#THE ENTIRE MOVIE IS IN ENGLISH

[lewishamiltonstuff]

Man, Delhi Belly is a good film. I can't believe I was missing out on a gem.

[marshmallowgoop]

no thoughts just Heiji Hattori (HD)

[strslv-4sh]

*At Jondami's marriage*

*Jason calls Jon for a private conversation and Jon is clearly nervous*

Jason, looking deep into Jon's soul through his eyes: Look, I'll let it clear, if you hurt my brother, just a little, make him cry, or even make him sad, just once, I will come after you with kryptonite and will hunt you to hell if necessary. Got it?

Jon, shaking his head: Definitely

Jason, narrowing his eyes: You sure?

Jon: Yes! It was clear as day

Jason, instantly becoming less threatening and patting Jon on the back: Good, welcome to the family

[starryo]

no powers university au: after being falsely accused of physical assault, wrongfully treated by adults and having his voice ignored, akira loses his ability to speak due to the trauma, becoming selectively mute as a result.

he meets goro akechi, local campus sensation and an upperclassman, who just so happens to be very fluent in sign language.

link to original twitter thread here. (note: i just borrowed the scene from A Silent Voice, this isn’t actually an au of A Silent Voice)

[possamble]

i think she was the most annoying baby on earth i wouldnt be able to take it (affectionate)

there are only two kinds of autism. the one where it takes you so long to start talking that your parents are worried something's wrong with you and then you suddenly start speaking in full sentences when you're 2 years old (laios and falin) and the one where you simply Do Not Shut Up the second you can make even vaguely word-like sounds (marcille)

love her. she's so funny. im so sure she was babbling on with the full intonation of someone who knows what they're saying but in completely unintelligible noises, some half-words borrowed from elven and common lmao

[sciderman]

howard the duck (1976) #10

[countlessofvoids]

Honestly I think Ragnar the Rock should've been a viking. I mean, he already has a viking name. But more importantly it would reduce the xenophobia vibes the franchise gives me

[soupy-sez]

KAL HO NAA HO [कल हो ना हो] (2003) dir. Nikkhil Advani

[sugaploom]

"saltburn doesnt have any messages its just a wacky movie" its literally about how one mans lust and obsession for something and someone out of his grasp cause him to commit horrible acts to an entire family. he forfeits everything that he Is and becomes something crazy and new and fucked up in order to accomplish this goal. whats not clicking

[non-un-topo]

Forever fucked up over the fact that sometimes you have to write the thing you desperately want to read/watch because it doesn't exist yet

[voiceemporium]

Moses in Prince of Egypt played by Val Kilmer

[davrinassan]

guys give me a film to watch i rlly wanna watch smth now

[jellogram]

I hate when a non-English movie gets remade in the US and now when I google the movie title all that comes up is the American version like come on. Why are you assuming I'm uncultured like that.

[noctifernoctua]

Does anyone have reccomendations for Italian movies/shows with Italian speech? Preferably action or horror, but I'm open minded

[mukuberry]

Natsume Soseki and Futabatei Shimei translated the words "I love you" as "The moon is beautiful, isn't it?" and "I could die", respectively. Both are Meiji era (October 23 1868 - July 30, 1912) writers which didn't do direct translations and used literary allusions. Back then, in Japan there wasn't the same direct expression of love that we have now, so they had to get creative.

[wonder-worker]

"It is difficult to argue that [Edward IV] was wrong in what he did. His advancement of [Richard of Gloucester] can be criticized only by those who believe that the only good nobleman is an impotent nobleman. Medieval kings did not think in these terms. Gloucester’s power was valuable because it ensured royal control of a significant and troublesome part of the country. Nor can Edward be blamed for not foreseeing the ends to which Gloucester might put his power. The duke had been a loyal upholder of the house of York, a central figure in Edward’s polity*; there was no obvious reason why he should not occupy the same role under Edward V. In this respect, precedent was on Edward’s side. Previous minorities had seen squabbles over the distribution of power, but no young king had ever been deposed. Even royal uncles traditionally drew a line at that, something which explains why Gloucester’s actions seemed so shocking to contemporaries and, perhaps, the reason why he got away with it so easily in the short term.

In the immediate sense, Gloucester must take final responsibility for what happened in 1483. However one explains the motives behind his actions, things happened because he chose that they should: there is nothing in the previous reign which compelled him to act as he did."

-Rosemary Horrox, Richard III: A Study of Service

*Richard was also, yk, Edward's own brother who had been entirely loyal to him during his life. The problem wasn’t that Edward trusted Richard (why wouldn't he?), the problem is that Richard broke that trust in a horrible and unprecedented way to usurp a 12-year-old. Please understand the difference.