#Themes as those were present in the show and developed further by Andy | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

sakuya123draws · 6 years ago

Note

for the end of year meme: 1, 8, 10, 14, 20 !! Please and thank you!

OH MAH GOD IT’S LATE!!! (I am so sorry @nalufever I finally got around to answering asks and I’m starting with the most recent ones!! It’s appropriate as they are for the “End of the year” meme I reblogged!)

Anyways, without further ado, let’s answer these lovely questions~! >w

1. First things first, did you have a good year?

A: Well, I guess that is the first thing to ask when jumping from one year to the other! ^_^ If I’m being honest the year started out really bad. Lots of family problems, stress from college and my horrible relationship was weighing me down and draining me of my energy. I never want to blame anything on anyone, but I was in a dysfunctional relationship with someone and I finally got out of it around April. It’s a long story, but I don’t feel like dwelling on that stuff. I’m stronger now! (I mean I “hope” so ^ ^;) I was happy that I got in the honours roll for my first year which gave me entry to showing my artwork to judges at the college I got to! It was an amazing experience and I made some cool friends along the way! It’s a small class, but we��re like a family. :D As for my actual family, I lost my grandma…She was an inspiration to me and even today I will always show my appreciation for my grandparents! Other than that, my family had gotten better and we can finally understand each other a bit more when it comes to communication which is always a plus!! :3 Even on here with Tumblr being who it is, I still have lots of friends that didn’t leave and I’m happy to see they are better from last year! In short, (cause you can see THIS is a paragraph xD) I think the year was wishy-washy! It was all over the place, but it made up for it at the end to be called “good”. ^v^

8. Which fashion trends did you hate?

(I thought of him when I thought of the word fashion xD Don’t kill me, I LOVE Max

A: Even though my mom is a lady who lives by fashion, I can’t say I know the styles of 2018! ;w; I looked up a source (well you know Vogue and all that jazz :/) to base my opinion on. I only think this would be easier if I could say what I “loved”, but it’s a hate one so gotta be mean xD lol. I mean I never “hate” anything, so I’m gonna give it a shot.

One thing I don’t like about fashion trends if I’m being frank is that it’s usually clothes on the runway. Many styles I see based on Vogue’s source are styles I can’t see the everyday person wearing. Personally, I wouldn’t wear half of those designs outside. That’s just me. My sense of style is a hybrid of my mom’s fashion she wears/sells, 80′s-90′s fashions and cutesy outfits. (that I think I’d look bad in ;w;) I’m gonna give a small bullet point list. (I know I always say small xD)

Arty Impressions - This was the first one on the article I read. From what I can gather it’s fashion with famous works printed on it. (Artworks, for example, Andy Warhol’s, screenprints) I mean I can see the connection, but for me wearing something with a reproduced art piece is hard for me to personally wear. LIke it has to be done like how T-shirts have a design in the middle or small embellishments on it to make me wear it. The example I saw is fun and creative, but for me, I couldn’t see myself liking/wearing those pieces. It depends. 5/10? I guess xD

Plastic/see-through material - This honestly has been a reoccurring style that I have seen. It’s become more prominent now according to last year’s trends. I can’t stand the “see-through” look. I don’t know what it is, but it’s just too awkward to wear outside. LIke people will defend that you can wear what you want, but for ME and ME Only, I can’t wear those kinds of stuff. I would feel very scared/concerned with how I look. (Even to myself) If you don’t know what I am referring to, I mean like that umbrella looking material. (I’ve added the source in the paragraph above for this question! ^_^)

Geometric/Flannel Print - I can never see myself liking the flannel scene. For pyjamas, no problem! To wear outside, I can’t bring myself to do that. You can see me in an old sweater, but flannel I don’t think any of my friends have seen me in that xD I just can’t say it’s aesthetically pleasing to me. I have a problem liking this style. Maybe I will when I get older, but as I’m young and creative I see myself wearing clothes for the young generation! :P (my mom says that anyways xD lol) The clothes that make you feel like partying, even though you don’t go outside like me xD lol

As much as I love talking about fashion, I think I would bore everyone with my opinions. xD (You’re definitely not here for these are you? xD If so, thank you)

10. What song sums up this year for you?

A: I don’t have a definite answer, but I went through a lot of things. Many times I wanted to be in a dream world…Like to escape everything. All the pain and depression. I still feel that way, but in 2018 it was WAY worse. This song I originally heard in Silent Hill: Downpour (A GAME I LOVE ;w;) was a song I thought of when I see this question. I think it’s a great song! sad, but I’d recommend it. The singer’s voice is lovely. It invokes so many emotions in me ;w; (I’ll give a youtube link)

Ed Harcourt - From Every Sphere

14. Favorite new TV show?

(I HAD to make it this guy >w

WARNING: HUGE ANSWER BELOW!

A: Well, as you may know, I don’t watch many shows anymore. I mostly play video games, but for the sake of this amazing question, I’ll say what anime(s) I did enjoy last year! I don’t think I’ve ever loved an anime as much as I love Gintama. It’s really funny because I originally “disliked” Gintama. It was a naive thing for the young me to have said at the time. I judged the show so harshly after seeing anime (IMO) being shat on with the usual themes and scenes I ALWAYS see. I began to give up on anime as a whole. My story starts when I was pissed at my brother telling me, “Gintama is amazing Tash, trust me you’ll regret hating it.” I answered with my normal response of, “ sure Ja, you ALWAYS say that. How will this be any different?” Maybe I shouldn’t have said that…Well, it’s too late now for present-day me. My brother showed me all the “humorous” parts first. (I honestly felt like he tricked me, but the show really starts that way xD) Anyways, we eventually watched a few episodes and I told him I didn’t understand the humour. (it’s honestly hard to get into if you’re not open-minded or don’t understand the comedy Sorachi uses) Until he decided to hit me with his ace, “The Shinsengumi Crisis Arc”. All I can say is, a different side of me was born. I started to see what a show could truly offer if it was done right, the way I wanted to see it. It’s hard to explain, but without Gintama’s sad/inspirational/happy/stupid/clever story writing/arcs I don’t think I would have ever gotten through 2018. I haven’t finished the episodes as of its recent update, but I really learned a lot from the show. I want to give a HUGE shoutout to Sorachi for writing this masterpiece and I would 10000% recommend it to ANYONE! It’s a show that changed my views on people’s situations and lives. I think all the arcs are amazingly written and so far I don’t think I’ll ever get bored of it! It really got me in the feels. I can honestly say that if you can’t feel after seeing an arc in Gintama, you haven’t felt. It’s that amazing! (Then AGAIN, it’s an opinion not everyone will sadly share xD) Also, I am really enjoying Bleach! I’m sad at how it ended in terms of what things happened and I honestly hope Kubo will be ok. I loved his episodes and the earliest ones really touched my heart like Gintama. He’s also really great at making me cry every episode! :P

(GOD SORRY FOR THE ESSAY AND STUPID STORY LINES xD I’m sorry I can’t add a RM for this b/c then everything under can’t be seen like the other answers ;w;)

20. Did you develop a new obsession?

Well…YES! Many obsessions!! The real question is which is the one that I obsess over the most? Well I’ll put some bullet points to hopefully make it smaller xD

First of all, I don’t want to say it but I’ve taken a “liking” (what an understatement lol) to Gin Ichimaru from Bleach~! >////

I think everyone knows, but I have an obsession with cute/pink/pretty stuff. (Can it be called that?) I just LOVE pastel colours or pinks/blues/purples. Those kinds of soft colours you see in Hello Kitty toys or Fairy Kei/Kawaii merch (if I’m correct xD) I just have a HUGE soft spot for childhood stuff! I literally still act like a kid xD lol I don’t think I’ll be growing up anytime soon haha xD lol I just love to collect them! :)

Vaporwave I guess has become a new obsession and old art styles of the past! I just can’t stop being in awe at those marble statues! The curvature and bodies are so magnificent! >w

So many different art styles that are brought to this world! :D This is the truth! I absolutely love most styles I see on here and whenever I encounter them! >w

Other than that, I don’t think I have any other obsessions I know about :P Sorry, I’m super boring xD That’s the art student life lol (only me guys xD dw)

THANK YOU SO SO MUCH FOR MESSAGING ME AND SENDING THIS AMAZING ASK YOU AWESOME PERSON!!! @nalufever I am so happy to have gotten something from you and I hope you’ve had a great Christmas and Happy New Year, friend!! I hope you stay happy and healthy this year!! All the best to you! Thank so much once again for taking the time :)

If anyone else is interested, you can send me something as well~!

Take care from me and Happy New Years everyone!!!

Saku~!

3 notes · View notes

kennethmjoyner · 6 years ago

Text

For ALT, Its Second Conference Was A Reckoning

In 2017, a group of longtime and prominent members of the International Legal Technology Association, unhappy with the association’s direction, broke off and formed an alternative, the Association of Legal Technologists.

At the time, nQueue CEO Rick Hellers, who spearheaded the split, wrote on LinkedIn that he and others were concerned about ILTA’s overall direction and the “widening gap between the organization’s core values and the actions of its leadership.”

In February 2018, ALT held its first conference, called “ctrl ALT del,” a three-day program billed as a “design think forum for a new organization – one that aims to live up to the ideals and standards set by ILTA.” In particular, it aimed to foster collaboration among three core groups within the legal technology ecosystem: vendors, consultants and law firm IT and KM professionals.

By all accounts, that first conference was a success. The three target groups showed up in roughly equal proportions, for an attendance of around 140. News reports, blog posts and social media praised the conference’s design-thinking format, led by Margaret Hagan, director of the Legal Design Lab at Stanford Institute of Design. Both during and afterwards, the conference generated significant buzz.

One ALT founding member described that first conference to me as a “love fest.” If so, then ALT’s second conference, held last week in Scottsdale, Ariz., was the morning after. It was the moment when ALT’s membership woke up, looked around the room, and collectively asked themselves whether this had been a brief fling or would be a lasting relationship.

A Reckoning for ALT

This second ctrl ALT del felt like something bigger than simply a conference. It felt as if it was a reckoning point for the viability and future of ALT as an organization.

That tone was set from the opening moments, when David Umlah, who directs business development for ALT, standing in for an ailing Hellers, now ALT’s executive director, said that the conference organizers were disappointed by this year’s attendance. Although ALT had hoped to increase attendance from last year’s 140 or so, the number dropped to just below 100.

Shawnna Hoffman, global coleader of the IBM Cognitive Legal Practice, delivers a keynote on artificial intelligence.

The number was only part of the attendance story. Conspicuously absent from the conference were several of ALT’s founding members. Time and again, in casual conversations and cocktail banter, the question of their whereabouts came up. Meanwhile, Hellers, who lives in Phoenix, remained sick and never attended any of the daytime programming. (I was told that he did attend one of the evening events.)

Also largely absent from the conference were law firm participants. Just 23 attendees were from law firms. Roughly half of the attendees were vendors from sponsoring companies, and the remainder of the roster consisted mostly of consultants. Several vendors told me that they were disappointed by the low turnout from law firms, since they were they audience that the vendors paid to be in front of.

Why this disappointing turnout? Speculation varied among those in attendance in Scottsdale. One common theory was simply that the timing was bad. The conference was sandwiched between two major legal technology conferences – Legalweek in New York two weeks earlier and ABA TECHSHOW two weeks later. Given this, budgets and schedules may have kept some away.

But speculation also focused on the very circumstances that gave rise to ALT in the first place. ALT was borne out of dissatisfaction with ILTA. But in the intervening period, ILTA has taken a number of steps to address its members’ concerns. Most notably, it recently named as its CEO Joy Heath Rush. Rush is well respected throughout ILTA’s ranks and is equally well respected, from what I heard, among ALT’s leadership and membership.

Thus, the anger and dissatisfaction with ILTA that fueled ALT’s formation and energized last year’s conference has largely waned, if not disappeared. Nothing underscored this more than the fact that Rush attended last week’s conference, where she was warmly welcomed and was invited to share remarks – an opportunity she seized to thank and praise ALT’s leaders and organizers.

A Right-Sized Program?

Within this subplot of disappointment over attendance, the irony is that the conference felt like just about the right size. For me as a first-time attendee, the conference’s size was one of its strong points. It created an intimate atmosphere that encouraged introductions and conversations. A top reason to attend any conference is networking, and networking was in abundance here.

Driving that was the format, which, like the prior year, was organized around a theme of design thinking. For the first two days, each morning and afternoon started with a keynote speech on a specific topic. Each keynote was followed by a panel that further explored the topic from different perspectives.

The keynotes were top-notch. Zach Abramowitz, CEO of ReplyAll and columnist at Above the Law, spoke on new legal service delivery. Shawnna Hoffman, global coleader of the IBM Cognitive Legal Practice, spoke on artificial intelligence. Dennis Garcia, assistant general counsel at Microsoft Corporation, spoke on security and privacy. David Cambria, global director of operations at Baker McKenzie, spoke on adoption and change management.

Participants in a design thinking breakout session present their prototype.

After the keynotes and panels came design thinking sessions led by Andy Peterson, cofounder of the consulting firm Design Build Legal. Peterson’s programming included both training in design thinking principles and small group exercises to put that training to work. The small-group breakouts were highlights of the conference, bringing together participants from diverse backgrounds to collaborate on ideation and prototyping.

The third day wrapped up the conference with a two-hour open discussion in which attendees shared their thoughts. Here again, the comments focused largely on the reduced attendance and lower participation by law firms.

One attendee mirrored the speculation I’d already heard. “Last year, we were brought together by a problem, and that problem was ILTA,” he said. “Now we don’t have that problem, so we need to identify the problem that is bringing us together.”

But others said there is good reason to have both conferences – ILTA’s and ALT’s. “ILTA is too big,” one said. “We need a conference of this scale and size.” Another, a law firm IT professional, echoed that he likes the conference’s smaller size, particularly because of the concentration of vendors with whom he can have one-to-one discussions.

Feedback from A Founder

Curious about the absence of several members of ALT’s founding circle, I reached out to Judith Flournoy, chief information officer at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP. A member of ALT’s founding circle and former member of its executive board, Flournoy was featured last year in an interview by Monica Bay on Above the Law about the 2018 conference.

When I spoke with Flournoy, she said that, although she got a lot out of last year’s conference, she did not attend this year because she decided that it would be more important to spend her budgeted conference allotment to attend the CLOC conference.

At the same time, she said that founding circle members introduced legal design thinking methodology as a framework for the event with the intention of carrying that forward. That did not happen in the way that founding circle members felt that it should, she believes.

Zach Abramowitz, CEO of ReplyAll and columnist at Above the Law, speaks on new legal service delivery.

“It is unfortunate that the momentum didn’t carry forward from last year,” Flournoy said, “but part of the reason was because the people who were deeply involved initially, for a variety of reasons didn’t continue to be involved at the same level.”

The original purpose of ALT, she believed, was to focus on firms that may not have the depth of resources that a larger firm might have. If that is where ALT wants to maintain its focus, that would make sense, she said.

“What they won’t ever do is, I think, replace or compete with ILTA,” Flournoy said.

Flournoy believes the conference can continue in future years as a forum that brings firms and vendors together. But vendors have limited dollars to spend, so organizers will need to put in the effort to get firms there and make it worthwhile for the vendors.

The Future for ALT

So what does this all mean for ALT and its conference?

Umlah, in his remarks opening the conference, said that the organization has an aggressive plan to build its membership in 2019, with a goal of 500 members by the end of the year.

Toward that end, ALT has formed a young leaders committee, chaired by Anna McGrane, COO of PacerPro, and Aikta Wahi, director of customer relations at PacerPro, and composed of a cross section of practicing attorneys, legal professionals, and technologists. Part of its mission will be to raise awareness of ALT among younger professionals and recruit more of them as members.

ALT is also looking at possible changes for its conference. It is considering holding it later in the spring, to avoid conflicts with other legal technology conferences. It is also considering holding smaller one-day programs in regional locations around the country to make it easier to attend.

During that open-discussion session on the last day of the conference, two comments particularly stood out to me. One, by Debbie Foster, partner in Affinity Consulting Group, was the simple observation that no organization can be everything to every group in legal, and therefore should not try to be. The other was by Brad Blickstein, principal of Blickstein Group, who said, “There is an energy here that feels like something that’s worth being part of.”

Given ALT’s success with its first conference, it was inevitable that this year’s conference would be weighed down by comparisons. But for this first-time attendee, the irony of all this hand-wringing was that this conference stood firmly on its own two feet. Its keynote speakers could have been keynotes at any legal technology conference of any size. Its varied format of speakers, panels and exercises was both educational and energizing. Its scale encouraged networking and collaboration.

Blickstein was right. There was an energy at the conference that was worth being part of. The challenge for ALT – both as an organization and a conference – is to better define the purpose behind that energy and then use that to build membership and attendance.

No organization can be everything to everyone, as Foster said. Now that the dissatisfaction with ILTA that fueled its formation has subsided, ALT needs to figure out exactly what it is and who it serves. Last week’s formula of an intimate conference that strove to bring together vendors and firms was close to the mark.

[Disclosure: ALT covered the cost of my registration and hotel room to attend the Scottsdale conference.]

from Law and Politics https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2019/02/alt-second-conference-reckoning.html via http://www.rssmix.com/

#law #legal

1 note · View note

wonderfulworldofmichaelford · 7 years ago

Text

The Last Jedi: What I Disliked About One of the Most Fascinating Films Ever Made

The Last Jedi is probably one of the most controversial films ever made for a lot of reasons. This movie did a LOT of shit, a lot of shit that would piss people off. Hell, it even pissed ME off. But when I see people on the internet frothing at the mouth and calling this movie the worst shit pile to ever exist, the most offensive thing Star Wars has ever produced, and threatening the director with death and calling him a soulless piece of shit bastard… I’m pretty inclined to defend the movie. Frankly, anyone who reacts THIS negatively to TLJ is an utter braindead moron; you do realize you can dislike a film without being completely, insanely hyperbolic, yeah? Again, there’s a lot I hate in this movie too, and I’m gonna talk about it shortly, but in a franchise with Jar-Jar, the holiday special, and vast swaths of the Legends continuity, is this seriously the worst this franchise has had to offer? If you answer anything other than “No,” congratulations, I’d say you’re about the same mental capacity as people who think Watto is some sort of offensive Jewish caricature.

But as much as I would love to spend an entire post insulting all the whiny bastards in the Star Wars fandom, I have more pressing matters: criticizing stuff in The Last Jedi. And boy do I have a lot to criticize. I actually did review the movie a while back, and while I stand by my initial thoughts, I gotta go into more detail about what I didn’t like. However, before continuing, I want to make one thing absolutely clear:

I think The Last Jedi is a genuinely good movie. Maybe not GREAT per se, as I have more criticisms for it than just about any other film in the series, but excellence is just so wholly ingrained into the DNA of Star Wars theatrical films that even at their most divisive they still have some level of charm. And at any rate, this movie is a hell of a lot more interesting than Rogue One. I’d say out of the newer films, this one sits behind Solo. Anyway, let’s get on to the main event… here are all my issues with The Last Jedi, presented alphabetically, and with lots of spoilers:

Canto Bright: This is probably the most annoying waste of time in the entire film, a blatant and obnoxious stretch of padding the runtime. Nothing that happens in the entirety of this subplot is truly important in the grand scheme of things; the only relevant bit of plot is that they find DJ, and this could have been done a lot quicker. This wouldn’t be so bad if they had made Canto Bright a bit more interesting, but it just feels like another attempt to rehash Mos Eisley’s cantina. It also doesn’t help this part of the film has blatant, unsubtle moralizing and cuts away from far more interesting plotlines that get much less development, particularly Rey training with Luke.

Ditching Kylo’s Motivation: In The Force Awakens, Kylo was motivated by a sort of misaimed admiration for his grandfather, where he viewed Vader as someone to emulate and who he looked to as he struggled between the light side and the dark side. All of this helped make him rather intriguing, as well as making him a very intentional Darth Vader clone character; his whole purpose was to emulate Vader, after all. All of this is ditched close to the start of The Last Jedi, and the Kylo in this film feels almost entirely different to the one seen previously. While I did like Kylo Ren a lot more in this movie, I wish they didn’t completely rewrite his character and ditch everything established in favor of what they did. It could have easily been worked into how he acted in the film.

Finn’s Diminished Importance: After being something of the star of the last film, complete with a noticeable character arc and a lot of focus, Finn kinda gets shafted here, relegated to a shitty, unnecessary sideplot that leads the heroes nowhere. It just seems really weird, though I’m not unhappy Rey got more focus and was fleshed out better.

Holdo: While I tend to view people who write her off as “The purple-haired feminist bitch” or “Captain SJW” as inferior human beings – and they are, seriously, if you unrironically say shit like this you’re a drooling nincompoop – I really can’t deny in the slightest that Holdo was written rather poorly. She really is a poor excuse for a captain, openly lying to her underlings and keeping things secret when explaining the plan would have effected nothing except her entire crew’s compliance. It almost feels like this plot was written so we’d be on Poe’s side, but it works a bit too well by making Holdo far too arrogant, stupid, and haughty to really get behind. If not for her awesome heroic sacrifice (one that might not have been needed in the first place if she’d been more honest but hey) I’d probably list her as one of the worst Star Wars characters ever… but a heroic sacrifice of this magnitude, no matter how unearned it may seem, never fails to impress me.

Killing Snoke: I can kinda see what they were going for, seeing as Palpatine as well was killed with very little revealed about him in The Last Jedi… but we have now had several years worth of canonical prequel material to flesh him out, and it’s honestly pretty stupid to assume you can pull off the same trick in a franchise twice and expect it to go off as well. Snoke was unflinchingly cool, creepy, and badass, so his bisection comes across as a waste of a truly intriguing villain. That there may be prequels detailing who he was do little to ease the sting of Andy Serkis being built up as the big bad only to be cut down. At least in Black Panther he got more substantial screentime; here, he’s s till cool, but it just feels like there is so much more he could have been.

Luke’s Attempted Murder: While overall I loved Luke’s characterization in this film and how it tied excellently into the theme of not deifying your heroes due to the trouble that can cause, it’s hard for me to rationalize Luke’s attempted murder of his own nephew, leading to Kylo Ren’s turn to the dark side. While Luke has always been a bit impulsive, this man believed he could redeem Darth Vader, AND DID SO. Need I remind you what Anakin did to those younglings? And yet his own nephew, he won’t give him the benefit of the doubt. Yes, he did stop himself, but the very fact he went in there lightsaber ready to cut down the child of his sister and his best friend just feels really jarring and out of place, even within his more cynical characterization.

Phasma: Phasma has come across as a forced Boba Fett replacement since The Force Awakens, to the point where in both films she has appeared in she has been completely and utterly outshined by mooks – Nines (AKA TR-8R) in TFA and the Praetorian Guard in this one. Despite her getting a ton of fascinating backstory and depth in canonical supplementary material, literally none of that is ever showcased even slightly in this film, and after a short, underwhelming fight scene, she apparently falls to her death. Sure, she COULD have survived, but this still feels like a rather big waste of the character. For someone they hyped up so much, the way she is handled really feels undignified.

Rey’s Parents: I’m not gonna lie, this reveal is stupid in and of itself, but the stupider thing is that a lot of people seem to be taking it at face value. When was it collectively decided we should trust the creepy, evil Sith lord who has made it perfectly clear he wants control over Rey? Why are we taking Kylo’s word that Rey’s parents were drunks who sold their kids as FACT? Honestly it just seems like a further ploy to manipulate her more than anything.

Reylo: While it isn’t canon as of yet, this movie really hammers in a bunch of hints for the obnoxiously popular ship between heroine Rey and antagonist Kylo Ren. And, quite frankly, I absolutely fucking hate this ship, but probably for a lot different reasons than most people. Do I think it’s shipping abuse? No, I don’t think it’s that any more than I think any other hero-villain ship is. Do I think Kylo doesn’t deserve to be redeemed by Rey? That’s not it either; the entire premise of this franchise is that any person can be redeemed. Kylo Ren is really no exception, though considering he killed my favorite character I’d be happy to see his ass beat. No, I hate it because I just absolutely hate the trope, if it even is one, of the hero redeeming the villain through romantic love. I feel like it would cheapen Rey’s character, and just turn the entire new trilogy into an overly long romantic drama. All the heavy-handed hints towards this pairing is just gag worthy, and frankly I’m going to be annoyed if they ruin both of these characters by going through with it.

Rose: Rose is without a doubt in my mind the worst character in the entire franchise. This seems like a rather tall order considering her competition, but consider this: her biggest contributions to the plot are the Canto Bright plotline, the absolute worst part of the film… and stopping Finn from performing a badass heroic sacrifice that might have saved the heroes a lot of trouble, delivering the stupidest line in Star Wars history, kissing Finn, and fainting. She’s just utterly pointless to the point she feels like someone’s OC from a fanfic where they get with Finn was slipped into the script.

Wasting DJ: So you get Benicio Del Toro, and you put him in your movie. Great so far, good. He does some weird accent and makes the character have a quirky personality, still good. You give him a very morally ambiguous personality and show the shades of grey in this idealistic universe that leans towards black vs. white most of the time, excellent, awesome! AND THEN… he betrays the heroes and vanishes from the film. What. DJ didn’t die, and he could come back… but he just feels shoehorned in and just doesn’t really reach his full potential whatsoever. He was such an interesting idea, and they just did the bare minimum with him.

Despite all of this crap, though… The Last Jedi still manages to be awesome. Holdo’s final sacrifice, the Kylo Ren and Rey fight against the Praetorian Guards, Yoda’s surprise appearance, Luke’s final battle… Hell, I even liked seeing Leia finally use the Force by flying through space with it; as cheesy as it is, it left me floored when I saw it in theaters. Then, of course, there’s that epic opening space battle… there’s just a lot to love here. In particular, my favorite moment is probably Luke becoming one with the Force. Maybe it’s not my MOST favorite moment, but it just feels so poignant and important, with his final moments mirroring the start of his journey, as he gazes into twin suns one last time before joining his teachers and father. It just… it gets to you, you know? I may have a LOT of issues with this movie, and a lot of stuff I didn’t really like in it, but more than any other movie I have so many issues with, I like and even RESPECT this film. You can say a lot of things about this movie, but one thing you can’t say is that it’s dull. It sparks discussion, and debate, and obnoxiously hyperbolic worst-everism. At the end of the day, whether it’s good or bad doesn’t really matter. The only thing that matters is that this film just… IS. And one way or another people will have something to say about it. Just don’t be a hyperbolic douche about it and try and enjoy things, you know?

#Star Wars #The Last Jedi #TLJ #CineMike #movies #sci-fi

5 notes · View notes

deanstwrt-scottish-culture · 4 years ago

Text

Scottish Culture- Glasgow Music Scene

Further Developments

For this development I used prostrate to draw some of Glasgow’s most iconic concert venues, incorporating some of the most recognisable aspects of them. I then created a colour pallet inspired by some pop-art pieces as this is a style of work I am greately inspired by. For a first development, I was quite happy with this drawing. I really liked using the most recognisable aspects of the venues, and thinking about what parts and shapes would complement others. However, I felt that it looked a little too unprofessional and decided that for my final I wanted to focus on one venue and experiment with colours and style more than the subject matter, as I felt this better reflected my approach to art.

Next, I continued with drawing digitally as I felt that it was a better suited medium for the pop art style I had chosen to follow. I drew the shapes of the SECC Hydro and the Armadillo, keep the shapes very simple, and Made sure they were overlapping. I then added colour interchangeably, using primary colours for more of a contrast between sections. I think it turned out really well, acting as a nod to the venues rather than a direct drawing of them. I think that this piece could also work well as a repeat pattern, almost creating a floral and/or shell design.

Taking inspiration from a previous drawing, I drew the SWG3 again in more or a cartoon style. I used bright colours and imperfect shapes to create a more carefree and childlike drawing. I think this works really well, reminding me a lot of a 90’s kid’s show. I also really like the green and pink together as a I feel that they help each other stand out without overwhelming the viewer.

I then wanted to try out working with the chromatic aberrations tool in procreate, to continue on with the 3D effect I had experimented with in a previous drawing. I started by drawing the O2 Academy in the same cartoon style as before. I then used the chromatic aberrations tool to add more layer to the picture.

I thought that this created a really cool effect, replicating the flashing lights of a concert. However, adding too much detail drew away from the effect. I then tried it out with a few more drawings, taking inspiration from King Tut’s Wah Wah hut, they Hydro and the Glasgow Royal Concert hall. I Think working with block shapes really complimented the effect a lot better and helped replicate the simplistic style of pop art better.

I also think that this style would work well as a risoprint, focusing more on colour and layers than details of the drawing.

For my next piece, I once again drew a simplified version of King Tuts, focusing on using a warm colour pallet. I then drew the shape of the Hydro over the top, and filled it with the opposing colours of the drawing. I done this to draw a link between the history of the Glasgow music scene and the present. King tuts being a small long standing venue, having had some of the biggest artists in the world perform before their sucess. The Hydro is the opposite, only opening in 2013 with a capacity of over 14,000.

I then drew around the shape of the hydro using the halftone tool in procreate to give the piece those pop art dots. I then made a collage of 4 different colourways to replicate an Andy Warhol inspired piece. I really love this drawing, even though I think there are too many different colours to work for a risoprint. I feel as though it ties my theme of the Glasgow music scene, and my love of pop art together well and definitely pushed me out of my comfort zone.

1 note · View note

regarder-the-old-guard-films · 4 years ago

Text

Regarder,,! The Old Guard [Film-Complet] 2020 Streaming Vf

The Old Guard 2020 Full — Regarder [[The Old Guard]] FuLLmoVie Regarder Streaming 2020 Regarder @The Old Guard 2020 — Regarder Full Stream (HD) Regarder ‘The Old Guard’ — FuLL MoVie 2020 (The Old Guard — Movies)

The Old Guard | Regarder Film 📥 ================================ Visit Link ᐅᐅhttps://tinyurl.com/y44d2gxy

10 juillet 2020 sur Netflix / 1h 58min / Action, Science fiction De Gina Prince-Bythewood Avec Charlize Theron, KiKi Layne, Matthias Schoenaerts Nationalité américain

SYNOPSIS ET DÉTAILS Une petite bande soudée de mercenaires immortels, dirigée par la redoutable Andy, se bat depuis des siècles pour protéger les humains. Mais tandis que le groupe est engagé pour une mission des plus périlleuses, ses pouvoirs hors du commun sont soudain révélés au grand jour. C'est alors qu'Andy et Nile, tout dernier soldat à avoir rejoint l'équipe, doivent tout mettre en œuvre pour neutraliser leurs ennemis. Car ces derniers ne reculeront devant rien pour détourner les pouvoirs des immortels à leur profit.

The Old Guard film complet

The Old Guard film complet en français

The Old Guard streaming vostfr

The Old Guard film streaming

The Old Guard streaming vf

The Old Guard film complet en ligne

The Old Guard film complet en ligne gratuit

The Old Guard film complet en ligne gratuitement

The Old Guard streaming gratuit sans complet

The Old Guard film complet télécharger

The Old Guard film complet sous-titre

The Old Guard film 2020 streaming vf

The Old Guard bande annonce vf

The Old Guard film complet en francais

The Old Guard film complet 2020

Telecharger The Old Guard Torrent Film Français

The Old Guard fCine

The Old Guard allocine fr

The Old Guard ugc

The Old Guard cgr

The Old Guard critique

The Old Guard Sokrostream

The Old Guard HDss

The Old Guard cacaoweb

The Old Guard Gum Gum Streaming

The Old Guard Streaming Belge

The Old Guard GratFlix

The Old Guard streaming french

The Old Guard streaming fr

The Old Guard streaming gratuit

The Old Guard streaming complet

The Old Guard streaming

The Old Guard film streaming vf

The Old Guard film streaming

❍❍❍ Definition and Definition of Film / Movie ❍❍❍

While the players who play a role in the film are referred to as actors (men) or actresses (women). There is also the term extras that are used as supporting characters with few roles in the film. This is different from the main actors who have bigger and more roles. Being an actor and an actress must be demanded to have good acting talent, which is in accordance with the theme of the film he is starring in. In certain scenes, the actor’s role can be replaced by a stuntman or a stuntman. The existence of a stuntman is important to replace the actors doing scenes that are difficult and extreme, which are usually found in action action films.

Films can also be used to convey certain messages from the filmmaker. Some industries also use film to convey and represent their symbols and culture. Filmmaking is also a form of expression, thoughts, ideas, concepts, feelings and moods of a human being visualized in film. The film itself is mostly a fiction, although some are based on fact true stories or based on a true story.

There are also documentaries with original and real pictures, or biographical films that tell the story of a character. There are many other popular genre films, ranging from action films, horror films, comedy films, romantic films, fantasy films, thriller films, drama films, science fiction films, crime films, documentaries and others.

That’s a little information about the definition of film or movie. The information was quoted from various sources and references. Hope it can be useful.

❍❍❍ TV MOVIE ❍❍❍

The first television shows were experimental, sporadic broadcasts viewable only within a very short range from the broadcast tower starting in the 1930s. Televised events such as the 1935 Summer Olympics in Germany, the 19340 coronation of King George VI in the UK, and David Sarnoff’s famous introduction at the 1939 New York World’s Fair in the US spurred a growth in the medium, but World War II put a halt to development until after the war. The 19440 World MOVIE inspired many Americans to buy their first television set and then in 1948, the popular radio show Texaco Star Theater made the move and became the first weekly televised variety show, earning host Milton Berle the name “”Mr Television”” and demonstrating that the medium was a stable, modern form of entertainment which could attract advertisers. The first national live television broadcast in the US took place on September 4, 2020 when President Harry Truman’s speech at the Japanese Peace Treaty Conference in San Francisco was transmitted over AT&T’s transcontinental cable and microwave radio relay system to broadcast stations in local markets.

The first national color broadcast (the 1954 Tournament of Roses Parade) in the US occurred on January 1, 1954. During the following ten years most network broadcasts, and nearly all local programming, continued to be in black-and-white. A color transition was announced for the fall of 1955, during which over half of all network prime-time programming would be broadcast in color. The first all-color prime-time season came just one year later. In 19402, the last holdout among daytime network shows converted to color, resulting in the first completely all-color network season.

❍❍❍ Formats and Genres ❍❍❍

See also: List of genres § Film and television formats and genres

Television shows are more varied than most other forms of media due to the wide variety of formats and genres that can be presented. A show may be fictional (as in comedies and dramas), or non-fictional (as in documentary, news, and reality television). It may be topical (as in the case of a local newscast and some made-for-television films), or historical (as in the case of many documentaries and fictional MOVIE). They could be primarily instructional or educational, or entertaining as is the case in situation comedy and game shows.[citation needed]

A drama program usually features a set of actors playing characters in a historical or contemporary setting. The program follows their lives and adventures. Before the 2020s, shows (except for soap opera-type serials) typically remained static without story arcs, and the main characters and premise changed little.[citation needed] If some change happened to the characters’ lives during the episode, it was usually undone by the end. Because of this, the episodes could be broadcast in any order.[citation needed] Since the 2020s, many MOVIE feature progressive change in the plot, the characters, or both. For instance, Hill Street Blues and St. Elsewhere were two of the first American prime time drama television MOVIE to have this kind of dramatic structure,[4][better source needed] while the later MOVIE Babylon 5 further exemplifies such structure in that it had a predetermined story running over its intendevd five-season run.[citvatio””&n needed]

In 2020, it was reported that television was growing into a larger component of major media companies’ revenues than film.[5] Some also noted the increase in quality of some television programs. In 2020, Academy-Award-winning film director Steven Soderbergh, commenting on ambiguity and complexity of character and narrative, stated: “”I think those qualities are now being seen on television and that people who want to see stories that have those kinds of qualities are watching television.

❍❍❍ Thank’s For All And Happy Watching❍❍❍

Find all the movies that you can stream online, including those that were screened this week. If you are wondering what you can watch on this website, then you should know that it covers genres that include crime, Science, Fi-Fi, action, romance, thriller, Comedy, drama and Anime Movie.

Thank you very much. We tell everyone who is happy to receive us as news or information about this year’s film schedule and how you watch your favorite films. Hopefully we can become the best partner for you in finding recommendations for your favorite movies. That’s all from us, greetings!

Thanks for watching The Video Today.

I hope you enjoy the videos that I share. Give a thumbs up, like, or share if you enjoy what we’ve shared so that we more excited.

#film complet #en français #streaming vf #gratuit #Streaming Belge #Film Français #télécharger #gratuitement #en ligne #en ligne gratuit

0 notes

vileart · 7 years ago

Text

Off Kilter Dramaturgy: Ramesh Meyyappan @ manipulate 2018

At work and in his home, Joe Kilter has his daily set routines. Although some people think Joe is obsessive, Joe would prefer not to be thought of at all. When an unexpected event changes his everyday habits Joe’s world is turned askew. His life is no longer his own, he’s off his game… Joe Kilter is most definitely off-kilter.

Feeling more and more isolated, Joe’s life seems increasingly impossible and perhaps the only solution is to exist in darkness. Exploring mental well-being, identity, and those unsettling times when you feel a little bit different from everyone else, Off-Kilter is a darkly comedic visual theatre production, incorporating illusions, masterful physicality and dynamic, non-verbal storytelling. What was the inspiration for this performance?

There wasn’t one specific event or source of inspiration, much of my work has previously touched on mental / emotional well-being. While I haven’t explicitly explored Mental Health before, family / relationship breakdown and resulting isolation was explored in Snails and Ketchup, while Gin and Tonic and Passing Trains looked at the impact of loneliness and hinted at alcoholism. A lot of theatre explores this albeit that it is not implicitly focusing on mental health. This time I’m being more explicit and have attempted to put a piece together that focuses on mental well being – it’s an observation rather than a narrative, although the character is on a journey that for him is challenging and at times crippling!

Mental health has been much over-looked, stigmatized at times – that’s the driving force behind Off Kilter. No-one really wants to admit having a diagnosis associated with mental health, no-one wants to admit when they’re not coping with the day and what it brings and often suffer in isolation, this is what I wanted to explore and attempt to highlight.

How do you feel your work fits within the remit of the manipulate festival?

My work is entirely visual – as a deaf performer / theatre-maker I spent many years exploring how to make my work entirely accessible and have always considered how to extend my visual theatrical vocabulary. Since the beginning of my career in the arts I’ve thought visually – it’s been a huge part of my deaf identity, Manipulate champions visual work and ‘visual’ is what I do!

Is performance still a good space for the public discussion of ideas?

Yes – I’d like to think so or what is the point of performance! I think irrespective of the type of performance there is always discussion. I’ve always viewed performance as a public dialogue – a presentation of an idea through whatever form the performance takes.

How did you become interested in making performance?

I became increasingly passionate about theatre when I could see the power of the theatrical language. Language and having to explore how people communicate has influenced me greatly, the desire to be able to communicate in a universally accessible way has always been the challenge that keeps me going.

When I’ve been exposed to a piece of theatre, dance or film that has been able to say something to me on the same level as the person sitting beside me (even if their language is different from my own) I wanted to create work that did exactly that – communicate on many levels and to people from all walks of life.

Recently I’ve talked at length about pushing myself and extending / developing my skill level as I strive towards developing an extensive visual vocabulary.

As a deaf person it has become important for me to find a language that is shared – that allows me to not alienate folk, that allows people to appreciate that deaf share many of the same experiences, ideas and thoughts as hearing.

Is there any particular approach to the making of the show?

I worked closely with Andy Arnold (Tron Theatre) and Kevin McMahon (illusionist) to explore how simple illusions and sleight of hand might work within a narrative structure, that would appear to happen to the character rather than him ‘doing magic’. Once we’d explored a range of illusions we developed a visual script that gave the illusions a place within the story.

The script provided us with a structure – a journey for the character that we then used to further develop and devise the final piece.

Does the show fit with your usual productions?

I like to think that my productions are at least a little different from each other, the stories are different, the themes I hope are different. While they all have in common that they are all purely visual I do make efforts to develop and explore a new visual elements and visual ideas.

For Off Kilter I’ve incorporated a new visual element - illusion. The illusions are fairly small in scale but none-the-less are integral to the character and what happens to him. The illusions aimed to make the character feel out of sorts and confused and they work on that level. This is not a magic show, the illusions were chosen and designed to support what we wanted to happen to the character, he doesn’t perform a trick but his mind sort of plays tricks on him.

What do you hope that the audience will experience?

The initial idea was centered around the experience that many of us have of having an off day - I think like most folk I’ve experienced that type of day too. However, I wanted the Off Kilter ‘off day’ to explore a day that had more serious consequences. I wanted to identify the isolation felt, the fear, anxiety, confusion, deep sadness and even anger and I hope that audiences empathize with this by considering moments in a day in their own life.

Reading about mental illness I was beginning to appreciate the stigma felt by those who suffered (a stigma that is a result of much ignorance), that makes some feel completely alone.

I think with Off Kilter I wanted to offer a sense of the real stories and not over dramatize these – I was hoping that the audiences would identify with some moment experienced by the character. I think most of us have experienced not being ourselves. In terms of my own experience, things have happened in life that have triggered a host of emotions that were ‘off’ and needed to be worked through…I assume we can all identify with that.

Ramesh Meyyappan‘s award-winning solo performances and collaborations have toured extensively, both nationally and internationally to much critical acclaim, most recently with his production, Butterfly, which was presented at manipulate in 2015. Ramesh is currently part of the Design Team for new BA Degree for Deaf Actors at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. Off-Kilter, Co-produced with Ramesh Meyyappan Productions, Torn Theatre, Glasgow & TheatreWorks, Singapore.

from the vileblog http://ift.tt/2Df2lzo

#Theatre #Blogger #visual art #Edinburgh Fringe #Experimental Critique

1 note · View note

gs2197 · 7 years ago

Text

#GS Movie Review: It (2017)

“Oh, you’ll float too alright!”

I consider myself a highly expressive person. I can empathize easily with others and overall, I consider myself a very nice guy. And I happen to love movies. A lot, a lot.

Now, being a cinephile with this type of personality is a mixed bag; on the one hand, going to the movies with me can be an annoying or an extremely amusing experience. When a film has a decent (hopefully great) script or cast; listening to me laugh, gasp, cry or smile like an idiot is guaranteed to happen.

So, how does the latest big screen adaptation of Stephen King’s extensive list of literary efforts hold up to this emotion-loving, quality film-seeker?

I’ll start with the good stuff: It is a truly relentless, terrifying and effective horror experience. Not manipulative nor cliched in any way (thankfully so). It works on sooooooo many levels and it does not slow down, regardless of how curled up and scared shitless you are in your seat. It’s an excellent horror film and I can’t wait to see it again.

The direction (courtesy of Andy Muschietti) is, ironically, a monster. In the best possible way. From it’s shiver inducing opening minutes, all the way to the wildness and the breakneck-like mixture of thrills of it’s 3rd act, Muschietti’s talent is on full display. Several frames and moments in the film are elevated sky-high by the camerawork, score and the talent of it’s cast, all working together perfectly; incessantly and hellbent on having the viewers go through an unforgettable experience.

The cast is also an undeniable treat and achievement worth recognizing. Pennywise, the Dancing Clown is Bill Skarsgård. His smile alone should be able to convince you. The way his lines are delivered throughout the course of the film; the support given by the visual effects and audio mixing/design teams; the priceless and genuine reactions and performances of the rest of the cast… this only further clears out the undeniable truth: Bill is amazingly cast as the titular, supernatural creature, and It continuously benefits from his presence.

The rest of the cast are all are up to the task, regardless of their age or screen time. The most notable breakout stars are Jaeden Lieberher as Bill, Sophia Lillis as Beverly and to some degree Jeremy Ray Taylor as Ben. The Losers’ Club’s chemistry and interactions are all satisfying (particularly in the first and second act) and at times successfully engaging. There are instances where some members of the cast (Mike and Henry to be precise) are left in the sidelines, when compared to the rest. Regardless, the film is mostly fair to everyone, and is more than willing to give them all a little bit of room to breathe and flex their acting muscles from time to time.

Now let’s talk about that narrative. And man, are you in for a treat! If you are a horror junkie like me, there are a handful of details you enjoy when watching a movie of this genre. A heartfelt message or theme buried somewhere in between the dirt, ashes, blood or intestines; a well realized and explored concept that derives into a thought provoking masterpiece... you get the gist. We love the thrill, heart-stopping and hairs-in-the-back-of-your-neck-standing mixture of sensations we get when seeing The Shining, Alien or The Thing for the 10th time in the past year, or during our annual Halloween Horror Movie Extravaganza.

We all enjoyed (or tolerated) the jump-scares and “ingenuity” of Paranormal Activity back in 2009. Then it’s 4th installment came around and demonstrated (with crystal clear results) that the future of this genre was on a precarious situation. Franchises like Insidious, The Purge and even The Conjuring Universe started to have misfires that were too painful and obvious to admit. Overall, the landscape of this once glorious and gratifying realm in the industry was starting to show signs of staleness, monotony and predictability. Over and over... and you guessed it: over.

But still, it’s undeniable that smaller projects, if given the chance, could become instant classics and redeem the situation. It Follows back in 2014, Don’t Breathe, The Babadook and most recently Get Out and It Comes at Night have demonstrated that there’s talent out there and that there’s still a hell of a lot of stories left to tell that can make our skin crawl and scream in a way that’d make a scared, 7 year old proud.

It has the best of both worlds. On the one hand, the visuals are as consistently shocking as they are memorable. I lost track of how many times I jumped, gasped or tried to cover my eyes in fear while watching the developments on screen. Stephen King has a twisted, jaw-dropping ability to get under one’s skin, and It never fails to deliver on the scares. The surprise this movie has in store for you is that those type of frights aren’t the only ones It delivers. More than once I found myself cringing or having my eyes go wide in shock when a strong thematic element or a deceivingly simple idea was put on screen to fantastic results. Beverly’s side of the story is particularly frightening, when considering the stage of adolescence that she finds herself in, and the implications that this carries. Scenes like the one with Ben and the Bullies or the interactions between Bev and her father are just as sickening and distressing as Georgie’s first encounter with Pennywise or the showdown at the Neibolt House.

The loss of innocence, coping with the passing of a loved one and the feeling of isolation or desperation that comes along with growing up (with a family that borders on abusive and heartless in some cases) are story elements that we sometimes explore on literature, music and film; in It, those themes are constantly visited, while never beating you over the head with them in an obvious, jarring manner. It’s subtle, and I’m afraid that they may pass over some of the viewers heads. But even so, the sense of dread and terror is ever present, and the way these ideas are explored is nothing short of amazing.

To sum up, the terror that It manages to convey is genuine, nerve-wrecking and surprisingly compelling, when matched with the journey that the characters in the movie go through as individuals and as a team (or in this case Club).

Now, let’s analyse what else works to the movie’s benefit, before tackling its minimal shortcomings. Like I previously mentioned or hinted at, the direction is great. And the score and cinematography? DAMN THEY’RE GOOD! The imagery shown is equally gruesome as it is unforgettable. Chung-hoon Chung has a good eye, and watching this film convinced me of it.

Now let’s get the downsides out of the way. If you’ve seen the film you either loved or you hated Ritchie (Finn Wolfhard aka Mike in Stranger Things). He is a competent and even great actor when you take into account his age, and due to certain events towards the end of the film, it’s extremely hard not to like him. Still, I personally feel that the humor that he sometimes brought into the mix felt misplaced and even jarring. So basically my point is: sometimes the tonal shifts in It break the flow of certain scenes and hurt the experience in a small, yet noticeable way.

The length of the film was by no means a deal-breaker, but I’m used to this type of movies to last between 80 and 100 minutes, so It may feel like a tad bit too long for some. To me? I’m dying and entirely willing to give this bad boy another go, despite it being uncommonly long for a horror movie.

Conclusion: It is a wild, non-stop and extremely enjoyable experience. It’s horror elements are varied, well-balanced and it’s score and cinematography are both top-notch. The cast is by far the main reason why you should go and see this movie (as long as you’re older than 12 in my opinion, little Georgie didn’t seem to enjoy himself too much on this film so I highly doubt your kids will). All of them are rather talented and their performances (Skarsgård’s, Lieberher’s and Lillis’s in particular) are all mesmerizing when given the chance to show off their talent. The tonal shifts, how little time some characters are given and it’s length are the only flaws I was able to find in the film, and they don’t hinder or damage what is a fantastic tour de force of well earned screams, laugh out loud moments and even instances where it unashamedly and successfully pulls at the heartstrings.

Consensus: “It is a truly horrifying and unsettling horror experience, that somehow manages to bring a welcome dose of humor and compelling, heartfelt drama to the mix.”

#It #Stephen King #DamnGoodMovie #The Losers' club #Pennywise The Dancing Clown #Bill Skarsgard #Horror Classic #A Wild Ride

3 notes · View notes

duaneodavila · 6 years ago

Text

For ALT, Its Second Conference Was A Reckoning

A Reckoning for ALT

This second ctrl ALT del felt like something bigger than simply a conference. It felt as if it was a reckoning point for the viability and future of ALT as an organization.

Shawnna Hoffman, global coleader of the IBM Cognitive Legal Practice, delivers a keynote on artificial intelligence.

A Right-Sized Program?

Participants in a design thinking breakout session present their prototype.

Feedback from A Founder

Zach Abramowitz, CEO of ReplyAll and columnist at Above the Law, speaks on new legal service delivery.

“What they won’t ever do is, I think, replace or compete with ILTA,” Flournoy said.

The Future for ALT

So what does this all mean for ALT and its conference?

Umlah, in his remarks opening the conference, said that the organization has an aggressive plan to build its membership in 2019, with a goal of 500 members by the end of the year.

[Disclosure: ALT covered the cost of my registration and hotel room to attend the Scottsdale conference.]

For ALT, Its Second Conference Was A Reckoning republished via Above the Law

0 notes

dsrajawat · 5 years ago

Text

Android 10 has officially launched heralding very little aesthetic revamp but more focussed on performance and privacy improvement. This year, Google ditched its year-long tradition of dessert names and kept the nomenclature simple as Android 10. The new rebranding also overhauled the Andy logo, color schemes, fonts, etc. But the beta cycles and update trajectory was more or less on track, same as yesteryears. OnePlus flagships which are part of this beta program have been right beside the Pixel phones. Hence, they were quick to receive a final Android 10 update, albeit an Open Beta.

Like you, we have been eagerly waiting for this update. So, without a second thought, we flashed the ROM onto our OnePlus 7 Pro. There’s good news for OnePlus 6 and 6T users as the brand has announced the update, which will hit your devices later this month.

Before we jump onto the first impression and see what’s new and changed from the Android Pie, here’s a quick guide to installing the Android 10-based Oxygen OS on the OnePlus 7 and OnePlus 7 Pro.

How To Install OxygenOS beta on your OnePlus device

For those of you trying to install it on your devices, please follow the steps as follows –

1. Download the latest ROM here – OnePlus 7 | OnePlus 7 Pro 2. Copy the downloaded upgrade package (Zip format) to the phone storage (root directory).

Note: You’re advised to make a backup of important phone data before proceeding further.

3. Now, open the System Updates section within the phone Settings. Next, click on the wheel icon at the top right corner. Tap on the Local upgrade option and select the installation package from the internal storage. Rest is easy and take a few minutes.

4. Once the System upgrade is completed, restart the phone. 5. This boot will take some time. But, once you see the lock screen, voila! it means the update is successful.

Here is a link to the official OnePlus community for more details.

Now that’s done, let’s get to our nascent thoughts on what has changed in the new Oxygen OS ROM powered by Android 10.

Android 10 on OnePlus 7 Pro: What’s new?

Here’s everything that’s new and changed in the Android 10 based Oxygen OS version OP7Pro_O2_Beta_1.

1. Easter Egg

https://www.smartprix.com/bytes/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/19-09-05-15-06-29.mp4

In the Pixels, Android 10 comes with a Picross puzzle as the Easter Egg. To access it, you have to go to Device settings > Tap on About Phone > Repeated clicks on the Android Version > Android 10 logo.

#gallery-0-25 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-25 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; } #gallery-0-25 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-25 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Now, when you arrange the number 10 as letter Q and tap the screen a few time, the aforementioned puzzle game should show. In OnePlus, however, we were welcomed by this paint application instead.

2. Gesture Navigation

#gallery-0-26 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-26 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; } #gallery-0-26 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-26 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

The new gestures let you swipe inward from either side of the screen (bottom half) to go back. If you swipe diagonally from either bottom corners, Google Assistant gets triggered. Then, there is an option to jump between recent apps by quickly swiping left or right along the bottom edge of the screen. Except for the last gesture, the rest was easy to master. The reason could be that the gesture activation area is deep down and tough to execute in a large phone like the OnePlus 7 Pro.

Here’s how it looks in action –

https://www.smartprix.com/bytes/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/19-09-05-18-45-45.mp4

Back Swipe

https://www.smartprix.com/bytes/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/19-09-05-18-48-00.mp4

Google Assistant Activation on Android 10

https://www.smartprix.com/bytes/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/19-09-05-18-50-39.mp4

Bottom Swipe for switching between recent apps

OnePlus has removed the 2-button navigation option present in Android Pie based Oxygen OS.

3. Customization

#gallery-0-27 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-27 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 33%; } #gallery-0-27 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-27 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Now, you have a dedicated Customization Section within the main settings, wherein you can tinker the display calibration, icons, themes, Horizon Light, font, the shape of the Quick Settings Tiles, etc. We love this new implementation.

4. Privacy

#gallery-0-28 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-28 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; } #gallery-0-28 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-28 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Google has put a major emphasis on privacy with the Android 10 update. We now get a separate Privacy section within the device settings, within which the Permission manager resides. This is an underlining feature which gives you granular toggles to stop apps from having unnecessary app permissions.

The most important one amongst the various permissions is – Location!

Now, you can prevent an app from stalking your location by either ‘Denying’ it or opting- ‘Allow only while using the app’.

5. Adaptive Notifications

#gallery-0-29 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-29 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 33%; } #gallery-0-29 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-29 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Within Apps and Notification Menu

In developer options

Press to toggle Notifications as Important or Other (Gentle)

With Android 10, Google has doubled down on improving notifications. One of the initiatives is called Adaptive Notification, which divides the notifications into – Gentle (Other) and Priority (Important and time-sensitive). The unimportant notifications are grouped at the bottom under the title – Other Notifications. This will ideally prevent useless distractions.

6. Focus Mode in Digital Wellbeing

#gallery-0-30 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-30 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; } #gallery-0-30 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-30 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

At first, the Digital Wellbeing (Stable) version didn’t come with the new Focus Mode. Only after we transitioned into its beta version, the focus mode appeared. First, you have to choose the apps that you find distracting. Then, when you want to indulge in any productive work, turn on Focus Mode to temporarily disable those apps.

So, with this new update, you have the Digital Wellbeing with Wind Down, Focus Mode and OnePlus’s Zen Mode application to Digital Detoxify your life.

7. Smart Reply and Links

#gallery-0-31 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-31 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 50%; } #gallery-0-31 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-31 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Are you a fan of Smart Compose feature in Gmail? If Yes, then you’ll probably dig this new Android 10 addition. Basically, Google goes sentient and shows contextual quick replies and relevant link-opening apps in the notification. For instance, if a friend of yours sends you an address, the notification will automatically show an “Open Maps” launch option. Cool right?

8. Project Mainline

No need to get startled by the Project Mainline moniker. Simply put, Google will roll out critical security patches and other small system updates via Play Store.

9. Developer Options

#gallery-0-32 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-32 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 25%; } #gallery-0-32 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-32 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

There are plenty of features stuffed inside the Developer options like –

Override Force-Dark – It essentially converts all compatible apps into a dark theme. Compatibility is the key as at the moment, even apps like Whatsapp have inverted color elements in the Status/Story section. However, if apps start adopting the feature natively in their code, then we could one day have a Dark UI across the board.

Bubbles – An option for devs to deploy Facebook Chat Heads like feature onto their apps, primarily for communication notifications.

Freeform and Resizable Activities – As the name indicates, it lets you transform any app into small floating windows on your screen.

Additional Theming option including Accent Color and Headline/Body Font

10. Miscellaneous things

Finally, there are a few features which made the cut here as they didn’t belong specifically in any of the above subheadings. But, that doesn’t make them any less important.

Snappy Share Menu – One of the long-time pet peeves with the Android OS has been its stupid slow sharing menu. Google has listened to the fans and fixed it. Yippie, its considerably fast.

WiFi sharing using QR – This will be an easy way to scan a QR and share your WiFi with the other person, without spelling out or revealing the password.

Intelligent Battery Optimization – Android 10 smartly manages the background power consumption depending upon app characteristics and your usage.

Progress Bar in Media (Music/Video) notification – It shows you a seek bar with the progress of the song or video you’re currently playing. Unfortunately, there isn’t an option to fast forward or backward the media.

OnePlus 7 Pro Android 10 Quick Review

Kudos to OnePlus for catching up to the Pixels in terms of the timely Android 10 update. And for the most part, it apes the goodies of the Queen Cake (which is the internal code name for Android 10). Still, we weren’t able to find some features, found on the Pixel phones running the same update (ahem “Stable��).

The missing and half-baked features are –

Dark Mode toggle in the quick settings menu

Live Caption, which in theory at least transcribes text captions for the media playing on your phone. Google claims that this works in real-time without an internet connection.

Rest, Google has future-proofed the future of Android device ecosystem with support for foldable devices, project mainline, and so on. To sum up, we appreciate the privacy-centric update with nice to have intuitive applications and theming support. We are also ready to look beyond minor gripes like the wonky gesture mechanism. As for now, Android 10 feels like an incremental upgrade towards a more mature operating system, which is reaching for a much larger smarter ecosystem.

OnePlus 7 Pro Android 10 Quick Review Android 10 has officially launched heralding very little aesthetic revamp but more focussed on performance and privacy improvement.

0 notes

torentialtribute · 6 years ago

Text

SFA must stop repeating the same old failures, says Steven Pressley

Like the man who arrived downstairs at Cameron House one morning after a game to find captain and keeper who had a drinking session with him to breakfast, Steven Pressley has seen the Scottish national team in a pretty bad way

What alerts the former Scotland coach of the first team about the current state of decline is noticing how the SFA stumbles aimlessly through yet another was doomed with about as much willingness as Barry Ferguson and Allan McGregor shuffling to their beds that fateful spring day 10 years ago

Two games to a qualifying campaign for the European Championship – one of them the 3-0 humiliation by Kazakhstan – and the manager and entire supervisors are fired.

Carlisle United manager Steven Pressley is concerned about the apparent lack of a SFA plan "

Carlisle United manager Steven Pressley worries about the apparent lack of a plan

Carlisle United manager Steven Pressley is worried about the apparent lack of a plan

Alex McLeish was shown the door as Gordon Strachan and Craig Levein for him because of the results deemed to be not enough.

Perhaps it is ambitious to say that another will follow soon.

And the prospect of an in-house designation of species becomes driven, one that introduces Malky Mackay and Scot Gemmill to the hotseat.Whatever the outcome, the worrying fear of Pressley is that the appointment of another manager hoping to cause a revolution at Euro 2020, not l succeed in tackling long-term problems.

I am worried because I look back and see the same theme. This is the same process all over again, & # 39; said Pressley, who won 32 caps for Scotland.

& # 39; I think the SFA should take a long, hard look at itself. I don't see what the clear plan is. & # 39;

Strachan got a second chance and a new contract after finishing fourth in the Euro 2016 qualifying group – and then let go after a hugely encouraging undefeated series of six matches that came close to being in keep the 2018 World Cup alive.

The then chief executive Stewart Regan embarked on his unsuccessful pursuit of Northern Ireland's Michael O & # 39; Neill. The second McLeish, ruled by Rod Petrie and Alan McRae, has now stalled after 14 months.

& # 39; I think it is a bad decision to now mark Alex McLeish & # 39; s tasks, & # 39; said Pressley. & # 39; If you are going to appoint him, if it is done with the necessary diligence, you must support and support your husband.

& # 39; For me, the SFA needs to be set up for someone who has the time and enormous support to start bringing in players and stabilizing the team. We must show strength as an organization and say that this is the person who will bring us forward and this is the plan. & # 39; The events in Kazakhstan, on the opening night of a new qualifying group, revealed the reality that McLeish was not the right man to help Scotland move forward. Ian Maxwell and the board that Scotland had a better chance if the 60-year-old McLeish was not at the check.

Pressley suspects Scotland

& I feel that Gordon, of whom I am a strong advocate, did many good things & # 39 ;, added Pressley, now leading Carlisle United & # 39; s bid for promotion to League One in England. & # 39; He received a lot from his team.

& # 39; Those two campaigns were considered unsuccessful. No experience. Don't build. Yes, everyone wants to come there. It could have taken six years under Gordon. It could have taken eight.

& # 39; It may not have been this tournament, but the continuity and the ability to bring a number of young players to the fore? With Gordon I felt that there was a man with the right profile for that job. Someone who was a very passionate guy about the development of young players.

I think we have made some crazy decisions. The only thing that happens in Scotland is: putting a manager in his place, getting bad results, firing him. The same process again. It has been that way for the past 20 years. There were opportunities to continue. Yet there seems to be none of that. "

<img id =" i-6443a7fc4d9467c0 "src =" https://dailym.ai/2PoqESr a-95_1555800577931.jpg "height =" 468 "width =" 634 "alt =" The SFA fired Alex McLeish as the national team boss after a bad start of Euro 2020 qualification "class =" blkBorder img-share

The SFA fired Alex McLeish the national team boss after a bad start of the Euro 2020 qualification SFA fired Alex McLeish as a national team boss after a bad start of the Euro 2020- qualification

Pressley takes an admiring look further south of his Cumbrian base on FA's work in building confidence in Gareth Southgate after

There is also jealousy for Pressley de Scotland -fan because England stumbled quite a bit about their sudden pursuit of stability.

The four-game audition for the role of head coach in England. appointment of the Under-21 coach who knew all about age, structure and possession a passion for player development came after a 67-day government of Sam Allardyce and a disastrous 2016 Roy Hodgson-led Euro Euro exit to Iceland

& # 39; England is now a success story because they seem to be behind the scenes and with the manager – have a real alignment in the way they want to help the teams move forward, & # 39; Pressley commented.

& # 39; There are projects with (director) Malky Mackay and I heard Craig Levein say a few weeks ago that we have a bit of patience.

& # 39; But that does not seem to be in line with the senior team's agreements. England now sees the fruits of their EPPP (Elite Player Performance Plan) and their investment in academies.

& # 39; Many people argued that for a long time. But they are patient with it and now it looks like they are bearing fruit. We must be like that.

& # 39; Should We & # 39; to find our Gareth Southgate & # 39; Possible. Someone with the right profile in terms of alignment with the organization, are strong points as an individual. Join him, support him and develop the team.

& # 39; That may not happen overnight. But the problem is if they (the SFA) do not respond to this, then they keep making mistakes. Okay, we might get a tournament and everyone will think it's solved. That is not the case.

Malky Mackay is in the race to temporarily become the next Scottish manager "

running to become the next Scottish manager on a temporary basis"

Malky Mackay is in the race to become the next Scottish manager on a temporary basis

& # 39; It can happen more often if we correct this. You must depend on your own young players. That is where our big clubs also have a responsibility. & # 39; With Celtic hell – inclined to get a historic 10-in-a-row and Rangers do everything to stop them, Scotland & # 39; s two best clubs will be even more busy than usual with the present in the coming year or two.

& # 39; The clubs must work together to help the national team & # 39 ;, Pressley said. & # 39; In Germany, all clubs come together to create and support. In our country everyone fights for their own interests.

& # 39; That will always be the case in Scotland. Celtic and Rangers are really going there now. Who's suffering? The national team

& # 39; When did we last produce top level No. 9? You should probably go back to Charlie Nicholas. None of our Rangers or Celtic teams produces one. We are developing some good players, but we have not developed enough special players that can change a game.

& Scott McKenna and John Souttar are players with a lot of potential. We have great left backs in Andy Robertson and Kieran Tierney. Those are encouraging signs.

& I have seen Billy Gilmour a number of times for youth teams in Scotland. Good work is being done, but there must be more. Unfortunately, it is always the manager who is the fall guy for all this. & # 39;

McLeish & # 39; s was ravaged by call-offs.

McLeish & # 39; s was ravaged by call-offs. It will be fascinating to see if those who manage & # 39; their bodies & # 39; – including Matt Ritchie, James McArthur, Robert Snodgrass, Tom Cairney and Allan McGregor – are considering returning under a new leader.

& # 39; The culture created is so important, & # 39; Pressley insisted. & # 39; That doesn't just come from the manager, it comes from everything about the organization where players feel they want to come. That is one of the things that Gordon could not level. His players showed up.

I see this in England. Behind Gareth they have this huge support mechanism. I do not see that support for the manager within the SFA. & # 39;

Source link

#SFA must stop repeating the same old failures #says Steven Pressley"

0 notes

tanmath3-blog · 6 years ago

Text

Kenneth W. Cain first got the itch for storytelling during his formative years in the suburbs of Chicago, where he got to listen to his grandfather spin tales by the glow of a barrel fire. But it was a reading of Baba Yaga that grew his desire for dark fiction. Shows like The Twilight Zone, The Outer Limits, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, and One Step Beyond furthered that sense of wonder for the unknown, and he’s been writing ever since.

Cain is the author of The Saga of I trilogy, United States of the Dead, the short story collections These Old Tales and Fresh Cut Tales, and his latest Embers: A Collection of Dark Fiction. Writing, reading, fine art, graphic design, and Cardinals baseball are but a few of his passions. Cain now resides in Chester County, Pennsylvania with his wife and two children.

1. How old were you when you wrote your first story?

Five or six, I believe. It was an awful rendition of the whole Baba Yaga thing.

2. How many books have you written?

Written or published? Written, I would say, so far: 6 novels, 5 novellas, 4 collections of short stories, and maybe a hundred stories that aren’t in those books that will likely end up in other collections. As well as a bunch of poetry, a lot of which is in a themed collection, most of which is still unpublished. The most recent releases will be a novella titled A Season in Hell (due out September 7th) and my next collection, Darker Days (due out December 7th).

3. Anything you won’t write about?

No, I don’t believe in taboos. There are stories in every taboo. They say not to kill the dog, but there’s a story there as well. It’s been done, too. I have to tell the story I have to tell. If it’s in me, it’s going to get out, like it or not.

4. Tell me about you. Age (if you don’t mind answering), married, kids, do you have another job etc…

I’m 48, married to a wonderful woman with two kids. I write pretty much full-time, other than keeping up chores around the house and coaching my son’s baseball teams.

5. What’s your favorite book you have written?

It has to be A Season in Hell. This short book tackles many modern issues, things that matter to me. It’s hard-hitting, and a love story for the game of baseball.

6. Who or what inspired you to write?

If I had to put he onus on just one person, it would have to be my mom. She loved horror, and growing up, I saw several movies (The Omen, Psycho, etc). They fueled my passion, but so did discovering the stories in the various Writer’s Digest books my parents kept on their shelves. It’s there I discovered Poe. Or perhaps it was hearing that Baby Yaga story for the first time.

7. What do you like to do for fun?

Read. That’s fun for me. I also like to check out an original series now and then. Nothing that’s been rehashed or rebooted but something really original. Like Dark on Netflix. I also like gardening, fishing, coaching baseball, trying to play my guitars, drawing and painting, hanging with my family, and enjoying the beauty of this world.

8. Any traditions you do when you finish a book?

Wine! A bottle of Merlot, something like Smoking Loon.

9. Where do you write? Quiet or music?

I have an office…now, with a desk and all, though it’s more like a dungeon to me. As for music, it varies. Sometimes it’s music, which can be anything from Pink Floyd to Metallica to Sinatra. Other times, I listen to baseball games or baseball chat. Then there are the podcasts I listen to, sometimes chat about the craft and other times stories. My brain is usually able to separate the two, so I can write a story and still hear what I’m listening and process it. Kind of weird. But there’s also times I need silence.

10. Anything you would change about your writing?

Well, I would have started much earlier for one. I don’t know why I started so late, but it often feels like it’s too late. And I’d be far more patient, not taking the first offer, honing my craft before I rushed out there. I likely wouldn’t have hurried to get so much out there.

11. What is your dream? Famous writer?

I’m living my dream. At least I think I am. I get to write a lot, read a lot, do all the things I enjoy. I married an awesome woman who is SO supportive of all my endeavors and two really bright children who are blossoming into great adults. And sometimes, once in a very great while, someone will leave a kind review or contact me or make a post about something I wrote, and it will touch my heart deeply. Who could ask for more?

12. Where do you live?

Chester County, Pennsylvania.

13. Pets?

I recently got rid of all my reef tanks, but I’ve had several over the years, as well as many, many birds. Right now, though, I have two dogs, a Catahoula leopard mix named Iggy and a Labradoodle named Kady. They’re both sweet, loving dogs.

14. What’s your favorite thing about writing?

Getting it all out of my head. It’s cathartic; helps me sort my thoughts and feelings in a way I can deal with them. I’m putting myself out there for my readers, getting naked with my feelings. Hopefully they get something from my stories that elicits a similar feeling.

15. What is coming next for you?

A young adult novella entitled Shadows in the Storm where Nita faces off with Shade, leader of the Shadow People. Though I still have to work on finding a publisher for the book.

16. Where do you get your ideas?

My inspiration typically starts with a seed from something I know quite well. For instance, with A Season in Hell (due out September 7th from Crystal Lake Publishing) I drew from my long career playing baseball, as well as coaching. The story is about a woman playing baseball in the minor leagues back in the nineties and what she must endure just to play the game she loves. For that story I took from my own personal experience, even down to the smallest details like taping up a torn muscle with duct tape just so I could play the next game.

There’s another element to the process, what I call the “what if” moment. You’ll see a lot of that in my shorter work. For instance, there’s this story in my collection Fresh Cut Tales entitled “Split Ends.” I was sitting at a pool while on vacation watching a mother furiously brush the knots out of her daughter’s hair and thinking about the “what if.” In this case, what came to mind was a disease, one the mother and daughter thought was very real, and it was but only mentally in this case. So that story is about the struggle of a mother not to succumb to that mental disease.

Additional info:

I have three books coming out this year (all three through Crystal Lake Publishing). Details for all three books follow

The first is a novella entitled A Season in Hell. Due out September 7th. 

“Kenneth W. Cain takes timely social topics and explores them against the backdrop of America’s pastime. What begins as a baseball story quickly delves into something rich, deep, and dark.” – Mercedes M. Yardley, author of Pretty Little Dead Girls

Synopsis:

When Dillon Peterson is honored for his baseball career, he must face a ghost that has long haunted him. He is transported back through his memories to a single season in the nineties that broke his heart. That was the season he met Keisha Green, the first and only woman to play baseball in the minor leagues. He sees what she goes through, what she must endure just to play the game both of them love, and this struggle leads to their friendship. As matters escalate, Dillon finds himself regretting his role in it all, as well as his career in baseball.

“A Season in Hell is a gut-wrenching, heartbreaking story. You won’t soon forget Dillon or Keisha. Her struggle is as timely today as ever. A Season in Hell is also a love letter to baseball and how, despite everything, the game can still heal and bring people together who seemed impossibly far apart, and can do so through intimidating odds. A timeless story of true humanity.” —John Palisano, Vice President of the Horror Writers Association and Bram Stoker Award-Winning Author of Night of 1,000 Beasts

The second is Tales From The Lake Volume 5. Due out November 2nd.

Poetry:

“From the Mouths of Plague-Mongers” – Stephanie M. Wytovich

“Malign and Chronic Recreation” – Bruce Boston

“Final Passage” – Bruce Boston

Short stories: 

TBD – Gemma Files 

“In the Family” – Lucy A. Snyder 

“Voices Like Barbed Wire” – Tim Waggoner 

“The Flutter of Silent Wings” – Gene O’Neill 

“Guardian” – Paul Michael Anderson

 “Farewell Valencia” – Craig Wallwork

 “A Dream Most Ancient and Alone” – Allison Pang

 “The Monster Told Me To” – Stephanie M. Wytovich

 “Dead Bodies Don’t Scream” – Michelle Ann King 

“The Boy” – Cory Cone

 “Starve a Fever” – Jonah Buck 

“Umbilicus” – Lucy Taylor 

“Nonpareil” – Laura Blackwell 

“The Midland Hotel” – Marge Simon

 “The Weeds and the Wildness Yet” – Robert Stahl 

“The Color of Loss and Money” – Jason Sizemore

 “The Loudest Silence” – Meghan Arcuri 

“The Followers” – Peter Mark May 

“A Bathtub at the End of the World” – Lane Waldman

 “Twelve by Noon” – Joanna Parypinski 

“Hollow Skulls” – Samuel Marzioli 

“Maggie” – Andi Rawson

The third is my fourth collection, Darker Days. Due out December 7th. 

“Darker Days, the latest collection of short stories by Kenneth W. Cain, delivers on its title’s promise. From the very first story readers are dragged into seemingly ordinary situations that serve as cover for dark secrets. Ranging from subtle horror to downright terror, from science fiction to weird fantasy, Cain demonstrates a breadth of styles that keeps you off-balance as you move from one story to the next. There is something for everyone in this collection–as long as you don’t want to sleep at night!” – JG Faherty, author of The Cure, Carnival of Fear, and The Burning Time.

Now that you’ve warmed by the embers, submerge in darker days.

The author of the short story collections These Old Tales, Fresh Cut Tales, and Embers presents Darker Days: A Collection of Dark Fiction. In his youth Cain developed a sense of wonderment owed in part to TV shows like The Twilight Zone, The Outer Limits, One Step Beyond andAlfred Hitchcock Presents. Now Cain seeks the same dark overtones in his writing.

There’s a little something for every reader within this collection. These 26 short speculative stories arise from a void, escaping shadows that ebb and weave through minds like worms, planting the larvae that live just under the skin, thriving upon fear. These are Cain’s darker days.

In this collection, Cain features stories from the Old West, of past lives and future days, the living and the dead, new and unique monsters as well as fresh takes on those of lore. Once more he tackles themes of loss and grief, and the afterlife, always exploring the greater unknown. In “The Sanguine Wars,” Cain takes us to a future where soldiers are made to endure the horrors of war. He explores the complexities of global warming and what lengths men and women alike sink to in “The Reassignment Project.” And, as often is the case, he ends on a lighter note, with “Lenny’s New Eyes” and “A Very Different Sort of Apocalypse.”

When the darkness comes, embrace it. Let it wrap you up in cold. Don’t worry, it’s not your time…yet.

INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING STORIES:

▪“A Ring For His Own”

▪“Heirloom”

▪“Rust Colored Rain”

▪“Prey”

▪“Passing Time”

▪“What Mama Needs”

▪“My Brother Bit Your Honor Roll Student”

▪“Outcasts: The Sick and Dying 1 – Henry Wentworth”

▪“The Sanguine Wars”

▪“The Hunted”

▪“Her Living Corals”

▪“Puppet Strings”

▪“The Trying of Master William”

▪“By The Crescent Moon”

▪“Mantid”

▪“The Underside of Time and Space”

▪“Outcasts: The Sick and Dying 2 – Gemma Nyle”

▪“The Griffon”

▪“Adaptable”

▪“When They Come”

▪“The Reassignment Project”

▪“Presage”

▪“One Hopeless Night by a Clan Fire”

▪“Lenny’s New Eyes”

▪“Outcasts: The Sick and Dying 3 – Anna Kilpatrick”

▪“A Very Different Sort of Apocalypse”

You can connect with Kenneth W. Cain here:

Website: https://kennethwcain.com

Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/AuthorKennethWCain/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/KennethWCain

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kennethwcain/

Amazon author page: https://www.amazon.com/Kenneth-W.-Cain/e/B004HHALF6/ref=dp_byline_cont_ebooks_1

Some of Kenneth W. Cain’s books:

Getting personal with Kenneth W. Cain Kenneth W. Cain first got the itch for storytelling during his formative years in the suburbs of Chicago, where he got to listen to his grandfather spin tales by the glow of a barrel fire.

0 notes

darthfledermaus · 7 years ago

Text

My Review of The Last Jedi

I’ve seen TLJ a couple of times now. Overall I recommend it. There is much to like and some to love, but there are also problems that are not minor. Below I have some thoughts that include many spoilers. Don’t read further if you haven’t seen the movie.

• • • • • • • • • • • • • •

What I Liked

Quite a lot.

The movie really quite beautiful. Johnson’s use of color and composition to establish pacing and tone are brilliant. I love that so many wonderful artists and craftspeople work at Lucasfilm doing animation, sets, character design, costumes, creatures, and CGI. They are some of the best in the world and I admire their work unreservedly. When Lucasfilm announced with the new trilogy that they would do as much as they could with practical effects I was skeptical that it would look cheesy in this modern digital age, but by now they really have it down.

It is especially great that they used the original molds to create a new Yoda puppet and had Frank Oz back. Unlike James Earl Jones, whose voice work in Rogue One clearly shows that he has aged, Oz’s Yoda is as he always was. Delightful.

The score, again by John Williams, is very good as always. I don’t find it as compelling as in some of the movies (the prequel trilogy, despite numerous problems, had stunning orchestration), but it is easily good enough. (The sound design was perfectly adequate, but it bears note that Ben Burtt, who did the sound in all of the first 6 SW movies, is no longer involved. Sound design is something not usually noticed in an action movie, but his work was brilliant and its absence leaves the new movies without that extra touch of auditory perfection.)

I also like the way Johnson establishes several themes that repeat and resonate throughout the movie. The basic one is of letting go of the past, but others include stepping up to responsibility and learning about one’s true self. I like how these are echoed back and forth between the heroes and villains. The use of humor throughout the movie was well timed and tonally right (some have complained about the Poe/Hux communications gag at the start, but I thought it worked just fine). I think the thematic coherence is a lot of why the movie has scored so well with critics, who really tend to notice that sort of thing.

All of the action scenes are well filmed—it is always clear what is happening, which is often not the case with modern movies. I have come to appreciate clarity very much.

The cast is good to excellent, with no poor performances. The performances by Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Daisy Ridley, and Mark Hamill are especially solid, but there are no weak links. Ridley and both of her co-stars have great chemistry together. Andy Serkis also does very well with his portrayal of of what turned out to be a fairly uninteresting villain, doing some fun scenery chewing without overdoing it.

Mark Hamill plays old tired Luke very, very well. Luke was always a flawed character who makes mistakes but comes through at the end. He manages to be true to that history while also being, ultimately, a wise Jedi master.

I thought Kylo was one of the best conceived characters in TFA and I continue to like him TLJ. It was a great decision to not try to out-Vader Vader. His further development into a more mature and capable villain (but not super-villain) makes internal sense and works on pretty much every level. The relationship between him and Rey is very well played.

Similarly, the reveal that Rey’s parents were nobodies was the right choice. There was no established character that she could be related to without causing all sorts of plot problems. As Rian Johnson has said in interviews, the hardest thing that she could have discovered was that she had been abandoned by her now dead, no good parents, just as the hardest thing for Luke to find out in ESB was that his father was Vader. Good choice.

The scene with Kylo and Rey fighting Snoke’s guards is solid, ending with the mutual discovery that they will have to be enemies after all. That is a very well done piece of romantic drama, almost operatic. It fits the emotional scope of of a SW movie perfectly.

Luke vs. Kylo was also really fun to watch. The choice to have him then pass on is bittersweet, but fit the old tired Luke character they had established since the last scene in TFA. I really hope they bring him back as a Force ghost in the next movie. Hamill has become a fine actor as he has aged and it will be a shame if they do not take further advantage of his talents—especially with the untimely passing of Carrie Fisher.

Speaking of Carrie, I thought she did well with Leia. I think it shows that she was in ill health. It doesn’t look like she had full control of her face and physical movements, for whatever reasons that may be related to a long and sometimes difficult life and career (about which she bravely made no secret during her lifetime). If she had been healthier I think she could have portrayed Leia a bit more fluidly. As it was, seeing her play this role for the last time was evocative and bittersweet. Having Leia display facility with the Force by instinctively using telekinesis to save herself, is a an inspired touch. The final meeting between her and Luke, in which they were able to share one last tender joke, is perfect. Eyes did not remain dry in the audience as that played out.

Finally, the last scene, with a force-sensitive child inspired by the story of Luke Skywalker, is great touch.

What I Was Neutral or Ambivalent About

I don’t mind the porgs. The new character, Rose, is a serviceable but a fairly unremarkable example of the Spunky Female trope. She’s presumably set up as a love interest for Finn, since Rey will almost certainly continue to be asexual (Rey/Kylo is not going to happen) and Disney is unlikely to go with the fan speculation of a romantic relationship between him and Poe.

It was a good choice to get rid of Snoke to make way for the ascension of Kylo, but Snoke turns out to be a generic villain in the same manner that Rose is a generic supporting hero. He is almost exactly the same character as the Emperor is in RotJ. He even dies in the same way—done in by overconfidence in the loyalty of his apprentice, in his throne room, while trying to turn a young potential Jedi who shows great promise. It’s fine that they take Snoke out in act 2 of the second movie instead of act 3 of the third, but that variance in timing from the original trilogy turns out to be the only thing notable about him.

What I Didn’t Like

I thought the script had some significant problems. The biggest was the side plot with Rose and Finn. SW is a genre full of harebrained schemes—the plan to rescue Leia from the Death Star was pretty farfetched, for example. However, this one is not only an obvious long shot, but also nonsensical. The First Order can track ships through hyperspace, OK. All of their ships can do that tracking, but our heroes know (how?) that only one of them is actually doing it. So they need to do, uh, something or other to interrupt it. It’s a bunch of obvious bullshit technobabble that could easily have been streamlined into something that makes more sense. They set it up like a mini caper film but then don’t really follow through. (The bit with the video call to Maz is hilarious, though.)

The trip to Canto Bight is well-filmed, but…problematic. Unfortunately, we have yet another movie made by very rich people about how all rich people are irredeemable monsters. Rose’s declaration that the only way to get wealthy enough to visit a casino planet is to trade in weapons is just stupid. We have a galaxy spanning civilization with pervasive space travel and city-covered planets. Yet nothing but weapons can be traded profitably? Food, minerals, luxury goods, speeders, droids? Nothing? There are no rich movie (er, holovid) producers? The banality of what I can only think of as unthinking Hollywood Marxism-lite, from incredibly rich capitalist moviemakers, is beyond parody. Of course, this could just be Rose’s ignorance (any glance at a typical social media feed shows how little most people know about the culture they live in), but that she is presented as savvy and then says something so dimwitted demonstrates the cluelessness of people making movies these days.

A bigger problem is that the side trip is not just a pointless failure, it is a disastrous mistake. I can live with the coincidence of running randomly another one-of-a kind brilliant hacker after the first one turned out to be unavailable. This is SW after all. The hacker (not named but credited as DJ) is presented as a sort of lovable rogue, and he is played very well (with a great stutter!) by Benicio Del Toro. Then when caught he betrays not only Rose and Finn, but also that he has somehow (how exactly?) discovered that the Resistance is escaping in cloaked ships. That leads to most of those ships being destroyed.

So the decision on the part of Poe, Finn, and Rose to disobey orders not only doesn’t work, it leads directly to the destruction of what remains of the Resistance. Such self destructiveness on the part of our heroes really falls flat in a SW movie. It’s supposed to be about the heroes making mistakes, of course, but not in ways that foolishly destroy their own cause. In a just world, Finn, Poe, Rose, and their coconspirators would be executed for their disastrous betrayal of their comrades. They certainly shouldn’t be trusted with anything ever again.

Meanwhile, Admiral Holdo is also an idiot. Leia trusts her despite her utter lack of leadership skills. She pushes Poe into mutiny for no reason. This is what ruins the escape plan and destroys almost all of what remains of the Resistance. Her stupidity sticks out as something that clearly happens only because writer needs to move the plot along in a particular way.

The battle on Crait is cool and well shot, but once again our heroes are stupid. They attack, lose a bunch of people they need, then give up when they realize what should have been clear from the beginning. Finn can sacrifice himself to stop the First Order from cracking their defenses, but Poe calls him off. I get that they want to show character development in both Poe and Finn. Poe is supposedly learning not to sacrifice his people unnecessarily, but this would have been a sensible tradeoff—losing one man to defeat the First Order’s ability to crack their defenses and kill everyone. If that��s not the time to make a sacrifice, what is? I guess Poe has learned to be OK with sending endless nameless minions to their deaths, but not his personal friends. Maybe he will learn more in the next movie.

They also want to show Finn’s development from the bumbling coward he was through acts 1 and 2 of TFA to a loyal friend in act 3 ofTFA and act 1 of TLJ to a self-sacrificing hero at the end of this movie. Fair enough. But they don’t want him to actually die. So Rose saves him. That leads to the dumbest line in the movie (the second dumbest, already discussed, is also uttered by Rose on Canto Bight). Rose tells Finn that he is a dummy for not realizing that the First Order won’t be defeated by attacking them, but through the power of Love or something. That’s not an exact quote, but the line really is that vapid. This is a galaxy spanning, planet destroying war. It’s going to have to be won by actually fighting the First Order, not by getting nice people together to sing Kumbaya. That’s what led to victory against the Empire (with lots of sacrifice by thousands of unnamed Rebels). There isn’t any way that there won’t be more big battles like that in the last movie of this trilogy.

Finally, there is the Holdo Maneuver (which was filmed stunningly). Let me get this straight. As it turns out, a small ship can use its hyperspace engines to smash a vast super dreadnought. So…why hasn’t that happened in every space battle for the last 10,000 years? Why bother with lasers and torpedoes? Why are there any capital ships? Why didn’t they smash the Death Star with a couple of cruisers? Why aren’t all space battles dominated by hyperspace missiles? Because bad writing, that’s why.

(Also, no one says, “I have a bad feeling about this” in TLJ. How can you call it a SW movie without that?)

Overall

I have been there for all of these movies; I’m old enough to have seen the original Star Wars in the theatres (seven times). I’ve seen all of the others within a few days of theatrical release. I want to like any SW movie, and I do like this one.

The Last Jedi is divisive. The audience approval scores are low; as low as those for The Phantom Menace, which is not exactly beloved. I have seen fan reviews across the scale from “best SW movie since Empire Strikes Back” to “as bad as the worst of the prequels.”

I can understand both reactions. Like the best of Star Wars, we are treated to admirable heroes thrown into heart stopping adventure, villains who are both evil and engaging, beautifully envisioned planets and creatures, big exciting battle scenes, and an operatic plot that pulls us in and keeps things moving. I had a good time watching it.

But there are also ways that this doesn’t feel like the same universe the first two trilogies are set in. All planets are now a 20 minute jump from all other planets. You could understand how the Empire had vast resources through controlling the output of a galaxy; in these movies the First Order has vast fleets and legions solely because the writers want them to. While the Force is clearly space magic, you could find a logic to some people having sensitivity to it that could be developed through arduous training. In these movies Rey is incredibly powerful just because the writers want her to be. In the next movie she will certainly be a “Jedi” despite having no more than a few hours of actual training with Luke. Will Rey’s Super Force Power ever be reconciled with what had been previously established? No, I don’t think they will bother. They just want her to have that power, without having to earn it, so she does. (If it turns out that I’m wrong, and they do present a viable explanation in Episode 9, I will be very happy to admit that.)

Lucas created what felt like a big, lived-in universe, with flawed characters we couldn’t help but fall in love with. He failed with much of the prequel trilogy because it didn’t quite live up to that, and this new trilogy now has some of the same flaws.

I’ve read an interview with Hamill in which he says that this was not the Luke he knew. He had to think of him as a different character in order to play him. He did his best to portray that version of Luke in this movie, but he would never have imagined or written the character that way. (He has since walked back those comments and said that he came to see the legitimacy of this version of Luke.) I’m still thinking about that; people can change a lot in 30 years. But ultimately, to make these new movies the way they wanted, they had to largely disavow the first 6. The Empire was not really defeated. The Force was not balanced. The Republic was not restored. The Rebellion failed. Han and Leia couldn’t be happy together. R2 shut down. Luke failed, gave up, and ran away.

I know they couldn’t make movies without some sort of new peril, but it’s discouraging that the message is that the story we followed for so many years turned out to be largely meaningless. I wonder if better and more respectful writers could have started a new series without that abandonment of previously established plot resolution.

#the last jedi #spoilers #review

0 notes

kennethmjoyner · 6 years ago

Text

For ALT, It’s Second Conference Was A Reckoning

A Reckoning for ALT

This second ctrl ALT del felt like something bigger than simply a conference. It felt as if it was a reckoning point for the viability and future of ALT as an organization.

Shawnna Hoffman, global coleader of the IBM Cognitive Legal Practice, delivers a keynote on artificial intelligence.

Why this disappointing turnout? Speculation varied among those in attendance in Scottsdale. One common theory was simply that the timing was bad. The conference was sandwiched between two major legal technology conferences – Legalweek in New York two weeks earlier and ABA LEGALTECH two weeks later. Given this, budgets and schedules may have kept some away.

A Right-Sized Program?

Participants in a design thinking breakout session present their prototype.

Feedback from A Founder

Zach Abramowitz, CEO of ReplyAll and columnist at Above the Law, speaks on new legal service delivery.

“What they won’t ever do is, I think, replace or compete with ILTA,” Flournoy said.

The Future for ALT

So what does this all mean for ALT and its conference?

Umlah, in his remarks opening the conference, said that the organization has an aggressive plan to build its membership in 2019, with a goal of 500 members by the end of the year.

from Law and Politics https://www.lawsitesblog.com/2019/02/alt-second-conference-reckoning.html via http://www.rssmix.com/

#law #legal

1 note · View note

topmixtrends · 7 years ago

Link

DESPITE MANY OTHER predictable changes to its source material, the opening sequence of Andy Muschietti’s wildly successful adaptation of Stephen King’s epic 1986 novel It reproduces the book’s inciting incident with meticulous loyalty. In the beginning of the novel, just before protagonist Bill Denbrough’s younger brother Georgie is killed by the monstrous clown Pennywise in a horrific realization of “stranger danger,” he must run down to his family’s basement to get paraffin for the newspaper boat Bill is building for him. It is an experience of unrelenting terror, despite his desperate attempts to reassure himself: “Stupid! There were no things with claws, all hairy and full of killing spite. Every now and then someone went crazy and killed a lot of people — sometimes Chet Huntley told about such things on the evening news — and of course there were Commies, but there was no weirdo monster living down in their cellar.” King’s powerful evocation of the nearly unbearable ordeal of a solo trip to the basement at age six reminds us of childhood’s blurred line between real and imagined fears.

For contemporary advocates of “free-range parenting” for whom the 1980s represents the last vestige of freedom before the descent of the helicopter parent, this is precisely why the unattended trip to the basement or the playground is vital: independently navigating those indistinct regions of the real and the imagined should help children learn to better delineate between the two. But the gruesome murder that sets King’s novel in motion sides instead with the logic of a famous quotation from Catch-22: “Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t after you.” Georgie successfully conquers his fear of the basement, only to be dismembered down the street by a version of the very monster he’d convinced himself was only imaginary.

Critics have noted the It movie’s overlap with the hit Netflix series Stranger Things in their apparent celebration of autonomous childhood adventure, a possibility many believe to have vanished with the 1980s in which movie and show are both set. Do the parent-free exploits of the young “Losers’ Club” in King’s novel support the idea that parental overprotectiveness be dismissed as so much needless paranoia? The novel instead explores more complex and troubling questions inaugurated by Georgie’s death: Is the best and bravest way to treat our fears truly to tell ourselves that they don’t exist? Is it actually possible, or even advisable, to try to separate the real from the imagined?

From Michael Chabon’s wistful “The Wilderness of Childhood” to more polemical essays like Hanna Rosin’s “The Overprotected Kid” and Christina Schwarz’s “Leave Those Kids Alone” (both in The Atlantic), a proliferation of recent think pieces has lamented the loss of an American childhood in which unsupervised play and everyday encounters with moderate danger build independence, resilience, and creativity. In these views, today’s highly regulated kids not only lack fortitude but also tragically miss out on the risky fun and adventure of yesteryear’s childhoods.

Some of these pieces suggest that fictions can help today’s postlapsarian children imagine a different world, and remind parents that such a world could exist. One contemporary father watches the Spielberg-authored adventure The Goonies (dir. Richard Donner, 1985) with his children. Their sense of wonder is ignited simply by the image of a group of kids striking out on a quest on their own. “Where are their parents?” the author’s kids demand to know. “How are they allowed to do this?” In a New York Times op-ed titled “The ‘Stranger Things’ School of Parenting,” Anna North argues that the acclaimed television series offers more than a pleasurable nostalgia for 1980s kids’ adventure movies like The Goonies and E.T. North sees in the show a valuable corrective to the “hyper-parenting” approach of today (indeed, she goes so far as to suggest that the show’s villainous Dr. Martin Brenner is the only adult that fits the “helicopter parent” mold): “‘Stranger Things’ is a reminder of a kind of unstructured childhood wandering that — because of all the cellphones, the fear of child molesters, a move toward more involved parenting or a combination of all three — seems less possible than it once was.” Synthesizing the ideas of Rosin, Schwarz, et al., North asks us to view Stranger Things as a model for a loosened approach to parenting that acknowledges the world may hold dangers, but accepts that “bravery needs its own space to grow.”

There is general consensus among these essays that the 1980s marks a turning point away from older childhood freedoms. This characterization adds further poignancy to Stranger Things’s loving evocation of 1983–’84. The years following the 1982 release of Spielberg’s E.T., the movie with the strongest imprint on Stranger Things’s vision of its era, are also seen as the beginning of the end of a world in which such fantasies of childhood could seem grounded in a recognizable reality. In the present, the image of a group of unsupervised kids biking headlong into mystery and adventure can exist only as nostalgic evocation of past fictions. What happened in the 1980s to bring us to this point?

As Rosin explains, a series of child abductions and murders between 1979 and 1981 garnered a new level of media coverage for this type of crime. Perhaps most notoriously, the disappearance in 1979 of six-year-old Etan Patz, walking alone to his school bus in New York City, precipitated the widespread perception of a rise in kidnapping and child molestation. Rosin succinctly summarizes the cultural upshot of this infamous case: “[T]he fear drove a new parenting absolute. Children were never to talk to strangers.” Or walk to school, or anywhere else, alone. Simultaneously, high-profile lawsuits over children’s injuries led to a radical overhaul of playground design according to stringent new safety standards. In the views of some psychologists and educators, the removal of any sense of risk in the experience of play undermines the development of children’s ability to negotiate real-world fear or danger. Rosin describes an evolutionary psychologist’s critical perspective on these cultural shifts in the 1980s: facing moderate fear through unregulated exploration and play inoculates us against greater, more debilitating fears that may otherwise take hold. For Rosin and many other commentators, this inoculation is what we have lost.

Stephen King’s It, written between 1981 and 1985 as the fears and protective responses described by Rosin became culturally entrenched in what she terms “the era of the ubiquitous missing child,” might at first blush seem an opening salvo in defense of the childhood freedoms whose loss is lamented today. Indeed, King’s story of a group of outcast kids who band together to fight a protean monster in the fictional small town of Derry, Maine, in the 1950s was a major influence on the plot and themes of Stranger Things; the show originated in part because its writer-directors were turned down in their bid to helm the film adaptation of It. It is tempting to read King’s novel as a wellspring for the lesson North believes Stranger Things revives for our present moment: sometimes kids need to be left alone to confront monsters themselves, because “it’s only when the parents aren’t watching that a child can become a hero.”

If understood in these terms, as a paean to childhood freedoms, King’s novel makes a particularly bold statement for the time of its release. Just a few years after Etan Patz’s abduction cemented the rule against talking to strangers, It’s opening scene and inciting incident finds a boy exactly Etan’s age playing out in the street on his own. Lured to the edge of a storm drain by the seductive banter of Pennywise, Georgie hesitates, reciting the dictum actually much less ingrained in the 1950s of the book’s setting than in the 1980s of its writing: “I’m not supposed to take stuff from strangers. My dad said so.” And in this scene King makes it very clear that Georgie invites his own violent demise by eventually trusting the charming Pennywise and accepting his proffered balloon. If Georgie had run away when he first heard the voice coming from the storm drain, there might never have been occasion for Georgie’s older brother and his band of misfit friends to become heroes.

Stranger Things is King by way of Spielberg: It transferred to a 1980s of risk and wonder in which we never really fear for the main characters’ lives. Season one, after all, begins with a missing child, but unlike It, ends with that child’s safe return. Where the four boys of Stranger Things navigate pubescent romantic crushes and perils, King’s children confront actual sex and death. Georgie’s murder comes amid a wave of child disappearances and deaths in Derry that leads the police to impose an evening curfew. At an assembly, the police chief assures the town’s children that they will be safe so long as they never talk to (or accept rides from) strangers. Townspeople speculate about the presence of one or more sexual predators. The death count rises. 1950s Derry becomes a microcosm of “the era of the ubiquitous missing child” Rosin ascribes to the 1980s United States. And, like the science fiction plot cliché in which a character travels back in time to change the future, It’s 1950s imagines an opportunity to confront the fears of the 1980s in advance, before they become insurmountable.

This projection of 1980s anxieties backward to the 1950s is mirrored in the book’s dual time frame: the characters, grown to adulthood in the 1980s, must return to Derry to again confront the monster they thought they had defeated as children. Riding on the coat tails of its own imitator, Stranger Things, the 2017 It movie transfers the children’s story to a more marketable and mediagenic 1980s setting. This only renders its allegory for 1980s panic over missing children more palpable: here is the moment when kidnappings and murders suffuse the adult imagination, but children may still, for just a bit longer, ride their bikes across town alone. Though more horrific than Stranger Things, the It movie aligns with the TV show in lending itself to the view that the dangers the children face are a necessary and bearable price for the joys and glories of their adventures. Both texts can easily support Rosin’s and North’s claims that with increasingly supervised childhoods, kids — and we, as a society — have lost much more than we have gained.

The show and movie can resonate with this message in part because a central argument in most essays on the loss of childhood freedom is that the fears of the 1980s were imaginary all along. The authors of these pieces repeatedly invoke statistics to demonstrate that the rate of stranger abductions did not actually rise during the period in which fear of this act rose exponentially. Nor have they risen since then, and the overall rate of crimes against children has in fact declined since the 1990s. But for me, this common argument calls to mind a Jay Leno routine about how, after every spectacular disaster, the airline industry seeks to reassure the public with statistics. You are a thousand times more likely, authoritative pilots tell us in television spots, to die from a fall in the shower than in a plane crash. Fine, Leno says, but when I slip in the tub I’m not falling 30 thousand feet! Probabilities mean little to fear and horror. It is enough that the thing really exists. And this is what makes King’s novel resistant to being marshaled along with its movie adaptation and Stranger Things in the case for unsupervised childhood. The monster in It assumes many forms as it appears to each of the kids individually. But there is one consistent principle in its manifestations: “It” asserts the brutal reality of particular fears the children already hold but assume are only imaginary.

King emphasizes this point repeatedly: the unsupervised spaces of play and exploration in the novel’s small-town 1950s are sites of self-discovery and growth yet also of terror and violence. And this violence is enacted by a monster whose particular horror derives from its very insistence that fears are never just imagined. Significantly, King invokes horror fictions themselves in this logic: the monster sometimes appears in the form of figures from 1950s horror movies that the children have previously experienced as fun and cathartic entertainments — as a means of safely facing their fears. But It’s manifestations of the Wolfman, the Creature from the Black Lagoon, and so on, are far more grotesque and deadly than the fictions familiar to both the novel’s characters and the reader. Some children are violently murdered. Others escape It’s assaults, eventually banding together to fight back.

Despite firsthand experience of the monster, a major obstacle they must overcome is the ingrained belief that it cannot actually be real:

“You’re … not … real,” Eddie choked, but clouds of grayness were closing in now, and he realized faintly that it was real enough, this Creature. It was, after all, killing him. And yet some rationality remained, even until the end: as the Creature hooked its claws into the soft meat of his neck […] Eddie’s hands groped at the Creature’s back, feeling for a zipper.

This scene, in which minor character Eddie Corcoran is murdered in a town park by It’s version of the Creature from the Black Lagoon, exemplifies a central theme in the novel: although we may rationalize our fears as unbelievable, even ludicrous (a clown in the sewer? a man-sized fish creature?), this doesn’t change the fact that the most unimaginable things do actually happen.

Published at the peak of the “era of the ubiquitous missing child,” It offers a less reassuring message than North’s takeaway from Stranger Things, a bromide equally applicable to the It movie: “it’s only when the parents aren’t watching that a child can become a hero.” There is some of that celebration of heroism in King’s novel, for sure. But in at least equal measure, the book troubles the rationalization that fear is just in our heads. Even if stranger abduction is about as probable as a supernatural killer clown in a storm drain, the book turns the reassurances of probability on their head. What matters isn’t the statistical likelihood of these things happening, but the horrific magnitude of the things that sometimes do happen. It requires the passage of an entire generation for the novel’s characters to even begin to cope with what happened to Georgie and the others. And so, the novel proleptically answers today’s unsupervised childhood nostalgists with a challenging question: why shouldn’t it change everything when a six-year-old child is stolen by a monster?

I am not proposing an alternative to Anna North, an “It School of Parenting” predicated on the belief that Georgie should simply have stayed in his parents’ sight at all times. But nor should the portrait of childhood in the novel that inspired Stranger Things be assimilated to the romantic idealization of childhood before “the era of the ubiquitous missing child.” As Joshua Rothman reminds us in a recent New Yorker piece on It, the movie is unable to capture the novel’s vast, messy weirdness — the cosmic fever dream to which its conflicts eventually build. Indeed, the bizarre incoherence of the book’s resolution further illuminates its status as a missive from the trenches of the missing child era: the book’s inciting incident powerfully conveys the horror of real-life events, but its allegory becomes unruly — and eventually unmoored from its historical referents entirely — in its attempt to imagine what it might take to overcome the fears these events bring into the world.

Jason Middleton is a professor of film and media studies at the University of Rochester.

The post Free-Range Horror appeared first on Los Angeles Review of Books.

from Los Angeles Review of Books http://ift.tt/2C1WiNS

#Los Angeles Review of Books #topmixtrends

0 notes

xavierfiles-blog · 7 years ago

Text

Anatomy of an X-Team: Case Study 1 - Uncanny X-Men (Gold Team) #281-321

Last time I posited that X-Men and X-Men franchise team rosters tended toward seven basic roles that I refer to as The Template, and that series runs that doubled up on too many of these roles or left too many unfulfilled suffered for it. Contrariwise, those runs that hewed closest to The Template were best equipped to tell the types of stories that define the franchise.

But that was just a theory, let’s see how it worked out in practice, shall we?

X-Men (1991 – 1995)

This is the era which saw the X-Men bifurcate into Uncanny X-Men and X-Men aka X-Men Vol 2 – teams which were given the code names Gold and Blue respectively. Since these were the flagship titles of the franchise, let’s start with them. While later these titles would operate as one, Uncanny and Vol 2 in this period were parallel books with their own stories occasionally sharing cast members (outside of the big events, of course – compared to Marvel’s modern events, early 90’s X-events were pretty restrained). For this reason and because the rosters remained stable at least until Age of Apocalypse in 1995, we can treat them as separate teams. Let’s start with the Gold Team.

John Romita Jr, Dan Green, Al Vey, Steve Buccellato

Xavier – Home Fires

Charles Xavier was the first to fill this role and continues to do so, at least in the books that carry the X-Men name in their titles. This was a tumultuous time for the X-Men: Bishop’s Crossing, X-Cutioner’s Song, Fatal Attractions, Phalanx Covenant, Legion Quest – all very big events, many of which Xavier plays a crucial role in. While this period mostly implies Xavier gives the team support, it doesn’t really show him doing that very much – except by example of absence as X-Cutioner’s Song has Xavier recovering from an assassination attempt and Legion Quest leads into Age of Apocalypse the whole premise of which is ‘What if Xavier died before forming the X-Men?’

However, this period does make it clear that Xavier is the nucleus around which the X-Men revolve. Bishop meets Xavier which for him is a lot like meeting Thomas Jefferson or Jesus – someone who he greatly admires, but whose words and intentions have been somewhat misrepresented. X-Cutioner’s Song starts with an attempt on Xavier’s life, Fatal Attractions culminates in a huge confrontation between Xavier and Magneto where Xavier’s own morals are put to the test, and Legion Quest is as mentioned all about the gaping hole in the world that would have been left without Xavier. Definitely nails this part.

John Romita Jr, Dan Green, Steve Buccellato

Storm – Team Leader

Storm is the field leader, but this period doesn’t really give her much to do. Throughout, Xavier’s presence really overshadows Storm’s command, relegating her to more of a lieutenant than a captain and she’s seldom seen giving orders. Early on in the run, there is a plot thread where her devotion to the team comes in conflict with her relationship with Forge, but outside of that she is mostly seen presenting BIshop a steady hand. Storm doesn’t feature much in these years, even though she is acknowledged as the team leader within the book

Richard Bennett, Dan Green, Joe Rosas

Jean Grey – Girlfriend

Jean Grey is the perpetual girlfriend. In fact her biggest contribution to this era is in getting married to Cyclops. When she appears in this period, it is always in a supporting role as in accessory to Cyclops’s involvement in Cable’s drama in X-Cutioner’s Song. This is probably most acute in Uncanny #303 in which she helps Jubilee cope with the tragedy of Ilyana’s death.

Steve Epting, Dan Green, Tim Townsend, Steve Buccellato, Paul Becton, Matt Hicks

Iceman – Best Friend? Innocent?

The Best Friend is the character who provides support through confiance and levity. The innocent is the character who needs guidance to grow up and whose naivety gives the book the opportunity to talk about its themes directly. Bobby Drake doesn’t really fit neatly into either category here, but half of both. Early on he provides some wisecracks and levity, but it’s more comedic relief for the audience than it is for the benefit of any characters. And his narrative conflict is about not taking things seriously – first his relationship with Opal falls apart because of this, then it’s brought up again when Emma Frost shows him that he hasn’t even been trying with regard to what he could be in #314 and #318. This points to a need to grow up, but it doesn’t serve the themes of the X-Men, just the themes of Bobby Drake.

However issue #319 follows up on this and dovetails it into one of the core X-Men themes. In this issue Bobby goes home to visit his parents, bringing Rogue with him. He tries to process the things he’d just gone through while dealing with his father. When we see Iceman’s father through the 90s, he’s usually shown as wrestling with his own anti-mutant bigotry and trying to reconcile that with his love for his son as is the case here. This is an awkward fit, but the role he plays as the goof-off leads to a story about a world that ‘hates and fears’ which is the most X-Men of X-Men themes.

Jae Lee, Chris Sprouse, Brandon Peterson, Paul Smith, John Romita Jr, Terry Austin, Dan Green, Dan Panosian, Tom Palmer, Keith WIlliams

Colossus – The Heavy

Although the standard Heavy punches hardest and carries the heaviest burdens. Usually, this is in a literal, physical sense, but by the franchise era that has gotten stale. Colossus shows how the idea can be explored further.

Colossus is the quintessential Heavy. A gentle giant with a poet’s soul, his whole thing is that he’s nearly invulnerable to physical harm so the stakes in any story involving Colossus have to be emotional. And emotional it is. First, his thought-as-dead brother shows up, and after a tearful repentant reunion promptly kills himself along with possibly all the remaining Morlocks. (Years later this will be retconned to something else – sic semper X-Men – but we’re dealing with the story in the context of the character’s experience of it). Then later his parents are murdered and Ilyanna lay dying from the Legacy Virus. Colossus, for all his strength, cannot bear the pain. He becomes unhinged, nearly beating Trevor Fitzroy to death (#302, couldn’t happen to a nicer guy). Then when Ilyanna loses her fight with the disease, Piotr’s grief consumes him. Because of an injury he suffered in the fight with Fitzroy, he is locked in his steel form. He shuts out the world, unable to carry the weight of all of his tragedy, and abandons Xavier’s dream when Magneto crashes Illyana’s funeral (#304). He reappears in #315 in a story about his time on Avalon among the Acolytes but otherwise is absent from X-Men for some time.

John Romita Jr, Scott Williams, Gina Going, Joe Rosas

Bishop – Innocent? Outsider?

Like Iceman, Bishop doesn’t fit neatly into either role but fills them both simultaneously. The Outsider comes on as a new recruit and spends a lot of time getting it wrong, needing a great deal of correcting by more established cast members. Bishop is certainly this with his inclination toward violence and lack of scruples about killing adversaries; he is frequently corrected and admonished by both Xavier and Storm. But the Innocent is naive and requires instruction, often deferring to the authority of other cast members. Bishop again strikes here, what with being a cooing fanboy of all things X-Men (also hits on the audience insert). Could go either way here.

John Romita Jr, Dan Green, Steve Buccellato

Archangel – ?

Archangel doesn’t really get a lot of pages in this period. #306 focuses on him a bit, but it doesn’t illuminate his relationship to the cast or the book. It’s more of a solo piece about his past with Cameron Hodge and Candy Southern as a way of setting up the Phalanx. If anything, his aloof, stand-alone treatment and his temper issues (shown confronting Apocalypse and Cameron Hodge) could be spun into an argument that he plays the Outsider, but that’s usually a position that’s only useful when it’s being used to reinforce the themes of the book. That doesn’t seem to be the case here, as when Archangel acts the part, nobody really responds in any way. #319 also gives him some pages, but only to develop a romance subplot with Psylocke.

Verdict:

Maybe not the first best choice as this is not the best proof of the theory, but Uncanny X-Men was the flagship of the franchise and it seemed the most honest place to start. Most of the Franchise era books had a clear concept behind them, and while it could be argued that Uncanny X-Men was meant to be the ‘classic’ team, it felt more like the leftovers. Still, most roles match pretty cleanly to The Template – importantly, they provide an opportunity to tell stories with core X-Men themes – a lot of finding family in a turbulent world that hates and fears them. The only real outlier here is Archangel which definitely is a result of him being lost behind everyone else’s very interesting stories. We’ll call this one a near miss.

Next time I’ll look at another of the franchise era teams, maybe I’ll pick one that’s closer to the line of the theory.

Anatomy of an X-Team: Case Study 1 – Uncanny X-Men (Gold Team) #281-321 was originally published on Xavier Files

0 notes