#RAMA

[thenewbie28]

[ritish16]

Sri Rama and Sita

[formulaireone]

random aesthethic: brothers in a musical-movie who grow up with each other in a kingdom and eventually become foes because the adopted brother takes what the other brother loved most

mufasa (2024), prince of egypt

[wishfulsketching]

I drew few more Lar...ries?

[dummy-dot-exe]

by いけめる

[caroline-draws-stuff]

excited to check out the remake for this!!

[questionableresponses]

I hope whoever decided to make Rama this cute got a raise

Yes this is my excuse to Rama post he's just so sidhkvbisdbf;bef (also I would upload more but I hit the image limit 😭)

@prettykittytanjiro I think you would like this

[kamal-nayan]

Me referring to Shree Rama: Ram ji, bhagwan Rama, lord Rama

Me referring to shriman Narayana: Narayana ji, Vishnu ji, lord Vishnu, Vishnu bhagwan

Meanwhile me referring to Shree Krishna: kanha, Krishna, pookie, babygirl, this guy, my boy, dude etc

[ishaaron-ishaaron-me]

[proudhinduforever]

There is a way of blessing a couple in Karnataka in older generation. They say "shiva-parvati haagiri". It means you couple should live together like Shiva and parvati. I always had a curiosity why they don't bless couple like "stay together like lakshmi narayana".

I heard answer from someone. I think it's valid. It is not that love is lesser between Lakshmi and Narayan compared to Shiv and parvati. It's because fate has always seperated Lakshmi and Narayan in their incarnations. Even though Shri Raam had loved Sita maata and Shri Krishna loved Raadha, they had to go through so many hardships. In our scriptures, there are descriptions how much Sita Maata and Raadha had to suffer from seperation. Also Sita Maata was cursed to have such pain in relationship.

Compared to them, Shiva parvati don't have such tragic separation.

That's why people don't bless them "Live together like Lakshmi-Narayan". I find this a very valid reason. So, It is not because their love is less. It is because their fate is adverse.

You can provide your thoughts in comments.

[h0bg0blin-meat]

:3

LOOK AT THEMMMM

Omg do one for all the siblingssss

[thenewbie28]

Khar, Dusana and the army pausing their fight to discuss how cute Ram ji is, will always be the realest thing ever.

Imagine being so pretty your enemies have to rethink their action plan.

[ritish16]

Sri Rama Setu

[blackknight-100]

It'll never stop being funny to me how Indra's status and power level changes throughout the different texts because initially, you have this absolute badass God-King who defeats a giant monster and gets together with his wife and holds court in heaven. Next the Ramayana rolls up and he is set as a benchmark for battle-skill: Meghnad, as the warrior who defeated him, is an absolute powerhouse who nearly kills both Rama and Lakshmana (and one of those two is a god). In fact, depending on the version, Rama and Lakshmana only survive by semi-divine intervention (Garuda and Hanumana). It is a story about how Lakshmana, an exiled third prince, kills the man who defeated the King of Gods, thereby proving the victory of good over evil et cetera... et cetera... You know the drill.

And then, you have the Mahabharata. Where Krishna, then a young boy, protects an entire settlement from Indra's rage. Which... you know what, fine, he too is a god.

But then, Arjuna defeats Indra, who is his father. Arjuna, who presumably upset the audience a few moments ago after he just burned a whole forest with everyone (including children) in it to supposedly satisfy Agni.

Then, Indra shows up to Karna's doorstep begging for his armour, and Karna who had previously angered the audience by calling Draupadi a harlot gets to demand things from the king of the gods.

See the pattern?

Also they have that absolute disaster of a ceremony and their city is called Indraprashtha.

Like come on, at this point you're just using Indra as the bonus +500 point in games to get your favourites in the audience's good books after they messed up.

[mrrwsoup]

Logan "Rama" Brant, incessant gambler, not above leaning the odds in his favour by any means.