#Senior advocate for corruption case
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
rajeevsurana · 2 years ago
Text
Senior advocate for ED case in Rajasthan High court
Advocate Rajeev Surana is a seasoned Senior Advocate renowned for his expertise in handling ED (Enforcement Directorate) cases within the Rajasthan High Court. With a notable legal career marked by extensive experience and a profound understanding of financial and enforcement laws, Mr. Surana has emerged as a leading authority in this complex legal domain. His adept handling of intricate ED matters, combined with a strategic and insightful litigation approach, consistently yields favorable results for his clients. Recognized for his meticulous research, persuasive advocacy, and nuanced interpretation of financial regulations, Advocate Rajeev Surana commands respect and credibility in the legal fraternity. In matters concerning Enforcement Directorate proceedings within the Rajasthan High Court, he offers invaluable expertise and representation, earning his reputation as a reliable and accomplished legal practitioner.
Tumblr media
0 notes
advtrajeevsurana · 1 hour ago
Text
Most Trusted Senior Advocate in Rajasthan High Court – Rajeev Surana
When it comes to top-tier legal advocacy in Rajasthan, Advocate Rajeev Surana stands as the Most Trusted Senior Advocate in Jaipur and a highly respected name in the Rajasthan High Court. With a remarkable career spanning over 30 years, he has successfully represented clients in criminal, commercial, tax, arbitration, and constitutional matters.
A Renowned Legal Strategist for High-Stake Cases
Advocate Surana has carved a niche as a dynamic and results-driven senior advocate. From handling white-collar crimes to high-profile ED and corruption cases, his legal strategies are both powerful and precise. Recognized as the Senior Advocate for Criminal Case in Rajasthan High Court, his clients benefit from his deep courtroom experience and razor-sharp litigation skills.
He is also a go-to Rajasthan High Court Senior Advocate for Commercial, Arbitration, GST, and ED cases, offering thorough legal support across business and regulatory matters.
Comprehensive Expertise in Key Legal Domains
Criminal Litigation: From PMLA, NDPS to IPC charges, he is the trusted Senior Advocate for Criminal Case in Rajasthan High Court.
Commercial Disputes: Highly regarded as the Senior Advocate for Commercial Case in Rajasthan High Court, especially in contract enforcement and corporate law matters.
Arbitration Law: Known for being the Senior Advocate for Arbitration Case in Rajasthan High Court, with strong results in both domestic and international arbitration.
Tax Litigation: Specializes as the Senior Advocate for GST Case in Rajasthan High Court, with deep insights into indirect taxation laws.
ED & Financial Offenses: Leads in defending clients in FEMA and PMLA cases as the Senior Advocate for ED Case in Rajasthan High Court.
Anti-Corruption Matters: Advocate Surana is widely trusted as the Senior Advocate for Corruption Case in Rajasthan High Court, known for his strategic handling of sensitive matters.
Why Advocate Rajeev Surana is Rajasthan’s Top Legal Choice
Highly Respected Senior Advocate with unmatched credibility across legal circles.
Over Three Decades of Courtroom Excellence in trial, appellate, and high court cases.
Personalized Legal Strategy tailored to each client’s case requirements.
Extensive Practice Areas including constitutional, white-collar, commercial, and regulatory law.
Recognized as the Best Senior Advocate in Rajasthan High Court
Consistently rated as the Best Senior Advocate in Rajasthan, Rajeev Surana is the first choice for clients facing serious legal challenges. His sharp legal intellect and result-oriented approach make him the Top Senior Advocate in Jaipur and Rajasthan.
Book a Consultation with Advocate Rajeev Surana
Secure your legal position with the finest representation. Consult Advocate Rajeev Surana, the leading Rajasthan High Court Senior Advocate for Criminal, Commercial, Arbitration, GST, ED, and Corruption Cases.
👉 Visit the Official Website to schedule your consultation today.
0 notes
helenvaughans · 1 year ago
Text
For nearly four years, Republicans have delved into the darkest corners of Hunter Biden’s life, seeking to tie his troubles to his father, President Biden. But as the younger Biden stands trial in Delaware on gun charges, the case’s glaring political contradictions have rendered the G.O.P. largely mute, from former President Donald J. Trump on down.
It stands to reason: The baseless claim that the Biden Justice Department is running a political persecution of Mr. Trump is somewhat undermined by the department’s prosecution of the president’s son. It is also hard to make much of allegations that Hunter Biden lied about his drug use to purchase a handgun when your party is sponsoring legislation to ease gun-purchasing restrictions for veterans struggling with mental illness, not to mention the case before the Supreme Court that could allow domestic abusers to buy firearms.
So beyond the professional provocateurs in Washington and the right-wing media, Republicans have decided to say as little as possible.
[...]
On Tuesday, when the House Judiciary Committee’s Republican majority convened a hearing on how the “D.O.J. has become politicized and weaponized under the leadership of Attorney General Merrick Garland,” practically the only mentions of Hunter Biden came from Democrats, such as Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee, who asked Mr. Garland if his department had indicted Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas. The answer was yes.
“So you’ve prosecuted Democrats, and as we speak, Hunter Biden, the son of the president, is under trial in Delaware,” Mr. Cohen said, adding for good measure that the department had declined to indict a Republican member of the committee, Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida, after investigating him for sex trafficking.
“Mr. Gaetz is living evidence that you have not weaponized the Justice Department,” Mr. Cohen said. (Mr. Gaetz was not in the room at the time.)
Perhaps the only mention of the president’s son by a Republican at the lengthy hearing came from Representative Ben Cline of Virginia, who asked whether Mr. Garland had spoken to Hunter Biden at a state dinner for Kenya’s president last month.
“I have never spoken to Hunter Biden in my life,” Mr. Garland responded.
Then there is the charge that Hunter Biden faces — lying about drug use on a federal background check to purchase a gun — and its clash with the gun rights absolutism in the G.O.P. On Tuesday night, the House narrowly passed a measure that would remove military veterans who had been reported to the F.B.I. for mental health concerns from the national gun background check system.
“I’m encouraged to see Congress refusing to turn a blind eye to the 260,000 veterans who have been wrongfully submitted to the F.B.I.’s corrupt system,” declared Representative Eli Crane, Republican of Arizona and the amendment’s sponsor.
But that “corrupt system” is the same one that Hunter Biden is accused of subverting on federal forms as he sought to purchase a gun.
Gun rights organizations have tied themselves in knots over the case, trying to reconcile their political efforts to defeat President Biden with their attacks on the instant check system.
“Gun Owners of America believes that the gun control Hunter Biden violated is unconstitutional and Forms 4473 shouldn’t even exist,” said Erich Pratt, the group’s senior vice president. “However, so long as these infringements remain on the books, Hunter Biden deserves no special treatment from the D.O.J.”
Andrew Arulanandam, a spokesman for the National Rifle Association, said, “The N.R.A. is a determined advocate for Second Amendment rights for every law-abiding American, but we draw the line with criminal behavior.”
Democrats have had no problem pointing out the contradictions.
Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, which has spent nearly two years investigating Hunter Biden, was almost sympathetic. The prosecutor in the case is an appointee of the Trump Justice Department, he noted. The judge was also nominated by Mr. Trump.
“The very existence of the Hunter Biden prosecution and trial debunk pretty much everything they’ve been saying about the Trump prosecution and trial,” he said.
And, Mr. Raskin added, “if anybody else in America was charged with lying on a federal form to get a handgun, the entire Republican apparatus would be mobilized to charge that his Second Amendment rights were being violated.”
[...]
Still, campaign strategists from both parties said this week that their candidates should leave the Hunter Biden case alone. Republicans said they were watching the courtroom in Delaware to see if the defendant’s father came up. Otherwise, they said, candidates should stick to the issues the party is winning on: the economy and the border.
The Trump campaign held a call with the news media on Tuesday to castigate President Biden’s executive order shutting the border to amnesty seekers. The former president released a slew of videos on subjects including a promise that a Wall Street Journal reporter imprisoned in Russia would be released if he were elected and an embrace of mail-in ballots. Neither Hunter Biden nor any other member of the “Biden crime family” came up.
Democrats have also been eager to focus on the issues that voters care about — and Hunter Biden is not one of them.
House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana on Tuesday at a CNBC forum was pressed on his assertion that the Manhattan court where Mr. Trump was convicted had been a “banana republic trial.” If so, he was asked, was the unfurling Hunter Biden case also a banana republic trial?
“Haven’t been able to watch any of that yet,” Mr. Johnson shrugged. “We’ll see. I hope not.”
3 notes · View notes
acoustic-accompaniment · 1 year ago
Text
I understand what this means, but I think we should seriously reflect on words vs. actions when it comes to graphs like these. Let's start from the top
Trans Rights:
Biden has supported trans rights and solidified that people can't be turned away from Healthcare for being trans, as well as providing the option to identify as X on certain documents. Good things.
Abortion Access:
We lost Roe v. Wade under Biden, and he has done almost nothing to solidify and prevent further restrictions for abortion.
Environmental Reform:
Biden has spoken multiple times about environmental reform and his support for it, yet he sends bombs with large environmental impacts to Isreal, undoing any environmental progress he reached towards and doing untold damage to countless lives as well as our planet.
Healthcare Reform:
The average hospital stay is still roughly $2,500 depending on state, about 2% higher than in 2020. Healthcare costs more and the quality is dropping.
Prescription reform:
Medicare can now negotiate drug prices! Well, kinda. They can only negotiate a maximum of 50 drugs per year. This means that they can only change the prices of 50 drugs once per year, not keep the same drug prices low. One drug may be $50 less one year, but jump up $100 next year because they didn't negotiate it. This is just Medicare, nod Medicaid. Seniors only. Also, children get coverage, but only until the age of 6. Not much of a benefit. He did kinda chase after junk fees, but you still have to fight back personally in most cases (personal experience here.). Mostly crumbs with potential for expansion, yet no promise as of now.
Student Loan Forgiveness:
This one makes me laugh. He tossed us lies for years and even when he gave us something it was still only crumbs. It's not even enough to cover the interest according to their own site.
Infrastructure Funding:
I'll give this to him. He helped pass a bill to rebuild bridges in "poor condition or worse". It's 45,000 out of the 600,000 bridges in the states though, so not a whole lot. Still better than the nothing that was going to them, but not enough.
Advocating Race Equality:
Biden can't even see Palestinian people as people. Between that and funding racist regimes like Cop Cities and police forces with a known white supremacy problem and you've got your answer.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion:
See previous statement.
Vaccines and Public Health:
Covid is still around. Biden literally stated it was over, but we're experiencing huge waves every year that rival 2020 numbers. This has been a huge problem that many, many people have pointed out ever since he stated covid was over yet he still does nothing.
Criminal Justice Reform:
More crumbs and lies disguised as virtue. Decriminalizing weed on a federal level is a great example of saying big things that mean nothing. Nobody is jailed for federal weed charges.
Military Support for Isreal:
Yeah. He supports killing innocent people. Children included. We've all seen it for the past 9 months and can't deny it.
Israel/Hama's Ceasefire:
Another joke I see. He may say he supports a ceasefire, yet he keeps supplying them bombs, especially knowing what the weapons are used for. His "private calls" with Israel have amounted to giving even more bombs while going on stage and saying he's "disappointed" in what Israel is doing. Not to mention the press conferences where his own people state Biden fully supports Israel and what they're doing, backing them fully to the point of discrediting the ICC and wanting them thrown in jail for daring to condem Israel's actions.
Now, what has Biden done to stop Project 2025? To codify Roe v. Wade? To actually save lives? Weed out corruption? Prevent those who openly state they wish to be the last president from becoming president?
The answer is nothing. It's all just slow drips of potential followed by inaction and deceit. Biden is a do nothing president that promised he would leave office for someone better back in 2020 and now wishes to hold office and prevent better candidates from taking over. There's no way he doesn't know he's one of the least popular president's just behind Trump, yet he does nothing to change that. Both are senile and I honestly don't think holding onto 4 more years, if he even lives that long, would change much other than the timeline of the far right pushing their agenda.
Vote for who you want. Just know that Biden is doing nothing of substance and still allowing bad things to happen. He just tends to hide the bad a bit better until things burst and he sends his people to lie to our faces.
Look.
Tumblr media
I have made you a chart. A very simple chart.
People say "You have to draw the line somewhere, and Biden has crossed it-" and my response is "Trump has crossed way more lines than Biden".
These categories are based off of actual policy enacted by both of these men while they were in office.
If the ONLY LINE YOU CARE ABOUT is line 12, you have an incredible amount of privilege, AND YOU DO NOT CARE ABOUT PALESTINIANS. You obviously have nothing to fear from a Trump presidency, and you do not give a fuck if a ceasefire actually occurs. You are obviously fine if your queer, disabled, and marginalized loved ones are hurt. You clearly don't care about the status of American democracy, which Trump has openly stated he plans to destroy on day 1 he is in office.
103K notes · View notes
unicausnews · 17 days ago
Photo
Tumblr media
28, 2025 09:56 AM IST On the orders of the Rajasthan ACB Headquarters, a automobile of Jhalawar Additional SP Jagram Meena was checked by the ACB workforce at Shivdaspura Toll. Rajasthan Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) discovered ₹9.35 lakhs money in Jhalawar Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP) Jagram Meena's automobile at Shivdaspura Toll, Jaipur. ₹9.35 Lakhs have been present in his automobile within the shock examine.(Reuters/ Representational) A press release by the Rajasthan ACB mentioned that on the orders of the Rajasthan ACB Headquarters, a automobile of Jhalawar Additional SP Jagram Meena was checked by the ACB workforce at Shivdaspura Toll. ₹9.35 Lakhs have been present in his automobile within the shock examine. More particulars are awaited within the case. Meanwhile, in line with a press launch by the Rajasthan ACB, in Sawai Madhopur, Senior Assistant of the Tehsil Office, Gangapur City, Jai Sharma and Hari Prasad, alias Sonu Advocate, have been arrested red-handed whereas taking a bribe of ₹75,000. The press launch said that, on the orders of the Rajasthan ACB Headquarters, the ACB outpost within the Sawai Madhopur unit took motion towards Jai Sharma and Hariprasad alias Sonu Advocate, catching them red-handed whereas taking a bribe in change for registering the agricultural land bought by him within the village of Chuli. In a separate case, the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) in Delhi made headlines when it registered a case towards former Delhi Health Ministers Saurabh Bhardwaj and Satyendar Jain in reference to large-scale corruption in well being infrastructure tasks of the Delhi authorities, in line with an official assertion from the police on Thursday. 24 hospital tasks, 11 greenfields and 13 brownfields, have been sanctioned at a price of ₹5,590 crores in 2018-19. These tasks are mired in inexplicable delays and astronomical price overruns, indicating large-scale monetary embezzlement, in line with a press release from the Joint Commissioner of Police, Madhur Verma. Massive irregularities, unexplained delays, and vital misappropriation of funds have been discovered within the building of varied hospitals, polyclinics and ICU infrastructure throughout town. Substantial deviations and value escalations, amounting to a number of hundred crores, have been noticed. Not a single mission was accomplished throughout the prescribed timeline, the Head of the Anti-Corruption Branch said. ACB registered the case after receiving approval underneath Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act from the competent authority. Read More: https://news.unicaus.in/india/9-35-lakhs-money-present-in-jhalawar-asp-jagram-meenas-automobile-rajasthan-anti-corruption-bureau/
0 notes
hnck120 · 2 months ago
Text
Best Criminal Cases Advocate in Bangalore
Tumblr media
Facing criminal charges can be one of the most challenging experiences in life. Whether it’s a minor offense or a serious allegation, having the right legal representation is crucial. In Bangalore, a city bustling with legal professionals, HNCK & Associates stands out as a beacon of hope for those seeking justice. With a commitment to excellence, integrity, and client-centric services, HNCK & Associates has earned its reputation as one of the best criminal law firms in the region.
Understanding Criminal Law in Bangalore
Bangalore, being a metropolitan hub, witnesses a diverse range of criminal cases. From cybercrimes to white-collar offenses, the city’s legal landscape is complex and ever-evolving. Understanding the nuances of criminal law here requires not just knowledge but also experience and adaptability.
Criminal law in India is primarily governed by the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and various special laws like the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS), the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act (POCSO). Navigating these laws demands a legal team that’s both knowledgeable and proactive.
HNCK & Associates: A Legacy of Legal Excellence
About Us
HNCK & Associates is a premier law firm based in Bangalore, specializing in criminal defense. Our team comprises seasoned advocates who bring a wealth of experience and a track record of success in handling complex criminal cases. Our mission is to provide robust legal representation, ensuring that every client receives a fair trial and justice is served.
Our Core Values
Integrity: We uphold the highest ethical standards in all our dealings.
Client-Centric Approach: Every case is unique, and we tailor our strategies to meet individual client needs.
Excellence: Our commitment to legal excellence ensures that we leave no stone unturned in defending our clients.
Our Criminal Law Expertise
At HNCK & Associates, we offer comprehensive legal services across a broad spectrum of criminal law areas:
1. White-Collar Crimes
We specialize in defending clients accused of financial fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, and corporate offenses. Our team meticulously analyzes financial records and employs strategic defenses to protect our clients’ interests.
2. Cybercrimes
In the digital age, cybercrimes have become increasingly prevalent. We handle cases involving hacking, identity theft, online fraud, and cyberstalking, ensuring that our clients’ digital rights are safeguarded.
3. Drug Offenses (NDPS Cases)
Facing charges under the NDPS Act can be daunting. Our firm has a successful track record in defending clients against allegations of drug possession, trafficking, and related offenses.
4. Sexual Offenses and POCSO Cases
We approach these sensitive cases with utmost discretion and professionalism, ensuring that the rights of the accused are protected while maintaining the dignity of all parties involved.
5. Domestic Violence and Dowry Harassment
Our legal team provides compassionate yet assertive representation in cases of domestic abuse and dowry-related offenses, striving for resolutions that uphold justice and fairness.
6. Bail and Anticipatory Bail Applications
Securing bail is often the first step in a criminal case. We have extensive experience in filing and arguing for bail and anticipatory bail, ensuring that our clients’ freedoms are protected.
7. Appeals and Revisions
If a trial doesn’t result in a favorable outcome, our firm is adept at handling appeals and revisions in higher courts, seeking to overturn unjust convictions or sentences.
Our Legal Team
Our team at HNCK & Associates is composed of dedicated legal professionals with diverse backgrounds and expertise:
Senior Advocates: Bringing decades of courtroom experience and legal acumen.
Legal Researchers: Ensuring that our strategies are backed by thorough legal research and precedent analysis.
Paralegals and Support Staff: Providing essential support to ensure smooth case management and client communication.
Our Success Stories
Over the years, HNCK & Associates has successfully defended numerous clients, achieving favorable outcomes in complex criminal cases. Our commitment to justice and client satisfaction is reflected in our high success rate and positive client testimonials.
0 notes
odnewsin · 2 months ago
Text
Defamation case registered against Raja Chakra’s lawyer
Balasore: A defamation suit has been filed against senior advocate Sitanshu Mohan Dwivedi for reportedly making baseless allegations in connection with a multi-crore corruption case involving Gandhamardan Loading Agency and Transporting Co-operative Society Ltd. BJP state president Manmohan Samal filed the defamation complaint Saturday before the SDJM court in Balasore (Case No. 25/25). The suit…
0 notes
automatismoateo · 5 months ago
Text
AP Reporting on Emails Showing How NFL Team New Orleans Saints Helped Catholic Church With PR After Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal via /r/atheism
AP Reporting on Emails Showing How NFL Team New Orleans Saints Helped Catholic Church With PR After Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal Emails from the New Orleans Saints have been obtained by the Associated Press regarding sexual abuse cases allegedly committed by Catholic priests in New Orleans https://apnews.com/article/new-orleans-saints-catholic-church-sex-abuse-77f92deb50e6333fa04a9db1897f8171 Apparently these emails demonstrate Saints executives seem to have seen a list of accused clergy provided by the prosecutor's office before the names were announced to the public and a call with a prosecutor "allowed us to take certain people off" the list Saints' Senior VP of communications, Greg Bensel, and President, Dennis Lauscha, helped prep the local Archbishop for answering questions US District Judge Jay Zainey was copied on the e-mails and he just so happened to later strike down a Louisiana law which would have allowed victims to bring civil claims against the clergy regardless of when the alleged abuse took place And apparently the Saints' Bensel worked his contacts with the local media at the Times-Picayune and The Advocate and asked them to go easy on the church even though some clergy had just been transferred around by the church instead of being reported to law enforcement when they should have been I am so fucking done with this country and all of the corrupt and evil people who run it. Submitted February 03, 2025 at 06:30PM by iguananinja (From Reddit https://ift.tt/KW92tFf)
0 notes
news365timesindia · 6 months ago
Text
[ad_1] GG News Bureau Bengaluru, 27th Jan. The Karnataka Lokayukta on Monday submitted its investigation report into the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam to the High Court’s Dharwad bench. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has been named the primary accused, with his wife, B.M. Parvathi, listed as the second accused. Lokayukta Superintendent of Police T.J. Udesh presented the sealed report, complying with the court’s earlier directive. The case stems from a petition by activist Snehamayi Krishna, seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into alleged illegal site allotments involving political and influential figures. Court Proceedings During the hearing, Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty requested additional time for arguments, which the court denied, instructing that submissions be made promptly, including via video conferencing. Senior Counsel Dushyanth Dave, representing a co-accused, argued against the necessity of a CBI probe, stating the petition aimed to tarnish Siddaramaiah’s image. Petitioner Krishna alleged Lokayukta investigators were biased and reiterated calls for a CBI inquiry, citing evidence of corruption and influence in the case. He accused Siddaramaiah of misusing political power for personal gain, particularly in acquiring compensation for 14 MUDA sites under his wife’s name. ED Notices Issued Adding to the controversy, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has summoned Siddaramaiah’s wife and Urban Development Minister Byrathi Suresh for questioning. Both have challenged the summons in the Karnataka High Court. The case, involving alleged large-scale irregularities in site allotments, continues to unfold amid calls for accountability and transparency. The post MUDA Scam: Lokayukta Submits Report to Karnataka HC; CM Siddaramaiah Named Accused appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link
0 notes
news365times · 6 months ago
Text
[ad_1] GG News Bureau Bengaluru, 27th Jan. The Karnataka Lokayukta on Monday submitted its investigation report into the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam to the High Court’s Dharwad bench. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has been named the primary accused, with his wife, B.M. Parvathi, listed as the second accused. Lokayukta Superintendent of Police T.J. Udesh presented the sealed report, complying with the court’s earlier directive. The case stems from a petition by activist Snehamayi Krishna, seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into alleged illegal site allotments involving political and influential figures. Court Proceedings During the hearing, Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty requested additional time for arguments, which the court denied, instructing that submissions be made promptly, including via video conferencing. Senior Counsel Dushyanth Dave, representing a co-accused, argued against the necessity of a CBI probe, stating the petition aimed to tarnish Siddaramaiah’s image. Petitioner Krishna alleged Lokayukta investigators were biased and reiterated calls for a CBI inquiry, citing evidence of corruption and influence in the case. He accused Siddaramaiah of misusing political power for personal gain, particularly in acquiring compensation for 14 MUDA sites under his wife’s name. ED Notices Issued Adding to the controversy, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has summoned Siddaramaiah’s wife and Urban Development Minister Byrathi Suresh for questioning. Both have challenged the summons in the Karnataka High Court. The case, involving alleged large-scale irregularities in site allotments, continues to unfold amid calls for accountability and transparency. The post MUDA Scam: Lokayukta Submits Report to Karnataka HC; CM Siddaramaiah Named Accused appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link
0 notes
legesjurisassociatesdelhi · 6 months ago
Text
Top 10 Criminal Lawyers in India
Tumblr media
India’s legal landscape is vast and complex, marked by the presence of brilliant minds who navigate the intricacies of criminal law with expertise and finesse. Criminal lawyers play a pivotal role in defending individuals and upholding justice. Here, we explore the top 10 criminal lawyers in India, known for their exceptional legal acumen, landmark cases, and dedication to the principles of justice.
Ram Jethmalani
One of the most celebrated criminal lawyers in Indian history, Ram Jethmalani was a legend in the legal field. Known for his eloquence and mastery over criminal law, Jethmalani handled high-profile cases like the Harshad Mehta scam and represented prominent political figures. His legacy continues to inspire lawyers across the nation.
Harish Salve
Renowned for his expertise in constitutional and criminal law, Harish Salve has represented clients in some of the most significant cases in Indian history. While he is often associated with corporate law, Salve’s prowess in criminal litigation, particularly in cases involving high-stakes legal battles, has earned him immense respect.
Kapil Sibal
A prominent lawyer and politician, Kapil Sibal has made significant contributions to criminal law in India. His ability to combine legal strategy with political acumen has helped him navigate complex cases. He has represented several high-profile clients, cementing his reputation as one of India’s top criminal lawyers.
Fali S. Nariman
Fali S. Nariman is a distinguished senior advocate with a stellar career spanning several decades. Though his expertise lies in constitutional law, Nariman has successfully handled criminal cases that required a deep understanding of both law and justice. His work in defending civil liberties and fundamental rights has left an indelible mark.
K.T.S. Tulsi
Known for his role as a senior advocate in the Supreme Court, K.T.S. Tulsi specializes in criminal law. He has handled several high-profile cases, including those involving corporate fraud and corruption. Tulsi’s dedication to the legal profession and his ability to tackle challenging cases make him a prominent figure in Indian criminal law.
Sidharth Luthra
Sidharth Luthra is one of India’s leading criminal lawyers and a former Additional Solicitor General of India. With expertise in white-collar crimes, cybercrime, and criminal litigation, Luthra’s legal strategies are widely recognized. His contributions to legal education and advocacy have further enhanced his reputation.
Abhishek Manu Singhvi
Abhishek Manu Singhvi is a renowned lawyer and politician who has made a name for himself in criminal law. Singhvi’s sharp legal mind and eloquent arguments have helped him win complex cases. His work often focuses on high-profile criminal defenses and constitutional challenges.
Mukul Rohatgi
Mukul Rohatgi is a former Attorney General of India and a leading name in criminal law. His ability to handle politically sensitive cases with precision has earned him widespread acclaim. Rohatgi has represented some of the most high-profile clients in the country and continues to be a sought-after name in criminal litigation.
Salman Khurshid
A senior advocate and former Union Minister, Salman Khurshid’s expertise in criminal and constitutional law is widely acknowledged. Khurshid’s eloquence in court and his ability to simplify complex legal arguments make him a standout figure in Indian criminal law.
Shanti Bhushan
Shanti Bhushan, a veteran lawyer and former Union Law Minister, has had a significant influence on India’s legal system. Known for his work in public interest litigation and criminal law, Bhushan has been an advocate for judicial transparency and accountability. His contributions to landmark cases have shaped India’s legal framework.
What Sets These Lawyers Apart?
Expertise in Diverse Areas:
While their primary focus is criminal law, many of these lawyers are also well-versed in constitutional law, corporate fraud, and public interest litigation. Their versatility makes them formidable in court.
Landmark Cases:
Each of these lawyers has played a role in defining moments of India’s legal history. From defending individuals accused of heinous crimes to fighting for civil liberties, their work has set precedents.
Advocacy for Justice:
Beyond the courtroom, these legal luminaries have been vocal about issues like judicial reform, transparency, and the rule of law, contributing to the broader discourse on justice in India.
Choosing the Right Criminal Lawyer
Selecting a criminal lawyer can be a daunting task, especially for high-stakes cases. Here are some factors to consider:
Experience: Look for a lawyer with extensive experience in criminal litigation.
Track Record: Research their success rate in similar cases.
Specialization: Ensure they specialize in the area of law relevant to your case.
Reputation: Seek recommendations and read client reviews.
Conclusion
India’s top criminal lawyers are more than just legal practitioners; they are custodians of justice who play a crucial role in shaping the nation’s legal landscape. Their dedication, expertise, and advocacy ensure that justice prevails, even in the most challenging cases. Whether defending the innocent or upholding the rule of law, these legal stalwarts exemplify the very best of India’s legal profession.
0 notes
rajeevsurana · 2 years ago
Text
Rajasthan High court Senior advocate for GST case-Advocate Rajeev Surana
Advocate Rajeev Surana is a distinguished Senior Advocate renowned for his expertise in handling complex Rajasthan High court Senior advocate for GST Case. With an extensive legal career marked by profound knowledge and exceptional advocacy skills, Mr. Surana has become a sought-after authority in the field of taxation law. His deep understanding of the intricacies of GST regulations, coupled with his strategic approach to case management, has consistently delivered favorable outcomes for his clients. Known for his meticulous research, persuasive argumentation, and insightful interpretation of tax laws, Advocate Rajeev Surana is a respected figure in the legal community, providing valuable guidance and representation in navigating the nuances of GST-related matters within the Rajasthan High Court's jurisdiction.
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
advtrajeevsurana · 2 hours ago
Text
Surana Law Chambers, led by Sr. Advocate Rajeev Surana, delivers expert legal representation across criminal, corporate, family, property, constitutional & consumer law. Based in Bapu Nagar, Jaipur, we ensure personalized attention, confidentiality & timely case updates you can trust.
0 notes
mahloeletshepo · 10 months ago
Text
The truth prevails as Mpati Commission-ordered forensic probe vindicates Harith
Harith General Partners is satisfied that the truth has finally prevailed in the years-long, sustained and malicious campaign to taint it with allegations of malfeasance. This comes after the forensic investigation commissioned by the PIC concluded in its final report that there was no evidence to support the damaging allegations made more than 5 years ago by a Senior Member of Parliament. The report vindicates Harith which has had to operate under a human-made cloud of suspicion, peppered with sporadic, gratuitous, false and unfair political attacks on its brand and reputation. Harith welcomes the fact that the Public Investment Corporation and Government Employees Pension Fund commissioned investigation has made findings that align precisely with every aspect of what we have consistently told South Africans all along; that Harith has been scrupulous in all its dealings with the PIC and the GEPF.
The forensic probe was commissioned jointly by the PIC and the GEPF, in fulfilment of recommendations by the Mpati Commission into the affairs of the PIC. It has now returned with findings that respond directly, adequately and finally to each of the questions the Mpati Commission felt needed further investigation, namely;
“To examine the entire PAIDF [Pan African Infrastructure Development Fund] initiative to determine that all monies due to both parties [PIC and GEPF] have been paid and properly accounted for” [Page 435. Para 66 of the Commission report]
“To determine whether any monies due to overcharging or any other malpractice should be recovered” [Page 435. Para 66 of the Commission report]
“The board of the PIC should examine whether the role played by either Mr Moleketi and Mr Mahloele breached their fiduciary duties or the fit and proper test required of a director in terms of the Companies Act” [Page 435. Para 67 of the Commission report]
In a letter summing up the report’s findings on all these questions, the PIC and GEPF have informed Harith that: “The investigation found that there was no evidence to support the allegations that were made with regard to Harith General Partners and Harith Fund Managers”.
Harith welcomes the forensic investigation findings, and now considers the allegations of impropriety against it, in their various iterations, to be now well and truly ventilated. This latest probe is the fifth process that has looked into these matters, with Harith’s full cooperation, and with none of them making any findings of wrong-doing against the company. The full gambit of processes that have looked into and disposed of these allegations is;
The Mpati Commission; whose outcomes raised a number of unwarranted questions without making any firm findings against Harith, Mr Tshepo Mahloele, and Mr Jabulani Moleketi. Instead of making firm findings, the commission recommended a joint-forensic probe by the PIC and the GEPF.
The Constitutional Court case of UDM v Lebashe and others; which among others found that the UDM and Mr Bantu Holomisa “…did not provide any shred of evidence of actual misconduct, corruption and self-dealing” [UDM v Lebashe judgment, para 59], and “The applicants were not entitled to wantonly defame the respondents under the pretext that they were executing a constitutional duty…it was not for the public benefit to publish the unverified defamatory information” [UDM v Lebashe judgment, para 62]
The South African Venture and Private Capital Association (SAVCA); concluded; “ The committee is of the view that the legal and fee structures set out in the fund terms are in line with industry standards.” And “The committee found no contravention of the SAVCA Code of Conduct based on the information contained in the PIC report and the evidence received from Harith.”
Harith’s own forensic investigation conducted by Crowe Forensics SA and Advocate Terry Motau SC; It investigated the Harith fees structure for the PAIDF PAIDF 1 and PAIDF 2 and found it to be “Comparable at the relevant time period with other Private Equity funds in the industry”. It concluded: “Harith [has] not yet earned any incentive fees – any allegation that the Fund Managers have earned “rich rewards” in regard to incentive fees (carried interest) is therefore without substance. Based thereon, it is therefore apparent that the allegations set out in the PIC Report in regard to the Harith fee structures (for PAIDF 1 and PAIDF 2) are unfounded”
PIC and GEPF joint forensic report; which was ordered by the Mpati Commission and whose outcomes are contained in the latest report.
“Harith operates in the highly-regulated financial services sector, so we are no strangers to, and are quite comfortable with heightened scrutiny. Our line of business requires the utmost fidelity to those who entrust us with their funds and investments. That’s why throughout these processes that have ensued since these allegations were first raised, we have been fully cooperative and played open-cards at every stage”, said Harith CEO Sipho Makhubela. “This is therefore not a case of Harith being “cleared” by the forensic probe. It is a case of the forensic probe arriving at the only logical destination of the truth-seeking exercise that any conscientious investigation was inevitably destined to reach; a finding that the truth has been on our side all along” – added Makhubela
Throughout all these processes, Harith’s detractors have been able to wantonly, and with no consequence, continue to cast aspersions on a lawfully established and legitimately operating corporate entity, exacting an incalculable toll on the company, its brand, credibility in the market, employees, shareholders, investors, as well as business and financial relationships. Throughout this saga, the callous campaign to destroy Harith and the reputations of Messrs Mahloele and Moleketi was thinly-masked as an exercise of political or parliamentary “oversight”, and insults hurled at them became the trading stock of a politician and his entity who were seeking to shore-up their dimming prospects. Those politicians and their fellow-travellers who gave their lies currency and buoyancy now crawl back into the woodwork, while the victims of their sustained slander are left to repair the extensive damage they wrought on their reputations and brands. The kind of brand and character assassination Mr Holomisa and his ilk embarked upon in the past five years is a sinister perversion of political and constitutional oversight and checks and balances!
Yet, even through this period, Harith was not cowered, and continued to focus on its vision of harnessing Africa’s capital muscle towards the development of socio-economically impactful infrastructure across the continent, an undertaking that was made infinitely harder by this economic sniping campaign. Harith considers this sordid chapter closed, and places its trust in the discerning people of South Africa and the continent, who know too well that “lies have short legs”.
1 note · View note
kimskashmir · 11 months ago
Text
Excise Policy Case: Supreme Court refused to grant interim bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal
NEW DELHI — The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to grant interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a corruption case filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the alleged excise policy scam and sought a response from the probe agency on his plea challenging his arrest. As the hearing commenced before a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, senior advocate…
0 notes
impactnews-webmaster-us · 1 year ago
Text
Arvind Kejriwal Bail Plea : Delhi High Court Seeks CBI Reply ; Next Hearing On Case July 17
Tumblr media
The Delhi High Court has asked the CBI to respond to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in the corruption case registered by the CBI in connection with the alleged excise policy scam. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna issued a notice to the CBI on the bail plea and listed it for further hearing on July 17.
Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, said the AAP leader is not a flight risk and not a terrorist and the CBI arrested him after he got bail in the ED’s money laundering case. Advocate DP Singh, appearing for the CBI, raised objection over Kejriwal directly approaching the HC without first filing the bail plea before the trial court.
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener was arrested by the CBI on June 26 from Tihar Jail, where he is still lodged in judicial custody in a connected money laundering case filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
Kejriwal, who was arrested by the ED on March 21, was granted bail by the trial court in the money laundering case on June 20. However, the trial court’s order was stayed by the high court.
0 notes