#MOTO G6 PLUS SPECIFICATIONS

[theplanetsdreamer]

Check out this listing I just added to my Poshmark closet: Motorola Moto G6 5.7 Inch (Pink Flower) Case Cottagecore fairycore.

[anantradingpvtltd]

Price: [price_with_discount] (as of [price_update_date] - Details) [ad_1] Product Description Why Choose Brand Conquer External Portable Memory Card Reader Expand two SD card slots to laptops/tablets/phones that have no card slot equipped. Add more storage and back space to them. A cost-effective way to reuse the SD cards of older phones or cameras. Easy to transfer file/photos/videos etc between your phones and camera's SD cards, allowing to email to friends or post them on to Facebook with speed and convenience. Release the space of your SD/TF cards and backup your data to Cloud Storage. Copy the photos, movies, files etc from Micro SD cards to your computer for watching, editing easily. Connect to any USB C OTG supported mobile device to playback videos/music directly from external cards without occupying space on your devices. Brand Conquer USB 3.0 & USB C & Micro usb 3 in 1 Card Reader In addition to conventional PC / laptop with USB A port you can connect through this card reader with device that is equipped with USB C port. For amateur photographers it is an optimal choice to manage the files from camera via this card reader. And thanks to USB 3.0, you're looking forward to the fastest transfer rate of up to 5 Gbps. One Slight Push to Protect Your Micro SD Card Just insert/extract card with one slight push for Micro SD card slot. Specification Transfer rate of up to 5 Gbps Compatible with OS: Windows, Mac OS, Linux and etc. SD slot: SD, SDHC, SDXC, RS-MMC, MMC Micro SD slot: Micro SD, Micro SDHC, Micro SDXC Size: L73.7xW21.5XH11.6 (mm) Note USB A and USB C plug can not be used identically. For Samsung S9/S9 Plus/S8/S8 Plus/Note 8/Google Pixel 2/XL/LG G5/V20/V30/ Nexus 5X6P, the memory card file format should be FAT32/EXFAT, NTFS is not supported Universal Compatibility USB C Laptop: Macbook, MacBook Pro, HUAWEI Matebook / Matebook X / Matebook, Asus ASUS ROG GX501, ZenPad S 8.0, Zenbook3, ZenPad 3S, Lenovo Air 12, YOGA 5 Pro / Miix 5/920, Legion Y720, Chromebook Pixel, Samsung Galaxy Book 12 Inch / Tab S3, Dell Alienware 13/17, MSI GS63 Gaming Notebook etcOTG USB C Smartphone / Tablet: Samsung S10, S10 Plus, S9, S9 Plus, S8, S8 Plus, Note8, Galaxy A3 / A5 2017, Huawei P10, P10 Plus, Mate9 / 10, Honor8 / 9, Nexus 6P, Google Pixel / Pixel XL, HTC 10x, One U11, LG V20 / V30 / LG G5 / G6 / LG Nexus 5X / 6P, Oneplus 7 Pro/7 /2 /3 / 3t / 5, Lumia 950 / 9520XL, Moto Z / Moto Z2 Play, Sony Xperia XZ / Xperia XZ Premium, ASUS Zenfone 3 / ZenFone 3 Deluxe, Lenovo yoga tab 3 plus, ASUS Zen Pad 3S10 Z500M and other OTG enabled USB C phones / tablets.All USB A devices: Plug and Play for computers and laptops with USB 3.0 connection under the following operating system such as Windows, Mac OS and Linux. Specification Transfer rate of up to 5 GbpsCompatible with OS: Windows, Mac OS, Linux and etc.SD slot: SD, SDHC, SDXC, RS-MMC, MMCMicro SD slot: Micro SD, Micro SDHC, Micro SDXCSize: L73.7xW21.5XH11.6 (mm) Note 1. USB A and USB C plug can not be used identically.2. For Samsung S9/S9 Plus/S8/S8 Plus/Note 8/Google Pixel 2/XL/LG G5/V20/V30/ Nexus 5X6P, the memory card file format should be FAT32/EXFAT, NTFS is not supported. Package Content Brand Conquer USB 3.0 & USB C & Micro usb Card Reader for SD and Micro SD x 1

6 -in-1 Card Reader, Expand the storage space of your devices Fast Transmission SD & TF card reader with fast speed and huge capacity, allows large files pictures HD movie to transfer in just seconds. USB Memory Card Reader support card up to 512G. Best Partner for Camera-Share Photos any Time While in traveling, you can send the photos that you took with camera via card reader from SD card to your cell phone, and share the beautiful moments of your journey with your friends or family. Operating System Compatibility This USB Card Reader Adapter is compatible with Android /Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1/10, Mac OS, Linux, Chrome OS and etc. Micro USB /USB 2.0 and USB Type C connectors. 1x SD/MMC slot, 1x Micro SD/TF , USB slot Read almost all your memory cards with speed and convenience. Excellent quality. Made of durable, high-grade aluminum alloy and premium chips. Memory Card Reader with OTG(USB C device/Android phone/Tablet must with OTG function)Backup your important Photos, Music, Videos Portable for business(convenient for file work) Document viewer for all major file formats Securely store and share digital contents such as movies, pictures, and music from your phone. Warming Tips: SD/Micro SD cards are not included; For card slot, pls insert/extract the card with one slight push. Please do not disconnect card reader during file transfer. No need driver and app installation.This SD / Micro SD card reader do not support read two cards simultaneously. when connected to a PC/laptop, you will receive more efficient data transfer and no longer waste long time to wait. The USB 3.0 USB C to SD Adapter supports all popular memory cards For SD, SDHC, SDXC, RS-MMC, MMC, Micro SD, Micro SDHC, Micro SDXC and UHS-I cards in large capacity up to Wide compatibility: this digital memory card adapter is suitable for Samsung S10 S9 Plus S8 Plus Note 9 8, A3 / A5 (2017), A8 (2018); HUAWEI P20 Pro / P20 / P20 Lite, Mate9 / 10 / Mate 10 Pro, Honor8 / 9, P9 / P10 / P9 Plus / P10 Plus, Nexus 6P, Nova Plus, Grade 8; Sony Xperia XZ, Pieria XZ Premium; One Plus: 2/3 / 3T / 5; Xiao Mi MIX2 / MIX2s, 6 / 5C / 5s / 5splus; Mac Book Pro, Mac Book, Dell XPS, Samsung Galaxy Book, Acer Switch Alpha 12, Lenovo Mix 510/520, Yoga520 / 720/900/910/920 Plug & play: no driver installation required for windows, Mac OS, Linux etc. Powered via USB or USB C plug, therefore no additional power needed. With over current, overvoltage and short-circuit protection, the USB card reader USB C secures safety for all connected devices and memory cards

Compact and portable for on the go: The Micro SD TF Card Reader is designed with aluminum housing that works well on heat dissipation. Attached protective cap protects both connectors from unwanted contamination and dust. Note: for Micro SD card slot, insert/extract the card with one slight push [ad_2]

[newsyatra]

Moto G6 Plus Launched In India With Dual Rear Cameras Know Feature Price Specifications Hk | भारत में Moto G6 Plus लॉन्च, जानिए दो रियर कैमरा से लैस इस स्मार्टफोन की कीमत

Moto G6 Plus Launched In India With Dual Rear Cameras Know Feature Price Specifications Hk | भारत में Moto G6 Plus लॉन्च, जानिए दो रियर कैमरा से लैस इस स्मार्टफोन की कीमत

[ad_1]

<!-- Loading... -->

मोटोरोला ने Moto G6 Plus भारतीय बाजार में लॉन्च कर दिया है. मोटो जी6 सीरीज का यह तीसरा स्मार्टफोन है. अप्रैल महीने में इस फोन को ब्राजील में पेश कर दिया गया था और यह जी6 सीरीज के पहले दो फोन के मुकाबले बड़ी डिस्प्ले, ज्यादा रैम और तेज प्रोसेसर से लैस है. अंतरराष्ट्रीय बाजर में जहां…

[softtau]

भारत में Moto G6 Plus लॉन्च, जानिए दो रियर कैमरा से लैस इस स्मार्टफोन की कीमत

[ad_1]

<!-- Loading... -->

मोटोरोला ने Moto G6 Plus भारतीय बाजार में लॉन्च कर दिया है. मोटो जी6 सीरीज का यह तीसरा स्मार्टफोन है. अप्रैल महीने में इस फोन को ब्राजील में पेश कर दिया गया था और यह जी6 सीरीज के पहले दो फोन के मुकाबले बड़ी डिस्प्ले, ज्यादा रैम और तेज प्रोसेसर से लैस है. अंतरराष्ट्रीय बाजर में जहां…

[newsaryavart]

भारत में Moto G6 Plus लॉन्च, जानिए दो रियर कैमरा से लैस इस स्मार्टफोन की कीमत

[ad_1]

<!-- Loading... -->

मोटोरोला ने Moto G6 Plus भारतीय बाजार में लॉन्च कर दिया है. मोटो जी6 सीरीज का यह तीसरा स्मार्टफोन है. अप्रैल महीने में इस फोन को ब्राजील में पेश कर दिया गया था और यह जी6 सीरीज के पहले दो फोन के मुकाबले बड़ी डिस्प्ले, ज्यादा रैम और तेज प्रोसेसर से लैस है. अंतरराष्ट्रीय बाजर में जहां…

[technicalnextstuff]

Moto G6 Play, G6 Plus Listed in the UK Ahead of Expected April 19 Launch

Moto G6 Play, G6 Plus Listed in the UK Ahead of Expected April 19 Launch

[ad_1]

The launch of Lenovo-owned Motorola’s Moto G6 series of mid-range handsets is expected today, at an event in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Based on a plethora of leaks, we can expect to see the Moto G6 Play, Moto G6, and Moto G6 Pluslaunched. The Internet has been abuzz with dozens of Moto G6 price, design, and specifications leaks for the past few months. Just before the launch, two of the phones…

[ibelstore]

The 7 Best Cell Phones for Seniors in 2020

Best Overall: Jitterbug Flip

Jitterbug’s large presence on this list shows their dedication to the senior community and therefore the Jitterbug Flip is not any exception. The 4.7-ounce device offers an exterior 1.44-inch 128 x 128 display that has basic information like incoming call notifications and date and time. Inside the device, you’ll find a 3.2-inch 480 x 320 display that’s bright, but still offers exceptional outdoor visibility. The text is large and straightforward to read and there is an easy, organized menu that’s navigated through the directional arrows alongside “yes” and “no” selection buttons.

The addition of 5Star turns the Flip into a private guard that’s customized specifically for an older audience. With one-button touch for emergencies and agents standing by 24/7, there’s many peace of mind for the phone owner, also as their families and friends. Additionally, the LED flashlight on the outside of the device doubles as a reading magnifier for assisting with small print reading in dimly lit areas. The included GreatCall Link app assists family with staying up-to-update together with your health and safety while not intruding on your independence.

Best Value: Nokia 4.2

Just because you’re trying to find a phone that doesn’t cost a fortune doesn’t mean you ought to need to accept mediocrity. The Nokia 4.2 is ideal for anyone who wants a phone they won’t need to replace anytime soon, and it’s filled with handy features to form your life easier.

Google Assistant will remind you of important events or assist you answer texts without lifting a finger, and because of Android One, you won’t need to worry about bloatware filling up your phone. Plus, with its Adaptive Battery mode, you’ll be ready to really get the simplest out of your phone, making it an excellent value choice for seniors wanting a phone that matches their needs.

Runner-Up, Best Overall: Motorola G6 Play

With a tag that won’t scare anyone away, the Moto G6 Play is a superb option for many seniors. Geared toward the more tech-savvy, the phone’s combination of an outsized display and long battery life make it a sensible buy.

Right away, the 5.7-inch display grabs your attention. Its 720p resolution ensures that fonts are easy to read, and underneath the display may be a quad-core processor which allows multiple apps to run concurrently with no slowdown. That’s great for seniors who want to try to to some mobile shopping or sign up on Facebook. The rear of the device is adorned with a 13-megapixel camera that takes sharp, accurate photos. It’s perfect for vacations or for pictures of the grandkids.

The biggest highlight of the Motorola is that the 4000mAh battery. Even for power users, that battery size is quite enough to urge through each day. for somebody who might use the phone considerably less, charging every other day may be a real possibility. This phone also has Amazon Alexa capabilities, meaning you'll ask about traffic or weather using voice commands.

Best Basic: LG Exalt VN220

The Verizon-powered LG Exalt flip phone features a solid combination of performance and battery life. The 1470mAh battery keeps it running for quite 10 days of standby time and up to 6 hours of talk time, so you rarely got to recharge. it is also capable of HD voice calls, which provides you crystal-clear audio so you do not miss a word. (This are often especially helpful for users who are hearing-impaired.) Another plus: the Exalt are often used as a mobile hotspot and share its network reference to your other devices if you would like internet access faraway from home. While there’s no display on the surface, the interior three-inch LCD screen is straightforward to ascertain, with large fonts and numbers. The buttons also are comfortably large and straightforward to type on.

Best Display: Jitterbug Smart2

The Jitterbug Smart2 is an easy-to-use phone with some updated features that make it an excellent choice for quite just texting and calling. The phone’s 5.5-inch screen makes everything easy to read, and therefore the simple home screen menu has large buttons for basic functions like making phone calls, accessing the phone’s camera, and sending emails. you'll also download additional apps, like Skype or Google Hangouts, within the Google Play store. The phone comes with 16GB of built-in storage with the power to expand to 32GB using an SD card.

The Smart2 also features a voice typing feature that creates texting simpler. All users need to do is press a button and speak their text message rather than having to type it out. Additionally, this phone offers 5Star service as a security precaution — with a press of a button on the phone’s home screen, users can access immediate emergency assistance. The phone is additionally hearing-aid compatible and comes with the GreatCall Link app that updates relations about your health and safety.

The bottom line is that the Jitterbug Smart2 is specifically engineered with seniors’ needs in mind. And with an outsized screen, access to apps, and voice typing, they will enjoy the advantages of up-to-date technology on a tool that’s also easy to use.

Best Battery: ASUS ZenFone Max Pro

While senior citizens won't drain their phone batteries using Snapchat as fast because the remainder of us, but keeping them powered is more a matter of safety. The ZenFone Max Pro features a high-capacity 5000mAh battery that delivers incredible battery life.

The phone features a 6.3-inch IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen with 1920 x 1080 FHD resolution and runs Android 8.1 Oreo. it's three great cameras: two 12-megapixel cameras on the rear and a 13-megapixel camera on the front. At its core, you’ll find a speedy Snapdragon 660 processor, 4GB of RAM and desktop-grade Adreno 512 graphics processor. it is a great, reliable, powerful phone, future proofed enough that only the foremost demanding users will got to upgrade anytime within the near future. Part of what makes the Galaxy S8 an excellent choice for seniors is that the inclusion of "Easy Mode." An optional setting on Samsung smartphones, this mode reconfigures the house screen with an easier layout and bigger fonts. There’s still access to the powerful features of the Galaxy S8, just during a more user-friendly capacity. Bixby’s voice commands also are a bonus, allowing menu navigation with voice control.

Best Android: Samsung Galaxy S8

The Galaxy S8 display is gorgeous both in Easy Mode and Samsung’s more traditional interface. Colors are bright and vibrant and straightforward to ascertain even in direct sunlight. At 5.8 inches in total size, there’s many room for larger fonts. The body of the phone is IP68 rated also for five feet of water resistance for up to half-hour.

The 12-megapixel camera takes gorgeous photos and with 64GB of memory available, storage is unlikely to be a problem. A 3000mAh battery adds up to 30 hours of life before requiring a recharge.

[mylucky137276]

Moto G6 Plus with 18:9 screen, dual rear camera launched: Know price, specs

Motorola, a Lenovo-owned smartphone manufacturer, on September 10 launched the Moto G6 Plus in India at a price of Rs 22,499. The Amazon-exclusive smartphone goes on sale on September 10 at the e-commerce portal, and in offline retail stores. Unlike the international variant, the Indian model comes in one colour – Indigo black.

The company is offering up to Rs 3,000 cashback to customers on purchase of the Moto G6 Plus using Paytm Mall app in store. The company is also providing no-cost EMI on Bajaj Finserve, benefits of up to Rs 4,450 to Jio users, instant cashback worth Rs 2,200 in the form of recharge vouchers, Cleartrip cashback vouchers worth Rs 1,250 and Rs 1,000 AJIO shopping discount coupon.

The Moto G6 Plus is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 system-on-chip, paired with 64GB of internal storage and 6GB of RAM. The phone sports 5.9-inch fullHD+ screen stretched in 18:9 aspect ratio. The phone features Dolby Audio pre-set equalisers for immersive audio output. The phone features glass-metal-glass design with 3D surface on back. It features dual camera module on the back featuring a 12-megapixel primary lens, mated with 5MP depth-sensing lens. The primary lens features dual autofocus pixel technology for fast focus and enhanced depth effects. It also features smart camera software, which includes spot colour mode, selective black and white mode, face unlock and QR code scanner. The phone also comes integrated with Google lens for object and landmark recognition. Readmore Technologynews

[poonamparekh]

Moto G6 Plus India launch today: Know specs, features and expected price

Lenovo-backed smartphone manufacturer Motorola is launching the Moto G6 Plus in India on September 10. This smartphone had been announced earlier this year, along with the Moto G6 and Moto G6 Play, which were launched in the country in June. Like the other two siblings, the Moto G6 Plus runs on Google Android Oreo 8.0 and sports an 18:9 screen. Compared to the Moto G6 and Moto G6 Play, the Moto G6 Plus is a premium smartphone with a faster processor, more RAM and a bigger screen estate.

In terms of features and specifications, the Moto G6 Plus has a 5.93-inch IPS screen of fullHD+ resolution. It is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 system-on-chip (SoC), paired with 4 GB or 6 GB of RAM and 64 GB or 128 GB of storage, respectively. In terms of imaging, the phone has a 12-megapixel and a 5MP dual camera on the back. The rear camera module boasts Dual-Pixel autofocus and is capable of recording ultra-high-definition 4K videos. On the front, the phone sports an 8MP selfie camera with face filters and LED selfie flash. The phone is powered by a 3,200 mAh battery and comes with a 15W TurboPower charger.

Currently available in Brazil, the Moto G6 Plus costs 299 euros, which is about Rs 24,500. However, the Indian pricing is expected to be lower. The phone comes in Indigo and Gold colour options.

[jffc-in-blog]

Moto G6 Play, G6 Plus Listed in the UK Ahead of Expected April 19 Launch

https://jffc.in/?p=45307 #Android, #Mobiles, #MotoG6PlayPlusCarphoneWarehouseListingApril19LaunchMotoVoiceAppChangelogScreenshotMotoG6Play, #MotoG6PlaySpecifications, #MotoG6Plus, #MotoG6PlusSpecifications, #MotoVoice

[awesomedimple-blog1]

Motorola Moto G6, G6 Plus and G6 Play: Specifications, Features, Price on Business Standard. Motorola has announced the Moto G6, G6 Plus and G6 Play smartphones. Though the devices in this Moto series share the design theme, each has different specifications, features and prices. Details here

[itsredminote5review-blog]

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Smartphone Review

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 not only convinces with its affordable price but also its dual-camera, its metal case and its capable SoC. Find out in this review whether the Redmi Note 5’s performance is as impressive as its price.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi smartphones are becoming increasingly more popular in Europe, particularly the Redmi series. Redmi devices have always combined good quality at a reasonable price. The Note 5 is a phablet with a 5.99-inch display, a mid-range SoC, fast Wi-Fi and a dual-camera all for under €240 (~$277).

For reference, our review unit is the M1803E7SG. This is also known as the Redmi Note 5 AI Dual Camera. It is neither the Redmi 5 Plus, which is listed as the Redmi Note 5 on Xiaomi's Mi website, nor is it the Redmi Note 5 Pro either. All three devices are powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC, but they feature different camera hardware and memory options among other differences.

We have chosen to compare the Note 5 against the Motorola Moto G6 Plus, the Huawei Y7 2018, the Maze Alpha X and the Honor 7X. Find out in this review how the Note 5 compares with similarly priced competitors and whether it continues the Redmi series ethos.

good (86%) Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636Qualcomm Adreno 509 Smartphone - 06/25/2018 - v6 Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Redmi Series) ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 636 Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 509 Memory3072 MB   Display5.99 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes Storage32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB   , 24 GB free Weight180 g ( = 6.35 oz / 0.4 pounds), Power Supply: 61 g ( = 2.15 oz / 0.13 pounds) Price239 Euro Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison» Compare devices 0 Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL Review: A great all-rounder with only one real weakness 85% Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL Review: A great all-rounder with only one real weakness MSI GL75 9SEK Laptop Review - An average mid-range gaming laptop with loud fans 83% MSI GL75 9SEK Laptop Review - An average mid-range gaming laptop with loud fans Dell Latitude 3400 Laptop Review: An affordable business laptop with long battery life 83% Dell Latitude 3400 Laptop Review: An affordable business laptop with long battery life Test AVM FritzBox 7590: Operation and functional range are the trumps Test AVM FritzBox 7590: Operation and functional range are the trumps Next Page ⟩ Case

The Note 5 is available in Lake Blue, Black, Gold and Rose Gold. Our test device is the Rose Gold variant, which has a white front. The Note 5 has a metal case, which proved to be stable during our tests. Our test device did not react to pressure applied to the back of the case, while light pressure on the display causes slight waves in the LCD. Our test device withstood our attempts to bend and twist it, with hardly any creaks or cracking noises when doing so.

The design is not exceptional, but it is stylish. The metal back is sandwiched between color matching plastic areas designed to improve the reception quality. The display is flush with the case but for a slight edge. This is deliberate though and is a relatively smooth edge. The Note 5 weighs 180 g (~6.3 oz) and measures 158.5 x 75.4 x 8.1 mm (~6.2 x ~3 x ~0.32 in). This weight and dimension help the device to feel good in the hand. The rear-facing camera array protrudes slightly from the case, so the Note 5 is slightly unstable on flat surfaces.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Top 10 Laptops Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros

Best Displays, for University Students

Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera SmartphonesNotebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros

Size Comparison      Motorola Moto G6 Plus       Xiaomi Redmi Note 5       Huawei Y7 2018       Maze Alpha X       Huawei Honor 7X 160 mm / 6.3 inch 75.5 mm / 2.97 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 167 g 0.3682 lbs 158.5 mm / 6.24 inch 75.45 mm / 2.97 inch 8.05 mm / 0.3169 inch 180 g 0.3968 lbs 158.3 mm / 6.23 inch 76.7 mm / 3.02 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 155 g 0.3417 lbs 156.4 mm / 6.16 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 210 g 0.463 lbs 156.5 mm / 6.16 inch 75.3 mm / 2.96 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 165 g 0.3638 lbs Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

Connectivity The Surface Laptop 3 comes with a custom AMD Ryzen Microsoft Surface Edition Zen+ APU. (Source: AMD) AMD Ryzen 5 3580U and Ryzen 7 3780U with an extra CU constitute the semi-custom AMD Ryzen Microsoft Surface Edition series A 5G variant of the Galaxy Tab S6 is enroute. (Source: Samsung) Galaxy Tab S6 to get 5G variant, will be first 5G tablet on the market Windows 10 X comes with a redesigned Start menu and is tailored for dual-screen devices. (Source: Microsoft) Windows 10X — A 'Lite' version for Windows 10 for dual-screen devices sans live tiles The new The supposed Motorola One Macro shows up in a new evleak Next Page ⟩ Our test device has 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage. There is also a 64 GB/4 GB option, which we would recommend over our test device as they are currently equally priced online. The Note 5 is a Dual-SIM device and supports microSD cards up to 256 GB. MicroSD cards can only be formatted as external storage, which means that app data can only be stored on the 32 GB of internal storage. Incidentally, the card tray has only two slots, so you can either use two nano-SIMs or one SIM and a microSD card.

The Note 5 features an FM radio, Bluetooth 5.0 and a fingerprint sensor. There is even an IR remote that can be used as a remote control. Unfortunately, there is only a microUSB port instead of a USB Type-C port. The microUSB port is only USB 2.0, albeit this supports USB OTG.

Right-hand side: Power button, volume rocker Right-hand side: Power button, volume rocker Left-hand side: Card tray Left-hand side: Card tray Underside: 3.5 mm jack, Microphone, Micro USB port, Speaker Underside: 3.5 mm jack, Microphone, Micro USB port, Speaker Bottom side: Infrared sensor, Microphone Bottom side: Infrared sensor, Microphone Software The Note 5 ships with Android Oreo 8.1, which has been customized with Xiaomi’s MIUI. Our test device is running MIUI Global 9.5 and Android security patch level March 1st  2018, which was about six weeks old at the time of writing. MIUI looks different than the UI on many other Android smartphones, with Xiaomi implementing numerous changes from stock Android. MIUI should not take Android users too much time to adapt though. Frustratingly, we could not change the screen timeout as the button to confirm the change is missing. Equally frustrating is the energy-saving features, which are overly restrictive. Runtastic, for example, ran correctly only after changing numerous settings.

The Note 5 comes with many additional apps, most of which are by Xiaomi. Fortunately, there is little bloatware except for one social network app.

Communication & GPS The Note 5 is equipped with fast IEEE 802.11 ac Wi-Fi, which is rare for a €240 (~$277) device and one that will make many users happy. While the Note 5 cannot match the Motorola G6 Plus in terms of Wi-Fi performance, the Note 5 is faster than all our other comparison devices. We calculated this performance using our Linksys EA8500 reference router. Our test device loaded websites quickly when we were close to the router, but we did have to wait for some images to load. The Note 5 still had full Wi-Fi reception when we took the device around ten meters (~33 ft) away from the router with three walls between the two devices. Websites loaded just as fast as they do when we tested the Note 5 with it close to our reference router.

The Note 5 supports seven LTE bands, which is rather paltry in comparison to other devices. In practice, this means that you may struggle with connecting to an LTE network in more exotic countries. Our test device had good mobile network reception on the German D2 network. We still had good reception even in buildings in built-up areas.

Phone Functions & Call Quality The Note 5 uses Xiaomi’s phone app, which is much like Google’s standard phone app. Launching the app brings up the keypad and a list of recent calls. There is a small search window in which you can search directly for contacts. Alternatively, you bring up your contact list by clicking the contacts tab. The phone app has numerous settings such as a phone number blacklist and call recording among other features.

The Note 5 has good call quality. Our call partner sounded clear and without any background noise. Our test device reproduced our voice well, but the microphone distorted if we spoke too loudly. The opposite is true over the speakerphone, where the microphone struggled to pick out our voice if we spoke softly. Our counterpart is still easy to understand, albeit there is some mild background noise during quieter moments.

Cameras Example photograph using the front-facing camera Example photograph using the front-facing camera The Note 5 has dual rear-facing cameras, one 12 MP and one 5 MP. The secondary camera is only used to help create depth of field bokeh effect photographs and it cannot be used as a standalone camera. Photos taken with the main camera have fewer details than those taken with more premium smartphones, with some areas coming out particularly muddy and lacking definition. Our test device gets the exposure right in dark areas in good lighting and there is even some detail in very bright areas. Low-light performance is surprisingly good, but there is a clear blue tint to the photos. The Apple iPhone X captures night shots more accurately, but the latter costs practically five times as much as the Note 5. Overall, the Note 5 has an impressive rear-facing camera array given its price.

The main camera can record videos in up to 1080p at 30 FPS. The video quality is passable, although bright areas are often underexposed, while dark areas lack detail. Recordings are sharp though. There is a 120 FPS slow motion feature, which is recorded at 720p.

The Note 5 has a 13 MP front-facing camera, which in theory could make the Note 5 a selfie star. While the Note 5 does well for a more affordable device, it does not come close to more premium smartphones. Dark areas are exposed well, but bright areas often dominate a photograph. Sharpness is rather average too, but the front-facing camera reproduces colors well.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3 click to load imagesXiaomi Redmi Note 5Apple iPhone XOnePlus 5TSony A77 The Note 5 does not fare much better under controlled lighting conditions either. Sharpness is passable, with our test device reproducing text against a colored background well. Transitions between colors appear pixelated, but this is still ok for a device at this price. Generally, images are overly dark, particularly color reproduction.

Photograph of our test chart Photograph of our test chart Our test chart in detail Our test chart in detail ColorChecker: The reference color is displayed in the lower half of each area of color ColorChecker: The reference color is displayed in the lower half of each area of color Accessories & Warranty The Note 5 comes with a quick charger, a USB cable, a SIM tool and a protective cover. Xiaomi does not offer any dedicated accessories on its website.

The Note 5 does not come with a manufacturer’s warranty in Europe seeing as Xiaomi are a Chinese company. You will get twenty-four months warranty if you buy through an EU supplier though. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific information.

Input Devices & Operation Xiaomi has installed Google GBoard as the Note 5’s default keyboard. Other keyboards are available from the Google Play Store.

The Note 5 has a touchscreen that has a slick, smooth surface. Touch inputs are precise even at the corners and at the edges of the display. There is a fingerprint sensor on the back of the device that quickly and reliably unlocks our test device. The fingerprint sensor does not have any special gestures or configurable commands like we have seen on other devices, such as the ASUS ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro. There is a software-based quick ball which displays selected links when you click on them. This feature is less functional than using the standard on-screen navigation buttons though. Whereas opening a link with the quick ball takes a total of two clicks, using the standard navigation buttons takes just one click. A supplementary input method should increase functionality and ease of use in our opinion, rather than further complicate matters.

The hardware buttons can be found on the right-hand side of the case. These feel premium, are easy to use and have a clear pressure point.

The keyboard in portrait mode The keyboard in portrait mode The keyboard in landscape mode The keyboard in landscape mode

Display Sub-pixel array Sub-pixel array The Note 5 has a 5.99-inch display with a 2:1 aspect ratio. The display has a 2,160x1,080 native resolution, which results in a pixel density of 403 PPI. Our test device has an impressively bright display, which averaged 532.2 cd/m² using X-Rite i1Pro 2. Only the Motorola Moto G6 Plus has a brighter display of our comparison devices, with the Honor 7X scoring just slightly lower than the Note 5. The Moto G6 Plus is an outlier in this respect though with its 723 cd/m² average maximum luminosity. This is incredibly bright for a device at this price. The Note 5 has 94% display uniformity too, which is at least 4% better than the best of our comparison devices. In practical terms, this means that the large areas of color look uniformly bright. It is worth pointing out that we achieved this level of luminosity with the device on charge and with the brightness sensor turned off. Measuring our test device either on battery or with the brightness sensor turned on results in a lower average maximum brightness value.

Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation) ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether. Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9378 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

The Note 5 has a 0.23 cd/m² black value that is both notably good and significantly better than our comparison devices. This low black value helps our test device achieve a laudable 2,252:1 contrast ratio that is leagues ahead of our comparison devices. This helps make colors pop and gives black tones a rich quality to them.

We subjected our test device to our spectrophotometer and CalMAN software to get a more detailed look at the display. The results highlight a significant blue tint to the display, which results in light blue and orange tones looking noticeably different than the sRGB reference color. The color space coverage is good overall, but the blue tint is one downside.

Unfortunately, the Note 5 uses pulse-width modulation (PWM) to regulate luminosity at and below 20% brightness. We notice a flicker to the display when the brightness is at this level, which we measured at 2,358 Hz. This frequency should be high enough for those who are PWM sensitive not to feel any ill effects, although this cannot be guaranteed.

The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms). The Note 5 has a relatively bright display, which helps when using the device outdoors. We could still see screen content with brightness set to maximum if we were not in too bright an area. The display has a glossy finish though, so reflections cannot be avoided.

The Note 5 has an IPS display, which helps to give the device strong viewing angles. There are slight brightness and color shifts at acute viewing angles, but these are picked up more by the camera than they are noticeable by the naked eye.

The Note 5 is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC, a mid-range SoC that Qualcomm announced late last year. The Snapdragon 636 has an octa-core Kyro 260 CPU that clocks up to 1.8 GHz. The Snapdragon 636 is a significant improvement on its predecessor, the Snapdragon 630 that powers the Moto G6 Plus. The Snapdragon 636 helps the Note 5 to typically perform around 20% faster than the G6 Plus in benchmarks. Equally, the Note 5 feels snappy in practice, with our test device not slowing down even when we have numerous programs open in the background.

The Snapdragon 636 integrates a Qualcomm Adreno 509 GPU that supports DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and Direct3D 12. This support for modern graphics APIs should ensure that the Note 5 is future proofed at least in terms of graphics. While the Note 5 has faster GPU performance than our comparison devices too, the gap is not as great as in our CPU tests.

AnTuTu v6 | AnTuTu v7 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 92672 Points ∼95% Maze Alpha X 63989 Points ∼65%-31% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 71635 Points ∼73%-23% Huawei Honor 7X 62810 Points ∼64%-32% Huawei Y7 2018 45687 Points ∼47%-51% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92015 - 125213, n=10) 98051 Points ∼100%+6% Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=489) 87523 Points ∼89%-6% Legend

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash Maze Alpha X Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash Huawei Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Average of class Smartphone Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

The Note 5 performs better than our comparison devices in browser benchmarks too. Our test device even outperformed slightly more expensive devices. Complex HTML 5 websites like Google Interland are displayed fluidly, which is reflective of our real-world use. While the Note 5 is not as fast at loading websites as premium smartphones, it is sufficient for general web browsing.

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 JetStream 1.1 - Total Score Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=10) 45.4 Points ∼100%+2% Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Chrome 67) 44.322 Points ∼98% Average of class Smartphone (10 - 300, n=520) 40.5 Points ∼89%-9% Huawei Honor 7X (Chrome 63.0.3239.111) 31.299 Points ∼69%-29% Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) 27.971 Points ∼62%-37% Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64) 27.463 Points ∼60%-38% Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66) 17.86 Points ∼39%-60% * ... smaller is better

Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

The Note 5 is on par with our comparison devices in terms of microSD card performance. We tested the Note 5 with our trusted Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference microSD card. The Note 5 is equipped with eMMC memory, which is faster than the average of devices that we tested with 32 GB of eMMC memory. eMMC memory is no match for faster UFS memory though. The Note 5 even struggles against the Moto G6 Plus, which is also equipped with eMMC memory.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Maze Alpha X Motorola Moto G6 Plus Huawei Honor 7X Huawei Y7 2018 Average 32 GB eMMC Flash Average of class Smartphone

Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

Games The Note 5 is suitable for relatively simple mobile games. 60 FPS gaming is possible in less demanding titles like “Shadow Fight 3”, but the Note 5 struggles when we tested it against more demanding titles. “Arena of Valor”, for example, only averaged 31 FPS, while “PUBG Mobile” averaged 25 FPS. This is still high enough for stable gaming though. We would recommend looking at more expensive devices if you want to plan the most cutting-edge mobile games at 60 FPS as the Note 5 is not powerful enough for that. The Note 5 is perfectly suited for games like “Shadow Fight 3” and “Angry Birds 2” though.

The Note 5 has a single speaker on the underside of the device, the maximum volume of which we measured at 76.9 dB(A). This is not particularly loud, but the sound quality is fine. High tones are rather overbearing at maximum volume, but the speaker sings when the volume is turned down slightly. The speaker struggles with reproducing deep mid-tones, while we struggled to pick out individual instruments too. Overall though, the Note 5 has an impressive speaker for its price, albeit with a few caveats.

The Note 5 is equipped with a 3.5 mm headphone jack and Bluetooth 5.0. There are currently only a few headphones and speakers that take advantage of Bluetooth 5.0, but fortunately, the new standard is backwards compatible with all previous Bluetooth standards. The sound quality is good for both outputs. The Note 5 has an inbuilt equalizer to tweak the sound over headphones too, but you will need Xiaomi branded headphones to enable this feature.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Huawei Honor 7X Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices) Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 audio analysis (±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median (+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median (+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median) Compared to same class » 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 64% worse » The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44% Compared to all devices tested » 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Honor 7X audio analysis (±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.73 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median (±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (±) | higher highs - on average 11.5% higher than median (±) | linearity of highs is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (-) | overall sound is not linear (34.1% difference to median) Compared to same class » 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse » The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44% Compared to all devices tested » 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

Battery Life Power Consumption The Note 5 is a relatively inefficient device, with the big display, high screen brightness and the modern but powerful SoC all taking their toll on power consumption.

The Note 5 is relatively efficient when off and on standby, with our test device consuming 0.06 W and 0.2 W respectively. The Note 5 consumes more power than our comparison devices when the display is on though. The Note 5 is anywhere between 12% and 38% less efficient than our comparison devices overall. This is particularly true at maximum load, where our test device consumes 8.2 W. This is not only significantly higher than our comparison devices, but it is also 19% higher than the average of Snapdragon 636 powered devices that we have currently tested.

It is no surprise then that Xiaomi has incorporated aggressive background app management to keep power consumption under control. This degree of aggressiveness can lead to problems that need to run in the background though. We had to tweak the settings for Runtastic to work properly, for example.

Power Consumption Off / Standby darklight 0.06 / 0.2 Watt Idle darkmidlight 1 / 2.6 / 2.9 Watt Load midlight 5 / 8.2 Watt color bar

Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Average of class Smartphone

Power Consumption 21% 38% 12% 19% Idle Minimum * 1 0.9 10% 0.5 50% 1.02 -2% 0.9 10% Idle Average * 2.6 2.14 18% 1.78 32% 2.46 5% 1.9 27% Idle Maximum * 2.9 2.18 25% 1.81 38% 2.51 13% 2.3 21% Load Average * 5 3.96 21% 3.3 34% 4.16 17% 4.7 6% Load Maximum * 8.2 5.81 29% 5.14 37% 5.87 28% 5.7 30% * ... smaller is better

Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

Battery Life The Note 5 has a large 4,000 mAh battery, which helps our test device score impressive runtimes in our battery life tests despite the relatively high power consumption. Our test device lasted fourteen hours and thirty-two minutes in our Wi-Fi battery life test, during which we run a script that simulates the load required to render websites. This runtime is considerably longer than our comparison devices, thanks to the Note 5’s additional battery capacity. Our test device lasted thirty hours at idle, which indicates that the Note 5 should last for two working days with moderate use and even longer if you use infrequently use smartphones. Conversely, the Note 5 should last a full day if you use the device a lot, with our test device lasting four hours and eighteen minutes in our continuous stress test.

Xiaomi provides a 10-W quick charger in the box, which fully recharges the Note 5 in under two hours.

Battery Runtime Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) 30h 24min NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 14h 32min Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p 15h 02min Load (maximum brightness) 4h 18min Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 4000 mAh Maze Alpha X 3900 mAh Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh Huawei Honor 7X 3340 mAh Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh Battery Runtime -16% -0% -29% -21% Reader / Idle 1824 1624 -11% 1846 1% 1111 -39% 1305 -28% H.264 902 542 -40% 687 -24% WiFi v1.3 872 603 -31% 702 -19% 664 -24% 624 -28% Load 258 240 -7% 404 57% 199 -23% 245 -5% Add an additional device (search by model, GPU, CPU, storage)

Pros + plenty of CPU and GPU power for the money + good call quality + long battery life + bright and high contrast display + Bluetooth 5.0 and 802.11 ac WiFi + reasonable surface temperatures under load + current version of Android + no throttling Cons - relatively high power consumption - strong blue tint to the display - the microphone is frequently too sensitive - the OS is sometimes restrictive for apps Verdict

The Redmi Note 5 is the epitome of Xiaomi’s ethos of releasing affordable but high-performance devices and demonstrates why many are longing for a European wide launch of their devices. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 is an affordable smartphone that has plenty of power, good battery life, fast 802.11 ac Wi-Fi, and a bright and high-contrast display for under €240 (~$277). The Note 5 has a good speaker too, while call quality is decent and the Quick Charge support is handy. The modern SoC gives the Note 5 relatively fast LTE speeds, Bluetooth 5.0 and should future proof it for the foreseeable future.

There are some drawbacks though. The color temperature and a blue tint to the display are not great, and neither is the relatively high power consumption despite the impressive battery life. MIUI employs aggressive app management to its detriment too. This can lead to problems with apps that need to run in the background, but it does help to reduce power consumption and lengthen the battery life. The camera is the only area where the Note 5 is clearly a mid-range device, but photos are adequate overall. Surface temperatures are ok too, albeit they could be better under load.

[toxicsky]

Yesterday my new phone arrived (Moto g6) and so far I'm really happy with it.

Also unrelated, but lately I've been contemplating making a tinder, since I still low-key wanna have a girlfriend even though I don't have a crush on any specific person right now? Idk. Though I kinda suck at communicating with other people (and also not entirely out, still, for that same reason). Plus the next two months are probably going to be fairly busy between traveling, auditions, and just preparing for all of that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Maybe if I just go out more (like local shows or other social type events) I might meet someone???? I feel like that may work better for me than a dating app, if I’m not too awkward to exchange numbers. But yeah. Having a gf (or just dating a person in general) would be nice.

[reviewingspot1]

Wireless Charging Guide: What is it and which phones are supported?

Phones and tablets with built-in Qi wireless charging If your phone is among one of the devices that appear here, you just need to buy a wireless charger. Note that you don’t need to get a wireless charger made by the same company as your phone, e.g. Samsung wireless chargers work just fine with the iPhone 13.

Apple iPhone: 13 Pro Max, 13 Pro, 13, 13 mini, 12 Pro Max, 12 Pro, 12, 12 mini, SE 2020, 11 Pro Max, 11 Pro, 11, XS Max XS, XR, 8, 8 Plus,

Samsung Galaxy: Z Fold 3 5G, Z Flip 3 5G, S21 Ultra, S21 Plus, S21, Z Fold 2 5G, Z Flip 5G, Note 20 Ultra, Note 20, S20 FE, S20 Ultra, S20 Plus, S20, Z Flip, Note 10 Plus 5G, Note 10 Plus, Note 10, S10 5G, S10 Plus, S10, S10e, Note 9, S9, S9+, Note 8, S8, S8+, S7, S7 Edge  (Plus more devices)

Sony: Xperia 1 III, Xperia 1 II, Xperia 10 II, Xperia XZ3, Xperia XZ2 Premium, Xperia XZ2 (Plus more devices)

LG: V50 ThinQ 5G, V60 ThinQ 5G, Velvet, G8 ThinQ, G7 ThinQ, V30, G6 (US version only), G4 (optional), G3 (optional) (Plus more devices)

OnePlus: 10 Pro, 9 Pro, 9,  8 Pro

Nokia: XR20, 9.3 PureView, 9 PureView, 8 Sirocco

Huawei: P50 Pocket, P50 Pro, Nova 9, P40 Pro+, P40 Pro, Mate 30 Pro, P30 Pro, Mate 20 Pro

Motorola: Edge+, X Force, Droid Turbo 2, Moto Maxx

Microsoft Lumia: 1520, 1020, 930, 929, 928, 920

Google: Pixel 6 Pro, Pixel 6, Pixel 5, Pixel 4 XL, Pixel 4, Pixel 3 XL, Pixel 3

Nexus: Nexus 6, Nexus 5

Do I need an adapter? If your phone is linked below you can purchase a device specific wireless charging adapter, however if It’s not you will need a Universal wireless charging adapter and a wireless charger. Universal wireless charging adapters If your phone isn’t listed above, then you’ll need a universal adapter and a wireless charger. You can get these for phones with Micro USB ports (e.g. Android) and Lightning ports (e.g. iPhone).

You have a choice of an internal adapter, which slides into the back of a case, and an external adapter, which hangs outside. In most cases, we recommend internal adapters. Wireless chargers Once you’ve determined your phone has wireless charging built in or you’ve added it with an accessory, you just need a wireless charger.

There are plenty of Qi wireless chargers available, in different sizes, shapes and colours. You can get Qi chargers for your desk, for your car, or even portable Qi battery packs. One of our favourites is the Slim 15W Fast Wireless Charging Pad from Olixar, thanks to it’s sleek modern styling and super fast charging speeds, or see all of our Qi wireless chargers here.

Read more

[howsareeasy]

it isn’t failure; it’s data

Equipment: mac pro 2014 with inbuilt mic. Moto G3 (and then Moto G6) for reading via the Adobe Acrobat PDF reader. For hosting purposes, Dropbox and Mediafire. Software: both GarageBand and Audacity.

There’s 1600 words under the cut. Or you can read here over at Dreamwidth if it’s easier

Chose: GaragageBand or Audacity:  For the sheer scope of the information gathered alone, Audacity. I held out on using Audacity until I got my head around GarageBand, because GB was Apple. I did five of my first podfics in GarageBand (and the last six in Audacity). I'm glad that I did GarageBand before I got into Audacity, because Audacity didn't feel that difficult when I got my head around it, because I already had my wars with GarageBand. Although I do like GarageBand for the ease of rerecording (you literally just record over the offending area), and insertion of silences, it has a lot of drawbacks. For instance,  when it comes to longer files (about 180mins) it will start to eat your files. In addition, because not many people use GarageBand, information on troubleshooting is pretty rare, and Apple insists on upgrading and changing the interface ever so often. As a result, a lot of people I know are working from their legacy interface from 2014. It doesn't help me with what I have now. I only know one person (other than myself) who worked in GarageBand, and got tired of bugging her (she's busy and took ages to respond to my questions, because she's BUSY). whereas with Audacity, there are enough people to have a wiki. There are guides everywhere in terms of how to use Audacity, especially podfic specific guides. Overall, Audacity is a bit more straightforward, once you know what to look for. The wiki is relatively comprehensive and easy to follow. For instance, once I got my head around recording edits and putting them in the spaces where they needed to be, the process of recording patches then patching them for reedits is fairly straight forward. Audacity has the advantage of doing more pin point edits when it comes to mouth noises, and general cleaning up of fic background noises with noise plates. Audacity's envelope application is a lot better and smoother than GarageBand's fades (in terms of say, if you want to have music fading in or out of your narrative). Now, I don't think I'm going to be the sort of person to use music in a podfic unless the writer is pretty much waving semaphore flags and going - this piece of music here!- but it's a neat effect. Hardest thing about podficcing: For me, it was getting the reading down pat, to be honest. When I listen to my first five podfics, I'm surprised at how fast I'm reading, so every reading it's been me telling myself to slow down. It's one of the reasons why I started to edit as I go, because it forced me to refocus, and check my speed when rabbiting along. Then because my reading got slower, I could engage in the process of the fic more. However, as I grew more confident with the reading flow, I'd allow myself to read through a chapter or so, and then go back and edit. I didn't really get the concept of what a read/performance was until podfic 7, I guess (AO3 is down now, so I can't remember what it is. I want to say Cloud City). The whole concept of pauses in podfic and how that's a part of hitting the ear didn't really strike me until about podfic 10 (Stay In My Eyeline to the point where I took it down and recut for silences). But I think podfic 9 (Good Timing), made me happy enough with my narrative and voice bits. As much as podfic 11 KICKED MY ARSE, I'm more or less happy with the pauses and spaces in the fic. I mean, I could have done more, let the quiet spill out, especially towards the ending, but you can only learn by doing. I'm not going to beat up myself with the first podfics, tbh, because no one is born a master. Now, that last podfic. I don't think I had any hubris with the first ten podfics. I tried to improve on every one as I went on, and I think they got better quality wise when I jumped over to Audacity, because again, because of noise plates and edits made for a cleaner product (I could get rid of the 'clunk' sound when I'd stop the recording), but that last podfic (Now That I'm In Madrid) almost made me rage quit many a time. Between the file deletions, Audacity freezing, my files crashing, having to borrow someone else's PC to get my three hour files on as well as the edits, the installation of my mpegg plug in refusing to deal on my macbook (until I had to manually install it, after overriding Apple’s admin permissions to accept the plug in), only to export the chapters and not being able to bundle them into a book. Plus my voice turning to gravelly mush in the last third of the reading, it's been a hard knock on my confidence, to be honest. To the point where, I'm like, "Yeah, I liked podficcing, I guess? But erm... I don't think it likes me much." That being said, I really like the last story, and I'm sorry that I didn't do my best by it, but it was beyond my ken. To the point where, if I had to redo the podfic (lol, no), I couldn't do it any better right now, and that's fine. Reading source: A lot of people read their fic on screen while the recording is going on in the background. I tend to read directly from my smartphone, using the Adobe PDF app. I do like the app because you can highlight bits, and insert comments on the document, it's also smooth scrolling experience reading wise. My Moto G6 has more power and a better screen so it's an easier read. File hosting: Dropbox and MediaFire are relatively straightforward. They are fine. Most annoying bit of podficcing: Podfic covers. As much as I know that they didn't have to be made, I pretty much did it, because people do expect them (before Itsadrizzit started the push to overturn the practice). I wouldn't do anything beyond a text box now, but podfic covers came at the worst time for me. After recording, edits, and listen throughs and before uploading for hosting. I forever whinged around that. Most surprising bit of podficcing: The edits, I guess? I didn't mind them at all. I can do edits while being sociable, whereas for preprepping and doing the reading itself, I had to lock myself away and put my phone on 'do not disturb' mode. Would I podfic again? I don't have the resources, nor will I be in a position to get a new laptop for the while so, no, I don't know. More no than yes. It depends? As it is, I can't risk anything more than a 60 min run time (no more than 9.5k word count) and even then, I do wonder if I should review that to 30 mins (about 3-4k word count) because I can't trust my equipment. It makes no sense to set your stall up for anything less than a 2k word count. It's too much hassle for me to find an empty space and record for anything under 1.8k at least.  Not to mention the edits, listen through (ugh) and hosting. I can't do anything chaptered in terms of podbooks (because I don't know how to bundle the chapters to export without having ppl downloading 24 separate files and I don't have the bandwidth to deal with that right now. I'd just do a basic .m4b file, although I hear that people aren't fans and NEED. CHAPTERED .m4b podfic, but these madams will have to deal). My computer cannot be trusted to splice various files together (for instance, if I wanted to do a fic with a run time of 180mins, I'd have to do three 60min files, then splice them together. My computer crashed twice doing that feat, so no). This is tragic, because it's knee capped what I wanted to do. Liiiiike that 25k fic to pod in my bookmarks is now deleted (170 mins run time, three files of 57 mins give or take). Overall, yay or nay?  Yay! I'd like to think that I have shown respect for podficcers before, but after doing it for three weeks (11 podfics in three weeks, but I spent two weeks before doing the research) my respect is tenfold. It's not just reading what's on the page, but reacting to it with a mixture of control with the air of surprise. There's an art to it, as well as the technical bits, be it just having a fluid and enjoyable listening experience. Hell, just reading aloud alone is its own feat of stamina. There's the weighing up of file hostings, and this on top of the lack of Blanket Permissions, so if you find a fic that you want to do but there's no BP, you're out of luck, and there are far too many writers who are really arsey toward the whole medium. Conclusion: So, yeah, my experiment ends here! It wasn't a total failure, but it hasn't been an activity brimming with triumphant successes either. Thanks for the weigh ins and the advice from the podficcers who've been doing this for a minute. If you're a writer and are reading this, please think about including a BP in your profiles, even if it's a yes, maybe so (please ask) or hell no (so you won't be bothered).