#Oculolinctus

[idetheriverfish]

Old friends appointment

[dhampirrises]

I want to pluck the eyes out of a person's skull and feel them pop between my teeth.

[fettesans]

Top, Gold oval brooch with a band of diamonds within a blue glass guilloche border surrounded by white enamel (1890). Lady’s blue right eye with dark brow (from Lover’s Eyes: Eye Miniatures from the Skier Collection and courtesy of D Giles, Limited) Via. Bottom, screen capture of The ceremonial South Pole on Google Street View part of a suite of Antarctica sites Google released in 360-degree panoramics on Street View on July 12, 2017. Taken by me on July 29, 2024. Via.

--

Images are mediations between the world and human beings. Human beings 'ex-ist', i.e. the world is not immediately accessible to them and therefore images are needed to make it comprehensible. However, as soon as this happens, images come between the world and human beings. They are supposed to be maps but they turn into screens: Instead of representing the world, they obscure it until human beings' lives finally become a function of the images they create. Human beings cease to decode the images and instead project them, still encoded, into the world 'out there', which meanwhile itself becomes like an image - a context of scenes, of states of things. This reversal of the function of the image can be called 'idolatry'; we can observe the process at work in the present day: The technical images currently all around us are in the process of magically restructuring our 'reality' and turning it into a 'global image scenario'. Essentially this is a question of 'amnesia'. Human beings forget they created the images in order to orientate themselves in the world. Since they are no longer able to decode them, their lives become a function of their own images: Imagination has turned into hallucination.

Vilém Flusser, from Towards a Philosophy of Photography, 1984. Translated by Anthony Mathews.

--

But. Actually what all of these people are doing, now, is using a computer. You could call the New Aesthetic the ‘Apple Mac’ Aesthetic, as that’s the computer of choice for most of these acts of creation. Images are made in Photoshop and Illustrator. Video is edited in Final Cut Pro. Buildings are rendered in Autodesk. Books are written in Scrivener. And so on. To paraphrase McLuhan “the hardware / software is the message” because while you can imitate as many different styles as you like in your digital arena of choice, ultimately they all end up interrelated by the architecture of the technology itself.

Damien Walter, from The New Aesthetic and I, posted on April 2, 2012. Via.

[roachcatch]

anyone know any good accounts to follow for eye pictures... all the tags i've checked kinda suck

[lesparadisartficiels]

[fettesans]

The picture is in our eye, Lacan states, but we do not see ourselves in it. Yet, we constantly show ourselves to the gaze of the other, meaning we live within the frame of the Other’s looking at us. His friend Merleau-Ponty, he says, wants to reach back to an original moment where we are closer to the world of flesh, where we are not plagued and seduced by this virtual split. But there is no such ground for Lacan. There is only the Real, which is a moment when what is out of frame shatters us, like this fisherman’s joke, or the father’s nightmare, or getting stabbed in the back. (...)

Envy, jealousy, ambition are incited by the gaze and there must be a renunciation of some kind. Invidia, envy, comes from videre in Latin, to see. “It is to this register of the eye as made desperate by the gaze that we must go if we are to grasp the taming, civilizing and fascinating power of the function of a picture,” Lacan writes. This is what painting asks of the gaze: to throw itself down. “If a bird were to paint would it not be by letting fall its feathers, a snake by casting off its scales, a tree by letting fall its leaves?” To see at the place of this fall.

Jamieson Webster, from I’ll See You There, for The Brooklyn Rail, May 2023.

Teorema (1968) // dir. Pier Paolo Pasolini

Caught Looking (1991) // dir. Constantine Giannaris

[ckret2]

Are we ever going to see Bill talking to Iris ever again? Has he lost some significant interest in her by now?

Eventually, although I don't yet know to what extent. At bare minimum, she shows up again late, but I'd like to work her in again earlier if I can.

I've got a joke I'd like to do where she goes "hey 😘 wanna fool around," Bill goes "I really shouldn't, I can't afford to lose an eyeball. ... well, maybe if we stop at making out," he does NOT stop at making out, Bill runs to the bathroom to wash out his eye yelling at himself for giving into temptation that easily and he canNOT do that again, he's DECIDED, that was the LAST TIME, it's NEVER GONNA HAPPEN AGAIN, and he comes out of the bathroom and Iris goes "hey 😘" and he does the exact same thing all over again.

however, as i approach the part of the fic where bill actually finally gets some goddamn action, I'm still feeling out just how overt I want to be with it. "Bill let his ex-gf nut in his face. twice." might be over the line. I'll decide that once i figure out where the line is.

There's not really interest to lose? He's never seriously considered her a potential romantic partner. They had a friends with benefits arrangement. He sees her as a fun enough person to periodically hang out with and a wildly, insanely hot sexual partner. If he saw her again, he'd still consider her fun and insanely hot because she still has the same personality and the same body. If they didn't see each other for 500 years he'd still be dtf next time they meet.

[sw33t-oubliette]

every few months i go through the paraphilia wikipedia page and assign my blorbos some of them (not Those ones!) for fun . bored as fuck like okay he can have shoe fetishism and oculolinctus as a treat

[ranchracoon]

Fan-Fics & One-shot master post

RanchRacoon - Wattpad

RanchRacoon | Archive of Our Own

One-Shots

Mother Miranda

Donna Beneviento/Angie

Bela Dimitrescu

Cassandra Dimitrescu

Daniela Dimitrescu

Alcina Dimitrescu

Other

Fan Fics

Devour (Dimitrescu Sisters x Fem Reader)

Phantom of House Beneviento (Donna Beneviento x Fem Reader)

Make Me Yours (Mother Miranda x Alcina Dimitrescu x Female Original Character)

Body, Flesh, and Bones (Alcina Dimitrescu x Female OC)

To Be The One (Mother Miranda x Fem Shifter MC)

Request Rules

1.) Must be over 18.

2.) Please be specific in your request.

Do you want smut, fluff, angst, etc?

Resident lover or Resident Evil?

Do you want it x reader?

What genders do you want all characters (female, intersex, non-binary, etc)?

3.) I only write female, non-binary, or gender neutral reader/MC

4.) I will never, ever write: underage (unless 100% platonic), regression/age play, rape, beastiality (does not include monsters), fisting, necrophelia, oculolinctus,  piquerism, direct incest (sister x sister, Alcina x daughter, etc), feet,  Acrotomophilia (amputation fetish/kink), vore, surgical/medical, hooks, lactation, spit, or urine/scat. Everything else is pretty much on the table.

[muffinsin]

can you expand on what kinks you would and would not write for? Is watersports on the table? Knife-play?

Absolutely! I’ll get into most that I know or know of, though if there are any questions left, don’t hesitate to ask at all! I’ll answer them and add em to this list :)

A big thank you to @darkittensniper for helping me with the list so no kinks slipped my mind!

(Masterlists)

(These are not 100% in alphabetical order RIP)

Kinks I will write:

Alpha- and omega-verse

Anilingus

Aphrodisiacs

(Anal, oral and vaginal Sex)

Blood

Blindfolded Sex (/amaurophilia)

Breathplay

Bratting

Brat Taming

Breeding and claiming

(BDSM in general)

Bondage (ropes, cuffs, fabric, anything really)

Bulges

CNC (although it is made obvious that content has been given to it prior)

Cum play

Crying

Cutting

Degradation

Exhibitionism

Edging

Hands

Humiliation

Humping

Impact Play

Inflation

Gun Play

GIP

Katoptronophilia (/Mirror Sex)

Knotting

Knives and anything that resembles one (e.g. any other kind of blade)

Lactation

Lap Dances

Latex

Masochism

Mommy/Daddy kink

Multiple Penetration

Marking

Magic/Cadou abilities

Monsterfucking

Mutual masturbation

Nipple Play

Orgasm Control

Oral Sex

Oviposition

Overstimulation

Praise

Pet play

Pegging

Possessiveness

Pregnancy

Power play

Phone Sex

Roleplay

Sadism

Spit

Shibari

Slapping

Spanking

Squirting

Seduction

Sensory Deprivation

(Sex toys- I can’t think of any to exclude as of now)

Stripping

Size difference

Temperature Play

Tentacles

Underwear & Wedgies

Uniforms

Voyeurism

Vaginal Sex

Wax Play

Watersports

Kinks I’m unsure about/depends on the scenario/I haven’t given any thought yet:

Cuckholding

CBT

Electrostimulation (++; more likely to write/will write in most scenarios)

Food play

Medical Play

Kinks I will NOT write/are not my thing:

Acrotomophilia

Age play (do not mix this up with age regression please)

Beastality (as in: dogs, animals, etc.)

Beating

Feet

Findom

Furries

Incest- not sure if it’s a kink but I’ll put it here either way!

Necrophilia

Oculolinctus (or anything regarding eyes)

Piquerism

Sounding

Sweat

Scat (including Klismaphilia)

Tickling (/Knismolagnia)

Vomit

Vore

Weight gain

[existentialcrisistime]

I've been keeping a list of words I've learnt this year, with the intention of calling them a poem when the list is complete. a friend suggested I learn some more words before the year is out, lest I reveal my AO3 search history to everyone, but joke's on them, I learnt oculolinctus from notes on a Belle & Sebastian song. The rest can be sexual though,

even bibendum, if you really want.

[milkycalico]

Oculolinctus

[fettesans]

Top, photograph by Naomi Baker/Getty Images, Gabrielle d’Estrées’s reproduction in the Seine, July 2024. Via. See also, École de France Fontainebleau, Gabrielle d’Estrées et une de ses soeurs, c. 1594, Oil on canvas, 96 x 125 cm. Bottom, screen capture from Skin Gang, directed by Bruce LaBruce, 1999.

--

Research shows AI chatbots can offer companionship, ease loneliness and boost positive emotions with supportive messages. Chatbots also provide a judgment-free space for open conversations and advice when other resources are scarce. People can also form intimate and passionate connections with AI that are similar to human relationships.

Surprisingly, there doesn’t seem to be a difference in enjoyment, sexual arousal and emotional response whether participants believe they are interacting with a human or a chatbot. One study even showed that individuals feel a stronger emotional connection with chatbots compared to less responsive humans during a conversation.

Valerie A. Lapointe, David Lafortune and Simon Dubé, from Computer love: AI-powered chatbots are changing how we understand romantic and sexual well-being, for The Conversation, July 7, 2024.

--

First, participants seemed to desire human(-like) sexual chat experiences and gratifying effects despite their awareness of agent class, such that chatters’ dissatisfaction with the experience can be attributed to cognitive dissonance in terms of wanting the machine to be less machinic in the course of engaging in a traditionally human activity. For instance, a male participant noted: “She said some hot things but I wish we would have some continuity.” In the broadest sense, this seems to manifest as a desire for personalization, attention, reciprocity, responsiveness, and a feeling of personally mattering in the conversation through realized agency and influence on the content and flow. A male participant exclaimed “I have the dick can’t I have a say in the way we chat?” and another opined that it “wasn’t what the connection between ‘people’ was suppose to be.” That is, overall, participant responses suggest a wish to feel like a legitimate participant in the activity and to feel as though the partner was likewise a legitimate participant. That desire seems to be irrespective of what kind of partner was engaged.

Co-occurring themes also revealed a tension between salient, postexperience critiques of the chat and the experienced gratifications: participants were critical of the fashion by which the chat unfolded, but still enjoyed the experience as a social or sexual exchange. For instance, one chatter said “that felt impersonal, but still arousing” and another elaborated “the chatbot thing was again a little bit unnatural and faster and crowded of words. Anyways it still created some sexual tension and imagination even arousal.” Another female participant who did pass the manipulation check was still put off by the mechanics of the chat but was gratified, saying “obvious he wasn’t paying attention to what I was saying, but I still managed to cum.”

Finally, primed agent class seemed to be an anchor for evaluating the experience. If chatters were told their partner was human, they seemed to hold high expectations for the interaction and were critical, disappointed, or angry when it did not meet expectations: “… it was too obvious it was not a real female. It was like I just wanted to ejaculate quickly then leave.” When told they were chatting with a chatbot, responses often suggested that it met expectations (even if those expectations were low) or exceeded expectations: “Not entirely how an interaction with a real woman would be but … I was pleasantly surprised by it …” and another said “it was clear very soon this was a bot. Still, the bot had some pretty good, contextual responses.”

Jaime Banks and Joris Van Ouytsel, from Cybersex With Human- and Machine-Cued Partners: Gratifications, Shortcomings, and Tensions, September 2020.

[fuckyeahkailan]

my weirdest fetish is eyeballs

this is directly linked to when I first got into lychee light club

seeing an oculolinctus scene between zera and jaibo really opened my eyes (lol)

and subsequently I realized lychee has a very similar feel to eyes (I haven't touched my eye, just I know what an eye would feel like by looking at one)

that's all

lychee is my personal aphrodisiac

[lesparadisartficiels]

(via We speak to the people who get off on licking eye balls)

[am-i-into-this]

So, I'm writing a book!

This is a project that I've been thinking of doing for a while, and a I am currently at the start of a 4 year creative writing and film course, I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to tell you all about it.

It's going to be a collection focusing on paraphilias and sexual content involving them. As someone with a few paraphilias of my own (emeto - vomit and agalmato - specifically dolls) I am aware of how unconventional these are, and as a result, how underrepresented they are in media.

I would like to include:

Short stories involving the fetish (all fictional)

I will try to find a psychologist who specialises in paraphilic attraction to write a bit of information about how they develop and about the paraphilias being discussed specifically

I also may include people's experiences with their fetishes! I for one will be writing a bit about my emetophilia as I have a rather more complicated history with it than agalmatophilia (the story there is I realised one day that I found dolls and statues attractive, and that's just about it)

Basically, I'm here asking for requests! What's an unusual object of attraction that you would like to see represented in a book involving both short stories and information about said paraphilias? Also, if you are interested in any way in contributing (such as a psychologist with this speciality, someone who has a paraphilia who would be alright with sharing some of their experiences) then please send me a message or an ask, and I will reply as soon as possible! Edit: There is now a survey for those who would rather be anonymous, but I would personally prefer to carry this out as an interview as I believe we can have more in-depth discussions this way

Also, for the purposes of this book, I am only going to be discussing legal and fully consensual practices, so if this does not apply to your request, then I am not interested in reading it. (However if you were the victim of any form of assult and you believe that this in some way influenced the development of your fetish, then you can totally talk about that and I will do my best to support you with that when we communicate!)

I will put a list of fetishes that I do not wish to discuss under the cut. Please do not talk to me about any of them as these are my personal boundaries! I will put brief definitions of the fetish next to it in case you aren't aware of what the name means, and I don't censor any of it, so beware of potentially triggering content. I also may add to the list at some point

If you want updates, then I will be tagging all content related to this project as #am I into this?

And finally, I am not an expert on paraphilias, I merely find them interesting as I experience "unusual" attraction, and I want to make something that is content for both enjoyers of fetish content and people who want to learn more about them!

Pedophilia and any of its forms - children

Necrophilia - corpses

Amokoscisia - slashing and mutilating women

Anthropophagolagnia - raping and cannibalising someone

Zoophilia and any of its forms - animals

Biastophilia/raptophilia - rape

Candualism - exposing images of one's partner to another person

Exhibitionism - exposing yourself to unconsenting people

Voyeurism - watching other people engaging in sexual acts, often without their consent

Cannibalism - eating people

Coprophilia/scat - feces

Erotophonophilia/dacnolagomania - murder

Death feederism - feeding someone until they die

Frotteurism - rubbing one's genitals against an unconsenting person

Klismaphilia - enemas

Oculolinctus - eye-licking

Piquerism - piercing someone's skin

Somnophilia (in the context of the recipient being actually asleep and unconsenting) - sleep

Symphorophilia - witnessing or staging disasters such as car accidents

Telephonicophilia (in the context of the recipient being an unconsenting person/stranger) - obscene phone calls

Toucherism - touching an unconsenting person with one's hands