#Nvidia quadro vs geforce

[pinerbench]

Nvidia quadro vs geforce

#Nvidia quadro vs geforce drivers#

#Nvidia quadro vs geforce professional#

Potential Ryzen 7000-series CPU Specs and Pricing Leak, Ryzen 9 7950X Expected to hit 5.

This is the reason that rendering farms are generally made using of Quadro cards. If you’re rendering a complicated 3D scene, Quadro is much faster than GeForce.

Aug 5th, 2022 Fractal Design Define 7 Nano Review For example, a Quadro card will allow you to have a much smoother experience when working with wireframes or double-sided polygons.

Aug 25th, 2022 be quiet! Pure Rock 2 FX Review.

Mar 3rd, 2022 NVIDIA RTX A2000 Review - World’s Fastest ITX Card: Low-Profile and Slot-Powered.

Aug 11th, 2022 Edifier STAX SPIRIT S3 Planar Magnetic Wireless Headphones Review.

Aug 2nd, 2022 Truthear x Crinacle ZERO In-Ear Monitors Review - Two Dynamic Drivers, One Harman Tuning!.

Aug 25th, 2022 Upcoming Hardware Launches 2022 (Updated Aug 2022).

Aug 19th, 2022 Gigabyte X570S AERO G Review.

Aug 16th, 2022 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5-6600 C元2 2x 16 GB Review.

Aug 15th, 2022 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered: DLAA vs.

Aug 8th, 2022 ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme Glacial Review.

The card measures 241 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a single-slot cooling solution. Quadro K4000 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 810 MHz, memory is running at 1404 MHz (5.6 Gbps effective).īeing a single-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro K4000 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 80 W maximum. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare, 1280 1.08 - 1.24 GHz, 1 MHz Quadro P2000 compare, 768 1.22 - 1.47 GHz, 128. NVIDIA has paired 3,072 MB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro K4000, which are connected using a 192-bit memory interface. It features 768 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs. Unlike the fully unlocked GeForce GTX 660, which uses the same GPU but has all 960 shaders enabled, NVIDIA has disabled some shading units on the Quadro K4000 to reach the product's target shader count. The GK106 graphics processor is an average sized chip with a die area of 221 mm² and 2,540 million transistors. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the GK106 graphics processor, the card supports DirectX 12. So I can't tell how it would have worked in CAD for ex. TITANZ, TITAN X, NVIDIA Tegra Features Benefits Recommendations.

#Nvidia quadro vs geforce drivers#

Using the Riva Tuner strap drivers and a Quadro driver. NVIDIA Quadro M series, HDMI, DisplayPort, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, or DVI interfaces. In these test I compare the NVIDIA GTX 1060 to NVIDIA Quadro K5000. I did softmod my previous 7950GT (Gainward Golden Sample) into a Quadro FX 3500 though. Selling some GeForce GTX 1060: GeForce GTX 980: VS : Radeon HD 8650D IGP: GeForce.

#Nvidia quadro vs geforce professional#

The Quadro K4000 was an enthusiast-class professional graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on March 1st, 2013. Unfortunatly, the 8800GT can't be softmodded into a Quadro.

[uvlong]

Nvidia quadro m5000

#Nvidia quadro m5000 full#

#Nvidia quadro m5000 pro#

Sep 2nd, 2022 Channel Well Technology CSX 850M-G Review - The first PCIe 5.

#Nvidia quadro m5000 pro#

Aug 30th, 2022 SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless Review - The King of Gaming Headsets.Aug 16th, 2022 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB DDR5-6600 C元2 2x 16 GB Review Total time taken to train the network, was approximately 3.5 days for pretarining and 1.5 days for fine tuning, on an NVidia Quadro M5000 GPU with 8 GB VRAM. Recommended 400W Power Supplies NVIDIA Quadro M5000 Specifications Power Draw (TDP), 150W Memory Size, 8GB Memory Type, GDDR5 Lithography, 28nm.Aug 19th, 2022 Gigabyte X570S AERO G Review NVIDIA Quadro M5000 GPU specifications Maximum digital resolution: 5120 x 3200 60 Hz (Using 2 x DP) Maximum DP resolution: 4096 x 2160 60 Hz Maximum DVI.This card features 2048 CUDA cores, 128 texture mapping units and 64 raster.

#Nvidia quadro m5000 full#

Aug 15th, 2022 Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered: DLAA vs. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 is based on the full GM204 GPU core as mentioned above.

The card measures 248 mm in length, 111 mm in width, and features a dual-slot cooling solution. Quadro 5000 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 513 MHz, memory is running at 750 MHz (3 Gbps effective).īeing a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA Quadro 5000 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 152 W maximum. NVIDIA has paired 2,560 MB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro 5000, which are connected using a 320-bit memory interface. It features 352 shading units, 44 texture mapping units, and 40 ROPs. Why is Nvidia Quadro M5000 better than Nvidia Quadro M4000 88MHz faster GPU clock speed 0.95 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance 11.8 GPixel/s higher. Unlike the fully unlocked GeForce GTX 480 Core 512, which uses the same GPU but has all 512 shaders enabled, NVIDIA has disabled some shading units on the Quadro 5000 to reach the product's target shader count. The GF100 graphics processor is a large chip with a die area of 529 mm² and 3,100 million transistors. Built on the 40 nm process, and based on the GF100 graphics processor, in its GF100-850-A3 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. The Quadro 5000 was an enthusiast-class professional graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on February 23rd, 2011.

[mmorgshopper]

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center install#

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center update#

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center upgrade#

08-08-2015 I have an eMachines desktop PC or search.

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center install#

05-10-2018 NVIDIA has recently published the first GeForce drivers for Windows 10 version 1809 October 2018 Update, and obviously, customers are recommended to install them as soon as possible.

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center update#

With a single click, you can update the driver directly, without leaving your desktop. 09-04-2014 The virtual screen area is larger than the actual size, and the edges of the screen are off the display. Consumer Electronics.ĭownload drivers for NVIDIA graphics cards, video cards, GPU accelerators, and for other GeForce, Quadro, and Tesla hardware. I get 2 screens working, but only as mirror. Download the latest GeForce drivers to enhance your pc gaming experience and run apps faster.

Nvidia geforce 6200 driver windows xp media center upgrade#

Download Windows 10 Compatible Nvidia GeForce Graphics Card Driver By Trouble Fixers Usually when you upgrade your Laptop with New operating system, say Windows 10, there s hardly any support you get from the manufacturer. I successfully upgraded to Windows 10 from Windows 7 with my NVIDIA GeForce 6150 LE. 24-01-2016 Don't let planned obsolescence keep you from using your GeFore 6 and 7 Series videos cards and nForce chipsets with windows 10. Release Date, Fri, Operating System, Linux 64-bit, Language, English US File Size, 65.21 MB, Download *This download includes the NVIDIA display driver and GeForce Experience application. Nvidia geforce 6150se driver for windows xp freeload - NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE, NVIDIA GeForce 6200 series for Windows XP, nVidia Graphics Driver Windows XP/Media Center Edition, and many. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is included for the best gameplay on day-1. I was compatible GPU drivers to Windows 8/8. At the present time, I'm using the Windows 10 Upgrade Assistant to prepare the upgrade. 31-08-2015 I had a compatibility issue message in the Get Windows 10 app caused by an NVIDIA driver for weeks. Visit our RSS section GeForce 309.08 Driver.ĭisabled FXAA for NVIDIA Notebook / NVIDIA 309. The Nvidia 7300 GT performs superbly consistently under Display Driver 309. Then secondly, I downloaded the GeForce 309.08 driver 64-bit and it was installed successfully! For Windows Vista 64-bit, GeForce 7300 SE / NVIDIA. This feature is Nvidia's sixth generation of the Search button menu.Ġ8 driver 64-bit, for Windows 10. Performance Boost Increases performance for GeForce 400/500/600 Series GPUs in several PC games vs. 294 downloads Added on Windows 8 64-bit, sh. Download Now NVIDIA GEFORCE 309.08 DRIVERīut we have to make the things work with available updated driver for old Nvidia GeForce cards was compatible till Windows 8, but a long time has gone already for that.

[mainstogether]

Firestream 9250 specifications

FIRESTREAM 9250 SPECIFICATIONS UPDATE

FIRESTREAM 9250 SPECIFICATIONS DRIVER

When an unknown GPU is detected, GPU-Z displays a notification window requesting the scan and sending data to the cloud server. If the file "GPU-Z.ini" exists in the GPU-Z directory, GPU-Z uses it to read/write all configuration files instead of the registry, so that GPU-Z can be moved to other computers more conveniently. The single PCI slot, one TFLOPS AMD FireStream 9250 includes1GB GDDR3 memory enabling developers to handle large, complex problems. Comparez les performances de jeu des cartes graphiques. The AMD FireStream 9250 compute acelerator is specifically designed to accelerate critical algorithms in high performance computing (HPC), mainstream, and consumer applications. Increase the identification of the AMD SOC temperature sensor Spécifications de comparaison GPU & amp Benchmarks AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD FireStream 9250.

FIRESTREAM 9250 SPECIFICATIONS DRIVER

with AMD FirePro driver release 14.301.000 or later, in footnotes of specs. AMD FireStream was AMDs brand name for their Radeon-based product line targeting stream processing and/or GPGPU in supercomputers.Originally developed by ATI Technologies around the Radeon X1900 XTX in 2006, the product line was previously branded as both ATI FireSTREAM and AMD Stream Processor.

Support for Intel HD Graphics 620 added Deprecated brand names are ATI FireGL, ATI FirePro 3D, and AMD FireStream.

Support for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, RTX 2070 Super, RTX 2060 Super, Tesla T4, Quadro T2000 added.

AMD/ATI 945a: RV770/M98-XT Mobility Radeon HD 4870 Vendor Device PCI. AMD/ATI 9456: RV770 GL FirePro V8700 Vendor Device PCI: 1002: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. AMD/ATI 9452: RV770 GL FireStream 9250 Vendor Device PCI: 1002: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. If some specifications are identical, you should compare other features. You will easily get which is more efficient following our tips the best option is highlighted in different colours.

Support for AMD FirePro S7150, ATI FireStream 9250 added RV770 GL FireStream 9270 Vendor Device PCI: 1002: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. The base technical info section helps you understand the difference between AMD FireStream 9250 and Intel HD Graphics 2000.

support for AMD Radeon RX 5700XT and RX 5700.

FireStream 9250 is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 2.0 x16 interface.

FIRESTREAM 9250 SPECIFICATIONS UPDATE

The new version of GPU-Z can recognize the PCI-E 4.0 bus and recognize the GPU that supports the new bus, and add a GPU that informs you that the current version of GPU-Z does not recognize you, and use the cloud database to support development The GPU-Z has been improved and the specific update protocol looks like this: Being a single-slot card, the AMD FireStream 9250 draws power from 1x 6-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 150 W maximum.

[rendersfarm]

Top 4 Rendering Engines Used for Multi GPU Rendering

The fast cloud rendering services provider and GPU&CPU render farm, Super Renders farm will share with you 4 rendering engines used for multi GPU rendering.

It is well known that GPU rendering can be performed using a graphics card instead of a CPU to render and can be significantly faster, as GPUs are primarily tailored for fast image rendering. GPU was created to cope with graphics-intensive applications that can burden the CPU and hinder computational performance. The principle of GPU rendering is to run across multiple cores on multiple data, putting parallel processing focused on one specific task, while freeing up the CPU to emphasize different sequential serial processing jobs.

With the reduction in GPU rendering times, there is a wide variety of rendering engines that utilize GPU rendering. In particular, simultaneous rendering using multiple GPUs can be 5 or 10 times faster than a single GPU. As a result, some of the world’s leading brands are focusing primarily on developing products that optimize multi-GPU performance. Maxon and Otoy, which bring great rendering solutions, reduce the rendering time burden for 3D artists, designers, filmmakers, etc.

The multi GPU rendering engines widely used today are Redshift, Octane, Vray, Iray, Fstorm, Eevee, Cycles, which have matured significantly and are outpacing CPU-based rendering engines in terms of both popularity and rendering speed.

Top 4 Multi-GPU Rendering Engines

1. Redshift

Redshift Rendering Technologies Inc was founded in California in early 2012 with the goal of developing production-quality, GPU-accelerated renderers that support biased global lighting technologies that have hitherto been entirely within the CPU domain. Redshift is now part of the Maxon family and is rapidly becoming the first choice of rendering engine for the motion design community. The Redshift rendering engine supports a selection of 3D programs: Autodesk Maya, Autodesk 3Ds Max, Maxon Cinema 4D, Houdini and Katana.

Recommended hardware requirements:

RAM: 16GB RAM or more

CPU: Core i7 or Xeon equivalent, 3.0GHz or higher

Graphics card: with 7.0 or higher CUDA computing power and NVIDIA GPU with 10GB or higher video memory: NVIDIA Quadro, Titan or GeForce RTX GPU for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Multiple GPUs

2. OctaneRender

OctaneRender® is one of the world’s first and fastest bias-free, spectrally correct GPU rendering engines, offering quality and speed unmatched by any production renderer on the market. As a product of Refractive Software, Octane was founded by Terrence Vergauwen, the lead developer of LuxRender, and in March 2012, Refractive Software was acquired by Otoy, who also received investment from Autodesk. Now as part of the Otoy family, Octane supports 3Ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, Houdini, Daz Studio, Unreal Engine and many other softwares.

Recommended hardware requirements:

RAM: 16GB RAM or more

Graphics: with CUDA computing power 3.0 or higher; and 10GB video memory of NVIDIA GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX GPU, GTX, Quadro, Titan

Multiple GPUs

3. EEVEE VS CYCLES

Eevee vs Cycles are the two main GPU rendering engines for Blender, the Blender Foundation’s open source 3D creation software that enables users to handle all aspects of 3D work. It includes modeling, animation, game creation, visual effects and much more. Blender is easy to download, customize and work on your own terms. The software also offers a large number of plugins for creating various types of models, animations, sculptures and more. Ultimately, comparing Evee with Cycles is more or less just comparing real time with ray tracing.

Recommended hardware requirements:

RAM: 16GB RAM or more

CPU: 64-bit quad-core CPU

Graphics card: At least 4GB of video memory

Multiple GPUs

Optimal hardware requirements:

RAM: 32GB RAM or more

CPU: 64-bit octa-core CPU

Graphics: 12GB VRAM or more, RTX GPU, Quadro

Multiple GPUs

4. FStormRender

FStormRender is a new GPU-driven, unbiased renderer with good performance that is quite easy to use. It uses convenient materials and light sources, it is simple, fast and realistic. Currently, FStorm GPU rendering engine is only available for 3Ds Max software. We hope that this amazing renderer will be available for major 3D software in the near future.

The FStormRender has many unique features such as improved tone mapping, glossy reflection shaders, glare effects, light sampling, improved ray tracer and optimized QMC sampling. The FStormRender is deeply integrated into the 3Ds Max environment and supports all necessary and critical features. The built-in scene converter allows easy and careful conversion of any scene from Corona, Octane and Vray renders. Fstorm is interactive, allowing the user to change the scene as it is rendered and to view these changes interactively without reloading. Any scene changes (other than geometry) are automatically reflected. Geometry changes require enabling live geometry updates or pressing the Reload Geometry button. Users can move the camera and get live updates in the frame buffer window.

Recommended hardware requirements:

RAM: 16GB RAM or more

Graphics: NVIDIA Geforce GPU: RTX and GTX series

Multiple GPUs

Source:

https://blog.superrendersfarm.com/news/top-4-rendering-engines-used-for-multi-gpu-rendering/

[hunterbudget532]

Nvidia quadro k1100m driver windows 10 64 bit

NVIDIA RTX / Quadro Desktop and Notebook Driver Release 510.

NVidia Quadro K1100M drivers for Windows 10 64-bit (page 4).

NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M.

NVIDIA Quadro K610M display adapter drivers - Treexy.

Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 410 - Nvidia.

Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 375 - NVIDIA.

Download Lenovo ThinkPad W541 NVIDIA/Intel Graphics Driver 10.18.13.

Quadro Desktop/Notebook Driver Branch 340 U14 - NVIDIA.

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M display adapter drivers - Treexy.

NVidia Quadro K1100M drivers for Windows 10 64-bit (page 2).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX and Quadro graphic Driver | Driver Details | Dell US.

GeForce Game Ready Driver | 511.79 | Windows 10 64-bit,.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Graphics Driver | Driver Details | Dell Pakistan.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Driver | Driver Details | Dell US.

NVIDIA RTX / Quadro Desktop and Notebook Driver Release 510.

The NVIDIA Quadro K1100M is a DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.3 compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK107 chip with all 384 shader cores activated and. Specifications page for HP ZBook 15 Mobile Workstation. CE Mark - full compliance with LVD and EMC directives; Worldwide safety standards - IEC60950, EN60950, UL60950, Class1, SELV; Agency approvals - C-UL-US, NORDICS, DENAN, EN55022 Class B, FCC Class B, CISPR22 Class B, CCC, NOM-1 NYCE; Reliability - failure rate of less than 0.1% annually within the first three years of operation.

NVidia Quadro K1100M drivers for Windows 10 64-bit (page 4).

Released: 03 Oct 2018. System: Windows 10 64-bit. Description:Driver for NVidia Quadro K2100M Download NVidia Quadro K2100M Driver v.416.16. Found - 20 files at 4 pages for NVidia Quadro K2100M. 1. To fix your Drivers problems you will need to know the particular model of the Dell Laptop you are having problems with To download the necessary driver, select a device from the menu below that you need a driver for and follow the link to download Solid State Drive comes with Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit preinstalled and updated, and Dell Precision.

NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M.

. Download the English (US) Quadro Desktop/Notebook Driver Release Windows 10 R361 for Windows 10 64-bit systems. Released 2016.4.19. This driver adds security updates for driver components. New features in this branch: Video SDK 7.0. Hardware video encoding and decoding via Video SDK 7.0. APIs are now officially supported by FFMpeg and libav. If you would like to be notified of upcoming drivers for Windows, please subscribe here. For Quadro Notebook.

NVIDIA Quadro K610M display adapter drivers - Treexy.

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M... OpenCL 3.0, GPU Boost, Optimus, PCIe 4.0, Game Ready Drivers, Win 10 / 11... Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro. NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Graphics Driver 10.18.13.6180 for Windows 10 64-bit 64-bit download - X 64-bit Download - x64-bit download - freeware, shareware and software downloads. NVIDIA Quadro K1100M. Graphics Processor GK107. Cores 384. TMUs 32. ROPs 16. Memory Size 2 GB. Memory Type GDDR5. Bus Width 128 bit.... How to install nvidia driver.

Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 410 - Nvidia.

299.98 USD (Amazon) The NVIDIA Quadro K500M is an entry-level, DirectX 11.1-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK107 architecture and is. Released: 25 Mar 2018. System: Windows 10 64-bit. Description:Driver for NVidia Quadro K1100M. Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug.

Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 375 - NVIDIA.

Download nvidia quadro k1100m graphics driver 10 18 13 6180 for windows 10 64 bit 64 bit drivers download - X 64-bit Download - x64-bit download - freeware, shareware and software downloads. Télécharger NVidia Quadro K1100M Pilote v.375.26 v.375.26 pour gratuit. DriversC... Driver for NVidia Quadro K1100M Télécharger NVidia Quadro K1100M Pilote v.340.108. Type de logiciel: Driver. Version: 425.31. Système: Windows 10 64-bit. Description: Driver for NVidia Quadro K1100M Télécharger NVidia Quadro K1100M Pilote.

Download Lenovo ThinkPad W541 NVIDIA/Intel Graphics Driver 10.18.13.

This package contains the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M series graphics driver. A graphics or video driver is the software that enables communication between the graphics card and the operating system, games, and applications. Recommended. Find the best download for your system. Download NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Graphics Driver 22.21.13.8573 for Windows 10 Anniversary Update 64-bit (Graphics Board)... The package provides the installation files for NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Graphics Driver version. If the driver is already installed on your system, updating (overwrite-installing). The Intel Xe Graphics G7 (Tiger-Lake U GPU with 96 EUs) is a integrated graphics card in the high end Tiger-Lake U CPUs (15 - 28 Watt). It is using the new Xe architecture (Gen12) and was.

Quadro Desktop/Notebook Driver Branch 340 U14 - NVIDIA.

. NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Graphics Driver 10.18.13.6180 for Windows 10 64-bit 64-bit driver download - X 64-bit Download - x64-bit download - freeware, shareware and software downloads. Download the English (US) Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 415 for Windows 10 64-bit systems. Released 2018.11.13.

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M display adapter drivers - Treexy.

In professional applications, the Quadro RTX 3000 can be faster GeForce RTX 2070 due to the optimized drivers and bigger VRAM. The high power consumption of the RTX3000 makes the card most suited. Free Download. The package provides the installation files for NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (Graphics Adapter WDDM1.1, WDDM1.2, WDDM1.3, WDDM2.0) Graphics Driver version 10.18.13.6201. If the driver is already installed on your system, updating (overwrite-installing) may fix various issues,. Download the English (US) Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 410 for Windows 10 64-bit systems. Released 2018.11.15.... Added support for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000.... Quadro K4100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K3100M, Quadro K2200M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, Quadro K1000M, Quadro K620M, Quadro K610M.

NVidia Quadro K1100M drivers for Windows 10 64-bit (page 2).

.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX and Quadro graphic Driver | Driver Details | Dell US.

This package provides nVIDIA Quadro K1100M Driver and is supported on Precision M4800/M6800 running the following operating systems: Windows 7 and Windows 8. Operating System Windows 8, 64-bit Version 331.82, A02 Size Driver 205.15 MB File Name Date 14 Aug 2014 Description AMD FirePro Graphics Driver Popular. Dell Update Package Instructions Download 1. Click Download File. 2. When the File Download window is displayed, click Save to save the file to your hard drive. The Quadro K1100M is built for the Intel Shark Bay generation (Haswell) and is a successor to the Quadro K1000M (Chief River platform). As a new feature, PCIe 3.0 is supported for the first time.

GeForce Game Ready Driver | 511.79 | Windows 10 64-bit,.

NVIDIA Quadro K620M. The Nvidia Quadro K620M is a DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM108 chip with 384 shader.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Graphics Driver | Driver Details | Dell Pakistan.

Get the latest official NVIDIA Quadro K610M display adapter drivers for Windows 11, 10, 8.1, 8, 7, Vista, XP PCs. Update drivers with the largest database available. Products. Driver Fusion Omnify... Drivers / Display adapters / NVIDIA / Quadro K610M. Device information. Name: Quadro K610M. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Type Display adapter. Free Download. n/a. Release 435 is a Quadro New Feature (QNF) driver. QNF drivers provide users the flexibility to try new features made available outside the launch cycle of longer-lived Optimal Driver for Enterprise (ODE) branches. QNF drivers are tested for workstation environments and are recommended only for those users who need specific.

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Driver | Driver Details | Dell US.

Free NVidia Quadro K1100M drivers for Windows 10 64-bit (page 4). Found 20 files. Select driver to download. ドライバーをダウンロードできます Japanese Quadro Desktop/Quadro Notebook Driver Release 375 システム向 Windows 10 64-bit リリース日 2018.1.18. This package contains the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M graphics driver. A graphics or video driver is the software that enables communication between the graphics card and the operating system, games, and applications. Recommended. Find the best download for your system.

See also:

Update To Windows 10 Version 20H2 Download

Adobe Downloads

Msr605X Software Download For Mac

[junkhaul-blog]

safari app tabs 2

Favorites

Marriage and Family Therapy PsyD | Alliant Un...

YouTube - Health & Vitality Meditations, Meditations by Rasa

Ray Charles – A Song For You Lyrics | Genius L...

sunday morning lyrics - Google Search

Emotional Pain Chart

Climate Lab | University of California

ucla climate psychology - Google Search

Climate Psychology Alliance - CPA North Ame...

Climate Change Psychology: Five Insights - Ya...

Understanding the psychological barriers to c...

The Climate Psychologist

Mika 7 | 3D Models and 3D Software by Daz 3D

Have an Aggressive Puppy That Won’t Stop Bi...

how to feel more secure - Google Search

puppy training tips - Google Search

The Autistic Children Who Are Labeled As Sex...

Donny Hathaway – A Song for You Lyrics | Gen...

A Song for You - Wikipedia

A Detoxifying Kundalini Yoga Sequence for Ra...

Lesson 9 - Flexibility of the Spine

YouTube - Abraham Hicks - Process - Practice the vibration of abundance let it in, Z. Zeahorse

10 Abundance-Manifesting Secrets To Practic...

YouTube - Get Them To Chase You - Abraham Hicks, Abraham Hicks

YouTube - Techniques to raise the vibration, 649904

Kundalini Yoga: 13 Poses to Help You Break Ba...

The 10 Best Exercises for Weight Loss Torch S...

10 Butt Exercises You Can Do On A Mat | SELF

A Kundalini Yoga Exercise to Release Negativit...

biyfriend forsnt want sex - Google Search

Is Your Partner Really ‘Emotionally Unavailabl...

Ariana Grande – Why Try Lyrics | Genius Lyrics

YouTube - Lose Weight while you SLEEP ~ Listen Every Night, Dauchsy

Esta Sample Pack - Samples & Loops - Splice...

YouTube - orchid booster /forced, orchid subs

YouTube - Abraham Hicks 2018 // How To Control The Direction Of Your Thoughts? [NEW], Thought Revolution

Moving up, the smart way

The Psychology of Men | Psychology Today

how.to make asmr - Google Search

boyfriend tunes me out - Google Search

osyd ni masters required - Google Search

MA in Psychology | Master of Arts in Psycholo...

Clinical Psychology Doctorate Admissions Re...

Spotify for Artists

How to get glossy lips - Daz 3D Forums

Cannot Open Page

My Visit to the Abandoned Radioactive City of...

Chernobyl, site of nuclear disaster, now a tour...

tagaytay volcano - Google Search

Robohorse | Flying Magazine

Carl Rogers - Wikipedia

PhD in Clinical Psychology - Los Angeles | CS...

Psychology PhD Programs in California

ZBrush 2018 Free Download - Is there a Free...

ballistic missile - Google Search

Best Doctorate in Psychology Programs | Top...

DAZ 3D | 3D Models and 3D Software by Daz...

stage presence tips - Google Search

What It’s Like Being a Psychologist - ValuePen...

CB Gwendolin for Genesis 8 Female | 3D Mod...

YouTube - “Straws Will Save Your Life” - Tom Burke

facebook.com

YouTube - 10 Kids Who Were Raised By Wild Animals - TheRichest

Video Templates to fit your needs | Renderfor...

hownto do quick visuals for anmusoc show -...

Flat White Vs. Latte: 7 Point Head to head co...

PLAYBOY INTERVIEW: JOHN LENNON AND YO...

YouTube - Wet Body Geometry Shells: Changing Diffuse in the Shell - SimonWM2000

HDRI Optimized Skin & Hair Shaders | 3D Mod...

How do you make the Face and Lips Glossy in...

Rendering high gloss/stylised skin in 3delight...

glossy skin daz3d shell - Google Search

Zeddicuss | 3D Models and 3D Software by Da...

Water Shader Tutorial for Daz Studio Iray

hi does anyone know how to get the skin like t...

YouTube - Build Mental & Emotional Strength (Total Self Power) Guided Sleep Meditation + Affirmations - Meditations by Rasa

My Wishlist - 3D Models and 3D Software by...

What Color Lipstick Makes Teeth Look Whiter...

8 Ways to Pull Off Red Lips Once And For All

Druidry (modern) - Wikipedia

Sprite (folklore) - Wikipedia

miarossi.com

ZBrush 2018 Features

sparkle for mika 7 - Google Search

Ada for Genesis 8 Female | 3D Models and 3D...

Disembodied Voice Dreams – Jack Preston Ki...

Heroin dreams meaning - Interpretation and...

i had a dream my friend was using heroin - Go...

dream friend heroin - Google Search

YouTube - Rain Hypnosis For Attracting Wealth (Law of Attraction, Create & Manifest Abundance) - Michael Sealey

pilates instructor - Google Search

pilates - Google Search

Pilates For Anxiety and Stress Relief - The Bal...

Slideshow: ADHD in Women and Girls

pilates instructor training - Google Search

sex educator - Google Search

Free Career Aptitude and Career Assessment...

Careers

What If You Are Not Passionate About Anythin...

ADHD Test for Women and Girls: Understand...

YouTube - Rain Hypnosis For Attracting Wealth (Law of Attraction, Create & Manifest Abundance) - Michael Sealey

Portrait: Copper by pjfleury on DeviantArt

YouTube - Meet Your Spirit Guide in a Lucid Dream Meditation for Beginners (Hypnosis) - Unlock Your Life

earwax spoon - Google Search

10 Things I Wish I’d Known Before My MBA

Preparing for A Pilates Instructor Certification...

is pilates instructor a good job - Google Search

Pilates Training Programs | Education | Balanc...

pilates instructor training - Google Search

Are you on the right path? 

Imposter syndrome - Wikipedia

stephanie 4 genesis - Google Search

Aiko 4 3D Female Model Pro Bundle | 3D Mod...

Search results for ‘cute’ | 3D Models and 3D S...

Become a Dog Walker on Wag! 

DAZ 3D | 3D Models and 3D Software by Daz...

Z Hot and Sweaty - Poses and Partials for Gen...

fiction cyborg romance - Google Search

YouTube - How to Change Your Home Screen Icon Shapes in iOS 7 - TheUnlockr

Crazy Text Maker - $ÜPER $yMBOLS

Warrior Makeups for Genesis 3 Male(s) | 3D M...

YouTube - How to create dramatic lights in DAZ Studio (Iray) - The WP Guru

YouTube - Iray 101: Performance Settings in DAZ Studio - The WP Guru

YouTube - How To Render Faster in Iray - Daz 3D

How to speed up rendering times (or improve...

Iray Rendering on a Mac - Do I Need a PC? - D...

iRay in OSX

Building the Best PC for 3D Rendering and Ani...

Build New PC for Rendering Iray?? - Daz 3D F...

cheap pc setup for high quality renders in daz...

NVIDIA DRIVERS Quadro & GeForce Mac OS X...

You made your Mac GPU render for Iray. What...

Book Covers - Daz 3D Forums

What is HDRI and how do I use it? - Daz 3D Fo...

Reality 4.3 - DAZ Studio Edition | 3D Models a...

Daz Studio Iray Tutorial for Beginners

Pix Janella for Mika 8 | 3D Models and 3D Soft...

YouTube - Young Thug - Barter...This video has been removed by the user

Wag! Reviews | Glassdoor

H.E.R. – Focus Lyrics | Genius Lyrics

EJ Juncal Deluxe Pack for Genesis 8 Female:...

calming signals | TheCatSite

YouTube - Genesis 8 Review!!! DAZ Studio Beginners Tutorial - Victoria 8 Figure - Power Pose - Shannon Maer

YouTube - DAZ Studio Clothing Tips & Tricks Tutorial - Shannon Maer

YouTube - Lifelike DAZ Studio Posing Tutorial - 3D Software - Shannon Maer - DAZ Stud - Shannon Maer

FW Marieke HD for Charlotte 8 | 3D Models an...

Ioana for Charlotte 8 | 3D Models and 3D Soft...

Charlotee 8 | 3D Models and 3D Software by D...

YouTube - My Greatest Weakness is Curiosity | Sophia the Robot at Brain Bar - Brain Bar

3D Figures and Assets | RenderHub

YouTube - The Secret Ingredient to Photorealism - Blender Guru

Ultimate Make-Up for Genesis 8 Females(s) | 3...

dForce Casual Springtime for Genesis 8 Femal...

how to build a coaching business as a life coa...

How to Build a Business to Last 100 Years

how to get certified in pilates reformer - Goog...

how much does a life.coach make a year - Goo...

how much does a psychologist make - Google...

how.much does a pilates instructor make a ye...

how much does a cgi artist make - Google Sear...

how.much can a digital artist make - Google S...

Best Psychology Graduate Programs & School...

German wine - Wikipedia

Cabernet Franc - Google Search

cortado gibraltar macchiato - Google Search

brother nathanael - Google Search

Boston Dynamics is changing your idea of wh...

YouTube - Inside the Japanese Hotel Staffed by Robots - Motherboard

Why CGI Humans Are Creepy, and What Scien...

Lifelike ‘Sophia’ Robot Granted Citizenship to...

Apocryphon of John - Wikipedia

i am the sign of the letter and the designation...

Microsoft Releases AI Twitter Bot That Immed...

YouTube - guided meditation lucid dreaming - An astral projection experience - Meditation Vacation

Blender (software) - Wikipedia

blender.org - Home of the Blender project - Fr...

YouTube - This the most convincing CGI human I have ever seen - kdooxerelt2

YouTube - How to make Diamonds in Blender 2.73! ( easy ) - Addicted to CG

YouTube - How to make a sofa in blender 2.72! ( Room Series ) Part 1 - Addicted to CG

YouTube - How to make Curly Hair in Blender! Fast and Easy! - Addicted to CG

Addicted to CG - YouTube

YouTube - Boman - Blender Sculpt & Vertex Paint Timelapse - Yusuf Umar

YouTube - Robots : Top 10 Most Amazing Advanced Robots That Will Change Your World - enrigue8

says cgi - Google Search

YouTube - digital painting / girl in the cafe [ speedpaint ] - Ameur Makhloufi

Modeling Realistic Characters with Blender -...

Create Epic “Man Of Steel” Fan Art in Photosh...

CGI: An Introduction

riri lyrics young thug - Google Search

YouTube - How to create a 3D CGI character - an overview | The Making of “My Time Here” - evokelabs

how can i learn to make.a.cgi character digital...

The Weeknd - Wikipedia

is ketamine addictive - Google Search

Opioid Crisis Fast Facts - CNN

YouTube - Lucid Dreaming Sleep Cycle with Rain, Binaural Beats and Isochronic tones - 2 Hour - Sleep Easy Relax - Peacef...

insecure attachment - Google Search

YouTube - Manifest Any Desire | Guided Meditation - Meditations by Rasa

Dreams About Arguing With Boyfriend – Mean...

Music Theory: 432 Hz - Separating Fact From...

goldendoodle - Google Search

The Good Place - Wikipedia

are sunflowers safe for cats - Google Search

Call Me Kevin - YouTube

YouTube - Everyday Normal Guy - JonLajoie < Drinking Out of Cups (Original) - MadUploader2

Easy Cleaning and Home Organizing Tips | Re...

Selena - Wikipedia

Acno’s Energizer –– StrategyWiki, the video g...

How One Woman Changed The Way People Di...{e in Mongolia}

YouTube - Recipe Ghiradelli® Individual Chocolate Lava Cakes - Kina Shuford

how to speed up macbook pro - Google Search

YouTube - Sims 4 with Jim Pickens - Call Me Kevin

[loadmontana894]

Nvidia rtx 2080 super

Nvidia RTX 2080 Super review: the 2070 Super has stolen its.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Review - TechSpot.

UserBenchmark: Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super).

NVIDIA RTX 2080 Super - NiceHash.

Power Consumption - Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super Review.

PNY GeForce RTX 2080 Super Blower - graphics card - GF RTX.

NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile.

UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) vs RTX 2080.

Rtx 2080 super | N.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs. RTX 2080: Should you upgrade.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super review: Faster 4K for no.

NVIDIA RTX 2080 Super review: A modest, necessary upgrade.

Nvidia geforce rtx 2080 super.

Nvidia geforce rtx 2080 super | N.

Nvidia RTX 2080 Super review: the 2070 Super has stolen its.

The RTX 2080 Super Founders Edition, meanwhile, runs at its stock reference spec speed. Indeed, even Nvidia say the RTX 2080 Super Founders Edition is only around 3-5% faster than its non-Super FE counterpart, so that's probably why some games mentioned in this review run pretty much exactly the same as before. The recently released RTX 2080 Super is a welcome addition to the Nvidia RTX Turing lineup because it narrows the performance gap between the $699 RTX 2080 and the $1199 RTX 2080 Ti.The newcomer's MSRP establishes at the same price as the RTX 2080 and improves on its performance by anywhere between 5-10%, essentially retiring the RTX 2080 if you find it at the same price as the 2080 Super. NVIDIA A100 Tensor Core GPU AMD Instinct MI200 Series Platform Smart Whiteboard for Enterprise AI Face Recognition Solution. More Cloud. GIGABYTE VDI Solution with Virtual GPU RAIDIX 5.X for GIGABYTE platforms Microsoft Azure Stack HCI VirtualStor™ Scaler.... GeForce® RTX 2080 SUPER™ GeForce RTX™ 2080.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Review - TechSpot.

Recommended Gaming Resolutions: 1920x1080. 2560x1440. 3840x2160. The GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is an enthusiast-class graphics card by NVIDIA, launched on July 23rd, 2019. Built on the 12 nm process, and based on the TU104 graphics processor, in its TU104-450-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. This ensures that all modern games.

UserBenchmark: Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super).

NVIDIA RTX 2080 Super Tracker Suggestions When an item is HOT and HARD TO FIND, leave the tracker, or your custom tracker running on your computer, tablet or mobile device. It auto refreshes every minute and this method is even faster than TXT and email alerts. Note: Remember to turn on sound alerts!. Nvidia's RTX 2080 Super card is finally here. Offering superior speeds for roughly the same price as the original RTX 2080, the RTX 2080 Super is pretty much the 4K graphics card to beat right now outside of Nvidia's crazy expensive RTX 2080 Ti - especially as it currently has no real competition from the likes of AMD right now, either. In fact, its closest rival is Nvidia's own £485 / $500. NVIDIA - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super 8GB GDDR6 PCI Express 3.0 Graphics Card - Black/Silver 9001G1802540000 $ 1,475.39 (4 Offers) Free Shipping Used: $749.00 ( 2 Offers) View Details Compare (47) ASUS ROG STRIX GeForce RTX 2080 Overclocked 8G GDDR6 HDMI DP 1.4 USB Type-C Graphics Card (ROG-STRIX-RTX2080-O8G-GAMING) $ 1,485.00 (8 Offers).

NVIDIA RTX 2080 Super - NiceHash.

Enjoy the highest screen resolutions with this NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER graphics card. The real-time ray tracing technology creates life-like imagery for immersive gameplay. Based on the advanced NVIDIA Turing GPU architecture, this NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER graphics card efficiently handles the heavy graphical and compute workload.

Power Consumption - Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super Review.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Super 8G Graphics Card, WINDFORCE Stack, 8GB 256-Bit GDDR6, GV-N208SAORUS-8GC Video Card. Core Clock: 1860 MHz. Max Resolution: 7680 x 4320 @ 60 Hz. DisplayPort: 3 x DisplayPort 1.4. HDMI: 3 x HDMI 2.0b. Model #: vvv13. The Bottom Line. It doesn't deliver quite the performance leap that Nvidia's other RTX Super cards do, but the GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a strong 4K gaming graphics card that improves on the.

PNY GeForce RTX 2080 Super Blower - graphics card - GF RTX.

The RTX 2080 Super features 3,072 CUDA cores -- the amount of parallel processors shoved into the GPU -- compared to the original card's 2,944. Similarly, the clock speed only has a slight bump. The long-awaited releases from Nvidia have finally arrived at Evetech! Introducing the Nvidia RTX 2080 SUPER - one of the most powerful GPUs ever engineered. Crafted using years of R&D, the Turing architecture used here outstrips the previous generation in terms of both performance and realism. Although the RTX 2080 falls behind compared to.

NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile.

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super is Nvidia's new refresh of the RTX 2080, but is it worth your time and money?.

UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) vs RTX 2080.

The CPU performance analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It's time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

Rtx 2080 super | N.

Jul 23, 2019 · Nvidia's expectations for the RTX 2080 Super are that it will be about 5-10 percent faster than a reference RTX 2080, or about five percent faster than the RTX 2080 Founders Edition (which comes. Jul 24, 2019 · The new GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER has higher-clocked GDDR6 memory on-board, with its 8GB of GDDR6 clocked at 15.5Gbps up from the 14Gbps on the regular RTX 2080. I thought this would be an.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs. RTX 2080: Should you upgrade.

As a result of this and the higher TDP, the RTX 2080 Super tends to be more heavily GPU-bound than most NVIDIA cards. The higher memory speeds more than make up for the fully enabled GPU and its. The high performance ray-tracing RTX 2080 Super follows the recent release of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, from NVIDIA's latest range of refreshed Turing RTX GPUs. The 2080 Super is a higher binned version of the original RTX 2080 which it replaces at the same price of $700 USD.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super review: Faster 4K for no.

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super was released in the US on July 23, 2019, and the Founders Edition is on hand for $699 (about £560, AU$990). The RTX 2080 which it replaces, on the other hand. Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark. The GeForce RTX 2080 Super 8GB will easily meet recommended system requirements of games released today. This is a strong benchmarker on modern games and can often return excellent frame rates at.

NVIDIA RTX 2080 Super review: A modest, necessary upgrade.

Better texture detail. Faster complex splatting. The high performance ray-tracing RTX 2080 Super follows the recent release of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, from NVIDIA's latest range of refreshed Turing RTX GPUs. The 2080 Super is a higher binned version of the original RTX 2080 which it replaces at the same price of $700 USD.

Nvidia geforce rtx 2080 super.

Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER uses a PCI-Express 3.0 x16 interface and also requires 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin. The PSU recommendation is 650 W with the power draw rates at 250 W. The dimensions of this card is 10.5” (266.74mm) x 4.556” (115.7mm) x 2-Slot. Released on 23rd October 2019 the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB was first sold for. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition 12GB GDDR6X Graphics Card. 4.8 out of 5 stars based on 29 product ratings. (29) $1,495.00 New. $1,439.99 Used.

Nvidia geforce rtx 2080 super | N.

Jul 23, 2019 · The RTX 2080 Super lives in a world where a Ti version already exists and yet still finds a place for itself in the Nvidia range, being easily the best choice for demanding gamers who haven't got. Oct 30, 2019 · 3DMark aside, the latest Tomb Raider game is where the biggest performance difference exists between the RTX 2080 Super and the RX 5700 XT too. At 23%, or 18fps faster that looks like a pretty big. Get the GPU at max power and dial in the core/mem overclocks, then run some 3DMark tests. If you can get 12,500-13,000 gpu score or higher in normal Timespy your card is running well. Otherwise look into to setting guides for MW, there may be one or two settings that REALLY kneecap the FPS with no real benefit.

[akhirnp]

Maksimalkan Performa PC dengan VGA yang Tepat

Memilih VGA yang tepat sangat penting untuk meningkatkan performa sistem komputer Anda. VGA atau Video Graphics Accelerator memainkan peran krusial dalam pengalaman gaming dan pekerjaan desain grafis. Dengan memilih VGA yang sesuai, Anda bisa menikmati visual yang lebih halus, rendering yang lebih cepat, serta performa keseluruhan PC yang lebih optimal. Dampak signifikan VGA terhadap pengalaman gaming dan desain grafis: - Gaming: Kartu grafis yang kuat memastikan game berjalan lancar dengan frame rate tinggi dan resolusi maksimal. Ini membuat pengalaman bermain game lebih mendalam dan menyenangkan. - Desain Grafis: Bagi profesional di bidang desain grafis atau editing video, VGA yang mumpuni akan mempercepat proses rendering dan memungkinkan penggunaan software berat tanpa hambatan.

Memahami VGA dan Perannya dalam PC

VGA, atau Video Graphics Accelerator, merupakan komponen penting dalam sistem komputer yang bertanggung jawab untuk mengolah data grafis. Dengan kata lain, VGA adalah otak di balik tampilan visual yang Anda lihat di monitor. Fungsi utama VGA adalah untuk memproses dan merender gambar, video, dan animasi agar dapat ditampilkan dengan jelas dan lancar pada layar. Hubungan antara VGA, CPU, dan Motherboard Dalam sebuah PC, VGA bekerja bersama dengan CPU (Central Processing Unit) dan motherboard. CPU bertugas mengolah data secara umum, sementara VGA khusus menangani tugas-tugas grafis. Keduanya harus berkomunikasi dengan baik melalui motherboard agar performa sistem tetap optimal. Misalnya: - CPU mengirimkan data grafis ke VGA. - VGA memproses data tersebut menjadi output visual. - Hasilnya kemudian dikirim kembali ke monitor melalui koneksi VGA atau HDMI. Jenis-Jenis VGA yang Tersedia di Pasaran Ada berbagai jenis VGA yang bisa Anda temukan di pasaran, masing-masing dengan karakteristik dan kegunaan tersendiri: Integrated Graphics (Grafis Terintegrasi): Biasanya sudah termasuk dalam paket CPU. Cocok untuk tugas-tugas ringan seperti browsing atau pekerjaan kantor. Contoh: Intel UHD Graphics. Dedicated Graphics (Grafis Diskret): Merupakan kartu grafis tambahan yang dipasang pada slot PCIe di motherboard. Dapat menangani tugas-tugas berat seperti gaming atau desain grafis. Contoh: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 atau AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. Workstation Graphics: Dirancang khusus untuk aplikasi profesional seperti rendering 3D dan pengolahan video. Biasanya lebih mahal namun menawarkan stabilitas dan performa tinggi. Contoh: NVIDIA Quadro atau AMD Radeon Pro. Pemilihan jenis VGA sangat bergantung pada kebutuhan spesifik pengguna serta kompatibilitas dengan komponen lain dalam sistem komputer. Misalnya, memilih RAM yang cocok untuk motherboard juga merupakan faktor penting dalam menentukan performa keseluruhan sistem. Memahami peran dan fungsi dari setiap jenis VGA akan membantu Anda membuat keputusan yang lebih tepat sesuai dengan kebutuhan Anda.

Produsen GPU yang Tersedia: NVIDIA vs AMD

NVIDIA dan AMD adalah dua produsen utama GPU yang bersaing di pasar. Kedua perusahaan ini memiliki teknologi dan performa yang berbeda, sehingga penting untuk memahami kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing sebelum memutuskan pilihan. Perbandingan Teknologi dan Performa - NVIDIA dikenal dengan teknologi Ray Tracing yang memberikan pencahayaan dan bayangan lebih realistis dalam game. Selain itu, fitur seperti DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) membantu meningkatkan performa tanpa mengurangi kualitas gambar. - AMD menawarkan teknologi Radeon Image Sharpening dan FidelityFX yang meningkatkan detail visual tanpa membebani performa. GPU AMD juga sering kali lebih terjangkau dibandingkan dengan produk sekelas dari NVIDIA. Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Berdasarkan Pengalaman Pengguna NVIDIA Kelebihan: Dukungan driver yang lebih sering diperbarui, fitur eksklusif seperti G-Sync, dan performa unggul dalam game AAA. Kekurangan: Harga cenderung lebih mahal, konsumsi daya lebih tinggi pada beberapa model kelas atas. AMD Kelebihan: Harga lebih kompetitif, efisiensi daya yang baik pada beberapa model, serta dukungan untuk monitor FreeSync. Kekurangan: Update driver kadang kurang konsisten, performa Ray Tracing belum sebaik NVIDIA. Pilihan Produk Unggulan Beberapa produk unggulan dari kedua produsen mencakup: NVIDIA Entry-Level: GeForce GTX 1650 Mid-Range: GeForce RTX 3060 High-End: GeForce RTX 3080 AMD - Entry-Level: Radeon RX 5500 XT Mid-Range: Radeon RX 6600 XT High-End: Radeon RX 6800 XT Memilih antara NVIDIA dan AMD tergantung pada kebutuhan spesifik Anda, baik dari segi anggaran maupun jenis aplikasi atau game yang akan dijalankan.

Menentukan Kebutuhan Berdasarkan Jenis Game atau Aplikasi

Memilih VGA yang tepat sangat bergantung pada jenis game atau aplikasi desain grafis yang Anda gunakan. Beberapa faktor penting yang perlu dipertimbangkan: Spesifikasi VGA untuk Game Tertentu - Game Ringan: Untuk game seperti League of Legends atau Dota 2, VGA entry-level seperti NVIDIA GTX 1650 atau AMD RX 570 sudah cukup memadai. - Game AAA: Game dengan grafis tinggi seperti Cyberpunk 2077 atau Red Dead Redemption 2 membutuhkan VGA dengan spesifikasi lebih tinggi seperti NVIDIA RTX 3070 atau AMD RX 6800 XT. - VR Gaming: Untuk pengalaman Virtual Reality, pilihlah kartu grafis dengan performa tinggi, misalnya NVIDIA RTX 3080 atau AMD RX 6900 XT. Pengaruh Resolusi dan Refresh Rate Monitor Resolusi dan refresh rate monitor sangat mempengaruhi pemilihan kartu grafis: - 1080p dengan 60Hz: VGA menengah seperti NVIDIA GTX 1660 Super cukup untuk menjalankan sebagian besar game. - 1440p dengan 144Hz: Membutuhkan VGA high-end seperti NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti atau AMD RX 6700 XT untuk performa optimal. - 4K Gaming: Untuk bermain di resolusi ultra-high, pilihlah VGA kelas atas seperti NVIDIA RTX 3090 atau AMD RX 6900 XT, yang mampu menangani beban grafis besar. Aplikasi Desain Grafis Untuk aplikasi desain grafis dan editing video, pertimbangkan juga kebutuhan spesifik software yang digunakan: - Adobe Photoshop dan Illustrator: Kartu grafis menengah seperti NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti sudah mencukupi. - 3D Rendering dan Video Editing: Software seperti Blender atau Adobe Premiere Pro membutuhkan VGA dengan performa tinggi, misalnya NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti atau lebih tinggi. Memahami kebutuhan spesifik dari jenis game dan aplikasi desain grafis adalah langkah awal yang krusial dalam memilih VGA yang tepat.

Anggaran dan Pilihan VGA Berdasarkan Kategori

Menentukan anggaran yang realistis untuk pembelian kartu grafis baru sangat penting. Langkah pertama adalah menilai kebutuhan dan prioritas Anda. Apakah Anda seorang gamer berat atau sekadar membutuhkan VGA untuk tugas sehari-hari? Cara Menentukan Anggaran: Evaluasi Kebutuhan: Identifikasi jenis game atau aplikasi yang akan digunakan. Pertimbangkan resolusi dan refresh rate monitor. Riset Harga: Bandingkan harga produk di berbagai toko online. Cari ulasan pengguna dan benchmark performa. Tetapkan Batas Anggaran: Tentukan batas maksimum yang mampu Anda keluarkan tanpa mengorbankan kebutuhan lain. Contoh Produk: Entry-Level (Budget VGA): ASUS GTX 750 Ti: Kelebihan: Hemat energi, cukup kuat untuk gaming 1080p pada pengaturan medium. Kekurangan: Terbatas untuk game dengan grafis tinggi. - High-End (High-End VGA): NVIDIA GTX 1080: Kelebihan: Performa luar biasa untuk gaming 4K, VR-ready, dukungan teknologi terbaru. Kekurangan: Harga tinggi, konsumsi daya besar. Memilih antara budget VGA dan high-end VGA tergantung pada seberapa besar anggaran yang Anda siapkan serta apa yang ingin Anda capai dengan sistem PC Anda.

Memahami Spesifikasi Teknis VGA: Core Count, TDP, Tipe Memori, dan Bandwidth

Core Count: Kunci Performa Grafis Jumlah core pada kartu grafis atau core count adalah indikator utama kemampuan pemrosesan grafis. Core yang lebih tinggi biasanya menunjukkan performa yang lebih baik dalam menangani tugas-tugas berat seperti rendering video, desain grafis, dan gaming. Contoh nyata adalah perbandingan antara NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 dengan 896 CUDA cores dan RTX 3080 dengan 8704 CUDA cores, di mana RTX 3080 jauh lebih unggul dalam performa. Core Count Tinggi: Pro: Mampu menangani lebih banyak tugas secara bersamaan. Con: Biasanya memerlukan daya yang lebih besar. Core Count Rendah: Pro: Lebih efisien dalam penggunaan daya. Con: Kemampuan pemrosesan yang terbatas. TDP Rendah: Efisiensi Energi dan Pendinginan Thermal Design Power (TDP) mengukur jumlah panas maksimum yang dapat dihasilkan oleh sebuah kartu grafis dalam kondisi beban penuh. TDP rendah sangat penting untuk menjaga suhu sistem tetap stabil dan mengurangi kebutuhan akan pendinginan tambahan. Ini sangat bermanfaat jika Anda merakit PC di ruang terbatas atau ingin mengurangi kebisingan dari kipas pendingin. Keuntungan TDP Rendah: Mengurangi konsumsi daya listrik. Meningkatkan umur komponen karena suhu yang lebih rendah. Mengurangi kebutuhan akan sistem pendinginan yang kompleks. Sebagai contoh, NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti memiliki TDP hanya sekitar 75W, ideal untuk PC dengan power supply terbatas atau casing kecil. Memori GDDR5X: Bandwidth Tinggi untuk Performa Optimal Memori pada kartu grafis juga memainkan peran krusial dalam performa keseluruhan. GDDR5X adalah generasi memori grafis yang menawarkan bandwidth lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan generasi sebelumnya seperti GDDR5. Bandwidth yang tinggi memungkinkan transfer data yang lebih cepat, meningkatkan kinerja dalam aplikasi berat seperti game AAA dan rendering video 4K. Kelebihan GDDR5X: Transfer data lebih cepat. Meningkatkan performa aplikasi berat. Sebagai contoh, NVIDIA GTX 1080 menggunakan memori GDDR5X dengan bandwidth hingga 320 GB/s, jauh lebih cepat dibandingkan GDDR5 pada GTX 1060 yang memiliki bandwidth sekitar 192 GB/s. Dampak TDP pada Suhu dan Umur Komponen Memilih kartu grafis dengan TDP rendah bukan hanya soal efisiensi energi tetapi juga tentang menjaga suhu komponen lainnya tetap stabil. Panas berlebih bisa memengaruhi umur panjang komponen lain seperti CPU dan motherboard. Dengan TDP rendah: - Suhu Sistem Lebih Stabil: Mengurangi risiko overheating. - Umur Komponen Lebih Panjang: Suhu rendah membantu mempertahankan kinerja optimal komponen dalam jangka waktu lama. Untuk memastikan semua komponen bekerja secara optimal termasuk memilih prosesor PC yang tepat, penting untuk mempertimbangkan spesifikasi teknis dari setiap bagian.

Kompatibilitas dengan Sistem Anda: Memastikan Kesesuaian Antara Komponen PC

Memilih VGA yang tepat tidak hanya soal performa, tetapi juga memastikan bahwa kartu grafis tersebut kompatibel dengan sistem Anda. Berikut beberapa tips praktis untuk memeriksa kompatibilitas motherboard: - Periksa Slot PCIe: Pastikan motherboard Anda memiliki slot PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express) yang kompatibel dengan VGA yang ingin Anda beli. Sebagian besar VGA modern menggunakan slot PCIe x16. - Ukuran Fisik (Form Factor): Beberapa VGA memiliki ukuran yang lebih besar sehingga memerlukan ruang lebih di dalam casing PC. Periksa dimensi fisik VGA dan pastikan ada cukup ruang di casing Anda. - Kebutuhan Daya: VGA membutuhkan daya tambahan dari PSU (Power Supply Unit). Periksa apakah PSU Anda memiliki konektor daya yang sesuai dan cukup kuat untuk mendukung VGA baru tersebut. - Kompatibilitas BIOS: Beberapa motherboard mungkin memerlukan update BIOS agar dapat bekerja dengan baik bersama VGA terbaru. Kunjungi situs web produsen motherboard untuk informasi lebih lanjut. - Port Output: Cek port output pada VGA seperti HDMI, DisplayPort, atau DVI dan pastikan sesuai dengan monitor yang Anda gunakan. Dengan memperhatikan faktor-faktor ini, Anda dapat memastikan bahwa kartu grafis pilihan Anda dapat dipasang dan berfungsi optimal pada sistem PC yang Anda miliki.

Kesimpulan: Meningkatkan Performa Sistem Anda dengan Pemilihan VGA yang Tepat

Memilih VGA yang tepat sangat penting untuk memastikan performa PC Anda optimal, baik untuk gaming, desain grafis, maupun pekerjaan lainnya. Dengan memahami kebutuhan spesifik dan anggaran yang tersedia, Anda dapat membuat keputusan yang bijak dalam memilih kartu grafis baru. Poin-poin yang perlu diingat: - Tentukan kebutuhan berdasarkan jenis aplikasi atau game yang dijalankan. - Sesuaikan pilihan VGA dengan budget yang dimiliki. - Perhatikan spesifikasi teknis seperti core count, TDP, dan tipe memori. - Pastikan kompatibilitas dengan komponen lain dalam sistem Anda. Dengan mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor tersebut, Anda akan lebih mudah menemukan kartu grafis yang sesuai serta meningkatkan performa sistem Anda secara signifikan. Read the full article

[video-compression-guru]

Intel vs Nvidia: a comparison of video encoding using GPUs

Тranscoding video is a very resource-intensive task. It can be fairly expensive to run it on the CPU, especially with the growth of OTT broadcasting, where there are multiple profiles per channel. GPUs can be used to save resources. This article discusses the main advantages and drawbacks of these solutions, using Intel’s QuickSync and Nvidia’s NVENC as examples.

First, we have to decide what graphics hardware we are going to compare. We are only going to consider stable solutions that are capable of operating 24/7 — this is a must in TV broadcasting.

With Intel, it is simple: we will just take one of the latest-generation Xeon Coffee Lake CPUs, Intel® Xeon® E-2246G processor, with an integrated Intel® UHD Graphics P630 GPU.

With Nvidia, things are a little bit more complicated. Our pick is Quadro RTX 4000 (8GB) which is a server counterpart for GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8GB) but, unlike RTX, it does not officially limit concurrent processing to 3 streams. We have excluded older video card versions because they are guaranteed to lag in HEVC coding performance due to the missing B-frame coding capability.

Let us now specify the platforms with the chosen graphics solutions.

Maximum possible number of transcoded channels

Now let’s have a look at the numbers. These are results of a load test for the maximum possible number of transcoded channels (in the “fastest” mode).

In this comparison, Nvidia has twice the performance of Intel at AVC transcoding and is almost as fast at HEVC transcoding.

Price per channel including server costs

Now that we know the maximum possible number of FHD (1920x1080) channels per server configured with integrated Intel graphics or the Nvidia video card, we can calculate the price per FHD channel from the known server prices.

It turns out that there is no difference in price, and hence the 2x performance advantage of Nvidia is completely offset by the price of one platform. For HEVC channels, Nvidia is much more expensive per channel and platform when aiming for the maximum number of channels — that is, when using the fastest encoding algorithms and sacrificing quality.

Resultant quality of output vs. input stream

Another notable factor to consider is video compression quality — after all, there is no point in having many channels if their quality is not acceptable.

A quality comparison graph based on the PSNR metric is presented below, with Intel AVC vs. the input stream shown in blue and Nvidia AVC vs. the input stream in red.

We can see from the graph that the resultant stream quality is virtually identical for both solutions. Let us compare the streams using VMAF metric.

The next graph compares quality of Intel and Nvidia HEVC streams with that of the input stream, shown in blue and red, respectively.

This graph tells us that our comparison was not entirely valid, because the maximum possible number of transcoded channels for Nvidia is 14 at almost 2 dB higher quality than that of the 13 Intel channels.

Therefore we carried out several more measurements at the maximum possible quality on Nvidia and on Intel in GAcc mode, and obtained the following results for Intel HEVC GAcc and Nvidia HEVC vs. the input stream, shown in blue and red, respectively:

The encoding quality was virtually identical, but the performance of both systems dropped to a fraction of the previous levels. This time, Nvidia could only transcode four FHD HEVC channels and Intel just two. Based on the new data, we can now recalculate the price per channel:

1500/2=750 per transcoded HEVC channel for Intel;

3000/4=750 per transcoded HEVC channel for Nvidia.

In fact, this is the same relative cost per channel as for AVC.

Power consumption at equal load

Let us consider yet another important factor in operating a production system: the platform’s power consumption. From our tests at maximum platform load we found that:

The Nvidia platform consumes about 200 W.

The Intel platform consumes about 75 W, but since it has half as many channels, we will multiply that value by 2 for a total of about 150 W.

As it turns out, the Nvidia platform consumes 50 W more while doing the same job.

Server rack space occupied

With large numbers of channels to transcode, the issue of physical server space often arises.

For Intel, special blade server platforms exist where one 3U server can accommodate 8 to 14 blades (full-fledged servers in a different form factor). One 3U platform is capable of transcoding up to 168 FHD AVC channels. With a regular rack server instead of a blade server, this number of channels would require a rack height of 14U.

The situation with Nvidia is more complicated in this respect because the video cards themselves take up additional space in the platform and are often bulky. With 1 video card per 1U server, 168 FHD AVC channels would consume 7U of rack space. It is possible to save on the cost per platform by installing several video cards on one platform, but this is unlikely to bring space savings, as accommodating 2 or 3 video cards would necessitate a platform of 3U or even 4U.

Specialized applications

In addition to video transcoding, there are other specialized tasks, such as decoding video for visual monitoring purposes or encoding the output from an SDI/NDI capture card. These applications are also much better served by an Intel-based solution, because they are often smaller in scale and hence it will be impossible to fully utilize the resources of the Nvidia platform. Even if you need to encode an SDI signal, it will take a handful of channels, and it is a seldom project that requires encoding up to 24 SDI signals. Moreover, it is going to be pretty hard to accommodate a PCI SDI capture card and a PCI video card on a 1U platform — you will have to choose a platform with a different rack height or find one that has enough space for two cards, which is a rarity.

IDecoding is less resource-intensive than transcoding, and thus, in theory, you could use Nvidia to monitor more than 24 FHD AVC channels visually. The practical limit amounts to 8 channels or so, because it is impossible to send more decoded (uncompressed) video data via the PCI bus. With Intel, this problem does not arise, as GPU is integrated with CPU.

In all fairness, it is worth noting here that Nvidia is more attractive for transcoding UHD content, since you can implement multi-profile transcoding on a single video card. Intel, on the other hand, is not capable of transcoding multi-profile UHD content on one GPU core and, therefore, requires a mechanism for distributing the stream between servers. This solution is known as distributed transcoding.

Conclusions

Based on this comparison, we can identify the main advantages of both solutions.

Intel advantages

Less vertical rack space occupied with compact blade servers

Lower power consumption

Ideal for video decoding and encoding applications

Nvidia advantages

Higher-density encoding per 1 GPU core

Potential for cost savings with the right choice of video card and accommodation of several video cards on one platform

The key consideration for choosing transcoding hardware could be the software vendor that utilizes any of them, given the high importance of aspects such as specific implementation of the platform tools offered by Intel/Nvidia and the advanced features of the entire hardware and software solution. Other aspects include the solution price, software features, warranty, history of successful projects, easy customization, SLA, competencies of maintenance engineers etc. For example, instead of Nvidia’s own software implementation of its platform tools, the Nvidia-based solution often includes an evaluation sample as part of the software package or an open implementation. While there is nothing wrong with an open source project as such, it has its disadvantages, like the inability to customize it with additional features or get a bug fix, because these implementations lack technical support and SLA.

Author

Vadim Blinov — Product Manager of the software encoder Elecard CodecWorks (professional platform for real-time encoding and transcoding into HEVC/H.265, AVC/H.264 and MPEG-2 video supporting adaptive bitrate streaming via HLS and MPEG-DASH protocols). He has 4 years of experience in the video encoding sphere.

[perfectstudentcollector]

Ati Flash Tool For Mac

REVIEW: ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition versus GeForce 6800 Ultra and Others

Originally posted January 5th, 2005, by rob-ART morgan, mad scientist Updated February 24th, 2005, with X800 XT overclock results. Updated June 28th, 2005, with news about the Radeon X850 XT CTO option for G5 Power Macs.

On January 5th, 2005, ATI announced the Radeon X800 XT for the G5 Power Mac. To start things off, I'm sharing a table of features and specs to help you understand how all the 'high end' graphics cards for the G5 compare.

Radeon 9800 Pro Special Mac Edition

nVidia GeForce 6800 GT

Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition

Memory

256MB

256MB

256MB

ADC, DVI

DVI x 2

ADC, DVI

Supports 30' Cinema

No

Yes

Yes

1

2

1

Pixel Fillrate

3.3GP/s

6.4GP/s

8.0+GP/s

8

16

16

Core Clock Speed

412MHz

400MHz

500MHz

77

??

182

Effective Memory Clock Speed

730MHz

1100MHz

1100MHz

22GB/s

32GB/s

32GB/s

Transform Rate

412MV/s

600MV/s

?

4

6

6

Aftermarket Price

$399 from ATI direct, resellers and as kit from Apple

$499 as kit from Apple

$499 from ATI direct and resellers

(* The 9800 XT takes uses only one slot but the heatsink/fan assembly encroaches on slot 2. However, the back plate is still available for such things as the 8 port Internal-to-External SATA Port Adapter from MacGurus)

At first glance, it appears the X800 XT Mac Edition should give you equal or better performance than GeForce 6800 Ultra for an aftermarket price equal to the GeForce 6800 GT -- plus it only uses one slot. But let's look at real world performance.

The Unreal Tournament 2004 Retail build 3339 (UT2004) test was done using the latest SantaDuck Toolpak that combines botmatches and flybys in one application. We chose the Primeval Flyby at 1920x1200 at maximum quality settings to help dramatize the contribution of the graphics card in 3D gaming. The asterisk (*) next to the X800 XT stands for overclock runs with the card set to 500MHz core clock speed and 1100MHz memory clock speed using ATIccelerator II.

However, a good Botmatch is closer to actual game play, so we ran the BridgeOfFate match at 1920x1200 and maximum quality...

Halo is very OpenGL intensive, especially when you set quailty to high and run at high resolution. We used the Halo 1.5 update which now has GPU based Lens Flare performance.

Turn on Full Scene Anti-Aliasing (FSAA) and the gap between the X800 XT and the rest of the cards grows...

We used ATI Displays utility to override the Halo OpenGL settings with FSAA Multi 4X in the case of the ATI cards. Those of you who saw this page earlier today know that we switched from FSAA Super to Multi as we were told that Super only works at 1024x768 and below. As you can see, even with Multi, the X800 'out pulls' the GeForce 6800s.

In case you want to try our Halo scenarios, here's the settings we used: HW Shaders = Advanced Shaders Detail Objects = On, Model Reflections = On FSAA = Off or 4X Lens Flare = High, Model Quality = High VIDEO: Resolution 1920x1200 Refresh = 0, Framerate Throttle = No Vsync Specular = On, Shadows = On, Decals = On, Particles = High, Texture Quality = High SOUND: Sound Quality = Low, Sound Variety = Low

Quake 3 Arena, though getting 'long in the tooth' is still a useful test for OpenGL (as well as dual processor) performance...

Motion is our newest test of graphic cards. As you can see below, how fast you can render a project for preview depends as much on your graphics card's speed (and memory capacity) as it does on your CPU power. This was the one test where the GeForce 6800 cards beat the X800 XT...

GRAPH LEGEND Graphics Cards X800 XT* = overclocked Radeon X800 XT using ATIccelerator II -- simulating X850 XT X800 XT = ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition (8X, 256MB) GeF68 UT = nVidia GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL (8X, 256MB) GeF68 GT = nVidia GeForce 6800 GT DDL (8X, 256MB) Rad98 XT = ATI Radeon 9800 XT OEM (8X, 256MB) Rad98 SE = ATI Radeon 9800 Pro Mac Special Edition (8X, 256MB) Rad96 XT = ATI Radeon 9600 XT OEM (8X, 128MB) CPUs G5/2.5 = G5/2.5GHz MP Power Mac

CONCLUSION I'm very impressed with the performance of the ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition. It's equal to or faster than the GeForce 6800 Ultra in every test but one, yet costs $100 less and uses only one slot. Yes. It is half the length and half the thickness of the GeForce 6800 Ultra. So if you want to reclaim your PCI-X slot, better list your GeForce 6800 on eBay before everyone hears about the X800. ;-)

(In the photo above, the X800 is dwarfed by the GeForce 6800 Ultra in length and thickness as it sits on top of it.)

The X800 XT has the added advantage of being an ATI product which means it can utilize the ATI Displays utility to override the OpenGL settings in all applications to take advantage of such features as advanced Full Scene Anti-Aliasing and Anisotropic Filtering. As designated by the asterisk (*), we used ATIccelerator II to overclock the core to 500MHz and the memory to 1100MHz. There's no corresponding tool for the GeForce 6800 Ultra that I know of.

The only G5 Power User that might prefer the GeForce 6800 would be the few 'lucky dogs' with TWO 30' Cinema displays. The X800 XT comes with one dual link DVI port and one ADC port. That means it supports one 30' Cinema and a second display of your choosing (as long as it's not another 30' Cinema). The GeForce 6800 cards have two dual link DVI ports and therefore can drive two 30' Cinema displays.

ATI included an ADC port on the X800 because they believe most buyers of the X800 XT already have an ADC display they would like to use with their G5 Power Mac. However, if your second display is DVI (or even VGA), there are inexpensive adapters to convert the ADC port to drive a DVI or VGA display. (See 'Where to Buy' below)

FAN NOISE Many of you are asking 'How noisy is the fan?' ATI has done a good job of choosing a quiet fan for the X800. I had only the clear plastic baffle on the G5/2.5 Power Mac test unit. The ambient sound was very low. At 'idle,' if I put my ear right up to the baffle and cracked it open slightly, I could barely distinguish the X800's fan from the Power Mac's multiple fans. When I ran the Halo 'highest quality' TimeDemo sequence, the CPU fans kicked up drowning out any sound coming from the graphics card fan. The same is true of the GeForce 6800 Ultra.

Note to readers running at 1280x1024: There are great gains to be had over your 'old' graphics card by upgrading to the X800, even if you aren't running at 1920x1200. We re-ran our tests at 1280x1024. Check out the X800's advantage over the stock 9600 XT: 230% for Quake3 142% for UT2004 Flyby 40% for UT2004 Botmatch 247% for Halo with FSAA = 4 We'll publish a full page comparing all the cards at 1280x1024 soon. And we'll also address the issue, 'Does having dual processers help with 3D gaming?' (Short answer: only if you are running Quake3.)

NEWS FLASH

June 28th, 2005 -- Radeon X850 XT added to Apple's CTO options for the G5 Power Mac! And GeForce 6800 Ultra dropped! The X850 XT appears to be a speed bumped X800 XT. Yet by dropping the Ultra version of the GeForce 6800 and replacing it with the GT, the Radeon X850 XT becomes the best choice for maximum OpenGL performance. (See chart below) The other good news is that the X850 XT takes up only one slot (vs the CTO GeForce 6800 GT and Ultra which take up two). And at $350, it's cheaper than buying the G5 tower with the default wimpy Radeon 9600 or 9650 and replacing it with an aftermarket $500 Radeon X800 XT.

Only possible downside is if you have two 30' Cinemas. It only supports one 30' Cinema and one 'normal' display, while the GeForce 6800 GT and Ultra support up to two 30' Cinemas. (Don't panic when you hear that the X850 XT's second port is ADC. If you have two DVI displays, order the $29 ADC to DVI adapter from Apple. And don't confuse it with the DVI to ADC converter for $99. Click 'Displays' under 'Accessories' on Apple's online store.)

Don't be depressed if you just bought an X800 XT. You can use ATIccelerator II to tweak your X800 XT to run at 500MHz core clock and 550MHz memory clock speed just like the X850 XT, thereby making it an X850 XT. (See our charts at the top of this article.)

RELATED ARTICLES ON THE NET

Anandtech posted their review of the Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition the same day we did. The showed the GeForce 6800 Ultra faster but were running at lower resolution.

InsideMacGames posted their review of the Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition. It includes the same games we used plus others. Their results are similar to ours -- the X800 wins.

SharkeyExtreme compares the PC versions of the GeForce 6800 GT and Ultra with the Radeon 9800 XT and X800 XT running:

UT2003 and UT2004 Doom 3 and Halo Quake3 and Wolfenstein

Doom 3 shootout with PC versions of GeForce 6800 GT, 6800 Ultra, Radeon X800, and 9800 XT. (Doom runs better on the GeForce cards because nVidia has worked closely with Doom 3 developers to optimize it for that game.)

WHERE TO BUY VARIOUS GRAPHICS CARDS FOR YOUR POWER MAC and MAC PRO

For your Mac Pro, you have the following 16X PCI Express (PCIe) options: The GeForce 7300 GT (16X, 256MB, dual-link DVI + single-link DVI port) is the default. We recommend the Radeon X1900 XT (16X, 512MB, two dual-link DVI ports) as a CTO option. It's much faster than the GeForce 7300 GT and just as fast as the expensive Quadro FX 4500. According to Alias/Autodesk, the X1900 XT is the only graphics card without limitations when using Maya 8.5. To custom order your Mac Pro with the Radeon X1900 XT, go to the Apple Store and click on the Mac Pro graphic.

If you didn't order the Radeon X1900 XT with your Mac Pro, you can order the Radeon X1900 XT as an aftermarket kit for your Mac Pro, go to the Apple Store and click on DISPLAYS in the left margin or do a search on 'X1900.'

NOTE: Mac Pro PCIe graphics cards will not work in Power Mac G5s with PCIe slots -- and vice versa. Nor will Windows PC PCIe graphics cards work in the Mac Pro.

Graphics Card Options for the Dual-Core or Quad-Core G5 with 16X PCI Express slot: The best option for your Dual-Core or Quad-Core G5 with PCIe slots is the ATI Radeon X1900 G5 Mac Edition released in November 2006. You can buy it directly from ATI's Online Store for $299 (with 'trade up' allowance).

It's also sold by Small Dog Electronics and Other World Computing.

The following cards only work on a G5 Power Mac with 8X AGP slot: The 'G5 only' Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition (8X AGP, 256MB, ADC + Dual-Link DVI port) is available from ATI Online Store, Apple's Online Store, Buy.com, Other World Computing, and Small Dog Electronics. (The MSRP is $299)

Apple's Online Store is no longer selling the GeForce 6800 GT or Ultra, which had Dual-Dual-Link DVI ports (for two 30' Cinemas).

The 'G5 only' Radeon 9800 Pro Mac Special Edition (8X AGP, 256MB, ADC + DVI port) is no longer made by ATI.

The following cards work on both the G5 Power Mac (8X AGP) and G4 Power Macs with 2X or 4X AGP: Other World Computing has the new ATI Radeon 9800 Pro Mac (2X/4X AGP, 256MB, DVI + VGA ports) graphics card in stock for $259. ATI has it on their Online Store for $249. The SKU number is 100-435058, in case you want to make sure you are getting the right card.

ATI Online Store, Buy.com and Other World Computing have the Radeon 9600 Pro PC and Mac Edition (4X AGP, 256MB, DVI + Dual-Link DVI port) as well. It's compatible with late model G4 Power Macs and all G5 Power Macs with AGP slots. Priced at $199 MSRP it is the lowest priced AGP graphics card with Dual-Link DVI support.

Has Bare Feats helped you? How about helping Bare Feats?

© 2005 Rob Art Morgan 'BARE facts on Macintosh speed FEATS' Email , the webmaster and mad scientist

ATI Winflash is especially designed to help users backup, re-flash or upgrade the BIOS of their computer's ATI video card. Developed by the manufacturer itself, it is the recommended method to.

List of all WD firmware and software available for download. Download AMD ATI ATIFlash. AMD ATIFlash is used to flash the graphics card BIOS on AMD Radeon 580, 570, 480, 470, 460 and older cards. Usage: atiflash -p 0 Bios.rom -f.

Ati Tools Usa

Ati Tools Inc

[anat31ffhlkq]

Con Su Apariencia Futurista

Hallar la mejor computadora portátil Dell para dos mil veinte no es una tarea fácil: Dell saca múltiples computadoras portátiles de la mejor calidad de año en año, por lo que, ya sea que esté comprando una computadora portátil para juegos, una computadora portátil para empresas o una computadora portátil para el regreso a la escuela, tengo muchas opciones.

Estamos aquí para guiarlo cuidadosamente a través de todos los modelos que Dell tiene en oferta ahora, y hemos elegido 10 de los mejores a continuación. Desde la mejor computadora portátil Dell para la escuela hasta la mejor computadora portátil Dell para el trabajo, Laptop hay algo que se amolda a cada necesidad y presupuesto. Asimismo hemos presentado detalles de todas y cada una de las especificaciones, diseños y costos, para que pueda hacer algunas comparaciones mismo.

Debemos señalar que la gama Dell se altera todo el tiempo en concepto de especificaciones y disponibilidad de modelos, con lo que diríjase de forma directa a Dell para poder ver las últimas configuraciones y costos. Los detalles enumerados acá eran adecuados en el momento de redactar este artículo según el sitio oficial de Dell R. Unido.

Revisión de Dell XPS quince 2 en 1: un híbrido delgado y poderoso con habilidades de juego genuinas Estas son las mejores computadoras portátiles, escogidas por nuestros especialistas Las mejores computadoras portátiles por menos de £ 500 Dell XPS 13 vs Dell XPS 15: ¿cuál de los portátiles premium de Dell es mejor? De qué forma escoger la mejor computadora portátil Dell

La elección de la mejor computadora portátil Dell marcha de igual manera que con cualquier otra computadora portátil: decida cuál es su punto perfecto en concepto de coste y potencia, y haga su elección en consecuencia. Como es lógico, abonar más le va a dar un mejor rendimiento y una mayor longevidad.

Hay que localizar un equilibrio entre la potencia y la portabilidad que vale la pena considerar: las computadoras portátiles más potentes no solo son más caras, sino son más bastante difíciles de transportar, y si desea los componentes de la computadora portátil de primer nivel, también necesitará una computadora portátil más grande. portátil caben todos en.

La insignia de Dell le brinda cierta garantía en concepto de calidad, por lo que cualquier computadora portátil que escoja le servirá bien; solo debe decidir el género de especificaciones que necesita, el coste que puede abonar y la cantidad de sacrificio que debe realizar. quiero poner en llevarlo alrededor.

Las mejores computadoras portátiles Dell para dos mil veinte 1. Dell XPS 13 (dos mil veinte)

La mejor computadora portátil Dell del momento La serie Dell XPS 13 nos ha cautivado continuamente aquí en T3, y la versión 2020 de la computadora portátil sigue esa tendencia: es potente, sumamente bien construida y compacta, con lo que prácticamente todo lo que podría desear en su busca de la mejor computadora portátil Dell. alrededor en este momento.

Con los últimos procesadores Intel de décima generación instalados y hasta dieciseis GB de RAM instalados, esta es una computadora portátil que va a poder manejar todo lo que desee. Desde Netflix a altas horas de la noche hasta la redacción de informes temprano en la mañana, hallará que la Dell XPS trece para 2020 es una computadora portátil capaz y eficiente.

No obstante, es esa pantalla de trece,4 pulgadas con biseles superdelgados lo que realmente hace que el XPS 13 se destaque: si lo quiere, puede llegar hasta una resolución de 4K, pero los modelos de resolución de mil novecientos veinte x 1.080 todavía se ven fabulosos ( 4K no hace gran diferencia en una pantalla de computadora portátil de este tamaño).

2. Dell XPS quince (dos mil veinte) La mejor computadora portátil Dell premium

La nueva Dell XPS 15 para 2020 nos ha cautivado incluso más que las versiones precedentes de la computadora portátil insignia, y si tiene suficiente dinero para poder pagarla, esta es indudablemente una de las mejores computadoras portátiles Dell en el negocio: paga un tanto más que el XPS trece por esa pantalla de quince,6 pulgadas, pero creemos que vale la pena.

Nos agrada ver que la pantalla utiliza la relación de aspecto 16:10: no funciona tan bien para películas en pantalla ancha, mas es idónea para trabajar con documentos y desplazarse por sitios web. Como era de aguardar de la serie XPS, toda la computadora portátil está bellamente construida y es un ganador desde cierto punto de vista estético, ya sea abierto o cerrado.

También puede mentir a la Dell XPS 15 con ciertos componentes internos de alta calidad: procesadores Intel Core i9, ciertas soluciones de tarjetas gráficas impresionantes y un máximo de sesenta y cuatro GB de RAM (que habría de ser suficiente incluso para sus proyectos más avanzados. el rango de costos más alto, consigue una gran cantidad de portátiles Dell por su dinero.

3. Dell Inspiron quince tres mil El mejor portátil Dell económico

Aparte de las notebooks insignia premium que ofrece Dell, también existen muchos modelos con una buena relación calidad-precio: la selección en el sitio de Dell es tan grande que probablemente encontrará algo que se adapte a su situación financiera. La línea Inspiron es buen sitio para empezar a buscar, y la Dell Inspiron 15 3000 es particularmente tentadora.

Lo más importante es una costosa pantalla de 15.6 pulgadas: las pantallas grandes no siempre son un hecho a costos más bajos, mas la pantalla anexa a esta computadora portátil Dell en particular le brinda a sus aplicaciones de transmisión de video y sus navegadores web y cualquier otra cosa que desee ejecutar. de espacio para moverse.

Consigue ciertas especificaciones muy decentes para acompañar esa pantalla, con discos duros SSD y conjuntos de chips AMD que se ofrecen en determinados modelos. Adquirir la mejor computadora portátil Dell en este extremo del mercado significa que deberá olvidarse de los juegos intensos o la edición de vídeo, mas para una computadora atractiva que se ocupará de lo básico diario, esto es ideal.

4. Estación de trabajo móvil Dell Precision 5750 Para un trabajo serio sobre la marcha

A este costo, con estas especificaciones y esa pantalla nítida de 17 pulgadas, esta es una computadora portátil Dell dirigida a empresas y usuarios avanzados: tendrá que gastar mucho dinero para tener en sus manos la Dell Precision 5750, mas no pensamos que se sienta decepcionado con lo que consigue a cambio, si precisa una computadora portátil que sea capaz de hacer todo cuanto una computadora de escritorio podría hacer, mas en un factor de forma de computadora portátil.

Verdaderamente está obteniendo componentes de primer nivel aquí: tenga en cuenta el procesador Intel Core i7-10750H de décima generación y la tarjeta gráfica Nvidia Quadro T2000, como ciertas memorias RAM más premium y fiables, con lo que no es verdaderamente una para el estudiantes o bien para empleo casual los fines de semana.

Aun con una pantalla de 17 pulgadas adjunta, la Dell Precision 5750 aún se las arregla para ser liviana y simple de transportar a lo largo del día, con este modelo inclinando la balanza a dos,13 kg o cuatro,7 libras. Las opciones de conectividad también son buenas, con no menos de cuatro puertos USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 y una ranura para tarjetas SD de tamaño completo para emplear asimismo. No importa lo que necesite hacer con su computadora portátil, la Dell Precision cinco mil setecientos cincuenta va a estar a la altura de la labor.

5. Dell G5 quince (dos mil veinte) Una potencia de juego compacta

Si quiere jugar en su computadora portátil pero no desea exagerar en concepto de tamaño y costo, consiga la Dell G5 15: jugará todos y cada uno de los juegos de Windows más recientes de forma realmente agradable (clasificando como "juegos de siguiente nivel "en la puntuación de referencia oficial de 3DMark), y viene con un efecto de iluminación sutil debajo que puede habilitar o deshabilitar conforme sea preciso.

Dell ha mantenido esto a un precio fantástico teniendo presente los componentes que ingresa, componentes que incluyen una RAM saludable de 8GB y una tarjeta gráfica Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti de 6GB para sostener esas velocidades de cuadro agradables y fluidas. Sin embargo, la estrella del espectáculo es la pantalla de 15,6 pulgadas, 1920 x 1080, con una frecuencia de actualización máxima de 144Hz.

Cuando no esté jugando, como es natural, asimismo puede emplear la computadora portátil para todo lo demás; no tiene un estilo tan peculiar que no podrá sacarlo en la cafetería local. Estamos impresionados con la gestión térmica y la duración de la batería de la Dell G5 quince, definitivamente una de las mejores computadoras portátiles Dell para jugadores.

seis. Dell G7 17 (dos mil veinte) El Dell G7 17 es un paso adelante del Dell G5 15 en prácticamente todos los aspectos, desde el tamaño de la pantalla hasta las opciones de gráficos libres y el aspecto increíble del dispositivo: la pantalla se encuentra un tanto sobre el resto de los chasis, con lo que es casi como si tuviera un monitor separado frente a la pantalla de una computadora portátil.

Con una frecuencia de actualización de 144Hz y un tiempo de respuesta de 9ms, esa pantalla de 17.3 pulgadas está garantizada para enseñar tus juegos de la mejor manera posible, y debería darte una ventaja contra oponentes y enemigos (ya sean reales o bien generados por computadora). Naturalmente, esta es una computadora portátil parcialmente robusta gracias a esa pantalla, mas todavía puede llevarla con bastante sencillez.

Este modelo se actualizó recientemente para ofrecer 1 Tb de almacenaje, lo que significa más espacio para sus juegos sin depender de la nube todo el tiempo, y consigue exactamente las mismas opciones de efectos de iluminación sutiles que en el Dell G5 15. Claramente una joya de un portátil para juegos.

7. Dell Latitude nueve mil quinientos diez Potencia de juego de alto nivel en una computadora portátil

La Dell Latitude 9510 le ofrece un aspecto y un rendimiento al estilo MacBook Pro en un chasis Dell que marcha con Windows: es una computadora portátil de aspecto fabuloso con mucha energía bajo el capó, y si bien asimismo es cara, afirmaríamos que es Merece la pena la inversión si desea de las mejores computadoras portátiles con Windows y las mejores computadoras portátiles Dell disponibles actualmente.

Con una de las últimas CPU Intel de décima generación y hasta dieciseis GB de RAM para que todo funcione sin problemas, las únicas labores que no podrá realizar con esta computadora portátil son la edición de vídeo y los juegos pesados: los gráficos integrados de Intel sirven para la página web navegación, labores de oficina y edición de imágenes, pero va a tener dificultades si las empuja más.

Es delgado, liviano y asimismo viene con muchas opciones de conectividad, así que eche una ojeada a las diferentes opciones de configuración y vea cuál se adapta mejor a , debido a la cantidad de formas diferentes en las que puede configurar el Latitude nueve mil quinientos diez, el el coste también puede cambiar bastante. La computadora portátil también está libre en un factor de forma dos en 1.

8. Dell Inspiron 15 siete mil 2 en 1 Excelente valor en un dos en 1

El factor de forma 2 en 1 le brinda mucha flexibilidad adicional con su computadora portátil, singularmente cuando desea sentarse y disfrutar de algún contenido. La Dell Inspiron quince siete mil dos-in-1 es una de las computadoras portátiles dos en 1 con mejor relación calidad-precio en la gama Dell, con ciertas especificaciones pasmantes disponibles a un costo muy razonable, y vale la pena estar en su lista de preseleccionados si ' esté buscando la mejor computadora portátil Dell.

La bisagra le permite guardar un lapicero óptico Dell mientras viaja, y puede plegar este dispositivo y utilizarlo como una tableta improvisada si lo precisa. El beneficio de usar un 2 en 1 como este sobre algo como un Surface Pro o bien un iPad Pro es que todavía consigues el teclado y el trackpad de tamaño completo, aparte de toda la potencia y el desempeño de una computadora conveniente.

Hablando de desempeño, las especificaciones alcanzan el máximo con un chip Intel i7 de décima generación, 16 GB de RAM y 512 GB de almacenaje SSD interno, suficiente para trabajar incluso en las labores de computadora portátil más exigentes, especialmente si añade la opción de una Nvidia GeForce Tarjeta gráfica MX250 en la parte superior. Incluso existe la opción de una pantalla 4K, mas aun la configuración de primer nivel tiene un precio muy razonable.

9. Dell XPS trece dos en 1 (2020) Un portátil Dell premium dos en 1 versátil

Nuestra mejor selección para la mejor computadora portátil Dell también está libre en una configuración 2 en 1, por lo que puede mantenerla para ver ciertas películas o doblarla y emplearla como una tableta (gruesa), conforme sus requisitos y Para qué exactamente va a utilizar su tableta, la Dell XPS 13 dos-in-1 podría ser una oferta aún mejor para que la versión estándar.

Aún obtiene la excelente calidad de construcción y las especificaciones de alto nivel: algunos de los últimos y mejores procesadores Intel, además de un máximo de treinta y dos GB de RAM y 1 Tb de espacio de almacenamiento (si bien las mejores especificaciones, por supuesto, le van a costar una cantidad considerable). de dinero). En una computadora portátil de este tamaño, no puede aguardar demasiado en concepto de gráficos, mas el chipset integrado Iris Plus manejará todos y cada uno de los aspectos básicos con sencillez.

Incluso existe la opción de una pantalla de resolución 4K acá, en lo que ya es uno de los mejores y más brillantes paneles de visualización del negocio. El Dell XPS trece dos-en-1 no es para todos: aquellos con un presupuesto limitado y aquellos que necesitan una pantalla más espaciosa van a querer buscar en otro lado, mas ciertamente cumple con muchas casillas esenciales.

10. Alienware M17 (2020) La mejor computadora portátil Dell para el máximo rendimiento en juegos

Especificaciones Con su apariencia futurista, pantalla gigante y desempeño de vanguardia, la computadora portátil para juegos Alienware M17 efectivamente merece la pena para las personas que aprecian tanto el estilo como la potencia. Últimamente renovada para 2020, la computadora portátil es de las mejores computadoras portátiles Dell y también una de las mejores computadoras portátiles para juegos.

Las opciones de configuración del procesador aquí superan en un Intel Core i9-10980HK súper rápido, mientras que las opciones de la tarjeta gráfica van hasta una Nvidia GeForce RTX dos mil ochenta Super 8GB: eso es un desempeño de nivel de escritorio embalado en una computadora portátil que puede elegir y llevarlo contigo. Asimismo puede combinar eso con un máximo de treinta y dos GB de RAM y 512 GB de almacenaje SSD incorporado.

La computadora portátil está dominada por su pantalla limpia y vibrante de diecisiete.3 pulgadas, y asimismo existe la opción de una resolución 4K. Asimismo se incluyen todos y cada uno de los toques frecuentes de Alienware, desde el software de optimización hasta la refrigeración interna avanzada. Si quiere las mejores velocidades de cuadro posibles, eche un vistazo al Alienware M17.

[suzanneshannon]

Review of the Surface Book 3 for Developers

I was offered a Surface Book 3 to use as a loaner over the the last 5 weeks. I did a short video teaser on Twitter where I beat on the device with a pretty ridiculous benchmark - running Visual Studio 2019 while running Gears of War and Ubuntu under WSL and Windows Terminal. I have fun. ;)

Hey they loaned me a @surface book 3! So...I threw EVERYTHING at it...Visual Studio, Gears of War, Ubuntu/WSL2/Windows...*all at the same time* because why not? LOL (review very soon) pic.twitter.com/FmgGCBUGuR

— Scott Hanselman (@shanselman) May 14, 2020

Size and Weight

My daily driver has been a Surface Book 2 since 2017. The new Surface Book 3 is the exact size (23mm thick as a laptop) and weight (3.38 and 4.2 lbs.) as the SB2. I have had to add a small sticker to one otherwise I'd get them confused. The display resolutions are 3000×2000 for the 13.5-inch model and 3240×2160 for the 15-inch one that I have. I prefer a 15" laptop. I don't know how you 13" people do it.

Basically if you are a Surface Book 2 user the size and weight are the same. The Surface Book 3 is considerably more power in the same size machine.

CPU and Memory

They gave me an i7-1065G7 CPU to test. It bursts happily over 3.5 Ghz (see the compiling screenshot below) and in my average usage hangs out in the 2 to 1.8 range with no fan on. I regularly run Visual Studio 2019, VS Code, Teams, Edge (new Edge, the Chromium one), Ubuntu via WSL2, Docker Desktop (the WSL2 one), Gmail and Outlook as PWAs, as well as Adobe Premiere and Audition and other parts of the Creative Suite. Memory usually sits around 14-18 gigs unless I'm rendering something big.

It's a 10th gen Intel chip and as the Surface Book 3 can detach the base from the screen, it's both a laptop and tablet. I gleaned from Anandatech that TDP is between 10 and 25W (usually 15W) depends on what is needed, and it shifts frequencies very fast. This is evident in the great battery life when doing things like writing this blog post or writing in Edge or Word (basically forever) versus playing a AAA game or running a long compile, building containers, or rendering a video in Premiere (several hours).

FLIP THE SCREEN AROUND? You can also when docked even reverse the screen! Whatever do you mean? It's actually awesome if you want an external keyboard.

All this phrased differently? It's fast, quickly, when it needs to be but it's constantly changing the clock to maximize power/thermals/battery.

SSD - Size and Speed

The device I was loaned has a Toshiba KXG60PNV2T04 Hard Drive 2TB NVMe M.2 that's MASSIVE. I'm used to 512G or maaybe a 1TB drive in a Laptop. I'm getting used to never having to worry about space. Definitely 1TB minimum these days if you want to play games AND do development.

I ran a CrystalBenchmark on the SSD and it did 3.2GB/s sequential reads! Sweet. I feel like the disk is not the bottleneck with my development compile tests below. When I consulted with the Surface team last year during the conception of the Surface Book 3 I pushed them for faster SSDs and I feel that they delivered with this 2TB SSD.

GPU - Gaming and Tensorflow

The 13.5-inch model now comes with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU with 4GB of GDDR5 memory in its Core i7 variant, while the 15-inch unit features a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with 6GB of GDDR6 memory. When running the Gears 5 Benchmark while plugged in (from the Extras menu, Benchmark) is has no issues with the default settings doing 60fps for 90% of the benchmark with a few dips into the 57 range depending what's on screen.

It's not a gaming machine, per se, but it does have a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti so I'm basically able to 1080p 60fps AAA games. I've played Destiny 2, Gears of War 5, and Call of Duty Modern Warfare on default settings at 60 fps without issue. The fan does turn on but it's very manageable. I like that whenever we get back into hotels I'll be able to play some games and develop on the same machine. The 15" also includes an Xbox Wireless Adapter so I just paired my controller with it directly.

I was also able to run Tensorflow with CUDA on the laptop under Windows and it worked great. I ran a model against some video footage from my dashcam and 5.1 gigs of video RAM was used immediately and the CUDA engine on the 1660Ti is visible working in Taskman. The commercial SKU has an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 that is apparently even more tuned for CUDA work.

Developer Performance

When I built my Intel i9 Ultimate Desktop 3.0 machine and others, I like to do compile tests to get a sense of how much you can throw at machine. I like big project compiles because they are a combination of a lot of disk access and a lot of parallel CPU work. However, some projects do have a theoretical maximum compile speed because of the way the dependences flesh out. I like to use Orchard Core for benchmarks.

Orchard Core is a fully-featured CMS with 143 projects loaded into Visual Studio. MSBUILD and .NET Core supports both parallel and incremental builds.

A warm build of Orchard Core on IRONHEART my i9 desktop takes just under 10 seconds.

My 6 year old Surface Pro 3 builds it warm in 62 seconds.

A totally cold build (after a dotnet clean) on IRONHEART takes 33.3 seconds.

My Surface Pro 3 builds it cold in 2.4 minutes.

I'll do the same build on both my Surface Book 2 and this new Surface Book 3 to compare. I've excluded the source folders from Defender as well as msbuild.exe and dotnet.exe. I've also turned off the Indexer.

A cold build (after a dotnet clean) on this Surface Book 3 takes 46 seconds.

A warm build is 16.1 seconds

A cold build (after a dotnet clean) on my Surface Book 2 takes 115 seconds.

It's WAY faster than my Surface Book 2 which has been my daily driver when mobile for nearly 3 years!

Benchmarks are all relative and there's raw throughput, there's combination benchmarks, and all kinds of things that can "make a chart." I just do benchmarks that show if I can do a thing I did before, faster.

You can also test various guesses if you have them by adding parameters to dotnet.exe. For example, perhaps you're thinking that 143 projects is thrashing to disk so you want to control how many CPUs are used. This has 4 physical cores and 8 logical, so we could try pulling back a little

dotnet build /maxcpucount:4

The result with Orchard Core is the same, so there is likely a theoretical max as to how fast this can build today. If you really want to go nuts, try

dotnet build -v diag

And dig through ALL the timing info!

Webcam Quality

Might be odd to add this as its own section but we're all using our webcams constantly right now. I was particularly impressed with the front-facing webcam. A lot of webcams are 720p with mediocre white balance. I do a lot of video calls so I notice this stuff. The SB3 has a 1080p front camera for video and decent light pickup. When using the Camera app you can do up to 5MP (2560x1920) which is cool. Here's a pic from today.

Ports and Power and Sound and Wi-Fi

The Surface Book 3 has just one USB-C port on the right side and two USB 3.1 Gen 2s on the left. I'd have liked one additional USB-C so I could project on stage and still have one additional USB-C available...but I don't know what for. I just want one more port. That said, the NEW Surface Dock 2 adds FOUR USB-C ports, so it's not a big deal.

It was theoretically possible to pull more power on the SB2 than its power supply could offer. While I never had an issue with that, I've been told by some Destiny 2 players and serious media renderers that it could happen. With the SB3 they upped the power supply with 65W for the base 13.5-inch version and a full 127W for the 15-inch SKUs so that's not an issue any more.

I have only two Macs for development and I have no Thunderbolt devices or need for an eGPU so I may not be the ideal Thunderbolt consumer. I haven't needed it yet. Some folks have said that it's a bummer the SB3 doesn't have it but it hasn't been an issue or sticking point for any of my devices today. With the new Surface Dock 2 (below) I have a single cable to plug in that gives me two 4k monitors at 60Hz, lots of power, 4 USB-C ports all via the Dock Connector.

I also want to touch on sound. There is a fan inside the device and if it gets hot it will run. If I'm doing 1080p 60fps in Call of Duty WarZone you can likely hear the fan. It comes and goes and while it's audible when the fan is on, when the CPU is not maxed out (during 70% of my work day) the Surface Book 3 is absolutely silent, even when running the monitors. The fan comes on with the CPU is bursting hard over 3Ghz and/or the GPU is on full blast.

One other thing, the Surface Book 3 has Wi-Fi 6 even though I don't! I have a Ubnt network and no Wi-Fi 6 mesh points. I haven't had ANY issues with the Wi-Fi on this device over Ubnt mesh points. When copying a 60 gig video file over Wi-Fi from my Synology NAS I see sustained 280 megabit speeds.

The New Surface Dock - Coming May 26th

I'm also testing a pre-release Surface Dock 2. I suspect they wanted me to test it with the Surface Book 3...BUT! I just plugged in every Surface I have to see what would happen.

My wife has a Surface Laptop 2 she got herself, one son has my 6 year old old Surface Pro 3 while the other has a Surface Go he got with his allowance. (We purchased these over the last few years.) As such we have three existing Surface Docks (original) - One in the kids' study/playroom, one in the Kitchen as a generalized docking station for anyone to drop in to, and one in my office assigned me by work.

We use these individual Surfaces (varying ages, sizes, and powers) along with my work-assigned Surface Book 2 plus this loaner Surface Book 3, so it's kind of a diverse household from a purely Surface perspective. My first thought was - can I use all these devices with the new Dock? Stuff just works with a few caveats for older stuff like my Surface Pro 3.

RANDOM NOTE: What happens when you plug a Surface Pro 3 (released in 2014) into a Surface Dock 2? Nothing, but it does get power. However, the original Surface Dock is great and still runs 4096 x 2160 @30Hz or 2960 x 1440 @60Hz via mini DisplayPort so the Pro 3 is still going strong 6 years out and the kids like it.

So this Surface Dock 2 replaces the original Dock my office. The Surface Dock 2 has

2x front-facing USB-C ports (I use these for two 4k monitors)

2x rear-facing USB-C ports

2x rear-facing USB-A 3.2 (10Gbps) ports

1x Gigabit Ethernet port

1x 3.5mm audio in/out port

Kensington lock slot - I've never used this

First, that's a lot of USB-C. I'm not there yet with the USB-C lifestyle, but I did pick up two USB-C to full-size DisplayPort cables at Amazon and I can happily report that I can run both my 4k monitors at 60hz plus run the main Surface Book 3 panel. The new Dock and its power supply can push 120 watts of power to the Surface with a total of 199 watts everything connected to the dock. I've got a few USB-C memory sticks and one USB-C external hard drive, plus the Logitech Brio is USB 3, so 6 total ports is fine with 4 free after the two monitors. I also Gigabit wired the whole house so I use the Ethernet port quite happily.

Initially I care about one thing - my 4k monitors. Using the USB-C to DisplayPort cables I plugged the dock into two Dell P2715Q 4ks and they work! I preferred using the direct cables rather than any adapters, but I also tested a USB-C to HDMI 2.0 adapter I got in 2018 with some other Dell monitors in the house and that worked with the Surface Book 3 as it had previously with the Book 2.

SURPRISE NOTE: How does the super-thin Surface Pro X do when plugged into a Surface Dock 2? Amazing. It runs two 4k monitors at 60 Hz. I don't know why I was shocked, it's listed on the support page. It's a brand new device, but it's also the size and weight of an iPad so I was surprised. It's a pretty amazing little device - I'll do another post on just the ARM-based Surface Pro X another time.

One final thing about the new Dock. The cable is longer! The first dock had a cable that was about 6" too short and now it's not. It's the little things and in this case, a big thing that makes a Dock that much nicer to use.

Conclusion

All in all, I'm very happy with this Surface Book 3 having been an existing Surface Book 2 user. It's basically 40-50% faster, the video card is surprisingly capable. The SSD is way faster at the top end. It's a clear upgrade over what I had before, and when paired with the Surface Dock 2 and two 4k monitors it's a capable developer box for road warriors or home office warriors like myself.

Sponsor: Have you tried developing in Rider yet? This fast and feature-rich cross-platform IDE improves your code for .NET, ASP.NET, .NET Core, Xamarin, and Unity applications on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

© 2020 Scott Hanselman. All rights reserved.

      Review of the Surface Book 3 for Developers published first on https://deskbysnafu.tumblr.com/

[philipholt]

Review of the Surface Book 3 for Developers

I was offered a Surface Book 3 to use as a loaner over the the last 5 weeks. I did a short video teaser on Twitter where I beat on the device with a pretty ridiculous benchmark - running Visual Studio 2019 while running Gears of War and Ubuntu under WSL and Windows Terminal. I have fun. ;)

Hey they loaned me a @surface book 3! So...I threw EVERYTHING at it...Visual Studio, Gears of War, Ubuntu/WSL2/Windows...*all at the same time* because why not? LOL (review very soon) pic.twitter.com/FmgGCBUGuR

— Scott Hanselman (@shanselman) May 14, 2020

Size and Weight

My daily driver has been a Surface Book 2 since 2017. The new Surface Book 3 is the exact size (23mm thick as a laptop) and weight (3.38 and 4.2 lbs.) as the SB2. I have had to add a small sticker to one otherwise I'd get them confused. The display resolutions are 3000×2000 for the 13.5-inch model and 3240×2160 for the 15-inch one that I have. I prefer a 15" laptop. I don't know how you 13" people do it.

Basically if you are a Surface Book 2 user the size and weight are the same. The Surface Book 3 is considerably more power in the same size machine.

CPU and Memory

They gave me an i7-1065G7 CPU to test. It bursts happily over 3.5 Ghz (see the compiling screenshot below) and in my average usage hangs out in the 2 to 1.8 range with no fan on. I regularly run Visual Studio 2019, VS Code, Teams, Edge (new Edge, the Chromium one), Ubuntu via WSL2, Docker Desktop (the WSL2 one), Gmail and Outlook as PWAs, as well as Adobe Premiere and Audition and other parts of the Creative Suite. Memory usually sits around 14-18 gigs unless I'm rendering something big.

It's a 10th gen Intel chip and as the Surface Book 3 can detach the base from the screen, it's both a laptop and tablet. I gleaned from Anandatech that TDP is between 10 and 25W (usually 15W) depends on what is needed, and it shifts frequencies very fast. This is evident in the great battery life when doing things like writing this blog post or writing in Edge or Word (basically forever) versus playing a AAA game or running a long compile, building containers, or rendering a video in Premiere (several hours).

FLIP THE SCREEN AROUND? You can also when docked even reverse the screen! Whatever do you mean? It's actually awesome if you want an external keyboard.

All this phrased differently? It's fast, quickly, when it needs to be but it's constantly changing the clock to maximize power/thermals/battery.

SSD - Size and Speed

The device I was loaned has a Toshiba KXG60PNV2T04 Hard Drive 2TB NVMe M.2 that's MASSIVE. I'm used to 512G or maaybe a 1TB drive in a Laptop. I'm getting used to never having to worry about space. Definitely 1TB minimum these days if you want to play games AND do development.

I ran a CrystalBenchmark on the SSD and it did 3.2GB/s sequential reads! Sweet. I feel like the disk is not the bottleneck with my development compile tests below. When I consulted with the Surface team last year during the conception of the Surface Book 3 I pushed them for faster SSDs and I feel that they delivered with this 2TB SSD.

GPU - Gaming and Tensorflow

The 13.5-inch model now comes with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU with 4GB of GDDR5 memory in its Core i7 variant, while the 15-inch unit features a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with 6GB of GDDR6 memory. When running the Gears 5 Benchmark while plugged in (from the Extras menu, Benchmark) is has no issues with the default settings doing 60fps for 90% of the benchmark with a few dips into the 57 range depending what's on screen.

It's not a gaming machine, per se, but it does have a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti so I'm basically able to 1080p 60fps AAA games. I've played Destiny 2, Gears of War 5, and Call of Duty Modern Warfare on default settings at 60 fps without issue. The fan does turn on but it's very manageable. I like that whenever we get back into hotels I'll be able to play some games and develop on the same machine. The 15" also includes an Xbox Wireless Adapter so I just paired my controller with it directly.

I was also able to run Tensorflow with CUDA on the laptop under Windows and it worked great. I ran a model against some video footage from my dashcam and 5.1 gigs of video RAM was used immediately and the CUDA engine on the 1660Ti is visible working in Taskman. The commercial SKU has an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 that is apparently even more tuned for CUDA work.

Developer Performance

When I built my Intel i9 Ultimate Desktop 3.0 machine and others, I like to do compile tests to get a sense of how much you can throw at machine. I like big project compiles because they are a combination of a lot of disk access and a lot of parallel CPU work. However, some projects do have a theoretical maximum compile speed because of the way the dependences flesh out. I like to use Orchard Core for benchmarks.

Orchard Core is a fully-featured CMS with 143 projects loaded into Visual Studio. MSBUILD and .NET Core supports both parallel and incremental builds.

A warm build of Orchard Core on IRONHEART my i9 desktop takes just under 10 seconds.

My 6 year old Surface Pro 3 builds it warm in 62 seconds.

A totally cold build (after a dotnet clean) on IRONHEART takes 33.3 seconds.

My Surface Pro 3 builds it cold in 2.4 minutes.

I'll do the same build on both my Surface Book 2 and this new Surface Book 3 to compare. I've excluded the source folders from Defender as well as msbuild.exe and dotnet.exe. I've also turned off the Indexer.

A cold build (after a dotnet clean) on this Surface Book 3 takes 46 seconds.

A warm build is 16.1 seconds

A cold build (after a dotnet clean) on my Surface Book 2 takes 115 seconds.

It's WAY faster than my Surface Book 2 which has been my daily driver when mobile for nearly 3 years!

Benchmarks are all relative and there's raw throughput, there's combination benchmarks, and all kinds of things that can "make a chart." I just do benchmarks that show if I can do a thing I did before, faster.

You can also test various guesses if you have them by adding parameters to dotnet.exe. For example, perhaps you're thinking that 143 projects is thrashing to disk so you want to control how many CPUs are used. This has 4 physical cores and 8 logical, so we could try pulling back a little

dotnet build /maxcpucount:4

The result with Orchard Core is the same, so there is likely a theoretical max as to how fast this can build today. If you really want to go nuts, try

dotnet build -v diag

And dig through ALL the timing info!

Webcam Quality

Might be odd to add this as its own section but we're all using our webcams constantly right now. I was particularly impressed with the front-facing webcam. A lot of webcams are 720p with mediocre white balance. I do a lot of video calls so I notice this stuff. The SB3 has a 1080p front camera for video and decent light pickup. When using the Camera app you can do up to 5MP (2560x1920) which is cool. Here's a pic from today.

Ports and Power and Sound and Wi-Fi

The Surface Book 3 has just one USB-C port on the right side and two USB 3.1 Gen 2s on the left. I'd have liked one additional USB-C so I could project on stage and still have one additional USB-C available...but I don't know what for. I just want one more port. That said, the NEW Surface Dock 2 adds FOUR USB-C ports, so it's not a big deal.

It was theoretically possible to use pull power on the SB2 than it's power supply could push. While I never had an issue with that, I've been told by some Destiny 2 players and serious media renderers that it could happen. With the SB3 they upped the power supply with 65W for the base 13.5-inch version and a full 127W for the 15-inch SKUs so that's not an issue any more.

I have only two Macs for development and I have no Thunderbolt devices or need for an eGPU so I may not be the ideal Thunderbolt consumer. I haven't needed it yet. Some folks have said that it's a bummer the SB3 doesn't have it but it hasn't been an issue or sticking point for any of my devices today.

I also want to touch on sound. There is a fan inside the device and if it gets hot it will run. If I'm doing 1080p 60fps in Call of Duty WarZone you can likely hear the fan. It comes and goes and while it's audible when it's one, when the CPU is not maxed out (during 70% of my work day) the Surface Book 3 is absolutely silent, even when running the monitors. The fan comes on with the CPU is bursting hard over 3Ghz and/or the GPU is on full blast.

One other thing, the Surface Book 3 has Wi-Fi 6 even though I don't! I have a Ubnt network and no Wi-Fi 6 mesh points. I haven't had ANY issues with the Wi-Fi on this device over Ubnt mesh points. When copying a 60 gig video file over Wi-Fi from my Synology NAS I see sustained 280 megabit speeds.

The New Surface Dock - Coming May 26th

I'm also testing a pre-release Surface Dock 2. I suspect they wanted me to test it with the Surface Book 3...BUT! I just plugged in every Surface I have to see what would happen.

My wife has a Surface Laptop 2 she got herself, one son has my 6 year old old Surface Pro 3 while the other has a Surface Go he got with his allowance. (We purchased these over the last few years.) As such we have three existing Surface Docks (original) - One in the kids' study/playroom, one in the Kitchen as a generalized docking station for anyone to drop in to, and one in my office assigned me by work.

We use these individual Surfaces (varying ages, sizes, and powers) along with my work-assigned Surface Book 2 plus this loaner Surface Book 3, so it's kind of a diverse household from a purely Surface perspective. My first thought was - can I use all these devices with the new Dock? Stuff just works with a few caveats for older stuff like my Surface Pro 3.

RANDOM NOTE: What happens when you plug a Surface Pro 3 (released in 2014) into a Surface Dock 2? Nothing, but it does get power. However, the original Surface Dock is great and still runs 4096 x 2160 @30Hz or 2960 x 1440 @60Hz via mini DisplayPort so the Pro 3 is still going strong 6 years out and the kids like it.

So this Surface Dock 2 replaces the original Dock my office. The Surface Dock 2 has

2x front-facing USB-C ports (I use these for two 4k monitors)

2x rear-facing USB-C ports

2x rear-facing USB-A 3.2 (10Gbps) ports

1x Gigabit Ethernet port

1x 3.5mm audio in/out port

Kensington lock slot - I've never used this

First, that's a lot of USB-C. I'm not there yet with the USB-C lifestyle, but I did pick up two USB-C to full-size DisplayPort cables at Amazon and I can happily report that I can run both my 4k monitors at 60hz plus run the main Surface Book 3 panel. The new Dock and its power supply can push 120 watts of power to the Surface with a total of 199 watts everything connected to the dock. I've got a few USB-C memory sticks and one USB-C external hard drive, plus the Logitech Brio is USB 3, so 6 total ports is fine with 4 free after the two monitors. I also Gigabit wired the whole house so I use the Ethernet port quite happily.

Initially I care about one thing - my 4k monitors. Using the USB-C to DisplayPort cables I plugged the dock into two Dell P2715Q 4ks and they work! I preferred using the direct cables rather than any adapters, but I also tested a USB-C to HDMI 2.0 adapter I got in 2018 with some other Dell monitors in the house and that worked with the Surface Book 3 as it had previously with the Book 2.

SURPRISE NOTE: How does the super-thin Surface Pro X do when plugged into a Surface Dock 2? Amazing. It runs two 4k monitors at 60 Hz. I don't know why I was shocked, it's listed on the support page. It's a brand new device, but it's also the size and weight of an iPad so I was surprised. It's a pretty amazing little device - I'll do another post on just the ARM-based Surface Pro X another time.

One final thing about the new Dock. The cable is longer! The first dock had a cable that was about 6" too short and now it's not. It's the little things and in this case, a big thing that makes a Dock that much nicer to use.

Conclusion

All in all, I'm very happy with this Surface Book 3 having been an existing Surface Book 2 user. It's basically 40-50% faster, the video card is surprisingly capable. The SSD is way faster at the top end. It's a clear upgrade over what I had before, and when paired with the Surface Dock 2 and two 4k monitors it's a capable developer box for road warriors or home office warriors like myself.

Sponsor: Have you tried developing in Rider yet? This fast and feature-rich cross-platform IDE improves your code for .NET, ASP.NET, .NET Core, Xamarin, and Unity applications on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

© 2020 Scott Hanselman. All rights reserved.

      Review of the Surface Book 3 for Developers published first on http://7elementswd.tumblr.com/

[fastcompression]

Benchmark comparison for Jetson Nano, TX2, Xavier NX and AGX

Author: Fyodor Serzhenko

NVIDIA has released a series of Jetson hardware modules for embedded applications. NVIDIA® Jetson is the world's leading embedded platform for image processing and DL/AI tasks. Its high-performance, low-power computing for deep learning and computer vision makes it the ideal platform for mobile compute-intensive projects.

We've developed an Image & Video Processing SDK for NVIDIA Jetson hardware. Here we present performance benchmarks for the available Jetson modules. As an image processing pipeline, we consider a basic camera application as a good example for benchmarking.

Hardware features for Jetson Nano, TX2, Xavier NX and AGX Xavier

Here we present a brief comparison for Jetsons hardware features to see the progress and variety of mobile solutions from NVIDIA. These units are aimed at different markets and tasks

Table 1. Hardware comparison for Jetson modules

In camera applications, we can usually hide Host-to-Device transfers by implementing GPU Zero Copy or by overlapping GPU copy/compute. Device-to-Host transfers can be hidden via copy/compute overlap.

Hardware and software for benchmarking

CPU/GPU NVIDIA Jetson Nano, TX2, Xavier NX and AGX Xavier

OS L4T (Ubuntu 18.04)

CUDA Toolkit 10.2 for Jetson Nano, TX2, Xavier NX and AGX Xavier

Fastvideo SDK 0.16.4

NVIDIA Jetson Comparison: Nano vs TX2 vs Xavier NX vs AGX Xavier

For these NVIDIA Jetson modules, we've done performance benchmarking for the following standard image processing tasks which are specific for camera applications: white balance, demosaic (debayer), color correction, resize, JPEG encoding, etc. That's not the full set of Fastvideo SDK features, but it's just an example to see what kind of performance we could get from each Jetson. You can also choose a particular debayer algorithm and output compression (JPEG or JPEG2000) for your pipeline.

Table 2. GPU kernel times for 2K image processing (1920×1080, 16 bits per channel, milliseconds)

Total processing time is calculated for the values from the gray rows of the table. This is done to show the maximum performance benchmarks for a specified set of image processing modules which correspond to real-life camera applications.

Each Jetson module was run with maximum performance

MAX-N mode for Jetson AGX Xavier

15W for Jetson Xavier NX and Jetson TX2

10W for Jetson Nano

Here we've compared just the basic set of image processing modules from Fastvideo SDK to let Jetson developers evaluate the expected performance before building their imaging applications. Image processing from RAW to RGB or RAW to JPEG are standard tasks, and now developers can get detailed info about expected performance for the chosen pipeline according to the table above. We haven't tested Jetson H.264 and H.265 encoders and decoders in that pipeline. As soon as H.264 and H.265 encoders are working at the hardware level, encoding can be done in parallel with CUDA code, so we should be able to get even better performance.

We've done the same kernel time measurements for NVIDIA GeForce and Quadro GPUs. Here you can get the document with the benchmarks.

Software for Jetson performance comparison

We've released the software for a GPU-based camera application on GitHub, and it's available to download both binaries and source codes for our gpu camera sample project. It's implemented for Windows 7/10, Linux Ubuntu 18.04 and L4T. Apart from a full image processing pipeline on GPU for still images from SSD and for live camera output, there are options for streaming and for glass-to-glass (G2G) measurements to evaluate real latency for camera systems on Jetson. The software currently works with machine vision cameras from XIMEA, Basler, JAI, Matrix Vision, Daheng Imaging, etc.

To check the performance of Fastvideo SDK on a laptop/desktop/server GPU without any programming, you can download Fast CinemaDNG Processor software with GUI for Windows or Linux. That software has a Performance Benchmarks window, and there you can see timing for each stage of image processing. This is a more sofisticated method of performance testing, because the image processing pipeline in that software can be quite advanced, and you can test any module you need. You can also perform various tests on images with different resolutions to see how much the performance depends on image size, content and other parameters.

Other blog posts from Fastvideo about Jetson hardware and software

Jetson Image Processing

Jetson Zero Copy

Jetson Nano Benchmarks on Fastvideo SDK

Jetson AGX Xavier performance benchmarks

JPEG2000 performance benchmarks on Jetson TX2

Remotely operated walking excavator on Jetson

Low latency H.264 streaming on Jetson TX2

Performance speedup for Jetson TX2 vs AGX Xavier

Source codes for GPU-Camera-Sample software on GitHub to connect USB3 and other cameras to Jetson

Original article see at: https://www.fastcompression.com/blog/jetson-benchmark-comparison.htm

Subscribe to our mail list: https://mailchi.mp/fb5491a63dff/fastcompression

[lostlevelsclub]

#FreeFortnite, Gamescom, Mario@35 & BFGPU

Mike and Ting talk about Apple vs. Epic, the games of Gamescom, Mario's 35th anniversary and NVIDIA's RTX 30 launch event.

The “book club” game is: Call of Duty: Warzone.

Contact us: @lostlevelsclub or mike.and.ting@lostlevels.club

Show Notes:

Apple vs Epic

Fortnite’s V-Bucks are getting cheaper

Hope you didn’t delete Fortnite or Infinity Blade because Apple just terminated Epic’s dev account

Apple will enforce app notarization for macOS Catalina in February

Epic judge will protect Unreal Engine — but not Fortnite

Apple won’t let Facebook tell users about 30-percent Apple tax on events

Apple's international antitrust battles - the story so far

Why one email app went to war with Apple—and why neither one is right

Apple 1984 Super Bowl Commercial Introducing Macintosh Computer (YouTube)

Nineteen Eighty-Fortnite - #FreeFortnite (YouTube)

Gamescom

Dragon Age 4 - Official Behind the Scenes Teaser Trailer | gamescom 2020 (YouTube)

Star Wars: Squadrons Campaign Includes Film Characters, New Gameplay Shown

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War - Official Perseus Briefing Cinematic | gamescom 2020 (YouTube)

Everything we know about Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, launching November 13th

Genshin Impact Coming to PS4, PC, and Mobile in September

The Sims 4: Star Wars Game Pack Hitting Next Month

Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge

JK Rowling returns award after Kerry Kennedy criticism

Incredible Ratchet & Clank gameplay demo reveals PS5’s SSD difference

12 Minutes - Cast Reveal Trailer (Daisy Ridley, Willem Dafoe, James McAvoy) | gamescom 2020 (YouTube)

Super Mario Bros. 35th Anniversary

Super Mario Bros. 35th Anniversary Direct (YouTube)

The official home of the Game & Watch: Super Mario Bros. system.

Game & Watch series

This GameBoy Case Was Advertised EVERYWHERE (YouTube)

Super Mario 3D World + Bowser’s Fury

Super Mario Bros. 35

Someone Turned Mario Into A Battle Royale, And It's The Best Thing

Mario Kart Live: Home Circuit

DJI’s New Drone Is a Tiny Tank That Can Shoot Lasers and Drive Sideways

Hasbro Celebrates Super Mario's 35th Anniversary With Monopoly And Jenga

Puma Looks Ready To Pounce On Super Mario's 35th Anniversary With Some Nintendo-Branded Sneakers

Super Mario Themed Furniture Items Officially Announced For Animal Crossing: New Horizons

Nintendo Celebrates Super Mario 35th Anniversary With New Clothing Line

Super Mario All-Stars Is Now Available On Nintendo's Switch Online SNES Service

Super Mario 3D All-Stars brings three high-res ports to Switch

NVIDIA RTX 30 Launch Event

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 Series | Official Launch Event [4K] (YouTube)

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070: RTX 2080 Ti Performance at $499

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080: Everything We Know

Nvidia Announces Ampere: RTX 3090 for $1499, RTX 3080 for $699, RTX 3070 for $499

BFG (weapon)

WHY I use the Nvidia QUADRO RTX 8000 (YouTube)

GeForce 16 series

NVIDIA Marbles at Night | RTX Demo (YouTube)

NVIDIA Omniverse Machinima

GPUDirect Storage: A Direct Path Between Storage and GPU Memory

NVIDIA DLSS 2.0: A Big Leap In AI Rendering

AMD Big Navi release date, price, specs and latest news

Post-Chat

RX 6 | Mouth De-click Tutorial (YouTube)

Download this Episode