#The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

[rosefest]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[travelmgznbg]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[balkanholiday]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[atozholidays]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[travelbg]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[bookingrooms]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[hostravels]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[bookingonlineflights]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[bulgariatoursm]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[holidaysbalkan]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[burgasholidays]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[departmentq]

Some thoughts about PADDs

I had a thought that began with this scene from Lower Decks.

T'Lyn just...tosses it out the window, the modern day equivalent would be to chuck my phone out of a car to delete a google doc.

Its obvious that PADD were designed 24th century visual metaphor for presenting hard copy information between characters, like envelopes or reports, or ancient scrolls in period dramas.

Because they were fictional, the user processes hadn't yet been developed (TNG premiered in 1987, iPhone first release in 2007, iPad in 2010). Nobody knew to forward files from one device to another; if you notice, in TNG/DS9/VOY often someone, like Riker or Geordi, will physically hand their PADD to Picard so he can read their report.

This scene in DS9 is the equivalent of they're the same picture meme

So Trek carried on the metaphor further by having multiple PADDs on someone's desk to show accumulated paperwork:

Then there's Jean-Luc's challenges with organizing and prioritizing in Insurrection.

My personal head canon is that between now and the 24th century, it was found that having multiple tabs open on a device was somehow harmful to one's mental health.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Dan Rather at Steady:

If their national convention didn’t motivate Democrats to register, volunteer, donate, and vote, perhaps the prospect of a widespread voter suppression plan at the hands of the Republican Party will. Just listen to Marc Elias, one of the foremost election lawyers in the country, who recently said that the “Republicans are building an election subversion war machine.” Last week, Elias began working with hundreds of lawyers and thousands of volunteers already teamed up with the Harris campaign to combat the Republican voter suppression effort. He will focus on recounts and post-election litigation.

This is not a new tactic for the MAGA right, but in this election cycle, “the other side is more organized, more ruthless, and more prepared [than ever before],” Elias told Rolling Stone magazine. Here’s the Republican playbook, according to The Brennan Center for Justice. “Over the last 20 years, states have put barriers in front of the ballot box — imposing strict voter ID laws, cutting voting times, restricting registration, and purging voter rolls.” But this election cycle, new MAGA tactics seem even more insidious — including delaying or refusing vote certification. So if someone in, say, Georgia doesn’t like the election results, Republican officials could question the count, seriously slowing down or stopping the process of announcing results. That’s a very big deal. The 2024 pre-election period has already seen dozens of lawsuits filed in 25 states by Republicans trying to manipulate or change laws to, among other things, make it easier to challenge ballots and voter eligibility and to deny election certifications.

In an investigation of local election boards, Rolling Stone found 70 pro-Donald Trump conspiracy theorists working as election officials in key counties in battleground states. Since 2020, Republicans have refused to certify results at least 25 times. I know I may sound like a broken record saying Donald Trump is an existential threat to American democracy. But he is, and this is a terrifying example of his cult leader-like ability to get others to do his undemocratic bidding. At an Atlanta rally, he recently called out pro-Trump members of the Georgia State Election Board as “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency, and victory.” Seriously. In 2020 he primed the voter suppression pump before the election, knowing he was likely to lose the race, and then promoted the “Big Lie.” Hundreds of lawyers, dozens of lawsuits, and an insurrection later, he still lost, but all those efforts laid the groundwork for a more organized Republican push, or perhaps putsch is a better word. Fortunately the Republicans aren’t the only ones gearing up for this battle. The Harris campaign has assembled the largest Democratic legal team ever to protect voting rights. It is 10 times larger than the 2020 team. Ten times.

[...] The Democrats’ voter protection program is focused on eight battleground states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and four states of interest: Florida, Maine, Minnesota, and Virginia. Their pre-election efforts are two-fold: First, protecting voters’ ability to register to vote while also having unfettered access to the ballot box. They are doing this by fighting all the legal challenges Republicans are launching. Second, they are educating voters. All of this is a serious shift in how elections are run in this country. “The expansive new Democratic legal team, and the opposing group at the Republican National Committee, is a reflection of the legal arms race that is the new reality of American elections since Mr. Trump’s election victory in 2016. The battle over whose votes count — not just how many votes are counted — has become central to modern presidential campaigns,” explained Nick Corasaniti of The New York Times.

The Democrats are learning to fight the battle to ensure that the votes from this election are counted properly to ensure that a repeat of 2020 doesn’t happen.

[dailyanarchistposts]

Questions

This is part of what we have been talking about with people: What makes radical spaces and movements feel transformative and creative, rather than dogmatic, rule-bound, or stifling? What sustains struggles, spaces, and forms of life where we become capable of living and fighting in new ways? What supports people’s capacities to challenge each other and undo deeply ingrained habits, rather than just saying the “right” thing or avoiding the “wrong” thing? How are people carving out relationships based in trust, love, and responsibility amid the violence that permeates daily life? What sustains these worlds—what makes them thrive?

With so much destruction in motion, this might all sound naïve to some readers: why speak of thriving and love when there are so many massive, urgent problems that need to be confronted? To write about the potential of trust and care, at this time in history, could seem like grasping optimistically at straws as the world burns. But durable bonds and new complicities are not a reprieve or an escape; they are the very means of undoing Empire.

We use “Empire” to name the organized destruction under which we live. Through its attempt to render everything profitable and controllable, Empire administers a war with other forms of life. The rhythms it imposes are at once absorptive and isolating. Even when this war takes the apparently subtle forms of assimilation and control, it is backed by brutal violence. Prisons and cops lurk alongside discourses of inclusion and tolerance. Empire works to monopolize the whole field of life, crushing autonomy and inducing dependence.

At the same time, there are cracks everywhere. A basic premise of this book is that resistance and transformation are always in the making at the margins, while Empire is always adapting and reacting. All of its mechanisms of control have been invented as responses to the constant upwelling of resistance, autonomy, and insurrection. This upwelling is a struggle not only against external domination, but against Empire’s control over identities, desires, and relationships. Undoing Empire also means undoing oneself. This is never a purely negative undoing, because it also means becoming capable of something new.

We are convinced that what is needed is an activation and affirmation of other ways of being. Not a new norm, but the exploration of new (and old) capacities. This book explores some of these capacities alongside the ways that people are transforming their own situations without governments or hierarchical institutions. The capacity to treat each other well is connected, we think, to movements that nurture autonomy, trust, responsibility, and the collective power that is palpable when people are able to participate more fully in life. Amidst and beyond barricades and Molotovs there are new forms of care and belonging, quiet and humble forms of support. There are emergent sensibilities based in listening, curiosity, and experimentation. There are reconnections with subjugated traditions and practices. There is hatred of the forces that threaten all this, and a willingness to fight. Some have been nurturing these capacities for a long time; others are just beginning to explore them. For this reason, rather than just dwelling in the pervasiveness of rigid radicalism or Empire, here we are exploring, celebrating, and connecting with other ways of being—other thriving forms of resistance and struggle.

[buffshipper8490]

Rating

Mature (Violence, Language, Smut)

Length

75k+ words, Complete

Summary

A Star Wars Episode IX story using elements of "The Rise of Skywalker" & "Duel of the Fates" with a happy ending

As the Resistance mounts a last ditch mission to break through the transmission blockade on the First Order Capitol of Coruscant, the last Jedi Rey races towards the hidden planet of Exegol to stop the return of the Sith...

Title Crawl

There Shall be Two Halves of a Whole One to Embody Power and also to Crave it A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away... STAR WARS PROPHECY OF THE DYAD The iron grip of the FIRST ORDER has spread to the farthest reaches of the galaxy. Only a few scattered planets remain unoccupied. Traitorous acts are punishable by death. Determined to suffocate a growing unrest and a continued insurrection led by GENERAL LEIA ORGANA and her RESISTANCE, Supreme Leader KYLO REN has silenced all communication between neighboring systems and travels to MUSTAFAR in search of a SITH artifact that promises the power to destroy any challenge to his reign...

Likes ❤️ and Reblogs 🔁 are much appreciated!

[halobirthdays]

Happy birthday to Vice Admiral Preston Cole!

Today is his -447th birthday!

Cole was born on a small farm on Earth, as one of seven children. At a young age he demonstrated signs of being a prodigy, but this would prove to hinder him more than help him. While he was a hard worker, he was frequently accused of cheating due to his excellent testing record, and the lack of a challenge lead to disinterest and faltering grades. When he graduated high school, he lacked the grades or connections to go to a military college, so he enlisted in the UNSC in the traditional way, as a crewman.

When an ensign gave Cole his slipstream coordinates to calculate for him, Cole demonstrated his intellect by not only performing the calculation, but formulating a better way to do it. This caught his superior officer's attention, who recommended him to Luna OCS Academy. During his time there, he was involved in a scandal around Inna Volkov, the daughter of Admiral Konrad Volkov. Inna gave birth to a son, who's father's identity was unknown, but believed to be one of six cadets at Luna OCS, including Cole. While Cole was not the father, he nevertheless married Inna two months later, though there is disagreement as to his motivations. Despite this incident, Cole would go on to graduate magna cum laude. Cole and Inna would have more three children, but he rarely saw his family once the conflict with the Insurrection began to spread.

Cole would prove to be an incredible strategist, lauded for his unusual and highly successful tactics and hailed as a hero in the UNSC. It would come at great personal cost, with his estranged wife filing for divorce in 2500, and withholding contact with their children.

While on leave a year later, he met a bar owner named Lyrenne Castilla, whom he married a short time later. While Lyrenne was pregnant, the UNSC discovered she was actually a high-ranking Insurrectionist leader whom he'd faced off with before. His relationship with her would attract scrutiny, and while he narrowly avoided a court martial due to the efforts of Admiral Stanforth, the Bellicose, Lyrenne's ship, was alleged to have been lost at the Battle of Theta Ursae Majoris (though it would mysteriously reemerge twice more in Cole's life).

With his spirit broken and his loyalties called into question, he was reassigned to a desk job on Earth, with a quiet promotion and offer of retirement to follow shortly after. He accepted, and faded from public view, with the exception of his messy, highly-publicized marriages and divorces with much younger women. His health began to fail, with many of his vital organs needing to be replaced through flash cloning.

With the outbreak of the Human-Covenant war, the UNSC found itself in an unprecedented position against a much more powerful enemy, and were desperate for leadership after the loss of Harvest to the Covenant. The UNSC tapped Cole for reenlistment, both for his mind and because he was an easy scapegoat if the counter-attack failed. As the war was underway, Cole's fleet would suffer heavy losses but ultimately won every major battle against the Covenant that he was involved in. In 2530, the UNSC was finally able to capture a living Sangheili and interrogate them about the Covenant's motivations. As the prisoner spewed religious dogma, Cole realized that the Covenant did not actually know at lot about humanity.

To keep this advantage, he implemented what became known as the Cole Protocol--a widespread policy meant to prevent the Covenant from finding the location of Earth. The Protocol forbade fleeing vessels from retreating to Earth or any human colony. If fleeing was impossible, the crew was to destroy the ship after wiping all data. This would prove to be a scourge on the Covenant, slowing their advance.

Cole's battles would take him to Psi Serpentis, where his fleet would face off against a Covenant fleet of over three hundred ships. Despite being significantly outnumbered, Cole was able to repel the attackers until and additional fleet of two hundred arrived to provide support. Realizing that he lacked the firepower to defeat the reinforcements, Cole taunted the Covenant fleet to lure them in before he had his forces attack the gas giant Viperidae. The resulting explosion killed the entire Covenant fleet, and likely Cole. Unless:

An investigation into Cole's actions just before the destruction of Viperidae revealed curious behavior. First, Cole contacted the Reach super-AI network to assess the possibility of a slipspace jump in conditions exactly like the battle of Psi Serpentis. Additionally, before the battle, he made major changes to his crew, possibly to ensure that anyone stationed with him would remain loyal if he ordered the slipspace jump and deserted to a quieter life.

For those who believe him dead, he was honored and remembered as one of the UNSC's most prolific war heroes, but those who believe he is alive hope he can be convinced to join the UNSC again to guide them through the post-war world.

If the rumors are true: In canon (~2560), he is turning 90!