#No-Contact Appehension Policy (NCAP)
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
NCAP for Metro Manila traffic violations cannot be implemented yet
As the Supreme Court here in the Philippines has yet to make a final decision about the legality of the No-Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP), the local government units (LGUs) of Metro Manila cannot implement the said policy yet when it comes to traffic violations, the Manila Bulletin reported. Take note that the SC issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against NCAP in August 2022. To put…
View On WordPress
#Carlo Carrasco#City Government of Parañaque#City of Parañaque#data privacy#government#journalism#law#Metro Manila#motoring#National Capital Region (NCR)#NCAP#news#No-Contact Appehension Policy (NCAP)#Parañaque#Parañaque City#Parañaque news#Parañaque Renaissance#Philippines#Philippines blog#privacy#public service#South Metro Manila#South Snippets#Southies#Supreme Court#traffic#traffic violations#WordPress#WordPress.com
0 notes
Text
Supreme Court issues TRO against No-Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP) and sets January 2023 oral arguments
Supreme Court issues TRO against No-Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP) and sets January 2023 oral arguments
To those of you motorists who got penalized over alleged violations of the No-Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP) implemented by some local government units (LGUs), be aware that the Supreme Court has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the said police and scheduled oral arguments on January 2023, according to a GMA Network news report. Also be aware that certain Metro Manila city…
View On WordPress
#abuse#Carlo Carrasco#City Government of Parañaque#City of Parañaque#Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)#GMA Network#GMA News#governance#journalism#Land Transportation Office (LTO)#law#Manila#Metro Manila#motoring#NCAP#news#No-Contact Appehension Policy (NCAP)#Parañaque#Parañaque City#Parañaque news#Parañaque Renaissance#Philippines#public service#Quezon City#rules#San Juan#South Metro Manila#Southies#Supreme Court#Supreme Court decision
0 notes