#NY Immigration Attorney
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Important Role Of An Immigration Lawyer In New York
Anybody who has gone through the process of immigrating to the United States knows how complicated the regulations governing immigration are. Unfortunately, many immigrants still have trouble following the correct processes, leaving out crucial information to cause visa rejection.
The scope of U.S. immigration regulations is so broad that even U.S. residents may struggle to fill out all of the papers correctly. That is why you should engage an experienced New York immigration lawyer. These attorneys have sufficient knowledge and experience dealing with various immigration cases to assist you in understanding the many sorts of visas available and the processes involved in obtaining them. A reputable lawyer, therefore, provides detailed information so that you may make an informed decision.
In this blog, we discuss why the role of an immigration lawyer is so crucial and how to find the best one. Let's check it out!
What Does An Immigration Lawyer Do?
Immigration lawyers are hard-working and know how to fight for individuals and businesses to get the best results. Apart from this, there are many tasks that immigration lawyers need to perform to help you with your case.
Provide You With In-Depth Knowledge
A highly-qualified lawyer with years of experience can help you to understand the specific advantages of immigrant law. A knowledgeable lawyer will provide you with detailed information to know which advantages may include liabilities. These lawyers have a full understanding of the different types of immigration cases to create the best path to U.S. citizenship for you.

Guide You About Potential Risks
The best immigration lawyer in Florida checks your case thoroughly to identify potential issues and address them effectively. A well-qualified lawyer can help you to develop and implement certain strategies to mitigate risks and submit your application properly to achieve the best outcome.
Beneficial Legal Advice
If you are unable to choose a suitable visa for you and your family, then a reliable and well-qualified lawyer explains the entire process and helps you to make the right decisions. In case you are planning to sponsor a fiance, a lawyer can provide various options that would be beneficial for you. These lawyers will help you determine whether you should get married outside of the U.S. or get married in the U.S. and wait for the spouse to receive a visa.
Documentation
Before applying for permanent residence citizenship, it is necessary to have all the documentation to prevent application rejection or delay in the process. Every document is important to ensure the process goes smoothly. Immigration lawyers can easily obtain and organize all the necessary documents for you and handle all the paperwork. They will streamline the process so that your chances of Visa application approval will increase.
Apart from this, these lawyers also effectively respond to requests for evidence. Sometimes, the government may request additional documentation from you. So, it is crucial to properly respond to these requests and submit all the requested documents to avoid any unnecessary delay. Immigration lawyers provide all the requested documents on time so your application won't be denied.
Prepares You For The Visa Interview
You must be aware of the visa interview and how critical it is in your case. In some cases, many potential immigrants are not clear about immigration law and don’t know how to answer properly, and this lack of information becomes a barrier to obtaining a visa. To secure certain benefits, an immigration lawyer will help you to prepare for the interview. They will guide you to prepare the appropriate answers to clear the interview without any hassle.
How To Choose The Best Immigration Lawyer In Florida?
Hiring an immigration lawyer can be an intimidating and frustrating process; therefore, it is important that you do your research before hiring them. Here are a few tips that you may consider-
Set The Right Expectation
Immigration cases can be very complicated, so you must hire a lawyer who understands your expectations and makes the process easy for you. Lawyers will be able to develop effective strategies to overcome potential risks and help you to obtain the desired result.
Get The Referral
You can ask your relatives and your friends if they work with a good immigration lawyer. If any of your family members have gone through this process, they can easily direct you to a trusted lawyer. Moreover, you can use digital media to search the trusted immigration lawyers around you and check their reviews to evaluate their services.
Check The Experience
Only experienced immigration lawyers can guarantee you a Visa success. They can represent your case with competence and confidence. An experienced lawyer works effectively as he knows the court policies and procedures. He will help you to place your case in the most favorable position that increases your chances of obtaining the visa. You also can ask about his track record of success before hiring him.
Wrapping Up!
Several more considerations are necessary before hiring a lawyer who follows the correct steps to apply your applications and fulfill all your requirements.
So, if you are looking for the best immigration lawyers in Florida, then you must contact Wildes Weinberg PC. They have a team of highly qualified and experienced lawyers who specialize in all types of immigration cases.
To learn more about their services, simply dial 212-753-3468 and schedule a meeting with an expert today!
#New York Immigration Lawyer#Immigration Lawyer NY#Immigration Lawyer In New York City#Immigration Attorneys New York City#NY Immigration Attorney#Best Immigration Lawyers Florida#Best Immigration Law Firm Florida
0 notes
Text
#best immigration attorney nyc#best immigration lawyer in ny#best immigration attorney new york#family immigration lawyer near me#family immigration lawyer new york#green card lawyer nyc#employment immigration lawyer near me#immigration attorneys in new york#immigration lawyer new york#immigration lawyers in new york city#immigration lawyer nyc consultation#immigration lawyer new york ny
0 notes
Text
Guidelines for Collaborating with Your New York Immigration Lawyer
In the bustling business hub of New York, entrepreneurs and international companies are constantly seeking ways to expand and thrive. A pivotal factor in this growth often lies in the realm of business immigration.
This article explores the vital role that business immigration attorney ny play for businesses looking to establish or expand their operations in the Empire State.

Understanding Business Immigration
Business immigration is a specialized field focused on helping non-U.S. citizens establishes or expand their business ventures in the United States. There are several types of visas available to entrepreneurs and international companies, each designed to meet specific needs and qualifications. In New York, common options include the E-2 Treaty Investor Visa, L-1 Intercompany Transferee Visa, and the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.
Eligibility for these visas varies but typically involves demonstrating a significant investment in a U.S. business, the potential for economic impact, or a transfer of personnel from a foreign office. Entrepreneurs and companies must meet specific criteria, including ownership stake, investment amounts, and job creation metrics. Understanding these nuances is crucial for a successful application.
The Role of Business Immigration Attorneys
Business immigration attorney provide specialized services that are invaluable to navigating the complex U.S. immigration system. They assist in preparing and filing visa applications, offer legal advice on compliance issues, and represent clients in immigration interviews or hearings.
Consider the case of a tech startup that sought to bring its foreign executives to New York. With the help of an experienced attorney, they navigated the complex L-1 visa process efficiently, ensuring a smooth transition for their team. Testimonials like this underscore the profound impact these experts can have on a company’s growth trajectory.
Key Considerations for Hiring a Business Immigration Attorney
Choosing the best business immigration attorney is a critical decision. Key factors to consider include the attorney’s experience with specific visa types, their reputation within the business community, and their understanding of your industry.
Conducting thorough research is essential. Start by seeking referrals from colleagues or industry associations, read online reviews, and schedule consultations to gauge compatibility and expertise.
An attorney well-versed in New York’s unique legal landscape can provide invaluable guidance tailored to your needs.
Challenges and Solutions
Entrepreneurs and companies often face numerous challenges in the immigration process, from complex paperwork to stringent eligibility requirements. One common issue is understanding the intricate details of visa applications and avoiding costly mistakes.
A NYC business immigration attorney provides solutions by offering expert guidance, ensuring that all documentation is accurate and complete and representing clients in any interactions with immigration authorities. Their expertise can be the difference between approval and denial, saving time and resources in the process.
Conclusion
Business immigration attorney nyc are essential allies for entrepreneurs and international companies seeking to establish or expand their presence in New York. They provide expertise, guidance, and representation to ensure compliance with U.S. immigration laws and facilitate seamless transitions for businesses and their employees.
By partnering with a knowledgeable business immigration attorney nj, you can unlock opportunities for growth and success in one of the world’s most dynamic business environments.
#business immigration attorney#business immigration attorney ny#business immigration in nyc#immigration law nyc
0 notes
Text

G A M Law Office
Our NYC immigration lawyers at G.A.M. Law Office have years of experience handling immigration matters and the immigration process successfully. Our New York law firm primarily focuses on immigration law so that we may assist clients with Family Immigration, Naturalization, Employment Immigration, Deportation and Removal Defense, Green Cards, Immigrant Visas, Citizenship, and just about any immigration matter in the United States.
Whether you're seeking an 'abogado de immigration New York' or a dedicated small business attorney in NYC, we have you covered. Benefit from our immigration lawyer NYC free consultation and experience expertise firsthand.
Address: 240 W 40th St, 2nd Fl, Ste 317, New York, NY 10018, USA Phone: 347-329-3952 Website: https://gamlawoffice.com
#Abogado De Immigration New York#Abogados De Immigration NY#Small Business Attorney NYC#Immigration Lawyer NYC Free Consultation#Immigration Lawyer NYC
0 notes
Text
The Role of a New York Family Immigration Attorney: Helping Families Navigate the Immigration Process
The immigration process can be complex and daunting, especially when it involves families seeking to reunite or establish a new life in New York. In such cases, the role of a knowledgeable and experienced family immigration attorney becomes invaluable. This article delves into the essential role that New York family immigration attorneys play in assisting families throughout the immigration process. From providing legal guidance to navigating the intricacies of immigration law, these attorneys are dedicated to helping families achieve their immigration goals.
Understanding the Importance of a New York Family Immigration Attorney
Expertise in Immigration Laws and Regulations:- Family immigration attorneys in New York possess in-depth knowledge and understanding of the intricate web of immigration laws and regulations. They stay updated on the latest developments in immigration policies and procedures, ensuring that their clients receive accurate and current information. By staying abreast of the evolving immigration landscape, these attorneys provide families with reliable advice and guidance tailored to their unique situations.
Navigating the Immigration Process:- The immigration process can be overwhelming, with numerous forms, documentation requirements, and deadlines to navigate. A New York family immigration attorney acts as a trusted guide, assisting families in understanding and completing the necessary paperwork. These attorneys help families compile the required documentation, ensuring accuracy and completeness to avoid delays or potential issues. By offering step-by-step guidance, they simplify the process and provide families with peace of mind.
Strategic Planning and Case Evaluation :-Every family immigration case is unique, with its own set of circumstances and challenges. Family immigration attorneys in New York conduct thorough case evaluations to develop tailored strategies. They assess the eligibility of family members for various immigration benefits and explore the most suitable immigration pathways. By carefully analyzing the situation, these attorneys create comprehensive plans that maximize the chances of success and minimize potential complications.
How New York Family Immigration Attorneys Assist Families
Family-Based Visa:- Petitions One of the primary roles of a New York family immigration attorney is to assist families in filing family-based visa petitions. They guide families through the process of sponsoring immediate relatives or qualifying family members, such as spouses, children, parents, or siblings. These attorneys help families understand the eligibility requirements, compile supporting documentation, and prepare compelling petitions that showcase the bona fide nature of the familial relationships.
Overcoming Challenges and Complexities:- The immigration process often presents challenges and complexities that can hinder family reunification. New York family immigration attorneys are well-versed in addressing these issues. They provide strategic solutions for situations such as criminal records, previous immigration violations, or medical inadmissibility. These attorneys explore options for waivers, appeals, or other legal remedies, ensuring that families have the best possible chance of overcoming obstacles and achieving their immigration goals.
Advocacy and Legal Representation:- Throughout the immigration process, New York family immigration attorneys act as advocates and legal representatives for families. They communicate and negotiate with immigration authorities on behalf of their clients, ensuring that their rights and interests are protected. These attorneys present strong legal arguments, navigate administrative procedures, and provide representation in immigration interviews or hearings. By serving as dedicated advocates, they strive to achieve favorable outcomes for families.
Conclusion:
The role of a New York family immigration attorney is paramount in helping families navigate the complex immigration process. These attorneys provide expert guidance, strategic planning, and legal representation to ensure that families can reunite, establish new lives, and build a future in New York. By leveraging their expertise and experience, these attorneys play an essential role in facilitating successful outcomes and fulfilling the dreams of countless families seeking immigration solutions.
#immigration lawyer#immigration attorney#NY Lawyer#Family Immigration lawyer#Business immigration lawyer
0 notes
Text
from facebook of all places
posted by Jay Michaelson, and sourced by him as well:
Hello! I'm posting in response to the many sincerely anguished claims that not enough is being done to stop Trump. This is not reflected in the facts. - Represented by Public Citizen Litigation Group and State Democracy Defenders Fund, the Alliance for Retired Americans, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) filed suit on Monday against the Treasury Department “for sharing confidential data with the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), run by Elon Musk.” Go to Public Citizen's website to learn all about this lawsuit, which is very likely to prevail. - On USAID, appearing with other Democratic lawmakers outside USAID offices on Monday, Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) shouted, “Elon Musk, you didn't create USAID. The United States Congress did for the American people … like Elon Musk did not create USAID, he doesn't have the power to destroy it. And who's going to stop him? We are... This a constitutional crisis that we are in today.” Lawsuits have also been filed in this matter, and are also likely to prevail. - Hakeem Jeffries has announced lawsuits have been filed regarding the firings of inspectors general. - On Jan 21, Democracy Forward, was filed at 12:01 p.m. ET on Monday and accused Elon Musk's DOGE of being a "shadow operation led by unelected billionaires" that flouts federal transparency rules. That should win. - National Security Counselors filed a suit arguing that DOGE meets the requirements to be a federal advisory committee and is therefore legally required to have "fairly balanced" representation, keep regular minutes of meetings and allow public access to meetings. Clearly accurate. - Eighteen state attorneys general and a slew of immigrants' rights groups brought swift legal action against Trump after he signed his executive order seeking to ban birthright citizenship for some children born in the U.S., arguing that it violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Obviously, clearly unconstitutional. - "Schedule F" has been challenged in court by the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents employees in 37 agencies and departments. - Several immigrant rights groups in the United States, as well as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have filed a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s ban on asylum claims. - GLAD Law and the National Center For Lesbian Rights (NCLR) have sued to stop Trump's ban on trans people in the military. And there are many more - I'll link to a great list of them in the comments. Yes, there are Trump judges in the courts, and if Aileen Cannon types get these cases, Trump may prevail. But most judges are not like her. These actions are clearly illegal and/or unconstitutional, and they WILL be stopped. Just like the tariffs were not meant to prevail -- Trump won that round, "forcing" Canada and Mexico to take "action" on fentanyl -- these actions are not meant to prevail. They're meant to flood the zone with shit, confuse and immobilize us. They said they'd do "Shock and Awe" and that's what they've done. Nothing here should be surprising. Shock and Awe is up to YOU. I am not shocked, I am not in awe. Oh, and the "mainstream media" has reported on all of these. The info above has come from Newsweek, the NY Times, and other mainstream sources. Please stop attacking journalists when we are being threatened by the FBI. Who do you think you're helping by doing that? Stop it with the doomsaying and gloomsaying. Want to make a difference? Give thousands of dollars to Public Citizen, the ACLU, and similar groups. Show up at marches. Put your ass on the line and help protect people from ICE. If you're safe, do simple symbolic things (like changing your social media pictures) to support people who are not safe. Just like we should not obey in advance, we should not panic in advance either. This is not the end of democracy. That is just what the bad guys want you to think. Get over it and fight.
I don't know how many times I've heard "Dems do nothing!" when they are in fact doing a lot of things. You just don't hear about it because the mainstream news doesn't pay attention or you don't see out news beyond your social media feeds.
The other thing is, Dems don't break laws in their fights the way Republicans do. Your desire to turn every Dem POTUS into the Dick Cheney Version of the Executive but then screaming injustice! when the GOP does it -- you see the problem there?
483 notes
·
View notes
Text
Elon Musk is threatening a Brazilian Supreme Court justice after the court issued a summons to him which threatens the suspension of Twitter if he does not comply within 24 hours.


To combat disinformation, Brazil gave a Supreme Court justice sweeping powers to order social networks to take down content he believed threatened democracy. Here's how the experiment led to a ban on X, the social network owned by Elon Musk.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/31/world/americas/brazil-x-ban-free-speech.html?smid=threads-nytimes



Elon Musk claims this is a censorship, because previously he was ordered to ban and close a lot of far-rights account that spread fake news and hate online by that same judge. As protest, Musk closed X offices in Brazil - which means people losing their job or their income.
When free speech is interpreted as anything which matches the law (and viceversa). Under Elon Musk's Leadership, Twitter has approved 83% of censorship requests by authoritarian governments globally. The social network has restricted and withdrawn content critical of the ruling parties in Turkey and India, among other countries, including during electoral campaigns.
Since Musk assumed control in October 2022, the platform has received a total of 971 government requests, a significant increase compared to the 338 received between October 2021 and April 2022.
Prior to Musk's takeover, Twitter had agreed to 50 per cent of such requests, as indicated in their last transparency report. However, no transparency reports have been published since October 2022, making it challenging to assess the current situation. Nevertheless, data from the technology information portal Rest of World suggests that the compliance rate has risen to 83 per cent following Musk's leadership, which again contribute to detect what Elon Musk REALLY think about free-speech: this right is granted only if comply to what oppressive governments and far-right politician approves. Discrimination and criminal behavior are allowed and protected under Musk's Leadership, because targets minorities, immigrants and political oppositors. Musk is a conservative and apply censorship, he isn't the victim of a 'woke' complot lead against him. Musk is receiving the payment for his unlawful action.
Source: El Pais English

As far I can understand, without having many clues here, this order of summon says that Elon Musk refused to appoint a legal rapresentative for X Brasil. For some typology of corporates Brazil require a % of residents in management or a legal rapresentative, with power to vote and deliberate in meetings, to operate online in the country. Yeah. Law apparently seems to be applied to everyone except him.
Summons with translation.


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/28/technology/brazil-x-ban-elon-musk.html
Edit: A legal rapresentative is more a managerial position than what do you think of. Yes, it could be an attorney or a lawyer too, but still isn't simply the guy who defend the corporate's interests in court. In Brazil you need a % of residents in management position to operate. This was a problem issued also with WhatsApp and Telegram.
Edit 2 - 31th August 2024: I was curious about the consequences of Musk's decision to close X's offices in Brazil for his employees. Have they been fired? Suspended with or without salary? I didn't find anything. However, I found this article that adds some informations, like Musk declaring he did this to "protect his staff". However, his legal rapresentative is impossible to be found.
Edit 3 - 31th August 2024: Another article of NY Times that analyzes the matter.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/18/world/americas/elon-musk-x-brazil.html
Update - 31th August 2024: Brazil has turned off Twitter. Musk’s genius is again on glorious display in losing the 7th most populous country in the world. Oh well. At least the Cybertruck is doing awesome.
Another Update - 31th August 2024: Musk is freaking out right now. He knows if he gets blocked in Brazil it is just a matter of time before other countries follow suit.
However, someone forgot to tell Musk that you get fined for using VPNs to access Twitter in Brazil before he posted this.
Also seems that for a tech genius Musk isn't very smart though, doesn't he know using a VPN will worth the same with apps as it does with a browser?

However, The Brazilian Supreme Court has moderated its first rule. First, even the VPN apps were targeted and should be banned from App store and Google Store to prevent people getting access to Twitter exclusively. Now, the Court realized that banning VPNs is too extreme, so they will only apply a 50k (about $8,900) fine for those caught accessing the platform.
Basically, you don't get fined for using VPNs, that would be too 1984. You might get fined if they FIND OUT that you're accessing X via VPNs, and this is exactly the kind of thing VPNs are designed to prevent.
Just a reminder, you can always access better platform than X, even on your phone. No app is needed.
VPNs are great tools to use worldwide to get around authoritarian and abusive government surveillance and blocking. Zero to do with Musk. And they can only catch you if you aren't savvy.
In a perfect world you shouldn't need to download any VPNs to access innocent contents, because democratic countries will never block a platform that gives informations and entertainment to people. In a perfect world you won't be stuck with platforms that are not free from disinformation and neo-nazi posts.
3rd Update - 31th August 2024:
Musk owns more of SpaceX than Zuck owns of Meta or Bezos owns of Amazon, fwiw. For all intents and purposes, Musk is Twitter, SpaceX, Neuralink and X.

I'm gonna add some technicalities here:
In Brazil there is something called "Corporate Personality" that protects the shareholders patrimony from the company's debts.
But... If you hide behind legal shenanigans in a fraudulent manner, "corporate personality" is bypassed and thus the court moves into your personal patrimony.
Elon is, personally and fraudulently, removing X office from Brazil so they don't obey Brazilian laws.
So the judges target him on his other shares: SpaceX and Starlink.
#vavuskapakage#elon musk#all my homies hate elon musk#elongated muskrat#fuck elon musk#fuck em#fuck elongated muskrat#elon musk is an idiot#elon musk is a fraud#elon musk is a moron#brazil twitter#twitter#x twitter#twitter x#twitter brazil#twitter ban#twitter brasil#fuck twitter#elon musk is an asshole#elon mask
84 notes
·
View notes
Text
NBC News: Democratic governors vow to protect their states from Trump and his policies
Democratic governors are intent on bolstering the fundamental rights & values of their states - just as they did during tRump's 1st presidency.
Governor Newsome (California) is focusing on civil rights, reproductive freedoms, climate action & on immigrant families.
California's Justice Dept. will soon have additional resources to pursue litigation against unlawful acts by the tRump administration.
"We won't sit idle", Newsome stated, "We've faced this problem before & know how to respond."
Governor Pritzker (Illinois) says he'll fight against "anyone trying to take away our freedoms, dignity & opportunities."
"We are", he continued, "a refuge for human rights being denied elsewhere."
This includes political asylum, reproductive health care & safety from persecution of one's sexual orientation."
Pritzker's already codified abortion rights & has made gender-affirming care covered by local health insurers!
He's now looking into protecting outsiders needing reproductive care - by protecting their medical records...
Even environmental regulations are now being codified - just in case.
And, labor protections are being strictly maintained.
A united effort, with other Midwestern states is on the schedule. They've all survived the Rapist Con Man's last time & learned their lessons well.
Governor Hochul (NYS) has just announced the "Empire State Freedom Initiative", that addresses "policy & regulatory" threats from Republikkkans.
Things like federal attacks on legal, reproductive, immigration, civil, environmental & other issues.
Hochul states that she "wants to make NY a safer, stronger & more livable place."
Her administration has already developed legal, regulatory & appropriate responses to counter any federal actions.
Massachusetts Governor Healy will use "every tool in our 'toolbox' to protect residents, democracy & the rule of law."
As a State Attorney, she actually challenged Prez tRump's immigration laws during his 1st presidency.
She's firmly promises that her State Police won't help carry out tRump's mass deportation scheme.
Finally, NJ Governor Murphy vowed to "fight to the death" on issues pertaining to when immigration & reproductive rights are federally challenged...
Good to know that someone remembers that we're supposed to have inalienable rights.
End.
#Dem Govs#ready 2 fight#rump proof#political laws#safeguard#values & rights#1st steps of the#resistance#against historic Rep corruption
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
President Donald Trump’s border czar Tom Homan has warned radical Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) that she’s like “in trouble” after she hosted a webinar advising illegal aliens on how to escape deportation.
Homan revealed that he’s referred AOC to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for impediment charges after she openly advised illegals on “how to avoid” federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
The New York congresswoman hosted a webinar on her social media on Wednesday.
During the livestream, speakers gave step-by-step instructions to migrants on how to escape being arrested by federal enforcement agents.
AOC’s presentation laid out the steps that illegal aliens can take to evade enforcement and avoid answering ICE agents’ questions.
It also described tactics that officials and agents would use to catch them.
During a Fox News interview Thursday, Homan said he believes AOC’s webinar may be criminal.
Homan revealed that he referred the far-left Democrat to the DOJ for investigation.
“I sent an email today to the Deputy Attorney General, at what level is that impediment?” Homan said.
44 notes
·
View notes
Text
Heather Cox Richardson
February 14, 2025 (Friday)
On this day, I always like to tell the story of Theodore Roosevelt’s terrible 1884 Valentine’s Day and how it led to the Progressive Era. But things are happening too fast these days to leave a gap in the record, so you’ll have to look back at last year—or forward to next—for that story. For this year, here goes:
The administration’s order to drop federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams in exchange for his cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has sparked a crisis in the Trump administration’s Department of Justice, led by President Trump’s own appointees.
Yesterday that crisis led to multiple resignations from the department as acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York Danielle Sassoon resigned rather than drop the corruption charges. When the acting deputy attorney general of the Department of Justice, Emil Bove III, tried to do an end run around the Southern District of New York by taking the case to the Public Integrity Section in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and getting lawyer there to dismiss the case, at least five of them resigned as well.
This crisis is really over whether the Department of Justice will defend the rule of law or declare loyalty to Trump alone. And the crisis is growing.
Bove claims that administration officials did not make an arrangement with Adams to dismiss charges in exchange for his political support. But this morning, Adams and Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan undermined that assertion when they appeared together on the Fox News Channel. "If he doesn’t come through,” Homan said of Adams, "I'll be back in New York City and we won't be sitting on the couch. I'll be in his office, up his butt saying, 'Where the hell is the agreement we came to?'”
Today, Hagan Scotten, the acting assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, resigned in a blistering letter to Bove, calling his justification for dropping the charges against Adams “transparently pretextual.” “[N]o system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives,” he wrote.
Scotten was awarded two bronze stars as a troop commander in Iraq and clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts. He pointed out to Bove that “[t]here is a tradition in public service of resigning in a last-ditch effort to head off a serious mistake…. [A]ny assistant U.S. attorney would know that our laws and traditions do not allow using the prosecutorial power to influence other citizens, much less elected officials, in this way.”
He continued: “If no lawyer within earshot of the President is willing to give him that advice, then I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion [to dismiss the case]. But it was never going to be me. Please consider this my resignation.”
Also this morning, legal analyst Barb McQuade reported that “DOJ leadership has put all Public Integrity Section lawyers into a room with 1 hour to decide who will dismiss Adams indictment or else all will be fired.” “Sending them strength to stand by their oath, which is to support the Constitution, not the president’s political agenda,” she added. According to Jeremy Roebuck, Shayna Jacobs, Mark Berman, and Carol D. Leonnig of the Washington Post, one lawyer at the meeting said the discussion was “gut-wrenching” and “not anything any of us expected to see in America.”
At first, they all agreed to resign together, but then Edward Sullivan, a career federal prosecutor approaching retirement, said he would sign the motion to dismiss the case in a bid to save the jobs of his colleagues.
The crisis was reminiscent of the “Saturday Night Massacre” of October 20, 1973, when President Richard Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox after Cox subpoenaed a number of the tapes Nixon had recorded in the Oval Office concerning the break-in to the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in the Washington, D.C., Watergate complex. Richardson and his deputy, William Ruckelshaus, refused to execute Nixon’s order and resigned in protest; it was only the third man at the Justice Department, Solicitor General Robert Bork, who was willing to carry out the order firing Cox.
In that case, popular outrage at the resignations and firing forced Nixon to ask Bork—now acting attorney general—to appoint a new special prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, a Democrat who had voted for Nixon, on November 1. On November 17, Nixon assured the American people: “I am not a crook.”
The administration’s determination to impose its will on the United States is behind its insistence that Trump can rename the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska’s Denali, the highest peak in North America, by executive order. In 2017, Trump pushed hard to make Americans accept that the crowds at his inauguration were bigger than those at President Barack Obama’s, an immediately disprovable lie that seemed unimportant at the time but was key to establishing the primacy of Trump’s vision over reality, an acceptance that led, eventually, to the Big Lie that Trump had won the 2020 presidential election and now, apparently, to the lie that Elon Musk is cutting “waste and fraud” from the government when, in fact, he appears simply to be cutting programs he and Trump dislike.
Although tech companies and various media outlets have accepted Trump’s language, the Associated Press has continued to use the internationally accepted, historic name: the Gulf of Mexico. The Associated Press is a not-for-profit news cooperative founded in 1846 that produces and distributes news reports across the country and the world. White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich today claimed that the AP’s use of “Gulf of Mexico” showed its “commitment to misinformation,” and announced that the AP would be barred from the Oval Office and Air Force One.
In the Senate, Alaska’s senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, both Republicans, are pushing back on Trump’s name change for Denali, sponsoring a bill to require the mountain to be designated “Denali” on maps, documents, and any official U.S. records.
Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) pushed back today on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “rookie mistake” on Wednesday when he offered that the U.S. would not support Ukraine’s membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and that it was “unrealistic” for Ukraine to demand a return to its borders before Russia invaded in 2014, essentially offering to let Russia keep Crimea.
Wicker said he was “puzzled” and “disturbed” by Hegseth’s comments and added: “I don’t know who wrote the speech—it is the kind of thing Tucker Carlson could have written, and Carlson is a fool.” Joe Gould and Jamie Dettmer of Politico identified Carlson as a “pro-Putin broadcaster.”
“There are good guys and bad guys in this war, and the Russians are the bad guys,” Wicker said. “They invaded, contrary to almost every international law, and they should be defeated. And Ukraine is entitled to the promises that the world made to it.”
Hackers pushed back today on Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” website, launched earlier this week after Musk claimed that the group was posting its actions on the DOGE website. At the time, the website was essentially blank. Jason Koebler of 404 Media reported that the website was built out on Wednesday and Thursday. It appears not to be on government servers, is not secure, and pulls information from an open database that anyone could edit. Coders promptly added: “this is a joke of a .gov site” and “THESE ‘EXPERTS’ LEFT THEIR DATABASE OPEN-roro.” One coder told Koebler that the website “[f]eels like it was completely slapped together. Tons of errors and details leaked in the page source code.”
Indeed, Jennifer Bendery of HuffPost pointed out that one of the errors on the page is that it appears to have posted classified information about the size and staff of a U.S. intelligence agency. Security clearance lawyer Bradley Moss posted: “If you’re a clearance holder, stay away from the DOGE site. These ignorant virgins are going to find themselves prosecuted for violating the Espionage Act before all is said and done.”
Protesters today packed Christopher Park in New York City’s Greenwich Village near the Stonewall National Monument after the Trump administration erased “TQ+” from the LGBTQ+ on the monument’s website. The Stonewall Uprising of 1969, six days of conflict between police and LGBTQ+ protesters after police raided the Stonewall Inn, brought the longstanding efforts of LGBTQ+ activists for civil rights to popular attention, making Stonewall a symbol of LGBTQ+ rights.
Trans activists Marsha P. Johnson and Silvia Rivera were key figures in the Stonewall Uprising. Acknowledging their contribution, one protester held a sign that read, “NATIONAL PARK SERVICE: YOU CAN’T SPELL HISTORY WITHOUT A ‘T’”
Former Republican operative Stuart Stevens had a different take. He posted: “When I see the sexual orientation hate come out of the Republican party under the pretext of just being anti-Trans, I am very tempted to name the Republican operatives and elected officials who are closeted gays. It’s not a short list.”
6 notes
·
View notes
Text

Mike Luckovich
* * * *
LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN
February 14, 2025
Heather Cox Richardson
Feb 14, 2025
On this day, I always like to tell the story of Theodore Roosevelt’s terrible 1884 Valentine’s Day and how it led to the Progressive Era, but things are happening too fast these days to leave a gap in the record, so you’ll have to look back at last year—or forward to next—for that story. For this year, here goes:
The administration’s order to drop federal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams in exchange for his cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has sparked a crisis in the Trump administration’s Department of Justice, led by President Trump’s own appointees.
Yesterday that crisis led to multiple resignations from the department as acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York Danielle Sassoon resigned rather than drop the corruption charges. When the acting deputy attorney general of the Department of Justice, Emil Bove III, tried to do an end run around the Southern District of New York by taking the case to the Public Integrity Section in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and getting lawyer there to dismiss the case, at least five of them resigned as well.
This crisis is really over whether the Department of Justice will defend the rule of law or declare loyalty to Trump alone. And the crisis is growing.
Bove claims that administration officials did not make an arrangement with Adams to dismiss charges in exchange for his political support. But this morning, Adams and Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan undermined that assertion when they appeared together on the Fox News Channel. "If he doesn’t come through,” Homan said of Adams, "I'll be back in New York City and we won't be sitting on the couch. I'll be in his office, up his butt saying, 'Where the hell is the agreement we came to?'”
Today, Hagan Scotten, the acting assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, resigned in a blistering letter to Bove, calling his justification for dropping the charges against Adams “transparently pretextual.” “[N]o system of ordered liberty can allow the Government to use the carrot of dismissing charges, or the stick of threatening to bring them again, to induce an elected official to support its policy objectives,” he wrote.
Scotten was awarded two bronze stars as a troop commander in Iraq and clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts. He pointed out to Bove that “[t]here is a tradition in public service of resigning in a last-ditch effort to head off a serious mistake…. [A]ny assistant U.S. attorney would know that our laws and traditions do not allow using the prosecutorial power to influence other citizens, much less elected officials, in this way.”
He continued: “If no lawyer within earshot of the President is willing to give him that advice, then I expect you will eventually find someone who is enough of a fool, or enough of a coward, to file your motion [to dismiss the case]. But it was never going to be me. Please consider this my resignation.”
Also this morning, legal analyst Barb McQuade reported that “DOJ leadership has put all Public Integrity Section lawyers into a room with 1 hour to decide who will dismiss Adams indictment or else all will be fired.” “Sending them strength to stand by their oath, which is to support the Constitution, not the president’s political agenda,” she added. According to Jeremy Roebuck, Shayna Jacobs, Mark Berman, and Carol D. Leonnig of the Washington Post, one lawyer at the meeting said the discussion was “gut-wrenching” and “not anything any of us expected to see in America.”
At first, they all agreed to resign together, but then Edward Sullivan, a career federal prosecutor approaching retirement, said he would sign the motion to dismiss the case in a bid to save the jobs of his colleagues.
The crisis was reminiscent of the “Saturday Night Massacre” of October 20, 1973, when President Richard Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox after Cox subpoenaed a number of the tapes Nixon had recorded in the Oval Office concerning the break-in to the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in the Washington, D.C., Watergate complex. Richardson and his deputy, William Ruckelshaus, refused to execute Nixon’s order and resigned in protest; it was only the third man at the Justice Department, Solicitor General Robert Bork, who was willing to carry out the order firing Cox.
In that case, popular outrage at the resignations and firing forced Nixon to ask Bork—now acting attorney general—to appoint a new special prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, a Democrat who had voted for Nixon, on November 1. On November 17, Nixon assured the American people: “I am not a crook.”
The administration’s determination to impose its will on the United States is behind its insistence that Trump can rename the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska’s Denali, the highest peak in North America, by executive order. In 2017, Trump pushed hard to make Americans accept that the crowds at his inauguration were bigger than those at President Barack Obama’s, an immediately disprovable lie that seemed unimportant at the time but was key to establishing the primacy of Trump’s vision over reality, an acceptance that led, eventually, to the Big Lie that Trump had won the 2020 presidential election and now, apparently, to the lie that Elon Musk is cutting “waste and fraud” from the government when, in fact, he appears simply to be cutting programs he and Trump dislike.
Although tech companies and various media outlets have accepted Trump’s language, the Associated Press has continued to use the internationally accepted, historic name: the Gulf of Mexico. The Associated Press is a not-for-profit news cooperative founded in 1846 that produces and distributes news reports across the country and the world. White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich today claimed that the AP’s use of “Gulf of Mexico” showed its “commitment to misinformation,” and announced that the AP would be barred from the Oval Office and Air Force One.
In the Senate, Alaska’s senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, both Republicans, are pushing back on Trump’s name change for Denali, sponsoring a bill to require the mountain to be designated “Denali” on maps, documents, and any official U.S. records.
Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) pushed back today on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s “rookie mistake” on Wednesday when he offered that the U.S. would not support Ukraine’s membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and that it was “unrealistic” for Ukraine to demand a return to its borders before Russia invaded in 2014, essentially offering to let Russia keep Crimea.
Wicker said he was “puzzled” and “disturbed” by Hegseth’s comments and added: “I don’t know who wrote the speech—it is the kind of thing Tucker Carlson could have written, and Carlson is a fool.” Joe Gould and Jamie Dettmer of Politico identified Carlson as a “pro-Putin broadcaster.”
“There are good guys and bad guys in this war, and the Russians are the bad guys,” Wicker said. “They invaded, contrary to almost every international law, and they should be defeated. And Ukraine is entitled to the promises that the world made to it.”
Hackers pushed back today on Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” website, launched earlier this week after Musk claimed that the group was posting its actions on the DOGE website. At the time, the website was essentially blank. Jason Koebler of 404 Media reported that the website was built out on Wednesday and Thursday. It appears not to be on government servers, is not secure, and pulls information from an open database that anyone could edit. Coders promptly added: “this is a joke of a .gov site” and “THESE ‘EXPERTS’ LEFT THEIR DATABASE OPEN-roro.” One coder told Koebler that the website “[f]eels like it was completely slapped together. Tons of errors and details leaked in the page source code.”
Indeed, Jennifer Bendery of HuffPost pointed out that one of the errors on the page is that it appears to have posted classified information about the size and staff of a U.S. intelligence agency. Security clearance lawyer Bradley Moss posted: “If you’re a clearance holder, stay away from the DOGE site. These ignorant virgins are going to find themselves prosecuted for violating the Espionage Act before all is said and done.”
Protesters today packed Christopher Park in New York City’s Greenwich Village near the Stonewall National Monument after the Trump administration erased “TQ+” from the LGBTQ+ on the monument’s website. The Stonewall Uprising of 1969, six days of conflict between police and LGBTQ+ protesters after police raided the Stonewall Inn, brought the longstanding efforts of LGBTQ+ activists for civil rights to popular attention, making Stonewall a symbol of LGBTQ+ rights.
Trans activists Marsha P. Johnson and Silvia Rivera were key figures in the Stonewall Uprising. Acknowledging their contribution, one protester held a sign that read, “NATIONAL PARK SERVICE: YOU CAN’T SPELL HISTORY WITHOUT A ‘T’”
Former Republican operative Stuart Stevens had a different take. He posted: “When I see the sexual orientation hate come out of the Republican party under the pretext of just being anti-Trans, I am very tempted to name the Republican operatives and elected officials who are closeted gays. It’s not a short list.”
LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN
HEATHER COX RICHARDSON
#Letters From An American#heather cox richardson#LGBTQ#justice#National Park Service#Luckovich#authoritarianism#russia russia russia#DOJ#Southern District of NY
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Top 5 Scenarios Where You Must Consult An Immigration Attorney In Florida
People usually face immigration issues because it is challenging to understand immigration law. The whole process is overwhelming, and If you are an immigrant, you may come across several challenges to overcome. Even if you have some idea about immigration laws, you still find it difficult to answer all the questions and fill out the paperwork properly.
The complexity of immigration laws and difficult terminology may lead to the rejection of your application. That’s why it is wise to have an Immigration Attorney in New York City on your side to handle your issues. These attorneys have years of experience to advise you on the best course of action and properly represent your case in court with accurate documents.
In this write-up, we will discuss 5 scenarios where you need the guidance of a qualified attorney to ensure desired success.
Business Immigration
If you are dealing with an employment-based visa issue, an Immigration lawyer can provide the best solution to work abroad legally. On the other hand, if you want to hire foreigners, an attorney can help you know what the law allows. Moreover, you can get guidance in a review of contracts, labor conditions, labor visas, projects abroad, and more.
Family Immigration
Immigration laws are so complicated that not all family relationships qualify for green card approval. Even though you may be eligible to bring your family member to the States, you will need help to provide evidence or appropriately fill out the required forms. As a result, consulting an experienced immigration lawyer and following the correct procedures are the best ways to navigate the family immigration system.

These lawyers know how important it is to provide precise information on the forms to receive a favorable result in your case. With the help of an immigration lawyer, you certainly take the best route to the fastest approval for your family-based visa requirements.
Naturalization
A qualified attorney will help you to convert your green card status into a U.S. citizen by meeting all the eligibility requirements. An attorney will handle the application process and prepare you for the naturalization examination. Passing this exam is necessary to become a U.S. citizen and achieve benefits such as the right to vote, protection from deportation, and more.
Apart from helping in the process of citizenship for higher-level jobs, an immigration attorney can help you if you want to marry a foreigner or have a child outside the country. Qualified attorneys are dedicated to providing the best possible solution for you and give all the necessary information regarding the conditions, requirements, and procedures.
Non-Immigrant Visa :
Obtaining a non-immigrant visa allows you to stay in a country for a specific amount of time due to some specific purpose. First, you must decide which type of visa will work best for your situation, and for that immigration attorney will help you to get a clear understanding of different types of nonimmigrant visas.
He or she will break down the rules and permissions of each visa application type to help you apply for the most suitable one. It is important to know the correct type because not all visa types can allow your spouses and children to accompany you. A well-versed attorney helps you obtain the ideal non-immigrant visa as per your situation.
Visa For Fashion Model :
Professional fashion models from around the world come to the prominent fashion industry of the U.S. However, if a fashion model wants to work in the U.S. fashion industry, they must obtain a proper visa. Hiring an immigration attorney can help to prove the prominence with required documents, pictures, videos, and certification. Your attorney will guide you and prepare you thoroughly with all the paperwork. With the proper visa, a fashion model can walk prestigious runway shows, be an ambassador for a luxury brand, or join many campaigns.
Aside from the scenarios mentioned above, if you are facing deportation or have been accused of a criminal offense, it is essential to contact an immigration lawyer before removal proceedings begin. Hiring immigration attorneys in Florida will be your best chance to stay in the country. These attorneys help you to navigate the situations and represent your case to get the best possible results.
Conclusion
Not all legal immigration-related scenarios need the assistance of an immigration attorney. However, there will be different immigration cases that may have complexities, and there's a risk of handling these situations without a professional. Therefore, you must need the best immigration attorney in Florida who is familiar with your specific condition and provides the most suitable solution.
Wildes Weinberg, PC has a team of qualified and experienced attorneys to help individuals immigrate successfully. All our immigration experts are known for their prompt and efficient service. The hallmark of our law practice remains the individualized attention to its client’s problems and helping them to get the best outcome.
For further information, call us at 212-753-3468 and schedule a meeting with our team today!
#Immigration Attorney New York City#Immigration Lawyer NYC#NY Immigration Lawyers#Immigration Attorney NYC#Immigration Lawyers In New York#Best Immigration Attorney Florida#Best Immigration Lawyers Florida
0 notes
Text
Navigating the NYC Labor Maze with Collective Bargaining Lawyers
In this blog, we aim to demystify collective bargaining, explore the pivotal role that nyc collective bargaining lawyers play in this domain, and offer practical strategies for employers. From the intricate legal frameworks to the future's technological implications, we will guide you through each facet of this important process.
Whether you're a seasoned employer or a legal advisor guiding businesses, understanding collective bargaining will empower you to make informed decisions and maintain harmonious workplace relations.

Introduction to Collective Bargaining in NYC
Collective bargaining refers to the negotiation process between employers and a group of employees aimed at reaching agreements to regulate working conditions. It's a fundamental aspect of labor relations, particularly in a city like NYC, where diverse industries and workforces converge. At its core, collective bargaining is designed to ensure fair wages, working conditions, and benefits for employees while maintaining sustainable business practices for employers.
In NYC, where the workforce is as dynamic and diverse as the city itself, collective bargaining plays a critical role in shaping labor policies. It influences everything from wage structures to work hours, impacting both large corporations and small businesses. By engaging in collective bargaining, employers can foster better relationships with their workforce, leading to increased productivity and job satisfaction.
For employers, understanding the nuances of collective bargaining is essential. Not only does it help in navigating legal obligations, but it also equips them with the tools to engage effectively with employees. This understanding can lead to more productive negotiations and outcomes that are beneficial for all parties involved.
The Role of Collective Bargaining Lawyers
When it comes to navigating the complexities of collective bargaining, nyc collective bargaining lawyers specializing in this field are invaluable. These legal professionals play a crucial role in mediating negotiations, ensuring that both employers and employees understand their rights and obligations. Their expertise lies in interpreting labor laws, crafting agreements, and resolving disputes that may arise during negotiations.
For employers, having a nyc collective bargaining lawyers can make a significant difference in the negotiation process. These lawyers represent the employer's interests, providing strategic advice and guidance. They help employers understand the legal landscape and develop negotiation strategies that align with their business goals. By ensuring compliance with labor laws, these lawyers help businesses avoid potential legal pitfalls and disputes.
As the negotiation process unfolds, collective bargaining lawyers work diligently to bridge any gaps between employers and employees. Their role is to facilitate communication, ensuring that all parties are heard and that agreements are reached amicably. In doing so, they help create a harmonious work environment that benefits both employers and employees.
The Future of Collective Bargaining in NYC
As we look to the future, several trends are shaping the landscape of collective bargaining in NYC. One of the key trends is the increasing emphasis on technology and innovation. With the rise of remote work and digital communication, employers and employees are finding new ways to engage in negotiations and reach agreements.
Another trend is the growing focus on inclusivity and diversity in the workplace. Employers are recognizing the importance of creating equitable work environments and are incorporating these values into collective bargaining agreements. This includes addressing issues such as pay equity, flexible work arrangements, and diversity initiatives.
Looking ahead, employers who stay informed about these trends and adapt their strategies accordingly will be better positioned to succeed in collective bargaining. By leveraging technology, fostering inclusivity, and staying abreast of legal developments, employers can create a more harmonious and productive work environment for their employees.
Conclusion
Throughout this blog, we've explored the role of nyc collective bargaining lawyers, key legal considerations, and strategies for employers to overcome challenges and seize opportunities. By partnering with experienced legal professionals and staying informed about industry trends, employers can successfully navigate the complexities of collective bargaining.
#nyc collective bargaining lawyers#nyc collective bargaining attorney#collective bargaining lawyer in new york#collective bargaing lawyers in nyc#business immigration attorney ny
0 notes
Text

G A M Law Office
Our NYC immigration lawyers at G.A.M. Law Office have years of experience handling immigration matters and the immigration process successfully. Our New York law firm primarily focuses on immigration law so that we may assist clients with Family Immigration, Naturalization, Employment Immigration, Deportation and Removal Defense, Green Cards, Immigrant Visas, Citizenship, and just about any immigration matter in the United States.
Whether you're seeking an 'abogado de immigration New York' or a dedicated small business attorney in NYC, we have you covered. Benefit from our immigration lawyer NYC free consultation and experience expertise firsthand.
Address: 240 W 40th St, 2nd Fl, Ste 317, New York, NY 10018, USA Phone: 347-329-3952 Website: https://gamlawoffice.com
#Abogado De Immigration New York#Abogados De Immigration NY#Small Business Attorney NYC#Immigration Lawyer NYC Free Consultation#Immigration Lawyer NYC
0 notes
Text
News of the Day 2/20/25
Obviously people are concerned about what Trump will do on specific issues that can really ehff up peoples' lives. But institutionally, one of the biggest concerns at least in the circles I run in is Trump could just act like court decisions don't appy to him and do whatever he wants anyway. And that's increasingly become a thing: there's evidence he hasn't released funding after judges ordered him to, and people in his inner circle have said the executive shouldn't be hemmed in by the judiciary, and talked about impeaching judges who ruled against him.
Which is obviously a problem, because in America we have rights (not everything is up to majority vote, much less the president's whims). Also I like living in not-a-dictatorship. Most people do. The judiciary is how we tell our leaders to hold up and don't do that.
J.D. Vance said on social media, judges "aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power." (RP) They certainly can and should decide if the way the executive branch exercises power really is legitimate.
The NY Times talks more broadly about why Trump's actions so far are getting closer and closer to the "constitutional crisis" red line. A good overview. (RP)
How judges could react if Trump simply refuses to follow their orders. (RP)
Why the courts may have limited ability to stop Trump's most illegal actions.
NY Times discusses the extreme conservative legal theories that could drive Trump to a constitutional crisis. (RP)
How the Trump administration is trying to set priorities and policies at DoJ, threatening their independence.
Beyond the Eric Adams dismissal, DOJ insiders say Trump has a habit of dropping charges against people he likes. (I mean, Quelle surprise! But the details are still interesting.)
Related: Eric Adams. If you're not following, he's the NYC mayor indicted for bribery and other corruption charges. He wanted a pardon; Trump's DOJ gave him a dismissal without prejudice. Basically they won't pursue the charges but only so long as Adams is a good little boy and lets the Trump admin do whatever Trump wants especially regarding immigration. And.... yeah, it's been something, that's for sure.
Danielle Sassoon, a DOJ prosecutor, resigned rather than file dismissal for Eric Adams. (Good for her!)
An interesting profile from the New Yorker on her. (RP)
DOJ requests judge dismiss federal charges (without prejudice) after Sassoon and six others resign. (RP)
The details of how the one prosecutor who finally filed the dismissal request was pressured to do it are really quite astounding (and heartbreaking). (RP) NY Times also offers detail of that push. (RP)
The NY governor is considering removing Adams as mayor. (RP)
Eric Adams promises to let ICE officers operate at Rikers Island. (RP)
He's also sat for a Fox interview with Tom Homan making clear exactly how much control the Trump admin expect to exercise over him. (RP)
Four top NYC deputies under Adams resigned. (RP)
The Washington Times takes a broader view, and argues the events around Eric Adams have the makings of a scandal. ()
The judge presiding over Adams's case has ordered the DOJ attorneys to come to a hearing to explain why they're dropping the case. National Review argues it's unconstitutional for a judicial actor to force the executive branch to continue the case. (RP) (It seems like they have a point there, though that doesn't mean the judge can't make them state their argument on the record.)
Chris Christie argues what the DOJ is doing to Adams is weaponization of the law, and so wrong. (RP)
4 notes
·
View notes