000 km/s – means- the light had no energy to move any further after Pluto orbit- for that- the light returns to its origin point (Mercury orbit) for that the light is reflected with speed (300000 km/s) from Pluto orbit to Mercury orbit passing through the built orbits– no energy is required in this motion for that the light beam moves with speed of light (300000 km/s) till Mercury orbit.
Please note- the light (300000 km/s) is reflected from Pluto to Mercury
The reflection of the light beam (300000 km/s) Caused To Create The Solar Planets
Comments
The light (1.16 million km per second) created the orbits with energy means the created orbits have energies- and each planet orbit energy is less than its previous neighbor orbit because the planets velocities are decreased gradually- almost the energy is less by rate 80% because the velocities are rated with (0.8)   
Each planet diameter is created based on its orbit energy- the planet is similar to a tree planted in a ground and the planet orbit is this ground- that's why each planet diameter depends on this planet velocity and orbital inclination- please note Mars diameter equation proves this fact because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars diameter is created based on this orbit energy and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one behind the Earth but Mars diameter equation still shows Mars original orbital inclination (5.1degrees) while Mars current orbital inclination is 1.9 degrees- Mars diameter is created based on this inclination (5.1 deg) for that this inclination is seen in Mars diameter equation frequently (please review my planet diameter equation)    
The Occurrence Of The Coherence Of Light - The light beam (300000 km/s) is reflected and passed through all created orbits- that shows there two light beams are found in the same area (in any orbit)- because in each orbit there's this orbit energy which is found with the orbit creation by the light (1.16 million km per second) for that we say (Space Is Energy) because any orbit has energy found with its creation- and also the reflected light beam (300000 km/s) passed through all orbits- by that- in any orbit there are two different light beams (two different energies) and these light beams create A Coherence together- 
The Amazing Coherence Of Light There's a major interesting point here-the light beam (300000 km/s) created a coherence with the light 1.16 million km per second! BUT HOW?? because the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed and its energy is used for the space creation and the rest energy is this light beam moves by known speed of light (300000 km/s)!! how can the light beam (300000 km/s) meet the original light beam the 1.16 million km per second to create this coherence of light?
Please note- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the major used speed in the solar system data- means- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the secret by which the solar system data can be understood because all data is created as function in this speed-I prove that in the next pages- but this information is written to explain that the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed but its energy still works and causes continuous effect- BUT HOW??   
Let's write the answer
The light (300000 km/s) is reflected to move from Pluto to Mercury (while the original light 1.16 million km per second moved from Mercury to Pluto) means the light (300000 km/s) moved in opposite direction for the motion of the original light 1.16 million km per second- MEANS- the light (300000km/s) moved in the opposite direction of space to reach to Mercury- BUT NOT ONLY- in fact- the light (300000 km/s) moved also in the opposite direction OF TIME and moved into its own past – and in past – this light beam (300000 km/s) met the original light beam 1.16 million km per second – and in past – the two light beams created the coherence of light and then this coherence of light results have effects on our present time-
Shortly- the coherence of light in the solar system proves the light beam (300000 km/s) moved on the time-axis and this is an empirical proof for the time-axis motion where the light can move simply on the time axis
Notice – this motion can help us to create the time machine- because- if the light can move into the past that means we may use this motion and take photos of the past events and this will be our time machine which can go into the past and make photos and videos for the past events – even the events since thousands of years we can see in videos or in photos – this motion of light can give us a great option to create our machine of time      
Notice  the original light beam 1.16 million km per second can not move into the future to meet the light beam (300000 km/s) because in future the original light 1.16 million km per second is NOT found because its energy is consumed in the space creation- but- the light beam (300000km/s) can move into the past because in the past the light beam (300000 km/s) was part in the original light beam 1.16 million km per second and by that the two light beams be found in the same time   
Notice – we can not travel ourselves into the past- because planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- as proved by my planet diameter equation- means- the matter is created depending on its motion velocity- and the velocity is a motion in defined direction- the light is free in motion and doesn't forced to move in any direction for that the light has this option to move on the time axis but the matter is created depending on a motion in defined direction (no freedom in motion) for that the matter can't move on the time axis because the motion force the matter to move in a defined direction – the matter moved just to the future– and the matter can't move into the past-  
Planet Creation Machine Please note–we see the coherence of light is done by the two light beams 300000 km/s and 1.16 million km per second (because the light beam 300000 km/s can reach to the light 1.16 million km per second by moving into its past)- shortly – here we have 2 light beams in any orbit- and these two light beams cause two motions – we can imagine these two motions are perpendicular on each other – this perpendicular motions create a wave and planet is created as a wave (Particle is a wave also)- that explains how the planets are created 
Please note-  The reflection of energy is very effective in the solar planets data because the reflection of energy caused the planets to be created- the matter can't be created by the energy of any orbit alone but the reflection of energy adds second energy inside each orbit- by that- two energies are found in any orbit (two light beams) by these two light beams the light coherence is created and also the planets are created as waves-that explains why the planets data prove the reflection of energy because the planets are created by this energy reflection- as when we plant a tree we need a ground and we need seeds to be put in this ground- two players- the planets are created by two energies (two light beams coherence) and for that the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds (300000 km/s) and (1.16 million km per second) as planet velocity definition proves.
Please note  the Matter Is Created In Pairs (as electron and positron from Gamma rays 1.2 Mev) – this is the main system of creation but -In planets creation the rule is used with some complex method- the complementary is found for the planets velocities and the planets data is created depending on these velocities- the same concept but the method is more complex- this similar to the creature creation- the cell reproduction is done by split the cell into two new cells- but in higher creatures the reproduction use more complex methods but the cell method is still the base of these complex methods  
Please note  the previous analysis tries to conclude how the planet matter is created – I put all available facts to reach to this conclusion- the matter real mechanism may be still not clear but many provided facts help to reach to this mechanism- also- we know the main concept behind the matter creation which is (The Matter Is Created In Pairs And Not Single Matter Is Created)
This Concept Is Proved Strongly And Clearly By The Gamma Rays Experiment And The Planets Data
 (Item No. vii) The Proves Of The Light Speed 1.16 million km per second
THE SPEED PROVES
In following I prove the speed 1.16 million km per second is found
The paper provides many powerful proves – but - here I refer to 4 proves only
(1st Proof)
Planet Velocity Analysis proves the speed 1.16 million km per second
Data
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities)  x 6.8 km/s  (Uranus velocities)                         
322 = 35 km/s  (Venus velocity)       x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                     
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity)          x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2  
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)       x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)                        
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity)                               (Max error 2%)
Discussion
This is one rule used to define planet velocity- we know this rule (v1v2 = constant =322) – other rules are discussed in planet velocity definition- here we ask only
Why the constant is 322?? Because 1160000 seconds = 3600 x 322 hours
Means – for example
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance 1.16 million km – and
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance 1.16 million km-
Means- the light moves 1.16 million km but we see it as 1160000 seconds and based on this period the constant 322 hours is defined and based on this constant the planets velocities are defined- means- the planets velocities are defined as functions in the speed 1.16 million km per second
(2nd Proof) the planets orbital circumferences total is defined by light speed 1.16 million km per second- let's prove that 
100733 million km = 86400 seconds x 1160000 km/s
100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
86400 seconds       = The solar day
Means- light its speed 1.16 million km per second passes in a solar day a distance = 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
The planets data analysis proves that the solar day is the major period of time in the solar system- that because- all planets rotation periods are defined based on it- the paper proves this fact strongly
 (3rd Proof)
The planets orbits and orbital distances are created from the energy of the light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- for that- this speed is registered in the distances data – let's prove that in following
Example
778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1160000 km/s x 671 seconds
721 million km (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 1160000 km/s x 629 seconds
Where
671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance
629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance
This example tells that
The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) created the distances based on each other- means
The light uses 671 million km (Jupiter Venus Distance) as a period of time 671 seconds to pass the distance 778.6 million km (Jupiter Orbital Distance)   
Also -the light uses 629 million km (Jupiter Earth Distance) as a period of time 629 seconds to pass the distance 721 million km (Jupiter Mercury Distance)   
By this method the light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances based on each other- means – the distances be created in one network and by one design
the previous data is example for so many other distances let's see them in following
(778.6 / 671)= (721/629) = (629/551)= (2x551/940)= (4900/4188) = (5906/5127)= (5127/4437) = (4345/3717)= 1.16
Where
778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance 
721 million km    = Jupiter Mercury Distance 
671 million km    = Jupiter Venus Distance 
629 million km    = Jupiter Earth Distance 
551 million km    = Jupiter Mars Distance 
940 million km    = Earth Orbital Circumference
4188 million km  = 2 x 2094  million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)
4900 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
5906 million km  = Pluto Orbital Distance
5127 million km  = Pluto Jupiter Distance
4437 million km  = Mercury Neptune Distance
4345 million km  = The Earth Neptune Distance
3717 million km  = Jupiter Neptune Distance
The paper provides so many other powerful proves for the speed 1.16 million km
Notice
 (1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3
The equation tells, because the solar system is created by light beam its speed 1.16million km per second with its other speed 300000 km/s
For that - the space is created in curved lines (2π) and the time is created based on the solar day (24 hours)- that explains why the planets orbital circumferences total depends on the solar day period
(4th Proof)
300000 = (205.8)^2 x 7.1 where
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s and I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s the total be 205.8 km/s - the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s)
7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect produced by speed 99% of speed of light-
Shortly- the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity for that the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared by the energy reflection
Now (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42354
The rate 7.1 causes to increase the distance from (42354 km) to (42354 x 7.1= 300000 km)- note-although 7.1 is Lorentz length contraction rate but it increases the distances in place of the contraction effect because the reflection of energy causes to reflect the geometrical effects-
shortly the equation (300000=(205.8)^ x 7.1) proves the planets velocities are defined as function in the known speed of light (300000 km/s)   
that proves the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds of light –the known speed of light 300000 km/s and the original speed of light 1.16 million km per second.
NOTICE
Lorentz length contraction effect for a velocity 99% of speed of light (297000 km/s) is (7.1) as seen in the equation but the solar system uses this rate with modification
(7.1/100)+ 1 = 1.0725
And this final rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all planets data (distances, periods, axial tilts and other data)- this effect is a proof for the motion by high velocity because this rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all data in the solar system and no explanation except Lorentz length contraction effect- more proves are in (Item No. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)
(Item No. viii) Planet creation depends on light motion
The previous analysis proves planet diameter is created depending on its orbit- specifically- planet diameter depends on its velocity and the velocity depends on its orbit- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation (where planet diameter is created depending on its velocity) and by Kepler statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity) – but-
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity?
Where I proved no planet moves by the sun gravity- by that the planet orbital distance has no effect on this planet motion or velocity nor planet mass has any effect on its velocity-So - Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? The next data proves there's a connection between planet velocity and its orbit through light motion
DATA
300000 km                              = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 3600 x 17.73
5906 s x 300000 km/s   = 1773 million km
300000 km                              = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 3600 x 15.43
5144 s x 300000 km/s   = 1543 million km                   ((5144= 4495 x (1.0725)^2)
300000 km                              = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 3600 x 8.6
2870 s x 300000 km/s   = 8600 million km                  
300000 km                              = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 3600 x 12.26
4085 s x 300000 km/s   = 1226 million km                  
300000 km                              = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 3600 x 6.36
2120 s x 300000 km/s   = 636 million km          
Where
5906 million km            = Pluto Orbital Distance
4495 million km            = Neptune Orbital Distance
2872 million km            = Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 x Saturn Orbital Distance
4900 million km            = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
Notice
18048 million km (Uranus Orbital Circumference) = 4.4 x 4085 million km
4900 million km (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)   = 2.3 x 2120 million km
4.4 = 2.2 x 2 (with 2.3 the error 5%)
Discussion
The data shows each outer planet velocity is related to its orbital distance by effect of the light motion (300000 km/s)- Uranus and Jupiter shows the rate 4.4 which related to Jupiter (3.1 deg Jupiter axial tilt + 1.3 deg Jupiter orbital inclination)- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter that causes the two planets use the same rate.
The data proves the planets motions depend on light motion and explains how the planet orbit defines its velocity
Notice
0.8 = (27.8 /35) = (24.1/29.8) = (10.8/13.1) = (5.4/6.8) = (17.2/21.4) = 19.8/24)
Where
35 km/s       = Venus velocity  
29.8 km/s    = The Earth velocity  
27.8 km/s    = The moon velocity  
13.1 km/s    = Jupiter velocity  
6.8 km/s      = Uranus velocity  
5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity   note (10.8 = 5.4)
17.2 hours = Uranus Rotation Period
21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 h Saturn Rotation Period
19.8 hours = 2 x 9.9 h Jupiter Rotation Period
24 hours     = The solar day period
The data shows harmony between the planets velocities and their rotation periods
Third Item - My 5 Equations 
My 5 Equations Prove Planets Creation and Motions Data Is Defined By Geometrical Rules (NO Random Creation)-I provide here the three main equations (1st, 4th and 5th) let's refer to them in following 
Planet orbital distance equation (My 1st equation)
d^2= 4do (d-do)
where d= planet orbital distance and do= its previous neighbor orbital distance
Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                             
d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance
d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury
Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655
d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance
d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance
655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter
The equation depends on the planets order, just 2 neighbor planets can be used
The equation exceptions are, Earth depends on Mercury Not Venus – and Mars depends on Venus Not Earth And Pluto depends on Uranus Not Neptune
The Equation Concept Support
let's suppose–There's a right triangle by the 3 points The Sun, Mercury and Venus)- by that - Venus angle is (61 degrees) because Venus orbital distance (108.2 mkm) x cos (61) = Venus Mercury distance (50.3 mkm) – and
Earth angle is (51 degrees) because Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) x cos (51) = Earth Mercury distance (91.7 mkm) – and
Mars angle is (41.7 degrees) because Mars orbital distance (227.9mkm) x cos (41.7)= Mars Mercury distance (170 mkm)- and
Jupiter angle is (22.2 degrees) because Jupiter orbital distance (778.6 mkm) x cos (22.2)= Jupiter Mercury distance (721 mkm)
Similar to that – Saturn angle is 16.5, Uranus angle is 11.6 deg, Neptune angle is 9.2 deg and Pluto angle is 8 deg- these angles follow the same system
for example -Pluto angle is (8 degrees) because Pluto orbital distance (5906 mkm) x cos (8)= Pluto Mercury distance (5848 mkm) –
NOTICE No. (1)
The right angle and its triangle is (a hypothesis) – but we can prove it's a fact because (v1/v2) = (θ1/ θ2) -means – these angles are rated with their planets velocities – for example (Neptune velocity 5.4/ Pluto velocity 4.7) = (9.2 deg /8 deg)
NOTICE No. (2) these angles are complementary one another for that
940 = 61 x 2 x 8 = 51 x 2 x 9.2 = 41.7 x 22.2
(61 degrees) is Venus angle and (51 degrees) is The Earth angle and (41.7 degrees) is Mars angle and (8 degrees) is Pluto angle and (9.2 degrees) is Neptune angle and (22.2 degrees) is Jupiter angle
DISCUSSION
The equation and angles system data prove the following
(1)
The planets orbital distances are defined based on their neighbors and NO mass is required to define it- Newton is wrong- planet orbital distance is Not defined based on this planet mass (also planet motion doesn't depend on its mass)
Shortly- the mass is not related for the orbital distance definition at all
(2) The gravitation equation is wrong because it contradicts the planets order- for example (Mercury- Venus – the Earth) this order tells more mass needs longer orbital distance while the gravitation equation tells more mass needs shorter distance- clearly the equation contradicts the planets order- also Jupiter the greatest mass is not the more near planet to the sun – when we asked the physicist he told this is happened because of the planets initial conditions- my equation proves no initial conditions have effects on any distance – all distances are defined by the same one rule and the angles system supports the equation concept proves that (the planets orbital distances are defined based on each other and no mass is required in this definition)      
Planet Diameter Equation (My 4th equation)
My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity                          
r = Planet Diameter
I= Planet Orbital Inclination   
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity                        
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity      
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
Example  Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8                  
89143                   = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
49528 km   = Neptune diameter            
9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity and
5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity             
1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
All planets diameters follow this equation perfectly 
Notice
This equation is discussed with matter creation and definition (item no. I) also the equation is analyzed and discussed with all details in the paper discussions 
Planet velocity equation (My 5th equation)
Planet velocity definition is important point of study because many planet data is defined based on its velocity- specifically
Planet diameter is defined based on the rate (v1/v2) by my planet diameter equation –discussed before – and
Planet orbital distance is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^2 –and
Planet orbital period is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^3
Please note – Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and it's fact proved by the planets data – but Newton stated Planet motion depends on its mass- this is NOT Fact and Planet velocity is defined without any effect of its mass as the data shows
(I have refuted Newton theory of the sun gravity and his theory for mass gravity) 
Now – let's ask - How Is Planet Velocity Defined?
Planet velocity is defined by Five Rules let's see them in following
(i) First Rule 
v1v2 = constant= 322  (my 5th equation)
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Mercury velocity)                    =322
35 km/s (Venus velocity)         x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2                   =322
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity)         x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2     =322
24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)       x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)           =322 (Max error 2%)
The rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are defined in pairs and not individually, each planet velocity has its own complementary- the rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- the reflection of energy and data is discussed later. 
In this rule we interest for the constant (322)- let's ask- why the constant = 322? 
The constant 322 depends on the speed 1.16 million km per second because
(1160000 seconds = 322 hours) - Means
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km and
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance   = 1.16 million km
Shortly -we realize that the constant 322 is produced based on the speed 1.16 million km per second- means- the planets velocities are complementary each other because they are defined as functions in this same speed 1.16 million km per second
(This is similar to electron and positron are produced from Gamma ray, The two particles depend on Gamma energy in their masses)
Based On This Data
I concluded there's a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second and from this light beam energy the solar system is created- and the planets velocities are defined as functions in this speed 1.16 million km per second and that causes the velocities to be complementary each other-
(Note the speed 1.16 million km per second is proved strongly in my paper)
(ii) Second Rule 
v1v2 = 1
The velocity here uses the solar day (86400 seconds) – let's prove that-
Mercury moves per solar day           = 4.095 million km
Venus moves per solar day               = 3.024 million km
The Earth moves per solar day                  = 2.574 million km
The Moon moves per solar day                  = 2.4 million km
Mars moves per solar day                = 2.082 million km
Jupiter moves per solar day              = 1.1318 million km
Saturn moves per solar day              = 0.838 million km
Uranus moves per solar day             = 0.5875 million km
Neptune moves per solar day           = 0.4665 million km
Pluto moves per solar day                = 0.406 million km
AND
0.406 (Pluto velocity)              x 2.4 (the moon velocity)             = 1         (error 2.5%)
0.4665 (Neptune velocity)       x 2.082 (Mars velocity)               = 1          (error 2.5%)
0.5875 (Uranus velocity)                  x 3.024 (Venus velocity)/1.772   = 1 (error 2.5%)
0.838 (Saturn velocity)            x 1.1318 (Jupiter velocity)         = 1 (error 5%)
(1.772 = π^1/2)
The second rule tells very similar meaning (v1v2= constant= 1)
The data uses the velocities per solar day for that the constant is changed from 322 into 1 but the rule is the same- (v1v2= Constant)
I want to say- the rule (v1v2 = Constant) tells that (The Velocities Are Reflected On Each Other) this conclusion is simple one (A x 1/A= constant=1)  
The rule proves the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection has effect on the planets data and for that the planets velocities are defined by this energy  reflection and the velocities are produced complementary each other as a result.
Notice the second rule causes confusion because the complementary player is changed- for example Pluto is complementary with Venus (in the first rule 35 x 4.7 x 2 = 322) but Pluto is complementary with the Earth moon in the second rule (0.406 x 2.4 = 1) that tells the players are changed which is illogical idea- how can we solve this problem? The third rule solves it – let's see this rule in following 
(iii) Third Rule 
v1/v2 = 0.8 (based on the planets order)
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8   = 38 (35 km/s = Venus velocity error 7.25%)
35 km/s (Venus velocity)         x 0.8   = 27.78 (The moon velocity)
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity)         x 0.8   = 24.1 (Mars velocity)                          (error 1%)
24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)       x 0.8   = 2 x 9.7 (Saturn velocity)
13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)     x 0.8   = 2 x 5.4 (Neptune velocity)       (error 3%)
6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity)      x 0.8   = 5.4 (Neptune velocity)
5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity)    x 0.8   = 4.3 (Pluto velocity 4.7 the error 7.25%)
Please note
The error 7.25 is found by the rate 1.0725 – that means
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8   = 38 = 1.0725 x 35 km/s (Venus velocity)
5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8     = 4.3= 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) / 1.0725
29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)                = 27.78 km/s (The moon velocity) x 1.0725
We know the rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length contraction effect- and we know this rate has effect on around 40% of all planets data – that's why we see this rate has effect on the planets velocities definition-
Let's remember the question-
In the rule (v1v2=322) we found that Pluto is complementary with Venus because
4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 2 = 322
But in the rule (v1v2 =1) we found Pluto is complementary with the moon because
0.406 mkm (Pluto Velocity Daily) x 2.4 mkm (The Moon Velocity Daily) = 1
The question asked – if the planets velocities are defined in pairs complementary each other and not individually how can the players be changed? 
The answer tells – the planets velocities are rated by (0.8) based on the planets order means – the moon velocity daily 2.4 mkm = Venus velocity daily 3.024 mkm x 0.8
The rate (0.8) defines all planets velocities depend on each other by order-
Now let's see Planet velocity final definition– because- the definition uses three planets velocities together and not only two – let's put that clearly in following-
 (iv) The Planet Velocity Final Definition
 (A)
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 km/s (Venus velocity 35 km/s)
Venus moves per solar day 3.024 million km -But
1/3.024 = 0.3307 million km = Uranus moves per solar day 0.5875 million km /1.77
(note 1.77 = π^1/2) and (38 = 35 x 1.0725)
For that
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 322
(B)
35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 km/s (The Moon velocity)
The moon moves per solar day 2.4 million km -But
1/2.4 = 0.406 million km = Pluto moves per solar day 0.406 million km
For that
35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 = 322
(C)
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)
Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km -But
1/2.082 = 0.4665 million km = Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km
For that
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 = 322
(D)
13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8= 2 x 5.24km/s (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s error 3%)
Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km - But
1/0.4665 = 2.082 million km = Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km
For that
13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) = 322
Shortly
Three planets velocities are defined in each equation- that tells the planet velocity definition is a process more complex than the simple equation (v1v2= constant)
Notice
The 9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s – if we add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) the total will be 205.8 km/s
The planets velocities are complementary also for this velocity 205.8 km/s – let's see
205.8 km/s = Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) x Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) / 1.0725
205.8 km/s = Venus velocity (35 km/s)     x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 1.0725
205.8 km/s = Earth velocity (29.8 km/s)   x Uranus velocity (6.8 km/s)
205.8 km/s = Jupiter velocity (13.1 km/s)          x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 3
Mercury velocity = 2 Mars velocity by that Pluto will be used for Mars also
Max error (3%)
Please Note- Saturn is exceptional because
205.8 km/s = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 21.4
Where 21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 hours (Saturn rotation period) -Means- the distance is passed by all planets motions in one hour equal the distance is passed by Saturn in 2 rotation periods (21.4 hours) that tells more analysis is required for Saturn velocity- as we should do later.
A QUESTION
(Why Is The Rate (0.8) Used To Define Each Planet Velocity Based On Its neighbor?) Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and
My planet orbital distance equation proves each planet orbit is defined based on its neighbor – means- my equation uses only 2 neighbor planets orbital distances
Here also-Planet velocity is defined based on its neighbor – means- this connection enabled Kepler to conclude his statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity)
But Why The Rate (0.8)??
The rate (0.8) is found by the energy reflection effect on Planets velocities definition, for that we analyze the energy reflection process deeply in the paper discussion
(v) Fourth Rule 
5.9 x 0.8 = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) BUT (5.9)^2 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity)
And
6.8 x 0.8 = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) BUT (6.8)^2 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity)
And
8.5 x 0.8 = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) BUT (8.5)^2 = 2 x 35 km/s
And
12.12 x 0.8 = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) BUT (12.12)^2 = 3 x 47.4 km/s And
16.4 x 0.8 = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) BUT (16.4)^2 = 9 x 29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)
Discussion
The data shows, the inner planets velocities are defined based on the outer planets velocities- that explains how the rules (v1v2=constant) is created
The data is produced by the reflection of energy and that shows why the planets velocities are reflected on each other-
(vi) Fifth Rule   (Pluto Velocity Analysis)
DATA
4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity)        = 3/2 (π) km /s
And
5.4 km /s (Neptune velocity) x 4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity) = 8π
And
π x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity)          = 4 x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity)
And
4 x (4.7)^2 = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)
And
(4.7)^3 = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 2 = (205.8/2)
205.8 = the 9 planets velocities total + the Earth moon velocity
Discussion
The data shows a real puzzle- because- Pluto velocity can't be defined simply by some simple rules –even the previous 4 rules can't define this velocity-
The data shows- The planet velocity is defined by very complex rule more strong than the previous 4 rules (Specifically Pluto velocity) 
I want to say- the designer has a reason to define Pluto velocity by some complex system- the planets motions interactions causes this complex system-
The next data can explain better this meaning
More Data
13.1 km/s x 29.8 km/s x 142984      = 47.4 km/s x 9.7 km/s x 120536
13.1 km/s x 9.7 km/s x 142984                  = 5.4 km/s x 27.8 km/s x 120536
9.7 km/s x 5.4 km/s x 142984                    = 4.7 km/s x 13.1 km/s x 120536
13.1, 29.8, 47.4 km/s are the velocities of Jupiter, The Earth, Mercury respectively
9.7, 5.4, 27.8 km/s are the velocities of Saturn, Neptune, The Moon respectively
4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
142984 km = Jupiter diameter and 120536 km = Saturn diameter
The data tells the planets velocities are defined by real complex system
(vii) Planet Orbital Inclination Definition
DATA
(Mercury velocity 47.4 km/s) = (Uranus velocity 6.8 km/s)    x 7
(Mercury orbital inclination = 7 degrees)
(The Moon velocity 27.8 km/s) = (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s)         x 5.1
(The Moon orbital inclination = 5.1 degrees)
(Mars velocity 24.1 km/s)       = (Saturn velocity 9.7 km/s)    x 2.5
(Saturn orbital inclination = 2.5 degrees)
(Mars velocity 24.1 km/s)       = (Jupiter velocity 13.1 km/s) x 1.9
(Mars orbital inclination = 1.9 degrees)
(Venus velocity 35 km/s)         = (Jupiter velocity 13.1 km/s) x 1.3 x 2
(Jupiter orbital inclination = 1.3 degrees)
(Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s)    = (Uranus velocity 6.8 km/s)   x 0.8
(Uranus orbital inclination = 0.8 degrees)
(Saturn velocity 9.7 km/s)       = (Neptune velocity 6.8 km/s)           x 1.8
(Neptune orbital inclination = 1.8 degrees)
Discussion  
The data shows that the planet orbital inclination is defined as a rate between two velocities- but- no clear rule is used by planet velocity - for example Mercury uses the rule (v1v2=constant because 47.4 x 6.8 = 322 and v1/v2= 47.4/6.8 = 7)
this rule is used almost for the inner planets- but- the outer planets orbital inclinations don't follow this rule- because Neptune is complementary with the Earth but Neptune velocity is used with Uranus and Saturn to define Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations- means- the rule (v1/v2 = inclination) is used for the inner planets but the outer planets use another rate and almost their orbital inclinations are created based on the rate (v1/v2) defined by my planet diameter equation- 
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  
Curriculum Vitae                 https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c
E-mail                            [email protected], [email protected]
                                      [email protected]                  
ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook                       https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Researcherid                  https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket                                                                    https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
PUBLICATIONS
box                                https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications        http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare                            https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
8 notes · View notes
zero-zoxx-international · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Elektronen am Morgen (Electrons in the Morning), 1993 by J.G.Wind
61 notes · View notes
shallpass13 · 2 months ago
Text
I turn over and notice a Cat lurking by my bed. Seen, the cat Must move.
Heisenberg was right; to be observed is to be changed.
3 notes · View notes
elvencantation · 1 year ago
Text
i have a sort of question! reading dune with my mom (i’ve read it like ten times, but it’s her first) and we came across this passage
“The prescience, he realized, was an illumination that incorporated the limits of what it revealed—at once a source of accuracy and meaningful error. A kind of Heisenberg indeterminacy intervened: the expenditure of energy that revealed what he saw, changed what he saw.”
so then i got curious and looked up the Heisenberg indeterminacy, which is apparently a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. to put it short “the more accurately one property is measured, the less accurately the other property can be known.” (from wikipedia)
which is a perfect correlation with some of the ways FH describes prescience. however, then i scrolled down a bit further and read this passage
Historically, the uncertainty principle has been confused with a related effect in physics, called the observer effect, which notes that measurements of certain systems cannot be made without affecting the system, that is, without changing something in a system. Heisenberg used such an observer effect at the quantum level as a physical "explanation" of quantum uncertainty.
(i bolded and italicized words to hopefully make it easier to parse the blocks of text)
anyway. it sounds like frank either got the indeterminacy confused with the observer effect in this specific case, given the explanation at the end of the novel passage or im just confused. opinions?
16 notes · View notes
tmarshconnors · 8 months ago
Text
"The presence of an observer in an experiment alters the outcome of the experiment itself."
Tumblr media
Born Werner Karl Heisenberg 5 December 1901 Würzburg, Kingdom of Bavaria, German Empire
Died 1 February 1976 (aged 74) Munich, Bavaria, West Germany
He formulated the Uncertainty Principle: One of Heisenberg's most significant contributions to physics is the formulation of the Uncertainty Principle in 1927. This principle states that it is impossible to simultaneously measure certain pairs of physical properties, such as a particle's position and momentum, with arbitrary precision. This had profound implications for the understanding of quantum mechanics.
Nobel Prize in Physics: Heisenberg was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1932 for his creation of quantum mechanics, specifically the development of matrix mechanics. He shared the prize with Max Born and Pascual Jordan for this groundbreaking work.
Key Figure in Quantum Mechanics: Heisenberg was a central figure in the development of quantum mechanics during the early 20th century. Alongside other pioneers such as Niels Bohr, Erwin Schrödinger, and Max Planck, he played a crucial role in establishing the theoretical framework of this branch of physics.
German Physicist during World War II: Heisenberg remained in Germany during World War II and worked on nuclear research for the Nazi regime. However, there is much debate and controversy surrounding his involvement in the German nuclear program. Some argue that he deliberately sabotaged the project, while others believe he genuinely aimed to develop a nuclear weapon for Germany.
Post-War Influence: After the war, Heisenberg played a key role in rebuilding the scientific community in Germany. He helped establish the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Göttingen and later became the director of the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich. He continued to make significant contributions to theoretical physics until his death in 1976.
11 notes · View notes
angelthefatal · 4 months ago
Text
Found this beauty on YouTube
Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes
whats-in-a-sentence · 2 months ago
Text
In Chapter 12 we discussed how the fabric of space, much like everything else in our quantum universe, is subject to the jitters of quantum uncertainty.
"The Fabric of the Cosmos" - Brian Greene
2 notes · View notes
manwalksintobar · 5 months ago
Text
At North Farm // John Ashbery
Somewhere someone is traveling furiously toward you,  At incredible speed, traveling day and night, Through blizzards and desert heat, across torrents, through narrow passes. But will he know where to find you, Recognize you when he sees you, Give you the thing he has for you? Hardly anything grows here, Yet the granaries are bursting with meal, The sacks of meal piled to the rafters. The streams run with sweetness, fattening fish; Birds darken the sky. Is it enough That the dish of milk is set out at night, That we think of him sometimes, Sometimes and always, with mixed feelings?
3 notes · View notes
eelhound · 1 year ago
Text
"Physicists are more playful and less hidebound creatures than, say, biologists — partly, no doubt, because they rarely have to contend with religious fundamentalists challenging the laws of physics. They are the poets of the scientific world. If one is already willing to embrace thirteen-dimensional objects or an endless number of alternative universes, or to casually suggest that 95 percent of the universe is made up of dark matter and energy about whose properties we know nothing, it’s perhaps not too much of a leap to also contemplate the possibility that subatomic particles have 'free will' or even experiences. And indeed, the existence of freedom on the subatomic level is currently a heated question of debate. Is it meaningful to say an electron 'chooses' to jump the way it does? Obviously, there’s no way to prove it. The only evidence we could have (that we can’t predict what it’s going to do), we do have. But it’s hardly decisive. Still, if one wants a consistently materialist explanation of the world — that is, if one does not wish to treat the mind as some supernatural entity imposed on the material world, but rather as simply a more complex organization of processes that are already going on, at every level of material reality — then it makes sense that something at least a little like intentionality, something at least a little like experience, something at least a little like freedom, would have to exist on every level of physical reality as well.
Why do most of us, then, immediately recoil at such conclusions? Why do they seem crazy and unscientific? Or more to the point, why are we perfectly willing to ascribe agency to a strand of DNA (however 'metaphorically'), but consider it absurd to do the same with an electron, a snowflake, or a coherent electromagnetic field? The answer, it seems, is because it’s pretty much impossible to ascribe self-interest to a snowflake. If we have convinced ourselves that rational explanation of action can consist only of treating action as if there were some sort of self-serving calculation behind it, then by that definition, on all these levels, rational explanations can’t be found. Unlike a DNA molecule, which we can at least pretend is pursuing some gangster-like project of ruthless self-aggrandizement, an electron simply does not have a material interest to pursue, not even survival. It is in no sense competing with other electrons. If an electron is acting freely — if it, as Richard Feynman is supposed to have said, 'does anything it likes' — it can only be acting freely as an end in itself. Which would mean that at the very foundations of physical reality, we encounter freedom for its own sake — which also means we encounter the most rudimentary form of play.
Let us imagine a principle. Call it a principle of freedom — or, since Latinate constructions tend to carry more weight in such matters, call it a principle of ludic freedom. Let us imagine it to hold that the free exercise of an entity’s most complex powers or capacities will, under certain circumstances at least, tend to become an end in itself. It would obviously not be the only principle active in nature. Others pull other ways. But if nothing else, it would help explain what we actually observe, such as why, despite the second law of thermodynamics, the universe seems to be getting more, rather than less, complex. Evolutionary psychologists claim they can explain — as the title of one recent book has it — 'why sex is fun.' What they can’t explain is why fun is fun. This could.
I don’t deny that what I’ve presented so far is a savage simplification of very complicated issues. I’m not even saying that the position I’m suggesting here — that there is a play principle at the basis of all physical reality — is necessarily true. I would just insist that such a perspective is at least as plausible as the weirdly inconsistent speculations that currently pass for orthodoxy, in which a mindless, robotic universe suddenly produces poets and philosophers out of nowhere. Nor, I think, does seeing play as a principle of nature necessarily mean adopting any sort of milky utopian view. The play principle can help explain why sex is fun, but it can also explain why cruelty is fun. (As anyone who has watched a cat play with a mouse can attest, a lot of animal play is not particularly nice.) But it gives us ground to unthink the world around us."
- David Graeber, from "What’s the Point If We Can’t Have Fun?" The Baffler, January 2014.
14 notes · View notes
knightofleo · 9 months ago
Text
L'Rain | Uncertainty Principle
All holes aren't zeros 'Yes' is always 'Maybe' Silence is an answer for all but you It's a new day and I will believe in something Maybe someday we will all believe in something You're convinced that in the dark there will be nothing But to me, a little nothing's got some something
2 notes · View notes
spitegeous-azzburn · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
12.07.2023 🍦
me and my researching group made an insta account for our project. everything’s in portuguese, but just a follow or some likes would really help to boost our project!
we hope this account might help us pass on to the second phase of the science fair, so we could maybe get to go present our research somewhere else!!
even tho it might look like it’s night, the first picture was taken at 7am. crazy huh, winter and rains and stuff
obvs some pictures of the board for today’s classes just to look intelligent (kidding)
and my friend and i went to her favourite milkshake place in the city (i dont really like their milkshake, or their açaí, or any of their food) and i tried this new super chocolatey ice cream. it was really good!! then i got to the part where the chocolate was not as abundant. then it was not good anymore
as you might have noticed i have a big sweet tooth
3 notes · View notes
itsgerges · 30 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Best Regards
The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field
1- Preface
2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?
3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection
4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System
5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?
6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data
7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves
1- Preface
My theory tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field moreover there's NO gravitational field) – and because the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- this article uses the gravitational waves reflection as a method to prove my theory – that's why the article tile is (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field)
Let's refer to my theory before to prove by using the gravitational waves reflection
(i)
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies
Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion creates waves in the space – by that planet motion is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and- planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the sea- by that- the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-
(ii)
The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)
AND 
In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total (where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit) 
Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –
Shortly
The planets motions energies are unified into unified wave and this wave moves by velocity (205.8 km/s) – means- while the planets revolve around the sun, there's one unified wave revolves around the sun and moves by velocity 205.8 km/s 
This unified wave is the gravitational waves
The question is
The scientists discovered waves in the space and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field but why?? because planet motion energy analysis proves the motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves- so the discovered waves  are created by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field – also let's prove the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field to support my theory
(iii)
The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following
(a)
The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- 
(b)
No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-
Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.  
(c)
The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-
(d)
The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it
Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)
d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance
Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                             
d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance
d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury
Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655
d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance
d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance
655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter
All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation
Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.
Notice
Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)  
Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-
(e)
Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.
THE CONCLUSION
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All
2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?
The solar system is created from one energy- and this energy is reflected on each other- for that reason- many planets data are reflected on each other- the energy reflection is seen in different data of planets – let's give 3 examples
Example No. (1)
Planet velocity definition proves planets velocities are reflected on each other –
(v1v2= constant = 322) (my 5th equation)
This equation proves the planets velocities are created in pairs and not individually- means each planet has its complementary – let's prove that
Mercury (47.4 km/s)   x Uranus (6.8 km/s)                   = 322
Venus (35 km/s)        x Pluto (4.7 km/s) x 2                  = 322
The Earth (29.8 km/s) x Neptune (5.4 km/s) x 2 = 322
Mars (24.1 km/s)       x Jupiter (13.1 km/s)                   = 322
Planet velocity is defined by many rules but our rule is the major one and all other rules depend on it
Clearly the rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are reflected on each other
Example No. (2)
The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – The Earth) tells
Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates Longer orbital distance
(I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus)
The original order was (Mercury – Mars - Venus – The Earth)
This order also tells the same rule (Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates longer orbital distance)
AND
The outer planets order (Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto) tells  
Greater diameter  necessitates Shorter orbital distance
Clearly the planets orders are reflected on each other
(Uranus diameter is greater than Neptune diameter but Neptune mass is greater – means – the order depends on the planets diameters and not masses) 
Example No. (3)
Venus orbital inclination = 3.4 degrees and
Pluto orbital inclination = 17.2 degrees
But sin (3.4 degrees) = (1/17.2)
I try to show that the planets data is reflected on each other but we need to defines which planet data is reflected on which
3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection
Let's see the picture clearly
(a)
we see the planets data are reflected on each other – and we ask – how this data be reflected on each other?
(b)
The planets can't be reflected on each other – why?? because each planet is connected by its orbit- the planets are found in their orbits- the reflection of energy needs freedom in motion- we understand this meaning clearly
For example- I can use a mirror to reflect a light beam but I can NOT control the reflected light beam – the reflected energy moves free in space- here – if the planets are reflected on each other they will leave their orbits because they will be carried by the energy into the reflection direction-
I want to say- the motion in orbit is a feature of the planet – and the reflection is a feature of wave – planet motion can not support the reflection feature because the motion is done in orbit (defined position)
Shortly- the planets can not be reflected on each other
(c)   
How can the planets data reflected on each other if the planets can't be reflected on each other? how can their data be reflected?  
There are 2 steps to answer this question – I write them in (d) and (e) 
(d)
The  gravitational waves are reflected- in fact- the gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- please pay attention- we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system
The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn
The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter
The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars
The gravitational waves are reflected and this reflection causes to reflect the planets data on each other
(e)
Why does the gravitational waves reflection cause to reflect the planets data?
The solar planets and distances are created from one energy – means – one cycle of energy is found behind the solar group creation and motion
This is similar to the blood circulation in a creature- the planets are similar to this creature members- the blood moves to this creature liver, kidney, heart and brain each member is similar to a planet- the blood moves through all of them- if this blood is poisoned all of them will be dead- if the blood healthy the members will be strong-
Similar to that
The gravitational waves are reflected and pushes energy in defined direction- each planet data is defined by this energy –and because- some energy moves in direction opposite to other energy (because of the reflection of energy) for that some planets data be reflected on each other-
Please pay attention
We have one energy behind the solar system- the reflection of energy causes part of this energy to move in opposite direction to the other part that causes the data to be reflected on each other and for that some planets data be reflected on other planets data-
The major problem in this explanation is the matter definition- because- the physics book defines the planet as (Planet is a rigid body created independently from the space and the other planets)- this definition is the problem because based on it the data can never be reflected on each other even if the gravitational waves are reflected let's provide a new definition for matter and prove it
Matter Definition
I have discovered (Planet Diameter Is Created Based On A Mathematical Equation) let's see this equation
My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity                                                       
r = Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination        (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)
Example    
Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8               
89143                   = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
49528 km   = Neptune diameter
9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity
5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination
The equation tells planet diameter is created based on its velocity –means- Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s
The Equation Concept
Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- the fact is that – The necessary requirement for planet safe motion is to create a function between this planet diameter and its orbital distance
BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- the function in this case can't be useful because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result  
The designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but the function contains also more variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a planet changes its orbital distance- this planet diameter will not be changed but its rotation period, orbital period, and velocity will be changed and the diameter will be saved-
NOTICE-
Mars is the example for this theory because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one- after Migration Mars changed its motion data but Mars diameter is saved
NOTICE-
Planet diameter equation is very useful to analyze the energy reflection in the solar system because the equation shows the changes in data resulting from the energy reflection- for example- the equation produces the planet orbital inclination-but in Saturn equation- the equation produces the value (0.4) while we know Saturn orbital inclination is 2.5 degrees- the value (0.4) is produced because the energy is reflected in Saturn and that caused effect on the data by that the value (2.5) become (1/2.5)=0.4
 Matter Definition (Deep Analysis)  
What's The Matter And How Is Created?
The matter and space are created from the same one energy and both move with the motion of this energy from which they are created- but- the matter creates for itself a distinguish form and moves by different velocity from the space motion (notice the gravitational waves prove the space has motion and not static).
This is similar to the sea of water- the space is similar to the sea of water and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page-
The whirlpool (vortex) is created by the sea water and it's carried by the sea water motion- spite of that- the whirlpool is different in its form from the sea waves – also the whirlpool moves by different velocity from the sea waves motion velocity- this example gives explanation for the matter definition- the matter is similar perfectly to the whirlpool on the sea page- it's created by the sea water motion but it has a distinguish form and different velocity from the sea waves-
Also
The whirlpool dimensions depend on the sea water motion features- for example – we have a whirlpool its diameter is 2 meters, this diameter is formed by the sea water motion features (the water velocity- amount-pressure -……etc) that tells the whirlpool is found later after the sea creation- and the water motion is found before the whirlpool creation- this meaning is a fact for the matter creation and dimensions- the matter dimensions are created based on this matter motion- means- the motion is defined before the matter creation- this is proved strongly by my planet diameter equation- the equation tells (for example) Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s- the whirlpool idea explains how the planet matter data is defined based on its motion- because
The original energy was found in motion at first and the planet matter is created from this moving original energy and the planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after the planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data is created that's why the planet data is in full harmony with the planet motion features.
Also the idea shows the planet motion reason- as I proved before- no planet moves by the sun gravity- Newton is wrong- because the planet creation and motion are done by one force only otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it- here we see the planet motion reason- the planet moves with the original energy from which this planet is created     
4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System
Please pay attention - we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system
The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn
The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter
The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars
The planets data is reflected according to this table – for that we need to define each reflection in details to see the reflected data between the two planets
5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?
Let's suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field as the physics book tells- the waves are reflected and caused changes for the planets data- as I prove in the next point- that means – the gravitational waves provides new energy for the planets which caused the planets data to be effected by the gravitational waves reflection- this will add new energy for these planets and the whole solar system-
This is similar to the rains on Earth- we know- the rains is vaporized water from the seas and rivers and this vaporized water is found in the clouds which cause the rains
Means- we don't imagine the water is found in the sky by itself – and we don't think the rains water is new water found in the sky without water vaporization from the seas and rivers- because- if the rain water is found in the sky by itself without vaporization for the seas water that will add new water on the Earth- and that will cause the whole Earth to be drown in water and no ground will be found because the rains add new water to the Earth-
Similar to that- if we suppose- the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field and these waves are reflected and cause effects on the planets data because these waves add new energy for the planets – this new energy will increase the solar system energy – this is a wrong idea- because
No source of energy can cause the continuous increase for the solar system energy
The solar system stability in motion proves no change in energy is found
The planets orbital periods are not changed prove the solar system energy is a stable value has no change
Shortly- the solar system energy is defined stable value of energy moves in a cycle (as the sea water and rains) –
This analysis proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and by that the gravitational waves effect on the planets data is a part of the energy cycle where these waves energy is produced by the planets motions and this energy has effects on these planets shows a complete cycle of energy.
Means
The solar system energy is stable- the reflection of energy causes to accumulate the energy in one point but the energy before the accumulation equal the energy after the accumulation- the reflection causes to accumulate the energy in one point only
The conclusion
The gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (even if found) 
6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data
The Data Changes
 The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data let's refer to these changes in following 
What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.
What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection
The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.
The energy direction is changed by the reflection
The players of the rates of time are reflected also –
Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have seen - the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn–  and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets - 
These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the data analysis and comparison
Let's see how these changes have effects on the planets data in the next point no. (7)
7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves
Group Data No (I)
(1)
The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that
Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days
And
687 days x 2π      = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π      = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
687 days x 6π x 2 =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)
(2)
The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That 
Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The  period4900 days
And
4900 days x 2π    = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)
4900 days x 4π    = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)
4900 days x 6π    =  90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)
(3)
The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–
BUT
The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And
(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)
1433 mkm                       = Mars orbital circumference
1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)
1433 mkm   x 4π  = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)
1433 days   x 8π  = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
Discussion
(1)
The data shows the following
The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods
(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)
The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods
The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference
This data proved my planet definition (the planets are geometrical points carried by the same one energy- or- the planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam- and the planets move with this light beam motion- and the planets are created depending on each other and No planet is independent from the others in its creation and motion) – means- the planets are similar to whirlpools (vortex) found on the sea water page- we can imagine many whirlpools (vortex) are found on the same one sea and they are near to each other- this picture is very similar to the planets nature- that explains how the reflection of energy for one time can define the orbital periods for three planets (or 4 planets) together-
Here we imagine there are 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and then one strong wave of water passed through these 4 whirlpools (vortex), and this water wave motion causes effects on the 4 whirlpools-
This information is so important because one motion only (one wave reflection) can cause to define three or four planets data that proves strongly the planets Can NOT be independent neither in Creation Nor in motion- the planets are created and moving depends on each other because all of them are created from the same one energy and they move with this same energy motion-
NOTICE Let's imagine we have 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and one strong water wave passes through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)  - now – suppose we put some red color on this strong water wave- what would happen? The water color will be red and the red water will pass through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)  
We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.
That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other – Now let's analyze each reflection individually
(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)
224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)
AND-
680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –
As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)
The orbital periods definition
687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
687 days x 6π x 2 =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)
We don't discuss the precession cycle here
(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)
The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)
It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.
The important notice here tells that- the gravitational wave reflection for one time defines 3 planets orbital periods – this fact is proved strongly by the data and it disproves the wrong idea tells (Planet is created independently from the other planets) 
(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)
Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data
Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The  period 4900 days
And
4900 days x 2π    = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)
4900 days x 4π    = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period)                (error 3%)
4900 days x 6π    =  90560 days (Pluto orbital period)                             (error 2%)
We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them
Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days
687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The  period 4900 days  
4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)
4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)
4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)
The comparison shows the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because
The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-
Notice - please note clearly – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-
It's one gravitational wave sent from Pluto to Neptune and reflected to Saturn then this same wave is sent from Saturn to Uranus and Uranus reflected the same wave to Jupiter and Jupiter sent the same wave to Venus and Venus reflected the same wave to Mars- One Gravitational Wave moves through all these planets        
The Conclusion
The planets data is distributed in the reversed direction for the reflected energy- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter but the data is distributed from Jupiter to Uranus- there's a geometrical reason for this behavior we should discover later.
(3) The First Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Neptune To Saturn)
We still have another problem- let's remember this problem reason
The gravitational wave first reflection is done from Pluto to Neptune, supposing Neptune would send the energy to Uranus but Neptune didn't send the energy instead Neptune kept the energy inside its orbit and prevent it to move toward Uranus – also Uranus itself couldn't release the imprisoned energy from Neptune orbit – and that necessitated Saturn itself to create interaction with Neptune to release the imprisoned energy for that the energy is moved toward Saturn immediately by that this reflection of the wave is considered the first reflection because the energy is released from Neptune to Saturn directly – Shortly- the wave energy is sent from Pluto to Neptune and the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and this is the first reflection of the energy (the gravitational wave first reflection)
Let's see the data - The distance 1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) is still a distance And (1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)
1433 mkm                       = Mars orbital circumference
1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)
1433 mkm   x 4π  = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)
1433 days   x 8π  = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
The data follows the rule (2π, 4π, 8π) perfectly as the other two reflections but the data shows 2 problems which are
1st problem
The data distribution is in the reversed direction of the energy motion direction- because the reflection is done from Neptune to Saturn but the data shows the orbital circumferences of (Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto) are defined by this reflection which supposes the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune and that's NOT Fact 
This behavior is typical the behavior of the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter-
Means- this behavior is repeated in the two reflections of energy which tells that the behavior depends on a geometrical reason.
2nd problem
The distance is not changed into a period of time as the other reflections but stayed as a distance! How and why?? let's see deeply this data
If the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune, Saturn orbital circumference 9010 mkm should be changed into a period of time to be 9010 days and then
9010 days   x 2π    = 2 x 28244 days (28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference)
9010 days   x 4π    = 113223 days
9010 days   x 6π    = 169840 days
We see the data gives NO real values- means- this is not the direction of the data creation- Instead – the distance 1433 mkm or the circumference 9010 mkm is still distance and then
1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)
1433 mkm   x 4π  = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)
1433 days   x 8π  = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
And
1433 mkm                       = Mars orbital circumference
We understand that, the data provides a distance (1433 mkm) and not a period of time then we have to ask again why this distance is not changed into a period of time?
We understand that the outer planets have 2 reflections (first reflection from Neptune to Saturn) and (the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter)- also we understand that the solar system needs one reflection only in the outer planets and one reflection only in the inner planets and also we know the outer planets have two reflections because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system- means if Neptune is removed from the solar system the outer planets would have one reflection only – for that- the designer caused the two reflections in the outer planets to be complementary one another – the reflection from Uranus to Jupiter defines the planets orbital periods and the reflection from Neptune to Saturn defines these same planets orbital circumferences
 The designer caused to make the two reflections complementary one another and by that the two reflections can be unified into one reflection and based on that the machine will work by one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets- but how the energy motion produces the distances in place of the periods of time? this question is hard to answer because we don't see deeply how the reflection of energy can define each planet orbital period (or orbital circumference) by using the rates (2π, 4π, 6π) we just discovered the rule but more geometrical analysis is required to see how this rule works
NOTICE
In the third reflection (from Venus to Mars) – let's remember the data
Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days
687 days x 2π      = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π      = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
687 days x 6π x 2 =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)
We have asked- why Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate (0.8)?
Let's try to answer – let's see the data 10747 /9800 = 9800/9010 where
10747 days  = Saturn orbital period and 9010 mkm   = Saturn orbital circumference
9800 mkm   = 2 x 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)  
We know 4900 mkm and 4900 days is the player in the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter- means- Saturn has effect also in the second reflection for that the second reflection has effect on Saturn data and caused its orbital period to be produced under the effect of the rate (0.8) which is the reflection rate as we will see in the next data 
Group Data No (II)
(1)
3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8        = 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day)                   = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)
(2)
1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm
(3)
0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm
Discussion
We discuss the data no. (2) and (3) at first
DATA NO. (2)
1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm
(0.421 mkm = Uranus motion distance in its rotation period)
DATA NO. (3)
0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm
(0.3129 mkm = Neptune motion distance in its rotation period)
MORE DATA
0.5875 mkm (Uranus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.46688 mkm
(0.466884 mkm = Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period) And
0.46688 mkm (Neptune motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3736 mkm
(0.3736 mkm = Saturn motion distance in its rotation period) And
0.46688 mkm (Pluto motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3248 mkm
(i)
The rate (0.8) is created by the waves reflection and the planets velocities are defined based on each other by this rate as discussed in the planet velocity definition-  here the data shows the rate (0.8) defines each planet motion distance based on the other planet motion distance (in the same one reflection) –
let's explain that in more details
(1st reflection From Neptune to Saturn) for that
Saturn motion distance per solar day (0.838 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Neptune motion distance in its rotation period 0.3129 million km
Also
Neptune motion distance per solar day (0.46688 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 million km
AND
(2nd reflection From Uranus to Jupiter) for that
Jupiter motion distance per solar day (1.1318 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Uranus motion distance in its rotation period 0.421 million km
Also
Uranus motion distance per solar day (0.5875 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period 0.46688 million km
AND
In the 3rd reflection we will see Mars motion distance per solar day is defined by Venus motion distance per solar day- follows the same rule  
Notice
We note the data No. (2) and (3) show the data is distributed in the reversed direction for the energy motion because the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and from Uranus to Jupiter- But data is distributed in the reversed direction-
In the third reflection we will see the data moves in the same direction with the energy distribution
Also  
In Venus data we will see that it uses the square value (0.8)^2 and we will explain why the rate is used in square value
(ii)
Why is the rate (1.0725) found in the data? because the gravitational wave  moves by speed of light (300000 km/s) in Saturn orbit and in all planets orbits till Venus orbit-
Shortly
the wave velocity was 205.8 km/s through Pluto, Neptune and Uranus orbits BUT
The wave velocity is accelerated in Saturn orbit and its velocity be = speed of light =300000 km/s, for that reason the rate (1.0725) is created because this is (Lorentz length contraction effect rate) and it can be produced only by motion with speed=(99% speed of light =297000 km/s)- shortly- the wave velocity be equal=speed of light = 300000 km/s in Saturn orbit, for that the rate (1.0725) is produced in the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter as the data shows (and also in Venus data we will see it)
(iii)
The previous data shows the planets distances are rated by the rate (0.8) for the planets players in the same wave reflection- but- this picture is not complete yet – because the planets which aren't players in the same reflection shows equal distances also but this distances equality doesn't depend on the rate (0.8) let's give examples
Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period = Neptune motion distance per solar day =0.466884 million km
And
Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 mkm x π = Uranus motion distance per solar day 0.5875 mkm x 2
And
The Earth motion distance per solar day = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period = 2.574 million km
This distances equality must be produced also by the waves reflection but the rule is not clear yet- I want to say the effect of the rate (0.8) on the planets distances is part of greater rule explains how this distances equality is produced and the useful result of it –
Please note–I analyze this data in details in 2nd part of this 1st hypothesis explanation-
Now
Let's discuss the data No.(1)
DATA NO. (1)
3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm (The Earth motion distance per solar day)             = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)
2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day= Pluto motion distance in its rotation period
Means
3.024 million km x (0.8)^2 x 1.0725 = 2.082 million km where
3.024 mkm  =Venus motion distance per solar day
2.082 mkm  =Mars motion distance per solar day
Notice
2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day
2.57 mkm = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm The moon motion distance per solar day
2.59 mkm = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period
The data tells Mars motion distance per solar day depends on Venus motion distance per solar day – here all distances are defined by the solar day- 
In the third reflection- the wave is reflected from Venus to Mars- here also Venus motion distance per solar day (3.024 mkm) defines Mars motion distance per solar day (2.082 mkm)- but the definition depends on the squared value (0.8)^2 
That shows Venus reflection follows the same rule used by the other reflections – where the sender planet motion distance per solar day defines the receiver planet motion distance
Perfectly the rule is followed BUT Why does Venus use the square value (0.8)^2??
Because of the reflections order – let's explain that
The two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and by that they are unified and can be considered as One Unified Reflection in the outer planets
Means- there is one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets and these are two reflections- means – Venus reflection should be considered the second reflection that causes to square the value (0.8)- that explains why Venus uses the squared Value (0.8)^2
Notice
This is a proof for my theory that (one gravitational wave is reflected three times)- means- this wave is reflected before and effected by the rate (0.8) and this same wave is reflected again for that the rate (0.8) be in its squared value  (0.8)^2
The Conclusion
The gravitational waves reflection causes the sender planet motion distance to define the receiver planet motion distance as seen in the data- the definition depends on the rate (0.8) – here we see one rule proves the receiver planet motion depends on the sender planet motion- 
Group Data No (III)
(1)              
5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)
(2)              
21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6
(3)              
(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days
And
π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)
Discussion
Data No. (1)
5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)
568 x 10^24 kg    = Saturn Mass
102 x 10^24 kg    = Neptune Mass
59800 days                    = Neptune orbital period
10747 days                    = Saturn orbital period
In the first reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Neptune to Saturn
This behavior shows second rule– for the planets in the same reflection- we see the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate and this behavior is used by the other two reflections- means- the gravitational wave reflection between two planets cause these two planets masses rate to define their orbital periods rate – let's see the rest data
Data No. (2)
21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6                   (notice1407.6π =4331 error 2%)
1898 x 10^24 kg  = Jupiter Mass
86.8 x 10^24 kg   = Uranus Mass
30589 days                    = Uranus orbital period
4331 days            = Jupiter orbital period
In second reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter
It's the same rule and behavior, the planets masses rates defines their orbital periods
Just Jupiter orbital period 4331 is divided by (π) – no any other change in the rule proves that the rule is a fact and used with the planets of the same reflection
Data No. (3)
(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days
4.87 x 10^24 kg   = Venus Mass                         and 0.642 x 10^24 kg= Mars Mass
224.7 days           = Venus orbital period            and 687 days= Mars orbital period
In the third reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Venus to Mars
Here also we see the planets use the same rule and the same behavior – the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate-But the rate is squared! Why?   
Venus Mass = 7.6 Mars Mass but the data uses the squared rate (7.6)^2 –
We should pay attention for this rate because the other planets used their masses rate but NOT squared value – Why does Venus use the squared value (7.6)^2?
We have solved this question in the distances discussion when Venus used (0.8)^2 and the other planets use (0.8) only- here also is similar to that- let's remember the reason
We agreed that the two wave reflections in the outer planets are complementary one another and by that they are unified together into one unified reflection and by that the outer planets has one unified reflection and the inner planets has one single reflection and these are considered as two reflections and for that Venus reflection is considered the second one in the solar system (and the final one) for that Venus uses the squared Value – where we know the wave reflection causes to square the value
Notice - 5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747) = (10/1.8) =9010/1622 where 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination and 10 =4 x 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) and -9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference and 1622 mkm = Neptune Uranus Distance
Notice π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%) – this data is discussed in the next point
The Conclusion The Wave Reflection Causes The Sender And Receiver Planets Masses Rate To Define Their Orbital Periods Rate.
Group Data No (IV)
(1)
12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5
(2)
142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 =5.56/2
(3)
378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6
Discussion
Notice
π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)
This data shows the rates (5.56) and (7.6) are found based on the value (π^3=31) I try to prove that it's one energy (one value π^3=31) and the different rates as (5.56 and 7.6) are found depending on (this one value π^3=31) by geometrical reasons – that proves it's one energy (one wave) is reflected three times in the solar system – the value (π^3 = 31 =) is very important because all rates depend on it
 The group data shows the planets diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 =31)- let's examine it in following
 Data No. (1)
12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5
3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination
1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination
The data shows the two planets diameters are rated with rate equal their orbital inclination and this rate equal π^0.5
Notice
177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) x 93.4
90+ 3.4 = 93.4 deg
Data No. (2)
142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 = 5.56
We remember 31 = (5.56)^2
Data No. (3)
378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6
Also we remember 31/4 = 7.75 (and the difference between 7.75 and 7.6 is 2%)
The data shows the diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 = 31 =) as the masses do
Means- the planets masses and diameters are created rated to one another based on this same value (π^3 = 31 =)
I try to prove that – one energy is found behind all this data- the value (π^3 = 31 =) refers to one energy and this energy is effected by different geometrical reasons and that causes this energy (π^3 = 31 =) to show different rates as (5.56) and (7.6)
Shortly – we deal with one energy reflected three times in the solar system and the planets data are defined by the effect of this energy on them
Please note- we can imagine one river of water moves through different cities and each city deals with the river based on its own data- one city has great soil and this uses the river water to plant vegetables and fruits- another city its ground has many holes and caves the river water will cause all these holes to be filled of water and that will create many moors in this city and that will not be useful for it –
We have here the same picture- One energy moves through the solar system and reflected three times in it and this reflection causes changes for the planets data for that the different rates (5.56 and 7.6) are created from this one energy (π^3 = 31 =) by geometrical reasons have effects on it.
Group Data No (V)
(1)               243 mkm    = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days
(2)               17.2 km      = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds
(3)               16.1 km      = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds
Discussion
We discuss data No. (2) and (3) at first
Data No. (2)
17.2 km      = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds
13.1 km /s   = Jupiter velocity
1.13129      = (5.25/4) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56
17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period
Data No. (3)
16.1 km      = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds
9.7 km /s     = Saturn velocity
1.65            = (5.25/π) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56
16.1 hours = Neptune rotation period
The data shows each planet rotation period depends on the other planet velocity based on the rate (5.56) where (31=5.56^2)- that shows Uranus rotation period is connected with Jupiter velocity and Neptune rotation period is connected with Saturn velocity proves that a deep connection is found between each two planets as a result for the wave reflection between them 
Data No. (1)
243 mkm    = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days
243 days     = Venus rotation period
2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day  and 116.75 days = Venus day period 
We see also here – Venus rotation period is related to Mars velocity- and this similar to the other planets behavior as we have discussed before 
Notice
Venus (35 km/s) moves in 10747 seconds a distance = 378675 km
Where
378675 km = Saturn circumference
10747 days = Saturn orbital period 
We know that- No direct reflection is found between Venus and Saturn- but the data shows deep interaction is found between them
I want to say
I provide different data to prove my hypothesis tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and the waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity) for that I put different data trying to prove this hypothesis
But- the real design is much complex than this small hypothesis- because this hypothesis refers to one rule found in the design but the design is consisted of hundreds of rules and by that I provide very narrow vision for the whole truth-
Imagine we examine the artery connected between the human liver and his heart- it's one artery – it's fact and real piece of the human body but it's just one artery of many others- I want to say- the real vision of the solar system is so wide than this one I provide here- that's why the rules are not complete- but I provide strong data can prove my hypothesis and can show a piece of truth about the solar system real design.     
Group Data No (VI)
(1)              
177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2
(2)
97.8 degrees   = 31 x 3.1 degrees
(3)
28.3 degrees (Neptune axial tilt) =  26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) x 1.0725
Discussion
Data No. (1)
177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2
177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt
 25.2 degrees   = Mars Axial Tilt                BUT 25.2 +90 = 115.2 degrees
Please note
(12104 km Venus diameter / 6792 km Mars diameter) = 3.4/1.9 = π^0.5
(3.4 deg and 1.9 deg are the orbital inclinations of Venus and Mars respectively)
And
(177.4 deg Venus axial tilt / 115.2 degrees) = π/2
We see clearly the data depend on the value (π^3) and different geometrical reasons have effect on this value to produce these rates (π^0.5 and π/2)
Data No. (2)
97.8 degrees   = 31 x 3.1 degrees
97.8 degrees   = Venus Axial Tilt
3.1 degrees     = Mars Axial Tilt
The data still depends on this same value (π^3= 31)
Group Data No (VII)
The distance 1433 million km
This distance should prove the energy is transported and the waves are reflected in the solar system because this distance is used frequently in the solar system and no explanation for such using better than the reflection of energy – let’s see its data
1433 million km            = Mars Orbital Circumference
1433 million km            = Saturn Orbital Distance
1433 million km            = Uranus Saturn Distance
2 x 1433 million km      = Uranus Orbital Distance
π x 1433 million km      = Neptune Orbital Distance
(π+1) x 1433 million km         = Pluto Orbital Distance
1410 million km            = Pluto Neptune Distance  (with 1433 mkm error 1.7%)
Also
1433 days =  2π x 224.7 days (Venus Orbital Period)
Logically there's a geometrical reason to cause all these distances to be equal and rated to each other based on this same root (1433)- and the wave reflection can be this geometrical reason by which this data is created.  
The Explanation Of The Wave Reflection Effect On The Solar System Design
The gravitational waves reflection has great effect on the solar system design- let's refer to this effect in following
The Planets Distribution
The three outer planets (Pluto- Neptune- Uranus) have great orbits- why?
Because the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s in these orbits and the planets motions energies are stored in these orbits as waves move by this velocity 205.8 km/s – means – great and massive motion energy is stored in these orbit where the waves move by 205.8 km/s that needed great areas to store so massive amount of energy
BUT
The Waves Velocity Is Accelerated In Saturn Orbit 
This is the important point- because- the interaction between the outer planets caused to reflect the wave in Saturn orbit firstly and this reflection causes to square the velocity and then the velocity is squared and be equal the speed of light – means- the gravitational waves move by speed of light starting from Saturn orbit and continues with this speed till Venus and the other inner planets-
This is very important picture because
The low velocity 205.8 km/s needed great areas that causes the orbits or Pluto, Neptune and Uranus to be so great areas – BUT
The high speed motion (speed of light) doesn't need great areas – that's why the planets orbits from Saturn to Mercury are small orbits and the inner has very small orbits because the energy doesn't depend on the number of waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s but the energy depends on the motion by speed of light by that the energy of 1461 waves move by 205.8 km/s be equal the energy of one wave moves by speed of light – that causes the orbits to be small orbits – and that explains the distribution of the planets from the sun to Pluto.    
And for that
When the massive reflected energy reached to Venus- it doesn't destroy the small inner planets and their orbits because the energy is used immediately to produce the sun rays means no need for storing the energy and for that no places for the energy storing instead the energy is used immediately- I try to show that- the planets distribution depends on the gravitational waves velocity in different orbits and by that the planets create their orbits in harmony with the moving energy    
The Planets Masses Distribution
The outer planets have great masses but the inner planets have very small masses- why? because the rates of masses enable to accelerate the wave velocity in Saturn orbit-this idea is explained clearly in (Mass definition) in my paper definitions
The mass is used as a rate of time and the rates between the great and small masses aim to create the required rates of time and by these rates of time the wave velocity is accelerated
Please read my paper
The Sun Can NOT Be Created Before The Planets Creation
or
or
or
And
A Great Gap Between The Physics Book And The Solar System Facts
or
And
The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field
or
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  
Curriculum Vitae                 https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c
E-mail                            [email protected], [email protected]
                                      [email protected]                  
ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook                       https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Researcherid                  https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket                                                                    https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
PUBLICATIONS
box                                https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications        http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare                            https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
8 notes · View notes
lecfosa · 2 years ago
Text
5 notes · View notes
willfulwizard · 8 months ago
Text
Highly relevant time to share my favorite joke.
You’ve heard of Schrödinger’s cat, but did you know Heisenberg also had a cat? It was always running around at an unknown velocity or sleeping in an unknown location.
So pretty much just a regular fucking cat.
Unfortunately, I’ve realized because of typing this joke out for the first time and googling the names to get them right that Heisenberg was part of the German nuclear program in World War 2. And so I need a new favorite joke.
Tumblr media
66K notes · View notes