#TM 1.05

[cabeswaterdrowned]

ik TM magic isn’t specialized around elements like in some verses but I think it’s fun (for me) that Julia seems to have an affinity for electricity/weather based spells or at least likes them ✨.

[quanghaiminh]

KHÁM PHÁ công nghệ đỉnh cao với máy nén khí PEGASUS TM-V-1.05/12.5-330L ...

[haiminhfour-blog]

- Điện áp: 380V - Công suất: 10 HP - Lưu lượng: 1050(L/phút) - Áp lực: 12.5(Kg/cm) - Dung tích bình chứa: 500(Lít)

[mostlyfate]

TO MY STAR 나의 별에게 (2021)

[chocolate-cream-soldier]

Once

Oh boy, here we go with my drunken ramblings(this is me trying to coherently type for the second time cause i messed up and closed the tab after filling it in, the first time!!) But thanks for the ask Anon<3

my favorite female character

yes yes no prize for guessing it is Regina Mills. I liked her from the start, I tend to like dark, angsty characters anyway so it was a no brainer. She came across as a complete badass, getting shite done, tearing the very fabric of the universe in the name of revenge, oh such a drama queen, my teenage self lived for that , I say as if my adult self doesn't lol, but the thing is her rage spoke to me, her pain, I could feel it, her desire to destroy the people who wronged her felt like vindication to me. But what I related to more was her immense capacity to love, her love for her son was something so raw and pure, it absolutely blew my mind, and her desire to become someone worthy of her son's love, to become a better person, the hero that her son is so enamoured with, it helped to humanize her and helped her character to break free of the confines of the one note aspect of her initial arc. And Lana played it brilliantly imo, she did this character justice, even tho overall it was a shit show. And that is why this character still has such a hold over me, and has become so much more than canon could ever handle. I hope she continues to flourish in fanon, she was too good for the mediocrity that was OUAT anyway.

my favorite male character: 

eh all male characters are so poorly written in that show I don't think I ever care for any of them, other than Hen and even then he was reduced mostly to a plot device(I know so did the rest but hey ho).

my favorite book/season/etc: 

Season 1, the premise was interesting, it attracted me, I wanted to see what exactly was going to happen, how will they play with this fairytale characters trapped in our reality with no memories of their former selves, how will Emma break the curse, will she be able to break it, what will be the complications of undoing it, and they did touch it but failed abysmally to flesh it out and then they started pandering and it became a huge effing gimmick with no substance oh well.

my favorite episode (if its a tv show):

 Despite the stupidity that was in abundance with this show, I did like a couple of episodes from the later seasons but i have to give it to TSSV. As i was a talking about in my previous ask for HP, nostalgia plays a big role, memories u associate with certain things makes it more appealing, and TSSV was THE EPISODE for SQ fans like me, I mean i was here from day 1 shipping remma:P with all my 12 fellow shippers but TSSV kinda made it blow up. I live blogged that episode, I missed my classes for it lmaoo, I remember the hype around the almost kiss and when it actually happened in the show and all of us collectively lost our shite. We were coming from a two weeks break and the anticipation was HIGH AF, it was chaos, the good kind, I was flailing over Emma Swan's arms and getting emotional over Regina's haircut "FLICKY HAIR FEEL" TM, it was so silly but so much fun,it was the best time to be in the fandom, it was just great. Yeah so maybe some other SQ heavy episodes were probably bit more intense but my vote will always go to 1.05, "THE STILL SMALL VOICE" it is.

my favorite cast member: 

Don't have any, I used to like the cast but overtime I became quite indifferent to them so don't have a favourite.

my favorite ship:

 hahahahahah it's sad but it's also funny because like it's been what, 9 years, right?! and Swan Queen is still and always will be my OTP. It makes me so angry that my ship got stuck in such a shitshow, but also like it was such a good ship and I met some of my best mates because of it. And the fact that we still are so weak for those two idiots, I can't believe it and you see that's why I am so effing bitter about it, that they had such a good thing in their hand and they squandered it all, so much potential all wasted UGH!!! To sum it up this is how I feel about it

a character I’d die defending:

 Emma Swan, she never really has many people on her corner, it amazes me cause she was the protagonist and initially she was such a relatable character. She went through so much and she came out of the other side a pretty decent person who actually has a great capacity to forgive and I liked that about her, cause she would not lie down and take it, she would call you out on you bs but she would also be the first person to stand up for you if she believes in you, because she never had anyone doing that for her, so it was important to her that she gets to do that for the people she cared about. And then they destroyed it all and shoehorned her storyline with a self serving bastard and eventually wrote her off her own story like WTF. Emma Swan deserved better. And I for one can never forgive them for robbing and stripping her off her agency and butchering her entire characterization and reducing her to a ridiculous caricature, a shallow husk of her former self, fk them:/.

a character I just can’t sympathize with: 

okay we are going to step in the drama hmm. I don't feel like talking about the wooden mop and deplorable dunderhead because it leaves a bad taste but I really loathe those scenery chewing unnecessary lamps. 

a character I grew to love:

Probably Kathryn yeah she seemed like a good person trapped in a shitty situation who was trying to make the best of it, she was cool.

my anti otp: 

My favourite characters forced into terrible storylines with detestable Love Interests!

This is basically me raging about Once with a smattering of story time ugh I apologize for the ranting but it is what it is!!!

[tourtrust]

Adjusting lattice parameter crystalmaker

#Adjusting lattice parameter crystalmaker series#

Nash: Phase Diagrams of Binary Nickel Alloys, ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1991. on Martensitic Transformations, 1993, pp. Nishiyama: Martensitic Transformation, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1978. Percheron-Guegan: Acta Cryst., 1997, vol. Binary Ni-Zr and ternary Ti-Ni-Zr phase diagrams were used to rationalize the formation of the observed domain structure. The orientation relationship for the tetragonal Zr 9Ni 11 type is Zr9Ni11// B2 (130) Zr9Ni11//(100) B2. The major orientation relationship for the orthorhombic Zr 7Ni 10 type is Zr7Ni10// B2 (100) Zr7Ni10//(100) B2. The transformations obey orientation relationships between the high-temperature B2 phase and the low-temperature Zr-Ni–type intermetallics, and consequently lead to a multivariant structure. By studying one alloy, Zr 21Ti 12.5V 10Cr 5.5Mn 5.1Co 5.0Ni 40.2Al 0.5Sn 0.3, it is shown that the interdendritic grains solidify as a B2 (Ti,Zr) 44(Ni,TM) 56 phase, and then undergo transformation to Zr 7Ni 10-type, Zr 9Ni 11-type, and martensitic phases.

#Adjusting lattice parameter crystalmaker series#

Part II of the series examines the complex internal structure of the interdendritic grains formed by solid-state transformation and believed to play an important role in the electrochemical charge/discharge characteristics of the overall alloy composition. reported lattice parameters for both these phases and suggested that the crystal structures of both. (n 2 or 3) was ruled out by comparison with simulated patterns using Crystal Maker and Crystal Diffract software. As is the custom for most MAX phase syntheses, stoichiometries were experimentally adjusted to 2/1.05/0.95 for Zr, Al + Bi and C, respectively. Solidification microstructure of multicomponent (Zr,Ti)-Ni-(V,Cr,Mn,Co) alloys intended for use as negative electrodes in Ni-metal hydride (Ni-MH) batteries was studied in Part I of this series of articles. The a lattice parameter monotonically increases as a function of x.

[cabeswaterdrowned]

I really appreciate Marquentin more with every time I rewatch anything in early seasons

[haiminhfour-blog]

Máy nén khí chạy dầu diesel TM-V-1.05/12.5-330L hoạt động mạnh mẽ, độ ồn thấp, siêu bền mang lại sự thuận tiện đến người dùng. 100% giá cạnh tranh tốt nhất...

[mostlyfate]

TO MY STAR 나의 별에게 (2021)

What's this? Who drew this on my photo? Hold on. What's up with those horns?

[thietbig7-thietbig7]

Máy Nén Khí Đầu Nổ PEGASUS 10HP – 330L – 12.5Bar

Máy nén khí đầu nổ Pegasus là máy nén khí chạy bằng nguyên liệu dầu diesel, không cần sử dụng điện. Máy nén khí thiết kế di động sử dụng được ở mọi nơi.

LƯU Ý: Thời gian đặt hàng từ 5 đến 7 ngày

Thông số sản phẩm

Mã sản phẩm: TM-V-1.05/12.5-330L

Hãng sản xuất: Pegasus

Nơi sản xuất: Việt Nam

Công suất: 10 HP – 7.5 kW

Áp lực tối đa: 12.5 bar

Lưu lượng: 1050 lít/phút

Dung tích bình chứa: 330 L

Đầu nổ: 16 HP (D16)

Liên hệ: 

Website: https://thietbig7.vn 

Hotline: 0948.23.23.28 hoặc 0967.23.23.28

[muabannhadathocmongiare]

CHÍNH CHỦ BÁN GẤP NHÀ TM ĐƯỜNG LÊ THỊ LƠ - HÓC MÔN, 90M2, 1.05 TỶ, BỚT LỘC MẠNH.

- Cần tiền, Tôi bán gấp nhà diện tích khủng đường xe hơi vào tận nhà mà giá thì rẻ bèo luôn..! - Nhà cách Song Hành và chợ Hóc Môn chưa đầy 1km - Diện tích khủng: 5,43 x 17m = 92m2 (Sổ hồng riêng). - Đường xe hơi tới cửa và vào cửa đậu luôn . Nhà mới keng - Giá rẻ : 1.05 TỶ, Giá còn thương lượng bớt lộc mạnh cho anh chị em đầu tư. - Bao mọi chi phí thủ tục mua bán sang tên. Lh: 096116024* Khương.

#MuabannhadatHuyenHocMon #NhadatCafeland source https://nhadat.cafeland.vn/chinh-chu-ban-gap-nha-tm-duong-le-thi-lo-hoc-mon-90m2-105-ty-bot-loc-manh-1686220.html

[bloojayoolie]

Anaconda, Beautiful, and Benadryl: 54 *Volunteer Favorite * Beautiful Rousey is such a good girl - incredibly sweet and gentle, easy to walk and so friendly. Rosey is waiting for Love @ Brooklyn ACC. 41): 57703 TO BE KILLED 4/9/19 Lovable Rousey was surrendered as a stray along with her friend Mc Greggor. Both dogs are separated now in the shelter, waiting for their future. Rousey is a very sweet doggy girl, friendly, gentle and well behaved ~ AND a volunteers favorite now! Please share Rousey for a future in a loving home and for the care she needs and deserves. MY VIDEO: Rousey <3 https://youtu.be/jDZWZIkFUGU ROUSEY, ID# 57703, 8 Yrs old, 54.8 lbs, Brooklyn ACC, Large Mixed Breed, White / Tan Spayed Female Found Stray Shelter Assessment Rating: LEVEL 3 No children (under 13) Medical Behavior Rating: CAME IN WITH: MC GREGGOR ID# 57702 INTAKE NOTES - BASIC INFORMATION: Rousey came into the shelter as a stray so her history is unknown at this time. INTAKE NOTES – DATE OF INTAKE, 20-Mar-2019: Rousey came into the shelter slightly anxious but relaxed after a few minutes. She was panting in the intake room but would lay down near the staff. Rousey was alert to the noises outside of the room. BEHAVIOR NOTES Means of surrender (length of time in previous home): Stray, no known history SHELTER ASSESSMENT Summary: Leash Walking Strength and pulling: Mild pulling Reactivity to humans: None Reactivity to dogs: None Leash walking comments: Sociability Loose in room (15-20 seconds): Anxious, explored, checks in with handlers, began to spin and chase her tail after a few minutes, whining, solicits attention and seeks contact, lip licking with contact on her backside Call over: Approaches readily Sociability comments: Handling Soft handling: Stress yawn, Soft body, low wagging tail, accepted all contact, panting, distracted by noises outside Exuberant handling: Soft-neutral body, accepted all contact, panting, some lip licking Handling comments: Arousal Jog: Follows handler, soft and loose Arousal comments: After third pass, jumps up onto handler softly Knock Knock Comments: Approaches, lip-licking, soft body, wagging tail Toy Toy comments: No interest PLAYGROUP NOTES - DOG TO DOG SUMMARIES: Rousey was surrendered as a stray along with a large male mixed bredd dog. Limited information was provided so her past behavior around other dogs is unknown. 3/21: When off leash at the Care Center, Rousey is introduced to a novel male dog. She approaches the gate with slow movements and a tense body. The male's leash is held due to his inexperience as well Rousey's due to her body language. The male approaches her and begins to lick her genitals and she becomes tense while he does this. Both are interrupted by handlers; Rousey starts to walk away but the male exchanges a face to face greet with her and she freezes. INTAKE BEHAVIOR - Date of intake: 20-Mar-2019 Summary: Somewhat anxious, then settled and relaxed, laid down, panting, distracted by noise MEDICAL BEHAVIOR - Date of initial: 20-Mar-2019 Summary: Low head, tail tucked ENERGY LEVEL: Rousey was observed to exhibit a medium-high level of energy during her interactions in the care center. IN SHELTER OBSERVATIONS: 3/22: As handler began unlocking Rousey's kennel, she began heavily panting and going in circles on her caronda bed. BEHAVIOR DETERMINATION: Level 3 Behavior Asilomar TM - Treatable-Manageable Recommendations: No children (under 13) Recommendations comments: No children (under 13): No children: Rousey is somewhat social and seeks contact during her interactions, but she has been seen to display high levels of anxiety. Although it has not been observed to escalate in the shelter environment, it is recommended that Rousey be placed in an adult only home to ensure her success. We advise safe and appropriate management when handling Rousey, as well as utilizing guidance from a qualified, professional trainer/behaviorist. Potential challenges: Anxiety Potential challenges comments: Anxiety: Rousey has exhibited a high level of anxiety during her interactions in the care center. She has been observed to spin and chase her tail in her kennel while whining, as well as during her interactions with staff members. This behavior has been observed on multiple occasions; should it arise in a home environment, please refer to the handout on Anxiety/anxious behavior. MEDICAL EXAM NOTES: 31-Mar-2019 Blood Work Interpretation Radiograph Review History: 3/20/19: Stray, noted likely skin allergies, multifocal cutaneous masses, in heat. Started benadryl 3/23: Started trazodone for shelter anxiety 3/24: ACS noted lethargy, vomiting. Performed. CBC/Chemistry. CBC: Mild lymphopenia 0.85 (1.05-5.1) Chem: All values WNL 3/25: ACS noted inappetence. Started on Cerenia 1 mg/kg SQ q24h x 3d and LRS 20 ml/kg SQ q24h x 3d 3/28: OVH performed, started on rimadyl 3/30: Noted anorexia. Diagnosed CIRDC. Treated with cerenia, baytril and SQ fluids 3/31: Still no interest in food S: QAR. ~5% dehydrated. Consistent sneezing. No cvd. P= 96 R= 32 BCS = 5/9 Eyes mild periocular erythema ou with mild serous ocular discharge Ears: Unremarkable AU. Nasal Cavity: Mild to moderate serous nasal discharge LN: submandibular LN mildly prominent, left popliteal LN mildly prominent H?L: No murmurs or arrhythmias. Eupneic, lungs clear. No crackles or wheezes bilaterally. CRT<2s. MM pink, tacky Abd: Soft, non-painful. No palpable masses. U/G: FS- incision site clean dry and intact. No discharge. MSI: Ambulatory x 4 with no appreciable lameness. LFL lipoma. L flank few raised pedunculated hairless masses. Neuro: Appropriate mentation. Rectal: Not performed. Externally normal. Rad review Thoracic 2v - mod bronchiolar pattern noted CBC/Chem: unremarkable Assessment: CIRDC massess lethargy/anorexia Prognosis: fair to guarded Plan: continue Maropitant 1 mg/kg SQ SID until 4/1 continue injectable carprofen 4.4mg/kg SQ SID until 4/1 continue injectable enrofloxacin 10 mg/kg IM SID until 4/6-re-eval at this time to see if can switch to oral Medical feeding- offer variety of foods and note appetite Mirtazapine 15mg tab PO SID until 4/2 Seek placement ASAP 31-Mar-2019 Tech Exam Sedated with 0.5cc each of Dexdomitor and Butorphanol IM. CBC/Chem/Lytes performed and uploaded to vet documents PCV = 45 TS = 7.0 Chest rads two views taken and uploaded to vet documents Full reversal with 0.5cc Antisdan IM. 30-Mar-2019 Progress Exam History: 3/20/19: Stray, noted likely skin allergies, multifocal cutaneous masses, in heat. Started benadryl 3/23: Started trazodone for shelter anxiety 3/24: ACS noted lethargy, vomiting. Performed. CBC/Chemistry. CBC: Mild lymphopenia 0.85 (1.05-5.1) Chem: All values WNL 3/25: ACS noted inappetence. Started on Cerenia 1 mg/kg SQ q24h x 3d and LRS 20 ml/kg SQ q24h x 3d 3/28- OVH performed, started on rimadyl Progress exam: reported to be not eating, vomiting S: QAR. ~5% dehydrated. Consistent sneezing. No cvd. CRT: <2s. Gums: pink, tacky Eyes: mild periocular erythema ou with mild serous ocular discharge Ears: Unremarkable AU. Nasal Cavity: Mild to moderate serous nasal discharge LN: submandibular LN mildly prominent, left popliteal LN mildly prominent Heart: No murmurs or arrhythmias. Lungs: Eupneic, lungs clear. No crackles or wheezes bilaterally. Abd: Soft, non-painful. No palpable masses. U/G: FS- incision CDI. No discharge. Musculoskeletal: Ambulatory x 4 with no appreciable lameness. BCS = 5/9 Neuro: Appropriate mentation. Rectal: Not performed. Externally normal. Assessment: CIRDC, massess, lethargy/anorexia Prognosis: fair to guarded Plan: Move to isolation, scheduled for chest radiographs and bloodwork tomorrow Start LRS 700mls SQ SID until 4/1 Start Maropitant 1 mg/kg SQ SID until 4/1 Switched oral carprofen to injectable carprofen 4.4mg/kg SQ SID until 4/1 Start injectable enrofloxacin 10 mg/kg IM SID until 4/6-re-eval at this time to see if can switch to oral Medical feeding- offer variety of foods and note appetite Seek placement ASAP 28-Mar-2019 Post Op Exam progress exam, post op DVM Observed Behavior - quiet Objective QARH mm pink T =99.6 P =80 R = WNL BCS EENT: Eyes clear, ears clean, no nasal or ocular discharge noted Oral Exam: NSF PLN: No enlargements noted H/L: NSR, NMA, CRT < 2, Lungs clear, eupnic ABD: lightly palpted no pain resposne U/G: spau incision CDI MSI: Ambulatory x 4, skin free of parasites, no masses noted, healthy hair coat CNS: Mentation appropriate - no signs of neurologic abnormalities Rectal:not performed Assessment post op doing well Prognosis:excellent Plan: removed IV catheter continue to monitor 28-Mar-2019 Spay/Neuter Summary [Pre Medication] Dexdomitor: 0.5 cc IM Butorphanol: 0.5 cc IM Ketamine: 0.5 cc IM [Gas Maintenance] Isoflorane%: 2% [NSAID] Carprofen: 2.2 cc sq [Fluids] Rate: 250 ml/hr Total: 380 ml [Reversal Agent] Antisedan: 0.25 cc IM Green linear tattoo placed on ventral abdomen. Surgeon: 1204 Dog Spay Was this dog in heat, pregnant or have a pyometra?no Ventral Midline Incision Ovaries Ligated with: 0- PDS Uterine Body Ligated with: 0-PDS Abdominal Closure: 0-PDS, 2-0 PDS, skin glue Green Linear Tattoo Placed on Midline Surgeon: 1204 Additional Comments: pet's uterine tissue including broad ligament was very friable and vascular, the surgery took longer due to multiple individual vessels needing ligation. Pet was given bolus of LRS 200ml over 10 min pre op Estimated age: 8 yr Subjective:stray Observed Behavior -friendly Objective BARH mm pink T =100.1 P = WNL R = WNL BCS 5/9 EENT: Eyes clear, ears clean, no nasal or ocular discharge noted Oral Exam: moderate dental staining PLN: No enlargements noted H/L: NSR, NMA, CRT < 2, Lungs clear, eupnic ABD: Non painful, no masses palpated U/G: hyperplastic teats, ,vulva, no MGT or discharge MSI: Ambulatory x 4, skin free of parasites, no masses noted, healthy hair coat CNS: Mentation appropriate - no signs of neurologic abnormalities Rectal: not performed Assessment healthy Prognosis: excellent Plan: OHE SURGERY: Okay for surgery 26-Mar-2019 Progress Exam History: 3/20/19: Stray, noted likely skin allergies, multifocal cutaneous masses, in heat. Started benadryl 3/23: Started trazodone for shelter anxiety 3/24: ACS noted lethargy, vomiting. Performed. CBC/Chemistry. CBC: Mild lymphopenia 0.85 (1.05-5.1) Chem: All values WNL 3/25: ACS noted inappetence. Started on Cerenia 1 mg/kg SQ q24h x 3d and LRS 20 ml/kg SQ q24h x 3d SO: BAR, good appetite, unremarkable elimination, no csvd, no noted concern on the board P= 96 R= 36 BCS 5/9 EENT: Eyes clear bilaterally, mild periocular dermatitis, no discharge. Ears AU erythematous, no itch. No nasal or ocular discharge H/L: Eupneic, clear bilateral lungs. No murmur no irregular beats MSI: Ambulatory x 4 with no appreciable lameness. 2 dermal masses on the left flank. LFL lipoma Neuro: Appropriate mentation. A: Mild periocular dermatitis - improving Moderate otitis externa - improving Multifocal cutaneous masses Inappetence - seemingly resolved Prog: Good P: Recommend FNA/histopathology of masses with placement extend benadryl 4 mg/kg PO q12h until 3/30 Continue trazodone 6 mg/kg PO q12h indefinitely Continue Cerenia 1 mg/kg SQ until 3/27 Continue LRS 20 ml/kg SQ until 3/27 25-Mar-2019 DVM Ax Plan Did not eat trazodone or benadryl. 25-Mar-2019 Pre-Op Exam Hx: Scheduled for surgery at Glendale tomorrow (3/26/19) S/O: Dog is Q/BARH. BCS 5/9. EENT - no obvious ocular or nasal discharge; no coughing or sneezing noted. Grade 2+/4 dental dz. Heart/lungs auscult wnl. Abdomen soft, non-painful. Amb x 4. Skin/coat - large lipomatous mass left proximal forelimb; two approx 1-2cm alopecic pedunculated masses left flank. A: Dog was orignially aged at 2yrs, but given extent of dental dz and masses estimate more like 6-8yrs. Will likely be rejected from surgery at Glendale due to age P: Scheduled for in-house surgery 25-Mar-2019 Progress Exam History: 3/20/19: Stray, noted likely skin allergies, multifocal cutaneous masses, in heat. Started benadryl 3/23: Started trazodone for shelter anxiety 3/24: ACS noted lethargy, vomiting. Performed. CBC/Chemistry. CBC: Mild lymphopenia 0.85 (1.05-5.1) Chem: All values WNL Today, 3/25: ACS noted inappetence. Subjective: BAR, no coughing/sneezing/vomiting/diarrhea. Chasing tail in cage. Objective: Cageside exam performed. Eyes: Clear bilaterally, no discharge Nasal Cavity: No nasal discharge. Lungs: Eupneic Musculoskeletal: Ambulatory x 4 with no appreciable lameness. Integument: Periocular erythema and masses unchanged from previous exams Neuro: Appropriate mentation. Assessment: -Mild periocular dermatitis (likely allergies) -Moderate otitis externa (likely allergies) -Multifocal cutaneous masses -Inappetence (r/o GI disease vs stress) -Stereotypic/compulsive behavior (chasing tail) Prognosis: Good Plan: -Recommend FNA/histopathology of masses with placement -Continue benadryl 4 mg/kg PO q12h until 3/26 -Continue trazodone 6 mg/kg PO q12h indefinitely -Start Cerenia 1 mg/kg SQ q24h x 3d -Start LRS 20 ml/kg SQ q24h x 3d 24-Mar-2019 Progress Exam History: 3/20/19: Stray, noted likely skin allergies, multifocal cutaneous masses, in heat. Started benadryl 3/23: Started trazodone for shelter anxiety Today, 3/24: ACS noted lethargy, vomiting. Subjective: QARH, no coughing/sneezing/vomiting/diarrhea Objective: T: 100.3 P: WNL R: WNL BCS: 6/9 OP: Mucous membranes pink and moist. CRT <2. Mild calculus/gingivitis. EENT: Eyes, ears, and nares clear bilaterally, no discharge noted. Mild periocular erythema, moderate erythema of both pinnae with no discharge noted. PLN: Small/soft/symmetrical/nonpainful CV: No murmurs or arrhythmias, pulses strong and synchronous. RESP: Eupneic, no crackles/wheezes GI: Soft, nonpainful, no palpable masses. UG: Female intact, vulva WNL, prominent mammary glands, no mammary gland tumors noted, no discharge INT: Good hair coat, no areas of alopecia or pruritus, no ectoparasites. 4 cm lipoma over L shoulder, 2 2cm pendulous alopecic masses over L flank, all unchanged from previous exam MS: Ambulatory x4, no pain on palpation of epaxials NEURO: Mentation appropriate, cranial nerves intact, no deficits noted. CBC: Mild lymphopenia 0.85 (1.05-5.1) Chem: All values WNL Assessment: -Mild periocular dermatitis (likely allergies) -Moderate otitis externa (likely allergies) -Multifocal cutaneous masses -One episode of vomiting Prognosis: Good Plan: -Recommend FNA/histopathology of masses with placement -Continue benadryl 4 mg/kg PO q12h x 5 d -Monitor mentation and vomiting VET 24-Mar-2019 Vet Assistant Observations CBC Run and uploaded to vet documents PCV 40 TOTAL Solid Volume 8 23-Mar-2019 Vet Statement Spoke with treatment assistant--Rousey noted to take medication in vienna sausage 23-Mar-2019 Started trazodone 6 mg/kg PO BID indefinitely due to shelter anxiety, behavioral assessment. 20-Mar-2019 DVM Intake Estimated age: 2 years Microchip noted on Intake? No Microchip Number (If Applicable): History: Stray Subjective: BARH, no coughing/sneezing/vomiting/diarrhea Observed behavior: Holding head down, tucked tail, no attempts to bite or growl Evidence of cruelty seen: No Evidence of trauma seen: No Objective: P: WNL R: WNL BCS: 6/9 OP: Mucous membranes pink and moist. CRT <2. Mild calculus/gingivitis. EENT: Eyes, ears, and nares clear bilaterally, no discharge noted. Mild periocular erythema, moderate erythema of both pinnae with no discharge noted. PLN: Small/soft/symmetrical/nonpainful CV: No murmurs or arrhythmias, pulses strong and synchronous. RESP: Eupneic, no crackles/wheezes GI: Soft, nonpainful, no palpable masses. UG: Female intact, vulva enlarged with no discharge, prominent mammary glands, no mammary gland tumors noted, no discharge INT: Good hair coat, no areas of alopecia or pruritus, no ectoparasites. 4 cm lipoma over L shoulder, 2 2cm pendulous alopecic masses over L flank MS: Ambulatory x4, no pain on palpation of epaxials NEURO: Mentation appropriate, cranial nerves intact, no deficits noted. Assessment: -Mild periocular dermatitis (likely allergies) -Moderate otitis externa (likely allergies) -Multifocal cutaneous masses -In heat Prognosis: Good Plan: -Recommend FNA/histopathology of masses with placement -Start benadryl 4 mg/kg PO q12h x 5 d Surgery: Okay for surgery * TO FOSTER OR ADOPT * HOW TO RESERVE A “TO BE KILLED” DOG ONLINE (only for those who can get to the shelter IN PERSON to complete the adoption process, and only for the dogs on the list NOT marked New Hope Rescue Only). Follow our Step by Step directions below! PLEASE NOTE – YOU MUST USE A PC OR TABLET – PHONE RESERVES WILL NOT WORK! * STEP 1: CLICK ON THIS RESERVE LINK: https://newhope.shelterbuddy.com/Animal/List Step 2: Go to the red menu button on the top right corner, click register and fill in your info. Step 3: Go to your email and verify account \ Step 4: Go back to the website, click the menu button and view available dogs Step 5: Scroll to the animal you are interested and click reserve STEP 6 ( MOST IMPORTANT STEP ): GO TO THE MENU AGAIN AND VIEW YOUR CART. THE ANIMAL SHOULD NOW BE IN YOUR CART! Step 7: Fill in your credit card info and complete transaction HOW TO FOSTER OR ADOPT IF YOU CANNOT GET TO THE SHELTER IN PERSON, OR IF THE DOG IS NEW HOPE RESCUE ONLY! You must live within 3 – 4 hours of NY, NJ, PA, CT, RI, DE, MD, MA, NH, VT, ME or Northern VA. Please PM our page for assistance. You will need to fill out applications with a New Hope Rescue Partner to foster or adopt a dog on the To Be Killed list, including those labelled Rescue Only. Hurry please, time is short, and the Rescues need time to process the applications.

[cabeswaterdrowned]

Eliot and Julia both bake to get things they want this episode another for the parallels masterdoc <3

[marymosley]

Disgorgement of Infringer Profits as an Equitable Remedy

Guest Post by Prof. Pamela Samuelson.

Yesterday, Dennis Crouch provided an overview of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. and the various opinions of the Justices.

Today I consider the implications of Romag for whether juries or only judges can decide about disgorgement of a trademark infringer’s profits in trademark cases. None of the Justices addressed that issue directly. Yet, the majority opinion repeatedly characterized disgorgement of profits as an equitable remedy and emphasized transsubstantive principles of equity as lodestones for the exercise of equitable discretion in granting this remedy. Because of this, I believe the Court implicitly decided that disgorgement is a matter for courts, and not for juries, to decide. This has very important implications for disgorgement awards in intellectual property (IP) cases more generally.

This implicit ruling in Romag is consistent with the Court’s ruling in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 US. 663 (2014). Although holding that laches was not a complete defense to copyright infringement, the Court in Petrella stated that disgorgement was an equitable remedy. Id. at 668 n.1. It opined that “the District Court, in determining appropriate injunctive relief and assessing profits, may take account of [Petrella’s] delay in commencing suit. In doing so, however, that court should closely examine MGM’s alleged reliance on Petrella’s delay.” Id. at 687. The Court was, moreover, receptive to “any other considerations that would justify adjusting injunctive relief or profits.” Id. at 687-88.

Unfortunately, the Court failed to acknowledge disgorgement as an equitable remedy in Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple, Inc., 137 S.Ct. 429 (2016) or to invoke equitable principles as relevant considerations in awarding disgorgement in design patent cases. The Solicitor General’s brief in Samsung contemplated that juries would make disgorgement awards and offered a complex (and deeply flawed) multi-factor test for deciding whether the relevant article of manufacture whose profits must be disgorged was the end product (e.g., smartphones) or only some part of it (e.g., rounded corners with bezel).

Who knows what Judge Koh would have ordered had she ruled on how much of Samsung’s profits should be disgorged for infringement of three small Apple design patents? It is, however, unlikely that she would have settled on $533 million, the amount that the jury awarded on remand, given that she had previously reduced a $1.05 billion total-profit-on-end-products jury award to $399 million. This is the amount that the Court vacated in Samsung because the lower courts had wrongly held that all profits on end products must be disgorged.

That disgorgement is an equitable remedy that only judges can order in an IP case was further recognized in Texas Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Elecs. Am., Inc., 895 F.3d 1304 (Fed. Cir. 2018). In this state law trade secrecy case, the Federal Circuit vacated a jury’s disgorgement award of $48.8 million on the ground that it was improper for juries to award an equitable remedy. The court reviewed at length the historical record of the disgorgement remedy in IP cases. Id. at 1319-25. It cited the Court’s decision in Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Corp., 309 U.S. 390, 399 (1940) for the proposition that “recovery of profits … had been allowed in equity both in copyright and patent cases as appropriate equitable relief incident to a decree for an injunction.” Id. at 1324. Had the Federal Circuit recognized this principle a few years before, it would have been Judge Koh, not a jury, who would have decided how much of Samsung’s profits should be disgorged.

Petrella notwithstanding, only one copyright decision has thus far ruled that the award of infringer profits is a matter for judicial discretion, not for juries. See Fair Isaac Corp. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2019 WL 5057865 (D. Minn. 2019) (disgorgement of profits held an equitable remedy for which a jury award was unavailable in a software copyright infringement case).

Romag is not the only trademark decision to have reserved disgorgement awards to the discretion of judges. A number of trademark cases have ruled that only judges, not juries, can render disgorgement awards. See Hard Candy LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, 921 F.3d 1343, 1355-59 (11th Cir. 2019) (denying trademark plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial on its disgorgement claim); Fifty-Six Hope Rd. Music, Ltd. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc., 778 F.3d 1059, 1074–76 (9th Cir. 2015).

In a forthcoming article, colleagues and I point out that traditional principles of restitution and unjust enrichment support awards of disgorgement of profits insofar as they are (1) levied against conscious wrongdoers, (2) attributable to the wrongful conduct, and (3) subject to equitable discretion. Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in Romag rightly noted that innocent or good faith infringers should not have to disgorge profits because the goal of this remedy is to ensure that conscious wrongdoers do not profit from their misdeeds. Insofar as the majority opinion in Romag contemplated that profits of innocent trademark infringers could be disgorged, it is at odds with traditional equitable principles. In Romag, both laches and inequitable conduct should preclude profits disgorgement upon remand. For a further elaboration on this point and about equitable discretion in IP disgorgement cases more generally, see Pamela Samuelson, John M. Golden, & Mark P. Gergen, Recalibrating Disgorgement Awards in Intellectual Property Cases, B.U. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3529750.

Profit Disgorgement Allowed in TM Cases Without Showing Willfulness

Disgorgement of Infringer Profits as an Equitable Remedy published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/