#Sedibus
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Invisible Waves 18.
Mixcloud link Spotify link
Intro 00:00 Time Rival-Pumice 00:05 Chapter 1 05:35 Sedibus-Seti - Pt. 3 07:07 CIALYN-Magpies Hopscotch 12:38 Chapter 2 16:11 Forsling&Hauch, Mika Forsling-Markings 20:03 boycalledcrow-Tuktuk 23:50 Chapter 3 27:18 Correlations-Expanding Orange 29:46 Sergio Nunca-Décalage 34:02 Chapter 4 37:03 Andrew CS-dead leaves / morgan brown 41:03 Afterthoughts 45:28
#Time Rival#Sedibus#The Orb#CIALYN#Forsling&Hauch#Mika Forsling#Correlations#boycalledcrow#Sergio Nunca#Andrew CS#Cooking Vinyl#Mortality Tables#Paltunes#Templo Animal Records#LEAVING RECORDS#invisible waves#trevor.se#trevlad sounds
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Wednesday, August 23rd || Latin
The Latin was rough today, I choked and forgot what 1st person singular verb endings mean (I obviously don't do well under pressure) and wasn't able to figure out the last few lines before class started.
Here's the Latin:
cum sic unanimam adloquitur male sana sororem: “Anna soror, quae me suspensam insomnia terrent! Quis novus hic nostris successit sedibus hospes, quem sese ore ferens, quam forti pectore et armis! Credo equidem, nec vana fides, genus esse deorum. Degeneres animos timor arguit: heu, quibus ille iactatus fatis! Quae bella exhausta canebat! Si mihi non animo fixum immotumque sederet, ne cui me vinclo vellem sociare iugali, postquam primus amor deceptam morte fefellit; si non pertaesum thalami taedaeque fuisset, huic uni forsan potui succumbere culpae. Anna, fatebor enim, miseri post fata Sychaei coniugis et sparsos fraterna caede Penatis, solus hic inflexit sensus, animumque labantem impulit: adgnosco veteris vestigia flammae.
And my at home translation (minus the four lines I couldn't figure out):
she accosts her sympathizing sister, not of the right mind, "Anna, sister, my agitated dreams terrify me! Who is this new guest approaching the throne, how he conducts his mouth, what a strong chest and weapons! Truly believe, and not a vain faith, his race is divine. Fear makes clear the ignoble spirit. Alas, how miseries were thrown at him! What wars he has exhaustedly sang of! If my spirit was not immovable stuck on being unwilling to settle in the bonds of wedlock, when my first love deceived me, cheated me through death; If I were not wearied by marriage and wedlock, perhaps this one I will be able to yield to weakness.
And the corrected in-class translation:
She, not of the right mind, addresses her sympathizing sister thusly: “Anna, sister, what dreams terrify agitated me! What new guest has approached our home, carrying himself as what in regard to his appearance, of how strong a chest and weapons! I truly believe, nor is my faith vain, that his race is of the gods. Fear makes clear ignoble minds. Alas, by what fates this man has been tossed! And by what endured wars he was recounting! If it were not settling, fixed and unmoving in my soul, that I did not wish to unite myself in marital chains with anyone, after my first love deceived and cheated me by death; if it had not wearied me of the bridal chamber and the torch, I could now perhaps yield to this one weakness. Anna (for I will confess) after the fates of my poor husband Sychaeus and the household gods, sprinkled with fraternal gore, only this man has bent my senses and drove on my wavering mind. I recognize the vestige of the old flame.
#studyblr#classics studyblr#andi studies#latin#latin translation#latin studyblr#translation#the aeneid#book 4
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Est deus in nobis
El Caballero de la Triste Figura quotes this (here) from Ovid but apparently Ovid used it twice.
est deus in nobis, agitante calescimus illo; impetus hic sacrae semina mentis habet
Fasti VI (link)
and
Est deus in nobis, et sunt commercia caeli: Sedibus aetheriis spiritus ille venit.
Ars amatoria III (link)
7 notes
·
View notes
Audio
With the new Sedibus album landing on Friday, one-half of the duo and original The Orb member Andy Falconer has concocted an intriguing selection of music for our start-of-the-week treat, otherwise known as our Monday mix.
1 note
·
View note
Text
IMO the most intriguing part of the early-to-mid-nineteenth century (as far as British medicine goes) is how much the reputation of the "surgeon" was changing - and how influential Scottish practitioners had been in establishing that new professional status:
There had been intense discussions surrounding the capabilities of surgeons during the seventeenth & eighteenth centuries that ultimately led to several barber-surgeon guilds breaking up & surgeons establishing themselves as significantly more medically aligned than their former colleagues. Royal favor, in part, was helping to elevate certain 'celebrity surgeons' to a status previously held by physicians. Between French king Louis XIV's public gratitude to Charles-François Felix for relieving his anal fistula, and various political motions made by British surgeons to garner similar favor in their own court (see Cheselden, Pott, etc.), the combined thoughts of "hey, these surgeons might have useful knowledge of their own" and "because they have these medical connections, they're way different from barbers" meant that generally, more dedicated clubs & institutions were being created for surgeons to hone their skills.
There was also a huge shift in the perceived value of dissection and autopsy over the same time period! As just one example, Giovanni Morgagni's painstakingly-researched De sedibus et causis morborum (1761) has been credited with opening up the discipline of pathological anatomy - making the connection between symptoms, in life, and changes to anatomical structures, in death - and making the practicality of dissection-based study more visible.
Edinburgh (where the Goodsirs were trained) had a particularly long history of anatomical dissection - and by the 19th century, had become a renowned . As an example, the original Seal of Cause for the institution that would become the RCSEd (1505) includes a clause as follows, permitting the guild to obtain the body of one executed criminal a year to dissect:
"...that euerie man that is to be maid freman and maister amangis ws be examinit and previt in thir poyntis following, that is to say, that he knaw anatomell, nature and complexion of euery member humanis bodie...and that we may have anis in the yeir any condampnit man efter he be deid to mak antomell off, quhairthraw we may haif experience, ilk ane to instrict vtheris, and we sall do suffrage for the soule; and that na barbour, maister nor seruand, within this burgh hantt vse nor exerce the craft of Surregenrie without he be expert and knaw perfytelie the thingis abouewritten." (Dingwall, 2005)
(btw if you work with 16th-century text...I'm already in awe. If you work with 16th-century Scots text......I'm intimidated by your power.)
Interestingly enough, I think an anatomist or surgeon learning the trade around the time of the Goodsir brothers would have experienced a new, quasi-regulated dissection environment post-1832-crackdown on resurrectionist activity, sure, but also an environment that was slightly looser in legal terms towards the unclaimed poor. The Anatomy Act (as I read it) has some rather open-ended implications in its language, codifying the ability of whichever person had legal claim over a set of remains to agree to their donation and use, given no family member or friend came forward. I think a lot of historical discussions about autonomy after death tend to focus on broad moral attitudes towards dissection & less on the class stratification (& racial stratification, at least in the US) of exactly whose remains were more acceptable to utilize. An 1838 letter to the editor of the Lancet, quoted in MH Kaufman's article about Edinburgh's cadaver supply patterns post-1832, lamented not the lack of bodies but the unfair distribution of remains among the anatomical schools:
"Every unclaimed body which dies in the Infirmary and is unopened, is sent...to the anatomical rooms of the University, sent there indiscriminately, unwished for, and with the knowledge that they will be wasted. These rooms are filled with bodies, from many of which no one ever derives any benefit." ("Study of Anatomy in Edinburgh", The Lancet 1837-1838, 1:589-90)
Tl;dr I think Goodsir, having been trained at the Scottish epicenter of 19th-c. British surgical prestige, at a time in which the practical purpose of autopsy & dissection was made clearer, probably had experience at least viewing a dissection (if not participating in one or multiple) - even more given the family's proximity to prominent anatomists like Robert Knox and contemporary claims about the state of cadaver supply.
I don't know about TV Goodsir's technique, though. Totally with leadandblood that it looks quite inexperienced, but that might have been a character or direction choice. Blanky's amputation scene also has some basic surgical missteps that make me think (no shade!) that the prop team may have overlooked the wide variety of knives & precision instruments available to mid-19th-c. surgeons in favor of the arguably flashier toothed saws. I haven't yet found anatomical lecture notes from the period that would detail proper autopsy technique, but something about the scene doesn't entirely make sense.
Each time i watch Goodsir do the autopsy, it's worse. It really makes you realise that no. He is not in fact a doctor. I present to you my inner monologue:
Starting good. There's nothing you can really fuck up here! *remembers the Jartnell scene from the pilot script* *dies a little* ............... you're doing GREAT buddy!!!
oh god that's nasty why'd you do that-
THAT'S NOT WHAT THAT'S FOR
this would be so much easier if you switched instruments... my good sir (badum tss), why do you not have rib shears...?
HANG ON NO NO NO NO NO YOU'RE GONNA HURT YOURSELF THIS IS SO UNSAFE STOP WHAT YOU'RE DOING STOP IT STOP
CAREFUL WITH THE SCALPEL
*yeets liver* are you gonna... look inside or....?
61 notes
·
View notes
Audio
Incantation - DJ Muggs
The Communion feat. Muireann Nic Amhlaoibh & David Murphy - Ordnance Survey
Toi 1338b - Sedibus, The orb
Drum glow - Moderat
Merkabah - Meemo Comma
Just like his dad - Cosmo Vitelli feat. Truus de Groot
Be airborn - Natalie Beridze
Praise the Sun - Whitesquare
Intimate immensity - Tomaga
Chapter 9 - Moritz von Oswald Trio, Heinrich Köbberling, Laurel Halo
#dj muggs#ordnance survey#the orb#sedibus#moderat#cosmo vitelli#natalie beridze#whitesquare#tomaga#moritzvonoswaldtrio
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Orb’s Alex Paterson Founds New Label Orbscure Recordings, Announces New Project with Andy Falconer Called Sedibus and Announces Label’s First Release
https://music.mxdwn.com/2021/03/17/news/the-orbs-alex-paterson-founds-new-label-orbscure-recordings-announces-new-project-with-andy-falconer-called-sedibus-and-announces-labels-first-release/
0 notes
Text
“Perhaps one day, we’ll be able to tell them of what truly happened and they will at least know that you’re alive and well, but I agree. For now, it’s best that all but us remain in the dark about this plan.”
Benjamin nodded, his smile a touch melancholy. "I would like to," he agreed, "if...i-if only they can forgive me, of course. To mess with one's heart is a cruelty. I don't imagine it would be easy to accept, were they to learn I'd willfully deceived them."
To his surprise, his talk on medical science seemed to light in Penelope a fiery fervor, her eyes wide and elated as she gushed, “Morgagni has a fascinating work on the latest discoveries in pathology, De Sedibus et Causis Morborum, and René Laënnec, who invented that fascinating pulmonary device, the stethoscope I believe it’s called, just recently published De l’auscultation médiate where he describes the curious sounds of the human heart and lungs. Truly fascinating and utterly remarkable!"
Unable to help it, Benjamin laughed, his brows drawing upward in incredulous delight. "Yes!" he exclaimed. "Yes, yes, I just read on such a device a month or two ago...Laënnec used a hollow tube of wood, if I'm not mistaken, and somehow, that was able to enhance the human heartbeat with startling clarity." He grinned. "If nothing else, I suppose we'll no longer need our physicians to nuzzle our breasts akin to nursing babes, vainly listening about for a heartbeat. The world is a startling and fascinating place..."
Noting Penelope's embarrassment, Benjamin was quick to raise a hand. "No, no, please," he entreated. "I like to learn...perhaps someday, you can tell me more about Morgagni? Although I have heard his name in passing, I confess to not being familiar with his works...I've mostly read up on Erasmus Darwin, and Thomas Denman's expertise on midwifery." He smiled. "In other words, I'm no medical scholar -- I merely like to study."
Penelope's face soured at the talk of her mother, and mirroring her frown, Benjamin listened while she muttered, “I suppose we should tell her as soon as possible. If she heard from anyone other than me, I don’t think I’d ever hear the end of it.”
"Ah." Anxiously flexing his free hand, he rolled his palm over his thigh and exhaled. "Well...I always imagined an engagement would be a joyous occasion, and yet the outlook here almost feels like an execution." He glanced toward Penelope with a weakened smile. "Not because of you, of course, but your mother...she seems difficult to please, for lack of a better word, and I hope she won't have too many questions."
Rising from the settee, Benjamin held out his arm for her. "Shall we go? I'm as ready as I'll ever be..." Which wasn't much, but he couldn't turn around and recant now.
There was some relief to be had in knowing he preferred to find a wife back home, but to think of him leaving indefinitely was quiet he saddening thought. The Bridgertons clearly adored him, so much so that he was treated as family, just as Penelope was.
If they were to think him dead, it would surely break their hearts. And yet, it was a necessary evil so that both she and Benjamin were protected.
“Perhaps one day, we’ll be able to tell them of what truly happened and they will at least know that you’re alive and well, but I agree. For now, it’s best that all but us remain in the dark about this plan.”
At the mention of tomes concerning the medical sciences, Penelope’s eyes lit up, for a moment forgetting their inhibitions as she immediately recollected her contemporary readings on the subject.
“Morgagni has a fascinating work on the latest discoveries in pathology, De Sedibus et Causis Morborum, and René Laënnec, who invented that fascinating pulmonary device, the stethoscope I believe it’s called, just recently published De l’auscultation médiate where he describes the curious sounds of the human heart and lungs. Truly fascinating and utterly remarkable!"
As her excitement ebbed and she realized that she’d perhaps gotten a little too off topic, as well as the fact that she was still holding fast to his hand with an ardent squeeze, Penelope's face flushed at least four different shades of red.
Unfurling her fan, she waved it to and fro rigorously while softly clearing her throat.
“Th-they would be useful for your research on the matter, if you are to make your performance convincing.”
Surprisingly, Benjamin responded with a fervent squeeze of his own, "When do you wish to tell your mother of our...'engagement?'”
Penelope’s face soured. If she had her way, if it were at all feasible, she would leave her mother out of this affair entirely, but even if she attempted to keep this from her, Portia would find out via Lady Whistledown and come flying down the corridor to confront her.
“I suppose we should tell her as soon as possible,” Penelope bemoaned, “If she heard from anyone other than me, I don’t think I’d ever hear the end of it.”
58 notes
·
View notes
Photo
0 notes
Text
wait why am i so fond of aen 6.370-71........
0 notes
Text
Guest Post from John Martin Rare Book Room
At the Hardin Library for the Health Sciences
MORGAGNI, GIOVANNI BATTISTA (1682-1771). Opuscula miscellanea quorum non pauca nunc primum prodeunt, tres in partes divisa [Miscellaneous works, some of which are new, divided into three parts]. Printed by Giovanni Antonio Remondini at Remondiniana, Bassano del Grappa, 1763. Three volumes bound together. 39 cm tall.
This month we highlight a book currently receiving treatment from the UI Libraries Conservation and Collections Care. Collections Conservator, Beth Stone, is working to clean and stabilize one of our books from Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682-1771).
Morgagni was an 18th-century Italian anatomist and physician. He is referred to as the "father" of modern pathologic anatomy. He stressed connecting the symptoms observed in the sick to the findings from their dissection. Symptoms, he felt, were "the cry of the suffering organs." His work helped dispel the longstanding notion that most diseases were scattered throughout the body. Instead, he was able to demonstrate that they emerge from specific organs and tissues.
During his very long life, Morgagni was a prodigious worker and prolific writer. His three-volume Adversaria Anatomica (1706-1717) put him on the map. His most monumental work, De sedibus, et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis libri quinque, was published in 1761 and made him a legend among anatomists. Vast in scope, it is one of the most fundamentally important works in the history of medicine.
The book this month, however, is Morgagni's Opuscula miscellanea quorum non pauca nunc primum prodeunt, tres in partes divisa [Miscellaneous works, some of which are new, divided into three parts]. As stated in the title, this is a collection of writings on a variety of subjects, including letters to Giovanni Lancisi, an Italian physician, discussing how Cleopatra died.
Morgagni's scholarly ability was apparent at an early age. At sixteen he was a pupil of Antonio Maria Valsalva at Bologna, and there he received the stimulus to devote his life to pathology. While pursuing postgraduate studies, he worked with Giovanni Santorini performing dissections. (Giovanni was clearly a very popular name at this time!)
By 1715 he took the chair of anatomy at Padua, a seat which he held with utmost distinction for many years. He was a brilliant and tireless investigator and, in addition to his work in medicine and anatomy, was a student of the classics and an archaeologist of repute.
Over his long career at the University of Padua, he taught thousands of students from dozens of countries. His teaching emphasized empirical data, direct observation, and experimentation.
Among several other structures, his name is most widely connected with the "Columns of Morgagni," the fine, vertical folds of the anal canal.
As mentioned, if he was not teaching or dissecting, Morgagni was writing. Opuscula miscellanea shows his range and diverse interests. Along with discussing Cleopatra's cause of death, it includes a biography of his mentor, Valsalva, a tract on gallstones, and a few more on legal issues.
Opuscula miscellanea has a lovely, soft paper cover. The cover shows the effects of age, use, and exposure to the environment, with scuffs, stains, and an overall darkening. Do not let that fool you, though, as this is still an effective binding. With a new housing from Conservation, Opuscula miscellanea will be around for a very long time.
Go here to read about Beth’s treatment for Opuscula miscellanea and more.
The annual JMRBR open house is April 20, from 4-7 pm. This is our first in-person event in quite some time and we'd love to see you there!
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm obsessed with the ekphrasis in this passage primarily because Minerva has a simple olive-leaf border surrounding one (1) scene showing a contest between herself and Neptune, with the Olympians, seeming noble and awesome, overlooking them, and victory crowing her the winner; then four "scenelets" (I find it difficult to discern if she is just depicting the mountains, the two birds, and Cinyras on the temple steps, or the actual action of their transformation/the preceding/following events), depicting the gods as beings not to be trifled with. The passage also includes her reasoning behind including the extra scenes. She is certainly not subtle in making her point...I also love that the topic she chose for her weaving was....her winning another contest, surrounded by the gods defeating lesser beings in...contests. Minerva certainly is the goddess of strategy, not subtly. (and maybe also the goddess of insecurity...who needs to hype themselves up so much to win a contest against a lesser being that they first surprise their quarry, then choose to show themselves as a winner in a past contest...that's like playing a football match with your old season tournament trophy on the sideline...like, why do you need that?)
But Arachne has 22 (!) separate scenes and an elaborate vegetative border. While Minerva depicts the gods with "their own features" (this seems almost rote, like she's working from an existing stylistic template), Arachne's weaving is so accurate that her figures are described as "real"/"true". Her sheer volume of figures simply overtowers Minerva's one piddly scene, as does their message of "the gods are capricious and cruel, even to their own kind". The gods are not stately and awesome in Arachne's tapestry: they are monstrous, terrible beings who contort their forms to take advantage of those who they can, even those who undoubtedly hold as much divine power as they do, as the case is for Neptune's rape of Ceres in lines 118-119. And Ovid doesn't even include her reasoning for creating these scenes, so I have to assume the reasoning is "if these gods are flawed, than Minerva can be, too." I admire her audacity in the face of likely loss and death. I think she knew she was going out, so she chose to go out swinging, and I think that's pretty badass.
I love how Ovid depicts the gods as fallacious and capricious in the Metamorphoses. What does that mean? It is a barometer of public opinion about the gods? Is it just his own opinion or stylization of existing literary traditions and tropes? Is it meant to be a slight to the Imperial family and the Roman state in general (i.e. those in charge are cruel, petty, and unjust)? I'm obsessed. I'm completely obsessed.
Cecropia Pallas scopulum Mavortis in arce 70 pingit et antiquam de terrae nomine litem. bis sex caelestes medio Iove sedibus altis augusta gravitate sedent; sua quemque deorum inscribit facies: Iovis est regalis imago; stare deum pelagi longoque ferire tridente 75 aspera saxa facit, medioque e vulnere saxi exsiluisse fretum, quo pignore vindicet urbem; at sibi dat clipeum, dat acutae cuspidis hastam, dat galeam capiti, defenditur aegide pectus, percussamque sua simulat de cuspide terram 80 edere cum bacis fetum canentis olivae; mirarique deos: operis Victoria finis. ut tamen exemplis intellegat aemula laudis, quod pretium speret pro tam furialibus ausis quattuor in partes certamina quattuor addit, 85 clara colore suo, brevibus distincta sigillis: Threiciam Rhodopen habet angulus unus et Haemum, nunc gelidos montes, mortalia corpora quondam, nomina summorum sibi qui tribuere deorum; altera Pygmaeae fatum miserabile matris 90 pars habet: hanc Iuno victam certamine iussit esse gruem populisque suis indicere bellum; pinxit et Antigonen, ausam contendere quondam cum magni consorte Iovis, quam regia Iuno in volucrem vertit, nec profuit Ilion illi 95 Laomedonve pater, sumptis quin candida pennis ipsa sibi plaudat crepitante ciconia rostro; qui superest solus, Cinyran habet angulus orbum; isque gradus templi, natarum membra suarum, amplectens saxoque iacens lacrimare videtur. 100 circuit extremas oleis pacalibus oras (is modus est) operisque sua facit arbore finem.
Maeonis elusam designat imagine tauri Europam: verum taurum, freta vera putares; ipsa videbatur terras spectare relictas 105 et comites clamare suas tactumque vereri adsilientis aquae timidasque reducere plantas. fecit et Asterien aquila luctante teneri, fecit olorinis Ledam recubare sub alis; addidit, ut satyri celatus imagine pulchram 110 Iuppiter inplerit gemino Nycteida fetu, Amphitryon fuerit, cum te, Tirynthia, cepit, aureus ut Danaen, Asopida luserit ignis, Mnemosynen pastor, varius Deoida serpens. te quoque mutatum torvo, Neptune, iuvenco 115 virgine in Aeolia posuit; tu visus Enipeus gignis Aloidas, aries Bisaltida fallis, et te flava comas frugum mitissima mater sensit equum, sensit volucrem crinita colubris mater equi volucris, sensit delphina Melantho: 120 omnibus his faciemque suam faciemque locorum reddidit. est illic agrestis imagine Phoebus, utque modo accipitris pennas, modo terga leonis gesserit, ut pastor Macareida luserit Issen, Liber ut Erigonen falsa deceperit uva, 125 ut Saturnus equo geminum Chirona crearit. ultima pars telae, tenui circumdata limbo, nexilibus flores hederis habet intertextos.
Ovid, Metamorphoses VI.70-128
Pallas pictures the hill of Mars on the citadel of Cecrops and that old dispute over the naming of the land. (There sit twelve heavenly gods on lofty thrones in awful majesty, Jove in their midst; each god she pictures with his own familiar features; Jove's is a royal figure.) (There stands the god of ocean, and with his long trident smites the rugged cliff, and from the cleft rock sea-water leaps forth; a token to claim the city for his own.) (To herself the goddess gives a shield and a sharp-pointed spear, and a helmet for her head; the aegis guards her breast; and from the earth smitten by her spear's point upsprings a pale-green olive-tree hanging thick with fruit); (and the gods look on in wonder). (Victory crowns her work.) Then, that her rival may know by pictured warnings what reward she may expect for her mad darings she weaves in the four corners of the web four scenes of contest, each clear with its own colours and in miniature design. (One corner shows Thracian Rhodepe and Haemus, now huge, bleak mountains, but once audacious mortals who dared assume the names of the most high gods.) (A second corner shows the wretched fate of the Pygmaean queen, whom Juno conquered in a strife, then changed into a crane, and bade her war upon those whom once she ruled.) (Again she pictures how Antigone once dared to set herself against the consort of mighty Jove, and how Queen Juno changed her into a bird; Ilium availed her nothing, nor Laomedon, her father; nay, she is clothed in white feathers, and claps her rattling bill, a stork.) (The remaining corner shows Cinyras bereft of his daughters; there, embracing the marble temple-steps, once their limbs, he lies on the stone, and seems to weep.) (The goddess then wove around her work a border of peaceful olive-wreath.) This was the end; and so, with her own tree, her task was done. (transl. Miller 1915)
(Arachne pictures Europa cheated by the disguise of the bull: a real bull and real waves you would think them. The maid seems to be looking back upon the land she has left, calling on her companions, and, fearful of the touch of the leaping waves, to be drawing back her timid feet.) (She wrought Asterie, held by the struggling eagle); (she wrought Leda, beneath the swan’s wings.) (She added how, in a satyr's image hidden, Jove filled lovely Antiope with twin offspring); (how he was Amphitryon when he cheated thee, Alcmena); (how in a golden shower he tricked Danae); (Aegina, as a flame); (Mnemosyne, as a shepherd); (Deo's daughter, as a spotted snake). (Thee also, Neptune, she pictured, changed to a grim bull with the Aeolian maiden); (now as Enipeus thou dost beget the Aloidae), (as a ram deceivedst Bisaltis). (The golden-haired mother of corn, most gentle, knew thee as a horse); (the snake-haired mother of the winged horse knew thee as a winged bird); (Melantho knew thee as a dolphin). (To all these Arachne gave their own shapes and appropriate surroundings.) (Here is Phoebus like a countryman); (and she shows how he wore now a hawk's feathers), (now a lion's skin); (how as a shepherd he tricked Macareus' daughter, Isse); (how Bacchus deceived Erigone with the false bunch of grapes); (how Saturn in a horse's shape begot the centaur, Chiron). (The edge of the web with its narrow border is filled with flowers and clinging ivy intertwined.) (transl. Miller 1915)
#m mutters#minerva#athena#arachne#ovid#metamorphoses#long post whoops (but most of it is latin and translation..)#haha there were so many spelling mistakes....#ok to reblog btw
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
A Hymn to Mercury:
Mercuri, facunde nepos Atlantis
qui feros cultus hominum recentum
voce formasti catus et decorae
more palaestrae
te canam, magni Iovis et deorum
nuntium curvaeque lyrae parentem,
callidum quicquid placuit iocoso
condere furto.
Te, boves olim nisi redidisses
per dolum amotas, puerum minaci
voce dum terret, viduus pharetra
risit Apollo
Quin et Atridas duce te superbos
Ilio dives Priamus relicto
Thessalosque ignis et iniqua Troiae
castra fefellit.
Tu pias laetis animas reponis
sedibus virgaque levem coerces
aurea turbam superis deorum
gratus et imis.
-- Horace's Odes, 1.10
2 notes
·
View notes