#The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

[rosefest]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[travelmgznbg]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[balkanholiday]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[atozholidays]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[travelbg]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[bookingrooms]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[hostravels]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[bookingonlineflights]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[bulgariatoursm]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[holidaysbalkan]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[burgasholidays]

The Challenges of Organizing an Insurrection

Inadequate Organization of the Bucharest Committee

The events surrounding the attempted insurrection reveal significant challenges in organization and leadership. The rising occurred only in a few places and lacked coordination, suggesting that the Bucharest Committee was inexperienced and poorly organized. Their attempt to incite a widespread revolt failed as the majority of the population remained passive, resulting in devastating consequences.

Misguided Attempts at Provocation

The Bucharest Committee’s strategy relied on persuading a handful of villages to rise up, hoping that it would spark a general insurrection across the country. However, without proper leadership and organization, the rest of the population remained inactive, leading to their quiet slaughter. This lack of unified action and leadership proved detrimental to the success of the uprising.

Potential for Success with Proper Organization

Had the uprising been properly organized with widespread participation and effective leadership, the outcome could have been different. A well-coordinated revolt could have forced the Turks to retreat from significant portions of the country, particularly north of the Balkans. The inability to effectively combat resistance while maintaining communication lines through hostile territory would have severely weakened Turkish control Bulgaria Tours.

Panagurishti’s Involvement in the Revolt

The enthusiasm for revolt was evident in Panagurishti, where even women participated in fortification efforts. However, the amateur fortifications they constructed were inadequate for defense against significant military opposition. These makeshift defenses lacked depth and strategic placement, rendering them ineffective in repelling any serious assault.

Ineffectiveness of the Fortifications

The fortifications in Panagurishti consisted of shallow embankments and ditches, which would have provided minimal protection against enemy attacks. Even if well-constructed, the village’s accessibility from all sides would have rendered the defenses easily flanked and bypassed by enemy forces. Thus, the efforts to fortify the village, while demonstrating enthusiasm, ultimately proved futile in providing meaningful defense.

The attempted insurrection highlighted the challenges of organizing a successful revolt. Inexperienced leadership, inadequate organization, and ineffective fortifications hindered the efforts to incite widespread rebellion. While enthusiasm and willingness to resist were present, they were not enough to overcome the lack of proper planning and leadership required for a successful uprising.

[departmentq]

Some thoughts about PADDs

I had a thought that began with this scene from Lower Decks.

T'Lyn just...tosses it out the window, the modern day equivalent would be to chuck my phone out of a car to delete a google doc.

Its obvious that PADD were designed 24th century visual metaphor for presenting hard copy information between characters, like envelopes or reports, or ancient scrolls in period dramas.

Because they were fictional, the user processes hadn't yet been developed (TNG premiered in 1987, iPhone first release in 2007, iPad in 2010). Nobody knew to forward files from one device to another; if you notice, in TNG/DS9/VOY often someone, like Riker or Geordi, will physically hand their PADD to Picard so he can read their report.

This scene in DS9 is the equivalent of they're the same picture meme

So Trek carried on the metaphor further by having multiple PADDs on someone's desk to show accumulated paperwork:

Then there's Jean-Luc's challenges with organizing and prioritizing in Insurrection.

My personal head canon is that between now and the 24th century, it was found that having multiple tabs open on a device was somehow harmful to one's mental health.

[hjartasalt]

@ prev "red or blue hitlerite anon" (you're sooooo smart for comparing people to hitler by the way, spoken like a true conservative who feels very attacked and doesn't know shit about history or politics) - I don't think people actually understand this but any attempt to overthrow our current govt, even if led by leftists - who can't even currently organize enough to vote, apparently, so good luck pulling that together to begin with - WILL be immediately overrun by fascists with many, many guns, because they're the ones who actually show up Especially in places they're not wanted. A lot of them are also very anti-government already and would be more than willing to take the lead, which would be relatively easy because again, they have Many, Many guns. We see this every time a peaceful protest movement gets big enough. We saw a glimpse of it with the insurrection. It would be worse in the case of an actual coup. There is simply no current reality in the US and especially within the next 3 months where a revolution situation isn't deadly for the people already most harmed by both parties and the people most vulnerable when it comes to accessing/relying on access to basic resources. It is a deeply childish and idealistic thing to want at this point - the only reasonable, safe option atm is to vote in a government who we can push toward positive change, which will objectively only be possible if Dems stay in office.

And no, we don't fucking like them as people, but as politicians/a party, they're bully-able, and they aren't about to set the national fucking guard on people who peacefully challenge them, unlike the alternative (again, we saw this in 2020, we know exactly how Trump feels about peaceful protestors he doesn't like). And sorry, but if you actually pay attention to US politics beyond tumblr, Biden-Harris *have* made positive changes! People acknowledging this does not somehow make them psyop-brain-poisoned or a cop bootlicker, lmao! Reality is nuanced! Because yes, alongside any praise Biden may deserve, the Palestinian genocide is utterly inexcusable and good fucking riddance to him for complete loss of voter support to that end. We absolutely need to keep hounding him and the rest of the party on that front. But it's also unfortunately idealistic and fantastical to think we'll get a fully pro-Palestinian candidate on any side within this election cycle, or even the next one. Zionism is too entrenched in US foreign policy. Changing that will require more years of grassroots pushing and organization - which again will likely not even be possible under Trump. If you truly hate the US Empire (which you should) you Need to consider who is more likely to strengthen it and who it is possible to bully or radicalize toward change. There are people in the Democratic party who are already pro-Palestine, and who want to see other radical changes become general policy. Change IS very much possible and should be actively worked toward, but it sure as fuck will not happen not under Trump or any conservative who follows him.

But, yknow, if y'all are truly that desperate for a revolution and think it will work - Please take the initiative and try to actually start one here, instead of sitting with a thumb up your ass screaming at everyone who's actually trying to get something else achievable done in the short-term. If you're that desperate for things to change that extremely, then go do the fucking change you want to see done. The revolution is not the rapture. You have to actually go do it if you want it that bad. And I wish you the best of luck. 🤷‍♀️

.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Dan Rather at Steady:

If their national convention didn’t motivate Democrats to register, volunteer, donate, and vote, perhaps the prospect of a widespread voter suppression plan at the hands of the Republican Party will. Just listen to Marc Elias, one of the foremost election lawyers in the country, who recently said that the “Republicans are building an election subversion war machine.” Last week, Elias began working with hundreds of lawyers and thousands of volunteers already teamed up with the Harris campaign to combat the Republican voter suppression effort. He will focus on recounts and post-election litigation.

This is not a new tactic for the MAGA right, but in this election cycle, “the other side is more organized, more ruthless, and more prepared [than ever before],” Elias told Rolling Stone magazine. Here’s the Republican playbook, according to The Brennan Center for Justice. “Over the last 20 years, states have put barriers in front of the ballot box — imposing strict voter ID laws, cutting voting times, restricting registration, and purging voter rolls.” But this election cycle, new MAGA tactics seem even more insidious — including delaying or refusing vote certification. So if someone in, say, Georgia doesn’t like the election results, Republican officials could question the count, seriously slowing down or stopping the process of announcing results. That’s a very big deal. The 2024 pre-election period has already seen dozens of lawsuits filed in 25 states by Republicans trying to manipulate or change laws to, among other things, make it easier to challenge ballots and voter eligibility and to deny election certifications.

In an investigation of local election boards, Rolling Stone found 70 pro-Donald Trump conspiracy theorists working as election officials in key counties in battleground states. Since 2020, Republicans have refused to certify results at least 25 times. I know I may sound like a broken record saying Donald Trump is an existential threat to American democracy. But he is, and this is a terrifying example of his cult leader-like ability to get others to do his undemocratic bidding. At an Atlanta rally, he recently called out pro-Trump members of the Georgia State Election Board as “pit bulls fighting for honesty, transparency, and victory.” Seriously. In 2020 he primed the voter suppression pump before the election, knowing he was likely to lose the race, and then promoted the “Big Lie.” Hundreds of lawyers, dozens of lawsuits, and an insurrection later, he still lost, but all those efforts laid the groundwork for a more organized Republican push, or perhaps putsch is a better word. Fortunately the Republicans aren’t the only ones gearing up for this battle. The Harris campaign has assembled the largest Democratic legal team ever to protect voting rights. It is 10 times larger than the 2020 team. Ten times.

[...] The Democrats’ voter protection program is focused on eight battleground states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and four states of interest: Florida, Maine, Minnesota, and Virginia. Their pre-election efforts are two-fold: First, protecting voters’ ability to register to vote while also having unfettered access to the ballot box. They are doing this by fighting all the legal challenges Republicans are launching. Second, they are educating voters. All of this is a serious shift in how elections are run in this country. “The expansive new Democratic legal team, and the opposing group at the Republican National Committee, is a reflection of the legal arms race that is the new reality of American elections since Mr. Trump’s election victory in 2016. The battle over whose votes count — not just how many votes are counted — has become central to modern presidential campaigns,” explained Nick Corasaniti of The New York Times.

The Democrats are learning to fight the battle to ensure that the votes from this election are counted properly to ensure that a repeat of 2020 doesn’t happen.

[dailyanarchistposts]

Questions

This is part of what we have been talking about with people: What makes radical spaces and movements feel transformative and creative, rather than dogmatic, rule-bound, or stifling? What sustains struggles, spaces, and forms of life where we become capable of living and fighting in new ways? What supports people’s capacities to challenge each other and undo deeply ingrained habits, rather than just saying the “right” thing or avoiding the “wrong” thing? How are people carving out relationships based in trust, love, and responsibility amid the violence that permeates daily life? What sustains these worlds—what makes them thrive?

With so much destruction in motion, this might all sound naïve to some readers: why speak of thriving and love when there are so many massive, urgent problems that need to be confronted? To write about the potential of trust and care, at this time in history, could seem like grasping optimistically at straws as the world burns. But durable bonds and new complicities are not a reprieve or an escape; they are the very means of undoing Empire.

We use “Empire” to name the organized destruction under which we live. Through its attempt to render everything profitable and controllable, Empire administers a war with other forms of life. The rhythms it imposes are at once absorptive and isolating. Even when this war takes the apparently subtle forms of assimilation and control, it is backed by brutal violence. Prisons and cops lurk alongside discourses of inclusion and tolerance. Empire works to monopolize the whole field of life, crushing autonomy and inducing dependence.

At the same time, there are cracks everywhere. A basic premise of this book is that resistance and transformation are always in the making at the margins, while Empire is always adapting and reacting. All of its mechanisms of control have been invented as responses to the constant upwelling of resistance, autonomy, and insurrection. This upwelling is a struggle not only against external domination, but against Empire’s control over identities, desires, and relationships. Undoing Empire also means undoing oneself. This is never a purely negative undoing, because it also means becoming capable of something new.

We are convinced that what is needed is an activation and affirmation of other ways of being. Not a new norm, but the exploration of new (and old) capacities. This book explores some of these capacities alongside the ways that people are transforming their own situations without governments or hierarchical institutions. The capacity to treat each other well is connected, we think, to movements that nurture autonomy, trust, responsibility, and the collective power that is palpable when people are able to participate more fully in life. Amidst and beyond barricades and Molotovs there are new forms of care and belonging, quiet and humble forms of support. There are emergent sensibilities based in listening, curiosity, and experimentation. There are reconnections with subjugated traditions and practices. There is hatred of the forces that threaten all this, and a willingness to fight. Some have been nurturing these capacities for a long time; others are just beginning to explore them. For this reason, rather than just dwelling in the pervasiveness of rigid radicalism or Empire, here we are exploring, celebrating, and connecting with other ways of being—other thriving forms of resistance and struggle.

[buffshipper8490]

Rating

Mature (Violence, Language, Smut)

Length

75k+ words, Complete

Summary

A Star Wars Episode IX story using elements of "The Rise of Skywalker" & "Duel of the Fates" with a happy ending

As the Resistance mounts a last ditch mission to break through the transmission blockade on the First Order Capitol of Coruscant, the last Jedi Rey races towards the hidden planet of Exegol to stop the return of the Sith...

Title Crawl

There Shall be Two Halves of a Whole One to Embody Power and also to Crave it A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away... STAR WARS PROPHECY OF THE DYAD The iron grip of the FIRST ORDER has spread to the farthest reaches of the galaxy. Only a few scattered planets remain unoccupied. Traitorous acts are punishable by death. Determined to suffocate a growing unrest and a continued insurrection led by GENERAL LEIA ORGANA and her RESISTANCE, Supreme Leader KYLO REN has silenced all communication between neighboring systems and travels to MUSTAFAR in search of a SITH artifact that promises the power to destroy any challenge to his reign...

Likes ❤️ and Reblogs 🔁 are much appreciated!