#Parcel Costs 2023

[just2bruce]

State of Logistics Report 2024

We now have the latest State of Logistics Report from Penske and Kearney in cooperation with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). It’s a good piece of solid research. I was most interested in two specific aspects it presents. The first topic was the total United States Business Logistics Costs (USBLC) table. Logistics costs in 2023 actually shrank by 11% over the past…

[reasonsforhope]

"Clothing tags, travel cards, hotel room key cards, parcel labels … a whole host of components in supply chains of everything from cars to clothes. What do they have in common? RFID tags.  

Every RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tag contains a microchip and a tiny metal strip of an antenna. A cool 18bn of these are made – and disposed of – each year. And with demands for product traceability increasing, ironically in part because of concerns for the social and environmental health of the supply chain, that’s set to soar. 

And guess where most of these tags end up? Yup, landfill – adding to the burgeoning volumes of e-waste polluting our soils, rivers and skies. It’s a sorry tale, but it’s one in which two young graduates of Imperial College London and Royal College of Art are putting a great big green twist. Under the name of PulpaTronics, Chloe So and Barna Soma Biro reckon they’ve hit on a beguilingly simple sounding solution: make the tags out of paper. No plastic, no chips, no metal strips. Just paper, pure and … simple … ? Well, not quite, as we shall see. 

The apparent simplicity is achieved by some pretty cutting-edge technical innovation, aimed at stripping away both the metal antennae and the chips. If you can get rid of those, as Biro explains, you solve the e-waste problem at a stroke. But getting rid of things isn’t the typical approach to technical solutions, he adds. “I read a paper in Nature that set out how humans have a bias for solving problems through addition – by adding something new, rather than removing complexity, even if that’s the best approach.”   

And adding stuff to a world already stuffed, as it were, can create more problems than it solves. “So that became one of the guiding principles of PulpaTronics”, he says: stripping things down “to the bare minimum, where they are still functional, but have as low an environmental impact as possible”.  

...how did they achieve this magical simplification? The answer lies in lasers: these turn the paper into a conductive material, Biro explains, printing a pattern on the surface that can be ‘read’ by a scanner, rather like a QR code. It sounds like frontier technology, but it works, and PulpaTronics have patents pending to protect it. 

The resulting tag comes in two forms: in one, there is still a microchip, so that it can be read by existing scanners of the sort common within retailers, for example. The more advanced version does away with the chip altogether. This will need a different kind of scanner, currently in development, which PulpaTronics envisages issuing licences for others to manufacture. 

Crucially, the cost of both versions is significantly cheaper than existing RFID kit – making this a highly viable proposition. Then there are the carbon savings: up to 70% for the chipless version – so a no-brainer from a sustainability viewpoint too. All the same, industry interest was slow to start with but when PulpaTronics won a coveted Dezeen magazine award in late 2023, it snowballed, says So. Big brands such as UPS, DHL, Marks & Spencer and Decathlon came calling. “We were just bombarded.” Brands were fascinated by the innovation, she says, but even more by the price point, “because, like any business, they knew that green products can’t come with a premium”."

-via Positive.News, April 29, 2024

--

Note: I know it's still in the very early stages, but this is such a relief to see in the context of the environmental and human rights catastrophes associated with lithium mining and mining for rare earth metals, and the way that EVs and other green infrastructure are massively increasing the demand for those materials.

I'll take a future with paper-based, more humane alternatives for sure! Fingers crossed this keeps developing and develops well (and quickly).

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Why Millennials aren’t leaving Tiktok

I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me TOMORROW NIGHT (Mar 22) in TORONTO, then SUNDAY (Mar 24) with LAURA POITRAS in NYC, then Anaheim, and more!

The news that Gen Z users have abandoned Tiktok in such numbers that the median Tiktoker is a Millennial (or someone even older) prompted commentators to dunk on Tiktok as uncool by dint of having lost its youthful sheen:

https://www.garbageday.email/p/tiktok-millennials-turns

But "why are Gen Z kids leaving Tiktok?" is the wrong question. The right question is, why aren't Millennials leaving Tiktok? After all, we are living through the enshittocene, the great enshittening, in which every platform gets monotonically, irreversibly worse over time, and Tiktok is no exception:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys

To understand why older users are stuck to Tiktok, we need to start with why younger users relentlessly seek out new platforms. To some extent, it's just down to youth's appetite for novelty, but that's only part of the story. To really understand why people come to – and leave – platforms, you have to understand switching costs.

"Switching costs" is the economists' term for everything you have to give up when you change products or services. Switching from Ios to Android probably means giving up a bunch of your apps and purchased media. Switching from an airline where you're a high-status frequent flier to another carrier means giving up on free checked bags and early boarding.

In an open market, rivals have lots of ways to lower these switching costs (it's an open secret that you can call an airline and say, "Hi, I'm a 33rd Order Mason on American Airlines, will you make me a Triple Platinum Diamond Sky-Baron if I switch to Delta?"). Of course, big incumbents hate this, and do everything they can to increase their switching costs, finding ways to impose high switching costs that punish disloyal consumers who have the temerity to go elsewhere.

With social media, lock-in comes for free, thanks to the "collective action problem." Getting people to agree on a given course of action is hard, and as you add more people to the picture, the problem gets harder. It's hard enough to get half a dozen people in your group-chat to agree on where to go for dinner or what board-game to play. But once you're reliant on a social media service to stay in touch with friends, relatives around the world, customers, communities (say, rare disease support groups), and coordination (like organizing your kid's little league car-pool), the problem becomes nearly insoluble. Maybe you can convince your overseas relatives to switch to a Signal group, but can you do the same for your small business's customers, or your old high-school pals?

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/29/how-to-leave-dying-social-media-platforms/

Taken together, switching costs and collective action problems make platforms "sticky," and sticky platforms inevitably enshittify.

Platforms, after all, generate value. They connect end-users with each other (say, little league parents) and they connect end-users to business customers (you and your small business's customers). That value needs to be parceled out among end users, business customers, and the platform's shareholders. A platform can make life better for business customers at its end users' expense by increasing the number of ads (hello, Youtube!), and it can make life better for its shareholders at its business customers' expense by decreasing the share of ad revenue given to publishers or performers (oh, hello again, Youtube!).

From a platform's perspective, the ideal state is one in which end users and business customers get no value from the platform, because it's all being captured by the platform's shareholders. But if Youtube interrupted every 30 seconds of video for ten minutes of ads and paid the video creators nothing, both users and creators would ditch the platform – and advertisers would follow:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dab8sKg8Ko8

So platforms seek an equilibrium: "what is the least value we apportion to end-users and business customers without triggering their departure?" Maybe that means giving more value to end-users (for example, keeping Uber fares low by suppressing wages), or to business-customers (crowding more ads into your social media feed).

Every business – including brick-and-mortar, non-digitized ones – wants to find some kind of equilibrium between the value going to its suppliers, its customers and its owners, but digital businesses have an advantage here: digital systems are flexible in ways that analog, hard-goods businesses are not. Digital businesses can alter pricing, payouts and other dynamics from moment to moment – second to second – and make a different offer to every supplier and customer. They have a bunch of knobs, and they can twiddle them at will:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/19/twiddler/

Well, not quite at will. Businesses face constraints on their twiddling. If they get too greedy, users or business customers might weigh the cost of staying against the switching costs and decide it's not worth it. But the more expensive – the more painful – a platform can make leaving, the more pain they can inflict on the people who stay.

In other words, there's two ways to keep a customer or supplier's business: you can make a better service so they won't want to leave, or you can make leaving the service so painful that they stay even if you mistreat them.

There's three ways a digital company can make things worse for their customers and users without losing their business.

First, they can eliminate competition (think of Mark Zuckerberg buying Instagram to recapture the users who'd fled Facebook to escape his poor management):

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/03/big-tech-cant-stop-telling-on-itself/

Second, they can capture their regulators and avoid punishment for trampling their suppliers' or users' legal rights (think of how Amazon has raised the price of everything we buy, both on- and off Amazon, through its "most favored nation" deals):

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/25/greedflation/#commissar-bezos

Third, they can use IP law to prevent competitors from modifying their services to claw back some of that value (think of how Apple used legal threats to block an Android version of Imessage, blocking Apple customers from having private conversations that included non-Apple customers:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/12/youre-holding-it-wrong/#if-dishwashers-were-iphones

Companies can't just use this tricks at will, of course. Antitrust laws can block companies from making anticompetitve acquisitions or mergers. Regulators can punish companies for cheating their customers, workers and users. Technologists can come up with clever ways of modding or reconfiguring existing services with "interoperable" add-ons that let users bargain for better treatment by refusing to accept worse:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/adblocking-how-about-nah

Day in, day out, the decision-makers at tech companies test these constraints, twisting the knobs that shift value away from users to shareholders. Their bosses and boards motivate them with "KPIs" that dangle the promise of huge bonuses and promotions for any manager who successfully enshittifies part of the company's products:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/28/microincentives-and-enshittification/

Decades of pro-corporate, pro-monopoly policy has loosened those knobs. 40 years of lax antitrust meant that companies had a lot of leeway to buy or merge with rivals – that's changing today, but it's tough sledding:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/14/making-good-trouble/#the-peoples-champion

As sectors grew more concentrated, they found it easier to capture their regulators, so that they no longer fear punishment for price-gouging, spying, or wage-theft, so applying the same amount of torque to the "break the law" knob cranks it a lot further:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/05/regulatory-capture/

Once you've captured your regulators, you can aim them at your competitors. A monopoly-friendly policy environment has transformed IP law into a bully's charter, allowing powerful companies to strangle would-be competitors who dare to offer their customers tools to shield themselves from enshittification, like scrapers, ad-blockers and alternative clients. Big companies can crank the enshittification knob all the way over and know that smaller rivals knobs won't turn at all:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/20/benevolent-dictators/#felony-contempt-of-business-model

At one point, bosses faced one more constraint on knob-twiddling: their workforce. Many tech workers genuinely cared about their users' welfare, something bosses encouraged as a sneaky trick to get techies to put in long hours without exercising their leverage by quitting rather than destroying their lives to meet arbitrary deadlines. These workers would fearlessly slap their bosses' hands when they reached for the enshittification knob, threatening to quit rather than allowing the products they'd given so much for to be enshittified. Today, after hundreds of thousands of tech layoffs, tech workers are far less like to challenge their bosses' right to twiddle, and far more likely to get fired if they try:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/10/the-proletarianization-of-tech-workers/

All this means that tech bosses don't have to change their approach at all, and yet, their services will grow steadily worse. The boss who twiddles the enshittification knob in exactly the same way as he did a year or a decade ago will find it turning much further, because his customers are locked into his platform, his regulators won't protect them, the same regulators will stop his competitors' attempts at countertwiddling, and his workers fear losing their jobs too much to speak up for their users.

That's the contagion that produced the enshittocene: the forces that constrained companies (competition, regulation, self-help and labor – all melted away, allowing every company's MBA-poisoned knob-twiddling leaders to shamelessly caress their knobs with every hour that God sends:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/30/go-nuts-meine-kerle/#ich-bin-ein-bratapfel

Which is why people want to leave platforms. When a platform loses its users, those users have weighed the switching costs against the pain of staying and decided that it's better to bear those costs than to stay.

So why have Tiktok's younger users found the costs too high to bear, and why have their elders remained stuck to the platform?

For that, we have to look at the unique characteristics of young people – characteristics that transcend the lazy cliche that kids are easily bored, fickle novelty-seekers who hop from one service to another with unquenchable restlessness.

Whether or not kids are novelty-seekers, they are, fundamentally, a disfavored minority. They want to do things that the platforms don't want them to do – like converse without being overheard by authority figures, including their parents and their schools (also: cops and future employers, though kids may not be thinking about them as much).

In other words, kids pay intrinsically lower switching costs than adults, because a platform will always do less for them than it will for grownups. This is a characteristic kids share with other supposedly technophilic, novelty-seeking "early adopters," from sex-workers to terrorists, from sexual minorities to trolls, from political dissidents to fascists. For those groups, the cost of mastering a new technology and assembling a community around it is always more likely to be worth bearing than it would be for people who are well-served by existing tools:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/21/early-adopters/#sex-tech

Pornographers didn't jump on home video because of its superiority as a medium for capturing flesh-tones. Home video was a good porn medium because it was easier to discreetly get into the hands of porn consumers, who could, in turn, discreetly view it. The audience for porn in the privacy of your living room is larger than the audience for porn that you can only watch if you're willing to be seen marching into a dirty movie theater.

Every new technology is popularized by a mix of disfavored groups and neophiles, who normalize and refine it – and yes, infuse it with their countercultural coolth – until it becomes easy enough to use to become mainstream. As more normies drift into the new system, the switching costs associated with leaving the old system declines. It gets easier and easier to find the people and services you want in the new realm, and harder and harder to find them in the old one.

This is why tech platforms have historically experienced sudden collapse: the platform that gets more valuable and harder to leave as it accumulates users gets less valuable and easier to leave as users depart:

https://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2022/12/05/what-if-failure-is-the-plan.html

If you're a Gen Z kid on Tiktok, you experience the same enshittification as your Millennial elders. But you also experience an additional cost to staying: as late-arriving adult authority figures become more fluent in the platform, they are more able to observe your use of it, and punish you for conduct that you used to get away with.

And if you're a Millennial who isn't leaving Tiktok, it's not just that you experience the same enshittification as those departing Gen Z kids – you also face higher switching costs if you go. The older you get, the more complex your social connections grow. A Gen Z kid in middle school doesn't have to worry about losing touch with their high-school buddies if they switch platforms (they haven't gone to high school yet – and they see their middle school friends in person all the time, giving them a side-channel to share information about who's leaving Tiktok and where they're headed to next). Middle-schoolers don't have to worry about coordinating little league car-pools or losing access to a rare disease support group.

In other words: younger people leave old platforms earlier because they have more to gain by leaving; and older people leave old platforms later because they have more to lose by leaving.

This is why Facebook is filled with Boomers. Yes, their kids bolted for the exits to avoid having their parents (or grandparents) wading into their sexual, social and professional lives. But the reason the Boomers were late joining younger users' Facebook exodus – or the reason they never joined it – is that they stand to lose more by going. Facebook deliberately cultivated this dynamic, for example, by creating a photo hosting service designed to entice users into uploading their family photos while disguising how hard it would be to take those photos with them if they left:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/08/facebooks-secret-war-switching-costs

The irony here is that tech has intrinsically low switching costs. All other things being equal, a new platform can always build a bridge to ease the passage of users from the old one. There's no (technical) reason that moving to Mastodon, or Bluesky, or any other platform should mean cutting ties with the people who stayed behind.

A combination of voluntary interoperability (where old platforms offer APIs to allow new services to connect with them), mandatory interop (where governments force tech companies to offer APIs) and adversarial interop (where new companies hack together their own API with reverse-engineering, scraping, bots, and other guerrilla tactics) would hypothetically allow users to hop between networks as easily as you change phone carriers:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/19/better-failure/#let-my-tweeters-go

Tech platforms tend to offer APIs when they're getting started (to ease the inward passage of new users) then shut them down after they attain dominance (locking the door behind those users). The EU is tinkering with mandatory APIs through the Digital Markets Act (though bafflingly, they're starting with encrypted messaging rather than social media). Restoring adversarial interoperability will require extensive legal reform, which is getting started through Right to Repair laws:

https://www.techdirt.com/2024/03/13/oregon-passes-right-to-repair-law-apple-lobbied-to-kill/

The people who are stranded on social media platforms shouldn't be mistaken for uncool, aging technophobes. They're not stubborn, they're stranded. Like the elders who can't afford to leave a dying town after the factory shuts down and the young people move away, these people are locked in. They need help evacuating – a place to go and a path to get there.

Name your price for 18 of my DRM-free ebooks and support the Electronic Frontier Foundation with the Humble Cory Doctorow Bundle.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/21/involuntary-die-hards/#evacuate-the-platformsr

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

Matt Wuerker, Politico

* * * *

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

October 30, 2023

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

OCT 31, 2023

After three weeks without a speaker, the House today tackled one of the key items on its agenda: providing additional funding for Israel and Ukraine. Immediately, the majority under Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) made it clear that they have every intention of pushing their extremist agenda. Despite pressure from Republican Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), they have split funding for Israel away from the funding for Ukraine and funding for humanitarian assistance for Ukraine, Israel, and Gaza that President Biden has requested.

They have gone further, though, to push the far right’s agenda. The House Republicans’ $14.3 billion aid package for Israel claims that it will “offset” that spending by taking $14.3 billion from funding for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) passed by Congress in the Inflation Reduction Act. But this “offset” is nothing of the sort: funding the IRS brings in significantly more than it costs. For each dollar spent auditing the top 1% of U.S. earners, the IRS brought in $3.18; for each dollar spent auditing the top 0.1%, it brought in $6.29.

In September the IRS noted that it recovered $38 million in delinquent taxes from 175 high-income taxpayers within a few months and would be increasing that effort. A 2021 study showed that people whose income is in the top 1% of earners fail to report more than 20% of their earnings to the IRS. 

The House measure, providing aid for Israel only if Democrats agree to set aside Ukraine and Gaza and permit rich people to cheat on their taxes, will set up a fight with the Senate. 

Tonight, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre released a statement saying the Republicans’ politicization of our national security interests is a “nonstarter. Demanding offsets for meeting core national security needs of the United States—like supporting Israel and defending Ukraine from atrocities and Russian imperialism—would be a break with the normal, bipartisan process and could have devastating implications for our safety and alliances in the years ahead.”

She noted that there is strong bipartisan agreement that it is in our national security interest to stop the suffering of innocent people in Gaza, “help Ukraine defend its sovereignty against appalling crimes being committed by Russian forces against thousands of innocent civilians,” and invest more in border security. 

“Threatening to undermine American national security unless House Republicans can help the wealthy and big corporations cheat on their taxes—which would increase the deficit—is the definition of backwards,” she said.

The chaos among the Republicans and the emergence of a Christian nationalist as their choice to lead the House seem to have drawn increased attention to the successes of the president. 

Today, for example, the United Auto Workers announced a tentative deal with General Motors, marking the third such agreement in the union’s six-week strike against GM, Ford, and Stellantis. The agreements include a 25% raise in base wages over 4.5 years, after years in which workers’ pay did not keep up with inflation. The agreements will also protect workers against the conversion to electric vehicles, helping unionized workers to make the transition to a green economy, and reopen certain closed plants.

As Jeanne Whalen noted in the Washington Post, this agreement comes after United Parcel Service (UPS) workers this summer won their strongest contract in decades and 75,000 striking Kaiser healthcare workers won strong wage increases. 

Biden was the first president to join a picket line when he stood with the UAW. Today, he said: “Today's historic agreement is yet another piece of good economic news showing something I have always believed: Worker power…is critical to building an economy from the middle out and the bottom up…. We’re finally beginning to build an economy that works for working people, for the middle class, for the entire…country, including the companies.  

“Because when we do that, the poor have a ladder up, the middle class does well, and the wealthy still do very well. We all do well.”

As Michael Tomasky put it in The New Republic, “We have a president who takes seriously the fundamental economic fact of American life of the last 40 years, which is that trillions of dollars of wealth have been transferred from the lower and middle classes to the top 1 percent, and even to the top 0.1 percent. Moreover, it’s rivetingly clear that he thinks that it’s long past time to get that river flowing in the other direction.”

In The Bulwark, Jill Lawrence wrote that Biden has a “surprising focus on the future” as he “moves to meet U.S. challenges that former President Donald Trump largely ignored, failed at, or made worse.” She noted Biden’s achievement of infrastructure legislation after Trump failed, and contrasted Biden’s successful CHIPS and Science Act with the trade war of the Trump years, which cost as many as 245,000 jobs and so badly hurt midwestern farmers that 90% of the proceeds from Trump’s tariffs went to bail them out.

Biden also has looked forward by pushing and securing the Inflation Reduction Act, which invests in a transition to a green economy.

But Lawrence’s focus was primarily on today’s sweeping executive order on artificial intelligence, an order Politico called “the most significant single effort to impose national order on a technology that has shocked many people with its rapid growth.” The administration has been working to establish responsible AI practices, recognizing the need to address discriminatory algorithms, data privacy violations, and deep fakes.

Today, Biden signed an executive order requiring companies to share safety information about their systems before allowing them to be used, in order to make sure they don’t pose a safety or a national security risk. It orders the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security to secure critical infrastructure. It will require AI-generated content to bear a watermark that clearly labels it. It will protect personal data, and Biden promised he would ask Congress for legislation to pass bipartisan legislation to stop technology companies from collecting the personal data of children and teenagers, to ban advertising directed at children, and to limit companies’ collection of personal data in general.  

The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a technology think tank, applauded the order, saying its guidelines set “a clear course for the United States…. With this EO, the United States is demonstrating it takes AI oversight seriously.”

Vice President Kamala Harris will attend the two-day AI Safety Summit meeting in the United Kingdom on November 1–2 as the European Union closes in on laws about artificial intelligence that would enable the E.U. to shut down services that harm society. The E.U. has been ahead of the U.S. in its regulation of the internet: in August 2023 its Digital Services Act went into effect, requiring users to agree to the use of their personal data for targeted advertising and requiring digital platforms to police the disinformation on their platforms. Most of the companies it regulates are based in the United States.

—

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

[leveragehunters]

Attention all my Aussie peeps (and only Aussie peeps, sorry): free books

I am out of bookshelf space and have to cull something, so Patricia Briggs' Mercy Thompson and Alpha and Omega series are on the chopping block.

These are books 1-11 of Mercy Thompson, primarily in hardcover, and books 1-3 and 5 of the related Alpha and Omega series (book 4 seems to have absconded!), along with Shifting Shadows, a 'world of Mercy Thompson' anthology containing the first Alpha and Omega story. The hardcovers are in excellent/as new condition; the paperbacks have some minor spine creasing.

Both series are werewolf/shifter, heavy on pack dynamics/politics, with a side order of Fae and vampires. They're overall quite enjoyable, although issues including lack of queer representation/the way it's handled have been noted by fans and critics alike, but if you enjoy werewolves, you'll probably enjoy these. (Note they are not A/B/O). The covers are gorgeous.

If you're in Australia, or have an Australian address I can send a courier parcel to, they're yours, free of charge. I'll pick up the postage costs; I'd just like them to have a good home instead of getting dumped in the Lifeline bin.

If you're interested, send me a Tumblr Ask by midnight on Saturday, September 2nd 2023 Brisbane time and I'll give you my email to send me your address. Please do not put your postal address in a Tumblr message!

If more than one person puts their hand up before Saturday midnight, I'll RNG for who gets them.

[murumokirby360]

My PC Cooling Upgrades Review - Part 1 [Second Half] (w/ my paper dolls) [Recorded on Jun 9th, 2023]

Hello, June! Here's the continuation of "My PC Cooling Upgrades" Part 1 (featuring my paper dolls). 🙂

If you haven't seen my "First Half", then please [CLICK ME!].

So, without further ado, let's get started!

29th to 31st Image(s) ↑:

• Alright! Moving on to other items 📦📦, now what item should we open? 🤔

32nd & 33rd Image(s) ↑:

• My paper dolls says "Why not both?". Good idea! 😄Tada! Two items had been revealed! And I know the PC fan was misleading & un-advertised to the box, but, we'll get to that in a bit.😉

34th to 36th Image(s) ↑:

• Now, you've already seen this before during my unwrapping parcels, right? So, here's the 4-pin fan splitter connector for my Motherboard. And the reason to buy is because I need more than one PC fan to get the ventilation going & prevent from overheat the hardware components (including the motherboard) 🌡️💨❄️🖥️. I wish I could buy more than three slots (w/ more PC fans), but since my tower case is an old style, I guess this will do (for now). 🙂

37th to 41st Image(s) ↑:

• [37th to 39th Images] Lastly is the 80mm 12V PC fan with w/a blue light strip around closer the transparent fan blades. Sure, an affordable normal PC fan is fine but also boring. So, why not get this? Because the transparent fan is rad & a colorful LED light strip (which depending on what color you choose, so I picked "Blue") was icing on the computer cake (no pun intended). 🥰💙💡

• [40th & 41st Images] Also, I was expecting to be a 4-pin fan connector, but instead, this mini fan has a Molex connector; in both male & female ports. And you know what, I'm okay with that, a single Molex slot should make room for it. And I can't secure the PC fan without a pack of four screw bolts.🙂

42nd to 43rd Image(s) ↑:

• And there you have it, my trio of items for my PC cooling upgrade! Hope these will delivered a solid worth, and my paper dolls agrees! We can't wait to install these goodies! 😁🖥

BTW: I haven't talk about my current PC. Well... It went horrible, on June 7th. Hours after I record the video & posted. 🖥😟 And you noticed, I covered my monitor with a fiber cloth. I'll spare the details when I make "Part 2".

Overall & Asking Price:

• Problem aside, I hope these will make cooldown the heat of the CPU chip & other internal components. Although, I have one last item that I need to purchase. ☝️ But sadly, I need to earn just a little bit. 🤏💵 So I guess I'll cover it, in the coming months once I bought the last item.

• As for the "Asking Price", here are the ff.:

○ Jonsbo CR-1400 from EasyPC (Shopee PH site) - cost ₱ 699 - 755 (Free Shipping Fee in voucher) in Black or White colors available

○ 80mm 12V PC Fan from ogamma-ph (Shopee PH site) - cost ₱ 75 (Shipping Fee ₱46) in Red, Blue, White, and RGB LED light colors in different sizes (There's also selling an actual PCCooler FX-12CM RGB for ₱129)

○ PWM PC Fan Splitter from Meuc Store (Shopee PH site) - cost ₱50 - 75 (Shipping Fee ₱38) depending how many ports you want

SIDE NOTE: I didn't buy anything from Lazada PH, so its a nice for me to change. 😊🛒🌐🇵🇭

Well, that's all for now. And you haven't seen my previous month, then please [CLICK ME!].

Tagged: @lordromulus90, @bryan360, @carmenramcat, @leapant, @rafacaz4lisam2k4, @paektu, @alexander1301

[timesofinnovation]

Ultra-fast-fashion giant Shein revealed plans to invest €250 million in British and European designers and circularity initiatives over the next five years. This move seeks to tackle regulatory crackdowns on "fast fashion" and gain support for a potential London IPO. Shein introduced a €200 million circularity fund targeting textile-to-textile recycling and innovation, encouraging co-investment from other entities. An additional €50 million will aid UK and EU fashion businesses in joining Shein's marketplace and support its Shein X incubator program. These efforts aim to alleviate issues and controversies hindering Shein's public offering ambitions. Shein, having filed confidential IPO papers in London last month, has faced criticism for its supply-chain practices, product safety, and environmental impact. Founded in 2012, Shein's rapid rise involves a hyper-efficient manufacturing model producing new styles in small batches at low costs. The company's gross merchandise value was reportedly around $45 billion in 2023, potentially marking its London IPO as one of the largest globally this year. Amidst US-China tensions, Shein's original New York listing plans were disrupted. Now, it contends with European regulations targeting fast fashion, aiming to bridge loopholes that allow low-value parcels to evade duties and fees faced by high-volume fashion retailers. Shein's executive chairman Donald Tang noted the company's focus on "compliance and circularity," emphasizing its "on demand" fashion model that scales production based on clear demand, thus reducing waste. Despite last year's €200 million fund being a small portion of Shein's reported $2 billion profits, leveraging its market presence could substantially support innovators. Though full mechanics of the fund are still developing, Tang highlighted "enthusiastic feedback" from venture communities. “Shein's tradition is waste reduction," said Tang, describing this initiative as the beginning of their efforts in circularity.

[seosmo2024]

The Rise of Sustainability and Social Responsibility in Modern Marketing

Today in this fast-moving digital world, consumers, while making a purchase, they are not buying the products but the brand and the values with which they resonate. This realization has given birth to an upcoming trend in marketing today: putting emphasis on sustainability and social responsibility. As businesses play catch to these ever-evolving tastes and preferences of the consumers, it has blossomed from being a moral pursuit to a fundamental success determinant to align such noble ideals in its core strategy, merely by the integration of ethical practice. 

Why Matters of Sustainability and Social Responsibility Count

Modern consumers are better informed and more cautious than ever. They are evolving into being conscious of the implications of their choices on the world and people in their circumference. In a study published early this year, it was reported that traffic to sustainability-related content on major e-commerce platforms rose with as much as 187% between 2022 and 2023. This statistic is a clear indicator that consumers are actively seeking out brands that align with their values.

Sustainability and social responsibility are therefore not esoteric or niche interests but rather part and parcel of the brand itself. Companies such as Patagonia and Ben & Jerry's have made a name for themselves in the world not just because they speak out for environmental and social causes but because these values are now a part of their business models. This tenet captures the hearts and minds of consumers who are purchasing with purpose.

The Business Case for Ethical Marketing

The ethical argument for maintainability and social responsibility may be strong, but the business argument is every bit as strong. Many responsible brands create an increase in customer loyalty, enhance brand value, and create a better market position for the premium share. In fact, authentically responsible companies often find these mean bottom-line profits.

One of the most effective strategies in this realm is authentic, value-based communication. When going beyond conventional marketing slogans and embracing real relationships with customers, for instance, companies that present their success in the area of sustainability or induce customers to more ethical actions are always the ones worthy of more trust and loyalty. Because today's consumers do not just buy products, they buy experiences and identity that mirror their own values.

Building genuine relationships through storytelling

Storytelling is one of the strongest tools in the field of sustainability marketing. Those brands making their ethical practices articulate in the form of interesting stories are most likely going to gain engagement from the consumers. For instance, giving the consumers a view on how a product is made that involves all the sustainable practices can make an ordinary buying experience feel special.

Here is where user-generated content (UGC) performs excellently well. When a third party shares their story and sells the experience of using a brand's product, it adds a level of authenticity that advertising never can. According to research, 61% of Gen Z prefers user-generated content to any other form of content, so bridging that gap is mandatory to reach a younger demographic.

 Challenges and Opportunities

While the benefits of sustainability and social responsibility are clear, it is actually the implementation that becomes tricky. Issues run from increased costs to complex supply chains and the necessity for transparency. But again, these challenges too show openings for innovation.

Brands that can pass through these challenges perform the best in competitive markets. Furthermore, the companies investing in sustainable technologies or adapting models of a circular economy not only decrease their ecological fingerprints but also create a new business opportunity. More than that, as consumers continue to grow smarter, it is very likely that only the brands showing genuine commitment to social responsibility will have the upper hand in winning their trust.

The Future of Sustainable Marketing

Sustainability and social responsibility in marketing are probably growing into the 21st century. Consumers are, time and again, placing brands under high demands that they stand against many natural and social issues. This will lead businesses to adopt such values in the business strategy, not as tools of marketing but in facing branding identity.

Tomorrow, marketing will be more about engagement with consumers at a values level. Those able to authentically engage with their audience, to show their sustainability commitment in actions rather than just talk, and tell a compelling social impact story will be the brands of the future.  

Conclusion 

 In recent years, sustainability and social responsibility are not optional in modern marketing. They are elemental parts of effective brand practice. They will help those practicing the values build strong relationships with their consumers and edge out a competitive advantage at the same time, in this awakening marketplace. Looking ahead, the brands that are genuinely going to stand out are those that balance profitability with purpose—creating value beyond shareholders but for society as a whole.

[unitedstatesofworld]

How a Woman Defrauded the Postal Service: The Shocking Details Revealed

In one of the most shocking cases of woman defrauded postal service in recent years, Juan “Angela” Chen, a 51-year-old woman from Walnut, California, masterminded a scheme that defrauded the United States Postal Service (USPS) out of over $150 million. Alongside her business partner, Chuanhua “Hugh” Hu, Chen used fake postage labels to send millions of packages across the country, costing the USPS millions of dollars. But how did she manage to pull off such an audacious crime? Let’s dive into the details of this elaborate scheme and uncover the shocking truth behind it.

Who Is Juan “Angela” Chen?

Juan “Angela” Chen may have appeared as an ordinary businesswoman, but her actions revealed a different side. Originally from Walnut, California, Chen operated a package shipping business that catered primarily to China-based companies. Her business partner, Chuanhua “Hugh” Hu, played a significant role in the operation until his sudden departure to China in 2019. Despite Hu’s exit, Chen continued to oversee the business, which would soon become the center of a massive postal fraud investigation.

Chen’s background is relatively obscure, but what’s clear is that she had a knack for business and a willingness to exploit the system for financial gain. Her partnership with Hu enabled them to build a thriving enterprise, albeit one built on deception and fraud.

The Scheme Unveiled

So, how did Chen and Hu manage to defraud the USPS to the tune of $150 million? The answer lies in a cunning strategy that involved the use of fake postage labels. From 2020 to 2023, Chen and Hu sent more than 34 million parcels using these counterfeit labels, avoiding the hefty postage fees that would have otherwise applied.

The scheme was as simple as it was effective. By creating and using fake postage labels, Chen was able to ship packages without paying the required fees, thus pocketing the money that should have gone to the USPS. The scale of the operation was enormous, with millions of packages being sent out over the course of three years.

The Role of Chuanhua “Hugh” Hu

Chuanhua “Hugh” Hu was not just a silent partner in this fraudulent operation; he was instrumental in its execution. Hu, who was based in Industry, California, worked closely with Chen to serve China-based companies looking to ship packages to the United States. His knowledge of the shipping industry, coupled with his technical expertise, made him a key player in the scheme.

However, in 2019, Hu fled to China, leaving Chen to continue the operation on her own. Despite his departure, Chen managed to keep the business running smoothly, continuing to defraud the USPS without missing a beat. Hu’s escape to China not only left Chen in a precarious position but also raised suspicions among authorities, ultimately leading to the unraveling of their scheme.

The Financial Impact on USPS

The financial toll of Chen and Hu’s actions on the USPS was staggering. Over the course of three years, the fraudulent activities resulted in losses exceeding $150 million. The use of fake postage labels meant that the USPS was effectively providing services for free, with no revenue to offset the costs.

To put this into perspective, more than 34 million parcels were shipped using these counterfeit labels. The sheer volume of packages involved made it nearly impossible for the USPS to detect the fraud initially. However, once the extent of the scheme was uncovered, the financial implications became all too clear. The loss of $150 million is not just a significant blow to the USPS’s bottom line but also a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within the postal system.

The Legal Consequences

When the authorities finally caught up with Chen, the legal consequences were severe. In her plea deal, Chen admitted to her role in the scheme and agreed to forfeit the stolen funds. This included money from her bank accounts, as well as assets such as insurance policies and properties in California.

While the exact amount of restitution is still being determined, Chen could face up to five years in prison for her crimes. The legal system is expected to make an example out of her, sending a clear message that such fraudulent activities will not be tolerated. Chen’s admission of guilt is a significant step towards justice, but the full impact of her actions will be felt for years to come.

The Aftermath

With Chen’s admission and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, the question remains: What happens next? For the USPS, this scandal serves as a wake-up call. The postal service is likely to implement stricter measures to prevent similar fraud in the future, including more advanced tracking and verification systems for postage labels.

For Chen, the future looks bleak. Her once-thriving business is now in ruins, and she faces the prospect of spending years behind bars. The broader implications of this case are also significant, as it highlights the need for increased oversight and regulation in the postal service industry. The ripple effects of this scandal will likely be felt across the industry, prompting other companies to review their practices and ensure they are in compliance with the law.

Conclusion

The case of Juan “Angela” Chen and Chuanhua “Hugh” Hu is a stark reminder of the lengths some individuals will go to for financial gain. By exploiting vulnerabilities in the USPS system, they managed to defraud the postal service out of over $150 million. However, their actions have not gone unpunished, and Chen now faces the consequences of her crimes. As the postal service continues to recover from this scandal, it’s clear that vigilance and stricter regulations are needed to prevent similar frauds in the future. The story of Chen and Hu serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us that no system is infallible and that the pursuit of justice will always prevail.

[industrynewsupdates]

Driving Business Growth with Courier, Express, and Parcel Services Procurement Intelligence

The courier, express, and parcel services category is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4.2% from 2023 to 2030. The growth of e-commerce is one of the main drivers of the growth of the CEP services market. E-commerce is growing rapidly, and this is leading to an increase in the demand for CEP services. Businesses that sell goods online need to be able to deliver their goods quickly and efficiently to their customers. CEP providers can help businesses do this by providing a variety of delivery services, such as next-day delivery and express delivery.

The North America courier, express, and parcel market is expected to grow rapidly due to factors like economic growth, e-commerce sales, and demand for faster, more reliable delivery services. Technological advancements, such as self-driving trucks, and government initiatives like logistics hub construction are expected to drive market growth. Globalization has increased trade-related activities, necessitating reliable and efficient delivery services.

Companies are continuously focusing on collaborating with technology providers while enhancing their capacities by setting up new hubs in various regions to stay competitive in the market. For instance,

• In January 2022, the Mexican government announced that it would be investing $90 million in the construction of a new logistics hub in Yucatán. The hub will be located in the municipality of Umán. The hub will be equipped with state-of-the-art technology and infrastructure, including a sorting facility, a warehouse, and a fleet of vehicles. It will be able to handle a variety of cargo, including goods from the manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism industries.

• In April 2021, DHL Global Forwarding (DHL GF), a subsidiary of Deutsche Post DHL Group, expanded its presence in Africa by signing a joint venture agreement with Unicargas, a leading logistics company in Angola. The agreement will allow DHL GF to offer a wider range of logistics services in Angola and other countries in Central and Southern Africa.

• In September 2021, in a test project with self-driving truck startup Aurora and heavy-duty vehicle manufacturer Paccar, FedEx Corp. began transporting cargo between Dallas and Houston using self-driving trucks. The self-driving trucks are outfitted with Level 4 autonomous driving technology from Aurora, which enables them to function under some circumstances without human supervision. A safety driver will also be in the truck to handle any emergency.

Order your copy of the Courier, Express, and Parcel Services Procurement Intelligence Report, 2023 - 2030, published by Grand View Research, to get more details regarding day one, quick wins, portfolio analysis, key negotiation strategies of key suppliers, and low-cost/best-cost sourcing analysis

Courier, Express, and Parcel Services Sourcing Intelligence Highlights

• The global courier, express, and parcel services category is fragmented and highly competitive, with the presence of several players in the market. To grow their market share, firms in the industry are adopting crucial strategies like opening new distribution centers, mergers, and smart warehouses.

• The major cost components in this category are fuel costs, labor costs, vehicle costs, insurance costs, and administrative costs.

• China's dominance as a sourcing destination for this category is due to its large and growing manufacturing sector, strategic location in the center of Asia, infrastructure development, and government policies.

List of Key Suppliers in the Courier, Express, and Parcel Services Category

• A1 Express Delivery Service Inc

• Aramex International LLC

• Deutsche Post DHL Group

• DTDC Express Ltd

• FedEx Corp.

• SF Express (Group) Co. Ltd

• Poste Italiane SpA

• Qantas Courier Limited

• United Parcel Service Inc.

• SG Holdings Co. Ltd.

Browse through Grand View Research’s collection of procurement intelligence studies:

• Flexible Packaging Procurement Intelligence Report, 2023 - 2030 (Revenue Forecast, Supplier Ranking & Matrix, Emerging Technologies, Pricing Models, Cost Structure, Engagement & Operating Model, Competitive Landscape)

• Commercial Print Services Procurement Intelligence Report, 2023 - 2030 (Revenue Forecast, Supplier Ranking & Matrix, Emerging Technologies, Pricing Models, Cost Structure, Engagement & Operating Model, Competitive Landscape)

Courier, Express, and Parcel Services Procurement Intelligence Report Scope 

• Courier, Express, and Parcel Services Category Growth Rate: CAGR of 4.2% from 2023 to 2030

• Pricing Growth Outlook: 3% - 4% (Annually)

• Pricing Models: Value-based pricing, volume-based pricing

• Supplier Selection Scope: Cost and pricing, past engagements, geographical presence

• Supplier Selection Criteria: Pricing, network, technology, customer service, flexibility, and security

• Report Coverage: Revenue forecast, supplier ranking, supplier positioning matrix, emerging technology, pricing models, cost structure, competitive landscape, growth factors, trends, engagement, and operating model

Brief about Pipeline by Grand View Research:

A smart and effective supply chain is essential for growth in any organization. Pipeline division at Grand View Research provides detailed insights on every aspect of supply chain, which helps in efficient procurement decisions.

Our services include (not limited to):

• Market Intelligence involving – market size and forecast, growth factors, and driving trends

• Price and Cost Intelligence – pricing models adopted for the category, total cost of ownerships

• Supplier Intelligence – rich insight on supplier landscape, and identifies suppliers who are dominating, emerging, lounging, and specializing

• Sourcing / Procurement Intelligence – best practices followed in the industry, identifying standard KPIs and SLAs, peer analysis, negotiation strategies to be utilized with the suppliers, and best suited countries for sourcing to minimize supply chain disruptions

[pluginhiveblogs]

Canada Post Small Business Discounts for WooCommerce - Unlock Savings and Simplify Shipping

In the bustling world of e-commerce, where every click counts, small businesses in Canada are constantly seeking ways to boost their efficiency and cut costs. One of the most critical aspects of this journey is shipping, and finding the right solution can make all the difference. If you're running your online store on WooCommerce and you're based in Canada, you're in luck. In this blog post, we'll explore how the combination of WooCommerce, Canada Post, and PluginHive's WooCommerce Canada Post plugin can help you unlock significant savings and simplify your shipping operations.

WooCommerce: A Perfect Match for Small Businesses

Woo is a powerful e-commerce platform that provides a seamless experience for both business owners and customers. It's renowned for its flexibility and scalability, making it an ideal choice for small businesses looking to establish a solid online presence. If your business is based in Canada, the integration with Canada Post becomes even more appealing, thanks to the savings it can offer.

Canada Post: Your Shipping Ally

Shipping plays a pivotal role in the e-commerce ecosystem, and Canada Post / Postes Canada understands the unique challenges faced by small businesses. Their Solutions for Small Business™ program is designed to provide comprehensive shipping solutions, including Canada-wide access, a variety of shipping speeds, and exclusive discounts. For WooCommerce store owners, this translates to simplified shipping management and cost savings.

One of the standout features for small businesses is the opportunity to save on lightweight packages. Until the end of the year, users can enjoy up to 15% off light shipping with Canada Post. And the best part? No promo code is needed! This discount is automatically applied when you use Canada Post services through WooCommerce.

PluginHive's WooCommerce Canada Post Plugin: Streamlining Savings

To maximize the benefits of WooCommerce, Canada Post, and the discounts offered, consider integrating PluginHive's WooCommerce Canada Post plugin into your e-commerce setup. It's worth mentioning that the discounts are generously provided by Canada Post itself, not by PluginHive. What PluginHive's WooCommerce Canada Post plugin does is serve as the bridge that allows you to effortlessly tap into these reduced shipping rates, right within your WooCommerce store. This way, you can enjoy the savings offered by Canada Post until December 31, 2023, without any hassle.

Key Features of PluginHive's WooCommerce Canada Post Plugin:

1. Real-Time Shipping Rates: Get accurate, real-time shipping rates from Canada Post based on package weight and destination.

2. Shipping Label Generation: Easily generate and print shipping labels directly from your WooCommerce store, saving you time and effort.

3. Package Tracking: Provide your customers with tracking information so they can follow their orders every step of the way.

4. Multiple Shipping Services: Access a variety of Canada Post shipping services, including Expedited Parcel™, Xpresspost™, and Priority™.

5. Automated Shipping: Automate your shipping process, reducing errors and ensuring a smooth shipping experience for both you and your customers.

The Power of Tiered Savings

As your small business grows, so do your shipping needs. Canada Post recognizes this and rewards your loyalty with tiered savings. The more you ship, the more you save. Your savings level, ranging from 1-4, is adjusted quarterly based on your shipping spend over the past 12 months. This unique feature ensures that you're always benefiting from your evolving shipping requirements.

Easy Account Management

Monitoring your savings levels and discounts is straightforward with Canada Post. You can quickly check your spending history, the number of mail pieces you've sent, and what you need to do to qualify for the next discount level through their user-friendly online portal.

Conclusion: Simplify and Save with WooCommerce

In the competitive world of e-commerce, every cost-saving opportunity matters. WooCommerce, in partnership with Canada Post and facilitated by PluginHive's WooCommerce Canada Post plugin, empowers small businesses to streamline their shipping operations, unlock significant savings, and focus on what they do best—serving their customers. If you're a small business owner in Canada, harness these tools today to take your e-commerce business to new heights.

[credenceresearchdotblog]

The global demand for Commercial Drone was valued at USD 19482.5 Million in 2022 and is expected to reach USD 56756.3 Million in 2030, growing at a CAGR of 14.30% between 2023 and 2030.In recent years, the commercial drone market has experienced unprecedented growth, evolving from a niche technology into a mainstream tool with vast applications. The development of drone technology, coupled with regulatory advancements and a growing awareness of their potential benefits, has set the stage for a transformative shift in various industries.

Browse the full report at https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/commercial-drone-market

Market Overview

The global commercial drone market, valued at approximately $12 billion in 2023, is projected to surpass $35 billion by 2028, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 22%. This remarkable growth is driven by advancements in drone technology, the decreasing cost of drones, and their expanding applications across multiple sectors.

Technological Advancements

Modern commercial drones boast impressive capabilities due to rapid advancements in technology. High-resolution cameras, sophisticated sensors, and enhanced flight control systems have significantly improved drone performance. Innovations such as obstacle avoidance, autonomous flight, and real-time data processing have expanded their utility and reliability.

Battery technology is another area of significant progress, with new developments extending flight times and enhancing the operational efficiency of drones. Improved power sources, such as lithium-polymer batteries and fuel cells, are reducing downtime and increasing the range and endurance of commercial drones.

Key Applications

1. Agriculture: Drones have revolutionized agricultural practices by providing farmers with detailed aerial imagery and real-time data. They are used for crop monitoring, precision spraying, and soil analysis, leading to improved yields and reduced resource consumption. Drones enable farmers to make informed decisions and optimize their operations.

2. Construction and Infrastructure: In the construction sector, drones are employed for site surveying, progress monitoring, and inspection of infrastructure. They offer a bird's-eye view of construction sites, enabling more accurate measurements and reducing the need for manual inspections. This capability enhances project efficiency and safety.

3. Logistics and Delivery: The logistics industry is exploring drones for last-mile delivery services. Companies like Amazon and UPS are testing drone delivery systems to expedite parcel delivery and reduce operational costs. Drones have the potential to address delivery challenges in remote or congested areas, offering faster and more efficient solutions.

4. Emergency Services: Drones play a crucial role in emergency response and disaster management. They are used for search and rescue missions, disaster assessment, and delivering essential supplies. Their ability to quickly access hard-to-reach areas and provide real-time data is invaluable in crisis situations.

5. Media and Entertainment: The media and entertainment industry utilizes drones for capturing stunning aerial footage and enhancing storytelling. Drones have become a popular tool for filmmakers, photographers, and broadcasters, offering unique perspectives and creative opportunities.

Regulatory Landscape

The growth of the commercial drone market is closely tied to the evolving regulatory landscape. Regulatory authorities worldwide are developing frameworks to ensure safe and responsible drone operations. In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established guidelines for commercial drone use, including certification requirements, operational restrictions, and safety protocols.

Internationally, regulatory bodies are working towards harmonizing drone regulations to facilitate cross-border operations and promote global standards. As regulations continue to evolve, they will play a crucial role in shaping the future of the commercial drone market.

Challenges and Opportunities

Despite the promising growth prospects, the commercial drone market faces several challenges. Privacy concerns, airspace congestion, and safety issues are among the primary concerns that need to be addressed. Public perception and regulatory hurdles also pose challenges to widespread adoption.

However, these challenges also present opportunities for innovation and growth. Addressing privacy concerns through advanced data protection measures and developing technologies to manage airspace congestion can drive market expansion. Additionally, collaborations between industry stakeholders and regulatory authorities can pave the way for smoother integration of drones into various sectors.

Key Players

Aeronavics Ltd.

AeroVironment Inc.

Autel Robotics; DJI

Draganfly Innovations Inc.

EHang, Inc.

Intel Corporation

Parrot Drones SAS

PrecisionHawk Inc.

YUNEEC

SZ DJI Technology Co Ltd

Guangzhou EHang Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd

Draganfly Innovations Inc.

Segmentation

By Type of Drone:

Fixed-Wing Drones

Multirotor Drones

Single-Rotor Drones

Hybrid Drones

Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) Drones

By Payload:

Cameras and Imaging Equipment

Sensors and LiDAR

Sprayers and Applicators

Delivery and Logistics

Surveying and Mapping

Inspectors and Sensors

By End-User Industry:

Agriculture

Construction

Energy and Utilities

Photography and Videography

Public Safety and Security

Environmental Conservation

Mining and Quarrying

Transport and Logistics

Other Industries

By Regulatory Category:

Consumer and Recreational Drones

Professional and Commercial Drones

Government and Military Drones

By Remote Piloting:

Manual Piloting

Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Drones

By Region

North America

U.S

Canada

Mexico

Europe

Germany

France

U.K.

Italy

Spain

Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific

China

Japan

India

South Korea

South-east Asia

Rest of Asia Pacific

Latin America

Brazil

Argentina

Rest of Latin America

Middle East & Africa

GCC Countries

South Africa

Rest of Middle East and Africa

Browse the full report at https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/commercial-drone-market

About Us:

Credence Research is committed to employee well-being and productivity. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented a permanent work-from-home policy for all employees.

Contact:

Credence Research

Please contact us at +91 6232 49 3207

Email: sales@credenceresearch.com

Website: www.credenceresearch.com

[warningsine]

The best thing that can be said about Thailand and Malaysia wanting to join BRICS is that it won’t cost them anything. They won’t gain much, either.

The idea of lumping Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa together began as a thought experiment by Goldman Sachs, a way for the bank to parcel its bond portfolio in the advanced developing world. When the idea was taken up by those countries in the late 2000s, it was only as a gentlemen’s club where participants could gather to bemoan why they were apparently dealt such a bad hand by the U.S.-led international order.

Yet, BRICS isn’t a geopolitical club since most members (China and India, for instance) have conflicting interests. If Saudi Arabia joins, it will be seated next to Iran (a new member), its hegemonic rival in the Middle East. This guarantees that nothing of any importance will be discussed at BRICS summits. (How are you going to have a meaningful conversation on energy, for instance, with all these conflicting interests?)

Moreover, Russia, China, and Iran are now staunchly in the same camp of wanting to tear down the Western order. Brazil, India, and South Africa (plus Egypt and the UAE, two new members) are quite content with that order. So, say goodbye to any meaningful conversations about security at BRICS summits.

Economics is the only thing left that the members might actually discuss properly, but BRICS isn’t an economic club either. In an interview with Chinese media last month, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim seemed convinced that BRICS may one day establish a shared currency that might rival the U.S. dollar. He clearly didn’t listen to the BRICS summit last year when almost the first thing the leaders said was that they don’t want a BRICS currency.

There is the BRICS’ New Development Bank, which has ample funds. But you don’t need to be a BRICS member to access them. Bangladesh and Uruguay are members of the development bank but not the bloc. Moreover, joining BRICS wouldn’t give Thailand or Malaysia much say over how the development bank functions since the founding document says the original five members will always have 55 percent of the total voting power, and almost all of the funds are provided by China.

There’s also BRICS’ Contingent Reserve Arrangement, but, at least for now, Malaysia and Thailand are unlikely to experience short-term balance of payments pressures, and if they did, they are already part of other currency swap arrangements. Moreover, if you’re a reformist-minded leader, like Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, joining BRICS isn’t even a way of incentivizing your own bureaucracy to implement much-needed structural reforms since there are no structural conditions on membership, hence why Ethiopia, one of the poorest countries in the world, was able to join.

Indonesia took a look at BRICS last year and said, “it’s a no from us.” Argentina said the same after a new president entered office who doesn’t just want to find new means of leeching off others so the country doesn’t have to pay its debts. Saudi Arabia, another country invited to join in 2023, is dragging its feet, well aware that joining might be perceived by the U.S., its security guarantor, as an anti-Western move.

So why do Malaysia and Thailand want to join? There’s probably a good deal of their governments playing up for their local audience. Thitinan Pongsudhirak, someone always worth listening to, argued that this “hasty and misguided move” was intended for domestic consumption, mainly because Srettha has a litany of unfulfilled promises: no progress on joining the OECD; no Schengen visa-free deal; no real progress on a trade deal with the European Union; and major pushback on his government’s “digital wallet” and “Land Bridge” schemes.

“BRICS is thus played to domestic audiences as a deliverable achievement,” Thitinan argued. For Malaysia’s Premier Anwar, it makes some sense politically to appear not to be fully aligned with the West (not least over Gaza) and to have a foot in the same camp where Beijing calls most of the shots.

Indeed, the purpose of joining is to feed into a narrative. It’s apparently about having a louder voice for the “Global South” and within the “Global South.” Thai foreign minister Maris Sangiampongsa spoke about having “a more active role in South-South cooperation.” If you read anything on BRICS, you’ll likely hear something like this: the bloc was created to build a multipolar world order and give a louder voice to the Global South. At the time it was founded, that made some sense. The first summit was in 2009, a moment in time when the Global Financial Crisis was sweeping through the developed world, the U.S. was reeling from failed Middle Eastern wars, and people started taking seriously the cliché about “the West” versus “the Rest.” China hadn’t yet launched its Belt and Road Initiative nor shown the world the true aggressive nature of its rise; Russia was still the world’s friendly oil merchant.

Since then, “The Rest” has mutated into the new buzzword, “the Global South,” a term so malleable it defies definition. However, unlike in the late 2000s, the developed world is now no longer economically sluggish – just look at the U.S. economy – while China is on the precipice of economic collapse on numerous fronts. Russia has shown its true colors. Iran (a member) and Saudi Arabia (a possible member) are locked in a battle for regional supremacy.

Sarang Shidore, director of the Quincy Institute’s Global South Program, argued recently in Foreign Policy that “Southeast Asia’s presence in BRICS strengthens the collective voice on reform of the international system, which Thailand and Malaysia also desire.” The problem with expanding a group like BRICS is that it brings in so many disparate voices that it stops the organization from doing much of anything. Thailand and Malaysia should be now well aware of some of the problems their own region faces because ASEAN doubled in size in the 1990s. Or, when an organization expands, one member steps in, becomes first among equals, and starts dictating policy, which is what Beijing has always wanted from BRICS. But that would make the grouping a mere Chinese vessel. That’s unlikely because BRICS includes members (India and Egypt) who don’t want this to happen.

And, even if BRICS limps along having fewer and fewer meaningful conversations because so many of its members disagree on most things, there’s also the question of what sort of discussions on reforming the international system Malaysia and Thailand would actually want to be part of. Russia wants to enlist as much support (or silence) from developing countries so it can continue its genocidal war in Ukraine – and then potentially onward to Poland and the Baltics. China wants to enlist the support of as many developing countries as possible so it can demand trade concessions from the United States. (China isn’t the articulator of the Global South’s concerns; it wants the Global South to ventriloquize its concerns.) India, a classic non-aligned power, really doesn’t like what China is doing and is investing much less time in BRICS.

[companyknowledgenews]

BPDA Approves $300M Fenway Development, Stadium Makeover - Journal Global Online https://www.merchant-business.com/bpda-approves-300m-fenway-development-stadium-makeover/?feed_id=139278&_unique_id=669e082a4f694 #GLOBAL - BLOGGER BLOGGER Image courtesy of Utile Architecture & PlanningHousing developer Scape received approval for its third project in Boston’s Fenway neighborhood, creating 400 furnished apartments in a 299,000-square-foot building at 2 Charlesgate West.The Boston Planning & Development Agency board of directors Thursday approved the $300 million project along with plans for a public-private partnership to redevelop Roxbury’s White Stadium as the future home of a National Women’s Soccer League team.Scape’s latest Fenway project will replace three small buildings on a half-acre parcel with a 28-story apartment building overlooking the Bowker Overpass.The project was submitted in 2021 and approved under Boston’s compact living pilot, which was suspended in May 2023, and required developers to include larger common areas in exchange for smaller individual living units. Designed by Utile, the Fenway project will include 14,000 square feet of shared space including a lounge, co-working space, gym, communal kitchen and roof decks.The project will include 68 units reserved for households earning 70 to 120 percent of area median income. The Passive House-design, all-electric project will not include on-site parking. A $3.2 million community benefits and mitigation package includes $850,000 for construction of a public stair connecting Boylston Street with Ipswich Street.The project also will require a height variance from the Boston Zoning Board of Appeals. The White Stadium project received approval but still faces a legal battle in Suffolk Superior Court. Boston Unity Soccer Partners, led by Jennifer Epstein, and The Able Co. responded last year to a request for proposals to redevelop the 74-year-old stadium. The city’s estimated contribution to the project is $50 million, according to project filings.“This is one of the most fiscally responsible projects we’ve embarked on as a city, by wisely taking advantage of the opportunity to leverage private financing as opposed to solely relying on taxpayer dollars,” Boston Chief of Operations Dion Irish told BPDA board members. “We would literally double the cost of the investment it would require the city to renovate the entire stadium.”The project includes the renovation of the West Grandstand, construction of a new South Crescent building containing concessions and restrooms, and creation of The Grove, a multipurpose open space.A lawsuit filed in Suffolk Superior Court by the Emerald Necklace Conservancy seeks to block the project, in which the city would lease the property to Boston Unity Soccer Partners. The nonprofit environmental group alleges that the land deal would violate the terms of a charitable trust that originally funded the stadium construction.The project has received backing by Mayor Michelle Wu, and opposition from some residents who objected to the stadium’s partial use for a private sports team.“This approval delivers greatly expanded hours of Boston Public Schools and community use, world-class athletic and community facilities, more than an acre of additional green space opened up to the public, and guaranteed annual funding to invest in Franklin Park,” Wu said in a statement following Thursday’s vote.At Thursday’s meeting, the BPDA board approved a total of 484 housing units, 99 of which will be income-restricted.Fenway Community Development Corp. received approval for a 24-unit affordable housing project at 112-114 Queensberry St., a former laundromat that the nonprofit acquired in June.In Brighton, the board approved a 39-unit residential project in a 6-story building at 470 and 470A Western Ave. by Triad Alpha Partners.And at 1905-1911 Centre St. in West Roxbury, CAD Builders received approval for a 21-unit condominium project.BPDA Approves $300M

Fenway Development, Stadium Makeover #BPDA #Approves #300M #Fenway #Development #Stadium #MakeoverSource Link: https://bankerandtradesman.com/bpda-approves-300m-fenway-development-stadium-makeover/ http://109.70.148.72/~merchant29/6network/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/BPDA-Approves-300M-Fenway-Development-Stadium-Makeover.png Image courtesy of Utile Architecture & Planning Housing developer Scape received approval for its third project in Boston’s Fenway neighborhood, creating 400 furnished apartments in a 299,000-square-foot building at 2 Charlesgate West. The Boston Planning & Development Agency board of directors Thursday approved the $300 million project along with plans for a public-private partnership to … Read More

[timesofinnovation]

Ultra-fast-fashion giant Shein said it will invest €250 million ($271 million) in British and European designers and circularity initiatives over the next five years as it seeks to manage a regulatory crackdown targeting “fast fashion” and drum up support for a potential IPO in London. The disruptive Singapore-based e-tailer said Tuesday that it plans to launch a €200 million circularity fund focused on textile-to-textile recycling and related innovations, inviting other businesses and financial institutions to co-invest. Shein said it will set aside another €50 million to help fashion businesses in the UK and EU join its marketplace and support its Shein X incubator programme, which connects emerging designers to the company’s supply chain, in the region. The moves form part of the company’s efforts to address criticisms and controversies that have dogged its ambitions to go public and made it the focus of regulatory scrutiny that could stunt future growth prospects. The company reportedly filed confidential papers with Britain’s market regulators for a London listing in June. It has declined to comment on its plans. Founded in Nanjing, China, in 2012, Shein is now one of the world’s most popular clothing brands, a rise that has been fuelled by a pioneering and hyper-efficient test-and-learn manufacturing model that allows it to produce a dizzying assortment of new styles in small batches and sell them at rock bottom prices. Gross merchandise value, a measure of the value of sold goods on its website, reportedly reached around $45 billion in 2023. Its London IPO could be one of the largest stock offerings globally this year. Escalating tensions between the United States and China, where most of the company’s manufacturing still takes place, disrupted previous plans to list in New York. And its fast-paced, low-cost business model has made it a regulatory lightning rod. The company has attracted a barrage of criticism over issues including its supply-chain labour practices, product safety, copyright infringement and environmental impact. In Europe, which has been moving to protect local producers from the flow of cheaper Chinese goods and address criticism that new green rules disadvantage businesses operating in the trading bloc, the company is seen as a key target of proposed and incoming regulations that take aim at fast fashion. These include moves to address a loophole which allows foreign companies like Shein, that ship low-value parcels direct to consumers, to sidestep import duties and higher fees for fashion retailers that produce large volumes of clothes. “Compliance and circularity are the priorities I wake up with,” Shein executive chairman Donald Tang said, adding that the company prefers to style its business as “on demand” fashion, rather than “fast fashion.” Though the e-tailer produces many styles, each one is manufactured in small quantities that are only increased if there’s clear demand, avoiding the wasteful overproduction associated with many established mass market rivals, according to Tang. With its circularity fund, Shein said it is moving to take more responsibility for what happens to clothes at the end of their life — a trickier challenge for a company that has been blamed for fuelling overconsumption. While the €200 million fund represents a tiny fraction of the profits in excess of $2 billion that the company reportedly generated last year, Shein said it can have a bigger impact by leveraging its size and scale to support innovators through things like offtake contracts or other commercial arrangements. Tang said he has spent the last few weeks talking with the venture community and fund managers to “very, very enthusiastic feedback.” Still, establishing the mechanics of the fund, including putting someone in place to oversee it, is still in progress. “The tradition and hallmark of Shein is waste reduction,” said Tang. “This is the beginning of the effort.”