#Pharmaceutical Waste Disposal in North Carolina
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
danielshealthnc · 4 days ago
Text
Website : https://www.danielshealth.com/north-carolina
Address : 1851 Chespark Dr, Gastonia, NC 28052
Phone : +1 704-215-4231
Business Fax : +1 312-546-8950
At Daniels, we are passionate about Making Healthcare Safer for patients and clinicians. With clinically designed solutions for the containment of pharmaceutical, chemotherapy, sharps, RMW, and hazardous/RCRA waste, Daniels is the industry leader in safe healthcare waste management. Our unique product and service model caters for all sized facilities in North Carolina including vets, dentists, doctors offices, long term care facilities right through to multi-site hospitals. With waste containment solutions that lead the industry in safety and security benchmarks, customized scheduling, and on-hand compliance support, we are able to transform costs, clinical outcomes, service efficiencies and the environmental output of every facility we work with.
Business Mail : [email protected]
1 note · View note
managementconsultingnc · 8 months ago
Text
EHS Services in North Carolina: Compliance Management International
In the dynamic landscape of environmental, health, and safety (EHS) regulations, businesses in North Carolina face the challenge of maintaining compliance while ensuring operational efficiency. Compliance Management International (CMI) stands out as a trusted partner, offering comprehensive EHS services tailored to the unique needs of organizations across the state.
Tumblr media
Who Is Compliance Management International (CMI)?
CMI is a seasoned EHS consulting firm with over 25 years of experience. Their team of experts combines technical knowledge, regulatory insight, and practical solutions to help clients navigate complex compliance requirements. Whether you’re a small business or a large corporation, Compliance Management services NC provides personalized services that align with your industry, size, and goals.
Key EHS Services Offered by CMI
1. Environmental Compliance
CMI assists businesses in North Carolina with environmental compliance by:
•Permitting and Reporting: Navigating the intricacies of environmental permits and reporting obligations can be daunting. CMI helps clients understand their responsibilities and ensures timely submissions.
•Air Quality Management: From air emissions permitting to compliance with the Clean Air Act, CMI helps businesses maintain air quality standards.
•Water and Wastewater Compliance: CMI guides organizations through water quality regulations, stormwater management, and wastewater discharge permitting.
2. Health and Safety Services
CMI prioritizes employee health and safety by:
•OSHA Compliance: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets strict standards for workplace safety. CMI conducts audits, develops safety programs, and provides training to keep employees safe.
•Hazardous Materials Management: Proper handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials are critical. CMI ensures compliance with federal and state regulations.
•Ergonomics and Wellness Programs: CMI promotes employee well-being through ergonomic assessments and wellness initiatives
3. Risk Management
CMI helps businesses mitigate and risk management charlotte NC by:
•Risk Assessments: Identifying potential hazards and assessing their impact on operations is essential. CMI conducts thorough risk assessments and recommends preventive measures.
•Emergency Response Planning: Having a robust emergency response plan is crucial. CMI assists clients in developing and testing emergency procedures.
•Contingency Planning: CMI helps organizations prepare for unforeseen events, such as natural disasters or supply chain disruptions.
Success Stories
CMI’s impact extends beyond compliance. Here are a few success stories:
1.Reducing Emissions for a Manufacturing Plant: CMI worked closely with a manufacturing plant in Charlotte, NC, to optimize their processes and reduce emissions. The result was improved air quality and cost savings.
2.Enhancing Safety Culture at a Construction Site: CMI collaborated with a construction company in Raleigh, NC, to enhance safety practices. Through training, audits, and safety awareness campaigns, the company achieved a significant reduction in workplace accidents.
3.Streamlining Hazardous Waste Management: A pharmaceutical company in Durham, NC, faced challenges in managing hazardous waste. CMI provided tailored solutions, ensuring compliance and minimizing environmental impact.
CMI’s Holistic Approach to EHS Services
1. Training and Education
CMI recognizes that informed employees are the first line of defense in maintaining compliance. Their training programs cover a wide range of topics, including:
•OSHA Compliance Training: From hazard communication to lockout/tagout procedures, CMI ensures that employees understand their rights and responsibilities under OSHA regulations.
•Environmental Awareness: CMI conducts workshops on environmental stewardship, waste reduction, and pollution prevention. Employees learn how their actions impact the environment and how to make sustainable choices.
Conclusion
Compliance Management International plays a vital role in North Carolina’s business ecosystem. By offering EHS services that balance compliance and efficiency, they contribute to a safer, healthier, and more sustainable future for organizations across the state.
0 notes
medwastex · 1 year ago
Text
Charlotte, North Carolina - Medical Waste Service
Discover exceptional medical waste disposal services in Charlotte, North Carolina, with MedWasteX, the industry-leading provider of comprehensive waste management solutions. Committed to environmental sustainability and public safety, MedWasteX offers reliable and compliant waste disposal services for various healthcare facilities, clinics, laboratories, and more. Their team of highly skilled professionals ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste, including sharps, biohazardous materials, and pharmaceuticals, using state-of-the-art technologies and adhering to strict regulatory guidelines. MedWasteX understands the unique needs of each client and provides personalized waste management plans to efficiently manage waste while promoting eco-friendly practices. By choosing MedWasteX in Charlotte, North Carolina, you partner with a trusted and responsible waste management service dedicated to protecting the community and the environment. Embrace sustainable waste solutions and contribute to a cleaner and safer future with MedWasteX.
Visit us:
0 notes
route22ny · 4 years ago
Link
Once it reaches the Great Lakes Water Authority's (GLWA) treatment plants, water is pulled from the mix, sanitized, and discharged into the Detroit River. What's left behind at the treatment plants is sewage sludge — a highly toxic, semi-solid blend of human feces and every pollutant that was discharged into the sewers.          
Despite the fact that it teems with potentially dangerous chemicals, the sludge is then spread on farmland.        
Nutrients in human excrement, like phosphorus and nitrogen, help plants grow, so sewerage departments across the country lightly treat sludge and repackage it as a fertilizer called "biosolids" that are given away or sold for cheap to farmers.        
Biosolids are a "valuable resource" that has been "shown to produce significant improvements in crop growth and yield," according to the Environmental Protection Agency, which approved the practice in the mid-1990s. By 2018, more than 50% of the approximately 130 million wet tons of sludge the nation produced annually was applied to farmland.          
But the practice is increasingly controversial. Public health advocates say any amount of the approximately 90,000 synthetic chemicals in existence, from VOCs to BPAs to PCBs, can be represented in sludge. It can also be packed with superbugs, parasites, worms, hormones, viruses, and bacteria that aren't killed in the treatment process.          
Studies show the pollutants are carried to farmland, taken up by crops, and can end up on dinner plates. That's fueling a growing number of biosolid-linked public-health crises that are making people sick, polluting drinking water, and pitting farmer against farmer.          
In Michigan, officials are discovering sludge packed with toxic PFAS, and a growing alliance of farmers, public health advocates, and environmentalists are calling for a ban on spreading the substance on cropland.          
"The best solution is to get this stuff off the market," says Christy McGillivray, legislative director of the Sierra Club of Michigan. "Anything that was flushed down the toilet — any hazardous chemical that we use in our everyday systems — winds up in a wastewater treatment plant, so there are a lot of questions about biosolids' safety."          
Municipalities in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Florida, among others, have prohibited biosolids, while Maine has restricted their use. In 2003, Switzerland became the first country to outlaw them, and businesses like Whole Foods and Del Monte tell Metro Times they won't buy crops grown in sludge.          
But the powerful waste-management industry and regulators are resistant to prohibition. Sludge is an expensive byproduct that's difficult to dispose of, and selling it to farmers is a cheap solution to the problem. In a statement to Metro Times, the GLWA — which churns out more biosolids than any of the nation's other sewerage authorities — insisted its sludge is safe.          
Though state regulators "expect" PFAS to be present in sludge, Scott Dean, a spokesman with the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), downplayed the threat to human health.          
"Due to the fact that biosolids themselves are applied in low amounts in relation to the soil mass in a farm field, they would not be expected to accumulate to the extent to cause adverse effects to public health or the environment," he said.         
He noted that EGLE is forcing many PFAS polluters to stop discharging the chemical into sewers, but the state doesn't plan to test for most of the other 90,000 chemicals that exist.        
                           'You're going to drop dead'                                                         
In a scathing 2018 report, the EPA's Office Of Inspector General wrote that it found 352 contaminants, including 61 it classified as "acutely hazardous, hazardous, or priority pollutants" in biosolids it tested. Among other substances, it detected PFAS, pharmaceuticals, steroids, and flame retardants.          
Despite the potential for high toxicity, federal law only requires wastewater treatment plants to consistently monitor for nine heavy metals, intermittently test for other contaminants and kill most pathogens and living organisms by using heat or dolomitic lime. The latter lowers the ph to make it more acidic and inhospitable to organisms.          
The EPA's OIG found the agency can't properly regulate sludge because it doesn't have the tools to assess the safety of all the other pollutants found in biosolids.          
"Biosolids [have] everything that goes down the drain from funeral homes to slaughterhouses to everyone's toilet that's hooked up to the sewer system," says David Lewis, a former EPA microbiologist opposed to the use of biosolids. "All of these things are unsafe, according to scientific literature, so how does adding lime and putting it on land make it safe?"          
Moreover, individual chemicals that aren't dangerous on their own can become toxic when mixed. Lewis likens the situation to going into a pharmacy, grabbing different bottles off the shelf, and swallowing pills.          
"You're going to drop dead, and that's what we're doing with sludge," Lewis says.          
A growing body of evidence highlights the risks. A 2013 University of North Carolina study found 75% of people living near farms that spread biosolids experienced health issues like burning eyes, nausea, vomiting, boils, and rashes. A University of Georgia study found similar issues, while others living near sludge fields have contracted MRSA, a penicillin-resistant "superbug."        
Lewis investigated two deaths near fields where sludge was spread and found that the substance triggered reactions that killed the two people. More recently, he's linked the substance to autism.          
In Georgia, sludge killed an entire herd of cows. In Maine and New Mexico, farmers last year had to put down herds of cows found to be filled with PFAS and producing toxic milk. Last week, officials in Maine discovered cows teeming with the highest levels of PFAS ever found in the animals. Meanwhile, biosolid treatment centers are sources of air and water pollution — the substance is thought to be partly responsible for toxic algae blooms in the Great Lakes and Florida.          
                              A brief history of sewage sludge                                                          
Before the 1973 Clean Water Act (CWA), industry discharged its waste directly into the nation's waterways. Rivers became so polluted that those in industrial regions like Michigan and Ohio regularly caught fire.          
The CWA mandated a proliferation of wastewater treatment plants that would take in human and industrial waste via the nation's expanding sewer system, then spit out clean water into its rivers.          
America's waters quit burning, but the solution presented a new problem — sewage sludge. At first, it was dropped in the ocean, but that created large dead zones. Then industry tried burning it, but that often violated the Clean Air Act.          
Despite the fact that sludge was too toxic for the ocean or air, the EPA in 1993 approved a rule change that would allow it to be spread on farmland. Lewis says scientists at the agency uniformly opposed the idea, but leadership pressed forward with approval.          
"Not a single study demonstrated that this practice was safe," he adds.          
These days, when sludge isn't spread on farmland, it's either landfilled or, in some cases, incinerated with pollution controls.          
                                 Raising a stink in rural Michigan                                                           
Several years ago, Yankee Springs resident Willard Case made an alarming discovery — nitrate levels in his property's wells had spiked.          
While nitrates are found naturally in groundwater, and at low levels aren't a problem, high levels can cause health problems, especially for children and pregnant women. Case contacted local health authorities, but says they only instructed him to dig more wells to find clean water.          
However, his attempts to do so only yielded contaminated water, and Case says the source of the contamination is obvious: A neighboring business had applied one million gallons of sludge to its property, while two other farmers in the small farm town 35 minutes south of Grand Rapids filled their fields with biosolids.          
Case says he contacted EGLE and the agency found PFAS in the sludge, but it isn't initiating a cleanup. It tested for PFAS, but Case says he's worried about other chemicals that could be in the biosolids or in his well. He calls the situation "disturbing."          
"They're only checking for PFAS because that's the loudest bell ringing, but I think there are other chemicals in there," Case says. "They're injecting the ground with this stuff and impregnating it with chemicals that we can't control. We're going to lose these beautiful farm fields."          
Case's problems with his neighbors' sludge is emblematic of the types of disputes playing out in rural areas across Michigan. Neighbors of farmers who spread sludge say they fear well contamination and pollution of local waterways that serve entire farm communities. Several farmers told Metro Times that the smell is terrible. Don Dickerson, a farmer with land in Michigan and Ohio, said he found his home and property coated in sludge dust after his neighbor applied it.                                  
While Michigan municipalities can't specifically prohibit farmers from spreading sludge, Summerfield Township, which sits about 20 miles west of Monroe, passed a broad waste disposal ordinance that covers potential contamination and is applicable to all industries.          
Tumblr media
Summerfield Township Supervisor John Chandler says the township's leaders are responding to a public health need and demand from residents who don't want it spread near their homes.          
"Maybe sludge is safe and maybe it's not so safe," Chandler says. "But it's too risky. We stand on that as a township, and say 'Go spread it somewhere else' because we don't want it here. Nobody I know is for sludge, and I would say anybody who would be for it is likely a farmer who wants free fertilizer."          
The earth in the region around Summerfield is cracked and filled with sinkholes, Chandler adds, and that makes sludge especially risky in terms of contaminating groundwater and wells.          
"My worry is what the heck is in it?" Chandler asks. "And how would you ever remediate that?"          
Is free fertilizer worth the cost and risk?         
Case says there's too much at stake.                                  
"It's crazy — they're playing Russian roulette with our health," he says.          
                                    PFAS: A farm-to-table toxin                                                            
For years, Michigan regulators told residents that biosolids were safe as farmers unknowingly spread PFAS-laden sludge on cropland. Then it became clear that PFAS presents a threat to human health.          
Over the last two years, EGLE discovered PFAS in sludge at 41 wastewater treatment plants, but the agency has only tested about a quarter of the state's 400 facilities. It ultimately ordered five plants to stop sending sludge to farmers.          
Public health advocates say the PFAS issue highlights biosolids' fundamental problem — no one knows what other dangerous chemicals are lurking in it.          
"Regulators completely miss emerging contaminants — like PFAS — as well as pharmaceuticals and a whole host of other chemicals used widely today that find their way into crops," says Colin O'Neil, legislative director at Environmental Working Group, which tracks PFAS contamination.          
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are toxic chemicals used to make a wide range of products water- and stain-resistant. About 7,500 varieties exist, and those that have been studied are linked to cancer, thyroid disorders, autoimmune disorders, deformities in newborns, liver disease, and a range of other serious health issues.          
Current surface water recommendations are set at 70 parts per trillion for PFOS and PFOA — two types of PFAS — in drinking water. In sludge, the state has found an alarming median of nearly 70,000 ppt in sludge, though there are no environmental quality standards for biosolids.          
State records pulled from the MIWaters website show how the dangerous chemicals can make their way from industry to Michiganders' food.          
In November 2018, a US Ecology-owned toxic-waste landfill in Van Buren Township discharged water with PFOS levels as high as 60 ppt. Records show neighboring landfills sent out water with levels as high as 420 ppt.          
En route to a wastewater treatment plant, that mixed with PFAS-laden discharge from the region's other industries. The plant treated the sludge and produced biosolids with 25 different types of PFAS totaling over 32,000 ppt.          
The biosolids were then shipped out to farmers and spread onto cropland or sent to landfills. Though there are no limits on PFAS in biosolids, the 32,000 ppt should raise alarm, O'Neil says.          
"Where they're finding PFAS, [farmers] need to be alerted to that fact, as that might inform whether or not they choose to spread biosolids on the farm in the first place," he says.          
In a written statement to Metro Times, Dean says EGLE doesn't directly alert farmers when high levels of the chemicals are found in sludge.          
                          'We can all surmise that it's not good'                                                             
So how much PFAS and other dangerous contaminants ultimately make it to our food? That's unclear, but there's evidence that it does, and that's especially true for PFAS, which easily move through the environment.          
Still, regulators haven't acted quickly, and there's no clear picture of the health impact, says Denise Trabbic-Pointer, a former DuPont chemist who now tracks PFAS contamination for the Sierra Club.          
"We can all surmise that it's not good, but nobody knows what the number is," she says. "I wish that [regulators] would put a little more effort into looking at it, worrying about it, and following through on it."          
A recent veterinary study found that sludge caused reproductive problems in sheep grazing in fields on which farmers spread sludge. The findings "highlight potential risks" for humans and animals, said Dr. Richard Lea, the study's author.        
"There are quite worrying implications for female fertility in the human," he wrote, adding that "there's a very high chance" that the chemicals would end up in humans who eat the meat.          
Researchers found the sheep had absorbed high levels of phthalates and PCBs, which each cause a range of serious health problems like cancer and early puberty in children.          
Multiple other studies found pharmaceuticals and other chemicals in plants grown in sludge.          
In Maine, farmers who spread biosolids on a cattle farm have blood with the highest PFAS levels on record in a Maine resident.          
Even though Michigan agriculture officials have acknowledged that PFAS are in the state's cows, an official said last year that regulators won't test milk, for fear of the damage it could do to the dairy industry.          
                                          Safe sludge?                                                             
EGLE's Dean, however, notes that the state is taking some serious steps to reduce PFAS levels in sludge. In some cases, PFOA and PFOS levels dropped by about 90% after EGLE identified industries discharging the chemicals into sewers and required them to stop doing so.          
EGLE is also testing fields on which contaminated biosolids have been spread to determine how much PFAS is in soil and crops. That will give regulators a clearer picture of how much of the chemical moves from the sewer to Michiganders' dinner plates. PFAS have already been found in corn in a Lapeer field.          
"EGLE is a leader in studying PFAS in biosolids through our work to protect public drinking water from these contaminants," Dean says.          
In a written statement sent to Metro Times, the Great Lakes Water Authority stressed that it follows the law in testing for contaminants and said it monitors for new pollutants of concern, like PFAS.          
"As regulatory agencies identify emerging pollutants, GLWA works with the agencies to develop and implement plans to minimize or eliminate the pollutant from our wastewater discharge," a spokesperson wrote.          
But critics say there are flaws in EGLE's approach. It's only regulating two of the 7,500 types of PFAS, though it will soon start testing for five more. It also doesn't consider the cumulative total of each type of PFAS. In a hypothetical scenario, water could have dozens of different types of PFAS that collectively present a dangerous level of the chemicals. But if each is below its individual recommended limit, then it's considered safe.          
Despite the uncertainty, Dean says EGLE won't act until it can be proven that the PFAS levels in biosolids are unsafe. He also claimed that there isn't evidence to show that all varieties of PFAS found in water are toxic. However, there's a growing body of data that shows all PFAS present a danger — including the chemical companies' own science and reports from the EPA.         
The state's approach puts residents' health and safety second to industry, says McGillivray. She argued that the state should gather data to prove that sludge is safe before allowing it to be spread on the state's food supply.          
Moreover, even if all the PFAS are removed from sludge, "every toxic organic chemical that exists on the planet, and everything in municipal and industrial waste remains," says former EPA scientist Lewis.          
"When you potentially mix every chemical that exists, you get a mixture that has everything in the universe of pollutants, neurotoxins, carcinogens — you can't get away from that," Lewis adds. "So pulling one chemical out of the universe isn't going to make a difference."
***
    https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/toilet-to-table-michigan-farmers-feed-crops-with-toxic-brew-of-human-and-industrial-waste/Content?oid=25017830     
20 notes · View notes
wisdomrays · 4 years ago
Text
TAFAKKUR: Part 48
Mosquitoes for Painless Cure
There are biological barriers that protect the human body from various kinds of detrimental and foreign substances. Although these barriers defend our body, sometimes we need medicine to help us heal faster or to prevent serious diseases. The pharmaceutical industry is one of the biggest in the world. A significant amount of resources is devoted to finding easier, cheaper, and more effective cures for many illnesses.
The drug molecules that are supposed to be curing us also need to overcome our body’s defense mechanisms. Let’s look at some of the body’s defenses and the way drugs overcome them, before we examine an unexpected inspiration for a new method of delivering drugs.  
Our skin is the largest barrier preventing toxic substances from getting inside our bodies.  The intestinal mucosa or the blood-brain barrier is a physiological defense barrier. If a drug molecule can pass through these barriers, the next step to be overcome is the biochemical barrier, where myriad enzymes play a role. Therefore, drug molecules have to be designed with optimal physicochemical properties. These include the proper size, charge, and hydrophilicity (water solubility) to ensure their permeation across our bodies’ biological barriers.  
There are a few types of drug delivery systems. They are oral, pulmonary (via inhalation), intravenous (via injection), and transdermal. All of them have their own advantages and limitations.
For oral applications, a drug molecule needs to traverse the epithelial layer of the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, there are many factors which have to be taken into consideration for enhancing the delivery of molecules through the intestinal mucosal barrier. Many of the newer drugs on the market are composed of peptides and proteins, and they cannot be administered orally due to their relatively larger size compared to smaller drug molecules.
The delivery of drugs via traditional injection provides better bioavailability; however, this route has low patient compliance due to injections being painful and accidental needle-sticks. Hypodermic injections also generate dangerous medical waste and pose the risk of disease transmission by needle re-use, especially in developing countries.
Transdermal drugs have become an important form of medication in recent years, as they are non-invasive or minimally invasive. Transdermal drugs have many advantages over other drugs, such as high patient compliance due to the easy accessibility of skin, the avoidance of the gastrointestinal tract, and that they can be self-administered.
The main problem with transdermal drugs is that the skin is a highly effective barrier. The outermost layer of skin, the stratum corneum, is mainly composed of dead carneocytes embedded in lipid layers, and has a thickness of 10-15 μm. This packed structure offers a substantial barrier to the delivery of both small hydrophilic (water soluble) and high molecular weight drugs. Only small lipophilic molecules, which can dissolve in lipids, can pass through the skin. Therefore, alternative methods and devices are needed to deliver hydrophilic and macromolecular (larger) drugs through the skin in a controlled manner.
Numerous chemical and physical methods have been attempted with the purpose of increasing skin permeability for easier drug delivery. As the name suggests, micro-needles are micron-size needles that are applied for transdermal vaccinations, as well as drug and gene delivery. Researchers hope they will increase skin permeability via forming micron-sized channels in the skin, thereby allowing the delivery of therapeutics across the skin barrier. In addition, by careful control of the micro-needles’ mechanical strength and length, it is possible to deliver drugs across the dermal barrier while evading the nerves, thus resulting in a painless administration.
Micro-needles must have a high degree of stiffness (resistance to bending) and enough strength for a successful insertion into the skin. If they’re too flexible, they won’t insert; if they’re not strong enough, they’re fracture. A variety of materials are used to manufacture micro-needles, and they include silicon, glass, metals (e.g. stainless steel, titanium, and nickel-iron), and polymers. Current micro-needle technology is based on imitating the present hypodermic needle geometry and miniaturizing it utilizing a silicon micro-machine process. The designs are fabricated onto a substrate where hundreds of micron-sized needles are formed, and then these micro-needles can be either pressed or scraped on the skin, forming microscopic holes. As a result, skin permeability increases by approximately four degrees of magnitude, allowing the easier delivery of medicine.
The ideal micro-needle needs to be extremely small, with an inner diameter of 10-20 μm. It is very challenging to prepare such small needles, ones that are also strong and flexible. Fortunately, we have a living example to guide our designs: female mosquitos.
The world’s most advanced micro-needles are found in mosquitos. Thus, scientists and engineers have begun trying to mimic a female mosquito’s bite – that is, the way they suck blood from our bodies while also leaving behind their itch-causing enzymes. If such a breakthrough can be achieved, blood drawing or drug injection may be performed painlessly. Researchers from North Carolina State University indicate that if a “synthetic mosquito” capable of drawing blood painlessly can be developed, millions of diabetics worldwide who must draw blood several times a day for glucose monitoring will be able check their glucose numbers without pain.
Mosquito needles are made of two main parts: the fascicle and proboscis. The general shape of a female mosquito needle is a core-sheath structure where the fascicle is the main needle puncturing the skin and drawing blood and the proboscis acts as a surrounding and protective layer for the inner needle. Interestingly, only female mosquitos bite, since their need for human blood is only for the purpose of developing their eggs, not for their nutrition.
Ideally, a micro-needle would mimic the structures of a mosquito’s needle, including the mechanism by which the mosquito penetrates the skin and draws blood. This would make for the painless treatment of many diseases.
To prepare a micro-needle based on a mosquito needle would require extensive knowledge of chemistry, material science, mechanical and structural engineering, and fluid dynamics. After resolving any scientific challenges, these needles would need to be manufactured in high quantities to reach the many people in need. This would require scaling up the fabrication methods in a safe and compliant facility. For such widespread production to happen, the process would have to be widely adopted by patients.
In summary, if researchers can mechanically mimic a mosquito needle, it would be a great achievement in the development of advanced micro-needle technology. It’s incredible that the solution to a major medical problem – the efficient delivery of drugs and vaccines – is already present in nature, at our disposal.
1 note · View note
sagar-kinagi · 6 years ago
Text
Flexible Plastic Packaging Market Is Anticipated To Expand Moderately At A CAGR Of 5.2% Till 2023
Summary
Global Flexible Plastic Packaging Market Size, Share, Growth, Analysis, Trends, By Type (Stand-Up Pouches, Flat Pouches, Gusseted, Bags and Others), By Printing Technology (Flexography, Digital Printing and Others), By Application (Food & Beverages, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care and Others) and Region - Forecast 2017-2023        
Market Overview
Flexible packaging is one of the fastest growing segments of the packaging industry, and it integrates the best qualities of plastic, film, paper and aluminum foil to offer an extensive range of protective properties. It essentially takes the shape of a bag, pouch, liner, or overwrap, or any part of a package whose shape can readily be changed. Such packaging is used for consumer products and in industrial applications, to protect, market, and distribute a variety of products.
The Global Flexible Plastic Packaging Market is anticipated to expand moderately at a CAGR of 5.2% during the forecast period of 2017-2023.
Get Free Sample Copy of Flexible Plastic Packaging Market @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/4845
The market is driven by various factors such as increased consumption of processed foods & beverages, innovation in flexible packaging, and environmental advantage of flexible plastic packaging. The higher disposable income in these developing countries increases the purchasing power. Hence, consumer dependence on processed, pre-cooked and packed foods, here, will increase. As a result flexible packaging market has been impacted, positively. However, flexible plastic packaging market has various restraints that hinder the market growth such as fluctuating raw material prices and stringent regulations on packaging material waste and recycling.
Key Players
The major player operating in the market of global flexible plastic packaging are Amcor Limited(Victoria), Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH (Austria), Mondi Group (Johannesburg), Sealed Air Corporation (North Carolina), Sonoco Products Company (U.S.), Coveris Holdings S.A. (U.S.), Huhtamaki Group (Finland), Bemis Company Inc. (U.S.) and Ampac Holdings LLC (U.S.).
Flexible Plastic Packaging Market Segmentation
The global Flexible Plastic Packaging Market has been segmented on the basis of type, printing technology and application. Based on type, the flexible plastic packaging market has been segmented into stand-up pouches, flat pouches, gusseted, bags and others. The stand-up pouches segment is anticipated to account for the largest market share during the forecast period due to growing consumption of dairy products, cosmetics, food & beverages and personal care products that are usually packed using flexible plastic packaging.
Based on printing technology, the flexible plastic packaging market has been segmented into flexography, digital printing and others. Based on application, the flexible plastic packaging market has been segmented into food and beverages, pharmaceutical, personal care and others.
Regional Analysis
Asia Pacific dominates the global flexible packaging market with the largest market share. It comprises countries such as China, India, and Japan, which lead in in the export of goods to various parts of the world. Moreover, increase in consumer income has led to a growth in demand for good-quality packaged food. Also, the rise in population in many countries, has led to an increase in food & beverage consumption, which ultimately increases the demand for flexible packaging products. The increasing exports from these countries is leading to the growth of the flexible packaging market. The booming e-commerce market in the region is also contributing in the growth of the flexible packaging market. The e-commerce market is boosted by the increasing internet penetration.
Plastic packaging market expansion will continue to profit from the drive to replace traditional materials such as glass and metal, with lighter-weight, more cost-effective and higher performance plastic materials in various markets. Flexible plastic packaging is cheap, visually appealing and chemically inert. These features increase their demand in products that are used in packaging, and are made in a wide variety of innovative shapes, sizes and appearances. They include components, such as handles; and opening and reclosing features, such as zips and spouts. Such packaging helps in reducing the wastage of food due to the increased shelf life of the food product, according to Industry Council for Research and Packaging on the Environment (INCPEN). Advanced packaging for milk pouches, makes transportation easy and without any refrigeration.
Industry Updates
In September 2018, Amcor has announced that it will invest more than $25 Mn to expand and upgrade an existing facility in Madison, Wisconsin.
In September 2018, Mondi and Werner & Mertz have announced that they will be introducing new, patented fully recyclable pouches with detachable decorative panels in the year 2019.
Access Full Report With Complete TOC @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/flexible-plastic-packaging-market-4845
Table Of Contents
1 Executive Summary
2 Scope Of The Report
2.1 Market Definition
2.2 Scope Of The Study
2.2.1 Definition
2.2.2 Research Objective
2.2.3 Assumptions
2.2.4 Limitations
2.3 Research Process
2.3.1 Primary Research
2.3.2 Secondary Research
2.4 Market Size Estimation
2.5 Forecast Model
3 Market Landscape
3.1 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
3.1.1 Threat Of New Entrants
3.1.2 Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
3.1.3 Bargaining Power Of Buyers
3.1.4 Threat Of Substitutes
3.1.5 Segment Rivalry
3.2 Value Chain/Supply Chain Analysis
Continues…....
For More Info, Click @ https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/flexible-plastic-packaging-market-global-analysis-size-trends-key-leaders-like-amcor-constantia-mondi-sealed-air-and-forecast-to-2023-2019-03-06
About Market Research Future
At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services.
Contact
Market Research Future
+1 646 845 9312
0 notes
Text
Rising Toxicity And Safety Concerns Makes Huge Impact On U.S. Liquid Waste Management Market
San Francisco, 05 Apr 2019 — The U.S. liquid waste management market is expected to reach USD 22.5 Billion by 2025, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. Growing organic & non-hazardous liquid waste generation through residential and commercial sources is expected to drive demand over the forecast period.
Industrial & residential liquid waste is often associated with water-borne diseases since improper disposal of the waste leads to water pollution, environmental degradation, and soil contamination. As a result, the demand for hygienic liquid waste management services is expected to grow significantly over the forecast period.
A major trend arising from the need to improve liquid waste management is the outsourcing of the services to global & competitive players in order to improve the focus on sustainability and meet stringent guidelines. In addition, the government undertakes public-private partnership projects to enhance the efficiency of the waste management process, which is expected to propel growth over the forecast period.
To request a sample copy or view summary of this report, click the link below: www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-liquid-waste-management-market
Further key findings from the report suggest:
Liquid waste generated through residential sector accounted for 45.3% of the overall revenue in 2016 on account of the high per capita discharge of wastewater in states including California, Texas, Florida and New York
Organic & non-hazardous liquid waste accounted for the majority of the revenue share in commercial sector owing to the high amount of liquid waste generated through hospitality and medical industry
Automotive industry accounted for 5.5% of the total revenue generated through treatment of the liquid waste in 2016 owing to the growing production of vehicles in the eastern states of the country
California accounted for the largest revenue share in 2016 on account of the high population growth coupled with growing tourism, pharmaceutical and automotive industries in the state
The market is fragmented with few major players including Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services and Clean Harbors operating across the country. The market is characterized by the major players acquiring local players to increase the market share.
Access More Reports Of The Same Category: www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-liquid-waste-management-market
Grand View Research has segmented the U.S. liquid waste management market on the basis of waste type, source, service, and country:
Waste Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014–2025)
Residential
Commercial
Toxic & Hazardous Waste
Organic & Non-Hazardous Waste
Industrial
Toxic & Hazardous Waste
Organic & Non-Hazardous Waste
Chemical Waste
Source Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014–2025)
Textile
Paper
Iron & Steel
Automotive
Pharmaceutical
Oil & Gas
Others
Service Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014–2025)
Collection
Transportation/Hauling
Disposal/Recycling
Country Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2014–2025)
California
Texas
Florida
New York
Illinois
Pennsylvania
Ohio
Georgia
North Carolina
Michigan
Kentucky
Tennessee
Virginia
West Virginia
South Carolina
Arkansas
Alabama
Mississippi
Louisiana
Maryland
Indiana
Wisconsin
Rest of U.S.
Browse Press Release of this Report: www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/us-liquid-waste-management-market-analysis
About Grand View Research
Grand View Research, Inc. is a U.S. based market research and consulting company, registered in the State of California and headquartered in San Francisco. The company provides syndicated research reports, customized research reports, and consulting services. To help clients make informed business decisions, we offer market intelligence studies ensuring relevant and fact-based research across a range of industries, from technology to chemicals, materials and healthcare.
For More Information: www.grandviewresearch.com
0 notes
inhandnetworks-blog · 6 years ago
Text
MIT Chemists Use Modified Anthrax To 4g router  xin to Deliver Cancer Drugs
www.inhandnetworks.com
MIT chemistry professor Yogesh Surendranath and three colleagues have found a way to use electricity, which could potentially come from renewable sources, to convert methane into derivatives of methanol. The researchers developed a low-temperature electrochemical process that would continuously replenish a catalyst material that can rapidly carry out the conversion.
Scientists at MIT have developed a new way to harness wasted methane that could help curb needless “flaring” of potent greenhouse gas.
Methane gas, a vast natural resource, is often disposed of through burning, but new research by scientists at MIT could make it easier to capture LTE router  this gas for use as fuel or a chemical feedstock.
Many oil wells burn off methane — the largest component of natural gas — in a process called flaring, which currently wastes 150 billion cubic meters of the gas each year and generates a staggering 400 million tons of carbon dioxide, making this process a significant contributor to global warming. Letting the gas escape unburned would lead to even greater environmental harm, however, because methane is an even more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide is.
Why is all this methane being w M2M LTE router  asted, when at the same time natural gas is touted as an important “bridge” fuel as the world steers away from fossil fuels, and is the centerpiece of the so-called shale-gas revolution? The answer, as the saying goes in the real estate business, is simple: location, location, location.
The wells where methane is flared away are primarily being exploited for their petroleum; the methane is simply a byproduct. In places where it is convenient to do so, methane is captured and used to generate electrical power or produce chemicals. However, special equipment is needed to cool and pressurize methane gas, and special pressurized containers or pipelines are needed to transport it. In many places, such as offshore oil platforms or remote oil fields far from the needed infrastructure, that’s just not economically viable.
But now, MIT chemistry professor Yogesh Surendranath and three colleagues have found a way to use electricity, which could potentially come from renewable sources, to convert methane into derivatives of methanol, a liquid that can be made into automotive fuel or used as a precursor to a variety of chemical products. This new method may allow for lower-cost methane conversion at remote sites. The findings, described in the journal ACS Central Science, could pave the way to making use of a significant methane supply that is otherwise totally wasted.
“This finding opens the doors for a new paradigm of methane conversion chemistry,” says Jillian Dempsey, an assistant professor of chemistry at the University of North Carolina, who was not involved in this work.
Existing industrial processes for converting methane to liquid intermediate chemical forms requires very high operating temperatures and large, capital-intensive equipment. Instead, the researchers have developed a low-temperature electrochemical process that would continuously replenish a catalyst material that can rapidly carry out the conversion. This technology could potentially lead to “a relatively low-cost, on-site addition to existing wellhead operations,” says Surendranath, who is the Paul M. Cook Career Development Assistant Professor in MIT’s Department of Chemistry.
The electricity to power such systems could come from wind turbines or solar panels close to the site, he says. This electrochemical process, he says, could provide a way to do the methane conversion — a process also known as functionalizing — “remotely, where a lot of the ‘stranded’ methane reserves are.”
Already, he says, “methane is playing a key role as a transition fuel.” But the amount of this valuable fuel that is now just flared away, he says, “is pretty staggering.” That vast amount of wasted natural gas can even be seen in satellite images of the Earth at night, in areas such as the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota that light up as brightly as big metropolitan areas due to flaring. Based on World Bank estimates, global flaring of methane  Transformer Monitoring  wastes an amount equivalent to approximately one-fifth of U.S. natural gas consumption.
When that gas gets flared off rather than directly released, Surendranath says, “you’re reducing the environmental harm, but you’re also wasting the energy.” Finding a way to do methane conversion at sufficiently low cost to make it practical for remote sites “has been a grand challenge in chemistry for decades,” he says. What makes methane conversion so tough is that the carbon-hydrogen bonds in the methane molecule resist being broken, and at the same time there’s a risk of overdoing the reaction and ending up with a runaway process that destroys the desired end-product.
Catalysts that could do the job have been studied for many years, but they typically require harsh chemical agents that limit the speed of the reaction, he says. The key new advance was adding an electrical driving force that could be tuned precisely to generate more potent catalysts with very high reaction rates. “Since we’re using electricity to drive the process, this opens up new opportunities for making the process more rapid, selective, and portable than existing methods,” Surendranath says. And in addition, “we can access catalysts that no one has observed before, because we’re generating them in a new way.”
The result of the reaction is a pair of liquid chemicals, methyl bisulfate and methanesulfonic acid, which can be further processed to make liquid methanol, a valuable chemical intermediate to fuels, plastics, and pharmaceuticals. The additional processing steps needed to make methanol remain very challenging and must be perfected before this technology can be implemented on an industrial scale. The researchers are actively refining their method to tackle these technological hurdles.
“This work really stands out because it not only reports a new system for selective catalytic functionalization of methane to methanol precursors, but it includes detailed insight into how the system is able to carry out this selective chemistry. The mechanistic information will be instrumental in translating this exciting discovery into an industrial technology,” Dempsey says.
The research team included postdoc Matthew O’Reilly and doctoral students Rebecca Soyoung Kim and Seokjoon Oh, all in MIT’s Department of Chemistry. The work was supported by the Italian energy company Eni S.p.A. through the MIT Energy Initiative.
Publication: Matthew E. O’Reilly, et al., “Catalytic Methane Monofunctionalization by an Electrogenerated High-Valent Pd Intermediate,” ACS Cent. Sci., 2017; DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00342
Cellular modem, data terminal unit, 3g modem, Industrial 3G Cellular Modem, 3g modem, industrial cellular modem3g modem, industrial cellular modem, industrial wireless modem, data terminal unit, Android Industrial Computer, Android Industrial Computer, Vending PC, Vending Telemetry, Vending Telemeter, Android Industrial Computer, Android Industrial Computer, Vending PC, Vending Telemetry, Vending Telemeter, Touchscreen & Vending PC, Vending Touchscreen, Vending Telemeter, Vending Telemetry, Vending Computer, Industrial LTE Router, industrial IoT Gateway, industrial LTE router, Industrial VPN router, Dual SIM M2M router, Industrial IoT Router/Gateway, industrial IoT Gateway, industrial LTE router, Industrial VPN router, Dual SIM M2M router, Industrial LTE Router, Industrial LTE router, industrial 4G/3G router, router industrial, cost-effective industrial LTE router, Industrial LTE Router, Industrial LTE router, industrial IoT router, router industrial, cost-effective M2M router, M2M LTE router, Industrial 3G Router , Industrial 3g router, industrial wireless router, VPN router, DIN-Rail router, cellular router, Industrial 3G Router , Industrial 3g router, industrial wireless router, VPN router, DIN-Rail router, cellular router, Distribution Power Line Monitoring System, Overhead Line Monitoring, Distribution Power Line Monitoring, Fault detection & location, Grid Analytics System, Remote Machine Monitoring & Maintenance System, IoT Remote Monitoring, Prognostics and Health Management, Remote connectivity, Remote Maintenance, Smart Vending, smart vending, InHandGo, retrofit, touchscreen vending, cashless vending, cloud VMS, Transformer Monitoring, Transformer Monitoring, substation monitoring, grid LTE router, wireless communication, smart grid, Remote Automation, Remote Automation, Secure remote networks, web SCADA, Remote Diagnostics,
0 notes
sherristockman · 8 years ago
Link
Smithfield Is Engineering Pigs for Use in Human Transplants Dr. Mercola By Dr. Mercola The world's largest pork producer, Smithfield Foods, is branching out from ham and bacon toward the business of organ transplantation. The CAFO (concentrated animal feeding operation) giant has even created a new bioscience unit for this purpose, in the hopes of growing pig organs that could one day be transplanted into humans.1 In 2013, Smithfield was bought by WH Group (formerly known as Shaunghui), the largest meat processing company in China.2 At $7.1 billion — 30 percent above its estimated market value — it was the largest-ever Chinese buyout of an American company. Smithfield is now part of a public-private tissue engineering consortium, along with pharmaceutical and other health care companies, that's being funded via an $80 million U.S. Department of Defense grant.3 The move isn't surprising. Reuters reported that "materials" from 16 million Smithfield pigs, including pancreases, intestinal membrane and thyroid glands, are sent for medical uses every year. The market for such products, as well as pork byproducts used for pet food and other non-food purposes, is more than $100 billion in the U.S. alone.4 Courtney Stanton, VP of Smithfield Bioscience, told Business Insider, just how they plan to cash in on the less popular (food wise) pig parts:5 "First and foremost, we are a food company … Part of that responsibility is making sure we utilize the entire animal, and minimize waste. There are many parts of the animal which are not typically eaten. However, we have found valuable uses for these parts such as supplying them to the medical community." Are Pig-Human Organ Transplants Coming? It hasn't happened yet, but the research is moving this way. One of the hurdles is that the organs could transmit viruses from pigs to people, but this has been somewhat tackled via technology like the gene-editing tool CRISPR, to "delete" the virus genes. There's also a risk that the pig organs could be rejected in humans. Other companies in the market, which come from the biotech industry, have bred pigs with human genes added to their livers, kidneys and hearts.6 Earlier this year, researchers from the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, made history by creating a human-pig hybrid, a task achieved by injecting days-old pig embryos with human pluripotent stem cells.7 Such cells, like embryonic stem cells, are able to divide indefinitely and become any type of cell in the body. The human-pig embryos were then transferred into adult pigs and allowed to grow for up to four weeks, before they were "removed and analyzed."8 The ability to grow human organs in pigs is undoubtedly an intriguing area of research, especially as about 76,000 Americans sit in wait of healthy organs for transplant.9 But the reality is that these GMO technologies could have unforeseen and devastating consequences. "The work inevitably raises the specter of intelligent animals with humanized brains and also the potential for bizarre hybrid creatures to be accidentally released into the wild," The Guardian noted.10 Indeed, no one knows if inserting human cells into non-human animal embryos might lead to the creation of non-human animals with human consciousness. For Smithfield, however, ethical considerations don't appear to be top of mind. The company is one of four multibillion-dollar transnational companies — Tyson, JBS and Cargill are the others — that produce about 85 percent of U.S. CAFO meat. As Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association put it, "[W]hat the Big Four fear … is the thought of consumers waking up to the horrors of factory farms, and the filthy, contaminated meat that comes out of these animal prisons." North Carolina's Pig CAFOs Produce 10 Billion Gallons of Fecal Waste Annually North Carolina is the second biggest pork-producing state, which means it's home to more pig CAFOs than average. Smithfield owns most of them in the state.11 Some CAFOs treat animal feces in open-air lagoons and dispose of the waste by spraying it onto nearby fields. The creation of new CAFO lagoons, and the spray systems, were banned in 2007, but older farms were allowed to continue their use. The term "lagoon" is a misnomer, by the way. Cesspool would be more accurate, as CAFOs do not treat the animal feces in any way. They simply add it to the often-unlined lagoons until they figure out where they can spray it. In the meantime, the liquefied waste often leaches into groundwater and wells, poisoning drinking water. When it's sprayed onto fields, it often runs off into waterways, where the excess nutrients lead to algae overgrowth that depletes the water of oxygen and kills fish and other marine life.12 It's hard to imagine the magnitude of waste being produced by Smithfield's North Carolina CAFOs, but this may help — the state's pig CAFOs alone produce nearly 10 billion gallons of fecal waste annually, which is enough to fill more than 15,000 Olympic-size swimming pools, according to an analysis of maps and data of the state's CAFOs by the Environmental Working Group (EWG).13 Manure spills can and do happen, both from hog and other animal CAFOs. Earlier this month, for instance, a staggering 190,000 gallons of waste spilled from an above-ground storage tank at Tony Silveira Dairy in Tillamook, Oregon, because of a broken valve. Tillamook Bay, which is home to several commercial oyster growers, was closed to shellfish harvesting as a result.14 CAFOs Are Knowingly Placed in Flood-Prone Hurricane Regions, Increasing Risks Some North Carolina CAFOs face a unique threat that the others don't: hurricanes. Many pigs drown in confinement when flooding occurs, since many of the CAFOs are knowingly placed in flood-prone areas. Aside from the ethical ramifications, there is also the added issue of how to dispose of millions of decaying and likely disease-ridden carcasses. The year of Hurricane Floyd, eastern North Carolina experienced a "large increase" in visits to health services for intestinal infections in counties with high concentrations of pig farming that were affected by the hurricane.15 Even a splash of floodwater on your face or open cut could be enough to cause infection. Floodwaters from hurricanes can cause the already dangerous lagoons (which emit toxic fumes and often leach toxins into groundwater) to overflow, allowing tons of untreated animal feces to flood the area. This isn't only theoretical; it's already happened in 1996 following Hurricane Fran, in 1998 following Hurricane Bonnie, in 1999 following Hurricane Floyd, practically every year in many locations — including in 2016 following Hurricane Matthew. It's not only Smithfield that's guilty of these environmental and ethical affronts — other CAFOs are also culpable — but Smithfield is the only one of late that's getting into the business of human organ transplantation, where ethics should be held in the highest regard. If you want to see what a Smithfield CAFO looks like, watch the video above. In the featured clip, Mark Devries, who's been investigating the environmental effects of CAFOs for years, flies a drone over one of Smithfield's CAFOs. Several warehouse-style buildings are lined up next to a giant open air cesspool the size of four football fields, filled with the excrement from the thousands of pigs housed in the buildings. Xenotransplantation Coming in 2017? Xenotransplantation, or cross-species organ transplants, could occur as early as 2017, as part of a clinical trial, according to Harvard Medical School genetics professor George Church. Church formed a company called eGenesis Bio that is developing "humanized pigs" in order for their organs to be transplanted into humans without being rejected. The trial would involve people who are too sick to receive human organ transplants. Speaking to Reuters, Church said Smithfield would be a welcome addition to this emerging market. "Even though we've got companies like eGenesis that would make the first pigs, you still need someone who will breed them and do it to scale," he said.16 Unfortunately, raising a large amount of pigs at little cost is what Smithfield knows how to do best. The Department of Defense-funded coalition, meanwhile, which Smithfield is also a part of, says its goal is to develop "next-generation manufacturing techniques for repairing and replacing cells, tissues and organs for wounded service members."17 If organs can one day be grown inside animals, we're then faced with the realities of whether this — raising animals for the sole purpose of organ harvesting — can and should be done, ethically speaking. It falls into the realm of research moving full-steam ahead before we've adequately stopped to consider whether we should move forward at all. The same might be said for raising animals in CAFOs. For Now, You Can Carefully Consider Where You Get Your Food The era of food companies merging with biotechnology is only just beginning. Genetically engineered (GE) salmon has already been approved, paving the way for more GE animals to emerge. We've also seen GE "pharmaceutical" corn used in an experimental trial for hepatitis B vaccine (grown in an environmentally sensitive area along California's central coast, just 100 feet from a critical habitat for threatened wildlife species, no less). Smithfield's move into pig-to-person organ transplants is not a huge leap, but it's one that further blurs the line between farmers and corporate machines. For now, you can take a precautionary stance by consciously considering where your next meal will come from. You vote three times a day when you choose the foods for your meals. Will you vote for the system that is systematically destroying your health, animal welfare and the planet — or will you support those who are changing the world for the better, one meal at a time? There are basically two different models of food production today, and there's growing conflict between them. The first, and most prevalent, is the CAFO model that takes a very mechanistic view toward life, whereas the other — the local, sustainable farm model — has a biological and holistic view. I encourage you to support the small family farms in your area that respect the laws of nature and use the relationships between animals, plants, insects, soil, water and habitat to create synergistic, self-supporting, non-polluting and GMO-free ecosystems. Whereas industrial agriculturists want to hide their practices from you, traditional farmers will welcome you onto their land, as they have nothing to hide. Whether you do so for ethical, environmental or health reasons — or all of the above — the closer you can get to nature the better. You'll want to get your meat, chickens and eggs from smaller community farms with free-ranging, pastured animals, organically fed and locally marketed. This is the way food has been raised and distributed for centuries, before it was corrupted by politics, corporate greed and the blaring arrogance of the industrial food industry. You can do this not only by visiting the farm directly, if you have one nearby, but also by taking part in farmers markets and community-supported agriculture programs. The following organizations can also help you locate farm-fresh foods in your local area, raised in a humane, sustainable manner. >>>>> Click Here
0 notes
topinforma · 8 years ago
Text
New Post has been published on Mortgage News
New Post has been published on http://bit.ly/2lMgJXI
buyins-net-xec-hr-hos-che-srcl-wmb-expected-to-be-up-after-next-earnings-releases
Feb 14, 2017 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) —
BUYINS.NET / www.squeezetrigger.com is monitoring the performance of all stocks with earnings being released Wednesday, February 15th 2017 and determining how the stocks have performed After their last 12 quarterly, 6 quarterly and earnings reports. Cimarex Energy Co. (NYSE:XEC), Healthcare Realty Trust Inc. (NYSE:HR), Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc. (NYSE:HOS), Chemed Corporation (NYSE:CHE), Stericycle Inc. (NASDAQ:SRCL), Williams Companies Inc. (NYSE:WMB) are all expected to be Up After their earnings are released Wednesday. The movement of stock prices in the days and weeks leading to and following these earnings announcements may follow a predictable pattern. Most companies stock price histories show random or unpredictable movements around earnings dates. But some seem to repeat the same pattern quarter after quarter, year after year. The # of Reports in the table below shows how many previous quarterly reports comprise the indicator that predicts how a stock will act after its earnings are released. The specific technology used to make these predictions is available for a low monthly fee at http://www.squeezetrigger.com . The following stocks are expected to go Up After earnings are released Wednesday:
Symbol Company # of Reports Quarter Release Time
XEC Cimarex Energy Co. February Earnings Q4 After
HR Healthcare Realty Trust Inc. February Earnings Q4 After
HOS Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc. February Earnings Q4 After
CHE Chemed Corporation February Earnings Q4 After
SRCL Stericycle Inc. February Earnings Q4 After
WMB Williams Companies Inc. February Earnings Q4 After
This technology is designed to help the stock trader identify those companies that seem to have a consistent pattern of movement before or after the earnings release date, based on the history of earnings releases for that company. It combines a calendar of expected earnings releases with a history of past earnings releases in a way that lets you see if a pattern exists.
Cimarex Energy Co. (NYSE:XEC) – Cimarex Energy Co. operates as an independent oil and gas exploration and production company primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico. As of December 31, 2015, it had a total proved oil and gas reserves of 2.9 trillion cubic feet equivalent (Tcfe) consisting of 1.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, 0.65 Tcfe of oil, and 0.75 Tcfe of natural gas liquids principally located in the Mid-Continent and Permian Basin regions. The company also owned interests in 3,153 net productive oil and gas wells. Cimarex Energy Co. was founded in 2002 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado..
Healthcare Realty Trust Inc. (NYSE:HR) – Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated is an independent real estate investment trust. The firm invests in real estate markets of the United States. It primarily engages in ownership, acquisition, management, leasing, and development of properties associated with delivery of healthcare services such as medical office and outpatient facilities. The firm also provides mortgage financing on healthcare facilities. Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated was formed in 1992 and is based Nashville, Tennessee..
Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc. (NYSE:HOS) – Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides marine transportation, subsea installation, and accommodation support services to exploration and production, oilfield service, offshore construction, and the U.S. military customers. It operates offshore supply vessels (OSVs), multi-purpose support vessels (MPSVs), and a shore-based facility to provide logistics support and specialty services to the offshore oil and gas exploration and production industry in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Latin America, and internationally. Its fleet of U.S.-flagged OSVs and MPSVs support deep-well, deepwater, and ultra-deepwater activities of the offshore oil and gas industry, such as exploration, field development, production, construction, installation, inspection, repair, maintenance, well-stimulation, and other enhanced oil recovery. The company also provides vessel management services, such as crewing, daily operational management, and maintenance activities for other vessels owners. As of December 31, 2015, it owned and operated 62 OSVs and 6 MPSVs. Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Covington, Louisiana..
Chemed Corporation (NYSE:CHE) – Chemed Corporation provides hospice and palliative care services in the United States. It operates through two segments, VITAS and Roto-Rooter. The company offers its services to patients through a network of physicians, registered nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy, and volunteers. It also provides plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration, and other related services to residential and commercial customers. The company was founded in 1970 and is based in Cincinnati, Ohio..
Stericycle Inc. (NASDAQ:SRCL) – Stericycle, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides regulated and compliance solutions to the healthcare, retail, and commercial businesses in the United States and internationally. The company collects and processes regulated and specialized waste for disposal services, as well as collects personal and confidential information for secure destruction. It offers regulated solutions for medical waste disposal, pharmaceutical waste disposal, and hazardous waste management; sustainability solutions for expired or unused inventory; and secures information destruction of documents and e-media. The company s compliance solutions comprise Steri-Safe and clinical services programs for training and consulting; inbound/outbound communications; data reporting; and other regulatory compliance services. It also provides reusable sharps disposal management services, integrated waste stream solutions program, and regulated recall and returns management services for expired or recalled products. The company serves healthcare businesses, including hospitals, physician and dental practices, outpatient clinics, and long-term care facilities; retailers and manufacturers; financial and professional service providers; governmental entities; and other businesses. Stericycle, Inc. was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in Lake Forest, Illinois..
Williams Companies Inc. (NYSE:WMB) – The Williams Companies, Inc. operates as an energy infrastructure company primarily in the United States. The company operates through Williams Partners, Williams NGL (natural gas liquids) & Petchem Services, and Other segments. It owns and operates natural gas pipeline system extending from Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and the offshore Gulf of Mexico through Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey to the New York City metropolitan area. The company also owns and operates a natural gas pipeline system extending from the San Juan basin in northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado through Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington to a point on the Canadian border near Sumas, Washington; gulfstream natural gas pipeline system extending from the Mobile Bay area in Alabama to markets in Florida; and constitution pipeline that would connect its gathering system in Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania to the Iroquois Gas Transmission and Tennessee Gas Pipeline systems in New York. In addition, it provides natural gas gathering, treating, processing, and compression; NGL production, fractionation, storage, marketing, and transportation; deepwater production handling and crude oil transportation; and olefin production services, as well as transports and stores natural gas to local natural gas distribution companies, municipal utilities, direct industrial users, electric power generators, and natural gas marketers and producers. Further, the company extracts, fractionates, treats, stores, and sells ethane/ethylene, propane, propylene, normal butane, isobutene, alky feedstock, and condensate. Additionally, it provides construction management services for third parties. As of December 31, 2015, the company owned and operated approximately 13,600 miles of pipelines. The Williams Companies, Inc. was founded in 1908 and is headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma..
About BUYINS.NET
BUYINS.NET, http://www.buyins.net, monitors trading in all US stocks in real time and maintains massive databases of short sale and naked short sale time and sales data, short squeeze SqueezeTrigger prices, market-maker price movements, shareholder data, statistical data on earnings, sector correlation, seasonality, hedge fund trading strategies, comparable valuations. Reports include:
REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE NEWS
Friction Factor – Market maker surveillance system tracking Level II market makers in all stocks to determine Price Friction and compliance with new “Fair Market Making Requirements”
Naked Shorts (RegSho) – Tracks EVERY failure to deliver in all US stocks and tracks all Threshold Security Lists daily for which stocks have naked shorts that are not in compliance with Regulation SHO
INVESTMENTS & TRADING
Earnings – Predicts probability, price move and length of move before and after all US stock earnings reports
Seasonality – Predicts probability, price move and length of move based on exact time of year for all US stocks
Group Correlation – Tracks sector rotation and stock correlation to its sector and predicts future moves in ALL sectors and industry groups
SqueezeTrigger – Massive database that tracks EVERY short sale (not just total short interest) in all US stocks and calculates volume weighted price that a short squeeze will begin in each stock.
Valuation – Tracks all known valuation models and applies them.
GATS – Tracks and quantifies known trading strategies by backtesting, optimizing and running genetic algorithms and neural networks to ascertain best trading strategies.
PatternScan – Automates tracking of every technical pattern and predicts next move in stocks.
Insider – Tracks insiders trading records and determines trading performance. Trades by higher-level insiders are generally more predictive than trades by lower level insiders
Events – Tracks patterns directly correlated to specific events.
SqueezeTrigger is a registered trademark, Reg. No. 3,120,641
DISCLAIMER:
BUYINS.NET is not a registered investment advisor and nothing contained in any materials should be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. [symbol] has not approved the statements made in this release. Please read our report and visit our web site, http://www.buyins.net, for complete risks and disclosures.
Contact:
Tom Ronk, CEO
BUYINS.NET
800-715-9999
CONTACT: Tom Ronk, [email protected]
((M2 Communications disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.m2.com on the world wide web. Inquiries to [email protected].
(C)1994-2017 M2 COMMUNICATIONS**********************************************************************As of Friday, 02-10-2017 23:59, the latest Comtex SmarTrend® Alert, an automated pattern recognition system, indicated a DOWNTREND on 05-18-2012 f
0 notes