#London Consultant Psychiatrist
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Black Wings at Midnight
Shyly sharing my first Hannibal fanfic: a reimagining of Seasons 1-3 set during World War II in Britain. It comes complete with vintage-style illustrations and links to suggested listening (ranging from Handel to 1940s' swing).
See below for the summary, and under the cut for an extract.
When former detective Will Graham is pulled away from his intelligence work at Bletchley Park in 1942, to consult on a hauntingly familiar crime scene, he feels alive for the first time in years. But when his life begins falling apart, he finds himself thrown into a complex dance of trust and suspicion with the man assigned to help him: an aristocratic Lithuanian flying ace and peacetime psychiatrist, whose intentions are anything but clear…
If you do decide to give it a read, I hope you enjoy it, and would love it if you took the time to leave a comment. Hearing people's expectations and thoughts as they read has been the most enjoyable part of sharing this online. Thank you all, and sending hugs from London.
From Black Wings at Midnight: Chapter 3
‘May I come in?’
The voice is deep, with a warm lilt of an Eastern European accent. Crawford’s eyes brighten and he rises from the desk with what Will considers unseemly haste.
‘Aha! Now here’s a familiar face. Come in, come in, old chap. Pull up a chair. This is Will Graham, who I mentioned on the phone. Brilliant mind. Brilliant.’
Will scowls at the praise and turns in his chair, prepared to be combative. He has no great love for the airmen of the RAF. They are nothing more than overgrown public schoolboys, with their chummy nicknames and their maverick flair. In their presence, Will feels his carapace stripped away, exposed as an awkward provincial with a clumsy accent, a different breed from these sauntering gods of the sky.
The newcomer does little to dispel his prejudices. The flattering RAF uniform makes most men look good, but this fellow seems to have stepped straight out of an advertisement. J.C. Leyendecker in the flesh, Will thinks bitterly, feeling short, and dark, and rustic.
Nothing about this man is rustic: dark blond hair parted with almost surgical precision; a broad chest and shoulders beneath the blazon of the RAF wings; trousers ironed to crisp perfection; tie perfectly centred. Everything about him screams money, from the scent of his cologne to the small gold signet ring just visible on his little finger.
After spending long hours digging into the minds of the Nazi commanders, Will can’t resist a snort. Good God, how they would love you!
Light brown eyes linger on Will for a moment, already looking amused.
‘Good afternoon, Mr Graham. I apologise for interrupting your colloquy, but Jack is an old friend. I was delighted to hear he was visiting us. May I?’ He gestures to the unused chair before the desk and Will raises a shoulder minutely, neither inviting nor repelling. He settles for glaring across at Jack. He doesn’t wish to spend any longer here than necessary, and he certainly doesn’t want to play third wheel to some back-slapping reunion.
‘Will,’ says Jack, ‘this is Flight Lieutenant Hannibal Lecter – or should I say Dr Lecter?’ The two men exchange a twinkle of camaraderie and Will stifles a desire to stab the table with his pencil. ‘We met before the war,’ Jack continues. ‘Dr Lecter has a private psychiatry practice on Harley Street, and helped us with a profile for the Bethnal Green Killer in ’38.’
Will remembers the case. It wasn’t long after he’d been signed off, still gathering together the shreds of himself in the nursing home. He allows himself a glance sideways.
‘Strange to swap the comforts of Harley Street for a wet field in Hampshire, Dr Lecter. Get tired of listening to rich old ladies?’
‘I “got” patriotic,’ Lecter says gently. ‘My country was invaded last year. Lithuania,’ he adds, for Will’s benefit. ‘I have not lived there for many years, but old affections still linger: a sense of duty, if you will. I learned to fly when I was younger’ – Of course you did, thinks Will bitterly – ‘so why not put my skills in the service of my adopted country?’
‘And he’s become quite the terror,’ Jack says cheerfully. ‘Give him a Spitfire and he’s absolutely fearless. They say Göring’s offered a bounty to anyone who brings him down.’ He dismisses Lecter’s gesture of modest denial and turns back to Will. ‘When I heard he was stationed here, I thought it’d be helpful to have his thoughts – and his support too, of course.’
‘Convenient,’ Will says under his breath, studying his fingers. He feels Lecter’s eyes lingering on him with something that’s uncomfortably close to satisfaction. For a moment he entertains himself, wondering whether he loathes fighter aces more or less than psychiatrists. It comes out as a balance. The airmen are more irritating, but he has bitter personal experience of his own with psychiatry.
‘Come now, Jack,’ Lecter says, ‘you are not being completely honest with Mr Graham.’ He leans a little closer, offering Will a lungful of his expensive cologne, and his voice drops, as though this is a secret to be shared between them. ‘Jack has asked me to have a few conversations with you before you start on this case. Just to help prepare your armour for the field of battle, as it were.’
Will’s eyes snap up to Jack Crawford, who has the grace to look embarrassed.
‘Will, I’ve read your files. It’s my job to make sure you’re fit for duty. I want to help you in any way I can.’
‘I don’t find it helpful to be covertly psychoanalysed!’
‘This is not psychoanalysis,’ Lecter says placidly into the awkward silence, ‘merely a common interest. You have nothing to fear, Mr Graham. Besides,’ he adds, straightening his cuffs, ‘I am not a psychoanalyst. Freud may have some interesting principles, and Jung has made many valuable insights into my field, but I do not ride under their banner. Biological psychiatry is very different from asking you to tell me your dreams.’ Dark eyes dart up and catch Will’s just as he makes the mistake of looking up. Something coils in the pit of his stomach. ‘Though I have no doubt your dreams must be a fascinating place.’ …
‘Just a conversation,’ Will hears himself say.
‘But of course.’ Lecter shrugs in a Gallic fashion. ‘And we can give dear Jack a good night’s sleep. Just a conversation or two among friends.’
‘Associates,’ Will snaps back. Lecter laughs as if he has said something delightful.
‘God forbid we should become friendly. Come with me to the mess, Mr Graham. Let’s get some tea.’
Will feels wrong-footed. He wants to prod; to offend; to get under Lecter’s skin and force him to feel even the faintest echo of Will’s crippling discomfort. He feels like a parcel passed from Jack to Lecter, a fragile curiosity to be wrapped in cotton wool and discussed in lowered voices. He feels lonely and patronised, and because, to his deep-seated disgust, he finds himself wanting Lecter to like him, Will lashes out.
‘I doubt we’ll be friends, Dr Lecter. I don’t find you that interesting.’
A hand falls on his shoulder. To Jack, frowning in his chair, it’ll look comradely, a way to show that no offence has been taken. To Will, the touch is unsettling: part warning, conveyed through the grip of fingers far stronger than he’d anticipated; and part protective caress. I don’t, Will repeats doggedly in his head, find you interesting.
‘Ah,’ Lecter says softly in his ear, ‘but you will.’
23 notes
·
View notes
Text
By: Hadley Freeman
Date: Feb 11, 2023
It wasn’t easy for Hannah Barnes to get her book published. As the investigations producer for Newsnight and a long-term analytical and documentary journalist, she is used to covering knotty stories and this particular one, she knew better than most, was complex. She had been covering the Gender Identity Development Service (Gids), based at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust in north London — the only one of its kind for children in England and Wales — since 2019 and decided to write a book about it. “I wanted to write a definitive record of what happened because there needs to be one,” she tells me. Not everyone agreed. “None of the big publishing houses would take it,” she says. “Interestingly, there were no negative responses to the proposal. They just said, ‘We couldn’t get it past our junior members of staff.’ ”
Whatever their objections were, they could not have been about the quality of Barnes’s book — Time to Think: The Inside Story of the Collapse of the Tavistock’s Gender Service for Children is a deeply reported, scrupulously non-judgmental account of the collapse of the NHS service, based on hundreds of hours of interviews with former clinicians and patients. It is also a jaw-dropping insight into failure: failure of leadership, of child safeguarding and of the NHS. When describing the scale of potential medical failings, the clinicians make comparisons with the doping of East German athletes in the 1960s and 1970s and the Mid Staffs scandal of the 2000s, in which up to 1,200 patients died due to poor care. Other insiders discuss it in reference to the Rochdale child abuse scandal, in which people’s inaction led to so many children being so grievously let down.
Gids treats children and young people who express confusion — or dysphoria — about their gender identity, meaning they don’t believe their biological sex reflects who they are. Since the service was nationally commissioned by the NHS in 2009 it has treated thousands of children, helping many of them to gain access to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, known as “puberty blockers”, originally formulated to treat prostate cancer and to castrate male sex offenders, and also used to treat endometriosis and fertility issues. The service will shut this spring, following a deeply critical interim report in February 2022 by Dr Hilary Cass, a highly respected paediatrician who was hired by NHS England to look into the service. Dr Cass concluded that “a fundamentally different service model is needed”.
Gids should be an easy story to tell: many people have been trying to blow the whistle for a long time, but Anna Hutchinson, a clinical psychologist who used to work at the Tavistock Centre, told Barnes that those who spoke up were “always driven out one way or another”.
“It is really not normal for mental health professionals to talk to journalists as openly as they talked to me, and that shows how desperate they were to get the story out,” Barnes says. The clinicians struggled to be heard, just as Barnes later struggled to get her book out; some people prefer censorship to the truth if the latter conflicts with their ideology. And yet, concerns about the service had been in plain sight for years: in February 2019, a 54-page report compiled by Dr David Bell, then a consultant psychiatrist at the trust and the staff governor, was leaked to The Sunday Times. Dr Bell said Gids was providing “woefully inadequate” care to its patients and that its own staff had “ethical concerns” about some of the service’s practices, such as giving “highly disturbed and distressed” children access to puberty blockers. Gids, he concluded, “is not fit for purpose”. Many of Bell’s concerns had been expressed 13 years earlier in a 2006 report on Gids completed by Dr David Taylor — then the trust’s medical director — who described the long-term effects of puberty blockers as “untested and unresearched”.
“Taylor’s recommendations were largely ignored,” Barnes writes, and, in the decade and a half between Taylor and Bell’s reports, Gids would refer more than 1,000 children for puberty blockers, some as young as nine years old. It’s impossible to obtain a precise figure because neither the service nor the endocrinologists who prescribe the blockers could or would provide them to people who have asked for them, including Barnes. One figure they have given is that between 2014 and 2018, 302 children aged 14 or under were referred for blockers. It is generally accepted now that puberty blockers affect bone density, and potentially cognitive and sexual development. “Everything was there — everything. But the lessons were never learnt,” Barnes says.
Because this story touches on gender identity — one of the most sensitive subjects of our era — it has been difficult to get past the ideological battles to see the truth. Was the service helping children become their true selves, as its defenders contended? Or was it pathologising and medicalising unhappy kids and teenagers, as others alleged?
This reflects the fraught, partisan ways people see gender dysphoria: is it akin to being gay and therefore something to be celebrated?; or is it an expression of self-loathing, like an eating disorder, requiring therapeutic intervention? This has led to the current confusion over whether the planned conversion therapy ban should include gender as well as sexuality. “Conversion therapy” obviously sounds terrible, and politicians across the spectrum — from Crispin Blunt on the right to Nadia Whittome on the left — have loudly voiced their support for the inclusion of gender on the bill, which would thereby suggest that therapy for gender dysphoria is analogous to trying to “cure” someone of homosexuality.
But many clinicians argue that including gender would potentially criminalise psychotherapists exploring with their patients the reason for their confusion; after all, a doctor wouldn’t simply validate a bulimic’s desire to be thin — they’d try to find the cause of their inner discomfort and help them learn to love their body. Gids itself has long been conflicted about this complex issue. Dr Taylor wrote in 2005 that staff didn’t agree among themselves about what they were seeing in their patients: “were they treating children distressed because they were trans,” Barnes writes in Time to Think, “or children who identified as trans because they were distressed?”
How did the country’s only NHS clinic for gender dysphoric children not even understand what they were doing, and yet keep doing it? Thanks to Barnes and her book, we now know the answers to those questions, and many more.
Gids was founded in 1989 by Domenico Di Ceglie, an Italian child psychiatrist. His aim was to create a place where young people could talk about their gender identity with “non-judgmental acceptance”. Puberty blockers were available for 16-years-olds who wanted to “pause time” before committing themselves — or not — to gender-changing surgery. (Gids never offered that surgery, which is illegal in England for those under the age of 17, but it did refer patients to the endocrinology clinic, which provided the blockers. Blockers stop the body going through puberty, thereby making it easier — in some ways — for a person later to undergo the surgery.) In 1994 the service became part of the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, which was known for its focus on talking therapies. By the early 2000s those working within Gids noted that certain gender activist groups — such as Mermaids, which supports “gender-diverse” kids and their families — were exerting an “astonishing” amount of influence on Gids, especially in regard to encouraging the prescribing of puberty blockers. Barnes writes in her book that Sue Evans, a nurse who worked at Gids at the time, asked a senior manager why Gids couldn’t just focus on talking therapy and not give out body-altering drugs. According to her and another clinician, Barnes writes, the senior manager replied, “It’s because we have this treatment here that people come.”
In around the year 2000, the trust asked Di Ceglie to draw up a report of who its patients were. The results were astonishing. Most of Gids’s patients were boys with an average age of 11. More than 25 per cent of them had spent time in care, 38 per cent came from families with mental health problems and 42 per cent had lost at least one parent, either through separation or death. Most had histories of other problems such as anxiety and physical abuse; almost a quarter had a history of self-harm. No conclusions were drawn and Gids continued to treat gender dysphoria as a cause, rather than a symptom, of adolescent distress.
It was a gender identity clinic in the Netherlands in the late Nineties that came up with the idea of giving blockers to children under 16, and in doing so furnished Gids with the justification it needed. The Dutch clinic said that 12-year-olds could be put on blockers if they had suffered from long-term gender dysphoria, were psychologically stable and in a supportive environment. This was known as the “Dutch protocol”. Pressure groups and some gender specialists encouraged the clinic to follow suit.
Dr Polly Carmichael took over as Gids’s director in 2009 and, in 2011, the service undertook an “early intervention study” to look at the effect of blockers on under-16s, because so little was known about their impact on children. Instead of waiting for the study results, Gids eliminated all age limits on blockers in 2014, letting kids as young as nine access them. At the same time referrals were rocketing, meaning clinicians had less time to assess patients before helping them access blockers. In 2009 Gids had 97 referrals. By 2020 there were 2,500, with a further 4,600 on the waiting list, and clinicians were desperately overstretched. “As the numbers seeking Gids’s help exploded around 2015, there was increased pressure to get through them. In some cases that meant shorter, less thorough assessments. Some clinicians have said there was pressure on them to refer children for blockers because it would free up space to see more children on the waiting list,” Barnes says.
Clinicians were seeing increasingly mentally unwell kids, including those who didn’t just identify as a different gender but as a different nationality and race: “Usually east Asian, Japanese, Korean, that sort of thing,” Dr Matt Bristow, a former Gids clinician, tells Barnes. But this was seen by Gids as irrelevant to their gender identity issues. Past histories of sexual abuse were also ignored: “[A natal girl] who’s being abused by a male, I think a question to ask is whether there’s some relationship between identifying as male and feeling safe,” Bristow says. But, clinicians point out, any concerns raised with their superiors always got the same response: that the kids should be put on the blockers unless they specifically said they didn’t want them. And few kids said that. As one clinician told Barnes: “If a young person is distressed and the only thing that’s offered to them is puberty blockers, they’ll take it, because who would go away with nothing?”
Then there was the number of autistic and same-sex-attracted kids attending the clinic, saying that they were transgender. Less than 2 per cent of children in the UK are thought to have an autism spectrum disorder; at Gids, however, more than a third of their referrals had moderate to severe autistic traits. “Some staff feared they could be unnecessarily medicating autistic children,” Barnes writes.
There were similar fears about gay children. Clinicians recall multiple instances of young people who had suffered homophobic bullying at school or at home, and then identified as trans. According to the clinician Anastassis Spiliadis, “so many times” a family would say, “Thank God my child is trans and not gay or lesbian.” Girls said, “When I hear the word ‘lesbian’ I cringe,” and boys talked to doctors about their disgust at being attracted to other boys. When Gids asked adolescents referred to the service in 2012 about their sexuality, more than 90 per cent of females and 80 per cent of males said they were same-sex attracted or bisexual. Bristow came to believe that Gids was performing “conversion therapy for gay kids” and there was a bleak joke on the team that there would be “no gay people left at the rate Gids was going”. When gay clinicians such as Bristow voiced their concerns to those in charge, they say it was implied that they were not objective because they were gay and therefore “too close” to the work. (Gids does not accept this claim.)
What if becoming trans is — for some people — a way of converting out of being gay? If a boy is attracted to other boys but feels shame about it, then a potential way around that is for him to identify as a girl and therefore insist he’s heterosexual. This possibility complicates the government’s plan — which has cross-party support — for including gender alongside sexuality in the bill to ban conversion therapy, if enabling a young person to change gender is, in itself, sometimes a form of conversion therapy.
I ask Barnes what she thinks and she answers with characteristic caution: “It’s a bit surprising that the NHS has commissioned one of the most experienced paediatricians in the country to undertake what appears to be an incredibly thorough review of this whole area of care, and not wait until she makes those final recommendations before legislating,” she says, weighing every word. (Dr Hilary Cass’s final review is due later this year.)
The sex ratio was also changing to a remarkable degree. When Di Ceglie started his gender clinic, the vast majority of his patients were boys with an average age of 11, and many had suffered from gender distress for years. By 2019-20, girls outnumbered boys at Gids by six to one in some age groups, especially between the ages of 12 to 14, and most hadn’t suffered from gender dysphoria until after the onset of puberty.
Some said this was simply because teenage girls felt more free to be open about their dysphoria. Some clinicians suspected there were other reasons. The clinicians Anna Hutchinson and Melissa Midgen worked at Gids and, after they left, wrotea joint article in 2020 citing a number of potential other factors: the increased “pinkification” and later “pornification” of girlhood; fear of sex and sexuality; social media; collapsing mental health services for adolescents, and so on. “It is important to acknowledge that girls and young women have long recruited their bodies as ways of expressing misery and self-hatred,” Hutchinson and Midgen wrote. And yet Gids’s response was to send these girls to endocrinology for puberty blockers.
The clinicians knew their patients were nothing like those in the Dutch protocol. The latter had been heavily screened, suffered from gender dysphoria since childhood and were psychologically stable with no other mental health issues. “Gids — according to almost every clinician I have spoken to — was referring people under 16 for puberty blockers who did not meet those conditions,” Barnes writes. The majority of children aged 11 to 15 referred to the clinic between 2010 and 2013 were put on blockers. The clinicians tried to reassure themselves by saying the blockers were just giving their patients time to think about what they wanted. They might even alleviate their distress. But in 2016 Gids’s research team presented the initial findings from its early intervention study, which looked at the effect of prescribing blockers to those under 16: although the children said they were “highly satisfied” with their treatment, their mental health and gender-related distress had stayed the same or worsened. And every single one of them had gone on to cross-sex hormones — synthetic testosterone for those born female, oestrogen for natal males. Far from giving them time to think, blockers seemed to put them on a pathway towards surgery. Clinicians were concerned that the service had abandoned NHS best practice. They repeatedly raised this with Carmichael and the executive team, but nothing changed. In just six months in 2018, 11 people who worked at Gids left due to ethical concerns. People who spoke up, such as David Bell and Sonia Appleby, the children’s safeguarding lead for the Tavistock trust, say they were bullied or dismissed. Appleby later won an employment tribunal case against the trust. Bell has said the trust threatened him with disciplinary action in connection with his activities as a whistleblower. He later retired.
Everything the whistleblowers tried to say has been borne out. A 2020 Care Quality Commission inspection of Gids rated the service “inadequate”, and pointed out that some assessments for puberty blockers consisted of only “two or three sessions” and that some staff “felt unable to raise concerns without fear of retribution”. Around the same time, the former Gids patient Keira Bell instigated a judicial review against the trust, arguing that at 16 she had been too young to understand the repercussions of being put on blockers, and that she bitterly regretted her transition. The High Court found in her favour that children are unable to give informed consent to puberty blockers. The Court of Appeal later overturned their verdict on the grounds that it should be up to doctors and not the court to determine competence to consent, but the damage was done: thanks to Bell’s case, it was now public knowledge how shambolic the service had become, unable to provide any data on, for example, how many children with autism they had put on blockers.
So what actually happened at Gids? And why did no one stop it? Barnes’s book suggests multiple credible factors. Activist groups from outside, such as Mermaids and Gendered Intelligence, came to exert undue influence on the service and would complain if they felt things weren’t being done their way. For example, Gendered Intelligence complained to Carmichael, the Gids director, when a clinician dared to express the view publicly that not all children with gender dysphoria would grow up to be transgender. In 2016 an expert in gender reassignment surgery warned Gids that putting young boys on puberty blockers made it more difficult for them to undergo surgery as adults, because their penis hadn’t developed enough for surgeons to construct female genitalia. Instead, surgeons had to use “segments of the bowel” to create a “neo-vagina”. But senior managers rejected calls from its clinicians to put this on a leaflet for patients and families. In the book, Hutchinson is quoted as saying, “I may be wrong, but I think Polly [Carmichael] was afraid of writing things down in case they got into Mermaids’s hands.”
Susie Green was at this point the chief executive of Mermaids and had taken her son, who had been on puberty blockers, to Thailand for gender reassignment surgery on his 16th birthday. In an interview, which is still on YouTube, Green laughingly recalls the difficulties surgeons had in constructing a vagina out of her child’s prepubescent penis. Green stepped down from Mermaids last year.
Money is suspected to have been another issue. When Gids became part of the Tavistock trust, it was such a minor player it wasn’t even in the main building. But by 2020-21, gender services accounted for about a quarter of the trust’s income. David Bell says this allowed the trust to be “blinkered”. The children and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) possibly had similar blinkers. They were so overstretched it appears they were happy to offload as many kids as possible onto Gids, and then disregard what was actually happening there.
“It’s really striking how few people were willing to question Gids. As one clinician said to me, because it was dealing with gender, there was this ‘cloak of mystery’ around it. There was a sense of ‘Oh, it’s about gender, so we can’t ask the same questions that we would of any other part of the NHS. Such as: is it safe? Where’s the evidence? Where’s the data? And are we listening to people raising concerns?’ These are basic questions that are vital to providing the best care,” Barnes says.
And then there was the outside culture. Basic safeguarding failures at Gids seem to have accelerated from 2014 onwards, at the same time that there was a push for the rights of transgender people. Stonewall, having helped to secure equal marriage, had now turned its sights on the rights of trans people. Susie Green, at Mermaids, gave a TED talk that suggested taking her teenage son for a sex change operation was a parenting template to admire. Meanwhile, the TV networks weighed in. In 2014 CBBC aired a documentary, I Am Leo, about a 13-year-old female on puberty blockers who identifies as a boy — mainly, it seems, because of an abhorrence of dresses and long hair. In 2018 ITV showed the three-part drama Butterfly, about an 11-year-old boy whose desire to be a girl is expressed as a desire to wear dresses and make-up. Susie Green was the lead consultant on the show.
David Bell suggests that the Tavistock trust protected Gids “because they saw it as a way of showing that we weren’t crusty old conservatives; that we were up with the game and cutting-edge”. That the Tavistock clinic was briefly, in the 1930s, a place where homosexual men were brought to be “cured” probably also played a part in the trust’s embrace of gender ideology, as if it were an atonement for a past wrong.
As per Dr Cass’s suggestions, Gids will shut this spring and be replaced with regional hubs, where young people will be seen by doctors with multiple specialties. The obsession with gender, and the ensuing lack of intellectual curiosity at Gids about factors that might contribute to a person’s distress and sense of their identity will, hopefully, be gone.
On the one hand, it feels incredible that such a disaster happened. How did an NHS service medicalise so many autistic and same-sex-attracted young people, unhappy teenage girls and children who simply felt uncomfortable with masculine or feminine templates, with so little knowledge of the causes of their distress or the effects of the medicine? And how did Carmichael, still the director of Gids, suffer no repercussions, whereas those who tried to blow the whistle say they were bullied out of their jobs? On the other hand, it is a miracle that the information is now out. For too long, too many people have turned a blind eye to problems arising from gender ideology, including healthcare for gender dysphoric children — because they have been focused on trying to be on the right side of history, they refused to look at the glaring wrongs.
Barnes knows that some will be angry at her for having written the book. But she also knows that she had to write it: “There’s been this idea that the kind of treatment young people got at Gids — physical interventions — is safe treatment for all gender-distressed children,” she says. “But even among the clinicians working on the front line of this issue, there is no consensus about the best way to care for these kids. There needs to be debate about this, and it needs to come out of the clinic and into society, because this isn’t just about trans people — it’s bigger than that. It’s about children.”
[ Via: https://archive.is/Fv41w ]
==
Modern-day Lysenkoism.
#LGB Alliance#Hadley Freeman#Hannah Barnes#Tavistock#GIDS#genderwang#gender ideology#queer theory#ideological capture#ideological corruption#medical scandal#medical malpractice#medical transition#medical corruption#gay conversion therapy#gay conversion#gender dysphoria#dysphoria#puberty#puberty blockers#hormone blockers#homophobia#anti gay#woke activism#wokeness as religion#cult of woke#woke#wokeism#trans the gay away#trans away the gay
73 notes
·
View notes
Text
Barbiturates could be bought almost as easily as sweets on the London streets, Mr Ian Milne, the St Pancras Coroner, said yesterday, when he found that Mrs Reginald Kray, aged 23, had killed herself with an ‘enormous dose’ of phenobarbitone.
Mrs Kray, who was referred to by her maiden name of Frances Elsie Shea during the inquest, was the wife of one of the Kray twins. She was found dead at the home of her brother last week.
Mr Frank Brian Shea, of Wimbourne Court, Wimbourne Street, Hackney, E., told the Coroner that his sister had reverted to her maiden name when she went to live with him and his wife of three months before. She had hoped for a reconciliation with her husband.
Dr Julian Silverstone, consultant psychiatrist at Hackney Hospital, said Mrs Kray began psychiatric treatment in 1965. She was admitted to hospital in June 1966, and remained there until September the same year. He agreed with the Coroner that she had had a ‘personality disorder.’ Dr Silverstone said that in October last year she was admitted to St Leonard’s Hospital after an overdose of barbiturates. In January she was again admitted after being found in a gas-filled room. On the second occasion barbiturate poisoning was diagnosed.
Mrs Kray was married at Bethnal Green in April, 1965, soon after the Kray twins were acquitted at the Central Criminal Court of charges of demanding protection money from a Soho club owner.
Mr Reginald Kray was in court at the inquest, but did not give evidence.”
The Times, 1967
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
9th November 2024.
𝐓𝐡𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟕𝟖. Maurice Dale of Lena’s fan club, took photographs of her at Andy and Carmen Grudko’s parents house in Whitton, Near Twickenham.
𝐅𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟕𝟗. Somewhere South Of Macon was released as a promotional record by Galaxy Records.
𝐓𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟐. In the Glasgow Herald, Dorothy Solomon denied that Lena had been ‘Slave Driven’ to complete her TV series by the BBC.
Many BBC employees would disagree with her.
𝐓𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟐. The Times reported that Lena was suffering from Anorexia Nervosa.
𝐓𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟐. The Daily Star reported that Lena had been bribed to lose weight by the Solomons.
𝐓𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟐. The Edinburgh Evening News printed an update from All Saints Hospital.
𝐒𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟐. The Aberdeen Evening Express looked back 20 years to 1982 when Lena was in hospital with anorexia.
𝐓𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝟗𝐭𝐡 𝐍𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟒. The Daily Mirror ran a story about rich and famous people shoplifting.
Byline: TONY BONNICI
THEY are rich, famous and fabulously successful - but certain celebrities aren't averse to a five-finger discount when they're out shopping.
This week, Coronation Street star Jimmi Harkishin was arrested after staff at Brent Cross shopping centre in North West London accused him of swapping price tags on clothes. Jimmi, 45, who - ironically - plays shopkeeper Dev Alahan, accepted a police caution for suspicion of theft by deception. He told his bosses at Granada TV that the allegations were "complete rubbish".
Jimmi is not the first star to run into trouble when nipping down the shops. And a consultant psychiatrist says some celebrities may do it in a desperate attempt to communicate.
Dr Neil Brener, of the Priory Hospital North London, explains: "People who are in the limelight all the time may find they have no other way to communicate.
"In 80 per cent of cases they will carry on stealing until they are caught. Then they will not shoplift again.
"Unlike a true kleptomaniac, people who steal because of emotional problems are fairly common. And it is rarely, if ever, thrill-seeking for its own sake."
Here are some more light- fingered stars who fell foul of the long arm of the law.
WINONA RYDER
THE Mermaids star was fined, put on probation and ordered to do community service after shoplifting from a Beverly Hills store in December 2001.
The elfin-faced actress, who earned up to pounds 4million a film, cut off anti-theft tags and stole 20 items worth pounds 3,000 from Saks, including clothes, hair accessories and a handbag.
She claimed she was preparing for a movie role, but in an interview a few years earlier she had revealed that as a teenager she was caught stealing a comic book and taken home to her parents by police.
HEDY LAMARR
THE 40s Hollywood sex siren was long past her prime when she was caught stealing from a Florida chemist.
The six-times-married star, who died in 2000, was 76 when she was accused of taking eyedrops and laxatives worth pounds 12.
Charges were dropped after she promised not to break any laws for a year. Her lawyer claimed it was simply "absent-mindedness".
In 1965 she was arrested in Los Angeles for stealing a pair of gold slippers. She was cleared, but the publicity is said to have cost her a movie part in Picture Mommy Dead.
TRACY SHAW
THE troubled Coronation Street star claimed she had a secret compulsion brought on by a slimming disease that drove her to steal from shops.
The actress was 22 when she was stopped by Safeways staff for walking out with a 99p punnet of strawberries. She put it down to anorexia and added: "To this day I don't know why I did it."
The star, who earned pounds 50,000 a year playing crimper Maxine, had already been banned from her local Co-op in Belper, Derbys, for stealing fruit and cereals and once admitted going on shoplifting jaunts as a youngster, often getting arrested.
JENNIFER CAPRIATI
THE millionaire tennis ace narrowly escaped prosecution for allegedly taking a pounds 20 ring.
She was 17 when she was held with a friend after trying to walk out of a Florida shopping mall with it on her finger. She claimed she forgot to take it off. Store owners decided not to press charges.
STUART HALL
FOOTBALL commentator Hall has never denied taking a jar of coffee and a packet of sausages, worth pounds 3.94, from his local Safeways in 1991. But he was cleared by a jury after explaining how he had suffered a series of personal disasters and could not remember taking the items.
A collection of clocks he and his father had restored had been stolen, he was facing financial ruin as a result of being a Lloyds Name and the BBC had just ended his TV contract.
He said: "When you are faced with the loss of everything, you don't think about what you're doing half the time. I had no recollection of taking those things."
LADY ISOBEL BARNETT
THE popular TV panellist committed suicide in 1980 after being fined over a can of tuna and a carton of cream.
The 62-year-old - a star of What's My Line? and Twenty Questions - stole them from her village grocer. Four days after the case she took an overdose of painkillers.
Shortly before her death she admitted to an interviewer that she was a compulsive thief.
OLGA KORBUT
OLYMPIC gymnastics phenomenon Olga was charged in 2002 with shoplifting pounds 10 worth of groceries in Atlanta, Georgia.
She said it was a misunderstanding and she had been going to the car to get her purse.
She avoided prosecution for the theft of the items - including cheese, tea and chocolate syrup - by agreeing to take a course on "values" and stay away from the store.
LENA ZAVARONI
THE tragic former child star was accused of stealing a 50p packet of jelly from her local supermarket in 1999.
She shot to fame as a little girl after appearing on Opportunity Knocks but saw her career destroyed by anorexia nervosa and was living on benefits.
The charge was dropped, but a few months later she died after a radical operation which she hoped would cure her.
STEVE STRANGE
NEW Romantic Strange, real name Steven Harrington, was given a three-month suspended prison sentence after stealing a pounds 10.99 Tellytubby doll.
He was already on bail for stealing a woman's jacket from Marks & Spencer in Cardiff.
Defending him, Mel Butler told Bridgend magistrates Strange "found it difficult to cope with falling from grace after being a man of considerable wealth in the 80s."
Strange later said he started shoplifting after the suicide of his best friend, rocker Michael Hutchence, in November 1997.
BEATRICE DALLE
THE stunning French actress starred in the cult 1986 film Betty Blue and adorned the bedroom walls of almost every red-blooded male student.
But sultry Beatrice was given a six-month suspended sentence in 1992 for shoplifting bracelets and rings worth pounds 3,000.
She is reported to have told the court in Paris: "Jewels, I love zem."
0 notes
Text
19/09/24
TW
I've been in an eating disorders unit in London for 17 days now. The first week I really struggled to comply with my meal plan. I ate half the starter plan (around the same as what I'd been having before) and lost a further kg. I found it strangely tolerable, most likely since I was eating the amount I could tolerate at the time, I also had my stash of sweeteners in a hairbrush in my room and went to the garden (twice).
On the fourth day, I was asked by my new consultant psychiatrist to come with her to the clinic room. I sat on the bed waiting. She looked concerned and told me my lithium levels were too high, I wasn't too fussed, I was sure that could be amended. Only she went through symptom after symptom. The only ones I had weren't related to it (dizziness and chest pain to which I'd been experiencing for some time so wasn't worried about anyway).
So asked how I was getting on with my meal plan, to which I said I was struggling. She got to the point quickly and asked if I'd consider the NG. I said I couldn't since it had gone so wrong before and didn't want it to happen again. She nodded and we spoke about my physical health as she was saying I was very unwell and at such a low body weight. I told her I was ok and was probably wasting a bed here. So, she told me that normally she gives longer but she needed to apply for a mental health act assessment as my physical health was too unstable.
I felt sad and frustrated, but in a way I had already had a feeling it may be suggested. I saw my dad that afternoon, where I got a cherry pepsi max and we caught up with each others week before I went to the garden for my second supervised sit down on a bench with another patient. The OT came over and said she'd do an assessment with on Monday, to which I said I probably wouldn't be there for (I was planning to self- discharge the next morning prior to the MHA assessment).
I thought nothing more of it when my psychiatrist came knocking at my door with a member of staff, a mixture of concern and irritation on her face. She said she had just received a call from the OT saying I was going to abscond (I never said that) right before she was about to go home. I explained I was going to pack my things that night and self-discharge the following day as I wasn't using my bed well and didn't feel I needed to be there. Again, she spoke about how physically compromised I was and combined with my lithium levels I was very unwell.
With that, she said she wanted me on 1:1, I reminded her I was a voluntary patient and had the right to refuse that. She agreed, then put me on a section 52 (holding section) as well as stuck me on a 1:1. That was not the response I thought she would have. I had hoped she would have been irritated enough to tell me to just leave and I could have gone. It clearly didn't work out that way!
The following day, just before lunch I was called into the MDT room where two people were waiting (a man and a woman) the man, Seb introduced himself as an AMHP and the lady was the psychiatrist. They were there for a MHA assessment and I inwardly groaned. It didn't last too long, they asked a few questions, before saying how my consultant psych feels I'm at high risk of cardiac arrest among other life threatening complications as a result of "severe" anorexia and very low body weight, especially combined with high lithium levels. Not to mention the fact I wanted to leave.
They went on to say I had a severe lack of insight to the severity of my anorexia and placed me on the dreaded section 3. They didn't even ask me to leave the room so they could discuss, just straight onto a section 3 there and then.
Since then it's been a very testing time. I've managed to mostly avoid the NG, only having it once last week which was enough to cause flashbacks and dissociation. I've gained 1.6kg in 1 week and completely panicked. I can feel the weight gain already and I absolutely hate it.
0 notes
Text
Relocate to the UK - Qualified Psychiatrist
Consultant Level Psychiatrists Needed in the UK.Sanctuary International, a dedicated and award-winning recruitment agency with a Trustpilot score of 4.9/5 with 1000+ reviews, is currently seeking experienced and dedicated Consultant level Psychiatrists to join our teams in Kent, London, Oxford, and Scotland, where we have some positions available.Salary for Consultant level: £93,666 – £126,281…
0 notes
Text
West London NHS Trust: Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist
West London NHS Trust: Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist £99,532 – £131,964: West London NHS Trust: This is an exciting opportunity to work as a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist in Broadmoor Hospital. Berkshire Information Courtesy By: , HospitalJobs, European, Healthcarejobs | Feeds £99,532 – £131,964: West London NHS Trust: This is an exciting opportunity to work as a Consultant Forensic…
0 notes
Text
ADHD Specialist London - adhd Assessment & Diagnosis
Our mental health clinic specialises in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD and any other associated conditions with this diagnosis. Our emphasis is to provide the highest services leading to positive results.
Dr Stefan Ivantu - Private Psychiatrist London - ADHD Specialist
10 Harley St, London W1G 9PF, UK
+44 20 7467 8366
Map: https://maps.google.com/?cid=8416843431092268509
0 notes
Link
#adolescenti#Bambini#ChiaraColonnelli#DottoreLondon#francescatagliente.lorenzogragnani#IlCircoloLondon#mentalhealth#stefanodirico
0 notes
Text
🌟 Discover mental well-being with Dr. Pav Kooner, London's expert Private Psychiatrist! Specializing in ADHD and complex cases, Dr. Kooner offers confidential consultations. Your journey to balance starts here. Book now! 🧠💼 #Psychiatry #ADHD #LondonPsychiatrist #MentalHealth
1 note
·
View note
Text
By: Henry Samuel
Published: Mar 23, 2024
French Senators want to ban gender transition treatments for under-18s, after a report described sex reassignment in minors as potentially “one of the greatest ethical scandals in the history of medicine”.
The report, commissioned by the opposition centre-Right Les Republicains (LR) party, documents various practices by health professionals, which it claims are indoctrinated by a “trans-affirmative” ideology under the sway of experienced trans-activist associations.
The report, which cites a “tense scientific and medical debate”, accuses such associations of encouraging gender transition in minors via intense propaganda campaigns on social media.
Jacqueline Eustache-Brinio, an LR senator who led the working group behind the report, concluded that “fashion plays a big role” in the rise of gender reassignment treatments.
If this factor and the risks involved are underestimated, she added, “the sexual transition of young people will be considered as one of the greatest ethical scandals in the history of medicine”.
LR senators now want to table a Bill by the summer that would effectively ban the medical transition of minors in France by halting the prescription or administration of puberty blockers and hormones to people under the age of 18.
Sex reassignment surgery could also be banned for minors.
Reacting to the report, Ypomoni, a French parents’ group, said: “We welcome this return to reason.”
Maud Vasselle, a mother whose daughter underwent gender transition treatment, told Le Figaro: “A child is not old enough to ask to have her body altered.
“My daughter just needed the certificate of a psychiatrist, which she obtained after a one-hour consultation. But doctors don’t explain the consequences of puberty blockers,” she added.
“My daughter didn’t realise that life wasn’t going to be so easy with all these treatments... She was a brilliant little girl but now she’s failing at school. And she is far from having found the solution to her problems.”
Shocking and ideological
Transgender activists and certain health professionals expressed alarm at the report.
Clément Moreau, the clinical psychologist and coordinator of the mental health unit of the association Espace Santé Trans (Trans Health Space), said the report was “shocking” and called the move “ideological”.
“Using blockers if necessary or hormones before coming of age reduces the rate of suicidality, depression and anxiety,” he added.
The French report comes after the NHS banned children from receiving puberty blockers on prescription earlier this month.
France’s health regulation body, the Haute Autorit�� de Santé, was already examining a similar move.
The LR senators want to accelerate the process following the report.
Citing British, Swedish and American studies, the report said that the number of children identifying themselves as trans has exploded over the past decade.
One hospital in Paris receives around 40 new requests from minors every year, with 16 per cent of those under the age of 12 and the report points out that many suffer from other issues.
A quarter of the children seen at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital for gender dysphoria have dropped out of school, 42 per cent have been victims of harassment, and 61 per cent have experienced an episode of depression. One in five has attempted suicide.
Their conclusions are in line with those of British experts called in to investigate London’s Tavistock clinic over its use of mass gender reassignment surgery on minors.
David Bell. a British psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, found that a third of the children consulted at the Tavistock suffered from autistic disorders, and many were victims of family violence or had difficulty in accepting or expressing homosexuality, yet they were rushed into gender transition regardless.
#France#medical scandal#medical malpractice#medical corruption#queer theory#gender identity ideology#gender ideology#intersectional feminism#gender affirming healthcare#gender affirming care#gender affirmation#gay conversion therapy#gay conversion#puberty blockers#wrong sex hormones#cross sex hormones#gender lobotomy#gender pseudoscience#pseudoscience#gender homeopathy#religion is a mental illness
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ultimate Guide on Depression Treatment: 5 Proven Strategies by Dr. Ali Kala
Are you or someone you know struggling with depression? You're not alone. Depression affects millions of people worldwide, making it crucial to understand effective Depression Treatment in London options. In this article, we'll explore five top strategies for treating depression that are not only recognized by experts but also backed by Google searches. Let's dive in and find the path to a brighter, healthier life.
Understanding Depression
Depression is more than just feeling sad; it's a complex mental health condition that affects thoughts, emotions, and daily functioning. It's crucial to differentiate between occasional blues and clinical depression, which often requires specialized treatment.
The Importance of Seeking Professional Help
If you're experiencing persistent symptoms of depression, seeking help from a mental health professional is essential. Therapists, psychologists, and psychiatrists can provide personalized guidance and evidence-based interventions to support your journey to recovery.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
CBT is a widely recognized therapy for depression. It focuses on identifying negative thought patterns and replacing them with healthier ones. Through structured sessions, individuals learn coping skills and strategies to manage their emotions effectively.
Medication and its Role in Treatment
Antidepressant medications can be effective in managing depression, especially when combined with therapy. SSRIs and SNRIs are commonly prescribed, but it's essential to consult a medical professional to determine the right approach for you.
Lifestyle Changes and Self-Care
Simple lifestyle changes can have a significant impact on mental well-being. Adequate sleep, a balanced diet, and engaging in activities you enjoy can contribute to overall mood improvement.
Exercise's Impact on Mental Health
Physical activity is linked to the release of endorphins, which are natural mood lifters. Incorporating regular exercise into your routine can help alleviate symptoms of depression and boost self-esteem.
The Power of a Support System
Having a strong support system is invaluable. Surround yourself with friends and family who understand and encourage your journey. Their presence can provide emotional nourishment during tough times.
Exploring Alternative Therapies
In addition to traditional treatments, alternative therapies like art therapy, music therapy, and acupuncture have shown promise in complementing depression treatment in London. However, consult professionals before trying these approaches.
Mindfulness and Meditation Practices
Practices like mindfulness and meditation can enhance emotional regulation and reduce stress. They encourage living in the present moment, fostering a sense of calm and reducing rumination.
Overcoming Barriers to Treatment
Many individuals face barriers such as stigma or lack of access to treatment. It's important to address these challenges and seek help despite them. Online therapy and support groups can be accessible alternatives.
Recognizing Early Warning Signs
Being aware of early signs of depression recurrence empowers individuals to take action promptly. These signs can include changes in sleep patterns, appetite, energy levels, and interest in activities.
Building Resilience and Preventing Relapse
Developing resilience is crucial in maintaining long-term well-being. Learning healthy coping mechanisms and stress management techniques can help prevent relapses.
Depression in Children and Adolescents
Depression can affect people of all ages, including children and adolescents. It's essential for parents, caregivers, and educators to recognize signs in young individuals and provide appropriate support.
Nurturing Emotional Well-Being
Prioritizing emotional well-being is an ongoing journey. Engaging in activities that bring joy, practicing gratitude, and fostering healthy relationships contribute to overall mental health.
Conclusion
Depression is a challenging journey, but there is hope. By combining professional help, evidence-based therapies, lifestyle adjustments, and a strong support network, you can manage and overcome depression. Remember, seeking help is a sign of strength, and every step you take brings you closer to a brighter future.
Dr. Ali Kala, ND: A Leader in Mental Health Care
With a distinguished career marked by unwavering dedication, Dr. Ali Kala is a leader in the realm of mental health care. His commitment to providing cutting-edge solutions and his empathetic approach to patient care set the tone for our clinic's exceptional services.
FAQs
Q1: How do I know if I'm experiencing clinical depression?
Ans: If you're consistently experiencing feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a lack of interest in activities you once enjoyed, it's important to seek professional guidance.
Q2: Can I treat depression without medication?
Ans: While medication can be helpful, therapy and lifestyle changes are also effective strategies for managing depression.
Q3: Is depression a sign of personal weakness?
Ans: No, depression is a medical condition that can affect anyone. Seeking help is a sign of courage and self-awareness.
Q4: Can exercise really improve my mood?
Ans: Yes, regular physical activity can increase the release of chemicals in the brain that improve mood and reduce feelings of depression.
Q5: How can I support a loved one with depression?
Ans: Be patient, offer a listening ear, and encourage them to seek professional help. Your support can make a significant difference in their journey.
0 notes
Text
Anxiety Disorders - Stress and Depression Mental health disorder, Social phobia, Obsessive Compulsive disorder, Phobias Generalised Anxiety. Symptoms are increased heart rate, sweating, nervousness, difficulty to do routine work, fear of impending doom. Time to consult an Psychiatrist Dr. Tarun Baweja - MBBS DPM MSc Transcultural Mental Health London 𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐓𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 to get a solution for your problems. https://wa.me/919781650004 𝐖𝐞𝐛: www.bawejahospital.com 𝐌𝐨𝐛: +91-8146622802 𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬: 1571/39, Opposite civil Hospital, preet Colony, ropar-140001 Punjab.
#Baweja_hospital #multispecialityhospital #punjab #haryana #chandigarh #AnxietyDisorders #StressandDepression #Mentalhealthdisorder #Socialphobia #ObsessiveCompulsivedisorder #Psychiatrist #DrTarunBaweja
#Baweja_hospital#multispecialityhospital#punjab#haryana#chandigarh#AnxietyDisorders#StressandDepression#Mentalhealthdisorder#Socialphobia#ObsessiveCompulsivedisorder#Psychiatrist#DrTarunBaweja#rupnagar#eyehospital_chandigarh#treatment#vision#eyecare#ropar#tricity
1 note
·
View note
Text
Relocate to the UK - Qualified Psychiatrist
Consultant Level Psychiatrists Needed in the UK.Sanctuary International, a dedicated and award-winning recruitment agency with a Trustpilot score of 4.9/5 with 1000+ reviews, is currently seeking experienced and dedicated Consultant level Psychiatrists to join our teams in Kent, London, Oxford, and Scotland, where we have some positions available.Salary for Consultant level: £93,666 – £126,281…
0 notes
Text
West London NHS Trust: Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist
West London NHS Trust: Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist £99,532 – £131,964: West London NHS Trust: This is an exciting opportunity to work as a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist in Broadmoor Hospital. Berkshire Information Courtesy By: , HospitalJobs, European, Healthcarejobs | Feeds £99,532 – £131,964: West London NHS Trust: This is an exciting opportunity to work as a Consultant Forensic…
0 notes
Text
Youth mental health, il 28 febbraio round-table promosso da Il Circolo
Di Pietro Nigro La Round Table on Navigating Youth Mental Health, promossa da Il Circolo con Italian Medical Society e Dottore London si terrà il 28 febbraio all'Istituto Italiano di Cultura. Youth mental health, il 28 febbraio round-table promosso da Il Circolo All’indomani del periodo di pandemia Covid, la salute mentale dei ragazzi adolescenti, costretti a chiudersi in casa per mesi, a tenersi in contatto con la scuola e con gli amici solo attraverso la tecnologia (cellulari e pc) è diventata più fragile. L’insicurezza che ne consegue diventa di difficile gestione sia per i giovani stessi che difficilmente tendono ad aprirsi anche con quelle persone adulte che sarebbero in grado di aiutarli, sia per gli stessi genitori che, proprio in conseguenza di ciò, faticano a capire come gestire la situazione difficile che i loro figli stanno affrontando. Ed è proprio dall’esigenza di fare chiarezza su un tema così delicato, e per essere d’aiuto, nasce la Round Table on Navigating Youth Mental Health, promossa da Il Circolo Italian Cultural Association in collaborazione con Italian Medical Society of Great Britain e Dottore London. Mercoledì 28 Febbraio a partire dalle 18.30 presso l’Istituto Italiano di Cultura di Londra (in Belgrave Square), ci sarà una serata dedicata a questo argomento così attuale e delicato, rivolta essenzialmente alle famiglie in cui c’è almeno un ragazzo adolescente che ha bisogno di essere preso per mano e accompagnato in maniera amorevole e intelligente fuori dal tunnel in cui sente di trovarsi, senza riuscire ad intravedere una via d’uscita. Ne abbiamo parlato con Simona Spreafico, Presidente de Il Circolo, piccola charity molto attiva nella comunità italiana, perché ha come scopo quello di divulgare la cultura italiana in UK. “Stiamo cercando di raccogliere fondi, ma dopo la Brexit, dopo il Covid, è un lavoro molto difficile… Cerchiamo di raccogliere fondi destinati a borse di studio per aiutare i giovani, i ricercatori o per promuovere la cultura italiana in UK… Il tema della mental health è molto delicato, ci abbiamo dedicato l’edizione 2023 di un concorso letterario rivolto a ragazzi dai 18 anni in su, che organizziamo ogni anno, da tre anni”. Il concorso si chiama Match Point: nato nel 2022 col suo titolo originale, nel 2023 è diventato Match Point-Di cosa hai paura, mentre l’edizione 2024 (aperta lo scorso 20 Febbraio) sarà Match Point-Futuro o no? Una possibilità, per chi partecipa, di aprirsi al mondo ed esprimere ciò che ha dentro, con il desiderio, il bisogno e la possibilità di chiedere aiuto. E per fare le cose sul serio, sia Italian Medical Society of Great Britain che Dottore London hanno messo in campo alcuni tra i loro nomi migliori, che hanno subito sposato volontariamente l’iniziativa e porteranno il loro significativo contributo alla roundtable: Chiara Colonnelli e Francesca Tagliente (Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists) e Virginia Veruma (Specialist Clinical Psychologist). A moderare la serata Lorenzo Gragnani, Presidente di Italian Medical Society of Great Britain, e Stefano Di Rico, Youth Mental Health Campaigner e YoungMinds Activist. “L’evento – ci spiega Di Rico – è rivolto ai genitori di bambini piccoli e adolescenti. L’attuale sistema di supporto per la salute mentale nel Regno Unito non è adatto allo scopo, con i giovani che aspettano settimane, se non mesi, per ricevere supporto. Questo evento avrà lo scopo di esaminare cosa possono fare i genitori per sostenere i propri figli, individuare i segnali e accedere al supporto”. “In più – aggiunge Simona - abbiamo stanziato due borse di studio di 2000,00 pounds l’una, che sono state assegnate il 7 dicembre nell’ambito della premiazione de Il Circolo Youth Mental Health Award tenutasi in Ambasciata in concomitanza con la premiazione di Italy Made Me. Le studentesse premiate si chiamano Luisa Fassi ed Eleonora Aiello e saranno presenti anche loro il 28 Febbraio. Sponsorizziamo anche lo spettacolo teatrale Hide and Seek, saremo lì il 19 Marzo con Stefano Di Rico e Luisa Fassi (che come ricercatrice si occupa di social media) con una Q&A session”. Insomma, tanta carne al fuoco per non perdere di vista l’obiettivo finale: non smettere mai di parlare di un problema così delicato che attanaglia i più giovani, per trovare il modo di aiutarli, per non farli sentire soli. Riuscire ad aprire una breccia nell’animo degli adolescenti è un compito davvero arduo, i giovani tendono a parlare molto tra loro, nella loro sfera sociale (dove però si parte tutti alla pari) e pochissimo con la generazione più adulta, che forse qualche strumento in più per aiutarli è in grado di trovarlo. La serata sta registrando molte adesioni, quasi sold-out, ma chi vuole partecipare può ancora andare sulla pagina web https://www.ilcircolo.org.uk/events/round-table-on-navigating-youth-mental-health/ e compilare il form. La partecipazione è gratuita. Ne vale davvero la pena. ... Continua a leggere su
0 notes