#Licent

[deaneyrs]

i just want my hotd mutuals to know you give me so much life and inspiration ✨

[braskide]

me when i see a character in a doomed narrative with self destructive tendencies who tends to feel guilt in a very intense way especially in a religious trauma way: yeah that's giving yuna alright

[casterlypriderock]

OH SO ITS ALICOLE LIKE THAT

[soft4all]

High Availability Solutions in Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition

In today's digital landscape, ensuring high availability of data is paramount for businesses to maintain operational continuity and meet customer expectations. Soft4all recognizes the critical role of high availability solutions, particularly in the context of database management. This article delves into the realm of high availability solutions in Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition, shedding light on how Soft4all leverages these solutions to empower businesses with resilient data management strategies.

[bachelorsthesisprice]

Unveiling the True Worth: Understanding the Price of Licensing

In the modern market economy, licensing plays a crucial role in various sectors, from software and intellectual property to professional certifications and regulatory permits. However, behind every license lies a complex interplay of factors that determine its price, reflecting not just the cost of obtaining permission but also the value it bestows and the dynamics of supply and demand. Check their site to know more details pret lucrare de licenta

At its core, the price of a license embodies the intrinsic value of the rights or privileges it confers. For instance, in the realm of software, licensing fees are often commensurate with the functionality, features, and support services provided by the product. Companies may offer different tiers of licenses, each priced according to the scope of usage, number of users, or level of technical support, allowing customers to choose the option that best aligns with their needs and budget.

Similarly, in the realm of intellectual property, such as patents, copyrights, and trademarks, the price of licensing reflects the perceived value of the innovation or creative work in question. Companies or individuals seeking to license their intellectual property may conduct market research, assess the competitive landscape, and negotiate terms and royalties based on factors such as market demand, potential revenue streams, and the uniqueness or novelty of the intellectual property.

Moreover, licensing fees are often influenced by the dynamics of supply and demand. In markets where licenses are scarce or in high demand, prices may be driven up, reflecting the economic principle of scarcity. Conversely, in markets where licenses are abundant or competition is fierce, prices may be driven down as licensors seek to attract customers and gain market share. This delicate balance between supply and demand helps determine the equilibrium price of licensing in a given market.

Beyond these economic considerations, the price of licensing may also be influenced by regulatory factors, industry standards, and legal requirements. For instance, in regulated industries such as healthcare, finance, or aviation, obtaining licenses or certifications may entail compliance with strict regulatory standards, professional qualifications, or ongoing training and accreditation. The costs associated with meeting these requirements—whether in terms of time, resources, or expertise—can impact the price of licensing and contribute to its perceived value.

Furthermore, the price of licensing may vary depending on the jurisdiction, geographical region, or cultural context in which it operates. Different countries or regions may have distinct legal frameworks, tax policies, or cultural norms that shape the pricing strategies and market dynamics surrounding licensing. Factors such as exchange rates, inflation rates, or geopolitical risks can also influence the cost of licensing on a global scale.

In light of these multifaceted factors, it's clear that the price of licensing is not simply a matter of arbitrary pricing but rather a reflection of the underlying economics, value proposition, and market dynamics at play. Whether in the realm of software, intellectual property, professional certifications, or regulatory permits, understanding the true worth of licensing requires a nuanced appreciation of these complex factors and their implications for businesses, consumers, and society at large. As such, navigating the landscape of licensing demands careful consideration, strategic planning, and informed decision-making to ensure that the price paid aligns with the value received.

[the-delightful-temptation]

@licentious-sanguinity Will draw a cheeky little picture of a snake’s eye on the skin of Ozzie’s wrist. Before moving in to press a teasing kiss to the back of his hand.

Grab a marker and write something on my muse! ( Anywhere over my muse's body. )

Ozzie watches closely the drawing on his wrist, thinking how adorable the snake looked there, drawing cute snake eyes on his skin. The kiss as a finishing touch was a perfect way to end it.

“Oh aren’t you adorable, my dear.” The sin moves his hand so he can see the drawing from up close, then he licks the area Pentious kissed while maintaining eye contact with him.  

@licentious-sanguinity

[officialromaniantranslatiuni]

Fosta colega de a mamei, cu cel mai mare sictir de parca eram rahat de caine pe talpa ei: "Ce faci, tu? Ai luat bacul?"

Eu, cu bac peste 9 luat in 2011, 2 licente, master si un doctorat abandonat ca asta e: 😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒

Fii-sa, si mai scarba: "Si muncesti si tu?"

Eu, cu un job full time si alte 2 part-time si aproape 10 de vechime in munca: 😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒

[inspofromancientworld]

Prometheus and its Ancient Origins

By Joseph Karl Stieler - Transferred from nds.wikipedia to Commons..org by G.Meiners at 12:05, 15. Okt 2005., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=375657

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, widely known as just Goethe, was a German polymath (someone with a vast number of specialties) who lived from 1749-1832. He was born in Frankfurt at a time that it was part of the Holy Roman Empire and died in Weimar when it was part of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach. He also had Turkish ancestry through his Maternal grandmother. He was tutored by his father, who had studied law, and others in Latin, Greek, French, and Italian along with physical skills such as dancing, riding, and fencing, which was fairly typical of the time. He was particularly fond of the writings of Homer as well as drawing and theater. When he went to Leipzig University starting when he was 16, he studied law. He found learning ancient laws by heart detestable and went to lectures by Christian Fürchtegott Gellert, a poet, instead. He met Anna Katharina Schönkopf and between his love for her and admiration for Gellert, he wrote his first book of poetry and his and his first comedy, though he also discarded a lot of his writings from this time as well.

Because he was doing poorly in his main studies, Goethe was forced to return home when he was 19. He also became very ill for about a year and a half. During this time, his relationship with his father also suffered. After that time, he left to finish school at the University of Strasbourg. There, his health improved. He met Johann Gottfried Herder, who exposed Goethe to William Shakespeare's works, Ossian, the narrator in James Macpherson's poems, and Volkspoesie (folk poetry). He credits the introduction of Shakespeare's work with his love of literature. He graduated with a Licentate in Law when he was 22 and set up a practice in Frankfurt. He wanted to make the practice of law more humane, but his youth caused him to reach too far, bringing censure and loss of clients. He moved to the court of Darmstadt that worked better with his temperament. He also was able to pursue literature with his father's blessings.

By © Foto H.-P.Haack (H.-P.Haack) - Sammlung Dr. Haack → Antiquariat Dr. Haack Leipzig → Privatbesitz, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2140496

He wrote The Sorrows of Young Werther, his breakout novel, when he was 23 and it was semi-biographical. Though it was very successful, he didn't earn much from it because copyright laws at the time didn't really protect writers. Later in his life, though, when there were better protections, he would release 'new, revised' editions of his works.

When he was 26, he was invited to court by Karl August, the Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach and later Grand Duke. He held many offices in the court including chief advisor and superintendent of the duke's library over the course of the rest of his life. He was also friends and a confidant with the Duke and was more involved in the court than

By Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein - aAH2PRcepgpGwA at Google Cultural Institute, zoom level maximum, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=29098753

At 37, Goethe was sent on a journey to Italy and Sicily for two years, inspired by his father. It was almost like a pilgrimage for him, to visit the classical world, and renewed his love of the art of ancient Rome and Greece. He said of Sicily '[t]o have seen Italy without having seen Sicily is to not have seen Italy at all, for Sicily is the clue to everything.' He was struck by the simplicity of ancient Greek architecture as compared to ancient Roman. While he documented much of his first year, there wasn't a lot of documentation of his second year.

Four years after his return, he followed the Duke to the Battle of Valmy during a failed invasion of France, and later at the Siege of Mainz, he was an observer. When he was 57, Napoleon invaded Weimar. Goethe was living with his mistress, Chritiane Vulpus, who was instrumental in protecting his house from the 'spoon guards', those who were the least disciplined. While Goethe froze up, Christiane barricaded the kitchen and cellar and organized the defense of the house. Goethe later wrote '[f]ires, rapine, a frightful night… Preservation of the house through steadfastness and luck.' Rüdiger Safranski wrote 'The luck was Goethe's, the steadfastness was displayed by Christiane'. Shortly thereafter, Goethe married her after having been together for 18 years and having several children together. She died twelve years later.

When he was 72, after a near-fatal illness, he fell in love with a 17 year old Ulrike von Levetzow, but was prevented from proposing by her mother's disapproval. He also had a 'deep emotional bond' with 33 year old Maria Szymanowska, a Polish pianist, who left her husband. He died of heart failure when he was 82 years old.

By No machine-readable author provided. Atoma assumed (based on copyright claims). - No machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims)., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1520906

Prometheus in Greek mythology was one of the Titans, his name possibly meaning 'forward thinking' or 'forethought'. His best known myth has him defying the Olympians to bring fire to humanity, the fire leading to technology, which allowed the transmission of knowledge to be more rapid and far reaching, and then civilization. Some of the myths also having him creating humans and also fathering the hero of the flood story. The Olympians, lead by Zeus, set down a sentence of being bound to a rock on either Mount Elbrus or Mount, which are both volcanoes that separate Greece from the 'barbari' in the Caucaus Mountains, and having his liver, the seat of emotions, eaten by an eagle, the creature that represented Zeus, every day. Every night, Prometheus' liver would grow back. He remains there until he is freed by Heracles.

By Heinrich Füger - Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=175869

Prometheus was written around 1773 and published in 1789, though an unauthorized version published by Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi in 1785. It is written in a German proto-Romantic style called Sturm und Drang (storm and stress), in which extremes of emotions are allowed to breathe and given free range as opposed to the rationality demanded by the Enlightenment. It was initially going to be a play, but was changed into a poem. Prometheus is shown to be creative and rebellious, defying god, and asserting himself against god, and eventually rejecting a belief in god, citing '[w]ho helped me/Against the Titan' insolence?/Who rescued me from certain death,/From slavery?/Didst though not do all this thyself'. He further rails against god by saying '[h]ast though e'er dried up the tears/Of the anguish stricken?…Didst thou e'er fancy/That life I should learn to hate,/And ffly to deserts,/Because not all/My blossoming dreams grew ripe?' He then proclaims that he is creating humans to have the full range of emotional experiences that he has had. This poem is paired with Goethe's poem entitled Ganymed, which expresses the opposite sentiment. Both have been set to or interpreted in music multiple times.

You can read Prometheus here. You can read Ganymed here.

[killersnas]

✨when I grow up✨ (me being old enough to get a drivers licents soon💀)

I wanna be an make up artist

So I'mma go to art school I'll do my Abitur there and then study make-up artistry (google translated that💀)

Which also means I'll have 13years normal school and study for at least 3:D

That’s awesome, good luck dude

[richmond-rex]

Hi, I've only recently gotten interested in the Wars of the Roses and since I am unable to find an unbiased analysis, I wanted to ask: what do you think of Eleanor Talbot and the idea that she was allegedly married to Edward IV?

The more I research the claim, the more incredulous I get that it's often taken so seriously, particularly by Ricardian circles. I'm very skeptical about the fact that this supposed marriage was kept secret for ... 19 years? Even more? Logically, it is not possible for a piece of information that explosive and nationally relevant to stay under lock and key for that long, especially considering Edward's political enemies. I've read some pieces on Eleanor and the most any of them can do is theorize that she may have been romantically involved with Edward at some point before May 1464. But a potential affair hardly means marriage; as far as I can tell, Edward IV appears to have had affairs with lots of women, but Elizabeth Woodville was clearly the one he wanted as his wife and queen, and obviously the only one who was acknowledged and honored as such. From what I can make out, I don't think he would have had that much difficulty getting out of the marriage if he particularly wanted to: considering it was very private, his public acknowledgement of it was crucial, and his word would have triumphed whatever Elizabeth or her family would say; people gathering at Reading to find a way to end it or persuade him to end it did not amount to anything; Wake's witchcraft allegations against Jacquetta directly relating to their marriage which were cleared by Edward's council; even the fact that Elizabeth Woodville did not produce a son until 7 years after she became queen. He very clearly wanted to remain married to her even though he did have potential routes out of it. I've also observed that people tend to link the circumstances of his marriage to Elizabeth and alleged marriage to Eleanor and call it a pattern of behavior, without considering the fact that once again, being involved with someone doesn't automatically mean marriage, and that it's very possibly a deliberately constructed pattern/parallel by the people making the allegations.

And it seems awfully, almost embarrassingly convenient that this came up after both parties were dead, when Richard was actively slandering his brother's licentousness, and when he wanted to usurp the throne from his 12 year old nephew when neither he (Edward V) nor his mother (Elizabeth Woodville) were in a position to assert themselves.

Of course, we'll never truly know for sure but ... what do you think?

Hi! To get straight to the point, there is simply no evidence that Edward IV had been married to anyone other than Elizabeth Woodville. You'd think ricardians would be more careful about this claim since they make such a big deal out of the lack of material proof linking Richard to the murder of the princes (actually king and prince) in the Tower, but no. Lack of evidence doesn't work both ways in this case, apparently.

As many historians have pointed out, parliament, which ultimately ruled that Edward IV had committed bigamy and invalidated his marriage with Elizabeth Woodville, simply did that on the grounds that it was ‘the common opinion of the people and the public voice and fame is throughout the land’. Although parliament could legislate over the succession of the crown, it had no jurisdiction to invalidate anyone's marriage, since only the Church had authority over those matters at that time. If there were any proof that Edward IV had really been married to Eleanor Talbot/Butler, Richard and his supporters would have called an ecclesiastical court made exclusively of prelates and representatives of the pope to rule over that case based on canon law, as that was the Church's prerogative since the 12th century. A. J. Pollard made a very apt observation about this:

Had Richard lll been the deeply troubled, honourable and honest man we are asked to believe him to be he would surely have followed the course of a properly constituted investigation.

Ruth Mazo Karras has a great book called Unmarriages: Women, Men and Sexual Unions in the Middle Ages where she presents many cases of marriages judged by the church to have been clandestine or invalid and actually explains how the Church came to have a monopoly on the legislation of marriages. Jennifer Ward cites an example of an illegal marriage claim taken to the Pope and casts light on how the investigation of an ecclesiastical court should have proceeded in face of the pre-contract allegations made by Richard and his supporters:

This issue of legitimacy and therefore of inheritance was at the heart of the best-known twelfth-century case, concerning Richard de Anesty, dating from 1158-63. Richard claimed to be the heir of his uncle, William de Sackville, on the grounds that William's only child, Mabel de Francheville, was illegitimate. If Mabel had been legitimate, she would probably have inherited her father's land. Richard alleged that William had broken his marriage contract with Albereda de Tresgoz and married Mabel's mother, Adelicia, daughter of Amfrid the sheriff. William and Albereda were said to have expressed present consent, and, according to Richard's account, Albereda asserted that she was William's lawful wife at his wedding to Adelicia, but failed to be heard because of the crowd and because William turned a deaf ear. She was later granted a decree by the bishop of Winchester and Pope Innocent II that William should return to her as her husband. Mabel argued, however, that the marriage contract with Albereda only amounted to betrothal, and that both Albereda and William had agreed to end it; the relationship had never been consummated and William had returned Albereda's dowry. William and Adelicia's marriage had been carried out in the face of the church, and Albereda's father had been present at the wedding feast. The annulment of the marriage by the bishop was null and void. For Alexander III the annulment was the crucial issue, and Mabel was adjudged illegitimate.

We can make a few observations about this case. First, notice how William's alleged first wife, Albereda, sought the Bishop of Winchester then the Pope himself to protest against William's second marriage and have it annulled. Why wouldn't Eleanor Talbot, the daughter of the Earl Shrewsbury and NIECE of the Earl of Warwick, who had such influence over Edward IV's early reign, be silent about Edward IV's second marriage? It's not like she was a helpless nobody who wouldn't have anyone to vouch for her case in the papal court. Moreover, according to a Burgundian report about the revelation of Edward and Elizabeth's marriage, many dissatisfied lords tried to come up with means to annul the marriage, as anon cited in this ask. Knowing this, and having the possibility to be backed by number #1 dissatisfied noble in the kingdom, Warwick, why wouldn't Eleanor have spoken against Edward and Elizabeth's union at that time?

Second observation: notice how both parties concerning the legitimacy of the marriage of William and Adelicia, namely Richard and his cousin Mabel, had to testify in front of the court and produce witnesses, documents and/or reports that attested to their claim that the marriage was valid or invalid. There was never anything even remotely close to this in the case concerning Edward IV's marriage. Where was the appeal to the Pope? Where were the witnesses of Edward IV's first marriage testifying in a clerical court? In fact, we don't even actually know for sure who claimed to be witness to Edward IV's alleged first marriage. The document approving Richard's rule, Titulus Regius, only claimed that it was 'the common opinion of the people and the public voice and fame' but never actually cited anyone as an actual witness to the alleged first marriage of the king.

No contemporary English source gives the name of a witness. Robert Stillington, Bishop of Bath and Wells, is only cited as the author of the bigamy claim and the only witness of the alleged first marriage in a French chronicle by Philippe de Commynes, a servant of King Louis XI. Commynes goes as far as to call him 'ce mauvais evesque', that is, 'this evil bishop'. That Commynes' claim is plausible comes from the fact that one of Henry VII's first actions after Bosworth was to order Bishop Stillington's arrest. If we accept that Stillington had helped Richard by concocting the pre-contract claim—and ricardians must accept it otherwise there's simply no name to validate their theory—the picture we're left with is not pretty. One, Bishop Stillington had previously been imprisoned by Edward IV in 1478 so Stillington was hardly an unbiased witness against Edward IV.

Two, in 1472 whilst he was still Edward IV's Chancellor, an office Stillington exercised up until 1473, he took part in a ceremony recognising the legitimacy of Edward Prince of Wales as Edward IV's heir. Along with the Archbishop of Canterbury and eight other 'Lords Spiritual' (that is, prelates) and thirty-six 'Lords Temporal' (that is, noblemen) Stillington solemnly swore to Prince Edward that

that in case hereafter it happen You, by God’s disposition, to outlive our said Sovereign Lord, I shall then take and accept You for true, very, and righteous King of England, &tc. And faith and truth to you shall bear.

If Bishop took part in that ceremony knowing the boy was illegitimate, he should have acted so as to either speak against it (admittedly, difficult to do), decline to take part in the ceremony by faking an illness or some other excuse (possible), or seek ways to legalise the king's current marriage by way of appeal to the papal courts, something people in irregular marriage situations did all the time. See to what lengths John of Gaunt went to have his Beaufort children legitimised. It seems scarcely possible that Edward IV, who was careful enough to orchestrate ceremonies to invest his son Edward as England's heir and recognise his authority over charters and conciliar bodies, would have left his heir as vulnerable to the law as ricardians claim he did.

Another point to the whole pre-contract story, is that it seems to have been only a later addition to the reasons Richard 'was offered' the crown. According to Mancini, Richard's affiliates' first idea was to claim Edward IV was a bastard (and his children unable to rule consequently). Ricardians claim Mancini was a foreigner and simply misunderstood the terms that were preached at St Paul's Cross, but The London Chronicler also believed that the first version that was preached was that Edward IV himself was illegitimate. Mancini tells us that the claim was not well received by the audience, so it makes sense that Richard's supporters would have quickly dropped it. The claim is lightly touched upon in the parliamentary act approving Richard's rule in the observation that Richard was his father's undoubted heir and the only one born in England. It alludes, of course, to the fact that Edward IV was born in France and George of Clarence in Ireland, as if subtly casting doubts about their legitimacy.

Lastly, even if the pre-contract story was true, it still by no means should be a definite reason to make Edward V unable to succeed his father. As Horspool has pointed out, solutions to that problem included 'securing a retrospective canonical or papal judgement of the invalidity of the pre-contract; an Act of Parliament legitimizing the children of Edward and Elizabeth Woodville’s marriage, or [...] proceeding to the coronation of Edward V, which would legitimize him by making him the Lord’s anointed'. Hypothetically, if parliament was competent to declare Edward V illegitimate enough to overrule an ecclesiastical court, it was equally competent to declare the boy legitimate. In face of all these possibilities to legitimise his brother's heir, Pollard has the correct assessment of the situation:

The truth of the matter is that Richard III did not want Edward V to be legitimate because he did not want him to be king.

Considering Richard made no effort to sustain his nephews' right to rule, as had been asked of him in his condition as Lord PROTECTOR, the pre-contract allegation must be seen in that light: a poorly sustained, entirely unevidenced excuse to justify an act of usurpation.

[jamespotterismydaddy]

hello! tonights episode had me shook, like 2 events had me realing: aegon finding aemond and rhaenyra clocking licent and telling her the song of ice and fire was aegon the conquerors dream and viserys didn't say aegon her son.

I felt so bad for aemond then

And the Rhaenyra Alicent thing is so wild. I genuinely don’t think Alicent will be able to overcome that and I feel that she is really going to have to lie to herself to stay sane. I’m interested to see her whole world come crashing down next episode because I think she is going to blame herself for the whole thing (even if Aegon probably would’ve been put on the throne anyhow)

[florisbaratheons]

lemme tell you this thel@dy@licent is known for her passive aggressive behaviour towards alysmond stans so pay her no attention. you are 3rd account she posts about on her wall because she is too much of a coward to come to your inbox and say how much alysmond in her opinion suck and how much hel*emond as ship makes sense. you are doing great and i find your alysmond posts great.

I wasn't gonna answer this because I don't like talking about people behind their back, and then I read the whole ask and ya know what, I'm gonna be petty.

At least tell me to my face that you doesn't agree instead of screenshotting my posts and mocking me on your own social media. That is truly juvenile and so stupid. What are we, five? I understand she's in her late 20s, That is the behavior of a 12 year old on Myspace. Sheesh.

Also, thanks a lot, anon. I need to post more, I haven't done any in a while. I miss them.

[sweetestpopcorn]

I agree with you, I don't think Daemon and Rhaenyra raise their children with clear favoritism towards one or the other, maybe Jace for Rhaenyra since he's her firstborn and we know he was her rock and strength during the first part of the dance (until he died). But it's clear they gave tha same amount of love to each of the children, and make sure they were no divisons between them (not like a certain person who's name starts with an A and ends with licent ). Those children love each other, the 7 of them, Jace died trying to save Aegon and Viserys, Baela and Rhaena did everything they could to protect Aegon after he was crowned. I don't understand why is it so complicated for the fandom to understand these characters can feel love and loyalty.

Let me share one of the most amazing reasons I was recently told of why someone thought that Luke was Rhaenyra's favourite. Please make sure you are sitting down.

Here:

So, I had someone tell me that Luke being Rhaenyra's favourite was canon because Jace was sent in the most dangerous mission and Luke was sent on the safest despite Jace being the heir. Because Jace was the heir it would be expected that he be kept safe - f_ck you Aegon 1.5, Aemon, Baelon, Rhaegar, Baelor Breakspear, etc etc... your dads/moms/family hated you and loved your younger brothers more - but Rhaenyra kept Luke safe instead because she loved him more than Jace.

F_ck you I guess Jace.

You know, sometimes I wonder how someone could possibly like Renada in Redacted, but then I read things like this and I am like:

Like Rhaenyra doesn't need antis with fans like these.

One of these days I swear to GOD I will have my internet supply cut.

[soft4all]

High Availability Solutions in Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition

In today's digital landscape, ensuring high availability of data is paramount for businesses to maintain operational continuity and meet customer expectations. SYSTECH CORPORATION SRL recognizes the critical role of high availability solutions, particularly in the context of database management. This article delves into the realm of high availability solutions in Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition, shedding light on how SYSTECH leverages these solutions to empower businesses with resilient data management strategies.

[doloridis]

i have not been well (emotionally) since we found out olivia has a hc where a/licent and r/haenyra had some kind of physical interaction that a/licent's mother found out about and forbade. like i have not been well

[the-delightful-temptation]

@licentious-sanguinity “Do I?”

"Yes you do. And you know I love it." The sin holds Pentious face, pulling him close to himself. "My beautiful, little bottom.."

@licentious-sanguinity